this won second place in a classical phototography contest. what does /p/ thinkEXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEASTMAN KODAK COMPANYCamera ModelKODAK DX4330 DIGITAL CAMERAMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)38 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiExposure Time1/700 secF-Numberf/4.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramLens Aperturef/4.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeAverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, AutoFocal Length8.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width0Image Height0Exposure Index120RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
I don't want to know how bad the others were. That's what I think.
u srs?
Does OP have proof?
>>285927op herehttp://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=36422&id=638637309
Wow must be horribly low standards if this got second.
1) All entries were horrendous2) The better ones didn't actually win.Conclusion: Shit standards and shit taste. Enjoy your meaningless not-victory.
>>285911wow this shit is awful. how the fuck is this classical photography. you fail.
classical = facebook?How did they procure entries?I didn't mind the trapeze one, the child was probably best though
lol, the unsharp mask is showing
>>285911what was the prize?
>>285961Let's hope it was a photography class.BA-ZING.
no comment on that...