>> |
Anonymous
>>389114 >First of all, lol @ comparing the SEC division against two teams from the Big 12. I like that it takes an entire division to live up to that of two individual teams.
Yeah, I talked about your relevant teams (not Missouri because I don't know anything about them really). The fact that there's so few is not something to brag about.
>But anyways, the "best" of the SEC has struggled and lost to teams they were supposed to beat. The "best" of the Big 12 beat the teams they were supposed to beat, and done so by a wide margin. I guess maybe with the exception of Kansas losing @ South Florida, and struggling with Iowa State. But that loss is a non conference ranked opponent. Something the "best" of the SEC routinely stays clear of, especially if the "best" of the SEC team has to travel there.
Yeah, UGA lost to Bama in a boring game when both raped each other in two different halves, but #3 losing to #8 is not exactly an "oh shit" moment. UGA's offense struggled against Southern Carolina, but they don't have a defense to be taken too lightly, so while it was a shitty performance, that wasn't too scary either.
Florida did get embarrassed, true story. That's part of the standard argument of SEC fans, though, that they beat each other up. It happened. Worse than expected, but they still have plenty of time to make up for it, and no SEC team is expected to go undefeated.
Auburn's offense sucks, they don't deserve discussion.
LSU struggled with Miss. St, that was unexpected. Given.
Vandy is looking good this year unexpectedly, and I don't know how they'll end up, but that's another good team that we normally don't have.
SEC is still best, enjoy your time going "LOL U LOST A GAME." I'll return the favor shortly.
|