File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Terrible quality, I know.

Taken on the gravitron. You know that ride that spins you really fast and you stick to the walls?

I was wondering how I'd go about taking a clearer photo, I'm using a pentax Optio and they usually come up pretty clear - perhaps it was the speed?
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX Optio S40Camera SoftwareACD Systems Digital ImagingMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.6Focal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:09:12 18:58:09Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/2.6ISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashFlash, AutoFocal Length5.80 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1434Image Height1075RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
1. ISO200 on a point & shoot. That's gonna give you lots of noise.
2. 1/40th in a moving... room? Vehicle? I don't know what you'd really classify that as. But moving. You were moving. So there was probably some vibration going on. Looks like you used flash, so the people are reasonably sharp, but there'll be some blurriness around the fringes even with flash.
>> Anonymous
>>77012
What would you suggest setting the ISO to?
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>77016
The minimum your camera has.

Don't go above ISO100 unless you're packing an SLR or that's the only way to get an image that's not blurry as hell from camera shake. P&S cameras have really crappy noise characteristics.
>> Ren Kockwell !!y74dwT8WYfm
>>77007
Interesting capture-- if you can try it again with less noise and a better exposure (like ac said), it could be really great.
>> Anonymous
How gay.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>77213
I've seen gayer.

Eku's last set with the crossdressing, for instance.
>> Anonymous
>>77226
Where is that silly person anyways
>> Anonymous
>>77226
Crossdressing not ftw?
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>77239
Hm? No, I'm just saying crossdressing not FTheterosexual.