File :-(, x, )
ITT ID this photographer anon
Does anyone know who photographed this series?
>> Anonymous
I don't know, but I like his style.
>> Anonymous
or maybe I should say... I like the fluidity of his style. The way the theme flows is particulary perplexing. Quite alluring, actually.
>> OP HERE anon
OP here...did some research

http://www.ashkansahihi.com/
>> Anonymous
>>89615
what is going on why does she have cum on her face?
>> Invi
I would like to be able to focus on the style, but it's fucking disgusting.
>> Anonymous
>>89626
lol "art"
>> Anonymous
That can't be real. I really hope that's not real.
>> Anonymous
what do you mean this can't be real? like there has never been cum on a girls face in the history of the earth. take a look at /gif/ fag
>> Anonymous
>>89658
i think he means the fact that theres a series of photos where the theme is cum on face.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>89638
>>89661
Why is this in any way unbelievable to you? Is this your first day on the Internet?

If for no other reason, the OP linked to the site where the photographer has the full series on display.

A fairly common feature of art is being deliberately obscene to provoke a reaction. The juxtaposition between people with perfectly calm, neutral expressions with the fact that there's cum all over their faces is something I can easily see an artist thinking would be a good idea. And hell, I agree with him. This is good stuff.

(Granted, I'm a pervert)
>> pskaught
man, so artsy fartsy.
I've seen his drug series in vice or something, and it was pretty good with the paragraph or so describing the experience of each person, but the bulk of his work is so unbearably pretentious. Maybe its the way he portrays himself. He makes me think of an IT guy who absolutely loves vincent gallo.

Visually its okay, its kind of a solid look, but there isn't much to it.

lol "art"
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>89676
I'm amused that the skeeziest, trashiest looking person in the drug series is the "Hashish" guy.
>> Anonymous
sigh, its about as edgy as the whole 'piss jesus' thing.

in b4 a Fox news special
>> Choamsky
>>89638

It doesn't matter if it's real or not. If it got a response, then it worked. That's all there is to it.
>> Anonymous
Hilariously bad.
>> Anonymous
>>89771

It'd be quicker to walk outside naked, punch or spit on someone in the streets.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>89684
But not quite as pretty.
>> Anonymous
http://destinyislands.com/
>> Anonymous
WOW! IT BREAKS THE BORDERS BETWEEN PORNOGRAPHY AND ART! IT'S TOTALLY IN MY FACE!
>> Anonymous
What I was saying is that I can't believe models would let someone actually ejaculate onto their face, figuring it had to be makeup or something. I looked around, and they did: that's real, genuine human cum.
>> des
>>89788
moar leik it's in HER FACE amirite
>> Anonymous
>>89684i like the photo "Piss Christ"
>>89781
>> Anonymous
>>89789

Did the photographer do the honors for everyone and jack off onto their faces moments before the shot?
>> Anonymous
>>89842
No. They went with a "partner" into the back room of the gallery the shots were to be displayed in, the partner ejaculated, and the photographer rushed back for ~2 minutes to shoot, which was how long the semen wouldn't be too dry/runny/whatever to photograph.

It's all in some article linked off to the side of the guy's site. The work only makes sense past the "eww..." stage if you read the guy's comments on it, which, IMO, means it doesn't work. I can think of several set-ups beyond this simple thing which will make "cum shot as antidote to sexualized advertising" much more clear.
>> Anonymous
>>89846

Sounds like a waste of time, really.
>> Anonymous
>>89846
>the photographer rushed back for ~2 minutes to shoot

I LOL'd!
>> Thumper !VFtk2VroH6
>>89846
meh, sounds like a wank

zing!