File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Methinks it's time for some HDR.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
http://www.myspace.com/thebuttholeexperiment
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
WTF is this shit?
>> Anonymous
OH GOD MAKE IT STOP
>> Anonymous
This shit is just surreal. I don't know, I can't really even see them as photographs, but they are definitely something. Interesting.
>> Anonymous
SORT OF WANT
>> Anonymous
At some point it stops being photography and becomes art. Which cool in its own right.
>> Anonymous
>>69708
Because photography isn't art right?
>> heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA
>>69688
This one is awesome, looks like a painting.
>> pskaught
I like them all, what do i use to do this?
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
You are doing it right.
>> Anonymous
wait ...what...ppl seriously like this?

Anyone that likes this HDR "talent with a mouse click" shit is a fucking moron and needs to re-asses their entire understanding of photography. God, it looks like a render from any bloom ridden game.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Macheath !8b4g0BkNZg
>>69709
What about photography of art?
>> Anonymous
noisy picture is noisy.
>> Anonymous
I risk being beaten with murdersticks, but I like the most shopped ones. The subjects and processing makes them look like 19th century landscape paintings.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Just took this today.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2007:08:18 00:00:33F-Numberf/8.0ISO Speed Rating400Focal Length10.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1059Image Height726
>> Anonymous
>>69728
Anyone that likes this complaining on the internet "brains with a mouse click" shit is a fucking moron and needs to re-asses their entire understanding of conversation.
>> Anonymous
most of these don't even look like hdr, more like blur for halos + saturation up the wazoo
>> Anonymous
I can most definitely say mine (the last one uploaded) is in fact HDR.
>> Anonymous
>>69696
>>69695
>>69689
>>69685

fucking amazing stuff ;]
>> Anonymous
>>69754
Good for you.
>> Anonymous
pieface?
>> Anonymous
OP here. Why did the first responses (negative comments) get deleted?

If you're curious about location(s)/technique(s), just ask.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Sorry, these are just hideous. A couple of them maybe might have some merit in the deepest corners of photomanipulation category on devart or whatever hippy site for photoshop-happy teenagers, but this is as much photography as the picture to the left.

See, I also took a photo, pushed butans to make it look "cool", and the result:

digital image - yes
aesthetic and pleasing - not really
photograph - HELL NO

4chan needs a 2d images board or something, possibly merged with /ic/. But until then, kindly please stop littering /p/hotography board with your non-photographs. With whatever argumentation I saw so far, you could also argue all pictures posted in /ic/ that were traced from photos would also belong in /p/. They don't. Neither do those abuses of this otherwise clever technique.
>> Anonymous
>>69810
Photomanipulations, no matter how much they've been modified, still originate from photographs. It IS photography, whether you like the picture or not. The scene is shot with a camera. The editing medium is irrelevant.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>69835
Thanks for proving my point.

The right picture originates from a photograph, therefore it's a photograph too. The scene was shot with a camera. The editing medium is irrelevant.
>> Anonymous
>>69810
signed
>> Anonymous
>>69810

>>69835

where is your god now
>> Anonymous
>>69838


oh shi- there he is
>> heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA
>>69838
No, dumbass. It's an illustration, with a photograph used for reference. Huge, massive facepalm...
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>69853

ARE WE THERE YET

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:08:18 22:38:26Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width238Image Height320
>> heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA
>>69857
NOW THAT'S WHAT I CALL A FUCKING PHOTO

SOMEONE GET MAGNUM ON THE PHONE
>> anon
DA at its finest
>> Anonymous
I think they're kinda cool myself!
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>69859
I dunno, man. I could use a bit more lens flare.

Really explore the frame next time.
>> Anonymous
>>69810
lolretard
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>69853

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:08:19 00:10:16Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width238Image Height320
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>69702

It's called poorly done HDR. Observe proper HDR |
<------------------------------------------------

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsPhotographerSam JavanrouhPhotographerSam JavanrouhImage-Specific Properties:Image Width2296Image Height3456Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2006:05:01 03:10:36Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/9.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/9.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length10.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width750Image Height1207RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
>>69878
Signed.
>> Anonymous
>>69853

Anon found your bluntness amusing.
>> Anonymous
>>69878
a good picture

>>69696>>69695>>69691>>69690>>69688>>69687>>69685etc
hideous, washed-out, oversaturated blurry crap
>> Anonymous
I really dont know what people find interesting about HDR.
>> Anonymous
>>69903
It's supposed to look like normal pictures. But notice in>>69878how nothing is overexposed nor underexposed. It basically is what photos would look like if you had an uber sensor.
>> Anonymous
I really like this stuff. F*ck the haters.
>> Anonymous
basically shows more color ranges than what a normal exposure would capture
>> pskaught
this is pointless drama. from now on, absolutely no photoshop allowed in /p/. Because any minor edit and it becomes "not photography."
>> pskaught
>>69949
correction:
no digital cameras either, because that really just a little computer. From now /p/ only consists of film only, shot through fully MANUAL cameras only, sorry guys no point and shoot.....
aaaaaand you have to develop them yourself.
>> Anonymous
nope, no cameras at all, you will have to perfectly drawn the images yourself using rocks
>> Macheath !8b4g0BkNZg
>>69952
Rocks? What luxury it must be to have permanent images! When I was a lad we had mere mud as our canvas. And we were grateful for it too!
>> Anonymous
/p/ is so hardcore
>> pskaught
no images what-so-ever, we'll just discuss things we once saw. in very small words.
>> Anonymous
I have a question; how do process the HDR source image to create the jpg image? I am very interested in trying this.
>> yeah, ok.
who fucking cares how they make it look that way? it doesn't matter! just enjoy the picture! that's not hard, is it??
>> Anonymous
>>70282
yes it is when the image is shitty
>> Anonymous
>>69966
Use Photomatix.
>> Anonymous
>>70309

Thanks I'll give that a try.
>> Anonymous
>>69871
but... but... but... there needs to be moar lens flare here:
>>69682
>> Anonymous
noob question: as far a I know you need several photos at different exposures tu merge into one HDR image; how did you manage to freeze people's movement in those shots? Even using bracketing I alway get moving objects blurry after merging.