File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
I got me a new external flash so i can masquerade as a photojournalist at big events
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 (10.0x20061208 [20061208.beta.1251 02:00:00 cutoff; m branch]) WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:01:16 17:02:22Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width700Image Height525
>> Anonymous
Photojournalists usually have a bracket to go with it.

Fail.

Nice gear though.
>> Anonymous
i'm not particularly interested.
>> Anonymous
>>114207
LOL, Quantaray. How does it compare to the Nikon flash?
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>114608
The 1D Mk III is geared towards photojournalists, not the 1Ds Mk III. Photojournalists need the speed more than the resolution and full-frame image quality.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>114608
all you need is:

Full size body + vertical grip
White lense
large flash

thats it, you now work for a newspaper, also wearing a cargo jacket makes you look like a prick, so it helps a lot.
>> Anonymous
>>114622wearing a cargo jacket makes you look like a prick

;_____;
>> Vincent
>>114623
It's True, All those people I meet wearing Photo Vests / Cargo Jackets are pricks.

Theres some sort of elitism that comes along with wearing one of those. Something along the lines of.
"Hey I've got a jacket just to carry expensive filters and other accessories that are worth their weight in gold, that makes me better than you"
>> Anonymous
>>114689

I don't get what you mean.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>114696
neither do i, but i think its inuendo and or insinuating something about you being fat.

either way i expect im insulting you or making jokes about your sexual preferance.

you choose.
>> Anonymous
>>114697

I suppose I'm okay with that. Hard to get upset about innuendo or insults that I don't understand.
>> Anonymous
>>114689im like 95% right and im hardly trying.

You're 7% right 98% of the time.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>114701
i was talking about this particular thread.

im 100% right other times.