File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Hey /p/. I've moved my darkroom into new flat.
>> Anonymous
>>300006
Why don't you take some pictures of your new flat for us bro?

After all, /p/ is your personal blog...
>> Anonymous
>>300010

Ha. Posting for critique. Used a lot of new chemicals so am curious if anyone comments on anything relating to that too.
>> Anonymous
As for information. HP5 120 shot on a Bronica SQA with a 50mm lens attached.

Processed with Ilford ID-11. Image is of a local beach. Suprisingly.
>> Anonymous
Love the lighting... the sand reminds me of a shot of the surface of the moon. And tell your city that curb needs to be re-poured bad, its in really bad shape.
>> Anonymous
If your focus was the lamp post you might have wanted to go in a little tighter... Great lighting
>> Anonymous
>>300018
Why is it surprising that you can shoot on a beach?
Anyways, the shot is not that interesting and there's a lot of dead space where nothing happens.

Nothing amazing about your development, or the film. You didn't do anything with it, so it doesn't matter. You have a bit of digital noise in the black space in the right, and I hope its from resizing, and not from scanning.

Have anything else? Preferably w/ people, because I get a sense that your scenes are kinda boring...
>> Anonymous
>>300039

Thankyou for the positives! The council is too busy shipping in sand from the U.A.E to bother with kerbs. Yes really.

I did want to get closer, but was limited as I'd only taken the 50mm lens out. The way the light was spreading out was my main draw though. This was my last frame of the night, I might go back this week and carry on. Although angry hobos live down there. Angry angry hobos.
>> Anonymous
>>300041

I hadn't noticed the noise, but it isn't from resizing. It's a pretty awful scanner I am using though. I borrow my old university's digital suite when I'm making something proper. This JPEG only being 80% might not have helped either.

This was only a test film just to make sure I hadn't forgotten how to process in the first place (I hadn't, but I had forgotten how much I suck at loading 120 onto a patterson spool) so no people I'm afraid, I agree that'd be much more interesting, especially in looking at the film and processing.

The processing was interesting to me (abiet, only me) as I've used Ilfosol in the past and have found that to be very very harsh. This is a lot warmer with a lot more range in it.

Thankyou!