>> |
heavyweather
!4AIf7oXcbA
I'd shoot film 100% of the time if I could afford it.
I've got no issues with digital, but it's really just a money thing. I'd rather shoot Tri-X, Velvia, RVP, and Provia than NEFs. Those films are so time tested, so utterly great, they require close to no post-processing 95% of the time. Maybe some sharpening, but that's it.
Digital is cheaper, but more time intensive. I can make good images with either film or digital though, so I'll side with the one that doesn't cost 50 cents every time I click the shutter release, y'know?
|