File :-(, x, )
Infrared Photography Anonymous
Anyone got some HR IR pics?
>> Anonymous
Seconding this request.
>> Anonymous
>>201805
That looks like a model or something.
>> rst
     File :-(, x)
i found these last week, i was impressed.
>> rst
     File :-(, x)
>> rst
     File :-(, x)
>> rst
     File :-(, x)
>> rst
     File :-(, x)
that should do for now
>> Anonymous
Anyone care to explain what exactly infrared photography does?
>> Anonymous
>>201900

It's just another film type. Whereas black and white film will record the light coming through the lens according to it's value, and color film will record light coming through the lens according to it's value, hue, and saturation, IR photography records light according to the amount of infrared radiation reflected from an object. The more IR radiation, the darker value and object gets. This is why sky's are sometimes nearly completely black.
>> Anonymous
>>201866
The fact that the trees and sky have an almost natural colour makes this the awesomest of them all.
>> Anonymous
/r/ infrared photography of a human
>> Anonymous
Bump for moar.
>> Anonymous
>>201916
The colors are artificial, added by the artist.
>> dedla !MQbFngGEl2
>>201916
>>202054
All the artist did was invert the reds with the blues with something such as PS's Channel Mixer.>>201864and>>201865is how the color of the pics turn out straight from the camera, inverting the two makes it more realistic/striking.

>>201919
If I can find an adapter for my smaller-than my new lens IR Filter I'll see how some turn out and post the results.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>201902The more IR radiation, the darker value and object gets. This is why sky's are sometimes nearly completely black.

You got that inverted. The sky diffuses mostly blue light, so it looks almost black in IR. Plants, on the other hand, reflect a lot of IR, so they look white.

Also, you can usually take IR pics with any digital camera. If you have old 35mm film negatives, cut the black end of them and make a 3-layer rectangle.

Use this rectangle as a filter in front of your camera's lens. The black film will block most visible light, leaving only infrared to hit the camera's sensor. This works best in a very shiny day.

Here's a crappy pic I took in front of my house. I removed some of the saturation in photoshop (the film made it all look magenta). Also, my camera sucks, so it's grainy and out of focus.

So if you have a decent camera and a tripod where you can set a long exposure, you might want to try it with 5 or more layers of film. I'm pretty sure you'd get some cool results with that.
>> dedla !MQbFngGEl2
>>202096
I thought that other post sounded off. Why not just go an buy an IR filter and do the exact same thing you're doing with all that extra work? Where'd you get this idea? Your pic looks ancient, but neat still.

The annoying thing with IR filters and digitals is the extreme exposure times you have to use in broad daylight. The filter's damn dark, as in you can barely see though it while holding it up to the sun. This means wind will blur the hell out of the plant life that makes IR so awesome. I'm assuming over half if not most of these shots were done with IR film, were the filter looks like an average transparent red. Can anybody confirm that?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>202119
hi guys, the photos i've posted were taken by a modifyed digital camera, which means you dont have to have long exposures, it works like a normal camera would. also he did play with the channels to get the sky that colour.
>> Anonymous
These are awesome. Post more
>> Anonymous
Fuckin cool. Is this what we would see if we could see ultraviolet rays?
>> Anonymous
>>202223
IR= infared, jackass
>> dedla !MQbFngGEl2
>>202133
Modified as in hacking/soldering/voiding warranties modified? I need to look into this...
>> Anonymous
>>202133
that one looks like a snowy scene (including drifts on the trunks and bowing branches), you sure that is IR?

Anyway, is the camera modified in such a way that it's sensitive range extends up into the IR spectrum? CCDs are naturally at least a little sensitive to IR (neat experiment: if you hold a remote control up to a digital camera you can see the IR LEDs blinking when you push buttons.) That would make a lot of these pictures with natural colors blended with the bright IR reflections make more sense.
>> Anonymous
>>201863
>>201864
>>201865
>>201866
>>201867
>>201805

shopped. not done in-camera.
>> Anonymous
>>202304
Kudos. Fuck photoshop. I shoot on film and do everything in camera, which the borders on my prints will prove.
>> Anonymous
bump thesefotosforcoolnesaneous
>> Anonymous
>>202309
"I'll fix it in post" lol. I wish I could rely on computers to fix my prints, lol.
>> Anonymous
>>201865
hell yes. bump.
>> Anonymous
>>202269
maybe it's a snowy scene with IR shot?