any one have this in 1600*1200 or more of a 4:3 scale ratio?
LURK MOAR!
NOH I DEMAND 4:3 WALLPAPER NOWH
>>330670Sorry, I didn't realize it was so important
>>330676lol i c wut u did thar
not quite 1600*1200 but its 4:3
I suppose I can help out a fellow anon just this once.
>>330708Your math is wrong, that would be 5:4
>>330709is your version ( x1200) upscale or OP's (x1050) one is downscale?
demand primary source anywayneed to get rid of bad gradient
It was an upscale.