File :-(, x, )
Hi-Res Movie Stills Anonymous
ITT Hi-Res Movie Stills

Let's try to get a good variety of movies going.
>> d2s !!YrO6ynPgvPN
     File :-(, x)
Rambo IV
>> d2s !!YrO6ynPgvPN
     File :-(, x)
Transformers
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>197978
nice one
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>197978so that's scarlett johanson frmo Lost in Translation??
>>197983OH OH i know, that must be Fifth Element with Bruce Willis, eh?
>> Anonymous
>>197986
Incorrect.

The second one is Sunshine.
>> Anonymous
Sunshine is awesome
>> Anonymous
>>197993
Agreed, very awesome.

I had to go and see it twice. One of those movies you really can't appreciate fully unless you see it on a giant screen.
>> Anonymous
>>197992eh? What is this Sunshine... besides the melanin life-giving compound.
I still vote for The Fifth Element, flawless victory with milla jovovich!
>> Anonymous
Will Smith is nothing but a NIGGER!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>198006
Cuuuuuute. Rat making omelettes.
>> d2s !!YrO6ynPgvPN
     File :-(, x)
>>198006

Here you go.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>198070
what movie is this, please?
>> Anonymous
>>198075
Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>197998
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunshine_%282007_film%29
>> Anonymous
>>198038
Do you think this is the resolution PIXAR renders it's movies at these days? Or higher?
>> Anonymous
>>198098
Does anyone have one with him going down into the slag?
>> d2s !!YrO6ynPgvPN
>>198284
I just did a little bit of research, and, surprisingly, it appears that Ratatouille was rendered at 1920x803. So, I guess they just render their promotional stills at super-hi resolutions. That's pretty interesting.
>> Anonymous
bump for moar
>> Anonymous
>>198300
They most likely render at the final output resolution, but with supersampling, which is sort of pseudo rendering at higher res. Basically the rendering they do is nothing like pushing 'Render' in 3dsMax.
>> Anonymous
>>198284Possibly but i'm SURE they aren't stupid about milking all "next gen" opportunities.
>>198300That would make sense. For current 1080p render, its the perfect ratio.
>>198133Sexy. So when does it release. The only film in my area not a "blockbuster" is Becoming Jane.
>> Anonymous
>>198440
It's already been released.

Came out in April here in the UK, and July in the States.

I doubt it was shown in many places over there, but the dvd should be coming out around now.
>> Doppelgänger !.97.to9elc
>>198425
IIRC, supersampling is just rendering something at much higher res than what you actually see, then downscaling the output to the final size. The downsizing process naturally hides aliasing artifacts and other visual problems that would occur otherwise.

Go ahead, take the largest image you have on your PC, and downsample it to manageable size. All the usual problems that would have shown up like individual ink dots are pretty much gone.
>> d2s !!YrO6ynPgvPN
>>198425
I would imagine that they use adaptive supersampling, but I don't know.

>>198524
Your example works if you use a good downsampling method (preferably Lanczos3 or a nice nonlinear method), but will break when using something like nearest neighbor. I'm sure you know this, you just forgot to mention it.
>> d2s !!YrO6ynPgvPN
     File :-(, x)
>> Doppelgänger !.97.to9elc
>>198587
No one in his right mind uses Nearest Neighbor. The end result by no means justifies the speed.
>> d2s !!YrO6ynPgvPN
     File :-(, x)
>>198624
My point was that your original example was entirely dependent on choice of downsampling method, therefore not entirely true.

I've seen plenty of images on the internet that were downsampled using nearest neighbor. Being in your right mind has nothing to do with it.
>> Doppelgänger !.97.to9elc
>>198699
And they would all probably look hideous to me. I like quality.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
The Fountain
>> Anonymous
Shot of Mordor from the end of two towers please
>> d2s !!YrO6ynPgvPN
     File :-(, x)
>>198719
Well, as you have seen, I'm a huge advocate of nearest neighbor, and I have absolutely no sense of image quality. I guess there's nothing else for you to say to me. You are cool and so much smarter than me. I surrender to your ego. You win.
>> Anonymous
Any hi-res still from Alatriste would be awesome.
>> d2s !!YrO6ynPgvPN
     File :-(, x)
>> d2s !!YrO6ynPgvPN
     File :-(, x)
>> d2s !!YrO6ynPgvPN
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>198730
>>198732
moar moar please
>> d2s !!YrO6ynPgvPN
     File :-(, x)
>> d2s !!YrO6ynPgvPN
     File :-(, x)
That's all I have. I hope you enjoy them.
>> Anonymous
>>198738
?|?|? thanx
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>198738
Sorry I had to cheat a bit. Do you have the proper hi-res version of this set?
>> Anonymous
>>198054
Thank you.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
SPARTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>198726
>>198719
I don't think Doppelgänger was trying to be the coolest and most knowing.

In any case, pic related (sorry about the artefacts, but I don't notice them anyway so..)
>> Anonymous
>>198790
But I can. Get the fuck out of /hr/ newfag
>> Anonymous
>>198790
It's "artifacts" you moron. Go kill yourself.
>> Anonymous
>>198807
>>198802
Fail for not realizing an obvious troll etc.

Also: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/artefact
>> d2s !!YrO6ynPgvPN
>>198790
I'd much, much sooner save the life of a retarded person than your own.