>> |
Anonymous
You'd be surprised what starting small & learning your craft can teach you, too.
OP sounds like an arrogant poser who buys ultra-expensive toys to show off for a few months, then lets them gather dust when the novelty wears off.
OP-Poser is "in school" but "won't have money in a couple of years"? What are you majoring in, modern Burmese poli-sci? Generally most people get out of school and get jobs, that tend to pay slightly more than pennies a day. Smart people can then manage that paltry paycheck into better options.
Ignore the advice here all you want, but the consistent thread across any brand/model info is: buy less camera and better lenses. Period. End of story. Anybody who respects the art of photography will tell you the same thing.
As for the 15 megapixel overkill... If you saved the money you'd otherwise spend on your mega-huge-prints for a couple of years, upgrading your camera becomes much easier.
Until you've used a camera for a while, you have no idea about what you really like, need, or want out of it. There are differences between the Nikon and the Canon that are practically imperceptible until you're out in the field, thinking about your shot. Camera shape, size, weight, menu design, feature accessibility... As you learn to shoot, you'll learn your preferences and needs. Until then, a good lens will give you markedly better results, and can be carried forward to your next camera.
Your original request is for a good starter camera, and then you proceed to ignore every piece of universally supported starter-camera advice, because you want to spend $2000 on a camera.
It sounds like you just want some big penis-substitution tool to take pretend-artsy photos of dumb college girls. And if you need to spend $2K to make that happen, you're a sad sack.
|