File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
ITT NFL in L.A.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
amidoinitrite?
>> Anonymous
It would be such a shame for the Raiders to get that location.

They should put up a new expansion team.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Give us one or two more losing seasons, and I'll be coming home!
>> Anonymous
They should just move the Chargers there. Nobody in San Diego really gives a fuck.
>> Anonymous
>>342929
exactly what I was thinking today. that would be the best
>> Anonymous
>>342929
Better you than the Raiders.

Your franchise may be in a slump, but at least you're not a complete joke like the Raiders.
>> Anonymous
>>342929
They better bring back the old colors. Shit was so cash.
>> Anonymous
What teams do you think would seriously consider moving to L.A.? I can only think of either Jacksonville or St. Louis now that the Vikings said nah.
>> Anonymous
LA CHARAIDAMS
>> Anonymous
>>342947
JAX is most likely.

St. Louis has the fat white midwesterner support that will neve go away.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
sup?
>> Anonymous
>>342947
When did the Vikings say no? They're the most likely to go because my stupid state is full of hippies who won't pay for a new stadium.
>> Anonymous
>>342947
werent the 49ers thinking about moving to santa barbera a few years ago?
>> Anonymous
>>342959
oops santa clara
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/11/09/BAGNJM99FK1.DTL
>> Anonymous
>>342954

But first off, how the hell did Missouri get two NFL teams?

Tell those fat assholes to run backward through another cornfield

Rams back to LA, problem solved...then they will actually feel like they deserve to be in the NFC west
>> Anonymous
>>342956

The state already paid for both a new Gophers stadium and a new Twins ballpark.
>> Anonymous
>>342966
No shit, so theres not much of a chance for a third stadium, so they're probably gonna be at the top of the list to go, which really fucking sucks.
>> Anonymous
>>342956
A Minnesota Vikings official says the franchise is not in active discussions about relocating to Los Angeles.

Lester Bagley, the Vikings' vice president of public affairs and stadium development, was quoted in Minneapolis-area newspapers in today's editions as saying that franchise owner Zygi Wilf had spurned overtures to speak to Ed Roski, the developer who is attempting to secure an NFL team for Los Angeles.

"They have knocked on our door, but we have declined," Bagley told the Minneapolis Star Tribune. "We have not had a meeting or discussion with Roski. All of our updates have come through the league. Our intention is to resolve the issue in Minnesota, but clearly they are out proactively seeking a team and they are the ones that listed the seven teams."

The St. Paul Pioneer Press published identical comments by Bagley.

According to reports, Roski previously identified the Vikings, New Orleans Saints, Jacksonville Jaguars, Buffalo Bills, San Diego Chargers, Oakland Raiders and San Francisco 49ers as candidates to be moved to Los Angeles.
>> Anonymous
>>342965
>But first off, how the hell did Missouri get two NFL teams?

Because the bitch that gained ownership of the Rams grew up in St. Louis so she decided to move them there. That is the only reason.
>> Anonymous
Do not want the Rams

Vikings or Chargers plz
>> Anonymous
>>342977
Really that's the reason?! Fucking cunt!
>> Anonymous
la has already had 3 different franchises, they dont deserve another shot
>> Anonymous
>>342972
Say goodbye to the Jaguars, Jacksonville.

I hope the team is renamed/colored. I hate the current scheme, and I'd like to be a fan of an expansion team for once.
>> Anonymous
>>342977
she moved the team because nobody went to the games you ass
>> Anonymous
>>342985
That would probably be my best scenario, either that or the Bills. But the Bills had to go and be good this year, faggots.
>> Anonymous
Chance an NFL team will relocate to Los Angeles in the next five years; 95%

Teams that will move, in order from most likely to least likely;

1) Los Angeles Saints
2) Los Angeles Jaguars
3) Los Angeles Chargers
4) Los Angeles Raiders
5) Los Angeles 49ers
6) Los Angeles Vikings
7) Los Angeles Bills
>> Anonymous
>>343002
The Saints are least likely to move.
>> Anonymous
>>343002
The Saints seem unlikely, unless the city gets knocked to the ground again. Even the Hornets came back.

The trick is to look at teams having trouble with their stadiums. I'd erase the Saints and the Raiders from that list (unless Al Davis dies), and put the Titans in at the bottom.

Oh, and followed by the Cardinals. Yes, they just got a new stadium, but they suck THAT MUCH.
>> Anonymous
found this on the internets:

10. The neutral-site option
I've written about this plan before. With the NFL considering expanding the regular season to 17 games per team, such a format would allow for 16 neutral-site games per year.

Four games could be sent to Europe, two to Canada, one to Mexico, one to China or Japan ... and eight games to Los Angeles.

It's the best way to solve the L.A. problem without pilfering another city's team. And it becomes a viable option after the various teams listed above have used the vacancy in Southern California to leverage new stadiums of their own.
>> Anonymous
>>343011
Yeah I thought that too with all the NO inspiration bullshit going on, they need them there.
>> Anonymous
>>343016
i had not heard about that one, good job anon.
>> Anonymous
>>343015
Cardinals move to L.A., and then put the UoP stadium on trucks and move it to San Francisco cause fuck we need a new stadium
>> Anonymous
>>342982
Deserve? No. Get? Yes.

LAfag here, and we'll get a team even though nobody here wants one. Why? Because it's the only "blemish" on the NFL that it really cares about (no team in the #2 media market).

Mark mah words...the team we'll get is the Jaguars, and don't be surprised if they Mexi-fy it to "Jaguares." It will still be a fail move no matter what the team we get is because all of the Mexifags here will still stick with the Raiders or Cowboys, the niggers will continue to bandwagon, and the decent white folk will stick to the team they rooted for before they got suckered into moving into this shit-pile. The team will sell out it's first three games but, after that, the nickname for LA will change from "The City of Angels" to "Blackoutville" -- and sales for DirecTV in the greater Los Angeles area will skyrocket.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>343002

>>7) Los Angeles Bills
>> Anonymous
>>343022

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
>> Anonymous
Anyways, enough laughing. Bills move to Toronto, Saints move to LA. Earthquakes are easier to deal with than hurricanes.
>> Anonymous
I really hope the Jaguars move to LA and get different colors. Jesus Christ, black and teal? Seriously???
>> Anonymous
>>343041
In before the LA Amigos.


JOSE RODRIUGUEZ JUST GAINED 250 METERS IN A GAME. HE IS UN APASIONANTE PLAYER!
>> Anonymous
Fuck, they're putting it right by where I went to High School.


Hooray.
>> Anonymous
>>343051
You know it. Worse yet, the crowd will go crazier for a little guy kicking a field goal than somebody scoring a touchdown.

I'll say this though...the team will be fail, but it'll have the best cheerleaders in the nation. Say hello to your Los Angeles Fappers!

LET'S GO FAP! LET'S GO FAP! LET'S GO FAP! LET'S GO FAP! LET'S GO FAP! LET'S GO FAP! LET'S GO FAP! LET'S GO FAP! LET'S GO FAP! LET'S GO FAP! LET'S GO FAP! LET'S GO FAP! LET'S GO FAP! LET'S GO FAP! LET'S GO FAP! LET'S GO FAP!
>> Anonymous
>>343047
I remember hearing that if Toronto was to get a team that it would be a nation wide team as opposed to city. So if Toronto got the Bills would it be in Toronto only? Or would it be a different stadium each game? So like Week 1 Toronto, Week 2 Vancouver, Week 3 Edmonton. Any truth to that?
>> Anonymous
just add 4 expansion teams one in LA, one in Toronto, one in Las Vegas, the city has expressed intrest in building a stadium and another out east a 2nd Chicago team or Richmond VA.
>> Anonymous
>>343088
thats only one divisions worth
youd need 8 teams, 4 for each conference
>> Anonymous
>>343088
A team in Vegas would be such an unbelievable trainwreck.
>> Anonymous
>>343098
Agreed. The superior and more logical choice there would be San Antonio.
>> Anonymous
>>343088

Expansion = never going to happen. 32 is a perfect number for sports leagues.
>> Anonymous
>>343103
I don't think my body could survive the hatred I'd feel for yet another Texas sports team.
>> Anonymous
>>343107
Never say never to expansion. Remember, the NFL is full of greedy fuckers.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>343103
>> Anonymous
>>343108
Come on...you're an /sp/tard. There's always room for more hate.
>> Anonymous
>>343113

The term is /sp/artan.
>> Anonymous
>>343098
Yeah, there's a reason they don't have any major league teams.
>> Anonymous
>>343122
I hate that term, I hate that movie, I hate all teams named Spartans and, oh by the way, I hate you too.
>> Anonymous
>>343125
That's right. It's called gambling, the NFL's activity who's name shall not be spoken.
>> Anonymous
>>343107
36 teams could work. Expand in LA, San Antonio, and then your pick-two of Tornoto, Vancouver, Richmond, Norfolk, Las Vegas, Wherethefuckever. Then, go back to the East, Central, and West divisions, but this time with six teams each.

Likely at this point? No. Just saying it could work and not look stupid.
>> Anonymous
The Los Angeles Sans, mang!
>> Anonymous
>>343141
Only problem: ten division games a year
>> Anonymous
>>343141
this would require some divisions to be dissolved or a complete jumble of all teams. idont think id like that