

Currently released so far... 12689 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ASEC
AR
AEMR
AMGT
AE
AU
AID
AORC
APER
AS
AM
AFIN
AMED
AJ
AGR
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
ABLD
AL
AA
APECO
AGAO
AY
AGMT
APEC
AINF
AG
ACS
AECL
AFFAIRS
ABUD
ASUP
ADANA
AADP
AMCHAMS
ARF
ASEAN
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
APCS
ADCO
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ADM
AN
AIT
BU
BR
BL
BO
BA
BB
BG
BM
BBSR
BH
BEXP
BK
BD
BTIO
BT
BE
BY
BF
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BILAT
BIDEN
BC
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CH
CG
CF
CU
CE
CVIS
CASC
CO
CS
CA
CIDA
CBW
CW
CMGT
CI
CODEL
CY
CPAS
CJAN
CD
CWC
CDG
CIA
CL
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CT
CR
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CFED
CV
CACS
CARSON
CLINTON
CN
CONS
CM
CAC
CIC
COPUOS
CDC
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EG
EZ
EUN
ECON
ETRD
ECPS
EFIN
ENRG
ETTC
EPET
EINV
EAID
EAIR
EWWT
EU
EAGR
EC
ELAB
EIND
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
EFIS
ELTN
ET
ECIN
EFTA
ES
EINT
EI
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
ELN
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
EXIM
ETRO
ENIV
ESA
ER
EK
EUR
EFINECONCS
EUMEM
EUREM
EPA
ERNG
ENERG
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
IS
IZ
IR
IC
IO
IN
ID
IGAD
IT
ILC
IAEA
ITU
ICAO
IMO
IBRD
IMF
ICJ
IAHRC
ITF
INRA
INRO
IWC
IQ
IV
ICRC
ICTY
INRB
IEFIN
ILO
ITRA
ITALY
IBET
ISRAELI
IL
INTELSAT
IRC
IDP
ICTR
IRAQI
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
IA
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
INDO
IDA
ISLAMISTS
KSPR
KNNP
KWBG
KAWK
KISL
KPAO
KN
KS
KIPR
KCRM
KDEM
KIRF
KJUS
KHLS
KSCA
KOMC
KAWC
KV
KFRD
KWMN
KTIP
KPWR
KSUM
KGHG
KTIA
KTFN
KIRC
KCOR
KACT
KMDR
KGIC
KOLY
KUNR
KIDE
KMPI
KPKO
KCFE
KVPR
KRAD
KPAL
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KTEX
KTDB
KFSC
KZ
KSEP
KFLU
KE
KU
KPLS
KRVC
KRIM
KSTH
KG
KFLO
KPOA
KICC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KBCT
KSAF
KMOC
KDRG
KBIO
KREC
KSTC
KVRP
KBTR
KMIG
KENV
KNSD
KCGC
KWAC
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KWMM
KPRP
KNEI
KPAI
KO
KVIR
KX
KMCA
KCRS
KMFO
KID
KCIP
KNAR
KR
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KHDP
KFIN
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KHIV
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KTER
KRCM
KCFC
KSAC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KCOM
KLIG
KDEMAF
KAID
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KOMS
KHSA
MPOS
MOPS
MARR
MTCR
MNUC
MASS
MX
MCAP
MAR
MTRE
MASC
MK
MG
MTCRE
MI
MD
MA
MO
MY
MU
ML
MRCRE
MAS
MEDIA
MC
MR
MIL
MW
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MT
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MEPP
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
NATO
NG
NL
NZ
NT
NW
NO
NU
NS
NPT
NASA
NI
NK
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NP
NATIONAL
NSSP
NSF
NA
NGO
NV
NR
NDP
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NEW
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NPG
NSC
NPA
NSFO
OPDC
OPRC
OEXC
OTRA
ODIP
OIIP
OVIP
OPIC
OPCW
OAS
OREP
OSCE
OSCI
OES
OFDP
OECD
OCS
OIC
OPAD
OVP
OHUM
OFFICIALS
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OBSP
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PTER
PHUM
PK
PREF
PM
PHSA
PA
PINS
PE
PBTS
PCI
PO
PL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PGIV
PROP
PP
PBIO
POL
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
PBT
PMIL
POV
PTBS
PG
POSTS
PALESTINIAN
PROV
PNAT
PINF
PRL
PAS
PDOV
PRAM
PREO
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PAO
PREFA
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PGOC
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RW
REACTION
RCMP
RSO
RO
RP
ROOD
RM
ROBERT
RICE
REGION
RSP
RF
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
RFE
REPORT
SY
SP
SOCI
SMIG
SNAR
SCUL
SC
SU
SO
SI
SENV
SZ
SW
SA
SR
SF
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SEN
SG
SYR
SWE
SK
SH
SNARCS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SCRS
SYRIA
SL
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SANC
SHI
SHUM
SIPRS
TSPA
TSPL
TU
TBIO
TRGY
TPHY
TS
TP
TW
TBID
TI
TF
TZ
TD
TT
TN
TNGD
TC
TX
TH
TL
TIP
THPY
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TINT
TFIN
TAGS
TR
US
UNSC
UNGA
UK
UP
UNCHC
UN
UNMIK
UNCSD
UY
USTR
USOAS
UNHRC
UNFCYP
UG
UNAUS
UNESCO
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
USUN
UZ
USNC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNEP
USEU
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNDP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
UNDC
UNICEF
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09WELLINGTON59, 2009 SPECIAL 301 REVIEW - NEW ZEALAND
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09WELLINGTON59.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09WELLINGTON59 | 2009-03-02 01:55 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO6119
RR RUEHNZ
DE RUEHWL #0059/01 0610155
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 020155Z MAR 09
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5778
INFO RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 1925
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 5462
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0804
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC 0281
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUEHRC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE WASHDC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000059
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR STATE FOR EAP/ANP, EEB/TPP/IPE TMCGOWAN, STATE PASS TO
USPTO, USTR JENNIFER GROVES AND COMMERCE FOR CASSIE PETERS
ITA/MAC/OIPR
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON ETRD KIPR NZ
SUBJECT: 2009 SPECIAL 301 REVIEW - NEW ZEALAND
Ref: State 8410
¶1. (U) Summary: Post recommends that New Zealand (GNZ) not/not be
placed on the Special 301 List in 2009. New Zealand has a
comprehensive Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) regime that strives
to meet its WTO TRIPS obligations with respect to patents, copyright
and trademark protection, and has in recent years amended and
updated a number of pieces of intellectual property legislation. A
new Patents Bill was introduced to Parliament on July 9, 2008 and
will, when enacted, replace the 1953 Patents Act. It is expected
that the Bill will be in force by late 2009. The Copyright (New
Technologies) Amendment Act was passed in April 2008 and most of its
provisions came into force by October 2008. Full implementation
with respect to digital data protection via the internet is expected
by the end of March 2009. The New Zealand Government has
proactively cooperated with and values the opportunity to work
constructively with the United States in a number of international
IPR fora. It was one of the first countries to join the U.S. in
developing the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) and
remains a fully engaged member of the WTO TRIPS Council. Placing
New Zealand on the Special 301 list may prove to be
counter-productive as it likely will result in a defensive rather
than consultative exchange. End summary.
Access to Pharmaceuticals
-------------------------
¶2. (SBU) While the U.S. pharmaceutical industry (PhRMA) urges that
New Zealand be placed on the priority watch list (PWL) in 2009, Post
continues to believe that the industry's concerns with regard to
access to New Zealand's market stem primarily from the cost
containment strategies for subsidized drugs that are a part of the
National Medicines Strategy (NMS). The government-affiliated
Pharmaceutical Management Agency (PHARMAC) is mandated to spend less
than its budget allows, and the U.S. pharmaceutical industry may
have a number of legitimate complaints about its treatment in
PHARMAC's purchasing process. However, these industry concerns are
not IP problems per se. While Post will continue to work to improve
access for U.S. pharmaceuticals in the New Zealand market, we
believe this should be dealt with as a market-access barrier and not
as a failure to protect intellectual property.
¶3. (U) In October 2005, the United Future Party announced that it
had secured an agreement from the Labour Party to develop a national
medicines strategy as part of Labour's coalition negotiations to
form a government. Following extensive consultation, the Government
released its improved access to medicines strategy ("Medicines New
Zealand"), and an associated action plan in December 2007. The
strategy is intended to provide a framework to support a sound and
transparent decision-making process enabling greater access to
"appropriate" medications. The strategy is also based on principles
of equity, effectiveness, confidence, value for money, affordability
and transparency and aims to deliver a coherent approach to
medicines issues in New Zealand. The plan's goal is to provide the
highest quality, safest and most effective medicines for New
Zealanders.
¶4. (U) With the election of the National Party in November 2008,
the United Future Party again secured commitment to the strategy
through its supply and confidence agreement as a coalition minority
party. Therefore, the New Zealand Government remains committed to
working with stakeholders to investigate ways to improve access to
higher-cost specialized medicines, and has recently announced it
would increase spending on medicines by NZ$180 million over the next
three years, starting July 2009. There are currently no undue
delays in assessing applications for market authorization in New
Zealand. The New Zealand Government's Medicines and Medical Devices
Safety Authority (Medsafe) is already meeting its goal of assessing
applications for market access within 200 days of receipt.
Patent Protection
-----------------
¶5. (U) The grant of patents in New Zealand is currently governed by
the Patents Act 1953. A new Patents Bill was introduced to
Parliament on July 9, 2008 and will, when enacted, replace the 1953
Act. The Bill will be referred to a Select Committee for review in
early 2009, which will likely seek public submissions as part of its
consideration of the new law by May and is expected to be in force
by end of 2009. The Patent term will remain at twenty years from
filing with no provision for extension.
WELLINGTON 00000059 002 OF 003
¶6. (U) The Patents Bill requires that, to be patentable, an
invention must be a "manner of manufacture", be novel, involve an
inventive step, and be useful. The Bill excludes certain subject
matter from patent protection:
--Human beings and biological methods for their generation;
--Methods of treatment of human beings by surgery or therapy, or
methods of diagnosis practised on human beings;
--Inventions whose commercial exploitation would be contrary to
morality or public policy;
--Plant varieties.
¶7. (U) The "prior art base" for novelty and inventive steps
includes all material made available to the public in any form
anywhere in the world. This replaces the "local" novelty standard
applied under the 1953 Act. Patent applications will be examined
for inventive step and utility; there is no examination for these
criteria under the 1953 Act. The Bill will remove the 1953 Act
provision for pre-grant opposition and will introduce a
"re-examination" provision which can be invoked at any time after
acceptance of an application. Re-examination will be limited to
issues of novelty and inventive step based on documentary prior art.
The 1953 Act post-grant opposition provisions will be expanded and
it will be possible to invoke post-grant opposition at any time
during the patent term. The current provision for revocation of a
patent through the courts will be retained. The Bill also provides
for the establishment of a Maori Advisory Committee to advise the
Commissioner of Patents where patent applications involve
traditional knowledge and indigenous plants and animals.
The Copyright (New Technologies) Amendment Act 2008
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶8. (U) The Copyright (New Technologies) Amendment Act was passed in
April 2008 and most of its provisions came into force in October of
that year. A number of changes were made to the Bill following its
report back from the Select Committee and prior to its final passage
through Parliament. In particular, changes were made to the
Internet Service Provider (ISP) liability provisions in response to
public concerns. Modifications included:
-- An ISP will not be protected from liability if it has reason to
believe that material on its clients' websites is infringing,
regardless of whether they have received a notice from a
rights-holder to that effect;
-- A requirement for ISPs to have and reasonably implement a policy
for termination of the accounts of repeat infringers was inserted
into the Bill; and
-- The offence provision for sending false or misleading notices to
ISPs which was inserted at Select Committee was removed from the
Bill.
¶9. (U) On February 23, five days prior to the full implementation
of the ISP provisions (sections 92 a and c) in the new Copyright
Bill, Minister of Commerce Simon Power suspended the ISP sections of
the law from coming into full force for 30 days (end of March 2009).
The Minister's action will give the IP rights holders represented
by the Recording Industry Association of New Zealand (RIANZ) and the
Australasian Performing Rights Association (APRA) additional time to
negotiate with the ISP trade association, the Telecommunication
Carriers Forum (TCF) a mutually agreeable code of practice for
terminating the internet access of users accused of infringing
copyrights. Once the code of practice is adopted, the government
will monitor its efficacy during the first six months after the
law's enactment.
¶10. (U) The provisions relating to technological protection
measures (TPMs) remain largely unchanged in the bill. The Act as
implemented reflects New Zealand's concern that TPMs should not be
protected to the extent that they restrict acts which are seen as
not protected by copyright law. The provisions of the Act have
therefore been drafted to ensure that access to a work for
non-infringing purposes, including the exercise of a permitted act,
is retained.
The Trademarks (International Treaties and Enforcement) Bill
-----------------------------------------
WELLINGTON 00000059 003 OF 003
¶11. (U) The Trademarks (International Treaties and Enforcement)
Bill was introduced to Parliament in 2008. The Bill contains
provisions to enhance the existing enforcement provisions in the
Trade Marks Act and Copyright Act 1994 to further deter
counterfeiting of registered trade marks and piracy of copyright
protected works. The Bill is expected to be referred to a Select
Committee in 2009.
Enforcement
-----------
¶12. (U) The GNZ remains committed to enforcing its IP laws
adequately and effectively. In most instances, the government
responds to complaints raised by rights holders against IP
infringers. The government set up a new office within New Zealand
Customs in 2007 that is exclusively dedicated to IP enforcement
issues. Currently, New Zealand Customs can confiscate and destroy
pirated products if the holder of the trademark or copyright has
requested that Customs detain the goods. That request is valid for
five years and can be renewed. Almost all the infringing goods
imported into New Zealand originated in Asia, particularly China.
While it appears that CDs and DVDs are increasingly being copied to
order within New Zealand (over the internet), making detection of
local production increasingly difficult, the copyright industry has
an ongoing cooperative dialogue with local authorities to better
police IPR as new forms of piracy are detected.
Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement
-----------------------------------
¶13. (U) New Zealand joined with the United States and a number of
its major trading partners, including the Australia, Canada, the
European Union, Japan, Korea, Mexico, and Switzerland, to help in
the development of the plurilateral Anti-Counterfeiting Trade
Agreement ("ACTA"). The government of New Zealand has made several
public statements regarding ACTA, saying "it would establish a new
international legal framework with the goal of setting a new, higher
benchmark for intellectual property rights enforcement." At the
fourth negotiating round in Paris in December 2008, New Zealand
reaffirmed its commitments to negotiate an agreement to combat
global infringements of IPR, particularly in the context of
counterfeiting and piracy, by increasing international cooperation,
strengthening the framework of practices that contribute to
effective enforcement, and strengthening relevant IPR enforcement
measures themselves.
¶14. (U) Recommendation: Post maintains that, despite delays in the
pending Copyright Bill's ISP provisions and the Patents Bill's
slowed progress because of last year's election cycle, there remains
a strong commitment on the part of the GNZ to continue to improve
its IP regime and bring it into conformance with international
standards. The GNZ's enforcement of current IP laws also reflects
the government's proactive stance as they learn and adapt to help
stem new forms of piracy. While there is additional work to be done
to strengthen the law and enhance enforcement, Post recommends the
better course of action is to continue engagement with the GNZ and
monitor the progress of IP legislation rather than place New Zealand
on this year's watch list. End Recommendation.
KEEGAN