File :-(, x, )
Trevor Brown art Anonymous
http://rapidshare.de/files/35851329/Trevor_Brown.rar
he is a 4chaner!
>> Anonymous
his compositions are so fucking disturbing...
some fetish elements... some things are just sick ;> hes not only a 4channer, he's the personified /b/.

thx for the upload man
>> Anonymous
i love you thiiiiiiiiiiiiis much
>> Akira.h
>>129748
Trevor Brown is awesome!
best artist ever!
thank you!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Trevor Brown is a hero to all of us perverts and weeaboos.

He's always complaining about people stealing his work and not supporting artists on his blog, so if he's reading this I've bought several of his postcard sets and WOULD buy his artbooks if I could find them in print before they sell out!

OP, is this just a rip of his website, or does it contain some of his rare/hard to find stuff? Guess I'll find out and report back.
>> Akira.h
>>129768
seconded. every - single - word.

plus: i'd buy his stuff, if i'd HAVE the money at all -_-
>> Anonymous
>>129768

nothing new under the sun!

it's a site-rip plus maybe a couple of trevor brown google images...it's not even a really pretty site-rip.
sorry guys, but this is a waste of time...now scans of his artbooks or his Taboo cd rips...THAT would be nice.
>> Anonymous
>>129768

it's kind of dubious to complain that nobody buys your books when they are never available or at least never availble through normal means (i'm not buying overpriced stuff through yesasia).

surely people have made way too much money on ebay by selling them horribly overpriced.
i can't see why he keeps complaining about money when he isn't selling his books...make them available and start selling shirts, i swear...he would never have to complain about money ever again.
>> Dietrich !H.of3iOYmg
If he's complaining about money then he is a greedy bastard. Artists do what they do because they love it. Not to make money. So if he complains about money, then he really doesn't deserve any at all. His art is, metiocre, at best.
>> Anonymous
>>129779

it's very good, but it's no art...surely he at least would have progressed on the subject by now.
i know infatuation with a certain subject is something you can't deny and i'm not saying he should...i'm saying that it's impossible for me to take him seriously as an artist when all he does is draw little girls.
in fact, i think like his backgrounds now more than his girls.(and he doesn't really do them anymore with little miss sticky kiss)
you'd think he at least would draw ONE boy or something different for the sake of being an artist (like he did in the past, clearly his non-figurative work is by far the best).
i guess his background as a commercial artist just shows more and more as time progresses.
even his old work was very little but a better skilled rip-off from loulou & kiki picasso and Slocombe.

i want him to take himself seriously as an artist instead of pissing on other artists for making money.
>> Anonymous
>>129748

is he a 4channer?...i thought japan was blocked from 4chan and he lives in japan.
>> Anonymous
>>129779

hahahaha give me a fucking break, tripfag.

Artists START making art because they love it, but if they want to continue making art as a full time job they have to get paid. And there is a lot of boring "real" work involved, especially when you have to deal with printers, publishers, art galleries, etc.
>> Anonymous
>>129783

that is true, but you really haven't been following mr. brown ongoing battle against artist that make money.
especially artists that steer clear of paedo-enticing topics and not forgetting his battle against every artist that has 'ripped him off' somehow...

i don't even think most artists have heard from him!

look, he made the conscious decision of drawing fetish related art...fetish people are by NO means art people (or else it would have been a less immature and ugly crowd), so if he's content with feeding them the same thing over and over again and everybody keeps telling him he's doing a great job, it will keep him in a constant delusion that what he does is in fact important to someone...and that those 'filthy' artists have nothing on his adoring fetish/goth/nu-hipster crowd.

for fuck's sake man, grow up...see that your crowd is pulling you down!
at least have the decency to learn something from people who criticize you for being obvious.

it's not too late to realize your hard-on isn't the sole inspiration for your art.
there is a whole world of subtlety and intelligence to be explored in art...it's not too late to be important!
>> Anonymous
>>129780but it's no art..

nigga please...

let's not get into that, the whole what is (not) art thing.
as a matter of fact, smartest thing one can do is to stay clear of that rotten word, at all costs.
>> Anonymous
>>129804

if a word makes your nervous it's better to stay clear of your opinion, at all costs.

"nigga."
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
This thread is now about art and niggers.
>> Anonymous
>>129807
you forgot to mention sexual art which is 'awesome' lol
>> Anonymous
>>129782
PROXIES MOTHERFUCKER, DO YOU USE THEM?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>129807
>> Anonymous
>>129785

Are you retarded or what?

How do you define art? How something is less artistic if it's based on fetishes? Hiroaki Samura isn't artistic because he draws BDSM?

Sade didn't do literature, then?

I like how this guy draws from these pics posted here, he has talent indeed. Which doesn't mean he isn't a faggot for bitching about people "stealing" his art.
>> Anonymous
>>129840

putting sade and literature in one sentence has relevance on it's age and the time it was written in...his work would have little to do with literature in modern days, wouldn't you agree?(i'm pretty sure you will also find the bible and interview with the vampire under literature)
you can find your answer by comparing desade with with william burroughs's naked lunch or j.g. ballard's crash.(of which the latter had a very arty influence on mr. brown's crash babies)

hiroaki samura isn't art...especially when he draws BDSM.
he is a manga artist and manga artists validate themself through skill, intelligence and perhaps relevancy on an artistic level...something of which samura only has the first.
oh, it's an art he draws, but his drawing aren't art.
make no mistake...there is a difference...furry art isn't 'art' for simply using the word 'art'.
that goes for mr. samura as well...it's pulp and it's also guro pulp when he draws them tied up...it's his skill that makes those drawings special.(the subject doesn't really go beyond ilsa, she wolf of the ss)

but you are getting it wrong here...mr. brown isn't an artist for drawing fetish related stuff...he's not an artist for ONLY drawing fetish related stuff.(not counting the few artistic sidetracks on his taboo series and his older stuff)

there are MANY artists who draw/paint/whatever in fetishistic regions, but it's subtlety what stops them from doing the same thing over and over again.

>> Anonymous
>>129814

he made a remark about not being able to visit 4chan on his blog because of the fact that he lives in japan...
>> Anonymous
this isn't even a torrent

also, get lives
>> Dietrich !H.of3iOYmg
     File :-(, x)
I'm an artist nao! GIMMEEE MUNNNNIES
>> Anonymous
>>129862

No, you are only trying to adapt the meaning of art to what you think it's art. You are trying to objectivize (sp?) art, which is totally stupid.

Art cannot be defined in one only way. More so, you didn't tell me how Samura isn't art and Makoto Aida it's art.

If skill doesn't matter in art, you are trying to say that until the impressionists we didn't have art? What kind of reasoning is that?

Now, define art. You cannot define art, you cannot say that Samura, Aida, Brown, Slocombe or whatever isn't art because you would be trying to impose your definition of art over my definition of art.

Picasso isn't less artistic than Rembrandt, Manet isn't less artistic than Kandinsky or Bouguereau... There are different interpretations of art, different motivations to do art, and art adapts to the needs of the artist (give a political message, exalt beauty, be abstract, express feelings, whatever).

To try to chain the freedom of art to adapt it to your preferences is seriously retarded.
>> Anonymous
>>129870

please don't bring up a 'everything is art if you believe it's art'...EVERYthing can be defined as art by those terms.

it's very obvious that by art...i'm talking about a combination of factors that excell and make it into something special.
one of which is skill...but not JUST skill...there is a whole variety of factors.
some obvious and some not quite as superficial as holding a rembrandt next to a samura bdsm piece.(or a trevor brown next to a makoto aida piece)
and when i say art...i thought it was obvious that i meant 'good art'.
like saying literature and not meaning blade of the immortal.
bad art isn't art...it's a progression of an artistic act, but it doesn't make the level of art by simply having it made.
artistic acts don't validate themself on a word...literature isn't just that because YOU think it is...it excells in a way that is undeniable and goes far beyond one single thing that stands out.

i get the impression that you think i dislike samura's bdsm pieces...you can't be more wrong, i'm a very, very big fan of them.
the same goes for trevor brown...i'm just saying the both don't go beyond those borders that are called art.

>> Anonymous
>>129894

If Advertising Design is art, then so is this.
>> Anonymous
>>129894

Your definition of art is still very biased and vague, as every definition of "art".

You say that it has to have a "combination of factors that excell and make it into something special", but you fail to say which are those factors and who defines that it's special.

The things that someone sees as special in Kandinsky can mean shit to a Rembrandt admirer, a Neoclasicist will seek different things from art than a Dadaist... I don't se why technique, beauty, sexuality, violence, etc. cannot be part of those "special factors".

You say you refer to "good art", which by itself it's a stupid term because the same thing you think is good someone else could see as shit.

And, how has literature more artistic value than comics? That's plainly idiotic, they are different media and cannot be compared.

Then you start with a very vague explanation of what you think it's "good art" (an invalid term, as I said) for the subjective reasons that make you feel that something is art. You are trying to make an objective definition of something subjective by nature, so you obviously end being biased.

You like Samura and the guy from this thread. But you don't think it's art, because you have some esotheric reasons that you cannot explain in a solid way. It's all right if you think like that; just don't try to say it's an objective truth, because it isn't that way.
>> Anonymous
has snacks posted to this thread yet

vsnares laffo
>> Anonymous
>>129865

just go away, you have nothing to contribute to this thread.
>> SAGE Dietrich !H.of3iOYmg
>>129946
NO YOU! By the way homo, I started this whole homosexual debate on what art is or isn't see>>129779.

Anyhow, take this shit to /dis/. It doesn't belong in /t/.