File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
does anyone have plans/diagrams for this thingy http://www.metacafe.com/watch/787816/perfectly_3d_star_one_of_the_best_of_origami/ ? it looks so cool...
>> Anonymous
image related? O_o
>> Anonymous
>>96417

does it matter so much anymore
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
the metcafe link
>> Anonymous
>>96410
DO WANT!
>> Anonymous
>>96845
Babytalk (or /b/ talk) gets you nowhere.
>> Anonymous
>>96410
>>96850
I would also like this.
Better?
>> Anonymous
*stares at it*
*stares at it some more*
*reads the person's pages*
Okay. They reinforced it somewhat, but I can see how it's made. It's a 90 unit ball, and the hinging is the only part that eludes me at the moment. My experience with them is that it wouldn't keep its shape; the flaps wouldn't stay locked in the open or closed position.

In any case, there are two units that could be used to create said figure... I'll see about scanning or photographing the pages this evening.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
You may want to pay attention to the text as well on these next 3 posts.

This is the first of two pages for making units like the ones used in the video. To make the star, you'll need 90 squares of paper; 60 of one color, 30 of another.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
You'll need to join the groups together after rewatching the video; the pattern's easy enough to see; 60 three-sided pyramids, each made using half of one of these units. It's a lot of paper and a lot of work... and I'm still not sure how well it'll transform. Did the author use tape or staples, as they said in their profile on that website? Who knows...
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
If you want to use less paper and have a different result, this uses 1:2 rectangles; you can make it with 45 sheets; 15 of one color, 30 of another. These units leave a small hole at the pointed end, but look really nice when completed. They're also easier to fold.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Here's what 120 of these units look like when they're put into a non-transforming figure.
>> Anonymous
thx for the scans...ill try to see if i can get somewhere with it