>> |
Anonymous
>>91817
>I didn't realize you had to lead the league in a category to be the best ALL-AROUND player in the league Again, people like you can continue to stick your fingers in your ears whenever Chris Paul is mentioned regarding that. It's amusing.
>We all know Kobe could lead the league in scoring if he wanted to without breaking a sweat. Who all knows that? Deluded Lakersfans? Making a completely opinionated claim and laying it as a fact doesn't make it any more true.
> they played the best in the conference in the regular season and earned the #1 seed, that's not "getting lucky." Actually it is, considering 9 different teams over the course of the season held #1 seed, several holding it for a long time. The Lakers had a much easier schedule near the end of the season compared to the competitors for the spot. To say that anyone definitively deserved first place in the West is just dismissive hubris, which you seem to use a lot of.
>And they haven't lost a game yet, so they are doing what they should be doing; Thank you for reinforcing my notion that they play shitty teams. The fact that the Nuggets even got into the playoffs is an insult to the Western conference. And the big bad Jazz actually struggled against a Houston that was missing Yao and was playing with several of its core players noticably injured (McGrady, Alston, Head, Landry). Houston lost game two because of a flop by Kirilenko which saved the game, that series could have turned out much more differently.
>not dropping games to inferior teams like the Spurs, Cavs, Pistons, Magic, and Celtics have. So yes, they are playing the best ball. Dropping games? Oh wait, you mean like playing harder opponents. You honestly believe that the Lakers could have swept anyone BUT the Nuggets? Delusion more.
|