File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
ITT: Stereoscopic/3D Images

1. Find an Object to take a Picture of that can remain perfectly still.
2. Use a Tripod, or set the Camera on something stationary
3. Position the camera slightly to the left the the object and shoot.

4. Change the angle of the camera so it's slightly to the right and shoot.
5. Use an image editor to place pics side by side, adjust size so you can easily see both pics as one when crossing your eyes (like a Magic Eye Picture).

6. Profit

(PS. if the farther stuff seems closer and the closer stuff looks farther, you're doing it wrong... in other words you need to move one image to the opposite side).
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)


Camera-Specific Properties:Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiExposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/2.8ISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length5.80 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1024Image Height768RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
>>284202
You moved it too far, my brain hurts
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>284202
yeah you're obviously doing something wrong...

>slightly to the left

you need to position it as it would be essential if you looked at it with one eye and then closed it and looked at it with the other.. the point you are focusing on should remain pretty much constant, you don't just shift the camera, you need to tilt it slightly inward as well
>> Anonymous
go play with your dolls elsewhere.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
OP you've really got some wonky eyes if you can make a third central image with these.

Your movements are off, do you really have a method? Or do you just "slightly shift the camera"

<--- This is doing it right
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>284242

The Japanese boys photo has almost no depth to it whatsoever, cept for that little bit near the picture frame. I'll admit that what I'm doing is totally up to experimentation.
<<< I think this one is probably my best attempt so far.
>> Anonymous
>>284331
If I can noticeably see the difference between the two without much thought/time... you're doing it wrong
>> Anonymous
>>284202

Instead of "slightly" moving the camera, move it the distance from the center of one eye to the center of the other.
>> Anonymous
>>284331

I think it'll work better if you are a little further away from the subject..

Also, there probably shouldn't be a gap between the two pictures. And changing the distance between the photos when editing wont work, I see the last pic has a bigger border, is that what you were trying to do?
>> Anonymous
You need to take into account the subject distance as well as the viewing distance when you move the camera. Read the wankopedia "stereoscopy" article.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>284346
>>284344
>>284341
>>284336
>>284242

I see what you did there.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Here you go, my first try... it works, but room for improvement for sure. Enjoy.
>> Anonymous
>>284374
sweet, it's like.... it's like I can touch it..