File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
ITT, surfing
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
     File :-(, x)
Well, there aren't any nekkid chicks in this, but it has the advantage that it was actually taken by me whereas I don't believe you took yours.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTiLens Size80.00 - 200.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware 1.0.5Owner NameunknownSerial Number0420104373Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:05:23 18:31:55Exposure Time1/800 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length93.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3888Image Height2592RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeAv-PriorityFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessUnknownSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeOne-ShotDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed224Camera Actuations-721223440Color Matrix129
>> Anonymous
>>69429
i didn't, but i still like it a whole lot.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>ITT, people holding surfboards but not actually surfing.
Fixed.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D50Camera SoftwareVer.1.00Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern824Focal Length (35mm Equiv)82 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2006:11:24 16:00:14Exposure Time1/640 secF-Numberf/13.0Exposure ProgramNot DefinedExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length55.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3008Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastSoftSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownISO Speed Used200Image QualityNORMALWhite BalanceAUTOImage SharpeningAUTOFocus ModeAF-AFlash SettingNORMALFlash Compensation0.0 EVISO Speed Requested200Flash Bracket Compensation0.0 EVAE Bracket Compensation0.0 EVTone CompensationAUTOLens TypeNikon D SeriesLens Range18.0 - 55.0 mm; f/3.5 - f/5.6Auto FocusClosest Subject, Right Selected, Unknown FocusedShooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/OffColor ModeLandscape sRGBLighting TypeNATURALNoise ReductionOFFCamera Actuations356Saturation 2NORMALDigital Vari-ProgramAUTO
>> heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA
>>69424
ITT MOAR.

Wow. Not only a nice photo, but what a NICE body.
>> Anonymous
>Only upload images that you, the photographer, have taken.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
     File :-(, x)
The ones I have of people actually surfing aren't that great. I've not been quick enough to get close enough, even with my 200mm tele on a 1.6x crop, for them to be much more than specs.

Pic related.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTiLens Size80.00 - 200.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware 1.0.5Owner NameunknownSerial Number0420104373Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:06:27 17:48:15Exposure Time1/2000 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length200.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3888Image Height2592RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeAv-PriorityFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessUnknownSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeOne-ShotDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed224Camera Actuations-699793344Color Matrix129
>> Anonymous
does anyone do surf photography in water? i love the ocean and this is relevant to my interests.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>69618
In water, no; it's cold and dirty. Near water, yes, although I'm really lazy to go there often.

<-- I probably posted this guy before. (500mm/5.6 manual lens on 2x crop)

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.Camera ModelE-500Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Color Filter Array Pattern654Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2007:08:18 01:10:53Exposure Time1/1250 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1024Image Height768RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessSoft
>> Anonymous
>>69436
>but what a NICE body.

Which one, specifically?

The girl on the far left-hand side looks very nice (perfect ankles, which is rare) but her waist is a little wide relative to her shoulders and hips.

Also, a little bit (just a smidge) too much fat on the hips. Girls ought to have wide hips and fat on them, but most of the width ought to come from bone structure, with just a little cushion to make them not rock-like.

The one in the middle, despite having an incredible ass and calves, doesn't seem too good otherwise. Her thigh is very large and unproportional, she has little arm muscle, and doesn't look like she has good shoulders, though it's hard to tell. Also, again though it's hard to tell, it doesn't seem like her waist tapers enough, either.

The third girl doesn't seem too remarkable at all. Light years ahead of most, but nothing in comparison to the other two, even.

The guy looks slightly over-built.

They've all got great bodies overall, but the third girl is just another good-looking girl, nothing exceptional in that category, and the first two both have a mix of great features and not-so-great features. Imperfections usually actually help the overall whole, but on those two they're distracting enough to make me do this whole long spiel.

Plus, the two girls' faces in view are absolutely nothing to write home about at all.
>> Anonymous
>>69640

virgin.
>> Anonymous
>>69643
Just bored.
>> Anonymous
>>69640

besides that, why go in without a rashguard, does she want her breasts to rub off on the wax? ...WHERE ARE THE WAVES ?!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)


Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDMC-FZ30Camera SoftwareVer.1.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)197 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:08:19 00:26:34Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating80Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length38.40 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width741Image Height468RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalImage QualityFineWhite BalanceAutoFocus ModeAutoSpot ModeUnknownImage StabilizerMode 2Macro ModeNormalShooting ModeUnknownAudioNoFlash Bias0.00 EVColor EffectOffContrastStandardNoise ReductionStandard
>> heavyweather !4AIf7oXcbA
>>69643
truth
>> Anonymous
>>69640
It's okay. You've probably never gone out on a date anyways.
>> Anonymous
>>69841
Or maybe I just hold the opinion that, while individual parts of these people are very good-looking, others detract from their looks and scramble up the whole?
>> Anonymous
I'm pretty sure this is from playboy or something. I remember seeing this in /wg/ a couple days ago and they said it was some kind of publicity shoot for the TV show the OC.
>> Anonymous
>>69640

you're seriously going to die a virgin.
>> Anonymous
>>69640
Hah, you spent far too much time playing with Barbie. Ever hear of diversity?