File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
dear /p/,

i am buy my first dslr, primarily for taking shots such as the picture to the left. specifically, what cameras would you recommend.

i have a price range of about $0-$700
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution28 dpcmVertical Resolution28 dpcmImage Created2005:10:19 14:20:06Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1200Image Height714
>> Anonymous
nothing in that price range has continuous FPS that fast.
>> Anonymous
a hasselblad is the only kind of camera that can take shots in sequence like that
>> Anonymous
something with fast fps, which I doubt you can get for $700. I may be wrong; haven't done my research.
>> beethy !HJGkSBB3Ao
>>186741
40D probably, if you want the high frames(shots) per second. Otherwise any old used low grade Nikon or Canon dSLR will do the job.
>> beethy !HJGkSBB3Ao
>>186762
Sorry, you can't afford one... I was thinking of the price I can get it for
Apologies
>> Anonymous
450D has 3.5 fps and 40D has 6 fps but both are out of your price range. I'm sure you'll do fine with 3 fps.
>> Anonymous
>>186763
sage for faggotry
>> Anonymous
but guys. here is a 40d for under $500. too good to be true?

http://www.pricingdepot.com/compare.asp?item=1901B004
>> beethy !HJGkSBB3Ao
>>186770
http://soniccameras.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=4554

holy shit that's cheap as hell
>> Anonymous
>>186770

if it's photography equipment, and too good to be true, then your wallet gon' get raped.
>> Anonymous
TROLL TROLL TROLL

And on a serious note: you won't be able to afford an slr body and a fisheye lens for under 700
>> Anonymous
btw OP, I'd bet money that sequence was shot on a video camera and the frames were pulled to make the image
>> Anonymous
>>186741
AMAZING!!! that lense gets such a wide angle that it even got the photographer in the shot!!!
>> Anonymous
>>186771
lol wut? if thats for real i'm buying it today. Anyone know have reason not to?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
oh hey, did someone say 1200 motherfucking frames per second?

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:08:31 15:34:01Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width414Image Height402
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>186787
>>186771

sounds like a real fucking winner here
>> Anonymous
>>186789
1200 fields, not frames.
>> Anonymous
>>186787
Lifetime Rating: 1.23 / 10

Go read some reviews, they're pretty entertaining

http://www.resellerratings.com/store/Sonic_Cameras
>> Anonymous
>>186786
god damn i lol'd
>> washer !kxrJVlZ8OE
http://www.keh.com/OnLineStore/ProductDetail.aspx?groupsku=DN029990798920&brandcategoryname=Digi
tal&Mode=&item=0&ActivateTOC2=&ID=70&BC=DN&BCC=3&CC=2&CCC=1&BCL=
&GBC=&GCC=

look up the d2h. it may only has 4 megapixels, but it's damn fast.
>> Anonymous
the scene in OPs pic took probably around 2-3 seconds or so. 40D will do this great, save some monayh and go for it.
>> Anonymous
As someone above mentioned a Cadio EX-F1 for 60 FPS might be good for a grand.

But then again I know these skater faggots love there fisheyes.
>> Anonymous
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d40.htm

http://www.costco.com/Browse/Product.aspx?Prodid=11243346&whse=BC&topnav=&browse=&la
ng=en-US

Buy a fucking Nikon D40.
>> Einta !!MWv3ICYobCM
I also suggest the EX-F1. Ultimate slow-motion video/photo camera for the price.
>> Anonymous
any pro slr (no one says dslr anymore since everything produced is digital) - d200 up, 20d up - plus a fisheye or a ultra wide (10-22/12-24)

all and all expect to pay about $1500-2000 used
>> Anonymous
most cameras to take sequences at that speed are shoot at 9fps you will have to spend at least 4 grand to get anywhere near that
prime example nikon d3 it shoots at 9fps
and you can have a fisheye
>> Anonymous
D3 shoots 11fps

D300 ($1800, 1600 used) will get you 8fps
>> Anonymous
also a used 1DmkII is an option at 8fps (and a pro body) for ~$1700-2000
>> Anonymous
>>187257

11 FPS at 5 MP
>> Anonymous
A wide angle lens on any camera and you are good to go as a generic and boring retarded skate photographer.
>> Anonymous
>>187278


Dont forget the shitty fisheye

IT MAKES IT LOOK SICK BRAAAAAAAAAAAA
>> Anonymous
Does the fps increase if you set the image resolution down? Ideally it should since the image size is smaller. But I'm guessing that it doesn't make a difference.
>> Anonymous
>>187792

bump
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>187995
On some cameras you can drop the image size to gain fps, but not on all.
>> Anonymous
if you set your camera to 1/8000, iso 6400 and 800x600, you can do 15 FPS

try it
>> Anonymous
>>188021

I tried it and I got PROMOTED!
>> Anonymous
>>188024

and i got a tax return? what the fuck?
>> Anonymous
Nikon F5
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Sony a200 SONY A200 FOR THE LOVE OF GOD SONY A200!!! AGHHHHH

...

I kinda like the Sony a200

<<<< Taken with a Sony A200
>> Anonymous
>>188511
I've got better pics of the moon with a P&S , Canon S5.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
prove it... come on show your pics!