>> |
ac
!!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>258002 >D300 versus D700 is debatable: viewfinder coverage versus viewfinder size. Er. There's more different between the D300 and D700 than the viewfinder, you realize...
>>258006 >Oh, and AC, what are you doing suggesting the D40/60 over the D50? Debated that, but I decided to leave it off for the same reason I left off the D1, D2, D2x, D100, D70, D70s, and D40x. Can't get it new, and it's debatable whether it's better or worse than the D40.
(D40 has newer software, and after using my D50 for a while I can say that a bigger LCD really is a nice feature. Probably some other little improvements, too, that I'm too lazy to go look up. Really the only disadvantage is the lack of an in-body motor, and I'm still holding out hope that Nikon will update its primes in the not-too-distant future. If not, Sigma and friends seem to be stepping up to bat)
|