File :-(, x, )
eku
Giev sum opinionz, k?

Like which of these two is better?
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelQSS-32_33Camera SoftwareQSS-32_33 001Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width800Image Height530
>> eku
     File :-(, x)


Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelQSS-32_33Camera SoftwareQSS-32_33 001Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width530Image Height800
>> eku
     File :-(, x)
Our dog, it's a bit dark and blurry.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelQSS-32_33Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2006:11:08 14:06:10Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width530Image Height800
>> eku
     File :-(, x)
So, any opinions? Camera was 40 year old Canon FT QL, film being Fujichrome Sensia 100 (dia).

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelQSS-32_33Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2006:11:08 14:40:57Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width800Image Height530
>> Otherwise Anonymous !R09./old82
I like the first one better, minus the leaves at the top. The second would be fine (including the leaves at the top) if the bottom ~1/4 was cut (just at the green grass level). The way it is now it feels too disjointed. Both seem to be overexposed, too.

Your dog is pretty, but that's a very bad photo of him/her.

The last one didn't work out, though I think I see what you were getting at.

Also, perhaps this is due to poor scanning, but they don't show what can be done with a dia.