File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
/p/, I have a question. Why is it that Nikon is superior to Canon. I am not asking if they are, as that much is patently evident, however, how do we as a sentient group of sane individuals prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Nikon truly makes superior cameras and lenses?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
0/10
>> Ken Rockwell
Fuck yeah!
>> Anonymous
Canon optics are e few steps ahead at the time actually. I still wouldnt trade my D80 for anything.
>> Anonymous
/p/, I have a question. Why is it that casio is superior to Canon. I am not asking if they are, as that much is patently evident, however, how do we as a sentient group of sane individuals prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that casio truly makes superior cameras and lenses?

btw, i agree with op
give me a d3 over anything else, anyday, except for maybe friday nights....when id rather have a P&S, so i dont get boozed and fall over, causing thousands of dollors of damage.....
>> Ken Rockwell
>>153416
This thread is now about Ken Rockwell, with guest appearances by humanitarian photojournalist Karl Grobl.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
/p/, I have a question. Why is it that Sony is superior to Canikon. I am not asking if they are, as that much is patently evident, however, how do we as a sentient group of sane individuals prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Sony truly makes superior cameras and lenses?
>> Anonymous
>>153436
I love you, Butterfly.
>> heman
/p/, I have a question. Why is it that Ricoh is superior to Canon. I am not asking if they are, as that much is patently evident, however, how do we as a sentient group of sane individuals prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Ricoh truly makes superior cameras and lenses?
>> Anonymous
Stop these fucking retarded threads!
>> Anonymous
"I have a question. Why is it that Leica is superior to Contax. I am not asking if they are, as that much is patently evident, however, how do we as a sentient group of sane individuals prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Leica truly makes superior cameras and lenses?" - 1938 editorial in the state organ photo magazine, "Der Volkamera," translated from the original German.
>> heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA
/p/, I have a question. Why is it that Hasselblad is superior to Mamiya. I am not asking if they are, as that much is patently evident, however, how do we as a sentient group of sane individuals prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Hasselblad truly makes superior cameras and lenses?
>> Anonymous
/p/, I have a question. Why is it that a lousy disposable camera is superior to Hasselblad. I am not asking if they are, as that much is patently evident, however, how do we as a sentient group of sane individuals prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that a lousy disposable camera truly makes superior cameras and lenses?
>> Anonymous
lul... I haev copypasta
>> $19.99
/p/, I have a question. Why is it that an apple webcam is superior to Canon. I am not asking if they are, as that much is patently evident, however, how do we as a sentient group of sane individuals prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that apple truly makes superior cameras and lenses?
>> /THREAD Anonymous
/p/, I have a question. Eye contact can make or break a photo, and if you're making a photo in which there won't be any eye contact, you have to make up for it in other ways. I am not asking if they are, as that much is patently evident, however, the digital-only lens or the Sigma that'll start having problems in six to twelve months. How do we as a sentient group of sane individuals prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that excluding the first, these all lack engagement with the camera and have various severe compositional flaws? I understand that my view isn't held by all, nor should it be, I suppose. It's just a product of necessity.