File :-(, x, )
Upon
blargh.

Oekaki post(Time: 1 h 53 min, Painter: Shi-Painter Normal, Animation:View)
>> Anonymous
WHERE'S HER ASS?
>> Upon
     File :-(, x)
hopefully improved.

Oekaki post(Time: 8 min, Painter: Shi-Painter Normal, Source:>>70065, Animation:View)
>> Anonymous
>>70065
If this where real I would frame it.
>> Anonymous
Holy shit guy! I'm loving that tree.
>>70069
If I made something of that quality I would hang on it my wall too.
>> Pixie
     File :-(, x)
>>70071
>>70069
Problem solved.

Oekaki post(Time: 4 min, Painter: Shi-Painter Normal, Animation:View)
>> crow
Very nice
>> Anonymous
Please draw here more.
/i/ needs this kind of quality.
>> Anonymous
uponthoufaircat
>> Anonymous
Tree is great, girl not so much. What the fuck is up with her legs, thighs, and arms. Like they're noodles or something. I would come all over that tree, though.
>> Anonymous
>>70100
Yeah, her arm is too long, the elbow is too low. There's not enough hip definition... and maybe a couple other things.
But other than that, it's sexy as hell.

At least he cared to make something of quality.
>> Anonymous
>>70108

I was so incredulous over your calling the picture 'sexy as hell' that I decided to take a further in-depth look at the picture. Now I see that her face is horribly FUBAR and her hand is just ridiculous. The foot makes no sense and the pose is dumb. Her tits look like they're so heavy that they're sliding in fat lumps down her collar.

What do you mean by this ->
>At least he cared to make something of quality.

At least he was desperate enough for /i/'s faphappy to draw a nude woman? I already commented on the quality of the tree. The girl is subpar at best. Just because he threw in some shitty gradient shading doesn't make it 'quality'. This is just as bad as breathe's shit. But this isn't /ic/ -- feel free to suck cock.
>> Anonymous
>>70128
Get out man, nobody wants your bullshit here, like you yourself said this aint /ic/. People mostly draw here just for fun despite drawing ability, we dont need people like you trying to bring everyone down.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>70128
>> Anonymous
>>70132

im soary i hurt ur fealings :'( i wouldn't want to be bringing anyone down with my mean words!
>> Grawh Anonymous
     File :-(, x)


Oekaki post(Time: 29 min, Painter: Shi-Painter Normal, Source:>>70068, Animation:View)
>> Grawh! Anonymous
>>70137
Fixed enough so I can fap to it.
>> Upon
     File :-(, x)
i made a few changes to the pic, i hope you approve.

Oekaki post(Time: 12 min, Painter: Shi-Painter Normal, Source:>>70068, Animation:View)
>> Anonymous
>>70138
It'd be good if you actually tried detailed shading.. no more shiney tits. Bawww..
>> Anonymous
>>70139

I notice you slipped in an ass. Or a wayward ballsac. gj either way, i came.
>> Grawh! Anonymous
>>70140
You think I'm gonna spend that much time fixing someone else's picture instead of drawing my own?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Let's make this fine art even better!

Oekaki post(Time: 16 min, Painter: Shi-Painter Normal, Source:>>70065, Animation:View)
>> Anonymous
>>70142
Do it, or put your money where your mouth is and do something yourself. Preferably a naked female.
>> Grawh Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Tail is lumpy.

Oekaki post(Time: 4 min, Painter: Shi-Painter Normal, Source:>>70143, Animation:View)
>> Mac !vv/Nr3MYLo
Nice pic Upon, good to see some new talent in /i/ regardless of flaws. Hope to see more of your stuff.

>>70128
You do raise some valid points, but it reads more like a malicious slagoff than a critique. "FUBAR," "ridiculous" and "dumb" don't really help unless you go into detail as to why that's the case. You can be scathingly witty and yet helpful at the same time, as per Grawh's redraw.

tl;dr Nice OP & lol 4chan
>> Chicken
>>70147
it's apparent that you dont know nagas
>> Grawh! Anonymous
>>70149
Lol "new" talent.

>>70153
Yes, I forgot, I don't nose nagas.
>> Mac !vv/Nr3MYLo
>>70154
Oh, I hadn't noticed Upon's stuff before. I'd lurk more, but . . . yeah.
>> Anonymous
excellent work upon
>> Anonymous
>>70143
You got rid of the one leg I liked.

>>70141
An ass was slipped in in the second version.

>>70128
I did think it was sexy at first - mostly cause I was captivated by the mere concept of a nude female and the shiny breast, plus it was looking pretty good compared to other pictures on the board of late - so I didn't care to look for mistakes. I didn't actually pay attention to the picture itself under other people started questioning whether or not it was actually "good".

It might not be your idea of quality - but cut him some fucking slack. He spent nearly two hours on this, trying to contribute a serious piece of art to this board.

Who are you to say what his motive was?
Who am I to try to defend him?
Fuck the both of us.

Blah blah blah. Piss ==> ocean of piss.

Sure, I'd suck your cock, but I can't find it.

Etc.
>> Anonymous
>>70143
You got rid of the one leg I liked.

>>70141
An ass was slipped in in the second version.

>>70128
I did think it was sexy at first - mostly cause I was captivated by the mere concept of a nude female and the shiny breast, plus it was looking pretty good compared to other pictures on the board of late - so I didn't care to look for mistakes. I didn't actually pay attention to the picture itself until other people started questioning whether or not it was actually "good".

It might not be your idea of quality - but cut him some fucking slack. He spent nearly two hours on this, trying to contribute a serious piece of art to this board.

Who are you to say what his motive was?
Who am I to try to defend him?
Fuck the both of us.

Blah blah blah. Piss ==> ocean of piss.

Sure, I'd suck your cock, but I can't find it.

Etc.
>> Anonymous
>>70137looks russian.

>>70139is fukken lolz, and fukken lolz is fukken saved for future generations and personal entertainment purposes.
>> sirjared
whole thread = tl;dr, but if OP is new to /i/ I just wanna tell him/her that when Anonymous really starts tearing into your work (when you haven't been an arrogent ass) that means you did a pretty good job. The only thing that bugged me about this is that the upper arm was abit long. That, and she looks abit unhealthy>>70137's edit is my fav for that reason.
>> Anonymous
>>70128

How come whenever someone tries to put effort into an Oekaki drawing, some fag from /ic/ comes along and has to bitch about how bad it looks?

Oekaki literally means doodle or scribble, not "o hi howz mai art luuk?" People draw in Oekaki most of the time just to fucking draw, so like said, get your ass back to /ic/, because the OP could probably care less about critique.

No, I'm not saying critique is bad, I think it's wonderful. I'm just saying that if he wanted it, he would've asked for it.
>> Anonymous
>>70174

Anon never takes the time to read a thread, it seems. Let's trace our steps to the beginning.

>>70100
this anon (anon 1) gushes about the tree but nitpicks loosely the anatomy of the girl.

>>70108
this anon (anon 2) decides to challenge the previous anon's complaint. anon 1 proceeds to list in detail complaints with the drawing in accordance to anon 2's complaints. anon 2 throws out a 'GTFO' and puts up a crap macro.

>>70137
This anon (anon 3) peeks in to alter the drawing a few times for lulz. At this point the drama ends and nitpickery such as
>>70174
>>70169
>>70163
ABOUT the goddamn drama begins.

Moral of this story: welcome to 4chan.
>> Anonymous
>>70177
No, I'm "anon 2", and I didn't offer any macros or pictures of any kind, nor did I GTFO anyone.

Seriously, what was the point of that? We get it, but you seem not to.
>> Anonymous
It's funny how anon only trolls the few quality pics posted here.
>> Anonymous
Yeah, as soon as something gorgeous like this turns up, it's an asshole pile-on.

I mean, yes, the leg's too long, and she has some anatony problems - but would it have killed people to admit that the rest of it's really nicely painted? I love the style and the feel of it, and the breasts are really lovely.

Thanks Upon, it's way cool!
>> Anonymous
>>70149
Better lol moar to cover how upset drama makes you

>>70155
Well stop jerking off in the mirror.

>>70537
Thats because youre all reputation fags that care way to fucking much. You all shit your panties on cue.
>> Grammar!Nazi !WokonZwxw2
Lol@dramafags and MASSIVE critique. I think it looks great. It has some issues, but I'm certainly not one to talk, and it would be weird if it DIDN'T have any issues. And it's better than 90% of the stuff on /i/.
>> Anonymous
>>70537
Imitation is the highest form of flattery.
That aside though, /i usually only rips apart the tryhard shit or the truly awesome, usually leaving it to the viewer to decide which it is. I think you can agree it fits in the awesome category.
>> Anonymous
Case & Point:
This is not /ic/.
Everyone shut the fuck up.
>> Anonymous
ignoring previous BAAAW'ing, this is seriously really good shit. the face kind of feels out of place to me, and of course there are a few things that could be fixed, but it's a fucking oekaki...it's amazing.
>> Anonymous
Nice job Upon.
I like her face. Very cute :)
>> Anonymous
Only the body looks good i think, as well as the background. need some work on the face though. But the body i think it's great it really shows that it's flesh im seeing ^^
>> Anonymous
This is still here? Why are threads lasting 8 days? Did the trolls win?
>> Anonymous
>>70147
is that an inside concept-art.org joke?
>> Anonymous
good job OP

>>70128
>>70135
>>70212
>>70622

christ...
just kill yourself
>> Anonymous
I like the body and pose, but the face reminds me of Bratz and that angers and confuses me.