>> |
Anonymous
IMO these lenses are practically useless.
On one hand, how often is it anyone needs >~90mm equivalent shooting a general scene?
On another, complementary hand, how often is it someone needs wide angles to shoot a far-away scene one would use a tele zoom for? I could see a normal to tele, say, a 50-200mm equivalent being useful, but not this.
On yet another, the one legit use for a ~28-300mm equivalent lens would be when one can't change lenses at all, say, a photojournalist in a very windy, sandy desert, who's going to have to shoot a crowd and then a speaker up on some stage or whatever. It's too dusty for him to switch from his 24-70 or whatever to his 70-200 or whatever.
But guess what? AFAIK, none of these is weathersealed. Can't use that.
|