Whats the diffrence between full and half frame? for eg canon 40d-5d ?
cropcheapersmallerdoesn't need the best lenses ever to get the most out of itsmaller viewfinder, dimmer viewfinder"free" telephoto bonusdoesn't go as wide as full framefull frameexpensivelargerneeds good lenseslarge and bright viewfindergoes pretty damn wide
>>239979>doesn't go as wide as full frameWith the exception of Sigma 12-24, both crop and full-frame go down to 14-15mm (which is more than enough for most photography needs anyway)>needs good lensesGenerally yes, but there are many exceptions. Some lenses don't have enough resolution in the center for crop cameras while looking OK on full-frame ones with the same megapixel count.
Full frame is generally less noisy at a given ISO.
>>239984With the exception of Sigma 12-24, both crop and full-frame go down to 14-15mm (which is more than enough for most photography needs anyway)12mm vs. 18mm and 19.2mm>> doesn't go as wide as full frameend of story
>>239984no crop camera can go as wide as a full frame with any given lens.
>>239989Sigma 10-20 equals 16mm on Canon and 15mm on Nikon, Zuiko 7-14 equals 14mm on Four Thirdstry again
>>240016okayby your logic, 14mm and 16mm is wider than 12mm, gotchaincredible logic is incredible
>>240020So you'd use a Sigma on a full frame pro camera? Haha.
>>240021if you want the widest rectilinear lens, yesnow we have an idiot trying to back out of a stupid fucking argument, good job, friendo
Comparison between 5D and 30D on same lens. The 30D will naturally crop the image, though it will not aproximate or zoom.
Ugh. In during flamewar.You can get wider angles with full frame with a given lens. Given the Sigma with a 12mm, you can get absolutely wider with full frame, too. Do most photographers need to go that wide? No. Do most photographers need to go wider than 28mm-equiv? No. Do most photographers who shoot with ultrawides make shitty pictures because they spend too much time wanking over their absurdly wide angle and not enough time composing? Yes.You both basically agree. So stop fucking arguing.
>>240026i shoot 90% of my shots with 11-18 and dont spend the time afterwards going omfg its soooo wide.but anyway.
thanks for all of you!
>>240026*golf clap*classic ac post, you must feel really proud of yourself that you would not partake in trivial arguments like these, yet you feel compelled to post>> You both basically agree. So stop fucking arguing.no, we don'tfriendo thinks 14/15/16mm is wider than 12mmyou just have to call those people out
>>240031No he doesn't. He just doesn't think the 12mm matters because it's (a) just the one weird outlying data point and (b) a third-party lens. He references the 12mm in the original post:>With the exception of Sigma 12-24 [...]
Also, "friendo" is at least three people pointing out what a colossal tool>>240031is being in his desperate attempt to win internet arguments about lenses.
>>240041you're a faggot who is butthurt about saying 14mm being wider than 12mmcongratulations on geometaphysics, you are bending the very fabric of reality, you must be on a higher PLAIN of consciousnessme 1, you 0, i win
>>24006714>12 has nothing to do with "geometaphysics"
yeah, that one went right over your head, didn't it
>>240067>me 1, straw man 0Fix'd.If you'll look back at>>239984, you'll see that he's not actually saying that you can't go wider on full frame, what he's saying is that you can get as wide as the vast majority of photographers will have a real use for.
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOALU S AU S AU S AU S A