File :-(, x, )
­­
This is a picture in high resolution.
>> ­­
     File :-(, x)
And this is another one.
>> ­­
     File :-(, x)
Close-up on the leaf snail.
>> ­­
     File :-(, x)
And the white flower thing.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> ­­
     File :-(, x)
And totally unrelated, a centipede on sand.
>> ­­
     File :-(, x)
All these 'cept for>>432328and>>432335who aren't me obviously were taken in a swamp I happened to walk through. Total amateur work.

Pic related, it's the swamp.
>> ­­
     File :-(, x)
Fucked up the focus on that.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>432304
You, Kind sir, Are a faggot, This is high res
>> SaVvy
>>432336

Millipede, actually.
>> ­­
>>433202

An unidentified xpede.
>> ­­
>>433202

If you want to be so anal retentive about it, it's a fine specimen of the Schizophyllum sabulosum millipede.

>>432982

A high-res vector picture is worth as much as a low-res vector picture, since the content is the same, only enlarged. I daresay you, sir, are the one of homosexual nature here.
>> ­­
     File :-(, x)
Theese are blueberries.
>> ­­
     File :-(, x)
Those are also berries, but not blueberries, obviously.
>> SaVvy
>>433226

What's anal retentive about pointing out that it is not a centipede? Are you offended that I corrected you? There is a huge difference between the two. It's like calling a sloth a wolf; sure both are mammals and they have four legs, but those features aside, they are completely different animals.

Do you know where was the photo taken?
>> ­­
>>433536

Of course I was being defensive about pointing out the mistake, and the picture was taken in eastern Poland. By, sort of, me.