What do you think of this one? It's from a kind of terrible scan, but I haven't had a chance to scan the negs yet.EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:03:26 00:13:54
It's interesting. Doesn't make me go wow but it's not exactly shit.
>>1484360/10no attempt at a tripcode, no signature email and no cutting sarcasam!I quite like it, but its not my sort of thing.
>>148436You have to crack his tripcode, if you want to impersonate Butterfly. Also, you forgot the SEGA. In other words, fucking fail.I like OPs pic, though. What film was used?
mods = quite acceptable people
Would be better if one or both were looking towards the camera.
>>148447Agreed. Unfortunately I wasn't able to wait for that to happen, and I don't think I could have gotten a shot of only one of them jumping again.>>148441It's just Fuji Superia 200.
People's backs are rarely interesting.
>>148528Unless they're women. In tight (or no) pants.
>>148529Ah, yes. I stand corrected.Delicious female derriere is always interesting.