File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
http://harbl.wetfish.net/cosplay/

FOR UP TO DATE INFORMATION ON SCIENTOLOGY RAID NEAR YOU.
>> Anonymous
Attacking legitimate web sites is in violation of US federal law. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.
>> sage sage
>>288099
That all depends on what you meant by attacking.

Using up public bandwidth, even excessively, isn't attacking. Consider that exploitation of the web site owner's stupidity. For example, if 100 people refresh the page a million times per minute, using up a huge amount of bandwidth, that's exploitation. A web site that pays for the amount of bandwidth to cover, lets say, 1mb per day and sees traffic of 1gb per day, gets slammed with charges, isn't able to sue all the people that connected to the site.

Either way, not everyone will be lawful. The destruction of Scientology in every manner is strongly encouraged.
>> Anonymous
>>288110
You're just plain wrong. Your analogy doesn't match the situation correctly and any excessive use of bandwidth by any one individual for the purpose of maliciously taking down or preventing access to a site is illegal.
>> Anonymous
>>288099

Stuck on the Bridge, harangued by management, overworked, underpaid, underappreciated. Paying for what was meant to be free, and is free to all Scientologists except those under the illegitimate leader Miscavige and his RTC. Read about Hubbard's death, how Miscavige drugged him with the tranq Vistaril and help him until exteriorization. He canceled Ron's Final order naming Pat Broeker as the new Leader and usurped RTC himself.

So what about attacking illegitimate web sites?
>> sage
Because taking down a website for the weekend is going to bring Scientology to a grinding halt. Only nerds that spend all their time online would actually believe the internet = real life.
>> Anonymous
>>288099
>>288492

red tape, suddenly, thousands of miles of it

there is so much red tape it doesn't even matter.. as long as the person being sued has done his homework.