File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
wow op is new to me!
>> HerrHATO !.5BD/wHb8k
     File :-(, x)
Salvaged the OP: detexted and enlarged.
>> HerrHATO !.5BD/wHb8k
     File :-(, x)
Also had a go at>>481390
>> HerrHATO !.5BD/wHb8k
     File :-(, x)
>>481412
and this one too...
>> HerrHATO !.5BD/wHb8k
     File :-(, x)
>>481413
Felt like this one needed some attention too...
>> Anonymous
>>482078
ugh could you have dilated that image any more? looks like shit now.
>> HerrHATO !.5BD/wHb8k
     File :-(, x)
>>482135
Well EXCUSE ME for trying...
>> HerrHATO !.5BD/wHb8k
     File :-(, x)
Perhaps this is small enough for ya?
>> HerrHATO !.5BD/wHb8k
     File :-(, x)
or better yet, how about the OP's res?
>> HerrHATO !.5BD/wHb8k
     File :-(, x)
or perhaps you're still living on a 1996 computer?
>> Anonymous
>>482164
Maybe he would use a 640X480 screen
>> HerrHATO !.5BD/wHb8k
>>482173
Would've run into the image size min. with that one, but I like your thinking anon.
>> HerrHATO !.5BD/wHb8k
     File :-(, x)
>>482164
>>482162
>>482158
>>482146
Okay, bashing aside I went back to my original edit and did some edge sharpening and some contrast/brightness tweaks. That should make the wallpaper somewhat less "shit".
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>482146
you're excused for trying since you fail so hard. most people would just get a larger image, shitface.
>> HerrHATO !.5BD/wHb8k
>>482184
Didn't mean to sound like an ass...nevermind, that's exactly what I meant to do, but I assumed that the OP was the only existing version of pic; just working with what I had.

Thanks for the scan however.
>> HerrHATO !.5BD/wHb8k
     File :-(, x)
Okay, for no reason whatsoever, here's a detext of>>482184
>> Anonymous
>>482245
Two things: Upscaling is shit. Only upscale if you're going up a few pixels. Never more than 100. If people want crappy, blurry pics they would simply set it to stretch and let Windows crappify the wall as if by magic.

Secondly, stop saving things as PNG when the source is JPG. You can't create quality that was lost when the source was saved as a JPG. All you're doing is bloating the filesize to losslessly save all the wonderful JPG artifacts and upscale blur.

Helping fellow anonimii is fine, but learning 'shop basics comes first.
>> HerrHATO !.5BD/wHb8k
>>482358
Point taken anon. Also should note that this wall isn't the most upscale friendly either...

Thanks for the advice
>> Anonymous
>>482358
>>482358
and if you are going to lecture about shoop basics you should know that saving a modified jpg as jpg introduces MORE unwanted artifacts and that only losers on 10 year old computers with dialup are worried about the extra size
>> Anonymous
>>482734
JPG uses a standard algorithm set to compress the file. New artifacts are only created around the edited areas (unless you save at a lower quality than the original). Also, JPG artifacts only truly stand out if you're dumb enough to save at less than maximum quality. Saving a 1024 JPG as a 1920 PNG does nothing but bloat the file. While my bandwidth and many other's bandwidth is fine for 3MB files, the 4chan servers are a bit more taxed most of the time.