>> |
Anonymous
>>167060 >More of a mountain/sky shot than a flora shot. I know, it's very weakly related to flora; not even the subject.
>You don't have the entire head in the frame. Do I have to really? It's much harder to get this close and get it sharp, considering how much it was moving, than it is to get its head in the frame.
>Technically good, although there is nothing unique about it. Yeah, very common subject and framing.
>I like the OP pic, however (if you got the top of the window). Thanks, but no, I didn't. Because of the camera I was using, I wasn't even able to see the entire frame. I thought I wouldn't even have any part of the interior in the shot. (Was experimenting with a 25-year old toy camera to see if it was in working order)
|