File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Searched for "massive fail" on google.
This was one of the hits.
>> Anonymous
Isnt that an A10? Sooo whats your point?
>> Anonymous
look at whats going on. yeah, there's something wrong with the aircraft, thats why it came up. big ball of flame coming out of the wing thats not a light is bad.
>> Dick Pound Brown
>>285594
best watch that one

hes retarded you see...

and he doesnt afraid of anything!
>> Megadeus
     File :-(, x)
A-10s are flying tanks. They can be shot to pieces and keep going until the wings fall off.

Besides, it's just releasing flares.
>> Megadeus
     File :-(, x)
>> Mr Anonymous
Correction, A10s CAN keep going with thier wings are shot off. I have seen it, beast as hell. Imagine you are shooting AA at a plane diving with gun blazing at you, you shoot off its wings and everything else to hell and it keeps maneuvering! I'd shit myself. But yes, the essence of it is that they took the largest gun ever conceived and built a place around it.
>> Anonymous
You know, there's a reason they called these things "tankbusters". It's one of the most durable and robust aircraft ever designed. Created in the early 70's and still in use today, scheduled to remain in service til the 2030s. How many other aircraft do you know can laugh off a direct hit from armor-piercing and high temp explosive rounds? These things are safer to be in than the national guard, for crying out loud.
>> Anonymous
A10, i love you
>> Anonymous
best
aircraft
ever
well, i think so
>> Anonymous
>>285714

I don't think so, I know so.
>> Anonymous
>>285688
No. If they lose a full wing, they cannot fly. If they lose half a wing, they can, but not a full wing.
>> Anonymous
This is a great plane, true, and extremely resilient, but it's not a divine entity. It is manoeuvrable, yet incredibly slow compared to most other military planes. Because of this, it is far from being the most difficult plane to get an HS, IR, or radar lock on, so when approaching SAMs, regardless of the titanium cockpit, I would be crapping myself. You could destroy the SAMs first with HARMs and Mavericks, and use chaff, flares, and radar jamming, but I wouldn't be too cocky in this plane. Any army worth anything has more than a fair amount of personal and mounted SAMs. The lack of speed makes weapon targeting more accurate, but the same can be said for the enemy. There's no afterburner to get out of sticky situations and the rate of climb is not impressive from what I remember. As much as I like this plane, I'd rather be in something faster, unless supported by air superiority fighters or something to help with SAMs.
>> Anonymous
Well, Afterburners are for wussies. These planes are meant to go low.Lower then a korean girl will go for 10 dollar.
>> Anonymous
Yep, they are meant to go as low as that :) and can avoid some missiles because of that, but how many missile hits can they survive? How many cannon hits from an SU27 could the engines survive? It is great at 'absorbing' AA, but many AA sites have SAMs nearby. I'd say these planes are great at getting in somewhere, and destroying several things, but I wouldn't like to face any enemy planes in one of these.
>> Anonymous
>>285803

...damn thats low. Korean girls would suck your TOES for 10 dollars.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Its a tank killer not an air to air fighter. It will very efficiently turn a tank into swiss cheese with its nose mounted cannon and then use one the many missiles mounted on the wing hard points to blow the tank to scrap.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
A wild Su-27 appears.
>> Warlord Kentax
>>285946
That looks kinda like G1 Starscream.
>> Anonymous
G1 Starscream jet would fuck that jet up before its seen
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>285946

Two Tomcats counter the Sukhoi threat :P
>> Anonymous
>>286303
SUPERIORRLY AWSOME !!!