File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
I was trying to get a unique type of exposure. Please give your opinions for this photograph could be used in a competition. I can't provide the EXIF data because the camera I used belonged to a professional who I work under.
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D100Camera SoftwareVer.1.01Focal Length (35mm Equiv)39 mmMaximum Lens Aperturef/3.2Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern36342Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2007:03:28 12:30:01RenderingCustomExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownExposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualExposure Bias2 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length26.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2000Image Height3008ISO Speed Used1600Image QualityFINEWhite BalanceAUTOImage SharpeningAUTOFocus ModeAF-SFlash SettingNORMALFlash Compensation0.0 EVISO Speed Requested400Tone CompensationAUTOLens TypeUnknownLens Range17.0 - 35.0 mm; f/2.8 - f/4.0Auto FocusDynamic Area, Center Selected, Top FocusedShooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/OffColor ModeAdobe RGBLighting TypeNATURALNoise ReductionOFF
>> Anonymous
you know...the exif data is embedded in the image, so its there unless you didnt save the image in the same file, meaning copy pasting the image itself (not the file) to a new file and saving it like that. kind of confusing explanation, but i tried.

anyway, what about this makes it unique? personally i think its similar to many pictures ive seen that were taken during an operation. also, its rather grainy. to me, it just doesnt jump out and strike me as unique.
>> Anonymous
>>39490
The lighting is the only particuarly interesting thing about it. The composition is just standard operation composition,>>39492is right about that.