>> |
Anonymous
>>161231 Considering I'm a student, though not particularly a photography student, we could say most of my work consists of a) portraiture (which is what both the 50mm and 28-75 are good for) b) product photography (again the 28-75 comes into play) c) photojournalistic work (28-75 fits the bill very often)
The rest of the time, when I'm not on a 'job' so to say, I just pack around the 50mm with me, so the camera doesnt get in the way, but is always there when I need it, without becoming a burden. I often do find it to be a little bit closed however, so the 28 1.8 does seem like a sound option, as I really like (night photography as well). I do often, however, feel lacking on the tele department.
Also, I'd like to experiment, given the time, with wider angle photography. I may have found Im actually interested in industrial or architectural photography, and I'm not lazy to lug a tripod around.
Pretty much, a fucking wildcard. I feel lacking on both tele and wide, and my standard isn't completely satisfactory (part of the reason I considered a film body, to make my standard lenses act like what they were designed to be)
|