File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
hey do u guys have any hi res galaxy pics? or do u know a place were i can find them?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html has a few good pics, although their index and search functions are almost useless; eventually you have to pan down their archive, looking for certain keywords ("NGC", "M#", ect.)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
Damn.

I have a series of sixteen images of the Milky Way, but they're, uh, 30-60 mb apiece.
>> Anonymous
http://www.nasaimages.org/index.html
>> Anonymous
>>392734
please upload.
>> Anonymous
i saw something about the hubble teliscope being pointed in what they thought was just dark, blank space. they pointed it there for 6 months straight, and found something like 600 new galaxies or something like that. has anyone got any sauce for that? i'd pop 20 boners if i could get some stuff on that.
>> Anonymous
>>392730
Woah.

I'm freaking out man!
>> Anonymous
>>393334

It's called the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. They only stared at a single point for 10 days, and they found a LOT more then 600 new galaxies :) Google that shit.
>> Anonymous
Anyone have a hi-res of the sombrero galaxy?

Shits badass.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I couldn't post the 16,7mb one...
>> Anonymous
go outside, wait till night time, look up.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>392732

I don't think this is real, sadly.

Astronomyfag here.
>> Anonymous
>>393943
yeah, the angle's too extreme, centers of galaxies don't look like that, etc.
>> Anonymous
bump
>> Anonymous
>>392734
Upload them please.
>> Anonymous
http://www.spacetelescope.org/images/original/heic0710a.tif

Link to the original 706MB tif image of the OP's image.

Oh, and it's 22620×15200
>> Anonymous
>>392734

rofl, id like to see you upload em...
there are no photos of the milky way since we are in it, and no man made machine has ever travelled far enough to get a shot of the milky way
>> Anonymous
bump, please upload them!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>394447

My, you are retarded, aren't you? Here's a picture of Milky Way for you.
>> Anonymous
>>394515

I think what anon was trying to say is that there are no picture of the Milky Way Galaxy in it's entirety, which is true. As far as the milky way though, as in the fogy band of stars we see at night, yes there are pictures of that. See above post.