Hey /p/. This is a photo I took of my sister when we were on vacation. I didn't really think about what I was shooting - I just wandered by and took a picture of what she was doing. And it turned out, to me, to be a great shot. What does /p/ think?EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEASTMAN KODAK COMPANYCamera ModelKODAK CX7330 ZOOM DIGITAL CAMERAMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)37 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution230 dpiVertical Resolution230 dpiExposure Time1/180 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramLens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, AutoFocal Length5.60 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2032Image Height1524Exposure Index100RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
Sometimes there can be happy accidents. Most of the time, though, random "I was just walkin' by" shots turn out like shit. I fear this might be the latter.
It's good for a random holiday shoot.
When did she have her lower legs amputated?Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEASTMAN KODAK COMPANYCamera ModelKODAK CX7330 ZOOM DIGITAL CAMERACamera SoftwarePaint Shop Pro Photo 11.20Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.7Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:04:22 21:36:48Exposure Time1/180 secLens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo FlashFocal Length5.60 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1203Image Height964
>>42606It's called an overhead shot, you idiot.
>>42606...as opposed to her upper legs?
I don't believe it.There's a thread about someone's sister on 4chan, and we're... discussing it platonically...!?
>>42701she is cutie.
>>42606I really like the texture of the sand here.-random non-photographer
>>42701In my experience, retardedness is directly proportional to board traffic.
>>42701I DONT HABEEB IT
>>42841Hey now, somebody could be referring to the way in which the photographer captured light in the sand. :P
Bah, you pedos, I should have known better. ;)
too big
>>42701If it had been posted on /b/, then yes, it would be quite odd, or ironic. But this IS /p/! *boot*