File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
How come the Bobcats, Bulls, Nuggets, Rockets, Grizzlies, Bucks, Timber wolves, Trail Blazers and the Spurs doesn't have a basketball in there main logo but all other teams do. 13 out of 16 team in this post season have a basketball in there logo. I would all team would want a basketball in there logo.
>> Anonymous
If you think that's odd, find me 3 NFL teams with a football in their logo... Wait.. find me ONE!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>116535

Moron.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>116535
new york Jets
>> Anonymous
>>116538
>>116539
Ok .. ok.. now keep going...
Yeah, that's right.. SHUT THE FUCK UP!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
old cheatriots logo!
>> Anonymous
>>116557
I think I'm the only person in the world who liked that one. And their uniforms remind me of a pro bowl team. I think this is why Superbowl 20 was the ugliest thing to ever have happen.
>> Anonymous
>>116535
the raiders logo artard
>> Anonymous
>>116535
fukken lulz
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
owned so hard
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
best buffalo bills teams ever wore this logo
>> Raider Nation
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Old school rockets
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>116532
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
also alternate new griz logo
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Milwaukee Bucks primary logo, in use from 1969-1993

Thank god they changed it.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
116707 here

Didn't see the post made seconds earlier. My mistake.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Ok people, let's see some NHL logos with pucks.
>> Anonymous
>>116714
That only leaves Anaheim, Boston, Buffalo, Calgary, Chicago, Dallas, Detroit, Edmonton, Florida, L.A., Minnesota, Montreal, Nashville, New Jersey, New York Rangers, Ottawa, Phoenix, St. Louis, Tampa Bay, Toronto and Vancouver

Honorable Mention goes to Carrolina and Philly. Can't tell if the small circular thing in the middle is the puck or not.
>> Anonymous
In baseball, it's against the rules to have a baseball in your logo.
>> Anonymous
>>116726
the thing in Carolina's logo is a puck, but it's lulzier to think of it as a turd being flushed
>> Anonymous
>>116726

Flyers' is also a symbolic puck.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>116729

Then I guess the Mets, Red Sox, Dodgers, Twins, Marlins, Brewers, Mariners, Rangers, Royals, Yankees, Rangers, Rockies, and Giants are all rule breakers.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>116782
>Royals
wat
I see no baseball.
>> Anonymous
>>116782
from Wikipedia:

No "pattern that imitates or suggests the shape of a baseball" may be used on uniforms. Notably, in apparent violation of this rule, the Milwaukee Brewers, Anaheim Angels, Florida Marlins and Philadelphia Phillies for many years had logos that incorporated the image of a baseball. However, while the Philadelphia cap logo clearly depicted the baseball, the logo worn on the uniform jersey did not feature the image of the stylized stitching indicating the image of a baseball. The Marlins logo, while depicting a baseball, can not easily be mistaken for one, as the team's namesake fish is displayed in front of the ball design. The classic Brewers "ball and glove" logo (with the team's initials, MB, stylized into the shape of a blue baseball glove surrounding a ball) made a comeback in 2006 on the hats of the Brewers' Sunday home uniforms and is now the Brewers' Friday home uniform. Also, many teams such as the Giants, Nationals, Rangers and the Mariners use uniform logos that clearly depict a baseball, and the New York Mets have featured uniforms with a sleeve logo that imitates the appearance of a baseball since the team's inception in 1962, so it may be that the rule is not enforced, at least for caps. (The purpose of this rule is to prevent one team from deceiving the other. The National Football League has a similar rule, which states that no pattern that imitates or suggests the shape of a football).