File :-(, x, )
Thoughts? Anonymous
I dont get enough time to play around, but i'm working on it.
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTLens Size28.00 - 80.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware 1.0.3Owner NameunknownSerial Number1020631437Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:03:14 12:24:21Exposure Time4 secF-Numberf/22.0Exposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/22.0Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length28.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3456Image Height2304RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeTv-PriorityFocus TypeAutoMetering ModePartialSharpnessUnknownSaturationUnknownContrastUnknownShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeManualDrive ModeContinuousFlash ModeOffCompression SettingNormalMacro ModeNormalFlash Bias2.00 EVWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed288Camera Actuations533332159Color Matrix0
>> Jesus !1EQ.kCAg9c
     File :-(, x)
...

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:05:16 18:41:51Exposure Time4 secF-Numberf/22.0Exposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/22.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePartialFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length28.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height667RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
my screen displays 3456x2304

sorry if you live in the stone age
>> Anonymous
Why did you use ISO1600 and 4Sec? it would look much less noiser, if you had used iso less than 400 and a higher Time Value.
And maybe you should use a wider focal length to show a bit more of the area sourrounding, to make the pic a more interesting
and fuck of some dudes like Jesus !1EQ.kCAg9c
>> Anonymous
and by the way, if you look in the upper left corner: You have been filmed ;-)
>> Anonymous
What's the deal with doing long exposures with high ISO?
>> Anonymous
>>183193
What the fuck kind of monitor do you have that displays at that resolution?

You post a shitty picture that everyone has to look at zoomed out and then you act all high and mighty because you have some fantasy computer, you mustn't want genuine criticism if you're being such a wanker.
>> Anonymous
>>183549

wow, what a trolled faggot
>> Anonymous
>>183549

No monitor I know of display's that resolution, not even the 30" Apples (max 2560 x 1600 ) ... He's dribbling shit.

And he'd be dribbling even more shit if he said he had a 65" Plasma that could .. :P

>>183193

If you're going to bullshit, make sure it's plausaible .. btw .. learn to use your camera

>>183196

Exactly ... 200ISO and maybe F5-5.6 @ 2 seconds exposure would have been far better.
>> Anonymous
>>184139No monitor I know of display's that resolution

lol..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WQUXGA
>> Anonymous
>>184305

Yes and i'm not about to believe anything posted in Wikipedia either.

And according to crapipedia .. none of the monitors are in production except for this one.

>However, Eyevis produce a 56" LCD named EYELCD 56 QUAD HD which can deliver 3840x2160.

And those monitors really weren't on sale in a wide scale release.

But I digress. The Monitors do exist, but I doubt the OP actually has one. Then again, this IS the net so he may have a virtual one ... You know .. pretend ... like my pretend Hasselblad :P
>> Anonymous
>>184376

please unplug your computer and throw it down the stairs
>> Anonymous
>>184398
Pretend throw it down the stairs?
>> Anonymous
>>184398

Please An Hero yourself and take your Kodak Disposable with you :P

>>184410

OP is just upset because no-one believes his crap :)
>> Anonymous
woah you live in omaha
>> Ren Kockwell !!y74dwT8WYfm
4s f/22 ISO 1600 ----> 4s f/8 ISO 200
>> sage sage
>>183181
Boring shot of Omaha is boring. If this is all you can get out of our fair city, then you're not trying.