>> |
Anonymous
>>264403 Though they're both good taken separately, background and foreground/midground compositions jar. I'd either burn or clone out the background somehow, though if this is for the paper I know you'd be heavily restricted in what you could do there.
>>264404 Okay, but cliched, which is the hardest thing not to be with concert pictures. The best way I've found around it is to to just to have really strong form- either just plain rigorous, thorough composition, or something experimental or both. Have you seen Koudelka's early work shooting theater? They're really abstract for photographs, almost like modernist paintings in silver halide. Not saying to go that route, but (probably also partially out of necessity with the emulsions and light he was working with) he went way off from normal photographs to make people on a stage look interesting.
>>264408
Now this is what I'm talking about, just plain awesome. To nitpick, it'd be better if there was just a little more space to the side of him, though not at the expense of the other side.
>>264415 More concert meh.
>>264463 More meh, dig the flare.
>>264473
There's nothing you did wrong here, but the blur on Beck is just the wrong amount (not "too much" or "too little", just off) for this would've-been-awesome frame to come together, at least for me.
>>264479 Simple but really effective. More crowd shots, please.
What FL was this shot at? It's hard to tell with the background all black.
>>264493 Good attempt but it doesn't come together compositionally.
>>264496 This is the best one, and I have nothing else useful to say about it except "woah."
>>264663 Meh, wake me up when it's a M.
|