>> |
Anonymous
>>287402 ... Continued
As for the others I considered, they didn't have the little thing that would make them as cool to a mass market. (Although after reading your post, I reconsidered and thought Luke might be on the list as well because he is the main hero of the original trilogy.) Anyway, Kenobi wasn't bad, and he beat Anakin once (because Anakin was fighting like he was drunk), but people aren't gonna go crazy for an above-average Jedi with one single-bladed lightsaber. Same with Windu, and I'd bet serious money they're not making it Qui-gon. On the dark side, the only other choice they have is Tyranus, but he's kinda minor, and his only gimmick is that his saber handle's curved and his style is for fighting other saber-users rather than blaster-users. Big whoop. Since he won't be fighting anyone with a saber anyway, it doesn't really matter.
All in all, if the Jedi and their sabers were accurately represented, they would never lose. So the swords won't cut through everything. Not a problem. My biggest concern is that they're gonna make the Wii character someone random like Plo Koon or Ki-Adi Mundi or some other random character. My biggest wish? They sould make the normal games (with Maul, Grievous, or Sideous) for the normal price ($50?), and then make one for each system that's maybe a little more ($70 or so) that includes all the guests - or make the other two guests normally available on your system available for purchase through your system's online feature. That way they'd make more money (the only reason they're splitting up the guests anyway), and we could have Vader vs. Yoda and so on.
|