so... what does /p/ think? its more of a spur of the moment shot then a planned one.. but i really like how the sky's colour gradient turned out.. and how the moon looks.what about you guys?EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 400D DIGITALCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:05:08 18:34:18White Point Chromaticity0.3RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardExposure Time1/25 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length75.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width690Image Height1000
>>178237thanks ^_^
Very nice, would have been terrific if you'd taken time to set up and use a longer exposure etc. instead of bumping up the ISO. I use a 400D also, and I usually steer clear of anything over 800.
^ Sorry, I meant 400.
>>178251I use a 400D also, and I usually steer clear of anything over 800.>> ^ Sorry, I meant 400.wow, way to not use your camera to its full potential
>>178254haha np and yeh i had grabbed the camera quickly to get shots of a plane flying over head. that was doing a "dump" and i noticed the moon. as i was fixing my cars side mirror.. cos i smashed it that day :( and didnt have my tripod so i needed the fastest shutter speed possible to reduce camera shake haha, and yeh the noise from the 800 ISO kinda kills it.. maybe ill re-attempt it when im actually set up for it :) but yeh i refuse to use 1600 ISO way too grainy lol
>>178335you're new around here aren't you
>>178335let me guess... you're used to people telling you A++ BEST SHOT EVER just because you're some vapid slut with tits and a vag?fuck you. every shot you've posted here is garbage and you're just wasting all the potential your camera has.
>>178340not new been here for over a year.. but only recently started posting..>>178343who gives a shit if im a girl or a guy? i want critique so i can better myself.. if you dont like it then gtfo.. and no most of my freinds cant really comment as they have no idea about photography and limit it to "this is nice/ i like this" or "na dont like that" etc... so i thought id ask here for some more experienced opinons... but apparently you are a fag and dont have any.. (i dont care if its good or bad.. i want to know how i can improve and get better.. ) im still a newfag with DSLR cameras...
>>178349>i want critique so i can better myself..bullshit. when you get critique that's not positive, you just say "CC from people _over_ 12.. kthxbai!"break and/or sell your camera
>>178352no i want something more indepth than "shitsux.grainy LOL" etc i want more descriptive.. i already know its bad cos its grainy.. maybe you should read the earlier posts..
>>178354>you're new around here aren't you
>>178354wtf do you want me to say? it's a boring picture and composed like shit. no amount of critique is going to make it, or you, any better.
>>178355read>>178349
>>178357well thats a start... how do you think i can improve on that? as i said im new to photography..
>>178359Books, books.
>>178359Look at some good pictures, see what they look like.