QUICK! FUJIFILM S9600 FINEPIX DIGI CAMERA£150; I buy? yes or no???
yes(shit sucks)
>>197478Really? £150 seems well worth it tho...
>>197476slr for 150 punds? did i miss something?even for secondhand that sound like a deal for me.
>>197482Apparently its boxed and new; but are you sure this is slr?
Get a Canon A-series instead. It'll be cheaper, smaller, and the higher end is better. Don't go for superzooms or bridge cameras. They're not stripped SLR's, they're glorified P&S's.
lol sorry, i just looked at the pic and thought its an slr
>>197493Oh look, the marketing design people claimed a vicitim.
>>197494marketing designlol
They should improve these things to fit the needs of hipsters and the like who will just be using it for snapshots. fixed wide focal f/1.8 lens, and a bit larger sensor, great high iso performance for those dark club snapshots and small swivel flash (similar to Nikon SB-400).They should be bringing high end P&S's up rather than bring entry level dSLR's down to fill that market.
Not bad cameras to have as a back-up or compact solution if you have a DSLR already. I like having one that does almost everything (accepting the obvious cost of quality) in a compact package when SLR kits are not practical.
>>197495Screw real use, we just need it to look like an slr so people will buy it...
>>197476It looks like it has manual focus and a twist zoom. Just make the lens removable and you'd have a noisier, but silent SLR (with no mirror of course).
>>197556Are you retarded? It is that shape because it is a good and comfortable design for the hands. Get off of your high horse, the thin air up there is clearly starving your brain of oxygen.
>>197639Hyperbole, man. You're right, it's a good shape, but part of the marketing (like calling them "bridge slr's") is to make people think they're pro cameras, and the look directly ties into that.
>>197646Look at slim's rage post, for crying out loud.