that watermark ruined it
>>340071yep it fucked the whole image up.... can anon deliver unlabeled?
About 30 seconds in MS Paint...
>>340124THATS MUCH BETTER
Seriously, once Scientology is destroyed, Anon should focus on watermarks. Watermarks suck. If there's a legitimate reason beyond advertising, they can embed it digitally. But watermarking images is spamming and should be fought.
>>340124well done :P