File :-(, x, )
studioeeg
i know the photographer, just really haven't spoken to her. How do you get this effect she is getting. I am pretty sure she is using just an external flash on her hot shoe.
EXIF data available. Clickhereto show/hide.
Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBELCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/3.5Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:07:13 22:29:17White Point Chromaticity0Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/16.0Exposure ProgramNot DefinedISO Speed Rating6553700Lens Aperturef/16.0Brightness0 EVExposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance0.00 mMetering ModeAverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length24.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width800Image Height533Exposure Index0
>> studioeeg
well thank you!
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>110548
Yep. Looks like she's shooting outdoors, just using EXTREM FAST SHUTTER SPEED (1/250th) along with a tiny aperture so that her flash overpowers the daylight.
>> Anonymous
It doesn't look like natural light to me, but the EXIF does say no flash.

Hot lights, maybe?
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>110552
If it's not a Canon dedicated TTL flash it won't list it in the EXIF.

(In fact, I'm not even sure if off-camera dedicated Canon flashes will list in the EXIF. But I know that plain hotshoe flashes won't)
>> Anonymous
>>110553

Canon Speedlite + off-shoe cord = yes in EXIF
>> Anonymous
well, it could be that the guys are jumping in front of a green screen -> exif from the background picture with no flash.

probably just external flash. anyway, ISO 6553700 is kinda cool.
>> Anonymouse !!h5ALjqgB4DE
Could be remote synced flash or just some portable lights. There's nothing to say this setting is far away from civilization, could just be in someone backyard.
>> Anonymous
lol thats green/bluescreened idiots
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>110595
Troll, or don't understand lighting?
>> Anonymouse !!h5ALjqgB4DE
>>110597
You're right, since there's only two kinds of people on 4chan, it's just hard to say which he is.
>> ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA
>>110690
I lol'd
>> studioeeg
actually to be pretty blunt I don't understand lighting 100%. So I guess you would be right?