>> |
Anonymous
>>183199 Age has nothing to do with a camera being professional or not. It's a stupid marketing term, since amateurs and fuck-ups use them, too, and professionals use lesser bodies, but it denotes a camera meeting a certain standard of reliability and ruggedness, things like interchangeable prisms, etc, and (today) with a full coverage finder.
Age of a camera makes no fucking difference at all, and I wish people would get that out of their heads. This is the first time I've seen someone silly enough to knock a modern film camera for being old, though.
And lastly, again, one is digital, one is film. I strongly prefer digital, I'm going to guess you do, too, other people prefer film. They're not interchangeable, anyway.
|