>> |
Anonymous
>>58312 I think that he means that when you're using film, you're almost "forced" to think more about your picture before you take it. Exposure-wise, you have less so once you go past 24 or 36, you really have to take into account time to rewind the film and then reload another roll too. Though this is usually a minor drawback, any moment you don't have film loaded, it means you could be missing precious moments. Also, shooting purely film can get pretty expensive, so if you're not thinking carefully about your shots, you're just throwing money down the drain.
In any case, a camera is still a camera. If you're skilled, then it doesn't matter whether you're shooting film or digital. But digital is a convienent option for amateurs on a budget. Lenses cost the same, bodies are a bit more expensive, but you won't have to worry too much about buying film at all. So if you take enough pictures, you'd be essentially saving.
|