>> |
Anonymous
>>150394 To recapitulate ac's post from my point of view:
>The FACT of dust in dslrs. >The problems of hot pixels and the manufacturers stand point them.
These two are kinda hilarious, to be honest. Because film would always have some dust on it, and I doubt a single roll ever left the factory with no flaws in however many bit of silver equal a pixel. Except now, correcting it is easy.
>Top display or no top display.
Nothing to add here, really. I prefer a top display for the discreet, quick-glance ability, but I wouldn't be pissed it they dropped it.
Actually, the ideal top LCD display would be a small little thing, with five values: aperture, shutter speed, iso, a meter reading (just as text, the reading, like "+2," to save space), and... the distance the lens if focused at at that moment, since lens barrels can be hard to read in low light.
|