File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
:)
>> Anonymous
story?
>> Anonymous
>>196323


Ah yes the effects of letting morons have children.
>> Anonymous
>>196374

STFU her name is Enlightened and she looks pretty in this picture and we are NOT morons!
>> Anonymous
>>196391
Her name is what?! You're not serious.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>196323
>>CANKER
>> Anonymous
Shes in my soul.... O.O
>> halloween_harry !HUs.X.TMco
>>196400
hurpies?
>> Anonymous
Enlightened is Gallente...
>> Anonymous
I wish that the Internet came with explanations.
>> Anonymous
>>196487
>> Anonymous
I can make a guess.
named Enlightened...
peace sign on face...
HIPPY SPAWN! KILL IT!
>> Anonymous
HOLY FUCKING SHIT

Sauce! I love this pic, I have it in low resolution and never found it again!
>> Anonymous
bump
>> Anonymous
umm what?
>> lame Anonymous
There is an axiom here… ah yes- children don’t have a complete understand the difference between right and wrong. Only a moral-relativist liberal douche would involve their children in the politics of war and peace. I wonder if her parents explained the torture and brutality that went on in Iraq under the former regime (I can only assume that the current war is the one these hippy twits are hoping this lame picture will be relevant to. Did they explain to their daughter about the ‘security rape cards’ that Saddam Hussein’s paramilitary goons carried around? The opinion’s of children are baseless since they lack experience, so it’s pretty pathetic when people have to parade their children as a substitute for any sort of explanation for their cock-eyed views. Ah well, it’s always good to have a few hippies around as a constant reminder of how not to be.
>> tehBeef
Sage for liberal faggotry.

Conservatives are against the exploitation of children. When are so called ‘progressive’ liberals going to join us in the modern era?
>> Anonymous
4chan has republicans?

fapping republicans?
>> Anonymous
>>196705
Only a religious douche would indoctrinate their children into beliefs about magical sky fairies.
>> sage sage
>>196709
This is exploitation now? Only an idiot wouldn't demand peace, and I think all children KNOW that peace is better than war. The message this picture sends, not that you'd look past your own oblivious crooked nose to find it, is that maybe we should encourage peace for the future of our world, our children.
>> Anonymous
>>196730

Sage goes in e-mail, not name.

You Fail, GTFO.
>> sage sage
>>196734
Sage goes in every field, newfag.
>> bump bump
>>196734
sage goes in all fields. bumping to reverse your sage since you're a brainless faggot who can't see
>> Anonymous
>>196730

Everyone wants peace except for crazy motherfuckers who strap bombs to their children. But we can't have peace until these people know that that is wrong.
>> The Red Mage
My personal political feelings aside, I do think it wrong to use children for one's own personal political objectives. A child's mind is not developed like an adults and, just as it is immoral to use psychiatrists to improve advertising toward children, it's wrong to make some little girl a poster child for war opposition.
>> tehBeef
>>196729
No one's talking about religion, idiot.
>>196730
Thanks for the schmaltz, cheese-dick. BTW peace is only better than war when the potential opponent is also a potential friend (ie: someone worth getting along with). Or maybe you think that the allies should have stayed at peace with the nazis as long as it was only Jews they killed. Or maybe the US should have been cowed into peace talks with the Japanese after the attack on Pearl Harbor. Oh yes, 'ANYTHING but war'. Mature thinking requires that one assesses each situation individually before coming to a conclusion. Children can't do that for issues that are beyond their knowledge and intellect, hence the stupidity of this picture. Liberals will have their children stand in front of tanks if it helps them posture themselves.
>> Anonymous
>>196730
Well the girl in the picture does have blond hair and blue eyes, so I guess technically she could survive in a world were we just laid down to tyranny instead of fighting back. Lol Use you head moron. Universal peace is only possible in a world where everyone actually WANTS peace, and that will never happen.
>> The Red Mage
tehBeef, while I do support mixed portfolio diplomacy, example: Allied war on the Nazis, do not route out all "liberal" objectives in foreign policy as foolish. Different situations worldwide call for a variety of responses, some conservative, some liberal.
>> tehBeef
     File :-(, x)
>>196748
Ya, I know. I believe for instance, that most middle eastern nations could stand to be a lot more liberal. However that’s not what we are talking about. We’re talking about homegrown liberals who have a knee-jerk pat liberal response for every issue. There’s no talking to people like that. They don’t realize the type of trouble we’d be in if everyone in the west started thinking the way they do, while the rest of the world didn’t.

P.s. Even if Bahamut helps you ascend you won’t be able to use Fade, Nuke, or the strongest armor and swords. I recommend equipping the Masamune.
.____________.
>> sage
>>196743
I don't think you give children enough credit.

Also, I wasn't disregarding the intricacies of human life on this planet. However when it comes to achieving absolute peace I am as much a realist as the next person. Defending the greater good and what have you. BTW, thanks for reading way too far into my explanation.
>> sage
>>196758
Europe is doing just fine.
>> Anonymous
>>196787


hahaha, no their not .
>> sir-rob-dsm
why carnt every just nuke each other and get it over with the human race doesnt deserve to be on this blue and pure world
( im uk white and mid 20s now stfu 4chan or post more pics of chicks with paint on them )
>> Anonymous
>>196785
I think we're giving children the credit they deserve. Indoctrinated children almost never repent. How many atheists do you know that were raised Christian? How many Christians do you know who were raised Christian? The results speak for themselves.
>> Anonymous
>>196904
What's with the religious example?

No, you all aren't giving children or any parents enough credit for that matter. Parents for the most part will allow their child to develop and most of the time they lend a simple guiding hand. Ideally. The fact is none of you know the girl, how smart she is or whether her right wing parents are merely supporting their daughter in her choice to proclaim peace visually. I don't expect any of you to know what it's like to have a mind of your own as a child, or be free of indoctrinating thought.

I was independent to the extent of making my own choice to reject or conform to the ideals of my parents. At the stage in her life that this girl appears to be in she probably is not aware of the drawbacks to "peace at any cost" but that does not stop it from being a human ideal she can appreciate as an individual, regardless of background.