

Currently released so far... 6239 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
ASEC
AU
AORC
AF
AM
AFIN
AEMR
AR
ASIG
AMGT
AG
APER
AL
ABLD
ASUP
AA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AE
AMED
AS
AGMT
APECO
AO
AFFAIRS
AJ
ACOA
AX
AROC
ATFN
ASEAN
AFGHANISTAN
ADCO
AFU
AER
ALOW
AODE
ABUD
ATRN
AID
AC
AVERY
APCS
CASC
CJAN
CVIS
CS
COUNTER
CD
CU
CI
CO
CG
CE
CA
CMGT
CH
CWC
CBW
CKGR
CR
CN
CPAS
CONS
CDG
CLINTON
CT
CJUS
CY
CV
COUNTERTERRORISM
CIA
CACM
CDB
CAN
COE
CM
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CF
CONDOLEEZZA
CARSON
CL
CIS
CODEL
CTM
CB
COM
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EAIR
EAID
ET
EFIS
ENRG
EPET
ETTC
ER
EG
EINV
EAGR
ELAB
EUN
EWWT
ENGR
EMIN
ECIN
ENIV
ES
EC
ECPS
EIND
EI
EU
ENVI
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ELTN
EZ
EINT
ELN
EUR
EUNCH
EN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
ENNP
ECUN
EXTERNAL
EK
EFINECONCS
ECINECONCS
ECIP
EINDETRD
EUC
EREL
ENVR
ECA
ENERG
ENGY
ETRO
EFTA
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
ECONEFIN
EINVETC
EINN
ESA
ETC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ESENV
ETRDECONWTOCS
IR
IZ
IWC
IC
ILC
IO
IAEA
IN
IS
IT
ICRC
INTELSAT
ILO
IBRD
IMF
ICAO
IMO
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ITRA
ISRAELI
ICJ
IACI
INTERPOL
ID
IV
ICTY
IQ
IPR
INRB
ITPHUM
IIP
IL
IA
INR
ITPGOV
IZPREL
IRC
INRA
INRO
IRAJ
IEFIN
IF
KE
KCRM
KDRG
KIPR
KCOR
KSCA
KBIO
KDEM
KMCA
KMPI
KNNP
KJUS
KOMC
KGHG
KSUM
KSTC
KIRF
KTIP
KWMN
KZ
KG
KTFN
KHLS
KPAO
KFRD
KTIA
KOLY
KCFE
KISL
KFLU
KPKO
KWBG
KTBT
KTDB
KOCI
KUNR
KAWK
KICC
KPAL
KSTH
KN
KS
KGIC
KNPP
KWAC
KMDR
KAWC
KBCT
KIDE
KFLO
KWMNCS
KSEP
KU
KNEI
KVPR
KACT
KRAD
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCIP
KSAF
KV
KSPR
KPRP
KFSC
KCRS
KR
KRFD
KX
KO
KPWR
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KFIN
KGCC
KPIN
KHIV
KPLS
KIRC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KGIT
KBTS
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KWMM
KRVC
KNSD
KVIR
KNUP
KTER
KDDG
KHSA
KMRS
KHDP
KTLA
KPAK
KNAR
KREL
KPAI
KTEX
KCOM
KNNPMNUC
KPOA
KLIG
KHUM
KDEV
KNUC
KCFC
KREC
KOMS
KWWMN
MASS
MP
MARR
MOPS
MNUC
MX
MO
MCAP
MY
ML
MU
MIL
MC
MTRE
MA
MD
MTCRE
MEPI
MAR
MRCRE
MR
MV
MPOS
MZ
MEPP
MOPPS
MAPP
MASC
MT
MERCOSUR
MK
MDC
MI
MAPS
MCC
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MTCR
MG
OVIP
OREP
OTRA
OSCE
OECD
OIIP
OEXC
OPCW
OPIC
OPDC
OPRC
ODIP
OVP
OSCI
OAS
OFDP
OTR
OSAC
OIC
OFFICIALS
OIE
PREL
PGOV
PHUM
PTER
PE
PINR
PINS
PARMS
PARM
PHSA
PA
PK
PBTS
PO
PREF
POL
PLN
POLITICS
PROP
PL
PM
PAO
PSI
PG
PEPR
POV
PALESTINIAN
PINT
PSOE
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PBIO
PECON
PAK
POGOV
PINL
PKFK
PMIL
PY
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PRAM
PMAR
PGOVLO
PUNE
PORG
PHUMPREL
PF
POLINT
PHUS
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PNAT
PGOVE
PRGOV
PRL
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PINF
PEL
SNAR
SO
SENV
SU
SCUL
SOCI
SP
SC
SA
SMIG
SAN
SZ
SW
SN
SY
SR
SL
SEVN
SF
SYR
SI
SG
STEINBERG
SIPRS
SH
SNARCS
SOFA
SANC
SHUM
SK
ST
TERRORISM
TRGY
TZ
TX
TBIO
TSPA
TS
TSPL
TW
TU
TD
TIP
TURKEY
TP
TI
TC
TPHY
TH
TO
TK
TNGD
TINT
TRSY
TR
TFIN
TT
UG
UK
UP
UNGA
UNHRC
UZ
UN
UNAUS
USTR
UNSC
US
UNEP
UY
UNESCO
USUN
UNHCR
UAE
UNMIK
USEU
UV
UNO
UNDP
UNCHS
UNVIE
UNCHC
UE
UNDESCO
USAID
UNDC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05SANJOSE2008, THE PROCESS OF RATIFYING FTAs IN COSTA RICA
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05SANJOSE2008.
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 SAN JOSE 002008
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
WHA/CEN
EB FOR WCRAFT, BLAMPRON
E FOR DEDWARDS
WHA/EPSC FOR KURS, LGUMBINER
STATE PASS TO USTR FOR RVARGO, NMOORJANI, AMALITO
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECPS ECON PREL PGOV SOCI CS
SUBJECT: THE PROCESS OF RATIFYING FTAs IN COSTA RICA
¶1. (SBU) Summary. The process to ratify free trade
agreements such as the United States-Central American-
Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR) in Costa
Rica is not simple. It is not even clear whether the
agreement must be passed by a simple or a two-thirds
majority. The Assembly members (deputies) will have to
vote at least twice on the agreement -- once before and
once after the Constitutional Court reviews it for any
potential conflicts with the Costa Rican constitution. The
entire process will take at least 6 months and possibly
much longer, and the process can begin only after President
Pacheco sends the treaty to the Legislative Assembly. Post
is hopeful that that will occur this calendar year, but the
President has not made a decision yet. End Summary.
----------------------------
SIX FTAs DOWN AND ONE TO GO
----------------------------
¶2. (U) The GOCR, with the Ministry of Foreign Trade (COMEX)
as the lead governmental organization, has negotiated and
the Assembly has approved five FTAs already: Mexico in
1995, Canada in 2001, Chile and the Dominican Republic in
2002, and most recently CARICOM, a group of 12 Caribbean
nations comprising Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, Belize,
Dominica, Grenada, Guyana, Jamaica, St. Kitts and Nevis,
Saint Lucia, St. Vincents and the Grenadines, Suriname, and
Trinidad and Tobago. (Note: In 1973, prior to COMEX's
existence, the GOCR ratified an FTA with Panama.) As an
example of the process, COMEX started negotiations with
CARICOM on October 22, 2002, and ended on March 14, 2003.
After President Pacheco signed the agreement on March 9,
2004, the agreement was sent to the Assembly where it was
referred to the International Relations and Foreign Trade
Commission for study. After voting to send the agreement
for a vote on the Assembly floor, the Assembly approved the
FTA in its first debate on the issue on May 9, 2004.
¶3. (U) As required by law, the Constitutional Court
reviews all international agreements, including FTAs, to
check that all procedural requirements are met and that
there are no potential conflicts with the Costa Rican
constitution. After finding no significant issue with
respect to the agreement with CARICOM, the FTA, by law, had
to be voted on a second time. On August 9, 2005, 41 of the
48 members present in the Costa Rican Legislative Assembly
voted final approval of the FTA with CARICOM. The second
vote occurred approximately one year after the Assembly
first started discussions on this issue. The agreement was
signed by President Pacheco on August 23, 2005, and will be
published in the official government gazette, after which
the FTA will be considered officially ratified.
---------------------------------
A POSSIBLE TIMETABLE FOR CAFTA-DR
---------------------------------
¶4. (U) Currently Costa Rica remains the only signatory
country of CAFTA-DR that has not already sent the agreement
to its legislature. The Administration is waiting for "the
appropriate time" to send it for ratification. Assembly
President Gerardo Gonzalez from the President's Social
Christian Unity Party (PUSC) is still pursuing the
acceptability of a deputy submitting CAFTA-DR to the
Assembly if the President will not. COMMENT: Most
constitutional experts believe that only the President is
permitted to submit an international agreement such as
CAFTA-DR to the Assembly for ratification. END COMMENT.
¶5. (SBU) The Constitutional Court finds problems with many
bills it reviews and in that likely case would send its
comments on potential conflicts to the Assembly for
correction. If there are significant issues, the agreement
may be sent back to the International Relations and Foreign
Trade Commission to study the Court's comments and to
implement corrective changes, if possible. With respect to
CAFTA-DR, Assembly staff sources told Econoff that the
President of the International Relations and Foreign Trade
Commission Rolando Lacle (PUSC) has primed the process by
discussing conduct of the review with Commission members.
The first vote is expected in approximately three to four
months, followed by an at least one-month review by the
Constitutional Court. In a best-case scenario, a second
vote would be held approximately four to five months after
CAFTA-DR is introduced in the Assembly. (Note: In the case
of the CARICOM FTA, which was not contentious, 16 months
elapsed between the first vote in the Assembly and the
agreement coming into force. Many Costa Ricans estimate
that 6-8 months of debate may be needed for CAFTA-DR before
the first vote.)
--------------------------------------------- ----
SIMPLE MAJORITY OR TWO-THIRDS TO PASS CAFTA-DR?
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶6. (SBU) There still exists a question as to whether a
simple majority or two-thirds majority is required to pass
CAFTA-DR. The prevailing opinion from many sources is that
only a simple majority (half plus one) is necessary in each
of the two Assembly votes to approve CAFTA-DR. However,
there are some political experts who believe that a two-
thirds majority will be necessary. Based on information
provided by a former COMEX official and Legislative
Assembly staff members, all previous FTAs were passed by
more than a two-thirds vote, although the stated
requirement was only a simple majority. During the most
recent FTA vote, Assembly President Gerardo Gonzalez issued
a ruling stating that the approval of the CARICOM FTA
required only a simple majority.
¶7. (SBU) The Constitutional Court reviewed the case and
did not take issue with his ruling. FTAs may vary in the
breadth and detail of the texts. It appears that the issue
regarding how many votes will be needed to pass CAFTA-DR
remains unclear. A former COMEX official stated that the
investment-related portions of CAFTA-DR may be an aspect
that could lead one to believe that a two-thirds majority
is required. COMMENT: Based on information available to
Post, there may be enough support for CAFTA-DR in the
current Assembly to pass the agreement even if a two-thirds
majority is required, especially if most of the PUSC,
National Liberation Party (PLN), and Libertarian Movement
Party (ML) deputies vote in favor of CAFTA-DR, as they
currently say they will. END COMMENT.
¶8. (SBU) Legislative Assembly staff members insist that
only a simple majority is required for CAFTA-DR approval
and cite the most recent FTA with CARICOM as an example.
Based on information provided by these sources, a review of
a minimum of three to four months until the first vote is
expected. The Constitutional Court review will take at
least one month, followed by the second vote or, in the
case of finding significant issues, perhaps another lengthy
review process.
¶9. (SBU) Proponents of requiring a two-thirds majority to
pass CAFTA-DR refer to a much-disputed 1993 Constitutional
Court ruling involving the World Bank's International
Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). The
Constitutional Court stated that due to the ceding of
control of legal remedies to a supra-national body, a two-
thirds majority was required. However, according to a
former COMEX official, this ruling appears to be based on
an obscure 1960 change to the constitution that was passed
to discourage closer ties with other Central American
countries. The Constitutional Court's decision in that
case seems not to have been based on precedent and has not
been repeated during the review of numerous other
international agreements, such as joining the World Trade
Organization, in which Costa Rica ceded far broader
jurisdiction on commercial disputes than is contemplated
under CAFTA-DR.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶10. (SBU) The Legislative Assembly's history regarding the
length of time it takes to approve an FTA does not bode
well for a rapid approval of CAFTA-DR. The Assembly took
approximately 18 months to approve the most recent FTA with
CARICOM. Post believes that the process to approve CAFTA-
DR, once it is in the Assembly's hands, will take at least
six months. Complicating the CAFTA-DR approval process are
the Presidential and Legislative elections that will be
held in February 2006. The President and entire Assembly
will be replaced in May 2006 as consecutive terms are not
permitted under Costa Rica's constitution.
FRISBIE