>> |
Vincent
>>101728 That convenience is the main reason to use digital. Quality may be exactly the same, but 500 shots later and at no cost to you, it seems a lot smarter (and more practical) to stick with digital.
I started with a DSLR, and then picked up a film SLR, (for Velvia 50) And after putting around 10 rolls through that camera, I have to say its not worth it to me. The quality is sometimes marginally better (I do landscapes mostly), but most of the time Its equal or even worse (motion blur) Than 200 or 100 ISO of my DSLR's.
IF I could afford a D3 now, I would safely say that would probably kill of any advantage I see in 35mm film, as it has the same sensor size, and all the advantages that come with it. Large format film is a different story, but its only a matter of time before the Mamiya Digitals and whatnot become viable economically..
|