|
|
|
|
|
|
Windmill Electric Power Farm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After the traveling team spent their required half hour at the West Gate target, they proceeded on to a windmill farm in the foothills of the Livermore Valley. When Joe focused his attention on this, his third target of the day, without any interim feedback at all, a completely new set of pictures came to him. In the table below, we note the poles, hills, and rotating blades that the sponsor wanted to see in Joe's transcript, compared with what Joe experienced. |
|
|
|
|
ITEMS AT WINDMILL FARM | JOE'S SCORE | Rotating blades | 100% | Multiple wind generators | 100% | Wind-Powered Electrical Generation | 90% for the concept | Poles scattered in hills | 100% | Poles connected in a grid | 100% | Foothills | 100% | Electrical grid | 100% | Overall accuracy of all concepts | 94% | Overall reliability of all concepts | 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joe's drawing of the windmill farm target with its poles, hills, and power grid is shown in Figure II. It is apparent from this sketch and the previous drawing that a remote viewer sitting quietly with his eyes closed can indeed focus his attention more or less anywhere he chooses. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This remarkable accuracy has been achieved with the viewer targeted on anything from a known person to a photograph of an unknown person, a specific site like the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory or the Windmill Farm, or even nothing more than a set of geographical coordinates. Remote viewing appears to be an entirely goal-oriented task. That is, the subject is able to describe the target to be viewed no matter what information is given to demarcate it. The overall reliability is reported as 75 percent. I take this to |
|
|
|
|
|