File :-(, x, )
Anonymous !mL2ZRk1cK.
I dunno anymore

Oekaki post(Time: 29 h 15 min, Painter: Shi-Painter Normal, Animation:View)
>> Anonymous
delicious
>> Anonymous
Thats pretty freaky. I know you used a ref so its a real pic but if thats spot on that girl I would not hit.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>74799
you're kidding, right?
>> Anonymous
>>74799
homosexual
>> Anonymous
>>74799
Clearly gay.
>> Anonymous
>>74809
I can feel it coming on...that man's clearly homosexual.
>> Anonymous
>>74810
>>74819
same virgin
>> Mac !vv/Nr3MYLo
ITT original post is ignored in favor of discussion about how horny and/or gay Anonymous is. Oh, 4chan.
>> Anonymous
>>74822
It's not like this is a drawing board or anything.
>> Anonymous
That is an excellent image, I thought somebody spammed with a photo instead of oekaki again.
>> Anonymous
>>74821
I swear, some people don't even know how to use sage anymore. Just because you're blind and/or have erectile dysfunction doesn't mean you have to fret over people who can pop a boner! By saging, you're bringing down a thread who's OP didn't do anything wrong to you. You're an enormous faggot. Pip, pip, cheerio!
>> Anonymous
>>74829
I second this motion.
Also, sagefagAnon, stop crying "virgin".
There are tons of undeserving people who get fucked every day.
>> (:)-
I thought it was a picture from the thumbnail so I scrolled past it.

Jesus christ!
>> yukorin Anonymous
her farts smell like vanilla
>> Anonymous
>>74829
FYI, sages don't actually bump a thread down. They only let you post in a thread without bumping it back up, for example, if you said something not very important to the topic and didn't want to bump it up.
>> Anonymous
>>74845
Fundamental knowledge is fundamental - and not reasonable grounds for holding back a Mac thread.
>> Anonymous
who cares about whews gay.
lets just kiss OP's ass for his amazing skill
>> Anonymous
>>74847
This isn't a Mac thread, it's an !mL2ZRk1cK thread, but the point still stands.
>> Needs moar Mac Needs moar Mac
Needs moar Mac
>> Anonymous
>>74845
A sage doesn't just let your post not bump the thread but also the next non-sage reply.
>> Anonymous
>>74861
I doubt it.
>> Anonymous
>>74863
Let's test it.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>74865
Already did.
>> Anonymous
>>74863
>>74865
>>74866
Testing...
>> Anonymous
>>74866
Well, okay. But I could've sworn...
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
!mL2ZRk1cK .... traces.

Before you shout at me and call me a fag.. Here's my proof.

Look at the image I posted.
it's the photo and the oekaki at 50% opacity.
- reference photo is EXACT SIZE (ratio) as drawing
- a real realism painting does not copy shit like the wooden panel exactly. this is crap tracers draw
- tracer artist has no artistic skill whatsoever. everything is a blatant and crappy copy. ... Take a look at his linework, it's messy, all over the fucking place and reminds me of shitty beginner artists.


!mL2ZRk1cK = tracing fucking fag fuck.


To prove me wrong I'd like to see some ORIGINAL work !mL2ZRk1cK has done.
>> Anonymous
>>74869

you must be new here.
>> Anonymous
>>74870
i agree with that guy.. i mean it looks heaps like a shitty trace job
did you even look at the picture he posted?
>> Anonymous
>>74871
>>74869

If you havent seen !mL2ZRk1cK's work you must be new here.

now gtfo newfags
>> Anonymous
then post his original work, fags.

prove me wrong :)
>> Anonymous
He used a "reference." He didn't make this out of scratch obviously.
>> Anonymous
>>74877
no fucking shit dumbass.
there's a difference between reference and obvious motherfucking trace.
this is the latter.


show
me
his
original
work

to prove me wrong. assholes.
>> Mac !vv/Nr3MYLo
>>74869
- it's not uncommon when reproducing a photo to work to the exact same size.
- if anything, the wooden panel in the illustration is rather plain and has not reproduced, say, the grain of the wood. If the image is the same size as the original, lining up points would be relatively easy.
- Watching the animation I can see a method of setting reference points and working from loose sketches to tighter detail.
>> Anonymous
>>74882
i can't argue with your first point.. but.
working on an image the exact same size is something tracers do.
look at how well the wooden shit is matched up. to match it up in such an exact manner is pointless since it doesn't make the drawing look any better.
.... as for the animation, i watched that before i made my comment. i don't see these 'reference points' you speak of.
all i see is someone trying to cover up that they trace.

has this person EVER done any original art? if not, you people are fools for thinking he doesn't trace.
haha.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Now GTFO newfags
>> Anonymous !4X8vLLNDE2
     File :-(, x)
am I part of the cool kids club yet

Oekaki post(Time: 8 min, Painter: Shi-Painter Normal, Source:>>74795, Animation:View)
>> Anonymous
>>74887
looks traced.
>> Anonymous
>>74887
even if that's not traced... the hand is totally fucked up. fingers make no sense.
shading makes no sense either.
(if the light is coming from behind.. how can the shading be on the sides?)

i wouldn't be surprised if OP traces.
>> Anonymous
>>74890
Multiple lightsources.
>> Anonymous
>>74890

oh fuck i am feeding trolls...

nm you are right !mL2ZRk1cK. is one big fat tracer.

how do you like your e-penis extension served?
>> Anonymous
he COPIES not traces.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>74898
>> Anonymous
>>74869
Judging from this post and the animation, yes, this picture was probably traced. HOWEVER, I strongly doubt that -everything- he draws is traced, and regardless of tracing, it still takes skills to get colors from realism to turn out well. So even if he traced the shapes from the picture, he still gets props from me for being able to color it to match even more. Especially the eyes, since I'm not personally a big fan of scribbly pen coloring.
>> Anonymous
>>74902
I always thought tracing was strictly going over the lines on a new layer (or on tracing paper). Grid drawing seems a little more difficult.
>> Anonymous
>>74902
OP's picture wasn't even done in that process... so what's your point?

this drawing screams trace
>> Upon !./wO9B/UkQ
hahahahaha this isn't tracing. anyways all the trolls likely make !mL2ZRk1cK stroke even harder considering it's an unintended compliment.
>> Anonymous
Holy shit, this looks amazing.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
~Can you paint with all the tools of the program~
>> Anonymous
>>74890
sounds like you know a awful lot about art.. care to show us some?
>> ??
It's not tracing, it's just useless work. Three clicks in photoshop will get you the same result from a photo.
Unless of course you have 29 hours to kill and you have nothing better to do.
>> Upon !./wO9B/UkQ
>>74958
yes, if you do not like to learn good things such as art
>> ??
>>74960
I doubt OP drew it for learning purposes.
>> Upon !./wO9B/UkQ
>>74962
that doesn't make any sense, why else would !mL2ZRk1cK draw it ?

unless he drew it to semi-satisfy ogura's constant begging for sex in a manner that was free of the transference of bodily fluids
>> ??
>>74968
To kill 29 hours?
>> Anonymous
>>74958
WHY WOULD AN ARTIST DRAW A DRAWING LOL IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE
>> Anonymous
Very good

not worth 29 h 15 min of your life though =(
>> Anonymous
>>74979

I doubt he worked non-stop 29 hours on it. He must have taken a break or two so now and then.
>> end_of_ !mL2ZRk1cK.
>>74962
uh, yes, I did paint it for learning purposes.
one of the exercises I did in class last year involved taking a master painting and repainting it. However, the goal was not to draw and render the painting exactly, but to pick up the various colors in the painting and to recreate them on a blank white canvas. Color is relative, and depending on where it is painted, the color changes -- for example, I thought the girl's hair was black, so I started it off that way, but later I realised it was a mix of browns and purples and the highlights were sky blue because of the sky. Had I just gone by memory instead of looking at the hair over and over again, I would have probably made it too orange (as it is my tendency to paint black hair slightly orange when it's resting near the skin).

The lips also look pink and red in the original, but if you closely it's actually magenta and lavender at the darkest and lightest part of the lips. The teeth are not really white but they're a slight gray with a hint of yellow (probably a reflection off the skin or floor). Her skin might not look like much, but the highlights are a light yellow while her cheeks are an ashy pink.

There is meaning to recreating an already existing artwork. You just won't realize the value of doing so until you try.
>> ??
Whatever, i'm here for flames, drama and bashing.
>> Anonymous !mL2ZRk1cK.
     File :-(, x)
anime is so pointless

Oekaki post(Time: 1 h 55 min, Painter: Shi-Painter Normal, Animation:View)
>> ??
>>75000
Porn isn't, draw porn.

PS: You rock, really.
PPS: 75000GET
>> Anonymous
>>74795
congrats on being able to make a completely bland, generic, and ultimately forgettable copy of a photograph. is all of your art this horribly boring?
>> Anonymous
I'm on your side, !mL2ZRk1cK.
>> Anonymous !mL2ZRk1cK.
>>75120

Heh, I'm fine. I find this discussion facinating, actually.
>> ebee
ITT faggots.

>>uh, yes, I did paint it for learning purposes.
>>uh, yes, I did paint it for learning purposes.
>>uh, yes, I did paint it for learning purposes.

/thread

Also, !mL2ZRk1cK, nice work.
>> Anonymous !4X8vLLNDE2
nice work~
>> Anonymous
this thread is just like counter strike or any sort of online game of skill. As soon as someone does something good people automatically scream HE CHEATS HE'S A FUCKING CHEATER. So post some drawings or GTFO.
>> Jack Avalon !s9IkbPHFYU
Nice work?

This is legendary.
>> Unknown
     File :-(, x)
Need red lines?
>> Anonymous
>>75256

We need less fags. Like toi.
>> Anonymous
>>75256
Cause, y'know, nobody ever tilted their head.
It's impossible.
>> Anonymous
>>75296
I don't think he was being serious.

...or my God, at least I hope he wasn't.
>> Anonymous
>>75256

You do realize its a trace of a photograph.
Are you telling the OP that the girl was grown wrong?
>> Anonymous !mL2ZRk1cK.
>>75731
In case you guys just HAVE TO KNOW EVERYTHING OMGZ!!!!
It was not a trace, and there was a grid.
But do continue your debates about whether it was traced or not and whether that makes it "worthwhile" or not.