File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
>> Anonymous
That car is pure sex
>> Anonymous
that car would kill me but i would die sooooo happy.
>> Anonymous
>>447352

second
>> Anonymous
'sright. I saged. What're you gonna do about it?
>> Ludwig Van Beefoven !mp2ihX70ug
>>447394
bump
>> Kinetic-kaze
     File :-(, x)
derp
>> Kinetic-kaze
     File :-(, x)
No need for 4-tubos and 16 cylinders to reach 231-240mph!
>> Kinetic-kaze
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
No need for 4-tubos and 16 cylinders to reach 231-240mph!

Yes, but the Veyron hits 250 and you can use it as a daily driver. Everyone who has road tested the F1 says it is a horrible vehicle to sit in for more than an hour. Besides, 1001 BHP in a car that has air conditioning, sat nav, stereo and every amenity you can get in a luxury sedan is just hands down amazing.
>> Zaniel
>>447466
>>447471
>>447474

I don't know much about cars, but those look like the same car. Maybe different years. I dunno. What kind of car is it though? I can't tell.
>> Zaniel
Bump. 'Cuz I'm really curious.
>> Zaniel
>>447832
they are all maclaren f1 cars, the first one looks like a vanila f1 the second is an LM variant that has been tuned in various ways. the third was made with motorsport in mind and the usual tuning and modifications that would make it more suitable for motor racing
>> Kinetic-kaze
>>447790
that is true, but the Mclaren was made for the true racer/performance gear-head. Also its is timeless classic, with the most beautiful sophisticated lines I ever seen.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>447466
Road-going McLaren F1 car.

>>447474
McLaren GTR from '95 or '96 ('97 models were very different, FIA homologation stuffs), the modified version of the F1 roadcar that ran as customer cars (no official factory support) in various GT series. Won Le Mans outright in '95 (which wasn't exactly a vintage year but, still).

>>447471
Had to look this up, but apparently it's a special edition (road car) McLaren made after the '95 Le Mans win.

The McLaren F1 wasn't originally intended as a racing car, but Gordon Murray built it, so it was built like a racing car. It's a misconception about racing cars that they handle 'well'. They go fast, but they don't often handle in a way that can be described as being enjoyable to drive. The McLaren F1 was awkward, twitchy, understeery and, yes, not a very pleasant place to spend too much time.

Anyways... Here's a -real- McLaren 'F1', and one of Gordon's better efforts.
>> Anonymous
bugatti veyron, the best
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
A challenger apaears: The Koenigsegg CCRX Edition; 1018BHP weights 1200kg and has a top speed of 420km/h (veyron does 407)
Ohh and it corners amazingly
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>448016

Woops forgot to add pic
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
More High res Koenigsegg ccrx at Flickr:

Stunning car


http://images.google.nl/imgres?imgurl=http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2401/2320145143_ffc09122ba_o.jp
g&imgrefurl=http://flickr.com/photos/cavalierelatino/2320145143/&h=2592&w=3888&sz=14
5&hl=nl&start=3&um=1&usg=__1oGiztK21jKl1qOlWvqGW2z0aY4=&tbnid=_Nz7ycmUbWWi9M:&am
p;tbnh=100&tbnw=150&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dkoenigsegg%2Bedition%26imgsz%3Dhuge%26ndsp%3D21%26um%
3D1%26hl%3Dnl%26rlz%3D1C1GGLS_nlNL292%26sa%3DN
>> Anonymous
I do like the Koenigsegg, all of the models (3 I think right?) looks stunning and from what I've seen they are a madman when driven properly but line for line I'd still have to say the Veyron is a much nicer looking car. If given the choice I'd go Bugatti.
>> Anonymous
I personnaly think the Koenigsegg looks better also the Finish on all that carbonfiber is amazing
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
wow that kongegsgesgsesggesgegiegsg

And the mclaren are far far better looking the the veyron.