>> |
Hatefag
>>159514 Too much post processing. Looks like you were using a shitty $10 soft focus filter. While there is definitely a time and a place for a soft focus filter (portraits of zitty teenagers) it makes this landscape look ultra-faggy, like some sort of Thomas Kindaide painting.
>>159515 See above comments.
>>159516 I like this. You've fucked with the levels and saturation a little more than I'd like, but despite my best attempts I enjoy looking at this picture. This looks like very good stock photography. I could see this as a full-page ad for some sort of rice-related business, or maybe as part of a promotional photo-book for a Sake factory.
>>159521 Art student faggotry. This would be acceptable-but-not-good if it was darkroom work, but since it's digital it's just kind of crappy. I give you bonus points for making it LOOK like darkroom work, but the composition blows and there's way too much dead black space all around.
|