File :-(, x, )
SUperior Anonymous
Sukhoi time!

Post your /hr/ Sukhoi pics now.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
love this beauty
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Not quite /hr/ but something at least
>> Anonymous
Whats the point of longer cone on the right side of the rear? Is it radar housing?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Now if I only could understand Russian...
>> Anonymous
Bump for moar
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
These guys watched way too much Yukikaze.
>> Anonymous
>>167666
>>167668
is that thing actually going to be ever be developed for production or is it still JUST a prototype?
>> Anonymous
>>168072These guys watched way too much Yukikaze.

I've never even head about Yukikaze, except for the WWII Japanese destroyer, but I don't think you're talking about that.

>>168096

Sorry, Idon't know about that. I'm a noob with these things.

You'd think that someone would have more pics than this...
>> Anonymous
>>168096
No idea... Last time i checked (which was a while ago) it was called the SU37... which is confusing because theres another plane they were going to call the SU37... which (to my knowledge) is now the SU-27...

But all that being said...

That plane kicks bloody ass. Vectored thrust, stabalating canards, the wings are not solid, they bend when the plane moves, has to or they would sheer right off. The thing can do all kinds of crazy shit.

Awesome plane. Great pic OP. thanks :)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>168111
OP here. That name thing confused me a bit too. Sometimes I run into it by the name SU-37 but on Sukhois official website it's called SU-47. That's pretty much all I know about it, I'm only just learning about these things.

Here's one more pic, but as you can see it's hardly /hr/ material. I wonder where all the /k/omrades are when you need them.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
AFAIK, it`s called Su-47, or S-37 (not Su-37). Officials say, it`s more of a concept plane, built to test out a doctrine of superagility aircraft with some stealth features. Mass production of this model is not planned, but Sukhoi is going to work in this direction, unlike MiG, for example.
>> Anonymous
>>168268

They got the idea for that plane from the U.S. Air Force's X-29 which first flew in the early 1980's.

http://users.dbscorp.net/jmustain/X29.htm

But they're not gonna produce it because it's too expensive and that forward wing design has certain problems associated with it. There's reason's why the U.S. Air Force didn't use such wing designs in it's newer aircraft.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Enough Ruski crap.

<-- F-22 Best fighter on Earth, period!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
F-22
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
F-22
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
F-22
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
F-23 should have won. F-22 blows.

Also, a F-35 is fine too.
>> Anonymous
>>168741
>>168743
>>168745
>>168746
>>168747
OP here. Fuck off.

>>168268
>>168734
Thanks for the info, it's very much appreciated.
>> Anonymous
>>168747

I think the irony here is the F-35 might be able to out manuver an F-22 easily. F-35 kicking on the hover mid combat will fuck up enemy aircraft so much.