File :-(, x, )
Vincent !!8LCSE0Zp1mL
OK heres a pretty big list of tips for making panoramics. These are all based on my experiences and I feel they produce the best panoramics.

Most importantly, when you take a pano, make sure there is a Foreground. Panoramics are not best used for taking pics of clouds or far away mountain ranges, they are best for very wide angle shots where the subject is close and large. If you don't have a foreground, its probably not worth taking the picture. This is even more important with wider angle lenses.

Tripods are definitely not mandatory, Unless I state otherwise all my pictures are taken handheld. you don't need a fancy technique for turning or anything, Just stand very straight in one spot and spin around taking pictures. Make sure you overlap a large portion of each picture (at least 30%) the more distortion your lens has (for example a fisheye lens) the more you need to overlap.

Pic taken handheld, D200, Sigma 10-20mm @ 14mm, 21 shots (7x3)
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:11:18 20:00:57Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2000Image Height667
>> Vincent !!8LCSE0Zp1mL
     File :-(, x)
OVerlap Vertical as well ashorizontal pictures, Your sliver of a picture looks like crap on a monitor and its impossible to print properly. Solve this by layering vertical rows as well as horizontal ones. I find for 5 pictures wide, you should have 2 vertical rows. The Ideal ratio for a panoramic is 3:1, These print nicely on any size paper, (double it up and you are back to 3:2).

Technical stuff.
Meter manually, I can't stress this enough. take a few pics to see what dynamic range you have to work with, and once you have checked the shadow and highlight areas of your pictures, pick the best exposure and set it to that. THEN focus manually, choose something close to the hyperfocal distance for best results. ALSO set the white balance manually, I have had to spend quite a bit of time (hours) trying to fix WB issues when I am too lazy to set this manually. And turn auto ISO off, it will fuck with you even in Manual.

Handheld, Casio Z120, 36 pictures at 36mm, (9x4)

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:02:17 17:15:45Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width3000Image Height1000
>> Vincent !!8LCSE0Zp1mL
     File :-(, x)
Now when taking the pics, know what you plan on keeping in the picture, and make sure you go quite a bit past it in all directions (an extra picture on the edges can save you big time!). The output you get will need to be heavily cropped and you want to make sure you don't fuck everything up by missing a vital part of the picture. I stitch on average 18 pictures per pano (6x3) However, I have done 50 and 70 picture panoramics in the past, And they work fine aswell. The program can handle it.

What I use and I find works best. I often shoot very wide, like 10, 14 or 15mm (fisheye, all on a 1.5x crop). The wider the angle the more distances are exaggerated (just like the lens normally functions). I use a Sigma 10-20mm most of the time, which has distortion and sharpness issues at the corners. So I simply overlap more and they cease to be a problem. These panoramics usually range from 180-240 degree field of views, and about 70-90 degrees vertically (any more and PTGui has issues because it wants to warp the tops and bottoms into wider areas) However in the past I used to take a lot of pano's at 20-28mm, which don't give such a dramativc sense of depth, but are still good for capturing scenes in the 120-180degree arc range. Any more than 35mm and you are creating a lot of work for yourself (however my best pano is 74 pictures, taken at 36mm)

This is prob my best pano, Handheld, Casio Z-120, 74 pics, taken at 36mm

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:02:01 17:19:13Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width3000Image Height1000
>> Vincent !!8LCSE0Zp1mL
     File :-(, x)
Software:
PTgui, get it, its the only program that you can add control points afterwards, and it also has a better track record with me and gives you 2 important options when stitching pictures. When stitching the program will work wonders automatically if you overlapped properly. When you see the preview make sure you center the horizon by using the blue crosshairs to adjust the picture (Lots of clicking around when the picture is tilted!). Also there are 3 options for the perspective. the first NEVER use (rectangle). The Cylinder is great for stitching wide shots with or without high vertical arc's, this does not correct for vertical blending and makes a taller picture than the Spherical option. The third option (sphere) also corrects for vertical distortion, and therefore functions as a tilt shift lens for correcting converging vertical lines. IT ALSO has the nasty habit of warping the top of your picture into a blurry mess when your vertical arc is too high. It also stretches pictures slightly wider.

Pic very related!

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:03:10 20:10:06Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1386Image Height936
>> Vincent !!8LCSE0Zp1mL
     File :-(, x)
Heres a good example of what Spherical blending gives you. Notice the corrected buildings (like a tilt shift / perspective control lens can fix)

Handheld, D200, Sigma 10-20mm @10mm, 21 pics (7x3)

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:03:18 15:57:05Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2160Image Height720
>> Vincent !!8LCSE0Zp1mL
     File :-(, x)
Tripod (No special pano head), D200, Sigma 10-20mm @ 17mm, 18 pics (6x3) Bracketed and combined to form an HDR

I only used the Tripod here because I wanted the HDR processing to save the detail in the clouds and keep the saturation high on the greens reds and oranges.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:01:30 16:24:06Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1800Image Height600
>> Vincent !!8LCSE0Zp1mL
     File :-(, x)
D50, Sigma 18-200 @ 24mm, 21 pics (7x3)

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:01:17 10:57:36Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width3000Image Height1000
>> Vincent !!8LCSE0Zp1mL
     File :-(, x)
Vertical pano, Stitched in horizontal because PTGui can't handle such high vertical arcs.
D200, Sigma 10-20mm @10mm, 9 pics (1x9)

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:10:12 14:41:14Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width572Image Height1200
>> angrylittleboy !wrJcGUHncE
Thanks for the tips. I've only attempted pano once and it was a failure. I'll try again with these in mind.
>> Anonymous
ITT: AWESOME

Also, how do you deal with the clouds? Because your first shot of sky wont have the same cloud shapes as the second shot of sky...
>> Christopher !LQd6JHwoaQ
>>145810

Same question here.

and also what orientation is the camera in ?

Thank you so much for spending the time to share your experience. :D
>> Anonymous
Awesome. I love you vincent.
>> Anonymous !sAGEr9FFjw
>>145810
also, what about people in city panos?
>> Anonymous
sticky this shit
>> lurker !rK4K86e49M
>>145841
>>145841
>>145841
>>145841

seconded
>> beethy !HJGkSBB3Ao
mods, sticky this now
>> Sicko !L3HRY/miC.
>>145857

No stickies in /p/ eva.

I forget why.
>> Anonymous !sAGEr9FFjw
>>145866
IIRC it was something about moot telling his mootlings not to sticky anything ever...
>> Anonymous
>>145857

>sluuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrp
>> pano Anonymous
once you get the pictures, what pieces of software are you using to stitch them together? I have tried quite a few packages...but I cannot find one I really like.
>> Anonymous
>>145881

read the whole thread, you stupid shit.
>> I||ICIT !!mknjFN/v/49
     File :-(, x)
>>145881
PTgui. i had a squiz and i think its bout 170USd... maybe in the future.

cheers man, and thanks from before i guess :)

will def have to try this, though it kind of goes against everything ive thought, i.e dont use wide angles, whereas you use them a lot.

thing is though, using such wide angles dont you find the amount of overlap is huge? i mean, considering at most your shooting 240 degree panos, and at 10-14 on a crop your going to get 100-60(guessed) degrees, wont that create huge overlaps?

heres a couple of examples at 30mm, the first one im happy with cos it worked near perfect(for me) the 2nd i somehow managed to bugger up the end....
both on a tripod.
>> I||ICIT !!mknjFN/v/49
     File :-(, x)
>>145898
i wished this one worked out due to the interest points of the signs but maybe i could just crop the ends, ionno/
>> I||ICIT !!mknjFN/v/49
also, shoulda mentioned both were about 16 shots long and only 1 high. manually metered off the brightest and darkest=averaged, MF and in portrait orientation. pano'd in arcsoft panorama maker.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Took this one fairly quickly and handeld on a p&s. It's cool how tripods aren't that important for big distances. I actually expected this to turn out really bad and distorted.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot A550Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.6Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created2008:03:23 22:22:35Exposure Time1/25 secF-Numberf/2.6ISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/2.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length5.80 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2882Image Height600RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I've been taking a ton of panoramas recently.

I agree with basically everything Vincent said (though I don't use a wide-angle lens for panos - tried it once with bad results; undoubtedly a result of inexperience).

Always shoot in portrait orientation and photograph well beyond where you want the border to be.

Before you start, check your horizon; IF IT ISN'T LEVEL, DON'T KEEP IT IN THE CENTRE OF THE FRAME. This is extremely important. Part of my job is photo restoration and I had a guy last week who'd taken a panorama of a desert somewhere - glorious landscape - but he'd only taken one vertical row and followed the (most assuredly not level) horizon. The end result was that his panorama ended up all over the place, and I was asked to fix it.

I certainly agree that having an interesting foreground is very beneficial, but I don't think that without one you'll necessarily have a bad photo.

As with all photos, lighting is very important. If you're not in a hurry, don't bother shooting a pano in bad lighting, it'll be crap and you'll be disappointed with the results (goes without saying really).

This pano here is comprised of 131 photos, and is 360 degrees. A little over the top but never mind.
>> Anonymous
>>145923
Oh, one other thing I forgot to mention. PTGui is awesome, but use the Smartblend plugin instead of PTGui's default blender. It gives far better results.
>> Anonymous
Those not wanting to look stupid (other than Vincent) should know that 'panoramics' is nonsensical. Panoramic is an adjective, the proper term is panorama or panoramas.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>145930
English is a living, growing, evolving language. "Panoramic pictures" got shortened to "Panoramics". It happens. Get over it.

Whining about it just makes you sound like a complete tool.
>> Anonymous !sAGEr9FFjw
>>145930
i think that "panoramic" is acceptable on this board, since we are talking about panoramic *photographs* (you know, rules about implied nouns and stuff... not sure though). But if context is absent, then I agree with what you said.
>> Anonymous
>>145932
Not whining, just pointing it out. I prefer to represent myself as an educated, articulate person but if you choose not to that's your decision.
>> Anonymous
Stop turning the thread to shit grammer nazi.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>145943

ITT: GRAMAR NAZIZ ON R 4CHAN
>> Vincent !!8LCSE0Zp1mL
Clouds were never a big problem for me, I start my panoramics usually top left or top right, and work my way back and forth. Theres only maybe 2 seconds between each pic, so any blending errors in the clouds can be fixed with the clone tool anyway.

>>145923
That shot is really good, the area to the left of the castle could probably get cropped out, and the flare from the sun fixed, but otherwise its pretty fantastic. Also those rocks in front of you are your foreground, And they do help the picture aswell.

Not sure what you mean about a level horizon, PTGui can set the horizon easy enough, just make sure you have lots of picture bleed.
>> Anonymous
We should have a /p/ archive for threads like this. Thanks for the useful info vincent!
>> fence !!POey2hdozCZ
anyone out there using opensource software instead of ptgui? don't particularly feel like piracy these days.
>> Vincent !!8LCSE0Zp1mL
>>145964
CS2 (mediocre) and CS3 (I hear its good) do it, if you have one of those.

I found autostitch was hit or miss, it either worked or it didn't, and you couldn't do anything to fix it after the fact.
>> Anonymous
>>145964
Dude, its like a 2mb download... ffs.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>145966
I think he was making a morality argument rather than a file download size argument.
>> Anonymous
>>145967
I know, but such extremely small sizes make it easy to overcome morally. You just have to be abit shallow minded for the few secs it takes to download. Its just like downloading a 4kb PS plugin that actually costs 400$. I didnt hesitate.. at all.
>> Anonymous
>>145965
At least CS2 didn't run slower than Crysis...
>> Anonymous
>>145977
Either it's a moral good (the creation of art outweighs the loss of profits to the software company) or it's a moral wrong (not so much the loss of a few hundred dollars to a large company, but the view of issues of labor and property it engenders could lead to something more clearly immoral down the line).

One's a pure utilitarian view; the other's a sort of Nicomachean-utilitarian cross. But actions are either the right course of action or the wrong one, and shallowness never does any good.

Me, I've been caught between these two arguments for years.
>> Bob
     File :-(, x)
Nice sum up Vincent :)

Anyway heres one of my fav panos.

Handheld, 400d, Sigma 17-70mm @ 17mm.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareACD Systems Digital ImagingImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2008:03:23 19:19:39Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/8.0Color Space InformationUnknownImage Width2000Image Height678
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>145984
Whole thing can be sidestepped if there's a free/open-source alternative. Which is what he was asking about.

Seems like I caught a thread a while back where one was mentioned, but I can't remember what it was. I don't really do panoramics, so I am unhelpful.
>> danchr !AZ2XAk0.RQ
     File :-(, x)
Tried out PTGui now on some old pics. White balance was off, causing amazingly horrid colours.

Great thread Vincent, thanks alot.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2008:03:23 19:25:12F-Numberf/5.6Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2000Image Height510
>> Anonymous
>>145990
I was addressing the guy who told him to just "be shallow for a few seconds" or whatever and pirate the proprietary software.
>> sv !!vC9KZM3Ch/H
Vincent == awesome

You should write up a nice document or something and upload it somewhere. Then all we panfailfags can refer to it easily and point others to it.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>Not sure what you mean about a level horizon, PTGui can set the horizon easy enough, just make sure you have lots of picture bleed.

I mean that something like this had happened. This is an exaggerated example, but you get the idea. Something like this can't really be fixed without retaking the photo.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.Camera ModelE-500Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Color Filter Array Pattern714Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:03:23 20:51:31Exposure Time1/640 secF-Numberf/4.5Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/4.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, AutoFocal Length26.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2000Image Height783RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>> Anonymous
>>146055
those are mountains they rise up
>> Anonymous
PANORAMICS
>> Anonymous
>>146060
Someone is having trouble with their English comprehension abilities.

A guy came to me who had taken a panorama. He had kept the horizon in the centre of the frame in every shot. The horizon was not level. When stitched together, this resulted in the panorama not being level. In turn, his panorama could not be cropped to make a proper picture without retaking the photographs again.

Is this a little clearer now?
>> Vincent !!8LCSE0Zp1mL
>>146078
ahh got you now, lol didn't think people would ever make that mistake.
>> Anonymous
>>146144
Never underestimate people.
>> Weed and Exercise
STICKY THIS THREAD
>> NGT
Thanks Vincent :)
>> Anonymous !sAGEr9FFjw
bump, for great justice!
>> beethy !HJGkSBB3Ao
bump
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I took this with my Canon A520 and stitched it together with photostitch, so you can clearly see the aberrations. I think this was with 3 pictures.

Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Here something definately went wrong.

Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>> Anonymous
>>147427

>slurp
>> Anonymous
>>145788
Thanks for a concise pano tute. Good on you for sharing the wealth of your knowledge. Cheers!
>> Anonymous
Giggity...
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Vincent, you're a god among men.

This is what I got from following the tips you laid out in here, on my first try.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2008:03:26 10:12:25Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/8.0Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2571Image Height719
>> Vincent !!8LCSE0Zp1mL
>>147468
Overlap more, will solve the blending issues

>>148147
bit boring, set the horizon level lower (in PTGui)
good proof of concept though, go out and find a better pano location now!
>> Anonymous
>>145910

Saan to?
>> Jeremo !iKGMr61IHM
     File :-(, x)
PtGUi was the best purchase i've made after Raw Shooter Pro.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareACD Systems Digital ImagingImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2008:03:27 12:08:34Exposure Time1/2 secF-Numberf/4.0Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width2879Image Height326
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)


Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2008:03:26 16:45:09Exposure Time1/400 secF-Numberf/8.0Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width3000Image Height836
>> Vincent !!8LCSE0Zp1mL
>>148580
Lol three way intersection, thats trippy.

Technical details? (how many pics, rows, camera, focal length, etc..)
>> Anonymous
>>148583

57 pics, 3 rows I think, 6 mm focal length on the camera, though I don't know what the film equivalent for it would be. Camera's a Canon Powershot S3 IS.

1/400 second exposure time, aperture f/8.0, manual white balance. Can't think of any technical details besides that.
>> Anonymous
>>148469
Alam mo na eh. Haha

LSGH, during my graduation. See all the red vested "professionals" there with nice dSLR's? None of them have my view!
Same place
>>145539
>> Anonymous
>>148600

Actually I was looking at it and then I was like "What the hell? Chinky brown people? No shit. This HAS to be from the PH." Didnt really notice the green theme till you pointed it out.

Anyway, awesome panorama. LSGH = La Salle? Haven't been there for a couple years now, could use a vacation for sure.
>> angrylittleboy !wrJcGUHncE
>>148600

Highschool graduation... in b4 underaged b&
>> Anonymous
>>148580
Indecision gets harder every day, doesn't it?
>> Anonymous
bump before thread disappears
>> beethy !HJGkSBB3Ao
bump
>> Vincent !!8LCSE0Zp1mL
I wonder if inactive threads die, or its a time thing...
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>149919
Inactive threads eventually get pushed off the 10th page and disappear. Eventually, if a thread gets enough posts, it'll stop allowing new replies. And I think that eventually, especially old threads get removed either automatically or by mods, but I'm not as clear on that one.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
wish i would have had this advice before this!

Abort trap (core dumped)
>> Anonymous
imaginary sticky
>> Anonymous
>>149923
Its actually quite a fucked up system for boards like this. Personly I think /p/ in a real forum, but with the same easy posting would be much much better.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
bump.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2008:03:30 23:56:01Exposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/8.0Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width5000Image Height865
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)


Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelDSLR-A100Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width18842Image Height2569Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2008:03:31 00:13:03Exposure Time2.5 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/8.0Brightness-2.1 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width4000Image Height545RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
The closest I've ever taken so far.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot A550Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.6Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created2008:03:31 12:23:55Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/2.6ISO Speed Rating80Lens Aperturef/2.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length5.80 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2070Image Height500RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Old pano I made with a p&s. Selective contrast/curves to bring sky back.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEASTMAN KODAK COMPANYCamera ModelKODAK DX7630 ZOOM DIGITAL CAMERACamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)39 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution230 dpiVertical Resolution230 dpiImage Created2008:03:30 21:04:23Exposure Time1/350 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceDaylightFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length8.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1024Image Height403Exposure Index100RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>> Anonymous
>>149958
I dunno. While I appreciate Vincent's tutorial, I do not appreciate this thread getting cpred back to front page for days and days. By now, everyone who wants the info has had plenty of chance to copy it somewhere safe. If a newfag turns up later asking questions about panoramas, someone can post a screenshot of this thread. There's no point in having it on the front page all the time.
>> Anonymous
Someone made a docfile/website/screenshot yet?
Care to share? Cba to do it myself.
Yes. Lazy.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)