>> |
?
From the comments: >Amazing work! You have such a skill with this >treatment--you even make a dude wearing an odd had >look like art!
I don't get it. As Woody Allen once implied, in "Annie Hall", that critical evaluation of photography work still hadn't reached the point of, for example, paint or sculpture, and so it became very difficult to separate what can be considered art, and what isn't.
Even today there still lives a discrepancy of opinions, ranging from "just luck" or "simply reflected light on a film" to "instaart". But it's not a single work to be contested. It's the entire medium.
I like tho think that a masterwork is a deep and intimate shot, that only its author could achieve, a perfect combination of inspiration, timing and vision.
I think we seeing photography still in its infancy. as we saw Donatello learning from Brunelleschi, seeing it going by incert and sometimes goofy steps. I am very worried that this "instaArt for dummies" fashion will only take to extreme elitarianism; even without going too far you can already find early traces of it in classicist and gear crusaders.
So, Depressed Cheesecake, count me on. Not as a presumed artist, but as a fan and lover of photography. The others please excuse this mine few words.
TL;DR: BAWWWWWW instaART
|