File :-(, x, )
Trends in International Travel Anonymous
Sup /trv/. This is a map of the world adjusted to population. As you can see, India and China vastly outnumber every other area of the world.

These countries have billions of people, but they are still very poor and underdeveloped, so they are not sources of tourism. But when these countries finally develop, we should start seeing floods of Indian and Chinese tourists on our shores.

Where can I learn some good mandarin?
Is Taiwan good for living?
>> Anonymous
China has a tremendous tourism industry. China is the 4th most visited country by tourists in the world.
>> Anonymous
>>5271

God, you are dumb. He said "floods of Indian and Chinese tourists on OUR shores."

By the way, OP is a dumbass, too; there already are floods of Chinese tourists. Where I live anyway.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>5274
>> Anonymous
>>5278
Are you stupid?
>> Anonymous
>>5281

Yes he is.
>> Anonymous
Shouldn't Antarctica be basically nothing?
>> Anonymous
>>5268

WTF?! Where's Australia? Why is Japan so bloated?!
>> Anonymous
>>5699
Just what we need, more retards!
>> Anonymous
>>5271
>>5278
>>5699
This thread makes me feel sad.
>> Anonymous
>>5686
Yeah, and New Zealand hasn't been adjusted at all. Failmap.
>> Anonymous
>>5713
neither has ireland or most of south america.

but WTF is up with nigeria?
>> Anonymous
Thank god we have so many Antartican tourists, I don't know what we would do without them.
>> Anonymous
fuck mandarin. they learn english or starve.
>> Anonymous
I am afraid of nigeria beeing so big.
Also turkey/iran/marocco/pakistan are too big for my comfort.
>> Anonymous
Why antartica is so big?
>> Anonymous
the map made me lulz
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Now I'm scared of Antarctica. What will all that melting ice reveal?
>> Anonymous
This thread makes me lol. I got the equivalent of D in geography in high school, but these morons make me feel like an A student.

Thanks.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>5951
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>6014
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>6015
>> Anonymous
>>6014
we need to arm those pengiuns and send them to kill terrists in iraq
>> Anonymous
Russia has 270 million people.

I don't gets why it's so small.

Also, India is alright. We can be friends if they learn how to clean up their fucking beaches and keep asbestos out of the ocean.

Chinkland however, I'm sorry, please gtfo because nobody likes you; you kill our dolphins, you kill all marine life, your skies are black, you shoot down sattelites in space against all treaties, and your hearts are made from stones.

I suggest we invade them. Where are the weeaboos?
>> Anonymous
"Russia" is not the Soviet Union.

Try checking the right article on Wikipedia next time, moron.
>> Anonymous
>>6168
Japan kills dolphins, not China.
Russia's population is less 200 million.

You are a moron.
>> Anonymous
>>5268

Mandarin isn't that hard once you master the tones and learn a couple thousand characters.

Forget Taiwan though. The mainland's better any day.
>> Anonymous
>>6168

Also, HAHAH, China shoots down a satellite 'against all treaties' and you bitch about that, ignoring that the US has killed 700,000 Iraqis against all treaties and international laws, as well as funded Israel's terrorist government which uses white phosphorous (worse than napalm) over civilian refugee camps.

You ignorant piece of shit.
>> Anonymous
>>6374
Sauce on white phosphorus claims or gb2/aljazeera.com/
>> Anonymous
Israeli e-newspaper: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/777549.html
>> Anonymous
And BBC if you're still going to be a faggot:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6075408.stm
>> Anonymous
>>6374
/n/ is thattaway <-
O wait..
>> Anonymous
>>6374
I'm not sure where these numbers come from. I'm in the military and I don't know anyone who has killed any iraqis. 700,000 is a lot. Surely I would know someone, or talked to someone who knows someone who has killed at least a few right? Also, "against all treaties and international laws" isn't correct either. It's good that you have an opinion and want to be involved, but try to stay logical and reasonable.
>> Anonymous
>>6374
You can't have the cake and eat it too. You can't repeatedly exploit civilians as cover, shell the other side's civilians as your main strategy and then BAAWWW when your civilians get hit as if the other side wants to kill them.
>> Anonymous
>>6396

>your civilians

"THEIR" civilians?

The civilians of Lebanon/Palestine/Iraq are a property of Hizbollah/Insurgency groups now?

That's new.
>> Anonymous
>>6409
Hizballah is a very large organization with many seats in the Lebanese parliament, undisputed control over parts of South Lebanon, social services such as a school system and a miltary that single-handedly fought against Israel in the war. Throughout the war, they were the ones who rose up to protect the citizens, while the Lebanese military stood aside. You better believe they're responsible for what happened to the civilians in their turf.
>> Anonymous
>>6168
>Russia has 270 million people.
>I don't gets why it's so small.
Probably the surface is not so small, because in that map it's stretched a lot.
My guess is the map is correct, but counter-intuitive.
>> anonymous of athens !SysNpnp3nU
>>6427

Russia has 140 million, not 270 million.
>> Anonymous
>>6452
Whatever. The fact is, you can't easily compare areas when one is round and the other is stretched.