

Currently released so far... 12689 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ASEC
AR
AEMR
AMGT
AE
AU
AID
AORC
APER
AS
AM
AFIN
AMED
AJ
AGR
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
ABLD
AL
AA
APECO
AGAO
AY
AGMT
APEC
AINF
AG
ACS
AECL
AFFAIRS
ABUD
ASUP
ADANA
AADP
AMCHAMS
ARF
ASEAN
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
APCS
ADCO
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ADM
AN
AIT
BU
BR
BL
BO
BA
BB
BG
BM
BBSR
BH
BEXP
BK
BD
BTIO
BT
BE
BY
BF
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BILAT
BIDEN
BC
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CH
CG
CF
CU
CE
CVIS
CASC
CO
CS
CA
CIDA
CBW
CW
CMGT
CI
CODEL
CY
CPAS
CJAN
CD
CWC
CDG
CIA
CL
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CT
CR
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CFED
CV
CACS
CARSON
CLINTON
CN
CONS
CM
CAC
CIC
COPUOS
CDC
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EG
EZ
EUN
ECON
ETRD
ECPS
EFIN
ENRG
ETTC
EPET
EINV
EAID
EAIR
EWWT
EU
EAGR
EC
ELAB
EIND
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
EFIS
ELTN
ET
ECIN
EFTA
ES
EINT
EI
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
ELN
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
EXIM
ETRO
ENIV
ESA
ER
EK
EUR
EFINECONCS
EUMEM
EUREM
EPA
ERNG
ENERG
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
IS
IZ
IR
IC
IO
IN
ID
IGAD
IT
ILC
IAEA
ITU
ICAO
IMO
IBRD
IMF
ICJ
IAHRC
ITF
INRA
INRO
IWC
IQ
IV
ICRC
ICTY
INRB
IEFIN
ILO
ITRA
ITALY
IBET
ISRAELI
IL
INTELSAT
IRC
IDP
ICTR
IRAQI
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
IA
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
INDO
IDA
ISLAMISTS
KSPR
KNNP
KWBG
KAWK
KISL
KPAO
KN
KS
KIPR
KCRM
KDEM
KIRF
KJUS
KHLS
KSCA
KOMC
KAWC
KV
KFRD
KWMN
KTIP
KPWR
KSUM
KGHG
KTIA
KTFN
KIRC
KCOR
KACT
KMDR
KGIC
KOLY
KUNR
KIDE
KMPI
KPKO
KCFE
KVPR
KRAD
KPAL
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KTEX
KTDB
KFSC
KZ
KSEP
KFLU
KE
KU
KPLS
KRVC
KRIM
KSTH
KG
KFLO
KPOA
KICC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KBCT
KSAF
KMOC
KDRG
KBIO
KREC
KSTC
KVRP
KBTR
KMIG
KENV
KNSD
KCGC
KWAC
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KWMM
KPRP
KNEI
KPAI
KO
KVIR
KX
KMCA
KCRS
KMFO
KID
KCIP
KNAR
KR
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KHDP
KFIN
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KHIV
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KTER
KRCM
KCFC
KSAC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KCOM
KLIG
KDEMAF
KAID
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KOMS
KHSA
MPOS
MOPS
MARR
MTCR
MNUC
MASS
MX
MCAP
MAR
MTRE
MASC
MK
MG
MTCRE
MI
MD
MA
MO
MY
MU
ML
MRCRE
MAS
MEDIA
MC
MR
MIL
MW
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MT
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MEPP
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
NATO
NG
NL
NZ
NT
NW
NO
NU
NS
NPT
NASA
NI
NK
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NP
NATIONAL
NSSP
NSF
NA
NGO
NV
NR
NDP
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NEW
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NPG
NSC
NPA
NSFO
OPDC
OPRC
OEXC
OTRA
ODIP
OIIP
OVIP
OPIC
OPCW
OAS
OREP
OSCE
OSCI
OES
OFDP
OECD
OCS
OIC
OPAD
OVP
OHUM
OFFICIALS
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OBSP
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PTER
PHUM
PK
PREF
PM
PHSA
PA
PINS
PE
PBTS
PCI
PO
PL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PGIV
PROP
PP
PBIO
POL
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
PBT
PMIL
POV
PTBS
PG
POSTS
PALESTINIAN
PROV
PNAT
PINF
PRL
PAS
PDOV
PRAM
PREO
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PAO
PREFA
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PGOC
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RW
REACTION
RCMP
RSO
RO
RP
ROOD
RM
ROBERT
RICE
REGION
RSP
RF
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
RFE
REPORT
SY
SP
SOCI
SMIG
SNAR
SCUL
SC
SU
SO
SI
SENV
SZ
SW
SA
SR
SF
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SEN
SG
SYR
SWE
SK
SH
SNARCS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SCRS
SYRIA
SL
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SANC
SHI
SHUM
SIPRS
TSPA
TSPL
TU
TBIO
TRGY
TPHY
TS
TP
TW
TBID
TI
TF
TZ
TD
TT
TN
TNGD
TC
TX
TH
TL
TIP
THPY
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TINT
TFIN
TAGS
TR
US
UNSC
UNGA
UK
UP
UNCHC
UN
UNMIK
UNCSD
UY
USTR
USOAS
UNHRC
UNFCYP
UG
UNAUS
UNESCO
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
USUN
UZ
USNC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNEP
USEU
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNDP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
UNDC
UNICEF
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07BERLIN244, JANUARY 23 MEETING OF G-8 GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07BERLIN244.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07BERLIN244 | 2007-02-07 10:41 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Berlin |
VZCZCXYZ0014
PP RUEHWEB
DE RUEHRL #0244/01 0381041
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 071041Z FEB 07
FM AMEMBASSY BERLIN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6948
INFO RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 7911
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 1693
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 0953
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 8436
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME PRIORITY 0190
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 1363
UNCLAS BERLIN 000244
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR ISN/CTR, EUR, WHA/CAN, AND EAP/J
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PARM PREL ETTC KNNP CBW TRGY GM JA RS CA
SUBJECT: JANUARY 23 MEETING OF G-8 GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP
WORKING GROUP IN BERLIN
¶1. (SBU) Summary: The G-8 Global Partnership Working Group
(GPWG) met January 23 in Berlin under the German Presidency.
The Chair informed partners that the next meeting, February
27-28, would focus on the mid-term review of the 10-year
Global Partnership (GP) program, with the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and NGOs being invited to attend.
The Chair then addressed preparations for a review and
assessment report of the GP's first five years, noting the
need to produce a review prior to the June 6-8 G-8 Summit.
After the Chair requested responses to a German-produced
questionnaire and a French-prepared matrix of GP projects,
the Russian delegation stated it opposed any reference in a
GP document to Russia as "a proliferation threat." Following
that discussion, the group discussed the review document and
the status of Chemical Weapons Destruction (CWD) projects in
Russia, with the Russian delegation complaining about the
slow pace of receiving funds. The Russian delegation next
gave a presentation on removing and securing Radioisotopic
Thermoelectric Generators (RTGs), and the group discussed the
status of decommissioning and dismantling Russian nuclear
submarines. Canada's delegation announced the construction
of a biosecurity facility in Bishkek; the U.S. delegation
raised the issue of the future of the science centers in
Russia and Ukraine. The Chair closed with the announcement
that Germany would send procedural information concerning the
review process to the delegations and requested they consider
options for presenting the review report at the G-8 Summit.
End Summary.
¶2. (SBU) German MFA Commissioner for Economic Affairs and
Sustainable Development Viktor Elbling chaired the opening
session and began by informing the delegations that the
GPWG's February 27 session will include presentations by NGOs
or other invitees selected from a list of proposed invitees
by GP members. Elbling also announced that Germany had
invited the IAEA to give a general overview of the global
threat of unsecured nuclear material, that Germany's Federal
Intelligence Service (BND) will contribute a segment on the
threat of nuclear material to Germany's overall presentation,
and that all partners are invited to include input from their
intelligence services in their presentations. He added that
the think tank, Foundation for Science and Policy, (Stiftung
fuer Wissenschaft und Politik, SWP), is the German NGO
designated to address the first day of February's session.
Elbling asked all members to respond by January 31 with their
proposed invitees. With little discussion, it was agreed
that GP donor states will also be invited to send proposed
NGO participants.
¶3. (SBU) Elbling turned to the major item for consideration,
the review/assessment report of the GP's first five years.
To encourage a structured discussion, he requested responses
to a previously circulated German-produced questionnaire and
a French-produced matrix evaluation scheme. French Delegate
Camille Grand suggested the matrix might be useful as a
quantitative tool for assessing the progress of GP projects.
Before discussion could begin, Russian Delegate Anatoly
Antonov said Russia would not permit any GP document to refer
to Russia "as a proliferation threat." Antonov reiterated
the statement several times and mentioned dissatisfaction
with the status of the CWD projects in Russia. He claimed
contributors to the CWD projects are lagging in their
allocation of funds and added Russia could not support the
German-produced questionnaire. Nevertheless, Antonov
insisted Russia wanted to improve cooperation with members on
CWD.
¶4. (SBU) The British, Canadian, French, EU Commission, and
Italian delegates, along with Deputy Assistant Secretary
Semmel, all acknowledged Russia's concerns about the slow
pace of some projects' funding, but reaffirmed their
continued commitment to all projects under way. The
delegates agreed the review/assessment was the basis for
moving the GP forward during the next five years and beyond
and said Russia would not be singled out as a "proliferation
threat." Italian Delegate Antonio Catalano pointed out that
Russia itself has voiced concerns over the CWD program,
thereby acknowledging concerns over proliferation on its
territory.
¶5. (SBU) Antonov continued, however, despite comments from
partners that emphasized the common threats faced by all
states. He claimed the U.S. has only given 10 percent of its
pledged amount for CWD. Noting the proliferation threats
around the world, including in the U.S., DAS Semmel pointed
out that pledged funds are not disbursed all at once but in
incremental amounts, typically annually, in accordance with
government budgets. He said the proper calculation is not
the percentage spent of the total pledged amount but the
percentage of funds made available by donor countries up to
that point.
¶6. (SBU) After Elbling brought the discussion back to the
review document, the delegates generally agreed the document
must be succinct and clear to leaders and the public. DAS
Semmel urged that members use the review to reflect on GPWG
assumptions. He suggested that as the review process
continues, some surprises may lie ahead and the members will
be compelled to consider what happens after the GP program
ends in 2012.
¶7. (SBU) At this point, German MFA International Energy and
Nuclear Energy Policy Office Director Thomas Meister replaced
Elbling as Chair. Meister gave a short presentation on the
status of CWD progress. Russian Delegate Antonov announced
that the process of donor countries funding CWD projects
through G-8 members, known as piggybacking, is not working.
He claimed the UK, Canada, and others are lagging far behind
in the work on their projects, and cited the need to finish
the current projects by the end of 2009. He also reiterated
an announcement made at the November 2006 meeting that Russia
plans to allocate four billion dollars, in addition to the
two billion already on record, to complete the CWD goals by
¶2012.
¶8. (SBU) The EU Commission, Italy, the UK, and Canada, and
others disputed Antonov's claims. Canadian Delegate Troy
Lulashnyk stated piggybacking is working and that Canada and
all other participants are completely committed to resolving
the current project delays. DAS Semmel noted some delays
have resulted from disagreements over estimates and took
satisfactory note of Russia's additional four billion dollar
commitment to the GP process. Antonov suggested members flag
the issue of discrepancies between Russia's figures and those
of other member states.
¶9. (SBU) Turning to RTGs, Meister noted the need for improved
cooperation on their removal. The Russian delegation gave a
status report on RTG removals and referred to a master plan
scheduled for completion March 8 that will be a guide for
funding the removals. The Russians calculated that, of the
581 remaining RTGs, about 35 will be removed annually until
all are gone. The UK delegates informed the group that the
UK has a good relationship with Rosatom, the Russian Ministry
for Atomic Energy Agency. The Canadian delegates announced
that, with U.S. cooperation, the removal of 16 RTGs will be
completed in Russia's Northern areas in 2007.
¶10. (SBU) The discussion of Russian nuclear submarine
dismantlement took place without incident. All delegates
delivered positive statements about the status of their
respective dismantlement efforts. The Canadian delegates
spoke of their plan to work with other members to dismantle
two Russian nuclear submarines per year "until there are none
left," and announced they are shifting their efforts to the
Far East. (Note: Submarine dismantlement in the Russian Far
East lags behind that in the Northern Baltic area. End
Note.) DAS Semmel drew attention to recent reports that
scrap metal from the submarines is generating funds that help
offset the costs of dismantlement.
¶11. (SBU) Canadian Delegate Ann Pollack announced a new
biosecurity project was under way at a human and animal
research facility in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, and informed
members that both the International Science and Technology
Center in Russia and the Science and Technology Center in
Ukraine are also working on five-year reviews. She said
Canada is considering sending a science center representative
to the NGO session in February. DAS Semmel added that, as
the evolution of the science centers is being considered,
they are, in some ways, going through an assessment similar
to that of the GP. Their future must also reflect the new
global realities in which the Russian economy has improved
since 2001 and can pay for the work of nuclear scientists
without so much outside support. Russian Delegate Valery
Biryukov informed the group Russia enjoys good cooperation
with the UK on working with former weapons scientists.
Biryukov expressed satisfaction with the current "Nuclear
Cities" project and announced that Rosatom is ready to sign a
new agreement.
¶12. (SBU) Meister closed with an announcement that all
members will soon receive information on the procedures for
the next steps in the review process and options to be
considered for presenting the review at the G-8 Summit. One
option is to replace the GP annual report with the review.
The other is to cite the review in the report and disseminate
the report as a stand-alone document.
¶13. (SBU) Canada followed with an announcement it will host a
reception at its Embassy the evening of February after the
NGO presentations. At that event, the Canadian Delegation
will present materials to show the positive results of GP
cooperation over the past five years.
¶14. (SBU) Comment: The GPWG partners are looking for ways to
bring some G-8 Summit attention to GP's successes to date, to
use the process to underscore the need to expand GP
priorities, and to re-energize the GP as a tool for reducing
the global threat of WMD. Over lunch, the Germans confirmed
our view that Russia,s primary, perhaps only, concern is
that the results of the review process might cause members to
stray away from CWD and submarine dismantlement commitments
toward new "priorities." The NGO session on February 27 will
be an important event in the GP process this year. It
appears our German hosts are carefully structuring the NGO
presentations in order to stimulate the review process and
perhaps defuse or reduce political differences among the
members over what the review should say. End Comment.
¶15. (U) Heads of Delegations:
--Viktor Elbling, Germany
--Anatoly Antonov, Russian Federation
--Camille Grand, France
--Antonio Catalano di Mellili, Italy
--Atsushi Kato, Japan
--Berenice Gare, United Kingdom
--Andrew Semmel, United States
--Troy Lulashnyk, Canada
--Lars-Erik Lundin, European Commission
--Tomas Reyes Ortega, EU Council
¶16. (U) DAS Semmel has cleared this cable.
TIMKEN JR