File :-(, x, )
linkiE !ei5A1FPDuk
>> linkiE !ei5A1FPDuk
     File :-(, x)
New tripfag, also filmfag

Everything processed and printed by myself.

Disregard that my scanner blows.
>> linkiE !ei5A1FPDuk
     File :-(, x)
I'm not exactly sure how to embed exif...sorry...if you all want, I can post my Flickr.
>> linkiE !ei5A1FPDuk
     File :-(, x)
>> linkiE !ei5A1FPDuk
     File :-(, x)
>> linkiE !ei5A1FPDuk
     File :-(, x)
>> linkiE !ei5A1FPDuk
     File :-(, x)
Here comes a smile!
>> Anonymous
Nice grain. What film were you using?
>> Anonymous
>>147433
why does everyone like grain?

i like it myself i just dont understand why an imperfection is so cool
>> linkiE !ei5A1FPDuk
Most of them were shot using Tmax 400, pushed and pulled different ways...I did the Mountain Goats concert with Ilford Delta 3200. Everything was printed on either Oriental, or Forte resin-coated paper.
>> linkiE !ei5A1FPDuk
>>147437

People have different tastes. I myself kinda like things on the grainy side.
>> Anonymous
>>147442
on the rare occasion i do black and white i always check to see if a little noise will add to the picture.
>> linkiE !ei5A1FPDuk
Oh; and mind, all the little white specks you see are the scanner's fault...the glass is all full of imperfections for whatever reason.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>147439
Huh. I totally thought when I saw that "That guy looks like John Darnielle"
>> Anonymous
>>147411

Yay! tMG!
>> Anonymous
sage
>> Anonymous
>>147416
i like this one alot
>>147428
i wish you could see more of the guy's face but that would be hard to do i guess

>>147481
atleast he puts in the effort to work with film, better than the countless HEY IM NEW WHICH CAMERA DO I BUY threads on here daily
>> linkiE !ei5A1FPDuk
>>147495

Yeah; I tried a lot to get more detail out of his face...dodging, split-toning...when something is lit like that it's tough. Plus, it's a little soft, I admit. Thanks for the input!
>> Anonymous
nice pics bro