Screwing with my fathers Wal-Mart digital camera. Its a HP M305, 3.2 megapixels, almost zero optical zoom, blah blah blah...I am suprised however that this picture turned out as well as it did. Who'da thunk it?EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeHewlett-PackardCamera ModelPhotosmart M305Camera Software.07_NLMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.9Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:10:18 17:29:06Exposure Time1/64 secF-Numberf/2.9Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/2.9Exposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance0.11 mMetering ModeAverageLight SourceFlashFlashFlash, AutoFocal Length6.25 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2048Image Height1536Gain ControlUnknownScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeMacro
that... really isn't a good macro shot.at all.I'm sorry.
It does hint that you may get a decent shot with the camera if you work at it. Keep trying.
>>85035Of course it isnt compared to other cameras, even MOST cameras. Just remarking that the amount of detail shown is suprising for such a shitty camera.
>>85038Thats more of what I was thinking. Decent mpotential with crap camera. I have beter ones with MY camera(FM10), but im intrigued by this camera at the moment.
>>85041At the very least you've rescued it from being trashed or damned to eternal storage, now you know it's useful.