File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Anything worthwhile y'think?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
Rather cliche, go find something else to shoot. Though if it's enjoyable, I'd say it's worthwhile. It's just not worth my time and bandwidth.
>> Anonymous
I thought I'd give an actual critique instead of just lol, flowers suck do some real photog

>>173427
nice colours. I like that you didn't over-saturate it.

>>173428
Way too much lens flare. Also got some purple stuff going on from the light on the sensor = not cool.

>>173429
nice colours but you cut the top of the flower off. This isn't necessarily a bad thing when done deliberately but its obvious you did it by accident and without thinking.

>>173432
good focus there & nice soft lighting.

>>173433
the light flowers just don't do it on the white background. First pic was better, cause the blue gives some contrast to the yellow.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>173427
>>173428
>>173433
Holy shit, flower pictures I actually like.

>>173429
>>173432
Yeah, that's more what I'm used to with flower pictures.
>> Teus !QbSstcPD6U
first one is great, but framing is a bit unbalanced. second nice as well, if it wouldn't have that horrible flare

peculiar bokeh, what lens?
>> Anonymous
>>173555
>>173555
The ever fabulous 50/1.8

Also, I seem to have lost my exifs. =(
>> Anonymous
>>173546

yeah.. the daffodils had nice backlighting to make the flowers glow.

the others are just pictures of flowers