>> |
Anonymous
>>33876 Sucks just as hard.
1 - Lighting sucks. Uniform flat lighting, seemingly from built-in flash. Lighting coming down low from side, casting long gloomy shadows would have been fappable in this picture. 2 - God damnit point and shoot auto settings. A wide aperture in this picture, focused onto the junk on the floor and putting the background into a blur would have been great - ISO could have been kicked up to give the picture a grainy and weary feeling. 3 - Dull colors. Touching up saturation of the junk in the picture would make it jump out more and draw attention to it's self quickly. As it is now, your eyes wander over the picture looking for a center of focus before settling on the junk. 4 - Uninteresting angle. Don't be afraid to get dirty and low when you're shooting pictures, a very low angle in this picture giving the junk a feeling of dominance and towering-ness would have been excellent.
tl;dr - Point and shoot; Aperture was too narrow, Shitty lighting (From built-in Camera flash. Suck.); Boring angle; nothing stands out.
God people, you can get a big-ass book of Photography 101 for 10 bux at your Barnes and Noble used section - Even if the book rambles on about film cameras, all of the stuff in it about lighting, angles, aperture, shutter speeds, flashes, ISO, etc etc.. is still entirely valid with a Digital camera. Also, why the hell can't I find environments like this? I'd kill for a nice abandoned trashy house or two..
|