File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
i could buy a nikon d40 second hand for £160 or wait a while and save for a nikon d60 around £400

is ther a reasonable difference between the two?

this was taken in auschwittz by the d40 i could buy due to the guy lending me it
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
Certainly not £240 worth of difference. Just get the D40.
>> Anonymous
get the D40, the D60 is basically a D40x
if you have the extra cash get a D40 and wait for the new prime lense to come out in december f/1.4 50mm or consider a Sb-600 speedlight
>> Anonymous
Got any Dachau photo's?
>> Anonymous
lol more like a 40d, go buy a real camera
>> nikon? Lance
dont waste your money, go buy a canon, nikons are cheap and low quality
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>264740
0/10
>> Anonymous
>>264763
0/10
>> Anonymous
>>264740

You don't seem to understand here though. They're not the same class of camera. A viper, and a Porsche Turbo may both be super cars but one is 90,000 and one is 200,000. It's not the same thing. Of course it out preforms it, if you're buying them in kit packages, theres an 1,000 price difference.

And really kiddies, this "it has 900345342 auto focus points" is embarrassing to read. Are you serious? I've never, ever needed more than 3. I'm going to get "well you don't do this, or that, and that needs it man." Please.

A lot of the way Nikon handles things, weather you want to admit it or not, is a trick. Sure, tell me I don't know. Thats really not about to change years of experience. I like to buy cameras that capture an image, and thats it. The Body, and interfaces are thing of nightmares. Nikon consistently, out of all manufacturers, finishes dead last in usability of interface.
>> tizzou !!HuouSd+PYUs
>>264781
mm.... copy pasta...
>> Anonymous !nzFagDPRLs
test