File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
is this a good /p/hoto?
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2008:04:15 18:53:31Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width800Image Height724
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
BURT!
>> Anonymous
It's gay as shit, but I kind of like it.
>> soulr !lK4GD5SleY
what photo?
>> Anonymous
Only if you were trying to mimic one of those pre-20th century photographs. Or some album cover for a 90's alternative band.
>> Anonymous
>>257652

I guess that makes you kinda gay.
>> Anonymous
I like it.
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
inb4:
Vignet Dog
USM Tree
B\W = Insta-art
"Its out of focus, therefore its not a good photo"
>> Anonymous
>>257943
>>"Its out of focus, therefore its not a good photo"
Martin, we discussed this yesterday. AND THE FACT STILL HOLDS.
>> Anonymous
>>257997
The Magnum Photos archive actually has a tag/keyword "out of focus."
>> else !L6xabslN96
>>257643
it probably contravenes all definitions of a photo because its shooped to shit. but i really like it. a lot. could be an album cover for a post-rock band.
>> heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA
     File :-(, x)
>>258004
Ian Berry, damn.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>258027
Pfft. Out of focus and underexposed. Very amateurish. You'll never get anywhere in the photography world taking pictures like that.
>> heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>258027
>>258029
holy crap gtfo
sell your camera
sage for blurry insta-art
>> Anonymous
>>258031
I lol'ed long and loud.
>> heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>258038

Who's this? I recognize the other uncredited one as Larry Towell, but I've never seen this one before.
>> Anonymous
>>257943
martin, just fucking leave, please
>> heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA
>>258042
Rene Burri
>> Anonymous
>>257943

Martin, you're a fucking idiot.
Any of that shit is fine WHEN IT'S DONE ON PURPOSE TO CONVEY SOMETHING.
However when it's done because someone is SHITTY WITH THEIR CAMERA it isn't acceptable.

Learn the difference or go home.
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
>>258058
all i have to say to this is you're only making my ego even bigger

I'll leave, when you faggot anon's actually contribute to /p/, other than just flaming.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>258062
"Hot pixel" implies that it's a pixel that's broken all the time. Most (all?) digital cameras will have some specs like that with an exposure that long, but the pixels will be perfectly fine the rest of the time.
>> Anonymous
>>258066

I think you're in the wrong room.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>258093
Hey, you're right, I am.

All of these internet arguments sort of flow together after a while...
>> Anonymous
I like it
>> Anonymous
>>258066
>>258062
I am starting to think that martin and ac are fuck-buddies. Any thread they're both in has character of two guys who have swallowed each other's cum.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>258110
You know, in this particular case, I was disagreeing with him. But you can probably be forgiven for not catching that since I was accidentally disagreeing with a point he was trying to make in a completely different thread.
>> Anonymous
>>258111
yeah, I know you were disagreing with him and that's what made me think of it. It's sort of like "I did NOT have sex with that man!". Like you two are secret spouses. All I want to know is who's the top and who's the bottom?
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>258115
My heart belongs to Heavyweather
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
</3


.. bitch