File :-(, x, )
Samsung i8 Anonymous
Accidentally posted this in /g/.

Anyway, anyone have any opinions? I know nothing about camera's, but I was thinking about getting one.
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.Camera ModelE-510Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshMaximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:01:06 22:44:56White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time1/25 secF-Numberf/3.5Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceTungstenFlashNo Flash, AutoFocal Length14.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width350Image Height245RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationHighSharpnessNormal
>> Anonymous
No one?
>> Anonymous
>I know nothing about camera's

We know, we know.
>> Anonymous
>>246348

No, no one.
>> fence !!POey2hdozCZ
samsung makes crappy cameras.
>> Anonymous
>>246360
what about the NV series? they look like ol' rangefinders
>> sage !i/euDJmWr2
     File :-(, x)
>>246374
Uh, no, they don't. Slim body and fat lens != rangefinder.
>> Anonymous
Canon SDxxxx
>> Anonymous
Oh well, I bought it.
>> Anonymous
http://flickr.com/cameras/samsung/digimax_i6_pmp/

Presumably an earlier version of the same camera/PMP/whatever it is. You can either trust someone on an Internets forum who says "samsung makes crappy cameras", or you can see what photos come out of one.

Truth: Nearly any camera can take good, or even beautiful, photos. The i8 is a piece of shit compared to any decent DSLR, but then a medium format camera from the 50s is, in many respects, a piece of clunky, primitive shit compared to a modern point and shoot, and that never seems to stop the medium format boys doing amazing things.

tl;dr gtfoutside and start taking photos, also sage for possible troll
>> Anonymous
>>246990
now you have to post pics once you've taken some decent ones
>> eagle
     File :-(, x)
>>246374
i dont see any resemblence

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS OPTICAL CO.,LTDCamera ModelC990Z,D490ZCamera Softwarev959u-72Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodUnknownImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:06:28 09:26:39White Point Chromaticity0Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/3.2Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating10813605Lens Aperturef/1.0Brightness0 EVExposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance0.00 mMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length6.90 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1442Image Height1128Exposure Index0
>> Anonymous
I have that camera, it's always done the job for me.
>> Anonymous
sexy camera
>> Anonymous
>>246383
second
>> Anonymous
cameras with the lens is that place are stupid 'cause the zoom's never gonna be great and it's so easy to stick your finger a little bit over it if you're not careful. Fashion kicks pratciality right out the window with these cameras. Just listen to this man>>246383
I recommend the powershot sd850is / ixus 950is. It's the best sd model without going into uneccessary flashy features for too much money.
>> Anonymous
>>248371
>in that place