File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Any good? rookie here
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKONCamera ModelE4600Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)34 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2008:10:29 21:44:43Exposure Time5/123 secF-Numberf/4.9Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating50Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length5.70 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height786RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>> reinfected !DwFBXiCxVI
>>284227
Dear god, someone posting a photo thread in /p/? That's completely unacceptable.

Fucking newfag, don't you know we just like to talk about whether Canon or Nikon makes the better camera for you?
>> Anonymous
>>284228


2/10
>> Anonymous
>>284228
way to support the photo thread by commenting on my comment instead.

and pull that newfag shit. you know this picture is shit. It's shit right? because otherwise you would have pulled some redeeming qualities out of your ass. instead of trying your shitty trolling tactics on me.
>> reinfected !DwFBXiCxVI
>>284231
Yes, shit photo is shit. I thought we already accomplished that by what you said.
>> Anonymous
alright! woo! constructive criticism! LETS DO IT.

It's a picture of a caterpillar, what is it supposed to do? I mean...its just a caterpillar. Nothing special.

but its a CATERPILLAR AND I LOVE IT.
>> okto !.ZlrOYZhsk
>>284225
Boring. This is a snap.
Get closer to your bug friend. Get your verticals vertical. Pay attention to the geometry of the stuff in the image; remember, you are creating a 2D image, not recording a 3D world. Forget you know what depth is.
>> Anonymous
>>284385
yea, definitely needs to be closer so you can see the fur, and those posts for the railing should not be in the frame: they're a little distracting.
>> Anonymous
I saw a cool caterpillar shot in one of the later threads. Take a look.
>> the caterpiller photograph Anonymous
its better than those losers are saying.

yes it may be a snap it may not be who the fuck can possibly know other than the photographer.

this picture is good for many reasons

sure you can do better but thats what everybody always says

if the viewer viewing this picture has the ability to actually look into a photograph not just see a caterpiller say "oh wow, its a caterpiller...moving on" then they will recognise that there is good imagery in this picture.


its good and thats all there is to it
>> reinfected !DwFBXiCxVI
>>284419
Assuming this is not the OP...

Dude just stop. You sound like this person filling in for my photo teacher who obviously didn't know what the fuck she was talking about. A person took a picture of a pumpkin stem really up close. To where the picture was just green. The teacher went on saying "THIS IS INTERESTING IMAGERY" when the shit had no subject and I could have made it in paint by just filling the entire screen green.

Anyways, to my point. This photo is not good for many reasons. One being that I already know the setting, on the OPs deck and the position of the camera is in a rather boring perspective on said subject, almost top down.

The subject has potential to be interesting but the way this is shot it certainly isn't. If he were to be up close and were to position the rail so it leads down the photograph with the caterpillar up close, yeah we'd be having a different story. That example setup might fail but hey, it'd be better than this.

Now, if you are OP:
Art is subjective. People are going to shit all over your work. get used to it. It's when people say your work is shit and suggest ways to improve it that really help you over all. Coming on this forum and posting the first shot you took with your brand new camera is obviously not going to yield great comments.

Learn the basic rules of photography (rules of thirds etc.) how to use the camera, great photos that changed photography, and then come back to us.
>> reinfected !DwFBXiCxVI
>>284440
Tired person is tired. Meant to say this as my closing comment:

Learn the basic rules of photography (rules of thirds etc.) how to use the camera, look at the great photos that changed photography, and then come back to us.
>> Anonymous
dude its a fucking caterpiller
wat the fuck
boring
go take a photo of some boobs then il be interested
fucking faggot
>> Anonymous
NICE SNAPSHOT, BRO
>> Anonymous
>>284466
this has been /p/'s best advice to noobs as of yet
>> Anonymous !!EdPcJkE5KyG
This shot may have had potential if..
1) I didn't see this shot over 9000 times.
2) You had a telephoto lens and could get much closer to the subject