>> |
Anonymous File :-(, x)
>>179782 You really don't grasp the concept of trying to prove your point, do you? 1) Completely different lens, way to compare apples and oranges 2) It's RIDICULOUSLY easy to have SOMETHING in-focus with that wide of a z-axis, so you're really an idiot 3) It's still not that sharp, honestly. Horribly shallow DOF, a lens flaw.
Yes, Nikon definitely still sucks. Here, have some Minolta 17-35/2.8 G glass sharpness. Lol you just keep wasting your money!
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeKONICA MINOLTACamera ModelDYNAX 5DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 MacintoshMaximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Focal Length (35mm Equiv)25 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:04:27 22:09:49Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Brightness9.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length17.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width800Image Height800RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastSoftSaturationNormalSharpnessHard
|