File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
anyone have this or one like this in a higher quality and resolution? Preferably 1280x1024
>> aza
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Bishounen
     File :-(, x)
I like mine better. :)
>> Anonymous
>>148106

Fail for a 3.76MB png.
>> Anonymous
thanks guys!
>> Bishounen
>>148114

Fail for looking a gift horse in the mouth when receiving a free High-rez wallpaper.
>> Ugoff
     File :-(, x)
Mine's more applicable.
>> Anonymous
>>148118
except he's not OP


and as OP, I have to say yours is shit
>> Anonymous
>>148118

I thought this wall was shit from the first time I saw it. I always thought it would look better is everyone else was in color and Osaka was black and white.

As such, your high-rez "wonder" is, to me, 4 megs of total shit. At least the original is only 200K.
>> Anonymous
>>148261
disregard then, i suck cocks.
>> Anonymous
any one got the one with osaka head in the background of the plain?
>> Anonymous
>>148980
you mean BLISS?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Superior.
>> ~Caine
yes
yes I do.
You should have been in /a/ yesterday. Closed a whole thread with osaka.
However today I can't seem to upload any images.
I can't in the Okami thread and now this one...

and in other news.
>>148114
is stupid.
PNG is not an inferior format. It has the smalles amount of file loss for its compression type, supports variable opacity, and doesn't have the JPG compression boxes. The best format to use in a wallpaper is .bmp because it doesn't use SYSTEM resources to run the decompression agent in the background. And if you even whimper about system memory then I suggest you upgrade from your 486 and invest in a faster internet connection.

Geez for the life of me I cannot understand why people think that larger file size is inferior. They must be on a dialup or something. I mean, my average vector file can run 15 megs in photoshop, then colored and rasterized can run up to 80 megs. SUPERIOR!
Fail for stupid.
>> ~Caine
and reading into the thread a little better, I realize that this wasn't what the bitchin was about.
However, I see it so often it does kind of irk me. I would rather have a PNG than a JPG any day.

In other news
Here is a second attempt at uploading osaka.

and it fails
>> Haplo
>>149016

I agree with you in that PNG is a superior format, but you are wrong in the BMP issue. In current computers the bottleneck, i.e. the thing which make tasks run slower than they could otherwise, usually is not the CPU, but the I/O system, the hard drive for the most part. CPUs are so fast than most of the time they're waiting for data to be ready (except in computing-intensive tasks like video and audio encoding, 3D rendering, etc.)

So, if you have a 1 MB PNG image and a 20 MB BMP image, is most probable that the PNG one loads and shows faster, at least the first time when it's not cached into memory by the OS.
>> Anonymous
>>149016
agreed
>> Anonymous
hey, do you have it in 1440 x 900? Thats the resolution of my iMac, and thats a perfect wallpaper.
>> Anonymous
>>149016
>>149018

You can call me an idiot, but at least I read the thread before I went off on a tangent.

I never said PNG was an inferior format. My point was that a 4MB file, regardless of format is inherently inferior to another file of the same visual quality that floats around 200K. It has nothing to do with e-penis things like how big my machine is or what my connection is.
>> Anonymous
>>149093
AFAIK, there is no such thing as lossless image format that can do hi res HQ wallpaper for just 200kb.
>> Anonymous
>>149112

I didn't say losslessl; I said the same visual quality. Most people can't see the difference, or just flat out don't care if there's a tiny little box around the edge of something.

Again with the e-penis...
>> Anonymous
>>149093

SVG. now go away.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Alright, a little late but...