>> |
ac
!!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>112910 >And Olympus is a clear winner for using old MF lenses, for example. Which still doesn't matter for OP. No, sorry, that's not an argument. You're either not understanding your own (and my) argument or you're deliberately trying to annoy me by bringing up something completely irrelevant.
What you mentioned was something the OP doesn't care about. What I was talking about was things that the OP cares about, but which weren't relevant to *this particular discussion*. I.e., the OP cares about those things, but they're equally good, so they can be ignored in a discussion of which system is better.
Here, I'll try to make an analogy: Op: I want five dollars and not to be punched in the stomach. Should I talk to Steve or Jim? Me: Well, if you go with Steve, he'll definitely punch you in the stomach. Jim'll punch you in the stomach, but not as hard. Have you considered talking to Leonard? He won't punch you in the stomach at all. You: Yeah, but I talked to Steve and he gave me five dollars, and he did it with a smile. Then he punched me in the stomach. How does this relate to getting five dollars? Me: They'll all give you five dollars. The only difference is how much of a punch in the stomach you get. You: Yeah, but I'M NOT WEARING ANY PANTS.
See how that's just a non sequitur?
|