File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
im starting to shoot porn... but not the filthy one
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution1200 dpiVertical Resolution1200 dpiImage Created2008:03:22 00:42:12Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1679Image Height1092
>> Anonymous
um. . . good job?
>> Anonymous
i dunno.. seriously, what do you think?
>> Anonymous
that girl is disgustingly skinny.
>> Anonymous
>>146945
Why is it that 90% of people seem unable to accept that there's a broad range of normal, in-shape, attractive female body frames? Seriously, every girl posted to /p/ gets bitched at for being too skinny or too chubby. And some of them have been. Like three.
>> Anonymous
Not sure about the focus of the choice of panties... Even if it's not the ''filthy'' one, it doesn't have to look like grandma's panties imo.
>> Jeremo !iKGMr61IHM
don't really know how we're supposed to comment on these ones.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>146945
>>146948
She isnt even skinny, thats just slim!

Fucking fatties.
>> Anonymous
>>146945
I don't think it's digusting, she sure is skinny but it's not that bad and absolutely horrifying. I agree with>>146948on this one.
>> Anonymous
>>146950
do you like it? why?
its quite simple
>> Anonymous
fucking gross
>> Anonymous
moar
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)


Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Elements 5.0 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution1200 dpiVertical Resolution1200 dpiImage Created2008:03:15 13:37:53Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1680Image Height1087
>> Anonymous
i'd say try to show a bit more of her/their body. Try to get them in poses that accentuate their features and curves. Try not to just make it an ass shot with the ass in the middle. Or pubic shot with the panties in the middle and no more... same as with the first.

Also, personally, I kinda like the lacy stockings. Show more of the leg!
>> Jeremo !iKGMr61IHM
ummm tits or gtfo???

... i do like these, but mainly cause i've just gotten into the basics of snapshot aesthetics, loved shit like Parr for years, but never really tried to understand the dynamics behind it.

But in terms of liking it or not, the style there is good, but it's not anything i haven't seen before. It's not a cop out, i still think it's nice that this is a direction you're taking.
>> Anonymous
>>146982
Snapshot aesthetics. You intend to call technique a blatant lack of technique?

Not technique if it isn't intended. In the case of snapshots, it's utter fail.
>> Jeremo !iKGMr61IHM
>>146983

... okay i see what you're saying... but read up on snapshot aesthetic before you attempt to engage me in discussion, otherwise it'd be a few threads of strawmen.

Or is this OP?
>> Anonymous
>>146985
oh shi

I see. My bad. Still though, I don't think it's deliberate.
>> iProd !8x7lXo9zIQ
We will only allow you to get into the pornography business if you share your work with /p/. Got it?
>> Anonymous
>>146940

these are awesome, OP. tell us about your process/show us more!

they have a great mood to them, and your model is a bit goofy looking in the first one, (squished legs, weird arm position) it is so great.
>> Anonymous
>>146940

mmmm sweet butt

btw insecure fat chicks need to gtfo the internet
>> Anonymous
i see no porn here