File :-(, x, )
Stereographs Anonymous
do it!!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>47899

Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpi
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>47899
>> Anonymous
Ok so....what is the point of this?
>> Anonymous
>>47899
So as to have more
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I took this around December last year.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDMC-FZ30Camera SoftwareVer.1.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)76 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2006:12:14 21:28:36Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/3.2Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating125Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length16.10 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width824Image Height611RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalImage QualityFineWhite BalanceAutoFocus ModeManualSpot ModeUnknownImage StabilizerMode 2Macro ModeNormalShooting ModeUnknownAudioNoFlash Bias0.00 EVColor EffectOffContrastStandardNoise ReductionStandard
>> Anonymous
yeah ... what's the point 3D pics?

or u want me to find the difference.
>> Anonymous
>>47909
Of course, 3D pics. Cross your eyes and try it out.
>> Zera060
COOL !!!!

but my eyes hurts!!!!!
>> Anonymous
mountain one is sweet.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Sometimes they are just fun to do.

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Elements 4.0 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:03:04 19:56:54Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width600Image Height400
>> Anonymous
>>48091

This is the only one that has worked for me so far, and it took 5 or 6 tries for me to finally go, "OH MAN, IT IS 3-D."
>> Anonymous
First one worked good.
Same with second.
Maybe I've just gotten better at fucking up my eyes than i was last time I tried these things O_o

I couldn't make>>48091work for me. Like, I could make it so I could percieve the depth, but it was all backwards. the sky was popping out, and the wall (which is clearly nearby) was receding. Yeah, i'll blame my eyes.

This stuff is fun though. :)
>> Anonymous
48091
Don't look at it crosseyed. It's a parallelogram just relax your eyes like your looking into the distance.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Here is a couple more.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>48560
That's not working for me. It's a lot easier to see the correct image when the right-eye picture is on the left and the left-eye picture on the right because I can adjust to the picture no matter what size it is.
>> Anonymous
I'm just the opposite, I just can't cross my eyes.
>> Anonymous
is it like that magic eye thing ?
how do you tell if its working?
>> Anonymous
>>48691
For the cross-eyed method (>>47899>>47900>>47906) you will:
1. cross your eyes so that the 2 images become 4 images
2. use your eyes to make the two middle images match together, making a total of 3 images
3. focus on the middle image, and it will appear as a 3D image.

For the relaxed eyes method, it's just like the magic eye puzzles: stare off into infinity rather than focusing directly on the images.
>> Anonymous
>>48692
im pretty good at magic eye but i cant get these to work
>> Anonymous
>>48693
Same here, which is why I said that I prefer the cross-eyed method ;_;