>> |
Anonymous
>>432066
You sound like a perfectionist and I know what you mean.
I do have some bad news for you though, you probably know this, but even a blu ray release is probably not the highest quality possible. Digital cinema is captured at a much higher resolution than 1080p and film also has a higher resolution. You'll have to wait for whatever comes after blu ray (and perhaps even that won't suffice) for the absolute highest quality. And even then, that will only apply to current media.
Getting your music in FLAC is probably a good idea, although I'd rather just keep it in FLAC for archival purposes. Though, it would suck if this was only a downsampled version and in the future the best possible version was released. One good thing about getting the ideal version of something is that you don't have to get it again.
Getting your images from here may not be the best idea, although it is a step up from typical web content. Don't you think it's better to get it from the source? Even some images here have been scaled down.
Oh and if I'm not mistaken, many astronomical related images are ALWAYS scaled down immensely. Hubble images can be gigabytes in size, even losslessly compressed.
|