File :-(, x, )
My Work Markofzo
Hey all, I'm supprised to see some actual works on 4chan, I guess I feared it was just another /b/ with higher quality photo's :P

Anyway.. I'd love to upload some photo's here but I wouldnt know where to start.
So here's my Deviantart,
http://Markofzo.deviantart.com
I'd love to get some comments/feedback/critique what so ever on my works.
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSAMSUNG TECHWINCamera ModelGX-1LCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)49 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2006:06:22 18:07:40Exposure Time1/10 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramActionISO Speed Rating800Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length33.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width279Image Height500RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeMacro
>> Macheath !8b4g0BkNZg
Oh man, fucking deviantfag- oh wait, these actually aren't that bad.
>> Anonymous
delete this post before you get flamed for deviant art

seriously people will troll the shit out of your page
>> Markofzo
>>121388

Got any better sites then?
>> Anonymous
>>121392
Flickr
>> Anonymous
Oh lawd, is that some Samsung GX?
>> Markofzo
>>121394
It is actually, it's my first DSLR, bought it two years ago.
Saving for a Nikon D80 at the moment.
Does it really matter what camera you're using anyway? Its the shots that matter.
>> Vincent !!8LCSE0Zp1mL
>>121399
It doesn't matter, its just thats a rare camera so its kind of a novelty.
I would skip the D80 and pick up a Used D200 if I were you, the prices will be about the same, and the D200 is a much better camera.
>> Anonymous
>>121384
flickr will suck your soul

photo.net
>> Anonymous
>>121416

Seconded.
>> Warren !WSxruxpIJs
>>121416
God no! Photo.net is evil. I remember when the photo.net forums were still on Phil Greenspun's personal servers. It was good back then, but that was something like 12+ years ago now, and that scares me.
>> fence !!POey2hdozCZ
photo.net is one of the few decent photo forums out there. you're pretty much guaranteed to find someone who knows exactly what you need to know, since it's populated by a lot of grumbling old fuckers and not dslr kiddies. and it gets enough working artists wandering through to make it interesting.

and flickr can actually be useful from time to time, although its main population is the aforementioned dslr kiddie. the ability to search by camera is especially nice. i think it's an underused feature, especially here on /p/ with all the gear threads we get.
>> beethy !HJGkSBB3Ao
OP, not too bad.. plus you're kinda cool because you're dutch, I used to live in Veenendaal and Amsterdam.. born in Haarlem :]

Anyway.. ITT photo.net
what are other people's opinions on it?
I don't like deviantart since honesty doesn't really exist there. It's all about complimenting the shit out of eachother, OMG U R GODDDD.
I would prefer actual critique that would help me improve
So, how is photo.net?