>> |
Anonymous
>>187110 >You make it sound like it's horrible when it isn't. I don't need to make it sound horrible, beacuse it is.
>There's SOME camera shaking and SOME blurring, but obviously not enough to make you miss what's hapenning, of course. There's blurring and shaking over 90% of the film. No, you're not missing what's happening, but it's still fucking annoying.
>You're just a rebellious teenager who didn't have his Love Hina-like supply of weeaboo hentai for the month. Wake up, what you got was an alternative creation, not intended to meet any standards of the sea of shit that's out there. Fail for ad hominem.
>This is pure art, and better yet, involving hot, mind-blowing sex. No, it's just another hentai trying to be different. It certainly is different, but it isn't better.
>Just by reading "Murakami" in the thread you should have an idea about what to expect, His other titles were better - same style of animation, some usage of blurring and shaking, but nowhere near as pervasive.
>or else, good-bye to your fucking average, horribly animated, repeatedly-showing-the-same-scenes licensed hentai. What kind of shitty titles have you been watching that uses repeated scenes?
|