One Megamiposter I had on my hdd...merged the parts, removed text+lines, cleaned a bit...too bad they forgot to finish drawing her foot
Any excuse to post some /hr/ GA
>>126925ah, mine could need a bit more saturation + color correction... other than that its quite fine ^^
>>126931You need to run a filter on it as well.
>>126935which one?resizing it down to 1600 is almost the same as yoursexcept the colormore denoising would result in some quality losslike in this one here
jpeg artefacts kick in... guess i shouldnt save in jpg after denoise steps...hue+sat is kinda tricky... my eyes hurt
>>126941My eyes!
Filtered. Not the best ever...
>>126972its filtered, but not color changed... tried to do both steps... which resulted in a nonperfect outcome...
>>126941What are you trying to do? I'm confused.
>>126993trying to get the op pictureto the colors of the first replied picture
>>127003You shouldn't have to adjust hue/sat too much to achieve that. Try brightness/contrast.
I had a go at the op picture, some might think it's too smooth tho
>>127070Nice work
>>127070Very nice. What package/filter did you use?
>>127119de-noise with Neatimage pro, then despeckle and surface blur in photoshop.
I was bored so I did another one :)
>>127159this looks like a vectorcool...are these ps filters already in ps itself or are they seperate filters ?
>>127162ah great, found them ... thx /hr/learnd sth again ^^
>>127162
Can anyone recommend any Linux-based restoration software? I've tried the GIMP, and digiKam, but they are no way as powerful as Photoshop in smoothing half-tone dots etc.Am I using the wrong tools for the job?
>>127273didnt adobe plan to release a free webbased photoshop version or something?maybe linux users can use it , too
>>127278Yes, but it seems it'll be a "light" version of photoshop, so maybe apart from its interface, there won't be any reason to use it instead of GIMP or whatever. It's a shitty idea anyway (fuck web 2.0).