File :-(, x, )
anonasean
wondering if anyone thinks this pic is decent. i read so much on here about expensiveasfuck cameras, but i think this pic is ok, and i took it with a kodak easyshare, 8.3 megs, not expensive, not complicated, everyday camera. any opinions from non-trolls and more laid back browsers?
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEASTMAN KODAK COMPANYCamera ModelKODAK EASYSHARE M853 ZOOM DIGITAL CAMERACamera SoftwareKODAK EASYSHARE M853 ZOOM DIGITAL CAMERAMaximum Lens Aperturef/4.2Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)77 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution480 dpiVertical Resolution480 dpiExposure Time17431/500000 secF-Numberf/4.2Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating160Lens Aperturef/4.2Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceDaylightFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length12.80 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3296Image Height2472Exposure Index160RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeMacro
>> Anonymous
i would say that the photo itself is, unfortunately un-original, but you bring up a good point, that i completely agree with. the camera doesn't take the photo, the photographer does. its all about your eye, not your lens. keep shooting kiddo...
>> anonasean
nature shots definitely arent original, but they're a good way to learn what your camera can do imo. different lighting conditions, unlimited angles, chances to play with focus. thanks for getting my point anon, trolls havent eaten me yet, so i'll keep shooting
>> Anonymous
no worries

(3)
>> Anonymous
nothing special