File :-(, x, )
Ryoujoku Gerira Kari 1 & 2 Anonymous
These were /r/, but my shitty ISP won't let me host a torrent.

Ryoujoku Gerira Kari 1 & 2
???????
???????2
Made by: Liquid

Pics/info of the first game:
http://www.tactics.ne.jp/~liquid/gerira/main.htm
http://www.getchu.com/soft.phtml?id=18205

http://rapidshare.com/files/14500675/Ryoujoku_Gerira_Kari__Liquid_.rar

Pic/info on number 2:
http://www.tactics.ne.jp/~liquid/gerira2/gerira2.htm
Comment too long. Clickhereto view the full text.
>> Anonymous
Rapids much appreciated, looks great.
>> Anonymous
>>149101
Thanks a lot!
>> Anonymous
CGs. Need I say more?
>> Anonymous
request the games, please.
>> Anonymous
> my shitty ISP won't let me host a torrent.

They won't "let" you?

Please.

Let me educate you about the free market, son. YOU are paying THEM _YOUR_ _MONEY_ to transmit your bits. You are not paying them to vet what particular bit you do and do not transmit. So long as you don't trransmit more bits than you are paying them for, what you transmit IS NONE OF THEIR FUCKING BUSINESS. Seriously. If the fuckers think they can vet your communications, then thay can't claim common carrier status when big brother comes down to fuck them in the ass to do his dirty work (see recent legislation).

YOU are the customer. YOU ARE ALWAYS RIGHT! Forcibly remind them of this fact or be a man and get another ISP.

Also, PROTOCOL ENCRYPTION and RANDOM PORT MAPPING.
>> Anonymous
>>150431

lol, internet tough guy. You don't realize when you 'buy' their service you also agree to THEIR EULA... which means they can do what ever they wish when ever they wish and its your choice to take it in the ass or go get a different ISP.
>> Anonymous
>>150442

Then you don't put up with that shit. And if more people refused to be a whiny little bitch and take it up the ass FROM PEOPLE THEY ARE PAYING FOR A SERVICE, then the ISPs wouldn't try pulling that shit.

Punish them by TAKING YOUR MONEY ELSEWHERE. Let open ISPs profit and the asshats go out of business.

It's called the FREE MARKET.

Look into it sometime.
>> Quote !Curly7Wya.
>>150431
>>YOU are the customer. YOU ARE ALWAYS RIGHT!
HAHAHA OH WOW

that alone speaks volumes about you. work a customer service position somewhere for a month and you'll learn just how wrong you are.
>> Anonymous
>>150444

Also PROTOCOL ENCRYPTION and RANDOM PORT MAPPING.

If you're too stupid to bypass the restrictions your ISP applied to you (and which you accepted like a bitch), then you deserve what you get.
>> Quote !Curly7Wya.
>>150446
>>PROTOCOL ENCRYPTION
only useful if both sides support it and have it enabled. otherwise you either can't connect to peers or it defaults to an unencrypted connection.
>>RANDOM PORT MAPPING
NAT
>> Anonymous
>>150431
>>150442
>>150444

for many people, there is only one ISP with broadband in their area. they can't just switch providers if their locale is monopolized-up (or duopolized, as it is in my area)

>>150446

"ISP counters with packet sniffing and port throttling! it's super effective!"
>> Anonymous
>>150445

I have personally gotten three customer service reps fired. One I knew personally outside of work. She still haets my guts for it.

You get their name, and when you pull your account, you send a personal letter to the CFO explaining why and how and who caused them to lose the contract.

Of course you also need to make sure you read the EULA. And if you on't agree to it, YOU DON'T SIGN UP FOR IT. And if they try to change it later, you cancel your account. And if they then try to claim it was for a specific term and you're cancelling early, you take them to court and nail their asses for breach of contract.

I've done that too. Got an award of $5500 in punitive damages. Not much, but it was so fucking satisfying to get it.
>> Anonymous
Sageing because posts are getting off-topic. Don't want to clutter the top with this debate.

>>150447
> only useful if both sides support it and have it enabled.

And if the other party can't be arsed to use it, too fucking bad for them. No torrent.

>>150448
> packet sniffing

Hello? Protocol ENCRYPTION.

> port throttling

Hello again? Random port mapping. Trivial with uPnP.
>> Quote !Curly7Wya.
>>150449
>>150450
i'm sure you are certain you will always be right and will never be wrong. but you're delusional if you think everyone has the "choices" you allude to, or that such a perfect ISP exists.

despite living near Silicon Valley, i can only choose between Comcast and SBC for my daily ass-stretching. the only other ISPs in the area serve dial-up. all have equally stupid Terms of Service.

packet sniffing doesn't necessarily mean they know what you're transmitting. if anything, sending a bunch of encrypted packets makes you look more suspicious. i mean, think about it. would you suspect the nervous looking guy trying to cover up something in his pocket with a newspaper, or the guy walking nonchalantly down the street?

not every client supports port randomization, and furthermore it presents a problem when software or hardware firewalls are introduced, most especially NAT. uPnP has never been a stable method of opening ports in my experience. also there's little stopping an ISP from blacklisting EVERY port except the common use ports.

businesses are in business to make money, not to provide quality services at low low prices. they don't care if they screw over a few people if they make a buck in the end. they don't give two shits about their customers. one lost customer is not going to suddenly make them turn around and stop their dastardly ways, and as long as someone is satisfied with them they will continue to do what they do. a few words on a website isn't going to change that.
>> Anonymous
>>150455

One lost customer might not make them change their ways, however one customer informing other customers of the TOS restrictions that are unreasonable in that service..... that will make them change their ways.