File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
abc said that the team who wins game one wins the series 79% of the time. since the hornets and lakers have home court, id say chances are about 2/3 that we will get to see a lakers/hornets WCF. if that happens, thank god, for the mvp will show the runner-up what its all about. fuck the spurs.
>> Anonymous
I VOTE FOR THE ENTIRE HAWKS TEAM FOR MVP FOR BEING SURPRISINGLY THE MOST EXCITING FIRST ROUND MATCH
>> Anonymous
>>87612
the hawks winning wasn't exciting at all. It was the prospect of Boston choking away another "guaranteed win".
>> Anonymous
while the spurs still have a chance this would be a great wcf. but the hornets have no one that can stop kobe.
>> Anonymous
>>87622
yeah, laker vs hornets would be over in 5 with the lakers whooping them.
>> Anonymous
THE PICTURE IS BLURRY
>> Anonymous
Lakers v. Suns would have been much more fun.

You know its true.
>> Anonymous
>>87641
I was hoping they'd meet in the first round, seeing as how kobe would have loved to knock them out. Either way, the suns were going home.
>> Anonymous
>>87611

>abc said that the team who wins game one wins the series 79% of the time

That's in regards to the first round. Trust me, the Hornets won't survive the Spurs.
>> Anonymous
>>87650
no, they said it in regards to today's SECOND round matchup between LA and Utah. Spurs are old; Hornets have home court and a 1-0 lead. gtfo.
>> Anonymous
in b4 history repeats itself

jazz vs spurs WCF
pistons vs cavs ECF

Finals = cavs vs spurs


if this happens, all hell would break loose.
>> Anonymous
>>87692

Lol homecourt advantage. I could give less than a shit, the Spurs can win on the road. Where was the 79% rule when the 76ers won game 1 in detroit?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Atlanta gonna win it all.
>> Anonymous
same fag says that every year. I don't dislike any player on SA, but I hate the spurs, they are so boring, yet so brutally efficient.
>> Anonymous
pls NO v. Utah, as well. Deron v. CP3 for 6-7 games would be awesome to watch.
>> Anonymous
>>87710
its not a rule. its a statistic. stop getting offended over nothing.
>> Anonymous
>>87720
then stop treating it like a rule, especially in use as an argument as if it holds any sort of weight.
>> Anonymous
teams coached by phil jackson who win game 1 win the series 100% of the time. lakers and hornets will make a interesting WCF.
>> Anonymous
>>87761
Yeah. I predict Lakers beating hornets in 6 or 7.

Lakers beat Jazz in 5.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Teams that win 4 games win 100% of their series, so I really think they'll be trying for 4 here.
>> Anonymous
>>87722
call out the idiots using it as a rule then. even OP was talking about chances
>> Anonymous
>>87772

Yeah, that's about right.
>> Anonymous
>>87772

tough actin' tinactin
>> Anonymous
>>87772
t-t-to win th-th-the game, you gotta-ta-ta put p-p-points on the board.
>> Anonymous
ITT Meaningless statistics.
>> Anonymous
I HOPE THE SPURS DON'T MAKE THE SEMIFINALS....BORING IS BORING
>> Anonymous
WOW op here...i was just saying itll be really fun to watch that series if it happens, and that statistically that has a good chance of happening. y'all need to calm the fuck down. now obviously im laker biased as a laker fan, but to>>87710and>>87722and>>88562- you missed the point. the % isnt whats important, its that right now, the two teams id like to see make it are one game closer than the two id rather not. thats all.
>> Anonymous
>>88959
i was>>87722. it's what is commonly referred to in the english vernacular as a "joke." chill, i'd like a la/no wcf as well. good times will be had by all.

72% of the people claiming to be op on 4chan are lying.
>> Anonymous
Every time Phil Jax has won the first game, his team has gone on to win the series. Lakers beat Jazz ez.

Hornets/Spurs, I wanna see Hornets beat Spurs. Lakers vs Hornets would be a far more exciting series.
>> Anonymous
>>89000

89K GET!
>> Anonymous
>>89014
Oh, wasn't aware of how awesome I am.
>> Anonymous
OP again...100% of people who are me and claim to be OP are telling the truth,>>88969
habeeb it.
>> Anonymous
>>87611
the runner-up will probably be showing the MVP that he was the wrong choice
>> Anonymous
Uh, the Hornets just obliterated the Spurs two times in a row. I'm pretty sure they can take the Lakers lol
>> Anonymous
The Hawks showing wasn't exciting at all. The Celtics annihilated them every time they went to Boston. It was a simple matter of math; Boston has the HCA, Boston would win simply because of that.
>> Anonymous
>>89606
It was exciting when the games were in Atlanta.
>> Anonymous
This is all dependent on the Lakers beating the Jazz.
.
.
...


LOOOOL Who am I kidding? Lakers are gonna destroy Jazz.
>> Anonymous
CP MVP
>> Anonymous
>>89599
Lakers > Spurs

Hornets > Spurs

Hell even Jazz > Spurs.

Spurs = old niggers + spanish flop.