>> |
Multiverse man
>>349810 Yes, I know how BH are created. For those that dont know, Peach has a good explanation for it. And I'll read up on these three ways, couse its the first I've heard of them.
Now, about what was BEFORE the BB, my thoughts are that it was a universe like this one. From what I can tell about how things work, EVERYTHING goes in cycles, right? +-, 0-1, on-off, which is extremely simplified, but you get the point. And I remember reading somewhere that when the BB occured, it expanded from the size of, well sumthin really small, to what we know today in a fraction of a second. I guess this this also contributed to this thought I had about the BB.
Thanks for clearing up the wormhole/black hole thing. (someone make a thread about Wormholes and theorys about this, I find this subject quite intriguing too. Plausible or not?)
>>349840 Okay, as far as I can reason the implosion of a neutron star (thats right, right? Not all stars can become BH) creates a BH after exploding, then imploding (correct me if Im wrong my memory is a bit fussy on this one). As we know a star has a intense gravitational field, so if a star should collapse on it self it would have a immense double effect, wouldnt it? Gravi and the force of the implosion. And as a BH is a continual implosion, and just keep densifying whatever it "eats", and in a continuos way will just keep getting stronger, denser, more compact.
And as you say, nothing could be intact after going into a BH, as you'll get "spagettified" as Hawking says, this will also in my head clear up this fact that there were very few matter particles in the first aftermath of the BB. As we learned in science class, everything collides, grows, evolves, as energy becomes matter, and matter becomes energy.
This makin any sense?
|