>> |
eku
!8cibvLQ11s
As a owner of 70-300 IS lens, I don't have much bad to say about it. It's very sharp. I would say it's almost as sharp as 50mm f/1.8 lens.
IS is must. I can take sharp photos at 300mm, hand held, with shutter speeds as low as 1/45.
If Canon would do things a little more better (different USM, not rotating front element, etc, small things), it would definetly be a L lens.
But if the money wouldn't be a problem, I would go for 70-200 f/2.8 IS lens. It's just soooo sweet I almost came once, when I had a change to use it for 30 minutes. <3
|