File :-(, x, )
Cumming by Sensual Simulatation! Paipan Beauty Therapy Anonymous
Hairless

http://www.akiba-online.com/forum/showthread.php?t=8015
>> Anonymous
They seem to have some sort of infection. After shaving off the hair BLURRY BOXES appear!!
>> Anonymous
Is final cut uncensored?
>> BelmontSlayer !PTiLTslS6Y
>>204678
Yes, as the Japanese law requires it to be.
>> Anonymous
wait wha?
>> Anonymous
shaven? nice.
>> Anonymous
why isnt it a torrent file?
>> Anonymous
>>204681
i think you need to read that more carefully. or let people know that your joke/trolling.
>> Anonymous
>Simulatation
is that like simulated lactation?
>> Anonymous
>>204730
no. yeah
>> Anonymous
What the fuck does it matter that they are hairless? I'd hate to be some fucked up japanese kid who thinks that a pussy is just a series of blocks. No wonder they are always depicted as getting nosebleeds in anime.
>> Anonymous
>>205037

LOL
>> Anonymous
Anon Approves.
>> Anonorway
Seed please?
>> Anonymous
>Hairless

Like that really fucking matters at this point.

Sage for useless non-porn.
>> Anonymous
>>205246
It's not quite useless. I'd honestly rather see some blurry boxes than a bunch of bumpy razor-burned pubic bone.

I am curious as to why the Japanese see fit to censor their porn though. I mean it is porn after all. The intended audience are adults, and just because someone isn't clearly seeing a vagoo getting fucked doesn't mean they aren't still seeing it.
>> Anonymous
>>205254
If what has been said by others on this board is true, the censoring law in Japanese porn was enacted by the US during World War II as a way to lower morale. I've heard here and there that the law should be going out of effect very soon, or is already gone (although that's not to say that the Japanese will stop censoring anytime soon...they tend to have a "meh, it can't be helped" attitude that would probably just leave the porn as is).

Not that it bothers me at all. I think vaginas are gross anyway. ¯\O.o/¯
>> BelmontSlayer !PTiLTslS6Y
>>204703
Whoops! I glanced at it and assumed it was asking if the video was uncensored. Meh...

>>205254
They don't want to censor it. The HAVE to censor it. Read the following quoted paragraph for more details...

"Porn was first seriously restricted in Japan in the Meiji Era, when materials deemed “injurious to public morals” were banned. After Japan’s defeat in WW2, American occupation authorities changed many of Japan’s laws to guarantee freedom of speech and expression. Sadly, the occupation authorities decided that the pre-existing law regarding pornography didn’t need to be changed. It has remained in effect to this day."
>> Anonymous
>>205264

>>205262here...and it looks what I heard was wrong. I guess that goes to show how reliable Anonymous is...
>> Anonymous
Watched and faped to this, a real good find indeed, thanks anon.
>> Anonymous
.rmvb file!? dammit.
>> Anonymous
>>205264
Fuckin' Meji Era. Banned swords, pretty much got rid of samurai and ninjas, and then they censored porn. The emperors then must have been complete douche bags.
>> Anonymous
>>205388
More like reversed weeaboos, actually. The reformers went "ZOMG THE WEST IS SO MODERN AND AWESOME, WE ARE INFERIOR AND MUST EMULATE IT, STAT!!" Among the things they emulated was the strange Western notion that showing naked genitals is somehow immoral and indecent.
>> Anonymous
>>205403
And that men following a strict code of honor and carrying around the greatest swords in the history of man kind was bad too. Fucking reverse weeaboo meiji douchbags.
>> Anonymous
>>205428
To be fair, many of those men weren't exactly happy with the reforms, and thus letting them parade their weapons around in public would have been inadvisable.
>> Anonymous
>>205428
LOL @ 'greatest swords'. Greatest swordSMITHs maybe. The steel they had to work with was shit, which is why it had to be folded with carbon to create any kind of decent blade.
>> Anonymous
>>205862
lol, protip all steel contains carbon, for katana e.g. carbon is/was added to reach ~ 0.7 % carbon fo gaining more hardness
>> Anonymous
Seeding.
>> Anonymous
>>205428
That's it. I'm sick of all this "Masterwork Bastard Sword" bullshit that's going on in the d20 system right now. Katanas deserve much better than that. Much, much better than that.

I should know what I'm talking about. I myself commissioned a genuine katana in Japan for 2,400,000 Yen (that's about $20,000) and have been practicing with it for almost 2 years now. I can even cut slabs of solid steel with my katana.

Japanese smiths spend years working on a single katana and fold it up to a million times to produce the finest blades known to mankind.

Katanas are thrice as sharp as European swords and thrice as hard for that matter too. Anything a longsword can cut through, a katana can cut through better. I'm pretty sure a katana could easily bisect a knight wearing full plate with a simple vertical slash.

Ever wonder why medieval Europe never bothered conquering Japan? That's right, they were too scared to fight the disciplined Samurai and their katanas of destruction. Even in World War II, American soldiers targeted the men with the katanas first because their killing power was feared and respected.

So what am I saying? Katanas are simply the best sword that the world has ever seen, and thus, require better stats in the d20 system. Here is the stat block I propose for Katanas:

(One-Handed Exotic Weapon)
1d12 Damage
19-20 x4 Crit
+2 to hit and damage
Counts as Masterwork

(Two-Handed Exotic Weapon)
2d10 Damage
17-20 x4 Crit
+5 to hit and damage
Counts as Masterwork

Now that seems a lot more representative of the cutting power of Katanas in real life, don't you think?

tl;dr = Katanas need to do more damage in d20, see my new stat block.
>> Anonymous
i thought we were still discussing vaginas
>> Anonymous
Swords? In my vagina?
>> Anonymous
there is no extension on this file, what is the format?
>> Anonymous
>>205965
>>205944

The Latin word "vagina" means "sheath". :)

Guess where the English word comes from. :P

(btw, it suits Japanese girls better to have a bush)
>> Anonymous
I'D SHEATH MY SWORD, IF YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN
>> Jesus !z.LOLm8x3o
>Cumming by Sensual Simulatation!

LIES, THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE
>> Anonymous
>>206067
Since "simulatation" is undefined so far, it may not be.
>> Anonymous
can anyone else not connect to the tracker?
>> Anonymous
>>206169
just wait for it. it seems like it is busy.
>> Anonymous
>>205264
>>205388
>>205403
Wow. I'm learning stuff from a porn thread in /t/. I'm impressed, 4chan.
>> Anonymous
>>205873
> Ever wonder why medieval Europe never bothered conquering Japan?

They didn't know it existed and had no way to travel that far.
>> Anonymous
>>206514
you are learning weeaboo faggotry. go die in a fire
>> Anonymous
>Wow. I'm learning useless stuff and stuff that everyone else knows from a porn thread in /t/. I'm impressed, 4chan.

fickzd
>> Anonymous
>>205873
EPIC COPY PASTA
>> Anonymous
>>205873
DELICIOUS COPY PASTA
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
*sigh*
I actually studied metal/bladesmithing for a few years freelance...

Katanas... most would have sucked, like any nation's swords really. Comparing the best of them, yes, in good hands a katana could slice milder steels because the edge was EXTREMELY hard. That also means in the WRONG hands, the edge would shatter like glass and you'd be left with a ragged crumbling sword edge - but the core should stay strong enough to bludgeon with. If you handle it properly though, the edge will stay sharp for a very long time. Proper Nepalese khukris are also like this - I have one that most files won't even bite into because it's so hard. One problem you may run into is delamination of the different hardnesses of steel in the blade. Masamune's swords were amazing (not "the Masamune") because he could make them - and damn well - out of SEVEN strips of steel. I don't remember the hardness distribution, but there was a core, front, back, and two layers on each side.

European swords... there were good ones, but generally also crappy metal that was made up for by making them BIG. Many were cast, not forged, and would therefore snap in half like modern day wall-hangers if they took a bad whack.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Damascus steel, or by its original recipe it's now called "wootz," was simply a mix of different steels, but back when most individual steels sucked, this almost fiberous mix of them lent a good deal of strength overall. Nothing mystical or fantastic. The ever-sharpening myth would work for a very little while if it were used to slice a lot of soft stuff - the edge would wear irregularly and become serrated - but once that wore down, you'd just have a dull sword with a rough edge.

Which was best? There were simply too many of all of them to honestly tell. Which would _I_ take? A katana, because I prefer the balance, blade geometry (slashing, not chopping, kids! Remember what I said about shattering the edge!), overall average weight, and a good tsuka-ito (handle wrap) is really amazing. Honestly when playing with dull sparring swords, I prefer a nodachi, but they're a little exhausting and cumbersome - awesome reach though!


BTW, shaved pixels are no different from unshaved pixels. I don't mind the censorship in a lot of Japanese AV, but a censored paipan video is really pointless. :/
>> Anonymous
>>206701

herro weeaboo
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>206713
???
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Greatest troll ever. I tip my hat to you OP.
>> Anonymous
Before I read the whole thread I was thinking "Pussies > Shaving > Katanas---WTF!"
>> Anonymous
any one seeding?