Does anyone have this poster in like 4x3k res?
only took few secs in ps. enjoy!
>>394526yeah wow that looks like shit. just because you can change the height and width to 1000% in photoshop doesn't mean you should, or that it will look decent.
Really, people need to stop doing that. Resizing a lower res pic doesn't make it HQ magically.
I most likely did the same thing that the Second poster did, but I fiddled with a few things to cover up quality loss from the enlargement.
>>394730mostly you utterly failed like the first dumbass
bump
OP, if you act like a dick you won't get shit.Use google faggot
>>394861FYI>>394836and>>394836arent my posts
OP: Don't think it exists. I have trying to find this poster 1680x1050 but no luck on my part. Does it have sort of official name?