File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
How shooped does this picture look on a scale from 1-10?

10 being blatant shoop.
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution96 dpiVertical Resolution96 dpiImage Created2007:12:10 15:05:16Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width214Image Height152
>> ????????
10.
i can tell from the pixels, and having seen a few shoops in my time.
also, different light levels on the guy than on the girl, and the level of grainyness is different as well (look at the girl's cheek, then look at the guy's cheek. you'll see what i mean). it's distinct enough for me to say blatant.
>> Anonymous
>>100416

Alright, well, how about at first glance? I mean, if I tell you it's shopped and ask you how blatant it is it might make it easier to identify.
>> Anonymous
I didn't read the message at first, I looked at the pic and even from the thumbnail I thought it looked fake.

From 1-10, probably a 9, where 10 is still plausible and not intentionally bad (done in paint). Basically, it's bad for a sincere shoop, but not terrible.
>> Anonymous
>>100418

Okie doke, thanks.

By the way, I took two separate pictures of people kissing other people. The guy is me and I was kissing my ex in the sauce pic, and the girl was just some pic I got of google images. Her pic was the original grainy one, dark subjects but bright background, and my original was bright subjects with a dark background.

It was hard to work with, and I had to add some grainy filters to my side and do a lot of individual layers to get the overlapping of faces to look somewhat realistic.

Any tips on making it better? I only spent about 15-30 minutes on this, so I'm sure I could have made it a lot better if I put more into it.
>> Anonymous
It would help if they were lit from the same directions.
>> Liquefied !!CF1+3tSFCce
>>100420
Start over with different pictures. If the lighting doesn't match there's not much you can do unless you're good at hyper-realistic digital painting.
>> eku !8cibvLQ11s
>>100420

Next time you do something like this, ask people do they see anything wrong in the photo, don't just reveal it immediately.
Oh, and pls, post a bigger photo.
>> Anonymous
dont make the females head twice as large as yours..
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>100435
QFT. That's the first issue I noticed. She looks like the kiss is a prelude to eating you with her massive jaws.
>> Anonymous
>>100415
2/10
>> Anonymous
It looks so shopped i shit adobe.


THe guys face is too straight. THe gilrs face is a little bigger than it should be.
>> Anonymous
Why would you make a photo illustration of you kissing some random girl? That just seems wrong on at least a dozen levels.
>> Anonymous
>>100475

so ronery ;_;
>> eku !8cibvLQ11s
>>100475

Maybe she isn't any random girl? Maybe she is his sister?! ...and so forth.
>> Anonymous
>>100415

Get out of here STALKER.
Get out of here STALKER.
Get out of here STALKER.
Get out of here STALKER.
Get out of here STALKER.
Get out of here STALKER.
Get out of here STALKER.
Get out of here STALKER.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
You
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
can't
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
fake
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
this.

(Photo credits to Koudelka, Abbas, Doisneau, and Dan Weiner.)
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>100507
>>100510
>>100511
>>100513
That was pretty awesome.
>> Anonymous
It's not as good as the original image of that midget about to be molested and eaten by the fat beast girl.
>> Anonymous
>>100604
Thanks. There's a joke in that sequence, if anyone gets it. (You might've, AC, you've seemed pretty well learned in the history of photography.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>100614
Oh yeah, I totally caught it. It's obvious, really.

...

Okay, I got nothin'.
>> Anonymous
>>100620
>>100511was presumed to be a normal street shot for decades, stuck on loads of merchandise as a "Romantic Paris" image, and then it turned out a few years ago it was staged.

Not that it makes it less of a photograph, but people will find anything to bitch about.
>> Anonymous
>>100620

One of the images was actually faked.
>> Anonymous
>>100513
hehehe his last name is weiner
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>100623
>>100624
Ohhh. Yeah, I actually should've gotten that.

DAMN YOU, /p/, FOR SHOWING THAT I AM FALLIBLE!
>> BlackAdder !!bSWRwu/NqzQ
It's maybe a nice example of why results are all that matters when you are doing it for the art. If you stage it well enough then it doesn't matter.
>> Anonymous
angle of your face is wrong
>> Anonymous
8

i would change the scale of the girl and make the guys face cast a shadow
>> Anonymous
remind me again, why are we wasting time on some shitty shoop made from cellphone images?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>100751
i don't remember either, this is /p/ dammit!
>> Anonymous
>>100774

Oh my God, I lol'd when I saw that.
>> Anonymous
>>101313
I started to lol but then vomit came out.