File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Decided to play a little with long exposures and b&w
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTiImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:03:27 22:23:49Exposure Time10 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeAverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length44.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3888Image Height2592RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Unfortunately that's the only one that came out close to decent. and it's still pretty meh. =/


You win some you lose some I guess. Any tips for these kinds of shots?

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTiImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:03:27 21:56:48Exposure Time30 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeAverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3888Image Height2592RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> hal9000 !a4fa8BKGtQ
>>149372
I'm sure the in frame light source isn't helping.
>> Anonymous
Going to long exposures-ville?

get a ND filter
>> hal9000 !a4fa8BKGtQ
ND FILTERS!!!!!!!!!!!!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>149375
definately not, it's a streetlamp that I thought I had gotten out of the shot but apparently hadn't. Bad composition on my part due to laziness and inability to see well in the viewfinder.

>>149376
I'd certainly like to.

Have a badly composed, poorly focused and generally crap photo of my legs.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTiImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:03:27 22:34:13Exposure Time5 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeAverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length25.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3888Image Height2592RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
>>149384

>I'd certainly like to.

DO IT FAGGOT
>> hal9000 !a4fa8BKGtQ
>>149397
ND filters cost moneys, duder.
>> Anonymous
>>149406
exactly. and I'm but a wee unemployed lass.
>> hal9000 !a4fa8BKGtQ
>>149411
You just implied that you are a female on the internet. With a functional camera.

You are in danger.
>> Anonymous
>>149411
PICTURES RIGHT FUCKING NOW
>> Anonymous
>>149478
THIS
>> Anonymous
>>149384
On any other board on the internet, I would be 99% sure that those are female legs. However, on 4chan, that percentage is far less due to the things I've seen on this board. Also, no women on the Internets.