File :-(, x, )
Digital cameras that dont killercomickxz
...automatically set every picture taken as a .jpg?

I'm losing quality to this damn compression!

A .png would be sooooooo nice.

Hell, even .gif wouldnt hurt


so /p/, gimme a camera
>> Anonymous
yay for 256 colors
>> Anonymous
For in-camera storage:
GIF < PNG < JPG < TIFF < RAW

PNG would be so inefficient. You would be bitching about slow save times and low total storage.
>> BalleSaque !!gA7JZaCZdKK
Even some of the worst point and shoot digital cameras have a pretty damn good quality JPEG setting. It's not your camera's fault that you're a shitty photographer.
>> Anonymous
>>61032
PNG would be rediculous, it would take up to much space, RAW does to but the quality is unmatched.

>>61036
I agree

>>61069

Like someone said before "Its up to the photographer, the camera is only a tool"
>> Anonymous
>>61036
RAW files are larger than PNG, and TIFF might be, too. I don't know. People don't bitch about lack of space with RAW files.

JPEG < PNG < TIFF < RAW

GIF doesn't even make sense. It only has 256 colors.

I'm with you OP, lossy compression sucks ass. What sort of camera are you looking for? All DSLRs have a RAW mode, and most have a TIFF. TIFF and RAW are both lossless. If you're looking for something cheaper, go to dpreview.com, click on "buying guide," and fill out the fields.
>> Atrum
>>61085
They don't bitch cause its non-compressed or edited in anyway