File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
FACT: Digital is better than film.
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodUnknownImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2006:07:30 11:58:41White Point Chromaticity0Exposure Time0 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramNot DefinedISO Speed Rating692Lens Aperturef/1.0Brightness0 EVExposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance0.00 mMetering ModeUnknownLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length0.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4100Image Height2393Exposure Index0
>> Anonymous
>>196142

QFT
>> sage !i/euDJmWr2
FACT: dicksss
>> Anonymous
>>196142
>>196143
>>196153
0/10
>> Anonymous
>>196178
actually I give sage the tripfag a 1/10 for not mentioning her CPL
>> sage !i/euDJmWr2
My CPL says dicksss too.
>> sage sage
SAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE!! FOR NOT COOKING UP A SHITSTORM! TRY HARDER NEXT TIME TROLL, TRY HARDER.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>196142
Prove it.
>> Anonymous
>>196257
ALIENS!
>> Anonymous
I actually like this photo. Technically not that great, but it's pretty cool.
>> Anonymous
does anyone else lol at ppl boasting about how great film is then scanning their negatives in and printing them on an inkjet while also posting the pictures on their flicker account?
>> Anonymous
would look great as a painting.
>> Anonymous
>>196301
yea thats why ive never bothered with film, the rest of my workflow is digital so its pointless throwing an analog/manual step in there...
>> Haddock !!xREx2m9lgBs
     File :-(, x)
ITT: Philistines or trolls.
>> Anonymous
>>196142
lol nice one
>> Anonymous
fail troll is fail