

Currently released so far... 12689 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ASEC
AR
AEMR
AMGT
AE
AU
AID
AORC
APER
AS
AM
AFIN
AMED
AJ
AGR
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
ABLD
AL
AA
APECO
AGAO
AY
AGMT
APEC
AINF
AG
ACS
AECL
AFFAIRS
ABUD
ASUP
ADANA
AADP
AMCHAMS
ARF
ASEAN
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
APCS
ADCO
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ADM
AN
AIT
BU
BR
BL
BO
BA
BB
BG
BM
BBSR
BH
BEXP
BK
BD
BTIO
BT
BE
BY
BF
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BILAT
BIDEN
BC
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CH
CG
CF
CU
CE
CVIS
CASC
CO
CS
CA
CIDA
CBW
CW
CMGT
CI
CODEL
CY
CPAS
CJAN
CD
CWC
CDG
CIA
CL
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CT
CR
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CFED
CV
CACS
CARSON
CLINTON
CN
CONS
CM
CAC
CIC
COPUOS
CDC
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EG
EZ
EUN
ECON
ETRD
ECPS
EFIN
ENRG
ETTC
EPET
EINV
EAID
EAIR
EWWT
EU
EAGR
EC
ELAB
EIND
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
EFIS
ELTN
ET
ECIN
EFTA
ES
EINT
EI
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
ELN
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
EXIM
ETRO
ENIV
ESA
ER
EK
EUR
EFINECONCS
EUMEM
EUREM
EPA
ERNG
ENERG
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
IS
IZ
IR
IC
IO
IN
ID
IGAD
IT
ILC
IAEA
ITU
ICAO
IMO
IBRD
IMF
ICJ
IAHRC
ITF
INRA
INRO
IWC
IQ
IV
ICRC
ICTY
INRB
IEFIN
ILO
ITRA
ITALY
IBET
ISRAELI
IL
INTELSAT
IRC
IDP
ICTR
IRAQI
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
IA
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
INDO
IDA
ISLAMISTS
KSPR
KNNP
KWBG
KAWK
KISL
KPAO
KN
KS
KIPR
KCRM
KDEM
KIRF
KJUS
KHLS
KSCA
KOMC
KAWC
KV
KFRD
KWMN
KTIP
KPWR
KSUM
KGHG
KTIA
KTFN
KIRC
KCOR
KACT
KMDR
KGIC
KOLY
KUNR
KIDE
KMPI
KPKO
KCFE
KVPR
KRAD
KPAL
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KTEX
KTDB
KFSC
KZ
KSEP
KFLU
KE
KU
KPLS
KRVC
KRIM
KSTH
KG
KFLO
KPOA
KICC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KBCT
KSAF
KMOC
KDRG
KBIO
KREC
KSTC
KVRP
KBTR
KMIG
KENV
KNSD
KCGC
KWAC
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KWMM
KPRP
KNEI
KPAI
KO
KVIR
KX
KMCA
KCRS
KMFO
KID
KCIP
KNAR
KR
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KHDP
KFIN
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KHIV
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KTER
KRCM
KCFC
KSAC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KCOM
KLIG
KDEMAF
KAID
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KOMS
KHSA
MPOS
MOPS
MARR
MTCR
MNUC
MASS
MX
MCAP
MAR
MTRE
MASC
MK
MG
MTCRE
MI
MD
MA
MO
MY
MU
ML
MRCRE
MAS
MEDIA
MC
MR
MIL
MW
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MT
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MEPP
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
NATO
NG
NL
NZ
NT
NW
NO
NU
NS
NPT
NASA
NI
NK
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NP
NATIONAL
NSSP
NSF
NA
NGO
NV
NR
NDP
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NEW
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NPG
NSC
NPA
NSFO
OPDC
OPRC
OEXC
OTRA
ODIP
OIIP
OVIP
OPIC
OPCW
OAS
OREP
OSCE
OSCI
OES
OFDP
OECD
OCS
OIC
OPAD
OVP
OHUM
OFFICIALS
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OBSP
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PTER
PHUM
PK
PREF
PM
PHSA
PA
PINS
PE
PBTS
PCI
PO
PL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PGIV
PROP
PP
PBIO
POL
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
PBT
PMIL
POV
PTBS
PG
POSTS
PALESTINIAN
PROV
PNAT
PINF
PRL
PAS
PDOV
PRAM
PREO
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PAO
PREFA
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PGOC
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RW
REACTION
RCMP
RSO
RO
RP
ROOD
RM
ROBERT
RICE
REGION
RSP
RF
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
RFE
REPORT
SY
SP
SOCI
SMIG
SNAR
SCUL
SC
SU
SO
SI
SENV
SZ
SW
SA
SR
SF
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SEN
SG
SYR
SWE
SK
SH
SNARCS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SCRS
SYRIA
SL
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SANC
SHI
SHUM
SIPRS
TSPA
TSPL
TU
TBIO
TRGY
TPHY
TS
TP
TW
TBID
TI
TF
TZ
TD
TT
TN
TNGD
TC
TX
TH
TL
TIP
THPY
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TINT
TFIN
TAGS
TR
US
UNSC
UNGA
UK
UP
UNCHC
UN
UNMIK
UNCSD
UY
USTR
USOAS
UNHRC
UNFCYP
UG
UNAUS
UNESCO
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
USUN
UZ
USNC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNEP
USEU
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNDP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
UNDC
UNICEF
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08SOFIA453, SUPPORTING BULGARIAN MILITARY MODERNIZATION
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08SOFIA453.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08SOFIA453 | 2008-07-03 16:08 | 2011-05-05 19:00 | CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN | Embassy Sofia |
Appears in these articles: http://www.bivol.bg/wlarmy.html http://balkans.blog.lemonde.fr/2011/05/05/et-la-bulgarie-renonca-aux-corvettes-francaises/ http://www.capital.bg/politika_i_ikonomika/bulgaria/2011/05/05/1085393_kak_se_pileiat_pari_v_otbranata/ |
VZCZCXYZ0000
OO RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSF #0453/01 1851608
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 031608Z JUL 08
FM AMEMBASSY SOFIA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5211
INFO RUEHZG/NATO EU COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO IMMEDIATE 0981
C O N F I D E N T I A L SOFIA 000453
NOFORN
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/03/2018
TAGS: PGOV PREL MARR BU IZ
SUBJECT: SUPPORTING BULGARIAN MILITARY MODERNIZATION
THROUGH ACQUISITION OF U.S. FIGHTERS
REF: A. SOFIA 305
¶B. SOFIA 303
¶C. SOFIA 87
¶D. 07 SOFIA 1271
¶E. 07 SOFIA 1219
Classified By: Charge d'Affairs, a.i., Alex Karagiannis for reasons 1.4
(b) and (d)
¶1. (C/NF) Summary. Based on an understanding reached at
Prime Minister Stanishev's 17 June meeting with Secretary
Gates, the Bulgarian Government is expecting a DOD team in
July 2008 to consult on Bulgaria's military modernization
plans. Post welcomes and fully supports this visit, which
represents an extremely valuable opportunity to shape the
future Bulgarian Armed Forces. The level at which this
assistance was requested demonstrates the importance the
Bulgarians place on our cooperation. They are expecting
guidance from us on how to proceed with a potential purchase
of multi-role fighters as well as broader input on their
modernization priorities. We suggest the following themes to
guide the discussions. A) Our shared top priority is
increasing the deployability and NATO interoperability of
Bulgaria's forces. The Bulgarian Land Forces and Navy have
already made significant strides in this direction, but the
Air Force lags far behind. Bulgaria needs, and the U.S.
government strongly supports the acquisition of a U.S.
multi-role fighter. But more important than the particular
airframe is the political decision to enter into a long-term
partnership between the Bulgarian Air Force (BuAF) and the
USAF. We will work with them to ensure that they can
purchase the best aircraft they can afford without
jeopardizing the long-term health of their modernization
efforts. B) To ensure that the Bulgarians make best use of
their scarce defense resources, we would like to share our
suggestions on how to reduce waste and focus their spending
on improving deployability and interoperability )
specifically, foregoing or delaying a commitment on French
corvettes, further elimination of legacy systems and
reduction of vehicle platforms to save on maintenance and
logistics. End Summary.
TIMING AND COMPOSITION OF VISIT
¶2. (C/NF) We recommend this visit take place within the
last two weeks of July (7/21 ) 8/1). This will allow the
Bulgarians time to absorb the messages of USAFE Commander
General Brady, visiting July 7, and Secretary Rice, visiting
July 9, but would precede the month of August, during which
many key Bulgarian decision makers will be unavailable. We
have an opportunity to drive the Bulgarian's decision
process, but the right message must be delivered soon. Delay
will not serve our interests. Since the request for this
visit was made to Secretary Gates by the Prime Minister, it
is important that the group meet Minister of Defense Tsonev.
Ideally, the group should be led by at least a one-star
officer. "Big picture" discussions will help the Bulgarians
prioritize their modernization projects, convince them of the
merits of an older-model, more-affordable U.S. fighter and
strengthen the position of like-minded thinkers in the MOD
through our support. A follow-up visit in the fall can then
assist the Bulgarians in budget planning once political
decisions have been made on their spending priorities.
CONTEXT: NEW MINISTER, OLD BUDGET BATTLES
¶3. (C/NF) Earlier this year the MOD, then under the
leadership of Minister Bliznakov, completed a re-evaluation
of its four-year old "Plan 2015" transformation and
modernization program. (Reftel C) While many steps taken
under these reforms were positive, such as acceleration of a
reduction in personnel and closure of unnecessary facilities,
key future procurement decisions were deliberately not
included in this review. It has fallen to new Minister
Tsonev to address these issues, which are particularly
contentious since Plan 2015 originally recommended the
purchase of 11 "priority projects", not all of which are
affordable under Bulgaria's budget.
¶4. (C/NF) Bulgaria's sense of procurement urgency is being
driven by the intense pressure they are under to purchase
very expensive corvette-class ships from the French company
Armaris. (Reftel E) The general assumption has been that
although corvettes and multi-role fighters were listed as
"priority projects," Bulgaria cannot afford both. For months
speculation has been rife that one of the projects would go
forward and the other would be delayed. Post assessment is
that an upgrade of Bulgaria's badly aging and
Russian-dependent Air Force is a much greater priority than
the corvettes, (especially given the recent purchases of
three used Belgian frigates.) Bulgaria intends to make a
decision on funding these two programs before August. A U.S.
team must visit no later than the end of July to shape that
process.
¶5. (C/NF) The Bulgarian Prime Minister will travel to
France on 4 July to meet President Sarkozy, and there is the
real possibility that a deal on French Corvettes may be
finalized. (Though perhaps for only two ships, vice the
original French offer of four.) A expeditious U.S. visit is
vital for establishing the acquisition of a U.S. fighter.
Should Bulgaria attempt to fund both projects, we need to
make the case that the fighter procurement must be given
priority.
ASSISTING BULGARIA IN BUILDING THE BEST, MOST DEPLOYABLE AND
INTEROPERABLE FORCE IT CAN AFFORD
¶6. (C/NF) FIGHTERS: Rapidly losing capability, the
Bulgarian Air Force is in dire need of modernization, but
meaningful transformation is not possible due to its
dependence on Russian airframes. Transitioning Bulgaria to a
U.S. multi-role fighter would drastically increase the
capabilities of the BuAF and draw our two armed forces into
ever closer cooperation. Additionally, it would eliminate
Russian influence over an entire section of the Bulgarian
military and reduce its leverage over the Ministry of Defense
as a whole. (See Ref A for full analysis.)
¶7. (C/NF) The Bulgarian Deputy CHOD told us the Bulgarians
"urgently" need a "positive message" from us on fighters.
They will look for a clear indication from the team that the
United States supports Bulgaria's purchase of a U.S. fighter
and will work with them to make sure they can conclude a deal
as quickly as possible. At the same time, we need to stress
to them that our aim is to assist them in acquiring the best
airframe they can afford. Currently, the Bulgarians are
overly focused on which particular aircraft (older vs. newer)
they will acquire and are worried about the political optics
of buying an airframe much older than what their regional
neighbors (particularly Romania and Poland) have. To counter
this, we suggest that the team stress the paramount
importance of partnership with the U.S. and the long-term
goal of bridging the Bulgarians to the Joint Strike Fighter.
The concept of a "bridge" to a fifth generation aircraft is
not well understood by the Bulgarians. Some key
decisionmakers have even talked about staying with Russian
MiGs and then jumping directly to a fifth generation
aircraft. It would be helpful to demonstrate clearly to the
Bulgarian leadership why this is impossible.
¶8. (C/NF) Moreover, we need to focus the Bulgarians away
from the hardware itself and more on the need for
transformation in doctrine and training. We should stress to
them that the BuAF not only needs new aircraft, but a
fundamental transformation in the way it operates. Strategic
partnership with the USAF is essential to this, but will take
time. The type of U.S. aircraft Bulgaria acquires at this
first stage (for example, Block 15 vs. Block 50) is less
important than building a partnership with the USAF that
increases interoperability and eventually leads to a fifth
generation aircraft.
¶9. (C/NF) The Bulgarians also have some misconceptions
regarding the speed at which they could acquire and begin
flying U.S. aircraft. We will need to lay out for them a
clear timeline of how long the acquisition and training
process will take. (Knowing that they will be comparing this
to offers made for Gripens, which could be made available
much sooner.) It is important to be frank about the
timelines involved, but also to note that lengthy training
programs will have to take place before any new aircraft
(U.S. or otherwise) could be flown by their pilots. We
should also reiterate the advantages of a U.S. partnership in
terms of the comprehensive package of training and
maintenance included in the acquisition of a U.S. aircraft.
¶10. (C/NF) CUTTING COSTS/REDUCING WASTE: It will not be
possible in the context of this visit to attempt a full
review of Bulgaria's defense budget. But since the
Bulgarians have asked us to take a comprehensive look at
their budget priorities, there are several areas in each
service where we could suggest targeted reductions, with
fuller recommendations to follow from an expert-level team.
Again the overarching theme is that Bulgaria should, in line
with NATO recommendations, continue to eliminate non-NATO
compatible legacy systems and to reduce units and equipment
designed for territorial defense (versus expeditionary
operations). Specific recommendations in this vein:
eliminate submarine program and outdated air-defense systems,
delay or avoid commitment on French corvettes and reduce the
number of vehicle platforms used by the Land Forces to reduce
maintenance and logistics costs. While reducing costs on
specific vehicles and equipment, Bulgaria should make larger
investments in training and development of its personnel,
particularly its NCO Corps.
¶11. (C/NF) Comment: The new Defense Minister is looking to
make bold moves on procurement and modernization decisions,
but lacks sufficient background on the issues involved. The
Minister wants U.S. fighters, but there is a great deal of
pressure elsewhere in the government for French corvettes and
European fighters. For political reasons, the Minister is
inclined to want the newest fighter possible. We can steer
him off this by presenting a clear, justified way ahead on
the procurement of an older, more-affordable airframe. We
want him to remain convinced that a U.S. fighter is the only
valid course of action, while gaining a more realistic
understanding of the costs and timelines involved. To make
procurement of an older fighter more politically palatable,
it will be valuable to focus the Minister on the future goal
of a fifth generation aircraft, with an older aircraft as a
bridge. The Bulgarians will almost certainly raise the Joint
Strike Fighter. We understand that the release of the JSF to
Bulgaria has not been approved, but we do not have clarity on
the criteria or decision-making process that led to that
determination. We urge this decision be revisited so that
eventual release of the JSF could be paired with the
near-term acquisition of an older airframe.
Karagiannis