File :-(, x, )
Star Trek Anonymous
After seeing the trailer for the new Star Trek film, I couldn't resist stitching together the pan of the front of the ship.

It took a while, because of the perspective differences during the pass, but I think it turned out okay. I wish I had a higher res version to use as source material, but 1080p was the biggest there was.

Anyway, I expect this to get zero replies, just thought some of you might like it.
>> Anonymous
Oh fuck, just noticed a massive error. I fail. I'll upload a fixed one in a second.
>> Anonymous
Oh wait, that wasn't an error, that's what it actually looked like.

Double fail.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
double fails can make a positive, here let me fix that for you. Will you PLEASE torrent photoshop? grey photos give me a headache!
>> Anonymous
In this topic, OP talks to himself.

I cant wait for the movie.
>> Anonymous
...as a side note, why does it have enormous "jet engine" style propellers anyway? surely in space they wouldnt have anything to propel???
>> Anonymous
you are well loved for your valiant effort, op.
>> Anonymous
>>285825
Either those get covered up with the giant red domes that were there in the the orginal series, or they're designed like that to be physical ram scoops, collecting hydrogen and such in space while traveling at incredibly high speeds.
>> Anonymous
>>285825
They are bussard scoops that don't have the familiar red caps on them.
>> Anonymous
I'm looking forward to the movie as well
>> Anonymous
>>285822
The bottom half of the ship looks way too big compared to the top. I hope this was on purpose and not the actual design.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Had this for ages! Thought it was a knock up by someone but could this actually be it?!
>> Anonymous
>>285847
it's because of the way the camera moved
>> Anonymous
>>285822
Ah yeah, thanks. Hadn't occurred to me to do any manipulation beyond stitching the image together.

>>285847
It's because the camera moved like this:

/
|
\

Makes the bottom part look bigger than it actually is. Watch the trailer, you'll see what I mean.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Hey, I was wondering if anyone had the two other shots of the ship being built? I know I've seen non-stitch screenshots of decent res before on /tv/, but I didn't have the presence of mind to save them. Here's a good shot from the end of the trailer, all I have to offer.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
You mean these?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I stitched this together too, from that one other shot, but it's not much use because of the angles they used.
>> Anonymous
I am kinda hoping those full-ship pictures on this thread are NOT what the ship in the movie is going to look like.

While, it is true they look sweet, it would totally kill the storyline. Anybody remember a little think called Star Wars: Episode 1? *shudders in utter revulsion*
>> Anonymous
>>286160
With CG, the model of the ship is far more flexible/less expensive, and therefore much much less important to the plot. If this movie is bad because the ship does not look cool... Well, there's a LOT of other reasons why it might fail that come first.
>> Anonymous
>>you are well loved for your valiant effort, op.

>>I'm looking forward to the movie as well
>> Anonymous
>>286160
Judging by the brief glimpses of the ship in the trailer, I'm going to say that those full-body images aren't the actual ship.

There are too many differences. If you study the OP image I made, there are many subtle differences. The dome part at the bottom of the saucer is totally different to the full-body image. Similarly, the edge of the saucer is different too.
The fins at the rear of the nacelles are also different. In the trailer they flow smoothly into the nacelle. In the mock-up image they don't.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>285847
>>285858
>> Anonymous
>>286151
>>285850

These full-body shots are both fan art. Whatever the movie Enterprise will look like, it won't be this.
>> Anonymous
>>286220
i would think that angle is there because the hull is, you know, curvy
>> Anonymous
>>286158

My common sense is offended by the entire notion of them building the Enterprise in the surface of a planet.
>> Anonymous
you can see the full HD trailer at: http://www.paramount.com/startrek/ so this is hardly just "fanart"...
>> Anonymous
>>286620

Yeah, I saw the trailer. Those two full-body shots aren't in it.

Where are they from, then? Star Trek Reborn, a fan project which predates the new movie.

http://www.startrekreborn.net/viewpage.php?page_id=112
http://www.startrekreborn.net/viewpage.php?page_id=84

See? And if you look for Gabe Koerner, whose Enterprise this is, in IMDB, you'll find that he's not part of the Trek 11 project.

I say again, fan art.