File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Now if we could just make <u>moving</u> computer animated objects look realistic then I would be amazed. BTW, nothing in this pic is real.
>> Anonymous
No offense intended, but nothing in that image looks real to me.
>> Anonymous
^ yea, its really not that good
>> Anonymous
looks real to me
>> Anonymous
The ice cube *really* gives the whole thing away, the backround could use some work as well. Just a bit too much perfect reflections all over as well.
>> Anonymous
This image is from wikipedia, derp.
>> Anonymous
Yeah the ice and the background are both giveaways.

NICE TRY OP BUT YOU GOT TO GET UP PRETTY EARLY
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
How's this for a bit of post-processing to make it look more like a digicam photograph?
>> Anonymous
the ice cube does not displace water lulz
>> 7eg
Agreed that the backdrop could use some work but the rest is awesome.

The ice cube isn't floating because the glass is empty.
>> Anonymous
wow, that image was generated by pov-ray. because 3ds-max suxxorz
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
crap I made a few years ago
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
(in 3ds max btw)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Here is a render w/o DOF. Looks alot more fake.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
http://forums.cgsociety.org/showthread.php?f=121&t=494554
>> Anonymous
highres is bad 4 56k
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
http://forums.cgsociety.org/showthread.php?f=121&t=459367
>> Anonymous
fake dof is faaake
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>182407

It's always seems like the little details let technically good images down. Like the light or scale of an object is off. In this image the light is coming in from the right but the left of the Chrysler building in the background is lit more than the right.
>> Anonymous
>>182700
The little details didn't really matter in this thread. The point of those pictures which I posted was to prove that the OP image was crap, and that there's much much better stuff out there.
>> Anonymous
Nothing in any picture is real.
>> Anonymous
>>182407
omg that looks so real

to my untrained eyes anyway
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Everything in any picture IS real. for the simple fact that it exists makes it so.

image made in Terragen 2
>> Anonymous
>>181695
lolza what game iz dat?

the lack of realistic texture esp. in the glassware -is that an icecube or a piece of glass made to look like one?- makes it obvious that this image is cg.
Still, this is better than certainly 100% of computer games.
>> Anonymous
Everything in OP pic is real. I know, because I took the picture.
>> Anonymous
just shutup. I saw this pic at least 6 years ago.
>> Anonymous
>>182221
terrible quality
>> Anonymous
>>182949
I thought it was pretty decent. Looks a hell of a lot more like the ice cubes I make than the original.