>> |
reinfected
!DwFBXiCxVI
>>284419 Assuming this is not the OP...
Dude just stop. You sound like this person filling in for my photo teacher who obviously didn't know what the fuck she was talking about. A person took a picture of a pumpkin stem really up close. To where the picture was just green. The teacher went on saying "THIS IS INTERESTING IMAGERY" when the shit had no subject and I could have made it in paint by just filling the entire screen green.
Anyways, to my point. This photo is not good for many reasons. One being that I already know the setting, on the OPs deck and the position of the camera is in a rather boring perspective on said subject, almost top down.
The subject has potential to be interesting but the way this is shot it certainly isn't. If he were to be up close and were to position the rail so it leads down the photograph with the caterpillar up close, yeah we'd be having a different story. That example setup might fail but hey, it'd be better than this.
Now, if you are OP: Art is subjective. People are going to shit all over your work. get used to it. It's when people say your work is shit and suggest ways to improve it that really help you over all. Coming on this forum and posting the first shot you took with your brand new camera is obviously not going to yield great comments.
Learn the basic rules of photography (rules of thirds etc.) how to use the camera, great photos that changed photography, and then come back to us.
|