WHERE THE FUCK ARE ALL THE SONY LENSESEXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:07:16 19:19:35Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width250Image Height124
preserved for posterity.Inv3stm3nt-Banking+P3do !Plusdp4o5Y
>>224766realistically...sony sensors, for what they are, aren't that horrible. Sure, they get their ass handed to them by Canon/Nikon, but for first generation stuff, it's not that bad.
Show me an example of Sony sensors being bad. You cant.
>>2247760/10
Nikon sensors *ahem*Also its because sony were not expecting anyone to actually buy into their system and dont have anything made.
>>224781Yeah thats a good point I thought Nikon used Sony sensors...
yeah.. and that's not exactly a good thing for Sonynikon commissions a cmos sensor from them for the d300, works greatsony makes their own "exmor" cmos for the a700, there's a pretty damn big difference of qualitythis just means they're unwilling to come up with a good solution or don't know how to do it right
>>224832They just want to keep costs down. The Nikon sensor is probably a more expensive unit with higher quality control. Or maybe it's a patented design that Nikon owns the patents for, and they just get Sony to produce it.
Sony uses the sensors Nikon rejects.True story.