File :-(, x, )
Anonymous

EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot S5 ISCamera SoftwarePaint Shop Pro Photo 11.11Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created2008:02:17 17:09:31Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/3.5ISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/3.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length0.01 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3264Image Height2448RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualDigital Zoom Ratio51/4147Scene Capture TypeStandard
>> ANTMY
ISO IS OVER 9,000
>> Anonymous
My age old Canon S50 produces better stuff at iso400!
>> Anonymous
>>143082
Moar megapixels is why we can't have nice things. This is the worst ISO 200 I've seen out of any camera at any sensor size.

So much so I'm hoping it was just hopelessly underexposed and pushed in PS.

(Although some really shitty $80 compact is probably worse.)
>> Anonymous
>>143063This is the worst ISO 200 I've seen out of any camera at any sensor size.

that's stretching it a bit or you just haven't seen enough

this looks normal, nothing NR can't fix
>> Anonymous
>>143162
The NR's the problem. The noise probably would've been noticable but okay if the NR they put on it didn't look like ass.

And like I said,

>(Although some really shitty $80 compact is probably worse.)
>> Anonymous
i'm assuming this has no NR from the RAW