

Currently released so far... 6239 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Kolkata
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Tijuana
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
ASEC
AU
AORC
AF
AM
AFIN
AEMR
AR
ASIG
AMGT
AG
APER
AL
ABLD
ASUP
AA
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AE
AMED
AS
AGMT
APECO
AO
AFFAIRS
AJ
ACOA
AX
AROC
ATFN
ASEAN
AFGHANISTAN
ADCO
AFU
AER
ALOW
AODE
ABUD
ATRN
AID
AC
AVERY
APCS
CASC
CJAN
CVIS
CS
COUNTER
CD
CU
CI
CO
CG
CE
CA
CMGT
CH
CWC
CBW
CKGR
CR
CN
CPAS
CONS
CDG
CLINTON
CT
CJUS
CY
CV
COUNTERTERRORISM
CIA
CACM
CDB
CAN
COE
CM
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CACS
CF
CONDOLEEZZA
CARSON
CL
CIS
CODEL
CTM
CB
COM
ECON
EFIN
ETRD
EAIR
EAID
ET
EFIS
ENRG
EPET
ETTC
ER
EG
EINV
EAGR
ELAB
EUN
EWWT
ENGR
EMIN
ECIN
ENIV
ES
EC
ECPS
EIND
EI
EU
ENVI
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ELTN
EZ
EINT
ELN
EUR
EUNCH
EN
EINVECONSENVCSJA
ELECTIONS
EINVEFIN
ENNP
ECUN
EXTERNAL
EK
EFINECONCS
ECINECONCS
ECIP
EINDETRD
EUC
EREL
ENVR
ECA
ENERG
ENGY
ETRO
EFTA
ECONCS
ECONOMICS
ECONEFIN
EINVETC
EINN
ESA
ETC
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ESENV
ETRDECONWTOCS
IR
IZ
IWC
IC
ILC
IO
IAEA
IN
IS
IT
ICRC
INTELSAT
ILO
IBRD
IMF
ICAO
IMO
ITALY
ITALIAN
IRAQI
ITRA
ISRAELI
ICJ
IACI
INTERPOL
ID
IV
ICTY
IQ
IPR
INRB
ITPHUM
IIP
IL
IA
INR
ITPGOV
IZPREL
IRC
INRA
INRO
IRAJ
IEFIN
IF
KE
KCRM
KDRG
KIPR
KCOR
KSCA
KBIO
KDEM
KMCA
KMPI
KNNP
KJUS
KOMC
KGHG
KSUM
KSTC
KIRF
KTIP
KWMN
KZ
KG
KTFN
KHLS
KPAO
KFRD
KTIA
KOLY
KCFE
KISL
KFLU
KPKO
KWBG
KTBT
KTDB
KOCI
KUNR
KAWK
KICC
KPAL
KSTH
KN
KS
KGIC
KNPP
KWAC
KMDR
KAWC
KBCT
KIDE
KFLO
KWMNCS
KSEP
KU
KNEI
KVPR
KACT
KRAD
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KCIP
KSAF
KV
KSPR
KPRP
KFSC
KCRS
KR
KRFD
KX
KO
KPWR
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KFIN
KGCC
KPIN
KHIV
KPLS
KIRC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KGIT
KBTS
KPRV
KBTR
KERG
KWMM
KRVC
KNSD
KVIR
KNUP
KTER
KDDG
KHSA
KMRS
KHDP
KTLA
KPAK
KNAR
KREL
KPAI
KTEX
KCOM
KNNPMNUC
KPOA
KLIG
KHUM
KDEV
KNUC
KCFC
KREC
KOMS
KWWMN
MASS
MP
MARR
MOPS
MNUC
MX
MO
MCAP
MY
ML
MU
MIL
MC
MTRE
MA
MD
MTCRE
MEPI
MAR
MRCRE
MR
MV
MPOS
MZ
MEPP
MOPPS
MAPP
MASC
MT
MERCOSUR
MK
MDC
MI
MAPS
MCC
MASSMNUC
MQADHAFI
MUCN
MTCR
MG
OVIP
OREP
OTRA
OSCE
OECD
OIIP
OEXC
OPCW
OPIC
OPDC
OPRC
ODIP
OVP
OSCI
OAS
OFDP
OTR
OSAC
OIC
OFFICIALS
OIE
PREL
PGOV
PHUM
PTER
PE
PINR
PINS
PARMS
PARM
PHSA
PA
PK
PBTS
PO
PREF
POL
PLN
POLITICS
PROP
PL
PM
PAO
PSI
PG
PEPR
POV
PALESTINIAN
PINT
PSOE
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PBIO
PECON
PAK
POGOV
PINL
PKFK
PMIL
PY
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PRAM
PMAR
PGOVLO
PUNE
PORG
PHUMPREL
PF
POLINT
PHUS
PGOC
PNR
PGGV
PNAT
PGOVE
PRGOV
PRL
PROV
PTERE
PGOF
PHUMBA
PINF
PEL
SNAR
SO
SENV
SU
SCUL
SOCI
SP
SC
SA
SMIG
SAN
SZ
SW
SN
SY
SR
SL
SEVN
SF
SYR
SI
SG
STEINBERG
SIPRS
SH
SNARCS
SOFA
SANC
SHUM
SK
ST
TERRORISM
TRGY
TZ
TX
TBIO
TSPA
TS
TSPL
TW
TU
TD
TIP
TURKEY
TP
TI
TC
TPHY
TH
TO
TK
TNGD
TINT
TRSY
TR
TFIN
TT
UG
UK
UP
UNGA
UNHRC
UZ
UN
UNAUS
USTR
UNSC
US
UNEP
UY
UNESCO
USUN
UNHCR
UAE
UNMIK
USEU
UV
UNO
UNDP
UNCHS
UNVIE
UNCHC
UE
UNDESCO
USAID
UNDC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05VATICAN514, VATICAN: LOOKING AHEAD ON BIOTECH
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05VATICAN514.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
05VATICAN514 | 2005-08-26 07:07 | 2010-12-10 21:09 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Vatican |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L VATICAN 000514
SIPDIS
DEPT. FOR EB; EB/TPP/ABT/BTT; EUR/WE (TCUNNINGHAM)
E.O. 12958: DECL: 8/26/2015
TAGS: PREL PHUM TBIO EAGR EAID SOCI VT
SUBJECT: VATICAN: LOOKING AHEAD ON BIOTECH
REF: A. A) ROME 2543,
¶B. 05 ROME 2543, 03 VAT 4859; 03 ROME 5205; 04 VAT 3810
CLASSIFIED BY: Peter Martin, Political Officer, POL, STATE.
REASON: 1.4 (b), (d)
-------
Summary
-------
¶1. (C) Recent conversations between Holy See officials and
USAID and EB representatives visiting the Vatican confirmed the
cautious acceptance of biotech food by the Holy See. Vatican
officials asserted that the safety and science of genetically
modified foods would eventually be non-issues at the Holy See.
Preoccupation at the Vatican, they said, was tied more to
economic arguments, as some fear that widespread use of GMO food
in the developing world would subjugate its farmer population
and become a form of economic imperialism simply serving to
enrich multi-national corporations. There remains vocal
opposition among some Catholic laypeople and clergy to biotech
food, and signs are not strong that the papacy or other Vatican
entities with which Post has worked are ready to issue a
stronger endorsement of these technologies. However, by
focusing on the economic benefits of GMO food for
developing-world farmers, safeguards in place to prevent
economic exploitation, and ongoing research on non-cash crops
such as cassava, Post will continue to engage the Holy See on
what we have called the "moral imperative" of biotech food. A
Vatican document on world hunger planned for drafting this fall
offers another opening for our work on the issue and a chance to
influence a wide segment of the population in Europe and the
developing world.
----------------------------
USG, Holy See Officials Meet
----------------------------
¶2. (SBU) Michael Hall, Biotechnology Advisor for USAID's
Regional Economic Development Services Office in Nairobi, met
with Monsignor James Reinert of the Pontifical Council for
Justice and Peace (J and P), and Jack Bobo, Deputy Chief,
EB/TTP/ABT/BTT, met with Fr. Michael Osborn of the Pontifical
Council Cor Unum, offering a chance to push the Vatican on
biotech issues, and an opportunity for Post to analyze the
current state of play on biotech in the Vatican generally. Both
meetings took place at the Vatican. J and P takes the official
lead on biotech issues at the Vatican, and has been quite active
in recent years, often working closely with Post (03 VAT 4859;
03 ROME 5205; 04 VAT 3810). Cor Unum, the Vatican's
clearinghouse for aid efforts worldwide, is another potential
ally on biotech, as food aid to the developing world is a great
part of its brief.
----------------------------------
Science and Safety not the Problem
----------------------------------
¶3. (SBU) Discussing the climate on biotech foods at the
Vatican, Osborn assured Bobo that doubts about the safety and
the legitimacy of the science of these technologies would not be
a long-term problem in efforts to bring the Holy See further
along on biotech. He noted that the Holy See did not feel that
the genetic modification of plants posed any moral problem.
Osborn mentioned a few clerical and other critics who had spoken
out at Post's biotech conference last year co-sponsored by the
Pontifical Academy of Sciences (04 VAT 3810), raising the alarm
about the alleged dire effects of biotech food on health and the
environment. "You're going to have a few people who continue to
use scare tactics about the science," Osborn said, "but little
by little, they will cease to be a factor." Within the Vatican,
he said, the mainstream opinion is that the science is solid.
Bobo filled Osborn in on recent studies that backed up this
view, and directed him to a recent World Health Organization
(WHO) report that found: "GM foods currently available on the
international market have passed risk assessments and are not
likely to, nor have been shown to, present risks for human
health." The report is available in English, French, and
Spanish at:
http://www.who.int/foodsafety/biotech/who_stu dy/en/index.html.
-------------------------
Economic Angle is Crucial
-------------------------
¶4. (SBU) According to Osborn, the main issue for the Church
will continue to be the economic angle of biotech food. Many in
the Church fear that these technologies are going to make
developing-world farmers more dependent on others, and simply
serve to enrich multi-national corporations. In his
conversation with Reinert, Hall also acknowledged this concern,
but noted that some researchers were working on crops such as
cowpeas and cassava that were unlikely to make big profits, but
could benefit the developing world. Bobo pointed out to Osborn
that competition between companies and the regulatory process in
individual countries provided some safeguards on these issues.
Poloff mentioned presentations given at Post's conference
showing that in several communities in various parts of the
developing world, the advent of biotech crops had brought
significant economic benefits for developing-world farmers.
While seed companies had made some profits, the big losers
appeared to have been multi-national pesticide companies.
Describing several examples of his group's projects, Hall
assured Reinert that USAID initiatives sought to empower
Africans and address their needs rather than blindly promote
U.S. interests.
-----------------------
Opposition Still Active
-----------------------
¶5. (SBU) Post notes that Catholic opposition to biotech food is
still active. Elements of the Catholic population, primarily in
the English-speaking world, peppered the Pontifical Academy of
Sciences and J and P with hostile emails when they moved forward
on the issue in the past two years. The UK-based anti-GMO
Catholic Institute for International Relations has been very
active on the issue, as well, often through the influential
English Catholic magazine, the Tablet. (In fact a letter from a
CIIR member in the July 30 Tablet made questionable assertions
attacking biotech.) Reinert said that many clergy, especially
those working in the developing world, continued to be
anti-biotech, though many seemed uninformed about the science.
He pointed to the Philippines as a country with a particularly
anti-GMO Catholic hierarchy, joking that the Filipino Church
would "go into schism" if the Vatican came out any stronger for
biotech food.
-------------------
Comment: Next Steps
-------------------
¶6. (C) By word and action the Pontifical Council for Justice
and Peace and the Pontifical Academy of Sciences have
established the Holy See as giving at least a cautious go-ahead
to bioengineered foods. It may be difficult to get much more in
the near future. The pope has not shown his cards on the issue,
but some feel he may have been influenced by European prejudices
against biotech food. Further, before the papal transition, J
and P sent a document laying out a moral/theological case for
biotech food to the pope's old curial dicastery for clearance --
the theological watchdog Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith (CDF). For whatever reason, the document never came back
from CDF. What's more, Post's greatest ally at the Vatican on
the question, Cardinal Renato Martino of J and P, may be through
pushing the issue. A Martino deputy told us recently that the
cardinal had cooperated with Embassy Vatican on biotech over the
past two years in part to compensate for his vocal disapproval
of the Iraq war and its aftermath -- to keep relations with the
USG smooth. According to our source, Martino no longer feels
the need to take this approach.
¶7. (C) Despite these less encouraging signs, opportunities
exist to press the issue with the Vatican, and in turn to
influence a wide segment of the population in Europe and the
developing world. According to Osborn, Cor Unum will be taking
the lead this fall on the updating of a Holy See document on
world hunger. In light of recent work that has been done on the
subject, including the Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations' 2003-04 State of Food and Agriculture report
that gave a cautious backing to the use of biotech food for the
developing world, it will be difficult for the Holy See to avoid
the issue. We will continue to press the "moral imperative" of
biotech, publicizing and sharing data that show the economic
benefit of these technologies to farmers, and explaining the
safeguards that exist to prevent economic exploitation. Sharing
information on research on non-cash crops such as cassava will
also be important to winning Vatican hearts and minds.
SANDROLINI