File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
9/11 was an inside job.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
ALERT THE MEDIA!
>> Anonymous
only un informed idiots believe that..... even if it was an inside job, could you imagine the number of people who would be "in" on the job, and how easy it would be to "leak".... get real dumbass

The twin towers fell due to gravaty collapsing towers. It fell naturally, and exactly the way it would have fallen if there was zero explosives.... the puffs of explosions you see in the stupid videos are what happens to a floor filled with smoke, when suddenly it smashes flat as a pancake, the air/smokes gota go somewhere.... ooh look proof that it was an explosion.

Anyone who does a little digging with REAL SCIENCE not just bullshit they read off the internet.... may actually learn a thing or two.

havent you learned anything about the truth of the internet after surfing 4chan?
>> Anonymous
>>209282
why the fuck did you read the text?
>> Anonymous
>>209283
Obviously, he's a homosexual.
Or a disinformant... a homosexual disinformant.
>> Anonymous
>>209282
missed the fucking tits and is an idiot
>> Anonymous
"blah blah let me tell you about 9/11. it wasn't....."

gtfo newfag.
>> Anonymous
>>209269
your mother's cunt was an inside job
>> Anonymous
>>209282
WRONG, there were plenty more people involved in the Manhattan Project in WWII, yet it wasn't publicly known about till long after the war, dipshit.

The towers fell AT FREE-FALL SPEED, NOTHING could explain that, except for explosives, the clouds of "dust" contained massive amounts of debris, large steel pieces were thrown over 500 feet in ALL directions, the way the buildings came down could ONLY have happened by explosives.

Maybe look things up a little before you spew your retarded filth across the internet next time.
>> Anonymous
IN B4 LOOSE CHANGE!!!
>> Anonymous
Anon has been so easy to troll lately, it's embarassing.
>> Anonymous
>>209325
Okay, I think your comparison is totally inappropriate, but I'll play along. Let's say you're right. Let's say that everyone (or those two or three guys) who come on here everyday to tell us 9/11 was an inside job - you and the people putting those stickers in the men's room at work - let's say you're right.

Okay, so what? What do you want us to do? Armed rebellion against the government? If the gov't pulled off an inside job...so what? There's not even a motive for them to do so. The American people are so complacent and willing to go along with whatever bullshit that they don't need to do anything. Why would they bring down the towers? To distract us from the Patriot Act? We already have reality TV. If 9/11 was an inside job then it was redundant and meaningless.
>> Anonymous
>>209420

Before taking to the abbatoirs, the pigs are given a nice shower with lukewarm water. Considering that pig carcasses are cleaned up at the abbatoirs after being slaughtered, what's the point of this unnessary wash?

It's because pigs that feel good give tenderer, sweeter meat.

There's nothing like having the support of the people willingly giving crud to the government. It certainly bought them time to do whatever shit they wanted (ie re-election).

Before 9/11, the people wanted NOTHING to do with the middle eastern situation. Before Pearl Harbour, people wanted NOTHING to do with WW2.

What's your point?
>> Anonymous
why is it I can tell those boobs are Japanese?
>> Anonymous
>>209425

It's the skin tone and the areoles.
>> Anonymous
>>209424

There's also nothing like expansive, contrived metaphor to make yourself sound like a resident of the deepest regions of one's own navel.
>> Anonymous
>>209432

I say! Well played, good sir!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR TITS!!

motive? WTF noob
america could pull of another 9/11 and their economy would still flourish...infact even higher as it so did after 9/11

while the americans go high its the world that falls in dipshit so thers ur motive dumbass

and its also a reason to go to war....wats the longest excuse known to go to war?
well finding an excuse
and bushy had no problem declaring war as he is only retaliating...not instigating

besides that do u know the amount of cash being pulled of from oil?

motives? hmmm gee thats a bit dang hard to see
gather all the info b4 u make a shitty comment dumbcunt

BTW i am not OP and i havent watched the video where u see them flashes and im not saying it was inside or not but theres motives everywhere
>> Anonymous
>>209284

Or a black homosexual disinformant.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>209282
Thermate was probably used to cut the steel beams as it's done by demolition experts tearing down a building. The towers went down with free fall speed. Jet fuel is not able to burn through steel, the floors would go down leaving the steal beams standing. The buildings were designed to withstand several jet impacts like that. WTC #7 went down for no apparent reason.

>>209420
The motive's, as always, to get an excuse for war.
>> Anonymous
>>209458
Then how fast would a building fall if it weren't explosives that took it down?
>> Anonymous
it wasnt so much an inside job, as we just let it happen. The Gov knew about it like Pearl Harbor and let i happen to give us a reason to go fight.
>> Anonymous
>>209458
Your inability to refer to the metal known as "steel" correctly makes anything else you say completely irrelevant.

BUILDINGS ARE NOT MADE OF STEAL
>> Anonymous
>>209492
it probably wouldn't fall at all. Most likely a few floors would've collapsed, stopped, and then who knows how much longer a few more floors could drop; but that's only if a force [such as another floor] resisted the falling debris; instead of completely collapsing all at once.
>> Anonymous
>>209724
Ok, so let's play "5 floors fell" from the top. Problem is that skyscrapers are designed for a load bearing that does NOT INCLUDE falling floors. So you've got floor 95, for example. And 5 floors fall onto it. That's a FIVE STORY FUCKING BUILDING just fell onto it. Of course it will collapse. Now you have a 6 story building collapsing onto floor 94. And a 7 story building onto floor 93, etc, etc, etc.
BAM, down it goes.
>> Anonymous
Loose change is for noobie's and there wrong lol. 9/11 was not an inside job. You guys are being con'd by college students who have nuthing better to do but buy a documentory on ebay and modify it. GG
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
From what I'd heard, the towers were originally designed to take a direct plane hit after the Empire State Building was struck by a B52 bomber. However, the ban on asbestos concrete came in mid-construction, and the building had to be finished using normal concrete. A plane fully loaded with fuel was not expected.
>> Anonymous
>>209740
Dig up some safety regulations for skyscrapers. You'll be amazed what shit they're required to withstand.

>>209740
I fail for not using a spell checker. You fail for spelling Nazism. Anon fails for Godwin's Law.
>> Anonymous
debate on my /hr/? fuck that! Can we get some moar tits?
>> Anonymous
>>209740
a plane crashed into a tower in some other country, I didn't really care enough to remember. A few floors from the top fell, the building burned for... hell, I can't remember, I want to say somewhere around twenty hours. The tower never fell.
>> Anonymous
>>209752
No, asshole.
No building is required to be built to withstand the weight of a 5-story building being dropped on it's roof.
You fucking do the research, post links. You're the one with taking the position that defies logic.
>> Anonymous
>>209760
Seconded, no links means it doesn't exist meaning argument fails. The thought of building a skyscraper to withstand another building being dropped on it is retarded, like making a sandwich that can withstand a shotgun blast, it's completely a waste of resources.

This argument fails.
>> Anonymous
Just because it's possible that 9/11 was an inside job, doesn't mean that it's much more likely that the buildings fell as a result of structural damage caused by the initial impact and the resulting fires.
>> Anonymous
I think skyscraper engineers are going to have figured out how their own damn buildings fall down. Afaik, it's either by it's by it's own weight straight downwards, or toppling over sideways, or some combination of the two. Such things are going to have been taken into account , and this five storey building you're talking about isn't going to have been 'dropped', but more like 'lowered' onto the next floor, if you take into account the scale of the whole structure and the height just one floor makes up of that.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Further, it's difficult for a lay person to judge the forces required for a building to fall. The World Trade Center was a masterpiece of engineering that took a lot of talented people to design and construct. Even engineers around the world can't unilaterally agree on what happened.

Are we supposed to take the word of college kids staring at grainy videos?
>> Anonymous
How something falls is as important as how much of it falls. Consider middle-age weapons and armour, which were essentially an arms race between transferring more impact per square inch and deflecting or distributing that impact over a wider area.
>> Anonymous
More conspiracy titties-- eh, theories, please.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
TITS DID WTC

(ALSO JEWS)
>> Anonymous
9/11 was an inside boob job!
>> Anonymous
>>209282
>>209325
>>209424
Anon is Educated
>> Anonymous
>>209803
quit talking yourself up

it's not very convincing
>> Anonymous
Alright, I've had enough of this faggotry.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

Take it all in before you start making bullshit claims about "Free-Fall" speed and "large steel pieces were thrown over 500 feet in ALL directions."

Every claim you conspiracy theorist make is backed up by nothing but junk science. Saying wild things and claiming its a fact doesn't make it so.

In b4 "Popular Mechanics is run by the government!"
>> Anonymous
Please cite more mainstream media sources that dispute the WTC was an inside job. I really never expected to find that!

Popular Mechanics is owned by the Hearst Corporation. Board members of Hearst also sit on the boards for J.P. Morgan Chase, IBM, Coca-cola, Wyeth, and may other powerful member-states of the corporatocracy.

The Hearst Corporation is "120 years old." I'm sure those dewds are not in the good old boys club with the Rockefellers, Rothschilds, and Morgans. SRSLY
>> Anonymous
PM isn't run by the government.

But it is run by the people who run the government.

LOL MEN IN A CAVE DID WTC
>> Anonymous
There are definitely holes in the official report, and a lot of questions the government simply refuses to answer. However, that doesn't mean that 9/11 was an inside job.
>> Anonymous
>>209864
Why the fuck is there a discussion on this? The same damn retarded troll reposts this twice a week. Ignore it and post more pictures you faggots.
>> Anonymous
lol while you guys argue about inside jobs, i get head from my girl after 3rd period everyday
>> Anonymous
>>209867
lol, it's awesome talking about sex to strangers where no proof is needed. I'm totally jealous of you, man.

SRSLY
>> Anonymous
>>209325

your manhattan project comparison is pretty much bullshit. the friends and family of the project workers knew SOMETHING secret was going on, they just weren't exactly sure what it was. Even if the family of those people who were 'in on 9/11' didn't know at the time that it was a conspiracy to blow shit it, someone would have put 2 and 2 together by now.
>> Anonymous
>>209867
That's why you're on 4chan right now, right?
>> Anon
most people argue that jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt the steel....true. But it weakens it. Which puts a huge load on the steel, and the towers pancaked :). Mmmm pancakes. moar boobs plz.
>> Anonymous
>>209880
There's also the fact that there were only interior "floors" every 4 levels. So when the first level collapsed, it didn't fall 1 level (10 feet). It fell 40 feet before it hit the next full-width level. More than enough that the next level wouldn't be able to withstand it
>> Anonymous
WWII was an inside job.
>> Anonymous
Only 4chan could turn me on to 9/11, both senses.
Let's stop arguing w/o pics. If you're gonna bitch, post some tits.
>> Anonymous
http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/

Part Two Bitches, 9/11, was an inside job. Plus your god is either fake, or a copy of another so STFU, we have tits, so we dont need to GTFO....good movie by the way, brings up some interesting points. Like World Trade Center 7!!! What the fuck was that shit man. A plane didnt hit that shit.
>> Anonymous
>>209974
You're retarded. Apparently you missed this discussion the other day. First of all, part one is a complete sack of garbage. Secondly, even the author said that he hopes people will not think of his film as the truth. The movie was created to get people to think on their own. (Which obviously you are too stupid to do.)

Look at the sources on the movie. The vast majority of them are conspiracy theory books.

OMG A MOVIE I FOUND ON THE INTERNET TOLD ME 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, IT MUST BE TRUE. FUCK DOING MY OWN RESEARCH, I BELIEVE!!

Grow a brain you 13 year old faggot.
>> Jack Kevorkian
>>209977
Conspiracy theorist target kids now like a cult. If you debunk everything they say they just repeat the same lies over and over. It's all about propaganda and their faith in it. Bush may be a retard, but the truthers is just fucking insane. I offer to end their pain with my needles, but they keep running away. So sad...
>> Anonymous
FACT:

Pearl Harbor was allowed.

FACT:

9/11 was allowed(and/or orchestrated).

FACT:

Both for the same reasons and had the same outcome.

FACT:

Enjoy your manipulating and oppressive government.
>> Anonymous
FACT:

You fucking suck.
>> Anonymous
>>209887
And what credible source did you hear this from?
>> Anonymous
>>210055
Fact: you're a faggot. nao gtfo

now enjoy your life of faggotry and aids
>> Anonymous
>>209325
>>209424
>>209458
>>209724
>>209752
>>209859
>>209887
>>209974
>>210055
College kids who need to learn about the real world.
>> Rant Part 1 Anonymous
>>209864
That's a very important point that needs to be addressed much more than it already does.

In addition: the "controlled demolition" theory is moot.

No, there's no arguing with it. None whatsoever.

With regards to WTC 1 and 2, anyone with even a rudimentary grasp of physics and the engineering used in the buildings construction can tell you that the impact of two fuel-laden jet planes and the ensuing fires they caused is what brought those buildings down.

Not thermite. Not explosives.

The buildings were engineered very well. They were over engineered, in fact. The central core shared load bearing with the outer skin. However, as the building was designed, it could not have stood without that exterior support structure.
>> Rant Part 2 Anonymous
The impact of the planes caused significant structural damage to the exterior support structure, causing loads to be transferred to the interior and remaining exterior columns. The over engineering of the structures allowed them to remain standing despite the damage. However, if even a very slight amount of the fireproofing on the internal columns were to be sheared off, they would become quite vulnerable to the raging fires. This is probably what happened, mostly since it's hard to imagine that big ass jet planes slamming into the buildings at full speed wouldn't have at least done minor damage to the fireproofing.

With the external support structure already taking up the slack, the damage to the internal columns' fireproofing made the buildings' collapses only a matter of time. Once the fires had caused enough weakening to the central pillars that the remaining exterior structure could not support any more weight, the supports gave way, and the building fell, experiencing cascade failure as it collapsed all the way to the ground. On a side note, on the topic of "squibs," no. Just no. If that had been explosives, they would have occurred in many places throughout the entire floor they happened on, not just a puff here and there. Also, it would have been seen to collapse before the cascading material from above reached it, which didn't happen. Please quit hanging on that like it matters.
>> Rant Part 3 Anonymous
As for WTC 7, I would imagine the great big gaping hole on one side of the building as well as the fires burning on a range of some 40 floors probably had something to do with it. The only reason it didn't collapse sooner was probably because of the design differences between it and 1 and 2. Judging by the way it looked, it probably had a more conventional design, much like the Empire State Building. The load bearing columns were likely distributed throughout the structure.

The failure of that structure likely occurred somewhere near a central point on one of the lower floors, where, due to the weight of the floors above, a fire would only need cause minor structural weakening to cause the columns to fail. This is also why WTC 2 was the first of the towers to fall, despite being hit first, due to the additional weight the columns at the failure level had to hold even before the impacts.

Also, had the building not been in danger of collapse, there would have been absolutely no need to "pull" the building at that time, since even if it had not collapsed on its own, which it did, there was so much damage dealt to it that it would have needed to be imploded anyway. To have blown it then would have served no purpose, as it was a loss as soon as 1 and 2 came down.
>> Rant Part 4 Anonymous
Now, all of this said, it does nothing to disprove the idea of a conspiracy. Let me be clear about this: the theories of an "Inside Job" and "Controlled Demolition" are mutually exclusive. "Inside Job", in fact, as a broad idea, is plausible. I say broad because the idea that an "Inside Job" must be a vast conspiracy is short-sighted. (Note that I'm not saying I believe there was a conspiracy, just that it's possible. I'm keeping an open mind.)

Orchestration of the attacks by Government officials needed only involve a few people. A little financing here, bargaining there, and 19 hijackers later, there you have it. Also, anyone who knew the system before the attacks; security, FAA tracking, escalation procedures, chain of command, bureaucracy, etc., would also know of the weaknesses and how to exploit them quietly, likely not even requiring any strings to be pulled on the part of those involved. This also could have been the case without any orchestration on the Government's part at all. Merely choosing to ignore intelligence and letting it happen because they knew it could succeed without help could be what happened.

In short, I ask that if you are one of those who feels the Government played a hand in this, step back for a second and understand that holding on to the "Controlled Demolition" theory when all the evidence points to the contrary only makes you look really dumb, and will make those you debate with immediately dismiss you and whatever "Inside Job" theory you adhere to, no matter how plausible it may be. If you want anyone to take you seriously, you have got to accept this: there was no "Controlled Demolition." All the evidence corroborates this. Anyone with even a rudimentary grasp of physics can tell you this. If you want to get anywhere close to the truth of who was behind it, you need to let it go. Concentrating on on the "what" instead of the "who" is drawing you away from the answers you seek.
>> Anonymous
>>210092
>>210093
>>210094
>>210095

Ya whatever. Fact is the govt's story is complete bullshit.

and about pearl harbor...this was the first hit on google:

http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/pearl.html
>> Anonymous
>>210109
>Ya whatever. Fact is the govt's story is complete bullshit.

Kindly remove your head from your ass, it's making you blind
>> Anonymous
>>209458
The towers weren't built to withstand jet impacts fag, jets didn't even exist when they were built.
>> Anonymous
>>210109

HOLY SHIT A GEOCITIES WEBSITE
>> Anonymous
Moar tits!
>> Anonymous
It's no use for us REASONABLE people to argue with these conspiracy theorist fags, they've choked down so much of the conspiracy semen that their logic drives have taken a shit and burned up in that small pocket of air they call their skull.

9/11 was an attack on a powerful country by some religious fuckheads who thought they could make a point, and they did, attack a powerful country, and it gives them the reason they need to go fuck with other countries.

Case closed.

To all the conspiracy theorists...
FUCK YOU!
>> Anonymous
in after fbi
>> Anonymous
Many reasonable people have reasonable doubts about the huge hole that was supposedly blown in the side of WTC7 which supposedly caused it to collapse, because no one has ever seen it.

If you can find me a picture, I'd sure like to see it.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>210118
Jets didn't exist in 1972? LOL
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
Okay... WTC 7. Explain plz kthx?

Not to mention how many times the Empire State Building was hit by numerous aircraft (not all tiny little two seaters mind you).

Bottom line, it was either orchestrated or allowed to happen to justify invading an oil rich country.

Also, MOAR TITS PLZ
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>210092
>>210093
>>210094
>>210095

Anon makes sense. The demolition "theory" is mostly moot. I think a "Pearl Harbor"(?) scenario where the attack was provoked, known to happen and allowed is pretty possible.

The signal-to-noise ratio in discussions on such topics is so low (conspiracy kooks, trolls and such), it's hard to have a discussion at all.

BTW Is Pearl Harbor really acknowledged as a provoked attack? (Not by mainstream media but academics for ex.)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)