File :-(, x, )
[Shibuyabashi] Comic TenMa 2006-07 That Kid Alex !DhXYWwm7jY
COMIC TenMa

Issue: 2006/07

Size: 128MB

URL: http://www.amazon.co.jp/gp/product/B000FZDJJO/250-7525452-9753020?v=glance&n=465392&s=books

Torrent:
http://www.metachan.net/shibuyabashi/showthread.php?p=1996#post1996
>> Anonymous
You skipped June 2006-06! Can you get it too?
>> Anonymous
Thanks for posting this, but I feel I have to whine a bit...

Am I the only one who thinks Satoshi Urushihara does terribly boring art? He's got good technique and all, but... The girls all look so bland and plastic. I used to like his work in the beginning, but I quickly grew tired of it (same with Shirow, by the way).

And no, I'm not just a bush hater :P
>> Anonymous
>>116937
You're not alone.
>> Anonymous
>>116937
Wow, someone who sees it for what it really is (same with Shirow). I thought I was the only one. You know, among hentai, both artists are pretty much similar to NGE in terms of fanbase. Say how much they suck at drawing and somebody will be ready to kill you.
>> Anonymous
>>116942
Well, almost.
It's that Shirow and Urushihara draw their own kind. People who donät like bushes don't like bushes and want not-so-shiny H.
But the thing in Urushihara's hentai is the feeling and accuracy.
Those pictures have been made with fealing and have unparaller amount of love put into them. Literally.
Also, the plastoc look is more or less distracting. You have to have a certain eye to appreciate this stuff. Most Urushihara fans WANT to love his works, but they simply can't.
Urushihara isn't god or something, he is just another artist, who loves his works.
>> Anonymous
>>116945
it's just porn...
>> po6
this tenma issue seriously lacks maguro teikoku :(
bumping for missing issue ^^
>> Anonymous
I don't like Urushihara at all... Not the style, not his colouring, and even less his knowledge of anatomy.

I love Shirow, though. Even when he tends to overuse his "shiny girls" style, he manages to colour a lot better than the plain and simple style of Urushihara, and his anatomy is awesome.

The only thing that I don't like from Shirow is that a lot of his works have tentacles... But his girls are gorgeous.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>116953

>>and his anatomy is awesome.

Sure it is buddy.

Get your eyes checked as soon as possible, hope you don't drive anything bigger than a bicycle, otherwise you would be a major traffic danger.
>> Anonymous
Ushirihara is going for realism with animu faces. Theres not a whole lot of variety to his work, every ushirihara work (i've seen) is as vanilla as humanly possible.

But comparing one porn artist to another? Are you seriously that fucking retarded? Unless they're trying to clone another artist's style, there is no way to compare because its 100% personal preference.
>> Anonymous
>>116974

Keep fapping to your well proportioned Urushihara's drawings, but I like drawings that somewhat look like models, not child-like bodies with big tits and undetailed colouring.

Have a nice day, sir.
>> Anonymous
>>116988
Are you high? Neither of them are perfect, and >>look like models
....wtf? Look at the image he posted, what kind of screwed up models look like thier body was stretched on a rack to give them an extra 4" in thier midsection. What the hell is going on there?

I like both artists, but like already said, comparing them is fucking moronic.
>> Anonymous
hmm, an image torrent that's compressed. No use seeding something like that
>> Simon Templar
IMHO Comparing both Urushihara and Shirow's girls with anything that could appear in NGE is irrelevant: those two artists were blackening paper way before NGE even was planned. As for comparing Shirow's stye with Urushihara's and dribble about "who's da man" is utterly ridiculous. Each artist has his own drawing style, his own tools and his own vision. Not only they see women in different ways (strong breast accuracy for Urushihara, slim-stretch and muscle underlining for Shirow) but they don't even conceive SF and fantasy in the same ways. Whichever story he'll pull off, Urushihara will favor the idea of romance and (if available) yuri love. Shirow will go for technological or mysical references.
Two bottles, two flavors. And I don't see why one should like lemon and hate strawberry...
>> Anonymous
>>117034
I don't think he was comparing them to NGE, he was comparing their fanbases; the idea is that they're all a bunch of rabid slobbering fanboys who would tear apart anyone who would speak ill of the object of their fandom, regardless of whether or not they have a point.

Whether that's TRUE (or more accurately, whether there are any internet fandoms where it's NOT) is up to debate.
>> Anonymous
there is some urushihara work inside or just the cover?
>> Anonymous
>>117034
No.>>116942here. Simon, you actually misunderstood every point on this thread. First, regarding my NGE mention, please read>>117036's answer as that's exactly what I meant. Second, the initial point was not to compare the two artists, specially because both suck (for a few of us, I mean), as opposed to what is normally created around their names -- and THAT is the point.
>> Garimos
Someone like Urushihara's style, someothers don't like it. Simply.
Mmm... Like any other things in the world?
>> Anonymous
>>117107

I would like to know what artists do you think that doesn't suck.
>> Simon Templar
the point was so tiny I aimed bad and hit the lamp instead. The thread really took off with a "Urushihara is boring" element. One wouild think that after all, this is not about fanbase but personal opinions. Even fanbase is a laughable concept. Take ten fans of NGE and they'll all come up with a different reason to like the show, just the way ten NGE haters will find ten reasons to hate it.
I think the educated thing to do would be to voice our likings but not crush other people's under our feet.
When I hear "fanbase" I can't help but think that just as there are "narutards" there are urushiharatards" and "shirowtards". You like something, you know why, if you don't, try something else.
I don't even understand why someone who dislikes Urushihara would want to start talking in a thread syated with a picture by this artist. That alone should have the guy run for the hills or at least for some other thread no? "This sucks let's find something I like" now that would be logical.
>> Anonymous
For those who asked, there's a couple of other Urishihara color pinup works at the end. They're pretty much forgettable, just like the rest of this magazine.

Urishihara is one of my favorite artists, hentai and non-hentai. What has always caught my eye about his work is his character and costume design. He manages to make women very naked while still wearing quite a bit of clothing. [Ragnarok anyone?] I have artbooks of his 90s work, which was all done on CELS, and in these his shading is very precise and vibrant. His work in them is very detailed, and his composition is breathtaking. I don't know what the hell happened to him recently, but maybe the lack of inspiration in this magazine was contagious, and he got a bad dose of it. Also, my favorite works of his are his fantasy ones, and nothing in this magazine falls under that.

I would ask any Urishihara critics to please look at his earlier works, especially Chirality, to get a glimpse of why he's earned a reputation as a great artist.
>> Anonymous
i Dont like urushihara's work at all . I find all of his non hentai stuff pointless , boring , pretty badly written and a pretext for nude scenes ... wich wouldnt be so annoying if i cared about the art .
His video games designs from Phantasy Star through Growlanser and a few other things are as generic as it can get .
And his H stuff doesnt impress me neither .
>> Anonymous
>>117777
get!
>> Anonymous
I don't like Shirows feet, the toes look like they can cut someone open
>> Anonymous
Seems like you guys just got into hentai since like what, 2000?

Seriously men. Satoshi-sensei's works were one of the best in the 90's. You cannot love hentai without loving this guy's stuff. And comparing him with Shirow is a despicable thing to do.
>> Opinion-chan
August issue just popped up on share couple hours ago... fyi ;)
>> Anonymous
>>117893
>>117777
Well, we all have opinions.. too bad yours are misguided and wrong. Both artists are great. Get over it.
>> Anonymous
>>117893
Really ? guess we are heretics .. we enjoy hentai and not Urushihara , ohhh the infamy !!
Get real and drop the H expert's hat , kid !!
>> Anonymous
Nothing is misguided here , except for nazi fans . I just gave a detailled post about my dislike of his work , without flaming or dissing the artist , just an honest opinion ...
Guess i should have spoken in the mighty 4ch usual language instead ...

"YOu sux , Urushihara SUXORz , Suck it up biotch !!"

Is this any better now ?
>> Anonymous
>>117951
You should learn that posts that make sense, like yours, are the least respected here. 4chan's rule no. 1, actually.
>> Anonymous
>>117951
If you don't like Urushihara, don't say a thing and ignore this, it's quite simples.