Sup /p/,I need some camera purchasing advice. While I'd love to get into the high quality DSLR category, I just don't see myself using a camera of that size just because I wouldn't want to lug it around everywhere. I want something to fit in my pocket that's not a crappy $100 Kodak/Polaroid.At what price point do pocket size digital cameras start having decent quality? Are there any that you'd recommend that have a killer bang/buck ratio?EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwarePaint.NET v3.31Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution96 dpiVertical Resolution96 dpi
all compacts have the same shitty iq
canon a series/thread
You can't get better bang for the buck then a Canon Powershot A630.
>>177638Do you have mail or something?
>>177639The Powershots aren't very pocketable.I guess if you don't mind having GIANT ROBOT BONER sticking out if your pants they are ok?
>>177639A590 is more compact and takes less batteries. Image quality is roughly the same, I think.
>>177670Protip: If you want to accentuate your gluteal shapes, do not wear a digicam in your ass pocket
Leica D-LUX 3!Extremely expensive but small and good quality.
Or you could get thishttp://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-LX2K-Digital-Optical-Stabilized/dp/B000GHULTM/ref=pd_bbs_5?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1210285590&sr=8-5Which is $200 cheaper and basically the same thing.
>>177701>the exact same thing except minus the tacky red dot, plus a grip, and with bad JPEG processing that doesn't matter because you should shoot raw.Fix'd.
>>177705serious comment was serious....
Olympus e-410/420