>> |
Anonymous
>>422850 No. He still has full copyright as the creator. If someone uses his pics in an advertisement or anything else (depending on the OP's explicit licensing prefs), he can get them to C&D and also sue them and collect a judgment for infringing on his rights. He loses nothing by exhibiting them online, and he is not required to put a copyright mark on his shit or provide licensing terms. These are his pics. Anyone arguing against this is automatically as stupid as Trig Palin.
|