File :-(, x, )
RMD !h1LZxECEVA
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/trainingcamp08/news/story?id=3519124

Looks like the Fins are giving that 0-16 thing another shot.

Tell me, /vc/, just how awesome would it be for a team to go 0-16?
>> Anonymous
1. Sparano has reiterated that there is starter named at QB yet and that the depth chart that was released was just because the NFL mandates one.

2. Why would it be awesome for a team to go winless?

3. The Dolphins are not going to be as bad as they were last season. You'd have to be a football noob to think that.
>> Anonymous
no starter*
>> Anonymous
>2. Why would it be awesome for a team to go winless?

Seriously. Now that we have 18-1 that type of failure is obsolete.
>> Anonymous
>>231845
I don't know 0-16 is sustained failure for the length of the season. It would be pretty epic.
>> Anonymous
>>231854


You might be interested in the AFL. I don't know that a real NFL fan would want anything but exciting parity across the board.
>> RMD !h1LZxECEVA
>>231873

Yes, parity. Seeing a lot of teams never get past mediocre is wonderful fun, especially when it's the same three or four teams always in the playoffs, with a couple other teams thrown in for early-round exits. Plenty exciting.
>> Anonymous
Imagine a team starting 0-15, then winning on the last game of the season? That would be epic.
However, it's going to be the Jets going 0-16 this year. Hell, it's just a matter of time before they do it.
>> Anonymous
Dolphins will win at least four games with Josh "I stop chainsaws with my bare hands" McCown at qb
>> Anonymous
as a raider fan

i lol at mclown