File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
New photo, from that guy again.
Color, I know, not too common for me, but this called for it, and thankfully, I had some loaded.
Hope you enjoy.
>> $19.99 !OSYhGye6hY
Oh, hey medium-format-anon. Delicious borkeh.
>> Anonymous
Hot girl, good photo. Probably the only good photo I've seen here in the past 48 hours.
>> Anonymous
>>208756
That's what I'm here for.
And yes, she's quite beautiful.
>> Anonymous
How is that delicious borkerh? Anyways, good photo and shadows. The top right and bottom right are distracting.
>> Anonymous
OP here.
Quick thought, if any anons live in Chicago, I have some work up in Wicker Park at what until recently was Naughty Puppy, opens Friday at around 8.
Have some prints from the ULF stuff I first posted here with and some 35mm stuff (not like you'd expect).
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>208766
Example for those of you that may not have seen it.
>> $19.99 !OSYhGye6hY
>>208765
how is it not delicious?
>> Alumrof
Ban me faggots. MOOT IS A RETARDED PIECE OF SHIT! YOU PEOPLE ARE FUCKING TWELVE YEAR OLD DIPSHITS WHO THINK IT'S COOL TO FOLLOW THE FAILCHAN THAT IS MOOT. FUCKING CAPS LOCK. YOU STUPID NIGGERS AND YOUR FAGOT LEADER SHOULD BE BEATEN WITH THE SHIT YOU ARE. MOOT, YOU'RE NOT WORTH THE DOG BALLS YOU'RE MADE OUT OF. NIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGER
FUCKING BAN PLX.

TL;DR

NIGGERSMOOTISAHUGEFUCKINGFAGOT
GO PLAY WITH YOUR FUCKING POWER RANGER DOLLS AND YOUR NEW FANGLED FUCKING INTERNET AND KEEP ACTING LIKE BREAKING THE CHANRULES IS COOL. DON'T TALK ABOUT IT FAGOTS. NIGGERS.

Homosexuals.

penis.Ban me faggots. MOOT IS A RETARDED PIECE OF SHIT! YOU PEOPLE ARE FUCKING TWELVE YEAR OLD DIPSHITS WHO THINK IT'S COOL TO FOLLOW THE FAILCHAN THAT IS MOOT. FUCKING CAPS LOCK. YOU STUPID NIGGERS AND YOUR FAGOT LEADER SHOULD BE BEATEN WITH THE SHIT YOU ARE. MOOT, YOU'RE NOT WORTH THE DOG BALLS YOU'RE MADE OUT OF. NIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGER
FUCKING BAN PLX.

TL;DR

NIGGERSMOOTISAHUGEFUCKINGFAGOT
GO PLAY WITH YOUR FUCKING POWER RANGER DOLLS AND YOUR NEW FANGLED FUCKING INTERNET AND KEEP ACTING LIKE BREAKING THE CHANRULES IS COOL. DON'T TALK ABOUT IT FAGOTS. NIGGERS.

Homosexuals.

penis.Ban me faggots. MOOT IS A RETARDED PIECE OF SHIT! YOU PEOPLE ARE FUCKING TWELVE YEAR OLD DIPSHITS WHO THINK IT'S COOL TO FOLLOW THE FAILCHAN THAT IS MOOT. FUCKING CAPS LOCK. YOU STUPID NIGGERS AND YOUR FAGOT LEADER SHOULD BE BEATEN WITH THE SHIT YOU ARE. MOOT, YOU'RE NOT WORTH THE DOG BALLS YOU'RE MADE OUT OF. NIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGER
FUCKING BAN PLX.

TL;DR

NIGGERSMOOTISAHUGEFUCKINGFAGOT
GO PLAY WITH YOUR FUCKING POWER RANGER DOLLS AND YOUR NEW FANGLED FUCKING INTERNET AND KEEP ACTING LIKE BREAKING THE CHANRULES IS COOL. DON'T TALK ABOUT IT FAGOTS. NIGGERS.

Homosexuals.

penis.
>> sage !i/euDJmWr2
>>208778
tl;dr
>> Anonymous
>>208778
>>208779
>>208778
lol /b/
>> Anonymous
More pics of the girl plz OP she's seriously hot
>> Anonymous
>>208798
This forum is about photography.
Not about you /r/ing other peoples girlfriends to fap to.
>> Anonymous
>>208801
So more photos plz
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>208816
I hate you guys.
>> Anonymous
Good:
- Hot girl
- Soft Lighting
- fence pattern on the girl
- Light patch in bg to create balance with the light patch in foreground

Bad:
- Face half in shadow
- Feet cut off
- looking down (great facial expression apart from this)

I guess you could have fixed some of these by taking a step back and maybe getting her to look a little to her left.
>> Anonymous
>>208822
Fuckkkkkkk that's hot. I will literally buy prints from you of her if you provide me with the ability to do so.
>> Anonymous
>>208823
>- Face half in shadow
Not a bad thing, I love how it looks.
>- looking down (great facial expression apart from this)
No, she's actually looking level with the camera, her face is just tilted down. It's a fantastic expression I think.
>> Jeremo !iKGMr61IHM
>>208822

Love the lighting, not sold on the composition though.
>> Anonymous
MOAR
>> Anonymous
>>208743

why'd you cut off the feet?
>> Anonymous
>>208831
>her face is just tilted down.

Which makes it look like she has a shrunken chin.

PROTIP: THese are snapshots, fags. Stop trying to analyze them.
>> Anonymous
MEDIUM FORMAT = INSTANT ART
>> Anonymous
>>209021
What the hell makes you think these are snapshots faggot?
>> Anonymous
>>209021
Somebody's butthurt cuz he hasn't had a nap lately!
>> Anonymous
>>209095
>>209092

I assume that they are snapshots because the composition is horrible.

If they aren't then the OP is a terrible photographer and should sell his camera immediately.
>> Anonymous
>>209136
Obvious troll is beyond obvious.
Go HDR some shit faggot.
>> Anonymous
>>209136
Awwwww still haven't had your nap? You're craaanky D:
>> Anonymous
>>209138
Butthurt OP.

How is it a troll to say that two seemingly candid shots of the same girl in the dead center of the frame are snapshots?

The composition in these is horrible, particularly in the first with all the shitty and distracting cars in the background.
>> Anonymous
>>209145
>two seemingly candid shots
Candid shots, of the same girl, clearly posing, in two different areas? Do you know the definition of candid? Jesus christ you are so whiny and jealous, you really need to take a nap before you start crying.
>> Anonymous
>>209151

1) Candid means "informal", not surreptitious.
2) LOL @ butthurt OP BAWWWWing when people don't like his shitty snapshots.
>> Anonymous
>>209153
>1) Candid means "informal", not surreptitious.
And "book" only means to put someone away in jail, and the only meaning for "light" is the opposite of heavy! Wow, English is so shallow and straightforward!!

>Definitions of candid on the Web:
>A photograph that is not posed. Generally taken without the subject's awareness.
>An unposed, spontaneous photograph of a person or group of people.
>Generally a photograph that is taken of an individual who is not aware that the photo is being taken. Usually is unposed and can be spontaneous.
>Un-posed pictures of people, often taken without the subject's knowledge or preparation. These usually appear more natural and relaxed than posed pictures.

Haha no but really you totally were right on that one! Wow!

Also, I'm not OP, you're just a dumb whiny tool.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
These stick out to me as composition killers. I think you just like the girl.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:06:19 17:25:31Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width690Image Height690
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Im>>209162
see how much better it is just by getting rid of that extra information in the photo. I completely agree the orig looks like a snapshot for myspace, not a photographer that applies the visual arts.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:06:19 17:27:46Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width397Image Height682
>> Anonymous
>>209156

Sage for thundering faggotry.

You asked if I knew what the definition of candid was.
One of the definitions is "informal" which is correct for these images.
Ergo these images fit one of the definitions of candid, which means that it is appropriate to call them that.

But beyond that there is no sign of artistic composition in either of these images. Both are
•subject centered
•dead-on front view
•eye level
•subject facing directly into lens

Which is snapshot or documentary-type shit.

Enjoy pretending that your snapshots are "art" because you think the chick is hot and you converted one of them to B&W.
>> Anonymous
ITT: Cutting people off at the joints, placing people in the center of the frame, taken with a medium format camera = INSTA ART!
>> okto !.ZlrOYZhsk
>>209168
Candid: 1. characterized by directness in manner or speech; without subtlety or evasion 2. informal or natural; especially caught off guard or unprepared 3. openly straightforward and direct without reserve or SECRETIVENESS

I believe Anon is correct.
>> Anonymous
>>209164
That doesn't look better at all, it looks much much worse.
>>209168
>Sage for thundering faggotry.
Don't steal someone else's comedy, you're a huge faggot and can't pull it off.
>Ergo these images fit one of the definitions of candid, which means that it is appropriate to call them that.
Ergo, you're so fucking stupid you can't admit you were 100% wrong. You don't even perceive the notion that words have different meanings when relating to different subjects.

>•subject centered
So? Is that supposed to be bad?
>•dead-on front view
Who cares?
>•eye level
What about it?
>•subject facing directly into lens
And?

None of that matters, none of them are steadfast, die-hard rules of photography. In fact, you proposing that they are proves how you know nothing about the subject.

>your snapshots
loooooool I'm still not OP, and you still don't have a brain or a point.
>> okto !.ZlrOYZhsk
>>209175
dictionary: 1
you: 0
>> Anonymous
>>209175
yea it looks alot worse without all that extra shit in background. face it you rolled in here thinking you took some awesome photos of a hot girl you know. You are arguing about snapshot and candid because you dont want to admit that you actually thought about the photograph and still ended up with crap. Go back to digital so your not wasting the good stuff.
>> Anonymous
>>209175

LOL @ this guy digging his own grave even deeper
this is as hilarious as when DC gets all pissy

you were wrong and your photos suck
>> Anonymous
>>209179
You're making a laughing stock out of yourself. The dictionary has a definition regarding photography that agrees more with me than your definition regarding speech and attitude agrees with you. Is this a speech and attitude board? No, it's a photography board.

>http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=candid&x=0&y=0
>informal; unposed: a candid photo.

But good job making up a tripcode to bring yourself out of anonymity so it can seem like someone else is stupid enough to agree with you.
>> Anonymous
>>209179
>>209181
>>209183
Not my photos, and clearly same person. Watch, I'll do it too:
>> Anonymous
>>209183
haha you're so wrong, poster here>>209185
is clearly right, i mean it's right in the dictionary, how can you argue with a defintion about photos?
>> Anonymous
>>209179

Uh did you even read his post? The dictionary has his definition too, this is like arguing that words can't have alternate meanings.
>> Anonymous
>>209168
you know nothing about photography. sage.
>> Anonymous
OP, please don't waste your time with these people here. If you enjoy doing what you do, go ahead.
>> Anonymous
>>209179
From dictionary.reference.com:
>Candid –noun
>an unposed photograph.
>> Anonymous
>>209194
>>209194
I forgot to add: If you enjoy doing what you do, keep doing. By the time you're bored of it, you'll find something else you like shooting. At least you have the technique down just fine.
>> Anonymous
shit it sure is jealous samefag in here. what a waste this board has become, people who probably never took a single photo in their lives, arguing that two posed photos are candids, trying to demoralize the work OP put into them. what a fucking shame, ugh.
>> Anonymous
I wonder why the person who was clearly wrong, saying these photos were candids, won't reply any more.
>> okto !.ZlrOYZhsk
>>209185
lol wut? I was just talking about what the definition of "candid" is realtive to photography, on which I *think* we agree. I didn't make any statement about the content of the image, just the word.

I don't know if this is candid or not. Clearly there was a shoot going on, but was she posing in this image, or was she standing like that between poses? I've taken some pictures that look for the world like they're posed, but absolutely were not; that's just the nature of capturing 1/1000th of a second of someone.
>> Anonymous
>>209211
>I wonder why the person who was clearly wrong, saying these photos were candids, won't reply any more.

Because this thread is clearly one troll (who has already been proven wrong) pretending to be different people bumping two incredibly shitty photographs.
>> Anonymous
>>209164

Huge improvement, but still an awkward pose, poor lighting, and a thoroughly uninteresting setting.
>> Anonymous
what's with the cuticle nippers in the b&w?
>> Anonymous
>>209225
From dictionary.reference.com:
>Candid –noun
>an unposed photograph.
>> Anonymous
>>209225
jealous samefag
>> Anonymous
>>209230
>what's with the cuticle nippers in the b&w?

OH HE MUST HAVE POSED HER WITH THOSE
BECAUSE THIS SURE AS SHIT ISN'T CANDID

sage for sobbing OP fagging up the board worse than usual
>> Anonymous
>>209242
>sage for me fagging up the board worse than usual
I agree, but I'm going to age to show off your stupidity instead.

From dictionary.reference.com:
>Candid –noun
>an unposed photograph.
>> Anonymous
>>209255

Yes 'cause dictionary.reference.com is THE PINNACLE OF DEFINITIVE TEXTS.

The word has several meanings. One of those meanings is informal. These images are informal. Continue enjoying your massive fail and inability to understand that words have different meanings.
>> Anonymous
>>209297

Yes, 'cause dictionary.reference.com actually is the pinnacle of definitive texts, taking definitions from numerous published dictionaries that have been around for centuries, including Merriam-Webster.

The word does have several meanings. However, only one of those meanings directly references photography. This definition is "an unposed photograph." These pictures are clearly posed. Continue enjoying your massive fail and inability to understand that words have different meanings.
>> Anonymous
OP here.
The only posts in this thread that were mine have pictures in them, except>>208765

You're all hilarious.

Nail clippers are for the lulz.

DC over processes, I cut off feet.
Deal with it.
I'll keep doing what I like, even if some of you troll and argue nonstop about it, actually, ESPECIALLY if that continues.

I don't consider these snapshots or candids, the camera I use is hardly conductive to those types of images.
But listen, simply, they're portraits, if you enjoy them, great, if you don't, whatever.
If you take something of the persons character from them, wonderful! If you just think she's a babe, fine, just don't fap to my pictures.

And to all the people saying my pictures suck...
Look at the rest of the shit on /p/, sorry to say but shit sucks, much harder than my cut off feet do. So either post your own better work (tits), or gtfo.
>> Anonymous
>>209310

the definition of "blue" does not include a specific definition for photography, yet i can say that a photograph has a "blue cast" to it.

sage for failure.
>> Anonymous
>>209314
wat
>> Anonymous
>>209313

Depressed Cheesecake's awful photos are significantly better than either of your two shots.

Any faggot who picked up your camera could have taken those pictures. There is absolutely nothing special or unique about them.
>> Anonymous
>>209314
wat
Reading comprehension ftw.
You don't even know what you just responded to do you?
>> Anonymous
>>209313
Being slightly better shit in the middle of shit does not make you good, it makes you shit.
>> Anonymous
>>209314
holy fucking hell lol WUT
>> Anonymous
>>209314
God you just keep proving yourself stupider and stupider, huh? But I bet that won't be your last post.