File :-(, x, )
eku !8cibvLQ11s
I say, digital is sharper than film. What do you say?

(Picture unrelated.)
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 30DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsPhotographerLauri KosonenMaximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2007:09:19 18:37:30Exposure Time1/15 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating640Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length17.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width640Image Height427RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>> thefamilyman !!rTVzm2BgTOa
I say stop starting pointless flame wars
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Digital is sharper than you.
>> Anonymous
if its not sharper now, it will be soon.
>> Anonymous
i say that you are a fucking idiot
>> Anonymous
You keep using that word.
I do not think it means what you think it means.
>> Anonymous
I see your trolling and raise you a link:
http://6mpixel.org/en/
>> Anonymous
>>78524
who are you?
>> Anonymous
i say you are comparing apples to oranges and are a complete twat
>> Anonymous
>>78524
lawl

I heard somewhere that 12 megapixel is about the same as an iso 100 35mm roll of flim as far as grain is concerned.
>> Anonymous
>>78561
and i heard its 22MP. comparing film and digital is needless. have a preference and enjoy it on your own; dont be a damn evangelist about the superiority of film/digital.
>> Anonymous
part of the reason why i like film is cuz u get to play with chemicals.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>78611
Yeah, that's one of the big reasons for me, too. Now that I've gotten over my fear of it, developing black and white is *fun*.

(Well, you know, when I don't completely fuck it up)
>> Anonymous
Technobabble matters for product photographers, and no one else.
>> Anonymous
>>78513
Oh yeah, awesome pic op
>> Anonymous
>>78572
It completely depends on the film, sensitivity, grain, etc.
A good roll will be able to get you detail up to 28mp. But then again, mp doesn't matter shit, so it doesn't matter.
>> Anonymous
lens quality, aperture, platform staibilty and focus determine sharpness. if you can get below 3 micron circles of least confusion then flim used to be able to surpass digital, however all of the films that could acheive this are now off the market.
>> Anonymous
>>78617
You are an idiot.
>> else !L6xabslN96
>>78513
is this double exposure?
>> Anonymous
>I say, digital is sharper than film
nah
>> eku !8cibvLQ11s
>>78825

Nah, how come that crossed your mind?