File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Really miss those two.

Oekaki post(Time: 9 min, Painter: Shi-Painter Normal)
>> Anonymous
It's okay; We still have Drew Pickles !ebRxo1tmWU
>> Anonymous
>>47149

You're the only one who does.
>> Haiku
Where are the two fags?
Does anyone even care?
No. Only one fag.
>> Mac !vv/Nr3MYLo
I'm still fagging around, I just don't post much anymore.
>> Badly-Drawn Artist !PK/J0EU.YY
>>47157
I care :<

>>47166
TRIPFAGS UNITE
>> Anonymous
I miss them too! :(
>> Anonymous
>>47166
Why exactly did you stop posting?
>> Anonymous
AIDS
>> /i/-nonymiss
>>47149

I went somewhere where the standard isn't a 2 minute "I'll finish this later" post not even worthy of 7chan.
>> Anonymous
>>47649
Care to do something to raise that standard?
>> /i/-nonymiss
>>47652
I would, but there's only so much time in a day one can spend saging.
>> Anonymous
>>47653
Why did you leave your fairyland and came back here then?
>> Anonymous
>>47649
Good please stay there. Or give us the URL so we can troll that up to, fag.
>> Anonymous
>>47653

So you're saying you're better at saging than drawing.
>> Anonymous
>>47649
You have a disgusting attitude.
>> Anonymous
Are you all angry because it's true? This /i/ has gone to shit because of no talent /b/tards fagging it up.
>> Delicious forced drama, I must eat it! /i/-nonymiss
>>47656
Because it's not /i/ and I heart /i/ and drama.
>>47665
Not what I was implying. Your question is also loaded, and you know it, sir!
>>47672
I'm disgusted that one of the few non-worksafe boards that contained the best elements of 4chan humor and quality has become a dumping ground for shitty 'joke' drawings a true /b/tard would reject.
>> Anonymous
>>47678
>>Not what I was implying. Your question is also loaded, and you know it, sir!

It wasn't a question, it was a statement.
>> /i/-nonymiss
>>47679
>>Not what I was implying. Your statement is also loaded, and you know it, sir!

Fixed!
>> Anonymous
I don't see how /i/ became worse than it was in the begining
>> Anonymous
If only mods would enforce this rule a bit more.

>Oekakis can be random in nature, but please, no "junk" drawings. Quality over quantity!
>> Anonymous
>>47693
It is ironic then that the OP pic is a junk drawing. Whoops there goes the moral highground!
>> Anonymous
>>47697
what moral highground? I don't mean to tear into you but you're dumb.

What you're referring too has nothing to do with the OP. I know you're trying to be clever, and that's what makes it even worse.

It's not ironic either btw.
>> Anonymous
>>47693
Use the report function.