>> |
Anonymous
>>62345 Show me a photographer who needs unlimited bandwidth.
I'm not going to argue about storage (since it's dirt cheap nowadays?), but believe me, flickr won't give you unlimited storage and bandwidth, that's just based on normal usage predictions. If you read the fine print, you'll probably find some clauses which enables them to cut you off their service if you "abuse" them. The limits of abuse? I don't know, but maybe they aren't too far off from what you could get from cheap webhosting.
Hell, for a portfolio website, if you don't use flash, with pictures sized for web, I can't see you go far away from 100mb - you're not going to provide everyone with RAWs, right? - , and that's what free hosting providers gave away back in the day.
Plus, the professionalism of a well built site is quite priceless compared to a flickr account...
|