File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Buccaneers - W
@ Redskins - W
@ Broncos - L
49ers - W
Vikings - W
Raiders - W
@ Panthers - L
Chargers - L
@ Falcons - W
@ Chiefs - W
Packers - W
@ Buccaneers - L
Falcons - W
@ Bears - L
@ Lions - W
Comment too long. Clickhereto view the full text.
>> Anonymous
>11-5 season. NFC South Champs.


You REALLY better be a troll.
>> Anonymous
>>236102
show me the error in my ways.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>236105
Ok.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>236101
>
11-5 season. NFC South Champs.

lol no
>> Anonymous
I can see it happening, their division isn't exactly great, and they have a pretty good team when they decide to try.
>> Anonymous
>>236115

N.O. fag here, doubt it.

They have a relatively easy schedule, which is bad because they have a habit of beating teams they shouldn't and losing to ones they should walk all over.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
UNLEASH THE CHEETAH UNIT
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Hay guise, what's going on here?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>236235
>> Anonymous
Not losing to the bears. 10-6
Still NFC south champs.
Reggie will get hurt,
as will deuce... but pierre thomas will run for 1000 yards
>> Anonymous
remember that time they lost to the skins when the skins weren't as good and the saints were better and the game was played in NO and it was one of jason campbell's first games as a starter?

and you really think they can beat the skins at Fed Ex this year?

really?
>> Anonymous
i was at that game.
admitted, we lost... but, as a N.O.fag, ive realized the saints ALWAYS play better on the road
>> Anonymous
>>236534
fair enough.

it worked out for the giants