

Currently released so far... 12689 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ASEC
AR
AEMR
AMGT
AE
AU
AID
AORC
APER
AS
AM
AFIN
AMED
AJ
AGR
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
ABLD
AL
AA
APECO
AGAO
AY
AGMT
APEC
AINF
AG
ACS
AECL
AFFAIRS
ABUD
ASUP
ADANA
AADP
AMCHAMS
ARF
ASEAN
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
APCS
ADCO
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ADM
AN
AIT
BU
BR
BL
BO
BA
BB
BG
BM
BBSR
BH
BEXP
BK
BD
BTIO
BT
BE
BY
BF
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BILAT
BIDEN
BC
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CH
CG
CF
CU
CE
CVIS
CASC
CO
CS
CA
CIDA
CBW
CW
CMGT
CI
CODEL
CY
CPAS
CJAN
CD
CWC
CDG
CIA
CL
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CT
CR
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CFED
CV
CACS
CARSON
CLINTON
CN
CONS
CM
CAC
CIC
COPUOS
CDC
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EG
EZ
EUN
ECON
ETRD
ECPS
EFIN
ENRG
ETTC
EPET
EINV
EAID
EAIR
EWWT
EU
EAGR
EC
ELAB
EIND
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
EFIS
ELTN
ET
ECIN
EFTA
ES
EINT
EI
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
ELN
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
EXIM
ETRO
ENIV
ESA
ER
EK
EUR
EFINECONCS
EUMEM
EUREM
EPA
ERNG
ENERG
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
IS
IZ
IR
IC
IO
IN
ID
IGAD
IT
ILC
IAEA
ITU
ICAO
IMO
IBRD
IMF
ICJ
IAHRC
ITF
INRA
INRO
IWC
IQ
IV
ICRC
ICTY
INRB
IEFIN
ILO
ITRA
ITALY
IBET
ISRAELI
IL
INTELSAT
IRC
IDP
ICTR
IRAQI
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
IA
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
INDO
IDA
ISLAMISTS
KSPR
KNNP
KWBG
KAWK
KISL
KPAO
KN
KS
KIPR
KCRM
KDEM
KIRF
KJUS
KHLS
KSCA
KOMC
KAWC
KV
KFRD
KWMN
KTIP
KPWR
KSUM
KGHG
KTIA
KTFN
KIRC
KCOR
KACT
KMDR
KGIC
KOLY
KUNR
KIDE
KMPI
KPKO
KCFE
KVPR
KRAD
KPAL
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KTEX
KTDB
KFSC
KZ
KSEP
KFLU
KE
KU
KPLS
KRVC
KRIM
KSTH
KG
KFLO
KPOA
KICC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KBCT
KSAF
KMOC
KDRG
KBIO
KREC
KSTC
KVRP
KBTR
KMIG
KENV
KNSD
KCGC
KWAC
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KWMM
KPRP
KNEI
KPAI
KO
KVIR
KX
KMCA
KCRS
KMFO
KID
KCIP
KNAR
KR
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KHDP
KFIN
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KHIV
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KTER
KRCM
KCFC
KSAC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KCOM
KLIG
KDEMAF
KAID
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KOMS
KHSA
MPOS
MOPS
MARR
MTCR
MNUC
MASS
MX
MCAP
MAR
MTRE
MASC
MK
MG
MTCRE
MI
MD
MA
MO
MY
MU
ML
MRCRE
MAS
MEDIA
MC
MR
MIL
MW
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MT
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MEPP
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
NATO
NG
NL
NZ
NT
NW
NO
NU
NS
NPT
NASA
NI
NK
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NP
NATIONAL
NSSP
NSF
NA
NGO
NV
NR
NDP
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NEW
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NPG
NSC
NPA
NSFO
OPDC
OPRC
OEXC
OTRA
ODIP
OIIP
OVIP
OPIC
OPCW
OAS
OREP
OSCE
OSCI
OES
OFDP
OECD
OCS
OIC
OPAD
OVP
OHUM
OFFICIALS
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OBSP
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PTER
PHUM
PK
PREF
PM
PHSA
PA
PINS
PE
PBTS
PCI
PO
PL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PGIV
PROP
PP
PBIO
POL
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
PBT
PMIL
POV
PTBS
PG
POSTS
PALESTINIAN
PROV
PNAT
PINF
PRL
PAS
PDOV
PRAM
PREO
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PAO
PREFA
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PGOC
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RW
REACTION
RCMP
RSO
RO
RP
ROOD
RM
ROBERT
RICE
REGION
RSP
RF
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
RFE
REPORT
SY
SP
SOCI
SMIG
SNAR
SCUL
SC
SU
SO
SI
SENV
SZ
SW
SA
SR
SF
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SEN
SG
SYR
SWE
SK
SH
SNARCS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SCRS
SYRIA
SL
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SANC
SHI
SHUM
SIPRS
TSPA
TSPL
TU
TBIO
TRGY
TPHY
TS
TP
TW
TBID
TI
TF
TZ
TD
TT
TN
TNGD
TC
TX
TH
TL
TIP
THPY
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TINT
TFIN
TAGS
TR
US
UNSC
UNGA
UK
UP
UNCHC
UN
UNMIK
UNCSD
UY
USTR
USOAS
UNHRC
UNFCYP
UG
UNAUS
UNESCO
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
USUN
UZ
USNC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNEP
USEU
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNDP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
UNDC
UNICEF
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09SANJOSE256, EU/CENTAM FTA MARKETED AS A "COOPERATION" ACCORD, BUT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09SANJOSE256.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09SANJOSE256 | 2009-03-31 13:00 | 2011-03-14 19:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy San Jose |
Appears in these articles: http://www.nacion.com/CustomerFiles/nacioncom/Generales/Subsitios/Investigacion/2011/WikiLeaks/bin-debug/ZoomWiki.html http://www.nacion.com/2011-03-13/Investigacion/NotasDestacadas/Investigacion2709043.aspx |
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0256/01 0901300
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 311300Z MAR 09
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0696
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000256
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR WHA/CEN; WHA/PPC; WHA/EPSC; EEB/TPP; EUR and H
PLEASE PASS TO USTR FOR DOLIVER AND AMALITO
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECON PGOV PREL CS EUN
SUBJECT: EU/CENTAM FTA MARKETED AS A "COOPERATION" ACCORD, BUT
DOUBTS PERSIST IN COSTA RICA
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY. On March 2, the Costa Rican Ministries of Foreign
Affairs (MFA) and Foreign Commerce (COMEX) hosted a seminar on the
Agreement of Association between Central America and the European
Union (Spanish acronym, AACUE). Cabinet ministers and other
speakers touted the AACUE as a welcome departure from "other trade
agreements" negotiated in the region (read: CAFTA-DR). Speakers
emphasized the AACUE's focus on "cooperation" and "political
dialogue" and lauded EU aid commitments embedded in the agreement.
Privately, however, some GOCR contacts seem less impressed. The
Costa Rican Ambassador to the EU opined that the AACUE's focus on
"dialogue" and "feedback" is just "marketing." Other contacts
question whether the EU will come through on the 34 million Euros in
aid earmarked for Costa Rica, and worry about strings that may be
attached. END SUMMARY.
--------------------------------
GOOD VIBRATIONS AND HIGH PRAISES
--------------------------------
¶2. (U) COMEX Minister Marco Vinicio Ruiz opened the conference with
a theme that would be repeated by each speaker: The AACUE is more
than a trade agreement; its goal is the overall well-being of the
Central American region. He noted that the AACUE's three pillars -
commerce, cooperation, and political dialogue - set it apart from
other trade agreements to which Costa Rica has recently been a party
(a clear, if unstated, reference to CAFTA-DR).
¶3. (U) Minister of Planning Roberto Gallardo went further in
contrasting the AACUE and CAFTA. Unlike "other trade agreements,"
Gallardo noted, "the AACUE expressly focuses on cooperation and
dialogue." Gallardo stated that this approach makes sense given
Costa Rica's and Europe's social and political affinities. He
reminded the audience that, while the "superpowers were using the
nations of Central America as pawns," the EU supported the Central
American peace plan proposed by Costa Rican President Oscar Arias.
Because of this, Gallardo said, "no one is protesting in the
streets" over the AACUE. Gallardo welcomed the AACUE as a chance
for "the EU to return to political influence in the region."
¶4. (U) In a similar vein, Roberto Echandi, Costa Rican Ambassador to
the EU and lead AACUE negotiator, emphasized that the AACUE will
allow broader sections of society to have a voice. In addition to
traditional administration-level trade talks, the AACUE contemplates
an "inter-parliamentary commission," formed under the auspices of
PARLACEN, and a "civil society commission," drawn from the labor,
business, and NGO sectors. These commissions will give feedback on
the implementation process and conduct dialogue with counterpart
groups on the EU side. Echandi also unveiled a website through
which private citizens can comment on or suggest development
projects. (http://www.aacue.go.cr/).
---------------------
PROCESS VS. MARKETING
---------------------
¶5. (SBU) On the margins of the conference, Ambassador Echandi said
these dialogue groups will have no real role in negotiating or
implementing the AACUE. Rather, they are an opportunity for
interested parties to gather, comment, and feel like they are "part
of the process." Echandi candidly described these mechanisms as
"marketing."
---------------------------------------------
THE MUCH ANTICIPATED EU COOPERATIVE BANDWAGON
---------------------------------------------
¶6. (U) Ambassador Echandi also focused on the "cooperation" prong of
the AACUE. He announced that the EU is pledging 34 million Euros to
Costa Rica for development projects through 2013. Part of this
money, Echandi said, will be provided "on demand," meaning Costa
Rica will be able to use it "without regard to the priorities of the
donor." Echandi listed several projects already in the pipeline,
including programs to assist Costa Rican producers to reach EU
quality control and sanitation standards; education projects;
programs to encourage women-owned businesses; and community policing
and other "bottom up" security plans.
--------------------------------------------- ------
BUT THE COOPERATIVE BANDWAGON MAY HAVE AN EU DRIVER
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶7. (U) Speakers from the EU brought a measure of realism to the
seminar. Estefano Sannino, Director for Central American Relations
at the EU, emphasized the complexity of the AACUE negotiations. He
said "the last issues will be the most difficult" but hoped to
complete the next round of negotiations by the end of March.
Christina Martins, lead negotiator for the EU, reminded the audience
that the EU considers Costa Rica a "middle income" country which
will not receive the same level of aid as others in the region. She
also cast doubt on Ambassador Echandi's statement regarding "on
demand" funding. Martin mentioned that, while recipient countries
will propose development projects, such projects will be reviewed by
the EU and "jointly planned" by the EU and the recipient country.
--------------------------------------------- -
SKEPTICISM REGARDING THE COOPERATIVE BANDWAGON
--------------------------------------------- -
¶8. (SBU) Several days after the conference, we asked a key
senior-level contact at COMEX about the prospective cooperative
assistance under the AACUE, specifically the 34 million Euro
commitment. The contact doubted whether the EU would actually make
that amount available and believed that, at a minimum, it would be
tied to various controls, benchmarks, and reporting requirements.
Our source went further, questioning the EU's motives for promising
the assistance. In an interesting contrast to the "anti-CAFTA" tone
of the seminar, the contact recognized that CAFTA-DR actually
cleared the way for the AACUE to proceed.
¶9. (SBU) We heard similar comments from a contact at Chemonics, a
USAID contractor working on trade capacity building (TCB) issues in
Costa Rica. This contact also questioned the EU's promised level of
assistance and the EU's motives. The contact maintained that EU
assistance is more appropriate for less developed countries. The
contact also reported an exchange with a Costa Rican colleague who
asked, "Does the EU think that we are in diapers?"
------------------------------------------
ONTO THE 7TH ROUND. . .WITH LITTLE DETAILS
------------------------------------------
¶10. (U) The seminar provided few details about the progress of
substantive negotiations. Costa Rican Foreign Minister Bruno Stagno
stated that Costa Rica hopes to complete negotiations by May 2009,
to allow six months for legal review, and to present the texts for
ratification at the beginning of the Spanish presidency of the EU in
¶2010. (This timing would also nicely cap President Oscar Arias'
term in office, which ends May 1, 2010.) Minister Ruiz stated that
the sixth round of negotiations has now been completed, and that a
seventh round will soon begin in Tegucigalpa.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶11. (SBU) The notably high-powered seminar appears to be part of a
strategy to portray the AACUE as a "kinder, gentler" trade
agreement, as distinguished from CAFTA. The seminar focused almost
entirely on the "cooperation" and "dialogue" aspects of the deal and
ignored the status of substantive trade issues. The GOCR no doubt
wants to avoid a repeat of the protracted and contentious domestic
political debate provoked by CAFTA (and to clear the way for the
next potentially controversial FTA, with China). The risk will be
if the ministers (and the public) believe the "marketing campaign"
promoting the AACUE.
¶12. (SBU) The private, more candid comments by the GOCR and
Chemonics interlocutors remind us that all is not rosy between Costa
Rica and Europe. Tough trade issues remain, as would be expected in
a comprehensive agreement like this, and a notable level of distrust
exists on the Costa Rican side, specifically within the GOCR
negotiation team. Despite these behind-the-scenes realities, the
seminar successfully conveyed to the public and the media the
perception of the AACUE as inclusive and collaborative. A lesson
learned for the USG (which we are applying here) is to "market"
CAFTA-DR in a more comprehensive manner, emphasizing the
collaborative nature of the Agreement, its shared benefits to all
member countries, and the "inclusive" aspects of our CAFTA trade
capacity building assistance for Costa Rica and the region.
CIANCHETTE