File :-(, x, )
NO TALENT ART Anonymous
THIS STYLE IS SO FUCKING SHITTY YOU CAN DO IT ON OEKAKI
fucking pisses me off.

Oekaki post(Time: 28 min, Painter: Shi-Painter Normal, Animation:View)
>> Anonymous
I agree that the style is shit and most animu styles are no talent hackjobs but I'd like to see some of your other stuff then. Not calling you out, I just like to see artists who know better than to draw anime.
>> Anonymous
... i find it very amusing that you dislike that style and yet know how to do it well enough to make that picture in under a half an hour...

Not that I disagree with you or anything...

Yeah, I second the other poster, draw a picture of a style you *do* like!
>> Anonymous
Doesn't the fact that it took under half an hour reiterate my point about this being a style that requires no talent?

Hey, I'm not saying I dislike animu in general, just this style in specifically.
>> Anonymous
>>92875

honestly you pulled it off with such proficiency that it doesn't so much say "takes no talent" as it says "this guy has drawn this picture a million times".
>> Anonymous
in b4 weeaboos defending anime style
>> Anonymous
>>92878

no, the OP is right, the style is an extremely simplistic one. I don't really care for it either.

Still, watch the animation. The OP is not looking at another picture and tracing it or some shit. They've just done this picture a million times before.
>> Anonymous
"this guy has drawn this picture a million times"
It would never take that many tries to get this style down. "This picture" was referenced, for the one time sake of lobbing the head off. Heaven forbid I look at it for any longer. Drawing techniques are transferrable are the not? If you learn something more complex, it's easy to do stuff like this.
>> Anonymous
>>92881

please draw in the style of your choice? Always good to get some talented people on /i/.
>> Anonymous
>>92872
AMURIA?
>> Anonymous
>>92875
You do now you can draw the Mona Lisa on MS paint right?
>> Anonymous
>>92875
Its no surprise you dislike it, you picked the worst type of anime there is which is the current Lucky Star type garbage.
>> -(:)
>>92872
oh god this style. Generic-ass shit that doesn't even look good most of the time because the anatomy is usually way the fuck off when I see this style.
>> Anonymous
yeah, is pretty basic and generic, giant eyes, triangle jaw, dot nose, line mouth, and stupid hair with the burn tool. I hate it when weaboos do this style, if you're going to do anime style try something that doesnt look like its straight out of a cheap doujin cover.
>> Anonymous
/ic/ artschoolrejectfags not content with fagging up just one board now?
>> Anonymous
So, just because it's easy to do means it's shit. Oh, I guess that mean Bugs Bunny and Mickey Mouse are shit then?
>> Anonymous
I agree
>> Anonymous
>>92946
Don't compare classics to this shitty style, AMURIA
>> Anonymous
>>92992
:)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>92872
So your logic is, if you can do it on an oekaki board, it's shit.

Well I guess this must be shit too.
>> Anonymous
>>92992
Wasnt the first anime inspired by Disney, and then that layed the foundation for what anime would soon become?
>> Anonymous
Amuria isn't good at all, she is only good at coloring. without that, she sucks balls.
>> Anonymous
>>92946
no, they are designed well

they have character
>> Anonymous
>>93052
.......designed well.................character........
no really, seriously now, dont make more jokes
>> Anonymous
>>93057
he's talking about Bugs Bunny and Mickey Mouse
>> Anonymous
>>93065
he knows