File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
= Leica summicron + Canon 5D
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:11:20 04:08:11Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1153Image Height791
>> Anonymous
+ taken in Tokyo
>> Anonymous
this is pretty nice.
>> Anonymous
waste of gear
>> Anonymous
and you are a waste of air
>> Anonymous
I like how the railings are lit by the car lights.
>> Anonymous
i like how I could have taken this on my d40 with a tamron 17-50.

I think I just saved $3000.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
heres another one

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:11:20 05:58:26Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1122Image Height748
>> Anonymous
>>296950
you COULD but you didnt.....so shut the fuck up
>> Anonymous
>>296928
Yep. Just a generic long-exposure night shot.

Also, knowing what focal length it is would be a hell of a lot more informative than knowing its maximum aperture or make, not that any of it is important.
>> Anonymous
>>296952
Better, well-composed but the colors are overwhelming, and not in a good way. Just busy.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>296955
you tell me the focal length, since your such an expert

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:11:20 06:03:18Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width953Image Height718
>> Anonymous
>>296952
I actually like this. The first one was good too. Nice colours.
>> Anonymous
More money than skill. These are junk, seriously. Terrible colour, no subjects, generic. Reminds me of Depressed Cheesecake and his Mark II and 1.2 but no skill and bad photos. Oh wait this is /p/ where your gear warrants respect.
>> Anonymous
>>296959
A 35 I'm guessing?

Why are you being so snippily defensive?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
and here is the shot , in full rez, just for reference

the focal length is 50, and the aperture used is always 5.6

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:11:20 06:08:38Exposure Time30 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias1/3 EVMetering ModeUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width3892Image Height2876RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
actually the focal length is 35 :S

not 50,
>> Anonymous
>>296963
define terrible colour? according to whom?
subject? do i need a subject? no.
not to mention that there is a subject...if you actually look at the photos as a (big picture) rather than trying to find a single subject inside it.
generic? how come?

+ if i didnt mention my gear you would like my picture more?.....
>> Anonymous
you need better framing and the last picture is pretty much pointless. number 2 could be much better composed.
>> Anonymous
ok dude thanks,

the 3rd picture is interesting for me, because i like this kind of building, and how the light makes the building different at night, and their texture, the flaws, rust,,,etc

the place i took the 2nd picture was really dark, and i think i looked like i was trespassing , so yes the framing isnt good :(
>> Anonymous
Meh, pretty boring.
>> Anonymous
Is it possible to even use a rangefinder lens on a canon? Isn't the flange depth much larger than the backfocal length of such lenses?
>> Anonymous
>>297047
Leica also makes a range of SLRs and lenses for them. The bodies are very mediocre although well-built, but the lenses are also acclaimed like their rangefinder lenses.
>> Anonymous
I like the first photo.