File :-(, x, )
Chris

EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwarePicasa 2.6Image-Specific Properties:Unique Image ID335977d0c967749280558e4b7589e430
>> Anonymous
Fucking awesome man.
>> Chris
Yeah thanks, I'm gay.
>> Anonymous
spectacular.
>> Chris
>>34738
>>34747
thank you :)

>>34739
fuck off
>> Anonymous
exif ;_;
>> Anonymous
HDR?
>> Anonymous
>>34762

HDR ruins mostly everything it touches.
>> Chris
>>34761
Nikon D80 w/ Sigma 10-20mm @ 10mm w/ ISO 100.
3 exposures (ev set to +-2) no tripod used =)

>>34762
yus
>> thefamilyman
     File :-(, x)
nice, but...
HDR is fail for item that move, like the waves on the water and the leaves in trees

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2006:12:19 14:18:42Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1024Image Height681
>> Chris
     File :-(, x)
>>34808
true, but good enough lightning and a fast camera you wont have much problem (depends on how much movement there is too of course..)

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwarePicasa 2.6Image-Specific Properties:Unique Image ID982dfc27b4e48758713fbcd700a5282f
>> Anonymous
>>34822
im pretty sure its fail because each picture is different, so the levels wont exactly mesh right...since the pictures arent the same.
>> Anonymous
I hate HDR mostly because it's all over the local photoblogging scene now, like it's the cure-all for badly taken photographs. They either take brackets of moving objects, or failing to take bracket shots, they jack up the exposure value in their RAW files to simulate the different exposure levels required to make HDR.