File :-(, x, )
Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
MIND
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelDSLR-A100Camera SoftwarePicasa 3.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationUnknownHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:04:19 11:37:46White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time1/800 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Brightness6.5 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width685Image Height1024RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalUnique Image ID0fa739e11184de61937566577b8f57b7
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
     File :-(, x)
=

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelDSLR-A100Camera SoftwarePicasa 3.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationUnknownHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:04:19 11:38:15White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Brightness7 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width685Image Height1024RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalUnique Image ID51518065026c645af79b912f0731f861
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
     File :-(, x)
BLOWN

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelDSLR-A100Camera SoftwarePicasa 3.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationUnknownHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:04:19 18:38:30White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/5.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Brightness5.5 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width685Image Height1024RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalUnique Image IDea9736f4a5954d016f3018c0d14052b7
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
Not that they're amazing or anything, everyone expects more photos out of me for some reason.

I prefer the ones i took in japan (also lol instant art and someone please PS those lights out)
>> Anonymous
>>164711
This is good. I don't get the other two. As of now, I think they suck, but for some reason I get the feeling there's something I'm just not getting.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
Oh also i think these are all taken with my "new" 1.5x TC, which is a 2 element job, no chip (no new exif etc) and is very blury wide open on my 50/1.7 (which is normally very sharp, even wide open)
>> Anonymous
The first two are horribly meh, not as poignant as I think you thought we'd think they'd be. The last is nice though.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
Holy shit, Butterfly actually posting pictures.>>164709
I like this one.

The other two, meh.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)


Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:04:19 18:40:33Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width685Image Height1024
>> Anonymous
>>164718
ac, you have the worst eye I have ever seen in a human being. you always like the pictures everyone else knows aren't as good. wtf
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>164721
Not *always*. There are a lot of threads where I mention that one particular one is my favorite and three or four other people chime in agreeing. Granted, that's balanced with the threads where I say I like something and then have to spend the rest of the day arguing with someone who assumes that I can't *possibly* actually like it and that I must just be saying it because I enjoy sucking tripfag dick.

That can't be the case for this particular thread, though, since I hate Butterfly and hope she dies in a fire.
>> Anonymous
>>164719
It's better with the lights, for what it's worth.

Also, idiosyncratic taste is good. At the very least, grant ac he actually looks at the content and composition of photographs, which is more than can be said for most people.
>> Anonymous
>>164729
i like it more without the lights personally but i only did it because she was apparently to lazy to do it herself..
>> Blackadder !!bSWRwu/NqzQ
>>164709

I prefer that one to the first shot. The background is more interesting as the tags are more obvious as well as the writing. I get a sense of the large numbers of them more.
>> Anonymous
The area with the tags tree would have been the perfect place to use a fish-eye lens, seriously.
>> Anonymous
should of bought a nikon
>> Anonymous
holy shit, i just shot one of those, wishing tree things the other day, i forget there actual name.
>> ANTMY
holy shit, i just shot one of those, wishing tree things the other day, i forget there actual name...
>> heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA
>>164709
I like the idea, but despite the shallow depth of field, somehow the background is still working against you. Also, the tones are super muddy. Why is everything that flat, boring gray?
>> EvenSteven !!RBDL+S5h60X
ITT: Buttertrap shows he is a huge failure at life. Kill yourself.
>> sage !i/euDJmWr2
>>164875
You're one to talk, b'w-out-the-window picture man. Or "low contrast is good for b/w"

Not trying to be mean, just saying...mellow out a bit, you're coming off as rabid and annoying lately.
>> heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA
>>164875
Just because you're posting under an alias on a largely anonymous internet board doesn't excuse the level of asshattery you're displaying. Say something useful, dick.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>164889
EvenSteven accidentally posted his name/trip in the subject line instead of the name field. So this guy's actively trying to destroy the guy's reputation.

I.e., the asshattery is its own goal.
>> sage !i/euDJmWr2
>>164896
Oh, guess he did then. Didn't notice that when I was looking at that thread earlier...

No hard feelings towards the real tripfag except "delete thread stupid"
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>164900
Yeah, I've been reporting 'em all. Which probably doesn't actually help anything, but it makes me feel better in a grade-school tattletale sort of way.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
And based on the various disappearing posts, a Janitor has noticed. Hopefully said Janitor will get a mod in here to actually ban the asshole...
>> heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA
>>164910
Now I feel like a dick, haha. Good to know, I guess. Poor dude.

IDENTITY THEFT IS A REAL AND PRESENT DANGER
>> Anonymous
bump for photothread
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>164873
Because liverpool is flat boring and grey.

Im not sure about the removal of the lights either, but all i have is Picasa not PS so I didnt have anything to remove it with.

Thanks for the comments.
>> Anonymous
>>165137
So shoot flatness, boringness, and greyness.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>165213
I thought thats what i'd done.
>> Anonymous
Wow! Butterfly posted photos?
How utterly unsurprising that they suck ass.

To be fair, they're better than I thought they would be.
The first two are an interesting subject but pretty poorly composed. The background is too cluttered and despite being OOF the background tags compete with the foreground tags.

The third image is pretty solid composition-wise, but just not very interesting. I could see this being turned in for a college course project on "geometric shapes" or somesuch.
>> beethy !HJGkSBB3Ao
really boring