File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
I'm looking for a way to get high dynamic range on normal films or a brand with high dynamic range.

so
better are positive or negative films?
fast or slow films?
shooting with longer or shorter exposure?
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwaredigiKam-0.9.2-finalImage-Specific Properties:
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
anyone?

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwaredigiKam-0.9.2-finalImage-Specific Properties:
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
Negative film tends to give you a wider range, as I understand it. Especially black & white films (traditional, at least. Not sure about C41 B&W) And film tends to be inherently better than digital with this, thanks to reciprocity failure. As for specific films, I don't really know.
>> Anonymous
Print film is the best, Kodak Portra is supposed to be the very best.

ASA speed doesn't matter, and overexposing print film by around a stop would help just a little with dynamic range. I've tried really, really hard to overexpose print film to the point of no return, and all I get are annoyed lab techs and prints with a weird color cast, weak shadows, and average highlights.
>> Anonymous
.
>> Anonymous
ok, thx /p/