My first shot with my XTiCanon 50mm f/1.8EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTiCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsPhotographerunknownMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Image Width2592Image Height3888Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2008:05:26 21:44:03Exposure Time1/800 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/2.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePartialFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width600Image Height900RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
please dont tell me you smashed that mirror for that shitty shot
>>190574used, i assume.>>190578that would be true dedication
bokeh is awful for some reason?
Yes, used, just 3500+ shots.
>>190585Second that, that's nearly mirror-lens bad.
I like the bokeh.
>>190858time for an eye check
>>190868I had my eyes checked and I still like it. Now what?
>>190849>>190585I was using the 50mm f/1.8When i say "first shot" it means i walked out my friend's house with the camera and shot in AVThanks for commenting.
>>191021ok but still... bokeh is shiti thought the 50 1.8 and what not had good bokeh?not a cannon fag so dont be cruel if im wrong
>>191025It has good bokeh... for a 70 dollar lens. Not great, but for the price, yes, it's good. Jump up to the 1.4 and you see the good 50mm bokeh.
>>191035That's what i'm going to do, the 1.8 was borrowed for that shot.Thanks.
>>191035The bokeh with those two lenses is very, very similar. The 1.4 doesn't give good bokeh if you think the 1.8 is bad.
>>191045Your opinion. For OP, here's an easy side-by-side that might help.http://photo.net/equipment/canon/ef50/
>>191089Your opinion.No shit Sherlock. Whose opinion did you think it was? Yours? Moron.
Holy shit that's some horrid bokeh.
>>191118From left to right: The 50mm 1.2, the 1.4 and the 1.8
>>191118canon sucks lawl. should have bought a sony.
>>191118eh 1st ones good enoughi think mostly its just incredibly distracting (op pic) and the dof was way to small for the shot
>>191123Op here, how should i take that opinion? That it just sucks?