>> |
Anonymous
>>182314 >I doubt anyone posts their pet images as if they were masterpieces Some do, and pet pictures are often boring, I'm not saying this is an exception to the boring either.
>your's would be better if the dog wasn't blurry. It would look like every other 'freeze frame' shot if the dog wasnt blurry. The difference is what I liked about it.
It's a slow exposure, obviously, and while I did pan to follow the dog as it fell, it did squirm a bit. In other words, nothing I can do to fix the dog being blurry, unless I either
a) used a wider aperture and thus made the background sharper as well, thus exposing its ugliness, making it an even worse shot or...
b) used a longer telephoto with a high aperture to blur the background AND freeze the frame, which I dont have and wouldnt have done much of a difference anyways.
In any case, that's your opinion, but that's my answer to it.
|