File :-(, x, )
NFL Power Rankings- As of November 26th Anonymous
32. Detroit Lions (0-10)
31. St. Louis Rams (2-9)
30. Kansas City Chiefs (1-10)
29. Cincinnati Bengals (1-9-wat)
28. San Fransisco 49'ers (3-8)
27. Seattle Seahawks (2-9)
26. Oakland Raiders (3-8)
25. Cleveland Browns (4-7)
24. Houston Texans (4-7)
23. Philedalphia Eagles (5-5-wat)
22. Jacksonville Jaguars (4-7)
21. San Diego Chargers (4-7)
20. Denver Broncos (6-5)
19. Buffalo Bills (6-5)
18. Miami Dolphins (6-5)
Comment too long. Clickhereto view the full text.
>> Anonymous
>9. New England Patriots (7-4)
8. Tampa Bay Buccaneers (8-3)

As it should be.
>> Anonymous
My thoughts? lol comcast sports writers.

Colts a top 5 team in the NFL? Haha, oh wow.
>> Anonymous
I like how you started from bottom to top. Without realizing it, The first name I saw was Detroit and I almost spilled milk.
>> Barack @ Star !!YvdR7lWl85/
Saints should be ahead of the colts.
>> anonymous
>>491251
Dude....you're pushin' it.
>> Anonymous
Saints should be higher, but not that high. They have to beat their division rivals.
>> Anonymous
Finally. No team that has it's Rushing game shut down by CHICAGO deserves to be ranked #1. LenFail needs to shut the fuck up about not getting carries.
>> anonymous
Wait a second....this is COMCAST's list?

Sage.
>> Anonymous
Comcast should worry less about NFL rankings, and more about what I'm going to do to them if they try to throttle my torrents.
>> Anonymous
>>491249
>manningface.jpg
>> Anonymous
Since we all agree Comcast is a terrible place for anything, here are the ESPN rankings. Rank, Last Weeks' Rank, Record.

1 (2) Giants 10-1-0
2 (1) Titans 10-1-0
3 (6) Jets 8-3-0
4 (4) Steelers 8-3-0
5 (5) Buccaneers 8-3-0
6 (8) Colts 7-4-0
7 (3) Panthers 8-3-0
8 (10) Patriots 7-4-0
9 (11) Cowboys 7-4-0
10 (14) Falcons 7-4-0
11 (7) Cardinals 7-4-0
12 (9) Redskins 7-4-0
13 (13) Ravens 7-4-0
14 (12) Dolphins 6-5-0
15 (19) Bears 6-5-0
16 (20) Saints 6-5-0
17 (21) Vikings 6-5-0
18 (18) Bills 6-5-0
19 (15) Broncos 6-5-0
20 (16) Packers 5-6-0
21 (17) Eagles 5-5-1
22 (22) Chargers 4-7-0
23 (25) Texans 4-7-0
24 (23) Jaguars 4-7-0
25 (24) Browns 4-7-0
26 (31) Raiders 3-8-0
27 (26) 49ers 3-8-0
28 (27) Seahawks 2-9-0
29 (28) Rams 2-9-0
30 (29) Bengals 1-9-1
31 (30) Chiefs 1-10-0
32 (32) Lions 0-11-0
>> michael moses !!6nOq0Y/J8jv
I was going to defend Comcast, but ESPN ranked the Dolphins higher.

Lol Comcast.
>> Anonymous
>>491281
The Jets wouldn't be able to make a dent in the Steelers D. If anything, they should be tied for third.
>> Anonymous
>>491281
This I can agree with.

Dolphins should be just under the top 12, not as good as a playoff bound team, but better then all the other crap.
>> anonymous
>>491313
Probably true. It would come down to who can turn the ball over more between Roethlisberger and Farve. It would probably be a very lame game if you're a fan of offense.
>> Anonymous
I don't think the Colts are even a top 10 team. Otherwise, it's close enough.
>> Anonymous
ITT: No one is a top 10 team.
>> Anonymous
cowboys should be ranked under the skins and the ravens, i mean honestly, whos playing better football? the Cowbawws, or Ed FUCKING Reed!
>> Anonymous
>>491241
I know this must have been discussed a million times (I was unfortunate enough to miss the game) but how the shit do the Eagles and the Bengals managed to tie?
>> Barack @ Star !!YvdR7lWl85/
>>491344
I think the more important question is why did they make you sit mcnabb?
>> Anonymous
Jest deserve #3.
>> Anonymous
Not last, fuck yeah.
Eat it Detroit, we're coming for you next KC.
>> Anonymous
>>491463
Congratulations. You are the last Ramsfag alive. You win the prize.
>> Anonymous
>>491281
Pretty good list, but aside from Carolina it's based entirely off teams' records. Take some risks whydon'tcha.
>> Anonymous
>>491344

don't feel bad. mcnabb had no idea how they tied either.
>> Anonymous
Comcast copied my top five from that thread we had a couple of days ago. Goddamn thieves.
>> Anonymous
fuck the giants

inb4 butthurt patsfag, 18-1, etc. fuck them too
>> Anonymous
>8. Tampa Bay Buccaneers (8-3)
>7. Carolina Panthers (8-3)
>6. Dallas Cowboys (7-4)
>5. Indianapolis Colts (7-4)

Wut? Why are Colts and Cowboys ranked ahead of teams with better records?
>> Anonymous
why the fuck arent the ravens higher?

fuck this shit
>> Anonymous
>>491581
Shhhh - the lower they're ranked, the better they'll do.
>> Anonymous
Jets would (metaphoricaly) rape the steelers. And any ass holes who dont like it should just head over to /b/ amirite?
>> Anonymous
>>491576
Because they are better teams.
>> Anonymous
>>491615
Considering Pittsburgh's biggest loss this season was by nine points, you might want to dislodge your head from your anus.
>> Anonymous
>>491664

Considering that Tennessee's biggest lost at 12:59 PM on Sunday was by negative three, the Jest have a pretty good argument for being the best in the AFC.
>> Anonymous
>>491642
Whatever about the Cowboys, there's no way the Colts would beat both the Panthers and the Bucs.
>> Anonymous
>>491670
Great teams don't lose to the Raiders
>> Anonymous
>>491673
its possible. i mean my raiders can still make the playoffs
>> Anonymous
>>491673
the jest were not in proper form, the raiders were motivated by coach change, and lets be honest, the bionic leg of kicker beat the jest, not the raiders
>> /sp/'s resident Jerseyfag !!EKdX53ZguNo
1.) New York Giants.

All is as it should be.
>> Anonymous
>>491701
hurrrrrrr
>> Anonymous
>>491671
falcons beat the panthers the colts should hve no problem
>> Anonymous
>>491670the Jest have a pretty good argument for being the best in the AFC

The Bretts have lost two games to the AFC West and barely won the third.

Playing scrub teams does not make your team legit. Example: 2007-08 Cleveland Browns
>> Lambchop's Death Legion !d7bMXbKy6Q
if the playoffs started next week, the Ravens would be in the playoffs, and yet their only #11?
>> Anonymous
>>491733

The Browns played some shit teams, yes. But they do have some talent.
>> Anonymous
>>491747
they would be the 6 seed in the AFC, due to losing the tiebreak to the colts (head to head DURR)

>>491576
Colts beat quality teams, cowboys lost to god-tier opponents and had to deal with no romo for a while. Bucs and panthers have had cakewalk schedules in comparison.
>> Anonymous
So who from the Lions is going to the Pro Bowl?
>> Anonymous
>>491752
The point was, last season, they played weaker teams, but this season, they played the #2s from each AFC division, the NFC East, the AFC South, and had their record reversed.

And don't give me anything about the Giants game. It was New York's game to lose, and they did. The Browns are not a competitive team.
>> Namefag Dorms
     File :-(, x)
1. New York Giants (10-1)
2. Tennessee Titans (10-1)
3. Tampa Bay Buccaneers (8-3)
4. Pittsburgh Steelers (8-3)
5. New York Jest (8-3)
------------
6. Carolina Panthers (8-3)
7. Dallas Cowboys (7-4)
8. Indianapolis Colts (7-4)
9. Arizona Cardinals (7-4)
10. New England Matt Cassels (7-4)
------------
11. Baltimore Ravens (7-4)
12. Atlanta Falcons (7-4)
13. Washington Redskins (7-4)
14. New Orleans Saints (6-5)
15. Chicago Bears (6-5)
16. Minnesota Vikings (6-5)
17. Miami Dolphins (6-5)
18. Green Bay Packers (5-6)
19. Denver Broncos (6-5)
20. Buffalo Bills (6-5)
21. San Diego Chargers (4-7)
22. Philadelphia Eagles (5-5-1)
23. Jacksonville Jaguars (4-7)
24. Cleveland Browns (4-7)
25. Houston Texans (4-7)
26. Oakland Raiders (3-8)
27. San Francisco 49ers (3-8)
28. Seattle Seahawks (2-9)
29. Kansas City Chiefs (1-10)
30. Cincinnati Bengals (1-9-1)
31. St. Louis Rams (2-9)
32. Detroit Lions (0-11)
>> Anonymous
>>491757
calvin johnson
>> sayain zubas !!o6QbIm7BfuM
     File :-(, x)
>>491782
no dante? awww :(
>> Anonymous
>>491763

Actually the Browns are a competitive team. Unfortunately they gave up after half way through the season.

>It was New York's game to lose, and they did

Explain what that means please. I have no idea what that means. I hope you are not saying the Browns did not beat them, because that makes no sense.
>> Anonymous
>>491794

>>It was New York's game to lose, and they did

That is just one of those nauseating sports cliche's that does not mean anything. Newfags to football like to talk like that to pretend they know what they are talking about. That fag probably heard Trey Wingo say it.
>> Anonymous
>>491247
lol no

NE would beat TB you need to realize that AFC in general > NFC

TB has no offense. Just because you play in a division that has no defenses doesn't mean your offense is AMAZING. You play the fucking Aints and Falcons. Neither of which have a defense.

SC is the only real team in the division.
>> Anonymous
>>491671
Uh yeah.

Let's have the SC go up against a real offense with real players. Let's see SC offense get torn to shit by a medicore at best defense. You'd lose to the Colts hands down.

TB same shit.
>> Anonymous
>>491251
HA HA HA OH WOW

THIS IS WHAT NFC SOUTH FAGS ACTUALLY BELIEVE
>> Anonymous
>>491856
> AFC in general > NFC

ITT it's five years ago.
>> Anonymous
>>491856
NE would beat TB you need to realize that AFC in general > NFC

Are you fucking DAFT?!?!?!
>> Shit was SO !CASHjM7a7M
     File :-(, x)
>>491856
>you need to realize that AFC in general > NFC
>> Anonymous
who's ready for a jest v bucs superbowl?
>> Shit was SO !CASHjM7a7M
     File :-(, x)
>>491908
>Bucs
>JEST
>Superbowl
>> Anonymous
Dolphins vs. Giants for the superbowl

Dolphins will make a cinderella story.
>> didn't read thread; kinda skimmed it 4-7 Houston Texans !!oiV64bkHZMl
Just going by these rankings (because I don't follow pro football), I like that there's a possibility of breaking even (win 4/5 remaining games).

JAGUARS
@ Packers
TITANS
@ Raiders
BEARS
>> Anonymous
>>491472

*ahem*

Don't mind me, just being another Rams fan.
>> Anonymous
>>491241


Steelers don't deserve to be that high, they can't hold there own when facing a team with any defense, look at when they played the eagles.
>> Anonymous
Super Bowl is going to be Manning vs. Manning.
>> Anonymous
Superbowl is Ravens / Giants

or

Subway Series.
>> Anonymous
>>491951
They beat Washington and Baltimore.

So, fuck your theory.
>> Anonymous
Lol why is Dallas so high? Beat the 49ers and you're the shit now, huh? What a joke. They should be around thirteen-fourteen fersher.
>> Anonymous
>>491973
Because they've shown the potential to be a top five team. In their losses they are bogged down by injuries or terrible coaching, but no one denies the talent and potential the team has.
>> Mr. Titles !py0Ym4iRJw
U BEST BE KIDDIN

WE ALL NO COWBOYS R THE BEST

GONNA KICK AZZ 2MORO BABY

TO... GETCHA TURKEY REDDY!
>> Anonymous
>>491964
well said
>> Anonymous
The Super Bowl is going to be

Cowboys and Dolphins

Don't tell me how or wat but its what my wigi board says
>> Anonymous
>>492012
The Cowboys will beat Seattle, sure

Too bad they've got a beatdown coming in the week that follows
>> Anonymous
>>492484
If Pittsburgh were to post one shut-out for the next four years, I'd wish it to be the Dallas game more than any other.
>> Anonymous
Seahawks getting fed to the Cowboys, should be fun
>> Anonymous
>>491920
>>492468

I wish cmon PHINS.. even with a somehow lucky wildcard I think we would do good in the post season.. we just got to get lucky