File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
I rather like this photo.

It's one of three I really like out of over a hundred that I took when I first had my SLR. It's been about 8 months between when I had them developed and now, when I've looked at them to do processing. The others are almost uniformly terrible.
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:02:09 14:48:19
>> Anonymous
Got the other two?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>123453
Here's one.

Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:02:09 15:03:53
>> beethy !HJGkSBB3Ao
wow, the first image rocks!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>123534
Thanks. Unfortunately, I rarely have a model that actually cooperates.

Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:02:09 19:28:45
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
1. Awesome.
2. Very nicely done, for sure, but I don't personally find the subject terribly interesting.
3. I may be shallow but I find the colours very bland and unpleasant to look at. See my quick shoop.

Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:02:10 15:15:17
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
?

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:02:10 16:26:42Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width569Image Height810
>> sage sage
>>123820
no
>> Anonymous
>>123820
much better
>> Anonymous
>>123824
I like the original better than the edit.
>>123819
But for this one, I'd have to say it was improved.
>> beethy !HJGkSBB3Ao
>>123819
better

>>123820
much much worse