>> |
Anonymous
>>420064
Rodgers is subpar? Fucking douche, have you watched a Packers game this year? And have you looked at his stats?
7th in passing yards (More than Farve) 5th in QB rating (well ahead of Farve) t-4th in passing TDs (1 TD less than Farve, whose numbers are skewed by one big game) 8th in completion % (2 spots behind Farve)
He's more mobile than Farve. He has less fumbles than Farve. He throws less interceptions (4 less than Farve so far). And he can be the franchise QB for the team for the next 10-12 years, something that Farve CAN'T do. I would say that the Packers are still the favorites to win their division, and with a QB like Rodgers, they will be in contention for a long time. If they had kept Farve, they may have had a better record this year, but they would have probably lost Rodgers and would have been forced to go with Matt Flynn, Brian Brohm, or another unproven rookie/sucky veteran at QB next year or the year after
Not even a Pack fan, just sick of people giving Rodgers bullshit.
|