File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
what is this shenanigans?
>> Anonymous
>>131744

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/kodakdcs520/
>> iProd !8x7lXo9zIQ
THERE'S NO DIRECT TO PRINTER BUTTON
>> Anonymous
>>131746

um, what IS it?

kodakcanon merger
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>131773
One of the (if not the) first digital SLRs. It's a Canon EOS 1N body with a Kodak digital system slapped on.

When I first learned about this, I assumed that that just meant that the body was more or less an EOS 1N. It wasn't until I actually saw one in person (at the George Eastman house in Rochester) that I realized that it was literally an EOS 1N--as you can see in the picture, the 1N logo is still on the body, and if not for the "KP DEMO" label on there, you'd see a vestigial switch for opening up the film compartment.
>> Anonymous
>>131797

It was apparently the 4th generation "professional digital camera" according to that dpreview link above.

The 1st (period) dSLR was apparently the Kodak DCS-100, released in 1991: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kodak_DCS-100
>> Anonymous
>>131803

>>the DCS 100 had a resolution of 1.3 megapixels. It came with an outer module to store and to visualize the images, and to house the batteries. It could store up to 156 images without compression on its 200 megabyte hard disk drive.

lawl
>> Anonymous
NASA uses DCS 760 at shuttle missions, ISS and space.
>> Anonymous
>>131836

That was true at one time, but Nasa switched to the D2X and D2Xs quite a while ago.
>> thefamilyman !!rTVzm2BgTOa
>>131836
and i thought the F5 was big enough as it was!
>> Anonymous
>>132007
At least its easy for them to shoot with cameras that size and huge lens attached because they are in zero gravity.