File :-(, x, )
told you I'd be back pskaught !!CrjzPzel1dX

EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image Width7139Image Height4549Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution100 dpiVertical Resolution100 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2008:10:20 02:33:04Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating50Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length17.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1099Image Height700RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
>Image Width 7139
>Image Height 4549
>Camera Model Canon EOS 5D

wat
>> Anonymous
iz dat sum silver rebel?
>> Anonymous
FUCK YEAH SILVER BODIED REBEL
>> Anonymous
lol'd at the photos on the wall
>> Vincent !!8LCSE0Zp1mL
funeral after party?
Wheres the portrait?

Also I Loled at the 2 guys outside.
>> Anonymous
Kinda David LaChapelle-ish without all that post-processing.

I like.
>> Anonymous
you really love to just cake your photos with pCHOP don't you
>> pskaught !!CrjzPzel1dX
     File :-(, x)
>>280531
this one is the least caked. This was like a 5 minute edit.

>>280529
keep looking you'll find her

>>280526
pic related

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Image Width5051Image Height7600Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution100 dpiVertical Resolution100 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2008:10:22 21:32:08Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/20.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating50Lens Aperturef/19.9Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length70.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width720Image Height1000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
Dude, this is awesome. I know you've got all the faggots here on auto-ignore, but please, make a series out of this. At least 3. How did the dudes on the wall die?
>> pskaught !!CrjzPzel1dX
>>280538
http://impsofmargeandfletch.com

I have history here
>> Anonymous
yay vomits back! looks less proceesed than usual. still up to usual standard though
>> beethy !vW/UaE6zYU
Don't really like this one, it's too bland compared to your usual stuff.
Also, why do you stick to one particular way of shooting only? I say try to do something different.
>> Project !dashI8UpO.
I think the group of people to the left are too close together. Love all the expressions though and the way it isn't as processed as the other ones.
>> Anonymous
HE'S GONNA EAT THE BABY
>> soulr !lK4GD5SleY
>>280522
Its a bit busy on the left side, I think you should had chosen a bit larger space, the baby looking at the camera would had make it better I think.

But its fine.
>> Anonymous
>>280574
pskaught's a pretentious one-trick pony. What do you expect?

>>280522
I actually do like some of your other pictures, but this one's not up to par. The composition is cluttered and you cut off the baby's foot as well as the guy holding it's arm. Your technique has transformed from simply that, a technique used to enhance the pictures, into a gimmick.
>> soulr !lK4GD5SleY
     File :-(, x)
also, I see what you did there.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image Width7139Image Height4549Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution100 dpiVertical Resolution100 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2008:10:23 08:58:38Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating50Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length17.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1099Image Height700RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>280606
you can't just modify things to make them work.
>> soulr !lK4GD5SleY
     File :-(, x)
>>280609
well, that's discussable.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>280609
hurdurrrr.
>> Anonymous
>>280611
the formula to make gold?
>> $19.99 !OSYhGye6hY
>>280611
Owned by SCIENCE!
>> Anonymous
Can't find the portrait!
>> Anonymous
>>280611

HYPERBOLIC SPIRAL, FUCK YEAH!
>> ?suomynonA ??????????
i love your work man, where do you get your models?
>> Anonymous
why do you only use wide angle...the distortion is ugry
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>280606
>>280611
I know I've seen that spiral somewhere...

Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:White Point Chromaticity0.3
>> Anonymous
>>280633
when will you beginner idiots learn? The converging lines and exaggerated perspective when using wa lenses is NOT distortion. If humans had eyes that were equivalent to say a 24mm lens (instead of the approx 45mm lens), scenes would look like that to us.

Distortion is measured as a percentage difference in image height.
>> Anonymous
you'll probably just think this is another Z0MG SO JELUS comment but i think it's dull. apart from the baby there's nothing particularly compelling or engaging about it at all. it seems to suggest with its angle and lighting that it is a very interesting photograph and has something quite witty to say but in truth, it just disappointments. it's a vacuous whore of a picture basically.

but yeah, we're all just jealous.
>> pskaught !!CrjzPzel1dX
it needs more contrast then?
>> Anonymous
it needs something. the models are all as plain as fuckery too. what's with that boring blonde in the back? i can barely see her but i know she's about as interesting to look at as a grey box of nothingness. if you're going to take photographs with people as your point of interest, surely them being fairly interesting would be a big part of the equation wouldn't it?

with the exception of front and baby and the fat asian, the rest of them don't warrant one nanosecond of my eye time. i get the impression there's a story going on here but it really is that boring that i can't be bothered trying to figure it out.
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
>>280670
The actual scene environment is abit to distracting in my opinion. The blown highlights of the window & the floor also.

The guy and baby closest to the camera look fine, but for example: The female and man eating in the background are too hidden. Don't jump out of the scene, like your normal work.
>> Project !dashI8UpO.
Needs more oomph, for lack of a better term. Your older ones with the guy trying to stab someone and the kids kicking ass, now those were awesome.
>> Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s
I dont like the framing or the composition much.

Its working, but it isnt stupid level awesome which you've got before. The processing is too bland too, it was better before also!

Also i cannot find her, someone circle it.
>> Anonymous
>>280635
This is the golden ratio, or phi as some call it. It has something to do with patterns in nature, like the placing of leaves on a tree and stuff.
>> Anonymous
This fucking sucks.
>> Mutt !!mIF4ZkWn+B/
     File :-(, x)
>>280522
How the hell do you process your pictures?
I tried just out of curiosity. Wide angle, bounce flash, subject with odd tendencies.
How do you get the tones?

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D40Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsFocal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmMaximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern828Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2008:10:23 17:32:26RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastSoftSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownExposure Time1/640 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias-1/3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width511Image Height768
>> Anonymous
Doesn't seem to work as good as your other stuff. The staging just don't look natural. I don't get the feeling of being there, just looks like some assembled stooges
>> Anonymous
I really don't get it, how has no one mentioned that all the people's facial expressions look so forced, it's like looking at a group of 15 year old drama students.

I really would need to see his other work before jumping to any conclusions or anything.

And don't pictures need some kind of use? when would anyone use this picture? give me a nice cliched shot with a D40 and kit lens and i'll hang that on my wall, not this.
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
>>280756
pskaught's style involves (obvious)over-the-top poses & expressions.
>> Anonymous
>>280718
it's not bounce flash at all, he has big strobes set up
>> Anonymous
>>280522
I love this photo XD
>> Anonymous
i love your photos with two dogs playing scrabble a lot more..
but, pskaught is still /p/'s legendary hero
>> Anonymous
for a /p/ newfag could you give us a bit of background to your work and what you do it for?
I was lurking on your site and all I gathered was theres 3 of you and you make calenders :3
>> Anonymous
>>280795
Pskaught is an ass hat stops in every 2 months or so with 1 photo in a vague attempt to drum up sales of his stuff. He never bothers to post in other people threads and doesn't add shit /p/ except for the occasional drama thread
>> Anonymous
>>280800
yes but what does he do apart from make slightly lulzy, staged photographs?
>> Anonymous
>>280800

how viral of him.
>> elf_man !!DdAnyoDMfCe
>>280826
Just say to yourself "I am a neursurgeon" and you will be able to unlock your full potential.
>> Anonymous
>>280800
>He never bothers to post in other people threads and doesn't add shit /p/

This. (except for the questionable grammar)
>> Anonymous
some of this looks almost hdr
>> Anonymous
>>280534
you cant be serious can you, you actually think this is good enough to show the public? what is this garbage, i wouldnt expect to see anything of this caliber to be posted in /p/, every aspect of this photo is over done
>> Anonymous
>>280862
hes right, this is not photography, you are posting in the wrong board pskaught,

go to the artwork board, or something of that nature

hell, go to the cartoon and comic board, but this type of work is not welcomed here, as you can see, its over done so much, its not even a photograph anymore, its art
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
photography = art
prove me wrong.
>> Anonymous
>>280866
photography != art
Here, my proof.
>> Anonymous
Found her!
>> Kilz2latex !!3htj9hFDMA4
>>280870
>>280534
who are we finding?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Photography is the process and art of recording pictures by means of capturing light on a light-sensitive medium, such as a film or an electronic sensor.

faggots
>> Anonymous
Looks like what I'd find in some expensive glossy mens magazine. Of course that's prolly what he's going for and that's fine. But it's definately not something I would buy a print of much less look at for much more than a minute since it just screams MARKETING!
>> Anonymous
Plan on throwing a hissyfit over criticism tonight, pskaught?
>> pskaught !!CrjzPzel1dX
hold on, I was working all day now I'm going out, I'll read all this shit later. so more contrast?
>> Anonymous
>>281030
These fags on /p/ overcontrast everything. I like a bit of contrast in my pictures, but it isn't necessary in every picture.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>280670
>>281030
> more contrast?

done and done

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image Width7139Image Height4549Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution100 dpiVertical Resolution100 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2008:10:24 00:29:09Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating50Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length17.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width500Image Height318RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
>>281033
Depressed Cheesecake....is dat u?
>> beethy !vW/UaE6zYU
>>281030
>i don't really like all this critique so i'll just pretend i was too busy with my awesome life and oh i'll also say i'm going out. i'll also say i'll read it later even though i've already read it all.

true m i rite?
>> Anonymous
>>281063
Maybe not everyone in /p/ is lonely.
>> pskaught !!CrjzPzel1dX
>>280718
you have to actually light a picture, until you people figure that out, quit asking.

>>280795
thats about it.

>>280903
qft

>>281063
so ronery


so, I've read everything. not the usual shit storm, but they can't all be winners. I like this one a lot because its different from the rest, less processed and there's a 4 month old in it.
I don't really hang out on /p/ much because I left for a long while and didn't feel the urge to come back, a lot of the old tripfags i liked left, and there's not much to comment on here. I hate repeating myself but its kid of turned into 7chan's photography board. I'm just letting the people who like it know whats happening with the imps. I don't post in most other people's threads because it was building too much ignorant rage. This time people had more than an incomplete sentence to describe why they hated it. yay.

so the general hate on the picture seems to be that its not processed enough or something, other than the general "not enough art school vignette for my art school tastes"

I'll be around for a couple of days and contribute to the board through comments and criticisms.. and to sage gear threads.
>> Anonymous
>>280522
imps?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Some of this guys face lost.

Also on the image in general. Really boring, not really moody. Seems VERY fake. ie not a real event but rather a soap opera or something. Alot of the composition lacks spontanity and comes out too forced. So while it is a nicely taken picture, it's very beeing is uninteresting and I have a hard time seeing someone liking it if they wheren't interested in photography.
>> Anonymous
its a bit hard to see the surprise in the window espicialy the other two. (is there 3?, definitely 2)
>> Anonymous
Your photography is shitty art school crap. It's fucking boring! You FAIL! Good day Sir..
>> Anonymous
Two soft boxes on the left for minor subjects (as shown up in the glasses)?, then 3rd light on the right near camera for the foreground subject ? 4th behind dude holding babys back? natural light in the windows.
>> Martin !!ve2Q1ETWmJH
>>281102
Theres 3, the same 3 people in the same order that appear in the portraits above the fireplace ;-)
>> Anonymous
its the same shit over and over.
>> soulr !lK4GD5SleY
still better than 90% of what /p/ can produce.
>> Anonymous
>>281126

welcome to the tripfag circle jerk.
>> Anonymous
>>280522
what the fuck
one of the best images ive seen on here in a while!
>> Anonymous
I like this. It isn't the best of the calendar set, but it is still nice. I liked your "gas prices" one much more. It was brilliant.

I think the expressions are either not wacky enough or not real enough for some, if you see what I mean.
>> Anonymous
>>281166

Part of the problem is that the expressions are what is going to carry this scene or ruin it. If they aren't right it just doesn't work properly. The Gas Prices one had some neato expressions, but could have gotten away without perfect modelling/acting on that part due to the nature of the scene.
>> Anonymous
Nice touch with the silver bodied rebel with the L lens on it and the classic old neck strap. Should cause some rage and lulz in photographers.

This one isn't as fun or interesting as the other scenes, I think. You've got some really good ones in the other sets.
>> Anonymous
Boring... same shit.
>> pskaught !!CrjzPzel1dX
>>281104
a pack outside with a strobe in each window.
soft box camera-left right next to the table. one soft box camera-right by the window and a unit with diffusion for baby and man.

>>281166
gas prices is one of my favorites, but how could you go wrong with guns and ski-masks.

so more funny faces?
>> Anonymous
>>281254

Not just "funny faces". That is simplifying the problem too much. More that the scene needs to be interesting and have a story and if the scene and story is good enough I won't care about the rest. In this case it lacks something more and I end up picking at all there is for me to think about. The good ones hit me like a slap in the face and I was immediately engaged. With this one I feel like I am in one of those situations where someone is explaining a bad joke for the second time because I didn't "get it" the first time, as I view the image a couple of times to see what I missed.

You can go for realism or go for wacky as long as it is done well. If it lands in the middle and doesn't seem to mesh well it just feels wrong - or even worse - dull. This one just isn't all that interesting and the actors/subjects in the scene don't seem right or as interesting as they could be. If "more funny faces" is what you can do well or will make it good then go for it. If it needs subtlety or realism then that is fine too. This one isn't realistic and it isn't surreal and fascinating like the others. It feels out of place with the others in the set too.

I like variety as long as it is done well.
>> Anonymous
>>281254, pskaught

Honestly, if you actually shot these pictures, you've probably developed enough skill to experiment even more. Asking for advice here is very humble of you, but I honestly think you should simply lock yourself up somewhere without a camera for a couple of days and think about where to go next rather than ask anyone else.

Also, there are so many things I would like to ask you. How did you start out, and how did you get to this point?
>> Anonymous
I agree this isn't a success, it lacks both the humor, irony, social angle, compositional wholeness and complexity, and humanity of most of your work; in other words, it looks like someone who wasn't you got a hold of your stuff and models and tried to do a pskaught and didn't get it.

Compare this to last year's "Vice Garden" if you don't get what I mean.

When the funniest thing in the picture is an L tele zoom on a silver Rebel, you haven't succeeded.

TL;DR more awesome pskaught, less some shmucks in front of a wide angle and some strobes.

>>281270
Locking himself in a room with a camera wouldn't work for him, since his stuff usually involves a lot of planning. Maybe a pen and a bunch of pieces of paper to "storyboard" stuff.
>> pskaught !!CrjzPzel1dX
>>281275
>When the funniest thing in the picture is an L tele zoom on a silver Rebel, you haven't succeeded.

I think that's just as far as the majority of the board goes. If you look at the rest of this years pictures it'll start to make sense, but what vague storyline in this picture will be fleshed out next year.
>> NatureGuy !se3A3TwzdY
>>281279
You can't expect people to reference that if you don't post them as such. You've only presented one photo.
>> pskaught !!CrjzPzel1dX
>>281285
true, go to the website.
impsofmargeandfletch.com
>> NatureGuy !se3A3TwzdY
>>281305
Which brings back us back to a previous statement that is a vague marketing attempt?
>> pskaught !!CrjzPzel1dX
>>281310
possibly, but I know you clowns don't have any money. you could say its more like bringing me back to reality through masochism.
>> Anonymous
>>281317

I resent that accusation. I have at least $10 right now.
>> NatureGuy !se3A3TwzdY
     File :-(, x)
>>281317
Possibly, but you're still only taking and not adding in regards to participation.

Also this made me think of you.
>> ilkore !!rybbb5OcRVp
hmmm i just realized what your calender needs.... more naked females in the crowd.

you know i'm right
>> ilkore !!rybbb5OcRVp
though, next time, it would help to not make everyone look like they poured bacon grease, all over their faces.
>> ilkore !!rybbb5OcRVp
also, the bounce from the green wall is doing something funky, with the wood floor.
>> NatureGuy !se3A3TwzdY
>>281326
He always does that. The effect isn't very effective in this photo, but usually it aids the weird surrealism in a lot of his photos.
>> sage ilkore !!rybbb5OcRVp
>>281328
lol i've seen his work...
>> Anonymous
Boring bacon grease.
>> Anonymous
>>281461

fuck i know. every dick at uni does this shit at the moment.

i think the effort this guy puts into the photos is awesome. i just think hes massively misdirected when it comes to the content.
>> Anonymous
>>281461

Can't agree with you more.
>> Anonymous
Best photo ever posted on /p. Fuck all the haters! They don't post anything good, and they don't learn people ANYTHING. /p is fail fail fail. You are win my man! Keep it up!
>> Anonymous
some fucker nailed it earlier, this faggot stops by every month or so to post some bullshit to drum up some popularity..
other than the funny thread that ensues, this ballsack contributes nothing to /p/..
>> pskaught !!CrjzPzel1dX
>>281319
still not enough

>>281523and so on...
what am I supposed to contribute exactly? its true that most of the posts on this board are terrible, usually the namefags bring something good, but come on, gear threads or what can i buy with a hundred bucks or whatever the fad is, right now looks like lomo and holga, before it was HDR, before that black and white vignette. how about some other shit if you plan on trying to make a career out of it. Everyone do some advertising spec ads, or find some designer and do some fashion, or post more set-up portraits. spend a little time here fellas.
>> Anonymous
this board is pretty bad except for the occasional (decent) tripfag post
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
fixd

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image Width7139Image Height4549Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution100 dpiVertical Resolution100 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2008:10:25 00:42:31Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating50Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length17.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1099Image Height700RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Kilz2latex !!3htj9hFDMA4
>they don't learn people ANYTHING
oh i learn people real good
>> Anonymous
>>281529
>usually the namefags bring something good

Oh, wow. You really haven't been here for a while.
>> Anonymous
why are you such a picture taking master?
>> NatureGuy !se3A3TwzdY
To be fair to pskaught, it has been awhile (2+ weeks) since a decent thread was up.
>> pskaught !!CrjzPzel1dX
>>281541
I actually wrote "decent" before I changed it to "good".
...in comparison i suppose.
>> pskaught !!CrjzPzel1dX
>>281559
and yes, its been a while, is familyman still here?
>> Anonymous
>>281636
intermitently, once a week or so.
>> Anonymous
>>281321
tha guys work would be good if everything wasn't so hdr, what camera does he use?
>> Anonymous
>>281129
I can post as anonymous too and say its certainly better than 90% of the shit you see here, and I don't even like his kind of photography, /p/ usually knows as much of photography as deviantart.
>> ilkore !!rybbb5OcRVp
>>281529
stop coming here, just to hate on the trolls.

if you want solid critiques, without the "dude youre awesome / dude youre a faggit," join:
http://www.photosig.com
>> Anonymous
>>281673
>http://www.photosig.com/
Jesus, at least two godawful HDR photos are presented as featured content for this week. I'm afraid to continue.
>> ilkore !!rybbb5OcRVp
>>281693
>Jesus, at least two godawful HDR photos are presented as featured content for this week. I'm afraid to continue.

do you mean the featured photographer, at the top? that just means the person paid for a subscription. and, it's not a weekly thing (more like hourly)... the only thing that is, is the photo of the week, at the very bottom.
>> M?e?e?s?e??? !iZn5BCIpug
>>281651
BAWWWWWWW /p/ IS MEAN TO ME BAWWWWWWWW
>> Anonymous
>>281693

Well? ...And what do you do you fucking faggot? Whine and moan? Join the fucking shit and fucking take a better photo for fucks sake. Oh... You have no talent?

Fuck, i'm out of here. Untalented fucking idiots all the fucking lot of you. Fucking pricks. Gearfags and fucking crybabies without talent. Fuck this shit!

Gay niggers! That's what you all are.
>> Anonymous
>>281556

lol lol lol

You haven't posted a good photo EVER!
>> Anonymous
DAVE HILL WANNABE DETECTED.
>> Anonymous
>>281937

Stevie Wonder?
>> Anonymous
some fucker nailed it earlier, this faggot stops by every month or so to post some bullshit to drum up some popularity..
other than the funny thread that ensues, this ballsack contributes nothing to /p/

some fucker nailed it earlier, this faggot stops by every month or so to post some bullshit to drum up some popularity..
other than the funny thread that ensues, this ballsack contributes nothing to /p/

some fucker nailed it earlier, this faggot stops by every month or so to post some bullshit to drum up some popularity..
other than the funny thread that ensues, this ballsack contributes nothing to /p/!
>> Anonymous
>>282722
Ballsack. No one contributes anything to /p/.
>> Anonymous
First photo i've actually saved to my image folder from /p
>> Anonymous
>>282837

you dont /p/ enough
>> Anonymous
>>282887

Now days, less and less.
>> Anonymous
It's easy for a handful of trolls to shit up things on such a slow board. Trolling on /p/ is easy mode.
>> Anonymous
shit is shit
>> nokin !ozOtJW9BFA
holy fuck its pskaught
>> Anonymous
NO ONE FUCKING CARES.
>> Anonymous
>>283275
One hundred and twenty-five posts and twelve image replies say otherwise.
>> Anonymous
This post is fucking cancer.
>> NatureGuy !se3A3TwzdY
     File :-(, x)
>>283291
>> Anonymous
Portrait on nappy?
>> Anonymous
Hi guys scott here. just wanted to let you know you can still check out my website and shit. oh yeah i still have stuff for you to buy too.

i wont contribute or answer any of your questions as im shitting my pants in fear that my dave hill series will be compromised if i tell you guys how i achieve this awesome look i originaly created for these pictures.

i hope you guys find my art funny as it really is funny. ist got al lthe charm you see ....do you see.
>> Anonymous
Worst Pskaught pic I've ever seen.