>> |
Anonymous
GODDAMN FIELD LENGTH LIMIT.
>>274715 Very much win. I don't know how much of a sense of humor your editor has, but if I was yours I'd run this.
>>274720 Don't like the angle of this much at all, though it looks like you didn't have much choice. Framing is too loose again, but it looks like the best you could've gotten from that spot.
>>274726
Never thought I'd say this, but this could benefit from a significantly wider angle. Like, really wide. There's just not enough separation between the mascot and the background, though the framing is excellent.
>>274730 I can tell there's definitely a good image in here somewhere, but the processing (batch, right?) you did on it just doesn't bring it out. Maybe moderately high contrast black and white? I don't know.
Same goes for the last three, but less so. If you ever get a chance to prepare undeadlined versions of these, post them.
>>274735 Very meh.
>>274738 Messy framing, referee adds nothing, all in all pretty bad. The moment's good, but nothing else about the shot is.
>>274750 I like this a lot, but it could just be because I like media-behind-the-scenes shots a lot.
>>274761 Does your paper really not have any 500mms so you don't have to fuck around with teleconverters?
The shot is good, well-composed, but it needs more depth of field. Give the background guy a more solid shape to stand against than the one he is now.
Oh, and overall, edit tighter. That used to be the only big crit I ever had of you, and you got a lot better at it, but here and especially on your Flickr you did an epic huge photodump this time.
Oh, and did you post that "Adrian and Eli, Duvie parking lot" on here before? It's rather good.
|