File :-(, x, )
Grand Canyon Anonymous
Some girl looking at the Grand Canyon. I love this picture. Thoughts?
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot SD900Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created2007:07:16 23:40:51Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/8.0Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, AutoFocal Length7.70 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height750RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Macheath !8b4g0BkNZg
I wonder what this would have looked like if she was on the left part of the frame. Could use a bit more saturation and contrast, the haze is killing it.
>> Anonymous
>>63026
HAze gives it depth, Also its a great pic, Someone should clone out the metal clamp on the bar though.

Good exposure, not too bright or anything
Props!
>> Anonymous
i'd hit it from behind.
>> Anonymous
go back to /b/
>> Anonymous
I'm thinking this would look a lot better with a pseudo-wide angle
>> Ren Kockwell !!y74dwT8WYfm
     File :-(, x)
>>63025
I'd move the pipe but I suck with healing brush

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:07:18 21:57:44Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height750
>> Minor Edit Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
How about the Grand Tetons instead?
>> Anonymous
dibs on redhead
>> Anonymous
>>63025
This would have worked far better with her facing the camera topless. Topless female and Grand Canyon, a win win for everyone here. Yes I`m being serious. This photo represents a lost golden opportunity.
>> Anonymous !4X8vLLNDE2
     File :-(, x)
>>63027
tried to remove it, not my best but i wanted to try my tablet

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:07:19 19:16:37Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height750
>> Anonymous !4X8vLLNDE2
     File :-(, x)
and again, without the pipe.
i love my graphire.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:07:19 19:30:28Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height750
>> Anonymous
tits or GTFO
>> Anonymous
>>63615
how'd u take out the pipe and leave it so clearly?
>> Anonymous !4X8vLLNDE2
>>63634
mmh, i just used the copy-stamp tool and my graphic tablet. the lower right is not sooo perfect i guess
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>63635
Which is a really good argument to present to people in the lossy-compression-is-evil camp...
>> Anonymous
>>63615
She's flying!
>> pskaught
I think the normal thing to do in /p/ is take a good picture and pick at the tiny details until the picture gets all fucked up.

I thought it was good without all the photoshop. It was a good composition, even with the pipe, because it was balanced. It could stand to be leveled out, but i don't think its that important.

but if you like what you've got with shoopdawoop than moar lens flare.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>63795
qft
>> Anonymous
>>63795
>moar lens flare

Every picture is better with lens flare.
>> Anonymous
a....gGIRL..uhhhhuhuhhhhuuuuuuuuh huhuhuh uhuh