File :-(, x, )
Infra Red Voyeur Photography Anonymous
http://www.akiba-online.com/forum/showthread.php?t=19611

Supposedly modified infra-red cameras have the ability to see through the layers of clothes.

So some dude takes his camera out on the street

Comment too long. Clickhereto view the full text.
>> Anonymous
Of course such technology does not really exist.
Don't cap obvious me, I'm sure someone was going to ask.
>> Anonymous
No, that is real. All CCDs are sensitive to infrared light, and manufacturers simply use IR-filters to block out IR. In some cameras these filters can be removed if one has the necessary tools, manual dexterity and wish to destroy the camera (it can't be used for anything else after removal of the filter)
>> Anonymous
I saw one video where someone used Infra Red camera at a cosplay convention. It was focused on a Lilith cosplayer and a nearby unsuspecting female cosplayer. I was wondering if there was a torrent for that.
>> Anonymous
http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/news/taming-terahertz.htm
>> Anonymous
is this a video of that xray vision kit i saw in the back of my boy scout magazine when i was young
>> Anonymous
The camera is real. However, as soon as they realised it did this, they modified the design. So they're pretty rare.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>249309
sauce
>> Anonymous
>>249381
SAUCE
>> Anonymous
>>249301
It's real. Do a google search. It happened a couple of years ago. Dunno how many of those cameras got out into public though. A couple of pervs got caught.
>> Anonymous
There are (were) also filters by Kaya Optics which convert the infra-red to something even a normal camera can see.
>> Anonymous
xrayhunter.com
>> Anonymous
link doesnt work.. anyone help me out?
>> Anonymous
www.LetsKeepitSecret.com
its secret.
get laid
>> Anonymous
for the love of christ moar
>> Anonymous
>>249301
its real.

they're planning on using this shit at airports.
>> Anonymous
dear marty chang, i received one of these cameras from my grandfather completely by chance like 3 weeks ago, it uses hi8 tapes and can be converted to digital. what do i do?
>> Anonymous
>>249512
Dress up as a teenie bopper and go to your local hgh school.
>> Anonymous
no what im saying is i need help making it do this oh god help me
>> Marty Chang
>>249512
You're going to want to act quickly. Fashion a snowman out of pretzels and molasses. Then cover it with gasoline. Apply light current to the snowman via a soldering iron and let it set for two hours. And you're done. It's elementary.
>> Anonymous
>>249517
I would if I could because I think these sluts deserve it lol but I don't have the technical experience.
>> Anonymous
>>249381
this is relevant to my interests
>> Anonymous
>>249309
does this exist?!?
>> Anonymous
because of the small size this video isn't worth taking a look since the quality is so lousy you can hardly see the x-ray effect plus the still shots could have been enhanced since the only clear views are loose, light, bright clothing and even then it's barely noticable
>> Anonymous
waste of a download. nothing to see here.
>> Anonymous
www.LetsKeepitSecret.com
fuck a local girl
email her
and hook up. its free
>> Anonymous
>>249381
from runaways i believe
>> Anonymous
>>249411
I remember hearing about this, I think it was some Sony Handycams about 9 years ago.
>> Anonymous
http://money.cnn.com/1998/08/14/technology/camera_pkg/
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>249603
If you aren't a natural voyeur you can't really appreciate it.
Anyway in summer I see more than that using just my own eyes.
I actually love summer quite a bit.
>> ???????Tripfag??????? !REDREDLOGo
>>249395
>>249558
Runaways.

A movie is coming in a few years, too.
>> Anonymous
>>249381
SAUCE PLS
>> Anonymous
>>249291
well it's a good thing they censor the guys' faces, otherwise i'd be totatly disgusted
>> Anonymous
>>249640
Anyone with a penis is a natural voyeur.
>> Anonymous
>>249716
Visit your nearest swingers club and I think you'll see just about everyone is a voyuer.
>> Anonymous
>>249291
Hm. I downloaded this, and it's utterly unremarkable. You see less than you would with your naked eye and some backlight. It seems to be a non-phenomenon.
>> Anonymous
>>249775
it's a bigger deal if you strap an infra-red emitter to the camera like a shotgun flashlight and do this kind of thing in the dark. That's way cooler than seeing some perky nipples through a white shirt.
>> Anonymous
Some people need girlfriends so bad it an funny.....well maybe just a little bit funny..but not much
>> Anonymous
FLIR = Forward Looking Infra Red

its a company based outside of portland, OR

they make cameras that can see thru smoke and polyester

they have govt/military contracts mostly

the images are good enough to find and shoot someone hiding in a burning building, but not generally fapworthy
>> Anonymous
>>250116
Even more funny when some people on 4chan try to give lessons to others about needing a gf as if they were any different.
>> Anonymous
this is 12 years old.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>250156
>> Anonymous
what a waste of bandwidth
>> Anonymous
>>250171
I lol'd, so help me, I lol'd.
>> Anonymous
Not giving anybody a damn thing it just pretty sad to go around looking at bearly visible panties and bars....hey here's an idea go up to her and ask her for a date......it's not that hard people

Oh and by the way nerd i'v had i girlfriend for 5 years and i didn't meet her by looking through her clothes Mr Anonymous>>250119
>> Anonymous
>>250405

here's a crazy idea: instead of coming on a saturday night to a website full of people doing something you think is stupid and telling us all what to do with ourselves like you're somebody's fucking mother, go fuck your supposed girlfriend.

or just stfu.
>> Anonymous
Hey here's a better idea instead of getting all upset about my personal opinion and writing me back about it like a little ass kid you to could be getting your own supposed girlfriend..instead of sitting in front of your computer screen trying to think of a clever come back to this.......you are more then likely going to reply to this but i don't give two shits i'm done with you and this hole invalid argument if you want to be a perv and look through girls clothes on your computer like a dateless wonder go right ahead i'm not stopping you or any one else
>> Simon Templar
>>250665
Nonetheless, 250410 is right. This website is fapland. If you're that good yourself that you can give lessons in life to the whole lot of us, you need not to wander such places as 4chan. If you still do, then you're just as much a no-lifer as the most of us and need, dear sir, to leave further debates to people whose brains are, unlike yours, larger than a corynthian grapefruit.
Those of your like are well known: they live under bridges and eat little kids. We call them trolls. You are green, scaly, ugly and have general hygienic habits which would ashame a well-educated swine.
See? if you're going to be offendive, at least you should try to do it in a refined fashion.
>> Anonymous
>>250405
You fail sir. You should have pumped and dumped instead of restricting yourself to one woman who decides if you will be having sex this month or year. Girlfriends for the fail.
>> Anonymous
successful ronery troll is successful
>> Anonymous
LOL!!! First of all i was commenting on the post i not one time give anybody on here any danm life lessons lol....second dude one 250696 and dude two 250410 if you want to looks through girls clothes go right ahead i'm not stopping you or giving you any quote on quote life lessons..and i don't care how much you say i'm just like you or everyone on here the truth is you or your sidekick don't know me but i will tell you one thing about me i will never ok looking through girls clothes but if you want to the door is open go right ahead...game over
>> Astr4y
>>250796
what

gb2/english/
>> Anonymous
>>250796
>I have a girlfriend but am still a virgin. We haven't even gotten to first base.
MEGAFAIL!
>> Anonymous
http://www.kaya-optics.com/products/experiments.shtml

depending on your equipment, it seems you can get pretty clear under clothing shots
>> Anonymous
>>249291
I've seen this one, it's not worth the download
>> Anonymous
I'll pass..i mean why waste time and money just to look through a girls clothes..lol 251265
>> Anonymous
>>251265
>Have we got you excited about the PF's possibilities yet? We hope so!
If you know what I mean
>> Anonymous
I work at an optics labs.

Infra-red cams are very far from being hard to find, they're just expensive. Most CCD cams can detect up to 1000nm, which includes some infrared. You can buy them from Thorlabs (it's the Wal-mart of optics) and there's no filter or anything on it; you can even unscrew the lens and see the CCD array itself. We have one in the lab to caracterize optic fibers.

I have no fucking idea why one would bother with this shit, though. All this work to try seeing a hint of nipple on some unattractive woman on the street?
>> typical 4chan moron
Too much work! Why not just kidnap and rape them? That's my preferred method.
>> Anonymous
That's not real. I'm in the business (cameras, hardware, optics) and it isn't possible to achive such effects with IR. Simply put, it's fake and a intertube myth.

Yes, all CCD/CMOS are sensetive to IR. No, there's no filter in cameras to take away the IR. Yes, you can easily get filters that rule out all light but IR (<800nm or <720nm beeing the most usual).
>> Anonymous
Finally someone that understands how silly this is lol 251373
>> Anonymous
>>251423
Lawls.
Take an el-cheapo web cam, open it up, find lense, remove small translucent plactic infront of it
Replace with the film negative of a picture of a black sheet or something
Re-asemble
?????
>> sage sage
sage. this was a total waste of time and bandwidth. you can't see shit in it. it's like they just put a green filter on regular video. save your bandwidth, move on and download something else.
>> Anonymous
>>251613
what this guy said, you can't see a damn thing.
>> Anonymous
Some people missing the point here. What everyone excited about was not the video itself, but the idea if we can make a see trough camera or not, like in a James Bond movie something. God knows if it is really possible, I'll definitely get one and start shooting sexy babes on the street lol.
>> Anonymous
>>251373
> I have no fucking idea why one would bother with this shit

Then you're a moron.

Even if you aren't interested in the subject, you should at least have some idea why other people are.
>> Anonymous
>>252573
YOU seem to be missing the point, if you had actually bothered to download and watch this movie you'd know that you can't see shit, it's a bunch of fully clothed women walking around, not even the slightest bit seethrough.
>> Anonymous
I can't believe this crap is still on here videos change on here fast so the fact that this is still here and people are still 50/50 the prevs that say i'd totally do this if god gave me a see through camera....and the guys that think this is dumb and a waste of time..lol good luck people
>> Tsu-na-mi
I downloaded this, watched all of it (well, I started FFWDing halfway thru, and all I have to say is...

MOST BORING 'PORN' EVER
>> Anonymous
>BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWW
shut up you fags
>> Senor Guapo
I own a modified IR still camera. It isn't some magic device that takes people's clothes off. Let me explain it this way:

A camera picks up light.
IR is a different region of light, outside of our visible spectrum.
IR allows one to visualize heat signatures.

If you really want me to go out and take some pictures with a real IR camera of girls in bikinis, I'll do it and post it here.

Of course, anyone with a Sony Nightshot or comparable camcorder can also visualize IR. Look at this site for more info:

kaya-optics.com/devices/sony_nightshot.shtml
>> Anonymous
You dont need a camera.. you can use your phone.

http://www.kaya-optics.com/products/experiments.shtml
>> Anonymous
>>253218
where can I get that? I can't find an online store for the camera phone paper thing.
>> Anonymous
here is what you do, take the IR filter out of your camera and replace it with a solid black end part of a photo negative. if you have a camera phone, just use the negative... it should give you more then nothing, but not the best
>> Anonymous
there was news of sony developing a camera like this years ago. somewhere definitely around the late 90s i think. it was very expensive. and yeah, release for it was blocked i think and only a few guys out there managed to get their hands on it. expensive and rare. quality was somewhat lousy i hear and it cannot go deep enough for underwears and some materials out there. but it wasn't developed fo voyeurism in mind anyway. it was developed to be used on security.
>> Anonymous
some idiot wanted to install these cameras in the city of london for security reasons apparently LOL
>> Anonymous
>>250796
>game over
sorry for quoting this old shit but I lol'd