File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Hi.
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBELMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.0.2Serial Number0360023606Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created2008:08:16 21:50:43Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/16.0ISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/16.0Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo FlashFocal Length15.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3072Image Height2048RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeProgramFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessHighSaturationHighContrastHighDigital ZoomUnknownShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeAI FocusDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeUnknownWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed288Image Number285-8599
>> i - !EoFJjFcCco
good bye
>> Anonymous
you're such a "rebel" taking skateboarding pics how original Ho Ho
>> Anonymous
lol 1600 iso ... l2settings -_-
it might be a cool pic without all the grain...
>> Anonymous
>>260222

What is your problem, bro? I am not the OP I just think it is a nice shot of a dope trick.

Stop being such a nigger.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>260219
Seriously, though. This shot is made of fail. First off, the technical:
1. ISO1600 on a Digital Rebel. Noisy as shit. And why did he have to go 1600?
2. f/16. Because it's *goddamn important* that that generic street in the background be in crisp focus?
3. Focal Length 15mm. The distortion in the shot tells me that you're shooting with the 15mm fisheye. I assume because you've seen other fisheye shots of skateboarders? Problem is, you're shooting on a crop-sensor'd Digital Rebel, which means that the distortion just gets to the level of "bad" without coming out the other end to "fisheye".

Artistic:
You're shooting straight into the sun. Looks like you crammed it right under his armpit. This has caused the majority of your sky to blow out to white. Additionally, you've got alllll sorts of distractions everywhere in the frame: Cars, houses, trees, that little rag or whatever in the lower left, flags, flagpoles, telephone cables, etc. All rendered nice and crisp and sharp and distorted by your f/16 fisheye.

So. Congratulations. You managed to take the interesting scene of a guy doing a trick on a skateboard and make it look like an extremely pedestrian snapshot. And you managed to make a $600 lens mounted on a digital SLR look like a particularly low-quality cell phone.
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
>>260230
Although my knowledge of Canon is limited, isnt the 15mm fisheye something crazy like f/2.8?

The shot was taken at f16.. if he went 6 whole stops down to f2.8, he would have been able to use what.. iso 400? Without adjusting the shutter speed.. :S seems silly not too..
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>260244
>if he went 6 whole stops down to f2.8, he would have been able to use what.. iso 400
Worse than that. One stop = one doubling/halving of the ISO. So...

He could've gotten the same shutter speed at f/8 and ISO400.

Or f/5.6 and ISO200.

Or f/4 at ISO100.
>> Anonymous
>>260244
>ISO 1600
>6 whole stops
>ISO 400

No. 400 is two stops away from 1600. If he was shooting wide open in this light he would have been able to shoot at ISO 25 and 1/1000 if that were possible on a digital rebel.

Incidentally, it's kind of neat that he is almost using the sunny 16 rule (it's sunny, ISO 1600, f/16, 1/1600s predicted but he's blown it out a little at 1/1000 to get some detail in the boarder's clothes...if only I didn't know that the camera chose those for him).
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
>>260253
1600 - 400
Oh yeah, urgh - I'm too used to the digital system of the inbetween stops..
400,500,640,800,1000,1600 or whatever it is.
facepalm.jpg
>> Serenar !m827jEgWi.
If it were me I'd shoot it at 1600 and f/16 but that's because I can only manual focus so I'd need every bit of DoF possible. Somehow I don't think OP quite intended that though.

Fisheye aside, the lens CAs like fuck and can't handle flare at all. What the hell was Canon thinking? (oh right, probably "gee whoever uses this shouldn't shoot into the sun" but still)
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
>>260297
x: Omigawwd guys i jus ordared dis fisheye to take propa awesum shots of u guise, am i cool?
x(friends): yehhh dawg!
canon: *recieves £350*
canon: lol
x: *click click click* omfg the distorxion maiks me hard
>> Anonymous
>>260309
i laughed