File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
ugh, I've tried to submit this like 5 times, haha. anyways, this is a photoshopped version of a pictures I took a few months ago. which do you better, /p/? this one?
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEASTMAN KODAK COMPANYCamera ModelKODAK DX7630 ZOOM DIGITAL CAMERACamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)39 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution230 dpiVertical Resolution230 dpiImage Created2007:02:10 20:25:10Exposure Time1/45 secF-Numberf/3.4Exposure ProgramPortrait ModeISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/3.4Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length8.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width801Image Height601Exposure Index100RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypePortraitGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
or this one, the original?

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEASTMAN KODAK COMPANYCamera ModelKODAK DX7630 ZOOM DIGITAL CAMERACamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)39 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution230 dpiVertical Resolution230 dpiImage Created2006:09:07 20:45:25Exposure Time1/45 secF-Numberf/3.4Exposure ProgramPortrait ModeISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/3.4Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length8.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width800Image Height600Exposure Index100RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypePortraitGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>> Anonymous
I like the photoshopped version better. I mean, the original is really good, but the photoshopped just grabs my attention a lot more.
>> Herr Doktor
They're both lame.
The guy next to me can do better. By a fucking LOT.
And you know what? He doesn't feel a need to post his proof on 4chan for other /p/tards to look at. He just gets his stuff FRAMED. KTHNX.
Also, digital cameras are for weeaboos.
>> Anonymous
thanks, jackass.

you can go back into your cave now.
>> Anonymous
>>35684
oooh, we got an internet big guy here. but he's not even talking shit by saying he's better, but his buddy is. why the hell are you so hostile when someone posts a photo they took and posts it on the, hold on to your seats here, photography board on 4chan.
>> Anonymous
>>35684
go back to /b/
>> Anonymous
Except there is some truth in the>>35684
flamebait. Shopped version is way too shopped, and the original is bland and uninteresting.

Go slap a red filter on the lens, take a contrasty b&w film, then dip it in a contrast developer, and you'll have a somewhat interesting *photograph*. Because all you have now is a lousy photoshop wank. Playing with levels and channel mixer does not make it cool.

Also, art my ass, but that's another story.
>> Anonymous
>>35704
>>pretentious pretentious blah blah blah

fix'd