File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
70-300 4.5-5.6 Minolta G with SSM for <$1000?

YES PLOX.
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:10:23 18:30:07Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width800Image Height533
>> Anonymous
l2canon, sonyfag
>> Anonymous
70-300
variable aperture

i sure as fuck hope you paid less than $1,000 for it
>> Anonymous
*facepalms for newfags not knowing the amazing minolta g glass*
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
this is what you want

fail
>> Anonymous
>>175866


$700 70-300G << $1900 70-200G

it's a helluva lens for $700.
>> Anonymous
>>175868

except there's no substitute for fast apeture

but please, enlighten us as to how this is so fucking awesome
>> fence !!POey2hdozCZ
BECAUSE IT'S MINOLTA

nah, just kidding. it's an amateur lens.
>> Anonymous
>>175868$1900 70-200G

I thought you were on crack so I went and checked the prices for the 70-200 2.8.

Where the fuck does Sony/KM get off to charge 1,979$USD for that.

Even Nikon doesn't do that shit and theirs has VR.
>> Anonymous
>>175873it's an amateur lens.

so this guy is happy he bought a consumer zoom for $700?

gotcha
>> Anonymous
I think I remember hearing about this lens being awesome somehow somewhere before, but I don't remember how.
>> Anonymous
Just beautiful haha.
>> Anonymous
Yeah, G glass is awesome, but G lenses are stupidly overpriced. The beercan is as good as any piece of G glass in every way except flare control, and the small difference there is in G lenses isn't worth $1600.