File :-(, x, )
Kim Jong Il Documentary Anonymous
Since North Korea is such a big deal in the news lately.

http://www.torrentspy.com/torrent/882085/Kim_Il_Sung_Kim_Jong_Il_Always_Together_Working_For_The_Peo
ple

Preview : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTnQA12IPMo
>> Anonymous
lol... read an article about him in a german newspaper called spiegel ~1 year ago.

he kidnapped some actors from south korea to create his own movies (thinks of himself as a genious or something :D)

...such a weirdo, really frightening to think of someone like this having nuclear weapons.
>> Anonymous
LOL... Just you wait...

A Danish tv-channel will show in Dec 2006 a serie about N. Korea called "Det Røde Kapel" aka The Red Chapel.

AFAIK: The Danish actors went to N. Korea under the pretext of wanting to make a theater about the leader and his country. They would do/demand silly things to see how far they could go and they apparrently could go VERY far without anyone saying anything EVEN when the NK intelligence shadowed them 24/7 and demanded that all vid/audio-recordings were screened!
>> Anonymous
He looks like that one kid who got picked on every day at school his entire life. Probably did too, that freak.
>> Anonymous
he is an artist, you can't understand him. he drinks french wine while his people are starving to death,> art my friends
>> Anonymous
>>130055
and whats the difference between him and bush? theyre both artists

anyway i hope for a new war, where everyone die once for all so all this mess will end once for all
>> Anonymous
>>130063
[]cry moar emo kid.
[]CRAWLING IN MY SKIN...
[]stfu emofag

Pick appropriate response here...
>> /t/ and /n/ Anonymous
U CROSSED THE STREAMS OH SHI-
>> Anonymous
Thanks OP, this looks interesting.

>>130063
We don't need this topic derailed into a fucking useless internet argument, retard.
>> Anonymous
He looks badass. ^^

Finally someone with nukes to stand up against US.
>> Anonymous
>>130074
>>Finally someone with nukes to fuck up the entire planet.

Fixed.
>> Anonymous
SO RONERY
>> Anonymous
Please!! you think just because he has nukes he can stand up against the US.North Korea is just boasting about being a powerful nation but in reality is just another weak little country that is dying from the inside out.How many nukes do you think he has and how many do you think th US has? In short, there is not one nation that can stand up against the US in the world today, that is the cold hard truth.
>> Anonymous
>>130089

Iraq seems to be doing a pretty good job at it so far. The US aint as strong as you think it is.
>> Anonymous
>>130091
trying to be an outsider building a country =/= nuking the fucking bastards and just getting rid of them permanently.
>> Anonymous
North Korea is doing what any country in its position would do. Of course they want nuclear weapons.
>> Anonymous
>>130092building petrol reffine plants

Fix'd, thank you for you time
>> Anonymous
>>130089

A few may be enough to ruin lots of lives.

By the way, when is USA going to disarm, since they are so against nuclear weapons?
>> Anonymous
>>130099building military bases

Re-fix'd. The four permanent bases and that hueg "embassy" are the only US contruction projects that are actually on schedule, the rest is so behind it's laughable.
>> Anonymous
We are NOT:

A) Nuking NK. There is no way to do that without fucking up our SK allies. Plus their neighbors are China and the Russians, and we don't need the grief right now.

B) Invading NK. Unlike the LULZ SADDAM GOT TEH WMDS fracas, we know for sure Kim Jong got nukes. Dubya may be stupid, but I don't think he wishes to be remembered as the president who sent thousands of GIs to be incinerated in nuclear hellfire.

If anything, we'll reinforce the economic sanctions that only work to make the civilian population suffer (look how well did that work in Cuba!). Perhaps we'll send a couple of F22s to throw a couple of bombs as a display of strength but nothing beyond that.
>> Anonymous
>>130038
JESUS CHRIST ITS KIM JONG IL, GET IN THE BOMBSHELTER!
>> DO YOU KNOW WHAT IS INTERNET!?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfURt2_2TNA&mode=related&search=
>> Anonymous
>>130104
>>Perhaps we'll send a couple of F22s to throw a couple of bombs as a display of strength but nothing beyond that.

If a slight american line of hair happens to fall in NK, Jong will try to nuke the US, and he might succeed.
>> Anonymous
>>130109
Doubtful. It takes a lot to get a nuke across the world, especially for a poor country like NK.

I highly doubt they could create an ICBM, and delivery by plane obviously wouldn't succeed.
>> Anonymous
>>130109
I don't think so, the guy may be crazy, but he is also smart. He won't risk a full war knowing that the US won't dare to invade as things are right now. Plus he can't nuke the US mainland, I think even that new rocket they are working with only has range to attack Guam and perhaps Australia at best.
>> Anonymous
Actually doesn't the Tae Po Dong II missle have a range that could reach the western coast of the US,.

And if not, nuking Tokyo, Beijing or Shanghai would be disasterous enough to fuck up the US economy. Damn you, globalization!
>> Anonymous
needs seeds.
>> Anonymous
>>130127
The TaePoDong II is indeed a three-stage ICBM, but won't be fully operationl in the near future (the first test was a failure).

And why would Kim nuke Beijing or Shanghai?
>> Anonymous
>>130129
Cause he hates chinese food.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>130127
North Korea relies on China too much. NK launching a nuke at China would never happen. Maybe South Korea or Japan, but I doubt they would be stupid enough to do that. Most likely Kim Jong will strut around like a chicken cause he just laid a nuclear egg. It's far more likely that they will sell the technology off to another country or terrorist organization, who then uses it against another nation.
>> Anonymous
North Korea: Welcome to 61 years ago.
>> Anonymous
NK cant do shit. They try anything and they have either

1) Japan on their ass
2) SK and US on their ass
3) China on their ass
4) All of the above on their ass
5) The majority of the world on their ass

If he even tries his whole nation is toast.
>> Anonymous
>>1301461) Japan on their ass

I thought Japan didn't have an army
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>130148
Well, no. Only for defensive proposes but if they want to they can get a decent size military pretty soon.
>> Anonymous
zero seeds.
>> Anonymous
plus they have gundams
>> Anonymous
>>130149

I guess getting some nukes is the only way for people to take this ugly weirdo seriously.
>> Anonymous
??????????????????????????????????r />???????????????????????????????????br />??????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????r />???????????????????????????????????br />???????????
>> SMAP
>>130162
It worked for the USA...
>> Anonymous
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lj8__EUjA4Y

Follow the link and watch the magnificence of our great leader the GRAND GENERALISSIMO Kim Jong IL.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>130172

What?...
>> Anonymous
NK nuke = Kim Jong Il life ensurance. As simple as that. He knows very well, as all dictators, that the US has never invaded a country with nuclear capacity.
>> Anonymous
>>130220
We never nuked a place and invade it later. It's bad enough that Iran has their own nuclear program and North Korea wanting to have a few warheads. The most likely thing people do with nukes is to sell them on the black market to make some cash. Terrorist organizations like Al-Qaeda will be all over Iran either buying them or smuggling them out of the country to make their own dirty bombs.
>> Anonymous
>>130220

The US has never really invaded a country that had technology beyond the musket. Vietnam doesn't count, as it wasn't a proper war (lol)
>> Anonymous
>>130225
We nuked (twice) AND occupied Japan, we had invaded Okinawa, the southernmost island in the chain.
>>130116
He will use it as a threat. He will use it on the American base(s) Only if he can't blackmail enough food aqnd fuel to keep the North alive, and then he would invade the South.
>>130225
Who wants to invade? The North is poorer than East Germany ever was. Let the South worry about the North and get our American troops out of South Korea and Japan.
>> Anonymous
>>130089
china and india would pwn the US so bad it aint even funny. Both are nuclear active. Keep in mind the US is only 400 million people, china has a billion and a half. And yes, china and india have very powerful weapons. But movies make idiots like you think US are invincible. Lets not forget how vietnam owned your asses.
>> Anonymous
Need experts for everthing? 4chan.
>> Anonymous
I like this... the NK screw all world with nuke! And all world screw all NK with bombs!
>> Anonymous
>>130278
And after the radioactive fall-out mutants all the way, like sex craving Catgirls with huge boobs!
Go Nukes go!!
>> Anonymous
>>130287
You get the idea!!! I want girls futa!!! Catgirls futa, or whatever, i want!
>> Anonymous
>>130272

With a 200:1 kill ratio? You must be European.
>> Anonymous
>>130294

or French...
>> Anonymous
>>130272
What does the total population of a nation have to do with ANYTHING? During the Gulf War, Iraq had a standing army that rivaled any nation in the world. They got pwned by a force way less than that simply because they were using 70's era tech.

Tech > numbers.
>> Anonymous
>>130294
Don't insult the Europeans there, bitch. Don't forget the Germans had an insanely high kill ratio vs the Allies, despite being vastly outnumbered and outresourced. They only lost because they had too many enemies after the treacherous western Allies allied with the commies. Yeah, thanks for the Cold War, assholes.
And the kill ratio in Vietnam was 20-1. America won the battles, but lost the political war.
>> Anonymous
>>130311
Too bad that between wallowing in guilt, a massive welfare system, and a fertility rate that's half of what it was when they fought the war, the Germans are slowly driving themselves into irrelevance. Truly, the mighty have fallen.
>> Anonymous
needs seeders
>> colorful metaphor
     File :-(, x)
Let's see if I can get this right this time.

>>130038
Hey, /t/ards, I can tell you really like this topic so let's see what's out there:

"When North Korea Falls"
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/print/200610/kaplan-korea

>The truth is, many South Koreans have an interest in the perpetuation of the Kim Family Regime, or something like it, since the KFR’s demise would usher in a period of economic sacrifice that nobody in South Korea is prepared for. A long-standing commitment by the American military has allowed the country to evolve into a materialistic society. Few South Koreans have any interest in the disruption the collapse of the KFR would produce.
>> colorful metaphor
>>130414
>Meanwhile, China’s infrastructure investments are already laying the groundwork for a Tibet-like buffer state in much of North Korea, to be ruled indirectly through Beijing’s Korean cronies once the KFR unravels. This buffer state will be less oppressive than the morbid, crushing tyranny it will replace. So from the point of view of the average South Korean, the Chinese look to be offering a better deal than the Americans, whose plan for a free and democratic unified peninsula would require South Korean taxpayers to pay much of the cost. The more that Washington thinks narrowly in terms of a democratic Korean peninsula, the more Beijing has the potential to lock the United States out of it.
>> colorful metaphor
>>130415
For there is a yawning distance between the Stalinist KFR tyranny and a stable, Western-style democracy: in between these extremes lie several categories of mixed regimes and benign dictatorships, any of which might offer the North Koreans far more stability as a transition mechanism than anything the United States might be able to provide. No one should forget that South Korea’s prosperity and state cohesion were achieved not under a purely democratic government but under Park Chung Hee’s benign dictatorship of the 1960s and ’70s. Furthermore, North Koreans, who were never ruled by the British, have even less historical experience with democracy than Iraqis. Ultimately, victory on the Korean peninsula will go to the side with the most indirect and nuanced strategy.
>> colorful metaphor
>>130416
The long-term success of America’s basic policy on the peninsula hinges on the willingness of South Koreans to make a significant sacrifice, at some point, for the sake of freedom in the North. But sacrifice is not a word that voters in free and prosperous societies tend to like. If voters in Western-style democracies are good at anything, it’s rationalizing their own selfishness and it may turn out that the authoritarian Chinese understand the voters of South Korea’s free and democratic society better than we do. If that’s the case, there may never actually be a Greater Korea in the way that we imagine it. Rather, the North’s demise will be carefully managed by Beijing in such a way that the country will go from being a rogue nation to a de facto satellite of the Middle Kingdom but one with sufficient contact with the South that the Korean yearning for a measure of reunification will be satisfied.
>> European
     File :-(, x)
thanks to US arogants this guy has now a nuke. ppl in the US should know that your way of life is not the best. you guys over there just think of your self. we dont want your view to be ours. do your own buisnes