File :-(, x, )
Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
Trolls are going to have a field day with this one.

I gave up on the excessive vignetting and unsharp mask and present ... TEXTURES.

But seriously. Tacky? Lame? Good, if done correctly?
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshPhotographerunknownMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:06:09 23:23:46Exposure Time1/80 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width576Image Height864RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> sage !i/euDJmWr2
hey, I have that shirt.
>> Anonymous
Ohhhh boy. *rubs his hands together in anticipation*

Nah, it's fine but I'd work to improve the gradient between the girl and the background. It's -waaay- too noticeable in my opinion.
>> Anonymous
i hate it
>> Anonymous
Do you study graphic design, DC?
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
>>201853
Aerospace Engineering, actually :p
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
     File :-(, x)
>>201849
Yeah, first attempts. I'm just bored and fucking around. In b4 "A+++++ +FAV WILL VIEW AGAIN", DA, etc.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshPhotographerunknownMaximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:06:09 23:51:42Exposure Time1/100 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width846Image Height553RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
>>201854
then why must you use some much photoshoop?
could maybe look better with a smoother gradient and
a better color. something besides white. its to bright for this. maybe a grey or a yellowy orange to go with the
background
>> Anonymous
>>201863
way to dark

>>201865
was said before>>201863had appeared but the last part still is relavent
>> Anonymous
I'm not even going to dignify this thread with a comment, except for this one right here.
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
>>201865
what white?
>> Anonymous
A+++++ +FAV WILL VIEW AGAIN
>> Anonymous
Cute girl, but way too tacky.
>> Anonymous
photoshop is ruining true photography
>> Anonymous
http://colerise.com/

You might find his stuff very relevant to what you are doing.
>> Anonymous
>>201880
couldn't agree more
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
>>201881
cool stuff, I like it. got any more?

>>201880
probably. I've said before, I probably suck at photography, at photoshop. I've only been at it for a few years and I'm still learning. Fuck, looking back a few months I was still shooting in JPG.
>> Haddock !!xREx2m9lgBs
I lol'd.
>> Anonymous
>>201880
I Agree Whole-heartedly! high five!
>> Meese !iZn5BCIpug
it has so much faggotry it would be unsportsmen like to insult it
>> Anonymous
>>201880

Jesus Christ I agree.
>> Anonymous
>>201845
1/10
>> Anonymous
>>201845
Overprocessed much? On that note:
>>201880
Yes.
>> Anonymous
It's okay, but your old style was better.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
when i looked at it while i was doing this horrible and lazy selection job i didnt think it was as bad as before.
then i looked at it again and decided it was lol.
so i dont know how i feel about that damn gradieng.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:06:09 23:29:26Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width576Image Height864
>> Blackadder !!bSWRwu/NqzQ
I really hope you are just trolling with this, DC.
>> Anonymous
>>201854
>Aerospace Engineering, actually :p

Not surprising at all, because only an Engineering student could fuck up so horribly on something and still think other people might like to look at it.

This is pathetic and embarrassing and, with its horrible overshooping, pointless layering, and faux-HDR look, is in direct opposition to everything that /p/ stands for.

The only troll here is you, DC.
You're purposefully making things to try and enrage the normal users of /p/ because you're a crying fucking baby who's all petulant because your fellow tripfags haven't supported you enough through your trials and tribulations with troll harassment.

This photograph is shit.
No amount of editing that you do will mask that to any but the most rank of amateurs.
>> Anonymous
>>201854


OH FUCK

DC IS BUTTERFLY.


also, EE here.
>> Anonymous
>>201845
reported for trolling

everybody report this so we can get it deleted

if he is going to troll the board then he should get the same treatment as when butterfly trolled
>> Anonymous
>>201863
This would be awesome with the same inky tonality but without the gimmicky texture.

>>201936
Oh, come on, he's just playing around. Results aren't top notch by any means, but artistic experimentation never hurt anyone so long as they wind back down to their strengths when it comes time to.

Oh, and you do know that Koudelka was an aerospace engineering major, right?
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
>>201936
lol more bawwwwwing

I told you fag, I'm just experimenting. I'm not claiming that my stuff is any good. Quit your fucking whining, it's getting tiresome.
>> Anonymous
>>201952

This exact behavior would be considered trolling by anyone else, and Butterfly was temporarily banned for far less obnoxious behavior and far less blatant trolling.

I agree.
Report this shit.
DC needs to take a break from /p/ until he learns how to behave himself.
>> Anonymous
>>201958
How the fuck is this trolling or being obnoxious? He posted some pictures.

And how would you have him behave himself?
>> Anonymous
>>201962

He's posting something he knows will piss off the board.
Instead of trying to correct the things he knows the board hates he's making them worse on purpose.

This is exactly the same thing as people who troll the board by posting shitty things they steal from Deviant Art that they know the board will hate.
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
     File :-(, x)
>>201971
Relax, before you give yourself a hemorrhoid. I've never seen someone get so worked up over /p/

Here, I did this one for you.

If you don't like it, just say so. I'm just trying out something new, fuck.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshPhotographerunknownMaximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:06:10 01:17:13Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width576Image Height864RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
>>201978

Just get a DeviantArt account already.
>> Anonymous
>>201971
So, what, people should only post work in the styles and genres /p/ likes?

Some people on this board dislike his work. Others, including me, like it. Stop talking about "the board" as if it were a monolithic entity.

For instance, I hate hate hate hate the sort of banal, generic model photography a lot of people do whose sole objective is to make a pretty shot of a pretty girl in a typical, inoffensive stlye. I think it's superficial, meaningless, and uncreative. But you don't see me dropping in and flaming their threads, do you? No, other than two or three times I've made a side remark about it, this is the first time I've aired my thoughts on it, and I'd never go into somebody's thread and shit all over them just because it's not my thing.
>> Anonymous
>>201983
> I hate hate hate hate the sort of banal, generic model photography a lot of people do whose sole objective is to make a pretty shot of a pretty girl in a typical, inoffensive stlye

People don't post that here.
When they do they get flamed.

Stop posting as Anon and own up to your trip.
>> Meese !iZn5BCIpug
>>201983
i think you should gb2 /da/
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
>>201988
>>201987
I found a thread you guys might like more

>>200749
>> Anonymous
ITT: Fags.
>> Meese !iZn5BCIpug
>>201993
i found a site you might like www.deviantart.com
>> Anonymous
>>201987
Godfuckingdammit, I'm not DC.

Yes, people do. I'm not going into anything because, again, I'm not going to rag on somebody just because I dislike it.

>>201988
I don't like that sort of thing either, and I don't like what he did with the textures here, but FFS, he's playing around.
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
>>201996
Congratulations.
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
     File :-(, x)
Here's the original, by the way. 100000x better, right?

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshPhotographerunknownMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:06:10 01:35:02Exposure Time1/80 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width576Image Height864RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
>>202004
>100000x better, right?
In the same way surviving a nuclear fallout is better than being killed by the blast?
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
>>202006
+1 for a good sense of humour, finally.
>> Anonymous
>>201944

I concur.
>> Anonymous
>>201944
>>202025
of course you do, you're the same person
>> Anonymous
>>202028

Actually, we aren't.
But thanks for playing.
>> Anonymous
>>202031

>Actually, im not.
But thanks for playing.
>> Anonymous
hey boddy, your skills sucks
go be web designer, quit the cameras
>> Anonymous
is that the same skank again?
>> Rad !!IpQSryGvPPO
>>201971

I have to say, these threads always make me lol. It's like trolls trolling themselves while trying to troll DC.

About the photos, they're interesting but it seems like they have no message or it's unclear. Like the actual photo is saying one thing and the post-processing is saying another thing...if that makes any sense. What I mean is that the post-processing style doesn't suit what the photo is showing.

The second photo is an exception though because it's actually really good. I can get what it's trying to say, I like it a lot. However, I'd try to get a little more detail in the dark area on the bottom right. Still though, really nice composition.
>> Anonymous
>>202004
she has no feets
>> Anonymous
>>201978
>>201845
>>201863

Theyre way too dark man. You cant see any detail on her jumper/jacket. Its pure black.

>>201863

Bottom right corner is black, has no detail.

Try maybe lightening them a bit and I'll probably like them more.
>> beethy !HJGkSBB3Ao
they're all too dark, DC
doesn't really suit the image

i almost thought you were trolling though