>> |
Anonymous
>>254693
jesus christ your butthurt is showing
>> We're talking about zooming, not focusing, you moron. And even if internal focusing were the issue here, the rear element still counts as "internal" for the purposes of calling a lens internal focusing.
you're a fucking idiot, if a lens has true internal focus, the rear element does not move. fairly obvious you've never used any higher end lenses
>> a moving rear element in a zoom lens is in no way in indicator of lens quality, you moron. Whether or not the front element turns when you focus, yes, but not movement of the rear element.
uh yes it is, it's a lot more complicated to design and build, it's higher end, it's better quality. they're not going to start making true internal focus lenses at $150
>> Which would you rather have, a few easily-cleaned specks of dust on the sensor of a camera that will be obsolete in two years anyway, or a few specks of dust inside your lens?
dust inside the lens is never an issue, dust on the mirror is
>> The whole discussion is about a 15x zoom from a third party manufacturer. Even if the above two elements made sense in the context, do you really think that this 15x zoom is going to be zomfghigh quality? You moron?
lol @ butthurt name calling
the Nikkor 18-200 VR has true internal focus and everything moves inside the lens body and it's $600 and okay quality
i don't care enough to check if the tamron has true IF
|