>> |
Anonymous
>>224092Someone got really, really butthurt about what I said...
more like you got ass raped by stating idiotic things and "quoting" imaginary statements i said
>> And I'm not going to argue with you or waste my time responding to everything you said because that's all it is; a waste of my time.
that's what people usually say when they lose an argument, but thanks for playing
>> But no, ringlights are no "out of fashion" you moron. They're as common as ever and plenty of studio and fashion photographers still use them. You probably just don't notice them in some magazines because, like I said earlier, they look best when used in conjunction with other light. Not every ringflash picture has the halo-esque shadow or catchlights.
HEY, NEWSFLASH
look at the two OP pictures, that is typical out of fashoin ring light
if you hide the halos and catch lights, then it's not a fucking ring light picture anymore because you have the decency to be using other lights
but if you're a strobist faggot and go around lololol shadow around subject and LOOK AT THE EYES, then you're a faggot ring light user who is doing COMPLETEY played out photography
>> What are you even raging about Strobist for? Who even _mentioned_ Strobist? I do read the blog, but not as often as you seem to think (maybe once every 2 weeks or so, or if I'm looking for information on something specific) and now I think you're just lashing out at whatever you can. Insulting someone for reading a lighting technique blog, good or bad, is silly.
nope, i'm just laughing my ass off at you because it's so obvious you're not good enough to be experimenting on your own and have to follow his lighting 101 instructions
|