File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Overdone?
>> Anonymous
at least remove the vignetting
>> Anonymous
>>190953

I never do vignetting usually but it kinda seemed to fit here. At least? :p
>> elf_man !!DdAnyoDMfCe
I dunno, it's a little distracting. I'd say just crop out the area that you're vignetting.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)


Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D80Camera SoftwareVer.1.10Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.4Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern670Focal Length (35mm Equiv)60 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:05:27 16:59:12Exposure Time1/30 secF-Numberf/16.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating220Lens Aperturef/16.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length40.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastHardSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>> Anonymous
crop it to a square maybe, flower dead center, and might wanna throw a tiny bit of vignetting.
>> Liska !!LIVFOETqL8j
>>190957

pretty. Can i have a bigger (non vignetted) version for my desktop at work, please? It's soothing.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>190978

I hope 1920 widescreen fits
>> Liska !!LIVFOETqL8j
>>190985

that'll be fine. Thank you ! <3
>> Anonymous
>>190988

It's not really all that sharp because it was really windy... ears were constantly moving ;)
>> Liska !!LIVFOETqL8j
     File :-(, x)
>>190989

I know, but it's soothing and I like the detail and color in it ^.^ This is how it ended up on my desktop at work, and i kinda like the crop. The wide screen will fit my imac at home.
>> Anonymous
y did u photoshp a poppy in2 the feld?
>> Anonymous
>>191005

I didn't!

http://www.flickr.com/photos/13753643@N02/2528296018/ here's teh flickr if anyone cares
>> Liska !!LIVFOETqL8j
>>191010

cool. Would you mind if i friend /r/ed you from my flickr?
>> Anonymous
>>191011

eh no sure go ahead ;)
>> Anonymous
>>191011
> Would you mind if i sucked your e-penis ?

fix'd
>> Liska !!LIVFOETqL8j
>>191019

Actually, according to the screen name she's a she. So it'd be more like implied lesbianism. :P :)


>>191013
cool. added you.
>> Anonymous
>>191041So it'd be more like implied lesbianism. :P :)

I'm not seeing a downside here.
>> elf_man !!DdAnyoDMfCe
>>191046
Who said it's a downside? Just looks like a correction. Kinda hard to suck e-penis when they're female.
>> Anonymous
>>191050

Everyone has an e-penis. Everyone. Male or female.
>> Inanimate !3dXYfvdbBk
>>190952

In my unprofessional opinion, the original photo you posted seems best. This is a rare photo where the vignetting actually added to it.
>> Anonymous
>>190952

The original photo is best.

Faggots just want to point out that there's vignetting every time they see it because the only thing they know about photography is the technicalities and what they read in books.

Vignetting, believe it or not, can make photos more dramatic and this often leads to a better picture. Obviously if the photo looks fine without vignetting then you shouldn't add it but a lot of times vignetting can make it more art and less of just a photograph.
>> Anonymous
>>191073
>a lot of times vignetting can make it more art and less of just a photograph.

10/10

Incredible troll.
People will repost this to induce RAGE in the future.
>> Anonymous
Oh my lol
>> Anonymous
>>191077

Yeah, you add something to the photo and get creative with it. Just because you faggots can't work photoshop doesn't mean that others aren't allowed to use it to make their photos nicer.
>> Anonymous
>>191073
>>191077
Sweet, this is the first time I've witnessed the birthing of copy-pasta
>> elf_man !!DdAnyoDMfCe
>>191068
I just think it gets in the way of the pattern of the grass. Perhaps just higher contrast, instead of a vignette, would achieve something similar but be less distracting.
>> Anonymous
Because Top Gear knows what's best. Vignetting makes everything more dramatic.
>> Anonymous
>>191128
/o/ in mah /p/?!