File :-(, x, )
heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA

EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5DImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2008:09:19 02:12:03Exposure Time1/80 secExposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
So what bro? I've seen plenty of shallow dof in my lifetime.

Give me some hot TAs making out on a table, and you'll get my thanks though.
>> Anonymous
awesome snapshot
>> heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA
     File :-(, x)


Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5DImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2008:09:19 02:32:24Exposure Time1/125 secExposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating640Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> i - !EoFJjFcCco
I find the piece of paper to be an annoyance, otherwise great.
>> beethy !vW/UaE6zYU
     File :-(, x)
>>257831
>> Anonymous
>>257831
>>257838
oh lawd....
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>257838

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 350D DIGITALFirmware VersionJames French and Rochelle JagerSerial Number1530723441Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:08:30 20:33:31RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure Time1/20 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2304Image Height3456
>> Anonymous
>>257873

It's a sad day for me when shit like this makes lol.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>257831
So is this actually Kevin Smith?

If so, I think I hate you a little for getting to photograph him.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>257873
fixed

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 350D DIGITALImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:08:30 20:33:31RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure Time1/20 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2304Image Height3456
>> Anonymous
>>257991

its not, or i would hate him for photographing him poorly
>> Anonymous
I fucking hate the bokeh on that lens, heavy. It's so goddamn distracting.
>> Anonymous
More proof that Heavyweather may be the King of Gear, but he's a shitty fucking photographer.
>> heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA
     File :-(, x)
I actually have been shooting stopped down lately... the results are so pleasant at f/4, it's just unreal. Super smooth bokeh, really sharp subjects, nice comfortable amount of depth of field. It's a little harder to focus at f/4, but worth the squinting.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5DImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2008:09:19 17:01:14Exposure Time1/60 secExposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating800Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA
     File :-(, x)
>>258135
Correction: shitty fucking *employed* photographer

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5DImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2008:09:19 17:11:32Exposure Time1/60 secExposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating3200Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
Someone needs to write a script that will reply to every photograph heavyweather posts with the comment

>nice snapshot, faggot
>> Anonymous
>>258138
What lens is all this about, the 50/1.2?
>> Anonymous
>>258146
>Correction: shitty fucking *makingminimumwageatacollegenewspaper* photographer
>> Anonymous
I think heavyweather catches so much flack around here because you can tell through his photographs he's working toward his goal and that he's going to get it. It's tough coming to grips with someone doing something you wish you were doing.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>258147
>Someone needs to write a script that will reply to every photograph heavyweather posts with the comment
Writing a script seems like an awful lot of work to do when some Anonymous faggot always has enough time to do it manually. It's like, why should a car manufacturer buy an expensive welding robot when you can pay a Mexican a nickel a day to do it?
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
Quality Control?


..ouch
>> Anonymous
>>258155
>I think heavyweather catches so much flack around here because you can tell through his photographs he's working toward his goal and that he's going to get it. It's tough coming to grips with someone doing something you wish you were doing.

What goal is that, pray tell?
Trying to turn shitty snapshots into insta-art through massive bokeh?
Taking remarkably uninspired journalistic snapshots?
>> Anonymous
>>257827

...the dude's face is the same color as the ceiling...
>> Anonymous
he should just run off to his little buttpirate party flickr group and stay the fuck out of 4chan
>> Anonymous
>>258175
anon speaks the truth.

Sure, his shots are good on a technical level (focus, lighting, etc) for the most part, but they're still always these simple un-interesting snapshots.

fuck, where's a pksaught when you need him. at least that guy's stuff was worty of a 300 post flamethread.
>> Anonymous
>>257827
You know, it's not that bad. Could use some work. But interesting angle. Could be a good stock photo.

>>257831
I.. I don't like this photo. Good tone on the skin tone, but imo too much overexposed window.


but agreed with anon above, you are the king of gear and bokeh
>> heavyweather !4AbbfVlFvc
>>258209
>>258221

ITT: Trolls spew hate because they're jealous that I get *paid* for my work.
>> Anonymous
>>258244

>>258221here.
it's called constructive criticism, if you ever want to sell anything to anyone other than your relatives you should probably learn to accept it.
>> Anonymous
>>258244oh hai, i'm a douchebag

the whole heavyweather/ac/dc/beethy crew is obviously way too awesome to be hanging out with us

we should just be happy they would consider posting on here and accept everything they do
>> Anonymous
>>258252
they post here because if they shared their garbage with, you know, competent photographers, they'd get laughed off the internet.

here on /p/, we're much dumber when it comes to photography, and some people, if it isn't the tripfag circlejerk, seem to even think they put good stuff out sometimes.
>> Anonymous
/p/ is like the early zones in MMORPGs. You level up enuff and you can start posting yor pics on Photography-on-the-net then Dpreview then Fredmiranda.com
>> Anonymous
>>258244

Sheesh. When did you become such a pathetic egotistical diva? Get off of your high horse or don't bother posting if you can't handle criticism.
>> Seriously? Anonymous
What do you want? what do you expect?

"hmm, which one should I post? ~scrolling~ ~scrolling~ chair in empty hallway, nope. person walking away from camera, nope. AHHH HERES THE ONE! its that one I took when i was trying to get people to notice that i had a camera and ask me about my photography, well... one of the ones. everyone on 4chan is gonna say how profound and technically correct it is, then i can talk about all my equipment! if anyone trys to cut me down i'll just tell them i'm a professional. a professional is technically someone who gets paid to do something, and those kids in the band that live next door payed me $20 to take pictures for their myspace! i AM a professional! lemme just randomly move sliders around in photoshop thinking i'm some sort of pixel alchemist until i arrive right back where i started...THERE! be sure not to post subject or comment... SUBMIT!"

If you had any class you would never post a photo here. I AM a photographer. I DO get paid. I can't tell you where, and I can't post any photos because someone may recognize one. I CAN tell you that I make more than you do, and I don't need (nor want) the approval of anyone who would post a photo here.

p.s. I lurk gearthreads
>> beethy !vW/UaE6zYU
>>258252
>>258254
hahahaha you guys are such bitter butthurt little fags who i know can't take photos or do anything creative worth a shit
it's true and you know it : D
>> Anonymous
>>258302

iceburn. marry me.
>> Anonymous
>>258307

YOU ARE THE CANCER
>> Anonymous
>>258302

</p>
>> Depressed Cheesecake !tZgmt2G.RA
>>258302
> I AM a photographer. I DO get paid. I can't tell you where, and I can't post any photos because someone may recognize one. I CAN tell you that I make more than you do

Bullshit.

If you were a TRUE PRO PHOTOG you would have something that's not in your portfolio and wasn't done for a client that you could post here to HARD PWN heavyweather.

The fact that you aren't posting shit means you aren't shit, and you're just another Anonymous fag talking tough and waggling you e-peen around with nothing to show for it.
>> Anonymous
here comes the tripfag circle jerk session. ready to white knight wherever there is criticism.
>> Anonymous
<Ignoring the oncoming drama and shitstorm that is brewing>

I find this set uninspired and unimpressive. What were you attempting? What are you trying to say with these? They appear to be random snapshots taken while you were bored at uni and little else. There's not even the always-welcome hot girl in the frame to make it worth our while when stuck with mediocre work.

What makes you feel that these are good or worthy photographs?

Before you get butthurt or upset, please note that I am saying this because you are presumably asking for responses in order to better yourself by posting this thread and I am not raging or insulting you and your family randomly.
>> Anonymous
>>258314

I'm pretty sure any "pro photog" (nobody with self respect uses that term) 's career would be real ruined real fast if anyone found out they post on 4chan. the fact that Mr. Miller posts his name to affiliate himself with 4chan basically guarantees his career will never rise above the level of college newspaper. it's pretty easy to make all sorts of assumptions when you've never been there and don't know what it's like. If you knew anything about the business-end you would know how important reputation is. But I bet you're extra excited that you got to use the words "portfolio" and "client".

maybe school portraits, that may also be a good career choice for mr. miller
>> Anonymous
>>258307
I won't deny it. i can't take pictures worth a shit. so what, i can still see when someone else can't do it either.

man, i used to think that the idea of trip fags circle-jerking was a joke, but this thread proves it isn't.

enjoy your aids, faggots.
>> Anonymous
>>258328

its not even fun to lurk /p/ anymore
>> savage !!4UjFwZgP/SG
>>258328
fap fap fap fap fap fap
>> Anonymous
>>258324
>I'm pretty sure any "pro photog" (nobody with self respect uses that term) 's career would be real ruined real fast if anyone found out they post on 4chan. the fact that Mr. Miller posts his name to affiliate himself with 4chan basically guarantees his career will never rise above the level of college newspaper. it's pretty easy to make all sorts of assumptions when you've never been there and don't know what it's like. If you knew anything about the business-end you would know how important reputation is. But I bet you're extra excited that you got to use the words "portfolio" and "client".


I hate tripfags, but I'm surprised at how retarded this post is.

As megafaggot DC pointed out, anyone who's actually a professional photographer ought to have an image or two on hand that they don't keep in their portfolio and that aren't identifiable as their work that they could post to show technical skill and aptitude.

You want to talk about reputation? Most celebrity photographers build their reputation by doing outrageous things, and considering what hot shit 4chan is in the media right now being aligned with 4chan would certainly be no worse than Jill Greenberg's bullshit with McCain or the copious tits & ass that fill the frames of indie photographers these days.

I don't like defending DC's position, but he's right on this one, and your post makes it painfully clear that you have no idea what you're talking about.
>> Anonymous
>>258349

if you knew who i was you'd know you are wrong. continue feeling superior. too bad nobody is gonna send you any checks for that.
>> Anonymous
>>258359
I know who you are but I am going to let you troll these idiots anonymously.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>258244
>ITT: Trolls spew hate because they're jealous that I get *paid* for my work.
I'm with you on most of this, man, but>>258221looks like constructive criticism to me.
>> Anonymous
>>258359
>if you knew who i was you'd know you are wrong. continue feeling superior. too bad nobody is gonna send you any checks for that.

Bullshit talk like this just proves my point.
You may do "pro" work, but it's increasingly clear that if you *do* get paid for photography it's to to do skill-less work like take pictures of shoes for a website.

The tripfags here may suck, but at least they post photos.
Enjoy failing worse than Heavyweather, DC, Beethy, and AC combined.
>> Anonymous
>>where's a pksaught when you need him

lol.Oh god you want to see a circle jerk then this guy is the best bait for that. Ive never seen so many faggots turn tail and completely change their stance on what is good photography what this prick is around. One second over processed HDR images are bad the next..........BEST PHOTOGRAPHER EVER.
>> Anonymous
>>258506

Pskaught doesn't do HDR you dumb fuck.
>> Anonymous
/p/ is full of fucking idiots. the tripfags are the worst.
there have been two maybe three ppl in /p/'s entire life that are actually educated. i think one is still around.

the problem with /p/ is that the idiots(tripfags) dont have the first fucking clue about creativity. They think all you need is more lights and a better camera. Thats fine, if you want to relate to photography on a purely technical level go ahead. Dont try and explain anything to them that is out of their comfort zone. Creativity isnt a given. It doesn't magically come over time or spawn from taking more photos. None of these tripfags spend more than a day on one thing and then expect fruition from it.

Things wont fall in front of your camera and make you a "good photographer". That isnt enough. Millions of idiots can go and spend a months wages on a camera and a few fucking lenses. That doesnt mean shit. How do you differentiate yourself from the droves that can take "nice" picuters? Thats the problem with /p/.
>> Anonymous
>>257827

I like this one, good spotting on the color. The composition of the people in the background frames this guy well. Could use some more sharpening.

>>257831
Shit sucks, I'm sorry. Looks uncomposed and the blown highlights are distracting. Use that 36x24mm sensor and underexpose a little.

>>258138
Good, but the guy in the background's pose doesn't jive compositionally with the guy in the foreground.

>>258146
Simple but very nice. Either this or the OP is the best of the lot.

Overall, though, they're kinda meh. Good meh, meh someone like you who knows what he's doing and is very talented, but meh. There's nothing *wrong* with them, but they lack that organic, lively quality that characterizes really good photographs. Focus on working on that intangible thing, you've pulled it off before and you've got all the foundation perfect.

>>258256
I don't know anything about the work on Photography-on-the-net or Fred Miranda, but I seriously lol'ed at the idea of /p/ being lower than the DP Review forums.
>> Anonymous
>>258512

who fucking cares what shitty ass Dave Hill want-to-be look that prick uses. its still over shopped shit.

lets not split hairs about what the "technique" is called lets just agree that photoshop isnt a magic tool that can polish a turd.
>> Anonymous
>>258523
>BAWWWW

I don't like tripfags either, but they're responsible for the majority of the non-shit content on this board.
>> Anonymous
>>258530

LIKE FUCKING WHAT? what do they contribute. tell me. what?
>> Anonymous
>>258529
>lets just agree that photoshop isnt a magic tool that can polish a turd.

No shit.
But pskaught's composition, lighting, and staging are quite good, and his images look even better without the shooping.

Keep trolling though.
It's cool to see fags like you show off how little you know.
>> Anonymous
>>258530

yeah your right ac contributes some fantastic information about like cameras and stuff. i think he uses google to like copy and paste technical info and stats and things. it doesnt really matter that he doesnt actually post any photos himself. Or well, yeah he does but they are shit.

heavyweather posts a lot of really mundane shit but at least he is posting.
>> Anonymous
>>258532
>LIKE FUCKING WHAT? what do they contribute. tell me. what?

LOOK AT THE FUCKING THREADS ON THIS BOARD YOU ASSHOLE.

The ones that aren't started by tripfags are gearwankery and PICTURES OF DEAD PIGEONS.

GET THE FUCK OUT OF /p/ IF YOU HATE IT SO MUCH.
>> heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA
     File :-(, x)
ITT plenty of material for meteorologists to study for years to come on the formation and structure of shitstorms.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5DImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2008:09:20 10:55:58Exposure Time1/200 secExposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating800Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
>>258532
Wow lurk moar
>> Anonymous
>>258534

that wasn't even a retort to what i said.

scott does what every fucker on strobists blog and flickr do with a few lights. the content, of which there is none, contains nothing redeeming. As a person, hes a prick. He likes ppl like you that have no idea about photography to lick his ass.
>> Anonymous
>>258542

Go fuck yourself, Heavy.
I may be defending tripfags, but your massive overuse of small DOF and total lack of improvement are annoying as fuck, and these trolls have plenty of valid criticism of your self-righteous shit.
>> Anonymous
>>258542
Come on Heavy. I have seen you take better photos than this. I think you are stuck in a rut.
>> Anonymous
>>258547
>BAWWWWW why aren't I as popular as Pskaught!

Post something better, faggot.
>> Anonymous
>>258539

Oh yeah this thread is fucking fantastic all these fucking photos are so fucking good.

id rather see what is considered "shit" photographs like that dead pigeon than all this pretentious shit that is in no way better.
>> Anonymous
>>258523
What, you? You're the Last True Artist on /p/.

I agree with your thesis but it's applied to mostly the wrong people. From the Tripfags:

Heavyweather is good and I'm certain will make it as a good PJ, market, networking and business bullshit permitting, DC was good before he fell into the gearwhoring, let's-shoot-generic-pretty-models-and-call-it-a-day trap you're talking about, Soulr is good (check his portfolio thread, it's awesome), pskaught is good, Beethy has potential and creativity but he learned his aesthetics from DeviantArt and he's growing out of that, Liska's old pre-model, pre-digital stuff is good, Jeremo was good but he left, Sage is lacking in the creativity department at this point but her posts make it clear she understands it's important and she's improving, some of her street stuff has been quite good.

Do I need to go on?
>> Anonymous
>>258523
>What, you? You're the Last True Artist on /p/?

Whoops, typo. Fixed.
>> Anonymous
>>258552
>id rather see what is considered "shit" photographs like that dead pigeon than all this pretentious shit that is in no way better.

0/10
>> Anonymous
>>258551

sorry bud you have nothing. Why dont you try and construct something rather than that mis mash of old memes and sentence fragments.
>> Anonymous
>>258556
>sorry bud you have nothing. Why dont you try and construct something rather than that mis mash of old memes and sentence fragments.

Post something.
Show us what a great artist you are.
Show us your technical mastery of the art.

Post *anything*.
>> Anonymous
>>258553

yeah your right to an extent. if you only consider whats posted within the context of /p/. it sure must be fun being the king of the castle when all of your subjects are shit.

mostly every thread on /p/ is full of trolling because its so easy to do. you guys always fall for the bait.
>> Anonymous
>>258561

Non-posting fags like you are worse than the tripfags.
YOU are the cancer that keeps /p/ from ever getting better because you troll every thread that comes up, and the better the work is the harder you troll it, making sure that anyone who's any good leaves /p/ as soon as they get here.

Reported for trolling, asshole.
Get the fuck out.
>> Anonymous
>>258558

Again you've tried and failed to move the argument away from yourself. that "i know you are but what am i" mentality is, as you've proved, for morons. Why dont you copy and paste another line from this, greentext highlight with some of your bullshit underneath. i see a pattern.
>> Anonymous
>>258551
Srsly, do this.
You don't have to post something that you've shot yourself, just post something you consider to be good. I fucking hate this, everyone is complaining about tripfags sucking but they never tell what they actually like and what to improve. Be constructive and post examples, please.
>> Anonymous
>>258562

you cant talk about the subject on the level the pothers have so you try and break it down to your moronic level or pull these strawman arguments out. your not doing to well son.
>> Anonymous
>>258563
>Again you've tried and failed to move the argument away from yourself. that "i know you are but what am i" mentality is, as you've proved, for morons. Why dont you copy and paste another line from this, greentext highlight with some of your bullshit underneath. i see a pattern.

1.) This isn't about me. This is a discussion about tripfags. I am Anon.

2.) I made the statement that Tripfags, though vile, provide more non-shit content to /p/ than anon does. Instead of attempting to disprove me, you just keep repeating yourself.

3.) You also have nothing of your own to show, so not only can you not prove that Tripfags don't contribute significantly to /p/, but you can't even back up your statements with your own work.

4.) You continue to fail, hard.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>258568

the tripfags dont add anything to /p/ apart from making it shitter. how do they make /p/ better. they may post alot but none of the posts are good.

>>258565
this is good.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>258572
Tripfags are no different to Anonymous.
>> Anonymous
>>258572
>this is good.

0/10
>> Anonymous
>>258574

no. you mark your shit.
>> Anonymous
>>258578

marked shit is better than no shit at all.
>> Anonymous
>>258572
Fail troll is made of fail.
>> Anonymous
>>258583

sockpuppet much?
>> Anonymous
>>258572
Yeah, sure, it may be good, but it is not related to heavyweather or pskaught's work. It's sort of like talking about what makes a good comedy film and show Schindler's List as an example of that.
>> Anonymous
>>258578
Which is decidedly less pretentious than removing your name to post pictures to keep them OH-SO-MYSTERIOUS

98% of the pictures posted here are posted by tripfags, and probably 25% of the Anonymous image posts are tripfags posting as Anon like I am right now.

Inb4 hi DC/Beethy/AC/Heavyweather/Vincent/Natureguy/Sage/Butterfly/Poopbiscuits/Ilkore/namefaggotry.
>> Anonymous
>>258589

do you understand the basic fundamental structure of 4chan. no one removes their name. You choose to post a tripcode or not.

>>258586

Anything is better than heaveywaethers pics and if you want something that is better than scott just Google dave hill.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>258589
Pfft. You're totally ac. It's so obvious.
>> Anonymous
>>258589
I heard you helped destroyed the world...
>> Anonymous
>>258593
The moron I was responding to believes that tripfags "marking" their shit makes them pretentious. If you wanted the tripfags to post their pictures anonymously, they would need to remove their tripcode. Whether you say using a tripcode period is pretentious is your call, but if you pull out the whole "4CHAN IS LEGIONNNN!" thing then I'm just gonna hope you get your head stuck in a microwave underwater.
>> Anonymous
>>258600

We are Anonymous.
We are Legion.
We do not forgive.
We do not forget.
>> Anonymous
>>258593
Meh. Of course Dave Hill is better. Pskaught is not very far away though and probably doesn't have the extra $$$ to be able to do such high budget shoots like Dave Hill is doing. And I actually prefer pskaught's to Dave Hill's. Dave Hill's photos are too... cluttered? Can't really find a good word for it I guess. And yes, Dave Hill is better but that's not really a fair comparison. It's kinda like saying you suck just because your not as good as Henri Cartier Bresson.
>> Anonymous
thank you /p/ for turning an average shitty snapshot thread into a flamefest of memorable proportions.

my hat off to you.
>> Anonymous
This>>258635

Also, you are a faggot, heavyweather. Grow some balls.
>> archive archive
this epic battle between anon & tripfags should be saved forever
>> Anonymous
The only good name users on /p/ are:

Serenar
Warren
NatureGuy

Compare their posts to other name users.

All the other ones can be read as: ME! ME! ME!

Bunch of self-centered, egotistical brats. Vincent doesn't even make the cut with his wedding bullshit.

And Butterfly deserves a nomination of best tripfag ever, all things considered.

Don't give me that /p/ has changed bullshit. If you wanted serious advice and conversations, you wouldn't be posting on fucking 4chan with dickgirl hentai and vagina eel JAV.

Give me a fucking break with your holier-than-thou attitude and get the fuck out of 4chan if you can't take it.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>258798
Delicious pasta is well flavoured but stale.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>258807sony sells more dslrs than nikon
>> Anonymous
archive
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Remember when Beethy quit 4chan for the second time?

Somebody should post some pix of LONG NIP WONG for old time's sake.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>258815
I hate Butterfly as much as the next guy, but she was talking overall digital camera sales there, not just DSLR sales.
>> Anonymous
>>258815

hahaha, that statement is right, you know.

Sony is only second to Canon when it comes to sales of digital cameras. He never specifically mentioned DSLRs, which in case you didn't know, are not the only kinds of cameras either canon or sony make.
>> Anonymous
Why does everyone hate Butterfly so much?

I find her to be one of the best Tripfags on /p/.
Her photography may not be ZOMG BEST EVAR but she's at least very humble about it and freely admits when she sucks.

At least she doesn't fly into a rage whenever someone criticizes her, like Depressed Cheesecake or Beethy.
>> Anonymous
>>258821

okay, ac, master of /p/

i have that thread saved, please do not contradict me
>> Anonymous
>>258821
>>258824

ugh, i never save anything not worth saving for later usage

i was the one who called him out on that and proceeded to post sales figures by dslr and total sales from CNET

and after seeing those, butterfly replied by saying oh the numbers i saw must've been very old then

come on, people, you should know by now my /p/ archive is entirely bulletproof and accurate of what /p/ posters are
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>258827
>Why does everyone hate Butterfly so much?
I've seen her post maybe 7 pictures total in the time I've been here. Did she post a crapload while I was gone?

Also, she constantly trolls any gear-related threads with Sonyfaggotry.

And if proven wrong, she invariably responds with "Ha ha i was just kidding lol"
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>258835
in order, yes, no not anymore and only when its appropriate.

Also, saving posts by tripfags, how fucking butthurt can you get?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>258838Also, saving posts by tripfags, how fucking butthurt can you get?

first of all, who is being butthurt now?

with that said

please, do not flatter yourselves

i do this on every forum i frequent regulargly and i only bother saving memorable quotes when they exhibit flagrant stupidity

it's not exactly my fault some people are stupid enough to post with a name on an anonymous board and that just about every one of those name users is stupid

no offense or anything
>> Anonymous
>>258835
>I tried hitting on her and she turned me down.

Oooooh, ok.
Makes sense.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>258846
Pfft. If that were enough to make me hate a woman, I'd be a total misogynist.
>> Anonymous
lol i can remember when most of the trip fags left 4chan. IM NOT COMING BACK BAW BAWBLAAAAHHH.

strange enough most of them have .
>> Anonymous
that's because the good ones can actually do without being on /p/

the heavyweather/ac/dc/beethy crew needs way too much attention whoring to leave
>> Anonymous
>>258859

the ones that said they left never fucking did.
>> Anonymous
>>258856
>lol i can remember when most of the trip fags left 4chan. IM NOT COMING BACK BAW BAWBLAAAAHHH.

>strange enough *ALL* of them have .
>> Anonymous
>>258861

yeah.. that's kind of what i implied :|
>> Anonymous
fuck off sockpuppet. if you guys really want to show your stripes then thats fine. im willing to show yours.