File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
CANON EF 28-90mm F4.0-5.6

Does anyone use this lens and if so would you recommend or not? I am being offered it for about 1/2 the retail price.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
Slow kit lens from the low-end film cameras?

What's the retail price on that? You might want to counteroffer with 1/4th the retail.
>> Anonymous
For all intents and purposes, the 18-55 is a better candidate all around.
>> Anonymous
But I guess for 50$, how can you go wrong?

It's an extra lens to use. Fuck it.
>> Anonymous
I'm not sure why anyone would want it. It's a slow, cheap lens with mediocre optical and poor build quality and a narrow zoom range. It would just be extra weight with little to no use. A better bet would be to get a 50mm prime and use your feet to zoom.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>102968
You could use that $50 to buy gas to drive somewhere really interesting to take pictures using one of the lenses you already own.
>> Anonymous
>>102968
>It's an extra lens to use.
28-90mm zoom range is okay on a film camera, but awkward on a APS-sensor DSLR. And if OP has something less sucky in the same range of focal lengths, chances are he will never use this one.


>Fuck it.
gb2/d/
>> Anonymous
>>102972
This is actually probably the wisest comment thrown up on /p/ today.