File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
why x40?
>> Anonymous
Thats the Iowa Battleship class -.-
>> Anonymous
Warhammer 40k
I think E=mc2 stands for no my brain can't handle it. Energy, it stands for all is energy. Mass times the speed of light squared equals energy, a dumb remark that makes no sense but fooled a lot of people and went down in history.
Supposed to dispel, every action has an equal and opposite reaction, which is shit anyway, there are no universal equasions or rules. The way things work is magic, fucked if I know how computers work.
"Processors"
It's all bullshit. But who cares screw living in a cave, magicians did a good job narf, what are we going to do today brain?
>> Anonymous
>>396273

Energy and mass are equivelent. They are one of the same.
>> Anonymous
>>396230

im guessing it means that they have 40 nuclear warheads on board
>> Anonymous
>>396273
Don't take drugs and post
>> Anonymous
>>396508
equivalent how? Or are you just saying that because you heard someone smart say it and you want to sound smart on the 4chan /hr/ board?
>> Anonymous
>>396871
>equivalent how?
Matter *is actually* energy

Do you know why the atomic bombs were so powerful?
it's becausze of E = MC²

you take a heavy (and unstable) element such as Uranium 238, you break the atoms, and some of the matter is released as energy.
The amount of energy you get is E = MC²
in other words, you multiply the mass by (the speed of light)² = 300000000²
which is a fuckload of energy
>> Anonymous
>>396887
go back to highschool chemistry, you don't know everything. mass is equivalent to energy only in very special cases. try taking a hotdog and making it turn into the amount of equivalent energy it's mass would have and you'll be sorely disappointed

btw: equivalent to doesn't mean "is". 10 pennies have the equivalent value of a dime, but they are not a dime
>> Anonymous
>>396887
Matter is energy the same as wood is fire you dumbass.
>> Anonymous
>>396887
>>you take a heavy (and unstable) element such as Uranium 238, you break the atoms, and some of the matter is released as energy.

You don't know what the hell you are talking about.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_reaction
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fission
>> Anonymous
Being able to convert from one form to another doesnt make both forms the same.
>> Anonymous
i cant believe how many obvious fucking retards are posting acting like they know what they're talking about

>>396871
this guy understands
>> Anonymous
>>396915

We're talking about ATOMIC energy, dumbass.

Einstein's formula theorises that mass (atoms, matter, etc) can be converted into pure energy, and vice-versa.

This is *partially* demonstrated during fission reactions, since heavy uranium(238) atoms in nuclear power plants are bombarded with neutrons, causing the nucleus to break down into smaller elements, splitting off extra neutrons and releasing energy in the process.
>> Anonymous
>>397057
the actual energy they get from the process you described is because minute amounts of mass are lost as energy. know your shit better before you criticize. it still only works on the atomic scale (in most circumstances) or in special cases on a larger scale thanks to fusion or fission, hence "VERY SPECIAL CASES"
>> Anonymous
>>396915
The mass-energy equivalence is of fundamental importance in serving as part of the theoretical model of several observable phenomena (i.e., what we observe as "binding energy," which plays a critical role in an entire class of relevant phenomena). We (and by "we" I mean, of course, the majority of the scientific community who would otherwise have the knowledge and credentials to say anything interesting to the contrary in the first place) have good reason to believe that the same physics applicable to these cases is extensible to the reality we inhabit; hence we (cf., above) believe that the mass-energy equivalence is a part of real life and that all matter (which is a subset of "mass") can be "recontextualized" (often only in environments that are decidedly atypical--but always, for any configuration of matter, in an environment that can be achieved in this universe) to energy. Because we cannot always achieve this event by utilizing the tools and techniques available to us is no failure of the theoretical model. Furthermore, its derivation can be observed from relatively simple considerations--the whole structure didn't fall out of Einstein's ass, it has its own rich and satisfying relevance to the entire field. Please to the knowing? A google to our comments for you.

On the flip side, it's much easier to casually ignore scientific milestones from a foundation of ignorance than from one of familiarity and knowledge, so perhaps these details should best be ignored. Unless I've been trolled, then lol @ me 4 tring ^_^;;;

pic related, it's a hi-res image an Iowa-class battleship shooting its guns.
>> Anonymous
You're all stupid.
>> Anonymous
taking a low res image and blowing it up doesn't make it high res.
>> Anonymous
>>396230
>>396232
40 years of atomic carriers, Enterprise(the one in the photo, CVN-65) was commisioned 1965, that photo is most likely 1995 seeing as there are F-14's on deck.

for the rest, stop arguing like idiots, post more high-res iowa-full-barrage shots
>> Anonymous
>>398693
King of the Internet. Of all these "smart people" only one person caught the only real relevance to this board. POST REAL HI-RES YOU FAGS!