File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
I know this isn't the auto section, but I've had some previous cool cars that I've taken some cool pictures of. Tell me what you think.
This car was my 2000 convertible sebring
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelFinePix S5100Camera SoftwareDigital Camera FinePix S5100 Ver1.00Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2006:09:01 20:19:36RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeUnknownExposure Time1/20 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating64Lens Aperturef/2.8Brightness3.4 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length6.70 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1024Image Height768
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
1994 s10, I rebuilt a chevy 350 and installed it with fuel injection. Yes it had balls.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
1999 Chrysler LHS. I need to get some better ones of this car still.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelFinePix S5100Camera SoftwareDigital Camera FinePix S5100 Ver1.00Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:05:13 00:47:30RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownExposure Time1/4 secF-Numberf/3.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/3.0Brightness-1.3 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length12.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1024Image Height768
>> Anonymous
>>225931
sebrings? arent coo.NOTHING Chrysler makes is cool.
the picture is the same thing, not cool. too dark, and the lights look like you added photoshop lens flares if you didnt.

the second one is ok, the trucks kinda neat, but its still a bit underexposed and i dont know what the little rainbow things are but those fuck the picture up quite a bit too, im guessing lens flare of some sort

your signature is extremely distracting.
>> Anonymous
>>225937
thanks for the critique, and the lens flare was natural (projector fog lights)
and I love chryslers :)
>> Anonymous
lol sebring.. you fucking faggot.
>> Anonymous
>>225941
it's true :(
>> heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA
     File :-(, x)
I never shoot cars, but I happened to grab a shot of my hetero lifemate's new ride two days ago. Just a detail shot, he wanted a desktop background, lol.
>> Anonymous
>>225947
nice
>> Anonymous
>>225947
Needs smoother borkeh
>> heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA
>>225952
I cannae' giv'er aneh more cap'n! The bokeh, she's maxed out a' f/1.2! She cannae' take it!

in b4 STF
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>225954


oh hay guize
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>225947

fuck yeah fake lens blur

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:07:18 15:31:00Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1024Image Height683
>> Anonymous
isnt the car meant to take the focus of car related photos, not funny coloured sky/half frame of gravel/blinding headlights/shit light contrasts?
>> Anonymous
>>225981

Did you just smudge over the bokeh of the 50/1.2 Nikkor? Seriously?
>> Anonymous
>>226399

heavens no.. i used Filter > Blur > Lens Blur
>> Anonymous
>>226402

Over the bokeh of the 50/1.2 Nikkor? Why do you do such things?
>> Anonymous
>>226404

see

>>225952
>> Anonymous
10/10 for "sacrilege"
>> heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA
>>226412
I lol'd