>> |
Anonymous
the 70-300 fails for many reasons
micro USM no FTM build quality is poor, it feels solid in your hands but it's the rings that suck, super loose and not in the good way and the plastics are cheap, think 18-55 but it feels heavier it's pretty much dead beyond 200mm rotating front extends way too much
with that said, it's a stellar budget zoom that gets you to telephoto range
but this lens is on my short list of could've, should've, would've lenses. as in, unless you desperately need it or don't want to spend more, you could do much better if you would save a little more
this might sound like a lens snob but i've sold too many lenses because of disappointing performance to just buy the one i wanted in the first place at the end
read: save more, get the 70-200 f4 is
|