File :-(, x, )
Question Anonymous
What resolutions will work perfectly on a monitor that supports 1440x900 walls? Either upscale or downscale. I'm seeking resolutions which won't result in any sort of borders.

Thank you
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
not a wallpaper but will you show you different resolutions and what aspect ratio it is
also i believe 1440x900 is widescreen
yeah it is so 1920x1200 1600x1000 1280x800 will fit that res fine
>> Anonymous
Thank you. ^_^ I was actually looking for that.
>> Templar !!F0PMwWYRsww
All you have to do for any resolution is divide the height by the width to get a fraction. For 1440x900, you get 0.625, which is 8:5. If you want to know if another pic will fit, you multiply the width by this number. For instance, 1600x0.625 = 1000. The other common ratios are:

4:3 = 1600x1200, 1280x960, 1024x768

5:4 = 1280x1024 (so ronery)
>> Anonymous
>>441606
Global Rule #2: If you are under the age of 18, or it is illegal for you to view the materials contained on this website, discontinue browsing immediately.
>> Anonymous
>>441750
OP here. Good to know that, but since I'm 26, I'm rather outside that rule's sphere of influence. I apologize that I totally fail at math since well, I haven't gone to school in like 8 years.
>> Anonymous
>>441623

you mean 1680x1050, or WSXGA+
>> Anonymous
>>441726
fail, 8/5=1.6
gb2/basicmath/

Also, there's 16:9 widescreen (results in 1.77777 repeating) too, though the 8:5 resolutions seem to be more popular.
>> Anonymous
>>442211
You're dividing the width by the height.
You're supposed to divide the height by the width.
>> Anonymous
>>442203
if your referring to the 1600x1000 i have there that works also
it seems that some common 3:4 res have been chopped off in height to get to widescreen
>> Anonymous
>>442211
oh okay, height by width... I fail. whatever.

Easier method that works:
divide the width by the aspect ratio of your screen, if you get the height, it's the same.
>> Anonymous
>>442211
16:9 are tv and 16:10 ( 8:5 reduced form) are computer monitors
it must be easier to make 16:10 then 16:9 monitors or some idiot thought it'd be a good idea to introduce yet another resolution