File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
well what do you think?

and shut up about the shit camera, tell me if the composition is good, etc.
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeUnknownCamera Model1.3M Digital CAMCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:11:27 02:08:25Exposure Time1/571 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating50Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length7.45 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1024Image Height1280
>> slim !yE5LOsLjxQ
rotten. you're new at this. this reminds me of shots of a clock tower i took when i just got my first camera.

what's wrong with it:
1. subject is centered and out of focus. what you're trying to get us to look at should be in sharp focus and placed somewhere interesting in the frame. centered subjects are rarely interesting.
2. it's not a very interesting subject. sure, it's a tower. it's ornate. neat. the guy who designed it sure did a good job on it. the problem with all this is that HE gets the credit for making a pretty tower, and you have to photograph it in some way that makes it more interesting than just showing some tower sticking up somewhere in order for YOU to get any credit. your shot says 'here is this cool tower, isn't this a cool photo?' and the answer is no, it's not. it's a boring shot of a cool thing. in the same way, you can take bad photos of a hot girl. the attractiveness of the subject does not translate to the attractiveness of the photo.
3. you shot from eye level. i don't expect you to get a ladder or a helicopter to shoot this tower or anything, but if you don't you're not likely to get a shot anyone would look at twice. as an exercise, try taking your camera and picking 5 things to shoot. take 10 different shots of each at eye level, and then 10 different shots of each from below or above or from some angle that would be very inconvenient or difficult to get to. get your knees dirty if you have to. then go look at your photoshoot later and you'll see how boring it is to look at those eye-level shots.
i really got going here -- more to come...
>> slim !yE5LOsLjxQ
>>95623
4. surroundings. you gotta frame your subject with things that complement it or draw the eye to it. plain sky is dull. i can see that any day.

there are basically no reasons to look at this shot. you haven't learned the basics yet. learn fundamentals of the technical aspect, then learn basic composition. once you can take great shots of boring shit, you're ready to take great shots of interesting shit. bad shots of interesting shit are still bad shots.
>> Anonymous
I think it's well-composed. Not a great photo, but well-composed.
>> Anonymous
>>95607
this photo reminds me of 1998.
>> Anonyfag of Borneo !bHymOqU5YY
>>95644
It reminds me of the days when we still have East and West Berlin.
>> Anonymous
>>95634
get out