>> |
Honest So You Dont Have To Be
!9UISPtwBPo
>Well, I am still just learning. Maybe you can point out specific ways I could have made the shots better?
>>278435
Nothing of interest here, Nasty shadow running down the center of a triangle, that has the end cut off, and is intersected by a cone....
none of the shapes work together, at least not in this shot, where ever you was going for, it never worked
>>278436
Again, nothing of intrest, if that wall was on the left 3rds line, and the guy was still there, then maybe it would work, but its just a poorly composed shot of a wall as it is...
>>278437
Wayyyyyy to buisy, what am i ment to be looking at here, eye goes from the red lining, to the checkers, up the road, to the red/white bumper things....
no clear point of focus, with no subject.
>>278438
Its a shot of a car... nothing that nice about it, you can make out what car it is, and the driver(s??) in it.
>>278439
Again, just shots of cars, these just aint so interesting...
>>278440
IMO the saving grace of the set,
Composure works (not perfect, but its good enough), i like the two sets of lighting on the car, side and half of the front,
I also love the way the car and the sky work, so for the eye it goes, red (bumper, thing), white (body), red (spoiler), white (sky)
duno if that was intentional, but its a handy occurrence
|