

Currently released so far... 12689 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ASEC
AR
AEMR
AMGT
AE
AU
AID
AORC
APER
AS
AM
AFIN
AMED
AJ
AGR
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
ABLD
AL
AA
APECO
AGAO
AY
AGMT
APEC
AINF
AG
ACS
AECL
AFFAIRS
ABUD
ASUP
ADANA
AADP
AMCHAMS
ARF
ASEAN
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
APCS
ADCO
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ADM
AN
AIT
BU
BR
BL
BO
BA
BB
BG
BM
BBSR
BH
BEXP
BK
BD
BTIO
BT
BE
BY
BF
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BILAT
BIDEN
BC
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CH
CG
CF
CU
CE
CVIS
CASC
CO
CS
CA
CIDA
CBW
CW
CMGT
CI
CODEL
CY
CPAS
CJAN
CD
CWC
CDG
CIA
CL
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CT
CR
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CFED
CV
CACS
CARSON
CLINTON
CN
CONS
CM
CAC
CIC
COPUOS
CDC
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EG
EZ
EUN
ECON
ETRD
ECPS
EFIN
ENRG
ETTC
EPET
EINV
EAID
EAIR
EWWT
EU
EAGR
EC
ELAB
EIND
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
EFIS
ELTN
ET
ECIN
EFTA
ES
EINT
EI
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
ELN
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
EXIM
ETRO
ENIV
ESA
ER
EK
EUR
EFINECONCS
EUMEM
EUREM
EPA
ERNG
ENERG
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
IS
IZ
IR
IC
IO
IN
ID
IGAD
IT
ILC
IAEA
ITU
ICAO
IMO
IBRD
IMF
ICJ
IAHRC
ITF
INRA
INRO
IWC
IQ
IV
ICRC
ICTY
INRB
IEFIN
ILO
ITRA
ITALY
IBET
ISRAELI
IL
INTELSAT
IRC
IDP
ICTR
IRAQI
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
IA
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
INDO
IDA
ISLAMISTS
KSPR
KNNP
KWBG
KAWK
KISL
KPAO
KN
KS
KIPR
KCRM
KDEM
KIRF
KJUS
KHLS
KSCA
KOMC
KAWC
KV
KFRD
KWMN
KTIP
KPWR
KSUM
KGHG
KTIA
KTFN
KIRC
KCOR
KACT
KMDR
KGIC
KOLY
KUNR
KIDE
KMPI
KPKO
KCFE
KVPR
KRAD
KPAL
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KTEX
KTDB
KFSC
KZ
KSEP
KFLU
KE
KU
KPLS
KRVC
KRIM
KSTH
KG
KFLO
KPOA
KICC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KBCT
KSAF
KMOC
KDRG
KBIO
KREC
KSTC
KVRP
KBTR
KMIG
KENV
KNSD
KCGC
KWAC
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KWMM
KPRP
KNEI
KPAI
KO
KVIR
KX
KMCA
KCRS
KMFO
KID
KCIP
KNAR
KR
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KHDP
KFIN
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KHIV
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KTER
KRCM
KCFC
KSAC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KCOM
KLIG
KDEMAF
KAID
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KOMS
KHSA
MPOS
MOPS
MARR
MTCR
MNUC
MASS
MX
MCAP
MAR
MTRE
MASC
MK
MG
MTCRE
MI
MD
MA
MO
MY
MU
ML
MRCRE
MAS
MEDIA
MC
MR
MIL
MW
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MT
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MEPP
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
NATO
NG
NL
NZ
NT
NW
NO
NU
NS
NPT
NASA
NI
NK
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NP
NATIONAL
NSSP
NSF
NA
NGO
NV
NR
NDP
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NEW
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NPG
NSC
NPA
NSFO
OPDC
OPRC
OEXC
OTRA
ODIP
OIIP
OVIP
OPIC
OPCW
OAS
OREP
OSCE
OSCI
OES
OFDP
OECD
OCS
OIC
OPAD
OVP
OHUM
OFFICIALS
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OBSP
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PTER
PHUM
PK
PREF
PM
PHSA
PA
PINS
PE
PBTS
PCI
PO
PL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PGIV
PROP
PP
PBIO
POL
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
PBT
PMIL
POV
PTBS
PG
POSTS
PALESTINIAN
PROV
PNAT
PINF
PRL
PAS
PDOV
PRAM
PREO
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PAO
PREFA
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PGOC
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RW
REACTION
RCMP
RSO
RO
RP
ROOD
RM
ROBERT
RICE
REGION
RSP
RF
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
RFE
REPORT
SY
SP
SOCI
SMIG
SNAR
SCUL
SC
SU
SO
SI
SENV
SZ
SW
SA
SR
SF
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SEN
SG
SYR
SWE
SK
SH
SNARCS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SCRS
SYRIA
SL
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SANC
SHI
SHUM
SIPRS
TSPA
TSPL
TU
TBIO
TRGY
TPHY
TS
TP
TW
TBID
TI
TF
TZ
TD
TT
TN
TNGD
TC
TX
TH
TL
TIP
THPY
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TINT
TFIN
TAGS
TR
US
UNSC
UNGA
UK
UP
UNCHC
UN
UNMIK
UNCSD
UY
USTR
USOAS
UNHRC
UNFCYP
UG
UNAUS
UNESCO
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
USUN
UZ
USNC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNEP
USEU
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNDP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
UNDC
UNICEF
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09OTTAWA581, Canada's Foreign Investment Reforms Create A More Open
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09OTTAWA581.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09OTTAWA581 | 2009-07-27 19:08 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
VZCZCXRO7520
PP RUEHGA RUEHHA RUEHMT RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHOT #0581/01 2081908
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 271908Z JUL 09
FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9705
INFO RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHDC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUEHME/AMEMBASSY MEXICO 2007
RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 000581
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR E, EB/DCT, WHA/EX, WHA/CAN
STATE PASS USTR (SULLIVAN)
COMMERCE FOR ITA/MAC (WORD AND BARRAGAN)
TREASURY FOR IA (NEPHEW)
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON EFIN ETRD EINV EIND PREL CA
SUBJECT: Canada's Foreign Investment Reforms Create A More Open
Market But Do Not Spare U.S. Steel from Canadian Court Action
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED. PLEASE PROTECT ACCORDINGLY
¶1. (SBU) Summary: Canada's July 17 federal court action against U.S.
Steel attempts to force the company to meet the production and
employment commitments it made to the Federal Government in 2007 in
exchange for permission to take over Canada's Stelco. At that time,
the GOC exercised its legal right make foreign acquisition of
Canadian assets conditional on the fulfillment of certain
performance requirements. However, at the same time as the Federal
Industry Ministry is cracking down on investor behavior, the
Conservative government is also implementing changes to the national
investment regime that would make Canada a more open and transparent
investment destination for foreign investors. Although most of the
proposed regulations are not controversial, some foreign investors
will be dismayed that Canada's new security requirements demand
increased disclosure of confidential information and increase the
possibility that the government might disallow an investment on
security grounds even after the transaction has been completed. End
summary.
U.S. Steel
----------
¶2. (U) On July 17, Minister of Industry Tony Clement announced that
the Government of Canada was launching an action against U.S. Steel
in the Superior Court of Canada to remedy an alleged breach of
Canadian investment law. The American steelmaker's 2007 acquisition
of Ontario-based Stelco was predicated upon the company maintaining
minimum levels of Canadian employment, capital expenditures and
production. In May 2009, the industry minister threatened legal
action after U.S. Steel cut production and laid off employees at its
Canadian operations in tandem with the global economic recession.
ICA Undertakings
----------------
¶3. (U) Canada's Investment Canada Act (ICA) permits the Industry
Minister to bind foreign investors to obligations on matters such as
local production and employment levels in order to ensure that the
investment provides a 'net benefit' to Canada. Following a recent
exchange of letters with the company, Clement stated, "I remain of
the view that U.S. Steel is not complying with its undertakings, and
I am not satisfied by its explanations for non-compliance." If the
Canadian court finds that an investor has breached an ICA
undertaking, remedies include curing the breach, fines or forced
divestiture of the investment. In this case, the Industry Minister
has asked the courts to levy a C$10,000-a-day fine against U.S.
Steel, retroactive to the November 2008 Canadian layoffs.
¶4. (SBU) Although the terms of the undertakings a company makes to
the government are generally confidential, the Canadian media is
reporting that when U.S. Steel bought the bankrupt Stelco in 2007
for C$1.16 billion, it promised to boost production at Stelco mills
by 10 per cent in each of the first three years of ownership and to
maintain 3,105 full-time employees. Today, some 2,400 workers have
either retired or been laid off by U.S. Steel, and the company has
halted steel output in Hamilton and Nanticoke, Ont. In its court
filing, the government alleges that the company has defaulted on 77
percent of its employment commitment. (Comment: Since U.S. Steel
Qpercent of its employment commitment. (Comment: Since U.S. Steel
has not responded publically to the GOC court action it is not known
whether the company's undertakings included any exemptions for
exogenous economic downturns. End comment.) This is the first time
the Canadian government has taken a foreign company to court over
promises made as part of an acquisition (although it has threatened
similar action against the Brazilian mining company Vale Inco which
has laid off approximately 400 workers).
¶5. (SBU) Some Canadians are criticizing the government's move for
the negative message it will send to other potential foreign
investors. A Globe and Mail editorial argues that although Ottawa
may be legally entitled to its actions, Stelco's 2007 commitments
are unreasonable in today's volatile economic climate. The paper
speculates that Canada's hard line against Stelco may be intended as
a warning to General Motors and Chrysler that they will be similarly
held to the employment commitments they made in exchange for federal
OTTAWA 00000581 002 OF 003
bailout funds. Nevertheless, the Globe concludes, "Ottawa should
refrain from intervening in future foreign takeovers. In a world
where economic volatility can render hard-won promises
impracticable, it simply isn't worth it."
¶6. (SBU) Christopher Sands, a senior fellow at Washington's Hudson
Institute, notes that the Canadian action puts U.S. Steel in the
difficult position of having to sideline one government's policy in
order to comply with another's. The steel industry has been hit
hard by the slump in construction and one of U.S. Steel's best
customers is the U.S. government, which has imposed strict Buy
American rules. This means that U.S. Steel has a stronger incentive
than usual to cut Canadian production to maintain higher volumes at
U.S. mills. Consequently, Sands suggests, the future decisions of
U.S Steel "will be determined by which government they fear more."
Changes to ICA
--------------
¶7. (U) In spite of the actions regarding Stelco, the Harper
Government is moving forward with commitments to open up the
Canadian economy to more foreign investment. In March 2009
preliminary changes to the Investment Canada Act (ICA) were
introduced as part of the government's budget legislation. These
were followed on July 11, 2009 with a number of proposed regulations
to give effect to the investment changes contained in the budget.
Among the most important amendments are increased investment
thresholds -- to determine which foreign investments will be subject
to a full governmental review -- and the imposition of a new
national security screening mechanism. Canada also plans to
eliminate differential review thresholds for transportation and
financial services and uranium production. The proposed regulations
will take effect after a 30-day comment period and do not require a
vote in the House of Commons.
Higher thresholds, new formulas, same cultural barriers
--------------------------------------------- ----------
¶8. (SBU) The ICA requires that direct foreign takeovers of large
Canadian companies be reviewed and approved based on whether or not
the investment constitutes a "net benefit to Canada." (Comment:
The net benefit criteria are not spelled out in legal terms and are
open to a range of interpretations depending on the disposition of
the government in power. End comment.) Frequently, the government
will ask the foreign investor to provide negotiated undertakings
such as those assumed by U.S. Steel. Under the old rules, an ICA
review is required for any direct takeover by foreign investors from
a WTO country of a Canadian company with more than C$312 million in
gross assets. The new regulations will increase the review
threshold, first to C$600 million and ultimately to C$1 billion by
the end of four years.
¶9. (SBU) Although the higher thresholds mean fewer foreign
investments will likely be subject to full review, all foreign
investments must be notified to the government. Also the
methodology for determining the review threshold will be expanded
from considering only the asset value of the proposed acquisition to
a broader evaluation based on a company's market capitalization,
assets, and liabilities. Despite the new regulations, Canada's
Qassets, and liabilities. Despite the new regulations, Canada's
pre-existing regime banning virtually all foreign investment in
cultural industries remains unchanged, even though the 2008
government report Compete to Win recommended reforms in this area.
Enhanced national security requirements
---------------------------------------
¶10. (U) Under the proposed regulations, a foreign investor will have
to disclose the names of directors, the five highest paid officers,
any person or entity holding more than ten percent of the investor's
equity or voting rights, and the name of any foreign state that
holds a direct or indirect ownership interest in the investor, even
minor shareholders. The security disclosure requirements apply to
all foreign investments (including acquisitions and the
establishment of new businesses), even those that fall below the
OTTAWA 00000581 003 OF 003
review threshold.
¶11. (SBU) The new regulations set out time frames for the government
to invoke the national security screening process - generally within
45 days after a notice of investment or review application has been
filed. However, in cases of investments valued below the applicable
review threshold, the government has up to 45 days after an
investment has been implemented to determine whether it should be
submitted to a full security screening. (Comment: Presumably, this
longer period exists to prevent smaller acquisitions that are not
subject to other forms of review from slipping under the radar and
to provide adequate time for the government to obtain more
information about the proposed investment and investor. End
comment.)
¶12. (U) The security review could take as long as four months and
will be conducted primarily by Canada's security and intelligence
agencies. If an investment is found to be a threat to national
security then the investment can be unwound or restricted.
Implications of Canadian changes for US investors
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶13. (SBU) Although the subjective net benefits test has not been
eliminated from Canada's foreign investment review process, the
higher review threshold means that fewer investments will be
subjected to it. As well, the addition of a more transparent
process to ensure that investments are not injurious to national
security brings Canada's policy more closely into alignment with
that of the United States. The clarification of Canada's security
requirements comes too late to affect the failed 2008 attempt by
US-based Alliant Techsystems, Inc. to take over the space-assets arm
of Canada's MacDonald Dettwiler and Associates Ltd (MDA), which
Ottawa vetoed on national security grounds. However during a
meeting with Embassy officials last week, a senior Industry Canada
official speculated that if the new security framework had been in
place at the time of Alliant's bid, the outcome could have been
quite different.