File :-(, x, )
McDragon !!0WDo4kBYwEi
Scanned using my new Epson 3490 Photo Perfection.

600 dpi but still much better than my old HP scanner, it's faster like less than a min. and much cleaner, almost perfect.

and a good software too unlike HP's.
>> The Faceless Horror !jxsanityIQ
     File :-(, x)
I think it is slightly out of focus, and you need to adjust the contrast/hue. Compare the image to the one you posted previously.

Otherwise good job.
>> McDragon !!0WDo4kBYwEi
>>66068
with epson, i did selected the color restoration, i didn't with hp because it would take even more longer time...

out of focus you say? maybe that's what descreening does, but at least it's not grainy and i don't need to mess with it in photoshop or something.
>> McDragon !!0WDo4kBYwEi
with epson, i did select the color restoration, but i didn't with hp because it would take even more longer time...

out of focus you say? maybe that's what descreening does, but at least it's not too grainy and i don't need to mess with it in photoshop or something.
>> Kaitsobato
>>66068
Any clue what scanner that was? A home scanner or copy-shop-scanner? Any recent scanner for around 150$? Looking for a new one :(
>> McDragon !!0WDo4kBYwEi
>>66531

>>66068
this picture was scanned by me using: HP scanjet 4370.

the first one was scanned using: Epson photo perfection 3490.

in my own opinion, epson wins, it's faster and cleaner, hp is so damn grainy and slow, take my advice and only get an epson.