File :-(, x, )
Critique Anonymous
Took this photo today on my walk and just by chance this woman stepped in front of it. I think that made it 100x better than it would have without her, but . . .

On a scale from "Sucks to Balls" how would YOU rate this photo?
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelDSC-W80Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:03:20 13:52:46Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating125Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length11.40 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2048Image Height1536RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>> Anonymous
take two steps back
crouch down a bit more
turn your camera sideways
>> Anonymous
Stained Disney hoodies are horrible.
>> Anonymous
>>144694

I think so too, but it gives the picture a realistic look. I mean, not everyone dresses up when they go out, but at the same time you don't wish to appear hagged. The stained Disney hoodie gives an assumed impression of this woman's self esteem.
>> Anonymous
I'm gonna go with...

photo as seen: sucks .........|...... balls
photo as you framed it, without the lady: sucks ..|............. balls
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
100x better than it would have been without her, but it would have been painfully boring without her so that 100x multiplier pretty much just brings it up to "really boring".

I.e., it looks like you accidentally hit your shutter button, not that you took a picture on purpose.

Also: 2048x1536? Really? For this?