File :-(, x, )
Toys? Anonymous
Hello /p/, long time reader, first time poster.
wanted to get some jealousy from the audience, my new lens arrived today.
excuse the bad image, g/f's point'n'click is the only other camera i could scrounge.
i would like to express my satisfaction with the camera and the lens.
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.Camera ModeluD600,S600Camera SoftwareVersion 1.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.1Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution314 dpiVertical Resolution314 dpiImage Created2008:04:29 17:24:14Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/3.1Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashFlash, AutoFocal Length5.80 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2816Image Height2112RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalCompression SettingSHQMacro ModeNormal
>> troll
Bad camera does not justify shitty composition. The camera is awkwardly facing out of the frame and the lighting is too harsh. Also, the camera shouldn't be in the dead center of the picture and the framing is all off. Finally, there is too much clutter in the background.

Also resize your damn picture. We don't need to see all 10 MP. And 314 dpi, what the hell? 120 dpi MAX.

Try taking the picture again and posting.
>> Anonymous
Who would be jelous? Nikon sucks ass. Sell your shit and get a good camera, like an XTi.
>> Anonymous
>>171574

C-C-C-Counter Troll!!!
>> Anonymous
>>171578

No trolling, just the truth.
>> Anonymous
OP here, didnt realise how nasty this board was.
so ill change my tune.
See this camera? i own it.
my parents? i dont live with them.
work? yes i get plenty.
and olympus pocket cameras can suck my hairy sack.
>> Anonymous
And I bet your pics still suck.
>> Anonymous
>>171581
See this post, no one cares

The 17-85 on my XT does the same thing, it takes pics. Only difference is that I didn't spend all my money on it.
>> Anonymous
>>171581
lrn2resize and you might not fail so hard
>> Anonymous
>>171567Hello /p/, long time reader, first time poster.
>>171581OP here, didnt realise how nasty this board was.
second statement proves the first wrong, unless you somehow managed to get a extremely fluffy posts combo.
>> Anonymous
You came here trying to brag and expected anon to be nice, ARE YOU RETARDED?!
>> Serenar !m827jEgWi.
>>171581
>OP here, didnt realise how nasty this board was.
Long time reader my ass.
>> Anonymous
>>171583
Yeah, sensors and shit are for pussies! It's all about the megapixels!!
>> Anonymous
I have an idea for a message board, where nobody is allowed to post original content or anything positive.
We can call it /pee/ and it can be full of us middle age white trash.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>171567
Thankyou TruthTroller.

an 8mm lens diameter is not what im used do, so please excuse all the noise/overflash/bad colour.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.Camera ModeluD600,S600Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/3.1Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:04:29 17:19:12Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/3.1Exposure ProgramCreativeISO Speed Rating64Lens Aperturef/3.1Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashFlash, AutoFocal Length5.80 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1024Image Height707RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypePortraitGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>> Anonymous
Screw sensors and AF and that VR shit....
If you have a meter and a camera you're all set.
Get your ass out there and shoot something.
>> Anonymous
>>171621
Screw meters too. Sunny 16 4 life.
>> I||ICIT !!mknjFN/v/49
>>171622
lol at sensor dust and un-needed higher than 100 ISO's...
>> Anonymous
I have a camera phone, is that good ?
>> Anonymous
>>171645
a camera INSIDE a phone?
WIZARDRY!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
yes a camera inside a phone
>> Anonymous
>>171645
camera phones are good cos you usually carry you phone around with you, mines not the worst digital camera I've owned, had a really budget $30 camera that was/is tragic but cheap. the quality of camera phones are fine for party pics in good lighting (and drunken self portraits)
>> Anonymous
>>171581
Toasty!!!
>> Anonymous
people react differently around a big camera with a shutter noise. some of the most candid shots (legal or no) are from cameraphones, plus its always in your pocket.
>> Anonymous
cmon, secretly all your rebel fags would love a D3
nothing wrong with that.

rebel fags and d40fags are the cause of 95% of the hate on /p/
butterfly causes 4%
and depressed cheesecake the other 1%
>> t00t
>>171664
wut about d60fags?
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>171672
There's only been about 1 post from a D60 owner so far. They're pretty new. I've seen one D60 thread, one XSi/450D thread, and one K200D thread.
>> Anonymous
>>171567
10/10
So, what fool photo editor let you take home the paper's new camera?
>> Anonymous
>>171674
lol, well played.
>> Anonymous
>>171574
yeah cause iso 6400 usuable images are just out of Canon range bitches
>> Anonymous
>>171694

Say that to the 5D MKII
>> Anonymous
still a nikon . . nothing to good come back when you have a real camera
>> Anonymous
>>171573
I love /p/ <3<3<3
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>171708
I would love to say that to the 5D Mk II if Canon would actually release one.
>> Anonymous
>>171673one XSi/450D thread

3 from my count

1. unboxing dude
2. 70-300 IS garden and bird pics dude
3. beach dude with the big ass bird
>> Anonymous
>OP here, didnt realise how nasty this board was.
>so ill change my tune.
>See this camera? i own it.
>my parents? i dont live with them.
>work? yes i get plenty.
>are my photos good? no.
>and olympus pocket cameras can suck my hairy sack.
>> Anonymous
>>171722
If your punctuation, spelling and composition denote the atypical Canon user, I'll stick with Nikon.
>> Even_Steven !!rUmVORA7JiP
And I bet its used in full auto to take SUPER SWEET party/rave photos
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>172645
>If your punctuation, spelling and composition denote the atypical Canon user, I'll stick with Nikon.
Wait, what? Poor grammar being out of the ordinary in a Canon user means you'll stay with Nikon?

Or have you made a complete fool of yourself by attempting to mock someone else's grasp on the English language while not realizing that "atypical" is the opposite of "typical"?
>> Anonymous
>>172850
he was being typically atypical

>CAH-MEDY
>> linkiE !ei5A1FPDuk
     File :-(, x)
Something I just noticed about OP's picture.

It made me giggle.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution314 dpiVertical Resolution314 dpiImage Created2008:04:30 23:40:00Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1172Image Height96
>> Anonymous
>>172850
There is no justice. Humor is a lost art. Sarcasm is all but forgotten. Now why was it that I started frequenting this board?

OH! Right! I actually thought that there was a spark of intelligence here. My bad...

"Ekky-ekky-ekky-ekky-z'Bang, zoom-Boing, z'nourrrwringmm".
>> Anonymous
>>174007

That was a really shitty cover up for not knowing the definition of atypical. Go take some pictures and stop being a fucking troll, dumbass.
>> Anonymous
>> There is no justice. Humor is a lost art. Sarcasm is all but forgotten.


Cut2Feel cunt
>> Anonymous
>>174040
Translation: "I am an asshole and smell of jizz".

Agreed. You are and do.
>> Anonymous
>>174041
Translate "Cut2Feel" into English if you would. I don't speak dialect or made up words.