>> |
Anonymous
>>198447 >thats like looking at the finger rather than the moon...and missing its beauty.. Yeah, pretty much.
>so whats the point of arguing? I don't know, brand zealotfaggotry? There is no point in arguing, but seeing how they never stop, I'm asking for facts that support their argument. You made a good point there, saying that >usually u cannot tell a shot if its shot by a leica or a nikon or a canon (well maybe if you shoot walls and test charts only) but some people seem to believe that such a test is equivalent of real life. The truth is that most objects won't stay still and you won't stay still handholding a camera, so whatever little thing is gained between two lenses that are very similar is immediately lost the moment a person is thrown into the mix.
>my glass is better than yours? I dont know, but Nikonfags spend half the time saying that, the other half fapping to their gear.
>how about my photos is better than yours...(not just sharper) If only nikonfags cared about that...
Also inb4poorfag, not everyone chooses a brand over money. More expensive for the same shit is stupid, and there are many other reasons to choose B over A.
|