

Currently released so far... 12689 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ASEC
AR
AEMR
AMGT
AE
AU
AID
AORC
APER
AS
AM
AFIN
AMED
AJ
AGR
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
ABLD
AL
AA
APECO
AGAO
AY
AGMT
APEC
AINF
AG
ACS
AECL
AFFAIRS
ABUD
ASUP
ADANA
AADP
AMCHAMS
ARF
ASEAN
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
APCS
ADCO
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ADM
AN
AIT
BU
BR
BL
BO
BA
BB
BG
BM
BBSR
BH
BEXP
BK
BD
BTIO
BT
BE
BY
BF
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BILAT
BIDEN
BC
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CH
CG
CF
CU
CE
CVIS
CASC
CO
CS
CA
CIDA
CBW
CW
CMGT
CI
CODEL
CY
CPAS
CJAN
CD
CWC
CDG
CIA
CL
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CT
CR
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CFED
CV
CACS
CARSON
CLINTON
CN
CONS
CM
CAC
CIC
COPUOS
CDC
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EG
EZ
EUN
ECON
ETRD
ECPS
EFIN
ENRG
ETTC
EPET
EINV
EAID
EAIR
EWWT
EU
EAGR
EC
ELAB
EIND
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
EFIS
ELTN
ET
ECIN
EFTA
ES
EINT
EI
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
ELN
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
EXIM
ETRO
ENIV
ESA
ER
EK
EUR
EFINECONCS
EUMEM
EUREM
EPA
ERNG
ENERG
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
IS
IZ
IR
IC
IO
IN
ID
IGAD
IT
ILC
IAEA
ITU
ICAO
IMO
IBRD
IMF
ICJ
IAHRC
ITF
INRA
INRO
IWC
IQ
IV
ICRC
ICTY
INRB
IEFIN
ILO
ITRA
ITALY
IBET
ISRAELI
IL
INTELSAT
IRC
IDP
ICTR
IRAQI
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
IA
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
INDO
IDA
ISLAMISTS
KSPR
KNNP
KWBG
KAWK
KISL
KPAO
KN
KS
KIPR
KCRM
KDEM
KIRF
KJUS
KHLS
KSCA
KOMC
KAWC
KV
KFRD
KWMN
KTIP
KPWR
KSUM
KGHG
KTIA
KTFN
KIRC
KCOR
KACT
KMDR
KGIC
KOLY
KUNR
KIDE
KMPI
KPKO
KCFE
KVPR
KRAD
KPAL
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KTEX
KTDB
KFSC
KZ
KSEP
KFLU
KE
KU
KPLS
KRVC
KRIM
KSTH
KG
KFLO
KPOA
KICC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KBCT
KSAF
KMOC
KDRG
KBIO
KREC
KSTC
KVRP
KBTR
KMIG
KENV
KNSD
KCGC
KWAC
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KWMM
KPRP
KNEI
KPAI
KO
KVIR
KX
KMCA
KCRS
KMFO
KID
KCIP
KNAR
KR
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KHDP
KFIN
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KHIV
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KTER
KRCM
KCFC
KSAC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KCOM
KLIG
KDEMAF
KAID
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KOMS
KHSA
MPOS
MOPS
MARR
MTCR
MNUC
MASS
MX
MCAP
MAR
MTRE
MASC
MK
MG
MTCRE
MI
MD
MA
MO
MY
MU
ML
MRCRE
MAS
MEDIA
MC
MR
MIL
MW
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MT
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MEPP
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
NATO
NG
NL
NZ
NT
NW
NO
NU
NS
NPT
NASA
NI
NK
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NP
NATIONAL
NSSP
NSF
NA
NGO
NV
NR
NDP
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NEW
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NPG
NSC
NPA
NSFO
OPDC
OPRC
OEXC
OTRA
ODIP
OIIP
OVIP
OPIC
OPCW
OAS
OREP
OSCE
OSCI
OES
OFDP
OECD
OCS
OIC
OPAD
OVP
OHUM
OFFICIALS
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OBSP
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PTER
PHUM
PK
PREF
PM
PHSA
PA
PINS
PE
PBTS
PCI
PO
PL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PGIV
PROP
PP
PBIO
POL
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
PBT
PMIL
POV
PTBS
PG
POSTS
PALESTINIAN
PROV
PNAT
PINF
PRL
PAS
PDOV
PRAM
PREO
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PAO
PREFA
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PGOC
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RW
REACTION
RCMP
RSO
RO
RP
ROOD
RM
ROBERT
RICE
REGION
RSP
RF
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
RFE
REPORT
SY
SP
SOCI
SMIG
SNAR
SCUL
SC
SU
SO
SI
SENV
SZ
SW
SA
SR
SF
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SEN
SG
SYR
SWE
SK
SH
SNARCS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SCRS
SYRIA
SL
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SANC
SHI
SHUM
SIPRS
TSPA
TSPL
TU
TBIO
TRGY
TPHY
TS
TP
TW
TBID
TI
TF
TZ
TD
TT
TN
TNGD
TC
TX
TH
TL
TIP
THPY
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TINT
TFIN
TAGS
TR
US
UNSC
UNGA
UK
UP
UNCHC
UN
UNMIK
UNCSD
UY
USTR
USOAS
UNHRC
UNFCYP
UG
UNAUS
UNESCO
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
USUN
UZ
USNC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNEP
USEU
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNDP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
UNDC
UNICEF
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09WELLINGTON102, NEW ZEALAND'S $1.5NZ BILLION BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09WELLINGTON102.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09WELLINGTON102 | 2009-04-22 03:03 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO5667
RR RUEHAG RUEHCHI RUEHDF RUEHFK RUEHHM RUEHIK RUEHKSO RUEHLZ RUEHNAG
RUEHPB RUEHRN RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHWL #0102/01 1120303
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 220303Z APR 09
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5840
INFO RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 1953
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 5497
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0832
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC 0297
RUEAFCC/FCC WASHINGTON DC
RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE
RUEHZU/ASIAN PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION
RUEHSS/OECD POSTS COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000102
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EAP/ANP, EEB/CIP/BA FOR TIM FINTON, AND DOC/ITA/OTEC FOR
ANDREW BENNETT
STATE PASS TO FCC ROBERT TANNER
STATE PASS TO NTIA
STATE PASS TO PACOM FOR J01E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECPS ECON NZ
SUBJECT: NEW ZEALAND'S $1.5NZ BILLION BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT
INITIATIVE
Ref: State 27310
WELLINGTON 00000102 001.2 OF 003
¶1. (SBU) Summary. In March, Communications and Information
Technology Minister Steven Joyce unveiled plans for GNZ to offer up
to NZ$1.5 billion for building high-speed broadband infrastructure
to cover seventy-five percent of New Zealand. A Crown-owned
investment company is expected, along with private sector partners,
to invest a total of NZ$3 billion into "regional fiber companies"
which will install fiber-optic networks throughout New Zealand's top
25 most densely populated cities and towns. The effort is part of
the government's attempt to marry an overall fiscal stimulus package
with investment in new technology to produce long-range economic and
commercial benefits. The GNZ admits that there are challenges for
the success of the initiative and the Labour opposition has already
slammed the plan as a waste of tax payer money. End Summary.
GNZ to Invest NZ$1.5 Billion in Broadband
-----------------------------------------
¶2. (U) At the end of March, Communications and Information
Technology Minister Steven Joyce unveiled plans to create a
Crown-owned investment company known as the "Crown Fibre Investment
Co" (CFIC) with a mandate to invest up to NZ$1.5 billion of
government funds for building high-speed broadband infrastructure
throughout New Zealand. CFIC will, alongside private sector
investors, put money into "regional fiber companies" that will
install fiber-optic networks in 25 New Zealand towns and cities.
¶3. (U) The effort comes as part of the government's attempt to
marry an overall fiscal stimulus package with investment in new
technology which it hopes will generate long-range economic and
commercial benefits. The new company's goal is to boost broadband
speeds to 100 megabits per second - more than 50 times faster than
speeds currently available - by connecting fiber-optic cables to
homes and businesses. The money will be dispersed via private
companies on a regional basis in a series of "Public-Private
Partnerships." A feasibility study commissioned by the NZ Treasury
and conducted by Milner Consulting Ltd. projects that total fixed
investment (infrastructure costs) required to connect seventy-five
percent of urban New Zealand is expected to range between NZ$2.6 and
NZ$3.3 billion.
Seventy-five Percent of New Zealand to be Connected
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶4. (U) The 25 (initial) centers identified are based on population
and range from Auckland, with 1.2 million people, to Oamaru, with
population of 12,681. Once finished, the GNZ hopes this investment
model "will deliver on the government's commitment of ultra fast
broadband to 75 percent of New Zealanders where they live, work and
study over the next ten years," said Joyce. Those towns or rural
areas outside this initial group would eventually get "improved"
internet services but that would occur in the second phase of the
initiative. The more remote regions could expect eventual upgrades
to broadband but they would not have the fiber enabling the
ultra-fast broadband, said Joyce.
Commerce Commission Report on Current NZ Broadband
--------------------------------------------- -----
¶5. (U) Apart from the CFIC initiative, the New Zealand Commerce
Commission's latest report claims that the quality of current
broadband services improved greatly by end of 2008. The Commerce
Commission released its report just days after the government
announced the CFIC initiative. The report, drafted by IDC
Consultants and Epitiro (consulting firms contracted by Commerce
Commission), claims that Telecom, TelstraClear DSL, Vodafone, Orcon
and Slingshot (firms with the largest share of the current NZ
internet market) have boosted their broadband scores by between 99
percent and 166 percent over the course of 2008. Most of this was
due to investment in their current networks and additional
improvements stemmed from the inclusion of ADSL2+ technology
(Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line - a data communications
technology that enables faster data transmission over copper
telephone lines).
WELLINGTON 00000102 002.2 OF 003
¶6. (U) As of June 2008, New Zealand ranked 19 out of 30 OECD
countries in terms of numbers of broadband connections, with about
20 broadband subscribers per 100 of population. Total broadband
connections, including fixed and wireless connections, had reached
915,000 by December 31, 2008. The overall quality of broadband
services has also improved, with major internet service providers
investing in extra network capacity. Nearly 60 per cent of digital
subscriber line (DSL) connections had now been upgraded to the newer
and faster ADSL2+.
Likely Investors Reviewing GNZ Proposal
---------------------------------------
¶7. (U) An internal report (Castalia consultants) commissioned by
the three largest telecommunications firms in NZ - Telecom, Vodafone
and TelstraClear - said their own investment plans would deliver
broadband speeds adequate for the needs of everyday internet users
without the need for a boost from the Government. Castalia
challenged the belief that high broadband speeds for households - up
to 50 times faster than what is presently available - would deliver
significant economic benefits.
¶8. (U) Telecom (largest NZ telecommunication firm) has set up an
internal "think tank" to formulate its response to the Government's
NZ$1.5 billion plan. Sources suggest there is still internal debate
within Telecom about the implications of the government plan.
"Telecom will be reviewing the opportunities the initiative presents
to work with the proposed CFIC to extend the reach of Telecom's own
ultra-fast broadband network, and to utilize the fiber networks
others may build," said chief executive Paul Reynolds. Reynolds
further opined that Telecom "looked forward to working with
government funding to complement the government's plans to take fast
broadband even further, including to those areas that currently are
not commercially viable." Telecom's current share of the retail
broadband market has slipped to 57 percent, down from 61 per cent in
¶2007.
¶9. (U) In addition to the traditional telecommunication firms
considering the CFIC's offer, Auckland-based Vector Energy is also
likely to be a prime candidate to join up with the new investment
company CFIC in rolling out fiber optic cables to homes and
businesses. Vector currently has 500km of fiber optic network laid
in Auckland's business districts and is expanding that network by an
extra 300km as part of an agreement with Vodafone.
Endorsements
------------
¶10. (U) Much of the GNZ's current CFIC plan was based on a March
2008 study by the Auckland-based New Zealand Institute entitled,
"Assessing New Zealand's Current Broadband Path: The Need for
Change." The NZ Institute concluded that the current state of NZ
broadband was insufficient. The NZ Institute maintained that the
announced investment by the major telecoms would not take NZ far
enough fast enough. Despite the dominant investor (Telecom) making
significant investments in fiber-optic, it had insufficient
commercial incentive to roll it out rapidly. Finally, the longer NZ
took to roll out its fiber-optic upgrade, the more costly it would
become thus shutting out all but the major urban centers.
¶11. (U) CFIC's plans have been favorably welcomed by the
Telecommunications Users Association, TUANZ. "The Minister's paper
is at the top end of our expectations," said TUANZ's chief executive
Ernie Newman. "It sets out a clear structure for the proposed
partnerships, and will give potential partners in the private sector
all the information they need to come up with regionally-based
proposals." Newman said the plan appeared to be "sector-neutral" -
meaning it opened the way for a wide range of potential co-investors
including telecommunications companies, power line companies, or
regional groupings. This was important, said Newman, as a greater
diversity of investors were "showing their hands and broadening the
range of innovative, cost-effective solutions."
Criticism of the Plan
---------------------
WELLINGTON 00000102 003.2 OF 003
¶12. (U) Labour Party's Finance spokesman David Cunliffe accused the
Government of "performing a NZ$1.5 billion back flip." He said the
scheme largely mirrored the approach of Labour's NZ$325 million
Broadband Investment Fund (BIF), which the Government scrapped, but
was more wasteful of taxpayers' dollars. Minister Joyce responded,
saying the Government's plan differed from Labour's in three key
respects: its sheer size, the Government's investment in fiber
providers instead of handing out subsidies, and its focus on fiber
to the home, rather than a mix of other technologies such as
wireless and/or satellite broadband.
¶13. (U) The Government conceded that there was a risk that private
investors might not come forward with their share of the NZ$3
billion, that this might not be enough to provide the desired
network coverage, and that local fiber companies might fail. Laws
might be changed to make it easier for contractors to string cables
on power and telephone poles, and to lay fiber in "micro-trenches"
cut in roads. Tim Davin, policy manager at the Institute for
Professional Engineers, said 25,000 kilometers of cabling would be
needed. New Zealand did not have enough trained engineers to build
the network, but some could be brought in from overseas, he said.
Comment
-------
¶14. (SBU) Despite the contested nature of the high-speed broadband
debate, most seem to agree that the best way forward for NZ is
through the Government's proposed collaborative approach. There are
a number of technical issues yet to be worked through and engaging
with the country's major telecoms will help the GNZ to form a
clearer roadmap towards developing an effective plan for the
proposed NZ$1.5 billion in spending. The GNZ's commitment to invest
in New Zealand's broadband infrastructure clearly demonstrates the
importance the National-led government attaches to state-of-the art
information and communication technologies (ICT) as an enabler of
business and a driver of international competitiveness. To date,
too much of the broadband debate in NZ has focused on the "last
mile" of infrastructure and centered on broadband access alone.
Faster broadband will eventually encourage developments in areas
such as eHealth (real time remote healthcare monitoring and
diagnosis) and education through improved research and
communications technologies and enhanced distance learning - all of
which were National Party campaign promises. End Comment.
KEEGAN