>> |
Otherwise Anonymous
!R09./old82
>>30934 >>30935 These scans are utter crap. But that's nothing unexpected from a mass consumer oriented lab machine. Your blue sky is on the dia, just compare the scan with the film (that's assuming you exposed properly, and it was well developed). So are details in shadows and highlights (lol Dmax). The grain is not natural at all, but a mass consumer wants his photos sharp, so the machine sharpens it by default - hence the result. Honestly, these are only good for previews. Not even for web, if you want a worthy representation of your work.
You want good scans, take the film to someone with a good dedicated 35mm scanner, who knows how to operate it (scanning dias properly is a bother). Have it scanned at 4000 dpi (the ones you posted are ~1000 dpi). You'll pay a tad bit more, but once you receive the scans, you'll know what you paid for.
|