File :-(, x, )
des
I forget the exact comment, but I think the word used to describe my last photo of this scene was "sullen". This time, I tried to go for romantic/hopeful. I was there purposefully this time and had a 135mm. Was a little later in the evening than I had hoped but I'm not displeased with the results.

In related news, the fujica I bought at the flea a couple weeks ago works mint! Needs a CLA and some foam, though.
Super tak 135mm - Didn't record exposure, probably 1/125th@~f/6.3 - press 800
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3339Image Height2238Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16Compression SchemeUnknownPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution40 dpiVertical Resolution40 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2007:03:28 14:35:39Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width448Image Height693
>> des
     File :-(, x)
from the same roll, same lens.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3378Image Height2248Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16Compression SchemeUnknownPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution200 dpiVertical Resolution200 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2007:03:28 14:48:59Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width700Image Height550
>> ac
I love my 135mm lens on my Minolta. I've stopped carrying around my 80-200mm zoom 'cause it's way bigger and I rarely wanted more telephotoness than 135mm.

Also, awesome pics.
>> des
>>39042
I'm a big 135 fan. Their popularity seems to have died, these days, though. I think they're very versatile.
>> ac
>>39080
I'm planning on getting Canon's 135 f/2.8 SF as my next big lens purchase, too.

(Although, granted, that'll be more like 200mm on my Rebel... But still! 135!)