File :-(, x, )
Snapesnogger
So who likes nagas?!

Oekaki post(Time: 11 min, Painter: Shi-Painter Normal, Animation:View)
>> Anonymous
too much nose.
fail.
>> Anonymous
needs more cock sheath and lumpy tails
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>59001
THE TAIL IS NOT LUMPY!!

Oekaki post(Time: 10 min, Painter: Shi-Painter Normal, Animation:View)
>> Anonymous
needs more pregnant males.
>> Anonymous
your art got less shitty
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Those aren't nagas, those are lamias. This is more like it.

Oekaki post(Time: 11 min, Painter: Shi-Painter Pro, Source:>>59003, Animation:View)
>> Anonymous
>>59009
how is that a naga and not just a snake?
>> Anonymous
>>59010
shoop lips
>> Anonymous
>>59009
needs like eighty million more heads
>> Anonymous
>>58997
Snapesnogger wouldn't even acknowledge the nose. IMPOSTER.
>> Anonymous
>>59033
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/50244484/
>> Wesker !JYbrm0g7fs
     File :-(, x)
While>>59009is correct in that Dumb Bitch's design is closer to that of a Lamia (even though Lamias are classically FEMALE) they also got the more mythological naga wrong.

In a way.

Naga can, in general, mean any sort of serpent creature, be it a regular snake, a multi-headed serpent, or even a humanoid serpent as I have portrayed.

Really, it depends on the myth.

HOWEVER, nagas will NEVER exhibit human features outside of possible arms/hands. They will not have human torsos and such, it would be a very reptillian structure through the entire body.

tl;dr 4chan /i/ DOES know nagas

Oekaki post(Time: 23 min, Painter: Shi-Painter Normal, Source:>>59009, Animation:View)
>> Anonymous
>>59039
Then what the fuck is a male lamia called?
Also,>>58997if you really are SnapeSnogger, I love you.
>> Wesker !JYbrm0g7fs
>>59083
There's no such thing as a male Lamia, Einstein.

Technically, Lamia was only ONE creature, a woman with a snake body who devoured children, but it spread to be more than one woman I suppose.

Kind of the same idea of a Sphinx. No males, just females.
>> Anonymous
>>59084
There's probably a male variation though. Like a Sphinx is to a Manticore.
>> Wesker !JYbrm0g7fs
>>59100
Which would be what, children?

That's right, the NAGA!

Good job. A+s all around.
>> Moot !Ep8pui8Vw2
>>59084
>No males, just females.
Problem. See>>58997and>>59003
People have created male variations of lamias, which would be...? Naga. You just have to clal it that because that's the only name you CAN use for it. Nothing else makes sense.
>Naga can, in general, mean any sort of serpent creature, be it a regular snake, a multi-headed serpent, or even a humanoid serpent as I have portrayed.
Only word that fits.
>>59104
Thank you.
>> Moot !Ep8pui8Vw2
>>59107
Oh, sorry btw. Forgot to change my tripcode-faggot-moot-piss-take name out again. Eheh.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
FIXED

Oekaki post(Time: 2 min, Painter: Shi-Painter Normal, Source:>>58997, Animation:View)
>> Anonymous
Can't we all just call them snake people and get it over with?
>> Anonymous
Nagas keep stealing my chicken.
>> ICI !E/izDXJg.Y
Ich konnte nicht nagas kennen, aber ich kenne etwas Deutsches.