File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Don't mind me. Just on my way to a first-round bye.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Don't mind me. Just on my way to a first-round bye.
>> Anonymous
>>321109

Enjoy losing to the Browns next week.
>> Anonymous
yeah, b/c beating a much weaker team is a good indication of how you'll do for the rest of the season.
>> Anonymous
>>321122
The Browns haven't beaten Pittsburgh in 4 1/2 years. And seeing their "defense" against Dallas, there's no reason to think it won't be 5.
>> Anonymous
>>321140

And Tom Brady has never missed a game. What is a dumb argument, this is a new year.

About the D, yea it looked shitty but we played the best Offense in the league, you played the Texans.
>> Anonymous
>>321144

>That

self fix
>> Anonymous
>>321144
new year, same old browns
>> Anonymous
>>321144
If every year is a new year, and Cleveland couldn't beat Pittsburgh for four years, why do you still believe this "every year is different" bullshit?

Pittsburgh offense is just as potent as Dallas', and Cleveland's defense isn't any better than Houston's. In fact, Cleveland's defense hasn't improved much at all.
>> Anonymous
>>321166
/cle/fag here... you are correct sir. Gonna be a long year with the tough schedule. 9-7 at best. miss playoffs again.
>> Anonymous
>>321175
But, it must be said, missing Stallworth and Jurevicius doesn't help the pass offense much.

Four staph infections?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>321166
>Pittsburgh offense is just as potent as Dallas
>> Anonymous
>>321166

>Pittsburgh offense is just as potent as Dallas

LOL

We will see next week. It is the fucking first week of the season.

(57-55)

Is the record between the Browns and Steelers.

But I am probably talking to a bandwagoner anyways. whatever
>> Anonymous
>>321179
>>321180

Retarded Steelerfag mind
>> Anonymous
>>321180
lol Browns fans calling other fans "bandwagoners"

4 1/2 years.
>> UZ !kHzD4It5Tc
     File :-(, x)
>>321166
>Pittsburgh offense is just as potent as Dallas
>> Anonymous
>>321196
wait so if we were fans of the old Browns we have to like the Ravens?

Doesn't work that way.

Brownsfag for 17+ years.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
superbowl 43
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>321166
Pittsburgh offense is just as potent as Dallas
>> Anonymous
>>321216
wat
>> Anonymous
Pittsburgh has a better defense than Dallas.

Cleveland has no defense at all.

Why are the Browns supposed to win again?
>> Anonymous
>Pittsburgh offense is just as potent as Dallas
QB-steelers
Oline-cowboys(by a mile)
runningback-cowboys
receiving corp-draw(seriously)
if the steelers could get that oline fixed, theyd be one of the best in the league. but thats a huge if
>> Anonymous
>>321109

that's a dude. welcome to pittsburgh.
>> Anonymous
>>321228runningback-cowboys

No. Even, arguable. But not a chance Barber/Jones is head-and-shoulers above Parker/Mendenhall.

And Pittsburgh o-line is still one of the best run-blocking o-lines in the league.
>> Anonymous
>Don't mind me, on my way to worst division winner in AFC
>> Anonymous
>>321247
No. Even, arguable. But not a chance
>> Anonymous
>>321253
ill take it
>> Anonymous
>>321216

FUCK YES
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>321228
>>runningback-cowboys
willie parker's 3 touchdowns disagree
>> Anonymous
>>321118
Please you guys won't even make the playoffs WATCH
>> Anonymous
Indy went down, San Diego went down, Brady went down.

I know it was just the Texans but Pittsburgh has to be considered a strong AFC force right now.
>> Anonymous
>>321284
>3 touchdowns against the Texans
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>321109

Sounds about right to me.
>> Anonymous
Cleveland will win because there offense will fuck the shit out of the Steelers. The Browns D will be much better. I am not worried at all.

>>321196

btw, as far as I have seen, I do not think it is possible for someone to be "bandwagoning" the Browns.

lrn2definition

But almost every Steeler fan I have met, outside of Pittsburgh, have been huge front runners.
>> Anonymous
>>321284
excuse me pittsburgfag
how many TDs did willie parker have last year?
HE ONLY HAD TWO THE WHOLE SEASON.
this is a new year but you guys played the texans.
barber has been consistent who got TWO
while rookie felix jones got one

so i disagree
>> Anonymous
>>321302
Which RB was about to win the rushing title last year until they got injured? Oh right Parker
>> Anonymous
>I know it was just the Texans

I know you personally may never have claimed it, but I remember a lot of bragging from the AFC South fanboys that they had the "toughest division" and that Houston was supposed to be a legit team to finish .500 at least.
>> Anonymous
>>321301Cleveland will win because there offense will fuck the shit out of the Steelers

CAUSE THE STEELERS HAVE A SHIT DEFENSE, AMIRITE?
>> Anonymous
>>321310
Indeed, if the Texans played in the NFC they'd have made the playoffs
>> Anonymous
>>321301
uh, after 2006 (4-12) how many people supported the browns? and now how many are supporting them after 2007 (10-6, almost made playoffs)? yeah......me thinks thats the definition of a bandwagon
>> Anonymous
>>321313

No, but they are old and slow.
>> Anonymous
>>321322
tell that to the texans offense faggot
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>321308
AD would have won it if he had not missed those two games, not Parker.
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>321180

>(57-55)

>Is the record between the Browns and Steelers.

True, but Pittsburgh is the team that LEADS the series and has won 9 straight.

Those regular season victories in the 1950s are a DISTANT memory brownstain.

You will be humiliated by Pittsburgh.
>> Anonymous
>>321319

People think they have a chance this year. A bandwagoner is being "OMG I am there biggest fan" all of a sudden because they are a good team.

I have seen none of that.
>> Anonymous
>>321322
They sure did look old and slow today, especially harrison, timmons, and woodley
>> Anonymous
>>321327

>ignore troll
>> Anonymous
>>321322
HA HA HA OH WOW

That Woodley guy sure is a geezer.

Seriously, if you're going to scrape the barrel for excuses, at least bring up Polamalu's recent rash of injuries.
>> Anonymous
>>321308
oh but he didnt though did he?
DID HE?
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>321332

Do the facts hurt?

Drown yourself turd.
>> Anonymous
I hate it whenever any Pittsburgh team wins because CB comes out and acts like a complete ass.
>> Anonymous
>>321352
Remember when you said Parker was trash and Mendenhall was amazing?

Parker:
3TDs
100+ yds

Mendenhall:
...well he didn't fumble at least


>Do the facts hurt?

>Drown yourself turd.
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>321375

Parker is trash.

Let's wait until they face a decent run defense.
>> Anonymous
>>321386
Even when Parker puts up numbers against a good defense, you'll just attribute it to the run-blocking or Roethlisberger being too much of a threat through the air.

Why not just admit you were wrong? It's not like we all don't realize what an idiot you are.
>> Anonymous
>>321386
>Let's wait until they face a decent run defense.

Well that won't be next week at least
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>321395

No, I'd be willing to admit that he has matured as a player. Once he demonstrates an ability to make tough runs.

He devours bad teams and always has.
>> Anonymous
>>321368

Well, it could be worse, he could be one of those fucking bandwagoners that is all about the steelers until they choke, which they will, then they put their steeler shit away and pretend they dont like football.
>> Anonymous
>>321400
100-yard games against New England and Jacksonville not good enough for you?