/b/ - says it all

/b/ - Random
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

Posting mode: Reply

[Return]

File : 1327706515.jpg-(1.04 MB, 1280x860, The Forgotten Man small.jpg)

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:21:55 No.377097560

says it all

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:23:24 No.377097823 why is andrew jackson on the peoples' side? he was a shitty president

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:24:33 No.377098035 >>377097560 why isn't FDR in a wheel-chair....let alone his polio braces on his legs this pic fucking sucks

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:25:55 No.377098281 >>377097560 I dont understand the division.... what is this supposed to depict?

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:26:20 No.377098362 >>377097823 I'm not OP, but read about Jackson and the Negro Fort. That's why he's on the people's side.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:26:27 No.377098383 where the fuck is clinton?!

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:26:29 No.377098388 >>377097560 why should the dead presidents give a shit about a hipster?

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:27:12 No.377098515 File1327706832.jpg-(73 KB, 1600x1200, 1325031734220.jpg) Ronald Reagan on people's side? wtf?

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:28:12 No.377098672 so everyone is white but one roody-poo

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:28:35 No.377098731 this picture makes no fucking sense i seriously think it's one of the most retarded things i've ever seen

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:28:37 No.377098741 >>377098383 right behind obama to his left

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:28:43 No.377098763 this picture would be better with ron paul on top of the white house shooting obama in the nignog

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:29:18 No.377098872 dude...free money on the floor

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:29:26 No.377098898 >>377098515 BUH THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS SAY REGAN WAS EVIL

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:29:46 No.377098965 >>377098362 because he started the trail of tears? typical tea party logic jackson was one of the most cruel, racist, overbearingly unilateral presidents the country has ever had. go fuck yourself.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:30:20 No.377099065 is this ryan from OC California sitting on the bench? man i really loved this series

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:30:27 No.377099091 >>377098763 enjoy being monitored by the secret service also failed at saying roody-poo

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:30:38 No.377099122 clinton is there because he signed the bill that deregulated the banks and let them loan out money to nigs

>>	sa ge NOT 01/27/12(Fri)18:31:25 No.377099250 WHERE AM I ON THAT PIC???! WHAT AN OUTRAGE

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:31:38 No.377099292 >>377099091 dont care , if the secret service showed up to my house i would laugh at them and slam the door in their face

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:31:49 No.377099324 Paultard thread spotted. Shouldn't you kids be doing homework so you can add something to society later in life?

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:31:59 No.377099357 File1327707119.jpg-(56 KB, 800x600, reaganomics-1.jpg) >>377098515 yeah I'm like wtf... pic related

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:32:08 No.377099386 File1327707128.jpg-(25 KB, 222x229, 1264097366005.jpg) lol is that andrew jackson on the right behind abraham lincoln? ohhhh jeesus

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:32:31 No.377099456 >>377099324 /thread

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:32:42 No.377099493 File1327707162.jpg-(33 KB, 400x236, ohlook.jpg) ....sigh.....

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:33:11 No.377099582 >>377099493 you must be nolife here

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:33:24 No.377099622 Is the the man sad because the mexicans he hired for work were deported?

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:33:26 No.377099632 whats really cool in that picture is the flag flying at half-staff

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:34:04 No.377099738 >>377099292 >reality >you'd be crying and begging for your parents when they take you away you are an internet tough guy

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:34:22 No.377099788 This picture is all fuckin types of inaccurate. Abe Lincoln was much taller than that.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:34:40 No.377099839 >>377099738 you are my mother

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:35:43 No.377100016 >implying any of them gave a fuck about their people

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:35:45 No.377100026 >>377097560 why isn't abe lincoln wearing his hat >fail picture

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:36:24 No.377100135 First, Reagan was just an senile old puppet, he said all the right things but the people who were running things help work towards destroying the country. And second Teddy Roosevelt would whoop all their candy asses.

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:36:31 No.377100162

>>377097823

Yeah, its the negras fault....every other president who circumvented the constitution to enact war w/o congrssional declaration.

Every other president who bent over to let the fed dictate monetary policy

Every other president who violated privacy, suffrage, etc

...blacks always take the fall. Sucks to be them

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:37:08 No.377100273

>>377098515
Not to mention Lincoln there with him. Lincoln suspended habess corpus, and was all sorts of a terrible president. He's only remembered well because he was assassinated. If he'd not been shot, he would have likely gone down as one of the worst presidents in American history in terms of abuse of power and trampling of rights.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:37:17 No.377100297 File1327707437.jpg-(24 KB, 240x320, RuPaul-1.jpg) another dumb RuPaul Thread

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:37:46 No.377100398 >>377098741 >left

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:37:55 No.377100423 >>377097560 >>377097560 >Teddy applauding Obama NOPE.jpg

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:37:58 No.377100432 File1327707478.jpg-(3 KB, 150x150, brand.jpg) >>377097560 I suppose if newt gingrich is next president that shit artist will paint him behind the bench too.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:38:09 No.377100479 Seriously someone explain what exactly this image is trying to say i really dont get it....

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:38:11 No.377100488

>>377098965
realize that the only way you're able to dismiss the great deeds of Andrew Jackson in protecting his countrymen (because it was his job, he was a fucking military officer) is by name calling. This is called an argumentum ad hominem. Come on Anon, age limit to be in here is 18, I expect you to have already matriculated kindergarten and be past the name calling.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:38:40 No.377100559 >nixon >reagan >bush >good I don't like Obama but it's not cuz he's black. Bush started the wars and the PATRIOT Act. 1/10 made me reply.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:39:21 No.377100660 File1327707561.gif-(104 KB, 530x722, reaganomics.gif) >>377099357 pic related dipshit

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:39:42 No.377100723 File1327707582.jpg-(13 KB, 180x175, 1325465011398.jpg)

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:39:51 No.377100749 >>377097823 because the person who made this knows nothing about US history or current US politics.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:41:51 No.377101085 File1327707711.jpg-(5 KB, 228x219, THIS.jpg) >>377100749 /thread

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:42:18 No.377101170 >>377100660 >implying obama took office in jaunary 2008 not january 2009

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:42:27 No.377101195 >>377100660 >clearly unaware of carter's stagflation leading to volcker to raise rates to kill it and causing a mini-recession but leading to prosperity until the housing crisis of 1990.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:43:42 No.377101406 >>377100660 taxes on the rich were much higher during the reagan era you nig. Learn some fucking history. The reason this recession has lasted so long is because of the massive fraud instigated by wall street and the global aspect of the downturn.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:44:29 No.377101560 >>377101195 >whiney liberal douche who thinks spending money on nigs makes debt go away

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:45:04 No.377101654

>>377101195
I'm sure they're aware of it, but notice that its from LibertyWorks, they're pretty conservative, they're probably just tossing out things they want to pretend are "outliers" so they can spin graphs to their political goals. Its the Faux News approach.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:45:09 No.377101671 Reagan among the Framers?? GTFO!!! Also: is Jefferson about to catch a huge dump from Obama's ass?

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:45:23 No.377101719 >>377101406 oh wow , you think taxing the rich will fix the economy wow how do people like you get tricked into that shit?

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:46:28 No.377101926 >>377101671 Actually, I think that's Adams, Jefferson is the one in between Washington and Reagan.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:47:36 No.377102126 >>377101671 Madison is about to catch the dump.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:47:49 No.377102170 >>377101671 >>377101671 President Nignog is stepping on the the Constitution. So yea Jeffy is pissed as fuck. Back in his time slaves were killed for less...

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:48:14 No.377102245 >>377101926 Oh, right! My bad... anyway, this clearly looks like some Tea Party poster or something

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:49:14 No.377102421 >dat Nixon....

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:49:16 No.377102432 >>377102245 >portraying obama as a bad president > hur dur it must be tee party HEE HEE

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:49:52 No.377102549 That is some stupid shit

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:50:43 No.377102728

>>377101719
Taxing the rich won't fix the economy, but it can help so long as the money is spent on job creation (i.e., infrastructure repair) that is then in turn bid on by the private sector and not stupid shit like wars in Arab countries and donations to 3rd world countries.

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:51:12 No.377102825

>>377101719
How do minimum wage earners like you continue to swallow the BS that giving tax breaks to the wealthy will jumpstart the economy? Time and again we've seen that the rich will just shuffle their money into offshore accounts, or investments in overseas funds to avoid paying taxes here. Money being leveraged on short sales, sitting in swiss accounts, and crap like that does nothing to free up capital for investment or improvement. The whole theory of trickle down economics hinges on the need for the people with money to reinvest it, so that capital can be liquid enough to be lent out. Instead they're all doing janky zero value add tactics that strips economic value rather than building it.

TL;DR You're a fool

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:52:17 No.377103018 >>377101654 >>377101560 you are both retarded. my point is the reagan recession was thanks to carter. the bush recession was due to overleveraging thanks to greenspan. all stats are stupid and you are all Faggots. >economic liberal here

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:53:32 No.377103256 >>377102728 the entirety of all money from income tax goes straight to paying off our debt , that includes capital gains so not a dime of it would actually go towards something

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:53:40 No.377103268 >>377101719 If the tax rate on business was hypothetically 100% then 100% of profits would be diverted back into the business. You only pay taxes when you pay yourself.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)18:59:54 No.377104351 >>377102825 Because the only experience most workers have with investing is as a consumer. Lowering income tax for most business owners just means more time vacationing and lest investing in infrastructure.

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:00:39 No.377104481

>>377102170
EDIT: you guys are right that's probably not Jefferson.

TL;DR Obama Sucks. Goats would do a better job!

Either way, Obama's Presidency was an utter failure. It's past the time to stop blaming Bush for all these fuck ups. Throwing money at problems does not make them go away, you just wasted money. Obama had 2 years of near free reign on Legislature and the only thing he managed to do was flush trillions down the drain.

I don't speak for anyone but myself, but I believe that another 4 years of this roody-poo will tank our country. Before he had no track record (But he was always "Present" apparently) and we feel for his hope and change BS. Now he has a long list of failures and a short list of successes. His ideals are a dream because his lives in this fantasy land; where suddenly it's the rich vs the poor. Some people actually start with nothing and become very successful. The government isn't responsible for success, Hard work, Dedication, and Ingenutiy breeds success and you're a fucking retard if you think sitting on your ass trying to get your Goddamn art degree is going to work.
Later /b/itches!

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:02:40 No.377104830 Who's the guy bending down to tie Obamas shoes?

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:03:27 No.377104945 ITT undereducated republican sacks of shit AND open-minded, liberal, educated, benevolent Americans.

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:04:34 No.377105152

>>377102825
>bad economy
>Investments from american tycoons are going overseas due to a speculative market based on the fact that we have a shit president who does not live in reality and thinks buisnessmen are being "greedy" when in reality they are just investing in markets that have a predictable future , no investor on the planet invests in things that have a dark future (the us) .
>small buisinesses are closing left and right
>Regardless of what obama says , many of the small buisinesses we like in this country fall under the axe he plans to swing.
>obamacare will destroy small buisinesses by requiring them to pay even more in taxes to pay for his nigerbill. (SB cannot afford current taxes btw , thats why they are going out of buisiness.

So you are telling me the best idea is to tax the people who make the investments that grow this country as a "punishment"? Knowing full well they will just end up not paying them and continue to spend their cash overseas since the president has no fucking idea what to do?

fuck no. You cut taxes across the board. None of our taxes are currently paying for anything than government debt. Let the candy-assgots default and learn their godamn lesson. We are the largest consumer on the planet and if you cut taxes to insanely low levels for everyone , you just got rid of the apathy of the american family wondering if they can pay their mortgage this month.

and then the economy exploads into a frenzy of investments and growth.

This is not economics , its just fucking basic logic

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:05:08 No.377105243

unblind yourself and realize that none of the men depicted even care a shred of you. America has done better than planned, by some crafty use over the years. Realize the founding fathers would be more than proud that the U.S. has become number 1. It was a long shot, and to think that you've muddled through all that constitutional rhetoric...such as a champion noble enough to carry on the next world order...

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:10:24 No.377106261 bumping this thread because the demoflops have been raped

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:13:39 No.377106831 The real point of this picture: The founding fathers are all asking "Why isn't that roody-poo picking up that garbage?!?"

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:13:52 No.377106866 burp

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:15:01 No.377107084 File1327709701.png-(738 KB, 720x549, sadkeanu.png)

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:15:26 No.377107166 I think they're all shouting at Lincoln for freeing the slaves and now a black guys president.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:16:03 No.377107277 >>377107084 Was waiting for someone to post that. Terrible effort, though.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:21:36 No.377108271 >>377106261 articles.businessinsider.com/2011-07-14/news/30093395_1_tax-rates-tax-shelters-income

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:21:49 No.377108303

>>377105152
"This is not economics , its just fucking basic logic"
pretty flawed fucking logic there.

Taxes, especially on the wealthy are already at insanely low levels. Look at Romney, he paid an effective 14% tax on his total worth. As a nation, we've continuously whittled down taxes on the wealthy since the end of WW2, all the while rallying behind the cry that lower taxes will create jobs and create opportunities, and its been the opposite outcome every time. There is the old statement, "Insanity is performing the same action over and over, and expecting an different outcome." Its not about "punishing" the wealthy, its about getting them to pay at least the same rates that I have to pay, and as I've already stated, most of them arent making the investments you seem to think they are. They're sitting on their money, and using it to back funds that are zero value add systems, purpose of which isnt to grow anything other than the money in the fund.

I don't know why I bother trying to educate idiots, especially here. You'd think I'd learn that you people are a lost cause, you who rush to defend the very people who would happily turn you back into serfs to work the land.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:23:48 No.377108665 It's saying that despite names/labeling, this is the real, historical left/right division of presidents.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:26:14 No.377109104 File1327710374.jpg-(373 KB, 1900x1200, 1323724260448.jpg) >>377108665 I've got your left right division right here. Pic related.

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:29:23 No.377109705

ITT: People that think rapid growth is a good thing.

Try to keep in mind that even if low taxes did cause the rapid growth mentioned in this thread, the corresponding increase to inflation coupled with already incredibly slow wage increases would wreck the buying power of the poor. Just look at gas prices and the effect on the poor already.

And I still feel sad for the private factory owners and such that can't break the million dollar barrier because that's where all the rich taxes are, anyway.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:29:55 No.377109800 File1327710595.jpg-(53 KB, 720x482, 1327709701506.jpg) >>377107277 cropped and EVERYTHING

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:30:38 No.377109946 File1327710638.jpg-(624 KB, 1900x1200, So_wise_The_American_Dream_Geo(...).jpg) >>377109104 If you copied Warren Buffets investments move for move you would not be rich.

>>	01/27/12(Fri)19:31:43 No.377110150 is that... marty mcfly?

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:34:27 No.377110684

>>377108303
way to completely bypass my fucking post and continue to spew irrelevant shit

pro tip homo , lowering taxes for everyone would be a very good thing , ask your mom how much lower taxes would help out next time she brings you spaghettios. You might be suprised that real people outside of reddit politics have to pay alot of money in taxes that doesnt go to anything relevant to help the country.

So no , raising taxes to "fair levels" on the rich wont make a difference , it might make you "feel better" since you have been corrupted into thinking taxing rich people "trickles down" to the poor. When in fact taxing the rich will turn them off to investing in the country in the first place. which is something we desperately need.

So take your choice

low taxes for EVERYONE

or

No jobs for everyone.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:35:53 No.377110951 >>377109705 Niggger dont talk to me about buying power of the poor when you have spooks in the ghetto dropping 500 bucks on a new pair of sneakers every week.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:35:55 No.377110958 File1327710955.jpg-(129 KB, 600x400, dorylus-big.jpg) >>377108271 Anyone have opinions on this yet.

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:37:52 No.377111328

>>377109104
george carlin is the most overrated comedian in history , i would rather sit in a coma re living comedy central presents dane cook for 30 years than listen to that bitter old cunt cry about how nobody loves him and he hates god because he sucks at life

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:38:22 No.377111413 >Dissin Teddy Roosevelt GTFO inb4 derp he caused WWII

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:41:19 No.377111991 >>377110958 tl;dr

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:41:37 No.377112045 File1327711297.jpg-(11 KB, 274x305, 1327279272760.jpg) >roosevelt >not for the people >mfw this artist is a tard

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:41:47 No.377112071 >>377098965 >racist >Implying that's any different then what's been said about every-other president in history.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:41:50 No.377112078 RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:42:34 No.377112226 >>377111413 I'm sorry you had a weak father and have to make up for it by worshiping old men with silly titles. You a batman fan too?

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:43:31 No.377112387 File1327711411.jpg-(170 KB, 400x400, wtf_am_i_reading?1.jpg) >>377112226

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:44:30 No.377112582 >>377110951 ITT: someone who thinks roody-poos are poor and not just stupid.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:44:45 No.377112632 >>377110684 Did you read this? >>377108271 Raising taxes forces people to invest in infrastructure and people. Is it moral? Probably not and if they are stupid enough to wind up paying those taxes to the government then its a waist.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:45:20 No.377112739 File1327711520.png-(894 KB, 1900x1200, massive faggot.png)

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:46:27 No.377112946 >>377097560 Theodore Roosevelt was the only president to secure national parks and protect domestic American species. But I presume the artist was an American liberal arts student and thus, did not know this.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:48:29 No.377113329 >>377111328 I agree with you completely but he does have a point. A point that is relevant to the argument.

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:49:00 No.377113453

>>377112632
>Raising taxes forces people to invest in infrastructure and people
>Implying taxes are used to invest in infrastructure and people

You should visit New York sometime. Rated one of the highest in city taxes, worst for infrastructure in developed countries.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:50:37 No.377113749 File1327711837.jpg-(1.04 MB, 1280x860, 1327706515076.jpg)

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:51:38 No.377113938 >>377112632 do you know what an investment is? and why do you think taxes are being used for anything other than paying off our debt?

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:51:52 No.377113988

>>377113453
That is because they are paying those taxes. Using taxes to force the economy in a direction and actually collecting too much in taxes are not the same thing.
Taxable income of all taxpayers is reduced by tax deductions for expenses related to their business

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:52:51 No.377114181 File1327711971.jpg-(20 KB, 544x400, 1291189077220.jpg) >>377113453 >Brings up a valid point >Uses New York instead of Detroit as an example.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:54:12 No.377114408 Why did reagan shank that guy on the bench?

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:55:20 No.377114643 >>377113988 >Implying everyone owns a business >Implying taxes don't drive up the price of everything else including rent sureiswomanlogicinhere.png

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:56:17 No.377114830 >>377107084 Thank you so much for doing this. I think it's amazing that someone went to the bother of creating the original image without doing a single bit of research.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:56:42 No.377114916 >>377113938 At&T investing in communications infrastructure and Enron's splurge in India are both investments but would have different consequences under a high tax rate. I am talking about using high taxes to govern the economy. Not to rape it.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:56:45 No.377114931 >>377098515 <<<this /thread

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:56:55 No.377114962 demoflops are getting raped itt

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:57:12 No.377115018 File1327712232.png-(147 KB, 291x324, elderly1ZOOM (copy).png) >>377112632 >its a waist. >waist

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:58:16 No.377115241 >>377114916 >govern the economy congratulations f@ggot , you are a socialist and dont even know it

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:58:20 No.377115268 >>377114916 No, you were just suggesting increasing taxes and you probably still think it's applicable.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)19:59:12 No.377115444 >>377114916 >govern the economy. >government fucked up everything so far >lets give them more things to fuck up

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:00:21 No.377115662 >>377115444 trips the keynsians have been decimated

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:00:57 No.377115782 File1327712457.jpg-(1017 KB, 1280x860, 0192310910924014102.jpg)

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:01:11 No.377115817 File1327712471.jpg-(91 KB, 506x338, url.jpg) >>377115444 can't argue with trips

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:01:23 No.377115870 Reagan was a dick. the '80s weren't some type of golden age. I don't know why republicans try to make him into a demigod. If you want some previous president to hold up as an example, how about Bush Sr. At least he knew voodoo economics when he saw it.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:01:40 No.377115931 >>377115782 I lol'd

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:02:02 No.377116016

How does this not make any sense?
You people are fucking blind

founding fathers on the left, obama administration on the right, the guy on the bench is an average joe american.

They're saying What the fuck obama? What are you doing? You're ruining the nation we created

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:02:31 No.377116111 >>377115782 needs sad keanu

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:03:14 No.377116268

>>377114643
>Implying everyone owns a business
That is why we have a tiered and nuanced tax system.
>Implying taxes don't drive up the price of everything else including rent
Prices go up in your argument in order to offset a cut in profits. I am not saying people should "pay" more in taxes.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:03:17 No.377116289 File1327712597.jpg-(1.22 MB, 1280x860, 1327712457053.jpg) >>377115782

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:03:31 No.377116330 >>377115870 >ends cold war by intimidation and swagger >reverses carters bullshit in one term >is older than most rocks how could you come to the conclusion that he sucks?

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:05:11 No.377116652 >>377116268 >Prices go up in your argument in order to offset a cut in profits >Has never owned property nice try but your underage is showing

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:05:13 No.377116662 File1327712713.jpg-(18 KB, 456x336, 11-801-_456_336.jpg) >>377107084 I expected this far sooner, but thank you for doing it.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:06:41 No.377116946 >>377115444 There is a difference between changing the rules of the game and trying to play it for everyone.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:06:52 No.377116987 File1327712812.jpg-(17 KB, 640x360, 2343422222.jpg) you have no chance against horus

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:07:01 No.377117015 >>377098898 >Reaganomics Part of the reason you're in a shitty place right now, you know.

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:07:14 No.377117049

File1327712834.jpg-(18 KB, 574x183, 409244_3072978140478_114439336(...).jpg)

>>377116268
>Prices go up in your argument in order to offset a cut in profits.
>Implying profit increase isn't a necessity to survive in a world where prices increase and currency becomes devalued.

try again I'll wait

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:09:20 No.377117458 >>377116652 Okay so raising income tax has what to do with property taxes? Real question.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:09:25 No.377117470 >>377116946 >changing the rules of the game >Thinks he can change human nature This is why we have checks and balances. The problem in the US is that politicians have been corrupted, which is illegal.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:09:32 No.377117498 File1327712972.jpg-(56 KB, 461x640, adsfr23rttww.jpg) >>377116987 666

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:10:41 No.377117725 >>377117458 >Originally discusses taxes in general >Tries retrofitting the topic to derail a well given point next comment...

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:10:47 No.377117752

>Reagan giving a shit about a homeless guy HE in all likelyhood put there.

>Obama on the Constitution, implying it wasn't already incinerated by Bush.

OP, you're a goddamned moron. I like the concept of the pic, but it's wholly inaccurate and stupid.

If anything, presidents 1- about 34 should be "outraged" at the perceived atrocities of 35-44 (the "corporatists" and neocons).

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:12:59 No.377118188 >>377117470 Actually it works because human nature is consistent. People generally try to act in there own best interest. The argument that high taxes have had a positive impact on the economy is not a product of human reason but human experience.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:14:01 No.377118406 >>377117752 >implying it wasn't already incinerated by Clinton inb4 militias and the right to bear arms don't count

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:14:51 No.377118571 File1327713291.jpg-(30 KB, 499x509, 666999.jpg) >>377117498

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:16:27 No.377118871 File1327713387.jpg-(59 KB, 500x499, album-the-right-to-bare-arms.jpg) >>377118406

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:17:09 No.377119013

>>377118188
The argument that high taxes have had a positive impact on the economy has failed miserably, as can be seen in every major city in the US.

As taxes increased over time, their infrastructures got worse.

Buying more apples doesn't increasing the number of oranges in your possession. The problem is corruption.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:17:21 No.377119053 >>377117725 >>377108271

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:18:29 No.377119269 File1327713509.jpg-(371 KB, 1280x860, 1327712597727.jpg) >>377116111 My half assed attempt

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:18:34 No.377119282 >>377097560 that's just a ridiculously well done image, even down to the various expressions on their faces seem appropriate for each man

‮otibuD ogrE otigoC‪‪‬ 01/27/12(Fri)20:19:14 No.377119415

File1327713554.jpg-(278 KB, 800x1000, 1288805180089.jpg)

>>377116330

1. Cold War ended by itself. Reagan happened to be steering the ship at the time of the Soviet collapse. To his credit, he at least didn't instigate further fearmongering, but he sure as shit didn't do a goddamn thing about it either.

2. Reagan and his Neocon movement is responsible for the current economic hardship. There is no such thing as trickle down economics. It's not a viable theory and no economist takes it seriously. It was nothing more than a buzzword that sounded better that "declaring war on the middle class and working poor".

3. Reagan was a (not the first, but possibly the worst) warcriminal who enacted and controlled illegal war activity using the vaguely established implied powers of the president. Technically, Nixon was the first to do this, but Reagan was the first to do it that cost a ton of money and lives for no good reason. He was scum.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:19:28 No.377119467 File1327713568.jpg-(84 KB, 411x600, asshole.jpg)

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:21:07 No.377119806 >>377119053 you dun goofed >>377112632 >Raising taxes forces people to invest in infrastructure and people.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:21:42 No.377119914 >>377119282 >Has no idea who Theodore Roosevelt is

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:22:14 No.377120022

>>377119013
Yes if a company can not pay its workers or is forced to rent equipment because of taxes then I would say you are right.

Taxes that are structured in such a way that they force you to pay or hire more workers and invest in equipment can be beneficial even if they are almost intolerable.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:23:38 No.377120307 >>377119914 I know full well who he is and TR wasn't big on constitutional limitations.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:24:41 No.377120509 File1327713881.jpg-(372 KB, 1280x860, 1327712597727.jpg) >>377119269 >why cant i hold all this freedom

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:25:25 No.377120661 Good Presidents: Abe Lincoln Franklin Roosevelt Teddy Roosevelt Bill Clinton John F. Kennedy

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:25:59 No.377120792

>>377119415
1.reagan ended the cold war , period

2.If you want to get technical clinton is responsable for the credit crisis that crashed the economy in october of 2008. Reagan had nothing to do with it.

3.last time i checked we didnt go to war during the 80s you dumb candy-assgot

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:26:17 No.377120845 File1327713977.jpg-(324 KB, 555x370, large.jpg) The asshole Jon McNaughton also painted this.

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:26:18 No.377120848

>>377119806
The alternative to investing in your business is buying yourself more luxuries or speculative investing in unrelated industries.

Those thing are not wrong in the least but generally investing in your business makes you more competitive and when done universally raises the standard of living of all working people.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:26:22 No.377120858 >>377119467 Well done sir!

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:27:22 No.377121053 >>377120022 >socialism is good >government is more efficient than the private investor You broke the speed of retard right there

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:27:30 No.377121080 File1327714050.jpg-(155 KB, 550x370, peace-is-coming-large-image-zo(...).jpg) Jon McNaughton lol at Christian Samurai...

>>	‮otibuD ogrE otigoC‪‪‬ 01/27/12(Fri)20:28:00 No.377121194 >>377120792 HOLY SHIT! You need an emergency, immediate Fox-ectomy and I'm prescribing you a few political science and US History books. Seriously, you are a massive embarrassment to this nation. ...or was I just trolled?

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:28:03 No.377121205 File1327714083.jpg-(850 KB, 1280x860, 1327712457053.jpg) >>377119269

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:28:40 No.377121330 >>377121194 He's a shill paid to post conservative propaganda...

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:29:40 No.377121545 >>377120661 >Franklin Roosevelt >Implying pearl harbour wasn't the biggest blunder in naval history inb4 the US navy always kept their ships in close clusters

>>	istsOf the Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:30:28 No.377121690 Boooooooooooooring

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:30:28 No.377121692

Let's see...

Polk, W.Harrison, Hayes, Arthur, Jackson, A.Johnson, Fillmore, Lincoln;
Grant, Buchanan, Pierce, Reagan;
sullen young Robert Redford;
Garfield, John Adams, John Quincy Adams, B.Harrison, Tyler, Jefferson;
van Buren, Monroe, Washington;
Eisenhower, Coolidge, Kennedy;
L.Johnson, Truman, Nixon, Madison (stooping);
Harding, Ford, Taylor, Bush 41, Bush 43;
Obama;
Carter, Clinton, Hoover, FDR;
Wilson, Taft, T.Roosevelt, Cleveland, McKinley

>>	When you see it Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:31:17 No.377121839 File1327714277.jpg-(2 KB, 600x600, Blank.jpg)

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:31:20 No.377121847 File1327714280.jpg-(358 KB, 1600x1080, One+Nation,+Under+Cthulhu.jpg)

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:31:46 No.377121916 George Washington wants a Segway. JFK and Abe show both have brains exposed.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:32:08 No.377121992 File1327714328.png-(190 KB, 400x323, >:(.png) >>377120848 >buying yourself more luxuries >Implying this has no positive effect on the economy Right, people shouldn't be able to buy nice things, that will boost the economy! next...

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:32:11 No.377121999 >>377099065 Ryan Weever? Lulwut

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:32:25 No.377122053

>>377121194

>>377120792
his statement isn't too far off,

Reagan was a big factor in the cold war, but Ike was probably the most significant President toward that. And of course the USSR fell because socialism doesn't work

The Federal Reserve was responsible for the crash, but Clinton era policy directed that credit into housing (W made this a little worse)

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:32:47 No.377122124 >>377121690 >Result of American education

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:33:56 No.377122393 >>377121194 >Implying the cold war didn't end wait...wat?

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:34:10 No.377122441 File1327714450.jpg-(19 KB, 311x304, can won't.jpg)

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:34:16 No.377122464 >>377121839 Woah, what the tits

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:35:38 No.377122756 File1327714538.jpg-(43 KB, 539x386, america fuck yeah.jpg)

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:35:41 No.377122762 >>377122464 Did you see the roody-poo?

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:35:47 No.377122772 File1327714547.jpg-(901 KB, 1280x860, 1327714083702.jpg) >>377121205

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:35:57 No.377122815 >>377121330 He's talking to himself in a foil hat

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:36:00 No.377122828 >>377120307 He wasn't big on corporations fucking the little guy by buying the government either, candy-assgot.

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:36:32 No.377122927

>>377121194
>HOLY SHIT , YOU JUST SAID SOMETHING THAT MY LIBERAL SOCIOLOGY TEACHER DIDNT SAY. YOU NEED TO READ THESE LIBERAL BOOKS

stfu pansy , I know US history , and any retard with half a brain knows that the tax cut of 81 caused the most economic prosperity in a century and is the direct cause of the happy times we had in the late 80s and well into the 90s. The reason we had debt wasnt reaganomics , it was incredible amounts of military spending to intimidate the soviet union.

get bent you gay cunt

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:36:35 No.377122939 File1327714595.jpg-(50 KB, 330x265, forman.jpg) >>377122756

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:36:38 No.377122946 File1327714598.jpg-(83 KB, 400x709, the way things are.jpg)

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:36:58 No.377123002 File1327714618.png-(1.75 MB, 1280x860, dealwithit.png) my OC. SPREAD THE WORD FAR AND WIDE this is the REAL IMAGE OF OUT PRESIDENTS

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:37:56 No.377123174 >>377122828 Big corporations only get big by government interaction. Check the history books, Standard Oil made the money needed to lower their prices below production costs thanks to shares owned in government granted railroad monopolies

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:38:21 No.377123258

>>377121053
>You broke the speed of retard right there
ImpossiblURe.
>socialism is good
Socialism is a shitty fact until the singularity or some other magic bullshit. Individualism is the dream of all none retarded humans. And a few retards like me.
>government is more efficient than the private investor
Changing the rules of a game does not mean playing the game for you. Innovation among the masses will always outpace think tanks and police states.

Why are people anti big government but not anti big corporation?

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:38:23 No.377123262 >>377122772 Who the fuck is the old lady flying?

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:38:49 No.377123345 >>377121205 I like where this is going.

>>	Niggerdemous 01/27/12(Fri)20:39:08 No.377123398 >>377107084 I am so glad I was not the first one to think Keanu Reeves when I saw the picture.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:39:15 No.377123428 >>77123002 The fuck is wrong with bush's neck?

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:39:25 No.377123461 >>377123002 lol you completely failed to understand what the image was saying in the first place there was a reason bush was behind obama

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:39:37 No.377123515 File1327714777.jpg-(281 KB, 555x370, wakeupameric.jpg) FUCK I LOVE THIS ART

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:40:07 No.377123605 >>377123174 >Big corporations only get big by government interaction. >Implying this wasn't due to corruption traced back to the corporations that benefited.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:41:02 No.377123793 File1327714862.png-(880 KB, 802x694, 804.png) >>377123262

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:41:04 No.377123803 >>377123258 >y u no like big government? um have you been alive the past 7 years

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:41:27 No.377123892 >>377123258 because most people don't realize the two are connected see >>377123174 The two advertise themselves as opposed to the other, and since people see how much they suck, they favor the one that appears to suck less

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:41:51 No.377123969 >>377123515 thats so godly

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:42:27 No.377124087 >>377123803 I mean why do people hate and fear one but not the other.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:43:07 No.377124220 >>377123002 >>377123002 >>377123002 >>377123002

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:43:14 No.377124246 >>377123605 when looking for a first cause in this look for the one that doesn't need the other. The corporation needs government power for wealth, the politician doesn't necessarily need the corporation for power.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:43:59 No.377124404 >>377124087 Because you are 12 and living in fantasy land?

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:44:11 No.377124448 File1327715051.jpg-(29 KB, 700x500, internets.jpg) >>377123793 >mfw

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:44:24 No.377124485 >>377124087 Because the bigger government gets , the more damage it can do if it becomes corrupt Not the other way around, corperations can only create , not destroy

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:44:42 No.377124553 File1327715082.jpg-(37 KB, 339x256, facepalm2ly3.2.jpg) >>377124246 >the politician doesn't necessarily need the corporation for power.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:45:23 No.377124701 File1327715123.jpg-(11 KB, 339x256, facepalm2ly3.jpg) >>377124485 >corperations can only create , not destroy

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:46:56 No.377125032 >>377124553 National media & endorsements >>377124701 Patents, lawsuits, and copyrights Christ sure is 12 in here

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:47:17 No.377125104 >>377121847 Can see this as a theory for 2012, just without cthulhu, the burning down of our government, yes....

‮otibuD ogrE otigoC‪‪‬ 01/27/12(Fri)20:47:27 No.377125134

>>377122053

The Fed's refusal to change interest rates did cause A crash, but not the current economic hardships.

Bush Jr. was directly responsible for this massive hole. Hell, his spending caused roughly 60% of the CURRENT deficit. Between his fudged numbers, two wars and tax cuts without spending cuts, he's dealt about 8 TRILLION dollars worth of damage to the debt with zero chance of a return (wars and tax breaks don't generate return wealth in any way like policy changes can/do).

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:47:51 No.377125204 >>377124553 so Washington was only elected because of corporations that didn't exist because there wasn't a government to form them (its a legal construct retard)

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:48:08 No.377125244 >reagan on the peoples side his single handedly fucked up this country

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:49:00 No.377125430 File1327715340.jpg-(183 KB, 799x532, Naughton-wakeupAmerica.jpg)

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:49:19 No.377125493 >>377124404 So abuses perpetrated by one are impossible or undesirable to the other? How are they so different in potential?

>>	‮otibuD ogrE otigoC‪‪‬ 01/27/12(Fri)20:49:25 No.377125517 >>377122927 It's scary because you actually seem to think that it's true.

>>	‮otibuD ogrE otigoC‪‪‬ 01/27/12(Fri)20:51:08 No.377125888 >>377123002 WOW. You are a photoshop MASTER. Seriously, how did you do that?

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:51:12 No.377125898 >>377098515 THIS the man was a hired fucking actor

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:52:10 No.377126095 >>377125517 total tax revenues didn't fall from Reagan's tax cuts, the problem was he also spent more... a problem eerily familiar with W.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:53:44 No.377126431 >>377123002 He didn't switch whole bodies. Just heads.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:53:44 No.377126436 >>377125898 I think bush was more of one too....explain how he won his second term and all

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:55:53 No.377126898

>>377125134
Funny how you gush about bush and then crawl into a defensive hole when somebody mentions obama is spending more money twice as fast as bush did.

also the massive hole we are in was the result of many presidents , people forget that bush walked into the presidency that had a 5 trillion dollar debt. we kept clintons surplus too until 911 happened and we had to rape the middle east.

Fact is that picture is extremely accurate displaying the problems of today

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:56:10 No.377126963 File1327715770.jpg-(928 KB, 1280x860, 1327714547563.jpg) >>377123002

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:56:15 No.377126981

>>377098898
He wasn't evil. He was just an asshole and a rather shitty president that went back on his own parties tenants(small government, less taxes), which is a HUGE difference.

Obama is black reagan, sorry. Just as shitty IMO but I'd rather have an actual liberal.

Democrat does not = Liberal

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:56:27 No.377127008 >>377126095 How much of that was do to any increase in net worth of our economy? If there was an increase in spending is there any data on were the money went?

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:58:27 No.377127448

Love how conservatives claim liberals don't follow the constitution while starting illegal wars, prohibition, the drug war, the patriot act, most of the support for internet censorship bill is from the politically right, NDAA, etc etc.

That "liberal" is a constitutional lawyer, trying to give you free healthcare is hardly unconstitutional.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:58:43 No.377127498 >>377125493 >Still implying that we live in a black and white society where people don't simply just hate one of the slightly more than the other.

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:59:12 No.377127591

>>377127008
been a while since I've seen any of those numbers, but I'm pretty sure the Treasury keeps them. If I remember correctly revenue increased a little under reagan's cuts but he spent a lot more, weighted toward military. Bush''s cuts had no effect on revenue and he spent on both military and BS domestic programs.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:59:48 No.377127704 >>377126095 >eerily familiar with W. >W You spelled Obama wrong

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)20:59:58 No.377127742

>>377126898
I don't have a problem with spending money when it's for things like roads and infrastructure. The problem people have with bush is we fought two really badly executed wars on foreign soil with no good exit strategy or understanding of the culture. Obama also spent far less in bailouts than Bush did(and his had at least a few strings attached beforehand). I'm not an Obama supporter btw, it's just bullshit to act like he's this crazy liberal spender when most of his shit is mediocre moderate at best. (private health insurance, he was never for public option, lowering taxes, hawkish on wars).

And before you talk about Libya notice it's over and we never put thousands of troops on the ground?Yeah. And we got a percentage of Gaddafi's money.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)21:00:23 No.377127830 >>377127498 one of them*

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)21:00:51 No.377127928

>>377125517
It is true
you can cry like a bitch all you want but we can have prosperity with a government deficit if the people are spending and expanding business , which they were under the tax cuts

although i will concede much later in the 90s growth was due to the internet , but its still a good 10 years of incredible prosperity for americans

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)21:01:46 No.377128106 >>377127704 lol. Sorry I'm used to treating the one time off tax rebate sort of cuts as spending (their economic impact is closer to that), so I wasn't even thinking about Obama

>>	‮otibuD ogrE otigoC‪‪‬ 01/27/12(Fri)21:02:12 No.377128212 >>377126431 Ah, I hadn't noticed (lol, Obama's hands look OK in white or black because he's a half race)/ Still, it's a good, clean job.

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)21:04:40 No.377128723

>>377122927
This is actually partially true. not either OP btw.

Reaganomics was stupid, sorry. But supply-side economics is rather silly on the whole doesn't really work right.

What Reaganomics did was cause a large boost in return for a large influx of credit(which is what Obama is generally doing right now), which of course inspires growth. Then in the 90s we smartly decided to pay that credit off because we were doing well. Then we decided to spend like crazy 2001-2007 while slashing taxes.

The problem with reaganomics is we keep trying to do it forever and that doesn't work. in the short term deficit spending is useful. in the long term it's not good.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)21:04:47 No.377128753 >>377126963 while assholes are arguing this is slowly getting better

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)21:04:48 No.377128759 >>377097823 and why isn't bush on peoples side? he saved them from the teroras

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)21:04:56 No.377128781 File1327716296.jpg-(259 KB, 450x332, wtc.jpg) >>377127928 >10 years of incredible prosperity for americans Yea, also in the 90's we had the most involvement in raping the middle east, and the most terrorist attacks against American interest.

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)21:05:09 No.377128817

all this picture displays is that obama, whether he can control it or not, is letting the government control everything and break its own hard working constitution that George Washington and the forefathers, who actually gave a FUCK about the common people, whom in this picture looking worried and asking the presidents of today current and past of why you fucked up this country? all you care about is yourselves and the rich, the middle class and below dont matter to you anymore? WHAT HAPPENED?

TL;DR our country is going to the shithole and its only going to get worse unless the common people take action

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)21:05:20 No.377128848 OP sure has a screwed up world view.

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)21:06:46 No.377129137 >>377128781 waiting for it...

>>	‮otibuD ogrE otigoC‪‪‬ 01/27/12(Fri)21:06:56 No.377129166 >>377126898 I didn't respond to it because it's absurd and untrue. idiot.

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)21:07:12 No.377129213

>>377128723
reaganomics does work. Historically it had flaws because it wasnt pure reaganomics , if we had no military spending we would not have gained a debt from it.

reaganomics is supposed to work when we are not spending massive government money. which isnt really reagans fault considering he was fighting a democrat congress at the time who were developing the welfare state

>>	Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)21:07:27 No.377129264 >>377128723 the joke about your supply side criticism is that those models are drawn totally from empirical data, unlike the Keynesian ones that are theoretic constructs. So they work out, because they worked out before they were known.

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)21:07:32 No.377129285

>>377128817
Obama isn't 'letting' anyone do anything. Stupid people elect stupid House Reps. Obama is the president, not the fucking Monarch. He doesn't write laws. He provides for defense and gets to veto unless all of hte house and senate agree.

candy-assgots need to lrn2 three branches of government. Obama or hte president isn't super important. house and Senate is. And unfortunately no one ever votes 'their official' out because they're great and everyone else is an asshole.

Anonymous 01/27/12(Fri)21:08:03 No.377129381

File1327716483.jpg-(23 KB, 400x400, 1326647150512.jpg)

>>377097560
Paultard here.

>mfw I see John Adams lamenting over Obama stepping on the Constitution

John Adams signed the Alien and Sedition Acts into law. He'd be standing on the same side as Obama.

[Return]

Delete Post [File Only]
Password

Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]

Japanese Culture

Interests

Creative

Adult

Other

Misc.