>> |
Anonymous
wow, you're being awfully butthurt about this, buddy
>> 1) He's carrying all this in a bag. If you're rejecting the Sigma because it's a heavy f/2.8 zoom, you're missing the point.
uhhh the 18-70 actually covers more range than the 28-70, is lighter and smaller so therefore, is better suited for walking around with it
>> 2) No one really "needs tele" in the way you're talking except people who actually need tele because everything they shoot in far away, e.g. wildlife photographers.
um, this guy has a 100-400, for whatever reason, so fucking obviously, he would need it, jesus
>> 3) The times when one needs a fast lens are usually predictable. He can take the Sigma then. As a general kit, when he has an 18-70, a 28-70 doesn't add anything.
thanks for proving what i said
|