File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
kind of bored so i got some images off DPR and made a size comparison.
>> iProd !8x7lXo9zIQ
EOS 1Ds is a hulking beast
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>132139
>EOS 1Ds is sexy a hulking beast
Fix'd
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>132139
put a battery grip on 20D and 5D and they will be almost as large.

I think Kodak made the most xbox hueg DSLRs evar, even if you count MF hasselblads/mamiyas.
>> Whoopty !!zX5ulf1s0MS
The full pro bodies seemed surprisingly smaller that what I expected from photos. I thought they'd be like half an xbox or something.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Well, considering that this used to be the standard news camera, I'd say the EOS 1 is a good size.

That said I don't want one cause my lenses (small no-auto-anythings from 35 years ago) already look weird on a 10D. My 50/1.4 is about 1/3 the size of an EF 50/1.4.
>> Anonymous
>>132155

Holy fuck, that has got to be the ugliest camera ever made. I almost shit myself.
>> Anonymous
>>132195
One of these days I'm going to buy an old Kodak DCS to scare people with.
>> iProd !8x7lXo9zIQ
>>132155
That's what I did lawl. The thing is like 50lbs now though.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
the 5D is always a lot smaller than i expect it to be. Its normally strapped to the battery pack though.
>> Anonymous
>>132199
that's because most 5D owners overcompensate
>> Anonymous
I've found that more Rebel XT and XTi owners get the battery grip than 5D people. I figure it's cause their camera is so small and uncomfortable.

I'll never know why Canon did that....the original Rebel/300D had a great handgrip just like the 10D, then the XT and further got smaller while the 20/30/40/5D all had good size grips.
>> Anonymous
>>132216
The grip is going to be better on the 450D from what I've seen. Although it still doesn't look as comfortably fat as on the 300D.
>> Anonymous
>>132216

QFT, i previously owned a 300D and when i bought a replacement 350D i shat brix at how tiny the grip was...
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>132216
Because size was a major consideration in the Rebel line. The loss of extra grip means that the Rebel XT/350D is noticeably smaller than the Rebel/300D. Let them say "Hey, our camera's lighter!" in comparisons against the D50.
>> Anonymous
>>132257
Then Olympus came and ruined their fun.

Seriously, Canon should stop chasing after compactness now, no one would care if the Rebels got a bit fatter again.
>> Anonymous
ROFL

olympus
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
hey guys, we'll make a smaller sensor and have smaller cameras, no one will mind the image quality

oh wait

(the e-410 is even more fail)
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>132274
haha you know this is why im glad i chose sony.

They might be hated by most of the world, but they make a decent set of cameras.
>> Anonymous
>>132273
Olympus was related to "hey our camera is lighter" part, if you bothered to think about it. By the way, Japanese loev the small E-4x0.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>132278
don't like the E-410?
what's the problem?
too COMPACT for you?

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.Camera ModelE-410Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Color Filter Array Pattern642Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:02:29 01:33:21Exposure Time1/15 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating800Exposure Bias1 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1280Image Height960RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessSoft
>> Anonymous
no one cares about the japanese
>> Anonymous
>>132282

if people wanted compact, they get a compact

not that shitty ass excuse for a slr
>> Anonymous
>>132279
Hahaha, Sony cameras manage to fail at noise as hard as Olympus despite the bigger sensors, and the new A300/A350 have viewfinders even smaller than Four Thirds, lol.
>> Anonymous
>>132284
And yet they still sell, despite your BAWWWing.
>> Anonymous
>>132278
E-510 feels sooooooo much better then the XTI i picked up an XTI and i felt like i was holding a toy...
>> Anonymous
>>132296
>>132291

rofl

itt olympus owners being butthurt
>> Anonymous
>>132311
ITT cannon owners refusing to admit they only got a cannon because they didnt know what else to get
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
hahaha flamewar

I think I'll post some olympus just to fuck with you people.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.Camera ModelE-500Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Color Filter Array Pattern702Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2007:12:18 18:42:04Exposure Time1/80 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashFlash, CompulsoryFocal Length43.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width800Image Height600RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessSoft
>> Anonymous
>>132279
Yeah, cause Minoltas have always been such great cameras.

>>132291
McDonald's food sells too. Doesn't have shit to do with the quality.

>>132267

Hah, Olympus. When you have the smallest sensor on the block and a TV aspect ratio you can get away with small body.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>132311
>>132313
>> Anonymous
>>132313

I freely admit this. I wasn't really sure what the right tool for the job was, but that 17th century fort wasn't going to knock itself down.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
My papa's olympus weighs so little compared to mai alpha, feels like a toy with plastic lenses.
>> Anonymous
>>132319
hey, I like mcdonalds salad
>> Anonymous
>>132323

ITT morons.
>> Anonymous
Wow, and I thought Sony and Pentax people were bad.

Olympus, what a fucking joke. Go back to your corner guys, keep thinking Olympus makes a difference.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>132321
>>132320
I lol'd
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
what now faggots?
>> Anonymous
>>132379

Suck on a tasty penis.
>> NatureGuy !se3A3TwzdY
>>132379
misleading
The camera only limits the very top of what the camera is possible while the lens on front of it is what matters. Without knowing what lenses were used and their quality you might as well have shit on a piece of paper and posted it.
>> Anonymous
>>132578

Give me fifteen minutes and I'll get back to you on that.
>> Anonymous
i don't know about you guys but 4/3 arguing about noise is a losing battle