File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
comment /p/
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 40DLens Size28.00 - 135.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.0.8Serial Number1220707441Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:06:14 08:40:38Exposure Time1/25 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/5.7Exposure Bias2 EVFlashFlash, CompulsoryFocal Length109.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3888Image Height2592RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeTv-PriorityFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessUnknownSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeOne-ShotDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeExternal FlashCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalFlash Bias-0.38 EVWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation13Sensor ISO Speed288Color Matrix129
>> Honest So You Dont Have To Be !9UISPtwBPo
>>269327

RE FUCKING SIZE!!

No one wants to see 3888x2592 of your shit

As for the photo...OOHHHHHH a random fucking emo kid screaming down the mic.. no ones got that shot before!!!

And to add to the amazing, its not even in focus!!

>Focus Type Auto

Good job !! Your to shit and lazy to use manual focus, and you still fucked up when the camera as doing it all for you!!
>> Anonymous
how did you manage to make such a shit photo with a 40d?

fuckying noisy as fuck, buy a flash or a prime, resize
awful subject and angle
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
more pleaaaasee
>> Anonymous
>>269332
LOL. you _would_ like this. faggot
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
>>269334
Considering I shoot alot of live music myself, ofcourse im going to be interested.
>> Anonymous
>>269335

this photograph has nothing to do with music. you don't know he's singing. the OP didn't even explain the photo.

put a fucking cheeseburger in his hands and then what does this photo mean? yeah
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
>>269346
My mistake, now you've mentioned it - its obvious hes examining the microphone with his teeth. Why did I overlook that?
>> Honest So You Dont Have To Be !9UISPtwBPo
>>269335

If you shoot allot of live music, you must know this one sucks balls, yet you haven't given your input on it yet, even though OP seems to be long gone.
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
>>269350
Yep it does suck, framing is terrible - but to be honest, i've lost all hope for anon & their compositional abilities.

Op if you're here, post more -.-
>> Anonymous
>>269327

is this The Enemy? chavs...
>> ANTMY !qDIAcd3vJM
>>269327

why must you make us 40D users look bad. This is why we can have nice things.
>> $19.99 !OSYhGye6hY
You used shutter priority, and set it to 1/25th, while using a lens at 109mm...

Why!?
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
1. As others have said, we don't need to see all ten megapixels. FUCKING RESIZE.
2. Very blurry. A faster lens would've helped here, as would getting closer with a shorter lens. Get yourself a nifty fifty is my point.
3. Bad expression on his face. His mouth looks like someone just kicked him in the danglies. His nose looks like he's pressing it up with his knuckles while he's singing, which has got to make his singing voice sound pretty awesome.
4. He's too far to the left. You've left a big blank space on the right and cut off his elbows.

Overall, just looks blurry and amateurish.
>> Anonymous
>>270306

I for one like the expression, and if you don't sing through your nose, it wouldn't make a damn bit of difference whether you were pressing on it or not. Try sticking to technical comments and not projecting lame prejudice of the subject and bullshit vocal technique.

>>269327

Yes, the composition is too far left, so resize and recrop to recenter.

Not horrible overall, just unfocused and unbalanced. It's not the most original pose, but unless you discussed it with him before hand, not your fault.
>> Anonymous
shitsux
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>270795
>Try sticking to technical comments and not projecting lame prejudice of the subject and bullshit vocal technique.
That is a technical comment, after a fashion. He chose to release his shutter at a point when the subject looked bad. Eyes closed, nose scrunched up, mouth way too wide. We can surmise the guy's singing because he seems to be clutching a microphone, but this could easily be cropped to make it look like he's just getting punched in the nose.

>It's not the most original pose, but unless you discussed it with him before hand, not your fault.
One could make the argument that not discussing it with him beforehand makes it his fault. Easier to just make the argument that he presumably had at least an entire song's worth of poses to choose from and yet he chose this one, though, which is definitely his fault.
>> Anonymous
all in all, it looks like something that my mom would take if I dropped here off at a metal concert and gave her a camera