>> |
Anonymous
>>143881 I didn't think about that; that's a good point, but still, the 50/1.8 is no slouch and the 50/1.4 is only $300. $30 out of ten paychecks, or $10 out of thirty paychecks, etc.
Plus, limiting oneself to one lens is the sort of masochism that usually winds up making one a better photographer in the end. But the interim is why the pressing question is what sort of photographs does the OP want to take? Depending on that answer, a 50mm might be perfect for him. Or, he might do better with a 35mm. Or, if he's doing this for other people for money, he might be better not taking the risks inherent in such a self-development exercise, i.e. shitty shots until he gets good.
|