Critique as a wallpaper? I know I'm not <insert nature photographer here>, but just based on merits of a wallpaper -- anything changeable? Thanks.
Too grainy, boring...put some color in this and run thru noise reduction software.
>>182658You think the grain looks bad? I did your suggestions here:
>>182667still boring, but better than the first
>>182668Well, it's a wallpaper, not an exhibition picture. I don't want it to be too busy or eye-catching, really, you know?
the colors are dull. looks like it was overcast that day. try again when it's sunny.
this is my wallpaperCamera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKONCamera ModelE990Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.4Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2003:11:10 20:20:02Exposure Time2/825 secF-Numberf/7.5Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias-0.3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length10.20 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2048Image Height1536
>>182675It actually was very overcast. Here's the original out of the camera.
Personally I really like, as quite a tree hugger myself and a fan of minimalism this is perfect. Be proud that at least one person will be using this :) cheers
>>182680Thank you! Which one are you using, the second one that's more saturated and noise-free?