>> |
Teus
!QbSstcPD6U
File :-(, x)
R09 is almost exactly the same as Rodinal. I'll look into it when my Rodinal runs out some time, or I can't find it in shops anymore. I heard that Rodinal got "cheapened" halfway the previous century, and R09 should be better quality. I heard its more expensive, at least.
>>BTW, could you post an unscaled cropped sample of>>30941 Sure, see attach.
I developed the film for 33 minutes, agitating every 5 minutes. I only had banding once, when i developed TMAX 400 in ID11, and forgot about agitation suddenly.. about 90seconds not agitated, while I agitate every 30seconds usually.
>> It compensates nicely, gives finer grain, and is not too time consuming. well, tri-x at EI 3200 takes one hour to develop in 1:100 :/ but well, it's interesting if the developer compensates more. My first push to 3200 was with ID11 and overdeveloped, it really sucked. in daylight, shadow detail was zero. even portraits in a nightly, medium-lit bar were poor.
Ah well I didn't like ID11 after all. either the weather around here was too dull and flat when I experimented with it, or it is just too low-contrast.
I've toyed with Fuji Acros, its lovely in Amaloco 74, but the S-shaped curve doesn't make it good for all-around photography. photos in very bright sunlight are way too contrasty. recently, I looked at my first film again (souped in ID11 by my local shop), and was amazed by the wide contrast range... much better details in the highlights/shadows.
|