

Currently released so far... 12689 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ASEC
AR
AEMR
AMGT
AE
AU
AID
AORC
APER
AS
AM
AFIN
AMED
AJ
AGR
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
ABLD
AL
AA
APECO
AGAO
AY
AGMT
APEC
AINF
AG
ACS
AECL
AFFAIRS
ABUD
ASUP
ADANA
AADP
AMCHAMS
ARF
ASEAN
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
APCS
ADCO
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ADM
AN
AIT
BU
BR
BL
BO
BA
BB
BG
BM
BBSR
BH
BEXP
BK
BD
BTIO
BT
BE
BY
BF
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BILAT
BIDEN
BC
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CH
CG
CF
CU
CE
CVIS
CASC
CO
CS
CA
CIDA
CBW
CW
CMGT
CI
CODEL
CY
CPAS
CJAN
CD
CWC
CDG
CIA
CL
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CT
CR
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CFED
CV
CACS
CARSON
CLINTON
CN
CONS
CM
CAC
CIC
COPUOS
CDC
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EG
EZ
EUN
ECON
ETRD
ECPS
EFIN
ENRG
ETTC
EPET
EINV
EAID
EAIR
EWWT
EU
EAGR
EC
ELAB
EIND
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
EFIS
ELTN
ET
ECIN
EFTA
ES
EINT
EI
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
ELN
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
EXIM
ETRO
ENIV
ESA
ER
EK
EUR
EFINECONCS
EUMEM
EUREM
EPA
ERNG
ENERG
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
IS
IZ
IR
IC
IO
IN
ID
IGAD
IT
ILC
IAEA
ITU
ICAO
IMO
IBRD
IMF
ICJ
IAHRC
ITF
INRA
INRO
IWC
IQ
IV
ICRC
ICTY
INRB
IEFIN
ILO
ITRA
ITALY
IBET
ISRAELI
IL
INTELSAT
IRC
IDP
ICTR
IRAQI
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
IA
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
INDO
IDA
ISLAMISTS
KSPR
KNNP
KWBG
KAWK
KISL
KPAO
KN
KS
KIPR
KCRM
KDEM
KIRF
KJUS
KHLS
KSCA
KOMC
KAWC
KV
KFRD
KWMN
KTIP
KPWR
KSUM
KGHG
KTIA
KTFN
KIRC
KCOR
KACT
KMDR
KGIC
KOLY
KUNR
KIDE
KMPI
KPKO
KCFE
KVPR
KRAD
KPAL
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KTEX
KTDB
KFSC
KZ
KSEP
KFLU
KE
KU
KPLS
KRVC
KRIM
KSTH
KG
KFLO
KPOA
KICC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KBCT
KSAF
KMOC
KDRG
KBIO
KREC
KSTC
KVRP
KBTR
KMIG
KENV
KNSD
KCGC
KWAC
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KWMM
KPRP
KNEI
KPAI
KO
KVIR
KX
KMCA
KCRS
KMFO
KID
KCIP
KNAR
KR
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KHDP
KFIN
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KHIV
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KTER
KRCM
KCFC
KSAC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KCOM
KLIG
KDEMAF
KAID
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KOMS
KHSA
MPOS
MOPS
MARR
MTCR
MNUC
MASS
MX
MCAP
MAR
MTRE
MASC
MK
MG
MTCRE
MI
MD
MA
MO
MY
MU
ML
MRCRE
MAS
MEDIA
MC
MR
MIL
MW
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MT
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MEPP
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
NATO
NG
NL
NZ
NT
NW
NO
NU
NS
NPT
NASA
NI
NK
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NP
NATIONAL
NSSP
NSF
NA
NGO
NV
NR
NDP
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NEW
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NPG
NSC
NPA
NSFO
OPDC
OPRC
OEXC
OTRA
ODIP
OIIP
OVIP
OPIC
OPCW
OAS
OREP
OSCE
OSCI
OES
OFDP
OECD
OCS
OIC
OPAD
OVP
OHUM
OFFICIALS
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OBSP
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PTER
PHUM
PK
PREF
PM
PHSA
PA
PINS
PE
PBTS
PCI
PO
PL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PGIV
PROP
PP
PBIO
POL
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
PBT
PMIL
POV
PTBS
PG
POSTS
PALESTINIAN
PROV
PNAT
PINF
PRL
PAS
PDOV
PRAM
PREO
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PAO
PREFA
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PGOC
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RW
REACTION
RCMP
RSO
RO
RP
ROOD
RM
ROBERT
RICE
REGION
RSP
RF
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
RFE
REPORT
SY
SP
SOCI
SMIG
SNAR
SCUL
SC
SU
SO
SI
SENV
SZ
SW
SA
SR
SF
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SEN
SG
SYR
SWE
SK
SH
SNARCS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SCRS
SYRIA
SL
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SANC
SHI
SHUM
SIPRS
TSPA
TSPL
TU
TBIO
TRGY
TPHY
TS
TP
TW
TBID
TI
TF
TZ
TD
TT
TN
TNGD
TC
TX
TH
TL
TIP
THPY
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TINT
TFIN
TAGS
TR
US
UNSC
UNGA
UK
UP
UNCHC
UN
UNMIK
UNCSD
UY
USTR
USOAS
UNHRC
UNFCYP
UG
UNAUS
UNESCO
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
USUN
UZ
USNC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNEP
USEU
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNDP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
UNDC
UNICEF
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05OTTAWA3317, CANADA: LAYTON PULLS THE PLUG -- THE GOMERY EFFECT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05OTTAWA3317.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05OTTAWA3317 | 2005-11-07 21:35 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Ottawa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
072135Z Nov 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 003317
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CA PGOV PREL
SUBJECT: CANADA: LAYTON PULLS THE PLUG -- THE GOMERY EFFECT
ON THE PARTIES, ELECTION TIMING, KEY LEADERS, AND BILATERAL
RELATIONS
¶1. (SBU) Summary: NDP Leader Jack Layton announced today that
the NDP cannot express confidence in the Martin government,
and "the life of this Parliament is limited," after receiving
what he considered an inadequate Liberal response to NDP
concerns over creeping privatization in health care. Layton
did not go so far as to say when he would try to bring the
government down and the other opposition leaders were just as
cautious, but there is now a greater possibility of a
snap-election. This possibility is increased by the recent
sharp (albeit probably temporary) rise in Conservative
fortunes in the polls. For the U.S. this means further
distraction for a weak minority government in Canada, which
will remain in campaign mode for the foreseeable future. End
Summary
GOMERY REPORT PART I EXONERATES MARTIN
--------------------------------------
¶2. (SBU) Part I of the Gomery Inquiry was released November
¶1. The report, subtitled "Who Is Responsible?" attempts to
assign blame for the scandal while the second report, due out
February 1, will make recommendations on avoiding a similar
mishap in the future. The report essentially exonerates the
current government and, significantly, PM Martin, whom the
report stated was responsible as Finance Minister for setting
department budgets but not managing them. Former Prime
Minister Jean Chrtien and persons close to him took the bulk
of the blame for creating and operating the program in a way
that left it open to abuse. High-ranking members of the
Quebec Liberal Party and several Quebec advertising agencies
were also pegged with abusing the program for personal gain,
and in some cases to funnel money to the Quebec Wing of the
Liberal Party.
BUT SO WHAT
-----------
¶3. (SBU) The upcoming "recommendations" section of the report
was supposed to draw the greatest attention, but it appears
most observers, especially the opposition parties, are more
than satisfied to attack the Liberal Government now. It also
appears that the Canadian people are not letting the PM off
the hook, at least not in the short term. A poll released
over the weekend conducted by the Strategic Counsel for the
Globe and Mail and CTV news showed the Conservatives ahead at
31 percent and the Liberals at 28 percent, with the NDP also
up to 20 percent and the Bloc steady at 12. (Polling data
from three weeks ago had the Liberals at 38, Conservatives at
25, and NDP at 17). Results in Ontario put the Conservatives
at 35, Liberals at 37, and NDP at 20, also a significant
slippage for the Liberals.
¶4. (SBU) Significantly, 60 percent of respondents do not
accept the findings that PM Martin was not involved, and 71
percent believe that Martin should be held accountable. Also
of interest, both parties are given equally low marks for
their ability to clean up the mess (20 percent each). But
regardless of how they feel about Liberal culpability for the
affair, 60 percent of respondents support the idea of waiting
until the 2d report is issued before going to the polls. It
would take a lot of scandal to get people here to support a
deep winter election.
DOES IT GET ANY BETTER THAN THIS?
---------------------------------
¶5. (SBU) What the opposition parties will do with this
scandal-driven traction is still an open question. According
to Strategic Counsel Chairman Allan Gregg, "the temptation to
defeat the government will be overwhelming, since the
opposition parties know that when the issue fades, their
fortunes will fade with it." Indeed there seems to be new
enthusiasm and some buzz coming from the Conservatives about
defeating the government, although just when and how to do so
is still under review.
¶6. (SBU) Stephen Harper has stated that he will not bring the
government down without the NDP on board, presumably because
he doesn't want to be painted as being in narrow coalition
with the separatist Bloc. He was in Montreal November 7
trying to convince Quebec federalists that the Conservatives
are a viable option for those who cannot stomach the Bloc.
This comes on the heels of a proposal November 4 for
improving government ethics -- a Federal Accountability Act
that would implement a series of measures to clean up the
ties between private money and lobbyists and politics. The
Bloc has said it does not want to see a winter election but
was otherwise quiet about its intentions until today.
NDP ASSUMES THE OPPOSITION HELM
-------------------------------
¶7. (SBU) The decision then rested with Jack Layton and the
NDP. In a speech November 7 Layton answered a letter from
Health Minister Dossanjh outlining the government's offer to
support the NDP health care position by saying that "what the
government is proposing is unacceptable." While stopping
short of stating how and when he would seek to bring the
government down, Layton said that he "does not believe there
are grounds to go forward" with the Liberals and "the life of
this Parliament is limited." He suggested that the Canadian
people should not have to wait for months to bring the
government to account for sponsorship. After the speech
Layton clarified that the NDP could not support the Liberals
in a confidence motion. Political Analyst Keith Boag said he
didn't see much room for future Liberal negotiations with
Layton over the issue, although some have suggested that it
may be a ploy to gain more leverage. This will be clear
within the next day or two.
¶8. (SBU) The Conservatives reacted cautiously to the
announcement (in part because Harper spoke without having
seen it), while the Bloc confirmed that if the other two
opposition parties got their act together to defeat the
Liberal government, his party would definitely not support
the Liberals. The issue now is when a confidence motion
could actually come to the floor. The Conservatives have an
Opposition Day on November 15 which has a no-confidence
motion waiting on the order paper. Harper had said he would
only go through with this if supported by the NDP. The Bloc
has its Opposition Day on the 17th and the NDP on the 24th.
But the Liberals have been conducting a filibuster of the
Commons process over a Bloc Quebecois mailing on the
Sponsorship program that could push back some or all of these
Opposition Days. The next key date will be December 8 when
there is vote on the spending supplemental which will be a
firm confidence vote.
TIMING IS EVERYTHING
--------------------
¶9. (SBU) All of the parties are trying in all of this to
avoid being responsible for bringing on an election in "deep
winter." The worst case would be responsibility for bringing
the election on during the Christmas season, but anything in
January would be only slightly less unpopular. It is,
however, quickly getting to the point where it will be
difficult for the opposition parties to maneuver to avoid a
crash by supporting the government as they did for a time in
the spring to avoid a summer election. If the NDP does not
walk back from today's gauntlet quickly, all three parties
will be on record as not supporting the government, and there
are no numbers games that could avert a fall in that case.
¶10. And even if the NDP were brought back in the fold, the
numbers are currently not in the government's favor. If
everyone votes (i.e. no illnesses), and the Independents
split 2-2, the Conservatives and Bloc have the votes to bring
down the government) The breakdown is:
Liberals 133 (minus the Speaker who only votes in a tie)
NDP 18
151
Conservatives 98 (three members are ill enough to
possibly miss a vote)
Bloc 54
152
Independents 4 (former Liberals Carloyn Parrish, David
Kilgour, and Pat O'Brien, and former NDP member Desjarlais;
in the last confidence vote Parrish and Desjarlais, the
latter still in the NDP, voted with the government, Kilgour
and O'Brien voted against)
Vacancy 1
CANADA'S NEW REALITY SHOW -- LIBERAL SURVIVOR
---------------------------------------------
¶11. (SBU) The Liberals will be scrambling over the coming
days to devise a survival strategy. Speaker Milliken
indicated to Ambassador that it would be possible using the
filibuster to avert the demise of the government; we
certainly saw in the last term that the Liberals have an
excellent capacity to manipulate the calendar. Finance
Minister Goodale is scheduled to give an annual economic
update on November 14 in which he is expected to highlight PM
Martin's current and future good stewardship of the economy
in what he calls a prosperity plan -- showing that the
Liberals have a viable strategy for the future by promoting
education and skills training, infrastructure, and research
and development. He could still include tax cuts and
spending as well. PM Martin has suggested, in what sounds a
bit desperate, that the country would not be well-served by a
government crash in the midst of its hosting of the climate
change conference. But it is difficult to see how they can
avoid the moment of truth over the
budget vote in early December, and if the NDP doesn't back
down fairly quickly and come back to the table, it is equally
difficult to see how it would endure.
U.S. INTERESTS
--------------
¶12. (SBU) For the U.S. this means simply that the Martin
government is far less stable and able to focus at the end of
the day November 7 than it was when at the start of the day.
It will for the near future be consumed with its own survival
and virtually incapable of pursuing ambitious or far-reaching
policies. Every initiative or change of policy course will
be vetted through the lens of political calculation. If
there is a campaign, all sides will need to keep a healthy
distance from the United States, and the Liberals and
Conservatives will also need to show the ability to work with
the U.S. on shared issues while standing up to the Yankees
during disputes. It is not clear whether issues like
softwood will be a direct campaign prop, but it has of late
faded into the background. Who could gain points from it
during a campaign is also not clear -- the Conservatives
could presumably beat up the Liberals for not having the kind
of relationship with the U.S. that would allow them to solve
such disputes, while the Liberals could try to show strength
by ratcheting up the rhetoric. But the campaign will be
fought over the single issue of simple government
accountability, and both sides will probably have their hands
full managing that one topic.
Visit Canada's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/ottawa
WILKINS