File :-(, x, )
Sigma - Satoshi Anonymous
Big enough?
>> Doppelganger !.97.to9elc
     File :-(, x)
Quite. Rather blurry, though.
>> Leomb
     File :-(, x)
I love the work of Urushihara
I downloaded a version of this artbook... though, it has this sketch that make me ask: Doesn't This artbook have this same image properly illustrated?? I there is one, i would like to request it!! (in /hr/ of course)
>> Anonymous
>>110925

That's my scanner for you :)Anyway to improve that? Im no ps pro. So what, do you photoshop it or vector it to make it look better?

>>110927

No there isn't. Sorry.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Doppelganger !.97.to9elc
I do not alter images myself, but vectors tend to be used on relatively low-res images to blow them up to huge proportions.

That would probably be better cleaned up in PS.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Hmmm ... Im trying to figure out how to create large scans without resorting to other means to clean them up. If I scan at 1200dpi then resize to 25% original the scan ends up being nice and clean and looks like the scanned image. But it ends up being not much larger than 1600x2900. That would mean I would have to scan at 4800dpi to get a reasonable sized scan after resizing. Or larger even. Then my computer probably wouldn't be able to handle the huge file that would be created. This image was scanned at 1200dpi then resized to 25% original and looks alot better than my original post. Any suggestions?
>> Anonymous
>>111272
Scan them @ 9600dpi and send the raw pics to me on Blu-Ray! :DDDD


No... eh... How about scan @ 2400ish then doing leet photoshop improvements and resizing it to ~50% ?
>> Anonymous
>>111272
Do the 4800dpi thing in sections, then shrink each section to 25% and then merge the sections into one image?
>> Anonymous
>>111364
I wonder if that would work ... I don't have photoshop so I can't go that route. Guess I'll try your suggestion and see what happens. Thanks.