File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
d40fag here, learned to fix this up in postprocessing, but would a high end D300, 5D, D3 whatever etc have made any difference in the exposure of the original shot ? i guess they do not, but i am curious... i believe it's just a general problem of photography since IRL your eyes adjust as you focus and in a photo everything has to look "as real" with the same amount of light.
obviously it can get out of hand with hdr....

i think camera makes no difference here execpt for perhaps less noise in the darker areas if you have to brighten up a few stops to get things "right".
>> M?e?e?s?e??? !iZn5BCIpug
>>240239
cool story bro
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
Larger sensor = better DR?

I think yes but not by much, a real grad ND would have helped the most.
>> M?e?e?s?e??? !iZn5BCIpug
     File :-(, x)
buy this
>> Anonymous
>>240243
yes, the original is iso200, and the lower half is up more than 1 stop i'd guess, so in this way the upper half is iso200 but the lower is (effectively) somewhere between iso400-iso800... where with the real filter it would all be iso200. maybe there are other benefits i'm not aware of... maybe composing with the filter is better.