File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
ITT: comments for improvements....
just took/made these pic for a frind... if any one got an idea, how to improve it... then let me hear....
>> one !craoLd8Ou2
     File :-(, x)
>>49532
try to crop it?
try it with toning?
if u have the original in color play with curves, channel mixer..

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution1038 dpiVertical Resolution1038 dpiImage Created2007:05:22 16:51:27Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width817Image Height1226
>> ac
>>49535
I agree with this comment. Although I'm strongly against One's insistence on not spelling out 'you'.

If you have the opportunity to make this picture again, get closer. The house and huge expanse of lawn add nothing to the photograph. In general, you want all of the stuff in your frame to carry their weight (or at least balance out some other visual element's weight). And, in addition to giving you a better composition, getting closer will let you look up tree-friend's skirt.

It's win-win.
>> one !craoLd8Ou2
>>49537
okay got it.. I'm too used to write "u" from sms because of the limitation of characters..
Anyway, I'll try to change it ;)

Have a nice day
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Dis better?
Tryed to cut it a bit...
And made it a bit darker, and the ligth whiter...
>> Macheath
Don't post such high res shots in the future, just resize them so that the longest side is less than 1024 ok?

I agree that you should get closer/use telephoto/crop for this shot. Would like to see this shot in color.
>> Anonymous
haven't got it in coloer...
>> one !craoLd8Ou2
>>49545
if you shot it digital - this was a mistake.
>> Anonymous
well had to do it in B/W so I found it easyer just to take it in B/W... ^^
>> ac
>>49554
Unless you're shooting on black and white film (or one of the old, rare black-and-white-only digital cameras), it's always better to shoot in color and then convert to B&W in postprocessing.

The argument could be made that it's better to shoot color film and then convert to B&W in postprocessing, too.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Yea I see... sorry 'bout that guys... I'll never do it again ^^

just to try and make up for it... here is another one I shot today... in B/W :P

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon IXY DIGITAL 55Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaLens Size5.80 - 17.40 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.01Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created2007:05:22 21:12:15Exposure Time1/100 secF-Numberf/2.8Lens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length5.80 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2048Image Height1536RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeCenter-WeightedISO Speed RatingAutoSharpnessNormalSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeUnknownFocus ModeSingleDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingSuperfineMacro ModeNormalSubject Distance2.020 mWhite BalanceUnknownExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed128Image Number166-6693
>> Anonymous
These are horrible.

Your camera sucks, the subject is posed horribly, and the background is unbalanced and too busy. She pretty much is eaten by the tree because it's black and white.
>> Anonymous
definitely would be better if they didn't have any clothes on
>> Anonymous
>>50054
You do realize that the two girls in>>49532
are the SAME girl, right?
>> Anonymous
yeah, i thought so... but its hard to tell... could be twins
>> Anonymous
these photos are horrible
no sign of any skill at all

please play around with your camera a little longer before you post anything

this is impossible to crit
>> Anonymous
shoop better

there is a gap between her shin/arm and where the hell does her foot go?