File :-(, x, )
Casual untitled Anonymous
Shot with Nikon D300, AiS 28mm f2, SB800, SB80DX.

A very simple two light setup with a reflective umbrella and bare bulb.

http://grebbin.deivantart.com
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D300Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern1066Focal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width4288Image Height2848Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16Compression SchemeUnknownPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2008:07:07 23:18:49White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceFlashFlashNo FlashFocal Length0.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width703Image Height457RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>> Anonymous
her pose is awkward and too much shadow on her face. i would've liked to see her looking direct towards the side maybe. and yeah, toes cut off doesn't work
>> Lynx !!KY+lVSl0s2m
Not bad, great setup, the only beef I have with it is the face. They was the light falls on it it makes her forehead xbox hueg. I would have probably gone with a longer lens, but otherwise, nice job.
>> Anonymous
I took them off for distraction.

It worked for the publication.
>> Anonymous
why would you use ISO 400 when you have lighting
>> Anonymous
>>244972
He didn't want to set her clothes on fire with stronger lighting?
>> Anonymous
these are small on camera flashes

they don't set anything on fire
>> Anonymous
>>244970
getting a bit sensitive there, son. welcome to 4chan. hope you're enjoying your visit
>> Anonymous
oh and sage for being a cunt
>> Sicko !L3HRY/miC.
>>244970

Is that about the toes? I don't see them being a huge distraction really...

And "It worked for the publication" is pointless, are we supposed to not criticise because some random editor liked it?

Apart from her looking downwards I rather like this, gradient of the light falling off helps make the background less bland.

And you spelt Deviantart wrong.