File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
I'm planning on buying a Olympus OM-1n or OM-1. I'm a photography nub, would you kind fellows at /p/ give me some good tips to know for film cameras this this?
>> Anonymous
What's a -good- cheap digital camera.
>> ? ?IRs !/sQSkEDLl6
I'm planning on buying a Olympus OM -NOM NOM NOM NOM
>> ? ?IRs !/sQSkEDLl6
>>208176
I'd like to see that.
>> Anonymous
I'm quite fond of the OM-1n's feel, it holds great. However, I've had two break on me. It's probably bad luck, but still. Why don't get the OM-2, of if you're serious, an OM-4ti?
>> Anonymous
>>208188

i dunno, he posted a bunch of links
>> Filipe
My father has a machine very crazy here
>> Anonymous
>>208166
This is awesome.
>> ? ?IRs !/sQSkEDLl6
>>208203

DC we demand those links.
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
>>208255
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_versus_film_photography#Dynamic_range

too lazy to find the other ones, just look in Google
>> Anonymous
>>208266

ROFL wikipedia
>> Anonymous
>>208266

uhhhh that article links to fucking DPReview and shows the dr charts rofl

doesn't say shit about more dynamic range
>> Anonymous
>>208326
>>208285
>rofl
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
10 seconds in Google

>Electronic sensors have a larger dynamic range than film
www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/film.vs.digital.summary1.html

>Digital has more dynamic range than film
www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/Cramer.shtml

proven wrong, butthurt fags, etc
>> Anonymous
>>208333


>208316
Already proved you wrong by a technicality.
>> Anonymous
>>208339

that's only for the fuji