>> |
Anonymous
>>58572 I only have a time to refute a few of these; some of them are true, like Hemingway, but most of them aren't.
>Kerouac was an drama-loving acid freak who would have adored myspace had he lived to see it. Kerouac tried hallucinogens and didn't like them. His drug of choice was alcohol; this led to his liver exploding.
I also don't think Kerouac was "drama-loving."
>Orwell was the original incarnation of Michael Moore. No, Orwell wasn't a party idealogue who couldn't live by his own principles. When Michael Moore goes a few days without food anywhere, let alone the slums of Paris, then we can talk.
>Shakespeare was Francis Bacon. No. The whole basis of the "Shakespeare was Bacon" theory is the elitist assumption that only a nobleman could've written his plays.
>Camus was proof that potheads exist throughout history and are not an invention of the 20th century. Camus lived in the 20th century. Also, I don't see anything potheaded about anything Camus wrote; I honestly don't know where you're getting this from, and I can at least see that on most of these.
>Singer was an annoying screechy bitch that wound up being used as a plot device in Fight Club I haven't read Fight Club. We are talking about the same Issac Bashevis, right?
|