>> |
Anonymous
>>77258 >>77260 >>77263 gb2/cgl/
As photographs, these are pretty bad. I don't exactly know what you're going for really, but it seems more like a random snapshot rather than a portrait of any kind. A more personal perspective would be better so the viewer can see both the person dressing up as well as the costume itself. Otherwise there's really no connection, just a body in no particular context. I can't even tell that this person is in a costume in>>77263, the lens flare consumes all.
I like potraits that have interesting faces or bodies, and some context is always nice. But there's not of that here. If you're just taking pictures of costumes, then you might as well put them on mannequins.
|