My first macro /p/Hows it look?EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot SX100 ISMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created2008:08:02 16:06:35Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/4.0ISO Speed Rating80Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length6.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3264Image Height2448RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>230404i don't think it even counts as macro. just an ordinary, boring photo of nothing.
I only wanted to make you happy /p/;_;
your diapoter setting is incorrect
I guess it's alright for a first attempt, but needs a lot of work.
>>230406YOU THINK SO?1/2.5 " (5.75 x 4.31 mm) fov is required for a real macro with this camera, dipshit.
>>230412why did i laugh
>>230416>1/2.5 " (5.75 x 4.31 mm) fov is required for a real macro
Ease up lads, I only got the camera that daySo everything is stock
>>230419do not rice your camera
>>230431Rice? Pretty sure its not gonna swell up and explodeIts a camera, not a pigeon
>>230435not true
>>230435idiotyou know what he means you gook. he means dont turn your camera into a rice rocket with CHROME HOOD VENTS AND A BLOWER. OH YEAH AND A SUPERCHARGER, YEAH!
did someone say "riced camera"?
'cos I think I heard someone said "riced camera"
>>230467that ones pretty cool, id feel so bad ass pulling that out of my sued jacket at a dinner party drinking cristaaaaallll with tony blair and donald trump
Centered subject is too centered.
>>230483That one is from cameraleather.com. They have some cool stuff that makes me regret that my only film camera already is in excellent condition.
the stuff on the bottom right is distracting
>>230500Bundaberg Rum can (yes ausfag)Being my first day, I didnt actually think to manipulate the environment to make a better shot