File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
What does /p/ thinks?

C&C are welcome!
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTiCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:06:02 03:10:11Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias-0.7 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width900Image Height654RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
very nice
>> Anonymous
I don't like the tonality much at all but good picture.
>> Anonymous
>>195195
>>195206

Thank you very much, my first set with my XTi :)
>> Anonymous
Would look better in color (imo). Also, looks like a snapshot to me.
>> Teus !QbSstcPD6U
great photo OP. tonality is just fine.
>> Anonymous
needs more: lens flare, jpeg artifacts, etc.
>> Depressed Cheesecaek Anonymous
needs moar vignetting and USM.

i contribute so much to this board.
>> Anonymous
>>195279

not one thread goes by without you faggots making the same shitty joke
>> TheGeneral !m7n7x2Yyfo
>>195293
see>>195197
>> .
>>195279
its not funny anymore you faggot. also stop using tripcodes you cocksucker.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Quick edit. Tonality isn't too good. Learn to use the burn and dodge tools and don't just restrict yourself to global adjustments.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTiCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:06:02 20:52:49Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias-0.7 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width900Image Height654RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
damn, wait, she looks too bright in that one

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTiCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:06:02 20:55:53Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias-0.7 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width900Image Height654RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
>>195336
Man that's ugly, now she looks sick!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Now in a mongol version

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTiCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:06:02 15:22:28Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias-0.7 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width900Image Height654RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
just trying color in ps
>> Anonymous
>>195354
>>195354

jaundiced bitch is jaundiced
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
>>195354
is dat sum usm.
shes got yellow fever.

OP:
I like the photo, nice even lighting. weldone - I hope shes happy with the result; because it bores me to sleep
>> Anonymous
>>195336
>>195337
You've sucked the essence out of this pic nicely. Learn to NOT use dodge and burn, and stay with global value edits, christ.

I do agree that the tone in OP's pic is a little lacking, though.
>> Anonymous
Op here, thank you very much for the comments. I think it got too much from shadows & highlights. Thank you all!
>> Anonymous
This photo was taken using Tamron 17-50 2.8
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>195337
my version is better?

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:06:02 23:53:37Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width900Image Height654
>> Anonymous
>>195346
WTF FILE DELETED! Censorship on /p/? WTF
>> Anonymous
>>196270
janitors exist oh nooooo
>> Anonymous
i would've preferred it a lot more with color.
>> Anonymous
>>195192

Try getting a model that isnt so fat. Fat chicks look fatter for the camera.

As far as composition, maybe vertical framing would have worked better for this one.
>> Anonymous
>>195192
I think she's too young.
>> Anonymous
Vertical framing would suck in this picture. Cut the person out in the back. First rule of a fundamentally correct portrait, is to clearly show your subject with no distractions. Looks good besides the person in the back and the cutting off the top of her head.
>> Anonymous
>>196638
Op here, thanks for the advice. It was actually a snapshot, but i did like so much the result that here it is.
I'd love that the other woman wasn't there, but neither PP so much the picture.
Thanks everyone for your critics.
>> Anonymous
>>196378I think she's too young.

>4chan.org

Get out.