File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM

I'm getting this one in a couple of days.

What are /p/'s thoughts on it?
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
Fapfapfapfapfapfapfapfap
>> Anonymous
Treat her well.
>> pskaught
I'm going to rob you.
>> Anonymous
Oh, cool.

I suppose those comments mean positive things.
>> Lynx !!KY+lVSl0s2m
I'm going to beat you with a sock full of oranges.
>> Anonymous
sock of oranges? I'd use a pillowcase full of doorknobs.
>> freak !!BgvYtRzHZrf
     File :-(, x)
>>106982

Phone books Bubbles. Old Police Trick. Won't Leave a mark
>> Anonymous
Great.
>> Anonymous
Not as great as my Leica 50mm f/1. srsly
>> Anonymous
I'm jealous, but since I suck at photography and have yet to get one shot I love, I suppose it doesn't matter what I have.
>> Lynx !!KY+lVSl0s2m
     File :-(, x)
toki get?
>> Anonymous
I know Anon, Leica's fucking awesome, but I can't afford the 1 one. It's extremely fucking expensive. Must be nice to have (if you really have it indeed).
>> Anonymous
>>107003

he doesn't. i would say that the number of photographers willing to spend 5 grand on a niche lens for a niche camera fall firmly into the 99.9999th percentile, which excludes 4chan.
>> Anonymous
I don't get why these aren't cheaper. Back in the 70's, even the shittiest companies like Vivitar offered a 55/1.2. Now Canon is the only one who moved to AF. Nikon/Pentax/Konica/Minolta/Leica (lol), whyyyyy?
>> Anonymous
>>107010

cuz back in the seventies (from what i've read, since i was born in 85 and didn't take an active interest in photography until 96), photographers measured their dicks with f-numbers. in the eighties, it was autofocus speed, in the nineties it was framerate and metering, in the aughts it's megapixels and signal/noise ratio.
>> Anonymous
>>107011

Golden post.
>> pskaught
>>107011
I agree with this shit, this little kid is wise beyond his years.
>> Anonymous
>>107018

i'm about a semester away from grad school, so i'm not exactly a little kid anymore, but i appreciate the thought.

but if i'm 22 and a little kid, how the hell old are you, pskaught? part of your intimidation for me has always been that you look like some 23 year-old wunderkind. plz to tell me you 31 year oldz.
>> I'm 21 actually. pscaught
>>107024
21.
>> pskaught
>>107024
ist bin ien shiez wunderkint!!!!!!!!!!11111ONE
24

I wish I knew another language. anyway, who is this pscaught loser?
>> fence !!POey2hdozCZ
>>107029

i don't know, but i fell for it originally and wrote this long, embarrassing post. thnks2god for "delete post".

but yeah, 24 sounds about right. you're a fucker; i better get my ass in gear.

also, tripcode for 2008 bitches!! it's about time, really.
>> its "##" right? pskaught !!qifqbrqZZKu
>>107035
wait, do what?

anyway, I think my this fake /p/ fame will thrust me into tripfag status.

anyway isn't this thread about how great canon primes are?
>> fence !!POey2hdozCZ
>>107036

that was back in 2007.
>> pskaught !!qifqbrqZZKu
>>107037
oh shi-
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>107036
>anyway, I think my this fake /p/ fame will thrust me into tripfag status.
ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF US!
>> pscaught !!qifqbrqZZcu
Sorry guys. Didn't mean to confuse you so bad.
>> pskaught !!qifqbrqZZKu
     File :-(, x)
oh man, I am AC aren't I? well thats okay. this picture is pretty badass.
>> Anonymous
>>107044
No I am ac!
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>107050
No, I'm AC and so's my wife!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>107044
>>107050
>>107053
You all suck, I'm AC.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>107061

No, I am.
>> Anonyfag of Borneo !bHymOqU5YY
     File :-(, x)
>>107044
>>107050
>>107053
>>107061
>>107062
Fuck you all, I popularised AC!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Bitches. I'm both ac and dc.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution90 dpiVertical Resolution90 dpiImage Created2007:08:03 11:26:35Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width500Image Height500
>> Anonymous
>>106943

1 599,95 €


oh my god


why
>> Anonymous
>>106943
Would you not get the 1.4 50mm and put the extra cash towards something like a 24-70L? I know the bokeh is slightly better, but seriously the difference in price doesn't match the difference in quality.
>> Anonymous
>>107070
You can get it for around 1100 € if you look around, but still, that half stop of aperture is fukken overpriced.
>> Anonymous
>>107073

Price of a fucking car.


For sure you wont use that lens to shot porn.
>> Anonymous !SDPEsPMnww
>>107077
how do i shot porn

lol, i dunno
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>107077
>For sure you wont use that lens to shot porn.
Why not? Fast apertures are great for porn. Most girls don't want to go outside for a dirty nekkid photoshoot.

(Although, if all goes according to plan, I'm going to be doing a porn shoot outside next time I fly down to Missouri. In February. Yay goosebumps)
>> sage
>>107099


well use moar lights when you shoot with a regular lens or some shit like that. Anyway you will end up resizing down the pics.

Also when you will have done the shots, pic or didn't happen ok?
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>107150
Girl's flaky, and it *will* be mid-February, so it's extremely likely that it won't happen. But she's also a bit of an exhibitionist (hence the outdoor shots) so there's a chance she'll let me post something here. No promises, though.
>> Anonymous
OP here:

I liked the Golden post.
>> Anonymous
A friend of mine shoots with an 85 1.2, and man, that shits fuckin nuts...