File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Cowboys - L
Steelers - W
@ Ravens - W
@ Bengals - W
Giants - L
@ Redskins - W
@ Jaguars - L
Ravens - W
Broncos - W
@ Bills - W
Texans - W
Colts - L
@ Titans - L
@ Eagles - W
Bengals - W
Comment too long. Clickhereto view the full text.
>> Anonymous
>>235240

I seconded this accept I think we will beat the fucking Titans.
>> Anonymous
>>235246

>except

whoops
>> Anonymous
Cowboys - L
Steelers - L
@ Ravens - W
@ Bengals - L
Giants - L
@ Redskins - L
@ Jaguars - L
Ravens - W
Broncos - W
@ Bills - L
Texans - L
Colts - L
@ Titans - L
@ Eagles - W
Bengals - W
@ Steelers - L

5-11
Enjoy your failure.
>> Anonymous
>Broncos - W
I DON'T THINK SO, TIM.
>> Anonymous
>>235277

>butthurt
>> Anonymous
>>235281
>>realistic

Silly brownsfags your team has always sucked and it always will.
>> Anonymous
>>235286

Go away underageb& that obviously doe not understand the NFL.

Lrn2parody
>> Anonymous
>>235294

>does
>> Anonymous
>>235294
lulz because it's really helped your team these last 50 years huh?
>> Anonymous
>>235299

You obviously have been watching football less then 15 years. I am done talking to children. Good day.
>> Anonymous
>>235325
Number of SuperBowl wins since the creation of the SuperBowl: 0
Number of SuperBowl appearances since the creation of the SuperBowl: 0
>> Anonymous
Cowboys - L
Steelers - L
@ Ravens - W
@ Bengals - W
Giants - L
@ Redskins - L
@ Jaguars - L
Ravens - W
Broncos - W
@ Bills - W
Texans - W
Colts - L
@ Titans - L
@ Eagles - W
Bengals - W
@ Steelers - L

HELLO 8-8!!!
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>235325

The Browns have been a fucking joke since the merger.

How the fuck old ARE you?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
ITT: DELUSIONAL THOUGHTS FROM FANTASY ISLAND
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Remember when the Browns were good?

Protip: Original Browns are now the Ravens
>> Anonymous
>>235352
Oh God. CB, get the fuck out of my thread. I don't fuck up your shitty Crosby cock sucking threads.
>> Anonymous
>>235352
>hurrr i must swear in every one of my posts to make myself seem older
>> Anonymous
Cowboys - L
Steelers - L
@ Ravens - L
@ Bengals - L
Giants - L

Brady Quinn New Starter

@ Redskins - W
@ Jaguars - L
Ravens - W
Broncos - L
@ Bills - W
Texans - W
Colts - L
@ Titans - W
@ Eagles - W
Bengals - L
@ Steelers - L

5-11 and yes im a clevelandfag last year was a fluke!
>> Anonymous
>>235352

lol no they havent

0/10
>> Anonymous
>>235399

Why the fuck does /cle/ think Quinn is going to be better than Anderson? I dont get it.
>> Anonymous
>>235410

cuz liek he was sooooooo good in COLLEGE LOL
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>235410
This is why.
>> Anonymous
>>235410
We used to think that but we became wise. Quinn has been looking like shit recently.
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>235404

Yes they have.

>>235393
>>235397

Does that truth hurt?

You will be done watching the Browns after week 3.

I guarantee it.
>> Anonymous
>>235399
that's actually 6-10, but whatever
>> Anonymous
>>235428
235397 here,

not even a /cle/ fag, you just annoy me to no ends.
>> Anonymous
>>235428

the 80's early 90's? how fucking dumb are you, fagget?
>> Anonymous
>>235410
I don't but everyone else in cleveland does!!!
>> Anonymous
>>235428
Goddammit i'm a steelers fan too, but you are an absolute tool. You and I both know the browns are a legit threat to win the division last year, plus our schedule is harder than your dick when you talk about Crosby
>> Anonymous
lulz the browns have been around FOREVER and they still haven't even gotten to the superbowl. That's becoming a pretty exclusive club of losers
>> Anonymous
rofl? you lose to the titans and win against the eagles? I think your team needs help if they cant beat the titans.
>> Anonymous
>>235478
Ummm see
>>235382
The Browns have multiple super bowls in the 50's and 60's
>> Anonymous
The Jets game is on Thursday. I bet Brett will be on the sidelines. It shall be a circus.
>> Anonymous
>>235486
Protip: those weren't superbowls
>> Anonymous
>>235478
Oh Im sorry but what are NFL championships then?
>> Anonymous
>>235487

AGAINST THE SUPERBOWL NEW YORK GIANTS
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>235470
>>235470

>plus our schedule is harder than your dick when you talk about Crosby

lol'd
>> Anonymous
>>235492
championships that occurred before the merger and have never been labeled as "superbowls" oh and btw you still have 0 lombardi trophies
>> Anonymous
Technically, the original Cleveland Browns have a "Superbowl Win", because they are now the Ravens, who won in 2000.
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>235486

>The Browns have multiple super bowls in the 50's and 60's

HAHA OH WOW!

>>235470

Legit threat? They didn't make the fucking playoffs. Wake me up when they do, so they can be slapped down by the Steelers. As fucking usual.

>>235453

Divisional playoffs
January 7, 1995
AFC: Pittsburgh Steelers 29, Cleveland Browns 9

Divisional playoffs
Sunday January 5, 2003
AFC: Pittsburgh Steelers 36, Cleveland Browns 33

Those were the last 2 times you made the playoffs.

Do you see something similar in both seasons?
>> Anonymous
>>235507
GTFO Ravens are the Ravens any talk of them being the old Browns should be set on fire and shit on!

>>235499
Oh and what team do you root for? Oh let me guess Patriots? Giants? Bandwagon?
>> Anonymous
The Browns were really good in the 50s. They won "championships" many times in a row. They weren't Super Bowls, but they were considered champions.

The Steelers get good suddenly (steroids) and the Browns become their bitch for over a decade.

In the 80s the Browns get good again but fuck up and don't get to a Super Bowl.

In the 90s the Browns move to Baltimore and become the Ravens, however, the colors, name, and records stays in Cleveland. Therefore, techincally, the Ravens are the expansion team. I know a lot of trolls want to say the opposite, but it's false.

The Browns come back in 1999 and suck for the next 8 or so years. Now they're good again but for how long?...
>> Anonymous
>>235507

technically no they don't because the team was called the BALTIMORE RAVENS not the CLEVELAND BROWNS

god are you guys fucking idiots? let's review

BALTIMORE RAVENS: NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE CLEVELAND BROWNS ANYMORE

CLEVELAND BROWNS: TERRIBLE FOOTBALL TEAM NOT ASSOCIATED IN ANY WAY BUT BY NAME WITH THE TEAM THAT WOULD EVENTUALLY BECOME THE BALTIMORE RAVENS
>> Anonymous
ITT: Three children with Downs Syndrome wrestle in a feces-strewn sandbox
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>235528

>Now they're good again but for how long?...

HAHAHAAHAHA

Only in Cleveland is FAILING to make the playoffs, YET AGAIN, "good".
>> Anonymous
>>235536
They were a good team last year, CB. They won 10 games. Bad teams don't win 10 games.
>> Anonymous
Cowboys - W
Steelers - W
@ Ravens - W
@ Bengals - W
Giants - W
@ Redskins - W
@ Jaguars - W
Ravens - W
Broncos - L
@ Bills - L
Texans - L
Colts - L
@ Titans - L
@ Eagles - L
Bengals - L
@ Steelers - L

Browns will win 8 games in a row, only have to win one more game to clench at least a wild card. Then lose 8 in a row.
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>235548

No.

The AFC North had a cream puff schedule.

There wasn't a good team in the entire division.

Cleveland will be awful this year. 6 - 10 would be overachieving.
>> Anonymous
>>235556
We shall see... We shall see.
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>235562

I'll be here to laugh at Browns fans by week 3.

I really should screen cap these predictions.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Browns > Steelers
Cleveland will not lose a game to an AFC North oppenent
>> Anonymous
>>235967
>>Browns < rest of AFC North
>>Cleveland will not win a game against an AFC North opponent
>> Anonymous
>>235382
And even they're starting to look like the new Browns.

Cowboys - L
Steelers - W
@ Ravens - W
@ Bengals - W
Giants - L
@ Redskins - L
@ Jaguars - L
Ravens - W
Broncos - W
@ Bills - W
Texans - W
Colts - L
@ Titans - W
@ Eagles - W
Bengals - W
@ Steelers - W

11-5
>> Anonymous
why are /sp/'s brownsfags so delusional? The AFC North belongs to OCHO CINCO BITCHES
>> Anonymous
>>236053
lol. Browns > Bengals > Steelers > Ravens < Dolphins.
>> Anonymous
>>236055
>>lol. Steelers > Bengals > Ravens > Browns < Dolphins.

fix'd your little mistake for you.
>> Anonymous
>>236060
haha, no. I'm not a fan of any team in the AFC north (fuck yeah Chargers) but the Steelers are too old to win anymore. O-Line is gone, Roflsberger is a terribad QB, they have 2 okay RBs but again, no o-line means no offense. They'll be lucky to beat the Ravens twice this year, and the Ravens are one of the worst teams in the AFC.
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>236053

>why are /sp/'s brownsfags so delusional?

It's a Cleveland tradition. After about 3 or 4 weeks into the season, the mistake on the lake will come back to reality.

>The AFC North belongs to OCHO CINCO BITCHES

Don't troll.
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>236063

>Roflsberger is a terribad QB

104.1 QB rating with 32 TDs and only 11 INTs is terrible?

If that is the case, EVERY QB is terrible.
>> Anonymous
>>236071
Faneca (gone) and his WRs are to blame for those numbers. He's a shit QB, a glorified FB who only throws when the Steelers get tired of running the ball over 9000 times a game. The Steelers aren't fun to watch, it's good for football that they suck now.
>> Anonymous
>>236063
lol you mean a qb who had the second best passer rating in the league and threw over 30 TDs, a rb who finished 2nd in the league in rushing yards due to injury, and uh, oh yeah an o-line that looks decent.... not great but good enough.... yeah... they're still the top of the division
>> Anonymous
lol everyone forgets about the defense.... steelers had one of the top d's last year while the browns had one of the worst
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>236074

>Faneca

is a terrible pass-blocking guard. All of his tools depend on running the ball.

You don't know a fucking thing about football.

WRs don't get you the 2nd highest QB rating in the league dipshit. Enjoy Phillip Rivers HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

>He's a shit QB, a glorified FB who only throws when the Steelers get tired of running the ball over 9000 times a game.

I don't think you have watched a Steeler game ever. The Steelers start by relying on Ben to pass them to a big lead in the first half and then they clamp down and run out the clock in the second half.

You are a fucking moron.
>> Anonymous
>>236094
Wow. You don't even pay attention to your own team. The Steelers have been a runrunrunrunrunrun team for the last 50 years for fucks sake. It's all they do.
>> Anonymous
>>236099
0/10 you're not even trying retard
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>236099

>Wow. You don't even pay attention to your own team. The Steelers have been a runrunrunrunrunrun team for the last 50 years for fucks sake. It's all they do.

Thanks for parroting the ESPN analysis. Unlike those faggots, I actually watch the games.

Since 2004, the Steelers have passed to the lead in the first half and run out the clock in the 2nd.

The only time they deviate from this plan is if they fall behind from poor play in the first half.

Perhaps you should watch more football dipshit.

Feel free to look at Ben's splits. He passes to the lead in the first half and gets far less attempts in the 2nd half. Just as I have described here.
>> Myron Cope's Dancing Corpse !MRu72sLc9I
Heh, Brownies.

You'll manage to tie Pittsburgh's record again, but, failing to defeat the Steelers for the fifth straight year, still sit out for the playoffs.
>> Anonymous
>>236106
im sorry i cant hear you over the steelers running the ball 95% of the time.
>> Anonymous
Going to the preseason game tomorrow.

My dad gets season tickets and nobody ever wants to go the the preseason games, but they rope you into buying them anyways to get the rest of the tickets, so I usually end up going.
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>236075
>a rb who finished 2nd in the league in rushing yards due to injury
Parker sucks and will be broken down by week 12.

I'm so happy that the front office recognized the glaring NEED and went to the RB well in the first round.

Parker spent his college time on the bench for a REASON.
>> Anonymous
>>236111
no no no silly they only do that against the browns because well... even casey hampton could rush for 200 yards on them
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>236111

Failure.

You should be glad you are anonymous. I have embarrassed you.
>> Myron Cope's Dancing Corpse !MRu72sLc9I
>>236118

Failure.

I resent that you are a Steeler's "fan". You embarrass us.
>> Anonymous
>>236114
Parker did have a bazillion carries last year... that's why he was so broken down. Now they have two backs to split the load so there's less chance of either getting hurt.
Oh and protip: they did need another back but it wasn't really as big a deal as you seem to think. They took mendenhall(sp?) because he was a STEAL at that spot.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I think EVERYONE here knows what the Steelers need
>> Anonymous
>>236064

>Don't troll.

OH DELICIOUS IRONY.
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>236121

I've already obliterated you before.

Quit acting fucking butthurt.

Go ahead, pick up another XXXXL Parker jersey you fucking yinzer fuck. I'll be laughing when you have shitty duct tape over his name by week 13.
>> Anonymous
>>236126
At least he is nice enough to use a trip code so we ignore his annoying faggotry.
>> Anonymous
the browns were 10-6 last season you fucking retard "CB", they only missed the playoffs by a tie breaker rule, the giants were also 10-6
>> Anonymous
>>236118
u sure emberassed me by having a shitty team. fuck am i emberassed.
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>236124

>They took mendenhall(sp?) because he was a STEAL at that spot.

I agree that he was clearly the BPA during the draft. It was also very serendipitous first round that also filled a HUGE NEED.
>> Myron Cope's Dancing Corpse !MRu72sLc9I
>obliterated

Was that the time where you made up your own statistics, or the time where you just refuse to acknowledge statistics in context? Really, you do both so often, it's so difficult to keep track.

No. Wait! I remember! You mean the time you claimed Jerious Norwood was a better back than Willie Parker just because Norwood had a better yards/carry. Oh, you card!
>> Anonymous
>>236134
3 1,000+ yd seasons in a row and he hasn't reached that magic number 30 yet.. so uh no not really a huge need.... at this point it's just as likely that the aging d-line and even o-line will be broken down from injuries
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>236135

>You mean the time you claimed Jerious Norwood was a better back than Willie Parker just because Norwood had a better yards/carry. Oh, you card!

Butthurt trolling.

Now now, you obviously remember that wasn't the case.

Enjoy your undrafted POS. He's awful.
>> Myron Cope's Dancing Corpse !MRu72sLc9I
I'm sorry that averaging four yards/carry over 300+ carries without a single run of 40+ yards is unacceptable to you.

I know Parker is no Jerious Norwood, but when the only running backs "better" than you are the absolute pinnacle of the league, there is honestly nothing to complain about.
>> Anonymous
Calling for ban of capitalistbastard, worst trip faggotry I've ever seen.
>> Anonymous
>>236150
You obviously haven't seen Mighty Mighty Boston's posts yet
>> Anonymous
>>236150
lol even pittfags hate him.... though that mighty mighty bawwwwwston guy is flat out retarded
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>236148

Why Willie Parker sucks:

1. 4.1 YPC is pathetically mediocre, especially behind one of the best run-blocking Guards EVER
2. He has absolutely no vision
3. He can't break a fucking arm tackle to save his life
4. He is fumble prone around the goal-line
5. He didn't break off a single "long run" the ENTIRE LAST SEASON
6. He can't score TDs
7. He is terrible as a target for passing
8. He can't block

Do I need to go on?
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>236150

You can't dispute any of the FACTS I present, so in typical butthurt faggot fashion you beg like a milquetoast for the big bad mods to save you.

Grow a fucking pair.
>> Anonymous
>>236161
I think that's why you hardly see them even give him the ball inside the 10. We used to have a duo to pull shit like that off, but he can't be counted on to put real points on the scoreboard.

I wish they'd offload him for a Jerome Bettis clone...
>> Anonymous
>>236161
>>1. 4.1 YPC is pathetically mediocre, especially behind one of the best run-blocking Guards EVER

You're overrating Faneca now and ignoring the rest of the o-line which was horrible... it doesn't matter how well Faneca blocks one guy when the rest of the line lets 4 others into the backfield.

>>2. He has absolutely no vision

A blind RB? That makes him more impressive.

>>3. He can't break a fucking arm tackle to save his life

Are you sure you're actually watching the games?

>>4. He is fumble prone around the goal-line

No, not really. 4 fumbles in 321 attempts... meh

>>5. He didn't break off a single "long run" the ENTIRE LAST SEASON

Again... horrible o-line etc.... also 12 20+ yard carries last year


>>6. He can't score TDs

Very situational and 13 TDs in 06 says he can


>>7. He is terrible as a target for passing

Not everyone can be LT


>>8. He can't block

He's ok at it.... as good as the o-line was last year.... Mendenhall won't be much better at it if at all

>>Do I need to go on?

On a diet? Yes, but that's besides the point.
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>236177

So fucking awful, I don't know where to start.

This is the problem with 4chan, faceless morons spouting unsubstantiated shit.

You think Parker is an "ok" blocker. I don't think you have actually watched him attempt to block. He is terrible.

I'm not going to waste my time.
>> Anonymous
>>236190
The biggest hypocrite and faggot /sp/ will ever know.
>> Anonymous
>>236190

And yet you keep coming back, and you keep using 4chan memes. If this place sucks so much, please by all means, go make a better website, where I'm sure it'll be nothing but circle jerking about Shittsburgh.

You are the cancer that is killing /sp/.
>> Anonymous
Chargers > any afc team
>> Myron Cope's Dancing Corpse !MRu72sLc9I
>>236161
I had addressed every "point" you tried to make, but 4chan ate it. Mostly, though it just pointed out your warped view of how rushing works in the NFL, how you blame a 5'10"/200 lbs back for not bulldozing linebackers, and knocking Parker for not being the third-down back in light of his 20+ attempts in a game.

Parker has one major flaw and two minor quibbles. The flaw: his fumbling. Fourteen over three seasons. No excuses. The quibbles: his awkwardness hitting the hole when attacking the middle and his decreasing yards/carry over the seasons. Why are they only quibbles? First, he's not Bettis. He cannot take on a 250+ lbs linebacker time after time running as much as he does. Concerning his average yards/carry, his last two seasons have been comparable in attempts and average yards/carry while his 2005 season saw less attempts and significantly better yards/carry. However, getting 50+ additional carries more than explains the .3 yards/carry drop.

All of your slander is colored by your personal dislike for him and/or his style of play. But Pittsburgh doesn't employ Parker alone. Throughout his career, he's done the majority of the grinding with a second, "big" back to handle short-yardage/goal-line situations. Welcome to today's NFL. Have a hotdog.
>> Anonymous
>>235555
lmao that you think Browns can beat the Jaguars. The Jaguars destroy teams w/o a WR core... consistently go 12-4 or 11-5 each year. Get that weak shit out of here... won't make the playoffs with Edwards, Stallworth, Winslow, and Jurevicious... Joke team is joke. /topic
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>236218
>Throughout his career, he's done the majority of the grinding with a second, "big" back to handle short-yardage/goal-line situations. Welcome to today's NFL. Have a hotdog.

Why do I dislike parker? Because he has never performed. Just take a look at his performance during the 2004 Playoff run.

Fucking pitiful. The ONLY notable play was the 75 yard run through a GAPING HOLE created by Alan.

>The quibbles: his awkwardness hitting the hole when attacking the middle and his decreasing yards/carry over the seasons.

Those are quibbles? That's his entire fucking job. He fails on both counts. It's not like he is being asked to score points or sustain drives(because he can't). He gets the vast majority of his yardage in clean-up time with the Steelers ahead.

HE SUCKS.

Parker has NEVER performed.
>> CapitalistBastard !!f/pELCnjRD0
>>236222

Oh and in case you think I'm bullshitting here.

These are his splits for last season.

Ahead Att-158 YRDs-666 AVG-4.2 LNG-32 TDs-2

Tied Att-79 YRDs-218 AVG-2.8(LOLOHWOW) LNG-27 TDs-ZERO

Behind Att-84 YRDs-432 AVG-5.1 LNG-31 TDs-ZERO

FUCKING PITIFUL.
>> Anonymous
>>236221
>>236221

3/10

For a seconded I thought you where serious, but then you said /cle/ does mnot have a receiving core. Eurofag troll spotted.
>> Anonymous
Who gives a shit about the shitty steelers? This is a Browns thread.

I think they will be between 10-6 and 11-5. Will be hard but I am excited. I think we have a good, young team with veterans in key spots.
>> Anonymous
19-0
>> Anonymous
>>236221
They've only been above 9 wins 4 times in the last 10 seasons. Try again, douchefag.
>> Anonymous
>>236222

yeah an undrafted free agent (who didnt play in college) gets 1000+ yds 3/4 years of his career and hes "NEVER" performed. i'm a pghfag and you're a troll, CB. with Mendy taking some of the load, Willie will have a great year.