File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
But shooting Leica involves such a high cerebral activity sometimes that it can be tiring. But I love the challenge and I love touching the camera! And I love the results!

And what I love in a film Leica VS. Digital is that you are allowed only one shot to catch a scene/moment (comparatively to about 5-trizillion digital deletable-on-the-spot shots).
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:05:27 18:20:45Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width769Image Height550
>> Anonymous
>And what I love in a film Leica VS. Digital is that you are allowed only one shot to catch a scene/moment (comparatively to about 5-trizillion digital deletable-on-the-spot shots).

Could you rephrase this?
>> Anonymous
>>58312
I think that he means that when you're using film, you're almost "forced" to think more about your picture before you take it. Exposure-wise, you have less so once you go past 24 or 36, you really have to take into account time to rewind the film and then reload another roll too. Though this is usually a minor drawback, any moment you don't have film loaded, it means you could be missing precious moments. Also, shooting purely film can get pretty expensive, so if you're not thinking carefully about your shots, you're just throwing money down the drain.

In any case, a camera is still a camera. If you're skilled, then it doesn't matter whether you're shooting film or digital. But digital is a convienent option for amateurs on a budget. Lenses cost the same, bodies are a bit more expensive, but you won't have to worry too much about buying film at all. So if you take enough pictures, you'd be essentially saving.