File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
So does my compositions need work yet? Yeah probably more stuff to note also.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
yes
>> SAGE
interesting
how did you end up with such low contrast? i never get that look
>> Anonymous
Which one, or both? It's probably the way I scanned the negs in. Also one is HP5 and the other is Tri-X.
>> Honest So You Dont Have To Be !9UISPtwBPo
>>280065

Just expose it at a lower grade?

>>280195

HP5 very much for the win!

Its my main film, still not sure what i like best as a second though, eather Neopan 400 or FP4
>> Anonymous
>>280206
So care to guess which is which?
>> SAGE
     File :-(, x)
does /p/ like this
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
This one I discounted as a screw up. But I could going back to it.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Same with this one.
>> Honest So You Dont Have To Be !9UISPtwBPo
>>280217

>So care to guess which is which?

Not sure, both of these are very thin :P

Am going to guess>>279969for HP5, purly coz id espect allot more punch in the buidling in>>279970
>> Anonymous
>>280235
Yup, You are right.

What do you mean by thin?
>> Honest So You Dont Have To Be !9UISPtwBPo
>>280237

I mean "Thin" as in low contrast, it normally comes from eather direct light (shooting into the sun), or over exposure

Its nothing that cant be fixed by poping the grade up one when exposing though
>> Anonymous
>>280206
>>280235
>>280245

Is this bullshit, or for once dose this troll know somthing?
>> Anonymous
So any thoughts on:
>>280231and
>>280233
>> Anonymous
>>280250

I think he means up the grade in printing (like grade 4 or 5), So yes he does know something.
>> Anonymous
>>280225
Are you shooting film or digital?