File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
What is /p/'s opinion of this?
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution200 dpiVertical Resolution200 dpiImage Created2008:05:10 16:32:19Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width619Image Height800
>> Anonymous
6/10

could be more interesting
>> Anonymous
not enough contrast
>> Anonymous
I like it. Good use of lines, curves and perspective. The foreground should have been in focus though.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
OP here, another from the same roll.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution200 dpiVertical Resolution200 dpiImage Created2008:05:10 16:23:42Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width519Image Height800
>> Anonymous
>>182143
I second this. I'm attracted by the contrast though. May I ask what film were you using for this?

>>182147
Silence fag.
>> Anonymous
>>182185
if u like the contrast so much why not add more? it makes it better rigth?
>> Anonymous
OP here.

If I recall, I shot with Kodak T-max 400 that day.
>> Anonymous
>>182191
0/10

>>182197
Cool, thanks
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>182162
not as good I think. I liked the first one because the stark contrast and geometric shapes. Plus, it reminded me a little of one of my favorite American paintings, "I Saw the Figure 5 in Gold" by Charles Demuth.
>> Anonymous
>>182202
hah, sweet observation

With the geometric patterns (and black and white, I guess), it reminded me of bauhaus posters
>> beethy !HJGkSBB3Ao
>>182142
kinda like it.. but it's a little too messy overall
>> Anonymous
I like OP alot.
Do you self develop?
If so what's your formula?
>> linkiE !ei5A1FPDuk
>>182142

Overall, I like it.

However, it's almost a lith...could use a lot of highlight detail. It'd be cool to see some textures. Assuming that image is a scan of a print, and you printed it yourself, try using a yellow filter to get some highlight detail. If that doesn't give you enough contrast (though I doubt that, considering you said you used tmax), use that in addition to a little bit extra exposure time using a magenta filter. That'll make the shadows darker.
>> Anonymous
>>182419

OP here, thanks for the feedback dudes.

To answer your question, I do self develop/print. I am currently a first year photography student and just use the school's stuff.

AFAIK formula wise, the school buys Sprint chemicals. When processing film, I use 1. developer, 2. stop bath, 3. fixer, 4. water rinse, 5. fixer remover, 6. power wash, and 7. photo-flo. For prints, it's a basic 4-step procedure with 1. developer, 2. water bath, 3. stop bath, 4. fixer, and a water wash.