>> |
Srs Critique Fag
!2y1il5Qy0g
Wow, /p/'s pretty gentle today.
>>222807 First thing I noticed was the bokeh. It really is busy, but I guess it's not too bad. I still prefer something smoother and more creamy, but it's not like it ruins the shot. The outfit's a good choice: Simple, but still eye-catching enough with those heels (but lose the fucking watch). Did you add faux dust and scratches to this? Because it really isn't necessary. You can hardly see it and it doesn't add anything even if it was noticeable. However, you really seemed to have taken some of my advice with loosening up your subjects. We can see she's relaxed and probably laughing about some crack about a priest, a rabbi, and the Trix rabbit walking into a bar. Her face is a little weird, but it's okay. The firetruck is an interesting choice of background, but whatever, it works. A strong start to the thread so far. Nothing too bad I can say about this one.
>>222809 Wow, bold, striking. Instead of having empty composition, you justified it with the mural in the background. Her face is a little too contrasty here (a post-processing mistake), but the lighting is spot on. That tree bothers me. It looks like one of those little things you don't notice until after the shot's taken. Also, she kinda looks fat with this pose, another little thing you don't really notice until the shot's taken. This is why it's good to stop and really study your shots every now and again while models change, reapply makeup, etc.
>>222810 Nice, pleasing. The moving car really adds to this shot. Your post-processing saturation isn't too bad here. It's enough to really bring out the background (which is obviously a bigger part of the photo because of how far away you are from the model). Once again, your model looks fat. Why? Pose and lighting's great. What are you using for a light source? It looks like you have something big nearby.
|