Sognsvann, Oslo, midnight Aug 4th.EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelDSC-H2Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:08:04 01:13:09Exposure Time30 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceCloudy WeatherFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length6.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1280Image Height960RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastHardSaturationNormalSharpnessHard
That is beautiful. Did you edit the colors?
>>67688Not one bit. I haven't done anything but resize it.
Norwegian nature FTW! Could you do a 1680x1050 version?
>>67686That's one heck of a nice photo.
*jawdrop*I too would like a desktop version.
Suh-weet!!Is that a little bit of Aurora Borealis at the left hand side?
Lovely pic. Is that some aurora borealis at the left or just some pretty cloud formation?
I like it...some nasty jpg artifacts on the bottom.
less black at the bottom more sky at the top.Specifically make sure the center tree isn't cut off at the top.Do that and you'll have a good image.Suggestion wise maybe use the right most tree to frame the image, but thats just me.
Sky is unimportant.Reflection in water is not.Take a shot of the same place, only in moonlight. <3
>>68097actually I like how the black balances out the composition, and if there was space above the trees it'll be distracting
>>68148The black is black and does absolutely nothing for the composition after the first inch. Its just a really thick frame at the bottom.Its distracting to lose the tip of the tree to the border.Also you might want to shoop out the two stars showing up in the top right