File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
70-200L f/4 IS for the win.
>> Anonymous
Cámara: Canon EOS 40D
Exposición: 0,04 sec (1/25)
Lente: 127 mm
Velocidad ISO: 400
Tendencia de exposición: 0 EV
Flash: Flash did not fire

Orientation: Horizontal (normal)
X-Resolution: 72 dpi
Y-Resolution: 72 dpi
Software: QuickTime 7.5.5
Date and Time: 2008:10:12 20:21:53
Host Computer: Mac OS X 10.5.5
Exposure Program: Shutter priority
Date and Time (Original): 2008:10:12 19:54:37
Date and Time (Digitized): 2008:10:12 19:54:37
Metering Mode: Pattern
Coded Character Set: %G
Object Name (Title): IMG_2160.CR2
Keywords: art, artistic, artistica, naturaleza, nature
Image Width: 1329 pixels
Image Height: 2000 pixels
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
...

Seriously? You're bragging about your 70-200 f/4L IS with *this* picture?

This is a silhouette against the sky of some grass or wheat or something. You didn't need 127mm because it was something hard to get to. You didn't need 127mm for a compressed perspective. At 1/25th, you wouldn't have needed IS at a wider focal length that would have given you an almost identical picture. Since it's a silhouette, you don't need an L sharpness. Since it's against the sky, you don't need the blurred background that an f/4 could give you.

This is a photo that could easily have been taken with the 40D's kit lens. Stop bragging that you're wasting a 70-200L.
>> Anonymous
Maybe you are right. I still love my 70-200L heh.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>275151
I would too if I had one. Just, you know, fucking take some pictures that actually make use of it.

Go. Right now. Don't come back until you get a good one. Then post it here. Redeem yourself!
>> Anonymous
>>274822

What he said. GTFO OP.
>> Anonymous
>>275152I would too if I had one. Just, you know, fucking take some pictures that actually make use of it.

angry fat man is angry and fat
>> Anonymous
that lens is such a fucking bargain at $1,000

too bad i don't have that kind of money for this :f