>> |
Anonymous
>>66821 >The Sigma DP1 was announced at Photokina 2007 but isn't actually available yet. Didn't know that. >That's 28mm *equivalent*. Not actually 28mm. If it were 28mm, it would be a nice slightly-wide-normal lens. It's actually 16.6mm, which is obnoxiously wide for something that's the only lens that'll ever be on the camera.
Good for street shooting, though I very much like the slightly-wide-normal look myself.
I agree it should be longer, but it's still a good camera, and, I assume, a good lens.
>. As if that weren't bad enough, that 16mm lens is f/4.0. M-M-M-M-MONSTER fail, especially combined with the Foveon sensor's craptacular high-ISO performance.
f/4 isn't that slow. Not what I'd like, again, but acceptable for most situations.
>Basically, I want a digital Canonet GL17. >(Bonus points if you actually give me rangefinder focusing on it instead of just autofocus)
That would indeed be splendid.
|