>> |
feedback
stickb0y7
!9FVrc11kpo
>>65462 i like the subject in this one and the shallow depth of field. something weird about the background though, the blurred out elements (bokeh) don't look very good, it may just be that's the quality of bokeh you get with that camera >>65464 this one's ok, needs to be straightened. also, the building on the left seems kind of boring, the sunset with the reflection on the bricks at the right is cool, and the power poles are good. >>65465 nice, but needs to be straightened >>65466 nice capture. i've sort of gotten into lightning pictures so i can actually give advice for this one - not sure how much you can manually configure on that kodak, but try to set an f-stop around 8, or something in the middle of the range available (so the lightning doesn't get blown out and you have greater depth of field), make sure the iso is turned all the way down (less noise), and then set the shutter speed slower so you get a better chance of getting a bolt. another effect i've started playing with is to go for shutter speeds up to 30 sec, so the foreground looks almost like daylight. use a tripod or stable surface, and a remote if possible. if you don't have a remote, use your camera's time-delay function, some will have the ability to set a delay as short as 2 sec. this is so the camera stops shaking after you press the shutter release and you get a clear picture. >>65467 i don't know what this one is, but i like it. looks like radar screen or something. did you illuminate it with a green laser?
|