File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
i need a fisheye. yes or no?
Tokina 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5
>> kashpla fuzzah
fisheyes are always good for abstract, and sometimes portraits. the offer an interesting view of people and places. if youve got the cash to burn, id say go for it.
>> Vincent !!8LCSE0Zp1mL
Another good option (especially if you are using film / full frame)
Sigma 15mm f2.8 EX Fisheye
Can find used for like 200$

On FX / Full frame sensor its 180 diag coverage.
>> Anonymous
No, the CA on the Tokina is brutal.

10.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye-Nikkor for Nikon
Sigma 10mm f/2.8 Fisheye for everything else.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
No, you don't need a fisheye.
>> Anonymous
A buddy of mine has a Sigma 8mm f/3.5 that i've borrowed once or twice. Its some fun stuff if you can afford it.
>> Anonymous
Get the Sigma 4.5mm fisheye.
>> Anonymous
Speaking about fisheyes ... is there any real point in indicating focal lenght for them?
>> I||ICIT !!mknjFN/v/49
>>117500
well yes;
there are two types of them. circular and diagonal.

circular on a FF creates a circlular image one the sensor that covers 180o in all directions across any point. of course this leaves a large portion of black around the edges though...

the other is diagonal which creates a FF image that covers the entire sensor but the only direction it creates a 180o image in is diagonal and not quite 180o side>side or top>botttom.

generally longer fisheyes; 10, 14, 15mm fisheyes are diagonal while wider ones; 4.5, 5, 8mm are circular.

hope that helps.
>> Anonymous
>>117504
I get it, thank you