File :-(, x, )
parshimers !y2fz.HIyUQ
lookin for rawr mountain lions :3
c&c appreciated
>> parshimers !y2fz.HIyUQ
     File :-(, x)
>> parshimers !y2fz.HIyUQ
     File :-(, x)
no pics of him on the game cam :(
>> Anonymous
exif or gtfo
>> parshimers !y2fz.HIyUQ
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>147783
too bad its not in focus, would have been pretty sweet.

I assume film scans?
>> parshimers !y2fz.HIyUQ
     File :-(, x)
>>147787
film doesnt really have exif data, it's tri-x @ 200 on a pentax MX if anyone's curious
>> Anonymous
>>147787
Troll ^
>> Anonymous
>>147782
Really like this one. The loose framing works great. The other horizontal one is meh.

The vertical ones are too large to judge. For some reason, pretty much every monitor is wider than it is tall. Resize it to something that'll fit.

(And while you're at it, 1600 pixels is wider than most people's monitors, too.)
>> Anonymous
>>147783
i think its beautiful
>> parshimers !y2fz.HIyUQ
     File :-(, x)
>>147803
ah, sorry :( used to 1600x1200 on here
>> Anonymous
JESUS FUCK LEARN HOW TO SPOT HEAL THOSE FUCKING SCRATCHES FOR FUCK'S SAKE, DO IT RIGHT
>> parshimers !y2fz.HIyUQ
>>147969
pretty hard to heal over a scratch when everything around it is also scratches orz
>> Anonymous
>>148142


if it isn't on the emulsion side of the film (so, if the scratches are on the shiny side), try rubbing the side of your nose and rub the grease into the film to fill the scratches.

it works sometimes.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>147782
Your main subject (i.e, the people) kind of get lost in the grass. I think this would be a much better shot if you'd been using color film, or if you'd gotten a little closer to make them a bit more prominent. Other than their size, though, i really like the composition.

>>147783
Eh. I don't find the fat guy pointing at lens flare too interesting.

>>147786
This one, I like a lot. Photojournalicious.

>>147789
Too much vegetation in front of your subject.

>>147792
Good shot.
>> Anonymous
>>147782

I think the main problem with all of these photos is how high the contrast is. Hardly any shadow detail and the highlights are blown. Probably because of direct sunlight and incorrect metering, but I think it might be that you scanned them/edited them in photoshop to look this way. It just makes them hard to look at.

>>147789

this one is my favourite, however. the vegetation is great. i fucking hate crocs though. but that isn't relevant.