>> |
Anonymous
>>263673
seriously. i just found out about it last night (i'm>>263592) and i must say what they got there is a shitload of incredible art that is easy to access. but they absolutely kill most of it with the logo. upon further browsing i discovered not all images, but it seems that the best ones have it. as far as i can tell the logo serves no purpose since usually watermarks are meant to identify the source of the image so others don't steal it. however in this case, unless i am horribly mistaken, ALL OF THE ART POSTED THERE IS NOT THE ORIGINAL CONTENT OF THE SITES OWNER. i recognize a lot of what i see from there from elsewhere (some of it directly from square-enix or other companies). so they don't really have a legitimate reason for ruining perfectly good art. i know no one here really cares, but this is the kind of thing that makes my brain hurt. if you're gonna be copying other peoples shit and putting it on the internet like that then just leave it unaltered, there's no need to add your watermark to it as all it does is ruin what you're attempting to do. video game preview sites who do this with official press release screen shots are just as bad or even worse.
|