File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
I need a good 67 UV protector, recommend me some brand. Thanks in advance.
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:03:26 10:40:41Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width650Image Height650
>> Anonymous
OP Here: I bought a Nikon D200 and I got no UV, should I buy one? what should I do? I'm going to take photos inside my house for a few days....tell me what should I do ;_; please.
>> Anonymous
You don't need one, but if you do decide to get one, grab a Hoya- they are cheaper and have respected quality.
>> Anonymous
use hoya moron. and not the hoya purple box. do the yellow one.
>> eagle
dont bother they often cause lens flare
>> Celotil !AN26.8FkH6
>>248568

I'm surprised no-one's replied to you yet, Eagle.

OP, I bought Hoya HMC Multi-coated UV and Polariser lens filters and they haven't negatively impacted my photos at all.

Actually, you shouldn't notice multi-coated UV filters as all they're supposed to do is take out that purplish haze you get on long shots. Plus, even the good ones are somewhat cheap and add a little protection for your lens.

Don't buy the cheapest ones though, the single-coating. The lens flare affect can happen with the multi-coat if you shoot straight into the sun, but it's likely to happen in more situations (not just shooting into the sun) with a single coating filter - the filter is only coated on the outside, leaving the inside more reflective and creating a subtle mirror-on-mirror effect inside the camera.
>> eagle
>>248823
in essence you are spending more to have what is negligable effect. a CPL filter is much much more usefull.