File :-(, x, )
Poast slides Kavbar !bhcZKibP7.
Slides. Post them. Mine aren't spectacular examples, but I'll start. Ignore the EXIF.

OM-2, Sensia 100, f/1.2, NDx8 (3 stops)
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelFinePix S6000fdCamera SoftwarePicasa 3.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationUnknownHorizontal Resolution96 dpiVertical Resolution96 dpiImage Created2008:05:13 20:24:51Exposure Time6.5 secF-Numberf/9.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/8.9Brightness-3.2 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeAverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length6.80 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1200Image Height800RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownUnique Image ID4038e0c815ef31b0c02a4229f70f3a30SharpnessNormalWhite BalanceAutoChroma SaturationNormalFlash ModeOffMacro ModeOnFocus ModeAutoSlow Synchro ModeOffPicture ModeManual ExposureContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffBlur StatusBlur WarningFocus StatusOKAuto Exposure StatusOK
>> Kavbar !bhcZKibP7.
     File :-(, x)
OM-2, Sensia 100, f/5.6, NDx8

Dirty slides are dirty. And I'm still preparing to invest in a scanner :<

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelFinePix S6000fdCamera SoftwarePicasa 3.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationUnknownHorizontal Resolution96 dpiVertical Resolution96 dpiImage Created2008:05:13 20:36:58Exposure Time5 secF-Numberf/9.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/8.9Brightness-1.6 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeAverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length6.80 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1200Image Height798RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownUnique Image IDe28e75efd2b89fa0a9651490149a1bd6SharpnessNormalWhite BalanceAutoChroma SaturationNormalFlash ModeOffMacro ModeOnFocus ModeAutoSlow Synchro ModeOffPicture ModeManual ExposureContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffBlur StatusBlur WarningFocus StatusOKAuto Exposure StatusOK
>> Kavbar !bhcZKibP7.
     File :-(, x)
Last one.

OM-2, Sensia 100, f/4, NDx8

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelFinePix S6000fdCamera SoftwarePicasa 3.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationUnknownHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:05:13 20:54:37Exposure Time10 secF-Numberf/9.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/8.9Brightness-2.3 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeAverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length6.80 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1200Image Height800RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownUnique Image IDf88020d454ac8b484cbdd87b8f81b00fSharpnessNormalWhite BalanceAutoChroma SaturationNormalFlash ModeOffMacro ModeOnFocus ModeAutoSlow Synchro ModeOffPicture ModeManual ExposureContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffBlur StatusBlur WarningFocus StatusOKAuto Exposure StatusOK
>> Anonymous
awesome... SLR?
do u still shoot film?
which scanner you looking to get?
you obviously get them developed at a lab.. correct?
>> Anonymous
>>185336<3
>> Anonymous
>>185360does not know what slides are.
>> angrylittleboy !wrJcGUHncE
These are nice
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Kiev 88CM, 80mm, Fuji Velvia
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Canon A2, 70-200 f/4L at 200, Fuji Provia 100
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Hasselblad 2000FC, 50mm, Fuji Velvia
>> Anonymous
>>185416
With such a nice camera, I would hope that you get better pics than that out of it.
>> Anonymous
>>185417
Actually I rather like the picture, that's why I took it. And I suppose if you had that camera you'd be the greatest photographer in the world.
>> Anonymous
>>185416

i like this pic
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>185423
I'm not saying it's bad, I'm just saying that I bet you can do better.

I sure wish I had a hasselblad when I took this photo. Cheap wannabe SLRs have a ton of noise in low light.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelFinePix S6000fdCamera SoftwareQuickTime 7.4.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:03:28 00:39:46Exposure Time1/4 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramLandscape ModeISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/2.8Brightness-3.2 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length6.20 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2848Image Height2136RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeLandscapeSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownSharpnessNormalWhite BalanceAutoFlash ModeOffMacro ModeOffFocus ModeAutoSlow Synchro ModeOffPicture ModeLandscapeContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffBlur StatusBlur WarningFocus StatusOKAuto Exposure StatusOver Exposed
>> hatefag
>>185416

Excellent job at fucking failing to get the roof of the building level.
It's a flat roof. It's RIGHT NEXT TO THE FUCKING EDGE OF THE FRAME. It shouldn't be difficult to get level, but somehow you managed to fuck it up.

A+
Failing that hard with such a nice camera took hard work and determination.
>> Anonymous
>>185465
he is called hatefag for a reason, I hate that fag
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
nikon FG, ultron 40/2, sensia 100
>> Anonymous
>>185416
This really quite a bad picture, I could do better with my crummy Program A1

>>185336
This is beautiful, good job.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>185461
Just because I posted a photo doesn't mean it's my best one. Besides, not every photo you take will be your best, nor will everyone like the same photos.

>>185465
I didn't want the roof level, I wanted the standpipe vertical. Since asking them to tear down and reconstruct the building didn't go over so well, I had to make do.

>>185479
I could probably take a better photo with an A1p too. You people still obviously don't get that the camera doesn't make any difference. It works for the high end as well as the low- just because I have a good camera doesn't mean that every photo I take is going to be good. In fact my ratio of keepers to trash is the same regardless of what camera I use (well mostly, my ratio improves as format size goes up). Furthermore, I don't think it's a bad picture. It's certainly not one of my best and certainly not one of the worlds best, but I like it and that's what matters to me. I think it has interesting colors, textures, and leading lines.

>>185479This is beautiful, good job.
You know what's funny? I don't particularly like that photo. It's dark, unsharp, and lacks a subject. Does that mean OP an inept asshole because he has a nice camera? No, it just means I don't like his photo.


Another one: same building, film, camera, lens, and day.
>> Anonymous
>>185496
yea, sorry about that
We're just jealous
>> Anonymous
>>185496
>I didn't want the roof level, I wanted the standpipe vertical. Since asking them to tear down and reconstruct the building didn't go over so well, I had to make do.

Well, good job at making it looks shitty.
Did it occur to you to try to get BOTH?
Your pipe isn't 100% vertical either, so you should have tried to find a harmony between the vertical pipe and the horizontal roof.

But, again, A+ good job on failing.
>> Anonymous
>>185496
What is wrong with this person, I really hope that was supposed to be a joke.