>> |
Anonymous
>>110915 They're basically the same thing, other than the user interface looks a bit different. I preferred lightroom's because it seemed more intuitive coming from many years of using photoshop. Aperture's UI used symbols I didn't recognize, histograms that I was not used to reading, and generally confused me. I'm sure I could have gotten used to it, but stability was the tie breaker.
Aperture was slow and buggy and tended to choke with raw files or large imports. It crashed a lot, and it was running on a core duo macbook, so it should have had enough resources to work with. On the other hand, lightroom has been perfectly stable, reliable, and fast.
|