File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Wolf 359

nevar forgit
>> Anonymous
its really sad that i understand this.
>> Anonymous
>>369350
not rly
>> Anonymous
>>369325

at least start off with a high res picture
>> Anonymous
>>369381
Shut the fuck up with your shit aleady. Go find a bigger one and I will give you a fucking cookie, bitch.
>> Blackwolf
What's with the stamp-sized pic? Go back to /wg, you twat.
>> Anonymous
>>369404
thats a big fucking stamp.
>> Mr. Anonymous
No, its a stamp. GTFO if you cant read "High Resolution" on the top of the page.
>> Anonymous
shittest thing i have seen since i took a dump
>> Anonymous
>>371486
why bump this oldass thread?

also i guess i am nerd as i understood what ' Wolf 359 ' meant without the thumbnail...
>> Anonymous
>>369538
Images at least 700x700 are allowed. GTFO yourself if you can't read that.
>> Anonymous
>>371536
That rule is really there to allow images that are, for example, 700x3000. A 700x700 image is not high-resolution.
>> Anonymous
>>371552

wrong, 700x700 is HR
>> Anonymous
>>371555
Yes, of course.

GET! THE! FUCK! OUT!
>> Anonymous
>>371536
>>371552
>>371555
Size has nothing to do with high-resolution. It's about image quality, or at least it ought to be. This image is far from high-res.
>> Anonymous
>>371560
According to the rules, it does in fact appear to be about size.
>> Anonymous
>>371563
If we go strictly by the rules, a .bmp cannot be high-res.