File :-(, x, )
thoughts? adam
TITLE: Tuesday, October 16, 2007, 8:16:26 PM, Target, 1154 S Clark St, Chicago, IL

Reshelved Commodities
>> Anonymous
>>125553
might work as a "sculpture" but definitely not a photograph.
>> beethy !HJGkSBB3Ao
     File :-(, x)
oh hi, i improved your photo

Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2008:02:13 17:56:11Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1024Image Height768
>> studioeeg
     File :-(, x)
if you want t take photographs like this look at Brian Ulrich work, this is one of his pieces
www.brianulrich.net
>> Anonymous
Eggleston...
>> Anonymous
>>125560
i like your flickr gallery
>> Anonymous
>>125553
1. Drop the pretentious title. Whether it's "non conformist orange terror" or "Tuesday, October 16, 2007, 8:16:26 PM, Target, 1154 S Clark St, Chicago, IL Reshelved Commodities" it's pretentious. "Reshelved Commodities" on its own worked, but nothing unique enough is happening in the photograph to make anyone care when or where you took it. In fact, how it could've been taken in any big box store, even the one five minutes from a viewer, would add to it if you hadn't specified.

2. Needs less noise. Usually noise or grain doesn't bother me, but it does here. Get a small quick-collapsing tripod if lowering the ISO would make your exposure too long to hand-hold, run in, do it, and get out.

Alternatively, shoot medium format film with a waist-level finder like Ulrich does. Or something that'll let you take a quick, surreptitious, non-noisy photograph.

Otherwise it's pretty good. Needs a little sharpening.

>>125560
Win for Ulrich.

>>125564
Lol Brian Ulrich on Flickr.
>> adam
>>125570
it's not a pretencious title at all, had you asked what it means you wouldnt look so dumb now

more comments please
>> iProd !8x7lXo9zIQ
Godlike chicken holding bell peppers in the Montecito Vons in Santa Barbara, CA.
>> iProd !8x7lXo9zIQ
     File :-(, x)
>>125602
whoops forgot my chicken

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTiCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshPhotographerunknownMaximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2007:12:07 17:34:55Exposure Time1/80 secF-Numberf/3.5Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/3.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length18.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width996Image Height1400RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>> Anonymous
>>125598
Okay, so, what does it mean?
>> Anonymous
i think this would have looked really interesting had you used a lens that would have shown more of the aisles while keeping the central focus undistorted.
>> adam
>>125604
nevermind...
everyone is missing my concept
>> Anonymous
>>125559
That pretty fucking epic Beethy
>> Anonymous
>>125617

No, it's a piece of shit. There are 23456789 things wrong with this photo. I hope you're a shitty troll. If so, die, /p/ is srs business. If not, never take another photo again you art school drop out flippy haired trend following converse wearing razr using apple faggot.
>> beethy !HJGkSBB3Ao
>>125618
why thank you

hahaha
>> Anonymous
>>125623
Copycat.
>> Anonymous
>>125617

You accuse us of misunderstanding it, but then refuse to explain it. If that's not pretentious then I don't know what is.
>> Anonymous
ITT /p/ gets trolled
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>125617
So okay, obviously you're trolling us, but I think this actually might be a good picture if the microwave were cropped out (or removed from the scene before taking the picture)
>> Anonymous
>>125620

^ Wins this topic