File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
While there is much needed improvement in this picture (it's rather plain to begin with) I really like this one. What does /p/ think?
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.Camera ModelE-510Camera SoftwareVersion 1.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution314 dpiVertical Resolution314 dpiImage Created2008:07:21 00:17:19Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramCreativeISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceFine WeatherFlashNo Flash, AutoFocal Length14.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3648Image Height2736RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeLandscapeGain ControlNoneContrastHardSaturationHighSharpnessHard
>> Anonymous
It lacks a subject.
>> Anonymous
Not bad....I guess.
>> Anonymous !uz8u2XmvbY
xChan
>> Anonymous
Out of focus.
>> Anonymous
Something small and red, standing in the grass near the camera.
>> Anonymous
>>303797
What?
>> sunshine
>>303792
It's okay. This inspires me to do a vertical pano of the path in some forest, sometime.

>>303797
Huh?
>> Anonymous
>>303793
I agree. But it isn't a bad picture either.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>303792

I don't mean to pry, but that doesn't happen to be up in Algonquin park OP, does it?

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNoritsuCamera ModelS2 Film ScannerCamera SoftwareDigital Lab SystemImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution256 dpiVertical Resolution256 dpiImage Created2007:09:06 11:01:02Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1037Image Height1565
>> Anonymous
>>303844
Nope. I can't remember the name of the park, but it was taken in New Jersey.