File :-(, x, )
Anonymous

EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot G10Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaLens Size6.10 - 30.50 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.00Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:07:28 18:25:48Exposure Time1/80 secF-Numberf/4.0ISO Speed Rating80Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0.7 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length21.46 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1656Image Height2208RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeManualFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessNormalSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeSingleDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingSuperfineMacro ModeNormalSubject Distance2.760 mWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed149Image Number100-0398
>> Anonymous
When did the G10 come out?
>> Liska !!LIVFOETqL8j
>>274324

Lovely; Do a bit of cropping and take the space off above her head, and a bit on the sides, and you're good to go.

Would like to have seen her chin up a bit higher (notice the wrinkles in her neck), the spots on her arm fixed and a bit more relaxed lips from the model-- but great lighting and exposure.
>> Anonymous
>>274340

your stating what you said like its fact. all you have done is told the op how you would make it better in your own eyes.

>>and a bit more relaxed lips from the model

apart from that shit the op should note that liska has a massive back catalog of photo shoots with models. th problem being that they are generally all shit.
>> Mr._Laugh_Out_Loud !!rc0QDfC1oX3
>>274352
hi OP

>>274340
what do you think of the positioning of the hands, and her 'belly-out' ish posture?
>> beethy !vW/UaE6zYU
>>274324
great shot OP
got no real complaints.

>>274352
>your stating what you said like its fact.
your statement is immediately invalid.
>> Anonymous
>>274357

beethy we all know your a faggot and you jump in on the tripcode circle jerk whenever possible.

liska produces some of the most bland, lowest common denominator photography i have ever seen.

>>Do a bit of cropping...and you're good to go.

for WHO for what...why? why would this make this better?
>> Anonymous
>>274366

Don't try and get any answers out of /p/. Someone has a Big Red Book of photography rules and regulations and they must atone to it by they letter.

Your the fucking dick for not knowing these rules.
>> Anonymous
Nice photograph... I wonder how much of it is due to shooping?
>> Anonymous
>>274367

Seems like there's plenty disagreement about things. I don't know why you feel the need to go in a huff and stamp your little feet over this.
>> Liska !!LIVFOETqL8j
>>274352

You may not like my photographs, but there are still models paying me $175 for a two hour shoot. The advice I gave OP i got from a professional 'getting paid a whole hell of a lot more than me' photographer when I did something similar. Maybe it'll help the OP, maybe it won't, and he/she can choose to take my advice or not, but models tend to pull their necks in and "turtle" (though it isn't too bad in this case) their necks which can mess up a photo. It helps to remind them to keep their chin up sometimes.

>>274355
I like both; it fits well for her, the dress, and gives it a formal/almost vintage feel that I like personally.
>> Jeremo !iKGMr61IHM
Jesus... the G10's got it going on.
>> Anonymous
>>274374
Poor models. They don't know any better and you're ripping them off.
>> elf_man !!DdAnyoDMfCe
>>274398
Lol, there are any number of pro models, relatively well known ones, that have been pleased with her work. Yes, they do know better, better than you.
>> Anonymous
>>274401
If they were a pro model then they wouldn't be paying anyone to take their picture. She would be paying them.
>> elf_man !!DdAnyoDMfCe
>>274403
You're making a statement about the business in general. I've seen the specifics in her case.
Point is, the people she's working with do know what they're doing.
>> Anonymous
>>274411

your a moron. there are thousands of "models" that sit on agency books for years and never get work. these "models" are exactly the same dumb idiots that choose to pay the agency fees and a photographer to do their failed portfolio for them.

sorry liska ive seen your work and its terribly outdated.
>> elf_man !!DdAnyoDMfCe
>>274413
And again, that's a generalization. Believe what you want, but you don't know the specifics.
>> Anonymous
"your stating what you said like its fact. "


I demand this becomes a /p/ meme immediately
>> Anonymous
With all the tripfags in here I'm surprised no one's bitched about resizing.
>> fence !!POey2hdozCZ
hot chick is hot.

that she's in a wedding dress is even hotter.
>> Anonymous
>>274446
its not over a meg
>> elf_man !!DdAnyoDMfCe
>>274456
It isn't just that, it's also about ugly browser resizing.
>> Anonymous
>>274465
What are you running? Internet Explore 4?
>> elf_man !!DdAnyoDMfCe
>>274468
I'm on firefox. I'm just saying, that's the other part of why people want smaller files on here. If you haven't seen that claimed repeatedly, you haven't been paying enough attention.
>> Anonymous
>>274390
You'll get similar quality at base and low ISOs out of any small-sensor camera.

Less megapixulz, but that doesn't really matter.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
3min edit
sorry for going crazy on the freckles once i started i couldnt help myself still is only a slight edit sharpen eyes+lips, heal brush burn scars and freckles, make eyes whiter, sharpen all slightly before save

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot G10Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:10:13 10:41:30Exposure Time1/80 secF-Numberf/4.0ISO Speed Rating80Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0.7 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length21.46 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1656Image Height2208RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
>>274474
You really seem to suck donkey balls when it comes to shooping.
Man, this is so fucking distusting, the original is waay better.
>> tizzou !!HuouSd+PYUs
>>274484

Why? Do you not like it sharp and with less skin defects or do you prefer the soft blur of the glamour shot?
>> Anonymous
>>274474
Terrible. This is a photography board, not a photoshop board. At least OP picture shows a human.
>> Anonymous
>>274486
Well it just looks unnatural. Look at the eyes, on the first glance you can see that this is shooped. I think PS should just help to make things look better, not unnatural (especially when shooting people). I hope I could make my point clear...
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
my edit.

(yeah, i was bored.)

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot G10Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaLens Size6.10 - 30.50 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.00Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:10:13 19:27:32Exposure Time1/80 secF-Numberf/4.0ISO Speed Rating80Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0.7 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length21.46 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1656Image Height2208RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeManualFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessNormalSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeSingleDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingSuperfineMacro ModeNormalSubject Distance2.760 mWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed149Image Number100-0398
>> tizzou !!HuouSd+PYUs
>>274495
I guess I've learned that when shooting portraits you want the eyes sharp and white(rather than red) and if glamour you want them to look perfect. The flipside is I've also seen it down where slight blur is added to give a kind of heavenly feel and to blur out defects, like OP.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>274474

too much.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:10:13 03:58:26Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1373Image Height2087
>> Anonymous
>>274374
>You may not like my photographs, but there are still models paying me $175 for a two hour shoot.

You take pictures of fat, ugly lesbians that you shoop to hell for them to give to their lovers.

It's like the photography equivalent of doing furry artwork.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
yup definitely bored

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot G10Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:10:13 11:20:34Exposure Time1/80 secF-Numberf/4.0ISO Speed Rating80Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0.7 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length21.46 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width800Image Height800RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
>>274544
no. it's actually nothing like that.
>> Kilz2latex !!3htj9hFDMA4
i dont think this needs a crop, i like the original.

and for liska, just because your being payed doesnt mean your pictures are good on an artistic level.
taking pictures of models is some boring shit, no one wants to look at it except the models and the people looking at their headshots to see if they are good models.
>> Anonymous
Your model is very pretty.
>> Anonymous
>>274564
good call, this anon approves
>> sage rage !3I4SJbCh8M
>>274324
I really like this shot. That is all. Keep up the good work

I don't presume to be arrogant enough to critique the quality of a photo I could not take myself.
>> beethy !vW/UaE6zYU
>>274564
I fucking love this... great job.
The square frame actually works surprisingly well.

>>274366
Someone who doesn't know the difference between "you're" and "your" is a fucking retard.
YOU'RE a fucking retard, I hope you choke on YOUR dad's cock.
See, it's not so hard.
>> Anonymous
>>274499
The face looks like plastic. Good job.

srsly, stop photoshopping other's pictures. If you think a square format would work better, give it as advice. If you think it needs smooth skin, give it as advice. It's that simple. Otherwise GTFO.

You too beethy.
>> beethy !vW/UaE6zYU
>>274746
I don't think anybody gives a shit that you don't like people on /p/ photoshopping other people's posts.
I mean, I value your opinion greatly.
>> Anonymous
God damn you /p/. You guys are a fucking joke.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>274746
suck it

this works better for me, as you can see exactly what i would change.

here's an animated gif, of before and after.
>> nokin !ozOtJW9BFA
>>274324
she looks like one of the olsen twins but...uglier
>> Anonymous
Beautiful girl, pretty shot, could be a bit better (can't quite place it), but it's still nice.
>> Anonymous
>>274903

Recheck your prescription.
>> Anonymous
>>274903

I don't think it's possible for anyone to be uglier than them.

This girl is gorgeous.
>> Anonymous
>>274900
Increase the boobs a touch and draw the neck in a tad and you've got a winner.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
i fucking love huge tits
>> Anonymous
>>275358

mmmm boobs
>> Anonymous
lol. you edited her moles out.