File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Like my headphones?
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelV5VMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodNot DefinedImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:05:24 15:42:53Exposure Time2/583 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/1.0Exposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance0.00 mMetering ModeAverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash FunctionFocal Length6.70 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3200Image Height2400Exposure Index0Exposure ModeAuto
>> Anonymous
what's a V5V
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>192223
>> Anonymous
i have to say that's really not bad
>> Anonymous
That's so fruity. Enjoy your aids.
>> Anonymous
fail purple sunlight is fail
>> Anonymous
>>192227

wtf? Do you see the colors here, or just assume multiple colors = rainbow?

OP, TIGHT HEADPHONES bra.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Like my headphones?

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.Camera ModelE-510Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution456 dpiVertical Resolution456 dpiImage Created2008:05:29 15:30:37Exposure Time1/25 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length23.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height750RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessHard
>> Anonymous
>>192221

background is horrible
headphones are ugly
if you aren't black these are terrible
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
how bout mine?

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D40Camera SoftwareVer.1.10Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern836Focal Length (35mm Equiv)450 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2008:05:18 05:28:52Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramNot DefinedISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashFlash, Auto, Return Not DetectedFocal Length300.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3008Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastSoftSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownISO Speed Used400Color ModeCOLORImage QualityFINEWhite BalanceAUTOImage SharpeningAUTOFocus ModeMANUALFlash SettingNORMALAuto Flash ModeBuilt-in,TTLFlash Compensation0.0 EVISO Speed Requested400Tone CompensationAUTOLens TypeUnknownLens Range70.0 - 300.0 mm; f/4.0 - f/5.6Auto FocusCenterShooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/OffColor ModeLandscape sRGBLighting TypeSPEEDLIGHTNoise ReductionOFFCamera Actuations2220Saturation 2AUTODigital Vari-ProgramAUTO
>> OiD
>>192845
Resize >_<
>> I &lt;3 SONY Butterfly
>>192845
fap fap fap
>> Anonymous
>>192731
lrn2headphones
>> Anonymous
>HEY GUISE OP HERE
>CHECK THIS OUT HAHA
http://rancid.outwar.com/page/120177
>> Noz !lXTdyjR3xc
     File :-(, x)
lolz Skullcandy.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D40Camera SoftwareQuickTime 7.4.5Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)82 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:05:29 23:23:00Exposure Time1/50 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length55.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1200Image Height1500RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastSoftSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>> Anonymous
>>192731
>>192872
probably terrible no matter what. cheap build, tiny wires, iunno though they could be good i guess, but i mean come one why "skull candy" thats just gay.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
everyday is repost day

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTiPhotographerunknownMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:04:26 21:52:29Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePartialLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length70.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>> Anonymous
that picture is bad and boring
and your headphones is a faggot headphones
ENJOY YOUR FAGGY HEAD PHONES
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Shitty picture of awesome headphones

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX K110DCamera SoftwareK110D Ver 1.00Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)82 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2006:06:12 00:44:24Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating1600Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length55.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width800Image Height532RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeMacro
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>193214

Couldn't help it

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX K110DImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2006:06:12 23:09:56Exposure Time1/45 secF-Numberf/4.0ISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width800Image Height769RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
i was gonna purchase OP's headphones the other day, bought different skullcandy ones :)
>> Anonymous
>>193223

itt: we shop at urban outfitters
>> Anonymous
skullcandy, Macs of the headphone world.
>> Anonymous
>>192230
>> Anonymous
>>192221

They remind me of primary school.
>> Anonymous
1) Anyone who intentionally wears Jamaican flag colors and isn't black is automatically a faggot.

2) Skullcandy is an overpriced, shitty brand that repackages low-end Chinese electronics in fruity colors for people who care more about the way their headphones LOOK than the way their headphones SOUND.
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
>>193299
>2) Sony is an overpriced, shitty brand that repackages low-end Chinese electronics in fruity colors for people who care more about the way their Cameras LOOK than the way their Camers perform.

fixed it
>> Anonymous
>>193304
>>193299

Both of these statements are 100% accurate
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
>>193304
inb4: Martin you cant spell, And Butterfly.
/thread, its going nowhere.
>> Anonymous
>OP here sign up

http://www.outwar.com/rec/mystikal

good shit
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>192221

your can suck fucking shit.


900's, reporting in.
>> Anonymous
Whats that? OP is a faggot?
>> Anonymous
>OP here if you like that

http://www.outwar.com/rec/mystikal

sign up and you will like this
>> Anonymous
>>193299

As much as I wholeheartedly agree, those are Rasta colors, not Jamaican colors. Jamaican colors are green, yellow, and black if I remember correct.

/geography class
>> Anonymous
>>193217
>>193214
Nice try guys, but>>193176is superior.
>> Anonymous
>>192221
Not really, no. They're Skullcandy heaps of distorted shit.

The only one who knows what they're doing is>>192706. I'm listening to 808 State in mine right now.
>> Anonymous
>>193600
Sorry faggot, but those things are uncomfortable to wear for long periods of time (both types or earpads) and the build quality is shit.

Once you break it, it's broken, don't like the rubber, very neutral sound. You're at the mercy of your usually shitty equalizer with your shitty grados.

I bet you can't even tell the difference between different headphones, but you root for grados because they're "different" as in ugly, and because no one else in your school has them.
>> Anonymous
>>192845

I have 7506 model . . .
>> Inanimate !3dXYfvdbBk
>>193600

Fuck you, fucker. Just because there's one pair of headphones you own doesn't mean the rest are shit. The best headphones in this thread are most likely the Sony. They have no distortion and respond perfectly to all frequencies.

Enjoy your non-flat frequency response line.
>> Anonymous
>>193608
really? NO distortion and respond PERFECTLY to ALL frequencies?
these must be a masterpiece of modern engineering to work perfectly.
they must cost thousands of dollars.
>>193605
how do they have shitty build quality? simple does NOT by any means mean shitty.
i wear them for hours a day and they dont really start to be uncomfortable, in fact i almost wore them to sleep last night but i was afraid id strangle myself.
it comes down to preference you fucktards dont seem to realize that.
some people like a flat sound some people like bassy shit sound some people like super high highs and some people dont whatever.

i dont think those sennheisers look to comfy, but i guess id have to try them on.

tldr: PREFERENCE
>> Anonymous
>>193630
"Preference" is not a synonym for badly designed ear pads. There's a reason they sell replacement ones that are different from the kit ones. And they are actually just as bad. No give whatsoever and scratchy. So either you get the styrofoam or you get the mattress foam. Pick your demon.

I know many people(more than one) that are uncomfortable with the ergonomics of these 'phones. I can't wear them for more than 5+. I can however wear my Sennheisers because they actually have some fucking GIVE.

Jesus, It's like putting rocks on your ears to look cool.

Don't give me that shit about flat sound.
http://preview.tinyurl.com/5ddb8z
>> Anonymous
>>193630
Actually try strangling yourself to sleep with your headphones. Happens all the time.
>> Anonymous
/p/ - /g/ - Headphones
>> Anonymous
My Sure e2cs just kicked the bucket.

Can someone suggest some good in-ear headphones for me? I don't want to break the bank, but I also don't want to buy Apple headphones. My ears are tiny and that shit doesn't fit well and leaks sound like a motherfucker.
>> Anonymous
>>193673
I owned a pair of these Sony Fontopias:

http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10551&storeId=10151&
amp;productId=11035138&langId=-1

I thought they were pretty damn good for the price. EXCELLENT bass response compared to the "Apple earbuds," and the semi-noise canceling is great too. I'd buy them again if I was in the market.
>> Anonymous
>>193637
I still don't know what you fucking guys are talking about with "uncomfortable pads." Been wearing mine for a couple hours and see no reason to stop any time soon.
>> Anonymous
>>193637
good link!

if you are wearing your headphones for more than five hours you must be incredibly lazy or have no friends. go take pictures or something.
BUT on the occasion that you do wear headphones for five hours a day i guess the grados could become a bit uncomfortable if you dont like the way they feel or if you havent gotten used to them.
i wear mine when im on the computer,walking to and from school, at school, playing games,and whatever and i never feel any major discomfort.
this thread is still useless, both as a photography thread and a headphone thread.
lol we all be trollin?
>> Inanimate !3dXYfvdbBk
>>193630

"Preference" . . . you can have your preference, I'll take headphones that most accurately reproduce sound. If I want to make something different I'll use an EQ instead of buying biased headphones.

You're talking to a guy that's using studio monitors as studio monitors. I need accuracy, not a neat sound.

Hell, you're probably using them to listen to MP3s, so you don't even need to spend more than $30 on whatever you buy anyways.
>> Anonymous
>>193754
I'm an engineering technician, so I find reasons to be wearing my 'phones for multiple hours a day.

That way I can fix up circuit boards while still listening to my newly downloaded radio shows and mp3s. Never boring. Or trollin' whichever you prefer.
>> Anonymous
>>193755
What do you use? I've never had the opportunity to test reference models, but from what I've heard, it's sex.

/g/ is now in /p/
>> Noz !lXTdyjR3xc
I really like my Denon D2000's. They're comparable to Sennheiser HD650's and higher-end Grado's.
>> Anonymous
>>193747

Link doesn't work for me...
Any specific model, or is that whole line pretty OK?