File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
I call it "Gatsby's American Dream"

CC please.
>> Anonymous
>>161452
I don't think anyone who's read the book needs it explained. That's what's blunt.
>> Anonymous
I see what you mean. But does the photo really convey that without the title?
>> lobstercake !pJDFbJZtxk
>>161452

yes i know perfectly well what you're referring to in the title and the image. but what i mean is the title is way obvious; like titling a picture of a sunset "sunset". it's up to you, though. you're the artist.
>> Anonymous
>>161447
>>161448
>>161456
>>161460
Or to put it in another way, you, OP, have McKee's sense for names.
>> Anonymous
>>161460

I see, but if I'm too vague no one will understand it. Forget the title for a moment. How's the photo itself?
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
I like the shot, but dislike the overly pretentious title. I probably wouldn't dislike the overly pretentious title anywhere else, but having it here on /p/ indicates that you need to lurk moar.

Also, PNG for posting pictures like this is fail.
>> Anonymous
i call it pretentious
>> Anonymous
1) Looks like shit.
Too much shooping and color editing.
Bad composition.
Light in front of a bunch of trees ? light at the end of a dock.

2) Just title it "Gatsby" you dumb fuck, or use a more obscure element of the book as reference.