i am very surprised at how well tri-x works at 1600. the grain is there for sure, but it isnt as harsh or sharp as i expected.hc-110 dil E for 21 & 1/2 min, minimal agitationcrit/commentary appreciatedEXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:11:19 22:31:07
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:11:19 22:31:05
.skcb tiS .?? .4.de oy elf tepO .3.nahc4a ievaS .2ei it eO .1g
orz
swear to god the only way to get people to reply to photo threads you make is to be a tripfag
>>297888True dat
They sure have that special analogue look, I like them. Mysterious, I think is the word I would use to describe them.I would like to see more, because these alone kinda leave ma hanging, they don't tell the whole story.
have you tried stand developing
>>297888or maybe posting interesting photos does :/
>>298261thats why heavyweather gets replies when he posts snapshots he takes at parties with a ricoh gr amirite>>298227ive heard people reccomend this before what kind of effect does it have>>298226yeah idk a red filter seems to have that kind of effect... makes it seem like a different planetCamera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:11:21 16:16:17
>>298271stand developing makes for less grain.basically Rodinal 1:100 for about an hour no adgitation.
Oh ho.Stand developing solves all problems amirite?
>>298274weird, i'd figure rodinal would be a less than optimal developer for pushing. ive been meaning to get my hands on some anyways for pan-f so i'll try it.
>>298279not really, try it and see. look at flickr examples on this