

Currently released so far... 12689 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ASEC
AR
AEMR
AMGT
AE
AU
AID
AORC
APER
AS
AM
AFIN
AMED
AJ
AGR
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
ABLD
AL
AA
APECO
AGAO
AY
AGMT
APEC
AINF
AG
ACS
AECL
AFFAIRS
ABUD
ASUP
ADANA
AADP
AMCHAMS
ARF
ASEAN
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
APCS
ADCO
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ADM
AN
AIT
BU
BR
BL
BO
BA
BB
BG
BM
BBSR
BH
BEXP
BK
BD
BTIO
BT
BE
BY
BF
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BILAT
BIDEN
BC
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CH
CG
CF
CU
CE
CVIS
CASC
CO
CS
CA
CIDA
CBW
CW
CMGT
CI
CODEL
CY
CPAS
CJAN
CD
CWC
CDG
CIA
CL
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CT
CR
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CFED
CV
CACS
CARSON
CLINTON
CN
CONS
CM
CAC
CIC
COPUOS
CDC
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EG
EZ
EUN
ECON
ETRD
ECPS
EFIN
ENRG
ETTC
EPET
EINV
EAID
EAIR
EWWT
EU
EAGR
EC
ELAB
EIND
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
EFIS
ELTN
ET
ECIN
EFTA
ES
EINT
EI
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
ELN
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
EXIM
ETRO
ENIV
ESA
ER
EK
EUR
EFINECONCS
EUMEM
EUREM
EPA
ERNG
ENERG
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
IS
IZ
IR
IC
IO
IN
ID
IGAD
IT
ILC
IAEA
ITU
ICAO
IMO
IBRD
IMF
ICJ
IAHRC
ITF
INRA
INRO
IWC
IQ
IV
ICRC
ICTY
INRB
IEFIN
ILO
ITRA
ITALY
IBET
ISRAELI
IL
INTELSAT
IRC
IDP
ICTR
IRAQI
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
IA
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
INDO
IDA
ISLAMISTS
KSPR
KNNP
KWBG
KAWK
KISL
KPAO
KN
KS
KIPR
KCRM
KDEM
KIRF
KJUS
KHLS
KSCA
KOMC
KAWC
KV
KFRD
KWMN
KTIP
KPWR
KSUM
KGHG
KTIA
KTFN
KIRC
KCOR
KACT
KMDR
KGIC
KOLY
KUNR
KIDE
KMPI
KPKO
KCFE
KVPR
KRAD
KPAL
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KTEX
KTDB
KFSC
KZ
KSEP
KFLU
KE
KU
KPLS
KRVC
KRIM
KSTH
KG
KFLO
KPOA
KICC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KBCT
KSAF
KMOC
KDRG
KBIO
KREC
KSTC
KVRP
KBTR
KMIG
KENV
KNSD
KCGC
KWAC
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KWMM
KPRP
KNEI
KPAI
KO
KVIR
KX
KMCA
KCRS
KMFO
KID
KCIP
KNAR
KR
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KHDP
KFIN
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KHIV
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KTER
KRCM
KCFC
KSAC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KCOM
KLIG
KDEMAF
KAID
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KOMS
KHSA
MPOS
MOPS
MARR
MTCR
MNUC
MASS
MX
MCAP
MAR
MTRE
MASC
MK
MG
MTCRE
MI
MD
MA
MO
MY
MU
ML
MRCRE
MAS
MEDIA
MC
MR
MIL
MW
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MT
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MEPP
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
NATO
NG
NL
NZ
NT
NW
NO
NU
NS
NPT
NASA
NI
NK
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NP
NATIONAL
NSSP
NSF
NA
NGO
NV
NR
NDP
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NEW
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NPG
NSC
NPA
NSFO
OPDC
OPRC
OEXC
OTRA
ODIP
OIIP
OVIP
OPIC
OPCW
OAS
OREP
OSCE
OSCI
OES
OFDP
OECD
OCS
OIC
OPAD
OVP
OHUM
OFFICIALS
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OBSP
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PTER
PHUM
PK
PREF
PM
PHSA
PA
PINS
PE
PBTS
PCI
PO
PL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PGIV
PROP
PP
PBIO
POL
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
PBT
PMIL
POV
PTBS
PG
POSTS
PALESTINIAN
PROV
PNAT
PINF
PRL
PAS
PDOV
PRAM
PREO
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PAO
PREFA
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PGOC
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RW
REACTION
RCMP
RSO
RO
RP
ROOD
RM
ROBERT
RICE
REGION
RSP
RF
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
RFE
REPORT
SY
SP
SOCI
SMIG
SNAR
SCUL
SC
SU
SO
SI
SENV
SZ
SW
SA
SR
SF
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SEN
SG
SYR
SWE
SK
SH
SNARCS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SCRS
SYRIA
SL
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SANC
SHI
SHUM
SIPRS
TSPA
TSPL
TU
TBIO
TRGY
TPHY
TS
TP
TW
TBID
TI
TF
TZ
TD
TT
TN
TNGD
TC
TX
TH
TL
TIP
THPY
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TINT
TFIN
TAGS
TR
US
UNSC
UNGA
UK
UP
UNCHC
UN
UNMIK
UNCSD
UY
USTR
USOAS
UNHRC
UNFCYP
UG
UNAUS
UNESCO
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
USUN
UZ
USNC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNEP
USEU
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNDP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
UNDC
UNICEF
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08WELLINGTON310, NZ DEFENSE REPORT REVEALS SHORTCOMINGS, CREATES DEBATE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08WELLINGTON310.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08WELLINGTON310 | 2008-09-19 07:22 | 2011-04-28 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Wellington |
VZCZCXRO6501
RR RUEHDT RUEHPB
DE RUEHWL #0310/01 2630722
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 190722Z SEP 08
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5439
INFO RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 1744
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 5264
RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 0722
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RUCNARF/ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE
RUEHPB/AMEMBASSY PORT MORESBY 0758
RUEHBUL/AMEMBASSY KABUL 0064
RUEHDT/AMEMBASSY DILI 0034
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 WELLINGTON 000310
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR STATE FOR EAP/ANP
PACOM FOR J01E/J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV MARR EFIN NZ
SUBJECT: NZ DEFENSE REPORT REVEALS SHORTCOMINGS, CREATES DEBATE
WELLINGTON 00000310 001.2 OF 003
¶1. (SBU) Summary. The publication of the 2008 New Zealand Defense
Force (NZDF) Annual Report created recent media controversy as it
revealed shortfalls in the country's military preparedness. The NZ
Defense Chief and Defense Minister defended the status of the NZ
military. A subsequent report reinforced concerns that the NZDF faced
serious manpower, procurement and capacity challenges. The opposition
National Party tried (without success) to gain political advantage out
of the reports but defense issues do not factor into the November 8
election for the majority of the general public. End Summary.
New Zealand Defense Force Release Status Report
--------------------------------------------- --
¶2. (SBU) The GNZ released the 2008 New Zealand Defense Force (NZDF)
Annual Report on September 3, which quickly prompted questions about
the state of the country's military preparedness. The New Zealand
Ministry of Defense-generated report revealed that the NZDF is
currently ill-prepared to perform any mission beyond a low-level
confrontation and faces numerous personnel, equipment and capacity
challenges across the services. One major newspaper used broadsheet
style banner headlines to sum up the NZDF's state of readiness: "Can't
Sail, Can't Fly, Can't Fight."
Problems Facing All Services
----------------------------
¶3. (U) According to the report, all three services of the NZDF - Army,
Navy and Air Force - are facing challenges. For the Army, the report
stated that land forces were only "partially" prepared for low-level
conflicts, and it was not equipped to meet higher threats. The report
further stated that "deficiencies in command and control, firepower,
and compatible protection and mobility for combat service support
elements would impair effectiveness in conventional military
operations, and the more challenging peace support operations."
¶4. (U) The Air Force was reported as having "insufficient personnel" to
meet air and ground crew levels and being only "partially prepared" for
complex maritime air operations. It was also revealed that essential
air transport and helicopter assets were restricted by technical
problems or crew shortages. The report stated that few of the Navy's
ships managed to get to sea as much as planned due to both a lack of
personnel and "equipment and capability issues." The Navy also did not
receive two offshore patrol vessels and four inshore patrol vessels
during the year in question, when these had been expected.
¶5. (U) The report stated that NZ's Special Operations Forces are
"maintained at a high state of readiness in order to meet short notice
special operations in support of land combat operations,
counter-terrorist operations, and the disposal of improvised explosive
devices." However, it conceded that their ability to contribute beyond
current operations is "very limited."
Another Negative Report follows Annual Report
---------------------------------------------
¶6. (SBU) A subsequent report only served to buttress the perception
that the NZDF has considerable equipment and staffing issues. The
Ministry of Defense and the NZDF commissioned John Coles, formally
Chief Executive of the UK Ministry of Defense's Warship Support Agency,
to independently review the acquisition and introduction into service
of the HMNZS Canterbury, the New Zealand Navy's recently acquired yet
troubled multi-role ship. The subsequent Coles Report revealed that an
extra NZD 20 million funding is needed to address vessel safety issues
and make it seaworthy. The report found no fault with Ministry of
Defense procurement officials for purchasing a NZD 177 million ship
vessel. Nonetheless, the Ministry's former Acquisition Chief Bruce
Green, who was involved in the original procurement of the vessel,
criticized the Canterbury's crew whose inexperience with multi-role
ship, he argued, directly led to the subsequent damage to the ship in
heavy seas. The report identified a number of material and training
shortcomings, but judged that there is no correlation between the death
of a crew member on October 5 2007 - during a maneuver at sea to deploy
a rigid hull inflatable boat - and the intrinsic safety of vessel.
Defense Chief says Standards not Compromised
--------------------------------------------
¶7. (SBU) In the 2008 Annual Report, Defense Force Chief Lieutenant
General Jerry Mataparae acknowledged the high staff attrition rate -
more than 15 per cent - and the loss of trained staff to the civilian
sector. However, he noted that the New Zealand Military maintains high
WELLINGTON 00000310 002.2 OF 003
standards at home and abroad despite the struggle to retain staff.
Mataparae said in the report that new equipment and new employment
strategies would help with the problems.
Defense Minister Endorse State of NZ Military
---------------------------------------------
¶8. (SBU) Defense Minister Phil Goff defended the state of the NZDF and
expressed confidence in its ability to carry out its mission. Goff
noted that armed forces worldwide face a challenge to attract and
retain staff and yet New Zealand's total number of defense force
personnel was at its highest level in seven years. He said that
despite the challenges currently facing the armed forces the reputation
of the NZDF remains high and noted that the company operating in Bamian
province is regarded as the "the best PRT in Afghanistan." Goff
asserted that any claim that the NZDF is not fit for combat on the
basis on the 2008 Annual report is without foundation.
Labour-led Government Committed to Building up NZDF
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶9. (SBU) When Helen Clark's Labour Party defeated the then National
Government in 1999, the NZDF was largely under-funded and beset by
chronic staff loss and obsolete equipment. The incoming Labour-led
government committed itself to build and maintain a modern, well
trained, well equipped defense force. Goff argued that 2008 Annual
Report was a progress report on rebuilding and modernising the NZDF
from a similar 1999 status report which underscored the sorry state of
the defense force at the time. Goff stressed that since 1999,
successive Labour-led governments have sought to redress the funding -
NZD 8 billion to date - and staffing shortfall in a ten-year plan that
has not yet run its course. Since 2002, Goff asserted, the Government
has injected NZD 4 billion to replace outdated equipment in all three
arms of the NZDF, making it "the best equipped it had ever been."
¶10. (SBU) In the 2008 Budget of May 23, the Government allocated NZD
276.4 million over the next four years to grow and retain existing
defense service personnel in a tight New Zealand labor market. This
funding is out of the NZD 4.6 billion Defense Sustainability initiative
started by the government in 2005. This represents approximately 1.4%
of GDP, which is not dissimilar to the 1999 level of 1.3% (Note:
Defense spending in NZ peaked at about 3% of GDP in the 1950s, and
declined to an average of around 1.7% over the next three decades
before falling sharply to around 1% of GDP during the 1990s. End
Note). Goff has stated that the current levels of defense spending
reflect the reality that "no-one is remotely interested in invading New
Zealand".
Opposition Criticizes Government over Findings
--------------------------------------------- -
¶11. (U) The findings of the 2008 report were immediately pounced upon
by the opposition National Party. Led by its defense spokesman, Dr.
Wayne Mapp, National highlighted the NZDF's "appalling state of
affairs" under Labour and condemned Goff's assertion the NZDF is "the
best-equipped it's ever been." Mapp stated that a National-led
government would immediately commission a Defense White Paper to
address the problems facing the NZDF. The National Party's attempt to
garner media attention over this issue largely failed, as defense
issues do not factor into the list of voter concerns for the November
elections.
Experts say Funding and Career Development Main Problems
--------------------------------------------- -----------
¶12. (SBU) Two of New Zealand's leading defense experts believe that
until the NZDF receive adequate funding and address career development,
problems will remain for the country's defense force. Air Vice
Marshall Robin Klitscher (ret.) welcomed the Government's plan to
re-equip the defense force, but questioned whether it would be enough
to restore troops' combat readiness to a reasonable level. Klitscher
also said New Zealand's defense policies leaned too heavily on its
allies to protect NZ troops when deployed. Former NZ Secretary of
Defense, and former NZ Ambassador to the US, Denis McLean said the
retention problem stemmed from New Zealand's defense strategy. McLean
argued that many NZ servicemen and women do not see a career in the
armed forces to be as attractive as in other countries because the NZ
military is under-resourced and operationally limited.
Comment
-------
WELLINGTON 00000310 003.2 OF 003
¶13. (SBU) The problems outlined in both the NZDF and Cole reports
mirror what many MOD officials have pointed out over the past several
years. New Zealand's military is funded and organized to be a largely
peace time military with limited capability geared towards the
occasional security problem in the Pacific. It is inadequate for
multiple, multi-year deployments such as those New Zealand is committed
to in Timor-Leste, the Solomon Islands and Afghanistan -- where some
troops have undergone multiple deployments to the same location. This
has led to the retention problem at the mid-ranks, which is most
worrisome to MOD leadership, primarily because security issues in the
Pacific and New Zealand's commitments to the UN are unlikely to
diminish. Until the NZ political leadership is willing to pay for a
NZDF that can handle multiple deployments over the medium to long term,
the NZDF will continue to work under stress.