Now I'm torn.http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08091703canon_sx1is_sx10is.asp
I thought cmos was crap, what's the price differential?
toniiight, I'm gonna have myseeelf a real good tiiimeI feel ali-hi-hi-hiiiveAND THE WOOOORLD IS TURNING INSIDE OOOOUT YEAHI'm floating around.. in ecstasy, so:DON'T. STOP. ME. NOW...
>>257009Most of DSLRs use CMOS.The problem with CMOS is that it's less suitable for high-density sensors because the readout circuitry tends to eat too much surface space compared to CCD, but it seems like Canon solved this.
Sample images of both the SX1 and SX10 are up.http://web.canon.jp/imaging/BeBit-e.html
"The Canon PowerShot SX1 IS will be available from December priced at £519.99 / 679.99, and the Canon PowerShot SX10 IS is priced at £359.99 / 469.99."Hmm. 28- 560 mm equiv. I wonder how much that will fuck with distortion and speed.
>>257022Well, Olympus has been doing this for some time and it's not like their superzooms don't sell.
lol are those stereo microphones? great, TWO channels of garbage
>>257088I agree. Just another fucking gimmick. Just give me the RAW meat (Oh I forgot they don't let you have RAW support on their semi's).