File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
While I'm waiting to get my Delta 3200 and Ektachrom 200 back, I'll post my weekly diptych.
As always, please critique, and comment as necessary.
>> Anonymous
Not bad, I enjoy the legs on the second lady.
Post moar.
>> Anonymous
why are these two in a diptych? i dont see any reason for them to be. they dont seem that connected at all.
>> Anonymous
The title was "Hands." I didn't include that in the file name.
>> Anonymous
>>185112
well the first picture has quite a lack of hands. it doesnt stand out at all. in fact i barely even noticed they were there.
>> Anonymous
Nice film choices, but as far as this photograph:

- These would better be presented seperately.
- Unfortunately, the only appealing thing about these photographs is that they're of a woman/en who dress/es well and at the very least do/es not appear to be ugly.
>> Anonymous
>>185145
Unfortunatelly, I agree with you.
Nice try OP. Try again next week.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Alright, here's some from my delta 3200.
I'll process the rest tomorrow.

Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:05:20 16:01:02
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)


Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:05:20 23:15:54
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
And that's it.

Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:05:20 15:51:08
>> lurker !rK4K86e49M
WHAT THE FUCK IS THE POINT OF THIS STUPID DIPTYCH BULLSHIT
>> Anonymous
>>185985
Wait 'til you see it done well. Go look at some classic art that uses polyptychs... lots of European altarpieces are polyptychs.
>> Anonymous
>>185964

Creepy, reminds me of an abattoir.