File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Here is one of my newer shots. does /p/ like contrast?
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:09:24 10:30:33
>> Anonymous
>>Here is one of my newer shots. does /p/ like contrast?

borders and watermarks are for faggots
>> Anonymous
>>261961
lol you're a faggot. OHHHHHHHH
>> Anonymous
lol i'm spesheul i has wetermork n cool boarders111
hit me up on deviantart
>> Anonymous
lol ill kill you.
>> Anonymous
>>261982
its not a watermark, its a signature faggit. sign your artwork sometimes
>> Anonymous
I think it's a little tightly cropped, personally. The wtf factor is pretty good.
>> Anonymous
Hey Kris Grant.

Why so FAT?

http://www.facebook.com/people/Kris_Grant/1194820921
>> i - !EoFJjFcCco
>>261999

Whoa, careful guys, we don't want to insult the douche's SIGNATURE omgomgomg.

Seriously though, what's up with the faggot border and lame watermark?
>> Anonymous
sign prints, not photos. There is a huge diff
>> Honest So You Dont Have To Be !9UISPtwBPo
>its not a watermark, its a signature faggit. sign your artwork sometimes

Dont ever call your shitty photos "artwork" ever again.

"Art" is not some badge you can pin on your frankly awful snapshot to cover up for the fact is sucks ass.

The photo you submitted is a whole world of shit. Cropped WAY to tight, and your lazy hipster faggot ass was to lazy to kneel down to get a good viewpoint, you just went "OH A PERSON" *CLICK* "OH THIS PHOTO SUCKS" *CONVERT TO B/W* "NOW THIS IS ART AND NO ONE CAN CALL IT BAD"

Fuck off and die faggot
>> Anonymous
>>262075

i love you and would like to suck your dick
>> Anonymous
lol wrong kirs grant.

>>262075
Im going to kill your entire family. with a fine toothed comb.
>> Anonymous
>>262160
>BAWWWW!!!!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
oh, and heres the color version. Which do you like better?
>> Anonymous
>>262167
The unprocessed one you still have to post.
>> Anonymous
>>262167

EWWWWWWWWW.
FAIL. HARD.
>> Anonymous
>>262160
>>262167

Just fuck off and die already you talentless and arrogant sack of shit.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
this is the original unedited image

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XSiCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:09:24 14:46:15Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/9.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/9.1Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length55.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width534Image Height801RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
>>262181

This is the least awful of the three, and it also shows what a shitty fucking tool you are.

Too bad you took such a shitty shot! The guy's outfit looks pretty interesting.
>> Anonymous
>>262183
thanks for the critique, but next time WHY DONT YOU PUT SOME FUCKING SUBSTANCE INTO IT FAGGOT. MAYBE ID FUCKING TAKE YOUR OPINION SERIOUSLY IF YOU COULD GIVE ME A REASON YOU ARENT A JUST BUTTHURT ASSHOLE. QUIT BEING AN IGNORANT TOOL AND FUCKING ELABORATE.
>> Anonymous
srsly though, idc if you hate my shit, tell me why you hate it so I can try and fix it. and idk if you could tell, but i fucking love contrast and HDR.
>> Anonymous
>>262186

Says the imbecil calling his amateurish shite "artwork".

Butthurt much?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>i fucking love contrast and HDR

Clearly this boy has been taken advantage of sexually at a young age, I see no other way that he can have developed such deviant perversions.
>> Anonymous
>>262189

says the asshole that was asked why he thinks what he does and still cant come up with a reason. amateurish is not a reason. get the dicks out of your ass and do your worst.
>> Anonymous
>>262183
This.

Also, if you can't take critique, don't come over here. At least we're being honest instead of your friends and family.
>> Anonymous
>>262195

what critique? all i see is bashing. the only remotely helpful thing to come out of this whole thread was that its cropped tightly.
>> i - !EoFJjFcCco
>>262198

Welcome to /p/
>> Anonymous
>>262198
You seem to be confusing two terms: Critique, and constructive criticism. They are both very different.

If you get what you call 'bashing', then there might be something wrong with the picture.
"borders and watermarks are for faggots"
With this line for example, if you did some thinking, you might think the watermark and the borders are a problem. Think about critique, because this is the only time I'm going to write out something this lame.
>> Anonymous
>>261999
No, that's a watermark. " - Photography" makes that clear, your name is "Kris Grant," unless somehow "Photography" is your last name.

Also, instead of shitting up the image with your "signature," why not just "sign" the EXIF?
>> Anonymous
>>262186

1) You came in too tight.
2) Your angle is shit.
3) Your exposure is poor.
4) Your focus is poor.
5) All elements of your composition are poor.
6) Your borders and watermark are pretentious.
7) Your color processing is hideous.

NO AMOUNT OF PROCESSING CAN SAVE A POORLY-FRAMED PHOTOGRAPH.

Next time take more time framing the shot and less time trying to make it look better in Photoshop.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>262226
>Next time take more time framing the shot and less time trying to make it look better in Photoshop.

I subscribe.
>> soulr !lK4GD5SleY
     File :-(, x)
>>262236
and that's me.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
how about this? better? I just got the camera yesterday, so I havent really gotten a chance to shoot that many different things.
Also, in response to the border and all that shit, Im a graphic designer first and a photographer second, so anything I do that doesn't look shooped looks incomplete to me. Never touched film and dont plan on it. But there is no /photoshop/ board.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XSiCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:09:24 15:30:41Exposure Time1/800 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width275Image Height534RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>262248
nice snapshot

>>262264
>Also, in response to the border and all that shit, Im a graphic designer first and a photographer second, so anything I do that doesn't look shooped looks incomplete to me. Never touched film and dont plan on it. But there is no /photoshop/ board.

RAGE
>> Anonymous
>>262236

WHY DID THE PHOTOGRAPHER CUT THE FEET OFF :(
>> i - !EoFJjFcCco
     File :-(, x)
>Also, in response to the border and all that shit, Im a graphic designer first and a photographer second, so anything I do that doesn't look shooped looks incomplete to me. Never touched film and dont plan on it. But there is no /photoshop/ board.
>Im a graphic designer first and a photographer second

No, no you are not, you are a fucking pretentious amateur with the talent of a goddamn twelve year old. For the good of the graphic designer and photographer communities as a whole as well as the good of humanity I sincerely urge you to go kill yourself, may god have mercy on your soul.
>> Anonymous
>>262264
If you are a graphic designer, I am not. And I am.
>> beethy !vW/UaE6zYU
     File :-(, x)
>>262264
Both of your photos are bad OP and your shoopan skills aren't anything special at all. All you try to do is bump the contrast and b/w your images. Oh.. and vignette them too.
>Im a graphic designer first and a photographer second
It doesn't show. You can't call that shitty border graphic design.
If you want to mix it up.. at least try and go all out. What you did is NOT graphic design... Pic related on what you should try.
But I think you actually suck balls at graphic design and should drop the shitty attitude and learn to take critique a little better.
I think you have potential. But your shots lack thoughtful composition. You're not keeping your eyes on the background and thus have distracting elements. You're also not watching your framing closely enough.
>> Anonymous
>>262355
>> i - !EoFJjFcCco
>I think you have potential

Who's your dealer?
Can I have his number?
>> Anonymous
>>262355
im not saying what I was doing was graphic design, im just saying i focus more on that than i do photography. (paul rand type stuff is what I do mostly) I just also really like HDR photography. thanks for the tips atleast.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
As if I needed any more reason for the people on this board to think I have no taste in photographs, I actually quite like>>261960

Would have been better if you'd focused on his eyes instead of the accordion, though.

Also, the watermark (and your defense thereof) makes you look like a tool.
>> Anonymous
the edited ones remember me of dave hill, the only thing is that you shit SUCKS.