File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Now I'm torn.

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08091703canon_sx1is_sx10is.asp
>> noko
I thought cmos was crap, what's the price differential?
>> Anonymous
toniiight, I'm gonna have myseeelf a real good tiiime

I feel ali-hi-hi-hiiive

AND THE WOOOORLD IS TURNING INSIDE OOOOUT YEAH

I'm floating around.. in ecstasy, so:

DON'T. STOP. ME. NOW...
>> Anonymous
>>257009
Most of DSLRs use CMOS.

The problem with CMOS is that it's less suitable for high-density sensors because the readout circuitry tends to eat too much surface space compared to CCD, but it seems like Canon solved this.
>> Anonymous
Sample images of both the SX1 and SX10 are up.

http://web.canon.jp/imaging/BeBit-e.html
>> Anonymous
"The Canon PowerShot SX1 IS will be available from December priced at £519.99 / €679.99, and the Canon PowerShot SX10 IS is priced at £359.99 / €469.99."

Hmm. 28- 560 mm equiv. I wonder how much that will fuck with distortion and speed.
>> Anonymous
>>257022
Well, Olympus has been doing this for some time and it's not like their superzooms don't sell.
>> Anonymous
lol are those stereo microphones? great, TWO channels of garbage
>> Anonymous
>>257088
I agree. Just another fucking gimmick. Just give me the RAW meat (Oh I forgot they don't let you have RAW support on their semi's).