only $24,499an extra $500 gets you one with a D40, but it won't autofocus with ithttp://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/551436-REG/Sigma_597306_200_500mm_f_2_8_APO_EX.html
GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS GEARFAGS
>>203381butthurt D40fag
>>203387canon user... i also hate the thread about the $99,000 canon 1200mm f/5.6though b/c its a gearfag thread
how much is the nigger that will carry it?
/me bawws on behalf of everyone else who doesnt even get this lens in their mount
>>203377wait, wutIt has its own AF motor (and own power source, too), so it should AF with a D40.
>>203905Yeah, it'd be pretty damn strange if it doesn't have a focus motor. Superteles are the only lenses that having an in-body focus motor really affects anything for.In before people baaawing about their autofocus not instantly moving from infinity to five centimeters and acting like mechanical linkage is some antiquated thing.
>>203914>>203905no HSM = no autofocus for D40, sorry
I bet Butterfly could hand hold this one for steady shots with no camera shake.
>>204006Wrong, the D40 autofocuses with Nikon AF-I lenses which have a non-HSM internal motor.
>>204017we're talking about sigma
>>204019Almost all Nikon-mount Sigma lenses are either screw-driven or HSM, that's why "no HSM = no AF on D40". The 200-500 is an exception to this.
>>204016I think these weigh the same as me >__<
>>203377Manual Focus, Mother Fucker.
can u kill a fucking elk with that thing
>>204242Yeah, just bludgeon it to death.