File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
>> hV !!Uu8NMl1et5d
Looks like shit...
Seriously.
>> Anonymous
i think u cant cook

but lovely colours..they are so purdy..
>> Anonymous
>>254982

dude if your shit looks like this
you SERIOUSLY need help
>> Anonymous
DON'T USE PRODUCT/PORTRAIT LIGHTING FOR SHOOTING FOOD

YOU STUPID FUCK
>> Anonymous
>>254986
fuck off! Is there a fucking rule for that? If so, fuck you and your stupid rule. The important thing is that it looks good!
>> Anonymous
>>254990
>>254987

Samefag OP.

Dude, it looks like shit.
If you're trying to make it look like vomit in a pan, then you succeeded.
If you're trying to make it look "good" then you failed miserably.

Food should almost always be lit as naturally as possible, because studio lighting (like what you used) makes the food look slimy, unnatural, and unappetizing.
>> Anonymous
>>254992

wrong prediction is wrong.
>> Anonymous
>>254992
there is no studio light, its on the balcony you fucktard and its natural light.
>> Anonymous
>>254997
Even if he was wrong about the lighting, he was right about how it looks.
>> else !L6xabslN96
     File :-(, x)
>>254958
>>255011
>>254992
because it's appetizing to a dog.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:09:16 00:35:38Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1936Image Height1288
>> else !L6xabslN96
>>255033
*appetising.