Greatings /p/This isnt another gear thread, I honestly need your advice. I need to grab a Prime lens for my 40D (1.6 crop). This is my findings under $800 AUDDoes anyone have any experience with the mentioned lenses? Reccormendations? I'm leaning towards a nifty fifty, maybe 1.4 for build quaility. So yeah, PRIME THREAD KGOCanon--20mm f2.8 $79924mm f2.8 $55528mm f1.8 $75928mm f2.8 $32535mm f2.0 $43950mm f1.4 $59050mm f1.8 $135Sigma --20mm f1.8 $605Comment too long. Clickhereto view the full text.
ITT: gear.
>>181740zomg einstein.i have both the 50 1.4 and 30 and i can highly reccomend them both.on 1.6x crop too
>This isnt another gear threadyes it is you faggot liar.
l2google faggotplease people, just one ounce of effort.http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/photo.nethttp://photographyreview.com/
>>181761why give him the answer?If anyone ask again, they should be permab&
>>181761effort isn't measure in ounces.
i would get one of the 28 or 30 and one 50
The 85mm f1.8 is outstanding.
It depends, like all lens choices, on what you plan to do with it.What do you plan to do with it?
>This isnt another gear thread, I honestly need your advice. I need to grab a Prime lens for m...what the fuck, I read this as>...I honestly need your advice. I need to grab a penis for my...
>>182278/b/ withdrawal symptom
Personally I'm looking at a Nikon 50 f/1.4 vs a 50 f/1.8I can't tell whether that .4 is worth $280 more.
>>182433maybe not the .4 you get more, but the usm and averall built quality ... i'm on the cheap one and i can tell you it's like wow for literally NO money (compared to any other new and GOOD lens)!
>>182433How often do you shoot in dimly lit situations which would call for that extra bit?
>>182474learn2nikkorNikon 50mm f/1.4D is not usm (swm in nikon speak)
>>182433you will thank yourself for saving the 280 that you could put towards some other equiptment.the 50mm 1.8 is fantastic. if your used to shooting on zooms the quality will really surprise you.
>>182483oookay, but OP is a canonfag, so i guess that counts.
My googling showed that the 1.4 was sharper which I'm a fan of.I don't do much low light stuff now because none of my lenses are fast enough but I'm looking to move toward that.
where are you going to buy the lens from?remember out prices in Aus are freaking hugely expensive compared to the states.
>>182811same with nz :(buy from b&h or adorama, but shipping from the US rapes in the ass, so make sure that you are getting a good deal *with* shipping included.I know that its the same price for the 50mm f/1.8D in nz as it is from the US *with* shipping.
>>182881Yeah it only really works with items of large numerical value.I bought the 17-55mm 2.8 from B&H cost me 1450 with the exchange rates favouring the aussie dolllar... the cheapest place i could find (excluding D&D photographics since they're grey market) was about 2200Obviously with a small item like the 1.8 it wouldn't be worth the trouble.
OP here.I am leaning towards the 50mm 1.8 AND Sigma's 28 1.8. Altogether, pretty cheap, for two lenses, and it will serve me well until I need to upgrade again. Unless I am horribaly wrong in my choice, which in case, PROVE ME WRONG
I can recommend the 50mm f1.8. It's cheap and takes some incredibly sharp pictures. I think it's worth more than I paid for it!