File :-(, x, )
HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
who the fuck is deleteing all the walls around here..
the Girls Bravo thread is GONE and several GOOD walls i was trying to get couldn't because they were deleted from various threads.. this is some bullshit ..
>> Anonymous
>>205020
ya...I noticed that to...
>> Anonymous
Watch this one get deleted too.
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
     File :-(, x)
probably not, that'd make it obvious that a janitor/mod is doing it.
>> Anonymous
iirc the girls bravo thread was full of porn wasn't it?
>> Anonymous
Any idea why?
>> Anonymous
>>205029
I didn't see any. Did you?
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
>>205029
nope. NONE.
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
     File :-(, x)
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
     File :-(, x)
also.. i just checked.. why is this thread not bumping?
>> Anonymous
>>205029
considering it was i who was posting 'em i'd would have to say no...few of em where lingerie but nothing that would cross that porn line.
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
Case and Point
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
>>205041
and you didn't delete them right?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>205044
It was not I..I would repost but if the thread disappears it would be a waste of time
>> Anonymous
worksafe doesnt mean no porn it means no things that aren't safe for work
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
     File :-(, x)
>>205041
also requesting re-posts of the walls, hopefully no more mod/janitor/whatever faggotry will ensue.
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
>>205047
I didn't see anything unsafe for work, and won't worry i don't need to "lurk moar" i'm a very active 4chan user.
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
>>205047
are we to assume you are deleting these?
and please do give a reason if you are.. a real reason, not a cop out like the previos excuse.
>> Anonymous
>>205051
I'm confused, how the hell can I delete other peoples posts?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>205047
hm...considering some of the stuff i see in the wallpaper thread i am suprised that this is an issue...but to each their own i suppose...i'll only post the work saft ones then
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
>>205053
uhh whoever is doing it is a mod/janitor... I assumed it was you, because you were the only ass who said about NSFW deletion policy goes beyond nudity/grotesque and into not even /e/ realm.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>205054
apparently i can't even spell safe...lol
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
     File :-(, x)
>>205053
YOU and whoever is doing the deleting needs to review the rules.
<- THIS IS WORKSAFE, and doesn't violate ANY rule for /w/
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>205057
uh I never said it was
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
     File :-(, x)
>>205061
>>205047
>worksafe doesnt mean no porn it means no things that aren't safe for work

clarify then.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
This one needs a tad of cleaning its from an artbook if you can't already tell
>> Anonymous
>>205063
I never said I was talking about a picture that you were going to post in the future.
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
>>205065
no, apparently you were talking about all the pics that were deleted, which were safe for work, yet you claim there are other factors than nudity in an image which would in fact also make the NSFW.
i'd like to know what these other things are, so i can consider them before uploading images to /w/
so go on..
do tell
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Last one that doesnt cross this um...line...as far as i can tell...too bad a few more decent ones...
>> Anonymous
>>205066
You're an idiot. The only image I was ever talking about was the one of Zero No Louise with cum dripping off her face from a hentai cg set.

Stop confusing me with whoever the fuck you're confusing me with.
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
     File :-(, x)
>>205067
well i'm sure we'll be told exactly where that line is, as it's obviously not only nudity.
I'm truly intruiged and waiting with baited breath.
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
     File :-(, x)
>>205069

you had no right to share your opinion in this thread then.
I wasn't talking about any images like the one you are talking about.
A Girls Bravo thread was completely deleted, as was a few in this thread.
I was trying to find out WHY.
these were worksafe pics.
you jumping in and saying it's not just porn that that makes it NSFW is retarded and un-needed, please think before you post and don't have any backing to your comments.
and again i'm still waiting for you to tell me what else makes an image NSFW.
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
>>205067
could you post the ones you feel may in the slightest way cross the line in /e/
plox and trankoos
>> Anonymous
>>205073
I never noticed any of this images on the board before you started this whining thread. The only thing I can see that you've accomplished is proving that you're the boards biggest complainer over and over again.
>> Anonymous
DEAR HAL9000,

PLEASE LEARN TO PUT YOURSELF IN THE SHOES OF AN AVERAGE CUBICLE-DWELLER AND STOP COMPLAINING THAT PICTURES THAT BELONGED IN /E/ AND /H/ ANYWAY (neither of which are work-safe boards) HAVE BEEN DELETED.

THANKS,
-ANONYMOUS
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
     File :-(, x)
>>205077
>>205076
lol, when rational arguments fail resort to that
big ups guys.
and the pics were worksafe...a little hard to prove now however since the whole thread was deleted.
>> Anonymous
>>205079
Again, stop confusing me with people I'm not.
>> Anonymous
>>205070
I Find it best not to rattle the powers that be...but seeing as i am in a generous mood tonight i rar/zip the last of 'em
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=RUXRPUFB
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
     File :-(, x)
>>205076
oh and oddly enough wehn i CONTRIBUTE a wall i usually get responses like this
http://zip.4chan.org/w/res/204237.html
however yeah, you must be right i sure complain a lot.........
...
..
.
not really though, just don't like shit being deleted when it's not violating rules.
Anybody with 1/2 a set would bring it up.. too bad you don't have even that much.
>> Anonymous
>>205079
psst... hey hal... psst... over here...
PANTY SHOTS ARE NOT WORK-SAFE

kthxdie!
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
>>205081
thx
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
     File :-(, x)
>>205083
maybe in your cubicle lol
explain how a panty shot is different from a swuimsuit please
>> Anonymous
>>205082
its actually impolite to wave your epenis around like that.

if you were actually concerned with the way the board was shaping out you wouldnt rely so heavily on your assumed 'status'. Contributing only in order to advance your own image on the board is stupid and not what imageboard culture is about.
>> Anonymous
>>205085
Swimsuits are more socially acceptable in public than underwear. It doesn't have to make sense, just accept it and move on.
>> Anonymous
>>205090
It doesn't have to make sense but it DOES!
>> Anonymous
>>205090
...and it occurred to me just after I hit Submit, that some swimsuit pics also leap headfirst into NSFW territory.
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
>>205089
I actually wasn't and i only did because i was called a whiner, whoah what a shock i reply with something to counter that.

>>205090
well maybe dl the Girls Bravo walls upload that was posted, and tell me exactly where these pics become so NSFW.

anyways i'm done here, any bashing and whatnot is to be expected, but yeah.. i know i'm right and i was on;y trying to stick up for other browsers of /w/.
the staff is NOT accountable, and personally that's not right. "image was deleted due to content" or something would be nice...unlikely though, this is 4chan right.
anyways, yeah i'll be over here apparantly waving my e-penis and laughing.
>> Anonymous
itt we take the internet seriously
>> Anonymous
>>205095
>well maybe dl the Girls Bravo walls upload that was posted, and tell me exactly where these pics become so NSFW.

Perhaps I will, when I get home. There does of course exist the possibility that you are right and there's absolutely nothing there that's NSFW, but I'm pretty sure it's simply that you're too thick to figure out what sorts of things other people don't find acceptable. If the former, I shall apologise (you're on your own for dealing with the mods/janitors, though). If the latter, I shall point out all the specifics to you. And ask that if this happens in the future, you just accept that some things you have no problem with are considered NSFW.
>> Anonymous
Wow, somebody has no life
>> Anonymous
Moar Girl Bravo wall
>> Anonymous
IT WAS I, THE GREAT DESTROYER OF THREADS. IT APPEARS YOU HAVE CAUGHT ON TO MY DASTARDLY PLAN. I AM SORRY TO INFORM YOU, HAL9000, THAT YOU HAVE BECOME THE TARGET OF MY WRATH. WEEP AND DISMAY, FOR YOUR DAYS ARE NUMBERED, MACHINE OF THE FUTURE. ALL THAT YOU KNOW AND LOVE WILL BE DELETED, THREAD BY THREAD! HA HA HA HA HA.
>> Anonymous
I was wondering where all the good walls had gone.
>> Anonymous
>>205095
As promised...
1024_all.jpg - panty shot. You *might* just get away with that in some places, but most wouldn't chance it.
1024_kirie.jpg - girl clad pretty much only in bra and panties. Generally frowned upon in the average office.
1024_koyomi.jpg - see above.
1024_miharu.jpg - panty shot.
876831629_1501526917__1152x864.jpg - two girls clad pretty much only in underwear, one of them only half-wearing her bra. Not gonna want that one on my monitor when the boss is around.
1148920418115.jpg - two girls in erotic lingerie. Like hell that's SFW.
Girl Bravo.jpg - two girls clad only in underwear. I believe we've already established that's certainly not SFW.

Any other questions? Or are you just going to claim that it'd be fine in *your* workplace, and therefore that makes it fine absolutely everywhere?
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
>>205106
srsly though

>>205311
wow... you must work in some pretty serious place.
1: browsing on the net @ most work places is "generally frowned upon"
2: browsing 4chan @ work, well it's just kinda stupid
3: When standards have not been clearly stated in the rules, where are we supposed to draw the line?

Maybe I work in a pornshop, maybe you work in a mosque. For me i could look @ full frontal, for you women without head coverings is a sin.

point: We don't have lines clearly drawn, and personally panty-shots are not too risque for work. If your dumb enough to click the thumbnail it's your fault, and if your browsing on 4chan at your job, and they wouldn't be cool with slightly sexy material, your an idiot who should be fired anyways.
I mean c'mon, @ home it's good, but @ work? be a fucking man already and do your job.
>> Anonymous
>>205322
winrar tripfag with a point. You sir, win.
>> Anonymous
Halp! Halp! I'm being oppressed!!
>> Anonymous
I'm sorry but if you don't know what worksafe means then you're an idiot.
>> ~Caine!
>>205322
But what if I AM doing my job...
and surfing 4chan at work...

but aged for truth
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
>>205359
http://zip.4chan.org/a/res/2401322.html
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
>>205359
also, go back to Minitokyo
>> ~Caine!
thread posted as dictated by MOOT himself.
I should have screen capped the thread.
it was in /a/ of all places too.
It is true, Nudity is not defined as NSFW, what has been childishly defined as NONO zones are. Zones such as things you WOULDN'T show children. in America that is.
Nipples, NO
VAGOO, NO
penor, NO
panties, is what we call GREY AREA material, and is up for interpretation. However, as HAL9K points out surfing 4chan at work isn't necessarily a wise idea.

The general public doesn't take kindly to individuals surfing an image board with sexually suggestive material of questionably aged subject matter.

and you can quote me on that.

Work place ethics will clearly define underwear as a nono item and shouldn't be displayed at the workplace. So why would they approve of it at work. This isn't to say that the material is work safe because it is on a work safe board. Even though it is not depicting sexual acts or sexual organs or material that is not fit to be viewed in public doesn't mean it should. 99% of the material on 4chan isn't to be viewed in public.
Discression + Reason seriously lack within Anonymous
>> Anonymous
all tripfags/namefags in this thread need to stfu and kill themselves

also, stop whining cos a few WPs got deleted, grow a pair of testes already
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
>>205369
no, not whining, and already got them thx
>> Anonymous
>>205375
Dude, you are fucking whining. Get over this bullshit.
>> Anonymous
>>205369
>>205376
>>205359
your points are moot
>> Anonymous
Hey, Halfaggot, stop posting your shitty threads in /a/ and /w/ and complaining when they get deleted. Shit sucks if you don't like the rules but people who have been on 4chon for a while KNOW WHAT THE RULES ARE and we have no problem abiding by them. If you don't like them, go back to gaia where you were last week, you whiny douchebag.
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
>>205380
lol my thread wasn't deleted, read first dumbass.
>> ~Caine!
>>205380
this anon fails for not paying attention.
>> ~Caine!
After doing some 'digging' I have noticed a small trend in the servers execution of these image boards.
This thread deleting thing isn't just a problem for /w/, it happens all over 4chan.
This is because of the high volume of visitors upon the poor hapless servers of 4chan that get high volumes of visitors per server load.
So much information goes through that not all threads get bumped properly, and the thread is flooded off of the board, even though you are continuously posting to it.
The boards get bombarded so much that the server doesn't' have time to rewrite the file, it just constantly reads the file, and after it gets flooded off the board, it is deleted.
This is rare, but for the volume in 4chan it is frequent enough.
Mods will usually delete posts that are offensive or threads that attract offensive posts.
In /b/ it has been observed that some images get cross pollinated and two posts will suffer the same image even though two different images were posted. This problem is again because of the high volume of traffic.
>> HAL9000 !aUC8h1oEKI
>>205390
unfortumately a few of the images were re-posted in this thread and were visable for a few minutes, until they were deleted by a janitor/mod =)
...sigh.. ITT i get tired of TT
>> Anonymous
Why is the OP's image post a shitty 1000x668 resolution? That's not even a real resolution! 1440 and higher or get out.
>> Anonymous
So did we get any clarification out of this thread? I'm still rather confused after reading it. Is there some mod/janitor enforcing his own (new) interpretation of the rules on the board?


>>205030
This was one of my posts. It got deleted without any kind of explanation. If I recall it wasn't anything that might be considered "not safe for work".

So WTF?
>> Anonymous
http://dark.scripted.info/Gallery/
http://dark.scripted.info/Gallery/
http://dark.scripted.info/Gallery/
http://dark.scripted.info/Gallery/
>> Anonymous
>>205544
Needs thumbnails. Badly.
>> Anonymous
>>205544
GTFO already.
Seriously.

Stop spamming
>> Anonymous
You motherfuckers need to stop messing with my /w/.

If you try to make it something it isn't, we'll take it back from you.

End of thread.
>> Anonymous
lol

*casts Phoenix Down*
>> Anonymous
cough