File :-(, x, )
Focus trav1085
What do you think of this shot? I think my camera went off accidentally while on this, but...
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSANYO Electric Co.,Ltd.Camera ModelS4PhotographerTravis NowickiMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.7Focal Length (35mm Equiv)37 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:06:22 18:39:15Exposure Time10/263 secF-Numberf/3.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100BrightnessUnknownExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length6.20 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3264Image Height2448RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeMacroPanoramic DirectionUnknownSequence Number6Picture ModeNormalQuality SettingFine, Unknown ResolutionMacro ModeNormalDigital ZoomNoneSequential Shot MethodBestWide RangeOffColor AdjustmentOffQuick ShotOffSelf TimerOffVoice MemoOffRecord Shutter ReleaseRecord While HeldFlicker ReduceOffOptical ZoomEnabledDigital ZoomDisabledSpecial Light SourceOffImage Re-savedNoScene SelectionOff
>> Anonymous
Out of focus and uninteresting.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
It would appear that your camera went off accidentally while on this.
>> Anonymous
why do people even bother posting complete SHIT like this? Do you think we're going to say "oh wow, that is brilliant?" No. It's shit. Fuck you for posting it.
>> tokyo yomama
     File :-(, x)
>>76414

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:08:14 01:31:11Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width691Image Height156
>> Anonymous
>>76432

The bit on the left is in focus, the, er, red bits. Well, the left red bits, right red bits are fuzzy. I think the OP wanted the chain in focus, the background moving. I think it could have been done better, but the idea seems around teh right place. Much like placing your camera at teh corner of a busy street, and getting a little lapse photography-stationary street, moving cars. Whats so bad about a pic with a stationary car and moving background...
>> trav1085
Re: 76450

I never said anyone was going to say "oh wow that's so brilliant" because it's not, it's just an accidental shot. By "shit like this" I believe this is referring to your comment, otherwise it would be that. Nice going, dipshit.
>> Anonymous
>>76501
we dont care for accidental shots unless they actually happen to be good somehow. also, it seems more like you probably took it on purpose but knew we wouldnt like it so youre covering by saying it was accidental.
>> Anonymous
>>76501
First, learn how to cite a post.
Second, I'm replying to your original post, so using the phrase "shit like this" is appropriate.

Basically, you're just hurt that your "accidental" shot turned out to be shit. Go fuck yourself. If you had honestly tried to put together a nice picture and asked for c&c, I would have replied in a polite way. But trying to cover up a snapshit with "I think my camera went off accidentally on this" (which, by your logic, should say on THAT) is pretty pathetic. Just get the fuck out and never come back.
>> Anonymous
>>76414
I kinda liked it....
>> Anonymous
Even if you hadn't fucked up the focus, that would have been a shitty shot.

I'm going to presume you're just covering by saying it was an accident, because then you'd say, "hey, shitty accident. I should delete this." Instead you posted it so that the rest of us can suffer alongside you in your incompetence.

Sell your camera.