File :-(, x, )
pskaught
you'll never guess what I did today...
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshMaximum Lens Aperturef/4.2Image-Specific Properties:Image Width5333Image Height8000Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution100 dpiVertical Resolution100 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2007:06:26 01:36:41Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/18.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating50Lens Aperturef/18.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length41.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width667Image Height1000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
Canon EOS 5D lol
>> pskaught
     File :-(, x)


Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshMaximum Lens Aperturef/4.2Image-Specific Properties:Image Width5333Image Height8000Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution100 dpiVertical Resolution100 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2007:06:26 01:58:58Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/22.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating50Lens Aperturef/22.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length44.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width667Image Height1000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Question pskaught
     File :-(, x)
anyone with a 5D, whats the largest you've printed without any digital artifacts?

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshMaximum Lens Aperturef/4.2Image-Specific Properties:Image Width5333Image Height8000Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution100 dpiVertical Resolution100 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2007:06:26 02:03:41Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/20.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating50Lens Aperturef/20.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length38.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width667Image Height1000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>> my soul died a little today pskaught
http://losangeles.craigslist.org/sfv/ers/360493352.html

http://losangeles.craigslist.org/wst/ers/360493675.html

http://losangeles.craigslist.org/sfv/ers/360492622.html
>> Anonymous
>>58325
Doesn't apply to 5D only... any DSLR picture that isn't excessively noisy can be printed just fine at 150dpi. It depends on how far the picture's going to be seen from, of course. Figure's just fine for arm distance.

so with a 12 mpix... 30x20 prints?
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>you'll never guess what I did today...
Took pictures of prostitutes?
>> Anonymous
>>58328
lmao, so they look skanky for a reason
>> pskaught
>>58329
thats about what I guessed for fie size, 400dpi at 24 inch height. The high res pics have a shit ton of detail, the girl's skin is really shitty and I'm kind of going for that.
>>58330
I handed you the answer... but nailed it.
>> Anonymous
>>58332
So the question is... did you get paid? If so, how?
>> Anonymous
"you'll never guess what I did today..."

hrm? took some crappy pics with your 5D?
>> Anonymous
These are the ugliest women I've ever seen.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>58392
What the hell? Do you live under a rock? I mean, they're certainly not terribly attractive, but I see uglier women than this every day.
>> Anonymous
>>58406
shit. where do you live? damn crackwhores
>> Anonymous
Those are some of the worst portraits I've ever seen. GB2 photography school
>> Anonymous
fuckin sage lol
>> Anonymous
>>58318
Whore 1 Whore 2 Whore 3? Lol, Also were you trying to make them look bad? If you were what was the trick? steep angles on the lighting?

Also you could probably print 20x30 without any problems, maybe 24x36 even, Just upsize in photoshop
>> Heart Of Gold Series pskaught
I was paid $50 a girl. cash.
It wasn't until I took the first picture of the chubby girl when I decided to make a series out of it. good enough content to blow up and have a small gallery showing.

School's for suckers.

I was trying to make them look good, but in photoshop I made them look worse. there's only so much you can do to make these girls look good. Except the 3rd one. she was a good looking whore.

So If you didn't "get it" I'm so so sorry, I'll take a picture of a sunset next time with my camera phone.
>> Anonymous
>>58499
Who Paid you?
>> pskaught
the pimp... who else.
>> Anonymous
These women would look a whole lot better dressed.
>> Anonymous
>>58511
Why'd he want shots of his prostitutes? It's not like he can open up a www.lapimpincorporated.com website to show them off.

Regardless, this is the best work of yours I've seen so far. I don't usually like your style (note that I'm not saying you're a bad photographer; you're a good one, but your style isn't what I personally like to see) but it works very well here.
>> pskaught
>>58538
refer to these links:>>58328
Craigslist is Lapimpsgotsometang.org
thanks for the compliment, I think this style has never worked better, the subject matter is fucking awful in a great way, their eyes will tell you everything; how they feel about what they're about to do. Its fucked up. as is the contrast and detail and poses and all that shit.
Its fucked.
>> Anonymous
>>58540
So that's why those links were removed.

Not that I'd ever get some through these channels, but sometimes I read the "casual encounters" section of Craiglists for the lulz, because most of them are pretty lulzy. You're telling me they're all hookers?
>> pskaught
>>58542
they are all prostitutes. yes.
and check the erotic services section.
>> Anonymous
>>58543
That's obviously prostitutes, but why don't they all just go to erotic services?
>> Anonymous
>>58543
Oh, and thanks:

http://losangeles.craigslist.org/lac/ers/360985785.html

Lulz to be had for all!
>> Anonymous
What made you shoot so stopped down? Was it something with flash sync, or something you actually wanted to do for a reason?
>> Anonymous
>>58546
oh lawd:

>I am on probation for violence. Beating up females who didnt give me money and what I wanted. [...] If you see me say HI!!
>> pskaught
>>58550
Flash, small studio. my next purchase is some serious ND. but sooting that stop gives me a remarkable amount of detail.
>> Anonymous
so what'd you do after you took their picture?
and are there any more?
>> pskaught
I cried myself to sleep.
there are plenty more.
>> Anonymous
>>58626
You only have one more step befoer you are unredeemable
Become paparazzi!

$150 is decent pay, but nothing spectacular
Were the girls reluctant to go along with it? Or were they ok with the whole situation?
>> Anonymous
>>58631
they had better been ok with it or they woulda gotten the pimp hand in full force
>> Anonymous
>>58631
being a paparazzi isn't too bad actually... if you can be at the right places, and shoot the right people at the right time.

Famous people's privacy is so wildly disregarded it's not even funny, but hey, one has to make a living... and the masses will buy it.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
yes, its hard to make them look good, but this is what can be done in 5 mins in photoshop, if you know what your doing in regards to masking....

hell, all ive done is clear up her skin a bit, i havent even played with her body shape...

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:06:27 17:43:06Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width667Image Height1000
>> Anonymous
if i were you, i really wouldn't be proud of these pictures
>> Anonymous
>>58638
That is bad. Even whorey socialite actresses deserve their privacy.

>>58641
All that one needs, body-shape wise, is smaller and better-shaped breasts.

Question: how does a hooker afford breast implants? Or do they naturally look that much like giant, swollen pimples?
>> Anonymous
>Question: how does a hooker afford breast implants?

Maybe she's paying for them?
>> Anonymous
>>58643
maybe their pimp pays for it to bring in more revenue
>> Anonymous
ho-tography
>> Anonymous
>>58545
because sometimes guys like to think they are the first ones to pay for that slice, so you ost under CE as a girl needing help for rent like its a one time deal.


not that i would know about doing that scheme o anything.......
>> pskaught
     File :-(, x)
>>58638
paparazzi are fucking scum. I worked on a jessica simpson music video. those guys are fucks, the scum of the earth, a god dammed waste of camera gear.

>>58641
dude, they're prostitutes, photoshop didn't even come into play. the point (for me) was to make them look bad.

>>58643
she's actually a good looking whore. I'm sure she pulls in a lot of cash.

>>58642
I am actually proud of these, I just need seven more girls.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshMaximum Lens Aperturef/3.7Image-Specific Properties:Image Width6400Image Height9600Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution100 dpiVertical Resolution100 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2007:06:27 01:35:34Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/20.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating50Lens Aperturef/20.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length30.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width667Image Height1000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
>>58682

moar whores
>> pskaught
I'll do a few more. there is no justice until you see the 16bit 300dpi 24x files. the detail is really disgusting.
>> Anonymous
great as a series
>> Anonymous
oh haha, i missed the point then.
if they are ment to look crappy and cruddy with bad skin then good job.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)


Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5DCamera SoftwarePaint.NET v3.08Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.2Image-Specific Properties:Image Width5333Image Height8000Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution100 dpiVertical Resolution100 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2007:06:26 01:36:41RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/18.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating50Lens Aperturef/18.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length41.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width667Image Height1000
>> Anonymous
>>58746
hulk angry?
>> Anonymous
>>58687
Well, consider high-res versions requested.
>> Anonymous
>>58638
hey Go fuck yourself thats how I make my living
>> street-pirate
>>58682

Oh my god, this is HIDEOUS.

Great job!
>> pskaught
>>58771
not at 381.3MB