File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
The division winners this year:

NFC:
North: GB
South: NO
East: DAL
West: SF

AFC
North: PIT
South: TEN
East: NE
West: DEN
>> Anonymous
It's only week 3
>> Anonymous
NFC:
Green Bay
Carolina
New York
Seattle
Minnesota(Wild Card)
New Orleans(Wild Card)
AFC:
Pittsburgh
New York
Indianapolis
Denver
New England(Wild Card)
Buffalo(Wild Card)
>> Anonymous
>>344331
your joking right?
>> Anonymous
>>344334

NOPE
>> Anonymous
>>344335
He's been drinking the NYC water.
>> Anonymous
>>344335
Which one was this referring to?
>> Anonymous
>>344346
It was quoted retard.
>> Anonymous
>>344335
Why would that be a joke?
>> Anonymous
>>344354
I'm too tired to even try and explain it
>> Anonymous
>>344356
No really, What is wrong with that?
>> Anonymous
>>344358
Minnesota is not gonna be a wild card hell if they don't get rid of travaris jackson they won't be over .500
Arizona is gonna win the west as long as kurt warner stays the QB
Dallas will win the east
Three teams from the AFC east in there no way
All the other picks are okay
>> Anonymous
>>344315
OP is repressed Titans fan...
>> Anonymous
>>344369
Arizona is fucking awful and Seattle will be healthy enough to start not sucking in a week, New York and Dallas are just kind of interchangeable to me, and What the fuck other teams in the AFC are going to make the playoffs? MAYBE replace Buffalo with San Diego, but it seems very possible at this point to me.
>> Anonymous
>>344378
What makes you thing that the Jets are going to be over .500? There will be wildcards in the AFC south and AFC West. Too early to say which ones. In the NFC the wild cards are coming from the East and North.
>> Anonymous
>>344343

NYC is known for having the best tap water in the world. They import that shit straight from the Catskills.

NFC:
North: GB
South: Carolina
East: Dallas
West: Arizona
Giants (wildcard)
Eagles (wildcard)

AFC:
North: Steelers
South: Colts
East: Patriots
West: Broncos
Bills (wildcard)
Titans (wildcard)
>> Anonymous
>>344315
>South: NO
>West: SF

I don't think so, Tim
>> Anonymous
>>344384
You're right, I fucked up. Dallas, not New Orleans will have that WC spot. Other than that I think it's good. Guess we'll find out won't we?
>> Anonymous
>>344386
correct. one football for you
>> SSG Posted Here
NFC:
North: GB
South: CAR
East: DAL
West: ?!?
WC: NYG
WC: PHI

AFC:
North: PITT
South: ?!?
East: NE
West: DEN
WC: BUF
WC: Whoever finishes second in the AFC South.
>> Anonymous
how is the wildcard spot determined?

new nfl britag here
>> Anonymous
>>344441
teams with the best record that did not win their division
>> Anonymous
>>344441
The two teams with the best records that didn't get first place in their division.
>> Anonymous
Super Bowl:
Green Bay over Pittsburgh
>> Anonymous
AFC
North: Pittsburgh
South: Indianapolis
East: New England
West: Denver
Wild Card: Jacksonville
Wild Card: Buffalo

NFC:
North: Chicago
South: Carolina
East: Dallas
West: Arizona
Wild Card: Philadelphia
Wild Card: New York Giants
>> Anonymous
What happened to everyone taking the Browns over the Steelers, huh?

Oh yeah, the season actually started.
>> Anonymous
People pick Arizona every single year, and they always find a way to fuck it up, and Seattle always finds a way to get back into shit. They won with SENECA WALLACE leading their team last year. They aren't that bad off because Branch and Engram are back after this next game. There's no way they miss out on winning the West this year.
>> Anonymous
>>344497
FUCK YA 7-9 CHAMPIONS BABY. OUT IN THE FIRST ROUND AGAIN!!!!!
>> Anonymous
>>344514
YA CUZ DAT HAPPUND DA LAZT 2 YRZ!!!!!!! LULULULULULULUULLLLLZZZZZZZ
>> Anonymous
ITT: Fucking morons.

NEW ENGLAND winning the East? HAHAHAHAHAHA.
>> Anonymous
>>344521
Believeing in anyone else in that division at this stage of the season is pure fantasy.
>> Anonymous
Is this a consensus?

NFC:
North: GB
South: N-CP
East: NYG
West: SF
WC: DAL
WC: PHI

AFC
North: PIT
South: IND
East: NE
West: DEN
WC: BUF
WC: TEN/JAX
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>344536

'cuse me, what the fuck are you doing?
>> Anonymous
>>344441
nice welcome to the dark side, who are you rooting for?
Or are you just following the league?
>> Anonymous
>>344543
No?
>> Anonymous
>>344547
Trent Edwards...
Need I say more?
>> Anonymous
This is the real list. It will happen. If you contest this, you are a pitiful homer.

NFC:
North: Green Bay Packers
South: Carolina Panthers
East: Dallas Cowboys
West: Arizona Cardinals

AFC:
North: Pittsburgh Steelers
South: Indianapolis Colts
East: Buffalo Bills
West: Denver Broncos

NFC Wildcard: Giants, Eagles
AFC Wildcard: Patriots, Chargers

This is all based on team talent and ease of schedule. There's no arguing this. (Unless you want to argue my dice roll for the NFC East.)
>> Anonymous
>>344556

And? Tom Brady was a nobody not too long ago.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>344558
>ease of schedule.
>> Anonymous
>>344558

yeah i would like to argue that NFC east. what makes you think the giants won't win it? i'm curious.
>> Anonymous
>>344558
LOL. Arizona will be between 4-12 and 6-10.

Look at their schedule and tell me different.
>> Anonymous
>>344580
I rolled the dice and gave the other two teams the Wildcard spot. The NFC East is too ridiculous to predict.
>> Anonymous
>>344581
>Look at their schedule
WELL GEE, I MUST HAVE FORGOTTEN TO DO THAT OR SOMETHING.

Homer.
>> Anonymous
>>344587
Are you fucking kidding me? They will go 6-10 and Seattle will go no worse than 8-8 and win it. You are a fucking idiot.
>> Anonymous
>>344601
Theyll go 6-0 in their division, they've already beat Miami, and they'll beat the Jets and the Vikings later in the season.

That's 9-7, homer.
>> Anonymous
>>344613
They're gonna lose their next 5 games, beat St. Louis, and lose another 4 in a row. What they do after that doesn't matter.
>> Anonymous
>>344617
Even if by some miracle, they fail to beat the jets and go on a 5 game losing streak, they still go 6-0 in the division, and beat the Vikings. That's 8-8, and still better than Seattle. Hop off Seattle's dick, you faggot.
>> Anonymous
>>344617
>beat St. Louis, and lose another 4 in a row
It's cute how you think the Seahawks will beat anyone, let alone a team with a top 10 offense.
>> Anonymous
>>344622
I'm just going to write this off as a lost cause, but you're an idiot. Just watch the season play out.
>> Anonymous
>>344628
Seattle lost to the 49ers. Arizona beat them easily. Arizona > Seattle.
>> Anonymous
>>344633
The Seahawks having none of their top 4 WR or their #2 RB for that game might have made a tiny difference. Or maybe not. Whatever. And it's not like after this coming week 3/5 of those guys are coming back or anything... Whatever.
>> Anonymous
>>344638
Their WRs are fucking awful, and their number 2 running back? Really? The one to turn the team around is a guy who isn't even number 1 on a terrible team?

Seattle is one of the worst teams in the league. You are a digusting homer.
>> Anonymous
>>344641
Co-Number 1 RB, sorry. And after this coming Rams game and Bye week, Branch and Engram are back. You are a closed minded idiot and are probably an Arizona fan if you really believe half the shit you are writing. HOMER HOMER HOMER HOMER HOMER HOMER HOMER HOMER HOMER HOMER HOMER HOMER HOMER HOMER HOMER HOMER HOMER HOMER HOMER HOMER HOMER HOMER
>> Anonymous
>>344638
You hear that, guys? Returning offensive players will stop teams from scoring 30+ points on you!
>> Anonymous
>>344658
Oh, yeah, I forgot that points off turnovers don't count toward the total score! That's my problem!
>> Anonymous
It's funny. A month or two ago, I said the Broncos would win 10 games, and everyone just balked at that statement.

Now everyone is picking them to win the division.
>> Anonymous
>>344674
lolmerriman.
>> Anonymous
Not a seattle fan, but considering their injuries, if they can stay healthy from now on, they should still win the division. They have lost 6 WR, 2 O-lineman, a RB, a QB/WR and a DT. They also have their QB, CB and LB playing with significant injuries.
>> Anonymous
>>344683
All but 2 WRs will be fine in 2 weeks. Thank you for this post.
>> Anonymous
>>344674
I said that too. I posted the schedule and had them going 10-6.

I was met very poorly.
>> Anonymous
>>344695

Looking at the Schedule there's no reason why they shouldn't be 6-1 before the bye. They have Nawlins and the LOLiefs next. They have a pretty easy schedule even after the bye. Miami, Cleveland, Atlanta, then LOakland again.
>> Zycho32
I want to see a Packers-Jets Superbowl, for the following reasons:

1. Rodgers vs. Favre. This is like what could've happened in '93 with Steve Young versus Joe Montana.

2. The draft pick GB got from the Jets automatically upgrades to a 1st round pick if Favre has the majority of the snaps.

3. Rodgers outperforming Favre in a Packers victory would settle the debate between the two once and for all (and you KNOW this debate will never be silenced otherwise)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I'l­l ­ju­st le­a­ve this ­here­.
>> Anonymous
>North: GB

I'm not buying that yet. They beat the Kitties and narrowly beat the team with the worst starting QB in the NFL at home.They've got a rough stretch coming up in 4 of the next 5 games (Dallas, @TB, @Seattle, Indy), but if they can pick up three more wins by Week 8 I would agree that they're legit.
>> Anonymous
AFC:
East: Bills
West: Broncos
North: Steelers
South: Colts
Wildcard: Titans, Chargers

NFC:
East: Cowboys
West: Cardinals
North: Packers
South: Panthers
Wildcard: Giants, Eagles