>> |
BlackAdder
!!bSWRwu/NqzQ
Seeing as you asked I'll nitpick where I can and voice my opinion.
>>95140
I like this one. Interesting geometric shapes and architecture. No complaints.
>>95143
I'd have liked to have seen more of it as it's an amazing and detailed object as it is. I look at that and feel I want more.
>>95141
I'm guessing the lion was the subject here, but it feels confusing in that I don't know what I am supposed to be looking at. The eye isn't drawn to or across anything and there isn't a balance to it. What's the subject or feature of the photo?
>>95142
The choice of subject is good, but the framing seems off. It'd have looked a little better if I could see all of the statue in a portrait aspect instead, rather than the legs cut off at the knees and the rest of the pattern, arch and column attached on their heads to distract me.
>>95144 >>95147
I like the shots of the guards, but I think they'd look better if you'd shuffled around and framed it a little differently. In the first one you can see the subject at the front has his feet cut off, which annoys me and there's a lot of wall and window space at the top that isn't adding anything at the same time. With the second one this isn't so much of a problem because of the swords pointing up that gives the space a little more meaning, but maybe you'd have been better off framing or isolating the two saluting in some way. It still feels a little dull and unexciting though, like a good but standard tourist snapshot of the changing of the guards. Perhaps you were restricted in where you can go, considering this wasn't just an open park, but that is what niggles with those ones.
>>95149
The couple in that shot were what would have made it for me and my eyes were drawn to them as the point of interest, but they look like they are almost dropping off the frame and were in it by accident. I think the photo would have benefited from making them more of a feature of it. It's very nearly very good.
|