>> |
Anonymous
>>228654 While I don't own a Four-Thirds SLR, I don't think it would pose a problem for most people:
1) There are four rectilinear lenses in the system with ultrawide lengths (7, 10, 11, and 12 as their starting points), and nine other ones with wide as their starting point (mostly 14, some 18).
Unfortunately, no primes except a fisheye. You could adapt an 135 format ultrawide (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18) to the mount and manually and scale focus.
2) 28 was the widest lens that existed, AFAIK, for some time. Capa, Cartier-Bresson, etc. still managed pretty well, don't you think? I don't know about Capa, but the widest lens Cartier-Bresson had was a 35mm, which he barely touched.
|