File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
http://tech.msn.com/products/slideshowspecials.aspx?cp-documentid=6748435&icid=tg6748435&GT1
=40007

5 best slrs voted by ninemsn and pc world.
i fucking loled.
>> Anonymous
"The EOS 40D shares many capabilities with Canon's $4,500 1D Mark III, including a 3-inch, live-view, 230,000-pixel LCD"

AHAHAHAHAYHAHAHAHAHA
>> Sicko !L3HRY/miC.
1.Olympus EVolt E-510
2.Canon EOS 40D
3.Olympus E3
4.Nikon D300
5.Sony Alpha DSLR-A700

For anyone too lazy to read it.
>> Anonymous
canon beats nikon in the everlasting war.

with a fucking 40d bahahahaa
>> Even_Steven !!rUmVORA7JiP
"The D300 should fare well against its two strongest competitors, Sony's Alpha 700 and Olympus' E3."

LOL, what about Canon
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
Clearly the A700 is the best here and MSN are being paid by the 360 team to slander sony products to make them feel better about being slaughtered by the ps3.
>> MSN = DOUBLE NIGGERS Anonymous
>The E-510 comes equipped with a 2.5-inch LCD viewfinder.
uh, what the fuck

>The EOS 40D shares many capabilities with Canon's $4,500 1D Mark III, including a 3-inch, live-view, 230,000-pixel LCD.
srsly, what the fuck

>The E3's flexibility starts with its bright, 2.5-inch color LCD
give me a break, do you masturbate to LCDs or what

>The Nikon D300 is not a camera to pick up and run with. Its high resolution, exceptional flexibility and excellent exposure accuracy make the effort of working through a longish learning stage worthwhile.
but what about the LCD

>With its sharp, 12-megapixel imaging and with more exposure controls than most photographers will likely ever use, the beefy and finely designed Sony Alpha DSLR-A700 rises to nearly professional-level photography,
where is the LCD msn
you said there would be LCD
>> Anonymous
>>167123
Lol if there where a camera prison, the 40D would be the cheap bitch sleeping with the Sony A700.
>> Anonymous
>>167178
Canon is substantially cheaper.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>167187
>>With its sharp, 12-megapixel imaging and with more exposure controls than most photographers will likely ever use, the beefy and finely designed Sony Alpha DSLR-A700 rises to nearly professional-level photography,
where is the LCD msn
you said there would be LCD

The A700 can conrol more than just shutter speed, aperture and iso? SOMEONE TELL KEN.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
Which just goes to show, non-photographers are incompetent at reviewing photography equipment.

That being said, I'll admit an amused smirk at
>the beefy and finely designed Sony Alpha DSLR-A700 rises to nearly professional-level photography
That's right--their top-of-the-line SLR rises to *nearly* the level of a professional SLR. BURN!

(But yeah, the whole thing is crap and should be totally discounted)
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>167210
the A700 isnt a pro level designed slr anyway, neither is the D300.
>> Anonymous
IS THAT SOME FUKKEN 7D?
>> Anonymous
>>167210


not designed to be pro

designed to be enthusiast.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>167244
i know the anon of this board dont like reading my posts, but just outright re-posting what i said is a little rude ne?
>> Sicko !L3HRY/miC.
>>167273

I'm not so sure. If you tell ac the reward involves a lot of hot, naked women...
>> Anonymous
>>167275
Then he would lose all interest and start talking about his Rebels and long, white lenses. Nah, to get ac interested the reward'd have to be hot, underaged boys.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>167284
While I always enjoy a good ac-mocking--to the point that I sometimes drop my tripcode so I can join in--that particular one doesn't really work. Anyone who's lurked sufficiently knows that I'm very much into the ladies.

I.e., me liking little boys *in addition to* women might work as a burn, maybe, if you've got rhetorical skillz to pull it off, but not that the idea of naked women would hold no appeal for me.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>167273
How is mine less annoying than others?

>>167293
Little brown boys look like little brown girls from the back you know.
>> Anonymous
>>167293
I stand corrected. Let's just leave it that you enjoy womens with long, white lenses (if you know what I mean) then.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>167299
>Little brown boys look like little brown girls from the back you know.
Hells yeah they do.
>> Anonymous
>>167275
Then maybe. Make the reward a Leica + Noctilux + Hasselblad and he'll win for sure.
>> Anonymous
tech.msn is clearly trolling /p/ and should be B& from the internets.
>> heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA
>>167267
>i know the anon of this board dont like reading my posts, but just outright re-posting what i said is a little rude ne?
>just outright re-posting what i said is a little rude ne?
>is a little rude ne?
>rude ne?
>ne?

Fucking fails for weeaboo faggotry. C'mon.
>> Anonymous
>>167401
??????
>> Anonymous
>>167486
Yes, that is so.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>167401
Im aka Angry Weaboo in #o-chan, why do i have to stop here deska?

heavyweather kowai neee!
>> Anonymous
>>167549
you mean kawaii, right? or are you referring to his photography style?
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>167555
i mean kowai, baka!
>> ????? !SHjzCSZsqE
:I
>> Jesus !1EQ.kCAg9c
>>167557
Butterfly-san wa waruidesuyo!
>> Anonymous
>>167593
??????
>> sage Anonymous
Knock it the fuck off you retards. This has gotten old.
>> Anonymous
>>167600
??????
>> Anonymous
Desu desu!
????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ???? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ??? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ??? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ???? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ?? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ?????