File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
gurren lagann, preferably not in png
>> Anonymous
ones of Kamina please
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>288372
>preferably not in png
>> Anonymous
>preferably not in png

So you'd rather have a pixalated piece of shit that no one can work on?
>> Anonymous
Eyecatch collection
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=QS3LMNTD

(all .png, lol)
>> Anonymous
(can't dl right now) Does that up contain all the vectors done so far or just up to around episode 13
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>gurren lagann, preferably not in png
>> Anonymous
PROTIP: Max quality JPEG images are virtually indistinguishable from PNG images, at least by what the eye sees. Also, Windows XP is teh ghey and doesn't like PNG wallpapers (you lose transparency on your icon text, for one). Lastly, unless the image is relatively simple in terms of color range, a max quality JPEG will be a lot smaller filesize, too.

There are advantages and disadvantages to all image types. Stop being faggots about this.
>> gundrake !3stw1O/bgU
>>288916
convert it yourself faggot
>> Anonymous
>>288951
You seem to misunderstand. I do. I am not the OP, though like a typical tripfag, you jump to the asinine conclusion that every Anonymous is the same person.

What's retarded is the faggotry that springs up around image formats. No one format is superior to all others all of the time. Not PNG. Not JPEG. Not anything. And all you retards who engage in such stupid fights despite having no fucking idea what you're talking about need to knock it off.
>> Anonymous
>>288958
>I am not the OP, though like a typical tripfag, you jump to the asinine conclusion that every Anonymous is the same person.

lurk moar
>> Anonymous
ITT internet tough guys.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>288962
>>288960
>>288958
Learn to sage
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> E-4 Agatha
Looking for more 1680x1050, or ones I can trim down to that size. And more Kamina, less dickface.
>> Anonymous
Thread needs moar Nia, less faggotry.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>288958
Except PNGs are lossless, so you lose nothing by taking an image that was in PNG and converting it to JPG. The reverse is not true. So as long as the image size is not an issue, which it shouldn't be as long as you're not on a shitty dial-up connection, PNG is just superior for distributing images. Just like FLAC is superior to MP3 for distributing music, regardless of what format you choose to put it in once you download it.
>> Anonymous
>>289079
Yes, and only faggots hear the difference between a FLAC file and a high-quality mp3 file.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>288916
In the case of Eye Catch traces though, PNG is most definetly supperior to a max quality jpeg. For educational purposes, I have taken the OP image and used advpng to compress remove 28% of the file size.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Compare that to the same image converted to a JPEG at max quality (wich isn't the same as the lossless jpeg format that is in the works of standardization). For file size comparison:

gurren-advpng.png - 458KB
gurren-maxjpeg.jpg - 1.1MB

You do the math.
>> Anonymous
>>288916
I should have mentioned the issue about XP and PNG files for wallpapers. XP will convert a JPEG into a BMP and store it in a temporary location before implementing it as the background, where as for PNG, it changes the background to be an Active Desktop, which is where you loose your transparency. If any decent wallpaper manager is used instead of the built in one, this problem goes away, but also, I have seen (but do not remember where) addons for windows that link into the Desktop Properties and will convert the PNG to BMP before implementing as well.

Saged, since I really didn't add any content to the thread.
>> Anonymous
there is no such thing as a 'High quality MP3'
if you have seen a mpeg video, you notice it is highly butchered, thats what mp3 is just the audio layer outta mpeg
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
So did anything come of this? Because it should.
>> Anonymous
<snip> there is no such thing as a 'High quality MP3' </snip>

what a lot of shite
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Reading this thread makes me want to punch babies. More walls, less internet tough guys.
>> Anonymous
>>289305
srsly, someone needs to make a wallpaper with this.
>> Anonymous
>>289006
Can somebody convert this one?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>289415
1. Open image in Paint
2. Save as .jpg
3. ???
4. Profit!
>> Anonymous
>>289466
100000000000 hours in MSPaint
>> Anonymous
>>Stupid JPEG versus PNG shi*

Solution: Use high-quality BMP.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>289468

Not really faggot. There's a word in this world. this word is called trying. and when you try, maybe you can get the things you want. MS Fucken Paint it for once.
>> Anonymous
>>289687

Yeah because I want my wallpaper folder to total 500 MB after like 100 wallpapers. Jpeg it at a high resolution + stretch = decent enough quality.
>> Anonymous
i know a good solution, use .svg AND STFU

btw, tits or gtfo