>> |
Anonymous
>>86219 you make sense.. however, over the last couple of days i've read countless reviews. it seems the cheaper lens has a clunky cheap feel when fully extended. but image quality is good.
and i wonder if i should pay double for a less clunky lens that cannot zoom as far .. and has very similar image quality.
so, does /p/ think the image quality between the 2 is great enough to justify the price?
i can't see enough difference between sample shots, maybe i'm missing something here?
|