File :-(, x, )
MuvLuv Alternative ~Name~ (ripped 128kbps) Cless
http://upload.deadfrog.us/MUV-LUV%20ALTERNATIVE%20Collection%20of%20Standard%20Edition%20songs%20%7E
Name%7E.rar.torrent
http://datorrents.com/download.asp?id=16928&name=MUV-LUV%20ALTERNATIVE%20Collection%20of%20Stand
ard%20Edition%20songs%20%7EName%7E.rar.torrent

5 MuvLuv songs 128kbps
1) Name ~Kimi no na ha~
2) Once & Forever
3) Kakusei ~Brave Mind~
4) Carry on ~early version~
5) Bandol version Banban no uta

I didn't find a ripped version of it + someone requested it. Please don't ask for flac/320kbps versions. Rip them yourself. Jacket/scans included.
>> Anonymous
Welcome back to 1997, when people were using dial-up and some actually downloaded 128kbit mp3s
>> Anonymous
>>138640

Some people don't need to quality-whore every song they download. Don't like it, don't download it. No one asked you to. Like the topic says, this is by -request-. Someone wanted 128kbps, he got it.
>> Rapidshare alternative Cless
http://rapidshare.com/files/6613260/MUV-LUV_ALTERNATIVE_Collection_of_Standard_Edition_songs__Name_.
rar.html

Alternative download link...
>> Anonymous
>>138641
It's not really quality-whoring to ask for something better than 128, shit sounds like it's playing over a telephone.

OP's trying to hook a brother up, and it's appreciated, but please please please say no to 128. I'm getting flashbacks to cassettes here.
>> Anonymous
All other things aside, is the music any good or is it just the normal stuff you would expect from a game?
>> Anonymous
>>138647
You're either a dog or an audio whore. Phone lines are around 8kbps, 128kbps is the lower end of CD quality. Ideal is 192kbps, but I imagine dumbshits like you think you can actually hear the difference with massive 320kbps files, eh?
>> Cless
>>138651

They're songs sung by JAM Project... I would say they're awesome, but I'm just a JAM fanboy ^_^;
>> Jesus !z.LOLm8x3o
>>138653
I can tell a difference, but then again, I'm Jesus, so lol.

And by the way, while the difference is not very prevalent at normal levels, as the music is played louder, the quality degrades. Of course, if you have shitty speakers/headphones then it doesn't matter, but oh well.
>> Anonymous
CD quality is around 2000 kbps...128 is NOT the lower end of CD quality.
>> Anonymous
>>138653
Yes we call that exaggerating to make a point.

Also you must seriously hate music.
>> Anonymous
>>138662

Yes thank you for comparing lossy psychoacoustically compressed rates to rates without any kind of an compression after sampling.
>> Anonymous
128 sounds fine to most people.

Most people aren't dumb enough to spend $300 on headphones/speakers

Most people aren't gay enough to complain about things they get for free over the internet
>> Anonymous
>>138745
$300 on speakers?

dude some people spend 20k on speakers
>> Jesus !z.LOLm8x3o
>>138746
Truth, lol.

I paid $35 for the headphones I'm wearing, but that's because Sennheiser=superior comfort.
>> Uh...there is a difference you dumbasses Anonymous
Even on a cheap set of speakers the difference between 128 and 360 or even VBR is painfully noticeable. The sounds are less crisp, everything sounds muddled and quiet. Basses have less oomph, drums sound weak, etc etc.

I'm not complaining since this was requested in 128, i'm just simply saying there IS a difference in quality. Anything but VBR nowadays is just archaic. VBR is the perfect balance in sound quality and size.
>> Anonymous
>>138745
And some people are stupid enough to think that "free" automatically invalidates constructive criticism.
>> Anonymous
i spent 400$ for logitech Z5500 and I'm very very happy with it
>> Anonymous
>>138801
>Anything less than 320 or FLAC nowadays is just archaic

VBR is for chumps that dont have enough storage.
>> Anonymous
>>138822
seconded.

although VBR is fine for most portable applications.
>> Anonymous
VBR is fine in a space constrained situation, but 320 should be standard. remember 320 is still lossy. on higher end equipment you can tell the difference. the problem is programs that upload audio to player should be reencode on the fly depending on device. so no matter what you're not getting pure sound. lossless is king in compression but it fucking huge. so don't complain about 320 its fucking reasonable compared lossless. its fine if it doesn't make any difference on your set up but dont discount other people's need for it. especially if you never experienced it.
>> Anonymous
Fucking lolled @ teh faggy audiophiles in this thread. Yeah, you and only U can hear the diff between 320 and 256 amireit *roll eyes*
>> Anonymous
With my speakers, which are cheap, the difference between 360 and VBR is impossible it differentiate. However, 128 to VBR is an easily noticable difference.

It all depends on the quality of equipment you have. You will notice the difference more if you own a decent pair of speakers or headphones. I've heard songs on my friends speakers with 128 and 360 and the difference was freaking insane. However on my crappy speakers, the difference is noticeable but not quite as much.

128 though is just pointless nowadays since almost everyone has broadband and large hard drives.
>> Anonymous
nice cover, is this a soundtrack of a game, animu, etc?
>> KaneBlueriver
>>138965

Game. All age Version MuvLuv Alternative. More or less, it has some connection with Kimi ga Nozomu Eien (A.K.A Rumbling Hearts)
>> Anonymous
>>138940
you're fucking stupid why not compare the size of a fucking 3 inch wide apple with a 3.1 in apple.
fucking moron.
there is a difference. going from standards of 128>192 is a a huge difference on anything. 192>320 is noticeable on any moderate quality system. any quality system you can hear the differences between lossless and lossy, cd to vinyl. if you have shit for ears or shit for speakers then then opening your mouth means you have shit for brains. go hum in bucket troll.

>>138953
yeah. the quality is determined by the lowest denominator. VBR is great, the only bad thing about it is when you might have to upconvert the audio for some reason like for playback as different media.
>> Anonymous
>>139057
Sounds just like a typical AngryAudiophile.
"ooooh, mah ears r suparior! oooooh mah ekiups suparior!!!"
I'll agree that the jump from 128 to 192 is substantial, but most stuffs above are a waste of space. VBR is a fine compromise between those. If you gonna do 320 anyway, just go lossless.
>> Jesus !z.LOLm8x3o
AUGHHHHH MY FREE MUSIX IS NOT HQ ENOUGH
>> Anonymous
>>139066

your gear and your ears are inferior