File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
hey /p/, i have a problem with my camera, it eats up batteries within about ten minutes.

i go out, and spend 15$ on the energizer batteries that are made for cameras, and within 15 minutes, the batteries are dead. anyone know why it does this, and if i can stop it?
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeHasselblad/ImaconCamera ModelIxpress 132C - HasselBlad ELXCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2005:12:21 16:50:08Exposure Time4294967/536870912 secF-Numberf/5.6ISO Speed Rating50Lens Aperturef/5.6Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width800Image Height680
>> Anonymous
>>260705
LOL@Exif

Really nice camera used to photograph one of the shittiest out there.
>> Anonymous
>>260717

I honestly don't understand where you are coming from. Kodak is one of the great pioneer companies in photography and it's been around even longer than Nikon. Given that a lot of their development budget over the company's life has been focused on the production of better photosensitive devices. You'd seriously be at a loss if you were to simply ignore kodak's great achievements in the field of photography and their contributions even today.

Schneider optics, which are used in OP's camera are also some of the leading optics manufacturers in Germany, most certainly on par with the Carl Zeiss of old, pretty much like Leica, except heavily underrated.

As for this camera, you need no more than take a swift look around the camera to know it's a really good camera for the money. First off, Kodak took it's cue for ergonomics from professional SLR designs. This isn't a flimsy camera and it isn't difficult to handle (unlike a certain entry-level model produced by Canon). Its control menus are certainly on par with Nikons' spot-on ones, if not better, given that there is a much better integration in this camera's system than there is with Nikon's entry level SLR's, perhaps even a higher level. The optics and imaging device are certainly where it's at with this model, however. Through Kodak's expertise (and history) in the creation of light-sensitive devices, you can most certainly assume, without a doubt, that this camera is at a whole different level than you'd find in an SLR. This sensor, coupled with Schneider's optics makes gives this camera the edge over the similarly-priced cameras produced by the Japanese market.

You guys need to do some reading on these companies instead of dissing OP's camera. You'll realize how much you've missed and even lost by buying an expensive all-in-one SLR system when you could have achieved comparable/superior quality images from a well-priced, spot-on solution as the one OP has put on the table.
>> Anonymous
>>260705
If you're up to waste some time. Contact HP's customer support, and tell them of your problems. If your camera is still under warranty they will kindly mail you out an empty box in a few weeks to ship the camera to them. In about 3months you should receive your camera back. But then it will probably break down quickly again. typical point and shoot garbage like this has issues with the telescoping lens getting stuck in the extended position.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>260717
are you sure

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera Model5Ds MkIVCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS WindowsSensing MethodThree-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2005:12:21 16:50:08Exposure Time1/99999 secF-Numberf/0.9Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating1Metering ModeAverageLight SourceUnknownColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width800Image Height680White BalanceAutoContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeMacro
>> Anonymous
>>260747
HOLY SHIT WHEN DID THE 5DIV COME OUT?!?!?!?1
>> Anonymous
MUST B SUM TIEM TRAVEL HAX
>> Anonymous
>>260747
you did it wrong faggot, it's Canon 5Ds MkIV
>> Anonymous
>>260743
I'm not being greedy, dude. I actually wrote that bit of copy pasta myself, and I'm always on the lookout to use it.