>> |
KiTA
!zx3TGNvBPw
Loli has been found to be legal in the US several times -- or rather, specifically, the concept of giving human rights to ink has been struck down as an unconstitutional repression of the freedom of expression.
In short -- Loli is art, and you can't ban art. Just like you cant ban Jock Sturges' photography books of artistic nudes or the novel "Lolita". Like it or not, in the US, Lolikon is fundamentally protected free speech.
But, of course, Bush is a fucking retard and, well, if there's one common theme of the retard's reign so far it would be "Who the fuck cares about the law or the will of the people?"
So, when the Amber Alert law was passed, the Republicans snuck in an Amendment banning "virtual child porn" dispite such laws being struck down at least 3 times so far that I know of.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolikon#Legal_status_in_the_United_States
It will, hopefully, be struck down again, but, who goes first? Who wants to be the first one to take it to the Supreme court as a "virtual pornographer"? And, I say hopefully because Retard managed to get two right wing nutjobs on the supreme court -- who knows if they'll actually respect the constitution they're supposed to be protecting or not?
|