File :-(, x, )
Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
The trolls here really need to do a better job. The fake tripcodes, vignetting jokes and posting my older Flickr photos aren't going to drive me out.

tldr: each troll post only makes my penis harder
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshPhotographerunknownMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:06:04 23:33:36Exposure Time1/640 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0.7 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width576Image Height864RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
>>197956tldr: each troll post only makes my penis harder

gaydar alert
>> Anonymous
I'm really confused, you were posting comments that sounded like they weren't you.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
excellent snapshot

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 MacintoshPhotographerunknownMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:06:04 23:41:10Exposure Time1/640 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0.7 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width576Image Height864RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
I like this one, but the bridge (?) at the top needs to go.

Also, I'd suggest you get a new and secure tripcode.
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
>>197967
I chose an outtake on purpose, sherlock.
>> beethy !HJGkSBB3Ao
haha yea, they're trying equally hard with me
not working though, it's kinda fun seeing me mentioned in almost every single thread
plus someone is advertising my page, which is cool
>> Anonymous
>>197991

LOL. You are not fooling anyone beethy-boy. You already BAWWWWWWW'd here about it. Too late to try and pretend it doesn't hurt. Everyone knows you you went off and had a cry about it after you announced your "leaving".

Your pathetic act is transparent and old and contradictory with your own words and actions.
>> Anonymous
>>197991

tried successfully cos you ran away once before and bitched about it all. flip-flop!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
oh lawd
>> Anonymous
>>197956

my penis is so hard right now
>> Anonymous
I'm gonna have to side with the tripfags on this. They all have the balls to keep using a name when posting their work, despite the enormous amount of bullshit they get back from /p/'s anons.

I find it pretty cowardly how the anons trolls don't hesitate to attack them without using a name without posting their own work to compare. Maybe no, they're no good, and many of the criticisms towards their work is true, but I find it pretty sad that people go out of their way to actually insult the person behind them, let alone when it's completely uncalled for.
>> Anonymous
>>198026

beethy
>> Anonymous
>>198030
I ain't Beethy, suck my dick.
>> $19.99 !OSYhGye6hY
>>198033
is it hard from the trolls?
>> Anonymous
>>198046
Not DC either, dude.
>> $19.99 !OSYhGye6hY
>>198051
i wasn't implying that you were. I was just trying to make a joke related to the thread.

0/10 for me
>> Jesus !1EQ.kCAg9c
If I pretend to troll and your penis gets harder, can I see it?
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
     File :-(, x)
>>198054

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:01:24 02:03:52Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width540Image Height308
>> Anonymous
>>198052
Ah... yeah, didnt get it. :[
>> sage !ccqXAQxUxI
LOL @ all the fake tripfags in this thread.

Also fake DC, I love the snapshot you posted!
truly a wonderful example of how shitty DC's photography is.
>> Jesus !1EQ.kCAg9c
>>198056
Oh baby, I'll adjust your focus ring any day of the week.
>> Anonymous
>>197956

WOW WUT A GUD PHOTO
TRULY U CAPURE HER BEAUTY
AND INDIVIDUALALITY
A+++ EXCELLENT
>> Anonymous
>>197956

Wow, great photo of a beached whale, Nature Guy!
>> Anonymous
>>198066
>>198064
>>198061
fake sage is fake (and the trolling force makes my dick extra hard too)
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
>>198062
oh, you better get your ultra-wide angle to see this one
>> beethy !HJGkSBB3Ao
>>198011
beethy5?
post 1 2 3 and 4 please
lol
>> Depressed Cheesecake !YdpC/gBCw.
     File :-(, x)
Only thing that's missing is the good looking models I get and the expensive L lenses you can't afford. t_t

Here I improved your photo by adding more atmosphere and bringing it more into focus.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshPhotographerunknownMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:06:04 21:49:41Exposure Time1/640 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0.7 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width576Image Height864RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
These pictures are shit. How sad.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
joke's on you, you don't have a penis.
>> Anonymous
>>198079
>good looking models

¬_¬
>> Anonymous
>>197956

That's some ugly looking bokeh.
>> Anonymous
>>197956

Her torso looks like a lumpy sack of potatoes.
Her face looks like she is having a seizure.

This may be one of the least-flattering photographs I have ever seen.
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
>>198128
HURR DURR I POSTED AN OUTTAKE ON PURPOSE YOU DIPSHIT

I thought trolls were smart.
>> Anonymous
>>198080

NOT ENOUGH, MOTHERFUCKER
>> The DC Thread Pattern Anonymous
1) DC posts some really shitty photos.
2) Someone criticizes him for one of many things, usually faux-vignetting or USM.
3) DC responds with >HURRR IT WAS AN OUTTAKE HURRR
4) Anon asks for a not-outtake.
5) DC declares that everyone posting on /p/ is a troll and refuses to post.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>197956

Why is the bokeh so weird looking?
What lens are you using? Is this the 50mm 1.8? Or is it a zoom?

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshPhotographerunknownMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:06:04 22:49:43Exposure Time1/640 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0.7 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width450Image Height414RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
>>198148

that's what happens when you try to sharpen the out of focus areas
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
>>198136
1) Dumbass is too stupid to recognize the picture is obviously bad.
2) Dumbass is also too stupid to read the opening text, obviously not aimed at a serious image critique.
3) Troll responds with tired vignetting and usm jokes.
4) I do not care
5) I keep taking superior pictures while the trolls anxiously await to shit on my next batch while they hold their thumbs up their asses in fiery rage and jealously.

Also>>197977


>>198149
No, that's what happens when you use a $70 lens, idiot.
>> Anonymous
rofl

just admit you were sharpening to the max instead of blaming the lens
>> Anonymous
>>198136
>4) Anon asks for a not-outtake.
>5) DC declares that everyone posting on /p/ is a troll and refuses to post.

I have yet to see DC post anything and not immediately blame anything other than himself (equipment, model, weather, etc) whenever someone critiques his work.

What I like best, however, is his new insistence that anyone who criticizes him is "jealous" of him, suggesting that it is totally impossible for any impartial viewer to dislike his body of work.

DC is a better troll than even Butterfly.
>> Anonymous
>>198161
Just do some reading yourself before attacking the user. The 50mm F1.8 is known for giving bad bokeh in some/many situations when wide open. It nearly always produces thick-rimmed bokeh.
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
     File :-(, x)
>>198161
rofl.

at least learn how sharpening works before you come off sounding like an ignorant toolbag. good thing you posted as anonymous.
>> Anonymous
>>198166
>Just do some reading yourself before attacking the user.

People would be more likely to do that if DC didn't respond like this:
>No, that's what happens when you use a $70 lens, idiot.

I'm still not sure what lens he was using.
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
>>198165
>I have yet to see DC post anything and not immediately blame anything other than himself (equipment, model, weather, etc) whenever someone critiques his work.

I haven't "blamed" anything, other than my lens which is notorious for poor bokeh. Fail.

>What I like best, however, is his new insistence that anyone who criticizes him is "jealous" of him, suggesting that it is totally impossible for any impartial viewer to dislike his body of work.

USM and vignetting jokes are not "critique". Fail again.
>> Anonymous
>>197956
every post of this girl makes MY penis harder.
>> Anonymous
>>198171
>I'm still not sure what lens he was using.
I just said it. 50mm 1.8
It's in the exif for bunchies' sake! Or what, do you have a zoom lens that goes up to f1.8?
>> Anonymous
>>198169

What are you showing us here?
Maybe instead of just responding to the trolls you can respond to some of us who are trying to ask polite questions without being an asshole?
>> Anonymous
>>198169

and that looks radically different than the goddamn crop you fucking idiot

you posted your super secret workflow and that photoshop shit you do does fuck up your out of focus areas
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
>>198175
Where is your polite question?
>> Anonymous
>>198174

Are you DC posting as Anon?
Is there only one lens that can do f1.8?

No?

Then shut the fuck up.
>> Anonymous
>>198177
>Where is your polite question?

>>198175
>What are you showing us here?

>>198148
>What lens are you using? Is this the 50mm 1.8? Or is it a zoom?
>> Anonymous
>>198178
>Are you DC posting as Anon?
>Is there only one lens that can do f1.8?
>No?
>Then shut the fuck up.

Oh my god. Im not DC but the exif data says it's a 50mm shooting at f1.8.
If you followed DC's shit around enough you'd know it's one of his lenses. Additionally, he just mentioned it's a 70 buck lens, which also points towards the 50mm 1.8. The 50mm 1.4 is around 300 bucks or more. I have the 50mm 1.8 too and it does produce that bokeh. Do you need more fucking information dude?
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
     File :-(, x)
>>198176
wow, you are fucking stupid.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:06:05 02:05:40Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1100Image Height600
>> $19.99 !OSYhGye6hY
>>198178
There is only one lens that has max ap of 1.8 with a focal length of 50mm.
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
>>198181
50mm 1.8, like it says in the EXIF

>Focal Length 50.00 mm
>F-Number f/1.8

I am showing you the RAW dialog with no extra sharpening applied.
>> Anonymous
>>198182

ITT; fags assume everyone spends all day sucking DC's cock and memorizing his shitty lenses
>> Anonymous
>>198187
ITT fags that read everything except the answer to their question.

You don't even need to follow DC around to know what the lens is, as this guy pointed out
>>198185
>> Anonymous
and this is why we stay anonymous.
>> Anonymous
>>198192
because we are idiots
>> Anonymous
>>198193

No, because Anon will never get hassled as bad as a Tripfag, and will never get chased around with fake posters and shitty motivationals.
>> Anonymous
>>198195
and also because we are idiots
>> Anonymous
All people seriously into photography should probably just stay the hell out of /p/, from the sound of this.

>>198195

This is why we cant have good things.
>> Anonymous
>>198195
exactly.

dc. suck a dick.
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
>>198221
>bawww, etc
>> Anonymous
>>198227
Baw, baw, baw yourself you fucking loser.
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
>>198230
>bawww
>> Happy Cheesecake
THIS THREAD IS AWESOME
4CHONARCHIVE NAOW
>> beethy !HJGkSBB3Ao
DC, i actually like you a lot more now after i read this
>>198157
>> sage !i/euDJmWr2
haha, this thread is awesome.
Im still waiting on that Hatefag that was raging so much the other night to post some pictures. :]
>> Anonymous
>>197956
>>197977
>>198073
>>198079
>>198130
>>198157
>>198169
>>198172
>>198177
>>198183
>>198186
>>198227
>>198231

FAAAAAGGOT. Seriously, no one has respect for you. So fuck off.
>> sage !i/euDJmWr2
>>198254
No one respects you either. You're fucking Anonymous.
>> Syphilis !cJqOleQS9g
Personally, as my 2 cents worth, I don't belive DC is a good photographer, but that judging by his works... There is a significant troll bench that will flame all tripfags... but meh, its 4chan... take it on the chin, or leave.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>198165
FUCK!!

I dont care if someone is a good photographer or not, having the balls to post _anything_ in /p/ now that schools out makes you a million times better than Anonymous.

Also how come i only got impersonated (badly) for a while, everyones knows not to bother with me now?
>> Anonymous
>>198261
Very true. Also butterfly, you used to piss the shit out of me. Now you actually make contributions that aren't trolls. Good job.
>> Anonymous
the photo DC posted is nice

maybe you artfags are too pretentious and snobby to admit it but if someone from an objective point of view saw it they'd say it's a nice photo. Not the GREATEST FUCKING PHOTO EVER obviously. Maybe it doesn't follow all the rules of a good photograph but it's still looks nice and that's usually all that matters unless you're looking to win a pulitzer prize or something.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>198262
I (should have) always posted worthwhile comments in photog threads, they just got overshadowed by the somewhat larger volume of SONYA100ROX posts :p
>> Anonymous
Crappy
>> Haddock !!xREx2m9lgBs
>>198263
Actually, no. I think most of his photos are relatively bad. Relative to other photographers, mind you, not /p/ which is, much like /b/, and ocean of piss.
>> Anonymous
I for one, have had enough of that nasty skank
>>197956
>> kyol !xwPXzZtgeg
>>197956
lmao.
So instead of being peaceful and simply accepting the fact that posting a piece of your personal self online can and almost always will result in negative response, you come right back into the ring swinging like you're having Nam flashbacks. Way to win the crowd, sport.

I've posted a lot of shit myself, only to have most of it thrown back in my face by Anon. It happens. It's not devianTART and it's much better that way. Learn to take advice and better yourself. Don't post the same (hate to say it, but they're really not that incredible. at all.) set of pictures when they failed the first time--honestly, that's just a matter of respect and common courtesy to your fellow man.

This entire thread isn't even necessary. Take the response you're given and work with it, use it to better yourself and then come back with what you've learned, because a lot of the members here have experience and tend to be able to call out bullshit like it's nobody's business--whereas the TARTs will simply jerk off to anything anybody throws up onto a screen.

Good luck bud.
>> Anonymous
>>198297
>This entire thread isn't even necessary
once again this is another great point.

dc. suck a dick.
>> Anonymous
>>198283
>Actually, no. I think most of his photos are relatively bad.

The thing about DC is that he's really good at PP and general technical/shooping, but his composition is frequently horrible and his photos of people make them look awkward and unattractive.

What you end up with are photos that look like amazingly well-processed snapshots, and I think /p/ has a hard time evaluating the technique of a photograph without concentrating on the content.
>> Anonymous
>>198297
>I've posted a lot of shit myself, only to have most of it thrown back in my face by Anon. It happens. It's not devianTART and it's much better that way. Learn to take advice and better yourself. Don't post the same (hate to say it, but they're really not that incredible. at all.) set of pictures when they failed the first time--honestly, that's just a matter of respect and common courtesy to your fellow man.

This post really isn't about taking constructive critisism or not. The thing is, dc doesn't really get honest critisism, he gets vignette dogs, and shitsux and your friend is fat.
>> Anonymous
>>198435
>dc doesn't really get honest critisism

Bullshit.
DC gets plenty of honest criticism, he just ignores it and keeps doing the same lame-assed shit so much that people have created MEMES for the repeated shitty things he does.

Vignette Dog = For the love of Christ, please stop adding fake vignetting, how many times do we have to tell you this?!?

Most of the complaints in the last set were about overshooping and awkward posing of his models, which was also extremely fair considering the shots posted.
>> Anonymous
>>198437
ok, the last set were awkward model poses, but there was no overshooping. There wasn't even fake vignetting.
>> Anonymous
>>198437
http://www.flickr.com/photos/soloxide/2535174327/

WHAAAA?! the corners have no vignette!? are we finally getting to him?!!?!!
>> Anonymous
>>198440
>no overshooping. There wasn't even fake vignetting.

Yes there was.
Fake vignetting was toned down, but still evident in the shots he posted.
Most of the models had bizarre halos from over-editing.

PROTIP: The shots in his flicker are different than the shots he posted here.
>> Anonymous
>>198455
Actually, I think they're the same. I'm not 100% positive though. Anyway, the ones he posted to /p/ are lost to the void after page 10. If you lose the prejudice and look at the flickr, you'll see that they aren't overshooped at all.
>> Anonymous
>>198456

The ones in his Flickr aren't overshooped, they'r underexposed.
I know they're different because I remember being surprised at how good the exposure on the models was in the shots he posted.
>> Anonymous
>>197956
>86 posts and 9 image replies omitted. Click Reply to view.

10/10
DC is the best troll /p/ has ever had.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>198468
oh no he isnt!
>> DC is the new Hatefag
>>198470

He's certainly more subtle than you are.
>> Nikon !!eX1E3IhZL8k
>>197956

No Nikon gear, no care.

P.S. Tits or GTFO
>> Anonymous
>>198237

>>198237

>>198237

This
>> Anonymous
>>198200
>This is why we cant have good things.

No, this is why DON'T FUCKING POST USING A TRIP.
Tripfags are hated on EVERY BOARD. It doesn't matter how good you are, DON'T FUCKING DO IT.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>198538
No, some tripfags are liked. Even old /b/ had its favourite tripfag (just the one though).
>> Anonymous
>>198538
Sage for anon vs. tripfag shit.
>> Anonymous
>>198550

Age to piss off tripfags posting as anon.
>> sage
sage
>> Anonymous
>>198538
Let me guess...you;
Are a protestfag who discovered 4chan in the past 6 months.

Actually believe that forced anon existed forever and existed in every board.

Actually believe that all forums outside of /b/ are also made of nothing but trolls and shitstorms.

Get out of 4chan and never come back, we don't need your "lulz anonymous does not forget & does not forgive" shit, you pathetic piece of shit. You're not Anonymous and you never will be, you're just "Anonymous".
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
>>198562
kudos to you sir.
>> Anonymous
sage for neverending faggotry
>> Anonymous
>>198562

3+ years.
Try again.
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
>>198568
3 years and you still havent learnt to sage?
>> Liska !!LIVFOETqL8j
Wow, i can't believe how much of a nosedive /p/ took. Entertaining thread is entertaining & useless.
>> Anonymous
>>198571

Why would I sage this awesome thread?
I love how butthurt you faggots are getting.
>> Anonymous
>>198568
>>3+ weeks
>>try again
>> Anonymous
>>198582

Somebody failed the reading comprehension section of the SAT, huh?
>> Anonymous
>>198437
>>198425

Bullshit. You guys sound like butthurt faggots who try to find everything bad in a photo. You probably go around evaluating more than you do actually taking shots and the shots you take are probably really boring. You can't justify you're trolling, sorry. Calling composition horrible, not accepting ANY use of fake vignetting whatsoever and using insults to critique a photo makes it really obvious what your motives are.

tl;dr stop being angsty preteens
>> elf_man !!DdAnyoDMfCe
>>198572
It's like this ALL THE TIME now. Yeesh.
>> Anonymous
>>198616

Basically, /p/ is the shithole of the photography world. Insecure faggots find the most trivial things to bitch about when a tripfag or anyone else with decent photos posts them and then they try to justify them.
>> Anonymous
>>198623
>>198616

If you want to get your e-peen stroked there are dozens of sites far better than 4chan for getting that done. Go to Deviant Art, go to Flickr, go anywhere but here.

When you come here asking for C&C /p/ will always be heavy with the criticism and light on the compliments because you can get compliments anywhere, but criticism is hard to find on the web.
>> Anonymous
>>198616

Exactly why I come to /p.
If I wanted my dick stroked I would be all over deviant art. I want someone to say bad things about my photos, even if it is uninformed. If someone can find a point to say something about, it is something I need to pay attention to and decide if I want to change it. If I wanted nothing but praise, I would take a giant pile of cat pictures to deviant art.
>> Anonymous
>>198640
However, predjudiced critisism (i.e. Your friend is fat, USM) is kinda stupid. USM is a valuable tool that everyone should use.
>> Anonymous
>>198621
as soon as the tripfags stop bawwing (or encouraging), it will stop.

anon will always be assholes. the onus is on the tripfags.
>> Anonymous
>>198643

Meh, I mentally filter. Like banner ads. Still, makes me wonder how I could have taken a more flattering picture.

Working toward the greatest picture evar.
>> Anonymous
>>198629
>>198640

So you don't want your penis stroked; understandable.

BUT, the "criticism" here isn't constructive at all. It's more like a shitty photographer who's insecure about his work coming and posting vignetting dog on every photo that has vignetting and then making a fake tripcode and editing the op's photo to be completely over-vignetted and thinking its funny. It's not objective and it's made to annoy the OP more than it is to tell him how to improve. At least some honesty is better than OLOOL I EDITED UR PIC TO BE BETTER LOOK AT THE VIGNETTING ARENT I FUNNY I WANT TO PISS OFF EVERYBODY BECAUSE I HAVE NO FRIENDS.
>> Anonymous
>>198643
>USM is a valuable tool that everyone should use.

Sure, but it should NEVER be immediately obvious that you've used USM. If I can see obvious telltale signs of USM (halos, fucked up highlights, etc) all over a photo then you're doing it wrong.

Also most of the time you can sharpen an image better in Lightroom or Aperture.
>> Anonymous
>>198650
>It's more like a shitty photographer who's insecure about his work coming and posting vignetting dog on every photo that has vignetting and then making a fake tripcode and editing the op's photo to be completely over-vignetted and thinking its funny. It's not objective and it's made to annoy the OP more than it is to tell him how to improve. At least some honesty is better than OLOOL I EDITED UR PIC TO BE BETTER LOOK AT THE VIGNETTING ARENT I FUNNY I WANT TO PISS OFF EVERYBODY BECAUSE I HAVE NO FRIENDS.

1) Welcome to 4chan, how are you liking your first day here?
2) DC brought that shit on himself with all his BAWWWWing about criticism he was getting.
>> Anonymous
>>198629
C&C is comments and criticism, not compliments and criticism...0/10

>>198648
obvious newfag to /p/ is obvious.
There used to be absolutely NO major problems with trolls on /p/, that shit came with you faggots when school got out for summer and the kids had nowhere else to go. The biggest problem /p/ had 4 months ago was too many gear threads and not enough picture threads, and that was what everyone raged about. No one raged about "LOL USM" or "FAT MODEL", it was "QUIT POSTING GEAR THREADS, FAGGOTS. GO TEST THE CAMERA YOU WANT AND GET WHAT YOU WANT. NO ONE CARES AS LONG AS YOU TAKE PICTURES WITH IT AND IT ISN'T A SONY"

So quit telling those of us who HAVE been here how it used to be or how it should be, you arrogant cunt. This is OUR /p/, not your /p/, and we've frankly had enough. Come back when you graduate from high school and aren't an angsty underage b& kiddie any more.

inb4 fucking "tripfag posting anon", "hi Beethy/DC/Butterfly/Sage/Martin etc."
>> Anonymous
>>198653

1. I was here before you douchebags started making shitty jokes so go suck a dick.
2. DC didn't bring anything upon himself because you faggots do it to every single fucking post you can find.
>> Anonymous
>>198655
>C&C is comments and criticism, not compliments and criticism...0/10

Where did I say C&C was "compliments and criticism"? I just mentioned compliments because the BAWWWWing faggots here who think /p/ is over-critical seem to think that the problem is that Anon doesn't have enough nice things to say.


PS: This isn't YOUR /p/. This isn't MY /p/. This isn't OUR /p/. None of us have any claim to, nor any ownership of, this board. It is a public space that can be used however the people using it in the moment see fit. ALL BOARDS ON 4CHAN TEND TOWARDS TROLLING AND ANARCHY. If you don't like it, leave, or at the very least shut the fuck up and wait until it invariably passes. Gay threads complaining about trolling like this one are what brings the trolls out in full force.
>> Anonymous
>>198651
Wow, so some people are learning photoshop, or some are just learning photography. I'd like to see you post some of your first Photoshop work. I know mine included hideous amounts of filters and lens flare.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
You know since /p/ hates me (right, you do dont you) I still got loads of decent crits in the last thread I posted.

I think i learned some things, mostly things i already knew and shouldnt have done, but there was lots of critisim and not much trolling.

WHY?!

because im happy with people insulting my work.
>> Anonymous
>>198629
>>198629
>>198629
>>198629
>>198629
this

there have been plenty of threads where people have gotten almost universal compliments on the photos they've posted.

the troll threads get more prominence because that is the nature of the fucking internet.
>> Anonymous
>>198675
>You know since /p/ hates me (right, you do dont you) I still got loads of decent crits in the last thread I posted.
>I think i learned some things, mostly things i already knew and shouldnt have done, but there was lots of critisim and not much trolling.
>WHY?!
>because im happy with people insulting my work.

If it wasn't for all your pro-Sony trolling you'd be one of the best tripfags on /p/.
>> Anonymous
>>198659
>ALL BOARDS ON 4CHAN TEND TOWARDS TROLLING AND ANARCHY.

The trolls used to at least be funny. They were trolling for teh lulz, not just to be retards and fuck up every thread.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>198680
whoa! dont be going overboard! (geddit?!) I dont do anymore pro sony trolling than everyone else does their own brands now.
>> Anonymous
>>198685
i think trolls from other boards have been coming in here. not sure why, maybe because of the whole thing about beethy's girlfriend. there definitely seem to be a lot more now than their used to be.
>> Anonymous
>>198655
every community that has ever existed on the internet has gone through what /p/ is going through right now. whenever the size of the community increases so does the trolling.

no amount of bawwing will revert /p/ back to what it was. the only thing you can do is ignore the trolling and move to the threads that are decent.

and, dc's been getting "LOL USM" or "FAT MODEL" for a couple of months. even before the influx of trolls.
>> Anonymous
It's fucking diffusion and devolution. Like in Idiocracy. Eventually, we'd all be DERP DERP CANIKON USM DERP DERP VIGNUT DERP
>> Anonymous
Get that skank ass ho out of /p/
>> Anonymous
Photoshop moar
>> Anonymous
>>198722
>Like in Idiocracy.

Wait a minute, someone actually saw that film?!?

How was it? The critics hated the shit out of it and I never got around to seeing it...
>> Anonymous
>>198797
About as blatant as you'd expect, although not without some funny parts. Amusing idea, stupid movie.
>> Anonymous
ITT: Film reviews
>> Anonymous
>>198825

Shut up DC.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
So...
My first encounter with you was basically you telling me to shove off about 15 minutes ago in my thread...
Now I see this... by your own account (and mine as well) god awful picture...

What else am I supposed to do but come in here and tell you to suck some nasty sac DC?

Can I at least see some of your "good" photography?

Goddamn tripfags, bring all this shit down on themselves and then whine about it...
>> Anonymous
>>198987
That wasn't Depressed Cheesecake. Look at the tripcodes. People like to impersonate him and troll.
>> Anonymous
>>198990
My mistake then.
Still would like to see some of his pictures.
>> Anonymous
>>198993
http://www.flickr.com/photos/soloxide/
>> Anonymous
>>198996
Sweet fill flash.
>> Anonymous
>>198997
He's actually got alot of good stuff there, you just gotta dig through some of the dirt.
>> iProd !8x7lXo9zIQ
ilu cheesecake :3
>> Anonymous
He does lots of simple available light portraits of his friends, sort of like your stuff in the other thread, except, of course, in a totally different style. The flash stuff isn't typical.

It's also why I hate people putting hundreds of pictures on their Flickr or other gallery. Show me your <50 best, preferably more like twenty, and then maybe have the rest put up somewhere if I'm interested. No one wants to wade through chronologically arranged junk or arbitrary sets.
>> Anonymous
>>199004
Well it's realyl only good for flickr users, since they would probably log in every day, they can see their "friends" progress as they do. It's not a portfolio site.
>> Anonymous
The "New Rules for /p/" thread gets deleted, but this blatant troll remains?

What the fuck?