File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Do your worst!
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelDSC-S60Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 7.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:04:15 17:51:24RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalExposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating80Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length6.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1536Image Height2048
>> Anonymous
First impression is gb2/myspace/.

Also, it looks awfully noisy for an ISO 80 shot.
>> Anonymous
How did you manage to make the pipe center of attention?
>> Anonymous
Igor? Is that you?
>> Anonymous
>>41434
lawl, ISO 80 and still too noisy for you?
>> ac
>>41442
Bumping up the contrast (or a crappy camera) will make an ISO80 shot look grainy.

(This is not always a bad thing, but it's a thing)
>> Anonymous
>>41448
Not true.

I almost always keep the saturation on my camera bumped up, and my ISO 80 shots are clean.
>> ac
>>41499
1. Saturation != contrast
2. I was talking about photoshopping afterwards. I.e., grabbing the contrast dial and zooming it the hell up. It's a useful technique if you're trying to go for that old grainy black and white look in a digital picture.
>> Anonymous
thats low mega-pixel grain you numbskulls
>> Anonymous
>>41503
Oh, contrast too, sorry. Both of them I meant.
>> Anonymous
Interesting.. I don't like it. It's kind of annoying - I want to see the whole face, what's with the tilt, why is that fur.. there. Most Pore!
>> Anonymous
might be better w/o distraction pipe
>> Anonymous
I find the half-face most distracting. If it were more/all of the face, but moved a bit more towards the right and down, I think it would look better.