File :-(, x, )
1440x900 Anonymous
/w/ needs more love for this res
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
Lurk harder,

>>404142
>> Ashchea
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
I don't get it.
Why don't we just say "16:10, 1920x1200 or higher"

I strongly believe that atleast 99% of us here can check the box for "stretch to fit"
>> Anonymous
>>405638
I hate this threads since most of the 1280x1024, 1440x900 etc threads are just plain resizes of a bigger image
>> sage
>>405676
technically it's 1280x800

also windows does a decent job of crop+resizing 4:3 stuff
i have a lot of 1600x1200 wallpapers on my 1280x800 laptop that look fine (they just need to have not much going on in top/bottom)