File :-(, x, )
Garo Aida, photographer of many little girls Investment Banker and !Pedo1f9P/Y
He is my idol.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garo_Aida

in case you don't know of him, Garo Aida is a japanese photographer of girls under 15 years of age. his most famous models include mao kobayashi and of course, saaya irie, the 11 year old (at the time) japanese girl with very impressive breasts, or to be more precise, cleavage.

obviously it's illegal to look at an 11 year old's bare breasts, as much as i disagree with the law.

he has the most enviable job in the world in my opinion. surrounds himself and takes photos of cute and pretty underaged girls. what's not to like?

i'm just surprised he hasn't been assassinated by anti-pedophile groups yet. if Garo Aida was in USA, he surely would have been killed by now.

thank you japan, for being more relaxed and progressive on sex-related issues.

are you pro-pedo, anti-pedo or neutral?
Comment too long. Clickhereto view the full text.
>> Anonymous
>Investment Banker and !Pedo
oh god i lol'd
>> Anonymous
>>247649
and i came :o
>> Anonymous
It doesn't take that much skill to shoot girls for U15 magazines. So while I admire Saaya Irie's cleavage, I don't thing this guy is special; he's just one lucky (or maybe unlucky) bastard.
>> Investment Banker and !Pedo1f9P/Y
>>247675
>I don't thing this guy is special; he's just one lucky (or maybe unlucky) bastard.

and that's what makes him special.

i wonder how he even managed to get the job.
>> Einta !!MWv3ICYobCM
>thank you japan, for being more relaxed and >progressive on sex-related issues.

Aha...aha...ahahahaha. Riiight.
>> NatureGuy !se3A3TwzdY
     File :-(, x)
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHRBGL

I see you trolling
>> Anonymous
I don't think adult-child sex is psychologically healthy for either, and there's nothing "progressive" about raping children. The armies of eight thousand years ago called, they want their tactic back.


Ephebophilia, where biologically the kid is an adult, is a different story. However, since society sucks and people are still insanely immature at fourteen, cases where everything is kosher are probably the exception today.

Child porn inherently involves exploiting children, so it should be illegal to produce or buy. Owning it should be legal, though, better someone fapping to an already exploited or raped kid than raping another. But no more of it- just throw out free and legal everything there is, and the market for new shit would go away.

Also sage for only the most tenuous connection to photography.

Also>>247686.
>> Anonymous
>>247682
>and that's what makes him special.
>i wonder how he even managed to get the job.

Well, SOMEONE had to get this job.
And I don't see how he is so much "luckier" than, say, a middle school swimming teacher.
>> Investment Banker and !Pedo1f9P/Y
>>247687

umm your post has nothing to do with the topic, with is garo aida, the u-15 photographer and his works.

since you obviously has something to say, i'll ask this instead for you:

can garo aida's photos of girls under 15 be classified as child porn, even though they're not nude?

can non-nude photos of children be sexual in any way?

lastly, a hypothetical situation:

A pedophile downloads saaya irie pictures and starts masturbating to it.

society now thinks saaya irie is unable to consent to having her non-nude photos taken and she has now a victim of sexual abuse.

should garo aida (who took those photos) be responsible?
>> Investment Banker and !Pedo1f9P/Y
>>247689
>And I don't see how he is so much "luckier" than, say, a middle school swimming teacher.

i can think of several reasons:

1) garo aida can dress up his subjects in whatever he wants.
2) garo aida, as a photographer can continually stare at his girls without looking creepy. he's a photographer, it's his job.
3) garo aida takes photos of u-15 MODELS. no ugly girls for him, only the cream of the crop
4) if the middle school swimming teacher took photos of any of his students... prepare the lynch, and prepare to be hanged.
>> Anonymous
>>247691
You asked three questions:

>are you pro-pedo, anti-pedo or neutral?
>do you think garo aida should continue to take photos of underaged girls or should he be stopped?
>are his current photos tasteful or too sexual?

I answered the first one by giving a summary of my views on the whole issue, and inadvertantly (I didn't notice it) answered the second one, although I wouldn't answer it quite the same way as I accidentally did.

I don't know anything about the guy except what you've told me, so I don't have an opinion with which to answer #3.

I'll answer your post and #2 later, laptop battery's about to die and I'm not going to waste the last juice on 4chan.
>> Serenar !m827jEgWi.
>>247687
Are you an idiot? Legalizing ownership will just encourage people to find more, thus encouraging people to make more and resulting in more exploitation by your logic.

Sage for worse than gear thread.
>> Anonymous
>>247694
>if the middle school swimming teacher took photos of any of his students... prepare the lynch, and prepare to be hanged.
1) Only in amerikkka (or if he did it in a very suspicious way)
2) On the other hand, Garo Aida can't touch his models. And he's known to half of Japan as that guy who takes semi-dirty pictures of little girls.
>> Anonymous
>>247701

AMERIKKKUH HURRR
>> Teus !QbSstcPD6U
torrent of his photo/art books plx
>> Anonymous
>>247649
>>obviously it's illegal to look at an 11 year old's bare breasts, as much as i disagree with the law.

You fail to understand the law.
Photographing nude models under 18 is perfectly legal, under certain conditions of course.
>> Investment Banker and !Pedo1f9P/Y
>>247733
>You fail to understand the law.
>Photographing nude models under 18 is perfectly legal, under certain conditions of course.

It doesn't matter what the law is, if people find out i've been looking at 11 year old breasts, they're gonna kill me anyway.
>> Anonymous
>>247724

2nd
>> Anonymous
>>247734
No, they won't. It all depends on circumstance. For your circumstance, yes, people will hate you and may harm you.

Also, do you have any idea how many models in America are under 18? Even ones that are supposed to look 18+ can be as young as 14 with makeup, lighting, and photoshop. It makes for an easier edit when someone has perfect skin etc.

There is also a huge market for child models in America, just not the kind you are looking for. Legitimate things, where you want a family in your photo, you are selling toys, clothing or whatever. Taking photos of children isn't abnormal, looking at them in the way you do it what makes it different.

You appear to be interested in girls that are physically developed, don't call that pedo, it isn't.
>> Anonymous
>>247743

in amerikuh if u pedo, u die
>> Anonymous
>>247652

i just notoiced that
>> Anonymous
>>
>> Anonymous
>>247705

DUUURR
>> Anonymous !SDPEsPMnww
I'm jealous of this guy's job.
>> Anonymous
I'm jealous of anyone who gets payed to photograph anything.
>> Anonymous
>>247951
lololol i have two photo jobs lined up. try parties first, they're always the easiest to get hired for, then you start getting your name out there, then they tell their friends, and then mayeb they want you to do a wedding, then their kids, then YOU'RE SET. :D
>> Anonymous
>>247932

taking pics of sexy 13 year olds?

who wouldn't be jealous? jesus fucking 10 year olds christ, hell yea.
>> Anonymous
ephebophile not = pedophile
wikipedia motherfucker, use it
>> Anonymous
wtf
>> Anonymous
more of op girl thx
>> s
pedo trolling
>> Anonymous
>>247649
>post cp plox

there, i translated for you
>> Anonymous
>>248086

cp hasn't been delivered though
>> Anonymous
Garo Aida = An inspiration to pedos everywhere
>> NatureGuy !se3A3TwzdY
trolled /p/ is trolled
>> Anonymous
>>248253

i fail to see how
>> Anonymous
Enough of this fucking thread. Some of us are at work here.
>> Anonymous
>>248266

pics in this thread are worksafe jackasses.

also get back to fucking work.
>> Anonymous
>>248267
Contrary to what you may think, 11 year old japanese girls in bikinis is not worksafe material.

Also, fuck you. Your not my boss.
>> Anonymous
>>248268

did you read the fucking memo, cubicle-rat? call our fucking suppliers and confirm with them that they will be able to send the stock before next week.

listen to me turd, i'm under pressure from the higher-ups and i've got deadlines to meet so don't question me you pitiful worm, just do your fucking job like the wage-slave you are.

now get out of my sight.
>> Anonymous
>>248270

Good thing I'm cleaning my guns tonight.
>> Anonymous
>>248266
bump for working guy. gb2work or get faired for being a pedo
>> Anonymous
I'd have to say neutral. I'd definitely tap saaya irie, but if kiddie porn was legalized... it'd have some issues. I mean isn't there enough kidnapping and child torture for sexual pleasure while it's ILLEGAL?
>> Anonymous
promotions!
>> Anonymous
How old is Garo Aida and what does he look like?

I like to imagine he's at least a little good looking so his young models feel more at ease.
>> Anonymous
Child pron is legal in Japan but for individual use only, so that means if you and your mates want to have a wank together then it is illegal.
>> Anonymous
>>248629

wut
>> Anonymous
Disgusting. He doesn't do it for the art, he does it to get off.
>> Anonymous
>>248758
and you are here why?
>> Anonymous
>>248758

If he's masturbating alone privately in his own home, what's the [problem?
>> Anonymous
>>248928

because masturbating makes you go blind and every semen you ejaculate is a baby killed.

You are a baby-killer
>> Anonymous
jesus christ who WOUDLNT fuck Saaya???
>> Anonymous
>>249086
I wouldn't, just because you are a savage animal doesn't mean everyone is.
>> Investment Banker and !Pedo.1CYjc
>>249088

a person who is sexually attracted to pretty girls is a savage animal?

i guess all of us humans are animals
>> Anonymous
>>249096
Well if you let your animal instincts win over ethics, yes you are a savage animal, sorry.
>> Investment Banker and !Pedo.1CYjc
>>249100

even i pedophile, know you have your ethics and morals mixed up.

in any case, i am hardly worse than warmongers who send soldiers off to die in foreign lands.

i mean, i don't want to hurt anyone. all i want is to have a little girl suck me off. is that too much to ask?
>> Anonymous
>>249114

I don't know, would you let your little daughter suck another guy?
>> Anonymous
>>249118
I'm assuming he would keep her all to himself
>> Anonymous
>>249114
Also excusing yourself by saying there are worse things in the world doesn't alleviate your paedophilia.
I'll admit most of you are harmless guys that like to fap over pics of little kiddies, the problem is when you take it out of your basement into other people's lives.
>> Anonymous
>>249088
>I wouldn't, just because you are a savage animal doesn't mean everyone is.

You are either:
1.) A homosexual male.
2.) A female.

Every heterosexual male on earth would love to have a chance to engage in consensual sexual intercourse with Saaya Irie.
>> Anonymous
>>249146
keep excusing yourself in false universal assumptions.
>> Investment Banker and !Pedo.1CYjc
>>249121

By continually saying "pedophilia is evil and wrong" doesn't alleviate my natural desire to fuck girls aged 10 to 30.
>> Anonymous
>>249152

Sorry, asshole, I'm not the same fag you were arguing with earlier.

If she came up to you at a restaurant or bar or whatever and you didn't know how old she was you'd want to fuck the shit out of Saaya. PERIOD.

The only thing that's keeping you from admitting that is faggoty social rules regarding age and sexuality.
>> Anonymous
ITT pedos baaawwwww.
>> Anonymous
>>249159
Just like there are people who would do it there are people who wouldn't, stop excusing yourself by spouting false generalisations.
>> Investment Banker and !Pedo.1CYjc
>>249170

generalizations exist for a reason.

the most hypocritical ones are people who deny finding saaya irie sexy after they find out what her age is.

this is the pedophile stigma.
>> Pedos belong in jail Pedos belong in jail
Pedophilia is evil and wrong you sick disgusting pervert. What if that was your sister or daughter? Or maybe some of you sickos are already genuine pedophiles? Well wait till you go to jail and see what they do to people like you.
>> Anonymous
Is this ``/p/ - Photography'' or ``/p/ - Pedophilia''?
>> Anonymous
>>249206
It's awwright either way.
>> Anonymous
>>249206
4chan - Pedophilia
>> Anonymous
This thread needs moar photos to illustrate the subject matter at hand.
>> Anonymous !SDPEsPMnww
>>249224
Yes.
>> Anonymous
This thread is providing more lulz than /b/ is at the moment
>> A few words to the pedos of /p/ Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>I want to fuck children.

Behind all the bullshit, this is what you think. It's not love. It's not natural, it's not beautiful. It can't be rationalized, through the past, present, or future.

>I want to fuck children.


Say it out loud.

...

When you fuck a child, you are inflicting the greatest wound that person will ever feel in their entire life. Most kill themselves, some live desperately, hoping to forget through drugs or therapy. But they never will, you have killed them already. They died the moment you fucked them.

If you find pre-sexual humans attractive. Thats YOUR PROBLEM. Not the world's, not your victim's, not your family's. It's a deep, deep evil that you either overcome, or don't.

>> Anonymous !EOS5DJQoBA
>>249439
This just made my dick even harder. Thank you!
>> Anonymous
Pedo :: world

furfag :: /b
>> Anonymous
what if i am 14 and i fuck my 14 year old girlfriend?
>> Anonymous !EOS5DJQoBA
>>249446
According to>>249439, you're killing her.
>> Anonymous
I never knew /p/ was like this.

>>249114
This has to be the single most funny thing I've read in a long time.
>> Anonymous
>>249448
A child is presexual, prepuberty. A 14-year-old isn't a child.
>> Anonymous
IN B4 avg age of marriage in roman empire was twelve.
Avg lifespan of male was 21 yrs.

Up through the 1st quarter of the 20'th century marrying @ 14 (to a 30+ yr old man) was considered the norm.


Rationalize this.
>> Anonymous
every 14 year-old i know is a fucking idiot. i can barely stand undergrads. frumpy post-grads do it for me.
>> Anonymous
>>249475Avg lifespan of male was 21 yrs.
Bullfuckingshit.
>> Anonymous
My answers to the questions.

1. I'm pro- for the friendly pedos who can control their urges, and I'm anti- for the pedos who resort to rape. Of course I'm also anti- for NON-pedos who resort to raping 18+ women. XD

2. I don't care if he stops or not... he's only one of dozens of successful JIdol photographers out there. XD Plenty to replace or succeed him. But he does make good, clear, well-lit photos, and is pretty good with his choice of set-ups, costumes, etc. And for those of you who aren't that familiar with Garo Aida, he USED to shoot full nudes of girls back in the days. XD Which means his work is actually much tamer now.

3. His current photos are a cross between tasteful and sexual... Most of his photos are very tasteful. As for the ones with very sexy poses, they're not that sexual when you compare them to actual porn. And if you follow US child porn laws, you need a "lascivious display of the genitals," or sexual content/objects (dildo, condom, lube bottle, etc), or actual sex/masturbation.... none of which Aida shows in his pics, therefore only ignorant/conservative people would call his work CP. Just putting a girl in undies/lingerie and sitting around on a bed isn't pornographic, thus not CP either. (Aida has a bunch of those.) But if it's a really erotic pose, like getting on hands & knees then spreading her thighs apart, or a close-up of pouring water right on her cleavage, then you can say it's kinda sexual/erotic. But still not clear-cut CP. To me, if a pic wouldn't be considered rated-R if an 18+ person did it, then it wouldn't be rated-R if a child does it. In fact, sometimes it's the other way around! A topless pic of a lil girl just standing at a beach could be considered rated-G or PG at the most, while a topless pic of a woman would be rated-PG13 or R.
>> Investment Banker and !Pedo.1CYjc
     File :-(, x)
>>249533
>But if it's a really erotic pose, like getting on hands & knees then spreading her thighs apart, or a close-up of pouring water right on her cleavage

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS-1Ds Mark IICamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2005:04:27 11:34:59Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/5.7Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length108.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width768Image Height1024RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
>>249535

nice
>> Anonymous
>>249490
Well said, old chap.
>> Anonymous
niiiiiiiiiiice.
>> Anonymous
good lord, jesus wont be pleased
>> Anonymous
any way girls 13-14+ yo can have body of a woman but face can tell you how old they are :P if you have hard on because of body its nothing wrong with you imo ... but if that youngster in front of you is flat chested skinny 12- yo girl and you have a boner you are fucking pedo sick fucker and this is'nt normal. BTW you know
that in few countries in europe 16+ is legal ? :>
>> Anonymous
>>249637

A few countries? As far as I know 16 is the limit in most European countries, but when it comes to nude photography, porn, and that kind of thing, it's 18 everywhere.
>> Anonymous
>mao kobayashi

who's she?
>> Anonymous
>>249711
Mao Kobayashi is another junior idol model, who also posed for Garo Aida. She's kinda chubby, but with decent cleavage.
>> Anonymous
>>249646
lol, here in Spain 14+ s'ok.
>> Anonymous
1. I'm anti-pedo. For some reason I fail to see the attraction to a little girl with little or no sexual development. That's like, getting turned on by a niece or a daughter. It's unnatural and that stupid 'the marriage age used to be 12-14 in the past' bullshit is long gone. When's the last time in modern day, thoroughly developed societies you've seen a girl get married at that age? You don't see it because it's no longer accepted, or needed, in today's modern society.

2. Garo Aida can take all the photos of these girls he wants, particularly because in his culture it's accepted. Not only that, from what I understand and heard about him, the photos are high-quality and very tasteful. If it gets to the point of sexualizing the underaged girls photos, then he should be stopped. For right now though, he's fine and he's doing a decent tasteful job.

3. I took a look at a few photos and they seem to best rather tasteful, with only a slight hint of sexuality (half of them are bikini shots, that's slightly sexual no matter how you see it). He does do nudes of 18+ models though, but as long as he keeps it 18+, yeah he seems to be doing a tasteful job.


Also, Saaya Irie's breasts are huge.
>> Anonymous !EOS5Dv76E6
>>249935Also, Saaya Irie's breasts are huge.

Admit it, you want to fuck her too.
>> Anonymous
>>249936
Only in Japan where it's legal ;)
>> Anonymous !EOS5Dv76E6
>>249937
If you're the same as>>249935, then you're a hypocrite.
>> Anonymous
>>249935

Ja, you have deep seated family issues, yes?
>> Anonymous
>>249935

as far as i know in afrika masais takes 12+ to girls as brides :P
>> Anonymous
>>249937
in japan the age of consent is 21, pedo
>> Anonymous !EOS5Dv76E6
>>249958
No it isn't. It's 20 at the most.
>> Anonymous
>>249958
No it isn't you fucking retard. The age of majority in Japan is 20 so there is no way the age of consent could be 21.

The federal age of consent is 13 and prefectural law supersedes federal in most cases raising it to somewhere between 13 and 18 depending on the specific prefecture.
>> Anonymous
>>249958
>>249960
Idiots, read http://legal.3yen.com/2005-07-27/is-the-age-of-consent-in-japan-really-13/ or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Asia
Just like how>>249961said, nation-wide the age of consent in Japan is 13, but individual prefectures have different ages, from 13 up to 18.
>> Investment Banker and !Pedo.1CYjc
>>250145

age of consent is irrelevant in this discussion.

if no-one was told how old saaya irie was, every heterosexual male would make a comment similar to this: "saaya? damn yeah she's fuckable"

THAT'S when you tell the guy who made the comment her real age. If the guy changes his mind about her being fuckable, then's he in denial. If he admits she's still fuckable despite knowing her real age, then's he normal.
>> Anonymous
if a male does not want to fuck saaya irie, then he is a racist or a fag.

or both, which is often the case.
>> Anonymous
>>249960
>>249961

I love how the pedos get all defensive about it. RAGE ON, you pathetic moron.
>> Anonymous
>>250258
o.o "age of consent is irrelevant in this discussion"? And you're talking about Saaya being fuckable or not? If you're not answering OP's three questions, you're off topic. (Thus you're off topic.) And yes, age of consent IS relevant to OP's first question, which is "are you pro-pedo, anti-pedo or neutral?" Because in order to answer that, you NEED age of consent to outline what being pro-pedo/anti-pedo is, since it's a different age in different places. (And Anon comes from different places.) If age of consent is 10 in one place, then no one in that place is pedo if they only lust after 10 year-olds. XD
>> fence !!POey2hdozCZ
>>250775

that dude IS the op. just thought you should know.
>> Anonymous
>>250775

age of consent is stupid.

you fuck a 17 year old girl in USA: disgusting child molestor go to hell!!!

you fuck a 16 year old girl in australia: it's awwwright mate.
>> Anonymous
>>250814
pedo detected
>> Anonymous
>>250814
It's more awwwwright if said girl is your own daughter!
>> Anonymous
>>250815

16/17 females =/= children
>> Anonymous
>>250837
but in the eyes of the faggotry law it does, you get called a pedophile and labelled a child molester if you are 16 and have sex with a 17 year old. true story. also true is the girl who got charged for cp for having naked pictures of herself on her computer and she was 16 or something. fucking failure of a country you are there, america.
>> Anonymous
>109 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click Reply to view.

sounds about right
>> Project !dashI8UpO.
But I'd rather have
>109 posts and 109 image replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
instead
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
i shoot pregnant girls instead. More fun

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsPhotographer© Rick Wilking / ReutersImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2008:09:04 15:12:34Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width3280Image Height2149
>> soulr !lK4GD5SleY
worse thread I've seen in /p/, congratulations.
>> Anonymous
>>250837
ok but where do you draw the line? You have to have a certain age as the cut-off. I'd say 11 falls below the age most people would suggest for age of consent.
>> Anonymous
>>250882

12
>> Anonymous
>>250875

jesus christ, her tits are fucking ENORMOUS
>> Anonymous
>>250882
You don't need a cut-off age. You can consider her fuckable when puberty is complete. Anything younger is pedophilia.
>> Anonymous
11 year old tits. part of every nutrutious breakfast
>> Anonymous
>>251047
pulp fiction?
>> Anonymous
wow olod thread
>> Anonymous
open notepad
type the following sentence into notepad:
moot hid the lolis
now save it as moot.txt
close note pad
go to where you saved the text file and open it - voila! moot really did hide the lolis ! see for yourself
>> Anonymous
Saaya irie is my angel
>> Anonymous
Men are hippocrites who tow the line of women when it comes to underage sex. Truth be told most men would fuck a 15 year old or younger if they could get away with it without ANYONE else knowing about it.

Those who say they would not are just lying because it's the done thing or have their GF/wife standing behind them or worst still, wish to tow the line of their social peers.
>> Investment Banker and !Pedo.1CYjc
>>251724

exactly. men only pretend to not want to fuck teenage girls because they're scared of being called pedophiles.

but the fact is, men DO want to fuck hot teenage girls.
>> Anonymous
>>252130
Not prepubescent girls though, you sick fuck.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>251724
don't project your perv on others sicko. More than law or opinion my sense of honor as a man and the obvious need to protect naifs from exploiters like you guides my acts.
Neither would I find acceptable let alone sexy, some vapid airhead scene lemming or self esteem starved goth or raver even if they were 21.
The usual 21 year old female exists in ungainly student pilot-like person unsure of her powers while dead set on screwing with them anyway. Wait till they're 27 or so and skip the drama.
>> Anonymous
>>252147
>Wait till they're 27 or so

hahaha. 7/10.
>> Anonymous
I will pray to whatever deity will listen that Investment Banker is murdered in cold blood while his family is forced to watch.
>> Anonymous
>>251724

Agreed.
>> Anonymous
>>252130
>>252145
/thread
>> Anonymous
This thread makes me lol hard XD
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
I shagged a 14 year old. :3
>> Anonymous
>>252189

wat
>> Anonymous
lol
>> Anonyfag of Borneo !bHymOqU5YY
/p/ - Party v&
>> Anonymous
>>252246

why, nothing is illegal here.
>> Anonymous
Is this /p/'s most epic thread?
>> Herbie !!s1ksehRmCZk
>>252693
You must not have been here for the discussions of Sally Mann, Jock Sturges, or Bill Henson.
>> Anonymous
>>252726

no i wasn't here for that.

so what was /p/'s verdict on naked children photographer Bill Henson?
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
who cares, stop bumping this shite.
>> Anonymous !EOS5Dv76E6
>>252823
I care. Start posting more lolis.
>> Anonymous
>>252814

Jock Sturges is better for fapping.
>> NatureGuy !se3A3TwzdY
     File :-(, x)
god damn it /p/
>> Anonymous
>>252823

sorry about that, i'll make sure not to bump this thread in the future.