>> |
Anonymous
>>271401
>>better high-ISO performance, dynamic range, >This is directly related to the sensor.
Partially, but it's also largely related to other electronics and software. I know the difference when the 2.0 firmware that updated my D2X to D2Xs specs came out was pretty substantial.
>Not much of them, and those customizable settings are used by like 1 person in 100.
Yeah, but you have to realize that the other 99 out of those hundred aren't really the audience that has a need for something like the D300.
Again, the real point of the 700 is to be a compact, light version of the D3, not an upgraded D300. The people who really need it know exactly why they'd want/need such a camera, the rest of us don't have much use for it. I, for one, prefer DX myself, I'd go for a 300 over a 700, and it's a big part of why I haven't found a real justification to move up to a D3 over my D2. For plenty of people out there, though, there's ample reason.
|