File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
=3
>> Anonymous
Massive mammaries make my miniscule member massive
>> Anonymous
>>91069
we need more people that talk like you
>> Anonymous
MOM?!
>> aglaophotus
source?
>> aglaophotus
more?
>> Anonymous
>>91069

We welcome word warriors with warm willful wanking.
>> Anonymous
>>91069
>>91125
Legendary.
>> Anonymous
huge nipple is HUGEEEEEEE
>> Anonymous
http://www.flurl.com/item/girlfriend_u_193428
>> Anonymous
more plz
>> Anonymous
seconded
>> Anonymous
Partial picture parading prodigious pilose pale piece purges prominent penis
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>91231

Fixed
>> Anonymous
big boobs builds big boners
>> Anonymous
>>91233
Fail
Why did the file size go up? It's not like you've added anything to the picture. There is no quality difference.
>> Anonymous
one is jpg, one is png
>> Anonymous
>>91237
U-U-U-ULTRAFAIL
>> Anonymous
>>91066
very sex. been to the site, still need moar.
>> Anonymous
Good lord, just because PNG supports high-color losslessly is no reason to use it in replacement of JPEG.

Even at a high-quality 90+ setting, JPEG can still outpwn PNG for final saves...
>> Anonymous
I think it's fixed because the image was cropped to remove the other person appearing at the bottom.

Resaving it as a PNG isn't exactly a good idea, but the reason it's called "superior" is not the format.
>> Anonymous
>>91300
Thank you.
>>91310
It is still stupid. It's like re-encoding an mp3 to lossless fromat. Are you magically going to get a better picture.

Thanks for getting rid of the fat guy at the bottom though.
>> Anonymous
those bewbs are legendary
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>91233
A better fix.
4 (or was it 5...) colours for the win.
>> Anonymous
>>91367
don't smoke crack
>> Anonymous
>>91367
what the fuck, man
>> Anonymous
>>91367
keylogger
>> Anonymous
>>91715
what?
>> Anonymous
>>91715
what?