>> |
ac
!!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>271814 I'm guessing that you were probably specifically trying to emphasize the emptiness of the stadium, but it just seems too empty. I think it would work better if you'd gotten closer to that one lonely guy out in the middle cleaning things up and just had the big empty stadium in the background (angling your lens to avoid the other two people in there)
>>271815 If these girls were better looking (not to say they're ugly, but they don't really fit the classical definition of beauty, unless by "classical" you mean "rubenesque") this would look like a clothing ad. Whether this is a good thing or a bad thing depends on what you were aiming for.
>>271816 Meh
>>271817 Colors are weird to the point that it almost looks like cross-processed slide film. Subject, being a big impressive work of decaying architecture, is a bit of a gimme, so you need to do something special to get a real standout pic of it. You haven't done so. Also, the floodlight that's not hiding behind the third pillar from the left ruins the look of the...ruins.
>>271818 Try for a 3/4 profile next time rather than flat on the side like this. This just looks like you didn't want to move and only had a short-tele lens available.
>>271819 Tight facial portraits are not this young lady's friend. Kid in the background is creepy and distracting.
>>271821 Aww. Why so sad, emo bear?
>>271824 Stupid colors. And it appears to be a "Stuff on my desk" shot.
|