>> |
Anonymous File :-(, x)
speak of 24-105, i think that lens is excellent for indoor activities, with the assist of some studio lighting, the skin color took with that lens is simply amazing, but for outdoor, the contrast is noticeably weaker compare with 24-70 when you take sky and landscapes, and without the designed lighting, the quality of the skin color will have a decent drop, it will still be better than 24-70, but the difference would be very slight, and also, another important reason which i wouldn't take this lens for outdoor, is it's dust proof capability, it's not weak, but it could be a problem depending on the environment, if you are going to take pictures in a construction site, i wouldn't suggest you take a 24-105.
and for 17-55, i can't use EF-S lens, so my speak here may not be accurate?but i do heard a lot of people call it a "dust collector", and the actual image the lens took from 20-30mm is very poor compare with other EF lens at the same range
the picture here is a comparison for 24-70 and 24-105, both took with a 1Ds Mark II body, at 70mm F4. i'd say it's hard to decide which one is better, only problem is, which one you like better
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:03:04 19:42:41Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width747Image Height999
|