File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Sky to Sky photo of a Virgin-Atlantic Airbus A340.. That's called the Colortrail Affect, specific to VA's A340. I was in a Southwest 737, FL310. They were at FL350.

Canon A540 @ Max Zoom
ISO400
>> Anonymous
Correction, CanonPowershot A520, not A540.
>> Anonymous
>>33779
big difference, right?
>> Anonymous
>>33781
Not really but I figured I'd make the distinction.
>> Anonymous
Amazing
>> Anonymous
Is that like, a rainbow effect in the condensation wake?
>> Anonymous
That's awesome, how does it happen?
>> Anonymous
http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=1088680&size=L&width=1024&height=741&sok=&
photo_nr=
>> Anonymous
>>33777
Were you in the cockpit? I'm assuming you were since you mentioned flight levels instead of "thousands of feet."

I'm a Marine Corps air traffic controller currently stationed in Okinawa, Japan.

Also, that's a great picture. Nice work!
>> Anonymous
>>33777

more info on how you took this photo please.
>> Anonymous
how in the world can the "Colortrail Affect" be specific to one model of airplane?
>> Anonymous
fukken saved

alsp /r/ more info on how to shot/post process something like this !
>> Anonymous
>>33809


does this make it stolen or not? I see no watermark.
>> Anonymous
lol you guys. the op is bullshitting you.
>> Anonymous
sorry. im just making sure that you guys know the op is bullshitting you.
>> Anonymous
>>33777

the op didnt take this photo
>> Anonymous
EXIF or you didn't take it
>> Anonymous
>>33897

lol its impossible to take this picture on a canon a520.

lol not even that. look at the angle the "sky to sky" picture was meant to be taken at. there is no way this shot could be taken by any conventional means from a plane. etc etc...there are so many clues to tell us this wasnt taken by the means that it says it was.

the main one is common sense.
>> Anonymous
Since this got missed earlier (didn't want to provide any more info and spoil the moment): http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=1088680&size=L&width=1024&height=741&sok=&
photo_nr= - the original (?) with watermark and some info
>> Anonymous
>>33914

>>didn't want to provide any more info and spoil the moment

yeah i think you've seriously misjudged how stupid ppl are.

TLDR you failed.