>> |
Anonymous
>>No, all that decided was the angle at which I could take pictures. I still did the framing by judging when the subjects were in good proximity to other things. Don't be so butthurt.
butthurt? oh the irony. I'm just criticizing, which is what this board is about. The only thing that you can have decided was the crop. That's not a lot, the point you took it from, the angles in all directions, etc, were all pre-decided. So no thoughts of compositions. At least not that I can see.
>>It's not trying to fake anything, it's just a gradient blur to cut down on (smear) the noise in the unimportant parts of the image. It's for function, not for KEWL TILT-SHIF.
It still has the same effect. The reason why, or how you did it, does not matter. It's what can be seen. If your picture hangs in a gallery, is placed on a website, you can't comment that back at anyone thinking it looks fake? Besides, it doesn't work. You can't just smear noise, the side effects are too heavy. If those parts aren't important, why photograph them? And it still looks KEWL TILT-SHIT.
>>Can't do a single thing about that, so why should I care? Why should anyone? It's from a $100 point and shit at ISO 400. What that fuck do you expect, really?
I expect a good photograph with at least a trace amount of composition. Now we've already concluded there's no trace of composition, so now I'm just checking if it's good in any way. Technically, thus, it sucks as well. I don't care you took it with a crappy point and shoot. No one cares, that's no argument boy.
>>Yeah, sorry I couldn't yell out poses for them and/or wait until he made an awesome pose with his arms while in the middle of playing guitar with his arms.
|