File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Hello there /p/. Just purchased myself an N75, and was wondering you you had any sugjestions for some relatively high speed black and white film?

Picture kinda related?
>> Anonymous
Ilford Delta 400

And at sensitivities higher than 400, you'll be better off shooting digital. Ilford Delta 3200, which is arguably one of the best ISO 800-3200 films, has grain the size of my thumb.
>> phesarnion
I quite like Ilford HP5. It's iso 400 native, but pushes very well (i've had good results at 1600), and is also remarkably finely grained for a 400 speed

Delta 3200 is actually natively around iso 1000, but is designed to be pushed anyway. as anonymous said, the grain is liek xbox hueg.

It all depends on what you're shooting as your your choice of film.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
Delta 3200's graininess makes me all tingly in my naughty places.

Just exposed my first roll of Delta 3200 in 120 size the other day (in an old box camera). Hopefully that'll actually turn out.
>> Anonymous
kokak technical pan film can be made super sensitve.
it need to be bathed for four days at about 115 fahrenheit in a gas of 8% molecualr hydrogen (H2) and nitrogen and then developed in D-19 rather than technodol
>> Anonymous
If you like classic (50s-70s) black and white photojournalism and the grain you see, try Kodak Tri-X 400 (NOT Pan). It's old, somewhat expensive, big grained, but you can push to 3200 and probably 6400 but it'd look like crap then.
>> Anonymous
grain = good.

any questions?
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>75359
Digital grain = better.
>> phesarnion
>>75270
Done similar with nice ol FP4+ in a kodak brownie. let us know how yours turned out. did you have to respool onto older spools (i.e. 120-620)?
>> Anonymous
>>75359
For artistic purposes, yes, but even then not every picture looks good with grain. For more practical kinds of photography, give me a clean picture plzkthx.
>> Anonymous
>>75361

it performs better, looks worse. and that wasn't a question.