>> |
ac
!!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>57885 Right, okay, let's see your qualifications.
Here's mine: I've taken tens of thousands of photographs, received praise on quite a few of them from both biased (my mom, my girlfriend) and non-biased (random assholes on /p/, random assholes on flickr) sources. I've got a bookshelf full of books on photography and books OF photography, and I make a beeline to the photography section of any art museum I visit.
And all of this adds up to... precisely bupkis in the grand scheme of things. My opinion with regards to the aesthetics of a photo are exactly equal to any yahoo pulled off the street. If I say a photo looks lame and every other yahoo pulled off the street says the photo's awesome, then it'd be a good idea to discount my particular opinion as not being worth much.
Hell, if everyone thought exactly like I do, William Wegman would have had to eat his wiemaraners to survive long ago because he sure as hell wouldn't have ever been able to sell a print. Obviously that's not the case.
The OP asked what we thought. I told him what I thought, and gave some suggestions for improvement. This is another way of saying "I gave him some tips on how to take pictures that I, AC, personally, would like." I can't speak for how to make pictures that everyone would like, and neither can you.
All I have is my subjective opinion backed up by some (really quite limited, overall) experience. That's all you have as well.
And in my opinion, those shots were boring.
|