>> |
Anonymous
>>187607 >So you're telling me that the depictions aren't, in any way, to any number of people, anywhere in the world, unsettling? Why is being unsettled a bad thing? Isn't "shaking things up" good sometimes? Why don't you look at it that way? Because YOU'RE biased.
It's supposed to be JOURNALISTIC COVERAGE. That's the fucking point. The writers of these articles are clearly trying to bring on more controversy - they do so because they know its good for their business.
Yes, I am biased in my opinions. That's what opinions are, after all. However, journalistic integrity dictates that the kind of blatant baiting used in these articles NOT be used. If these were editorial pieces, I wouldn't give a shit about the bias. But, they're not, and a photographer whose work is totally valid is being led to the fucking gallows by a hysterical public and an irresponsible media. Shit, even the Australian PM has jumped on this now, and I can guarantee that he knows shit about Henson's work. Bias and ignorance abounds in this debate, and it's totally out of hand.
|