File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Can we have a NFL team now? Seriously, fuck all these small market teams and give us a team. Los Angeles is full of bandwagon faggots, and we'll sell out the games because of how good USC is.

Because of USC, LA now loves football, and we will have one of the highest attendances. Throw the team at the Rose Bowl, and give us a good team.

We don't want a shit team like the Rams or Raiders. That is why Los Angeles didn't work the first two times. Give us the Colts, Jaguars, or Saints.

Seriously, the Saints have some crazy hurricane every few years.

The Colts? Does Indiana really need a football team? Who actually cares?

Jaguars? Seriously...honestly? Just give them up.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>USC
>Good
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
You guys already have an NFL team.
>> Anonymous
Too many teams in California. Have the Chargers or something.
>> Anonymous
>>412578

We don't want the Chargers.

We want the Jaguars, Saints, or Colts.

Give us the Colts, and change the name to the Los Angeles Stars.

We will be the most hated team in the NFL in two weeks.
>> Anonymous
L.A. will get Jacksonville's franchise, the Jaguars most likely. They play in a shitty stadium, and they're almost out of their lease, and Jacksonville hates the Jaguar's owner because he's a huge pussy.

MARICE JONES DREW IS COMING BACK TO CALI IN 2010.
>> Anonymous
Seriously, the Colts vs. Pats rivalry is big...but so fucking lackluster.

New England vs. Indiana? Seriously.

...Now think of this:

New England Patriots vs. Los Angeles Stars at the Rose Bowl.

BOSTON VS. LOS ANGELES

BRADY (IF HE ISN'T HURT) AND MANNING
>> Anonymous
>>412583

Los Angeles Jaguars?

Bleh, I still want the Stars, Superstars, or some awesome douchebag title that makes the NFL hate us.

Then kick the St. Louis Rams out of the NFC West (Seriously, what the fuck) and put us in the NFC West and throw them in the Jaguars old spot.

Fits much better.
>> Anonymous
>>412585
>Los Angeles Giants

Fixed.
>> Anonymous
>>412589

Easy, the Los Angeles Angels of Culver City.
>> Anonymous
The Faguars won't move.


Also, what the shit? Some people drive hundreds of miles to see a game, can Califagians not drive even half that? Awwwwwww
>> Anonymous
Still, the NFL needs LA.

LA doesn't need the NFL.

Los Angeles is a huge market to place some good looking kid as QB and market him like David Beckham.

I still don't know why we didn't give a shit about the Rams or Raiders.

Probably because they had horrible names.

We need to make our own team name. No more stealing like the Lakers and Dodgers.

We need to build our own shit dynasty.

Maybe call them the Los Angeles Trojans for epic lulz.
>> Anonymous
>>412580
>We want the Jaguars, Saints, or Colts.

Saints and Colts have season-ticket waiting lists in 5 figures. You'll get the Bills and you'll like it.
>> Anonymous
LA doesn't love football, they love winning. Even if you manage to get a good team like the Colts, as soon as they hit a bad streak they'll be thrown out of town like all of your other NFL teams.

Fucking fair weather fans.
>> Anonymous
When The NFL expands you will probably get one, Give up one of your Basketball or Baseball teams to Jacksonville before you start demanding their ONLY team.
>> Anonymous
>>412600

No we can't.

Because unlike shit cities like Jacksonville and Indianapolis, we can do other things. Like we can go have sex with sluts, or we can go get some good sushi.

Or we can get some coffee or some ice cream.

Los Angeles is going to steal one of your shit city teams, and we will ruin them. We will change everything about your lovable team and rape it.

Before you know it, Los Angeles will take your franchise away and it will be like your old friend after getting raped 10 times.
>> Anonymous
LA doesn't deserve an NFL team because
1. NFL is the most important pro sport. It should be tough to get an NFL team, especially if you fag it up twice.
2. California has enough teams.
3. Everybody hates LA.
>> Anonymous
>>412603

We know that.

We're Los Angeles.

We don't like losing. When we lose, we don't care.

That's why we need a good team, and that's why we need a good quarterback.

Let's make a trade:

Los Angeles Avengers + Los Angeles Clippers for a NFL team.

Good trade.
>> Anonymous
>>412607
Give up claim to both fake USC national championships and you have a deal.
>> Anonymous
>>412606

Everyone hates New York and Boston. So?

Seriously, no one gives a shit about Oakland or San Fransisco or San Diego in Los Angeles. San Diego is for Sea World, SF is for the homosexuals that LA doesn't want, and Oakland is the place where all the rejects go.

Yes, we fucked up twice because the teams sucked. This is why the NFL needs to give us a good team.
>> Anonymous
>>412609

No deal.

We'll throw in Chivas USA for a bonus. No one in Los Angeles really gives a shit about that MLS team except the people who come up from Mexico.
>> Anonymous
>>412601
>the NFL needs LA

lol no
>> Anonymous
>>412611
Oakland is cool because they're like a gimme win and it's funny watching the football equivalent of 1945 Germany. San Diego is cool because of the powder blue uniforms and their inherent failure. 49ers are irrelevant but important historically, unlike LA.
>> Anonymous
>>412618

Don't lie.

Los Angeles is the second biggest market besides New York.

Los Angeles can produce more money for the NFL than the Jaguars, Texans, and Saints could all together.
>> Anonymous
>>412615
If you're going to throw in an MLS team I'll have to ask you to give up even more. That's like a negative.
>> Anonymous
>>412621

Clippers, Avengers, and Chivas USA is good enough for a NFL team.

If you really want a big team, we'll give you the Clippers and the Angels.

No one in Los Angeles really likes the Angels, and most Angels fans are Dodgers bandwagoners who left after the Angeles won the World Series.
>> Anonymous
>>412620
I guess that's why Jacksonville, Houston, and New Orleans don't have teaWAIT A SECOND!

Seriously. New Orleans and Arizona have never been good and they can at least keep their teams lol.
>> Anonymous
>>412624
Either the USC stolen championships or the Lakers.
>> Anonymous
lol padball
>> Anonymous
>>412569
>>412580
>>412601
>>412605
>>412607
>>412611
>>412620
>>412624
Wow. Trolls get more obvious by the day. GTFO. I'm sure I missed a few...
>> Anonymous
>>412626
Oh, and for the Lakers: Kobe must give all of his championships to Penny Hardaway and his MVP to Chris Paul.
>> Anonymous
/la/ - Faggotry
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
HAI LA
>> Anonymous
indianapolis just got a new stadium, and new orleans is full of post-hurricane guilt. maybe one of the ohio teams could move. i think the bengals would fit in really well in brentwood.
>> Anonymous
You guys had your chance and you had to have an earthquake fuck it up. Live with it faggots. Maybe next time you'll think before you have one of those.
>> Anonymous
>>412659
Both teams have relatively new stadiums that cost their taxpayers almost a billion dollars each. They are going NOWHERE.

The only teams that could conceivably move are the Chargers, Jaguars, Bills, Vikings, or maybe the Raiders. (The Saints would be on the list, but no way would the NFL want the bad PR about moving an NO team.)
>> Anonymous
>>412569
The Saints have never been more successful financially. They're even upgrading the Superdome.
>> Anonymous
>>412620
The NFL is overwhelmingly dependent on its TV contract. (Almost every NFL team would still turn a profit before they sell one seat.) An LA team wouldn't change that by much.
>> Anonymous
>>412569
Protip: the last time the NFL expanded they practically threw you the franchise that became the Texans, but you failniggers couldn't even get that right. What's the matter, do you need more high income earners to pay for your shitty, over-regulated state? Seriously, go die in an earthquake, no one's gonna miss your drain on the economy.
>> Anonymous
If the league wants to literally GIVE Los Angeles a new team, it will ruin the current divisions. They'd have to expand the league by atleast four more teams, maybe even eight. It would finally give them a reason to put a team in Mexico and Canada. Toronto and Mexico City, along with LA, and...fuck...where ever else. Just throw them in shitty divisions and it would be doable.
>> Anonymous
>>412680
they are truly faggots and the only thing useful they provide the nation is 54 or so blue electoral votes but i must say, normally their economy does really well as the movies we make do so much business overseas its actually important to our trade deficit
>> Anonymous
>>412683
mexico is far too shitty for an american sports team
and mexico city is really fucking far from the border man
>> Anonymous
LA can't get a team because ESPN would just cycle through Sportscenter talking about only NE, DAL, and LA.
>> Anonymous
>>412690
The two main epicenters of the housing crisis are California (particularly around LA) and Florida. The income from the Movie industry is a drop in the bucket compaired to the damage done by these idiots.
>> Anonymous
>>412691
Well, they've played a game or two there and afterwards there was more of the expanding to other countries bullshit, thus adding the games in London.
>> Anonymous
I'm sorry, you don't get my Colts. I suffered through the '80s and first half of the '90s dealing with a bunch of 1-3 win teams. I get to enjoy them now. Go overdose you useless fucks!
>> Anonymous
>>412696
The housing thing is just a byproduct of Allen Greenspan's disastrous legacy of leaving interest rates at 1% for so long. It will straighten itself out in a few years and we will still need Hollywood.
>> Anonymous
>>412707
Partly. It also has to do with banks and realtors convincing morons that they need, and can afford, a five bedroom house. It's also builders faults for building moronically expensive houses. It's also the fault of house flippers (like we see on tv all the time) who put in new faucets and hike up the price by $15,000.
>> Anonymous
>>412569
>>Rose Bowl

hahahahahano. Build a stadium with more than just seats and then we'll talk.
>> Anonymous
>>412727

They're building a new Football stadium in Culver City on a hill. Which means less steel and contrite for the stadium, which means it'll be cheaper to build. The developer says he can get it down on $900,000,000, and it'll be privately owned. Contrast that to the new Jets/Giants stadium for over $1.5 billion dollars.

Culver City is a fucking rich part of L.A. County.

Most important, Culver City is actually closer to LAX than Downtown is. It'll allow teams to get in and out faster.
>> Anonymous
>>412680
/thread
>> Anonymous
la lost a team to oakland

to FUCKING OAKLAND

enjoy ur non-football, homos
>> /b/'s down again. ?
Please go to http://wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=A&action=edit&oldid=246043556 and click "Save page."
>> Anonymous
The Chargers would be good in LA. They already have great rivalries with Oakland and St. Louis.
The Chargers could join the LA3.
>> Anonymous !!35pjJ34t/2v
>>412783

Actually, to be completely correct, LA lured a team to move there FROM Oakland, and then the team decided to move BACK to Oakland after a few years.
>> Anonymous
>>412732
They're not building it in Culver City, they're building it in the City of Industry. (supposedly, I'll believe it when I see it)

You, sir, are and idiot :)
>> Anonymous
>>We don't want a shit team like the Rams or Raiders. That is why Los Angeles didn't work the first two times. Give us the Colts, Jaguars, or Saints.

And that's why a team won't work in LA. A team isn't going to be great every season. You want to know why there are so many teams in small markets compared to a place like LA? Because the fans remain fans in those smaller markets despite the team doing badly. They don't leave the instant the team starts losing.
>> Anonymous
but who was phone?
>> Anonymous !!35pjJ34t/2v
>>412884

First three times. The Chargers played their first season in LA as well, and then left.
>> Anonymous
>>412569
>We don't want a shit team like the Rams or Raiders. That is why Los Angeles didn't work the first two times.
The Rams were in LA for over 9000 years. They failed and moved for far more reasons than just being a shit team. Also I would ask if you ever saw the crowds at Trojan games during the "dark age" between John Robinson's departure and Pete Carroll's arrival? Your post is either a semi-well-crafted troll or the typing of somebody who has just barely started puberty because you obviously don't understand Los Angeles nor care to do any research.

In general on this topic, unless whatever team that is eventually forced upon LA wins the Super Bowl every year, it will be fail. You will never get all of the Mexicans there to stop rooting for the Raiders, and the team will have to constantly be x-0 for people to want to deal with the traffic and cost, all while getting most of them to give up rooting for their true home town team. I've said it before here and I'll say it again -- when the NFL returns, LA's new nickname will be "Blackout City" because the stadium will rarely if ever sell out.
>> Anonymous
1. Move the Jaguars to Los Angeles
2. Watch them fail in Cali
3. Move the Jaguars back to Jacksonville
4. ??????
5. PROFIT!!!!!!
>> Anonymous
The Chargers quit L.A. after just one season. Gotta tell you something.
>> Anonymous
>>413193
Yes, it does...that it was 1960 when Los Angeles was a much different place and the Rams did generally very well attendance-wise at the Coliseum. Meanwhile, the Chargers were part of a brand new league that was struggling for attention.

Facts are a bitch, ain't they?