File :-(, x, )
Nikon D3X, WHY GOD WHY? Anonymous
>> The D3x will sport an FX-format, 24.5 megapixel sensor shooting 5fps at full resolution or 7fps at a reduced 10 megapixels.

>> Nikon made a few other tweaks including an extended ISO 50-6400 range but the body design, AF, metering, and main functions remain the same as the D3.

No video mode, price unknown. That's not what WHY GOD WHY is for though.

Maximum default ISO is 1600, 3200 and 6400 are H1 and H2. WHY GOD WHY?

This better be the same price as the D3 and not more expensive.
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width600Image Height401
>> Anonymous
>release the D3x with the same resolution and twice the fucking noise performance!

Increasing the amount of pickles is simple, but there's no ready technology yet to increase noise performance.
>> Anonymous
>>303142


I phrased it weird. The successor to the D3 would be a camera with the same resolution as the D3 but ~twice the noise performance. That would be the upgrade.
>> Anonymous
>>303146


I'm sure you could improve noise performance if you didn't jam more megafucks on the sensor every time you released a body.
>> Anonymous
35.9x24mm sensor.

WHY GOD WHY can they not make sensors with a normal 3:2 aspect ratio instead of that retarded almost 3:2 format?
>> Anonymous
>>303153


That's one of the most minor things in the world. Who gives a shit?
>> Anonymous
>>30315335.9x24mm sensor.

lol Canon has "real" 36mmx24mm sensors, Nikon likes to not use the full surface
>> sage
what the fuck is wrong with you people
>> Anonymous
uh, the d3x isnt the "successor" to the d3, its the studio version of the same camera.

Just like with the D2, you had the D2H (high speed) and the D2X (high resolution).

The D3 is your sports/news/pro cam and the D3X is your fashion/landscape/studio portrait.

Sheesh, fucking noobs with their d60s think they know shit.
>> Anonymous
>>303177
almost...
>Sheesh, fucking /p/ with their no camera/dpreview/wiki think they know shit.
>> Anonymous
fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

why no 1080p video? the D90 has it
>> sunshine
>>303188
HD doesn't necessarily = 1080p
D90 shoots 720p
>> Anonymous
>>303214
HD 1280 x 720/24 fps
VGA 640 x 424/24 fps
QVGA 320 x 216/24 fps

Just backup :D
>> Anonymous
Again old-tech released by others before Nikon and they brand it NEW because of the new fancy and a so called "ergonomic" body.

BTW, D90 video was a gimmick which Nikon was forced to put in the camera. I bet it's just a firmware hack like the Canon 40D, except Nikon made it. The technology wasnt really made to suit video shooting. (Wobbling etc)

I bet it was implemented (badly) just because Nikon did some suspicious research inside the Canon camp. "Destined evolution" campain really does add up to my theory. Canon really was the first to make a proper video shooting with an SLR.

Too bad america-fags. Nikon just lost the match.
>> Anonymous
>>303218
1/10
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>303216
...
>> sunshine
>>303218
....
Get the fuck back to skepticwiki.