

Currently released so far... 12689 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ASEC
AR
AEMR
AMGT
AE
AU
AID
AORC
APER
AS
AM
AFIN
AMED
AJ
AGR
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
ABLD
AL
AA
APECO
AGAO
AY
AGMT
APEC
AINF
AG
ACS
AECL
AFFAIRS
ABUD
ASUP
ADANA
AADP
AMCHAMS
ARF
ASEAN
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
APCS
ADCO
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ADM
AN
AIT
BU
BR
BL
BO
BA
BB
BG
BM
BBSR
BH
BEXP
BK
BD
BTIO
BT
BE
BY
BF
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BILAT
BIDEN
BC
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CH
CG
CF
CU
CE
CVIS
CASC
CO
CS
CA
CIDA
CBW
CW
CMGT
CI
CODEL
CY
CPAS
CJAN
CD
CWC
CDG
CIA
CL
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CT
CR
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CFED
CV
CACS
CARSON
CLINTON
CN
CONS
CM
CAC
CIC
COPUOS
CDC
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EG
EZ
EUN
ECON
ETRD
ECPS
EFIN
ENRG
ETTC
EPET
EINV
EAID
EAIR
EWWT
EU
EAGR
EC
ELAB
EIND
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
EFIS
ELTN
ET
ECIN
EFTA
ES
EINT
EI
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
ELN
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
EXIM
ETRO
ENIV
ESA
ER
EK
EUR
EFINECONCS
EUMEM
EUREM
EPA
ERNG
ENERG
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
IS
IZ
IR
IC
IO
IN
ID
IGAD
IT
ILC
IAEA
ITU
ICAO
IMO
IBRD
IMF
ICJ
IAHRC
ITF
INRA
INRO
IWC
IQ
IV
ICRC
ICTY
INRB
IEFIN
ILO
ITRA
ITALY
IBET
ISRAELI
IL
INTELSAT
IRC
IDP
ICTR
IRAQI
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
IA
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
INDO
IDA
ISLAMISTS
KSPR
KNNP
KWBG
KAWK
KISL
KPAO
KN
KS
KIPR
KCRM
KDEM
KIRF
KJUS
KHLS
KSCA
KOMC
KAWC
KV
KFRD
KWMN
KTIP
KPWR
KSUM
KGHG
KTIA
KTFN
KIRC
KCOR
KACT
KMDR
KGIC
KOLY
KUNR
KIDE
KMPI
KPKO
KCFE
KVPR
KRAD
KPAL
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KTEX
KTDB
KFSC
KZ
KSEP
KFLU
KE
KU
KPLS
KRVC
KRIM
KSTH
KG
KFLO
KPOA
KICC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KBCT
KSAF
KMOC
KDRG
KBIO
KREC
KSTC
KVRP
KBTR
KMIG
KENV
KNSD
KCGC
KWAC
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KWMM
KPRP
KNEI
KPAI
KO
KVIR
KX
KMCA
KCRS
KMFO
KID
KCIP
KNAR
KR
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KHDP
KFIN
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KHIV
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KTER
KRCM
KCFC
KSAC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KCOM
KLIG
KDEMAF
KAID
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KOMS
KHSA
MPOS
MOPS
MARR
MTCR
MNUC
MASS
MX
MCAP
MAR
MTRE
MASC
MK
MG
MTCRE
MI
MD
MA
MO
MY
MU
ML
MRCRE
MAS
MEDIA
MC
MR
MIL
MW
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MT
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MEPP
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
NATO
NG
NL
NZ
NT
NW
NO
NU
NS
NPT
NASA
NI
NK
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NP
NATIONAL
NSSP
NSF
NA
NGO
NV
NR
NDP
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NEW
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NPG
NSC
NPA
NSFO
OPDC
OPRC
OEXC
OTRA
ODIP
OIIP
OVIP
OPIC
OPCW
OAS
OREP
OSCE
OSCI
OES
OFDP
OECD
OCS
OIC
OPAD
OVP
OHUM
OFFICIALS
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OBSP
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PTER
PHUM
PK
PREF
PM
PHSA
PA
PINS
PE
PBTS
PCI
PO
PL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PGIV
PROP
PP
PBIO
POL
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
PBT
PMIL
POV
PTBS
PG
POSTS
PALESTINIAN
PROV
PNAT
PINF
PRL
PAS
PDOV
PRAM
PREO
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PAO
PREFA
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PGOC
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RW
REACTION
RCMP
RSO
RO
RP
ROOD
RM
ROBERT
RICE
REGION
RSP
RF
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
RFE
REPORT
SY
SP
SOCI
SMIG
SNAR
SCUL
SC
SU
SO
SI
SENV
SZ
SW
SA
SR
SF
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SEN
SG
SYR
SWE
SK
SH
SNARCS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SCRS
SYRIA
SL
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SANC
SHI
SHUM
SIPRS
TSPA
TSPL
TU
TBIO
TRGY
TPHY
TS
TP
TW
TBID
TI
TF
TZ
TD
TT
TN
TNGD
TC
TX
TH
TL
TIP
THPY
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TINT
TFIN
TAGS
TR
US
UNSC
UNGA
UK
UP
UNCHC
UN
UNMIK
UNCSD
UY
USTR
USOAS
UNHRC
UNFCYP
UG
UNAUS
UNESCO
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
USUN
UZ
USNC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNEP
USEU
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNDP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
UNDC
UNICEF
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09WELLINGTON181, FIXING THE BIG CITY
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09WELLINGTON181.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09WELLINGTON181 | 2009-06-26 03:58 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO0648
RR RUEHAP RUEHDT RUEHNZ RUEHPB
DE RUEHWL #0181/01 1770356
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 260358Z JUN 09
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0022
INFO ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE
RUEHAP/AMEMBASSY APIA 0005
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 0009
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0011
RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 0008
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000181
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR EAP/ANP
PACOM FOR J01E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV KDEM NZ
SUBJECT: FIXING THE BIG CITY
WELLINGTON 00000181 001.2 OF 003
¶1. (SBU) The Auckland region, New Zealand's commercial center and
home to a third of the country's population, is governed by a
patchwork of institutions - four city councils and mayors, two
district councils and an overarching regional council. These
overlapping and competing authorities slow decision-making and hobble
the city's development at taxpayers' expense.
¶2. (SBU) In 2007, the previous Labour government tasked the city's
leaders to come up with a new governance plan. Their proposed
changes were mostly cosmetic and designed to protect existing
political fiefs. Unimpressed with the product but not wanting to
deal with the issue during an election campaign, the Labour
government punted the job to a Royal Commission of three eminences
grises, with a mandate to come up with a new plan after the November
2008 national elections.
¶3. (SBU) After extensive consultations, the Royal Commission issued
its report in March. It called for the establishment of a single
city council with a popularly elected mayor and some council seats
set aside for Maori. Existing city and district councils would be
replaced by six local councils covering the same localities as the
current city and district councils. They would be subordinate to the
new greater Auckland council but still authorized to raise and spend
money independently.
¶4. (SBU) Within weeks, the National-led government in Wellington,
via Local Government Minister Rodney Hide, leader of the small ACT
Party, set aside much of the Royal Commission's plan and put forward
a more radical proposal. Hide proposed a single city council -
without Maori seats - and a popularly elected mayor. The six
proposed local council were eliminated, to be replaced instead with
20-30 community boards that would have very minor responsibilities
(graffiti and pet control) and would otherwise be limited to an
advisory role. The new governance structure is to be in place by
October 2010.
OXEN GET GORED
--------------
¶5. (SBU) Initial reaction was predictable. Current Auckland City
Mayor John Banks, a minister in an earlier National government and
frontrunner (to the extent there is one) for mayor of the new
"supercity," praised the government's plan. The mayors and council
members from the other current city and district councils, who will
be out of their jobs if the plan is implemented, spluttered in
outrage. The New Zealand Herald's op-ed pages have been filled with
columns penned by various mayors, deputy mayors, and city councilors
decrying Wellington's attack on local democracy. The decision has
also upset community activists concerned their neighborhood interests
and pet projects will be overlooked by a top-heavy city government.
¶6. (SBU) The Maori community condemned the government's elimination
of Maori seats, but Maori Party co-leader Pita Sharples' response was
nuanced. He objected to the elimination of the Maori seats, but took
pains to add that the disagreement would not affect the Maori Party's
confidence and supply agreement with National. The protests from
local Maori tribes were more pointed and a protest march (hikoi) was
called for late May. The 6,000-strong hikoi managed to close down a
few blocks of downtown Auckland on May 25 but PM Key dismissed it.
A STUMBLE, BUT A SMALL ONE
--------------------------
¶7. (SBU) The government seems taken aback by reaction to the
supercity plan, but it is not clear how seriously the government has
stumbled. The government has dropped hints that, when the enabling
legislation moves through parliament, there may be room for tweaking,
including a way to guarantee Maori representation on the new council.
While the opposition Labour Party has been trying to make political
hay out of the issue, strong opposition remains limited to Maori and
community activists. Media interest in the issue is fading. One
Auckland MP confirmed a view held by many: the average Aucklander
cares little about the governance debate so long as the outcome
delivers better traffic and lower taxes. A recent public opinion
poll showed Aucklanders were evenly split on the supercity concept,
but feelings among the general public on the issue do not seem
particularly strong. Outside Auckland, the debate attracts barely
any interest at all.
¶8. (SBU) One analyst suggested that the Maori Party's protest was
muted because Sharples has bigger fish to fry. This observer
suggested that Sharples is hoarding his political capital to expend
WELLINGTON 00000181 002.2 OF 003
on social and welfare issues more important to the Maori community.
By largely giving National a pass regarding Maori seats in Auckland,
he has earned points with PM Key that he can spend later.
BAD POLITICS?
-------------
¶9. (SBU) Some observers suggest that National has made bad decisions
both for itself and for the people of Auckland. One local government
expert from one of Auckland's big law firms noted that National's
rejection of the Royal Commission proposal meant that National had
taken ownership of Auckland governance issue. Given that few
analysts expect any form of local government reform to have much
impact on Aucklanders' tax bills and traffic woes, that may have been
a mistake. Had National simply implemented the Labour-appointed
Royal Commission plan, it could have dealt with Aucklanders'
inevitable disappointment by shifting the blame to Labour and the
Commission. At least one Auckland politician agreed, arguing that
while there were no votes to be won in redesigning Auckland's
government, there were at least a few votes to be lost.
¶10. (SBU) Auckland University Professor Ray Miller sounded a similar
theme, warning that National was identifying itself with a policy
drawn up by Hide. Hide's party drew only 3.7% of the vote in last
year's election and, argued Miller, Hide is not very popular with the
New Zealand electorate and is not trusted by his National
counterparts in cabinet. Hide's pro-business attitudes open the
government up to accusations that it is backing a plan meant to
promote a business takeover of Auckland's government. According to
this argument, only the wealthiest candidates will be able to mount
serious campaigns in a constituency of 1.4 million. (By comparison,
the population of Auckland City, the largest of the Auckland region's
current municipalities, is about 450,000.)
A BAD PLAN?
-----------
¶11. (SBU) Some experts in local government see a fundamental flaw in
both the Commission and government plans. Both plans opt for what
experts describe a "weak mayor" model. The mayor will get to appoint
his/her deputy and committee chairs and propose the budget, but the
mayor's authority will not be nearly as strong as that of London's
mayor, for example. Experts point with concern to Toronto, which
implemented municipal reform similar to that proposed for Auckland
and has been left with a divided council with a mayor too weak to
resolve disputes. It is certainly hard to see how a council that
included the four current mayors - different from each other in both
temperament and philosophy - could succeed.
ALTERING THE AUCKLAND-WELLINGTON DYNAMIC
----------------------------------------
¶12. (SBU) The impact of reform on the relationship between Auckland
and national politics remains to be seen. In New Zealand, local
government generally is not a stepping stone to higher levels of
government. While there are exceptions, mayoralties in New Zealand
are filled with politicians at the end, rather than the beginning, of
their careers. Likewise, members of city councils tend to limit
their focus to local issues. Last year's election to parliament of
Auckland City Councilman Peseta Sam Lotu-Liga is the exception rather
than the rule.
¶13. (SBU) A number of our interlocutors suggested that a supercity
might change all that. Traditionally, gaining a ministry required an
ambitious young politician to toil for years in the party hierarchy
and parliament's backbenches. That has already started to change, as
party leaders take advantage of the party list system to bring in
fresh blood. Some observers argue that a relatively junior
politician could avoid paying his dues in Wellington and pursue a
city-wide council seat or mayoralty in Auckland. A politician who
could succeed there, and demonstrate to party leaders that he can
capture a plurality in what will be by far the single largest
constituency in the country, could make a persuasive argument to
enter national politics at the ministerial level.
¶14. (SBU) Even if a reformed Auckland government does not become a
springboard to national office, many of our interlocutors hope it
might lead to better candidates at the local level. We heard many
complaints about the dismal quality of local government officials,
with the few noteworthy exceptions only drawing attention to the
mediocrity of the rest. A more authoritative government for the
entire Auckland region might draw more effective policymakers who
WELLINGTON 00000181 003.2 OF 003
consider pursuit of local office under the current structure to be a
waste of effort.
¶15. (SBU) Despite its weaknesses, reform may strengthen Auckland in
its dealings with the rest of the country. New Zealanders outside
the city tend to be wary of Auckland, believing it already gets too
much attention and too many resources compared to the rest of the
country. This is reflected in national politics, where some
politicians, such as former Finance Minister Michael Cullen, gain
reputations for being particularly "anti-Auckland." This infuriates
Auckland boosters, who point out the city contributes much more in
economic growth and tax revenues than it gets back in, for example,
funding for roads.
¶16. (SBU) One expert argued that even an imperfect supercity will be
better placed to battle for its interests in Wellington. He used a
recent example of a regional fuel tax. The previous Labour
government imposed a fuel tax for the Auckland region only, with the
proceeds to go to Auckland infrastructure. When gasoline prices
spiked last year, the tax became politically unsupportable and the
government withdrew it, without any indication of how it would
replace the badly-needed funding. Auckland's fragmented leadership
made no effective response. A mayor and city council from a single
Auckland supercity would have been better positioned to protect the
fuel tax or draw a commitment from the government that funds for the
needed infrastructure would be found elsewhere.
¶17. (SBU) The final shape of the supercity won't be seen for months,
after continued public debate and parliamentary hearings. The
hearings will keep the story in the newspaper, but it is unlikely to
return to the front pages soon. Prime Minister Key, a pragmatic
politician, will likely use the hearing process to make adjustments
to the new governance structure in order to appease key
constituencies like the Maori. Regardless of the final design, it
will be years before we learn whether the restructuring has created
the world class city everyone seems to agree New Zealand needs.
KEEGAN