HDR from RAWEXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelNIKON D50Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2007:11:13 15:11:00Exposure Time1/100 secF-Numberf/9.0ISO Speed Rating400Focal Length70.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2000Image Height3008
sorry forgot my question, why is it so grainy? the quality was fine to begin with. (processed in photomatix)
It looks blurry too. What processing did you do on it?
Are you SURE this is hdr?
Why the hell does this crap exist?
>>91387yes i am sure, you should see the original. I used photomatix and photoshop. I used photoshop to change the exposure of the RAW file then uploaded the files to photomatix
because when you pull up the shadows alot, it brings out the noise
The lesson here is to stop trying to make HDR images from one capture.
>>91433moar liek use HDR on a photo that actually needs it. am i rite?
>>91437Truth. HDR mania is out of hand. It has its place like any other tool, but every image isn't sure to be better with HDR.