File :-(, x, )
Anonymous

EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D40XCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/5.1Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern738Focal Length (35mm Equiv)52 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:09:21 20:15:37Exposure Time1/400 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias-0.7 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3872Image Height2592RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>> Anonymous
what is that? an old movie camera crane/tripod thingy?

or a piece of art.

i bet its a piece of art. don't take photo's of art.
>> Anonymous
Or... take pictures of whatever you want, just learn composition.
>> Anonymous
Also, resize
>> Kilz2latex !!3htj9hFDMA4
i like it. underexposed but i still like it.
>> Anonymous
>>260052
piece of art

looks like the sculpture on courtenay place, wellington, new zealand
>> else !L6xabslN96
>>260007
that's pretty shitty.

bumping so it can get torn apart some more.
>> Anonymous
> don't take photo's of art.
If you can't write `photos' correctly, I don't think you should be giving advice on photos.
>> Honest So You Dont Have To Be !9UISPtwBPo
>>260007

Shitsux

>>261223

Spelling mistake or not, he has a point, grammarfag

Taking photos of art is redundant, you might as well take a photo, of a photo, and say its your own...
>> Anonymous
i think its pretty cool, you could have just made the actual subject more visable/less dark.
good attempt.
>> Anonymous
>>261588
You're either retarded or OP. There is a 95% chance that you are both.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
Looks cool, but
>I bet it's a piece of art. Don't take photos of art.
doesn't look liek the cool-lookingness is your doing.
>> Project !dashI8UpO.
     File :-(, x)
>>261234
>Taking photos of art is redundant, you might as well take a photo, of a photo, and say its your own..

'sup.
>> Anonymous
>>262701
Yeah, that's a fail.
>> fence !!POey2hdozCZ
>>262701

he was making art out of commerce, not art out of art.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>262704
>>262701
Yeah, I thought that was weak sauce when I first heard about it. Still do.