File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
What client does everyone here in /t/ use to download their torrents?
I was using bit torrent for a while but it really sucks.
/r/ names and links of good clients.
>> Anonymous
utorrent. nice standalone proggy, all the options you'll ever need and more, good UI, no extra shit like azureus
>> Anonymous
I can vouch for utorrent. It's nice, simple, and user friendly.
>> Anonymous
utorrent, no doubt about it. light fast and customizable
>> animefreak032003
I hope I don't sound like a absolute jackass but I really like azureus! It is a little simple to use and Is precise down to a point. also it doesn't cost anything!
>> Anonymous
>>126435
and is bulky and inefficient, and doesn't manage bandwidth as well as utorrent (last time i checked, granted that was like a year ago).

>also it doesn't cost anything!
are there even any bitorrent clients out there that *aren't* free?
>> Anonymous
>>126435
Too late.
>> Anonymous
BitLord
>> Anonymous
uTorrent is really a good choice under Windows
not like Azeurus full of Java crap.

On my Linux server I use rTorrent in a screen which is also pretty efficient.
>> Anonymous
>>126435
You'r not only a complete jackass but also a complete fag
>> Anonymous
>>126446
2nded for rtorrent
>> Anonymous
>>126445
BitLord is a joke.
>> Jesus !z.LOLm8x3o
I use Azureus, and that's because I use the "extra shit". However, Java does suck more cock than>>126447. Since you're asking for a good client then I'll take a wild guess that you won't be using Azureus's extra functions, so you should probably go with uTorrent. I also do not recommend Azureus to anyone with less than 1 GB of ram, thanks to Java's tendency to leak around 150 MB of memory.
>> Anonymous
It's a easy choice on windows. You use uTorrent.
>> Anonymous XIV
I normally use Bittornado and usually have no problems - occasionally I have used BitComet for awkward naming conventions. I have never used Azureus. I will look into utorrent as it seems to be recommended...
>> Anonymous
I'm using azureus now.
It seems ok.
>> Anonymous
>>126454
well, the "extra shit" that's bitorrent-related, utorrent has. the "extra shit" that's just other java functions, well, if you do use that, then whatever, but i'd still say you're better off using utorrent and java for whatever else you need.

>>126462
i used to use bittornado before i switched to utorrent. for me, the deciding factor was having multiple torrents going for tornado meant lots of multiple clients/processes, rather than just 1 for utorrent. there's lots of other handy things that aren't really necessary, but with utorrent you at least have the option if you want it
>> Anonymous
ยต ftw
>> Anonymous
uTorrent FTW, thank the gods for WINE project, I can also run uTorrent in Linux
>> Anonymous
I use ABC

It works fine, nothing fancy about it. I used to use Azureus until the java started 100% cpu usage.
>> Anonymous
rtorrent on Linux ftw
>> Anonymous
Actually he does have manager bandwidth, Azureus ftw, stop using that uTorrent crap.
>> LUrker with news pls don't ban
I agree with>>126491.

ABC for the leave-it-going-all-night-and-download-every-ouran-episode-individually client. It's extremely easy.
>> xatm092
uTorrent. ABC I was using until I found it doing some weird shit and then my virus software said it was spyware...

So just to be safe I started using uTorrent, and it is great.
>> Anonymous
BitTorrent, who cares, i don't see why it sucks
>> Anonymous
>>126447
Err, GAL?
>> Anonymous
Azureus on Mac OSX
>> COMPARISON TABLE Anonymous
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_BitTorrent_software
>> Anonymous
>>126526
Wow, look at the Azureus rows!
>> Anonymous
uTorrent. I used Azereus, but it ate my megahurtz. After that I used ABC for some time, but it tended to crash (and wipe half of my torrents in the process), so I switched to uTorrent.

With the new beta you can control it from anywhere you have an internet connection, as long as the program is running it home, so you can still sort of download at work. Makes it good.