File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
I'm going to buy this box, there is coming objektives: 18-55 & 50-200 made by ultrasonic. So I'm asking is these any good? And about camera is it fast to take night photos? So I heard that to take one photo takes 0,33 seconds.
>> Anonymous
> 50-200 made by ultrasonic

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA... oh geez, you cracked me up
>> Anonymous
>>73518
Ultrasonic is fail, I heard lenses made by Multicoated are way better.
>> Anonymous
>>73518
You try writing in whatever his language is.
>> Anonymous
>>73471

USM = Ultrasonic Motor. It's the type of autofocus mechanism in the lens, not a brand. The lens is made by Canon.

I would suggest researching more information on photogaphy, and if you go with Canon, research Canon DSLRs specifically.

You will find that you have a lot of options when it comes to lenses. The 18-55mm is decent to start with, and the 55-200 probably is, too.

As for shooting low-light, you will want a lens with a wide aperture. The Canon 50mm 1.8 is good and very inexpensive. You should be able to find it for under $100 US. Using a wider aperture will allow you to shoot a faster shutter speed, as well as decrease ISO, which will eliminate the noise, or grain, in photos.
>> Anonymous
Yup, better get a prime lens for low-light. Most "zoom" lens aren't fast enough.
>> pskaught
     File :-(, x)
this is still what you want
>> Anonymous
>>73684
You're going to post that until we don't like it, so there won't be any demand for it and you can get it on the cheap, aren't you?
>> Anonymous
>>73688
i wouldnt mind. i'd fight and still like it and get it on the cheap. yeah, woo
>> Anonymous
The Canon kit lenses are known for not being the best lenses around, even for f/3.5.

What I'd do if I were you is skip the kit, get the body and get them to order you in a 50mm f/1.8 (or 1.4 if you have the money). It's a good staple lens (remember prime lenses [non-zoom] have a lot more clarity compared to zoom lenses). Then after that you can get a 28mm if you like wide angle or a telephoto lens.
Perhaps I'm just biased towards using prime lenses.
If you're looking to use it to take touristy shots, then the 50-200mm could be useful, but there still are better zoom lenses around which will deliver greater results.
>> Anonymous
So U say that Canon's Objektives and lenses suck?
>> Anonymous
>>73720
No, not at all. Canon lenses are great, albeit a bit expensive. Their KIT bundled lenses are rubbish.

The camera is good, you just need to sort out getting some good lenses for it instead of the kit ones. If they won't give you a deal on getting a 50mm lens with it, then look elsewhere to get it.

Also, look at the Nikon D80. Less noise at higher ISO ranges than the 400D, if you want to be shooting at night. Nikon also have some pretty cheap lenses, I've been told, but I can't confirm that.
>> Anonymous
http://wandering.un-clic-por-el-bosque.com/
http://wandering.un-clic-por-el-bosque.com/
http://wandering.un-clic-por-el-bosque.com/
http://wandering.un-clic-por-el-bosque.com/
http://wandering.un-clic-por-el-bosque.com/
>> Anonymous
Yes, of course, but I'm so fucking broke that I don't have any money to buy anything very big and good.
>> Anonymous
>>73717
There was just a discussion about this recently. 50mm is not a good only lens on a crop sensor camera. They're great lenses, but not as a person's one and only lens on a crop sensor.

The 28mm you suggest or a 35mm would be, though.