File :-(, x, )
Nikon D3 review Anonymous
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/NikonD3/

Fuck yeah! The D3 is a fucking world beater.

Compared to the Canon 1Ds and 5D, it fucking BITCHOWNS them.

"At ISO 1600 and over the D3 really starts to shine, leaving the competition behind and producing perfectly usable results at ISO 6400. "

"The ability to produce usable results at sensitivities of up to ISO 6400 (or higher, if you're prepared to accept some compromise) will be a godsend to sports photographers and photojournalists working in the most challenging conditions. Nikon's engineers must be applauded for not merely knocking the EOS 5D's high ISO supremacy into a hat, but for totally redefining what professional users can expect to achieve in low light conditions or with slower lenses."

You read that^ BITCH SLAPPED the 5D.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
While we're on the subject of the D3...
http://support.nikontech.com/cgi-bin/nikonusa.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=14553

On the off chance any of you fags has one, be sure not to install the latest firmware. It will apparently fuck your shit up.
>> Anonymous
eh, I didn't see much difference between 5D and D3 in dpreview's shots. Nikon seems to have better in-camera NR, though.
>> Blackadder !!bSWRwu/NqzQ
>>164031

Ooops! Bloody hell. That is bad. Hopefully any D3 users here spot it before it is too late. Spread the word, Nikonfags.

Oh, and as I do not have a D3 or a 5D or a 1Ds and will not be owning one for the foreseeable future I really don't care how they perform outside of what technology and developments may trickle into future models. May as well talk or argue about the $30,000 Hasselblad as far as I am concerned.
>> Anonymous
>>164031
Lol, is there any new high-end camera that doesn't have problems with continious shooting? First Canon had broken AF tracking, now Nikon fucks up the image data...
>> EvenSteven !!RBDL+S5h60X
>>164025

The D3 is targeted at photo journalists and sports photographers.

The D3X will be 24mp, and will be similar to the 1Ds in terms of target market.
>> Anonymous
An $8,000 super camera intended for serious studio work is a higher resolution than a $5,000 ultimate photojournalist kit. OH SNAP
>> Anonymous
also: most photo/sport pro work only requires 6mp. If I wanted to I could do my job with a D70.
>> Anonymous
>>165034An $8,000 super camera intended for serious studio work is a higher resolution than a $5,000 ultimate photojournalist kit. OH SNAP

A $5,000 ultimate photojournalist kit is faster and better than a 3 year old $2,000 ($3,000 at release) budget studio camera. OH SNAP
>> Anonymous
wow this cameras amazing.

but does it really compare with my sony a100?
>> Jeremo !iKGMr61IHM
>>165040

Canonfags letting things slide instead of getting butthurt... OH SNAP
>> I||ICIT !!mknjFN/v/49
well considering all the canonfag stuff's already been said, i wont bother, but its obvious where i stand r.e the 5d ;)

also, did any of you read about the deal with the d3 firmware containing code possibly intended for the new d3x? (uh, the high res version?)

supposedly its going for 24mp, which leads many to think theyve gone back to/co-worked on it with sony considering the a900 is tipped at FF and ~24mp

theres more details on it at dpreview of course...

go 5d!
>> Anonymous
2 grips makes it cool
>> Anonymous
>>165076

There's no logic in trolling.

Shut the fuck up faggot.

...dipshit.
>> Jeremo !iKGMr61IHM
>>165078

yet you followed my logic in your argument...

Learn to troll properly then fuck off and die.

...dipshit.
>> Anonymous
>>165084

ROFL

That's all you have?

Get the fuck out faggot

...dipshit.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
douchebag
>> Anonymous
Why the fuck would you compare the D3 to a Canon 5D?
>> Anonymous
>>165145
Yeah makes no sence.

Truth is that D3 scored a lot higher in various test than any camera before. That's a fact.

Someone has another oppinion? Well then prove it Canon-guys!
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>165145
They're both full frame cameras of about the same resolution. Makes sense to compare them since they're fairly close technically.

Granted, the D3's three years newer and three grand pricier, but still. They're comparable cameras, technically.
>> Jeremo !iKGMr61IHM
>>165086

...you fuckin idiot... that's your comeback? a 5th grade tirade?

Please do as I advised in previous post. But make your death a slow one.
>> Anonymous
>>165155

But they're both aimed at totally different people.

Would you compare the Nikon D300 to the Canon 450d because they are both 12mp and have APS-C sensors? No.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>165223
>Would you compare the Nikon D300 to the Canon 450d because they are both 12mp and have APS-C sensors?
No, but just the other day some troll posted some links to articles pitting the D80 against the 450D and pitting the D300 against the 40D.

And you've got to admit that the 5D is considerably closer in its usages to the D3 than the D300 is to the XTi. Especially since, so far, it's Nikon's only full-frame.
>> Anonymous
>>165223
Plenty of photojournalists use a 5D as a more compact alternative to a 1D/1Ds series, or as an affordable/expendable backup.

Twelve megapixels is more than enough for studio work. No one really needs twenty-four megapixels. Even if I was a big studio shooter, I'd rather have something like the D3, to deliver a cleaner image with better tonality, than OMG ULTIMATE RESOLUTION I'LL NEVER USE.

So regardless of how they're built, they're used the same way.
>> heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA
>>165227
Lots of people on my newspaper use 5Ds. All of the badasses, basically. You can't argue with those files.
>> Anonymous
>>165196

DURRRRRRR I USE NIKON BECAUSE IT'S THE BEST DURRRRRRRRRR

suck more nikon dick
>> Anonymous
too many threads about cameras.
not enough threads about photographs.

instead of jacking off over gear why don't you faggots post some fucking photographs.
>> Anonymous
>>165380
>instead of jacking off over gear why don't you faggots post some fucking photographs.
Because I'm a perfectionist and because I'm a lazy sonbitch when it comes to processing raw files.
>> pskaught
I'm so sick of gear threads
>> Anonymous
>>165324
He might be a nikonfag, but you're still a shit troll and he's still a better photographer.