>> |
Anonymous
>>197460 Con't.
>I can't get a decently wide angle
Again, lol wut? 36mm equivalent is wide. Big wide angles are seriously overrated; they make it easier to make an eye-catching shot, sure, but they're harder for 90% of photographers, even good ones, to compose with, and they're often just distracting flair. David Alan Harvey and Josef Koudelka shot almost everything they did with a 35mm. Henri Cartier-Bresson widest lens was a 35mm, photographs from which make up maybe 5% of his output, if that. He mostly used a 50mm. You don't need a very wide angle to take good pictures, and especially if you're learning, you're probably not skilled enough yet to compose well wider than a ~35mm equivalent.
>and it's impossible to shoot in cramped areas
For the third time, lol wut? I don't get where people come from in saying one needs a wide to shoot in cramped areas. I shoot almost exclusively with a normal, and I don't have any problems shooting at crowded concerts, or even in cars.
>the gay little lcd screens are a joke and i can't tell if my shots are even NEAR focused until i view them on the computer.
Adjust your diopter or get your eyes checked. You should be able to check focus with the EVF.
|