File :-(, x, )
Trek Anonymous
starting with new
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
Are there any half decent shots of Simon Pegg as Scotty floating about?
>> Anonymous
this movie actually looks like it might be pretty good
>> Anonymous
>>466592
is that the asian from harold and kumar behind the guy wearing black?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Are you sure this isn't The Half life 2 movie?
>> Anonymous
>>466611
yeah Harold is playing Sulu
>> Anonymous
Just horrible. They look like a bunch of homos, emos and metrosexuals.
>> Anonymous
>>466614

Worst idea ever... unprotected speaker for a mouth.
>> Anonymous
moar leik "Dawson's Creek In Space"
>> sage sage
>>466617

+1

William Shatner would be rolling in his grave if he was dead. As it is, he's too senile with mad cow disease to notice.

PS, goes in every field.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
New Enterprise (A bit larger than above)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
That's Uhura above ... this is the requested Scotty
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
McCoy
>> Sulu Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>466701
Cracking. As much as I loathe Star Trek (well, as much as I loathe Trekkies) I'm going to watch it just for this.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Uhura again (Sulu Above)
>> Anonymous
Deep inside
I died a little.
>> Anonymous
>>466707
wtf
original uhura was hotter
>> Anonymous
>>466704
jesus christ
how could they cast him as sulu?
>> Anonymous
Fucking Epic Mis-Casting, especially with Uhura :(

FFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
>> Anonymous
Just when you thought Star Trek might die quietly and not dig a deeper pit of suck.
>> jack
WTF they got the ugliest fucking chick to play that role
>> Anonymous
>>466706
same
>> Anonymous
>>466746
Yeah, although this is the first Star Trek in twenty odd years that has nothing to do with Rick Berman, so it might be better than you think.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
who the fuck is kevin?
>> Anonymous
>>466775
The Enterprise wasn't the only ship of that broad design, but no idea of who Kelvin is. Maybe its named after The Kelvin scale, which is is a thermodynamic (absolute) temperature scale.
>> Anonymous
>>466746
When you're done hating worf's pimples and Crusher's 'perky' tits, come back and watch this movie and tell us how you really feel.
>> sage Mr. Repost
     File :-(, x)
It's like it was made to cause rage. No one in their right mind would put a guy that young in charge of that kind of ship.
>> Anonymous
>>466775

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Kelvin
>> Anonymous
>>466592

Never been too much of a fan.. but this picture made me real angry for some reason.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
It can't be worse than Nemesis.
>> Anonymous
>>466941
We do not speak of the N word here.
>> Anonymous
Where are these nice trailer screenshots coming from? The bootleg trailer I downloaded doesn't look as nice as these screenshots.
>> Anonymous
>>466976
http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/startrek/large_trailer2.html
Hmm?
>> Anonymous
>>466697
Wow - so women's underwear remains unchanged for the next few hundred years?
>> Anonymous
>>467225
I can't view it. I got quicktime and all. All it does is load the page
>> Anonymous
>>467231
Maybe it'll get unneccessary, but they couldn't get that past the censors
>> Anonymous
This is just "Batman Begins" with the Star Trek universe, plain and simple. Does anybody complain that Batman Begins doesn't exactly match up, canon-wise or style wise, with the Burton-Schumacer Batman? Of course not, BB and TDK were good movies that did not need to be slaves to canon established by the first 4 Batman movies.
So what is the problem with the same thing happening here??
>> Anonymous
>>467586
gtfo
>> Anonymous
Fucking Dawson's Planet. Goddamnit.
>> Anonymous
>>467586
canon ?? is then people argue somothings is impossible or non-exist in ships who dasent exist ... its a movie. if the result is cool like you sayd in BG and TDK, ok. but in the end canon is things who are in the MOVIE/Or TVSHOW and only that. i love the ST TOS, the movie era, next gen, and enterprise... voyager and ds9 is just because the story sucks...
>> Anonymous
>>467590
"Dawson's Planet" would make a nice band name, thanks.
>> Anonymous
I give you my 100% guarantee, that this will be, by far, the worst trek movie of all time, if Star Trek : Enterprise is any indication. A nail in the coffin of Star Trek, a process of milking the last of the green of this once great IP.

This is an anon guarantee.
>> Blaak Obongo
>>466594
What's with that shot of the Enterprise being built on the ground? There's no way they could get it into orbit -- it's not like it's some damn Saturn Five that can blast off from ground level.
>> ?????????????????
>>467662

they used the teleporters to get it to the moon
>> Anonymous
Was going so good until that PNG-faggot came in. Take your overblown filesizes with neglidgable quality improvements and get the fuck out.
>> Anonymous
I GROK SPOCKS COCK
>> Anonymous
>>467662
Isn't it? I thought they could, um, fly. Not a big Star Trek fan, but I'm sure I've seen the Enterprise land on a planet and then take off again.
>> Anonymous
the voyager could land

not so sure about the enterprise though
>> Anonymous
So, why are they trusting the most advanced ship in the fleet to nobody younger than their 30s?
I'm just askin'.
>> Anonymous
The Enterprise cannot land. Closest any Enterprise ever came was the saucer section's crash-landing in Generations.
>> Anonymous
>>467545
No he hasn't. Kirk joines the academy while the enterprise is being built. During that time, 2 5 year missions were completed: Pike and April's. Do your research you nub.
>> Anonymous
this whole movie has to be the worst casting in ages
>> Anonymous
>>467662

So that they could ruin consistency between this movie and previous movies. Generally in Star Trek ships are built in space at Utopa Planetia. But they probably branded the bike, so he can ride it up to look at the ship, despite the fact there's no commerce in the future.
>> Anonymous
It's ok, it's not as though the original series made sense from episode to episode.
>> Anonymous
>>468041
but at least kirk was sexy beast and spock was full of handsome and dignity

now we get a bunch of fagged up kids and low brow comedians because they are popular
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I am only watching it for this scene.

While I normally love space operas, I hated the slow and plodding plotwork of past star trek movies.
The franchise needs more action, more adventure, more sex and no more yapping in techno babble about make believe hardware that no one gives two shits about.
>> Anonymous
>>468076
Yeah but in addition to action/adventure/plot you gotta have some scenes devoted to the characters to help tell there story as well as the "bigger picture" that is the main plot. A lot of films now just focus on the action and plot and leave out the character's story completely. I hope there's no plot holes in this movie, that's something else a lot of films have, big plot holes.
>> Anonymous
so what about age and career progression?

They are all in this movie in their younger years. This doesn't jive. If you have younger officers like Sulu serving with Kirk at the same time you have an anachronism. While Kirk is a young officer, Sulu should be in high school turning boy tricks. With rank comes seniority. Furthermore, do these guys stay on the same ship for their whole careers or do they get assigned elsewhere and return to the Enterprise? Hey, Uhura, it's me Kirk, fancy seeing you on the Enterprise! Remember we were on this ship together ten years ago?
>> Anonymous
GET OVER THIS SHIT FAGS!!!!

This film has NOTHING to do with what came before and that's a very good thing.
>> Anonymous
Kirk was an admiral in the original movies. He took command of the enterprise in his early 30's... which is very young by most standards.
I think considering his tendency towards valor and luck, its not that far out of the question that he could rise to command a ship crewed by members only slightly younger than himself.

It don't matter...
We already know the crew of enterprise. We already know how it ends. This is "Episode I" and we're going to see the oiled up wrestling match between our old heroes and the modern shaky-cam movie filming method.

At long last, Swashbuckling passion is on the menu!
(...lets just hope the Chefs don't screw it up)
>> Anonymous
>>468076

I am a fan of the hyper-spanners, cortical stimulators, and nacelles... xD
>> Anonymous
>>468125

Until your local theater is consumed by nerd rage. This movies shits on 40+ years of continuity.
>> Anonymous
I read a one sentence synopsis of this film. I have seen to many star trek episodes with that very same theme. Im not going to watch it cause i know how this fucking dumbass idea ends.
>> Anonymous
>>467544
Pike is the guy in the trailer saying "Fire all weapons." He's being played by Bruce Greenwood.
>>467653
Yeah, but no one who worked on Enterprise is on this movie at all. Berman is off sucking dick for money.
>>468034
Jesus fuck, the original Enterprise was built at the San Francisco yards, which could maybe have been on Earth or in geosynchronous orbit above SF. Either way, there's no way to know if that's Enterprise that's being built in that scene.

For fuck's sake, get your shit right before talking like you know something.
>> Anonymous
>>468161
I thought it was built in Utopia Planitia, Mars
>> Anonymous
>>468172
The Enterprise D was built at Utopia Plantia...

Yes, Dork Alert... :P

I'm sensing a Thunderbirds Movie parallel... *shudder* :(
>> Anonymous
>>468186
Well, I'm just an ensign anyway. On a goddamned Super Star Destroyer. This fucker has it's own gravity well, I swear.
>> Anonymous
I personally don't care for the Kirk/Spock era Star Trek, but I am looking forward to this.
>> Anonymous
>>468134
Nacelle is an acutal engineering term for a covered housing of an Engine Component.
>> Anonymous
>>468172
The original Enterprise (NCC-1701) was built at San Francisco Fleet Yards.
>> fucking shit not again Anonymous
>>468294
San Francisco Fleet Yards (also known as San Francisco Navy Yards or simply San Francisco Yards) is a Starfleet shipyard located in Earth orbit, with its shore offices probably located in the city of San Francisco. There is also an orbital office complex near the drydocks of the yard. (Star Trek: The Motion Picture)

SAUCE http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/San_Francisco_Fleet_Yards
>> Anonymous
Simple: A couple other ships use their tractor beams and carry the Enterprise up to the space dock for the final construction phase.
>> Anonymous
>>467653

Guaranteed by die-hard TOS trekkie fans who can't appreciate anything for what it is. I for one despise TOS, and dislike TNG, but like Voyager, DS9, and find Enterprise to easily be my favorite. Aslong as all the lense flare is toned down in the movie, this'll prolly be really good.
>> Anonymous
So bad they had to start over...
way to fuck up the series, bakula!

anyone else reminded of dragonball GT by this?
>> Anonymous
>>468356
don't blame archer, he had a decent run. it's all voyager b&b fault for tanking the franchise.
>> Anonymous
>>468134

Self-sealing Stembolts, you fag.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
.skcirb tihS .5

??? .4

.KdKedvas uouy yelif eht nepUO .3

s[j.nahc4Y sa t i evaS .2

.egami siht nepO .1
>> Anonymous
>>468015

Quinto as Spock is bang on, though.