>> |
ac
!!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>262951 Correction: Only one place on earth that still develops it. Well, Kodak probably has a private lab, but only one place that you can use without owning Kodak.
>>262926 Say it costs you $4/36 frames to use film. That's a serious lowball, since it sort of assumes you buy your film in bulk and develop it yourself using your school's darkroom setup. A DSLR costs $500, so that's about 4500 shots of film equals one DSLR. And keep in mind all of the time and effort you'll be spending developing film and archiving your negatives. And scanning.
More likely, but still a lowball, say about $4 for a roll of film and $6 to get it developed. That's $10/36 shots, or a mere 1800 pictures before the DSLR wins. And again, it's gonna be at least an hour wait between finishing a roll and seeing how you did. And the hassle of archiving your negatives and scanning.
(Caveat: I really like shooting film. I just wouldn't want to learn on it)
|