File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Can anyone give an example of a professional sports team logo from before 1990 that is worse than a logo that debuted after 1990? I cannot
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
thread over yet?
>> Anonymous
took.at.that.gay.pirate
>> Anonymous
>>370859
No way. That logo was so much more awesome than the 3d / diagonal / metallic skull and cross bone shit.
>> Anonymous
>>370859
fuck you. That logo was fucking awesome, much better than the shitty new one.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
lol
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
This was godawful and I'm glad it's gone
>> Anonymous
>>370889
Second...that thing looked more like a billy goat than a bull.
>> Anonymous
>>370889
Wrong- that was from the mid-90s

OP wanted examples of ones from the 80s are before that were worse than post-1990 ones
>> Anonymous
quit being so fucking picky
>> Anonymous
why did logos go downhill in the 90s and today?
>> Boss Hogg of tha NAUF !!WV1mHrkCO6N
>>370889
what the fuck is this
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>370913

Fine then. The current one is better than this, too.
>> Anonymous
>>370913

You're wrong.

>In 1984, Athletics trademarked the horned head of a bull and the hump of the bull's back emerging from correspondence and marketing. The diamond shape apparently is a simply a design element to contain the bull-head.
>> Anonymous
>>370975
I think that one is pretty cool, actually
>> Anonymous
>>370985
Do you have the slightest idea about being able to place times to graphic design? That logo looks NOTHING like anything else from 1984. There was probably some other logo that was similar, before it became all angular and 90s.
>> Anonymous
>>370987

The name was certainly better. Bulls is fucking generic, but Golden Brahmans is unique and memorable.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Speaking of 90s logos....
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Lets go Buff-a-lo