>> |
Anonymous File :-(, x)
On>>37163, the thing that makes it work at all, really, is the tree and the shoreline, but especially the tree. The house off in the distance is a weak point... it does give the photograph a central point, but it is too bright, I think, to not be disruptive.
>>37164is just too empty of a frame, or perhaps unbalanced would be a better word: all the "stuff," with the exception of a wisp of land, is at the bottom and the rest is just water and sky. Stepping back maybe a meter or something to put in frame more of the shore would have helped it, I think.
>>37165is the lighting, mostly. The composition is technically good, but the photo still seems uninteresting. The light just happened to be wrong.
On>>37166, the foreground is well-filled and the background is interesting. Also, the Rule of Thirds applies to this photograph: the horizontal middle of the dock lines up perfectly with the lower-right intersection, and the right-hand trees are reasonably close to the top-right.
>>37168is really the contrast between the color and light on each side of the picture. Plus, once more, the foreground and background are well-filled.
And again,>>37169bothers me, and I'm not sure why. If I had to guess, I'd say that it may be the excess of green in the picture, but I'm honestly not sure.
|