File :-(, x, )
Girl's Avenue Zothique !5kL7bwCrGk
>> Zothique !5kL7bwCrGk
     File :-(, x)
>> Zothique !5kL7bwCrGk
     File :-(, x)
>> Zothique !5kL7bwCrGk
     File :-(, x)
>> Zothique !5kL7bwCrGk
     File :-(, x)
>> Zothique !5kL7bwCrGk
     File :-(, x)
>> Zothique !5kL7bwCrGk
     File :-(, x)
>> Zothique !5kL7bwCrGk
     File :-(, x)
>> Zothique !5kL7bwCrGk
     File :-(, x)
>> Zothique !5kL7bwCrGk
     File :-(, x)
>> Zothique !5kL7bwCrGk
     File :-(, x)
>> Zothique !5kL7bwCrGk
     File :-(, x)
>> Zothique !5kL7bwCrGk
     File :-(, x)
>> Zothique !5kL7bwCrGk
     File :-(, x)
>> Zothique !5kL7bwCrGk
     File :-(, x)
>> Zothique !5kL7bwCrGk
     File :-(, x)
>> Zothique !5kL7bwCrGk
     File :-(, x)
>> Zothique !5kL7bwCrGk
     File :-(, x)
>> Zothique !5kL7bwCrGk
     File :-(, x)
>> Zothique !5kL7bwCrGk
     File :-(, x)
>> Zothique !5kL7bwCrGk
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
bump...

sorry but...what happen to number 8?
>> TheLostOne
>>104504
Notice how the numbers on either side of this image are 5 and 6 ? NOT 5 and 7 ?
>> THXS! WE
>>104704

OK did have that in a lower-res (and with scan line), but, Who is the artist? It look a bit Riviera-ish.
>> Anonyfap !6L7Jz/ysJc
is this a series, or just a collection of artists drawing?
>> Zothique !5kL7bwCrGk
>>104713
I seem to be missing number 8
>>104727
I believe it a random set of artists from the Megami magazine.
>> Anonymous
I'm not reporting this for loli but I sure am saging it.
>> Zothique !5kL7bwCrGk
>>104746
Who let the village idiot out?
>> Anonymous
>>104753
Who let the paedophile out? I appreciate your contributions, but
>>104497
>>104498
>>104503
>>104666
>>104668
>>104670
>>104672

will get you a court date faster than you can blink
>> Anonymous
>>104763
Hi there, welcome to the internet.
>> Anonymous
>>104765
If it aint nude, it's legal. So proclaimeth the interbuttz
>> Anonymous
If it's drawn...it's legal. At least in the US (not communist Canada).
>> Anonymous
>>104763
go play yourself...
>> Anonymous
>>104813
Anonymous is correct. No victim, no crime. The CP laws in the U.S. were not written to censor or protect our morality. They were written to protect kids. Real kids. Not drawings or adult models dressed like kids. There isn't a victim here, because the above images are drawings and not real people.

U.S. law is also pretty specific about age limits, and much of it pertains specifically to record keeping. This really only concerns live action films and photographs, because you can't keeps records on the age of cartoon girls or even determine it.
>> Anonymous
>>104746

Pround citizen of the UK
>> Anonymous
>>104826
One guy did actually go to jail on charges of posession of CP, but it was never really clear if he was arrested for the lolicon, or the mounds of real CP he had. I'm sure there is a wiki on it somewhere, there is always a wiki.
>> MR. Anon
>>104896
You mean a wikipedia article? Like the one on lolicon, or the one on one of the more recent laws. And it was never made clear if he was being prosecuted for the loli artwork... but sense he had tons of kitty ... er.. kiddy porn, I'm guessing it was that.