>> |
ac
!!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>173230 >No, it's not, really. That's the point. A 3200x2400 image, printed at 300ppi, looks best at around 16x20" and lower. No, a 3200x2400 image, printed at 300ppi, is 10.6x8". "ppi" stands for "pixels per inch", you see.
Have you ever tried making a print from your DSLR at larger than 16x20? You might be pleasantly surprised at the results.
>>173232 >So, read them too, because they talk about the exact in-camera sensor-data interpolation that I was talking about. Decent cameras generally don't do interpolation (with the arguable exception of the Sigma foveon-based ones). A lot of really crappy ones do, and scanners frequently interpolate to double the size in one direction, but decent camera makers don't do that.
|