I took this tonight. This would be the sky line of St. Paul, MN. Stitched together 7 pictures. One of the few times a picture turned out exactly like I envisioned it to be.EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D50Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 MacintoshMaximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:03:29 21:36:04Exposure Time30 secF-Numberf/29.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length70.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width4713Image Height700
very nice, you should sell this shit
>>39193Haven't seen you around in a while. Nice to see you again and bearing pictures. =) Anyway, very good night picture, just seems a bit slanted but not too much.
>>39202The slant is not due to my tripod not being on level ground as most would think. Its actually due to a St. Paul building code that states that all building must lean at least 3 degrees to the northeast. Its the craziest thing.
>>39199Does anyone know where I could get this printed out. Do photo places develop pictures this big?
>>39232Best bet might be getting it on a 16x20 and then taking a yardstick and X-Acto to the white bits.(Or, better idea, stick several of 'em in a single file and then order *that* on a 16x20 to slice up)
>>39232Yes, digital photo print shops will usually be able to print on rolls 48" or more in width.
>>39272Like a Proex or Ritz can do that?