File :-(, x, )
Submissions for Female Persona Vincent
Ok the admin for our account has been decided, The email address
projectflickr@anon.norristology.com
Now leads to the correct address.

So now what we need to do is to submit good Profile pics to be used for our "female"
Heres my suggestion (up for debate)

Young, around 18-30
Cute, But Doesn't have to be smashingly hot
3 pics absolute minimum of the same girl, Cheesy self portraits a bonus.
Not too heavy on the photoshop, we need to keep with a style, something easier to reproduce.
No exif data (just Save to web in photoshop)

Anyway, lets get this party started!

Comment too long. Clickhereto view the full text.
>> Anonymous
haha oh WOW so this is really going forward?
>> Anonymous
so wait, what is this now?
>> Liska !!LIVFOETqL8j
As i said earlier, I have some blurry photographs I can contribute. Not of me, but of animals and stuff.
>> Anonymous
>>81434
a community /p/ flickr account to test how many people try to make love to the "girl" that owns the account simply because its a "girl" even if the pictures are out of focus, blurry, just plain bad, etc.
>> Anonymous
i can submit some shitty quality pictures
u want those e mailed to the adress supplied?
>> Liska !!LIVFOETqL8j
>>81440

make sure said "girl" uses lots of :) ;) & <3's etcetc
>> /P/roject Flickr coordinator
Yes, the Email address posted is our means of communicating with the account admin. So thats where the submissions go, And the admin has veto power over anyting that gets sent, So if you want a picture posted, you HAVE to go through this email or the Admin might save pictures posted in threads like these.

For now we need a suitable Persona, In other words we need a picture set of a female who can be our "Account holder"

So get emailing / posting in here (Preferable post in here first so we can all discuss)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>81464
I'm the admin. Yes, please post the different candidates for the girl in here; I wasn't expecting "veto power," or anything much more than just writing the copy for the account. I think this would be best as a communal project, and certainly on something as important as what the face of our character is I think it should be decided by consensus.

Attached is the pic of a girl submitted to my e-mail. The submitter also said this:

"I will have no shortage of shots of her, that can be blurry, off focus or any other way you'd like. I also possess the ability and time to fix exif and do minor edits."

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D40XCamera SoftwareVer.1.00Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern836Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2007:09:02 20:25:02Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramNot DefinedISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashFlash, Auto, Return DetectedFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3872Image Height2592RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownISO Speed Used200Color ModeCOLORImage QualityNORMALWhite BalanceAUTOImage SharpeningAUTOFocus ModeMANUALFlash SettingNORMALAuto Flash ModeBuilt-in,TTLFlash Compensation0.0 EVISO Speed Requested200Tone CompensationAUTOLens TypeUnknownLens Range50.0 mm; f/1.8Auto FocusCenterShooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/OffColor ModeLandscape sRGBLighting TypeSPEEDLIGHTNoise ReductionOFFCamera Actuations25Saturation 2AUTODigital Vari-ProgramAUTO
>> Anonymous
that's a girl?
>> Anonymous
>>81471
It's a trap!
>> Anonymous
>>81471
well the post does have the word "female" in quotes...
>> Anonymous
>>81471
>>81474
>>81475

Admin here... the submitter specified it was his girlfriend.
>> Anonymous
>>81478
He sure did a good job of making it out of focus. This project is awesome :-D
>> /P/roject Flickr coordinator
>>81470
Well we can definitely "recommend" shots that get posted, But you have the final word (Since you have the account password)

Anyway, I like the fact that that shot has "Katieclothes" as the filename, Suggesting theres "Katienude" pics aswell.

Anyway thats for another board

Also that pic is too out of focus, We want to fail, but only marginally, We want typical camwhore type angles (As if the Girl herself took them)

She looks like she could be suitable given the right pose (That one is unflattering unfortunately) Ask him if he has more.

In the meantime other people fill this thread up with your pictures (and note how many more you have / ability to get more etc...)
>> dirtylittlecity
My girlfriend has volunteered to be a model for the profile if you guys want. That way we could get consistent pictures.
>> Anonymous
This has me excited for reasons I cannot begin to understand.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
:P
Opinions?
>> Anonymous
>>81490
I like, its photoshopping might be a bit harsh though, hard to imitate, How many more do you have of the same girl?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>81491
face.
I have a few.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelDSC-S500Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution314 dpiVertical Resolution314 dpiImage Created2007:08:14 22:37:31Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length5.40 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width450Image Height600RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>> Anonymous
>>81492
Of the 2 people posted in here, This ones my choice, Fits what i imagined better, And the cleavage shot is exactly the type of cliche i was hoping for!
>> Flickr Prank Admin !X70QD/ZrXI
This is the same guy as before, in the first thread; I forgot the tripcode I used there and the same name wouldn't make much sense anyway.

>>81491
Even over-photoshoppers have a range of over-ness. So it doesn't have to be duplicated exactly.

>81492

How many is a few? Could you get more, like of her holding the camera in front of her, and doing MySpace style shots?

>>81485

We'll need sample pics, obviously.
>> Flickr Prank Admin !X70QD/ZrXI
Oh, and how long do you fellows think we should keep the trick up? Because the biggest fun of it will be in the reveal, but we need to keep it going long enough to build her a following.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>81496
Massive popularity ftw.

Myspaceface.
>> Anonymous
>>81495
Also, a few is access to the girl at all times and a folder of over 200 pictures.
>> angrylittleboy !wrJcGUHncE
lmfao. epic lulz in the making.

Can't do much when it comes to contributions, but here's something to inspire you guys. This one made it to the top 3 in Explore once:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/annatheodora/453854966/
>> Anonymous
>>81526
Its times like these after I read the comments I just know the bait /p/ flickr account will succeed.
We shouldn't come out with it quickly, let the account get commented on for months and months.

Hell someone taking sociology would get a kick out of this, this should be their master thesis :)

People keep posting the potential female's, we need to pick a good one :)
>> Anonymous
zomg?
>> Anonymous
Needs more possible girls. :(
>> else !L6xabslN96
>>81492
i vote for this one. she's purdy...
>> Teus !QbSstcPD6U
>>81490
>>81498
fuck yeah. one photo already useable with black gothic dress and bland film-like colors.

>>Oh, and how long do you fellows think we should keep the trick up?
one or two months, depends how quickly things go. we also have to watch out we don't get uncovered. I say we do a first evaluation after 2 weeks.
>> Anonymous
This is genius. An experiment on the fawning effect would be fascinating to see.

You should have a control that is set up as a male but with the same or very similar pictures as a comparison.

I'd bet anything the female gets more "appreciation".
>> Anonymous
>>81662
This is a very good idea. Any experiment worth its salt needs a control.
>> Flickr Prank Admin !X70QD/ZrXI
This is slowing evolving to absolute epic win.

Since we're doing this as an experiment:

Our hypothesis is that an attractive female posting shitty photographs will get a larger amount of positive attention than a male photographer. (Should we also include an unattractive female photographer as another control?)

We'll measure this both by number of comments, number of commentators, and a subjective assesment of how pathetically gushing they are.

Also, I think we should have a hypothesis as to how the duped will react when they find out about all this.
>> Anonymous
>>81665

WE KNOW THAT SHITTY PHOTOGRAPHS BY HOT GIRLS GET MORE VIEWS.

Why would we test that??

Rather, why not use all of the above that has been said to test exactly HOW SHITTY things can really get and still be fawned over if the girl is hot enough?

I mean, do it in degrees of shit. Start light, and then keep working your way down.
>> Anonymous
>>81669

eventually if you get enough fans you could produce stuff that is just downright god awful (but with a bit of t&a) and see if people try and nominate it for all those stupid faux awards....
>> Anonymous
Lol ya its those shitty awards people "nominate" you for that drive me nuts. They are obviously a scam to attract more attention to themselves so they can pretend to be important.

I don't know if we can really get a good control going though, I mean its tough to judge photo's anyway, how are we going to get equal ones?

Also just checking, but if someone posts in your flickr account you can delete the comment right? Because we might get some tools trying to prematurely unveil the account...
>> Liska !!LIVFOETqL8j
>>81697

Yes, you can delete any comments on your photos.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
If you need a constant flow of pictures I can always post myself. I can also submit any of my own photos that didn't come out as well as I hoped.

This is the most current photo I have. Sorry for the dust, didn't realize the lens was dirty and didn't care.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot A520Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.6Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created2007:07:07 23:59:16Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/2.6Lens Aperturef/2.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashFlash, Auto, Red-Eye ReduceFocal Length5.81 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width924Image Height1410RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
To really make it a proper test, you really need to have a Control Photographer who's a male persona posting the exact same pics.
>> Anonymous
>>81709
That's impossible. We can only use pictures of the same quality with the male persona, otherwise, we'd probably get busted.
>> Anonymous
>>81708
ha. That's a pretty bad picture... Hot body though, definite plus.
>> Anonymous
>>81708
Anonymous...

Can I humbly request more pictures of yourself?
>> Anonymous
How about really good pictures of a semi-attractive woman as a control? We should also decide what type of personality the should persona have. Is she going to respond to comments and if: in which way?
>> Anonymous
>>81743
I think this would work, but maybe really good pictures of a handsome man is more what we'd be looking for as a control?
>> Anonymous
>>81744
Lol if thats the case, I'm the man for the job (Lol just kidding)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>81740
NO!

Oh, well, since you asked so nice, one more.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot A520Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.6Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created2007:07:08 00:02:05Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/2.6Lens Aperturef/2.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashFlash, Auto, Red-Eye ReduceFocal Length5.81 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width873Image Height1437RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
>>81753
You are absolutely gorgeous.
>> Anonymous
>>81759

This experiment is aimed at people just like you.
>> Anonymous
>>81769
Yeah, I know.

I'm okay with that.
>> Anonymous
>>81780

Shameless, but I like your style.
>> Anonymous
>>81753

oh fuck, this is *exactly* what we need.

However, there should probably be some shitty artsy stuff going on too. As it is this picture isn't all that good, but it isn't the shitfest we need.

However, the model is a very good level of attractiveness, and the blurriness is ace.
>> Anonymous
Also... WE DON'T NEED ANY FUCKING CONTROLS.

Don't try and make this more compicated than it needs to be!

/p/ is only going to go along with this as long as it is fairly simple, people just won't have the attention span beyond this.

THIS ISN'T A RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT. WE JUST WANT TO SEE HOW MUCH SHIT WE CAN CRAM DOWN SOME IDIOTS THROATS UNTIL THEY START TO CHOKE IT BACK UP.
>> Anonymous
>>81791
Are you kidding me? It looks really overdone, not pretentiously arty enough.
>> Anonymous
>>81793
This anon is right.
This is great and all, but do we even have the flickr account up? The photos don't all need to go up at once, we've got a few decent user photos, let's put this bitch into action!
>> Anonymous
>>81791
If need be I can take some new photos tonight, myspace poses included.

It's a good thing I'm planning on getting a new digital. Seems like mine is getting outdated.
>> Anonymous
>>81798
Try decreasing the ISOzzzz
>> Anonymous
Well we still need to decide on a single girl before any account goes up, but we can maybe use some of the other girls as "Friends"
Then we can use the whole "close friend" stereotype to get the semi clothed shots that get all the "fawners" fantasizing.

That will really get the comments flying.

Also what we need to do is have a "build up" group of 4chan users who simply comment on the pics and make it all seem more community oriented.
Though their comments can't count for the totals, So we need to have a thread dedicated to who these 4channers are.
>> Anonymous
Will all this stay in /p/? Who knows what could happen if it got onto /b/.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)


Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeResearch In MotionCamera ModelBlackBerry 8300Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:09:10 17:24:55Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width640Image Height480
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)


Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeResearch In MotionCamera ModelBlackBerry 8300Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:09:10 16:48:20Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width640Image Height480
>> Anonymous
make sure you join those god-awful groups.
>> Anonymous
>>81853
Thats on the agenda, aka how we will bait all the other flickr peoples.
>> else !L6xabslN96
>>81840
A CHALLENGER APPEARS?

fapfapfapfapfapfap....oh lawd it just gets better, and the response from the flickr community will be the icing on the cake.
>> Anonymous
So which girl is going to be our girl?
>> Anonymous
>>81872

I like this newest one now
>>81840
, Especially since shes a member it would be easy to get new pics (Assuming you co-operate that is :)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I'll do it for the lulz!

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeResearch In MotionCamera ModelBlackBerry 8300Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:09:05 00:45:44Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1024Image Height768
>> Anonymous
>>81875
that looks a lot better from the thumbnail than it really is...

Also might be too hard to use a cell phone camera, there isn't enough quality and the DOF isn't short enough to use half of those "Artsy" type shots.

We are going for failed photographer, Not really a camwhore uses cellphone to take non-nude pics.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
How is cam/whore/ and not nude in the same sentence.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBELCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/5.6Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created2007:08:01 15:24:43Exposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/5.6ISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, AutoFocal Length46.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width860Image Height1003RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypePortrait
>> else !L6xabslN96
>>81876
a camwhore is fine too.

>>81877
Canon 350D is credible.
>> angrylittleboy !wrJcGUHncE
>>81875

artsy-fartsy B&W? I like.

"GREAT CAPTURE! I LIKE THE TONES HERE!"

Holy shit, I wish it would be as epic as the time Cartier-Bresson got booted out of flickr.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/andrerabelo/70458366
>> Anonymous
>>81910
that shit happens too much on 4chan already,

But then you get into a huge argument over how, just because its a famous photographer, Doesn't make it a good pic, (or just because at one time it was considered a good picture doesn't mean it still is, OR just because one group of people don't like the picture it doesn't mean anything, because OPINION IS EXACTLY THAT)

Also I think we have a good selection of girls to choose from now, And we should keep the others and use them as "friends" Even the cellphone shots our profile girl can say "Oh I left my camera at home :( so I had to borrow my friends <3 cell phone camera, but I think I did alright :)"
>> angrylittleboy !wrJcGUHncE
>>81968

Even if we don't take into consideration the technological limitations of that period, I personally think it's still a good photo (not just because it's from Bresson).
>> Anonymous
>>81970
Stay on topic.

I'm voting for this girl
>>81840
>> dirtylittlecity
     File :-(, x)
Here is another option for the persona.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCASIO COMPUTER CO.,LTDCamera ModelEX-P700Camera Software1.01Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)33 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationRight-Hand, TopHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2004:04:12 22:26:18Exposure Time1/25 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length7.10 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3072Image Height2304RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I have a lot of pictures, and can produce more when needed.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBELCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/5.6Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created2007:08:12 16:37:17Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/5.6ISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashFlash, AutoFocal Length55.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height667RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypePortrait
>> else !L6xabslN96
>>82043
i'm sold.

what does the rest of /p/ think?
>> angrylittleboy !wrJcGUHncE
>>82051

Cool, get started.
>> Anonymous
Ok anyone got a status update on the profile?

Anything needed still?
>> Flickr Prank Admin !X70QD/ZrXI
Could the girls/submitters of girls who have posted multiples in this thread indicate who is who? Because a couple of you look a lot alike.

I'll get the account started after that gets sorted out.
>> Anonymous
>>82447
also, tits or gtfo?
>> Flickr Prank Admin !X70QD/ZrXI
>>82473
I don't think we need tits. Does Flickr even allow nudity?
>> Anonymous
>>82478
http://flickr.com/search/?w=all&q=nude+&m=text
>> Flickr Prank Admin !X70QD/ZrXI
>>82482
I stand corrected. Still, I think flashing /p/ and a bunch of horny guys on Flickr is a bit much to ask. If they're comfortable with it, I don't see a problem, but /p/ isn't the place for "tits or GTFO."
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I can be reached at Morafik@gmail.com

No tits 4u. Srry. Lulz.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:07:19 00:41:54Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width644Image Height960
>> nokin !ozOtJW9BFA
>>82517
I know this isn't the place for this kind of thing but I think I've seen you before.
519 ring a bell?
>> Anonymous
Nope, it does not.
>> Anonymous
>>82517
You are quite pretty.......... *is shocked*
>> nokin !ozOtJW9BFA
>>82530
Never mind Carry on.
>> Anonymous
Do this many pretty girls really surf 4chan?... Seriously?
>> Anonymous
>>82517
You work in a chinese store in TO?
>> Anonymous
>>82534
Yep, although /p/ is generally considered the best-looking (and generally least stereotypical /b/tard like) board.