>> |
Anonymous
>>283064 That point is pretty much irrelevant as there are no good viewfinders in modern DSLR's Even if you go fullframe they are shitty by yesterdays standards, the 5D has what I would call a decent viewfinder, not a good one. Even though compared to most cropsensor DSLR's with their crapfilled keyhole viewfinders it's fuckin amazing.
If you are bitching about this then there really just two options for you. Buy the most expensive fullframe DSRL you can find and live with the fact that even though the viewfinder isn't superb it still isn't bad. Or you can go back to old manual focus SLRs and fuck around with film, developing and scanning. You'll get a great viewfinder (if you're carefull picking out the camera) at a low low cost but with all the obvious disadvantages of film.
As that creepy fucking voice which every single CS and CS:S server uses, IT'S TIME TO CHOOSE (I guess you already chose something like one step up in the product line and think your marginally better camera is O so fantastic and completely superior)
Also, for about a year I was happily using a camera which I bought for about forty bucks, and that included two lenses. But yeah, go ahead and call me a gearfag. (yes that camera had a viewfinder better than that shitty DSLR I bet you are using. And yes, I still use it for taking pictures)
|