>> |
ac
!!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>293914 >Is it more cost effective to go for full frame and buy non-DX lenses, or the other way around? Define "cost effective". Getting the DX body is going to be a hell of a lot cheaper than springing for an FX body, and DX lenses are cheaper than FX equivalents.
>Are full frame sensors inherently better? Define "better". Better image quality, yeah, and less noise at a given ISO. If you really like telephoto, a DX sensor's crop factor gives you a bit more reach, though.
|