File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Ok seriously.

Saying "18=1" and such seriously is getting annoying. We get it, the Pats lost, whatever.

Also, I'm not a Patsfag. I'm a Vikesfag who stopped caring about the Super Bowl about a week after it happened.

In b4 people think they're clever for saying 18-1 now.
>> Anonymous
Pic not really related. It's Cunningham on the Ravens.
>> Anonymous
Patsfag pretending not to be a patsfag to get everyone to stop saying 18-1 lmao.
>> Anonymous
I'm a Coltsfag so I had to root for the Giants.

Sorry but you'll be hearing about 18-1 for another 20 years.
>> Anonymous
>>23534
Respectful Vikesfag.
>> Anonymous
18-1
>> Anonymous
>>23543

LOL, if I were a Patsfag, wouldn't I do something like pretend to be a empathetic Giantsfag or some shit?

FYAD.

>>23549

And you just lost the game.
>> Anonymous
>>23534


Hey man, Skol VIKES
>> Anonymous
>>23558

No, you would pick a completely random team to make everyone think you were legit, didn't fool me though faggot.

18-1
>> Anonymous
>>23560

Skol Vikings indeed.
>> Anonymous
>>23567

OP again. Fuck off. I have better things to do than lie about which team I support on /sp/. I've been a Vikesfag since birth. Randall Cunningham is my personal hero for his magical 1998 season. I'm currently wearing a Fran Tarkenton jersey. Fuck, I rooted AGAINST the Pats when they went up against the Rams and Panthers.

Now kindly GTFO faggot. I'm not trying to "fool" anyone Sherlock.
>> Anonymous
You're a disgrace to Vikesfags, keep harping on it so that they will forget out shitty season.
>> Anonymous
>>23580

Keep harping on it to forget our shitty season? People would forget our season either way, and did you really expect that much?
>> Anonymous
18-1 lol
>> Anonymous
>>23546
lol, coltsfag is just a faggot in general.

tell peyton his brother is better.
>> Anonymous
>>23579

PATSFAG TROLL'D
>> Anonymous
>>23591

When all else fails, go to the "LOL TROLLED" excuse. Good show.
>> Anonymous
>>23534
So, you're not a Patsfags but rather a Vikesfag. Why post a picture of a Baltimore Raven??? Dumbass.
>> Anonymous
>>23590
I love Giantfag's thinking Eli is an elite QB.
>> Anonymous
>>23596

It's Randall Cunningham. See>>23579
>> Anonymous
>>23600
Never said he was an elite QB. However, he won the superbowl in fewer season than it took Peyton, and Peyton had a much better supporting cast, did he not?
>> Anonymous
>>23613

Winning a Super Bowl in fewer seasons doesn't make you better.

I can name quite a few QBs who don't deserve the rings they have. Brad Johnson, Jim McMahon and Trent Dilfer come to mind.
>> Anonymous
>>23620
And I think the Patriots proved this season shit you do in the regular season really means jack shit. Those guys won in the big game, whether they deserved to or not.
>> Anonymous
>>23630

...

That's not what I'm arguing.
>> Anonymous
>>23634
So what are you arguing?
>> Anonymous
>>23636

That Eli is an inferior QB to Peyton.
>> Anonymous
>>23639
And it's not even close.
>> Anonymous
>>23639
I think we've already discussed and agreed on this board that what really matters is superbowl wins. Since both eli and peyton both have 1, i'd choose eli for doing it in a quicker time period and having less talent around him.

Just using /sp/ logic!
>> Anonymous
>>23654

Perhaps in /sp/ logic you are correct, but Peyton's stats are overwhelmingly better than Eli's.
>> Anonymous
>>23654
>i'd choose eli for doing it in a quicker time period and having less talent around him.

Because Burress, Strahan, Tuck, Umenyiora, Jacobs, Ross, Shockey, Ward, Wilson, and Pierce are all scrubs amirite?
>> Anonymous
18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1 18-1
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>23973

Somebody tell me this nigga isn't being serious right now
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>23976
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>23978
>> Anonymous
>>23579
>Fuck off. I have better things to do than lie about which team I support on /sp/

That is the stupidest thing anyone ever says in an internet argument. You DON'T have better things to do, otherwise you wouldn't be here.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>23978
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>23979
>> Anonymous
18-1
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>23976

I know right?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>23985
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>23986
Yea man.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>23983
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>23990
What's with this bullshit?
>> Anonymous
Well then, it is agreed that Eli singlehandley sacked Brady, blocked for himself, caught and threw for TDs, and kicked FGs in Super Bowl XLII. You know, seeing as how he has little to no talent around him.
>> Anonymous
>>24002
wait a minute....THAT DIDNT HAPPEN!
>> Anonymous
>>24002

That'd have been bitching.
>> Anonymous
>>24000
w00t 24000 congrats
>> Anonymous
>>24000

Vinatieri GET?
>> Anonymous
>>24010
That's a cool number cause its all even and shit amirite?
>> Anonymous
>>24002

chill man, the only thing people are saying is that the colts had the better team overall, which I would agree with, although the giants were very solid on both sides of the ball.
>> Anonymous
18-1
>> Anonymous
It will live forever in infamy as the worst 18-1 season EVAR. Everyone was licking their dick about undefeated this and destiny that and they can't even win when it matters. It's like Babel's tower all over again and Eli is God.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>24018
>colts had the better team overall
>giants were very solid on both sides of the ball

wut?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>24034

I just shat bricks.
>> Anonymous
>>24032

the colts had an absolutely great set offensive weapons to go along with a very good defense. i would categorize the giants as "very good" in both regards, but the colts were more loaded offensively.
>> Anonymous
>>24045
>colts
>very good defense

wut?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>24054
please see pic
>> Anonymous
>>24054
i know. its scary.
>> Anonymous
>>24055

All I see is a man who regularly chokes in the playoffs.
>> Anonymous
>>24059
ummmm Superbowl?
>> Anonymous
>>24059
And who doesn't?

PROTIP: most teams in the playoffs lose
>> Anonymous
>>24059
Speaking of choking....18-1.
>> Anonymous
>>24060

ummmm aberration?
>> Anonymous
>>24061

11 out of every 12, to be exact.
>> Anonymous
>>24059

Tony Dungy
Postseason record: 9-9
Doesn't look too bad to me.
>> Anonymous
prepost: AND ONE GIANT LOSS
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>24059

0-4
>> Anonymous
in b4 Romo
>> Anonymous
Franchise name change to New England 18-1.
>> 18-1 18-1
     File :-(, x)
18-1
>> Anonymous
XVIII - I
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Lets see... 18 here...
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
and 1 here!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>24185
Thats not funny.
>> Anonymous
eighteen ünt one
>> Anonymous
???????????? ? ????
>> Anonymous
>>24219

\??o/
>> Anonymous
>>24221
????
>> Anonymous
18-1