File :-(, x, )
Monica Bellucci Cronauer !sRg2SqGvH.
Well..it's /hr/. :)
>> Dominoooo !arjgWSIZBg
I used to have a few really good high res pics of her, no idea what happened to 'em. Post more?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Not very HR, but it'll have to do.

>>105628

She looks like death there.
>> Anonymous
Yeah, not her best picture, but damn this resolution! Thank you kind sir.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
MOAR
>> Anonymous
This thread is made of win and god, MOAR NOW.
>> Cronauer !sRg2SqGvH.
>>105689

Thankyou kind sir, the more the merrier.

I'll post some more a little later :)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I've said it once and I'll say it again

nice tits
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
yes?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Dear /hr/,

I come bearing gifts.

To begin with, we have http://theplace.ru/archive/monica_bellucci/img/, an open directory of Monica Bellucci pics.

But why should I stop there? I downloaded all the images, weeded out the thumbnails, and weeded out the low-res images (the ones where both dimensions < 1000px), and am currently uploading it now. Will post the download link when I'm done.
>> Anonymous
>>105779

you are the besto, I will watch for it :)
>> Anonymous
>>105779
You are awesome
>> Anonymous
>>105779

Well...?
>> Anonymous
Bump. Still waiting.
>> Anonymous
http://rapidshare.com/files/8249351/Monica_Bellucci.part1.rar (100MB)
http://rapidshare.com/files/8291485/Monica_Bellucci.part2.rar (100MB)
http://rapidshare.com/files/8298410/Monica_Bellucci.part3.rar (18MB)
>> Anonymous
>>105869

You shall have as many internets as you want, kind sir.

Now torrent it. :|
>> Anonymous
>>105872
Sorry, I'm not stupid enough to try to stream over 200mB to 20 people at once on my 30kB upload. That would take over 37 hours before anybody got a full copy.
>> Anonymous
>>105874
wtf 0_o Someone doesn't understand torrenting. It's not streaming. I can torrent all that in 90 mins with my 35kb/s upload.
>> Anonymous
>>105879
20 people are trying to get one 200mB file from you simultaneously.
I only have a 30kB upload.
That means each person gets 1/20th of my 30kB upload, IE each person gets a 1.75kB download.

So now compare 1.75kB download via bittorrent
With an unlimited download via rapidshare (maxes out my 500kB download)
>> Anonymous
>>105882
yeah that's not... how... it works.
>> Anonymous
>>105888
Yeah, it is. There are 20 people trying to get a file from you at once. Do you think that they can magically download it faster than you can upload it?
>> Anonymous
A while back some guy tried to torrent a pack of PSD's from RO or something. Everybody asked for a rapidshare but he decided to be stubborn and torrent it instead. About 30 people ended up trying to get it from him at the same time, and his upload couldn't handle it. Everybody had sub-kb download speeds, and a few weeks later the furthest anybody had gotten was ~1.5%, with the guy seeding the whole time. After that everybody sort of gave up.
>> Anonymous
Torrent will work if you have a client you can set to Superseed. That way, the original seeder has to upload every piece once before they start uploading duplicates to other people (the streaming the source mentioned). The leechers can spread the file around, but the seed has to first get the full file out.

Ideally with the seeder uploading at 30k every downloader should be getting at at least 30k.

I'm getting the rapidshare, anyway.
>> Anonymous
>>105889
*smacks head*
You don't simultaneously send the same bit to everyone at the same time.
TORRENTING ISN'T STREAMING, can you read?
In superseeding mode, you send each bit of the file out once in sequential order, alternating between a few peers - on mine, 3 peers each get about 10kb/s, then once the file piece is sent it switches to another piece, another peer.

They in turn send what bits they have to peers who need it.
To put it simplistically, everyones upstream is combined.

Noone is dling faster than you upload but it's like you've only uploaded it once, i.e. the same as you did to rapidshare, but everyone completes the file around the same time and can share it on.

THERES YOUR SHORT INTRO TO BT

Anyway, thanks for sharing at all.
>> Anonymous
I bet everyone was using shitty Shadow's mod and bittornado, like it was 2002 or something. So, taking the enormous number of successful torrents in /t versus your anecdote about one idiot seeder, we should conclude that torrents are shit? The guy probably had shit upload anyway.

Modern clients like utorrent and azureus prioritize the least-common pieces, to the point that I find super-seeding significantly degrades overall upload time; super-seeding is a hack to work around shit clients, that only works if you have hundreds of peers or other torrents to use up the wasted bandwidth. Otherwise you spend more time using zero upload while the leeches upload to each other. That's my experience with upping moderately popular concert DVDs, that typically start with have 2-10 clients, but once in a while several hundred. Super seeding always leaves my upload idle or very underutilized 70% of the time.
>> MR. Anon
>>105890
lies, people were saying nobody was seeding shortly after he started (like, the same day or something).

also with the size rapidshare i think it would have had to have been uploaded in like 10 or 15 huge parts that can fail while you dl them, with an hour and a half wait between DL attempts

Personally, I think he was pulling some kind of stunt, and had not intention of actually letting people have the files. Otherwise he would have waited until the swarm had at least one complete copy between all of them
>> Anonymous
>>105890
You must be thinking of something else. With the RO psd torrent, everyone had decent speed... up to 3% completion, then he just abandoned us D: I'm one of those stragglers who leave it open 'just in case'.
>> Anonymous
THAT'S A HUGE BITCH