>> |
ac
!!VPzQAxYPAMA
I swear to God, this is /p/'s equivalent of the airplane-on-a-treadmill argument.
>>79106 >>79112 >>79113 There's an enlargement step. If you have an 8x10 print from a full frame sensor and it looks fine, then you crop the physical paper so only the APS-C-sized image in the center is still there, it'll still look fine. But when you enlarge *that* back up to 8x10, it'll look a little blurrier than the original.
(Well, assuming that the original was taken at the edge of handholdability. If you took it at 1/2000th on a 50mm lens, it'll look fine either way.)
|