/w/ needs more love for this res
Lurk harder,>>404142
I don't get it.Why don't we just say "16:10, 1920x1200 or higher"I strongly believe that atleast 99% of us here can check the box for "stretch to fit"
>>405638I hate this threads since most of the 1280x1024, 1440x900 etc threads are just plain resizes of a bigger image
>>405676technically it's 1280x800also windows does a decent job of crop+resizing 4:3 stuffi have a lot of 1600x1200 wallpapers on my 1280x800 laptop that look fine (they just need to have not much going on in top/bottom)