File :-(, x, )
Vincent !!8LCSE0Zp1mL
Ok /p/ I know Panoramics are my thing, but I need some Solid criticism for these 2 pics.
I'm not 100% sure what I think of these pics, so bash away and maybe i'll learn something.
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:02:08 16:24:55Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2400Image Height799
>> Vincent !!8LCSE0Zp1mL
     File :-(, x)
And this one, a more excessive version of my Fall colors one, Runs over 180 degrees (10 vertical pics @10mm)
Fits a perfect 3:1 ratio as of right now, Taking out more ground could ruin it as it requires an even thinner pic to stay with the 3:1 ratio

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:02:08 16:43:56Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width800Image Height2400
>> Anonymous
the footprints everywhere in the first kinda distract me.. but the colors are beautiful. especially near the lake. maybe try to incorporate moar laek?

the 2nd is awesome. it reminds me of something i've seen on APOD.
>> Vincent !!8LCSE0Zp1mL
     File :-(, x)
>>123054
Ok Quick edit, I had a tradeoff between the little tree on the right or more of the lake, I chose the little tree in my first edit.

Also related to APOD, HOPEFULLY i will get my Equitorial mount soon, I've been itching to try out some Astrophotography stuff, so i bought one in like september, but Customs has had it for over 3 months... (Meade lxd55)

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:02:08 17:18:39Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2400Image Height800
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I'm not sure on the first one, seems unbalanced or something, i'm not sure, just isn't grabbing me.

I really like the second one - apart from your shadow, so i did a quick edit.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:02:09 12:18:51Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width800Image Height2400
>> Anonymous
>>123060

i highly prefer this one to the first.. the ice makes it cool (lol). just shoop out that bit of your shadow.
>> Anonymous
>>123060

the first one looked like two different pictures put together. this one is definitely better in that it's a solid pic and the colors in it are good.
>> beethy !HJGkSBB3Ao
>>123060
much much improved over the first.. but overall (and especially compared to your other work) this is lacking. The actual scenery is just not interesting enough to look at.

>>123061
Cool edit!
Anyway.. in regards to this shot I have mixed opinions, a part of me wants to like it.. but another hates it.
I like the concept, it's fantastic; but I think this idea would work MUCH better with the bottom of the picture having a very unique scenery to the top.
tl;dr .. do same idea somewhere else.
>> sv !!vC9KZM3Ch/H
     File :-(, x)
>>123061

I liek these pictures but I hate looking at them. Wonder how it looks rotated 90º?
>> beethy !HJGkSBB3Ao
>>123171
That's actually more interesting!
>> Liquefied !!CF1+3tSFCce
Panoramics is not a word.
>> beethy !HJGkSBB3Ao
>>123188
approx 517,000 people think it is.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>123188
English is a growing language.
>> Teus !QbSstcPD6U
First one has too many shadows, with the snow the blue color cast is pretty bad. too much blue in the sky and on the ground.

the shadows divide the photo into two: left side with lake, right side with trees. second edit is better, but is still split. there's nothing harmonic linking the hills and lake to the trees.

vertical panorama is nice, but I dont think its something that would sell. photos that look up to the sky can work though, like this one:
http://foto.no/bruker/portfolio/38015.jpg
>> Vincent !!8LCSE0Zp1mL
>>123384
Ya I took the blue out of the snow in an edit, ut it actually looked stupid, so I left it in.

The vertical pic I doubt will work (with 2 grounds in it) And I think frame integrity would be a problem hanging a picture like that..
BUT its interesting enough for me to try it again somewhere better.
Ya Not a big fan of circular fisheye's, The black space around the image circle doesn't do it for me. Maybe for other people but not me.

>>123163
Ya thats my plan, might have to wait till spring to find some better Trees or whatever though.
>> D: des
>>123188
>>123200
>>123381
Panorama is singular and plural
Panoramic is how you describe a panorama
>> Lynx !!KY+lVSl0s2m
The only thing I don't care for is the yellow playground stuff, and I like the 2nd version of the 1st pic better.
Other than that I'm jealous of your pano skillz.