

Currently released so far... 12689 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ASEC
AR
AEMR
AMGT
AE
AU
AID
AORC
APER
AS
AM
AFIN
AMED
AJ
AGR
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
ABLD
AL
AA
APECO
AGAO
AY
AGMT
APEC
AINF
AG
ACS
AECL
AFFAIRS
ABUD
ASUP
ADANA
AADP
AMCHAMS
ARF
ASEAN
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
APCS
ADCO
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ADM
AN
AIT
BU
BR
BL
BO
BA
BB
BG
BM
BBSR
BH
BEXP
BK
BD
BTIO
BT
BE
BY
BF
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BILAT
BIDEN
BC
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CH
CG
CF
CU
CE
CVIS
CASC
CO
CS
CA
CIDA
CBW
CW
CMGT
CI
CODEL
CY
CPAS
CJAN
CD
CWC
CDG
CIA
CL
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CT
CR
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CFED
CV
CACS
CARSON
CLINTON
CN
CONS
CM
CAC
CIC
COPUOS
CDC
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EG
EZ
EUN
ECON
ETRD
ECPS
EFIN
ENRG
ETTC
EPET
EINV
EAID
EAIR
EWWT
EU
EAGR
EC
ELAB
EIND
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
EFIS
ELTN
ET
ECIN
EFTA
ES
EINT
EI
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
ELN
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
EXIM
ETRO
ENIV
ESA
ER
EK
EUR
EFINECONCS
EUMEM
EUREM
EPA
ERNG
ENERG
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
IS
IZ
IR
IC
IO
IN
ID
IGAD
IT
ILC
IAEA
ITU
ICAO
IMO
IBRD
IMF
ICJ
IAHRC
ITF
INRA
INRO
IWC
IQ
IV
ICRC
ICTY
INRB
IEFIN
ILO
ITRA
ITALY
IBET
ISRAELI
IL
INTELSAT
IRC
IDP
ICTR
IRAQI
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
IA
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
INDO
IDA
ISLAMISTS
KSPR
KNNP
KWBG
KAWK
KISL
KPAO
KN
KS
KIPR
KCRM
KDEM
KIRF
KJUS
KHLS
KSCA
KOMC
KAWC
KV
KFRD
KWMN
KTIP
KPWR
KSUM
KGHG
KTIA
KTFN
KIRC
KCOR
KACT
KMDR
KGIC
KOLY
KUNR
KIDE
KMPI
KPKO
KCFE
KVPR
KRAD
KPAL
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KTEX
KTDB
KFSC
KZ
KSEP
KFLU
KE
KU
KPLS
KRVC
KRIM
KSTH
KG
KFLO
KPOA
KICC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KBCT
KSAF
KMOC
KDRG
KBIO
KREC
KSTC
KVRP
KBTR
KMIG
KENV
KNSD
KCGC
KWAC
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KWMM
KPRP
KNEI
KPAI
KO
KVIR
KX
KMCA
KCRS
KMFO
KID
KCIP
KNAR
KR
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KHDP
KFIN
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KHIV
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KTER
KRCM
KCFC
KSAC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KCOM
KLIG
KDEMAF
KAID
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KOMS
KHSA
MPOS
MOPS
MARR
MTCR
MNUC
MASS
MX
MCAP
MAR
MTRE
MASC
MK
MG
MTCRE
MI
MD
MA
MO
MY
MU
ML
MRCRE
MAS
MEDIA
MC
MR
MIL
MW
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MT
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MEPP
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
NATO
NG
NL
NZ
NT
NW
NO
NU
NS
NPT
NASA
NI
NK
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NP
NATIONAL
NSSP
NSF
NA
NGO
NV
NR
NDP
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NEW
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NPG
NSC
NPA
NSFO
OPDC
OPRC
OEXC
OTRA
ODIP
OIIP
OVIP
OPIC
OPCW
OAS
OREP
OSCE
OSCI
OES
OFDP
OECD
OCS
OIC
OPAD
OVP
OHUM
OFFICIALS
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OBSP
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PTER
PHUM
PK
PREF
PM
PHSA
PA
PINS
PE
PBTS
PCI
PO
PL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PGIV
PROP
PP
PBIO
POL
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
PBT
PMIL
POV
PTBS
PG
POSTS
PALESTINIAN
PROV
PNAT
PINF
PRL
PAS
PDOV
PRAM
PREO
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PAO
PREFA
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PGOC
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RW
REACTION
RCMP
RSO
RO
RP
ROOD
RM
ROBERT
RICE
REGION
RSP
RF
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
RFE
REPORT
SY
SP
SOCI
SMIG
SNAR
SCUL
SC
SU
SO
SI
SENV
SZ
SW
SA
SR
SF
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SEN
SG
SYR
SWE
SK
SH
SNARCS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SCRS
SYRIA
SL
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SANC
SHI
SHUM
SIPRS
TSPA
TSPL
TU
TBIO
TRGY
TPHY
TS
TP
TW
TBID
TI
TF
TZ
TD
TT
TN
TNGD
TC
TX
TH
TL
TIP
THPY
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TINT
TFIN
TAGS
TR
US
UNSC
UNGA
UK
UP
UNCHC
UN
UNMIK
UNCSD
UY
USTR
USOAS
UNHRC
UNFCYP
UG
UNAUS
UNESCO
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
USUN
UZ
USNC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNEP
USEU
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNDP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
UNDC
UNICEF
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09TOKYO2815, FRF: SENIOR DPJ LEADER SAYS ""NO DEAL"" THIS YEAR
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09TOKYO2815.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09TOKYO2815 | 2009-12-09 08:56 | 2011-05-04 00:00 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Tokyo |
VZCZCXRO1197
OO RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #2815/01 3430856
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 090856Z DEC 09
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 8095
INFO RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE IMMEDIATE 1648
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO IMMEDIATE 8343
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA IMMEDIATE 0186
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA IMMEDIATE 7837
RUEKJCS/CJCS WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/USFJ IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUALSFJ/COMUSJAPAN YOKOTA AB JA IMMEDIATE
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI IMMEDIATE
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 TOKYO 002815
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/09/2019
TAGS: PREL MARR PGOV JA
SUBJECT: FRF: SENIOR DPJ LEADER SAYS ""NO DEAL"" THIS YEAR
Classified By: DCM James P. Zumwalt per 1.4 (b/d)
¶1. (C) Summary: DPJ Diet Affairs Chair Kenji Yamaoka (a
close confidante of DPJ Secretary General Ozawa) told Embassy
Tokyo December 8 that the Futenma Replacement Facility (FRF)
decision was ""all about managing the Diet."" Until two weeks
ago, he thought the Japanese government would agree to an FRF
deal by the end of the year. However the PM moved too slowly
and now a decision within the year is no longer possible due
to coalition partner intransigence. He said that after the
Upper House elections next summer, the Socialist Democratic
Party (SDP) and People's New Party (PNP) would no longer be
needed in the coalition, and at that point the government
would implement the deal. Yamaoka advised the United States
to be patient. In the meantime, he promised he would pass
the necessary FRF-related budget items so that Japan could
reserve its position on realignment. The DCM pressed for an
expeditious decision, but Yamaoka dismissed our arguments on
the need to move forward this year saying that the decision
had already been made and ""only FM Okada"" was still arguing
for an agreement this year. He acknowledged that this would
present difficulties for PM Hatoyama's relationship with
President Obama and criticized the PM as a ""poor
communicator."" When asked about Okinawa politics, Yamaoka
said that Governor Nakaima would go ahead and sign the
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), but that he could not
win the governor's race next year. In summer 2010, the
Japanese Government would move forward with the FRF plan, and
the new Okinawa governor would have to accept the ""done deal""
of the realignment package. End Summary.
¶2. (C) In a December 8 meeting with DCM Zumwalt and Poloff,
DPJ Diet Affairs Committee Chairman Yamaoka frankly shared
his views on Japan's political situation and issues
surrounding FRF. Yamaoka explained that there were
precedents that PMs had to resign in order to pass the
budget. If the DPJ's coalition partners left the government
over the FRF issue, then the DPJ would lose its Upper House
majority and be unable to pass budget-related bills; Hatoyama
might thus have to resign. Hatoyama's political donation
problem is likely to reach a critical point from the end of
this year to early next year, and Hatoyama is likely to be
attacked in the ordinary Diet session. As the Diet Affairs
Committee Chair, Yamaoka said he would try to delay the
opening of the session as long as possible in order to
deprive the LDP of time to attack Hatoyama's scandals. That
means deliberation of key Diet bills, including the
supplementary budget and regular budget, will be pushed back
and the DPJ will be pressed to handle them all quickly. To
manage this process, the party needs its coalition partners
in the Upper House. Since the UH election will be held in
July, the session cannot be extended. The supplementary
budget and the regular budget have to pass before the UH
election, and key budget items, such as child allowances and
agricultural subsidies must be implemented as well.
Therefore Diet management in the next session was critical to
Hatoyama's success, Yamaoka explained.
¶3. (C) If the SDP continues to threaten to leave the
coalition, the PNP may threaten to do the same to ""increase
its profile,"" Yamaoka continued. The PNP hopes to hold the
casting vote once the SDP is gone, and that means the PNP
will become increasingly vocal about the FRF issue. Yamaoka
explained that the most important issue for the SDP was
Okinawa, for the PNP was the postal issue, and for DPJ SecGen
Ozawa was Diet reform. In order to position themselves
favorably, all three parties will use whatever political
cards they have. If the United States continues to pressure
Hatoyama on the Futenma issue, the Hatoyama Cabinet could
possibly collapse. If the SDP leaves the coalition, Diet
management for the DPJ would be extremely difficult. FM
Okada and MLIT Minister Maehara have no experience in Diet
management, and they cannot be where they are now without
being supported by the ""ship called a coalition."" They do
not understand the politics of the Diet affairs. If they
could put themselves in the PM's position, their judgment
would be different, said Yamaoka. In his view, it is better
for the United States to wait for the political situation to
calm down until after the budget passes and the DPJ's victory
in the July 2010 UH election. If the United States continues
to apply pressure, reiterated Yamaoka, the situation could
further deteriorate. Yamaoka said that haste makes waste,
TOKYO 00002815 002 OF 003
and stated that waiting, in the end, is the best way to
ensure the plan's implantation. Once the DPJ wins the UH
election, the FRF issue can be solved said Yamaoka. Yamaoka
has been discussing the FRF issue with the PM and Chief
Cabinet Secretary Hirano and advising them on the Diet
situation. Yamaoka told the PM if he could meet with the
President in Copenhagen, he should fully explain the current
political/Diet situation and gain his understanding.
¶4. (C) The DCM underlined the need for an expeditious
decision, particularly in light of local Okinawan politics
and our own budget process. Yamaoka said that a decision had
already been made; the only issue that remained was how to
explain to the United States that, by earmarking FRF-related
funds in the budget, Japan was making a de facto commitment
to move forward with the FRF plan as currently envisioned.
Yamaoka made it clear that Hatoyama was not planning to
commit political suicide in order to implement the FRF this
year. FM Okada may think it's okay for Hatoyama to quit if
the FRF deal could be pushed forward, but Hatoyama does not
think so. The more that Okada -- who may think he can
replace Hatoyama -- presses the PM, the more Hatoyama will
consider the political situation and how best to protect his
position. He will not give up the prime ministership for
Futenma, Yamaoka said.
¶5. (C) That said, Yamaoka repeated that he told Defense
Minister Kitazawa to make sure to earmark the FRF and Guam
expenses in the regular budget. Yamaoka said that as the
manager of the Diet business, he would make sure these
government requests passed. Yamaoka hoped that the United
States would implicitly understand that earmarking meant that
the plan would be implemented eventually. Yamaoka also
stated that relevant Cabinet members were being called to the
Kantei not to be told that a decision on the implementation
of the current plan would be made in December, but to be told
that the implementation would not be announced before the end
of the year, although the budget would be earmarked.
According to Yamaoka, PM told this to Okinawa Governor
Nakaima as well; for his part, Nakaima has been pressuring
the PM to move forward with the current plan for the sake of
his own political position, Yamaoka said.
¶6. (C) On Okinawa politics, Yamaoka said that Okinawa would
oppose base issues whenever they are discussed. ""It's all
about opposing for its own sake,"" Yamaoka stated. The
Okinawa gubernatorial election will be held next fall and
incumbent governor Nakaima will lose for sure. Once the new
governor is elected, the FRF issue could hit a real wall, so
the GOJ needed to resolve it before then. If the base
decision were a fait accompli, then the new governor would be
forced to accept that decision. Nakaima knows that he has to
stick the current plan and that's the only way for him to
have a chance to survive politically. As for the Nago
mayoral election, regardless of the outcome, the government
must stick to its plan to implement the realignment
agreement. If Okinawa's will is respected, ""nothing will
ever happen."" The issue of Okinawa politics, therefore, is
not a big deal as long as the government's decision is made
before the gubernatorial race.
¶7. (C) On PM Hatoyama's ""trust me"" statement, Yamaoka
explained that PM meant to say that he would surely move
forward with FRF ""at some point."" Yamaoka expressed his
understanding that the United States took this to mean that
the PM would make a decision within this year, and that
President Obama had ""lost face."" Yamaoka believed that
Hatoyama exercised the wrong political judgment. In
Yamaoka's view, Hatoyama should have clearly promised
President Obama when they met that his government would
implement the current plan. Yamaoka revealed that around
that time, the SDP was under a great deal of political
pressure, as Yamaoka had told them that once out of the
coalition, the SDP would vanish as a political party in the
upcoming election. SDP president Fukushima seriously
considered accepting the DPJ's position; however, when PM and
others moved slowly on FRF, the SDP took the initiative by
holding an anti-base rally in Okinawa. This created the
political momentum for the anti-base elements in the SDP to
oppose the Futenma relocation even if it meant putting the
coalition at risk. Yamaoka critically said that the PM's
lack of leadership and determination led to the current mess.
TOKYO 00002815 003 OF 003
He lost the opportunity to make a political decision by
moving too slowly, Yamaoka said.
¶8. (C) In Yamaoka's view, the best way to break through the
current stalemate is for Washington to understand the current
political situation in Japan and to tell Japan what it would
like to do in search of mutually acceptable ""next best way.""
If PM Hatoyama cannot meet President Obama on the matter,
Yamaoka thought that Japan should send a special envoy to
deliver the message and seek U.S. understanding. He thought
a phone conversation between PM Hatoyama and President Obama
would not be sufficient, as their ""true feelings"" would not
be adequately communicated by telephone.
¶9. (C) Yamaoka added that even if the current plan were
implemented, the Japanese public would not necessarily be
favorable towards U.S.-Japan relations, as the media and
other ""agitators"" would focus on the issue of the coral reef
and environmental destruction caused by the landfill. The
negative image could shake the DPJ government.
Implementation of the current plan meant reduction of the
burden on Okinawa, but politically it could be viewed
negatively. In order to avoid such a situation, Yamaoka said
it was critical to discuss the future direction of the
alliance and make the FRF/Henoko issue as but one of many
issues in the alliance. In doing so, it is also important to
explain to the Japanese public that it is the time for Japan
to reduce its dependence on the United States and try to
assume a greater defense burden.
¶10. (C) On the DPJ's position on the future of the alliance,
Yamaoka explained it had three stages. First, the DPJ should
make it clear to the United States that it intends to bear
much more responsibility in the alliance. Second, the United
States should explain what kind of roles it expected from
Japan within its global strategy. Third, Japan should then
decide its direction and what it can do. The process may
take some time, but Yamaoka said that was what Ozawa wanted
to do. Japan needed to continue to stay under the U.S.
nuclear umbrella and needs to bear more of a burden. The
current public feeling between Japan and the United States is
that while Americans feel overburdened, the Japanese public
feels negative about foreign military forces stationed in
Japan. Yamaoka understood that Japan was very ""spoiled"" and
dependent on the United States and was taking U.S. protection
for granted. Some Japanese think that Japan's security is
none of their business, and therefore, no bases were needed.
Once the UH election is over, Yamaoka thinks the DPJ can
remove the SDP and the PNP from the coalition. The DPJ will
have three years before another national election, and within
the three years, the DPJ should be able to step up
discussions on how to advance the alliance from the post-war
relationship to future-oriented relationship without any
obstacles.
ROOS