File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Remember back in the day when we wanted to do /p/rojekt flickr?
I've got a better idea. Though it has one small catch

We need someone who is unbiased in their view of pictures, and has no loyalties to tripfags. you will see why in a bit.

Instead of making a fake persona that requires organization, I say lets use 4chan for what its best at, being anonymous and random.
I propose a "Hall of Shame"
Someone takes all the mediocre to bad, trollable, vignette dog, USM to the max type shots (Though nothing too obvious / bad), And strips them of EXIF and uploads them to a flickr page after a couple months.
We can give this profile a cute female persona aswell, therefore trolling the flickr users at the same time.

No names would be mentioned, most people would forget who posted the picture originally, so its your own little personal hall of shame if you see your shot in there. And the comments from other flickr users would add some spice to this situation.

What say you? Can it be done? Who could be a judge?
>> Anonymous
Sounds funny...
>> Anonymous
>>266686
it died out, we had a few potentials but, it was kind of a lazy group effort. No-one sent enough pictures, and we didn't have enough direction to really do it properly.
>> Project !dashI8UpO.
>We need someone who is unbiased in their view of pictures

This is going to be shit hard. I was going to suggest people would simply nominate a photo to be added and if enough people nominate the same photo, it gets added but that'll be impossible since everyone's anon and I'm sure no one wants to give that power to just tripfags.
>> Anonymous
>>266691
no voting, Once someone is appointed they have to be secretive. otherwise people will start needlessly voting for all beethy's pics or AC's pics to be put on there.
>> Anonymous
>>266683
Oh, like a monthly "Here's /p/'s fail from the last month" thing?

Don't know what bash.org is, and it's down now.

The issues of subjectivity and the simple fact people form positive-negative judgments still stand, and I'm not so sure about the premise that certain heavy stylistic things automatically make a photo fail. I like straight black and white with a normal lens and lots of depth of field for my own stuff, very simple, very content and composition oriented. But that doesn't mean a shot taken with that new 21/1.4 wide open with the corners burned, lots of sharpening and saturation, etc. would be bad or not to my liking. /P/ just looks at the superficial aspect of pictures, notice the bashers never point out what they do like. Tripfags post good work and bad work, but they never attack the actual substance or creativity of the work. Just pick a few talking points about whoever's style and repeat them ad nauseum.
>> $19.99 !OSYhGye6hY
I think this would be a good idea. At the very least it would be pretty interesting to look at.

Why don't you do it, op?
>> Anonymous
>>266707
>Because OP is really a tripfag who is masquerading as anonymous to work his hidden agenda

Soulr?
>> Syphilis !SC5mMmABng
....it settles it, we need WT Snacks, here, now
>> Anonymous
>>266732
guess again! OR maybe I'm just saying that?
>> Anonymous
>>266738
I'm pretty sure you're either Soulr or Vincent.
>> Anonymous
>>266742
guess again! OR maybe I'm just saying that?
>> Anonymous
potential lulz to be had...
>> Anonymous
what happened to that thread where people were posting old classic photos to see what criticism they were going to get from the modern Rebel owners on flickr?
>> Anonymous
Could /p/ make images specifically FOR this Flickr group?

I think it'd be fun to try to make images that showed the worst photographic gaffes and then put them all in one Flickr to try to see how many ###BEST PHOTO### PLEASE JOIN MY GROUP comments we got.

HDRs of cats and all that shit.
>> Project !dashI8UpO.
>>266831
Trolling flickr with poor composition and overdone HDR is like pissing in an ocean of piss.
>> Anonymous
>>266837

i think Project is the latest faggot in /p/ and i agree with his post
>> Anonymous
Just ask ac to do it, he spends more than a reasonable amount of time on the internet, and he looks/comments on almost all photo threads.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>266854
Yeah, but I don't give a good goddamn about this faggotry. "Oh, look at us, we're so awesome because other people like these photos that we think are crap." Generally from people who wouldn't know a great photo if Ansel Adams smeared them with silver halide and developed it right on their chest. Fucking get over yourselves.