File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Does anyone know what camera William Eggleston shot on?
>> Honest So You Dont Have To Be !9UISPtwBPo
Dose it matter?

Any point and shoot could take a photo of a shitty red ceiling and call it art...

am sure you can find plenty of examples over at DA, overrated faggot is overrated
>> Anonymous
>>282439
>Dose it matter?

Yes. The camera a photographer uses is often an important part of their working methods. Besides that, different cameras can produce radically different results, e.g. a 8x10 view camera lends itself to the use of shallow depth of field, whereas a 1/1.8" sensor digicam lends itself to the use of extensive depth of field.

I think it would matter less with Eggleston than with some others, because his images don't have anything extraordinary in their technical aspects except OMG COLOR, or anything in their shooting conditions, but it still counts.

>Any point and shoot

For all we know, he preferred point and shoots and loved the Ricoh GR or the Leica Minilux. Maybe that was personally important to his photographic process.

>could take a photo of a shitty red ceiling and call it art...

Why do you think it's not art? You can have an opinion about it, but of course it's art. It's an attempt to communicate something through aesthetic form. That's art.

>am sure you can find plenty of examples over at DA

You can find plenty of pictures shot in black and white with ultrawide Canon zooms over on DA, too, but that doesn't mean the shits are Jim Nachtwey.

>overrated faggot is overrated

Make your case.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>282469
MY DOCTOR SAID I WOULD HAVE A HEART ATTACK IF I KEPT RAGING GOD DAMMIT 4CHAN

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:09:12 17:39:57Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width300Image Height300