File :-(, x, )
ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
Some grainy-ass photos I took the other day and developed yesterday. Ilford Delta 3200 (at ISO3200), developed in DD-X. Shot with a Canon Rebel II S.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
     File :-(, x)
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
     File :-(, x)
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
     File :-(, x)
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
     File :-(, x)
Everybody likes kitties.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
     File :-(, x)
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
     File :-(, x)
Remember: Everything looks artsier in black and white.
>> Anonymous
>>88835
Your pic lack black borders, HDR, lens flare and Deviantart URL at bottom for maximum artsiness.
>> Anonymous
>>88835
don't forget the selective desaturation
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>88874
Given that it was shot in B&W film, it'd have to be selective *re*saturation.
>> Anonyfag of Borneo !bHymOqU5YY
>>88844
You forgot 300.
>> Anonymous
>>88829
>Shot with a Canon Rebel II S.
omg dey cam out w/ new rebel? I want!
>at ISO3200
k, i buyin now lol
>> Vincent
In all seriousness the Kitty one, and the First shot are great.
Suprised its ISO 3200 film, My 1600 stuff turned out granier than this! (Fuji Neopan)
>> Teus !QbSstcPD6U
>>89054
neopan 1600 isn't really known for having a lot of speed. Delta3200 has the most speed of all, depending on developer. DD-X is great for this kind of stuff alright, and it's not too contrasty. I've shot Delta3200 at 1600, and photos in broad daylight weren't unusable contrasty
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>89054
You know, the last few times I've shot Delta 3200, I've exposed it at 1600 and damned if it didn't look grainier than this.

I think it's probably just because I chose naturally grainy-looking subjects for this roll.