meh. Im back again.c&c of course...EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTCamera SoftwareGIMP 2.4.2PhotographerunknownMaximum Lens Aperturef/5.6Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:04:20 21:51:00Exposure Time1/50 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length18.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
Besides that softening error around the forehead, not too bad. Although, i would loose that 18-55mm i expect your using. Unless you don't usually do this type of shooting.
The wide angle makes her nose look too big.
>>166972the blown out sky is distracting. if you turned so you were a bit more in front of her, you could cut that out.also, her face is kind of awkward in this one.
I see she still hasn't removed her bra like we instructed you to make happen.
That's a dud, try a different angle. That one makes her look like a pregnant jew.
>>166996Nothing wrong with pregnant Jews, though I agree this is a dud and agree the angle is bad.Try a more moderate focal length, too. The angle wouldn't be too bad with a moderate wide or normal.
Is she actually pregnant or does she just look that way because of the angle she's leaning at?If the latter, tell her not to lean at that angle anymore.
baad angle, baaad position
>>167146baaaad use of prevention
she looks pregnant. don't have her lean on weird things anymore.
photoshopped skin is photoshooopped.
photoshopped skin is photoshooopped.no srsly it is too obvious