>> |
Anonymous
>>52255 I've tried to avoid this thread, but really, this post is just
>in general bub ppl seem to worry far to much about what equiptment they have or rahter dont have. This is true of the entire photographic community since digital started having radically better equipment come out every six months. And yes, it sucks, but unless there is some epic photoboard out there with welcoming, old school Magnum-level photographers, then this is probably close to as good of a photoboard as one is going to get, certainly as good of an anonymous photoboard. And looking for it, I have a feeling, is like looking for the "secret chan" that /b/tards are always going after.
>ok so this is constuctive to the op is it? Yes, the quote you mentioned was harsh, but true and constructive. The OP was pretty clearly trying to make a hipster girl look cool and badass. He shouldn't have.
>oh by the way, opinion isnt critique A critique is a thorough evaluation of and idea or work. That by nature MUST include opinion.
>the difference between objective and subjective when anylse photos?
Objective: Focus, exposure, grain.
Subjective: Everything else, and sometimes those, too.
>you state that like its a fact.
How was she supposed to say that? "In my opinion...?"
Have you taken a single English class in your life? In non-fiction opinion writing, avoiding words emphasizing first-person perspective ("I," "my," "me," and phrases including them like "I think," "In my opinion," and "To me) is the equivalent of the rule of thirds: a general rule that should be kept in mind, though not always kept, because the majority of the time it produces more powerful work, be it prose or a photograph.
|