My personal voyage into the
perspective expressed in Energy Psychology Interactive
occurred over many years and with much resistance. I happened to marry a
woman (Donna Eden) who was destined as it turned out to become one of
the world's most renowned natural healers. For the first nineteen years
or so of our relationship, I did not know what to make of her work. I
did witness people coming from all over the world with serious illnesses
report improvement after a session or two, but I explained it to myself
in terms of her charisma, deep empathy, and healing presence. I did not
think it was a system that could be taught or replicated, and the
"subtle energy" explanations seemed more confusing than clarifying.
Donna was receiving overtures to write
a book. She kept passing up these opportunities, for a number of
reasons: Her healing work was all-consuming. Conceptualizing was not her
forte. And she did not want to hold herself up as being particularly
special (she believes that everyone is born with the capacity to see
energy as she does, but that the capacity is usually lost very early in
a culture that does not validate the experience), plus she is allergic
to having people put her in a guru role. One evening, however, after
telling me about her four clients that day, each of whom took a somewhat
miraculous turn, she said, "You know, David, it would be a shame for my
work to die with me." I mark that comment as the point where she became
open to describing her approach in a book.
When she had firmly decided to move
forward, she asked me, as the conceptualizer in the family, to help her
write the book. The next 18 months were an amazing process for me. I
interviewed her, day after day after day. I could not pose a question
that she could not persuasively answer from within her energy paradigm.
Granted, she has one little quirk that is hard to verify, her claim to a
lifelong ability to "see" energy as clearly as you are seeing the words
on this page. While she has again and again made diagnoses that were
later confirmed medically by simply looking at a person's body, the
ability to see and read energies is so far outside my own experience
that I cannot directly verify it. But given a great deal of indirect
evidence, such as her accurate medical diagnoses based on very little
other information and impressive cure rate, I finally came to accept
that it is so.
Once the ability to read and derive
meaningful information from the body's energies is accepted, then
Donna's approach turns out to have a strong internal logic. In our
interviews, I realized that she operates according to a set of
principles that are based on empirical observation and that can be
systematized and taught to others. Now with the book widely distributed
and many students trained, there is much anecdotal evidence that the
procedures work whether self-applied or applied by individuals who do
not match Donna's charisma or "healing presence."
The book was released in January 1999,
and we headed out for a six-month book and workshop tour. I went on
sabbatical from my private practice as a clinical psychologist in
Ashland, Oregon. As the close of the six months approached, the book was
rapidly becoming the classic in its field and the demands on Donna to
speak and teach were compelling. I returned to Ashland, and with strong
misgivings, closed what had been a deeply satisfying clinical practice
in order to support her work, which seemed to be hitting a cultural
nerve. I was sad that I might be leaving my own career forever. I was in
my 50s and did not know where this would lead me. Where it led was right
back into psychology. Many of Donna's students were psychotherapists who
were applying energy interventions to psychological issues. Through
their influence, I began to study with some of the pioneers in this
area. I found it daunting. While I was now open to an energy paradigm,
as I educated myself about the new field, which had developed
independent of Donna's contributions—they are just both part of the same
Zeitgeist—I found that despite this being a relatively new area, it was
already rife with warring factions, incompatible explanations, and deep
schisms about procedures and appropriate claims.
Something else happened, however, that
in my mind overshadowed the field's confusion. The outcomes I was seeing
were remarkable. Because I read the field's fractionated literature before I learned
how to apply its methods, I was quite skeptical at first. But I began to
obtain results for a wide range of complaints that were more rapid and
consistent with anxiety-related disorders in particular than anything
I'd seen in some 30 years of practice. One of my first sessions outside
of a supervised setting was with one of Donna's friends who had recently
been spurned by the first man who had opened her heart in years. She was
in agony and had been for several weeks. Within an hour of relatively
mechanical procedures, the spell was broken. She still felt the loss of
a dream. She still missed his love and presence. But she radiated in her
relief ("My heart isn’t hurting!!!"), and she was no longer
incapacitated. After she returned home, her responses to him were no
longer pleading and bereft. I'd never before facilitated such a healing
of intense heartbreak in a single session. I now have had many cases
that were similarly dramatic and have interviewed dozens of
practitioners whose claims corroborate my personal experiences. This
does not constitute scientific proof, but it is not a one-person
medicine show either.
Energy Psychology Interactive
began as my way of trying to learn about the field and sort
through all of the claims and confusion. Bringing on an
Advisory Board with many of energy psychology’s leaders
and pioneers transformed my computer into a lightening rod
for the field's controversies. It turned out that learning
how to reach consensus between Donna's and my deeply contrasting
intellectual styles was great practice for this task. The
Advisory Board, however, was wonderful in positioning themselves
behind a project whose purpose was to draw the field together.
Many many hours were devoted freely and intelligently. Energy
Psychology Interactive is the product. It is the most
comprehensible statement I am capable of pulling together
at this point about the state of the art in this very new
and potentially revolutionary area of study.
With the book and CD in galley form, I
sent the program to one of the most respected clinical psychologists of
the past half century. His reply began, "If your claims turn out to be
true, it will stand everything I have ever learned and believed about
human behavior and physiology on its head." He went on to pose strong
doubts about the program’s claims. In my response, I shared some of this
history and closed by noting, "I am only one witness, but I have been
slowly persuaded that the findings from this area of investigation will,
as you put it, ‘stand’ some of our understanding ‘about human behavior
and physiology on its head.’ But I should mention that the claim that
perhaps should first turn our understanding about human physiology ‘on
its head’ is anesthesia through acupuncture, which is now used
throughout the world and has been widely documented in procedures from
appendectomies to brain surgery. Those reports, as mentioned in the
Introduction, may be challenging for Westerners to assimilate into their
world view. But from there, entertaining the possibility that anxiety
can be reduced by stimulating a set of acupuncture points is only a
small conceptual step."
Return to Contents