File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
From the Rush concert tonight.
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCASIO COMPUTER CO.,LTD.Camera ModelEX-V7Camera Software1.02Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.4Focal Length (35mm Equiv)266 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:01:01 04:48:56Exposure Time1/20 secF-Numberf/5.3Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias-1.7 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length44.10 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3072Image Height2304RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastHardSaturationNormalSharpnessHard
>> Anonymous
The composition is good but fuck...get a real camera.


Also, why would you pay to see Rush?
>> Anonymous
>>219687
>but fuck...get a real camera.
Yeah, let me just get a EOS 30D and a 70-300/2.8L and hide it in my pocket so that I can sneak it past the security. Any other genius ideas?
>> Anonymous
>>219692

Good point, but why post it on a photography board?
>> Anonymous
>>219687
>Also, why would you pay to see Rush?

/mu/ is <--- that way, no one cares about your music opinions
>> Anonymous
>>219697
Not the OP, but maybe because it's a photograph with more than trace amounts of thoughtful composition?
>> Anonymous
>>219697
My "good point" is that you're an idiot, so why are you still posting?
>>219701
Thanks.
>> Anonymous
>>219701
Not really? It's just the place OP was standing that decided the framing and composition. Also, shitty PP trying to fake a tilt shift lens. Too grainy. Bad moment to take the picture, uninteresting pose. Misses the energy I hope there actually was live.

Also, I'm not 219697.
>> Anonymous
>>219708
also, butthurt fags. Welcome to /p/.
>> Anonymous
>>219773
>It's just the place OP was standing that decided the framing and composition.
No, all that decided was the angle at which I could take pictures. I still did the framing by judging when the subjects were in good proximity to other things. Don't be so butthurt.
>Also, shitty PP trying to fake a tilt shift lens.
It's not trying to fake anything, it's just a gradient blur to cut down on (smear) the noise in the unimportant parts of the image. It's for function, not for KEWL TILT-SHIF.
>Too grainy.
Can't do a single thing about that, so why should I care? Why should anyone? It's from a $100 point and shit at ISO 400. What that fuck do you expect, really?
>uninteresting pose.
Yeah, sorry I couldn't yell out poses for them and/or wait until he made an awesome pose with his arms while in the middle of playing guitar with his arms.
>Misses the energy I hope there actually was live.
It wasn't a ska show. They're like 50 years old, give them a break. They're not going to slide onto stage on their knees or anything.

Get real, why are you even here? I don't see any photos you're posting.
>> Anonymous
retarded snapshot
>> Anonymous
>>219929
retarded poster
>> Anonymous
Someone's butthurt that their garbage camera phone snapshot sucks ass.
>> Anonymous
>>219932
>well, Geddy Lee might.
Haha, yeah, you know how he still jumps around a lot. I give him credit. Lifeson is kind of stagnant though.
>> Anonymous
>>219933
Someone's butthurt that their garbage brain makes asinine posts.
>> Anonymous
Composition is nice, the camera quality lets it down a bit, but that couldn't be helped. Well done OP.
>> Anonymous
>>No, all that decided was the angle at which I could take pictures. I still did the framing by judging when the subjects were in good proximity to other things. Don't be so butthurt.

butthurt? oh the irony. I'm just criticizing, which is what this board is about. The only thing that you can have decided was the crop. That's not a lot, the point you took it from, the angles in all directions, etc, were all pre-decided. So no thoughts of compositions. At least not that I can see.

>>It's not trying to fake anything, it's just a gradient blur to cut down on (smear) the noise in the unimportant parts of the image. It's for function, not for KEWL TILT-SHIF.

It still has the same effect. The reason why, or how you did it, does not matter. It's what can be seen. If your picture hangs in a gallery, is placed on a website, you can't comment that back at anyone thinking it looks fake? Besides, it doesn't work. You can't just smear noise, the side effects are too heavy. If those parts aren't important, why photograph them?
And it still looks KEWL TILT-SHIT.

>>Can't do a single thing about that, so why should I care? Why should anyone? It's from a $100 point and shit at ISO 400. What that fuck do you expect, really?

I expect a good photograph with at least a trace amount of composition. Now we've already concluded there's no trace of composition, so now I'm just checking if it's good in any way. Technically, thus, it sucks as well. I don't care you took it with a crappy point and shoot. No one cares, that's no argument boy.

>>Yeah, sorry I couldn't yell out poses for them and/or wait until he made an awesome pose with his arms while in the middle of playing guitar with his arms.
>> Anonymous
>>219977
continued.

Hey, yeah, maybe you could've wait until he at least not have his legs awkwardly posed. Maybe you could've wait until he was standing somewhere else on stage. You could've wait until he had a different facial expression, or looked into a different position. You could've wait until the camera man was gone, or did something else.

>>It wasn't a ska show. They're like 50 years old, give them a break. They're not going to slide onto stage on their knees or anything.

I'm not asking for sliding, but more then just the cliche standing man with a guitar.

>>Get real, why are you even here? I don't see any photos you're posting.

I post them all the time, but it took me a while to get you were just trolling.

4/10.
>> Anonymous
>>219977
>I'm just criticizing, which is what this board is about.
This is /p/ - Photography, not /p/ - Non-constructive Criticism From Butthurt Idiots
>The only thing that you can have decided was the crop.
And then you say...
>Maybe you could've wait until he was standing somewhere else on stage. You could've wait until he had a different facial expression, or looked into a different position.
I thought I wasn't in charge of anything? No decisions? Maybe you could not contradict yourself in your own post, lmfao. You're horrible at making any semblance of a thought, but you're good at making me laugh.
>The reason why, or how you did it, does not matter.
Yeah, you're right, nothing matters when it proves you wrong, LOL.
>Now we've already concluded there's no trace of composition
Why are you speaking as "we"? Are you that weak that you have to pretend other people are agreeing with you? You're the only RAAAAAAAAAAGEing person with ill-formed "points" complaining about stupid things.
>so now I'm just checking if it's good in any way. Technically, thus, it sucks as well.
You're the only one who thinks that, mainly because you're butthurt.
>You could've wait until the camera man was gone, or did something else.
Obviously I wanted him there. Are you just that stupid?
>more then just the cliche standing man with a guitar.
Well what the fuck is he? An ox with a broom? Jesus hell you're so fucking stupid and bad at making an argument, but you're good at making me laugh at your stupidity at least.
>I post them all the time
Grow some balls and post in this thread! Butthurt pussy.
>> Anonymous
This thread is awesome.
>> Anonymous
Bump for hilarity.