File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
You guys probably already seen this, but, fucking Magical Girl Lyrical Nanoha Visual Collection. I found it on MegaUpload.
520MB for 77 files, JPEGs are 6MB-7MB.

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=0ZNXUL9L
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=OU6A9ZMZ
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
Oh wow, now those are some SHITTY scans if I've ever seen any.

*sigh*
>> Anonymous
ok... i'm sick of seeying scans of this shit

is this anime worthy to download and watch it?!

Is it like Sakura card captor or what?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>200740
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magical_Girl_Lyrical_Nanoha

It's pretty adult, though. Don't expect something a jr high schoool girl would watch.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>200728
gtfo slowpock
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>200740
The first season is okay, but it's the second season that made everyone go gaga over Lyrical Nanoha (me included). Haven't seen any of the third season yet, though.
>> Anonymous
BUMP
>> The Nightmare Factory !r5OSw310Bk
     File :-(, x)
Those scans are not good.
>> Anonymous
>>200992
define good scans
>> The Nightmare Factory !r5OSw310Bk
     File :-(, x)
>>200994
Look at what I'm posting. Someone has put care & attention into scanning these.
>> Anonymous
>>200998
scans are unfiltered... with some denoising they would look better

however, juding from the noise lvl, scanner itself was on its limit i guess...

even then , some ppl dont like denoised images, bc they are too smooth/blurry or whatever
>> Anonymous
looks like someone sharped the images including the noise...
>> The Nightmare Factory !r5OSw310Bk
     File :-(, x)
>>201004
>>201006
Quit whining. They are better then the other scans in this thread.
>> Anonymous
>>201014
he meant the scans from>>200728
etc

not your two , u ideot
>> The Nightmare Factory !r5OSw310Bk
     File :-(, x)
>>201028
If that is what he meant then I apologise...
>> The Nightmare Factory !r5OSw310Bk
     File :-(, x)
>> MDG !oynMWmSRzY
     File :-(, x)
is it not possible to remove the noise on the black outline ?
>> The Nightmare Factory !r5OSw310Bk
Try reducing to 1000x1421 before applying any filtering.

They are still going to be messy.
>> MDG !oynMWmSRzY
>>201052
Usually you dont have to reduce resolution at all... But even @ 2000 they look kinda shit...

And yeah sure ANY scan will look good, if you reduce it to ~8% its original size...
(1,4 mpixel <> 35mpixel )
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
with some noise reduction and size reduction they can look alright. better to just have better scans.
>> MDG !oynMWmSRzY
     File :-(, x)
>>201055
not enough noise left to even filter lol ...

aside from normal errors / whitedots / dust etc
>> MDG !oynMWmSRzY
i still wonder what caused these scan mess ...

still think its>>201006

wrong shooping after scanning...
>> The Nightmare Factory !r5OSw310Bk
The white dots/errors/dust can be cleaned using a clone brush, but I'm not going through 77 scans to do that.

I suspect I will be hitting the delete button...
>> MDG !oynMWmSRzY
     File :-(, x)
>>201058
should take the time to go through my own scan with the copy tool...

well was already rejected on MT/AP (too blurry... yeah next time ill not denoise it , instead just sharp it! with noise! hahaha)

well i like smooth look, besides the 49,14 mpixel version looks the same muahahaha
>> The Nightmare Factory !r5OSw310Bk
>>201063
LOL unfortunate. MT/AP suck anyway.

You need to rescan.
>> MDG !oynMWmSRzY
>>201065
for what ?

source was already not that good (pic was on carton, probably bootleg picture to begin with)

got enough credits/paper already...
>> Anonymous
>>200742

You're kidding, right?
>> The Nightmare Factory !r5OSw310Bk
>>201066
You could try scanning other material for /hr/...

I've just deleted those scans. What a pity.
>> MDG !oynMWmSRzY
>>201069
ill definately do a Bondage Fairies remake... Somewhen... 1200dpi of course.... :]
>> MDG !oynMWmSRzY
>>201071
but before that, my website goes online...
its like rapidsearch, but for pictures instead...

right now i got ~0,5m pictures sourced...
>> The Nightmare Factory !r5OSw310Bk
     File :-(, x)
>> MDG !oynMWmSRzY
moe.imouto one paged is still working btw... ;)

(if you update the dl links...)
>> The Nightmare Factory !r5OSw310Bk
>>201071
LOL - Oh, shi-
>>201072
500,000? Where in hell did you get that many?
>> MDG !oynMWmSRzY
>>201076
Current Count Animepics : 534598
Currenz Size Animepics (in gb) : 116.045

My H-mag folder alone is 150k+ images...
Remember the 21gig HCG torrent on /t/ ?
Well I sourced each pic of that... ;)

Some doujins, some artbooks
Hell I havent even TOUCHED my artist folder...

Whole moe imouto will be a piece of cake compared to that... (already sorted like 75%, well more than 1k pics will prob be left since they were only "tagme" or "boon"... )

In the end, Ill easily go beyond 700k ...
Since there was no prog which could handle that, I had to write my own...
>> The Nightmare Factory !r5OSw310Bk
     File :-(, x)
>>201080
I'm topping out at 60Gb at the moment. I've getting very selective about what I keep....

When is the website becoming live?
>> MDG !oynMWmSRzY
     File :-(, x)
>>201082
already up and working
but design is kinda nonexistant
im still not sure how i should allow others to sauce their collections...

no one would name 10k+ pics by hand... but no one would download a java prog from an unknown source either...
>> MDG !oynMWmSRzY
>>201082
oh btw.
how do you sort your stuff ?

my order kinda sucks ^^
thats why importing them is kinda a pain...
>> The Nightmare Factory !r5OSw310Bk
>>201090
Alphabetical by series. Also have areas for artist, artbooks, various etc for stuff which will not fit in.

If I was to start again, I would use tagging.
>> MDG !oynMWmSRzY
>>201099
i dont like tagging...

i dont search for stuff like "brown eyes, yellow hair" when i search for a pic ...

most tags are not suitable as sauce anyways... ("awesome... i searched for this pic with a catgirl and it said... its a catgirl pic... ")
>> The Nightmare Factory !r5OSw310Bk
>>201102
You don't have to tag at such a low level. Series name would be mostly all that you would need.
>> MDG !oynMWmSRzY
>>201106
the most awesome thing about my naming is : its permanent...

doesnt matter if its downloaded via MT/AP/MOE/4C, as long as the filesize/md5 is the same, and it was named, I will find it!

Not sure if these tag progs use filesize/md5, too... Kinda doubt it, only file+filename
>> The Nightmare Factory !r5OSw310Bk
>>201108
I agree tags aren't the panacea to photo/scan searching. It is easier, and quicker, just to dump the scans in the series folder.
>> Anonymous
>>200992
>>200998
>>201014
Glad people like my scans at least. >_>
>> The Nightmare Factory !r5OSw310Bk
>>201140
Not bad at all.
>> Anonymous
i like it
>> boon
curious, how do you tag images. throw images in folders? tag the files itself? edit metadata in the jpg? or solely using a program to handle all the tagging using a seperate file to contain filename+tag data?

cause right now i know i can tag data right into jpgs but what about png.
>> MDG !oynMWmSRzY
     File :-(, x)
>>201144
I especially wrote a prog to ignore filenames , with it I name the files.
The prog searches for images in the folder(+all its subfolders) and assigns them the Data I entered. See screenshot...

After that, I import the data to my database where I can search for anything.
Size, Md5, Resolution, Type, Names, etc ...

And Size+MD5 is primary key...

I could already write another module which automatically generates folders+subdirs and puts the files in their...

Renaming to previous filename already works ^^
>> MDG !oynMWmSRzY
     File :-(, x)
will now forever give me :
ba1c27e6d80f0ba6ef3ea4925300ee76
24 Bit 1060*1497 JPEG
Artist: Carnelian
DoujinName: Benigyokuzui
vol 9
Previous Name: BENIGYOKUZUI vol.9 019.jpg
>> MDG !oynMWmSRzY
>>201080
Animepic Count: 538765
Animepic Size: 120.195 gb
Last updated: 2007-09-02 22:11:13

this got pretty off topic... ^^
>> Anonymous
So My 410+gb anime folder is not bad at all..

But I collect every DVD cover scan (200-300 dpi jpg/png) of japanese anime I found on share since 4-5 years (250+ GB only for that...)

I can't count images because I .zip every artbook, wallp. series.

Overall it's 8+ years saving, scanning and allmost all sorted (good filenames).

I also 'dump-sort' every img site/board (4ch, ko-ch, moe imouto, danbooru etc.).

If I owned an oc-12 fiber I would upload them publicly but I only own 1mb dsl, sorry T_T
>> MDG !oynMWmSRzY
>>201199
I cant share my collection, either...

When I shared the moe imouto site rip (3,x gb) it took more than 3 days to get others to 100% ...

So with 100+ gb its more than half a year... My line cant run 100% 24-7 , ping sucks and downloading doesnt work as good...

However you could share all fileinfos ^^
Shouldnt be more than 100mb total...
>> Anonymous
Can you rip moe.imouto.org with just wget or the usual?
>> The Nightmare Factory !r5OSw310Bk
>>201598
Not very nice.
>> Anonymous
>>201598
firefox downthemall plugin... ;)
>> dovac
>>201598
Abusive leeching and face a ban