File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
lol high iso on sony's.
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelDSLR-A700Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)45 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:09:10 21:16:08Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating6400Lens Aperturef/6.3Brightness2.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceTungstenFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length30.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width900Image Height574RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastSoftSaturationNormalSharpnessHard
>> $19.99 !OSYhGye6hY
..? it looks pretty good to me...
>> Anonymous
>>252081


guessing OP had crappy sense of sarcasm.
>> Anonymous
damn that's hot.


a mount owner here.

forget the a900

a700<3.
>> Anonymous
>>252081
i'm pretty sure that's what op was trying to prove. You know cause the /p/ sheep hear someone say Sony only makes LOLNOISEBOXES and they run with it because they want to fit in with the rest of the canikon faggots.

it's actually pretty good for 6400. i doubt it's OPs picture, but i suppose it wouldn't hurt to ask for some crops.
>> beethy !vW/UaE6zYU
>>252080
Not bad.. do show some 100% crops though. Or upload full size.
>> Anonymous
Too small to examine properly. Also no way to tell what PP has been done.
>> else !L6xabslN96
>>252080
im calling bullshit.
>> Anonymous
>>252212
Ditto.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
ISO >9000 on an Olympus E-500 (probably the failest camera when it comes to high ISO noise). Disregard the EXIF, it's pushed +2.5 stops in software.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.Camera ModelE-500Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Color Filter Array Pattern702Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2008:09:11 17:22:20Exposure Time1/25 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias-1.3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length22.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width800Image Height600RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessSoft
>> Anonymous
http://a.img-dpreview.com/gallery/sonydslra700_samples/originals/dsc04285_gs.jpg

OP seems legit.

Sage for troll thread.
>> Anonymous
lolwut

http://www.dyxum.com/dforum/forum_posts.asp?TID=35698&PN=2
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
haha.

good joke OP

lol, sony
>> Anonymous
>>252237
...so they fixed shitty NR in new firmware on the A700, yet the A900 still retains it? lolwut.
>> Anonymous
>>252245
doesn't understand the meaning of 'shot with a pre-production camera' that precedes any and every A900 image sample out there.

nobody else seems to either. Do they not teach reading comprehension in schools anymore?
>> Anonymous
>>252252
>pre-production camera

Dude, they were presenting a fucking flagship SLR. Couldn't they, I dunno, delay it a week to put new firmware in? Now it'll take them quite some time to make people believe that A900 doesn't suck at high ISO.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>252259
Canon, nikon, leica etc? Yeah sure, those guys have huge reputations to make.

Sony doesnt give a shit what you think, they're not aiming at destroying the pro market overnight and with their marketing division why bother?

See how nintendo created a whole new market with the wii and sony did the same shit with the PS3? Canon started that with the Rebel but sony know how to do it far better.

Also, sage
>> Anonymous
>>252314sony know how to do it far better.

hahahahaahajhahaha, oh wow

only from Butterfly
>> Anonymous
Mmm that Fernet-Branca...

Are you argentinean?
>> Project !dashI8UpO.
Can't wait for someone to say how Nikon has better performance even though they share sensors.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>252517
What :P Sony are world leaders at marketing stuff, far better than apple.

>>252530
Nikon has better performance.
>> Anonymous
>>252530

sony makes nikon sensors

but no nikon is sharing a same sensor with a sony
>> Anonymous
>>252533What :P Sony are world leaders at marketing stuff, far better than apple.

uh Apple manages to sell the exact same hardware as others at over 50% price premium

Sony sells comparable hardware with more features at less than the big guys

that's not good marketing, sorry. that's just wrestling yourself into an 8% market share by buying out another company and acquiring technology from others
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>252537
>Sony sells comparable hardware with more features at less than the big guys
only in SLR because their new and that is how you get market share. Everywhere else sony means 2x the price for 1.4x the features.

Does anyone have minolta's market share figures for the few years before they pulled out, would be interesting to see how sony has done in that respect.

>>252536
might wana look in a D300.
>> Anonymous
>>252542Does anyone have minolta's market share figures for the few years before they pulled out, would be interesting to see how sony has done in that respect.

oh wow, are you serious?

you claim to be such a huge sony fanboy, yet you know so little about it

the 7d and 5d barely made it out of the production chain to sell in minuscule numbers before they closed up. why do you think they closed in the first place

KM had no presence at all in digital, did you seriously think they even remotely had any kind of respectable figures? oh wow, we've got 5 to 10% market, let's close down for the lulz. no, just fucking no

>>252542might wana look in a D300.

uh? okay, feel free to enlighten us as to which Sony camera shares the sensor in the D300

Sony makes the D300 sensor

that doesn't it's in any Sony camera

(pro tip before you reply to this, the A700 sensor is not the same as the D300 sensor)
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>252549
I know minolta had rubbish market share with their digital bodies, thats why it'd be interesting to compare it to sony's current one.

re-reading the dpreview review of the A700 it doesnt state either way (afaik) that the D300 sensor is the same so whatever, their similar.

Also i've been down the whole nikon = sony route ages ago, geez get with the times.
>> Anonymous
>>252549
butthurt is butthurt.
>> Anonymous
>>252554re-reading the dpreview review of the A700 it doesnt state either way (afaik) that the D300 sensor is the same so whatever, their similar.

uh, the big bad EXMOR sensor isn't flagrant enough for you?

nikon
does not
share their sensor
with sony

the D300 has a 23.6 x 15.8 mm 12.3 MP sensor

the A700 has a 23.5 x 15.6 mm 12.2 MP sensor

the D300 does ISO 3200 natively

the A700 only does ISO 1600

>>252554Also i've been down the whole nikon = sony route ages ago, geez get with the times.

yeah... good thing i was replying to you to, moron

i was replying to this

>>252530Can't wait for someone to say how Nikon has better performance even though they share sensors.

from Project, which is another soon to be failure of a tripfag

and you had to chime in like you always do and say this bullshit:

>>252542might wana look in a D300.

should i go find the screen cap from the thread where you claim the A700 is everything the D300 by saying it was the same sensor and then proved the fuck wrong

stop being stupid, please

>>252558

get the fuck out
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>252563
Delicious butthurt, im out anyway ->
>> Anonymous
>>252565

lol @ pitiful attempt at backing out of a losing argument

good show, good show
>> Anonymous
>>252563
They're not the same sensor, you're right, but the base design is the same, and Sony manufactures them both. Sony just adds their bullshit and changes a few things to the A700's, and they do the same with Nikon's bullshit and changes to the D300's.

This is common knowledge.
>> Anonymous
>>252570They're not the same sensor, you're right

thanks

i know i am
>> Anonymous
lol butthurt Nikonfag doesn't wanna be associated with Sony. Next thing you'll be defending them with is how Nikon designed their own sensors and only needed Sony for the manufacturing.
>> Anonymous
>>252584

joke's on you, i use a rebel xti