

Currently released so far... 6239 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
ASEC
AU
AORC
AF
AM
AFIN
AEMR
AR
ASIG
AMGT
AG
APER
AL
ABLD
ASUP
AA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AE
AMED
AS
AGMT
APECO
AO
AFFAIRS
AJ
ACOA
AX
AROC
ATFN
ASEAN
AFGHANISTAN
ADCO
AFU
AER
ALOW
AODE
ABUD
ATRN
AID
AC
AVERY
APCS
CASC
CJAN
CVIS
CS
COUNTER
CD
CU
CI
CO
CG
CE
CA
CMGT
CH
CWC
CBW
CKGR
CR
CN
CPAS
CONS
CDG
CLINTON
CT
CJUS
CY
CV
COUNTERTERRORISM
CIA
CACM
CDB
CAN
COE
CM
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CF
CONDOLEEZZA
CARSON
CL
CIS
CODEL
CTM
CB
COM
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EAIR
EAID
ET
EFIS
ENRG
EPET
ETTC
ER
EG
EINV
EAGR
ELAB
EUN
EWWT
ENGR
EMIN
ECIN
ENIV
ES
EC
ECPS
EIND
EI
EU
ENVI
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ELTN
EZ
EINT
ELN
EUR
EUNCH
EN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
ENNP
ECUN
EXTERNAL
EK
EFINECONCS
ECINECONCS
ECIP
EINDETRD
EUC
EREL
ENVR
ECA
ENERG
ENGY
ETRO
EFTA
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
ECONEFIN
EINVETC
EINN
ESA
ETC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ESENV
ETRDECONWTOCS
IR
IZ
IWC
IC
ILC
IO
IAEA
IN
IS
IT
ICRC
INTELSAT
ILO
IBRD
IMF
ICAO
IMO
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ITRA
ISRAELI
ICJ
IACI
INTERPOL
ID
IV
ICTY
IQ
IPR
INRB
ITPHUM
IIP
IL
IA
INR
ITPGOV
IZPREL
IRC
INRA
INRO
IRAJ
IEFIN
IF
KE
KCRM
KDRG
KIPR
KCOR
KSCA
KBIO
KDEM
KMCA
KMPI
KNNP
KJUS
KOMC
KGHG
KSUM
KSTC
KIRF
KTIP
KWMN
KZ
KG
KTFN
KHLS
KPAO
KFRD
KTIA
KOLY
KCFE
KISL
KFLU
KPKO
KWBG
KTBT
KTDB
KOCI
KUNR
KAWK
KICC
KPAL
KSTH
KN
KS
KGIC
KNPP
KWAC
KMDR
KAWC
KBCT
KIDE
KFLO
KWMNCS
KSEP
KU
KNEI
KVPR
KACT
KRAD
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCIP
KSAF
KV
KSPR
KPRP
KFSC
KCRS
KR
KRFD
KX
KO
KPWR
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KFIN
KGCC
KPIN
KHIV
KPLS
KIRC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KGIT
KBTS
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KWMM
KRVC
KNSD
KVIR
KNUP
KTER
KDDG
KHSA
KMRS
KHDP
KTLA
KPAK
KNAR
KREL
KPAI
KTEX
KCOM
KNNPMNUC
KPOA
KLIG
KHUM
KDEV
KNUC
KCFC
KREC
KOMS
KWWMN
MASS
MP
MARR
MOPS
MNUC
MX
MO
MCAP
MY
ML
MU
MIL
MC
MTRE
MA
MD
MTCRE
MEPI
MAR
MRCRE
MR
MV
MPOS
MZ
MEPP
MOPPS
MAPP
MASC
MT
MERCOSUR
MK
MDC
MI
MAPS
MCC
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MTCR
MG
OVIP
OREP
OTRA
OSCE
OECD
OIIP
OEXC
OPCW
OPIC
OPDC
OPRC
ODIP
OVP
OSCI
OAS
OFDP
OTR
OSAC
OIC
OFFICIALS
OIE
PREL
PGOV
PHUM
PTER
PE
PINR
PINS
PARMS
PARM
PHSA
PA
PK
PBTS
PO
PREF
POL
PLN
POLITICS
PROP
PL
PM
PAO
PSI
PG
PEPR
POV
PALESTINIAN
PINT
PSOE
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PBIO
PECON
PAK
POGOV
PINL
PKFK
PMIL
PY
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PRAM
PMAR
PGOVLO
PUNE
PORG
PHUMPREL
PF
POLINT
PHUS
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PNAT
PGOVE
PRGOV
PRL
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PINF
PEL
SNAR
SO
SENV
SU
SCUL
SOCI
SP
SC
SA
SMIG
SAN
SZ
SW
SN
SY
SR
SL
SEVN
SF
SYR
SI
SG
STEINBERG
SIPRS
SH
SNARCS
SOFA
SANC
SHUM
SK
ST
TERRORISM
TRGY
TZ
TX
TBIO
TSPA
TS
TSPL
TW
TU
TD
TIP
TURKEY
TP
TI
TC
TPHY
TH
TO
TK
TNGD
TINT
TRSY
TR
TFIN
TT
UG
UK
UP
UNGA
UNHRC
UZ
UN
UNAUS
USTR
UNSC
US
UNEP
UY
UNESCO
USUN
UNHCR
UAE
UNMIK
USEU
UV
UNO
UNDP
UNCHS
UNVIE
UNCHC
UE
UNDESCO
USAID
UNDC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09SEOUL672, MND: DPRK MILITARY RHETORIC AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09SEOUL672.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09SEOUL672 | 2009-04-27 06:06 | 2010-11-30 16:04 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Seoul |
VZCZCXYZ0000
OO RUEHWEB
DE RUEHUL #0672/01 1170635
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 270635Z APR 09
FM AMEMBASSY SEOUL
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 4147
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 5773
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 1316
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 9637
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 5865
RUEHUM/AMEMBASSY ULAANBAATAR PRIORITY 1817
RUEHSH/AMCONSUL SHENYANG PRIORITY 4294
RUACAAA/COMUSKOREA INTEL SEOUL KOR PRIORITY
RHMFISS/COMUSKOREA J5 SEOUL KOR PRIORITY
RHMFISS/COMUSFK SEOUL KOR PRIORITY
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SEOUL 000672
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/27/2019
TAGS: PGOV KN KS
SUBJECT: MND: DPRK MILITARY RHETORIC AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
COMMISSION CHANGES ARE ABOUT SUCCESSION
Classified By: POL M/C Joseph Y. Yun. Reasons 1.4(b/d)
¶1. (C) SUMMARY: The DPRK's recent restaffing and expansion of
the National Defense Commission (NDC) and its hostile
military rhetoric over the last several months are related to
the DPRK leadership's "top priority" need to stabilize the
DPRK internally in preparation for succession, according to
XXXXXXXXXXXX A second priority was to achieve improved
Relations with the United States, which the DPRK regards as its only
potential security guarantor, ironically. END SUMMARY.
-------------------------------
Military Statements and the NDC
-------------------------------
¶2. (C) In an April 23 meeting, XXXXXXXXXXXX told Poloff that the
Korean People's Army's (KPA) spate of high-level
announcements over the past several months (such as the March
8 KPA Supreme Command report, the first in 15 years, and the
four KPA General Staff statements since January, not seen
since 1999) should not be misinterpreted as the DPRK military
asserting control over the country, because the military
could act only in concert with the Worker's Party and the
Cabinet. Instead the "generals appearing on TV" was a
phenomenon directed at DPRK citizens with two goals: to show
that the DPRK's hostile external situation meant citizens had
to pull together, and as a "power display" to send a
law-and-order message to counter the increasing economic
disorder resulting from decades of economic "depression."
There was dissatisfaction among some elite groups in the
DPRK, who knew of economic reform in China and Vietnam and
wondered why the DPRK had instead deteriorated. To tamp down
this internal dissent, external tension was needed. The ROKG
was not particularly worried about the specific threats to
the South contained in the statements because they saw the
statements as targeted at the domestic audience, and in any
case knew the DPRK would try to achieve surprise if it were
to resort to military action, rather than giving warning.
¶3. (C) The key factor in the background was 67-year-old Kim
Jong-il's (KJI) waning health. After KJI's August 2008
stroke, the DPRK was a "different environment that needed
stronger leadership." XXXXXXXXXXXX said that before the stroke, KJI
was confident that he could rule for years, but afterward he
suffered "physical and psychological trauma." KJI had become
obsessed with creating political stability to allow an
orderly succession, though XXXXXXXXXXXX did not claim to know who was
next in line. Immediately after the April 5 missile launch
the Supreme People's Assembly had declared the beginning of
KJI's third ruling period. But rather than celebrating the
renewal of his mandate, KJI was concentrating on changes that
would pave the way for succession.
¶4. (C) The most important of these was the enlargement (from
8 to 13 members) and strengthening of the KJI-chaired
National Defense Commission (NDC). The NDC was first
established in 1998 with a largely symbolic role, but had
since taken on policy and coordination functions. Now it had
the lead on succession, XXXXXXXXXXXX believed. KJI brother-in-law
Chang Song-taek's addition to the NDC was important for
succession preparation, not only because he was married to
KJI's only sibling and close confidante 63-year-old Kim
Kyong-hui, but also because Chang was seen as having
effectively protected and acted for KJI during KJI's fall
2008 recovery period.
¶5. (C) Another key change was the replacement of National
Defense Commission Deputy Chairman Kim Yong-chun with Oh
Kuk-ryul, a 78-year old Kim-family loyalist (in relative
terms, since all senior officials are loyalists) who XXXXXXXXXXXX
thought was consolidating various ROK-surveillance and
special operations institutions under his control at NDC.
One of these was the Worker's Party's Operations Department,
which Oh has headed since 1989. (XXXXXXXXXXXX also referred to an
April 21 JoongAng Ilbo newspaper article claiming that
"Office 35," charged with intel collection, and the "External
Liaison Office," charged with training agents, had both been
moved from the Operations Department to NDC/KPA control,
saying that ROK intel sources did not think there was
evidence of such a move.) The Operations Department, which
formulates actions against the South, was "passive" during
the 1999-2007 Sunshine Policy period, but was now becoming
more active again. In other words, Oh's job was to keep the
South off balance and make sure that it did not disrupt the
succession period. XXXXXXXXXXXX said he believed that changes to the
DPRK constitution, announced but not yet explained, would
also focus on succession-related issues. He alluded to
frequent DPRK propaganda aiming for the establishment of a
"strong and prosperous" nation by 2012, saying that DPRK
authorities believed they had already succeeded ideologically
and militarily, so they were concentrating on the economic
side, which is where the Kaesong Industrial Complex fit in.
¶6. (C) The DPRK's determination to maintain internal order
meant that it could go so far as to engage in "limited armed
conflict" with the ROK. At the same time, the DPRK was well
aware that ROK forces were ready for any provocation and
would respond with superior force. In addition, the DPRK
knew that combined ROK-U.S. surveillance capabilities would
prevent it from achieving surprise, so XXXXXXXXXXXX was reassured that
no direct military provocation was imminent.
-----------------------
Relations with the U.S.
-----------------------
¶7. (C) Asked what the ROKG's policy options were, given the
above situation, XXXXXXXXXXXX answered indirectly, saying that the
main question was U.S.-DPRK relations. Second only to
maintaining internal stability to allow for succession was
the DPRK's determination to improve relations with the U.S.,
because only the U.S. could solve both the DPRK's security
and economic problems. XXXXXXXXXXXX said this push for improved
relations was ironic, given DPRK rhetoric attacking the U.S.
as a menace, but was nevertheless high on DPRK authorities'
agenda. XXXXXXXXXXXX said the DPRK saw the 1999-2000 rapprochement
with the Clinton Administration as the first, failed, chance
for peace with the U.S.; that the Bush (43) Administration
had turned to negotiations too late for substantial progress;
and that the Obama Administration amounted to a "second
chance." The DPRK craved a dialogue with the U.S., aiming
for a "big deal," but first needed to raise tensions to
create the need for dialogue.
¶8. (C) The scope for inter-Korean relations depended on what
happened with U.S.-DPRK relations. XXXXXXXXXXXX was convinced that
the DPRK would keep tension high towards the South, while
seeking an opening with the U.S. Therefore, his
recommendation to ROK policymakers was to stay on an even
keel to keep the South-North situation from deteriorating
further. The DPRK's April 21 proposal for dialogue about
land-use and wages at the Kaesong Industrial Complex was
potentially helpful in that regard, but had to be approached
carefully, because the DPRK would try to seize the initiative
and lock-in economic benefits without offering reciprocal
steps. Like other ROKG officials, XXXXXXXXXXXX emphasized the need
for continued close U.S.-ROK coordination on all issues
related to North Korea.
¶9. (C) XXXXXXXXXXXX cautioned that China would seek to prevent
U.S.-DPRK relations from improving too much, adding with a
smile that had it not been for its attitude toward the U.S.,
China would have moved to prevent the October 2006 DPRK
nuclear weapon test.
-----------
Mt. Kumgang
-----------
¶10. (C) As an aside, XXXXXXXXXXXX commented on the July 2008 shooting
death of a South Korean tourist at Mt. Kumgang. He said that
KPA soldiers and sentries in the area, after frequent contact
with South Korean tourists, had a tendency to be too relaxed,
so KPA officers periodically conducted exercises to tighten
discipline. The shooting had occurred during one of those
exercise periods.
STEPHENS