>> |
Anonymous
>>232694 >2 times the weight, 2 times continious shooting speed, 3 times battery life and a host of other small features like dual CF cards on the D3 =/= "being equal". If you're gonna compare E-3 to a full-frame camera, pick D700.
I was referring to the sensor, not the body when I wrote that bit. "All other things being equal" = the quality of the design and the level of its technology, and how many pixels you cram onto it.
>1.5 stops or more. If you're mostly using ISO 100-400, it doesn't matter, but at ISO 800+ it may be a matter of life and death.
Noise doesn't really matter. There has never been a genuinely great photo ruined by noise or grain, and there's certainly never been a photograph good because it's free of noise.
And they're all cleaner than Delta 3200 or whatever.
>>232687 >...and all your lenses become un-1.5x'd.
Which doesn't really matter much unless you're trying to go really, really wide.
>>232691 >Go back to your exalted point and shoots.
Where did I say anything about point and shoots? I'm talking sensors from (inclusive) 18x13.5mm to 36x24mm. There's two point and shoots in that range- one old Sony bridge camera with an APS-C size sensor and the Sigma DP-1.
|