File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
What say you /p/?
Please ignore the dust I re enlarged them today and there is no dust.
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image Width1611Image Height2007Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution200 dpiVertical Resolution200 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2007:05:31 00:47:17Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width800Image Height642
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)


Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image Width1611Image Height1998Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution200 dpiVertical Resolution200 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2007:05:31 00:47:31Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width800Image Height992
>> Anonymous
Third one I accidentally posted out of the thread sry.
-OP
>> Anonymous
how could you get a 800x600 p&b picture to have 232kb?
That's magic brothers!

I'm trying not to be a stupid rage commentor but, the first one is out of focus, shaken, noisy, and I don't find it nearly artistic so, what can I say?

Second one is a good premise I think, I would like the texture if it wasn't misfocused in the eye, plus shaken again... But it's a good composition, and I like it, but I honestly think you should work your technique, maybe then you'll need a watermark, believe me no one would use your pics now.

Don't call me rude or something but, "shakey" pictures are for myspace whores.

Aftermath: Good composition on the second one. Gave me a "doll-like" feeling.