File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
what say you...
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 40DMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:08:17 01:34:51Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePartialFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length130.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
Why so sad, sad girl?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
not sad: real question... why so srs?

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 40DMaximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:08:17 01:27:59Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePartialFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length70.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
The color and clarity rock, but i think you could have done more with the sunset in the background.
>> Anonymous
>>236985

op here, i agree, i agree. i guess i just didn't feel like getting out a wider lens.
>> Anonymous
DC?
>> grant
polarizer would have helped the second one a bit. hella noise when enlarged. what was the MP, or the film ASA?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
thank god for photoshop's new "beer goggles" filter.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 40DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:08:17 02:05:59Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePartialFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length130.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1000Image Height750RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> beethy !CESB7V1aLA
>>237079
I wouldnt hit either of those ugly bitches.
>> Anonymous
>>237083
Not enough cock for you?
>> beethy !vW/UaE6zYU
>>237079
fuck i lol'd
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
Outfit and setting make me expect a happy and sunny disposition, but her face is all like "Grr, quit taking pictures of me". Kinda ruins it for me.

So.. Good picture other than the model fail.

(Though I think she'd be attractive if she weren't so grumpy looking)
>> Anonymous
insanely boring poses
awkward cropping
fat model
>> Anonymous
>>238428

cancer killing /p/. an unattractive model does not make a bad photograph.. it makes a bad COMMERCIAL PHOTO.

i hate you faggots who think that every picture should look like it's fashion photography.. ever notice that most of the great portrait photographers dont have attractive people in their photos?

oh wait, no you wouldn't have because you're too busy looking at pictures in some magazine advertisement by some fag who gets paid to make his shit look commercial when on the side he's probably doing REAL art.

FUCK i hate you kids who pick up a Rebel and think you know shit.
>> Anonymous
>>238434

that said, i do think the juxtaposition of the bike and beach w/ the intense look make it a little weird.

also looks like she has a weird claw hand with 4 fingers and no thumb.

could crop a little of the bottom and left as well.

you're still a faggot for thinking pictures need to have attractive models though.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>238434

well put

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 40DMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:08:17 09:25:05Exposure Time1/25 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
i think its obvious shes not a commercial model, so why are people posting with such high expectations. 8/10. she serves her purpose as a subject, the bike is nice, and the photos are all around decent.
>> Anonymous
>>238441

every time someone posts something where the person isnt attractive, people say bad photo.

I say let them think that, and let them never have good photos of interesting people. Those who realize that imperfection is more interesting to look at have the one-up on them and are more likely to be recognized for their photography. Attractive models are easy-mode.
>> Anonymous
>>238443
>>238441
>>238438
>>238434

1) insanely boring poses
2) awkward cropping

those alone kill the photo

the fact that he used a 3) fat model
just ices the cake
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
i messed with your picture, she was to dark for me...

less tight cop would make this 1000 better.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:08:19 12:57:29Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width667Image Height1000
>> Anonymous
>>238446

1.) insanely boring posts
2.) awkward insults

this alone is causing the cancer.

the fact that you are 3.) most likely a fat, lonely photographer just ices the cake
>> Anonymous
>>238450

haha oh wow, i lol'd
>> noclue !!2yUmAID3520
>>238443
that's the point.
>> Anonymous
>>236982
this is almost a nice shot. What would have been nice is fill flash so the skin tone would come out more natural, and so that she didn't look like she had panda eyes. I little less crop (you didn't need a wider lens - you needed to take a step back) at the bottom would balance things. There a nice diagonal component that makes it interesting