File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
SIGMA 24MM F: 2.8 AF MACRO SUPER WIDE II LENS

what does p think?

or is a 28mm a better option for my minolta 7000?
>> Anonymous
>>165127
lurk moar
>> Anonymous
yeah they made a 28 and a 24 also but the 24 in minolta is spensive as fk.

not very well for an amatuer photog.
>> Anonymous
Dude, if you want substandard choices, go for the gold. Get the digital-only lens or the Sigma that'll start having problems in six to twelve months. I understand that my view isn't held by all, nor should it be, I suppose. It's just a product of necessity.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>165140
0/10
>> Anonymous
>>165140

hahahahah didn't think anyone still had that saved

who was it? heavyweather?
>> Anonymous
>>165144
No, while Heavyweather does frequently use the word "dude," he also uses a third-party digital-only zoom himself. I think it was some anon.
>> heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA
>>165215
Nope, I said that. I just hate Sigmas. :D
>> Anonymous
i think that's funny considering tamron is consistently worse than sigma on just about any aspect

tokina is the closest to original equipment
>> Anonymous
>>165321
Tamron does make some very sharp zooms however.
>> Anonymous
>>165334Tamron does make one very sharp zoom however.

fixed