File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Tell me your opinion /p/?

Did I rape it too much with photoshop?
>> Anonymous
yes
>> radnomness !t4XAG9SVEw
you raped it so much that it started to like it in the end.
>> Anonymous
No, I think you should turn up the contrast and saturation
>> Anonymous
it hurts my eyes
>> Anonymous
you raped it of its exif data!
/p/ does not recognise photo...
>> Anonymous
you forgot the vignetting+lens flare+unsharp mask
>> Anonymous
oversaturated. period.
>> Anonymous
>>184609
Unquestionably. Did you expose for the sky or the lamppost?
>> Anonymous
I can't tell if this is bad HDR, bad Photoshop, or a magnificent combination of the two.

Marvelously horrible! I love it!
>> Anonymous
>>185575
All HDR is bad. You don't check to see if piles of dogshit are good or bad, do you? :P
>> okto
>>185593
you fucking bastard
>> Anonymous
>>185581
see
>>184436

not all hdr is bad
>> Anonymous
>>185616
I've seen enough HDR to make an educated statement, and it's just a trick. It actually manages to look less real than a conventional dynamic range photo. Part of that is that there are no display technologies AFAIK that can actually display the DR of an HDR image, so they always look kinda washed out.
>> Anonymous
>>185616

>>184436
could have been done with slide film, 1/3 stop under.
>> Anonymous
>>185616

6/10
Given how much /p/ hates the photo you linked to as an example of "good" HDR this would be epically rage-inducing if the other thread wasn't already full of rage.
>> Anonymous
The lamp in the middle is really annoying.

Shop that out if you're gonna shop out anything.