File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
My friend lent me his camera, and I took this pic and edited it.
Am I awesome?
>> heman
no exif, no win
>> Anonymous
Could be just some photo pulled of the internets. Provide us with the version with exif.

Other than that this photo is quite good.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
k

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D200Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/5.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern846Focal Length (35mm Equiv)30 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2008:04:03 18:48:36Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length20.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1500Image Height1004RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationHighSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>> Anonymous
>>153850
>>153851
EXIF proves nothing. It can be faked in two minutes.

Also, this photo isn't too good at all. It's a properly focused and exposed photograph of a beautiful scene. Composition is very meh, and it looks like a shitty pic from a Sea Ray or Hatteras catalog.
>> Anonymous
Well actually, looking at that again, that looks nothing like a Hatteras.

95% sure it's a Sea Ray, though.

Saging myself for useless knowledge about useless luxury motoryachts.
>> heman
i like the photo. im in debate as to whether it should have had a slower shutter speed or not. but i think i like it.
>> heman
/p needs to learn to like a photo for its aesthetic purpose!
>> Anonymous
Sooo... I am awesome then?
>> Anonymous
>>153983

If you have to ask, then no.