

Currently released so far... 12689 / 251,287
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Melbourne
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AF
ASEC
AR
AEMR
AMGT
AE
AU
AID
AORC
APER
AS
AM
AFIN
AMED
AJ
AGR
ACOA
ANET
ASIG
ABLD
AL
AA
APECO
AGAO
AY
AGMT
APEC
AINF
AG
ACS
AECL
AFFAIRS
ABUD
ASUP
ADANA
AADP
AMCHAMS
ARF
ASEAN
ADPM
ATRN
ALOW
APCS
ADCO
ACAO
AORG
AROC
AO
AODE
ACABQ
AX
AMEX
AFGHANISTAN
AZ
AND
ARM
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
ACBAQ
AFSI
AFSN
AC
AUC
ASEX
AER
AVERY
AGRICULTURE
ASCH
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AORL
ADM
AN
AIT
BU
BR
BL
BO
BA
BB
BG
BM
BBSR
BH
BEXP
BK
BD
BTIO
BT
BE
BY
BF
BX
BP
BRUSSELS
BILAT
BIDEN
BC
BMGT
BWC
BN
BTIU
CH
CG
CF
CU
CE
CVIS
CASC
CO
CS
CA
CIDA
CBW
CW
CMGT
CI
CODEL
CY
CPAS
CJAN
CD
CWC
CDG
CIA
CL
CROS
CAPC
CTR
CT
CR
CBSA
CEUDA
COM
CFED
CV
CACS
CARSON
CLINTON
CN
CONS
CM
CAC
CIC
COPUOS
CDC
CONDOLEEZZA
CICTE
COUNTER
COUNTRY
CBE
CKGR
CHR
CVR
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CLEARANCE
COE
CARICOM
CB
CSW
CITT
CACM
CDB
CJUS
CTM
CAN
CLMT
CBC
CNARC
CIS
EG
EZ
EUN
ECON
ETRD
ECPS
EFIN
ENRG
ETTC
EPET
EINV
EAID
EAIR
EWWT
EU
EAGR
EC
ELAB
EIND
EN
EMIN
ESENV
ENNP
EFIS
ELTN
ET
ECIN
EFTA
ES
EINT
EI
ENGR
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ENVI
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECINECONCS
ELN
ELECTIONS
ENVR
EXTERNAL
EXIM
ETRO
ENIV
ESA
ER
EK
EUR
EFINECONCS
EUMEM
EUREM
EPA
ERNG
ENERG
ECA
ETRC
EINVEFIN
ETC
EAP
ECONOMY
EINN
ECONOMIC
EXBS
ECUN
ENGY
ECONOMICS
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
EURN
EDU
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ECIP
EFIM
EAIDS
EREL
EINVETC
ECONCS
ETRA
EAIG
EUC
ERD
ETRN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
IS
IZ
IR
IC
IO
IN
ID
IGAD
IT
ILC
IAEA
ITU
ICAO
IMO
IBRD
IMF
ICJ
IAHRC
ITF
INRA
INRO
IWC
IQ
IV
ICRC
ICTY
INRB
IEFIN
ILO
ITRA
ITALY
IBET
ISRAELI
IL
INTELSAT
IRC
IDP
ICTR
IRAQI
IPR
IIP
INMARSAT
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
INTERNAL
IRS
IA
INTERPOL
IEA
INR
IZPREL
IRAJ
IF
ITPHUM
ISRAEL
IACI
INDO
IDA
ISLAMISTS
KSPR
KNNP
KWBG
KAWK
KISL
KPAO
KN
KS
KIPR
KCRM
KDEM
KIRF
KJUS
KHLS
KSCA
KOMC
KAWC
KV
KFRD
KWMN
KTIP
KPWR
KSUM
KGHG
KTIA
KTFN
KIRC
KCOR
KACT
KMDR
KGIC
KOLY
KUNR
KIDE
KMPI
KPKO
KCFE
KVPR
KRAD
KPAL
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KTEX
KTDB
KFSC
KZ
KSEP
KFLU
KE
KU
KPLS
KRVC
KRIM
KSTH
KG
KFLO
KPOA
KICC
KDDG
KPRV
KTBT
KBCT
KSAF
KMOC
KDRG
KBIO
KREC
KSTC
KVRP
KBTR
KMIG
KENV
KNSD
KCGC
KWAC
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KWMM
KPRP
KNEI
KPAI
KO
KVIR
KX
KMCA
KCRS
KMFO
KID
KCIP
KNAR
KR
KCRCM
KBTS
KSEO
KHDP
KFIN
KOCI
KGIT
KNUP
KPAONZ
KNUC
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KSCI
KTLA
KHIV
KCSY
KTRD
KMRS
KNPP
KJUST
KCMR
KTER
KRCM
KCFC
KSAC
KCHG
KREL
KFTFN
KCOM
KLIG
KDEMAF
KAID
KGCC
KICA
KHUM
KSEC
KPIN
KESS
KDEV
KWWMN
KOM
KWNM
KRFD
KRGY
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KOMS
KHSA
MPOS
MOPS
MARR
MTCR
MNUC
MASS
MX
MCAP
MAR
MTRE
MASC
MK
MG
MTCRE
MI
MD
MA
MO
MY
MU
ML
MRCRE
MAS
MEDIA
MC
MR
MIL
MW
MARAD
MAPP
MZ
MP
MOPPS
MTS
MLS
MILI
MEPN
MEPI
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MT
MCC
MIK
MAPS
MV
MILITARY
MDC
MEPP
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
NATO
NG
NL
NZ
NT
NW
NO
NU
NS
NPT
NASA
NI
NK
NSG
NE
NORAD
NAFTA
NP
NATIONAL
NSSP
NSF
NA
NGO
NV
NR
NDP
NIPP
NZUS
NH
NC
NEW
NRR
NAR
NATOPREL
NPG
NSC
NPA
NSFO
OPDC
OPRC
OEXC
OTRA
ODIP
OIIP
OVIP
OPIC
OPCW
OAS
OREP
OSCE
OSCI
OES
OFDP
OECD
OCS
OIC
OPAD
OVP
OHUM
OFFICIALS
OIE
OTR
OMIG
OSAC
OBSP
OFDA
ON
OCII
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PTER
PHUM
PK
PREF
PM
PHSA
PA
PINS
PE
PBTS
PCI
PO
PL
POGOV
PAK
PEL
PGIV
PROP
PP
PBIO
POL
POLITICS
POLICY
PINL
PBT
PMIL
POV
PTBS
PG
POSTS
PALESTINIAN
PROV
PNAT
PINF
PRL
PAS
PDOV
PRAM
PREO
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PAO
PREFA
PSI
POLITICAL
PAIGH
PARMS
PROG
PTERE
PRGOV
PORG
PS
PGOF
PKFK
PSOE
PEPR
PPA
PINT
PMAR
PRELP
PNG
PFOR
PUNE
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PSEPC
PNR
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PDEM
PECON
PGOC
PY
PLN
PHUH
PF
PHUS
PU
PARTIES
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PHUMPREL
RS
RU
RW
REACTION
RCMP
RSO
RO
RP
ROOD
RM
ROBERT
RICE
REGION
RSP
RF
RIGHTS
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RUPREL
RELATIONS
RFE
REPORT
SY
SP
SOCI
SMIG
SNAR
SCUL
SC
SU
SO
SI
SENV
SZ
SW
SA
SR
SF
SEVN
SN
STEINBERG
SEN
SG
SYR
SWE
SK
SH
SNARCS
SAARC
SNARIZ
SPCE
SARS
SNARN
SCRS
SYRIA
SL
SENVKGHG
SAN
ST
SIPDIS
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SANC
SHI
SHUM
SIPRS
TSPA
TSPL
TU
TBIO
TRGY
TPHY
TS
TP
TW
TBID
TI
TF
TZ
TD
TT
TN
TNGD
TC
TX
TH
TL
TIP
THPY
TV
TK
TERRORISM
TO
TRSY
TURKEY
TINT
TFIN
TAGS
TR
US
UNSC
UNGA
UK
UP
UNCHC
UN
UNMIK
UNCSD
UY
USTR
USOAS
UNHRC
UNFCYP
UG
UNAUS
UNESCO
UNIDROIT
UNO
UV
UNHCR
USUN
UZ
USNC
UNCHR
UNCND
UNEP
USEU
USPS
USAID
UE
UNVIE
UAE
UNDP
UNODC
UNCHS
UNFICYP
UNDESCO
UNC
UNPUOS
UNDC
UNICEF
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06SANJOSE280, NEW LAW STRENGTHENS COSTA RICAN IMMIGRATION
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06SANJOSE280.
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 SAN JOSE 000280
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR CA/OCS/ACS/WHA; WHA/CEN FOR JMACK; CA/OCS/CI
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CASC KFRD CS
SUBJECT: NEW LAW STRENGTHENS COSTA RICAN IMMIGRATION
AUTHORITY
-------
SUMMARY
-------
¶1. (SBU) On October 27, 2005 the Legislative Assembly
approved a draft law that criminalizes alien smuggling;
increases fines on airlines carrying passengers without
correct documentation; and fines individuals who aid, abet,
harbor, transport, and/or employ illegal migrants. After
nearly four years of political debate, the law is expected
to reduce illegal immigration. The new legislation will
come into effect on August 12, 2006. Human rights
organizations have spoken out vigorously about the law's
"draconian anti-human rights measures." It remains to be
seen whether the General Migration Directorate will receive
the resources needed to conduct the patrols and
investigations necessary to execute its new authority. END
SUMMARY.
-----------------------------
New Law In Effect Next August
-----------------------------
¶2. The last legislation on immigration was enacted in 1986
and it continues to serve as the country's migration law. It
does not criminalize human smuggling. The rise in smuggling
and illegal immigration was a major impetus in the decision
to draft new legislation four years ago. The President of
Costa Rica heartily supported the bill, emphasizing that it
would improve citizen security, reduce exploitation of
immigrants, and improve the GOCR's ability to collect social
security taxes. In a January 6, 2006 meeting, General
Migration Directorate Director Johnny Marin told ConOff that
the bill is a watershed in updating the law to reflect the
reality of Costa Rica's current migration trends. He
pointed out that the new law clearly articulates a
comprehensive migration policy that is focused on three
issues: public security, integration of foreigners who are
already living in Costa Rica, and preventing future waves of
immigrants. The full text of the law is available on-line
at: http://www.asamblea.go.cr/
¶3. Marin commented to ConOff that several issues in the new
law need to be developed further in future legislation. He
noted that the three pillars of the new migration policy are
going to be hard to implement. Marin shared that, due to
lack of political will, several important issues remain
untouched, such as the sections of the law which deal with
the amount of monthly income foreigners must show to obtain
status as residents in the country and the rules regarding
transmission of residency via marriage. He explained that
legislators are reluctant to attempt any changes to the bill
after the four long years of work it took to pass the
current version.
¶4. The new law states that foreigners who wish to obtain
legal permanent resident status as a "pensioner" must
demonstrate that they receive a minimum monthly pension of
USD 600 (Article 77). The law for retirees with no pension
seeking such status is contradictory. Article 77 states
they must show a "stable and permanent income from abroad"
in the amount of USD 1,000. However, Article 79 states that
retirees without a pension must demonstrate a "permanent and
stable income from abroad" in the amount of USD 2,000.
Marin himself pointed out this contradiction to ConOff, and
expressed his frustration that the paradox was not resolved
before the law was passed. He attributed the fact that the
amounts were not increased to efforts made by the
Libertarian legislators and an influential retirees
association.
--------------------------------------------- --------
New Smuggling Sanctions May Help U.S. Border Security
--------------------------------------------- --------
¶5. The new migration law explicitly criminalizes the
"illicit smuggling of people" for the first time in Costa
Rica. Marin commented to ConOff that this is one of the
strongest planks for getting tough on illegal migration.
The new law punishes "the transport of persons" with the
"intent to illicitly smuggle" them "into or out of the
country" by "evading established migratory controls or
utilizing false data or documents" with two to six years of
incarceration. The same punishment applies to persons who,
"with the intent to illicitly smuggle humans," "house, hide,
or conceal foreigners who enter or remain illegally in the
country." The punishment is increased by a third when the
individual involved is a government employee, or when minors
are involved in the smuggling process, whether as
accomplices or as victims (Article 245). The new law
stipulates that any foreigner who has entered the country
without following the proper procedures and is in the
country without the necessary legal documents may avoid
deportation if the person opts to press charges against
those individuals involved in their illegal entry and if
they cooperate with local authorities in the ensuing
investigation.
--------------------------------------------- -----------
Enhanced Sanctions For Complicity With Illegal Migration
--------------------------------------------- -----------
¶6. The new Migration Law has stiffer and more detailed
penalties for individuals who aid, abet, harbor, transport,
and/or employ illegal migrants. Director Marin pointed out
to ConOff that the 1986 legislation had only one section
that encompassed all regulations regarding "international
transport" issues. The new law has expanded this into four
sections, dealing with maritime, air, and land transport
separately, as well as a section that addresses "general
norms." Marin expressed confidence that the new law will
provide the Migration Department with expanded oversight and
investigative authority that should help cut down
significantly on the illegal flow of people and goods,
provided that staffing levels and resources are adequately
funded.
¶7. International transport companies will now be
responsible for presenting travel documents of each
passenger and crewmember, along with passenger lists
(Article 150). Sea vessels must present this information
eight days prior to arriving at a Costa Rican port (Article
157).
¶8. The new law prevents any boat from sailing or any plane
from taking off prior to receiving formal approval from the
Migration Directorate that all individuals on board comply
with migration requirements (Articles 158 and 161). Failure
to comply with this rule will result in administrative
proceedings being taken against the port's captain or the
air traffic controller for "grave error in exercising his
duties." The Migration Directorate will also be able to
board ships to conduct migratory checks of the passengers
either in port or while the boat is in national or
international waters. All inspection costs will be covered
by the maritime vessel involved (Articles 160 and 161).
¶9. The Migration Directorate will now be able to prevent
the entry or exit of any ground transport, national or
international, which is carrying individuals who do not
comply with migratory requirements. The Directorate will
also be able to detain vehicles for the time necessary to
ensure that all passengers comply with these requirements.
¶10. Any person representing an international transport
company whose vehicle, plane, or boat enters the country
with foreigners not in compliance with migration
requirements can be fined three to twelve times the base
monthly salary established by law. This fine can also be
applied to any foreigner who remains in Costa Rica after the
departure of the vessel by which he entered the country.
Repeat offenders in either of these areas may be subject to
administrative proceedings involving formal charges
(Articles 168 and 169). These are new sanctions that do not
appear in the existing migration legislation. Current law
states that international transport companies can be fined
$30-$45 for each person who enters the country via their
company and who is not in compliance with migration
requirement or who remains behind after the departure of the
vessel by which they entered the country (Articles 103 and
105 of 1986 legislation). The new law will also hold
transport companies financially responsible for all costs
involved with foreigners who remain in the country while
their status (whether they can stay or must leave the
country) is being determined (Article 153).
¶11. The new bill increases the sanctions against
individuals who harbor and/or employ illegal migrants
(Articles 173 and 178) from two to twelve times the minimum
monthly salary.
--------------------------------------------- ----------
New Law Criticized For Alleged Human Rights Infractions
--------------------------------------------- ----------
¶12. Several entities involved with migration issues have
expressed concern about the law. Presidential candidate
Oscar Arias unsuccessfully asked the President to veto the
bill due to his concerns that it could lead to abuse of
illegal immigrants. The Human Rights Ombudsman's office,
the Catholic Church, and the U.N. High Commission for
Refugees (UNHCR) also expressed strong reservations about
the law. The Human Rights Ombudsman's Office (an
independent entity within the GOCR) was worried that there
is no system of checks and balances in place; the new law
gives General Migration Directorate final authority on
several matters. Article 220 of the new law states that
decisions made by the Migration Department to deny a visa,
refuse entry, or deport an individual cannot be appealed.
However, Migration Department Director Marin pointed out to
ConOff that the law does allow for appeals in some
circumstances; Article 219 cites five specific instances in
which appeals to the Migration Directorate's decision can be
made regarding the status of foreigners who are already
legally in the country.
¶13. The Catholic Church was concerned about measures that
would mete out jail sentences to individuals assisting
undocumented labor migrants. The Church succeeded in
getting the language changed such that individuals can
provide humanitarian assistance to undocumented migrants
without fear of going to jail. The UNHCR is worried that
the internationally accepted definition of refugee is not
used in the text, and key articles dealing with the
treatment and status of refugees (Articles 108 and 113) use
definitions created by the Legislative Assembly as opposed
to the internationally recognized terms. When asked about
the motive for this decision, Migration Department Director
Marin explained that one legislator decided it was pointless
to repeat definitions that had already been used in the
Geneva conventions to which Costa Rica is a party, so he
decided to craft his own. (Note: Marin expressed
frustration at the many thousands of Colombians in Costa
Rica with refugee status. It appeared that he supported the
narrower definitions included in the law; he said it is the
GOCR's right to establish whatever refugee definitions are
appropriate for Costa Rica. End Note.)
¶14. A spokesperson for the International Organization of
Migration (IOM) commented in a recent press interview that
the law does not adhere to standards set out in the U.N.
Protocol to Prevent, Suppress, and Punish Trafficking in
Persons. The Public Security Ministry responded that the
new legislation "complements international agreements
signed, ratified, and in force in Costa Rica." (Note: The
U.N. Protocol to Prevent, Suppress, and Punish Trafficking
in Persons was ratified by Costa Rica on September 9, 2003
and entered into force on December 25, 2003. End Note.)
¶15. After four years of debate in the legislature, the
Constitutional Court also weighed in, providing suggestions
to modify an area of the law that, in the Court's view,
contained potential Constitutional shortcomings. On July
21, 2005, the Court issued an opinion stating that paragraph
one of Article 67, aimed at reducing marriage fraud as a
means of obtaining citizenship, was unconstitutional. The
law's draft language stated that the Costa Rican citizen in
the marriage would have to prove the union's legitimacy by
having lived overseas for a year with a foreign spouse. The
Court pointed out that the GOCR could not require a citizen
to live outside of his country on any grounds. The bill's
text was changed to eliminate this constitutional weakness.
Marin expressed his frustration to ConOff regarding the new
law's inability to outlaw marriages by proxy in which
foreigners are able to marry Costa Ricans and be in full
compliance with all the current requirements for residency
without having ever met their spouse. He explained that
Chinese and Cuban citizens widely abuse the current
loopholes in the system to gain Costa Rican citizenship.
--------------------------------------------- -
Funding Uncertain for New Law's Implementation
--------------------------------------------- -
¶16. Marin declined to comment directly on funding issues,
but candidly pointed out that his research indicates he
needs at least 300 more staff to carry out the new mandate
adequately. He stated that the Migration Directorate will
need "international dollars" to implement the new
legislation correctly. Marin added that due to payments on
the national debt, the Migration Directorate only receives
one-third of its allocated budget. He explained that
several key border posts lack the most basic tools, such as
vehicles, to investigate reported cases of illegal migration
and lawyers on staff who know the law and can build a case.
He mentioned that in San Jose alone, there are over 500
pending immigration investigations that are not attended to
due to lack of resources. Marin explained that some border-
crossings close at 4:30p.m., and that anyone who wants to
can easily cross over after the officials have gone home for
the evening.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶17. It appears that the challenge facing the migration law
is whether the GOCR has the political will and financial
resources to enforce it. It remains to be seen how the
implementing legislation, which is scheduled to be presented
to the newly elected President this summer, will be received
by the new administration. If the GOCR is successful in
eking out the required funds from its already cash-strapped
budget to fully enforce the new law, Nicaraguans who used to
come to Costa Rica looking for work may now start going
elsewhere, presumably north.
LANGDALE