File :-(, x, )
Random Pictures Anonymous
/p/ I'm just gonna leave a few pictures that I've taken over the last few years here. Feel free to comment, hate, like or vomit on. All were taken on either velvia 50 or 100 iso and scanned in.

This one is from the Great sand dunes in South Colorado
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution2720 dpiVertical Resolution2720 dpiImage Created2008:09:08 20:22:19Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width500Image Height735
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
This one is from Shennendoah National Park in Virginia

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution2720 dpiVertical Resolution2720 dpiImage Created2008:09:08 20:20:49Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width500Image Height747
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
From the same park in Virginia

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution2720 dpiVertical Resolution2720 dpiImage Created2008:09:08 20:20:22Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width757Image Height500
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
This one is from the rocky mountain national park

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution2720 dpiVertical Resolution2720 dpiImage Created2008:09:08 20:21:09Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width738Image Height500
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Last one for now and it's a bit bland but I love the rich green of the original (R.I.P.) velvia. Taken in eastern colorado

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution2720 dpiVertical Resolution2720 dpiImage Created2008:09:08 20:19:11Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width746Image Height500
>> jessienotbobby
>i love all of your pictures!!!
>> Anonymous
>>250617
Win. I've seen it done before, but this one wins.

>>250618
Nice colors, but a bit soft and rather generic. Well executed, though.

>>250620

Great, but not as win as the first. The lack of any object to compare the scale of the picture makes it seem like the waterfall could be either large or small.

>>250619
The light on this is spectacular, but the lack of a firm subject marginally detracts from its value.

>>250622
I want me some velvia! Never before have I seen greens as green as these greens in a un-brutally massacred in photoshop photo.
>> fence !!POey2hdozCZ
i could do without the soft focus, but some of these are very, very good.
>> Anonymous
>>250645
my >>s got messed up somehow, should be 17, 19, 18, 20, and 22.
>> Anonymous
As a whole, these photographs are incredibly generic and boring.

>>250617
>>250622

Those two are OK I guess, but the rest are shit.
>> NatureGuy !se3A3TwzdY
>>250617
>>250619
I like these two

They're all kind of that late 70's early 80's generic nature shot though. The first one is well done, but the softness of the focus a lot the rest.

>>250620
Right next to the road in Moraine Valley?
>> Anonymous
OP here, thanks for the comments. The soft focus photos are all multiple exposure where I take a very sharp exposure at like f/22 and then a very out of focus exposure at like f/5.6 on the same piece of film, it looks ok sometimes, but I have phased away from that technique lately.

And yes nature guy that is right off the road in moraine park. I saw some of your RMNP photos and I think they're pretty cool. I just took another roll up there last weekend, it's in the soup now
>> beethy !vW/UaE6zYU
>>250617
>>250622
Not bad at all.
>> Anonymous
I like them all, the waterfall the least.
>> Anonymous
>>250661
Orton effect?
>> Anonymous
>>250666

Devil post lulz.

But seriously, those two pics are fucking good.