File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
tear me apart.
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelDSLR-A100Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/4.5Focal Length (35mm Equiv)39 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:10:17 22:03:55Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/5.6Brightness5.2 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length26.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height669RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>> SAGE M?e?e?s?e??? !iZn5BCIpug
>>277500
OH HAI LOOK AT ME /P/ I POINTED MY CAMERA IN A RANDOM DIRECTION AND PRESSED THE SHUTTER BUTTON AM I AN ARTIST NOW. A FUCKING KID WITH DOWN SYNDROME COULD DO BETTER.
>> Anonymous
/p/: brutually honest.
>> sunshine
We just have nothing to say. It's a snapshot. Scene has potential, but whatever.
>> Anonymous
I can see where you were going with it, OP, the shadows/lighting on the ground look nice. That's about it though.
>> Anonymous
wow, nice lawn.

shame you couldn't take a decent picture of it. it's like you intentionally framed it so that *nothing* draws my attention or even looks vaguely interesting.
>> i - !EoFJjFcCco
lacks a subject, what the fuck else do you want us to say about it?
>> Anonymous
So is this back lighting or diffused lighting or is it a silhouette lightning?
>> Anonymous
>>277511
/p/: idiots with d40's

photo is meh, you probally know that though. rememer the rule of thirds. pic would of looked much beter if the lawn / grass took up one third of the image and the trees and sky took up the other two thirds.
>> fence !!POey2hdozCZ
>>277625

>idiots with d40's

>probally
>rememer
>would of
>beter