80's anyone?
I fuckin' love the eighties. But... is this really what you consider high resolution?
>>315176High as I could find. I'd like higher, but what can you do.
I have two more of these as large posters, too bad I can't scan them.
ITT surprisingly hawt images are posted.
Wow - haven't seen these in nearly 20 years!
artist? moar?
http://www.patricknagel.com/
bricks were shat on the cumulative 3D effect that the clean blue and black lines make
He was an artist unparalleled in his time. Damned shame he's gone (been dead for quite a while now), but his artwork will stand the test of time./me has a signed print on the wall, paid a good five figures for it a decade ago, now it's worth 4x the original price...
bump for massive win.
Also look for his protege Mukai for different art in similar media - usually mostly a frisket-like film cut with exacto over pencil with some ink touch ups IIRC.
Are there any old guys here that remember Windows 3.1?There was a picture of Nagel's girls (filename Nagel24 if I remember correctly) along with other bitmaps that came along with every copy of Windows (in Europe, at least)Windows 3.1 fucking rawked.
>>315176well, I think these pics can be easily vectorized for MASSIVE WIN.All we need now is a volunteer.
http://www.anonib.com/artgalleries/index.php?t=96
>>315402THANK YOU
>>315402Fuckin' Rights.
god i remember when these pics were everywhere, gave me a stiffy as a child ;)
>>315639It seemed like every hair styling place had Nagel posters. Like it was the law.
some high re sof charlies face and umba lumpa face
charlie and the chocolt fatory
>>315655My town still does. Maybe I'll take a picture if this thread's still around tomorrow.
>>315665>>315661TROLL. Let's spam his conveniently-provided e-mail address.Kofcgregbennett@hotmail.com
bump for troll-spamming.
>>315661>>315665LOLOLOLOLcharlie and the chocolt fatorycharlie and the chocolt fatorycharlie and the chocolt fatorycharlie and the chocolt fatorycharlie and the chocolt fatory>fatory
>>316010Frank N. Furter!
>>316365no. it's not.
>>316010I see michael jackson!!
>>315168there was one that looked like this chick, it was a wide-shot, whe was wearing shades, arms wide open & her shirt was open. no nips, but still a pic that has remained in my memory forever.plz supply & win urself sum internets.
>>315402???
>>318473DOS'd