File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Pentax_K20D/noise.shtml

lol, Sony got owned. By Samsung, no less.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
Yup, newest "manufacturer" of dslrs isnt that great at reducing noise.

shock.
>> Anonymous
>>184119
But their noise reduction is awesome! I mean, they even reduce noise in RAW files for our convenience!
>> Anonymous
sony a100 @ ISO 1600: http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/sony/dslr_a100-review/DSC00213-boosted.jpg

sony a200 @ ISO 1600:
http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/sony/dslr_a200-review/DSC00098.JPG

so at least theyre getting better.

>>184122
sony a100 and a200 dont do that fortunately
>> Anonymous
>>184119Yup, newest "manufacturer" of dslrs isnt that great at reducing noise.

they've been supplying sensors for years

how do you explain Nikon using the same sensors having better performance?

they obviously are doing it wrong
>> Anonymous
talking about Pentax..

the K200D is pretty damn good compared to the equivalent Nikon and Canon

sensor shift, weather sealed body, 2 LCD screens, live view

but what's up with 1 FPS RAW mode? what the hell
>> Anonymous
>>184210
>sensor shift, weather sealed body, 2 LCD screens, live view
Judging by the review in the OP, live view in K20D is a joke. It's not like this is a big loss, but overall it seems that Pentax is somehow lagging in the refinement of many technologies they have - inconsistent metering, only a handful of weatherproof and SDM lenses despite weatherproofing in all new bodies, IS system reported to be less effective than competing ones, and now the most pedestrian implementation of live view since Fuji S3 Pro.
>> Anonymous
>>184107
Oh wow, the Sony does horrible things
>> Anonymous
>>184223
And that's why they're so cheap.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>184172
Thats the point. Having a great engine wont make a great car unless you couple it with great everything else. They've no experience actually using them, why should they suddenly take off where Nikon has spent years getting too?
>> Anonymous
>>184230

i dunno?

using the minolta foundations and still not achieving good results?
>> Anonymous
SONY SUCKS, LAWL

BUTTERTRAP AND OTHERS BUYING SONY=FAIL
>> Anonymous
>>184271
exactly, they are not starting from scratch.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
>>184271
>>184281
Yeah fair enough, but the sensor noise is the only problem the system has (yeah i know, big problem). In a few years they have pretty much turned up from nothing (minolta only had 2 digital bodies) and put out a entire range to compete with canikon on fairly level ground plus some special lenses from CZ and minolta.