File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
what does it think? more saturation or less? Should I make it b/w?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
which one?

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 40DMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:10:09 14:02:31Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/4.5Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating640Lens Aperturef/4.5Exposure Bias0.7 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length55.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
neither.. these are awful
>> Ken Rockwell
You should always have your saturation up all the way. No post-processing is ever needed.
>> Anonymous
>>271892
why? Whats wrong with the first one, the second is fucked with all the yellow, i know that.

>>271893
Have my saturation up all the way? That would look totally destroyed..
>> Anonymous
>>271895

>why?

1) These pictures dont tell me anything about your subject.. no emotion I can connect to. Your subject looks like an vapid confused mongoloid with disgusting nose blackheads.

2) The focus is on the disgusting nose and the cheek, the eyes are slightly out of focus, and on a portrait, they are the most important thing to have in focus.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>271887

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 40DMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:10:09 14:02:31Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/4.5Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating640Lens Aperturef/4.5Exposure Bias0.7 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length55.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
>>271896
he's watching 'days of our lives'
>> Anonymous
>>271893
What the fuck are you doing on /p/, Ken Rockwell!? Shouldn't you be supporting your kids and family and have people buy from Amazon so you can keep your site up?
>> Anonymous
umm i suggest you delete this shit... it sucks
>> Anonymous
>>271916

WHY does it suck!? Just because the focus is in between his nose/cheek?! If I've put the focus on his eyes you would say the face is not in focus and all is diffuse..
>> Anonymous
>>271918
No it sucks because it's a boring subject on a white background with poor lighting... the only real thing you did right here was use a camera and you just barely managed to pull that off
>> Anonymous
Fuck you retards, I think its great! The better one is 271897
>> Anonymous
>>271893
post-processing is always needed but most people just suck at it.
>> Anonymous
can i suck on your nose plz
>> Anonymous
is this thread for real?
>> Anonymous
I think its ok, its not VERY good but its ok..
>> Anonymous
i thought we got saddam?
>> Anonymous
Needs to be shopped. Definitely needs shopping. Shopping. Shopping. Shopping.
>> Anonymous
>>272250
shop what?
>> Anonymous
i think you should maek it b/b
>> Anonymous
this.. this.. This is good shit!
>> Anonymous
It's great because it's shot with a Canon.
>> Anonymous
WATCH OUT!! NIKON SHITSTORM!
>> Anonymous
>>273257

we dont have to shitstorm, we know we're superior.

theres no contest. Nikon 1UP
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)


Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Width860Image Height598
>> Anonymous
>>273273

Shop the nose to be smaller than a house.
>> Anonymous
>>273274
sage, seriously this is not b
>> Anonymous
besides that he looks like a 'yea you know what', theres nothing wrong with the picture technically. It would be much better with a blond whore.. otherwise its a good picture, its sharp and clean.
>> Anonymous
>>271884

Boring shot and he has a big nose. Lighting is nice though.

>>271887

That is just crap. First one is better.
>> Anonymous
aouuu nice nosy