>> |
Anonymous
>>130876 "True" HDR?
You are stupid? Do you even know how TRUE HDR works? They way you get true HDR, it's just impossible to have humans, or anything that could move between to shoots in the picture.
Good HDR pictures are taken using multiple shoots of the same scene (with different stops/aperture each time) and then combining them together. I will go as far as to say that you could try that technique with film.
What you just called "HDR" is a stupid overuse of different filters on THE SAME IMAGE. Usually looks like shit, and usually it's incorrectly used.
The whole HDR crap started (IMO) when attempting to imitate the look Jim Fiscus gives to his images. While you might, or might not, like Fiscus' work, you gotta admit his editing isn't as obnoxious as the people who try to imitate him.
Instead of trying to imitate the effect via the use of layers in PS, retards started using shitty plug-ins that poorly copy the effect. They don't even take multiple shoots of the scene, it's all done in a single image, abusing plug-ins and filters from PS. And now you have all mediocre -yet big- photo communities using those shitty plug-ins in shitty photos, thinking they are any better photographers for doing that.
|