File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
I'll just leave this here, amerifags
>> Anonymous
the green box is broken.
>> Anonymous
Where's the homeless dude mascot?
>> Anonymous
Canuckifag here.

Yeah, they better not keep fucking with us, or else we'll fuck with them in 2010. But, we still suck in the Summer Olympics this year. Always had and always will.
>> Anonymous
There are a couple things wrong with your picture.
1. Winter Olympics are insignificant
2. LOL @ THE LOGO.
3. It's not in the picture, but you have no medals.
>> Anonymous
Stop making Canada look bad.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
sup?
>> Anonymous
Not like Canada will be able to keep up with the United States in medals there either lol
>> Anonymous
>>253263
>1. Winter Olympics are insignificant.

Then maybe you Amerifags should stop giving a shit about your "miracle on ice" against Soviet Russia in 1980.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Why do Canada and GB have such fail logos for the next Olympics? I mean, at least the British recognize that looking at their logo is like looking into the sun, but this Canadian seems proud of their fat man.
>> Anonymous
>>253281
Ours looks better than that failure of a Chicago one, faggot.
>> Anonymous
>>253276
We recognize it as an awesome game in our #4 sport. Doesn't really save the Winter Olympics.

I mean, what are you trying to argue? The Winter Olympics are never given as much priority by networks, the IOC, ratings, most countries...
>> Anonymous
>>253283
The Chicago one is simple. Canada's looks like a cross between a totem pole and a fat guy.
>> Anonymous
>>253287
It's an Eskimo symbol
>> Anonymous
>>253276

>>Miracle on Ice

>>1980
>> Anonymous
That can't possibly be their real logo
>> Anonymous
The USA is better at the Lesser Olympics anyway. I don't know why all the Canadafags are so pissy. Most of us were cheering for you to medal last night.
>> Anonymous
>>253285
Still shouldn't give a fuck since it was in the WINTER OLYMPICS. Faggot!
>> Anonymous
>>253290
Oh lord. Now I know what the theme of that Olympics is going to be like...
>> Anonymous
>>253296
That's shitty reasoning.
>> Anonymous
>>253299
AMERICA TAKES ALL THE MOTHERFUCKING LAND! EVEN IF IT'S OWNED BY SOME MOTHERFUCKING INDIANS...

AMERICA, FUCK YEAH!
>> Anonymous
>>253276
There isn't even a Soviet Union anymore, so shut the fuck up.

Winter Olympics is fail.
>> Anonymous
>>253262
Dude, out of all the Olympics since Canada's last Olympics in 1988, Canada managed to outrank the US once, ONCE and it WASN'T EVEN THE OLYMPICS THEY HOSTED.

We will most likely kick your shit again. Seriously, the Amerikkkans can do well in BOTH Summer and Winter Olympics, why can't you?
>> Anonymous
Why is KKKanadia is failz?
>> Anonymous
>>253306
Winter is over 9000 times better than Summer! The only one I like from summer is basketball and baseball. Winter has fucking hockey and figure skating!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I'll just leave this here, amerifags
>> Anonymous
>>253325
You mean things that were never in the original and REAL Olympics a few thousand years ago and shit nobody cares about?
>> Anonymous
>>253328
huh?
>> Anonymous
>>253263
People in the US care about the Winter Olympics. Don't fucking lie, all you ever hear on tv when that time comes is APOLLO ANTON ONO APOLLO ANTON ONO MIRACLE ON ICE FIGURE SKATING APOLLO ANTON ONO FIGURE SKATING MIRACLE ON ICE
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>253325
don't forget Curling
>> Anonymous
>>253342
We don't care about it, but that doesn't stop us from being awesome at it.
>> Anonymous
>>253325
>>253354
Hockey is decent.
Ice skating is not.
Curling is shit tier.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>253354

This is more like it.
>> Anonymous
>>253342
No, we don't.

And the only ones we actually are about are the ones that get screamed on our local news station.
>> Anonymous
winter olympics is awesome, i love watching curling
>> Anonymous
>>253296
you disregard the winter Olympics because you know your niggers and MICHEAL PHELPS can't win everything for you.

you disregard it because you know that you are substandard at every sport that involves cold.

your hockey teams are substandard. your snowboarders (shaun white excepted) are substandard. your skiers are substandard and your skaters are substandard.
>> Anonymous
>>253368
What the FUCK is curling?
>> Anonymous
>>253472
Shuffleboard with bigger rocks and brooms
>> Anonymous
>>253435
No, we disregard it because curling is considered a legitimate event. In fact, pretty much all of the winter Olympic events suck ass. The only sport worth watching is hockey. Plus, we get to see hot young chicks wearing skimpy outfits compete in events like gymnastics, volleyball, and tennis.

Enjoy 10 variations on skiing and curling in prime time, faggot.
>> Anonymous
The USA always beats Canada in the winter Olympics.

This won't change just because of your god awful Olympic logo.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>253435

Oh anon...
>> Anonymous
>>253733
350 million vs. 35 million
>> Anonymous
>>253779
Population doesn't matter. China isn't kicking our asses because they have more people. China is kicking our asses because they work harder, and are emphasizing sport in their nation.

Quit making excuses.
>> Anonymous
>>253779
How many medals does India have?
>> Anonymous
>>253788

Population does matter. It is how human capital works.

You cannot however compare two countries from different worlds. If India had the same opportunities open to its people as say America or China, then strictly speaking it ->would<- do as well.

This is why the feats of Georgia, Norway, South Korea and Australia are so magnificent.
>> Anonymous
>>253826
That's fucking retarded. You're fucking retarded.

Each country only gets as many athletes as other countries. Population is irrelevant. Your stupidity is made worse by the fact that not everyone in any given country even tries sport.

Quit making excuses.
>> Anonymous
>>253835
More population = A greater pool of athletes to choose from
You must be retarded if you can't see this.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
more people care about the pan-american games than the Winter olympics.
>> Anonymous
>>253862
+1

Winter Olympics = Nobody cares
>> Anonymous
>>253865
Winter Olympics = Nobody in America cares cause they have no niggers or MICHAEL PHELPS.
>> Anonymous
Larger populations promotes more competition from within. That is, if the country is capable of supporting and nurturing those athletes with decent training and sufficient facilities.
>> Anonymous
>>253835

Think about what you are saying before you post and make comments about intelligence sir.

"Each country only gets as many athletes as other countries."

I'm not quite sure exactly what you meant here because each conclusion I have is as ridiculous as the next and considering that is your only contribution to the argument (the rest being worthless insult throwing) I am properly flummoxed by your complete idiocy.

If you are trying to say that every country has the same numbers of athletes period, then this is quite obviously wrong. If you are trying to say that every country in the Olympics has entered with the same amount of athletes, then this is also wrong. Honestly man, think before you speak and work on clarity.

If you take a population:medal ratio of the teams, you would be crazy not to be impressed by the smaller countries.
>> Anonymous
>>253887
Emphasis and Money are the only two things that matter in sport. Period. If you think otherwise: You're a retard.

Considering how you make excuses to make your shitty country look better than the top 5 countries, I'd have to say "Yes. You are a retard."
>> Anonymous
>>253875
Except that America is one of the best countries in the Winter Olympics and have hosted it numerous times including Lake Placid '32, Squaw Valley '60, Lake placid '80, and Salt Lake City '02.

>United States Winter Olympics medal count: 78 G, 80 S, 58 B, 216 Total

>Canada Winter Olympics medal count: 38 G, 38 S, 43 B, 119 Total

Fuck off Canadafag.
>> Anonymous
>>253919
Oh, and before you make even MORE excuses and say "Hurr, more population eekwalls more moneys," consider that 7 billion dollars in to one athlete is equal to 7 million dollars into one athlete. After you can afford the best training facilities and other things, money no longer matters. So your "Small impressive countries" still aren't worth shit.

Canada sucks.
>> Anonymous
>>253887
I think he meant that every nation is allowed to bring the same amount of athletes. America, China and all the other countries with lots of participating athletes don't have some sort of privilege to bring more athletes than the other nations, just because they are bigger nations. They do however have more athletes to chose from, therefore they bring more athletes (larger pool of athletes = more athletes with chance of "medaling" = brings more athletes to the Olympics. If you can't understand this by now, theres is no hope for you).

I'm pretty sure that's what he meant.
>Population is irrelevant
He was wrong about this though, population+economy+"sports culture" are what I think are the main reasons for the chance of succeeding in the Olympics.
>> Anonymous
I thought canada didn't have a summer and that was why they're shit

that's a good excuse right?
>> Anonymous
>>253919

Haha, wow, you really think that? Looking at the table, other than the top two countries (who are void due to population), you really think that money creates medallists?

Besides this really doesnt help your point that larger countries like the US and China aren't benefited by their population, because then you are wandering into the realms of economic human capitol which really does work on population ratios.
>> Anonymous
>>253954
Norway have medals, with a smaller population, and probably smaller budget to use on athletes (not sure though). I don't know who has more summer, but that isn't why Canada "suck".
>> Anonymous
>>253937

Yes,... you are arguing the point I am arguing? That large pop 1st/2nd world countries have more athletes and therefore can choose the best and bring the maximum number of athletes in all disciplines.

Hence, smaller countries who earn more medals than larger counties with higher economic prowess are more impressive. And when you work on a pop:medal ratio, this justifies my stance.
>> Anonymous
>>253992
I'm stating to get a bit conufesd now, but I agree with you since I disagree with the whole
>Population is irrelevant
statement, and I agree with>>253992. So yeah.
>> Anonymous
RANDOM FACT: Only one nation has managed not to win a gold medal in an Olympics they played host to. Yeah, it's Canada.

Oh, yeah. They did it twice: 1976 and 1988.

EPIC FAIL.
>> Anonymous
>>253984
one of the richest countries in the world - no budget?
wat
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I don't know why Chicago didn't stick with their original logo.
>> Anonymous
>>254784

Violates IOC rules for having image of olympic torch in their logo
>> Anonymous
The pathetic from Canadafags amuse me as they try to defend their suckage at the games.

Other countries winning because they have more athletes and money? Consider this, Norway is a MUCH smaller country and has MUCH less money. They managed to top you 4-5 times out of the last 6 Winter Games.

Hell, this very Olympics, you have THREE HUNDRED AND FUCKING TWO ATHLETES representing your country AND YOU STILL DIDN'T FUCKING MEDAL. Fuck South Korea has LESS athletes at 267 and they're FUCKING 4TH on the medal count.

Seriously, you can't explain that shit due to money and representatives. You fucking suck, deal with it.
>> Anonymous
>>254840here
Correcting 332. 332 and no medal.
>> Anonymous
>>254767
thats not true. it is true however that canada is the only host nation not to win a gold medal in the SUMMER olympics, which are the only ones that matter anyway. 88 canada hosted winter not summer
>> Anonymous
>>254848
Research '88 Calgary Winter Olympics and '76 Montreal Summer Olympics medal count and you will see Canada's Gold count is a fucking zero.