File :-(, x, )
HR save me Anonymous
HR I need your help! can you give me a clean HR (1600 res or thereabouts) version of this pick (preferably without the yay) even vector i dont really care. any help appreciated
>> Anonymous
>>91028
>even vector i dont really care
do you even know the amount of work needed to make a good vectorization?
>> Anonymous
>>91029
Chances are he thinks it's like applying a filter.

Fucking noobs.
>> Anonymous
>>91029
Not OP, but I'm curious. How much work/how long does it take?
>> Anonymous
>>91055
the lines aren't precise so the graphist would have to guess a lot of details
and the colors in the background are not plain
I'd say 2/3 days (a few hours a day)
>> Anonymous
>>91028
>>91055

Same fucking poster

Anyways, making a vector is like using tracing paper, you're making an entirely new picture using the old one as reference. Those two people would probably several hours, the background... I don't even know if you could make a good vector of that without using gradients (which suck, and show you're a sucky artist)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>91154
This piece of art uses gradients, so by your definition it's sucky. :[
>> Anonymous
>>91154
Um, actually, no, we aren't the same.
>> Anonymous
>>91155

o.o

Sometimes gradients can not suck (like with small buttons, naked girls and whatnot), but most of the time they make it look like a retarded flash drawing.
>> Anonymous
>>91157
Um, actually, yes, we are the same.
>> Anonymous
>>91155
doesn't look like a vector
>> Anonymous
>>91155
>>This piece of shit uses gradients, so by your definition it's sucky. :[
>> Anonymous
>>91160
If you say so.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Gradients?
>> Anonymous
Cute LOL-tan
>> Anonymous
>>91573
>>91155

Good gradents.
>> Anonymous
>>91573
obviously done with photoshop afterwards
>> Anonymous
>>91573
Doesn't look as much gradients as either:
* vector layers with either inner or outer glow, or
* rasterized vector layers that have been gaussian blurred.