>> |
Srs critiquefag to the rescue...
Anonymous
I saw these yesterday, but wasn't really moved to comment. However, I'll try to whip up a little critique now since I have the time and I haven't really looked at anything since DC's last photo thread...
>>215890 Can't beat the smooth, full-frame look of film... Sharp shit, nice choice of focal point. However, how about getting whatever's in your model's face out of the way. I know it's hidden in borkeh, but you can still tell something's in the way and it's distracting. Composition's solid in this, nice job.
>>215891 Different pose, lighting's interesting and I think it really helps her skin look smooth and creamy. Not bad. I really don't have much to say about this one.
>>215893 I dig. Solid composition, this kinda look works for this shot. Exposure's nearly perfect, just need to hide the blacks under that table a little better. Oh, and the window slats on the bottom right are a little wider open than the rest. Shame you didn't catch that.
>>215894 First thing I noticed was the bokeh, normally not the type I usually like (outside of the circle's a little too heavy, too much detail, doesn't seem very creamy) but it works for this shot. The softer image isn't too bad, but it'd be better sharper in my opinion. Good place for a soft spot filter maybe? Oh, but then your bokeh might be off. Overhead lighting's a little harsh, but I know there's not much you can do to fix that.
>>215895 Insects, crustaceans, etc. all look better when they're sharp as fuck. Now's not the time to be dropping down to f1.2.
|