File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Mike Sanchez, AMA Superbike Racer. Taken at Texas World Speedway on 11.11.2006
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBELCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/5.6Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created2006:11:11 22:21:14Exposure Time1/400 secF-Numberf/5.6ISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, AutoFocal Length121.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width750Image Height498RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypePortrait
>> Anonymous
Larger version on my dA:
>> Anonymous
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/42950915/
>> Anonymous
>>49863
Way to be an attention whore, shithead. We don't like your kind around here.
>> OP Anonymous
>>49889

And here I was hoping for some actual critique on my photo, rather than mindless retardisms spouted by some cockless idiot.

Only reason there were two posts before is because I accidentally hit Submit before I pasted the link (for anyone who wanted a higher resolution shot to look at).
>> Anonymous
>>49897
I really like it, too bad my view of it is soiled by 2 flaming retards.
>> slim !yE5LOsLjxQ
this thread makes me want to vomit into my lap.
>> Anonymous
"I accidentally hit Submit before I pasted the link"

3 comments to paste one fucking link? nice way of bumping your own shit, retard. we're not that stupid.


as for the photo, it's very boring and uninteresting.

yay, a bike.. in motion.
nothing special about it
composition absolutely blows cock.

move along
>> Anonymous
it's a typical sports-journalism photo

nothing to see here
>> OP Anonymous
>>49926

Actually, I made the initial post, then realized it was not as high a quality as I had elsewhere, so I attempted to post a link to it in case someone actually had some valuable critique.

I'll admit, I'm new here and had forgotten about how to make a non-bumping post, so piss off with your elitist bull shit.

Does anyone actually have any VALUABLE critique on how to improve, or perhaps on how to make it a better shot?
>> Anonymous
>>49978
yes, stop taking crappy typical pictures of goddamn moving motorbikes

try taking some of em stationed.. that way you have a lot more creative possibilities

i checked out your gallery and all the 'moving' shots are garbage
put more time into considering composition
>> ac
>>49925
Pro Tip: Run to the bathroom first. Use the toilet.

>>49978
Don't do that. If people want a larger version, they'll tell you. Your two mistakes were:
1. Bumping your own thread (twice), which makes you look like an attention whore
2. Posting a DeviantArt link. There's a strong anti-DeviantArt bias around here.

I personally think your shot's quite well done, for what it is. I didn't comment earlier because, well, I find what it is to be pretty boring. But as sports photography goes, it's quite well done.

>>49980
Epic fail. Who the hell wants to look at a picture of a motorcycle just sitting there? Well, besides motorcycle fetishists. The way to take good sports photography is to catch the action.
>> ac
>>49978
Oh, and the way you respond to a thread without bumping is to sage it. Just type 'sage' in the email field (as I'm demonstrating here, since there's not a good reason for me to bump this twice just 'cause I forgot to explain this in the last response)
>> OP Anonymous
>>50014

See, now that was helpful critique.