File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
>Josh Beckett has an oblique injury and may not be able to pitch against the Angels.

That's just fucking great.
>> Anonymous
he'll pitch
>> Anonymous
ehh its ok josh could roll out of bed and dominate the playoffs put him out there whats the worst that could happen?
>> Anonymous
That is fucking great. I'm so happy right now. You don't even know. :-D
>> Anonymous
Get swept, fgts.
>> Anonymous
1. make him pitch
2. pop ketchup bags on side of injured oblique
3. call it the blood shirt à la Schilling's bloody sock
4. ???
5. PROFIT
>> Anonymous
he's gonna pitch game 3. now everyone just settle down.
>> Anonymous
>>368721
So hes pitching the elimination game, good move from Francona.
>> Anonymous
>>368745

Well you gotta do something when you're down 0-2
>> Anonymous
>>368745
can't tell who you're talking about here. Lester and DiceK in first 2 games is pretty solid. I'll just assume you're talking about eliminating the Angels.
>> Anonymous
>>368751
oh please. Dice-K is pretty much unstoppable on the road, might even be undefeated this season. No way he's losing his start.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>368766
>>368755
Soxfags detected.
>> Anonymous
Matsuzaka is 9-0 with a 2.37 ERA on the road this year. He will dominate the Angel's pathetic lineup. The only reason K-Rod even has that many saves opportunities this year is because the Angels can never manage to score enough runs.
>> Anonymous
>>368786
after this year you can replace red sox with the Rays, Brewers and Dodgers on your nice little picture.
>> Anonymous
>>368766
MIGHT??? Nigga he is
>> Anonymous
not to mention future Cy Young award winner Jon Lester. Can't think of a better 1 - 2 punch.
>> Anonymous
>>368795

I've seen delusional, but you take the cake. The Angels' lineup is "pathetic"?
>> Anonymous
>>368797
>Dodgers
Wat?
>> Anonymous
Angels:
765 runs scored (in a division with terrible pitching)

Baltimore Orioles (68-93)
782 runs scored

Detroit Tigers (74-87)
819 runs scored

Red Sox
845 runs scored

Let's face it. The Angels line up is terrible. They wouldn't have won anywhere near as many games without their excellent pitching.
>> Anonymous
you've obviously never seen a single angels ga-OH SHIT, I'BEEN TROLLED
>> Anonymous
>>368868
>excellent pitching.

Angels over Red Sox in 5
>> Anonymous
Angels sweep in 4
>> Anonymous
>>369021
Only need 3 for a sweep.
>> Anonymous
Angels in 5 tops
>> Anonymous
>>369027

I meant 4
>> Anonymous
No way does the sox/angels series go 6.
>> Anonymous
Sox and what every the AL central has to offer are redundant

ITT Rays v. Angels predictions

Rays in 7
>> Anonymous
Boston sweeps Anaheim in 4.
>> Anonymous
>>369033
18-1
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>368868

You're comparing a team that plays in one of the most hitter-friendly stadiums (Fenway) with a team that plays in one of the least hitter-friendly stadiums (Angels).

Park-adjusted total runs (rounding off the decimals):

Angels 844
Red Sox 814
>> CeeDub !!P3FqfVrI4VK
>>369038

OH SHI-

Actual statistics instead of rampant fanboy speculation? In MY /sp/?
>> Anonymous
>>369033

WAT. sweeps in 4? They're in the ALDS. That's best of 5 nigger. It'd be sweep in 3. And yes, the Angels will sweep in 3.
>> Anonymous
>>369061
FUCKING LURK