File :-(, x, )
Bob
Taken down from my city, what do you think?
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 400D DIGITALCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:10:28 23:17:29Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length17.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width778Image Height1166RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
>>86761
I like it. In fact, the blown out sky goes great for the morbid town look. The only thing that I could think of is that there is no object that anchors the picture together. I dart to the sky, to the ground, to the red cloth. Maybe if there was something in the middle of the frame that was the main focus point. Anyway, I do like the pic.
>> Anonymous
It's okay, but extremely generic. Congratulations, you've done what hundreds and hundreds of other photographers have already OVERdone.
>> Anonymous
>>86776
+learn to level your camera
>> Anonymous
1. Way too dark.
2. Generic, cliche, and boring.
3. Your camera isn't level.
4. ???
5. No, not even profit. You just fail. Stop fishing for complements.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>86776
>>86779
>>86794

anon does not forgive

I know the town looks quite flat but these usually look better from the top of a hill looking down or vice versa.

I don't profess that this is a great picture at all, it was point and shoot (on auto i think) and there was no thought in it. But it illustrates my point about gradient making it more interesting.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 400D DIGITALLens Size18.00 - 55.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware 1.0.5Owner NameunknownSerial Number1280611979Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:06:10 10:45:20Exposure Time1/400 secF-Numberf/14.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/14.0Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length55.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height667RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessUnknownSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeFull AutoImage SizeLargeFocus ModeAI FocusDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeRed-Eye Reduction (Auto)Compression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalSubject Distance5.460 mWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed224Camera Actuations-1875967936Color Matrix129
>> Jeremo !iKGMr61IHM
It's a nice idea, but perhaps a lomo PP effect would have saved the overblown sky...or perhaps not...

use an ND, a level horizon for vanishing points is almost compulsory.

And shoot as low as you can, crouch and get as low as you can. Shooting eye level just doesn't produce good results.
>> Fucken Tai
Am I the only one who thinks the unlevel camera makes this picture worth anything above shit?
>> Anonymous
I like it. The underexposure and tilt is fine with me.

Much better than all the fuzzyy noisy lousy shit that gets posted here. /p/, stop hating when something actually decent shows up.