>> |
Anonymous
stole these comments from Engadget, not that their users are camera experts but they are truth and it was lulz worthy to see them all get rated negative by canonfags
>> The D300 is around $1500 online these days, so price-wise its almost the same.
>> With the D300 you'll get better pro-autofocus (51-point AF and spot meter linked to the focusing point) compared to Canon (9-point AF with spot meter linked to only center point), 100% pentaprism, and 8fps (with MBD10 grip), but with the 50D you're getting 3 megapixels
>> Yeah, the 50D is pretty fucked up. They're just making the 40D even worse by throwing in a couple of new parts (crammed sensor and digic 4) and changing the label on the outside. Hopefully their 6D won't be the same - just a few more megapixels and useless features. At least nikon has a bubble level built into the D700 - that's useful. Squishing megapixels and providing "light balancing" crap that photoshop or a filter can do is a waste of time. They knew their 40D was bad, so they release a "replacement" 10 months later. Seems like they liked their 5D in comparison - no release for 3 or so years.
>> umm i have an xt and this is not what im looking for. I guess I'm really going to nikon next round. I need better AF,.better metering and better flash ( think CLS system).
|