>> |
Anonymous
I have a Nikon D40x which I decided to buy instead of the Canon 400D. I have friends with Canon 400D and when we shoot side by side, sometimes their pics look better, sometimes mine are better. It seems to depend more on the photographer than the machine.
They can use a wider range of lenses, I can only use Nikon AF-S or AF-I lenses (lenses with the AF servo inside). For many, that is a deal-breaker. There's only one fast prime that works on the D40/D40x - the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 (~$400)
I tend to have to tweak my settings less to get an equivalent picture. I shoot in A or P mode mostly. The ergonomics on Nikon is more fitting to me. It has Auto ISO as well which comes in handy, I am not sure if the 400D has similar.
Nikon creative lighting system with SB-600 or SB-800 flash is awesome. I have an SB-800 and a couple of SB-600s. My friends say the Canon flash systems aren't as great. This subject however, is quite debatable.
I suggest just trying out Nikon or Canon cameras for yourself and check out which feels better. Nikon is a great choice. If you have some more $$$ check out the upcoming Canon 40D.
|