File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
>> Anonymous
They won all but one game?
>> Anonymous
4-1
>> Anonymous
in b4 spursfags come in talking about refs and lakers etc
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
unless they taped their opponents, nope.
>> Anonymous
Except the Giants didn't have the refs help like the Lakers* did. -10/10
>> Anonymous
>>124081

in after Lakers*fag casually trying to legitimatize their fixed wins
>> Anonymous
We all know that the Lakers* deserve everything they get.

They have never been the beneficiary of any wrongful officiating.

The Los Angeles Lakers* are a World-Class organization*.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>124088
>BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
>> Anonymous
They've both won an assload of championships recently?

FUCK YEAH SAN ANTONIO!
>> Anonymous
>>124109
4-1 faggot
>> Anonymous
-Most successful team of the last decade in the league.
(3 Super Bowls / 4 NBA Titles)

-Eventually plagued by being too old in certain areas.
(86 yard final SB drive / Two chokes, one series)

-Team built with role players, not superstars.
(See: Rosters / Pats pre-2007)

-Quiet, non-flashy punch in, punch out teams
(NO ONE opens their mouths on either team)

-Have millions who hate seeing them make championships.
(If you're not a fan, you don't like them)

-Choked. Big time
(18-1 / 20 & 17 point blown leads)

Note: 2007 Patriots did begin to break the mold due to massive SpyGate coverage and big free agency moves.
>> Anonymous
>>124107

How does that comparison stand? The Pats cheated and STILL lost. The Spurs got cheated AGAINST. Two completely different things
>> Anonymous
Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*La
kers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lake
rs*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers
*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*L
akers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lak
ers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Laker
s*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*Lakers*
>> Anonymous
>The Pats cheated and STILL lost.

If you did not notice the SpyGate scandal ended in Week 1 of the NFL season and had no effect on the Super Bowl in terms of illegal video tapes then you are an idiot.
>> Anonymous
>>124117
So what? All of 2006 and that first game of 2007 will always have an asterisk next to it.

Pats should have one less Super Bowl win and should have been 17-2.
>> Anonymous
Maybe the NFL should stop holding 19 game seasons with the championship determined by ONE game.
>> Anonymous
>>124127
>2006
>Pats should have one less Super Bowl win

Ever watched football before in your life?

People bitching about cheating and conspiracy are butthurt faggots.

It's 18-1 idiots, not 17-2.
>> Anonymous
>>124127
That is such an astonishing amount of fail, I am forced to believe you are either 8 years old, or are 80 and have Alzheimer's.
>> Anonymous
>>124127

There last Super Bowl win was in the 2004 season you idiot.

And yes go ahead and put a * next to two seasons of back to back chokes, that's fine.
>> Anonymous
Uh the Pats cheated for numerous years and letting players on the IR practice with the team is actually worse cheating than the video taping. But did they get punished for it? No, because Goodell is too busy finding ways to punish the players more. That and fapping to Tom Brady.
>> Anonymous
>>124154
Well actually they got fined and a draft pick taken away.
>> Anonymous
>>124157
I'm talking about the IR stuff not getting punished.
>> Anonymous
>Pats cheated for numerous years and letting players on the IR practice with the team is actually worse cheating than the video taping.

For 2006 to the first quarter of a game in 2007, yes.

It was not cheating before that due to the rule specifically stating "FOR USE IN THE GAME" and it's already been confirmed by Matt Walsh and Goodell that the tapes were never used during the game.

None of the championships are "tainted."

Also that IR shit has been going on for years in the NFL, do a Google search for fucks sake.
>> Anonymous
>>124154
And the Broncos fucked with their salary cap numbers and contracts to keep their dynasty team alive.
>> Anonymous
>>124160
Apparently they rolled it into the camera punishment.

Frankly as a Raiders fan I'm still upset the NFL didn't nuke the Broncos and 49ers after they cheated on the salary cap, which IMO is way worse than taping and IR shenanigans. I think both those teams only lost 3rd round picks, which is ridiculous.
>> Anonymous
>>124163

70's Steelers = Steriods
80's 49ers = Cap Violations
90's Cowboys = TAPED SIGNALS JUST LIKE THE PATS (Jimmy Johnson ADMITTED)

Everyone cheats.
>> Anonymous
>>124161
>it's already been confirmed by Matt Walsh and Goodell that the tapes were never used during the game.

Actually it was confirmed by both of them that a tape of the walkthrough of the Rams practice never existed, period.
>> Anonymous
It pays to cheat in the NFL.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
ITT bawwing Patsfags who try to deny and downplay the truth.
>> Anonymous
>>124171

Oh, I'm not reffering to that.

I'm reffering to the regular taped signals they had. They never used those DURING the game and the NFL rule before 2006 clearly stated it's only illegal is used DURING a game.

BSPN likes to brainwash people though.
>> Anonymous
>>124169
Not to defend the Steelers, but everybody used steriods back then.
>> Anonymous
>>124177
0/10
>> Anonymous
>>124169
>>70's Steelers = Steriods


lol wat

Never proven try again.
>> Anonymous
>>124184
patsfag
>> Anonymous
>>124169
Interestingly enough Jimmy Johnson DID get his team's ass fined for fraudulently using the injury report.
>> Anonymous
>>124186
Come on man, everybody knows they used it. They weren't the only ones, however, so most people let it slide.
>> Anonymous
>>124186
Ex-players have admitted to it.
>>124194
Some people claim they started the steroid craze.
>> Anonymous
>>124186

http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/story/8322840

lol refuting a guy who actually played

try again
>> Anonymous
>>124181
I've never heard about the 80's 49ers violating the cap. I don't even think there was a cap at the time. The cap came about as part of the 1993 CBA.

Rather, it was the 90's 49ers that cheated the cap by paying Steve Young, Lee Woodall and others under the table for non-football related activities.

Which lends Steve Young's current commentary on the state of cheating in the NFL now its own ironic humor.

They also tampered with other players under contract to other teams, for which they were also fined. Apparently most of this was the work of Carmen Policy, ex-mafia lawyer.
>> Anonymous
>>124206
"steroid use was rampant because the league had no policy banning such drugs."

Taken from your article.
>> Anonymous
>>124167
>Frankly as a Raiders fan I'm still upset the NFL didn't nuke the Broncos and 49ers after they cheated on the salary cap, which IMO is way worse than taping and IR shenanigans. I think both those teams only lost 3rd round picks, which is ridiculous.
What's worse is most people don't even know about it.
>> Anonymous
>>124212

Just because it wasn't illegal, didn't make it right.

Kobe cheated on his wife, not illegal, but wrong and tainted him as a person.
>> Anonymous
>>124228
Well then we could say that like half the NFL was tainted in the 70's and early 80's.
>> Anonymous
>>124228
actually i think it made him better

after that kobe started dropping 40 like nothing
>> Anonymous
>>124217
I know, it still burns me. Though to be fair, I believe what the Broncos did wasn't so much about getting an advantage on the field itself, but it was about maintaining cash flow to get their new stadium financed, so they deferred cap payments but didn't brazenly overpay on the cap. Still, I hope Bowlen dies in his accounting-fraud enhanced stadium one day.

What the 49ers did was out-and-out thievery though.
>> Anonymous
>>124234

Just as the roids made the Steelcheats better.
>> Anonymous
ILLEGAL ROSTER BUILDING IS WORSE THAN TAPING SIGNALS FROM ACROSS THE FIELD, VISABLE TO ANYONE IN THE FIRST ROWS

ILLEGAL ROSTER BUILDING IS WORSE THAN TAPING SIGNALS FROM ACROSS THE FIELD, VISABLE TO ANYONE IN THE FIRST ROWS

ILLEGAL ROSTER BUILDING IS WORSE THAN TAPING SIGNALS FROM ACROSS THE FIELD, VISABLE TO ANYONE IN THE FIRST ROWS

ILLEGAL ROSTER BUILDING IS WORSE THAN TAPING SIGNALS FROM ACROSS THE FIELD, VISABLE TO ANYONE IN THE FIRST ROWS

ILLEGAL ROSTER BUILDING IS WORSE THAN TAPING SIGNALS FROM ACROSS THE FIELD, VISABLE TO ANYONE IN THE FIRST ROWS

ILLEGAL ROSTER BUILDING IS WORSE THAN TAPING SIGNALS FROM ACROSS THE FIELD, VISABLE TO ANYONE IN THE FIRST ROWS

ILLEGAL ROSTER BUILDING IS WORSE THAN TAPING SIGNALS FROM ACROSS THE FIELD, VISABLE TO ANYONE IN THE FIRST ROWS

ILLEGAL ROSTER BUILDING IS WORSE THAN TAPING SIGNALS FROM ACROSS THE FIELD, VISABLE TO ANYONE IN THE FIRST ROWS

ILLEGAL ROSTER BUILDING IS WORSE THAN TAPING SIGNALS FROM ACROSS THE FIELD, VISABLE TO ANYONE IN THE FIRST ROWS

ILLEGAL ROSTER BUILDING IS WORSE THAN TAPING SIGNALS FROM ACROSS THE FIELD, VISABLE TO ANYONE IN THE FIRST ROWS

ILLEGAL ROSTER BUILDING IS WORSE THAN TAPING SIGNALS FROM ACROSS THE FIELD, VISABLE TO ANYONE IN THE FIRST ROWS

ILLEGAL ROSTER BUILDING IS WORSE THAN TAPING SIGNALS FROM ACROSS THE FIELD, VISABLE TO ANYONE IN THE FIRST ROWS
>> Anonymous
>>124241
I agree, but you didn't need to yell about it.
>> Anonymous
>>124241
Hey man, I hate the Broncos too.