>> |
Anonymous
>>96759 Well, that's mostly what I've been doing, but macro stuff like feathers and leaves aren't much more interesting than the big stuff (unless I just haven't learned how to make them interesting).
The pics I posted were from the last 2 weeks. I've got a bunch more that I took yesterday (before I made the post, but I hadn't sorted through them yet), so I'll probably post a few of those later if I decide they're any good. There are a couple of my house that I think would be alright if it weren't for a little bit of junk laying around.
I'm also pretty ignorant about what exactly to do in post-processing. I mean, I know how to adjust color levels and all, but I don't know what I'm really aiming for. For example, the edit of my leaf picture looks a little better than the original at first, but the original is honestly more like it looked in real life (it was dusk). Even in a picture that I thought didn't look quite like it did in real life, I wouldn't really know exactly what to do to it other than fiddle blindly until it seemed to be fixed.
>>96801 No way, there are trees outside your house too?? (It would probably look less familiar to you if the trees were more than silhouettes, but I'm not sure how to make a shot come out that way nor that it would be a good thing.)
|