File :-(, x, )
High Dynamic Range Anonymous
post moar hdr
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
okay ;)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
aaand another
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
Too awesome. I came just by looking at these.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
hdr moar!
epic
>> Anonymous
overcontrast/saturation! do you speak it?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> noko
     File :-(, x)
some of these don't even look like photographs
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>293337
I think that might be a shoop. I have pictures of the same scenery without any effects.
>> 7eAL !!tllRoBnU1Sb
>>293390
fundamentally speaking, HDR is a shoop involving at least three different exposures of the same image, isn't it?
>> Anonymous
>>293402

in a very basic way, yes thats your answer.
>> Anonymous
this thread is the cure for the cancer that is kill /hr/
>> Anonymous
THESE ALL FUCKING SUCK HOLY SHIT
>> Anonymous
>>293364

...which is why HDR pics kind of sort of fail. They just looks so fake and unreal sometimes.

Even though they are so much fun to look at.
>> Anonymous
also, MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>293448
Their whole fucking point is to look unreal.

"fucking facepalm.jpg"
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
gods of HR bless this one
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
how does one take hdr photos?
>>293598
how does i mindfuck?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> noko
     File :-(, x)
This is TRUE HDR, you ngrs. The rest of the bullshit you posted is just a bunch of lame high contrast newfag@hdr lameness. fuck off and die.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>293610

Too bad your image isn't /hr/, dipshit
>> Anonymous
>>293610
HAHAHA! Horribile fail! XD~ LOL'd so hard... Also stop trolling, or when you mean it business, then GTFO NAO.
>> Anonymous
>>293610

Neither 4chan or any web browser supports viewing of HDR images, so NONE of the pictures uploaded to 4chan are HDRI.

You need a format with 16bits per channel or greater to qualify it as HDRI, like OpenEXR or something.

JPEG and PNG (well, the web standard for PGN is 8bit, but in some conditions it supports 16bits) only support 8bits per channel.
>> Anonymous
>>293657
Only one I like
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Post more multiexposure composites, please. The trolls will tire out eventually and go to threads they get a response in. I love this thread! @_@
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Here's some chernobyl HDR :)
>> Anonymous
>>293715
Well where would a resource be to VIEW HDR images then?

>>293658
>>Images smaller than 700x700 pixels are not allowed.

4chan says otherwise.
>> Anonymous
>>293715
Would you just stfu? ...you wouldn't even be able to tell the difference between a .png format HDR-processed image from a 'true' HDR image anyways. Go back to your fucking hole
>> Anonymous
>>294070
stupid cunt !!
Have you ever seen a real HDR image through exrdisplay of something ?? I guess not as your comment is moronic and totally out of reality.