File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
http://preview.tinyurl.com/6gdtmr

Vintage lenses on digital is nice.
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D80Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern834Focal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2008:09:15 20:36:47Exposure Time1/400 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating500Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length0.00 mmCommentwww.angrylittleboy.comColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width800Image Height537RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastSoftSaturationLowSharpnessSoftSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I­'ll­ ­j­ust ­l­eave th­i­s he­r­e­.
>> else !L6xabslN96
>guesswork with the shutterspeed and iso is nice
>> $19.99 !OSYhGye6hY
>>255404
Well... they meter fine with canon...
>> Anonymous
>>255404

lern2 sunny16
>> Anonymous
>>256046
And failing that, decent light meters aren't all that expensive these days, cheaper than most modern glass.

Never fails to amaze me that some of these gearwhores with what seems like every damn lens Nikon/Canon/Leica/whoever ever made and multiple $5000 bodies never seem to have any metering gear, unless it's "vintage" and "collectible".

Same goes for lighting setups, though.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>256050
>Never fails to amaze [...] never seem to have any metering gear
Still amazes me that people would spend money on external metering gear to use with digital cameras with a built-in meter.
>> I||ICIT !!mknjFN/v/49
>>256327
QFT, i could find a way easier way to spend $300 on improving my photography equipment than to buy a lightmeter...
>> Project !dashI8UpO.
>>256327
I'd say that an incidental meter is better than a reflective meter because you can get a more accurate exposure regardless of the luminance of subject say for example a white wedding dress, snow scene or a black suit. But yeah, it's digital and you can simply delete, compensate, then shoot again not to mention fine tune in post processing. I suppose it can meter external flashes but again, pointless given how convenient digital is.