File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
'sup guys. i have a /p/roblem. currently i have the nikon d200 and f100. i have the 50/1.8 and the 18-70. have a bugdet for 80-200/2.8, but still thinking that i should buy another prime, i'm thinking on the "wide" end like a 20-30. my problem is that i don't know which one i should get. what do you guys think?
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX *ist DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)94 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2006:06:22 00:25:09White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/19.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias2 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length63.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width500Image Height375RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeClose View
>> Anonymous
What photos do you want to take?
>> Anonymous
mainly street and/or photo journalism
>> Anonymous
get the widest prime you can reasonably afford
>> Anonymous
>>260612
okey, is the sigma 20/1.8 good or should i go for the "lesser"(?) nikon 20/2.8?
>> Anonymous
>>260613
Optically speaking the 20/1.8 is absolutely horrible. Don't know about the 20/2.8.
>> Jeremo !iKGMr61IHM
what's the budget?
>> Anonymous
also, stick with nikon glass
>> Anonymous
Either a 28 or 35.

Works as a wide on your F100 and a normal on your D200.

>>260612
No.