>> |
Anonymous
exactly. his style sucks. why? because you have to interpret them by looking at shapes / colors, which just distracts and makes you unable to concentrate on important things, what's more, you can't think of any sensible things when you look just at shapes and colors. (more below) what's important then? composition and poses of people, or (more below) so? i see nothing worth in picassos abstract arts.
but it does not mean that i like other arts. 80-90% of them are crap. again, why? oh well , let's see. how many times have you seen a photo or artwork which, when you saw it, suddenly made you think of some story, for example - i don't know, let's imagine some traffic scene: a man with gloomy face, and ppl going by - what comes to your mind? actually i think about a man, which just lost his job, his wife rejected him, in other words, his life became ruin. and ppl going by and not paying attention at him would be a metaphor of world novadays. that's it: good artwork, really good artwork should tell a story. if it does not, it should at least create some feelings. and now tell me how many artworks work like this. back to picasso: his drawings do not change your feelings (excluding 'what the hell is this?..'), and there's no sensible (at least for me) interpretations of them.
|