File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
This is my first vector. What do you think, /w/?
>> Anonymous
Needs more PNG. Also, my guess is you drew half the picture, copied it, mirrored it, and pasted it on the other side. If you didn't, well, SOMETHING happened to the nose, brow, etc that caused some sort of line up issue. Other than that, it looks fine.
>> Anonymous
It is really, really bad.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>154855
Damn, I'm caught. "Make sure everything lines up" was on my to-do list, but didn't get to-do'd.

I brushed over the fuckups. It doesn't look great up close, but whatever.

I also fixed the two canine teeth lines, because they looked pretty bad.

>>154856

Thank you for the constructive criticism. With your help, I am sure I will be able to get better at this. You will be remembered when I'm good at this.
>> Anonymous
If you brushed over your fuckups, it isn't a vector, it is just a trace, with perhaps some vector portions
>> Anonymous
>>154876
Not even a 99% vector, with 3 or 4 five pixel sized brush areas?

Man, that's a tough definition.
>> Anonymous
line your teeth up, the center of the bottom and top teeth are way off.
>> Anonymous
i applaud you, sir
>> Anonymous
>>154892
Can do, though, in my defense, the original picture had misaligned teeth too.
>> Anonymous
Vectors are awesome for two things: the original file format allows unrestricted scaling (since it's made to be scaled) and because those files tend to be much cleaner than some other originals.

Brush it over, and it's still a PNG... but it's not a true vector. By the way, PNG is -not- a vector format, so none of the "vectors" on 4chan are really true vectors unless they're in say... Adobe or .svg format.

I prefer the original file formats myself, but they're incredibly hard to find.

And to all those people who don't like touched-up images, go find yourself any image that can't use even little touching up and improving.
>> Anonymous
>>154984
>>And to all those people who don't like touched-up images, go find yourself any image that can't use even little touching up and improving.
Yes, but the touching up shouldn't be done with a brush tool. He should have kept the original vector file and fixed it there.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>154988
>>154876
Behold! I have redone the fucked up areas in the original vector format, and...

it really doesn't look too different, does it?

Perhaps that might have something to do with why I didn't do this in the first place? And that this method took longer? Oh well, I guess that's the price to pay to consider this a "true" vector.

Oh, I fixed the lower teeth too (with a Vector!).
>> Anonymous
>>155076
Not at all, it actually does look better than the brushed version. The only other way I see that you could make this any better (clearer) would be to save this as a PNG rather than as a jpg. You won't get all the fuzziness that comes with jpg compression.