File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
lulz demoted
>> Anonymous
But nothing can undo Olbermann's sexiness.
>> Anonymous
>>415995

Ah, Olbermann. The Left's answer to Rush Limbaugh.
>> Ken
Left wing bomb thrower. I thought he was fired.
>> Anonymous
>>416608
Not really. Rush lies. Olbermann is just obviously biased in his presentation of the truth.
>> Anonymous
>>416646
This.
>> Anonymous
What happened? I can't find any Wiki info about this.
>> Anonymous
>>416608
Don't flatter Olbermann. He's a hack.
>>416646
>Rush lies
Oh ya? When?
>> Anonymous
I think we can all agree; they're both cunts.
>> Anonymous
>>416696
Wrong. Rush kicks ass, and Olbermann is a nobody.
>> Anonymous
>>416694

fuck'n idiot, there are too many lies to list

From the June 17 broadcast of The Rush Limbaugh Show:

LIMBAUGH: The [9-11 Commission] report said that Mohamed Atta did meet with an Iraqi Intelligence Agency, or agent, in Prague on April 9th of 2001. We've known this for a long time.

From the 9-11 Commission "Staff Statement 16":

We have examined the allegation that Atta met with an Iraqi intelligence officer in Prague on April 9. Based on the evidence available -- including investigation by Czech and U.S. authorities plus detainee reporting -- we do not believe that such a meeting occurred.
>> Anonymous
>> 416694


On the September 14, 2003, edition of Meet the Press, Cheney repeated his claim that Iraq and 9-11 are linked, saying: "If we're successful in Iraq ... we will have struck a major blow right at the heart of the base, if you will, the geographic base of the terrorists who have had us under assault now for many years, but most especially on 9-11."

From the November 8 edition of The Rush Limbaugh Show:

LIMBAUGH: The fact that there's no -- no relationship to Iraq and -- and 9-11 -- nobody ever said there was. You guys just believed the myth out there that was -- that was -- that was promulgated. Nobody ever said there was.
>> Anonymous
>>415995
Worst Person in the World
>> wrong Anonymous
>>416701
That's hillarious. That report (the one that Rush repeated) was all over the news at the time (and no not just FOX, you predictable twat). Everyone reported that same thing - that Atta had met with some sort of Iraqi official in Europe somewhere.

Nice try faggotron. Next time get your information from people who aren't trying to manipulate you by holding back some of the facts. You might want to try cross-referencing as well, instead of listening to the source that tells you what you want to here and then tuning everyone else out. When that story broke I heard that exact thing on CNN, MSNBC, and BBC. Before you start shitting your pants in an accusatory frenzy - Yes, I did follow all those networks at the time.
>> Anonymous
>>416706

Let me give this a try:

Limaugh: 'The moon is made of cheese'

*GASP* I can't believe he said that. He's the devil.

Let's all get mentally ass raped by radical leftist internet hate groups who do nothing but lie and aren't even vulnerable to slander charges because of their anonymity. Assholes like you believe everything you here so long as it’s convenient for your current ‘ideology’ the point of which is simply to posture yourself. You’re opinion doesn’t count because you didn’t come by it honestly. You simply adopt random shit prefabricated for you by other liberal shit heads.
>> Anonymous
>>416716
i didn't know religious right wing pro life retards actually came on 4chan
>> Anonymous
"On 7th Anniversary Of Attacks, White House Claims Bin Laden Was Not The ‘Mastermind’ of 9-11. PERINO: No, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was the mastermind of 9/11, and he’s sitting in jail right now."
Oceania was at war with Eurasia now, but just four years ago, these two had formed an alliance against Eastasia. Winston remembered this clearly, but it made no difference what he or any other individual remembered, for the Party said that Eurasia had always been the Enemy and what the Party said was the Truth. This, thought Winston, was the most frightening aspect of the party regime-that it could obliterate memory, turn lies into Truth and alter the Past. The Party slogan was “Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past.”
>> Anonymous
>>416701
>>416706
>>416726
samefag

Thanks for the bumper-sticker remarks, and for proving what a predictable little robot you are.
>> Anonymous
>>416728
hahahaha, its funny i bet you think i'm on the left too.
>> Anonymous
>>416727
'Double Think' reference eh?

The only ones who fall for that are liberals. Global warming vs global cooling is a perfect example.
>> Anonymous
>>416729
Oh wow lol. Are you actually going to pretend to be a conservative now to add to your credibility when you give your obviously leftist opinions? Who the hell are you kidding?
>> Anonymous
>>416733
anyone who disagrees with fox news, or you is on the left huh?
>> Anonymous
>>416736
You're a neo-con. I'm not.

i'm not the same guy from earlier in the thread. Even if you don't believe me.
>> so lame Anonymous
>>416727

Involking 1984 and any of the concepts therein in order to demonize a verbal opponent pretty much guarantees that you’re an extremely petty person who doesn’t understand the gravity of the subject matter you’re referring to. Don’t be such a pseudo-intellectual faggot. No one is impressed with that shit.
>> Anonymous
>>416740
Yes, clearly I'm a 'neo-con' because I don't think that Rush Limbaugh is a liar for referencing the same information as all the major news networks... Dumb ass.
>> Anonymous
>>416753
nah you are
>> grow up Anonymous
>>416740
Whatever, retard. You just called a guy a neocon for such a trivial disagreement. That speaks volumes about how petty you are. If someone disagreed with you about the best flavor of soda pop you’d call them a fascist.
>> Anonymous
>>416759
Because you say so huh? And who are ‘you’? Nobody, and that’s all you’ll ever be. A nobody who repeats what others say. What a loser you are.
>> Anonymous
>>416759
Typical. You liberals always think you can skirt the issue unnoticed if you act confident and pour on the attitude. You can't even explain the insult you're using. Don't worry though, we'll all wait while you look up the term, then copy and paste the definition as though you knew all along.
>> Anonymous
>>416759

Captain POINTLESS!!!!!!
>> the only one here Anonymous
who makes any fucking sense is the guy referencing 1984. everyone else is to caught up in name calling and partisan politice to see that neither side can be right all the time, and neither side can be wrong all the time. guys, this is the internet, grow and get a life that involves a woman(or man) and a career and find some actually sustenance in your life.
>> Anonymous
>>416781

Name calling? The guy who referenced 1984 was likening conservatives to ‘the party’. If you’d actually read the book you would have realized that that’s actually worse than calling someone a ‘nazi’.
As to your typical namby-pamby relativist remarks about neither side being right all the time- No one said one side was right ‘all the time’, but in the absence of such a scenario the wise thing to do is side with the group who is right the vast majority of the time. Liberals are in the business of peddling dangerous trends and have no real intention of hitting upon the truth so long as they effectively demagogue and further their careers. If conservatives decided abortion was ok, it would take all of 2 seconds before liberals decided all of a sudden that it wasn’t. They are defined by what preexisting conservative ideals they are against. It is how leftist politicians make money, and how rank and file liberals posture themselves.
>> Anonymous
Petty sums up liberals. They are not know for their ability to debate anyone beyond cheep insults and overly simplistic slogans that really mean much. They want what they want and don't care about facts or logic. Add this to the fact they love brainwashing newfags with fake facts and the usual propaganda.

I use to hate republifags, but liberal faggots take the cake. Now, I can't even really stand taking to these walking bags of irrational hate. I just can't trust liberals to rule anything.
>> Anonymous
‘the party’ is what happens when socialists get control. Just look at the UK.
>> Anonymous
I just don't understand why people want 800 bases around the world. Unless you want to rule the world and kill your national security. I am not directing this to republicraps or democraps. Just all Americans.
>> Anonymous
>>416716
>>416747
>>416764
>>416781

seriously, all you do is ignore issues and spout lame insults
blah blah you twat blah faggatron
really, those are your facts? your best shot?
you just repeat the nonsense that comes from talk radio and cable media. next your gonna tell me that corporate owned media companies like cnn and msnbc are liberal. they're for PROFIT. they'll say what sells.
>> Anonymous
>>416769
I'm actually a paleo conservative.
>> Anonymous
Petty sums up Republicans. They are not know for their ability to debate anyone beyond cheep insults and overly simplistic slogans that really mean much. They want what they want and don't care about facts or logic. Add this to the fact they love brainwashing citizens with fake facts and the usual propaganda.

Republicans faggots take the cake. Now, I can't even really stand taking to these walking bags of irrational hate. I just can't trust liberals to rule anything

I am, however, a snaggle toothed fuck knuckle.
>> Anonymous
>>416813
‘Saying what sells’ is what the media does, but it's also what liberal politicians do. They are two groups of opportunists who correctly identify the rank and file liberal as easier to manipulate via their susceptibility to trendy thinking and alarmism.
>> Anonymous
>>416824
Same liberal who transposes words of opposing posts in every thread. Why not just say 'I know you are but what am I'?

Note: due to the nature of your reply we all now know that you are 12.
>> Anonymous
>>416817
no one cares :/
>> Anonymous
>>416834
well he called me a liberal, so..
>> Anonymous
This is awesome. All I have to do is post an image of anyone related to politics and I have an insta-debate including that "liberals are cancer" anonymous who pops up in all of these threads.

OP here. I posted this because I think Olbermann is hot IRL.
>> Anonymous
>>416872
Don't act like you've cleverly tricked people. Those of us who posted here did so because we felt like it. Also, you're gay. lol
>> Anonymous
Liberals are gay. Normal people can't help but shit on them and try to burn them with fire! Disgusting subhuman trash.
>> Anonymous
I LOVE IT WHEN /HR/ GETS POLITICAL. TRULY THE GREATEST MINDS FROM HIGH SCHOOL COMBINE FOR MEANINGFUL DISCUSSION.
>> Anonymous
Anon says:

"Arguing on the internet is like competing in the Special Olympics. Win or lose, you're still a fucking retard."
>> Anonymous
>>416942


pretty much. but fun to watch nonetheless.
>> Anonymous
"Obama troofers arguing on the internet is like competing in the Special Olympics. Win or lose, you're still voting for a Marxists Muslim you retard." - V
>> o_o Anonymous
What is Barack Obama if not a very 'special' man constructed entirely out of overcooked, slightly rotten sausages, drunkenly waltzing to the out-of-tune harpsichord of leftist double think?
What's that awful, un-fresh smell?
It's Barack Obama!
His lips are slightly darker than they should be, even for a 'man of color', and his eyes are soulless and void.
Awww, how cute. He's devouring a small child.
Oh Barack, you crazy guy you!

Remember, a vote for Barack Obama is a vote for the new and improved airborne HIV AIDS virus which only effects filthy little midgets, everybody human, and the homeless.

o_o
>> Anonymous
>>416960

>HURF DURF OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST NAZI JEW
>> Anonymous
>>416895
It wasn't at all clever, and that's the awesome part.
>> Anonymous
>>416970
Still acting like you accomplished something by getting people to post on a forum? What a mastermind you are.
>> Anonymous
>>416969
Well he is you know.
>> Anonymous
>>416984
Actually, if you look at the Bush term it shows more communistic activity than it should've been under a Republican. Absorbing fannie mae/freddie mac pretty much confirmed it. All we need now is more prisons and organized crime and you have a perfect system that shits on its people.

By the way, Rush does suck cock. Most of it is trolling through inflammatory comments. Fox news is okay. I respect them for what they do because someone has to ask certain questions. Outside of that, I have not seen so many Republican Liberals since 1992. You guys should be ashamed of yourself.
>> Anonymous
>>417118

UH OH... LOGIC AND SENSE ENTERING INTO A DISCUSSION ON /HR/. GET READY TO BE CALLED A FAG.
>> Anonymous
HAHA EPIC PHAIL.. WHAT A LOOSER LOST HIS JOB TO HIS OWNS HOW CUZ HIS RATTINGS SUCKED SO BAD.. THE LIES THE LIBS SAY BRAIN WASH THEIR FELLOW DEMOCRATFAGS WITH SHOWS WHY MSNBC IS DEAD LAST IN RAITINGS AFOX NEWS IS #1 IN RAITINGS

LIBFAGS SUCK DEMFAG COCK
>> Anonymous
I like cookies.
>> Anonymous
>>417190

I love how they argue that Fox News is first because the Republicans "get it," but then try to say that Fox News is "Fair and Balanced."
>> Anonymous
>>417118
'Ashamed'? Please, we deserve medals for living on the same planet as fags like you and not being infected by weakness and stupidity.
>> Anonymous
>>417118
>>417154
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSAMEFAG.

Btw stating that you will be called a fag is not much of a prediction since you are one.
>> Anonymous
>>417240
The only reason why you naïve, pampered little shits think FOX is bias is because you think that the obvious liberal bias rampant on other networks is actual balanced. Liberals lol.
>> Anonymous
All FOX news has to do to be perceived as bias by liberal viewers is cover any story involving the presidency in a manner the reflects even the slightest respect for the office itself while a republican is incumbent.
>> Anonymous
>>416824
petty isn't as appropriate as *greedy*. If you follow the money it always leads back to an almost hysterical CHEAPNESS.
>> Anonymous
>>417250
are you nuts or just lying as usual? We've seen a dozen examples of Fox placing a big "D" next to a GOP pervert or criminal's name.

Accident? Over & over & over.........................?
>> Anonymous
"Breaking News from Dumbfuckistan" (01/31/2005)

Bobo and Cletis
Y
ou would think that legislation to make domestic violence a crime would not be controversial. But you would be wrong.

In Montana a bill to specify attempted strangulation as a crime of domestic violence is under attack from Christian Evangelicals. They are up in arms because the bill would make this a crime not only for upright Christian families that slip into a little rough play from time to time but also for gay couples:

Representatives of the Eagle Forum, Montana Family Foundation and Montana Family Coalition opposed the bill, calling it a measure designed to legally recognize homosexuality and create a "designer crime."

Yet another example of special rights for designers.

The lack of gay activists speaking out in the hearing indicated an attempt to pass the legislation without drawing attention to the homosexual agenda in it, said Harris Himes of the Montana Family Coalition.

Which means, of course, that, if you believe Harris Himes, just about everything is part of the homosexual agenda.
http://www.outsidethetent.com/archives/00000350.php
>> Anonymous
Liberals always are intolerant of other views. If you disagree with them then you are the liar and they hate you. Fair and balanced is mutually exclusive with leftists ideology these days. Fact checking and truth seem to be poison to them.

The liberal media has officially picked sides. They became propagandist when they abandoned truth and started playing king makers. But everything Fox says is always fake...right?

Gullibility is the precursor to liberalism. Ignorance, hate and self-delusion is it's heart. Lies are the language they speak. Liberals are a cancer.
>> Anonymous
>>417257
That's not true... at all. Seriously, if you're going to lie, so be it, but as least gain some skill at it. lol
>> Anonymous
Be honest, when was the last time that someone got in your face (in person or in the media) and tried to dictate to you how you can talk? Unless you’re living in the 1950s it probably wasn’t a Christian. Don’t get me wrong it might have been. However chances are in was a radical leftist scrutinizing you or someone else based on the warped standard of political correctness.
Do you like being told what you can say or do based on your race, religion, or gender? If not then why put up with liberals and their tactics of intimidation? Liberals use political correctness as a pretext to slander people.
>> Anonymous
>>417245
Actually, no. Two separate posters. I was the first one. Don't know who the second one was but apparently the hilarity ensures.

Look, I'm not the pundit here. I could careless about Republican or Democrat. I vote for the person I know will do a better job. As a registered Republican back in 2000 and a current registered Independent I don't put up with shit on either side. I like Obama. Not so sure about the other Democrats but I do like Obama. If he can get Bill O'Reily to squirm for 95% of an interview he's got something going for him.

I can't wait till the elections are over so most of us can get back with our lives.
>> sage
>>417257
>>417341
Great comeback. Call the person a liar. Great way to make friends and influence people.

>>417352
Everyone has an agenda. Everyone wants other people to give them money one way or another. Everyone wants to be heard so they can make their lives easier. Everyone whines and complains for no better reason because they can't get their way. If someone complains it's probably some liberal, right? Tell that to the ten's of thousands of people who have been laid off over the course of the past 8 years. Tell them that they are nothing but liberal whiners. Do you even care about the people whom you are supposed to work for or is this just a game to you?
>> cause and effect Anonymous
>>417299
You must like being lied to. Every time democrats pass a bill they make sure it involves something that conservatives can’t in good conscious support, whether it’s something that provokes a moral objection, or just straight up pork barrel spending. That way when conservatives oppose ‘such a virtuous’ bill, liberals can point and say look how evil they are (which is their true goal all along).
The implication of the example you posted is that conservatives are so callus towards human life and so hateful towards gays that they would oppose this bill. Has it ever occurred to you that the consideration for homosexual couples in that bill sets a precedent that effects a number of other laws that you didn’t bother to note?
Gays are just pawns. They are being used in an attack on Christianity and eventually freedom of religious practice in general. Bills like the one you mentioned are being fought over all the time because they include rules that add up to gays gaining status as legitimate couples.
So why is that bad? Because once that happens the government can force churches (note: private sector) to marry gays and allow them as members of a congregation (which allows them to vote in the church). This is the first step towards the attempted dissolution of religion and the right to practice a faith.
Before you start cocking off about how you want that to happen, consider that such action will mark the end of separation between church and state, and that it’s a double edged sword. If that’s not enough to clue you in, consider that genuine government infringement will actually result in civil war, even if in your tiny pee-brain you can’t imagine such and event by virtue of the fact that it’s never happened in you lifetime yet. Try thinking for a change.
>> Anonymous
>>417356
Don't even invoke O'Riley. I'm a pretty conservative guy, and I hate that dumb shit. In fact I didn’t start disliking him recently like so many others because of certain outbursts and lies of his. I read a book of his back before most people even knew about him (like a decade ago), and right away the guy bothered me somehow. I've never considered him a true conservative no matter what he says. I’ve always felt like he was just trying to tell me what I want to hear in order to get something. He is just trying to gain money and fame by pandering.
People like Limbaugh, Coulter, Hannity, etc. have never irked me like O’Riley. There’s just something wrong with that guy.
>> Anonymous
>>417361
I accuse liberals of using political correctness to infringe on free speech and you start blabbing about people being laid off from work. Way to miss the point jackass.
>> get a clue Anonymous
>>417361

The problem isn’t people wanting to be heard. The problem is when they stop others from being heard using intimidation tactics and slander. A Christian saying that you’re going to hell for not believing doesn’t mean a lot in today’s political environment. However, a liberal accusing you of racism can destroy your livelihood and ostracize you. The latter example exceeds simple speech because it infringes on someone else’s rights.
>> Anonymous
>>417370
There’s just something wrong with that guy.

all 3 IMO but i agree, he's a whackjob.
>> Anonymous
I'm in no fear of being called racist simply because I'm not one. Are you?
>> Anonymous
Oh THIS fucker....

Hey Keith, don't ever let me near your coffee. Two words: Horse Laxatives.

Something else Keith, you have a pretty advanced case of Bush Hater Syndrome that looks like it's going to develop into full-blow Palin Hater Syndrom in a few weeks.

They have pills you can take now that will make you stop hating people.
>> Anonymous
>>417379

At the end of the day it’s more important to simply not be a racist, than whether or not people think you’re one. However if being accused to the point of defamation causes damage to your career, social life and reputation, then it’s probably something to worry about. It’s easy to say you don’t care when you’re a nobody and no one is watching what you do.
>> Anonymous
>>417379
That’s an oversimplification based on the misconception that you can only be ruined be false accusations if they are actually true.
>> Anonymous
>>416829
>‘Saying what sells’ is what the media does, but it's also what liberal politicians do.
Yeah but just liberal politicians. All other politicians are completely fucking honest all the time.
>> Anonymous
I think muslim extremists did 9/11.
I think if "someone" gave them a nuclear device they would blow up NY or DC
Olberman is a shameless blatant shill who is ostensibly is an unbiased reporter.
Rush Limbaugh is an openly right leaning commentator and entertainer not affiliated with any ostensibly objective news organization.
Also, did I mention that if someone gives them a bomb they will use it? Srsly
>> Anonymous
>>417396
Liberals prove the point you just made wrong every time they use the expression ‘religious right’. The social conservatives that make up the conservative base adhere to a moral code grounded in the Judeo Christian ethic, which itself doesn’t change. If a conservative politician deviates too far from this underlying ideology he/she loses support. That is why conservative politicians cannot simply go along with whatever is trendy. They must stay the course. Liberal politicians can say anything to their constituents and have it be excepted because the liberal base has no core belief system to compare those trends too. As long as liberal politicians dress an idea up as being ‘progressive’ or anti-tradition, rank and file liberals go along with it. You can try to do the same thing by spinning a political agenda as being Christian, but if it’s not, then it won’t pass close scrutiny.
Liberal politicians also play on the anti-establishment tendencies of liberal voters, which has the self-defeating effect of causing a liberal key issue to become passé and ineffective once it gains enough support (ie: it has become part of the hated establishment). That’s why you hardly here left wingers talk about AIDS anymore, and when they do it has to be ‘AIDS in Africa’ to pose it as a fresh issue and get the attention of other liberals. As for conservatives, we never tire or our creed or betray it en mass because it’s part of who we are regardless of politics.

Flame me now. I enjoy it. lol
>> Anonymous
>Judeo Christian ethic, which itself doesn’t change
Yeah I know of course it doesn't.

It's funny because when the neoconservatives started out they originally had 0 to do with any religion; rather they adopted that group to expand their base. You honestly think the likes of Rumsfeld or Cheney give a fuck about the alleged "Judeo Christian ethic"? And would you not describe them as conservatives?

Indeed we see these supposed Christian values being shifted to instead conform to politics, which is why it's not unlikely you'll hear a religious nutjob claim that the Iraq war is the work of God or some such bullshit. The loss of life in response to fabricated intelligence to make the world "a safer place" is A-OK in their books just because it was the will of their favored politicians.

>If a conservative politician deviates too far from this underlying ideology he/she loses support.
You don't say...

>Liberal politicians can say anything to their constituents and have it be [accepted]
Yes I'm sure if a liberal politician came out and said "you know I'm against affirmative action, abortions, welfare, and public schools" every liberal in the U.S. would instantly cheer without second thought instead of abandoning that moron for the next best candidate offering government handouts and empty promises.

Your entire fucking post is just _wrong_.

99% of politicians are full of shit to varying extents.

Get real, nigga.
>> Anonymous
>>417418
When It comes to bullshit. It's not about who does it, it's about who does it more. Liberals do it more. That's all I was saying. You can scream till you're blue in the face that some conservatives don't give a fuck, but that will never describe me. Whereas I've met so many liberals in real life that are just messed up people who are always torn between what trend to follow, and they converse entirely in bumper-sticker talking points. They have no idea what they believe. I do know what I believe and it defines me as conservative, not liberal. I’d rather take a chance on leaders who might not be my exact brand of conservative as long as they respect the voice of conservatives like myself, rather than support a ‘liberal’ who is the self-proclaimed enemy of everything I believe in.

Good job pointing out that spelling error by the way. That wasn’t petty at all.
>> Anonymous
>>417418
The point is that religious conservatives are honest about who they are and give you a fair chance to oppose them. Liberals pretend to champion freedom as a pretext to take freedom away. The abiding theme of all leftist policies is the government decides for you. This is in direct opposition to every article of the constitution which itself dictates that the government will be empowered by the people. Don't like America the way the founding fathers (ingeniously) established it? Then GTFO.
>> Anonymous
>When It comes to bullshit. It's not about who does it, it's about who does it more. Liberals do it more.
Meanwhile war in Iraq, sup fabricating intelligence to start wars, good thing no one actually died, lost limbs, or got their faces melted during all of that, just a little harmless bullshit.

>whereas I've met so many liberals in real life that blah blah blah by the way using anecdotes to support my argument

>They have no idea what they believe.
Shame on them, right? It's not as if there's biased (mis)information assaulting the common man from all directions.

>>417437
>The point is that religious conservatives are honest about who they are and give you a fair chance to oppose them.
I guess that's why Palin is hiding from the media because she wants to be up-front with everyone.

>The abiding theme of all leftist policies is the government decides for you.
Yeah like war on drugs. Good thing everyone gets to choose which chemicals they can put in their bodies without the possibility of having their lives ruined for it.

>constitution
Oh yeah that thing. 10 e-bucks to the first person who can tell me which president referred to it as "a goddamn piece of paper".
>> 01 Anonymous
>>417449

>Meanwhile war in Iraq, sup fabricating intelligence to start wars, good thing no one actually died, lost limbs, or got their faces melted during all of that, just a little harmless bullshit.
This is just a left wing interpretation of what actually happened. You think that if you say it enough that it makes it true, and that if you pretend there’s a consensus that no one will defy you. Complete liberal bullshit.

>whereas I've met so many liberals in real life that blah blah blah by the way using anecdotes to support my argument
It’s true. Deal with it.

>Shame on them, right? It's not as if there's biased (mis)information assaulting the common man from all directions.
Yes. Shame on them for using the above mentioned garbage as an excuse to never take a real stand on anything important while simultaneously aligning themselves with every trivial ‘cause’ they can fabricate. Anyone should be able to see through dogma and rhetoric and recognize axioms of truth (ie: don’t murder, don’t rape, don’t steal, etc.) and apply them to the various issues of any era in a manner that informs their decisions.

>I guess that's why Palin is hiding from the media because she wants to be up-front with everyone.
Another leftist interpretation. Typical liberal tactic of skewing the premise to trick your opponent into arguing against your flawed version of the truth. If you’re referring to Palin’s daughter, it may not have occurred to you in your hubris, but that particular issue is none of your business, regardless of how much the leftwing media conveniently insists that it is.
>> 02 Anonymous
>>417449

>Yeah like war on drugs. Good thing everyone gets to choose which chemicals they can put in their bodies without the possibility of having their lives ruined for it.
This sentence is so poorly worded, laced with sarcasm and based on yet another twisted premise, that it’s impossible to even interpret what the hell your point is.

>Oh yeah that thing. 10 e-bucks to the first person who can tell me which president referred to it as "a goddamn piece of paper".
Wow, speaking of anecdotes… President Bush is arguably the most lied about president in American history, and if by some chance he did say that, it would still be a single instance. It pales in comparison to the attitudes and dealings of liberal politicians who make no bones about the fact that they regard the constitution as irrelevant.

You’re living in a bubble filled with leftist fiction. That may be your right, but don’t expect anyone sane to be receptive to the shameless bias you’re spewing.
>> Anonymous
>>417449

You're just basing everything you say on really biased versions of events as though everyone sees it that way. You're the most pampered, delusional little shit head I've ever seen on this forum- and that's saying something.
>> Anonymous
You all need to STFU. You’re all arguing over the policies or biased opinions of a party made up of fat, over fed and over privileged men that don’t give a fuck what you think. And in all probability would laugh at loss you might incur, including that of any of your right, or that of your own life. You mirror their exact irrational thought process, mindless decision making and rationale. If at this moment we replace you all with these people you argue over whether it be in the media or congress, the difference wouldn’t be noticeable. Just a bunch of young faggots sitting around, opposed to a bunch of old faggots sitting around concerned with their own self interest.
>> Anonymous
>>417508
Except for you right? Go fuck yourself, faggot. You're a pampered little bitch like all the rest.
>> little bitch lol Anonymous
>>417508

We don't 'need' to do anything. People can say what they want, fuck face. We don't need your approval.
>> Anonymous
>>417534
We will is an Islamic Marxists named Obama gets what he wants. It'll be Orwellian nightmare.
>> Anonymous
Obama has no chance. I can't believe even liberals pinned their hopes on that guy. I mean, at some point you have to be able to differentiate between wanting to win and actually believing you will. Obama is going to lose this thing badly.
>> Anonymous
True. How could liberals not realize that he was going to lose form the start. Oh, yeah...liberals are fucking stupid. They want a fucking Islamic Marxists in power! They make rednecks look educated and wise.
>> Anonymous
Only two images and ninety god damn posts of nothing but politics wank.
I love you, /hr/. Don't ever change.
>> Anonymous
>>417618
>>418317

Islamic Marxist? Are you fucking kidding me? McCain is now a nigger jew pass it on.

P.S. Read up on Marxism so you don't have to incorrectly define people with in it the future. Seeing as you can't spell or use grammar correctly I doubt reading is easy for you so I understand if you can't.
>> Anonymous
When the alternative is a senile old fuck who thinks being hit with whips is executive experience, and some cunt, whose party allies have been spending MY MONEY hand over fist, I'll take the crazy nigger, thank you.
>> Anonymous
>>418330
My god, that's the most retarded logic I've ever seen stated here. I mean really, do you have down syndrome or something?
>> Anonymous
>>418330
Grats on higher taxes and bigger government. You're voting for what you're against.
>> Anonymous
>>418321
Marxism is a political philosophy and Islam is a religion. You can be both at once. In the case of a guy like Obama who will merely dip into either at his self-severing convenience, any real contradictions would be ignored.

Note also that you can be black and Jewish at the same time including instances in which 'Jewish' denotes both the race and the religion.

You are a massive retard.
>> Anonymous
>>418355

You're delusional.
>> Anonymous
>>418321
>>418361
samefag, hoping people will take his 'word' for it. 'Delusional'? Fascinating..... Why?
>> sad Anonymous
>>418361

No, that would be you actually. The post you just insulted was correct. I also noticed that you give no explanation why you disagree. You think that if you disagree aggressively enough that no one will notice that you can't explain why. Who are you kidding?
>> Anonymous
>>418361
Saying it doesn't make it true fuckwit.
>> Anonymous
Seriously claiming Obama an Islamic Marxist? Does all your information about him come from regurgitating email propaganda? Fucking kooks.
>> wow... Anonymous
>>418385

His political leanings are Marxist by any other name and he reads the Qur'an. You can glean this much about him from his own words in speeches covered by every major news network. He’s an Islamic Marxist. If you don’t like it may I suggest simply not voting for him?
>> Anonymous
>>418321
>>418361
>>418385
samefag

Still no explaination on WHY you disagree.
>> Anonymous
>>418387

He identifies himself as a Christian.
>> Anonymous
Liberals are hilarious. You can’t stomach the truth about your candidate, but instead of doing the sane thing and refraining to vote, you practically lobotomize yourself with self deception to the point where what you say and believe completely fly in the face of reality. Seriously, you could simply admit what the guy is (since he more or less announces it with fervor every time he opens his mouth) and still reluctantly vote for him. Why lie to yourself?
>> Anonymous
>>418389
Yet he spends his time reading the Qur'an, then referencing it in his speeches, while distancing himself from even minor Christian rhetoric for fear of being identified with the right wing. Kind of like how he 'defines' himself as a democrat while all of his ideas pertaining to policy are simply Marxist.
Still confused? Here's a tip: Don't just listen to what he says- watch what he does. That's how people are actually ‘defined‘.
>> Anonymous
>>418391

>Yet he spends his time reading the Qur'an, then referencing it in his speeches

source?
>> Anonymous
Obama’s only real religious practice involves sticking his finger in the political wind. It doesn’t matter anyway. Regardless of his real religious persuasion (if any), posturing himself ‘enlightened’ by bragging about reading the Qur’an, is just plane stupid in this political climate. It’s just another reason why this dumb ass is unelectable and will ultimately lose this election.

Look at the last three democrat candidates, Al Gore, John Kerry, and now Barack Obama. Every one of them has made the same stupid mistake of looking phony on camera by acting as per the bad advice of their wannabe press agent, minders. Guys like Obama make backfire-prone remarks about stupid shit like reading the Qur’an for one reason: because some fresh out of UC Berkeley political advisor douche tells them it will sound clever. What a pack of idiots.
>> Anonymous
>>418397
I saw it in a speech live on CNN (for real). Google it yourself if you want proof. You'll probably find it right away.
>> Anonymous
>>418390
I'm not a liberal, but I can't stand you. You can't label someone delusional just based on which (of two!) political candidates they like.
I think YOU'RE delusional.
>> gay Anonymous
>>418321
>>418361
>>418385
>>418389
>>418397
>>418404
XXX Hardcore Samefaggotry.

BTW shit-for-brains, liking a candidate doesn't make you delusional. Being under the impression that the candidate is different than they obviously are, IS delusional. Semi-consciously forcing yourself into delusion is self deception, which by the way was my wording. Go fuck yourself, you whiny 12 year old.
>> poor little baby Anonymous
>>418404
^
This is seriously the namby-pambyist post I have ever read, and I actually LOL'd

>I think YOU'RE delusional

eh heh heh heh... ha ha ha ha ha... HA HA HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAA.....

*sigh*

What a fucking shit head. LOLZ
>> Anonymous
In dumbfuckistan reading books and gaining knowledge is a bad thing.
>> Anonymous
>>418416
^_^ clever girl
>> Anonymous
>>418416
>>418422
DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR :/
>> Anonymous
>>417352
S'funny but I've never really had a beef with PC. It can get silly like anything else but it's mostly just being polite.

The Right hates politeness because it offends their racist hearts.
>> Anonymous
>>418404
NO U!
>> Sarah is ready! LOL Anonymous
>>418390
but instead of doing the sane thing and refraining to vote, you practically lobotomize yourself with self deception to the point where what you say and believe completely fly in the face of reality.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>418455
>Good. Use your aggressive feelings, boy. Let the hate flow through you.
>> Anonymous
>>418485

you been DICKED!
>> Anonymous
>>418411

That's right, anyone who disagrees with you is a samefag liberal! Keep saying it! It makes it true!
>> Anonymous
>>418517
That was samefaggotry. Not because I care what the fuck the guys said, but because it was obvious.
>> Anonymous
>>418454
Political correctness is an attack on free speech. I'm a white conservative, and I support the rights of whites, blacks, Asians, Latinos, Indians, Arabs, Jews, etc to practice free speech.
>> Anonymous
>>418657

Every right wing nutjob post is you, stop being a samefag you fucking redneck.
>> Anonymous
>>418663
Ya ok. I was commenting just now because I noticed the samefag too. I'm Canadian and can't even vote in the coming election. Has it ever occured to you that people might disagree with you for reasons other than politics? Like maybe the fact that you're an ass.
>> you suck cocks? Anonymous
>>418663

Apparently the definition of 'rightwing nuttjob' is when you call bullshit on a 4chan poster's samefagging. You should get used to plenty of people disagreeing with you since you're a total dick head. lol
>> MWA HA HA HA HA HA Anonymous
ITT: typical robot liberal fags relegated to samefagging 4chan threads to make up for the fact that they don't have a fucking chance of winning the November election.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
>> Anonymous
>>418671
Interesting fact: if you read through this thread, you will notice multiple posts in which liberal posters use racial slurs such as the 'N' word in mock immitation of conservatives. Yet no conservatives in this thread are talking that way. HMMMMMMMMMMMM.....
>> Anonymous
Oh for fucks sake! Go away! Politicfags
>> Anonymous
>>418674
Well, liberals are the God Kings of slander, lies and disinformation. They can't win with the facts so they just shit out pure propaganda and think it's so clever.

They are the cancer in our society. That is all they can be.
>> MR. Anon
     File :-(, x)
Saging for angry troll for mccain and the fools who bit.

I don't mind talking about policies, but when all one talks about is how everyone who disagrees with them is "cancer" or "destroying america" (despite not being in power), that's just nonsense.

>>415995
>>415996
>>418485
The only worthwhile posts on this thread. Remember folks: this is an image board!!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I love this picture