>> |
Anonymous
>>172578 "Then no problem, since people have ISPs not ips."
You don't log an ISP.
IP in this context is usually short for IP Address, which is what they use to find your ISP, which is who they contact to find you.
"Then no problem, since people have ISPs not ips."
Where has his status as a pot or his color been established?
"As for these, they're as illegal as family videos of their children running around on the beach and posting it on youtube as far as I'm concerned."
Your concern doesn't determine legality. I'm sure it is legal in most countries, but that doesn't make it any less creepy.
"Individual perception itself is what makes these reprehensible"
The only non-stupid thing in your post.
"I stand by the concept that if this gets people off, let it, at least its one less situation where a girl is hurt to satisfy sexual urges. Pedos didn't choose to be pedos, so the more outlets for them, the better."
They may not choose to be pedos, like "Hmm, you know what, I really want to be aroused by children!" but there is an element of choice in what they view and what they dwell on.
Does a pedo blowing his load over some video where a girl did not in fact get raped mean that one less girl gets raped?
Maybe, but maybe it's helping a guy get fixated on little girls.
And maybe furry porn is helping guys get fixated on fucking dogs.
You know, people watching this probably aren't baby rapers, but they're creepy, they're closer to baby rapers than the rest of us, and frankly I don't see anything wrong with ostracizing someone who reveals a fondness for this material.
Seriously, what would you do if you visited a friend and saw dozens of DVDs like this on his shelf?
|