File :-(, x, )
oh shi- TheGeneral !m7n7x2Yyfo
http://www.cameralabs.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=45366#45366

fuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuck
>> Sony !!wPqPEXsrYBc
lolwut

Meh, the A900 > 5Dxyz
>> Anonymous
lolwut

Meg, the Canon lens lineup > Sony anything.
>> Anonymous
>>189575
sony Zeis lenses > Canon bullshit
>> Depressed Cheesecake !wFh1Fw9wBU
     File :-(, x)
>>189579
>>189575
>>189573
Superior
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>189575


i herd u liek zeiss
>> Lynx !!KY+lVSl0s2m
>>189581
would have been epic win if it happened to be a Zeiss z-point reflex sight.
>> Anonymous
>>189573Meh, the A900 > 5Dxyz

I sure as fuck hope a $8,000 camera is better than a $3,000 one.
>> Anonymous
The A900 will be between the 5D and D3.
>> Anonymous
>>189606The A900 will be between the 5D and D3.

Right, because Sony will sell a 24 motherfucking megapixels full frame sensor camera for something between $3,000 and $5,000.

Great logic is great.
>> Anonymous
>>189610


No pros are going to dump their 1Ds/D3 for a camera that's unproven and untested and (according to /p/ atleast) hated. Minolta's legacy was always for innovation and advanced amateurs and never really the "pro" field.

Also, rumor is there's going to be a "halved" A900 ~12-14mp as a direct assault on the 5D.
>> okto
>>189579
sony zeiss lens price >>>>>>>> canon lens price
and they're not much better than Nikon's pro stuff. Better low-frequency MTF, but that's it.
>> Anonymous
How did this thread turn into such stupidity so fast? God, you guys suck.
>> Anonymous
>>190865
well coming into /p/ thinking sony is all that wasnt a good start.

as mentioned in this thread:
they're still un-proven in the higher end of the digital slr word.
sony's lens prices far exceed any other normal d-slr manufacturers and 3rd parties.
for that price, the results have yet to prove you get what you pay for compared to proven brands(canikon)
its just fucking sony!