File :-(, x, )
Polaroids!! Anonymous
Post some polaroids!!!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)


Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2006:08:17 21:35:04Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width428Image Height430
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)


Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2006:08:17 12:38:09Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width841Image Height1024
>> eku !8cibvLQ11s
>>199732
Winrar. Seriously. I love the colors, grain, and somehow the way it's all blurry.

Who has taken this? :)
>> Anonymous
>>199732
this is a very nice photo, i don't know if its the naked girl or the ambience or the blur, but it produces some sort of mystery, very nice indeed.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
it is just natural light and Polaroid 650 camera and 600 film, plus an unsteady hand.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2006:08:17 12:34:20Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width840Image Height1024
>> eku !8cibvLQ11s
>>199762

Quite nicely unsteady. A bit more unsteadiness, and these would be total shit. Now they just look like some nice paintings. <3
>> soulr !lK4GD5SleY
Proof that stuff taken on some shitty camera with some shitty lens and some shitty film is still better than 80% of what /p/ can produce.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Pro tip for the kids - Go easy on the flash, it tends to make things look shitty and flat. :D

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution75 dpiVertical Resolution75 dpiImage Created2005:10:31 19:25:46Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width742Image Height886
>> soulr !lK4GD5SleY
>>199770
ok, now you've ruined it : (
>> Anonymous
>>199770

It was all good until that one, which I agree shows how lighting can ruin a shot. The girl is still pretty though.
>> Anonymous
A fine example that sharpness isn't everything. Something to remember for all the pixel-peepers and gearfags that obsess over statistics.
>> Anonymous
>>199783
Uhh, what does this have to do with sharpness? It's the right-on flash that killed it. Those other shots would've still been good if sharp.
>> Anonymous
I miss 665 film :(
>> Anonymous
>>199881
Very much. Theyre all out of focus and taken with a cheap camera, he's not being specific about the third example.
>> Anonymous
>>199893
And I'm saying the out of focus doesn't matter, they would've been nice sharp as well.
>> sage !i/euDJmWr2
>>200004
...that's the point he is making. Nice pictures are nice, it doesn't matter if they're sharp or slightly out-of-focus if they're well composed and thought out. So there is no point in always obsessing over sharpness.

Though for the record those nude shots ARE made better by being OOF.
>> Anonymous
>>200041
i think if its meant to be out of focus it works
if someone misses focus though its not going to look good
>> Anonymous
>>199770

WALK LIKE AN EGYPTIAN.
>> Anonymous
>>200041
>>200004
Understood.

Sage is right though. Those do look better being subtle as they are, instead of dead sharp.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
wut
>> sage !i/euDJmWr2
>>200112
This will probably just buy me accusations of HIPSTERHIPSTERHIPSTER, but I fucking love Vampire Weekend.
>> Anonymous
>>200121

I understand completely.
>> Anonymous
>>199725

Nice shot if thats yours,

EXIF data plz.
>> Anonymous
>>200253, OP here, that was taken with my other polaroid camera a spectra 1200, it is just the lights in an underground busway in a city i used to live in. I think the reason why some have EXIF data is from when i used to use Photoshop years ago, I now use GIMP. Which reminds me the series of nudes was actually part of an animation i did using polaroids, i will remake it into an animated gif using GIMP later today if i have time.
>> Anonymous
>>200121
>This will probably just buy me accusations of HIPSTERHIPSTERHIPSTER, but I fucking love Vampire Weekend.

I think you meant HIPSTERWITHSHITTYTASTE.
Vampire Weekend is thoroughly unspectacular.
All hype and no substance.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Here is the short animation i made from the polaroid series.
Just a simple 10 frame loop
>> Anonymous
>>201332
Are you that guy who posted dozens of old polaroid shots of a variety of different women in that thread one time?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>201334
Wasn't me buddy,but i am intrigued can you repost some?
I only posted these dental ones in /b/ the other night.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2007:01:26 22:14:08Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width624Image Height379
>> Anonymous
>>201342
Didn't save them, sorry.
>> Anonymous
I think polaroids have got to be the ugliest cameras ever made. Big chunk of cheap plastic in shit colors with no sense of design whatsoever.
>> noclue !!2yUmAID3520
>>201334
weren't most deleted? i saved most of them though.
where to post? i don't wanna waste them to /b/ or /s/ maybe megaupload?