>> |
heavyweather
!4AIf7oXcbA
>>258491 It's certainly not bad. You're better than a lot of the tryouts we had this time around. With a little bit of practice and cutting out a few bad habits (and trying some new things) you could be pretty awesome. >>258481 I know I'm one to talk, and as I say this, I'm thinking in my own head "I should do this less also...", but for a shot like this that doesn't really have much going on (the moving cars on the track, one hand placing a car) can't stand to have identity removed, especially for a college paper where part of the goal is to connect to the student body with your photos. Can't do that without faces and names. If you're going to anonymize, do so for a reason. Good composition though. Tight frame, good leading line out of the bottom right. >>258482 Not a bad blog shot or detail, but it would never run so dark, and the human element isn't good enough. If you're going to silhouette, it has to be a better silhouette than that. Again, cutting off the head. It'd be a whole lot better if you had a whole human shape in the frame. >>258483 Something like this is tough because of the relatively few shooting positions and your inherent limitations. It's hard to shoot. This one didn't work out. >>258485 >>258484 Difficult to read, don't make the cut.
|