File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Fuji xtra 100
grain like a motherfucking beach
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2008:07:19 18:13:23Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1788Image Height1200
>> Anonymous
you should vignette and b/w it
>> Anonymous
>>240523
do it and post here
i cant force myself to
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
IT'S BEAUTIFUL

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2008:07:19 18:13:23Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1788Image Height1200
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
ok i converted this one to black and white first

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2008:08:21 23:56:35Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1788Image Height1000
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
this has way too much grain and i was not pushing this film. i fooled with the levels and such before i converted to black and white. nothing else

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2008:08:22 00:02:50Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1176Image Height1744
>> Anonymous
Past date drug store film ftw.
No wonder your shit is grainy.
Try some 160C or Velvia if you don't want grain.
Consumer film is always shit, pro film is NOT much more expensive.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
...

That's a scanned print, I'm guessing?

The grain is because you underexposed the trees badly and the minilab you took it to tried to compensate by brighting the bejeezus out of it. *that's* what brought out the grain. It was trying to bring a silhouette with an extremely bright sun up to 18% gray.

Modern ISO100 film, even shitty expired grocery store film, shouldn't have nearly that much grain if it's exposed and developed properly. And one could make the argument that you exposed properly, but the minilab certainly didn't print properly.

(One could also make the argument--and I'm doing so right here, in case you hadn't guessed--that you fucked up by focusing on the clouds in the background rather than the trees in the foreground, which is worse than the grain issue)
>> Lynx !!KY+lVSl0s2m
If we want to blame the minilab, unreplenished developer will do that. C-41 chems never get replaced, just replenished ever few hundred rolls. If they don't, shitty negatives come out.