File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
guru guru mawaru~
>> Anonymous
anata no nihongo wa jouzu desu ne
>> Anonymous
>>356928
Omae mou da
>> Cancer that is killing /g/ !zkraGArAss
itt weeaboos
>> Anonymous
>>356941
sankyuu desu

>>356943
shinde kudasai
>> Anonymous
Boku no atama ga itaindayo. Minna uruse!
>> Anonymous
itt: baka no koto
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
needs moar school rumble
>> Anonymous
?????????????????????????(`?´)?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
bump for moar.
>> Anonymous
bump for moar yakumo, maybe some suo as well if it's out there.
>> Anonymous
>>357123
>>?????????????????????????(`?´)?

??????????????????????????????????
??????????? ??????????????????????????????????
????????????????????

?????????????????????
>> Anonymous
>>357250
????
???????????????????
?????

??????????????????????
>> Anonymous
>>357250
>>????

??????????????????????????????????
???????????????????

>>???????????????????
?????

??????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????
????????????????????????

>>??????????????????????

??????????????????????????????????
??????
>> Anonymous
>>357123
>>357250
>>357258
>>357275

this is why i fucken love the japanese language

you can call people trash while still being more polite than them in speech and even further tell their social standings by whether or not they understand keigo

heres a hint: the dude with the shorter responses that aren't quoting the other guy is getting wtfpwnt
>> Anonymous
>>357276

Translations?
>> Anonymous
>>357276
The first guy came in and bagged on Anonymous for using ro instead of actual Japanese characters, and further, "bad Japanese".

The second guy came in and pwned the first guy in response for using informal command form rather than proper (polite Japanese) and called him trash for his crude language.

The first guy retorted back saying, "Are you a samurai?" Furthermore, bagging on the second guy for his use of "old speech" which is actually keigo, formal Japanese language, that is still used today by educated (smart) Japanese people.

Basically, in Japan, if you don't understand keigo, you're either a kid or uneducated and you don't have a good-paying job. Companies like Sony (even Nintendo) require the use of keigo.

So anyway, the last response form the formal-Japanese-using guy just wiped the floor with the crude-Japanese-using guy. He called him on what I mentioned above.

Oh yeah, the first guy mentioned Rurouni Kenshin in retort to the second guy and the second guy shot that down noting that Rurouni Kenshin uses keigo improperly.

Man, this is the best read I've had in ages, /w/.
>> Anonymous
>>357283

i think the best part is that this whole time the keigo dude is using nothing but keigo in response

he's still being polite in talking the shit out of the other dude
>> Anonymous
...Why the fuck are these guys arguing here instead of translating my anime and manga?

GET TO WORK NAO
>> Anonymous
>>357276
I'm sure that's marveling and all as you so colorfully put it, but language is no more polite then the culture using it. The victorian writers like Lord Alfred Tennyson, Elizabet Barret Browning, and twentith century writers like S.T. Eliot and A.E Houseman proved to be worthy challenge to Romanticism without the need to directly attack any Romantics.

Any language can be indirect and ambiguous in nature, it just takes the mind of a person using the words to put it into play. Japanese is just more reputable at it currently.
>> Anonymous
>>357291
You obviously do not know Japanese. I must suggest that you keep your logical fallacies of assumption to yourself, because indeed in Japanese, there is actual polite speech.

Indirect and ambiguous in nature? Yeah, if we're talking short/plain form Japanese. We are, however, talking about KEIGO. Honorific language. Polite isn't even polite enough to describe it. It's literally honoring whoever you address with it by use. Japanese is such a feudal language.

Please do not comment on something that you obviously do not even understand.
>> Anonymous
>>357291

lol some hasn't taken JAPN4 in uni yet
>> Anonymous
>>357296
Hmm. That would be JAPN4 in a semester system school. In a trimester or quarter system school, the fourth course isn't even close to covering keigo.
>> Anonymous
Guy who posted shorter sentences here.

Regarding the dude who posted long sentences:
He wasn't using keigo, he was using samurai Japanese.
I honestly thought it was a joke. The grammar was improper as well.
Let's go through this a bit at a time, shall we?
>>?? (You, ????
First of all, no one uses ??. If it is ever used, it's used as a joke. The only time you ever hear it is anime or manga. If you want to say you, use ???
>>?????????????(I can't forgive you for that.)
Proper Japanese: ?????????????
>>???????????????????????????????
??? (What he meant to say I believe: If you want to correct that Japanese you would make it xxx)
....rofl. My first post said "if you can't speak Japanese don't post shitty Japanese". He's telling me that my saying "don't" is incorrect and that I should be saying "If you can't speak Japanese, you must post shitty Japanese."
So if he wanted to say what he wanted to properly, here's how it would go:
??????????????????????????????????
????????????????????
to be continued...
>> Anonymous
>>357301

dude your wrong he's still using keigo even if he doesn't address you with keigo "you"
>> Anonymous
>>357293
It's quite clear your English isn't elaborate enough to describe the hierachy of politeness in this language. I suggest a thesaurus and a class in language arts with vocabulary builders. And just because you may or may not be an English native, doesn't qualify. Sorry!

By the way, assuming logical fallacies without explaining them is a false assumption fallacy in itself begging the question. I expect you to likewise to keep your fallacies to yourself.
>> Anonymous
>>357301
>>357301
Umm, no, it's still keigo. I've been through two keigo courses (one here in AU and one in studying abroad in Japan), and quite frankly, he doesn't have to address "you" as keigo to use keigo sentence structure.

Furthermore:

>>>>?????????????
>>>>Proper Japanese: ?????????????

Even if the second is proper, the first is still actual keigo. I'm looking at two different textbooks as we speak. Both show that adding "o" plus the verb-stem and ending with "suru" in "masu" form as keigo conjugation for non-special case keigo-conjugated verbs.

Also:

>>>>????????????????????????????
???
???

Is a statement of what one must not do. As it's proper Japanese, your correction is irrelevant. I think you're confusing yourself here, as this is pretty damn basic "te" form use.

"te ha ikenai" = must not do.
"te mo ii" = can do.

The keigo aside, this is mid-level Japanese, mate. C'mon.
>> Anonymous
>>????????????????????(To be honest, you're the one who has awful Japanese)
Almost correct on this one! Nice try lol.
?????????????????? is more proper. Fixed the stupid samurai talk and added ?? to make it correct Japanese.
>>?????????????????????(Don't appear before me again, scum)
Once again... samurai talk anyone?
Regarding ??? ? is added to make it honorific. but this is an insult. You don't use an honorific for the word trash!!!

NEXT POST
>>???????????????????????????????
???
??????????????????? (This isn't correct Japanese. Who's the one speaking improper Japanese? That's you.)
??????????????????????????????????
??????????????? There we go. A bit more natural sounding Japanese, at least. By the way, he was commenting on me saying ???? which is the way of writing a sudden laugh.
>> Anonymous
??????????????????????????????????

?????????????????????????????????
????????????????????????

??????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????
?????????Just fixed it up. Made grammar correct, took away the stupid old japanese mannerisms.

>>
??????????????????????????????????
???
??????????????????????????????????

??????
fix'd.
Before you all pretend to know Japanese and say he's right lern2japanese.

>>357290
Don't worry, I'm working on that... Just doing this in my breaks from it ^^
>> Anonymous
>>357314

>It's quite clear your English isn't elaborate enough to describe the hierachy of politeness in this language.

Oh, the irony. Try using actual words next time.

>I suggest a thesaurus and a class in language arts with vocabulary builders. And just because you may or may not be an English native, doesn't qualify. Sorry!

Sorry, but I'm not going to follow your ad hominem into the zone of being out of context. So I'll kindly say "fuck you" and dismiss this.

>By the way, assuming logical fallacies without explaining them is a false assumption fallacy in itself begging the question.

Self-explanatory assumption fallacies do not require explanation even in proper argumentation, sorry. When you group Japanese as simply "language", I don't have to explain shit, bloke.

>I expect you to likewise to keep your fallacies to yourself.

Yeah, it's a good thing I haven't presented any.
>> Anonymous
>>357315
>>>>?????????????
>>>>Proper Japanese: ?????????????
Sorry, I was in a rush. ???????????????
Happy? w His Japanese was not proper gramatically. I was mainly focusing on that.

>>>>????????????????????????????
???
???

Um I corrected that... Read below that part please (^^;
The part I quoted is the part that is mistaken. My corrections are below.
>> Anonymous
>Oh, the irony. Try using actual words next time.

I'm not the one desiring to use a word more impacting than polite.

>Sorry, but I'm not going to follow your ad hominem into the zone of being out of context. So I'll kindly say "fuck you" and dismiss this.

I'm not attacking you to suggest your arguement it wrong, I'm just adding a suggestion after the fact no more than adding insult to injury.

>Self-explanatory assumption fallacies do not require explanation even in proper argumentation, sorry. When you group Japanese as simply "language", I don't have to explain shit, bloke.

Accusing doesn't make it anymore self-explanatory than by me accusing your arguement as asinine. And not explaining yourself in a mean spirited way just confirms my arguement. Oh bloke?! That's informal language.

>Yeah, it's a good thing I haven't presented any.

You can keep denying all you want no more than a child. Good luck with that!
>> Anonymous
Quit the moonspeak
>> Anonymous
SHUT UP! THIS IS /W/, NOT SOME PROPER BULLSHIT CLASS
>> Anonymous
>>357334
fuck you! ill eat your words!
>> Anonymous
>>357321
>>357322
>>357325
All of your corrections are wrong, and I'm tired of explaining for someone else. You're correcting correct keigo with NON-keigo, and it's as simple as that.

Furthermore, you say grammatically incorrect, but there is no actual rule to how much or how little keigo one can use in a sentence. That's superficial. If anyone wanted, he or she could conjugate every part of speech possible in a sentence to keigo.

In all my nine years of uni and grad-school Japanese learning, I've never been so irritated for someone else. Really, your ignorance annoys me that much.

If you're trying to correct his keigo, why can't you even give keigo in correction back? It's apparent who's lacking in Japanese skill here, and it's neither him nor me.

And to>>357328, you apparently have never been in an actual collegiate argument, because you're confusing what both you and your opposition require in warrant, claim, and citation. I'm just going to ignore any further posts from until you learn some actual argumentation if you persist in attempting to use it.
>> Anonymous
>>357339

it's ok man i feel ya

>>356928>>357286>>357296and>>357313here btw

>>357321
>>357322
>>357325

you need to learn keigo before you try and correct it dude cuz your not even using keigo
>> Anonymous
>>357339
Some things both of us understand without the need to premise, other parts I asked him to explain which he failed to. That's where he failed to make sense of himself and he never asked me to explain anything.

Back to the informal anonymous: You've had more than enough time to respond, and you didn't. I'm not going to stick around like some passive-aggressive person, I have a life. Sorry, but the pseudo-debates are over, if you'd like to play again, try the same time tommorrow when I'm around.
>> Anonymous
Are you trying to say that you call people ???and ??? If so that's hilarious www
??????
??????????? ??????????????????????????????????

????????????????????
this was pretty funny too.
9 years of Japanese with these kind of errors is pretty pathetic dude
Learn the difference between keigo and improper grammar
If you've been learning for 9 years, you should at least be able to speak fairly fluent Japanese.
??????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????
????????????????
>> Anonymous
>>357342

dude debate? are you in high school? leave the guy alone cuz even i know that college terminology refers to it as an argument and not debate
>> Anonymous
pffff...all that work, and what did it get you?

you're sad men.
>> Anonymous
>>357344
psuedo?
>> Anonymous
>>357343

wait wait if he's that guy then i'm>>357123

its like you didn't even read what he typed in his final response

furthermore its pretty damn suspicious how you still have yet to show any keigo

also you also ignored my response cuz i personally said that how you address someone does not change the fact of keigo sentence structure (i think)

illiterate anonymous is illiterate in both eng and jap
>> Anonymous
>>357342
play? that's not fun, jerk!
>> Anonymous
WHAT THE SHIT IS GOING ON?! I SAID SAGE!!!
>> Anonymous
>>357346

i never said psuedo and it aint even a word moron
>> Anonymous
>>357339
If you overuse keigo it sounds too formal. He was making it sound more natural Japanese. I'm a major in Japanese, and if you think that the Japanese before was incorrect I refuse to believe you've been studying for 9 years.
>>357347
Kisama is not keigo... Is this a joke?
>> Anonymous
>>357353

can u read? even if u "overuse" keigo it isnt incorrect

and where the fuck did i say i studied for 9 years?

i'm a double major in japanese and int business so w/e go flash your major at someone else

furthermore again if you could read you'd see that i didnt state that kisama was keigo
>> Anonymous
HAI GAIZ, KEEP IN MIND THAT THIS IS A THREAD FOR POSTING SCHOOL RUMBLE WALLPAPERS >_>
>> Anonymous
>>357355

hai dood keep in mind that the asshole that is>>357123started this w/ his trolling and then tried to correct keigo w/ non-keigo

fission mailed troll
>> Anonymous
>>357353
yes you did! shut up!
>> Anonymous
>>357354
Poster of the corrections here.

Kisama is extremely stupid. Don't use it.
Keigo is okay, but in limits. Use too much and your sentence sounds like a textbook.
Moreover, this is a messageboard. Use keigo and you sound like a fag.
>> Anonymous
>>357354
keigo isn't word damnit!
>> Anonymous
WORD ISN'T A WORD DAMNIT!
>> Anonymous
>>357360
it totally fuckin' is!

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/word

so is pseudo

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pseudo
>> Anonymous
>>357358

sry but your arguing opinion against fact cuz nothing you said in response contradicts my messages

so i must say

...


good for you?
>> Anonymous
>>357356
Not trolling, but I want some School Rumble wallpapers. Please move the conversation somewhere else.
>> Anonymous
>>357360
gtfo troll, this is a real mans arguement! where real men...argue. and that is a fucking word. Word!
>> Anonymous
>>357364

i started this damn thread and i can defend ppl in it from being trolled whenever i damn well please
>> Anonymous
hai! ill /b/ ur troll 4 the dai!
>> Anonymous
>>357365

"arguement" isn't though

the actual word is "argument"

who knew?
>> Anonymous
>>357363
Have Skype?
Username: SirAnonymous, Nickname: ??????
Let's continue this on messenger.???????
>> Anonymous
>>357366
HAHA! I'M TROLLING IN YOUR THREAD!
>> Anonymous
>>357369
thats wut i ment bich!
>> Anonymous
>>357366
Oh well, do as you please. I'm just saying that this might not be the right place for it, as this is an imageboard.
>> Anonymous
>>357369
c'mon! bring it dial up faget!
>> Anonymous
>>357370

no i dont and that's a bit creepy actually

you being free aside your inviting the wrong guy

in case you didnt notice both of your opponents left this thread a while ago

im just a the op who doesnt like trolling
>> Anonymous
>>357369
word isn't a word!
>> Anonymous
>>357375im just a the op
>a the op
>a the
>> Anonymous
>>357379

im also not one of the ppl who stressed correct language so good for you
>> Anonymous
>>357375?you being free aside your inviting the wrong guy
>being free aside your inviting
>free aside your
>> Anonymous
>>357379I'M A GRAMMAR WHORE.
>>A GRAMMAR WHORE.
>>A WHORE.
>> Anonymous
2 or 3 trolls, i think?
>> Anonymous
1 troll 2 troll red troll blue troll :D
>> Anonymous
>>357381I'M A WHORE.
>>A WHORE.
>>WHORE.
>> Anonymous
>>357383I'M A GRAMMAR WHORE.
>>A GRAMMAR WHORE.
>>A WHORE.
>> Anonymous
>>357384
What the shit? I counted seven!
>> Anonymous
>>357384i think?

AHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>> Anonymous
I lurve dis tred~ <3<3
>> Anonymous
~Dudes! It's 7chan~
>> Anonymous
as long as nobody responded to my post, technically i'm still right. even though they did it on anothersssssgshshshshshshs
>> Anonymous
>>357380
I love you.
>> Anonymous
>>357393

i <3 you more precious
>> (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) Anonymous
MOAR TROLLS DAMNIT!!!
>> Anonymous
chicken mootle anyone????
>> Anonymous
>>357345you're sad men.
>> Anonymous
HAI GAIZ IM LISTENIN 2 PRESSURE SUIT BAI AQUALUNG THAT SO DOES NOW MAEK ME A FRUITCAKE
>> Anonymous
arguing on 4chan for the lose my dude it's worse than special olympics its down right sad.
>> Anonymous
>>357432
good way to revive a dead topic
>> Anonymous
>>357432
failfag
>> Anonymous
D:
>> Anonymous
:o
>> Anonymous
Oh shit! I've read about these threads before!

These are those kinds of threads that you can glean some Japanese-ness just by posting in them!

Fuck yeah. I'm not worried about my Japanese finals next month anymore!

<3 4chan charms!
>> Anonymous
God, as much as I know about English, I don't have any fucking clue what's going on.