

Currently released so far... 12689 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ASEC
AR
AEMR
AMGT
AE
AU
AID
AORC
APER
AS
AM
AFIN
AMED
AJ
AGR
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
ABLD
AL
AA
APECO
AGAO
AY
AGMT
APEC
AINF
AG
ACS
AECL
AFFAIRS
ABUD
ASUP
ADANA
AADP
AMCHAMS
ARF
ASEAN
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
APCS
ADCO
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ADM
AN
AIT
BU
BR
BL
BO
BA
BB
BG
BM
BBSR
BH
BEXP
BK
BD
BTIO
BT
BE
BY
BF
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BILAT
BIDEN
BC
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CH
CG
CF
CU
CE
CVIS
CASC
CO
CS
CA
CIDA
CBW
CW
CMGT
CI
CODEL
CY
CPAS
CJAN
CD
CWC
CDG
CIA
CL
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CT
CR
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CFED
CV
CACS
CARSON
CLINTON
CN
CONS
CM
CAC
CIC
COPUOS
CDC
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EG
EZ
EUN
ECON
ETRD
ECPS
EFIN
ENRG
ETTC
EPET
EINV
EAID
EAIR
EWWT
EU
EAGR
EC
ELAB
EIND
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
EFIS
ELTN
ET
ECIN
EFTA
ES
EINT
EI
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
ELN
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
EXIM
ETRO
ENIV
ESA
ER
EK
EUR
EFINECONCS
EUMEM
EUREM
EPA
ERNG
ENERG
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
IS
IZ
IR
IC
IO
IN
ID
IGAD
IT
ILC
IAEA
ITU
ICAO
IMO
IBRD
IMF
ICJ
IAHRC
ITF
INRA
INRO
IWC
IQ
IV
ICRC
ICTY
INRB
IEFIN
ILO
ITRA
ITALY
IBET
ISRAELI
IL
INTELSAT
IRC
IDP
ICTR
IRAQI
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
IA
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
INDO
IDA
ISLAMISTS
KSPR
KNNP
KWBG
KAWK
KISL
KPAO
KN
KS
KIPR
KCRM
KDEM
KIRF
KJUS
KHLS
KSCA
KOMC
KAWC
KV
KFRD
KWMN
KTIP
KPWR
KSUM
KGHG
KTIA
KTFN
KIRC
KCOR
KACT
KMDR
KGIC
KOLY
KUNR
KIDE
KMPI
KPKO
KCFE
KVPR
KRAD
KPAL
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KTEX
KTDB
KFSC
KZ
KSEP
KFLU
KE
KU
KPLS
KRVC
KRIM
KSTH
KG
KFLO
KPOA
KICC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KBCT
KSAF
KMOC
KDRG
KBIO
KREC
KSTC
KVRP
KBTR
KMIG
KENV
KNSD
KCGC
KWAC
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KWMM
KPRP
KNEI
KPAI
KO
KVIR
KX
KMCA
KCRS
KMFO
KID
KCIP
KNAR
KR
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KHDP
KFIN
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KHIV
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KTER
KRCM
KCFC
KSAC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KCOM
KLIG
KDEMAF
KAID
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KOMS
KHSA
MPOS
MOPS
MARR
MTCR
MNUC
MASS
MX
MCAP
MAR
MTRE
MASC
MK
MG
MTCRE
MI
MD
MA
MO
MY
MU
ML
MRCRE
MAS
MEDIA
MC
MR
MIL
MW
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MT
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MEPP
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
NATO
NG
NL
NZ
NT
NW
NO
NU
NS
NPT
NASA
NI
NK
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NP
NATIONAL
NSSP
NSF
NA
NGO
NV
NR
NDP
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NEW
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NPG
NSC
NPA
NSFO
OPDC
OPRC
OEXC
OTRA
ODIP
OIIP
OVIP
OPIC
OPCW
OAS
OREP
OSCE
OSCI
OES
OFDP
OECD
OCS
OIC
OPAD
OVP
OHUM
OFFICIALS
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OBSP
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PTER
PHUM
PK
PREF
PM
PHSA
PA
PINS
PE
PBTS
PCI
PO
PL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PGIV
PROP
PP
PBIO
POL
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
PBT
PMIL
POV
PTBS
PG
POSTS
PALESTINIAN
PROV
PNAT
PINF
PRL
PAS
PDOV
PRAM
PREO
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PAO
PREFA
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PGOC
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RW
REACTION
RCMP
RSO
RO
RP
ROOD
RM
ROBERT
RICE
REGION
RSP
RF
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
RFE
REPORT
SY
SP
SOCI
SMIG
SNAR
SCUL
SC
SU
SO
SI
SENV
SZ
SW
SA
SR
SF
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SEN
SG
SYR
SWE
SK
SH
SNARCS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SCRS
SYRIA
SL
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SANC
SHI
SHUM
SIPRS
TSPA
TSPL
TU
TBIO
TRGY
TPHY
TS
TP
TW
TBID
TI
TF
TZ
TD
TT
TN
TNGD
TC
TX
TH
TL
TIP
THPY
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TINT
TFIN
TAGS
TR
US
UNSC
UNGA
UK
UP
UNCHC
UN
UNMIK
UNCSD
UY
USTR
USOAS
UNHRC
UNFCYP
UG
UNAUS
UNESCO
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
USUN
UZ
USNC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNEP
USEU
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNDP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
UNDC
UNICEF
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09PANAMA156, PANAMA: MARTINELLI MAINTAINS LEAD BUT LOSES GROUND
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09PANAMA156.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09PANAMA156 | 2009-02-23 20:19 | 2011-04-11 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Panama |
VZCZCXYZ0021
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHZP #0156/01 0542019
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 232019Z FEB 09
FM AMEMBASSY PANAMA
TO RHMFISS/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC
RHMFISS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHDC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 3029
UNCLAS PANAMA 000156
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PM
SUBJECT: PANAMA: MARTINELLI MAINTAINS LEAD BUT LOSES GROUND
TO HERRERA
-------
Summary
-------
¶1. Democratic Change (CD) opposition presidential candidate
Ricardo Martinelli lost six points in the polls, shortly
after naming former Panamenista Party presidential candidate
Juan Carlos Varela as his vice presidential running mate and
thereby cementing a grand opposition "Alliance For Change"
movement, according to Dichter and Neira's presidential poll
for the week of February 15. Martinelli still maintained a
12 point lead over Revolutionary Democratic Party (PRD)
candidate Balbina Herrera, whose stalled campaign appeared to
have been kick started, rallying for a five point gain since
February 1. Martinelli probably also took a hit for not
participating in a debate hosted by a television broadcaster
on February 10; Herrera "debated" solo responding to
questions from journalists. Former President Guillermo
Endara, heading his Moral Vanguard for the Nation (MVN)
party's ticket, stubbornly remains in the race but is trapped
in no man's land at five percent and received fewer votes
than the number of mock ballots left blank in Dichter and
Neira's poll. For all intents and purposes, Panama now has a
head-to-head race for its presidency.
------------------------------------------
Momentum Shifts As Martinelli Loses Ground
------------------------------------------
¶2. When asked who they would vote for if the 2009 elections
were held today, 49 percent of respondents to Dichter and
Neira's latest presidential poll said they supported
opposition candidate Martinelli and 37 percent said they
supported ruling party candidate Herrera. Herrera has gained
five points since February 1, climbing slowly from 32 percent
of voter preference the first week to 33 percent the next,
then gaining steam to finish with 37 percent last week, her
highest numbers since January. Opposition golden boy
Martinelli lost six points, falling from 55 percent in the
first week of February to 53 percent the next, and dropping
still further to 49 percent in the week of February 15, as
some voters clearly migrated to the Herrera camp. It remains
to be seen whether the latest numbers reflected a momentary
dip in the polls for Martinelli or signalled the beginning of
a downward trend. Martinelli's dip in the polls as well as
Herrera's gradual ascent came in the wake of Martinelli's
formation of a grand opposition "Alliance for Change" and his
refusal to debate Herrera on February 10; Herrera "debated"
solo responding to journalists' questions.
¶3. Contrary to Dichter and Neira's more recent data, the
three other monthly polls indicated that Martinelli pulled
further ahead of Herrera in February, but only by three to
five points. The three other polls also showed that Herrera
gained from three to five percent of voter preference in the
last month: According to IPSOS, Martinelli now leads by 17
points, up from a 12 point lead in January. Martinelli
gained ten points to win 51 percent of voter preference and
Herrera gained five points to capture 34 percent of voter
preference. (Polling took place February 6 to 8 and included
1,040 people. The margin of error was three percent.)
According to SigmaDos, Martinelli led by a more modest eight
points in February, up from a five point lead in January.
SigmaDos gave Martinelli 48 percent of voter preference,
representing a six point gain from January, while Herrera
garnered 40 percent, a three point gain for her from the
previous month. (The poll included 1,428 people and had a
margin of error of 2.6 percent.) According to Unimer,
Martinelli led by 22 points in February, up from 18 points in
January. Unimer gave Martinelli 50 percent of voter
preference, up seven points from January, and Herrera held
28.5 percent of voter preference, up three points from
January. (Polling took place February 4 to 6 and included
2,500 people. The margin of error was 2.8 percent.)
---------------------------
Herrera Base Remains Strong
---------------------------
¶4. Herrera has maintained the strongest base of committed
voters since Dichter and Neira's polling began in January.
In the latest poll for the week of February 15, when asked
who they would vote for if elections were held today, 31
percent of PRD party members said they would vote for
Herrera, while 25 percent of CD party members would vote for
Martinelli. Herrera also rallied the highest number of
committed voters according to the SigmaDos monthly poll,
where of those who support Herrera, 91 percent said they
would definitely vote for her. Of those who support
Martinelli, 86 percent said they would definitely vote for
him. When asked in the second week of February if they
believed that the National Assembly would be dominated by the
parties that supported Herrera or the parties that supported
Martinelli, 40.3 percent stated that the parties that
supported Herrera would dominate, while only 33.8 percent
stated it would be parties who supported Martinelli.
---------------------------
Effect of Varela as VP Pick
---------------------------
¶5. Martinelli's selection of former presidential candidate
Juan Carlos Varela of the Panamenista Party (PP) as his
vice-presidential running mate appeared to give him an
initial boost in the Dichter and Neira poll, taking him from
46 percent of voter preference in the last week of January to
55 percent in the first week of February, representing a nine
point gain. However, Martinelli's numbers have steadily
declined since then, indicating that voters may not view the
alliance favorably on further reflection. In the first week
of February, when asked if an alliance between CD and
Panamenista Party was intended to benefit the country or was
an electoral strategy to win votes, 50.8 percent of
respondents felt that it was a strategy to win votes. In the
most recent Dichter and Neira poll for the week of February
15, the same period corresponding to a four point drop in
voter preference for Martinelli, when asked whether they
believed that political alliances were principally for the
benefit of the country or the politicians, 61.4 percent said
that they were for the benefit of the politicians. There was
no significant boost in numbers as a result of the
Panamenista Party joining the CD, the Patriotic Union (UP),
and Movement of Liberal Republican Nationals (MOLIRENA) in
the Martinelli-led "Alliance for Change." Dichter and Neira
showed a six point loss and, according to the monthly polls,
Martinelli made a modest three to five point gain over
Herrera from January to February.
--------------------------------
Importance of Candidate Platform
--------------------------------
¶6. When asked in the second week of February whether the
candidates' platforms were important or irrelevant when
voting, a whopping 85.7 percent of those polled responded
that they were indeed important. This sentiment on the part
of voters may have played into Martinelli's recent six point
slide. Martinelli's refusal to participate in the February
10 presidential debate gave Balbina Herrera an hour of prime
time media coverage to sell her platform, and was viewed by
320,000 Panamanians. Just after the debate, according to the
Dichter and Neira poll for the week of February 15, when
asked whether they approved or disapproved of Martinelli's
failure to participate in the debate, 66.3 percent of voters
indicated their disapproval; voter preference for Martinelli
dropped another four points during this time.
------------------
The Navarro Effect
------------------
¶7. When asked in the second week of February whether they
believed that criticism of incumbent President Martin
Torrijos by Herrera's VP running mate and PRD National
Executive Committee (CEN) member Juan Carlos Navarro helped
or hurt Herrera's presidential ambitions, 70 percent of
respondents stated that the criticism had a negative effect.
Interestingly, when asked the following week who in the PRD
party would be in the best position to unify the PRD after
the elections, 31.6 percent of respondents felt it would be
Herrera, while a virtually equal number felt that Juan Carlos
Navarro would be a better unifier, at 31.2 percent.
------------------
Voters Pessimistic
------------------
¶8. When asked in the second week of February whether the
country was or was not on a good path, 64.4 percent of
respondents felt that Panama was not on a good path, while
only 29.8 percent felt that the country was headed in the
right direction.
--------------
Technical Data
--------------
¶9. Third Dichter and Neira February poll: Dichter and Neira
conducted 1,226 interviews of men and women over the age of
18 who are residents of Panama. The poll was conducted
nationally, except in the remote and difficult to reach
Darien Province and indigenous people's autonomous regions
(comarcas). Interviews were conducted face-to-face in
individuals' homes from Friday, February 13 to Sunday,
February 15. Sampling was multi-staged. The first stage
distributed the total sample according to population by
province as well as rural and urban precincts, and in the
second stage blocks were randomly selected and homes were
first randomly and then systematically selected. The margin
of error for the poll was assessed at /- 2.9 percent with a
confidence level of
95 percent.
¶10. Second Dichter and Neira February poll: Dichter and
Neira conducted 1,229 interviews of men and women over the
age of 18 who are residents of Panama. The poll was
conducted nationally, except in the remote and difficult to
reach Darien Province and indigenous people's autonomous
regions (comarcas). Interviews were conducted face-to-face
in individuals' homes from Friday, February 6 to Sunday,
February 8. Sampling was multi-staged. The first stage
distributed the total sample according to population by
province as well as rural and urban precincts, and in the
second stage blocks were randomly selected and homes were
first randomly and then systematically selected. The margin
of error for the poll was assessed at /- 2.9 percent with a
confidence level of 95 percent.
STEPHENSON