>> |
Oemo Systemo
!Jbu1IeSmKM
File :-(, x)
>>292878 Well yes, that shot was a bit underexposed, I used it because it had the worst grain/noise, although since I cranked the blacks it's mostly just showing huge ass grain.
The whole roll was very noisy in the shadow areas, so I have to get rid of all the shadow detail :(
Bottom right of this image shows it better I guess. There is really no information besides noise. The person moved and blured it so the picture isn't much good anyway, but this is what I'm seeing in every single picture.
Pulling in the blacks to get rid of noise or whatever the proper english term is isn't something I mind doing when post processing films like superia 800, but portra 160.
Also, I develop my own film and have the scan software do as little as possible to the image, everything is done in photoshop. PS. pardon for not editing the exif, they're from the same roll though.
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution3200 dpiVertical Resolution3200 dpiImage Created2008:11:13 01:37:16Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width595Image Height910
|