How can it be considered a rivalry if the Celtics always win?
good point maddam
>>169162It was only really a rivalry in the 80s. The 60s were Celts domination and now it's just an attempt to capture nolstagia/ratings.
It would have been more laker woopings had they not been upset by houston so many times
>>169169What upset? Hakeem never got HIV, and HE'S FROM AFRICA.
>>169165It wasn't a rivalry in the 80's, either. Boston won most of the time, except when Bird was injured. The last two months have only been for marketing purposes.
>>169189The lakers won 5 during the 80's, 2 against boston, who won 1 against them, and 3 total...
Only the Lakers thought it was a rivalry. Celtics thought it was a freebie.
>>169162Same could be said for the Yanks and Sox over the years you underage faggot.