>> |
Anonymous
>>165099 >3 FPS, if you mean the lens, see above. I mean "slow" like "unresponsive". After you're used to DSLR operation and focusing speed, R1 is a slowpoke.
>it compares favorably to a D40 and 350D and is better than Olympus SLRs. The sensor is noisier than 350D, slightly better than CCD-based olympus (and I think olympus beat them when they went CMOS). Its only advantage is that it was ZOMG 10MP back when everyone else sported 6 or 8.
>You can use the LCD. LCD sucks even more then the EVF. It's got like half resolution of the viewfinder and totally sucks in sunlight. Barely enough to frame pictures, definitely not enough to check where it focused.
>It's in a different category. It's similar in weight, features, quality and cost to an entry-level DSLR, why can't they be compared?
|