>> |
Anonymous
>>216525 Wow. Fucking bravo. Am I the only one who was totally blown away by this image? Protip: An image doesn't have to be sharp as hell to be good. This has really inspired me to play around a lot more with the stereotypical long shutter speed crowd shot. If there was more blur or if there was no motion blur, then I wouldn't like this anywhere near as much as I do. The lines, repetition of the sharper pillars on the left, the slight motion blur- for some reason, this really came together into something I really love.
>>216526 Street photography without a strong, interesting subject. There are a lot of little things I like: the huge overpass, the tangle of wires in the upper corner, the foreign signs, but none of them are really strong or interesting enough to be a subject. My eye just wanders. Try focusing on one of those and get closer. Maybe take a long shot of the sidewalk sprawling out before the camera, wires and signs cluttering above people (who become more interesting the closer you get) who can give us something more to look at. Composition's not bad though.
>>216530 Another great shot! This, not the usual photo of random boring people walking we see on /p/, is more like street photography. Only issue: A better angle might be more in front of him, allowing us to read the sign more clearly. I know I've mentioned it in another thread, but a good way to get this guy more clear and sharp while isolating the background might be a soft spot filter on the lens or actually blurring the background more through photoshop instead of using your aperture to set DoF.
Otherwise, great stuff! Moar to come?
|