File :-(, x, )
BTTF Delorean Anonymous
So, /po/, did anyone find the template for this?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
So I googled delorean papercraft and in the images I found what appears to be the source of the picture: http://ghostman.zombie.jp/bttf.html

With Babelfish I got this: "To back the future ????? papercraft A4size 5, metal silver printing and 1/20 scales, total length approximately 22cm. It changes to four types with part replacement. Back to the future 20th anniversary DVD BOX benefit: ????? papercraft"

So I'm guessing it's a gift in some kind of special DVD box. I even clicked the link provided (http://www.universalpictures.jp/backtothefuture20thaniv/) where I found the picture to the left.
>> Anonymous
I knew I saw this somewhere. After a small search, I found it.

http://www.paperinside.com/delorean

The model is extremely detailed. Good luck.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>26480
That one's actually more detailed than the one that comes with the special anniversary edition DVD box (allthough that one has interchangable parts that you can "switch" so you can make it look like the Delorean from the different movies).
Also, as you can see in the picture (< ---) an important part of why the model from Paperinside looks so good, is because it also uses non-paper parts; I think you should keep that in mind, be sure to have those parts!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Most people will have the small electrical wires, but there are some parts that I for on know I don't have
don't know if it'll look quite as cool without all those wiring (it probably will, but it'll look just that litlle bit cooler with them). Personally, I always hate it when papercraft designers cheat like this, I prefer 100% paper models, even if that means the wires will just be textures and it won't be an exact scale model of the Delorean (but if wanted that, I'd buy a resin kit or something ;o)
>> Simple Model Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Found.

http://www7a.biglobe.ne.jp/~sf-papercraft/download/gallery2/
>> Anonymous
>>27122

Not the same as OP, but much more simple than the one with the wires.