File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Is this overexposed? Can't decide.
Also, is it any good?
>> Anonymous
>>175756
Who wants to look at plants????
>> Anonymous
and...uh...exif whar? Donno how I lost that.
>> Anonymous
i just see..plants...a lot of them
>> Anonymous
>>175758
Who wants to look at ANYTHING? Why even shoot photos?
My goal was to get how all the stems where lined up, which was easy to see the pattern with my eyes but very hard to capture.
>> Anonymous
plants in front are overexposed, plants in back are underexposed.

overall the picture has no main subject so ends up boring as hell.
>> Anonymous
Seems my goal failed. Didn't help that the light kept changing angles. The subject was supposed to be the pattern.
Oh well, back to messin with the 70 other photos I shot
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
digital doesn't have enough DR to really do that lighting justice. You need some kind of ND filter

plantz

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX K100DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern738Focal Length (35mm Equiv)64 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3040Image Height2024Number of Bits Per Component12Compression SchemeUnknownPixel CompositionUnknownImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2008:05:05 19:07:36Exposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length43.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width752Image Height500RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeMacro
>> Anonymous
Damn, all my pictures suck. Either under/over exposed or for some reason not sharp enough even though I used 200ISO.
Man, I remember when I could shoot awesome photos all the time (I'd upload one but damn board is giving me error message shit). I think I've really lost my ability.
>> Anonymous
>>175775
your cam is a P&S, it's not like you have much control over how pics turn out.

as long as you like the pics, it's all that matters
>> Anonymous
>>175782
How can you guys even tell my cam when my exif isn't showing?
I paid $400 for it ;_;
Let's see if it'll lemme upload now....nope I donno what the fuck is wrong
>> Anonymous
>>175785
sry, i had just checked exif on another thread and thought it was yours
>> Anonymous
>>175787
I don't know what the problem is, I just uploaded a pic on another board so that's still working. I keep getting this "Record Not Found" message.
The OP pic I did "save for web" so the filesize would be smaller, might be why there's no exif. Lemme try the bigass version....nope still same error message. I give up.
>> Anonymous
just copy/paste the opertinent exif info
>> Anonymous
>>175796
I'm too stupid to even know how to look it up.
My camera's a Fuji S7000. I was using ISO either 100 or 200. The rest I don't know now.
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
     File :-(, x)
>>175756
overexposure causing the highlight on the stem burns out into the leaf.
>> Anonymous
>>175799
yeah I saw that but I thought it could still work since it was small
I suppose it's not the kind of shot I could hope to accomplish without filters, special lenses and all that other advanced stuff I know nothing about
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
>>175799
highlight of the stem to burn out onto the leaf.*
>> Anonymous
trollsage