File :-(, x, )
Liquefied !!CF1+3tSFCce
Shot these yesterday. I tried using the in-camera meter on my Rollei with mixed results. Film is Ilford Pan 50.
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image Width1661Image Height1631Number of Bits Per Component8Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionUnknownImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution800 dpiVertical Resolution800 dpiImage Created2008:06:07 12:16:33Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width800Image Height786
>> Liquefied !!CF1+3tSFCce
     File :-(, x)
No. 2
The exposure came out better here but I'm thinking I will just stick to my sekonic for tough situations like these.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image Width1661Image Height1578Number of Bits Per Component8Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionUnknownImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution800 dpiVertical Resolution800 dpiImage Created2008:06:07 12:17:59Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width800Image Height760
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
>>200031
Really like the exposure and lighting in this, although the harsh shadow across her face emphasises her mole/spot/blemish thing.
>> Anonymous
>>200031

the overexposed window looks really shitty
>> Liquefied !!CF1+3tSFCce
>>200034
Hmm, yeah it does. It's cool though, I'm not going for high fashion or anything.
>> Liquefied !!CF1+3tSFCce
     File :-(, x)
One more.

btw these are scanned with the Epson 4490 in case scanner dude is reading this.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image Width1661Image Height1626Number of Bits Per Component8Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionUnknownImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution800 dpiVertical Resolution800 dpiImage Created2008:06:07 13:00:43Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width800Image Height783
>> Liquefied !!CF1+3tSFCce
Did I mention the dynamic range of B&W film still fucking rocks the shit out of digital? That last shot is a straight scan, no pp except for resize.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>200078
I know i remembered wrong last time, but isnt it almost twice that of most digital sensors?
>> Liquefied !!CF1+3tSFCce
>>200083
I don't know what the numbers are but it's enough that it's obvious.