>> |
fence
!!POey2hdozCZ
i think the requirements for the photo should be more technical and less thematic. i see lots of photos on /p/ that would be much better if the photographer just took the time to focus correctly, expose correctly, straighten horizons, etc.
so, basically, the requirement is that whatever photo you post for this, you had to have spent at least an hour making it. however you divide that time is up to you. it could be 2 minutes composing and focusing and 58 minutes lighting it strobist-style, or it could be more like large format where you walk around for a half hour just deciding where you want to set up your tripod, then spend another half hour focusing and figuring out exposure. if we really wanted to make it worth something, we could even require a warts-and-all contact sheet that shows all the bad photos you had to take to make the one really good one.
we could all make half-hearted suggestions about x in x photos, or whatever, but i think just making a technically proficient photo for once would be a better experience for /p/.
|