http://www.cameralabs.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=45366#45366fuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuck
lolwutMeh, the A900 > 5Dxyz
lolwutMeg, the Canon lens lineup > Sony anything.
>>189575sony Zeis lenses > Canon bullshit
>>189579>>189575>>189573Superior
>>189575i herd u liek zeiss
>>189581would have been epic win if it happened to be a Zeiss z-point reflex sight.
>>189573Meh, the A900 > 5DxyzI sure as fuck hope a $8,000 camera is better than a $3,000 one.
The A900 will be between the 5D and D3.
>>189606The A900 will be between the 5D and D3.Right, because Sony will sell a 24 motherfucking megapixels full frame sensor camera for something between $3,000 and $5,000.Great logic is great.
>>189610No pros are going to dump their 1Ds/D3 for a camera that's unproven and untested and (according to /p/ atleast) hated. Minolta's legacy was always for innovation and advanced amateurs and never really the "pro" field.Also, rumor is there's going to be a "halved" A900 ~12-14mp as a direct assault on the 5D.
>>189579sony zeiss lens price >>>>>>>> canon lens priceand they're not much better than Nikon's pro stuff. Better low-frequency MTF, but that's it.
How did this thread turn into such stupidity so fast? God, you guys suck.
>>190865well coming into /p/ thinking sony is all that wasnt a good start.as mentioned in this thread:they're still un-proven in the higher end of the digital slr word.sony's lens prices far exceed any other normal d-slr manufacturers and 3rd parties.for that price, the results have yet to prove you get what you pay for compared to proven brands(canikon)its just fucking sony!