File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
So i took this the other day outside my window in England. Thoughts?
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDMC-FX3Camera SoftwareVer.1.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:10:31 01:12:56Exposure Time1/8 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length5.80 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2816Image Height2112RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalImage QualityFineWhite BalanceAutoFocus ModeAutoSpot ModeUnknownImage StabilizerMode 2Macro ModeNormalShooting ModeUnknownAudioNoFlash Bias0.00 EVColor EffectOffContrastStandardNoise ReductionStandard
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Sorry >_< I forgot this was the high res one. Here is a smaller version.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
buy a spirit level.
>> Anonymous
>>92712

Haha. I can assure you the street is flat but the room is took is from is slightly sloped towards one side :tear:
>> Anonymous
it should still be level. when a room or something is slanted, you dont stand perpendicular to the ground, you stand so you are parallel to the pull of gravity.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
I don't think the tilt of the street and buildings is a big problem. Gives a nice perspective-going-off-into-the-distance effect. However, I do have some criticism:

1. Half of the frame is blank blue sky. Pretty blank blue sky, granted, but still blank blue sky. Would have been better rule-of-thirds'd.
2. Your camera and ISO200 are apparently not friends, 'cause that shot looks powerful noisy.

That being said, I do quite like this shot. Beautiful light and colors. Just need to get a tripod and compose it better.
>> Anonymous
>>92734

Why thank you ac. After i looked at the high res i do agree it is quite a noisy picture but my Lumix only goes up to iso400 so the difference would have been minimal with the equipment i had at hand.

But i do agree with the rule of thirds. Damn i should have thought of that before.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
dude, your image isn't baaaaaaad but
make 3:2 crops out of your images sometimes... it really spice the things up
and DON'T use that ISO ever again, it's too noisy
I had to wash the shit out of it
my version <- somewhat

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDMC-FX3Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:11:20 15:58:07Exposure Time1/8 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length5.80 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width800Image Height533RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>> Anonymous
>>92749

Shit. Thanks a bunch dude it looks a lot more crisp.
>> Anonymous
Very noisy at 200! Get a new camera!
>> Anonymous
nice lights at 200 alittle fast will get that car! should have waited...