>> |
Anonymous
>>195100 There's nothing wrong with Lightroom. It's just a faster Photoshop and ACR with less functionality. If you don't use that functionality, it's a matter of taste, and I could see someone managing a large number of shots from the field for a monthly publication preferring lightroom, easily. If I understand correctly, NatGeo is especially manic about having their photographers turn in a huge number of shots.
|