File :-(, x, )
Girls Museum 2005-2006 & Oxide kadomatsu !WirZirBf.Q
Sorry, we're back.

Girls Museum 2005-2006
Images: 134
File format: JPEG
Filesize: 36.7MB (Value)/366MB (HQ)
http://dpg.acxn.net/torrents/[DPG]Dengeki-Hime_Collection_-_Girls_Museum_2005-2006_(18p)_VALUE_[F853
E8FF].rar.torrent
http://dpg.acxn.net/torrents/[DPG]Dengeki-Hime_Collection_-_Girls_Museum_2005-2006_(18p)_FULL_[9B469
2F5].rar.torrent

Oxide
Images: 115
File format: PNG
Filesize: 805MB
http://dpg.acxn.net/torrents/[DPG]%20Oxide%20[97e5553d].rar.torrent

Visit us, etc:
www.animeartbooks.org
#animeartbooks @ irc.irchighway.net
>> Anonymous
thank you much :D
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
First of all, thanks for sharing. Good stuff in here.

One minor complaint - In the info it says "obvious under 18 nudity has been censored". Does that mean censored by the scanner? If so I don't suppose we could get an uncensored version of this picture (I don't care about page 89 which was the only other censored picture I noticed)?
>> Anonymous
Sorry, one more question - what happened to the xdcc bot in your channel?
>> kadomatsu !WirZirBf.Q
>>165246
Yep, censored by the scanner. We didn't ask him to, he just did it. I'll ask him the next time he's online. Feel free to drop by the channel and ask, cause I'm pretty forgetful.

>>165247
The guy who ran it has went AWOL. We put a request on the website for people willing to run fserves or XDCC bots in channel, with little success. This has probably got alot to do with the IRC network we're on, which will hopefully change in the future.
>> Anonymous
>>165246
awesome picture, such a shame
>> Anonymous
wtf
>> Wallpapers Anonymous
Just looked thru the Girls Museum. Lots of good pics for Background images. I think I'll make some, nothing fancy of course. Now if anyone could clue me in on a way to automate the posing of them to the wallpaper groupl I would be very thankful.
>> Anonymous
>>165279
It's nice that he scans, but who's he to censor?
>> Apparition !PJfaNLFaGE
How many pictures were censored?
>> Anonymous
I'm left speechless both by the beauty of the images and the absoFUCKINGlutely ridiculous censoring. What the FUCK? The scanner ruined the artwork.

Thanks a million for the torrent, I'm getting it now, but honestly... this is a fucking joke. I just hope there aren't many loli pics there...
>> Anonymous
>>166549
As I said in /hr/:
I find it kinda hypocritical that the group that dubs itself "Digital _Preservation_ Group" censors the release...
>> Anonymous
>>166551
Agreed. But that was not their decision as a group, it's the scanner's fault, which makes me even more confused. The guy simply decided by himself to censor the images. Again, what the FUCK...
>> Anonymous
>>166557
It was still released with the group's label, which makes the group as responsible as the scanner.
>> Anonymous
>>166548
2 that I noticed
>> Anonymous
That is really ass. Hopefully they'll be able to get different scans of the vandalized pages and make them available.
>> WE
>>165246

Still no clean scan?
>> Apparition !PJfaNLFaGE
Bump
>> Anonymous
Read the May 3rd news post on the site
http://www.beanoo.com/~artbooks/news.php

It seems like the dude that censored it is new to the group.
>> Anonymous
>>167020
good idea from them to not include a comment system...

otherwise it would have been raped to death already...
>> Anonymous
Wow, that's just sad. Why on earth would DPG release garbage like this? It devalues their name...
>> kadomatsu !WirZirBf.Q
>>166549
>>166551
>>166558
fair comment, but we're not going to harass the guy into making those scans available. If he decides to make them available, we'll either repack, or have them on a fserv in channel, assuming the network doesn't explode with all the recent splits.

>>167023
>> Anonymous
>>167053
go fuck yourself, your group should be shot for releasing shit
>> kadomatsu !WirZirBf.Q
>>167117
I lol'd. Go cry some more please.

Anyhow, I spoke with the scanner, and he doesn't want to release the uncensored versions. We respect his decision, and are grateful he scanned the book for us in the first place. It's a shame that some people don't see it that way.

If you like the book, please support the artists/publishers, and buy it.
>> Anonymous
Why do I find it funny that DPG went out of their way to re-release Flamboyant and badmouth the scanner for censoring it, and now they're releasing censored shit ^_^;;
>> kadomatsu !WirZirBf.Q
>>167146
see previous comment.
>> Anonymous
>>165246

See, that pisses me off.
It was all pretty fucking arbitrary, in my opinion. There are a couple of obviously underage pics in there with nipples showing, so WTF? At least if you're going to be a douchebag and censor something, get it right...

Art is dead?
>> Anonymous
Censored.
Not downloading.
Why even bother scanning it in the first place, then?
>> Anonymous
Fan-censors, fan-rewrites, fan-uncensors.
They all fail equally hard.
DO NOT WANT.
>> Anonymous
Hay, I'm gonna scan this very same book. Some sick friend gave it to me.
Problem is, I'm gay and girls disgust me.
So I'm just going to censor every girl in my scans.
If you don't like it, don't download it.
>> Anonymous
>>165246
where does it say that shes minor btw ?

If you look at shows like Manabi Straight or Lucky Star youll notice that looks dont tell you shit about a charackters "real age" ...

Plus theres something like artistic nudity...
>> Anonymous
>>167117
signed
>>167143
no
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>165168
>> Anonymous
"obvious under 18 nudity has been censored"

last i checked, drawings don't have an age. unless he's censoring everything that was drawn less than 18 years ago? it's completely fucking arbitrary like someone said. he gets to look at the artwork as the artists intended it, but we can't? what kind of a douchebag fascist do you have in your group is what i want to know.
>> Anonymous
OHH GOD WONT SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDRENS!!!1!

If the uploader is so aghast at the sight of lolicon that he was compelled to shield our collective eyes, what the fuck is he doing buying anime art books?? Anime art books are about nudity, more often than not, nudity that involves young girls. This self-appointed defender of purity is in the wrong fucking scene, he should volunteer with Perverted Justice and protect girls in the physical world.

I hope he took a permanent marker to the parts he arbitrarily decided to censor. Otherwise it's like the equivalent of your dad jerking off when he's alone, and then punishing you for finding his porn stash.

BTW

>>167143
Translation = We are spineless faggots that have no principles.

Please stop pretending like this guy did us a great favor, and we all have to complacently pat him on the back.
>> Anonymous
The scanner of Girls Museum lacks integrity, and by association, so does DPG.

No respect for the hypocritical scanner who owns a book with drawings of naked under 18 girls, makes it available to the internet, and then reveals their lack of comfort with the subject matter by censoring another artist's work.

No respect for DPG for lack of standards. Censored scans of an artbook are worthless, everyone will always prefer seeing the artwork as the artist originally intended--uncensored.
>> Anonymous
tl;dr
So,>>165246is the only censored page, right?
The rest of the torrent is still clean?
>> Anonymous
>>167519
he mentioned in his post that at least one other page was censored...
>> Anonymous
I regret that I even wasted time, etc. to download this. I didn't even get a chance to look at it. As soon as I heard that it's censored, it was off my hard drive. If I want censored products, I'll go to the bookstore and buy a copy of Tenjho Tenge.

I use the internet to escape precisely the kind of nanny behavior American companies inflict on anime fans. That it would spread to fan groups is a little disheartening. It's downright pathetic on DPG's part, to release anything they can get their hands on, regardless of how it was handled.
>> ?(??´)INVISIBLE SKY MAGICIAN? !!0a7tnvoNtct
     File :-(, x)
>>165279
>Yep, censored by the scanner. We didn't ask him to, he just did it. I'll ask him the next time he's online. Feel free to drop by the channel and ask, cause I'm pretty forgetful.

Censored? By the scanner?

My question: Is he an uptight Conservative Christian fundametalist faggot?

>>167500

TRUTH.

>>167521
>I use the internet to escape precisely the kind of nanny behavior American companies inflict on anime fans. That it would spread to fan groups is a little disheartening. It's downright pathetic on DPG's part, to release anything they can get their hands on, regardless of how it was handled.

Truth again.

Take a good hard look at yourselves "Digital Preservation Group".

This artbook was censored by the scanner, but released by and therefore associated with DPG.

Your internet cred went down by a few notches.

If I wanted moral guidance and shielding from cartoon nipples, I'd join a fucking church.

FAIL.
>> Anonymous
>>165168
>Sorry, we're back.
I dont need the likes you so you can die and gtfo AND RESPECT THE PPL OPINIONS.
>> http://www.beanoo.com/~artbooks/frames.php ?(??´)INVISIBLE SKY MAGICIAN? !!0a7tnvoNtct
     File :-(, x)
>News: wow.

Welcome to the Internet.

>The censoring of the Girls Museum book seems to have upset some people, and I made the mistake of arguing with them, and you know what they say about arguing on the internet.

>Constructive criticism is one thing, which is fine, we welcome it, but when it falls to the level of "shit sux.", it makes you wonder if it was worthwhile in the first place.

Censorship on the Internet: SHIT SUX, no ifs, no buts. SHIT SUX.
The scanner who self-censored it: SHIT SUX^10

>This censoring was entirely at the discretion of the scanner, not the group. If we start laying down rules for scanning for us, people just won't scan for us, it's that simple.

And that's a good thing.

The last thing I need on the Internet is defenders from the holy order of the purity of anime children shoving their cartoon-nipple-hating agenda down my throat.

Like other people mentioned, if 2d anime nipples offend him so much that he chose to censor it, then WHAT THE FUCK IS HE DOING BUYING ANIME ARTBOOKS, OR ANYTHING ANIME FOR THAT MATTER?

Message to the person who scanned and uploaded his artbook: Reinsert the artbook back up your ass, because we don't want it.

>However, a lesson was learned here, if this situation arises again, it will be stated in the post that there is some censoring, people can decide if they want to download it or not, and move on.
>Posted by kadomatsu, 10 May 2007.
>> Anonymous
I happen to like anime artbooks, and dislike lolicon. That doesn't mean I want shitty censored images though. Redraws I happily accept, if it's removing fictional children from sexual situations. Censoring arbitrary non-sexual nudity is just retarded. Either that or the nudists I've hung out with brainwashed me too well.
>> ?(??´)INVISIBLE SKY MAGICIAN? !!0a7tnvoNtct
     File :-(, x)
>>167548
>I happen to like anime artbooks, and dislike lolicon.

Reasonable.

>That doesn't mean I want shitty censored images though.

Indeed.

>Redraws I happily accept,

What? Fuck off.

Get your filthy fat American fingers off my Japanese art, motherfucker.

You don't like a particular aspect of the art?

Don't buy it, don't look at it, don't download it.

Either that or draw your own fucking art.

Goddamn Americans, always stealing Japanese ideas (which in turn was stolen from America) from Japan.

The difference of course is that America fucks it up rather than improve it.

I'll give you another chance>>167548to mend your ways, for hell hath no fury like a Wapanese scorned.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
this was the other censored one
resized down bc full size wasnt worth it
>> Apparition !PJfaNLFaGE
Bloody censorship.
>> Anonymous
The lamest shit ever.
>> Anonymous
'Digital Preservation Group'

I lol'd
>> Anonymous
shit sux
>> Anonymous
Man, too bad the scanner fucked this shit up.

Looked like it would have been pretty nice too.
>> Anonymous
Lol, Preservation.
Such irony.
>> Anonymous
oh man i lol'd when i saw that it was a censored nipple and not even ass or vagina
>> Anonymous
>Get your filthy fat American fingers off my Japanese art, motherfucker.

Uho! Sorry to dissapoint you, I'm not American, in any sense of the word. Nor am I some fat weeaboo, unlike you? I don't discriminate, if it's good it's good, regardless if the art's from France or Brazil.
Redraws really do have to be good, I'm not talking about the kind of redraw that might just as well have been a black box of censorship on top of stuff. Besides, I prefer it if it's the artist that's done an alternate version, rather than someone else trying to mimic his or her style. For a weeaboo you seem awfully hung up on America. What's with that? Assigned the two countries the values of "Hell on Earth" and "Heaven"?
You do realize that no country is perfect, right? You're worshipping a fantasy. Although there is no way in hell I'd ever want to live in USA, it tells a lot about you when you automatically assume that someone displaying opinions you don't like has to come from the negatively associated country you're obsessing about.
Different people like different things, get over it. My opinions are hardly any threat to you, so why do you act as if they were?
>> Anonymous
>>167550
And as for the
>Either that or draw your own fucking art.
I do draw my own original art. That doesn't mean I'm to isolate myself from all the other artwork in the world.
I even sometimes dabble in re-creating art images I stumble across, that feature a wonderful composition and style, but a questionable subject (e.g. too young). Naturally my versions are nothing I re-distribute, but it's a fun way to practice your skills. It also forces you to go about things differently than your own natural art styles, helping you to not get too rigid and fixated doing stuff the same old ways as always.
>> ?(??´)INVISIBLE SKY MAGICIAN? !!0a7tnvoNtct
bump
>> Anonymous
hahaha oh wow so much fail
>> Anonymous
>>65168

>Sorry, we're back.

You know what? You shouldn't have bothered to.
>> Anonymous
extreme e-peen loss from dpg

scanner and group should stay dead
>> Anonymous
>>167552
This is so tragic it's actually funny...
>> Anonymous
NIPPLES INFURIATE AND CONFUSE ME, THANK THE LORD JESUS CHRIST THAT THE SCANNER CENSORED THEM, I WOULD HAVE BEEN ABSOLUTELY DEVASTATED OTHERWISE

also, shit sux
>> Anonymous
You guys are all fucking retarded. I will download it and I will enjoy it. No one is forcing you to download it if the "defiling of art" is so bad that you cannot stomach the torrent.

I feel like I haven't called you retards enough.

Retards.
>> Anonymous
>>167963
>No one is forcing you to download it

Woah dude "kadomatsu". Did such a revolutionary concept hit you right away, or was it a gradual realization?

It makes so much sense. Criticism of stuff should be exclusive to stuff that we are "forced" to obtain.
>> Anonymous
This thread delivers.
>> kadomatsu !WirZirBf.Q
>>168026
lulz, 167963 isn't me. Thanks for your wonderful insight though.
>> Anonymous
how much does the artbook cost btw. ?
and where can i find it ?
>> kadomatsu !WirZirBf.Q
Only ever seen it on Amazon Japan
I'm not all that familiar with american retailers
>> Anonymous
>>168089
I know Diamond carried this back when it came out, it wasn't that expensive. Try asking your local comic book retailer, they may still have stock orderable even though it's kinda old.
>> Anonymous
I have seen the book and there are only two censored pictures (you can see them in this post).

the book is wonderful.
>> Anonymous
I know it's a matter of principle and all, but don't you think you're overreacting just a little? The two censored pics are regretable, yes, but it doesn't detract from the rest of the scans
>> ?(??´)INVISIBLE SKY MAGICIAN? !!0a7tnvoNtct
>>168158
>don't you think you're overreacting just a little?

Hi, and welcome to 4chan.

Here at 4chan, no flaw will go uncomplained. Made a simple and innocent typo? Expect to be zoomj'd 10 pics in succession by the nazis.
>> Anonymous
>>168158
It'd be fine if it wasn't for it being DPG. They strive for the biggest HQ e-penis the world has ever seen, and they prettymuch deserve it. Intentionally modifying one of their releases and just throwing it out there is a affront to everything they've stood for and an insult to every fan they have.
>> Anonymous
I lol'd at this thread. /t/ is funnier than /b/ nowadays, new drama always beats old memes.
>> Anonymous
This thread is full of WAAAAAAAAH and fail.

Seriously, you act like you are fucking paying DPG with this "oh they've insulted the fans" BS. The SCANNER insulted the fans, DPG still has plenty of quality releases under their belt. They have more quality than most fucking for-profit companies but i've seen more bitching here about DPG than I have about any of those other fuck up companies. Furthermore if you bother to READ they did try to contact the scanner to fix this problem but the scanner went AWOL.

What's more laughable is the whole boycott movement going on against DPG despite the fact all their other stuff is fine. The immense faggotry in this and other threads makes me believe you are all a bunch of faggots. Promptly get a life or shoot yourselves.
>> To quote their website... Anonymous
"This censoring was entirely at the discretion of the scanner, not the group. If we start laying down rules for scanning for us, people just won't scan for us, it's that simple."

Apparently you'd all prefer we just get no scans at all from how you are acting right now. As a scanner myself I have to say...if some group tried to slap a bunch of rules at me i'd tell them to fuck off and keep the scans to myself, guaranteed. While I think this censorship was dumb as hell and unnecessary they did try to contact the scanner and made the effort to fix it. In return...you all keep bitching like a bunch of ignorant dumbshits strung out on crack repeating the same damn thing over and over. If I was them i'd take down the website and cease all releases immediately until this bullshit stopped.

After getting no releases for 6+ months that tactic worked great for Snoopycool. People kept their ignorant fucking mouth shut from there on out. Internet tough guys will bitch and bitch but then when the releases they want stop coming for a prolonged period they learn quite quickly that unnecessary negative commentary = zero shit to download. I suggest DPG do the same for the time being. But that's just my opinion.
>> Anonymous
Should have read the whole thread first instead of downloading this "digital preservation" fan-censored shit. Absolutely worthless for actual archival.
>> Anonymous
shit sux
>> Let's not lose another contributor Anonymous
>>168299
Well it's kind of stupid to punish the fans who do appreciate the work of DPG on account of a few morons who keep sending obnoxious e-mails. Though it is true that Snoopycool managed to stop people from saying dumb crap by using that strategy. I certainly understand how hurtful it can be for a group to devote their time and effort to giving people cool stuff then just because of one mistake they get bitched out endlessly by inconsiderate people on the internet who have no manners. I guess if DPG starts getting hassled too much then i'd understand if they halt releases until people learn some manners. It's just not worth doing something for the good of the people if the people are going to bite the hand that feeds them and ignore all their previous releases which we would not have if not for DPG.

They made a mistake but you are all over-reacting and ignoring their past good releases(and bitching about all their new releases) because of TWO pages. That's kind of ridiculous. There is constructive criticism then there is just flat out verbal abuse which serves only to discourage further releases. Don't chase away yet another contributor to 4chan's /t/ section, you've already chased away like 5-10 good contributors in the past over this kind of immaturity.
>> Anonymous
If the guy who censored his release never releases anything again because we bitched then it's a good thing. The availability of crippled releases makes it much less rewarding for someone else to do it right.

We can both appreciate the hard work of people making quality releases and bitch at this fucking retarded fan-censoring shit.

Just because this guy went through the trouble of doing all the hard scanning work doesn't entitle him to any sort of respect if he's gonna shit all over what the material he scanned is about.
>> Anonymous
Snoopycool can suck the green shit right out of my ass. How does that sound?
>> Anonymous
>>168318
The problem is that people are holding this release against DPG rather than the scanner responsible even after DPG asked for the uncensored scans and the guy refused.

The problem is people aren't making the distinction between the two.
>> Anonymous
>>168326
mildly arousing
>> Anonymous
>>168343
was this scanner some sort of paranoid retard?
"No! I will not scan it again! Those images are dirty, dirty, dirty!", what the fuck is his problem? He bought the god damn book.
He's just trying to keep all his loli pr0ns to himself...
>> Anonymous
>>168299
"Wah, people are complaining against our flawed release. Let's throw a bitchfit and stop releasing, that will show them!"

Snoopycool? They haven't released anything in ages, so they're dead to me. Some other scan group will take their place.

Really DPG, is it so hard to admit it was a shitty release, and promise never to release any censored shit again?
>> Anonymous
>>168353
Once again, I repeat;
"The problem is that people are holding this release against DPG rather than the scanner responsible even after DPG asked for the uncensored scans and the guy refused.

The problem is people aren't making the distinction between the two."

>> Suomynona
>>168343
What should have happened:

monsta: "I self censored two of the pages because they contained content which I found objectionable."
kadomatsu: "I'm sorry, but we can't accept your scan. We're the Digital Preservation Group and in the past have prided ourselves with providing to the anime community high quality, uncensored scans of artbooks and anime paraphenlia. To accept anything less than the original work would be a disservice to our fans."
monsta: "Understood. Good day to you sir."
>> Anonymous
>>168381
GET OVER IT. Christ. Fucking whining little children. You don't run DPG, you don't get to decide how they are run. You don't make the rules. You will NEVER make the rules. Get. The. Fuck. Over. It.
>> Anonymous
>>168386

You're exactly right. We don't run DPG. That's why we whine. What's wrong with that?
>> Anonymous
>>168388
The less appreciation a group sees and the more bitching/whining they see the less motivated they are to bring you future releases. Trust me, i'd know as someone who USED to scan in manga. People bitched about the resolution and editing(postprocessing) of my scans and I decided it wasn't worth the time to spend my free time doing a job I was getting very little appreciation for.

People who complain tend to outnumber people who praise...and if someone isn't getting SOMETHING positive in return for their work it starts to feel like "what's the fucking point if all people are going to do is bitch about little things?"

Constructive criticism is one thing, insulting people is a whole other thing. This thread is full of blatant insulting. THAT is the problem.
>> Anonymous
>>168391
Well, if they want appreciation they should consider not butchering the works they scan
>> Anonymous
>>168397
And you just once again showed your absolute ignorance to the FACTS surrounding this incident. It's this blind hatred of a group over what one scanner did that is so fucking retarded on so many levels.
>> Anonymous
Could someone tell the scanner to next time just remove the nipples with a clone tool,if they offend him so. At least that would look more artsy and alien, rather than downright silly.
>> Anonymous
>>168400
It's not because a scanner butchered a scan. It's because a group decided to associate with a scanner who butchers their scans, and distribute their butchered works.

This does the group no favors, and calls into question the quality of past releases, and if they can be trusted not to butcher future releases, or distribute butchered releases.

Is there any argument that can vouch for the unnecessary censoring of this otherwise beautiful artbook?
>> Anonymous
>>168409
You sure are throwing the "butcher" word around a lot. You sound like one of those elitist pricks that caused me to stop scanning in manga for people.

To put it in more simple words so your equally simple mind can understand. If you don't like the releases or question their quality don't fucking download them and go out, buy the artbook yourself and spend your own fucking time scanning it in instead of trying to bitch out a group that's made ONE mistake.

God forbid anyone makes one mistake, it brings a fucking endless onslaught of faggotry and eternal damnation with it.
>> Anonymous
>>168417

i'm glad that fucks like you are crying instead of releasing more shit scans on the internet.

the worst part is how this kadomaster faggot pulls that "we respect the scanner's decision" bullshit. bottom line is dpg supports the scanner's actions, and thus shows that they condone random censorship.

>> Anonymous
>>168420
Cry some more baby.

Also, my scans were decent and what people mostly bitched about was the fact I didn't release super high quality scans on my own website. That got annoying real fucking fast because I tried to explain I didn't want my bandwidth being eaten up. At the time, bittorrent wasn't around and neither was rapidshare.

In other words people were bitching me out simply because I refused to pay hundreds of dollars out of my own pocket just so they could have high-res scans. I wasn't about to put up with that kind of selfishness when I was devoting hundreds of hours to giving people free shit.
>> Anonymous
>>168420
Cry some more baby.

Also, my scans were decent and what people mostly bitched about was the fact I didn't release super high quality scans on my own website. That got annoying real fucking fast because I tried to explain I didn't want my bandwidth being eaten up. At the time, bittorrent wasn't around and neither was rapidshare.

In other words people were bitching me out simply because I refused to pay hundreds of dollars out of my own pocket just so they could have high-res scans. I wasn't about to put up with that kind of selfishness when I was devoting hundreds of hours to giving people free shit.
>> Anonymous
Posting in a legendary thread.

>>168417
You ARE an elitest prick. I can tell from the pixels and from reading quite a few posts in my time.

>>God forbid anyone makes one mistake, it brings a fucking endless onslaught of faggotry and eternal damnation with it.
Welcome to 4chan.
>> ?(??´)INVISIBLE SKY MAGICIAN? !!0a7tnvoNtct
     File :-(, x)
>>168381
>What should have happened:

Agreed.

>>168409
>This does the group no favors, and calls into question the quality of past releases, and if they can be trusted not to butcher future releases, or distribute butchered releases.

That's a good point and also applies to any products in real life.

If you, a self-proclaimed "preserver" knowingly release a flawed scanned artbook with completely unnecessary censorship, then this brings into question the quality of past and future releases.

Who's to say some images of their past artbook releases have been censored, or completely removed because it may offend a few prudes?

If you're not going to "preserve" the book, then don't call yourself DPG.

If this is a trend that will continue, then here's a suggestion from yours truly:

DPGWSCPBTMOTWC

or,

Digital Preservation Group With Some Censored Parts Because They May Offend The Wapanese Christians.

>>168420
>don't fucking call yourself 'digital preservation group' if you don't have the balls to pry those scans out or get new scans from someone with a brain

Indeed, the growing of some balls are needed. If the scanner of this artbook wants e-penis points, then he'd better fucking do it right.

Just as a note to clarify my position, DPG is a decent artbook releasing group but involve censorship in any way and I'd quickly have a fork up your ass.

As for the scanner of that specific book...

BEHEAD THOSE WHO CENSOR AND INSULT WORKS OF ART!
>> Anonymous
ITT PEOPLE BITCH ABOUT FREE DOWNLOADS
>> ?(??´)INVISIBLE SKY MAGICIAN? !!0a7tnvoNtct
>>168409
>Is there any argument that can vouch for the unnecessary censoring of this otherwise beautiful artbook?

And the last but perhaps most important point.

What possible "For" argument can apply to the censorship of cartoon nipples?
>> Edgeworth
     File :-(, x)
>>168434
Cartoon nipples single-handedly caused the downfall of Southern civilization.

Just look at Antartica. Before uncensored cartoon nipples, it was a tropical paradise.

Censorship of cartoon nipples in select artbooks distributed over the internet prevents global freezing much better than ziplock bags.
>> Anonymous
> The less appreciation a group sees and the more bitching/whining they see the less motivated they are to bring you future releases.

That's a good thing. No releases is much better than fan-censored shit. Now that this cunt fucked up this awesome book, doing it right will be much less rewarding, so we got to make sure he never ever releases anything else.
>> Anonymous
1 book (of all the books they scan) with only 2 scans censored, and nude lolis with that.
Nothing to cry about except if you are a 4chan loser.
>> Anonymous
>>168454
Absolute fucking truth. We are talking about 2 pages out of probably like...3-4,000 pages released, possibly more. Only a 4chan loser would bitch about some loli censorship amongst the massive amount of win within DPG's overall actions.
>> Anonymous
>>168454
>>168460
Lol fascism
>> Apparition !PJfaNLFaGE
>>168454
>>168460
Censorship is bad.
>> Anonymous
I really shouldn't care since I think this artbook is terrible, but I understand Anonymous bitching to a point.

DPG made a HUGE mistake by releasing censored material, and they are pretty naive if they didn't expect people to bash them for this.

Now, people who say "DPG should dissapear" are utter retards. DPG scanned lots of top-quality artbooks with top quality scans. They deserve bashing for this failure of a release, but not those extremist insults.

>> Anonymous
>>168426
you seem to be crying the most.

BAAAWWWWWWWWWW no one sends me thank-you notes for my scans