File :-(, x, )
Yoko Wants YOU! Anonymous
>> Anonymous
Brilliant conversion of a vertically oriented image into a wallpaper. But the brown stripes should have that paper texture as well.
BTW, original plox
>> Anonymous
whys the wallpaper texture so... paper-like?
>> Anonymous
>>397068
To recast the vertically oriented image as a picture on a wall, I imagine. Though if the red parts had a brick-like texture this would be more apparent.
Either that or it is simply used to disguise the scan artifacts of the original image.
>> Anonymous
Actually, this is pretty good. Impressive, anon.
>> Anonymous
That is pretty good, nice job Anon.

Can we has some original?
>> Anonymous
This is awesome! Widescreen version plox!
>> Anonymous
4chan, you never cease to amaze me. I shat out this crap wallpaper, and you people praise it like it's great. I don't even understand why I spend time on things anymore.
>> Anonymous
Fuck off troll
>> Anonymous
bump for original

>>397141
if this is true, then you don't understand your own work
>> Anonymous
It is true, and I do understand my own work. I took this image: http://www2.gainax.co.jp/shop/index.cgi?rm=image&id=1795&genre=&page=&key=&8%A1%
E04=2%A1%DE0, enlarged it, filtered it, and textured it to make that wallpaper.

I know how to make things look nice. But now I know I don't have to put in much effort in cleaning or vectoring a scan because image quality definitely does not matter to most people (as shown here), so long as it's a picture they like.
>> Anonymous
>>397592
No, the image quality does matter (for a clean wallpaper). But in this case it works well because it's a poster on a wall.
If every other wallpaper was made the same way this would suck. This wallpaper isn't perfectly done, but it's great because the concept is sort of original, or at least not something we see often.
Now anon demands you fix those freaky brown stripes.
>> Anonymous
>>397592

your e-cock is showing fagot
>> Anonymous
>>397605
Must be hard not to be able to type a five word sentence without a mistake.
>> Anonymous
>>397605
>>397613
hahahaha, oh wow
>> Anonymous
>>396961
Is it me or is the scan probably crumbled in the first place before it was scanned?
>> Anonymous
>>397646
RTFT