wats a good film speed for overcast days? 400 be okay?EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2006:02:13 18:16:54Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width330Image Height297
What is this 'film' you speak of?
>>112780it came after stone and chisels but before silly ccds and cmos and algorithms and jpgs and porn
bu t srsly, 400 be okay for overcast?
>>112794simple answer, yesmore complex answer, depends on what focal length and aperture.
Jebuz... how long is a piece of string.
I used Kodak Gold 200 for Overcast and they came out fine.Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:01:11 19:55:37
>>112818Lmao. That's fine to you? Sage.
>>112821The picture may be bad but I don't think it was the films fault. I'm using a camera from the 70's I don't really know how to work very well and have next to no clue what I'm doing besides. I think in those dire circumstances the film handled it pretty well.
>>112823It looks extremely blurry, which suggests (although doesn't say conclusively) that you needed to use a shutter speed that was too slow for you to handhold it cleanly. I.e., ISO200 Kodak Gold wasn't fast enough.