File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Hey fans of the Chiefs, Jets, Dolphins, 49ers, Chargers, Broncos, Rams, Colts, Bills, Steelers, Seahawks, Raiders, and Cardinals.

Just a quick reminder that you're all going to lose next season.

Sincerely, 16-0 undefeated New England Patriots
>> Anonymous
I think I speak for all of /sp/ when I say we will gladly welcome, in fact encourage, a 16-0 Pats season if it means more 18-1 endings.

You can't spell 18-1 without 16-0.
>> Anonymous
>>164960

Yes you can. 15-1 in the regular season + 3 playoff wins = 18-1.
>> Anonymous
You think Patsfags would have learned not to trash talk.
>> Anonymous
>Dolphins
>Just a quick reminder that you're going to lose all next season.

Fixed.
>> Anonymous
18-1
also, troll
>> Anonymous
>>164964
Then they would win the superbowl moron.
That isn't what people want to happen.
>> Anonymous
>>164956
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH.
>> Anonymous
how does i 18-1?
>> Anonymous
spoiler, 16-0 is never coming around again for the patriots. ever.

18-1
>> Anonymous
18-1*
>> Anonymous
Thanks for the lol, troll.
>> Anonymous
Enjoy never reaching 18-0.

If you somehow do, I'll eat my words, fair is fair, but until then it's 18-1
>> Anonymous
>>165024
It wasn't a fluke troll, the beat the Giants by 3 in week 17, then lost by 3 in the Super Bowl.

Evenly matched teams are evenly matched.
>> Anonymous
>>165026
Don't forget, had to comeback on!

Also, don't forget they had to comeback against the FAILING Ravens!

FAIL TEAM IS FAIL!

18-1*
>> Anonymous
>>165030
And the Giants had to comeback to beat the Pats.

What's wrong with a comeback win?
>> Anonymous
>>165034
So both of you guys did it! Therefore, you guys are even! No fluke! 18-1*!
>> Anonymous
>>165024
18-1
>> Anonymous
>>165036
Fail troll is fail!
>> Anonymous
>>165040
We made it last year with a 10-6 team, won the Super Bowl, and created more BAWWING by the patsfags! Why not this year? Plus, we have more than just Strahan on our team.
>> Anonymous
>>165040

0/10

we fucking pay rent for that 5th seed.

You also seems to forget that DE is our deepest position. So now Strahan is gone? Oh wow, now we'll just replace him with Justin "should have been superbowl MVP" Tuck.

Tuck and Osi will still be the most dominant DE combo in the NFL, just like Osi and Strahan was last year.
>> Anonymous
>>165040
>BAAAAWWWW!!!
>> Anon vi Philadelphia !!CF3BKIiUIDY
18-1
>> Anonymous
>>165038

So when'd you jump on the bandwagon? May?
>> Anonymous
>>165059
Lifelong Giantsfag. Seen them win all three championships! Eat it, patsfag!
>> Anonymous
>>165047
While I agree Tuck is your best d-lineman, it seemed he did his best work for you when he was playing 1-tech and angling inside for you in the playoffs. That inside pressure is what killed the Pats.

With Strahan (your 2nd best lineman) gone and Tuck outside, who's going to be that force in the middle? Cofield's decent, but its like he runs out of gas by the 2nd half.
>> Anonymous
>>165066

Jay Alford, DT who we picked up in last year's draft that put up some great numbers.

Also, don't forget that we also have Mathias Kiwanuka who is a natural DE, but we switched him to OLB because we already had so many DEs at the time.
>> Anonymous
>>165064
>I was born in 1986

fix'd
>> Anonymous
>>165066
Definitely wrong on your first point. The the tackles were absolute garbage against Strahan and Umenyiora. The interior guys did okay, but once Neal went down Brady pretty much had 3 seconds to get the ball out of his hands.
>> Anonymous
I lol'd at this whole thread. Patsfags aren't going 16-0, aren't winning the Super Bowl, and aren't even going to dominate their own shitty division. Enjoy your 18-1. As for the rest of you, you got trolled and thus this thread has served its purpose. Good job.
>> Anonymous
>>165094
No I'm not. I actually did a statistical breakdown of where pressure was coming from in both Giants-Pats games last year.

Tuck was far and away the best rusher for the Giants, and he did his best work in the gap between Logan Mankins and Dan Koppen.

Fail more, fairweather football fan. Just because you can see the end/tackle matchups better on TV doesn't mean that's where the pressure's coming from.

>>165083
Alford was good at the end of the Super Bowl, but I was under the impression he didn't play much last year.

I just think you'll have a hard time replacing the combo of Strahan and Tuck. Strahan was a special player. Osi is okay, I haven't seen a whole lot but I've never seen anything impressive then him constantly running around William Thomas.
>> Anonymous
>>165118
trolled
>> Anonymous
>>165139

LOL AND JAMARCUS RUSSEL WILL BE UNDER 300 LBS TOO RIGHT?
>> Anonymous
>>165118
>I actually did a statistical breakdown of where pressure was coming from in both Giants-Pats games last year.

gamblemuch?
>> Anonymous
>>165142
It won't matter how much he weighs because Mcfadden, Bush, and Fargas are going to run all over their defense.
>> Anonymous
>>165123
>lulz imma gonna pretend being wrong was my intention from the beginning
>> Anonymous
>>165143
What good would that information do me gambling after the game was already over?
>> Anonymous
>>165149
165094 here,

That wasn't me.
>> Anonymous
>>165167

oh hi
>> Anonymous
Damn, look at all those good teams you're playing.

OH SHI-
>> Anonymous
needs more 18-1