File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
For those who remember me, I was the one using Velvia 50 and Didn't have a scanner.

So I got them scanned by London Drugs, and Oh boy did they fuck up big time on my favorite pic. I can't help but feel a 250$ scanner I can buy would do a better job than this. So anyway heres what I got back from them scanned. (unedited yet)

Posting full res pics because they are only about 1MB, and for the people who Saw them originally. (And wanted to see the scanned versions)
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelQSS-32_33Camera SoftwareQSS-32_33 2.00A.017 2006.04.07Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3436Image Height2241
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
This one turned out quite well

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelQSS-32_33Camera SoftwareQSS-32_33 2.00A.017 2006.04.07Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3436Image Height2241
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
This one is saveable in photoshop, but still just seems noisy.

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelQSS-32_33Camera SoftwareQSS-32_33 2.00A.017 2006.04.07Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3436Image Height2241
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Sharper than i thought!

Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelQSS-32_33Camera SoftwareQSS-32_33 2.00A.017 2006.04.07Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3436Image Height2241
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
In what way did they fuck up?

Also, we really don't need the 7 megapixel version. Shrink 'em.
>> Anonymous
>>60238
They overexposed the first one (my fav) and I think they did it in software afterwards because the dark areas have very harsh grain, And by doing that they overexposed the skies.
>> Photoshop-kun !!cBJbNBorLte
>>60242
I was under the impression film scanners had limited dynamic range, thereby introducing the problem?
>> Anonymous
>>60252
Yes thats true, thats why multiple passes in the software can perform a somewhat HDR rendered scan, Better scanners should do that to meet the films Dynamic range.
>> Photoshop-kun !!cBJbNBorLte
>>60272
Yes, I see. That'll work fine, just fine.