File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Do you guys see a difference?
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTCamera SoftwareQuickTime 7.4.5Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:05:31 14:43:42Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length43.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3456Image Height2304RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)


Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTCamera SoftwareQuickTime 7.4.5Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:05:31 14:38:23Exposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/5.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/5.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3456Image Height2304RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>> eku !8cibvLQ11s
It would be much easier to compare if you could have been still while changing aperture.
>> Anonymous
>>194101
i'm glad you can view EXIF data, sir.
>> sage !i/euDJmWr2
>>194116
he was talking about the fact that you MOVED between the two shots you wanted compared, the framing is different.
>> Anonymous
>>194126
I don't think he moved. He just changed focal length.
>> Anonymous
>>194141
He moved, it seems like it was tilted up and panned right a tad.
>> Anonymous
yeah i moved. my bad about that.
but i guess the point i was trying to make was that these pictures were taken with two different lenses.

one with a canon f/1.8 and the other with the kit lens.

i really don't see a big difference :/
so in conclusion, i phail.
>> Anonymous
>>194175

you dont see a big difference b/c tehyre both at ISO 1600.

Put it down to 200 and try agian.

And yes, you do fail.
>> Anonymous
>>194180

Ha ha ha!
Oh wow. PWNT!
>> Depressed Cheesecake !AetWvVyeS.
The reason you can't see a difference is that you haven't added enough vignetting. In addition your focus is off. I would suggest using the USM to bring your image more into focus.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>194201
Is this better?

i know it's a 0/10.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTCamera SoftwareQuickTime 7.4.5Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:05:31 17:30:23Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length43.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibrated
>> FIXED IT FOR YOU. sage
>>194236
Is this better?

i know it's a 0/10, somtimes I dont know why i bother. i should go back to sucking on my papa's pipe..
>> Anonymous
>>194236
What? No HDR?