A while back, there were a couple "post your favorite flickr account" days. Before the usual Leica jealousy and rage started, some one posted a rather interesting (non-red dot) account.A couple of this guy's shots that I looked at we very nice looking diptychs. Most of them were street photography with an emphasis depiction of passage of time and consistency between the frames, unlike the 30K other diptychs on the site.Here's a description of one: Human female crossing a somewhat empty street, 50 from the camera, left frame. Right frame, same female, 3/4 portrait, identical setting, no changes.Now, this is nothing masonry inducing, but I liked a lot of his other stuff, but I didn't fucking bookmark it. And needless to say, finding for a specific image on that site (especially one you suspect of being untagged) is nothing short of painful.Can anyone help?In return, I'll post my own feeble attempts at diptychs.EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:04:30 15:19:15
Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwarePicasa 3.0Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:05:02 09:45:27Unique Image IDcc2b16b0d7d0fb7a6051ff6a8397a22b
>>173928This is awesome.
>>173931You want to see the color version?
>>173933For comparison, sure, but I think it works perfectly fine as b&w.
>>173934While I'm still here, you have any idea what i'm talking about here?Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:05:02 09:45:27
enjoy your shitty weekendhttp://www.flickr.com/search/groups/?q=diptychs
>>173945Fraid not.Both are nice, but I still think I prefer the b&w.
>>173946Thanks cpt. obvious.
Attempted triptych.Is /p/ asleep tonight? I'm sure there are more than one flickr lurkers here.