>> |
Macheath
!8b4g0BkNZg
>>170237My point is, I don't think anyone plans to be contemplating spending hundreds of dollars, repeatedly, when they first decide to take a few pictures.
Well, I know of a few people that did. My friend's mom blew thousands on a Pentax K1000 outfit back in the 90s, which he tells me has been used only a handful of times. But she refuses to sell it so that she can brag about how she spent thousands on it.
But yeah, when I first decided to "take a few pictures," I picked up a point and shoot, but when I decided that wanted a little more control over the final image, I contemplated spending $700 on a camera outfit.
>>170265 >>170228
Yep, that's precisely what I wanted to do. Although I originally thought I'd rather have a Zeiss Ikon, I realized the Bessa R2M had the framelines I was most interested in anyway.
And I don't plan on buying a rangefinder for at least another 3-5 years.
Basically what I want to know is, would this be a waste of money buying tools that overlap jobs, or would I be buying another camera that compliments my SLR nicely?
|