File :-(, x, )
Toob Light GrammarNaziChan !!kae1NL+So5x
Does /p/ approve of my minute DOF?

Its a tube light. Macro-tized.
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.Camera ModelE-500Camera SoftwareVersion 1.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationRight-Hand, TopHorizontal Resolution314 dpiVertical Resolution314 dpiImage Created2007:11:05 01:23:07Exposure Time1/15 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length0.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3264Image Height2448RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessSoftCompression SettingSHQMacro ModeNormal
>> Anonymous
delicious borkeh
>> Anonymous
actually would prefer this with more DOF.. the shallow DOF does nothing to add to this picture, and actually makes it kind of confusing.

Also, OMFG BORKEH
>> Anonymous
well fuck....

I have no idea what borkeh means. (I'm new to /p/)
>> GrammarNaziChan !!kae1NL+So5x
>>209939

Also, I forgot to put my name back in. That was I.
>> Anonymous
>>209939
>>209941

Borkeh = /p/ meme.. misspelling of bokeh (the DOF blur effect)

I actually like the colors, and the DOF make it more abstract than if it were all in focus, but i think you are so zoomed in on it, that it would have been abstract enough while fully in focus.

Also, welcome to /p/. Remember to resize your images for this board to 1000pixels on the long side.
>> GrammarNaziChan !!kae1NL+So5x
>>209943

Hey, thanks. You folks are much more civilized than /b/. I wish it had stayed dead.

I came from /hr/ mostly, so that would explain the huge file. I'll resize next time. :]
>> Anonymous
It looks like a dildo trapped in jello.
>> GrammarNaziChan !!kae1NL+So5x
Maybe we can disregard my "civilized" comment....
>> Pentard !pjwjmEQ1RM
>ƒ0.0

Wat?
Also I like narrow DOF as much as the next guy, but it would have been nicer to see what was going on here.

This kind of reminds me of those weird color field segments of Punch Drunk Love.
>> Liska !!LIVFOETqL8j
>>209933

I actually really like this. I would crop a bit off the top, and possible off the right hand side, but aside from that. um. saved ;)

>>209952
Just don't post in .PNG, and you're fairly safe. /p/ is odd- except the odd comments. I posted a girl with a flower behind her back and was told it reminded them of goatse. Just ignore it.
>> Sicko !L3HRY/miC.
     File :-(, x)
Minute DOF you say? Pic related.

Almost makes yours abstract and that is rather nice borkeh.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX K100DCamera SoftwareGIMP 2.4.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern564Focal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:06:18 20:34:55Exposure Time0.7 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length0.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeDistant View
>> Anonymous
>>209956

also needs moar DOF.. i dunno what i'm looking at, and it makes me not want to look at it but for just a second.

would keep my eye in the frame if more were in focus
>> GrammarNaziChan !!kae1NL+So5x
>>209956

I, for one, dig this.
>> Sicko !L3HRY/miC.
>>209958

I think that's actually the most DOF I can get with that lens combo (reversed 50 on a 135), it's a moth in case you're interested.

I froze it to kill it which I assume is the reason for the water droplets on the eye.

Hard to find an angle which showed both an eye and the proboscis in enough focus.
>> Anonymous
>>209988

ah makes sense..yeah you pretty much have to photograph flat stuff when you do the 2 lens trick.

thought about getting a macro lens?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
washing line :/
>> Anonymous
>>210054
You wash clothes on that thing? I've only been drying them there! Oh how I've wasted my life thus far!!
>> Anonymous
>>210054
sorry about the lack of exif its off my flickr I think I deleted the original
>> Anonymous
>>210054
white balance looks off on this one, which isnt awful it just doesnt aid this picture having a blueish clothes line thing
>> Anonymous
>>209945
>>209950
lolz

>>210054
makes my head hurt
>> Anonymous
Unless you are a scientist, macro lens are gimmicks. All these photos suck, they are boring and lack any semblance of originality.
>> okto !.ZlrOYZhsk
>>210384
ITT: Unfounded sweeping generalizations.
There are some people that do magic with macro lenses.
0/10