File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
I just felt that I had to post something.

A door.
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D80Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern942Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width2592Image Height3872Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16Compression SchemeUnknownPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2007:11:02 04:24:16Exposure Time1/45 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating220Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias-1/2 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length50.00 mmComment(c) Antti HakkarainenColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width536Image Height800RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
And a street.

Both are "meh", but until I come up with better photos.. :-I

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D80Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern838Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2007:11:02 04:26:41Exposure Time1/20 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/2.0Exposure Bias-2 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length50.00 mmComment(c) Antti HakkarainenColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width533Image Height800RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>> Anonymous
why are you even posting these
>> Anonymous
>>87910
cant you read?

>>87908
"I just felt that I had to post something. "
while its a poor reason, its a reason none-the-less...
>> Anonymous
>>87911
its a rhetoric question. if you "just feel you have to post something" dont, seriously.
>> Anonymous
If you "just have to post" go to /b/

If you want to post quality you can come here.
>> Anonymous
>>87955

Does someone post quality to /p/?
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>88018
Of course. Every once in a while there's a thread where someone pretends to be an actual good photographer, like that one a while back where someone posted a Diane Arbus shot.
>> Anonymous
These aren't bad, just boring.
>> Anonymous
>>88019
Don't forget the constant arguing afterwards on the quality of the picture

- This person is a famous photographer, therefore this picture is good

- This picture was good / renowned in the past, therefore it is still good, and always will be

- This picture is B&W and is good because although it could be taken better with a DSLR, Its graininess / bluriness, are what makes it good

- This picture is not good by today's standards, and therefore its worth in the past is no longer relevant

- This picture Never was good, And the only reason why it was ever popular was because of the photographers name

- Followed by an Ansel Adams repost..

- Comment on how Ansel Adams pictures are mediocre, but he was a master in the darkroom

and so on...