File :-(, x, )
Markofzo
A photo I made for a school project today, first of 2 pics. Some guy gave us a workshop about flower-photography, and I must say I'm prety pleased with my own shoots. What does /p/ think of it?
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSAMSUNG TECHWINCamera ModelGX-1LCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)142 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:06:04 13:46:12Exposure Time1/180 secF-Numberf/16.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/16.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length95.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width650Image Height999RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastHardSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeClose View
>> Markofzo
     File :-(, x)
And here is the second one,

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSAMSUNG TECHWINCamera ModelGX-1LCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)132 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:06:04 13:54:23Exposure Time1/180 secF-Numberf/22.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/22.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length88.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1000Image Height700RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastHardSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeClose View
>> $19.99 !OSYhGye6hY
They're nicely lit and well staged, good job.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
me, myself and i

so deep and emotional ;_________;

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSAMSUNG TECHWINCamera ModelGX-1LCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)49 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2006:06:22 18:07:40Exposure Time1/10 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramActionISO Speed Rating800Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length33.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width279Image Height500RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeMacro
>> $19.99 !OSYhGye6hY
>>197695
Your thread was excellent until you posted this.
>> Anonymous
>>197690
I second this.

The only thing I would have done differently is a little more saturation in the colours.

in b4 raging about borders
>> Anonymous
1) Shitty borders.
2) Shitty desaturation.
3) Shitty composition.
4) Shitty lighting.

These look like the kinds of shitty prints that you would see on the wall of a cheap motel.
>> Markofzo
>>197695
>>197696
First of all, thats just some guy that found my Deviantart, with an old photo.
Fuck that, its about the first 2 pics anyway.
Stop whining.
>> Anonymous
gb2da
>> Anonymous
>>197700
Fucking butthurt loser. Go fuck yourself.

But OP's stuff is good. I like it, maybe a tad bit of color, but it's good.
>> Anonymous
lol, the borders look like a motivational poster
>> Anonymous
I like the lack of saturation and the somewhat brown tone. It's by his choice and not a technical thing. I suppose he wanted to go for an old, vintage or "flashback" look.

Composition on the other hand is meh. 2nd one looks disorganized. 1st one, the leaves distract me from the flowers and those ball like things (buds?) look gross.
>> Markofzo
     File :-(, x)
The color (or lack of it) was my choice indeed.
The original colors were a bit ugly in my opinion.
But heck, I'm colorblind, what can I say.
Here's the pic in full color.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSAMSUNG TECHWINCamera ModelGX-1LCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:06:05 02:15:43Exposure Time1/180 secF-Numberf/16.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width900Image Height598RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastHardSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeClose View
>> Anonymous
Shit sucks big time.

Composition is completely awful on the first, second is okay but both are ruined by the desaturation and fucking stupid looking borders.
>> Anonymous
>>197704
>Fucking butthurt loser. Go fuck yourself.
>But OP's stuff is good. I like it, maybe a tad bit of color, but it's good.

LOL @ butthurt OP defending himself.

Faux-vintage desaturation looks like shit.
Why the fuck would anyone want to look at a turd-brown rose?

Composition on the first one is so bad that it's fucking painful.
100% centered and portrait = massive fail.


Despite the shit composition>>197712
Is like a billion times better than that over-edited shit in the first two shots.
>> Markofzo
>>197700
>>197714
>>197715

Well I'm glad you're all bigtime photographers, and giving me really great and supportive feedback! Really helps out guys :D :D :D
>> Anonymous
>>197718

Stop being so butthurt.
"Don't desaturate like that it looks shitty." is great feedback and a hell of a lot more than you'd get at DA or Flickr.

Instead of making the flowers look dull and dead, why not try making them look vibrant and alive FFS.
>> Anonymous
Wow, the word 'butthurt' has been used quite alot in this thread.

Butthurt.

Anyways, it's okay, but yeah what's up with the desaturation, almost toooo much.

Butthurt.
>> beethy !HJGkSBB3Ao
OP, in /p/ you can't desaturate. You'll get flamed
in /p/ you can't add borders. You'll get flamed

But I actually find myself agreeing a little with the negative consensus. The composition on both isn't interesting enough at all. These are photos I wouldn't look at for longer than half a second
>> Anonymous
only thing i notices is that the 1st ones high lights are blown on some parts of the flowers.
not sure if this was mentioned already or not.

i dont really like them but im not a big prearranged flowers still lifey kind of guy.

the desat was fine until someone said something about the shit brown roses. thats pretty true.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Here.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSAMSUNG TECHWINCamera ModelGX-1LCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)142 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:06:05 12:35:19Exposure Time1/180 secF-Numberf/16.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/16.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length95.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width650Image Height999RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastHardSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeClose View
>> http://beethy.deviantart.com/ for sexy AZN n00dz http://beethy.deviantart.com/ for sexy AZN n00dz
>>197741

Desaturation has a place.
OP's desaturation is over the top and shitty. So is yours.

Borders have a place.
That place is Deviant Art and greeting cards. Borders are amateurish and look ridiculous.

HOW ARE YOUR GIRLFRIEND'S SUCKABLE 4" LONG NIPPLES, BEETHY?
DO YOU STILL HAVE THOSE SEXY N00DZ ON YOUR DEVIANT ART ACCOUNT?

http://beethy.deviantart.com/
>> beethy !HJGkSBB3Ao
>>197897
do you really think this shit gets to me?
lolol
>> Anonymous
>>197953
it probably does
why didnt you use a delorean for you "back to the future" or whatever picture?
or atleast rename it
>> Anonymous
>>197953

It does. You said it did when you went off on a tantrum last time and hid for a while and then you cried like a baby about it happening again while writing thank you notes to the mods to suck up. You are pathetic.
>> Anonymous
I'd like to see you trolls try this in /d/.
>> sage !ccqXAQxUxI
>>197953

Considering the hissy fit you pitched the last time this happened, I think it's pretty safe to say that it does.
>> beethy !HJGkSBB3Ao
>>197982
>>198074
What hissy fit are you fags talking about?
I left /p/ for like a day because fags were posting photos of my girlfriend going "hurrr durr nipples hurrr i wanna suck them hurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr"
no point hanging around this shitfest of a board 24/7
>> Anonymous
>>198244
HURR DURR I WANNA SUCK YOUR GIRLFRIEND'S NIPPLES.

Fucking faggot.
>> sage !i/euDJmWr2
>>198256
>>HURR DURR IM POSTING ANONYMOUSLY.
>>I really hope mom doesn't find out I've been visiting 4chan.
>> Anonymous
beethy, are you Dutch?
>> Anonymous
http://sorrywasntlistening.deviantart.com/art/beethy-77596759
>> kyol !xwPXzZtgeg
OP says, "COMPOSITION? WAT!?"

First picture makes me feel like I just ate a bag of cheeseburgers and went on a roller coaster ride. Way too much attention, everywhere.

Second picture's not so bad but what the hell is what that weirdass slimy wet looking flower at the top? Fucking gross, takes away from the entire, uhhh, photo.
>> Anonymous
>>198319


Lol, Beethy you look like a gimp. How did you get a girlfriend with such suckable nipples?
>> beethy !y561z6aSgg
>>198321

;_;

FUCK YOU /p/, I'M LEAVING
>> sage !ccqXAQxUxI
>>198319

LOL!
What a fucking hipster asshole.

Also, how tall is this faggot? 3'4"?

Put down the camera and go back to listening to Linkin Park and sucking on your girlfriend's 2" long nipples you pathetic faux-hawk-having waste of oxygen.
>> Anonymous
>>198336

jealous faggot is jealous
>> Anonymous
>>198366


Go back to bed beethy
>> Anonymous
>>198375

Isn't Depressed Cheesecake the one who always whines about how everyone is jealous of him?
>> Anonymous
>>198319
i like beethy's shoes. what are they?
>> Anonymous
>>198336
>>198322

being a fake tripfag doesn't make you cool.
>> Anonymous
>>198439

Being a tripfag posting as Anon doesn't make you cool either.