File :-(, x, )
Jeremo !iKGMr61IHM
PS KAUGHT!!!

Dude, are you around? Would you mind re-posting your stuff with your friends involved? And honestly, if you help a brother out and gimme a clue on what your setup for your shots are and all that... it would be well wicked...

I just want to try it out and have some fun with friends.

We'll all buy calendars. Uh huh.
>> Anonymous !RX7/134byQ
http://toasterfoot.houseofsprouts.com/fashion.html
>> Jeremo !iKGMr61IHM
>>82995

Cool, i just need to know what setup he used for those awesome shots with his friends. Like how many softboxes, strobes... and whether or not it was one exposure... that sorta stuff...

i know it's all trade secret, but hey it never hurts to ask.
>> Anonymous !RX7/134byQ
>>83086
I agree. I'd like to know, too ;_;
>> else !L6xabslN96
>>83086
consider this, would a world-class chef give out his recipes? or an assassin his techniques?

OP is a sexy photo, sauce?
>> Anonymous
http://toasterfoot.houseofsprouts.com/months.html
>> Anonymous
>>83184

The French Laundry Cookbook, by Thomas Keller.

And there a few photo industry trade magazines dedicated entirely to commercial photographers, their latest and greatest image, and a lighting diagram explaining exactly how they did it.
>> Anonymous
>>82995
Horizontal scrolling should be illegal >:(
>> Anonymous
>>83196
QQ more you piece of shit.
>> Anonymous
>>83184
http://kenrockwell.com/tech/share.htm

"Photographs come from imagination, observation and inspiration. Knowing someone else's technique and locations won't reproduce their results."

but seriously, why do you take the time to experiment and find your own style. your photos wont be so great if i see them and instantly think of someone else's work.
>> Anonymous
>>83207
>why don't

is what i meant to type
>> Anonymous
>>83207

Fail for Ken Crockwell.
>> Liska !!LIVFOETqL8j
>>83207

you gain your own style from learning with others
>> Jeremo !iKGMr61IHM
>>83207

I see what that points is trying to say and to a certain extent I agree, but it's not what I'm asking for or trying to achieve here.
>> Anonymous
How is what Jeremo is asking any different than reading "The Strobist?"
>> elf_man !fBgo7jDjms
>>83264
Not really, large portions of strobist look at assignments and how the lighting was set up.
>> Anonymous
>>83294
Exactly my point. Everyone going "lol don't copy pskaught do your lighting yourself" has probably read at least one Strobist lesson, or some other photography tutorial.
>> Anonymous
>>83357
I think>>83207was the only person with that opinion...
>> pskaught
     File :-(, x)
HEY GUYZ WUTS GOING ON IN THIS THREAD?

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution100 dpiVertical Resolution100 dpiImage Created2007:10:12 19:15:11Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/10.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating50Lens Aperturef/9.9Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length65.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width665Image Height1000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
>>83428
i dont think jeremo wanted the exif data
>>Like how many softboxes, strobes... and whether or not it was one exposure... that sorta stuff...

unless he does, then hes a newfag x 10
>> Anonymous
>>83357

yeah, ive read the basics from strobist and learned how to count light sources. i see one, two, three and four different lights in>>83428i can guess that theres one on either side, one in front and one above, just like the strobist told me to try!
>> Anonymous
>>83450
also one above (hair highlights)