File :-(, x, )
does anyone use the Eye-Fi card? Anonymous
does anyone use the Eye-Fi wireless SD card with their dSLR?

i don't think it supports RAW but would be pretty useful to get the JPGs transferred automatically to my computer by Wi-Fi

i sold my point-and-shoot when i got my dSLR and while i love using it, sometimes it's just so much effort to get it out of the bag to snap something i just want to send to someone over IM.

gotta take it out, lens cap, switch lens if i have the wrong one, snap a photo, take card out and put in card reader or plug camera by USB, transfer it, save. hassle :/

anyone use this card with a dSLR successfully? does it work well? i have a D80
>> Anonymous
Do the thoughts simply spill out from your woolly brain into the post at random? It's like listening to someone's senile old grandfather.

>anyone use this card with a dSLR successfully? does it work well? i have a D80

You could have cut the entire post to just that. And Yes, of course it works with DSLRs. You could have Googled that though.
>> Anonymous
nah, i just didn't want some idiot liike you to come in and be like LOL JUST USE YOUR USB CABLE/CARD READER so that's why i explained the situation

i was wondering if anyone here used this
>> Honest So You Dont Have To Be !9UISPtwBPo
>gotta take it out, lens cap, switch lens if i have the wrong one, snap a photo, take card out and put in card reader or plug camera by USB, transfer it, save. hassle :/

I honestly dont see the problem with doing this...

If your going to do it over wifi, your going to be at your laptop.... and your going to have your camera close by to turn it on/off and send the files....

So why not just keep the good transfer speed of cables?

Sure, i can see the benefit if you was taking shots at a function, send them over on the fly to an assistant, light PS, ready to sell at the end of the night...

But other than that, its just laziness and another thing to go wrong... cables dont mess up
>> soulr !lK4GD5SleY
Wait for the camera that goes out and takes pictures for you too.
>> Anonymous
>>290722So why not just keep the good transfer speed of cables?

because i don't want to get the cables and/or card out of m camera and/or bag just to get one photo?

with the Eye-Fi card in the camera, i take the photo and it's automatically updated on Flickr or any other photo website and it's done
>> Honest So You Dont Have To Be !9UISPtwBPo
>>290733

>with the Eye-Fi card in the camera, i take the photo and it's automatically updated on Flickr or any other photo website and it's done

Oh god..... Its worse than i thought...

here i thought you was just been lazy..

But you rly want to upload without seeing the photo in any reasonable quality?? (and dont for a second think that bullshit screen on the back of slr's is a accurate representation of the photo)

I now assume your one of the people who uploads 20-100 street photos after a day out, put them in black and white, and call them art....

go die
>> Anonymous
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/eye-fi/
>> Anonymous
>>290737But you rly want to upload without seeing the photo in any reasonable quality?? (and dont for a second think that bullshit screen on the back of slr's is a accurate representation of the photo)

>> I now assume your one of the people who uploads 20-100 street photos after a day out, put them in black and white, and call them art....

are you dense or just a mongol? i went back a few pages now and it seems like everyone else thinks you're a huge idiot

>> to snap something i just want to send to someone over IM.

i'm not making instant art
i'm not making emo pictures for deviantart

i just want a fast way to transfer a photo out to my computer or a website quickly and wirelessly. sheesh

i don't give a fuck if the quality is bad to show someone something quickly

>>290738

didn't test it on a dSLR :/
>> Anonymous
I highly recommend it for instantly sharing your CP photos on the net with.
>> Anonymous
It works the same with DSLRs as it does with P&S cameras, you damned fool.