File :-(, x, )
Cum Inside World: EXCITE 2007 - HD JAV uncensored Anonymous
how about some HD porn?

http://s2d1.turboimagehost.com/sp/f25673f0892fb434b2150c4bb3bc05ab/2.jpg
1280x720, BluRay rip.
H.264, 4.36G, 1h42m

Comment too long. Clickhereto view the full text.
>> BelmontSlayer !PTiLTslS6Y
Lol at "cum inside world"...a better translation would be "creampie world".
>> Anonymous
>>226008

The fuck would the Japanese know what a "cream pie" is?
>> Anonymous
moar like semi-hd
720p =/= hd
>> Anonymous
>>226021
He's not doing a literal translation like the OP (or whoever did the original translation of the title)

Also lol @ the cover claiming 1080p when the video is 720p
>> Anonymous
>>226026
the original is certainly in 1080p

but the ripper is a faggot and downsized the video
>> Anonymous
awesome hd porn
>> Can any of you preverts identify this chick? Anonymous
>>226021

I'm not sure you understand the objective of translation.
>> Anonymous
Fuck this 720p bullcrap. Wheres my delicious 1080p, 50+GB sized prons?!
>> Anonymous
Over 1.5 hours in 720p and its only 4gigs? Must be compressed to hell. I'll pass. REAL HD, pls.
>> Anonymous
>>226052
errr, what? It's ~6MBits/s H.264, more that enough for a high-quality 720p encode.
>> Anonymous
>>226052
fucking retard
>> Anonymous
>>226006
WOW HD Pixelated Vaginas!
>> Anonymous
it's 4.37gb. will this fit in a dvd?
>> Anonymous
>>226056
It's uncensored you idiot.
>> Anonymous
>>226062
yes, it's pretty much exactly the size of a DVD-R
>> Anonymous
>>226052

You're a faggot. You obviously don't know shit therefore you fail. 0/10
>> Anonymous
>>226056
I chuckled a little bit at this but..

>>226065
Pardon... are you sure ?
>> Anonymous
>>226068

It is.
>> Anonymous
Yay High-definition. Now you can see better how ugly those girls are.
>> Anonymous
sorry i can't hear you behind my 1920x1080 material
>> Anonymous
lol, the music is so at odds with the content.

and yeah, this is exactly DVD sized. sort of like how standard def movies were often released CD-sized.
>> Anonymous
what program would i use to play this file?
>> Anonymous
to play this file you need a program
>> Anonymous
PROTIP: You can only tell the difference between 720 and 1080 if you have ALIEN EYES. Seriously, do you faggots actually find HD that impressive? I've had HD on my PC for like a decade.
>> Anonymous
>>226143
If you can't tell the difference between 720p and 1080p, you must be blind. You're probably one of those people who can't tell the difference between SD and HD either.
>> Anonymous
>>226149If you can't tell the difference between 720p and 1080p, you must be blind.

Depends on what size TV you have and how far away you view it dumbass.
>> Anonymous
>>226022moar like semi-hd 720p =/= hd

Except it is, dumbass. 480p is considered "Enhanced Definition TV (EDTV)" and it's only marginally different than SDTV. 720p was the first "HDTV" resolution.
>> Anonymous
so im guessing i wont be able to play this on my crt will i? ;.;
>> Anonymous
>>226080sorry i can't hear you behind my 1920x1080 material

This would be impressive if most peoples' monitors weren't capable of doing resolutions better than this.
>> Anonymous
>>226143
On a computer screen, the two resolutions are physically different.

On a TV, everything is scaled so you have no control and it appears the same screen size. Still you will see a difference unless you sit too far back, or are legally blind.
>> Anonymous
>>226160
If more movies were in 16:9 instead of 1.85+:1 then my 1680x1050 monitor would work.

But no, now I need a 24" to get 1920x1200 to watch most 1080p stuff. That is, when people start ripping at that size.
>> Anonymous
>>226142
Holy fuck! Here I thought I could just put it on a flash drive and start sniffing it.
>> Anonymous
So, is it worth the download, or does the whole thing look as bad as the preview image?
>> Anonymous
>>226177
as bad as the preview
>> Anonymous
>>226187

Is that a good thing or a bad thing?
>> Oni !sage3722z.
What's the difference between the monikers "p" and "i" because I've seen both used, but never together.
>> Anonymous
P = PROGRESSIVE
I = INTERLACED

where p displays a full image for each frame, interlaced displays only part of each frame at the same rate. the short answer is I is way better than P.
>> Oni !sage3722z.
>>226195
Thanks, now I know why the 480i videos of FFX were so awesome-looking.
>> Anonymous
>>226194
p means progressive scan - whole frames are updated line by line
i means interlaced mode - frames are updated at double frequency, but only the odd or even lines at a time.

Interlaced mode is a cheap way to increase framerate without doubling the data rate/bandwidth and will give you smoother picture ONLY IF displayed on CRT operating on specifically this resolution and framerate. It looks like shit on everything else (computer displays, LCD, beamers etc.), especially if picture has to be scaled, unless deinterlaced.

>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>226027
agreed, said faggot (or non-faggot) should re-encode at 1080p. would be worth the d/l, imo.
>> Anonymous
I miss the good old days of 160x120 RealVideo porn clips.
>> onan
>Lol at "cum inside world"...a better translation would be "creampie world".

But that wouldn't be proper engrish, would it?
>> Anonymous
>>226221
well we can't have that can we
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
It's called "Nakadashi WARUDO", so everyone shut up.
>> Anonymous
>>226160
Sony FW900 here

sorry i can't hear you behind my 2304x1440
>> Anonymous
>>226080
>>226292

"Warning: High resolutions can make you deaf."
>> Anonymous
I wonder how they managed to rip the Blu-ray disc, considering all the DRM crap.
>> Anonymous
>>226342
BR/HDDVD protection was cracked long time ago, besides, is use of AACS compulsory? I know that CSS on DVD is not, so many cheap DVDs simply don't bother with encryption (it costs additional fee).
>> HD PReP
<- HD For brainless shit-heads ->

If you plan to watch HD-material on your computer-monitor 4:3 display (not widescreen)

720p is to be played in 1280x1024.
1080p/i is to be played in 1920x1440.

If you have a monitor that doesn't suck you can set it to these resolutions.

If DVD-movies where compressed with divx/xvid, it would go from around 4-8 GB to 700 Mb to be fitted on a CD-R/RW.

Now with HD, they mostly do 10-25 GB bd/hd-dvd/hd-stream to 4.4 GB, to be fitted on a dvd-r/rw instead.
And on top of that there is a new codec which is even more owning than xvid - x264.

In conclusion, HD rips to DVD with x264 and your display-device set to the fitting resolution = success.

No more discussion from the n00bs so the rest of us can chill.

/P. ReP
>> Anonymous
>>226349

lol what's this faggotry, just maximize to wathever your screen resolution is (unless the screen is much larger so just resize vid to whatever is comfortable)
>> Anonymous
>>226347
Well, until now I thought AACS WAS compulsory. Also, I was only aware of HD-DVD being cracked.
>> Panda Boi
>>226021
maybe they think its food O.O
>> Anonymous
what program do you use to play this file?
>> Anonymous
>>226476
cccp
>> Anonymous
theres a fine torrent for japanese creampie porn in dvd quality and you discuss high definition specs.

You fucking nerds.

Thanks OP!
>> Anonymous
maybe someoen would be kind enough to post some screenshots of high quality
>> Anonymous
>>226580
exactly
>> Anonymous
>>226476
www.videolan.org/vlc/
...now those screens..
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>226349
>If you plan to watch HD-material on your computer-monitor 4:3 display (not widescreen)
>720p is to be played in 1280x1024.

bzzz wrong, 1280x1024 is 5:4. If you are watching this on a 4:3 display, use 1280x960.
>> Anonymous
High-definition, uncensored creampies.
Who the fuck cares about resolution?
>> Anonymous
>>226849
1280x960 is a non-standard resolution, whereas 1280x1024 is SXGA. I agree with the man when he recommended 1280x1024, as CRTs probably won't support 1280x960 so well.
>> Anonymous
Wrong, 1280x1024 is not 4:3. If you want perfectly square pixels on a CRT you need to either use a 4:3 resolution or mess around with the image dimensions in the monitors controls. 1280x1024 is a common native resolution for LCD monitors, which are rarely 4:3.
>> Anonymous
>>226849
I think he's saying that you'll get the full resolution at anything with a width of 1280. So on a 1280x1024 monitor, you'd get the full 1280x720 feed with black bars. Which aren't a problem unless you're a mongoloid.
>> Anonymous
thanks OP!
>> Anonymous
this is my first time using rapidshare, so beratings and insults aside, i dunno which thing to download from.

Download via Cogent
Download via Teleglobe
Download via GlobalCrossing #2
Download via TeliaSonera #3
>> Anonymous
>>227043
Well, why don't you ask yourself: "Who is my Tier1 IP carrier"?
>> Anonymous
argh it finished downloading but when i watch it the video is all slow while the audio keeps going. and when i convert it to avi there is no sound. is it me or my comp that fails? or perhaps a joint fail on both our parts?
>> Anonymous
or rather, the converter puts the sound into a seperate file...
>> Anonymous
nvm i think i got it.
so far from what ive seen this is pure win.
>> Anonymous
waaaah its still not working, the unfairness!
>> Anonymous
ITT: Newfags

If you watch HD stuff in a 4:3 crt monitor you won't even notice the difference between an HD show and a SD one. Get an HDTV fags.
>> Anonymous
So..i have an hdtv..but it supports only 1024x768 with a pc res..beside that..i can force stretch the image to fullscreen when i watch stuff. Is that still HD? Cuz i can really notice the quality difference between an SD show and an HD one. Some people tell me that it's not true HD cuz the tv doesn't support more then 1024x768 when connected to the pc. >:(
>> boon
>>227927
how are you connecting the pc to tv? cause s-video tops out at 1024x768, to get any higher you need component cables, dvi, vga, or a dvi to hdmi adaptor.
that is.. if your tv is really hd. look it up online, the model number should be on the back or front of the tv.
>> Anonymous
>>227927
You'll be able to watch 720p at full res, but only downscaled 1080p.

>>226512
welcome to 4chan.
>> Anonymous
You know what? this was great, quit yer bitchin
>> Anonymous
WHERE CAN I FIND MOAR?!
>> Anonymous
Where would I be able to buy this fine BRD? And is it region coded?
>> Anonymous
>>229322
i don't think blu ray discs are region coded
>> Anonymous
Why the fuck would someone download a 4.36Gb censored pron?
>> Anonymous
>>229336
There's probably little reason in downloading so much censored porn. This is why everyone is downloading this torrent instead.
>> Anonymous
>>229336
protip: this is uncensored, genius.
>> Anonymous
Hay guise, I got 8.3 in ratio on this torrent. :3
>> Anonymous
>>229377
nice keep sharing! DLing nao
>> Anonymous
720p is HD. Anyone saying otherwise is stupid.

1080p is Full HD, but can be categorized into just HD.
>> Anonymous
also 1920x1080= 2,073,600
where as 1280x720= 921,600

You get more than double the pixels with 1080p, so yes, you would have to be blind not to notice a difference from 720p to 1080p because you get double the image quality(if it's not just upscaled.)
>> Anonymous
Baw....never seen a pron clip in 1080p :/

Any link, kind anons?
>> Anonymous
what a great way to bump and piss each other off at the same time...

also, cocks
>> Anonymous
>>229454
yeah, i doubt my laptop would play a full 1080p and it barely plays 720p prefectly T_T
>> Anonymous
>>229457
Many people are unaware of this, but 1080p pron is strictly prohibited by law. Leading pornography experts have proven that watching pron at such high resolution will cause nausea and vomiting.
>> Anonymous
>>229491

Buy a copy of CoreAVC h.264 decoder or their player.
http://www.coreavc.com/

I bought the professional version of the codec (can use multiple cores) for 15 bucks - but it turns out that multicore wasn't necessary for this movie.
>> Anonymous
> Buy
lol
>> Anonymous
>>229520
faggot
>> Anonymous
>>229491
what kind of old crap is your laptop? 720p plays just nice on a 1GHz class CPU
>> Anonymous
>>229504
1080p is just close to reality...
if people aren't vomitting coninuously at strip bars, they wouldn't do it during 1080p porn
>> Anonymous
>>229545
Like hell it does. h264 720p content almost maxed the CPU (85~95%) on an old Athlon XP 2600 I had.
>> Anonymous
If I see the word "nakadashi" anywhere one more goddamn time...
>> Anonymous
>>229670
What? Nakadashi means creampie in Japanese. What's wrong with that?
>> Anonymous
>>229664
It depends more on bitrate and not on resolution.
>> Anonymous
>>229678
I'm aware of that. But you'll agree with me that the higher the resolution, the higher the bitrate will be to produce decent results. I've experienced with HD content on the old system basically using subbed animu with relatively low bitrates (~200MB / 24 min), and CPU usage was never less than 85%. I've also watched a few high quality RAWs (120fps / ~400MB / 24 min) and, surprisingly enough, the CPU could taking, averaging 95% (without maxing).

The point is, if low bitrate 720p content almost maxed an Athlon XP 2600 (1.9 Ghz), an "1Ghz class CPU" certainly wouldn't be able to play it.
>> Anonymous
>>229693

sounds like you have some other problem going on. Maybe you should try using either cccp or k-lite codec packages with mpc or zoom video players.

I can run a 720p video (MPEG4 24 fps, 2.2 GB, 115 min, 6 ch 48000 Hz Dolby AC3 audio) and use in the 40% CPU usage for media player classic, and I have a Athlon 64 3500+ 2.2 GHz processor.

Sounds to me that it isn't the video you are having problems with, but either a software/hardware problem and/or conflicts.

I don't have this video anymore, so I can't give you the rating, but, I didn't notice any problems. It played fine with other programs running in the background such as uTor, winamp, and a couple others.

get a better player, a better codec, and maybe a better pc. If my computer can run it with 1 GB of slow ass memory (200 MHz) and not much better of a processor, and this pc is 3-4 years old ... I doubt many others have worse these days.

1080p, bring it on, (though my screen is only 900 veritcal, so, it doesn't matter too much to me)
>> Anonymous
>>229760
No problem at all, my system was perfectly optimized and I used CCCP. The thing is my system was reasonably worse than yours. Your 3500 (Newcastle core) has a completely different architecture than the 2600 (Barton core) I had, and it's much better. Your RAM seems to be DDR400, which is the fastest RAM in that class, while mine was DDR333(166Mhz). Your processor also supports dual-channel mode of operation, so you probably have your RAM working that way, while my memory was working at single-channel.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Thanks for posting, OP.
>> Anonymous
How do I burn this on a blank DVD? It's not Iso and I never burn a mkv. file before.
>> Anonymous
>>230077
to play it on a DVD player? that'd be kind of stupid since you'd need to downconvert it to non-HD first
to play on your computer, you need to burn it as UDF not ISO since ISO doesn't support files >4GB.
>> Anonymous
lol @ all the fucking technical debate from virgins who aren't interested in the porn.
>> Anonymous
>>230088
i can play iso with my VLC player.
>> Anonymous
>>230145
you can also play mkv with VLC player if your computer's fast enough
then just burn it as a regular file with the UDF filesystem, not ISO
>> Anonymous
i am trying to play the file while downloading and it is kind of lagging. i have an intel core duo processor t2350 1.86ghz with 1g of memory. can my computer play this file or do i have to do something to the file. I am playing this with a media player classic. what do i need to do.
>> Anonymous
The quality is good I can't see what you guys are complaining about anyway?
>> Anonymous
>> The quality is good I can't see what you guys are complaining about anyway?

Hi, Anonymous here! After a hard day, there's really nothing I like better than complaining. The more someone's done for me without recompense and the less I had to do myself (hand ponderously moving mouse, clicking url as the fat on the back of my forearm wobbles like jello) the more pleasure I derive from complaining. Fapping? Sure, that's... okay. But nothing compared to the orgasmic surge I get when there's a misplaced pixel. And let me tell you, I've seen a few pixels in my day.
>> Anonymous
bump for moor
>> Anonymous
What's with all the crying emo faggots? You don't like it? Then don't download it, just shut the fuck up.

To op, thanks for the upload, and if it sucks, Anonymous does not forgive or forget, lol.
>> Anonymous
>>230466
spoken like a true newfag
>> Anonymous
>>230474
Uh-huh, you seem like the newfag, retard.
>> Anonymous
>>227409
i have the same prob, i sux at technical mumbo jumbo, anon, please help me! what must i do? i'm using vlc
>> Anonymous
>>230849
probably means your comp can't handle it. I'm not familiar w/ re-encoding, but that's what you need to do, at a lower bitrate too so your comp handle it.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Okay, you asked for it:

Nakadashi, uncensored, BR-ISO, 1080i, 22.2GB :

http://rapidshare.com/files/105769416/mai-hanano_nakadashi.torrent.html
http://www.jptorrent.org/link.php?ref=PEMHUJU1SL
>> Anonymous
Only in 4-chan would a porn post escalate to a nerd on nerd hd-tv specs fag fest.
>> Anonymous
>>232451

(just realized you're actualy helping some guy with the vid, my apologies anon)
>> Anonymous
I have a 2.3 GHz c2d and 7950 GTX Go, how should I best maximize my HD viewing experience?

CCCP + CoreAVC or ...?
>> draker !KtMudshitI
i have a fucking athlon X2 with igp and i run any hd video at full speed
>> Anonymous
i'm>>232492
hd content stutters at 720p, with video lagging behind audio.

What am I doing wrong / not doing that is right?
>> Anonymous
>>232495
Something is very wrong with your system, you should be able to play 720p content easily. Just uninstall every codec you have (Insurgent, a utility found in CCCP's page, can help you finding the codecs you have installed) and install CCCP.
>> Anonymous
>>232492
cccp has a shitty decoder which is set most of the time as the standarddecoder. you need to deactivate it in ffdshow.

ffdshow video decoder configuration -> codec -> h.264/avc -> disable
>> Anonymous
>>232527
what do you use if not ffdshow?
>> Anonymous
>>232548
Mplayer, VLC
>> Anonymous
>>232548
core avc. way better than anything, especially fddshow's decoder
>> Anonymous
>>232568
>especially
ffdshow's is easily second best
>> Anonymous
>>229664

dude, you're doing something wrong. my Athlon XP 2100+ plays 720p/x264 files with 30% processor usage.
>> Anonymous
CoreAVC Professional Edition v1 6 5 0-EDGE
http://www.fulldls.com/download-app-849544-CoreAVC+Professional+Edition+v1+6+5+0EDGE.torrent