>> |
Anonymous
>>271784 Not everyone is big on microcontrast. I am, but if the OP hasn't developed his own taste yet it doesn't make sense for him to shell out for another lens that might not end up to his liking.
And if we're getting into suggesting some awesome primes, suggesting a fifty is a bit off. Touch too short for a great portrait lens (in before Nifty Fifty fanaticism, I'm not saying great portraits can't be made with that field of view, I've done it myself, but that's not the point), something like a 55-70 would be best, combined with a 28-35mm for wider shots.
|