File :-(, x, )
Lara Croft Super Fly! !!S3XhqPkAHej
Can anyone fix the logo colors?
>> Anonymous
I'm weak at GIMP, but I think with mere correction of color/hue/saturation you can get it to fit in relatively good.
>> Anonymous !4X8vLLNDE2
     File :-(, x)
you upload shitty jpg, so you deal with converting it back to lossy. here is edited jpeg i make in shit-time. enjoy
>> Anonymous
>>176111

And you're a stupid faggot cunt that uploaded a useless PNG that inflates the fucking filesize with no appreciable gain in image quality.

Go fucking die you fad-whoring faggot.
>> Anonymous !4X8vLLNDE2
oh you so funny. i didn't want to again encode with shitty jpg and left that as an exercise to the user. (as i don't know how shitty of an encoding would be preferred. this way less loss will occur. feel free to convert to jpg encoding of your choosing)
>> Anonymous
wow. /hr/ is serious business

also OMG YOU'RE SO STUPID! NO YOU
>> Anonymous
that picture is good besides the stupid watermark
>> dinasaws! Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>176166
FUCK OFF!!!

Take your fucking low quality JPEG to anywhere but /hr/
>> Anonymous
>>176199

Faggot

>>176246

Nigger

You dumb cunts have a lot to learn about 'image quality'. Stupid dumb fucks
>> Super Fly! !!S3XhqPkAHej
>>176111
Thank you
>> Anonymous
saging in a bitch thread.
>> Anonymous
>>176245


ahahahhah oh wow
>> Anonymous
Couldn't all the faggots bitching about the PNG, you know, download it and convert it to JPG afterwards?
>> Anonymous
>>176367
It minds the boggle.
>> Super Fly! !!S3XhqPkAHej
>>176367
Considering the amount of people still asking for down resized of pictures, then I'd guess no.
>> Anonymous
GODAMMIT WHY ARE YOU PEOPLE SUCH IDIOTS
JPG IS FOR IMAGES SUCH AS PHOTOS
PNG IS FOR GRAPHICS
>> Super Fly! !!S3XhqPkAHej
>>176414
And your and idiot for believing that analogy, why do you think professional photographers use a lossless format such as .tif
>> Anonymous
oh yes how I love my tiffs.

That is the best for me too.
>> Anonymous
.png is a lossless format too. go ask mr. google if he'll teach you about graphics compression again.
>> Anonymous
yea but tiff is faster when saving and editing.
>> Anonymous
maybe faster on an old atari machine... I can't imagine a whole 10 ms is going to ruin your day all that much.
>> Anonymous !4X8vLLNDE2
the reason i chose to upload as png was due to when i tweaked the colors out, i got horrible blocking artifacts out of it and had to dick around with getting rid of those. i figured *i* would spare the image from any further harm. the image can be transformed, edited more or whatever without an additional jpg step. lossy to lossy is a horrible idea and i tend to avoid it when possible. eg converting all my mp3s to vorbis or aac would be a bad idea. hope i don't open up another can of worms here, but i beleive what i say has merit. if the OP did have bandwidth concerns, he could just ask me to jpg it for him and i would have done so. as for all you idiots who still want to drag this out: TITS OR GTFO.
>> Anonymous
>>176487
ignore that BAAAAAWing faggots who have dialup
>> Anonymous
no difference between either.
nameless tripfag shits up the day again.