i know the photographer, just really haven't spoken to her. How do you get this effect she is getting. I am pretty sure she is using just an external flash on her hot shoe.EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBELCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:07:13 22:29:17White Point Chromaticity0Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/16.0Exposure ProgramNot DefinedISO Speed Rating6553700Lens Aperturef/16.0Brightness0 EVExposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance0.00 mMetering ModeAverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length24.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width800Image Height533Exposure Index0
well thank you!
>>110548Yep. Looks like she's shooting outdoors, just using EXTREM FAST SHUTTER SPEED (1/250th) along with a tiny aperture so that her flash overpowers the daylight.
It doesn't look like natural light to me, but the EXIF does say no flash.Hot lights, maybe?
>>110552If it's not a Canon dedicated TTL flash it won't list it in the EXIF.(In fact, I'm not even sure if off-camera dedicated Canon flashes will list in the EXIF. But I know that plain hotshoe flashes won't)
>>110553Canon Speedlite + off-shoe cord = yes in EXIF
well, it could be that the guys are jumping in front of a green screen -> exif from the background picture with no flash.probably just external flash. anyway, ISO 6553700 is kinda cool.
Could be remote synced flash or just some portable lights. There's nothing to say this setting is far away from civilization, could just be in someone backyard.
lol thats green/bluescreened idiots
>>110595Troll, or don't understand lighting?
>>110597You're right, since there's only two kinds of people on 4chan, it's just hard to say which he is.
>>110690I lol'd
actually to be pretty blunt I don't understand lighting 100%. So I guess you would be right?