Which film should I use next, /p? Picture shows what I have available.(picture details: Nikon D200, 85mm f/1.8 at f/8, 1/60s with SB-800, exposure comp +1)
well, since your going to use them anyway (as it looks like you already own them) it doesn't matter, just close your eyes and point blindly.buuuuuuut, since you asked, i would say HP5 pushed 2 stops.
>>77459HP5 for B&W, Fuji Reala for Color
I vote TMax 400, 'cause I just bought a couple rolls of it and want to see what it looks like before I actually shoot with it.Once I'm done with the roll of Delta 3200 in my SLR, I'm gonna load me up some Velvia 50. It's very exciting for me.
>>77459400 Tri-XYou can't beat a classic.
Currently lovin the Ilford 400 and the tmax 100 personally.
>>77473oops the SP2 Ilford
Tri-x!
Hey Liska, you should totally do the RedBull Air Race this weekend. I think that would be a great opportunity to capture some awesome photographs.
>>77542I'm planning on being there, i've got a visitor in town but has an appt that day. When is it, what time, and WHERE? I can't seem to find any info on it.
http://www.redbullairrace.com/Location info.
Specifically, look under ticket info.
Technical pan is by far the finest B&W film ever made
>>77603sure is. too bad they don't fucking make it anymore, nor will they ever again. fucking digital cameras fuck.
>>77611kodak announced well in advance of it's cancellation.if you dont have some in storage its you own fault.
>>77603except they dont make it anymore
ilford is considering producing delta 25 until then the closest you can get without paying an assload il panf+
Kodak Gold goes in the bin nowno excuses
>>78119why the dislike for Kodak?
Doesn't Efke make some 25 or 50 panchromatic?
>>78125yeah, looks like a really cheap film, though.
Seattle Film Work is the best film
>>78123every time ive used Gold, its been horrendously grainy crap
>>78123because its cheap in a bad waynot cheap in a does the job for less way
25
>>78178is that from prints?i use gold sometimes when i'm feeling cheap, but when scanned, its ok.Usually when ppl complain about print film is due to the tech who printed them.
>>78278>tech who printed themyeah i always forget about that with print film