File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
c&c plx
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpi
>> Anonymous
well im pretty serious, but definetly not a /p/ro, i have just done stuff for folios at school etc.
>> Anonymous
>>284259
wat
>> Anonymous
this is interesting because, what is it?
>> Anonymous
>>284262
its exactly what it looks like.. dead wood
>> okto !.ZlrOYZhsk
Good: Good saturation. Good exposure, although a bit contrasty. Lots of visual/graphic motion.

Bad: The light sucks. The shadow areas look like you took this on the moon; things are either high midtone or black. It's pretty harsh, and it makes me feel like this is a snap, when it clearly was not intended to be.
I also don't feel like I connect with the wood, visually. Where is the important part; where should my eye be drawn? Why is the dirt and shit at the bottom in frame? Is it important? To me, it feels like it's just distracting my eye from the nice sinuous saturated red wood in the top half/two thirds of the frame.

Winterlight can be amazing, but it can also be super harsh, depending about 60% on your subject and 40% on the time of day. It seems like you get longer magic hours in winter, partly because God often puts a softbox on the sun in the form of overcast, and because they actually happen when you might want to be awake, instead of killing the people that are making you be awake.
>> Anonymous
>>284382
mmm yeah i can see what you're saying... i think maybe some subtle depth of field would have helped but i have no ND filters, and it was bright noon sunlight at about 11,000ft. that's also kind of why it looks like it's taken on the moon haha. i suppose you would use a flash to remedy that?