File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
What do you think of this one? It's from a kind of terrible scan, but I haven't had a chance to scan the negs yet.
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:03:26 00:13:54
>> Anonymous
It's interesting. Doesn't make me go wow but it's not exactly shit.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>148436
0/10
no attempt at a tripcode, no signature email and no cutting sarcasam!

I quite like it, but its not my sort of thing.
>> Anonymous
>>148436
You have to crack his tripcode, if you want to impersonate Butterfly. Also, you forgot the SEGA. In other words, fucking fail.

I like OPs pic, though. What film was used?
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
mods = quite acceptable people
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
Would be better if one or both were looking towards the camera.
>> Anonymous
>>148447
Agreed. Unfortunately I wasn't able to wait for that to happen, and I don't think I could have gotten a shot of only one of them jumping again.
>>148441
It's just Fuji Superia 200.
>> angrylittleboy !wrJcGUHncE
People's backs are rarely interesting.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>148528
Unless they're women. In tight (or no) pants.
>> angrylittleboy !wrJcGUHncE
>>148529
Ah, yes. I stand corrected.

Delicious female derriere is always interesting.