>> |
Anonymous
>>136970 I dunno, it seems like it gets mentioned in a "FUCK YEAH!" manner atleast once every time a Holga pops up as if it's actually a better camera. It's not, it's less capable of producing a pleasing picture and doesn't have any of the quasi-gimmick features of a Holga that they are usually sought for. I mean, yeah, a lot of people may not LIKE the shots Holgas take because of the vignetting and occasional light leaks, but that's also part of the cameras charm to many people. The Clack doesn't do any of this in my experience (for better or for worse) but it lacks any kind of sharpness. Holgas atleast manage to have a small section of the photograph in the center fairly focused, clacks are just one big, blurry image that looks like it was taken with a 69 cent camera from a dollar store. No unique characteristics, no sharpness, nothing. Just a crappy photograph.
|