was up /p/
too bad the glass was dirty as fuck
3.26 and 2.93mb for pictures thare are 1000ishx700ish? no thanks. png is fail for sharing photos.
>>50739dont open them then, not my loss
>>50740I think his point was if you wanted a critique, then shrinking them is the way to go. No one's going to wait for a huge file to load
>>50741and even if critique wasnt what you were looking for, then whats the point in sharing if no one's going to look past the thumbnails
I think the point is, I like .png, and now matter how much /p/ whines about it, it's what I'll use.
Not quite steady enough with the telephoto zoom all the way out to 300. Would've been fine if the little kids would've stopped kicking the banister I was leaning on/the sun would come outall of these taken at the henry doorly zoo in Omaha NE
>>50743Faggot. Get the fuck out.
>>50743Could you at least namefag it up, please, so those of us who don't particularly want to rape 4chan's bandwidth for absolutely no reason will learn to avoid your threads?I'd appreciate it.
PNG is about as useful for photographs as GIF, which is what it was meant to replace; that is, not very useful.
look he just wants to share his pictures in lossless format so you can see ever bit of how mediocre they are