You're an American and your city has a chance for a soccer team.How do you vote?
>>45913Meh, couldn't hurt. It'd probably only close after a few seasons anyways.
NMy city sucks.
I live in Hell, Minnesota.So, yes.
why waste money on a sport that will only ever broadcast on espn2?NO
My city already has MLS... but I would vote Yes if we could get a real soccer team.
No, keep that crap out of here. Now, if we had the chance for a football team.. hell yeah.
I would vote no because it would fail, and be a waste of time and money.
I have one, and it fails HARD. Toronto FC FTMFL.
New York already has one, I only know because of the ads on MSG.The Mexicans are the only people who I can think of who would go, and they're always working.
New York also has a professional lacrosse team, its probably more popular than the MLS team.We have too many sports already, Football owns Fall, Baseball owns summer, and hockey and basketball fill in the off-seasons
i say no lol because soccer is gayyyyyyyyyyy and boring gtfo soccer fan
Hell yeah!We could call them the Tampa Bay Mutiny!...oh wait.
Philadelphia 2010.Yeah, our tax dollars at work.
I live in Detroit, and I would vote yes, even though the team won't get as much recognition as the Lions, Tigers, Pistons and Red Wings do, but it couldn't hurt to keep expanding the MLS to get America more into the sport
>>46059no there not
>>46083We survived North Philadelphia, and that should count for something.Fuck, maybe we'll WIN in soccer.
i would vote, wait soccer is a joke so NO
>>46059>The Mexicans are the only people who I can think of who would go, and they're always working.>The Mexicans ... and they're always working.>Mexicans ... working.