File :-(, x, )
HR Constitution 4 Images Anonymous
http://rapidshare.de/files/28025211/Constitution_HR.rar
>> Spyder
Are these of the actual original, or a cheap copy?
>> Anonymous
It's the original. The reason it's brown is because the President used it has toilet paper.
>> Anonymous
>>72563

Who saw this comming!?
>> Anonymous
>>72562
I dont know. The only way to find out is to pour lemon juice on the back then blow it dry with a hair dryer. If it has teh secret map, its is teh real one.
>> Anonymous
>>72562
They are high-res scans from the national archieve. They pulled down the the really high-res's though.

Looks like anonymous has put my copy of them and rapidshared it. I also have the declartion of independence and all the amendments if anyone wants them.
>> Anonymous
>>72634
Yes please.
>> Anonymous
>>72566

It's predictable because it's (figuratively) true.
>> Anonymous
>>72738

No, it's predictable because there's a certain signifigant population of barely literate but somehow computer literate users out ther who don't let their infantile lack of political knowledge, failure of perspective, and utter inability to form a cogent argument prevent them from expressing their baseless political views.
>> Anonymous
Here are your rights, #1 (67.8 MB):
http://rapidshare.de/files/28329655/Doc1.rar.html

Archieve #2 comming up...
>> Anonymous
http://rapidshare.de/files/28332711/Doc2.rar.html
Here are your freedoms #2. Enjoy your rights.
>> Anonymous
thanks for the uploads
>> Anonymous
THERE'S AN INVISIBLE TREASURE MAP ON THE BACK! IT'S TRUE! BUT NO ONE BELIEVES ME! (/???)/
>> Anonymous
>>72740

Smooth words, but I don't see you presenting a cogent argument yourself. If anything, it's just more ad hominen drek, that keeps both parties and supporties so fiercely and vitriolically partisan.

It's become fast obvious to most people that the current president has very much subverted the original intent and values upon which the country was founded, upon which so much effort has been made to fight for. If it was all upto him, secularism and following it, democracy would go the way of the dodo.

And don't let the word secularism confuse you into thinking it's a bad thing (as the average religious conservative is wont to do); unless you consider a theocracy a good thing.
>> Anonymous
>>72740
Or they could be trying to raise a laugh in their own ways, whether or not we agree with their caliber of humor.

>>72957
I prefer laïcité, even if such a policy would only exist by name. By practice, the development of opinions cannot rely on secular knowledge alone, and a person's religious belief(s) will continue to provide undertones and back-support for one given motion or another. In the United States, such a thing would never come to pass because the current voting system may only be possible through the continued, though bias, support from church officials who encourage masses of people (double-meaning ahoy) to vote for such and such a person. And given the annoying level of Catholicism and Protestant levels in the country already, implementing the schism would be a nearly impossible task.

Back to Bush and another forty years of wandering in the desert. I forget who the person was who thought that philosophers should be the people running countries but that they were smart enough not to try, but I always felt that the current direction of political activity is further from an ideal way of running a country - hell, keeping a planet intact, I dare say. Bush and UberRepublicans are so conservative that they refuse to see things beyond their own nose, striking out climate control issues, stem cell research, etc. (on the other hand, I am not too familiar with Democratic views on their prior to Bush; can someone fill that in for me?). You know, I've always been hoping someone at some meeting asks Bush's official if the president would push for a ban on known, working stem cell reinjection treatments if they were discovered because they'd "still be harming the potential for life."
>> Anonymous
>>72957

If it, in fact, has become clear to most people that Bush has subverted the Constitution, where is the great outcry for impeachment? Sadly, what you refer to as a great many or majority or mass of people is nothing more than a very loud, very powerless far-left fringe of the political spectrum. Furthermore, 72740 may back up his claim against your supposed ad-hominem retort by referring to numerous recent attacks against the current administration and the falsifications reported as truth:

Bush's military records (Rathers)
global warming (where's the other side in this debate?)
Fahrenheit 9/11 (numerous falsehoods there)

combined with the readiness of people on the internet to believe and repost such issues without doing research.

>>72957

Only stem cell treatments that work thus far are from adult stem cells.
>> Anonymous
>>72957
>It's become fast obvious to most people that the current president has very much subverted the original intent and values upon which the country was founded

Except, he hasn't. I used to be annoyed by the whole "Bush is ignoring the Constitution" argument, until I realized it was being made primarily by people who don't really care about the document in the first place and are simply trying to throw out charges in the hope that they stick. Meanwhile, sage for politics in my /hr.