Questions:Why is it that that two sub-.500 teams in the National Padball League can go to Wembley Stadium, and 90,000 people will watch the game (40,000 bought tickets in the first 90 minutes)?If West Bromwich Albion and Sunderland (two teams similar to San Diego and New Orleans) played in New York, do you think the same thing would happen?
>>427331>West Bromwich Albion and Sunderland (two teams similar to San Diego and New Orleans) played in New York, do you think the same thing would happen?LOLOLOL
>>427331Because the two teams in question are overrated and full of overrated players (but maybe not so much with Reggie Bush out).
>>427340>>427341wat happened to flood control?
>>427341>>427340What is your point? All four teams have three wins and four losses.
>If West Bromwich Albion and Sunderland (two teams similar to San Diego and New Orleans) played in New York, do you think the same thing would happen?no. Try one of the big four teams, then probably yes
giants stadium filled for Team USA v Argentina (where we won fifa btw)but i agree, if you got one of the top 4 to play a regular season game here, it would probably fill up
>>427355it also filled when FC Barcelona played New York in a friendly match a few months ago.Yes games will fill out not only in New York but pretty much everywhere in America (except in the south). There just needs to be high-profile teams (Man U, Chelsea, Barcelona, Real Madrid etc)
Face it UK, you still love us even if you won't admit it.that or our sports are more interesting and funner to watch. Soccer is fun, but let's be honest, it isn't exactly like a chess match. Baseball, football, basketball these games take a little more intelligence than LOL KICK BALL THIS WAY
>>427405inb4 cancer
>>427405>Soccer is fun>not a chess match.I'd rather watch something thats fun than a chess match.
Maybe because a lot of people in England try and rebel against soccer because of its popularity.
>>427352OP's point was that the two NFL teams playing are not top-tier here, but it drew a crowd. Mid-level in the EPL wouldn't draw anyone in the US.
Have any of you faggots considered that maybe, JUST MAYBE, these two teams are playing in London, not just because of San Diego's record last year, but because of how talented their offenses are? Their defense are average at best, which means we should expect a high-scoring affair. Lots of points = lots of fun for those watching.Jesus fucking Christ, you're all morons.I say San Diego over New Orleans, 41-37.
>>427331Because the game was scheduled long before the season actually began. Both teams were expected to be pretty good, and as>>427474said, have good offenses.
I would just like to point out that the predictions from the preseason declared that both San Diego and New Orleans would be in the NFL elite and there was no way they could have known that both teams would be mediocre this year.
>>427492>>427500Exactly.I think it's worth nothing that this game should be much better than the shitfest game the Giants and Dolphins played there last year.
San Diego and New Orleans were supposed to be good, but not the NFL's elite. ANYONE had New England, the Giants, Steelers, Cowboys, Eagles, Panthers, and even Vikings better than these two.Face it, Britfags <3 the NFL.
>>427474>Lots of points = lots of fun for those watching.>Jesus fucking Christ, you're all morons.lrn2soccerthe eurofags will sit through 90 minutes of no scoring and still be happy
>>427510>SteelersDidn't most people have the BROWNS winning that division?
>>427515lol no
>>427443THISTHISTHISTHISTHISAll the people I know who like NFL (well, not "like", because I myself think it's decent, but have it as their favourite sport) are upper-middle class teens who listen to Slayer.
>>427443thats why i started watching nfl, because al the dumb shit retards like football, so i just wanted to be different, now i fucking love the nfl and still follow my team.protip: The NFL is better though
if the NFL wanted to give eurofags the kind of action they like, it would be baltimore vs detroit.
lol'd at WBA and sunderland being compared to saints and chargers
>>427550they are all 3-4
OP is trollNO vs. SD is more like Everton vs. pre-2008 Tottenham.2 ok teams who never live up to the hype.
>>427567Which one is Everton, I want to mock them.
>because al the dumb shit retards like football>so i just wanted to be differentYou're not.
>>427510>Vikings
Well, if san diego and new orleans (more so new orleans) didn't have god throw the raging ball of INJURIES at them, it would be the best teams.
>>427540Thats actually true. I have read many great NFL magazines and a lot of there analysts picked the Browns for the AFC North. They are a really talented team, for some reason they could not put it together this year. My theory is early injuries and terrible coaching.