File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
does dis need sum moar vignetting?
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
No, but it needs more correct focus on her eyes.

Also: PNG is fail for the purpose you're putting it to. Upload in JPEG.
>> Anonymous
Ergo Proxy?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
frosted butts

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTPhotographerunknownMaximum Lens Aperturef/5.6Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:04:16 23:41:40Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/5.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/5.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length31.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>163115
The cupcake pattern under her shirt is distracting.

Have her take off her bra next time.
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
>>163115
72dpi, do you use it, motherfucker?
>> Anonymous
Your girlfriend has a fat head.
>> Anonymous
>>16316972dpi, do you use it, motherfucker?

... Wow, are you stupid?

Everything on your computer monitor is 72 DPI.

Learn about resolution.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>163221
While I agree that "72dpi" has no bearing on this conversation and that Depressed Cheesecake was dumb for saying it, I should point out that computer monitors are almost never 72dpi in this day and age. The two I've got attached to this computer are 85 and 100dpi.
>> Anonymous
>>163121
>The cupcake pattern under her shirt is distracting.
>Have her take off her bra next time.

This is the best advice I have ever seen on /p/.
Listen to this man.
>> Anonymous
>>163226The two I've got attached to this computer are 85 and 100dpi.

Are you confusing refresh rate (Hz) and DPI? Or are you talking about pixel density?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>163226
Maybe he simply meant resize it to 72dpi. Although, I doubt it.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTPhotographerunknownMaximum Lens Aperturef/5.6Image-Specific Properties:Image Created2008:04:16 23:41:40RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardExposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/5.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/5.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length31.00 mmWhite BalanceAuto
>> Anonymous
>>163236
Monitors have a dpi that is essentially the same as ppi.
>> Anonymous
>>163239Maybe he simply meant resize it to 72dpi. Although, I doubt it.

He meant resize it, so that's smaller in width and height.

But he wanted to feel smart and say 72 DPI, which has fuck all to do with it.
>> Anonymous
Or maybe he meant jpeg compression? 1MB is rather large for a 1mp pic.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>163236
>Are you confusing refresh rate (Hz) and DPI? Or are you talking about pixel density?
Nope.
1024 pixels across, 12 inches wide. 1024/12 = 85 (.3333333) pixels per inch.
1280 pixels across, 13.25 inches wide. 1280/13.25 = 96 dpi (I rounded more last time I ran the numbers)

>>163239
>Maybe he simply meant resize it to 72dpi.
Obviously that's what he meant. However, that has no real meaning in this context. 72dpi = 72 dots per inch. You can't deal in dpi unless you know the size and resolution of the output device.

It's like saying "You should drive at three hours". It only translates to a speed if you know the distance being driven.
>> Anonymous
>>163246Or maybe he meant jpeg compression? 1MB is rather large for a 1mp pic.

Pro tip: Those were PNGs. They're almost always larger.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Ronery Darth sez "TITS OR GTFO"

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:01:16 17:08:23Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width440Image Height330
>> Anonymous
>>163249
The second one was still a 1mb jpeg.
>> Anonymous
It doesn't need more vignetting, it needs less clothes.