>> |
Anonymous
>>272764 all right let me explain
they are in focus, they are very well in focus
I would go through all the photos but I'm too drunk; yes they are very good technically, exposure and focus is excellent but would you print them as ads for a_fucking_expensive_watch in a glossy paper magazine, would you? No, you would not, you'd need different composition and different lightning - you know, they don't have a shitload of halogen lamps in a jewelry store for nothing.
>>272749 is the only one interesting, stressing the interesting word
|