File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
>> Anonymous
Me confused?
>> Anonymous
he's trying to show that the perfect human being can be described using a simple mathematical formula.

Little does he know that symmetry does not define a perfect body and without variation we'd all be inbred retards.
>> Anonymous
>>269910

i thought beauty was on the inside?
>> Anonymous
>>269900

Whats the equation for her hugeass cameltoe?
>> Anonymous
>>269917

Amount of OP being a douche
divided by
amount of OP not sucking

That's a whole lotta mooseknuckle there.
>> Anonymous
beauty is in the pooper
>> Anonymous
"As soon as you discard scientific rigor, you're no longer a mathematician, you're a numerologist." Pi (1998)
>> Anonymous
high crotch is high
>> Anonymous
>>269944
>> Anonymous
the nipples are too high, they should be lower on the breasts
>> Anonymous
Her knees are too sharp.
LOL
>> Anonymous
point is it's not a divine number, it's called the golden number, famous for golden/perfect series of measures in architecture, it can be found by resolving the equation x = 1 + 1/x which has 2 roots:
(1-sqrt(5))/2 and (1+sqrt(5))/2, the latter being the golden number
>> Anonymous
face too sad, nipples too small, pussy too shaven ect. far from perfect.
>> Anonymous
>>269915
that's what ugly people say! it's a lie. :P
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Only the proportions are supposed to be perfect, anal-births.
>> Anonymous
Her waist hip ratio should be lower. PHIail
>> Anonymous
Looks exactly like Luba from Hegre archives to me.
>> Anonymous
>>270329
A perfectly proportionate woman is supposed to have a man's torso? lol whut?
>> Anonymous
>>270333
no, thats just your fetish.
>> Anonymous
>>270304
golden ratio?
>> Anonymous
>>270462
Most of the ones I've met have several, usually buried in the garden or under the floorboards in the cellar.
>> Anonymous
So, he's trying to scientifically prove his personal tastes. Fail.
>> Anonymous
aren't women supposed to have hips?
>> Anonymous
>>269910
>symmetry does not define a perfect body
fail