>> |
Anonymous File :-(, x)
>>183301did you ever consider that your L lens is below standard quality?
did you ever consider your 70-300 was below standard quality?
see how that works?
and also notice how you automatically assume L is better?
>> I don't need to look for samples and show 100% crop samples
that is because you automatically assume L is better, AM I RITE?
>> I believe there is a significant IQ difference in an L lens vs a standard lens.
again, based on your own experience, your word.
just humor me then, based on these samples please tell me how exactly they differ, other than the things i mentioned.
please don't just go "i don't have time to fuck with this" or any kind of reply like that, just humor me
and also, bear in mind that if you do choose to answer it, you're getting into the pixel peeping game and last time i checked "good" photographers don't pixel peep
>> You don't, you think they're the same.
hah, remember that talk we had about the 70-200 2.8 IS?
i buy nothing but the best, 17-55 2.8 IS and 70-200 2.8 IS
i just don't like when idiots get all gay for L just because it's L
|