>> |
Anonymous
Why do companies always shoot themselves in the ass when it comes to names?
The replacement for the D60 would, logically, be the D70. OH WAIT.
Two generations down, the D80 will be the D100. Hmm, haven't I heard that name before?
The 450D? In ten generations, it would, logically, be the 1000D. Isn't that what we're talking about now?
Why not name it like something like this:
FX pro model: Nikon FX-P[rofessional]-I, II, III, etc. DX pro model: Nikon DX-P[rofessional]-I DX just below pro: Nikon DX-A[dvanced]-I D80 level: Nikon DX-whatever-I Consumer: Nikon DX-B[asic]-I
|