File :-(, x, )
Critique me Anonymous
What does /p/ think?
>> Anonymous
You're ugly.
>> Chib
Bo?
>> Anonymous
>>172176

I see what u did thar. Not what I meant tho.

Honestly, wanna know what you think of the photo.

Btw, I'm not the girl in the photo.
>> Anonymous
>>172182
The vignetting is god-awful, and the flash used on the model is a little harsh and unattractive for her complexion. And I think you blurred out the flowers in back? Because they look fucking horrible.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
1. Little bit too orange. Would prefer the flowers brightened up to yellow.
2. POINTY HAIR SPIKE
3. She looks like she might be doing something interesting with her hands. Can't tell, though, because they're mostly clipped out of frame. Of course, if they were in frame, we probably still wouldn't be able to see because we'd be too distracted by POINTY HAIR SPIKE.
4. There's like a road and a field or something up at the top, at a crooked angle, that should have been framed out originally but should be cropped out now. I probably wouldn't have noticed it, but the POINTY HAIR SPIKE is dragging my eyes upwards.
5. Would be better if we could see her eyes. More eyes, less POINTY HAIR SPIKE.
>> Anonymous
>>172184

Point taken on vignetting. i thought it was too much too, but I never mess with it so I figure I should give it a try. Any types on how to properly use it?

What would have been the proper flash for her complexion? Or would no flash have been better?

Flowers weren't blurred by the way.
>> Anonymous
>.png
>> Anonymous
>>172189
>What would have been the proper flash for her complexion? Or would no flash have been better?
I personally use natural light whenever possible. You could have used a remote flash on the sides of her instead of it being dead-on and shining off her cheeks and arm.
>Flowers weren't blurred by the way.
What lens was this taken with? Because that's some funky bokeh.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>172188

I didn't think the pointy hair was that bad. here's a close up shot of her with the eyes. I thought the hands thing was bad too, but I wanted to get the background. It was a compromise I guess.
>> Anonymous
>>172188
Fool!! The pointy hair spike is what makes the photo. Learn modeling techniques moar.
>> Anonymous
>>172188
>5. Would be better if we could see her eyes.
THAT'S HOW HER EYES ARE NATURALLY YOU RACIST.
>> Anonymous
>>172193

I'm a big fan of natural light as well, but there was a lot of shadow because of her hair most of the time. i also tried the flash once and she loved it, although i generally don't like flash because it makes the pic look fake (plus why use it when there's shit loads of light?).
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>172195
Shadows are a bit weird in this one, but I still prefer it.
>> Anonymous
>>172201
>i also tried the flash once and she loved it
If her eyes were any wider she could have been blinded.
>> heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA
>>172195
... I dig your model.