File :-(, x, )
finfag !cMsqVR/LtM
What did I do wrong?

The film I used was from 2006
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>> Anonymous
Looks like cross processing.
>> finfag !cMsqVR/LtM
>>245561
wat
>> Anonymous
It means you took a kind of film (slide film) and got it processed as color negative film, which isn't the most appropriate method of developing pictures if you're going for more realistic colors.
>> finfag !cMsqVR/LtM
>>245564
I still didnt understand but thanks anyway, I'll be sure to get my photos developed elsewhere from now on
>> Anonymous
>>245561
No it doesn't, please learn what you're saying before saying it.

The film is just too old, has been stored improperly, and if this is a scan, the drugstore might have printed it badly.
>> finfag !cMsqVR/LtM
>>245609
ISO 400 C-41, thats what it says, need more?
>> finfag !cMsqVR/LtM
>>245611
Also on the back it says Film for color prints and process promptly
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>245611
>>245612
Nah, basically ignore most of my post. Either the store fucked up developing or the film was fucked to begin with, see an expiry date on the box or negatives?

Also check you dont have any skylight filters on your lenses.
>> finfag !cMsqVR/LtM
>>245613
Expiration date is 2008 01.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>245615
Heat/cold probably then, i wouldnt expect film to go off that quickly after expiring.

Store any film you buy in a freezer (or just outdoors right).

Anyway, can anyone recomend him a cheap FD telephoto?
>> Anonymous
It just looks like an excellent replica from the 70's....

wait....