File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
im looking for the cover of vanity fair with scarlett johansson on the cover from a few months back, in return i offer hi res elish cuthbert, yummy.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
This?
>> Anonymous
Anyone else think neither of those 2 look good?
>> Anonymous
>>129507
>>am i the only gay guy in the village?

i do believe so, yes
>> Anonymous
>>129507
I do too. They look totally cold and distant, on other pics they can be hot as hell, though.
>> Anonymous
That particular image is ultra-crap. It's quite astonishing actually.
>> Anonymous
>>129487

Is there one without Kiera Knightly's chest all shopped to be not flat?

That would be awesome.
>> Anonymous
>>129532
Any poster of that King Arthur she was in.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>129532

Looks to me that if you saw that pic from the front, her boobs wouldn't appear "not flat", but instead would look like a pancake on a stick, you know, with the stick going under it, so that the pancake forms an upside "U", thats what it'd look like, ummhum.
>> Anonymous
Oh yeah, and I forgot to add, that I have never seen a pic/movie/interview where Keira wouldve looked at all desirable. To me she just looks so stuck-up and she never seems to be natural, relaxed, its like shes making faces, all the time. And shes pretty skinny too.. But all to their own I guess. And then Scarlett.. well.. shes one of those girls whos face just doesnt stick to my mind.. either Ive never seen her work, or she just is too bland. I would bet on the second one.
>> Anonymous
>>130299
Gotta admit though, Scarlett's got a nice ass.
>> Anonymous
>>130308
And huge boobs. Always a plus.