A shot from an interview that I edited, be as critical as you can please.processing:1-adjust wb2-adjust to have true black and white3-add a wee bit of contrast4-unsharp mask5-cropped to current stateEXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 40DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshMaximum Lens Aperturef/5.2Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution580 dpiVertical Resolution580 dpiImage Created2008:09:17 15:01:36Exposure Time1/10 secF-Numberf/4.5Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/4.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2000Image Height698RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
Looks like a standerd shot, nothing more, but nothing wrong with it...Put that text back on the board! taking it away dose nothing but make you go "why do they have a tiny black board with a petrol pump on it??"
yeah, I suppose. I removed it because I didn't want his beliefs and stuff in the picture, just him during the interview, ya know? Although the article is about him so it could go there and shouldn;t be unexpected.
IT'S SO IN FOCUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111111111put the writing back too
>>256650>I removed it because I didn't want his beliefs and stuff in the picture>PhotojournalismWay to fucking fail, you dumb nigger.
>>256691QFT
photojournalism is the exact opposite of what you just posted
Sorry, I'm new to PJ. But thanks for letting me know. I'm just used to taking pictures and I had a friend asked me to come shoot an interview so I did. She didn't specify what she wanted so I just edited it to make him stand out more.
I looked at this picture with my eyes crossed and it didn't turn 3D.I was disappointed.