File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
>> Anonymous
HAY GUYZ HOW DID I TRIED TO RESTART A STUPID THREAD?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Fix'd
>> Dark Link !3GqYIJ3Obs!!fcA
>>84371
That's probably more offensive to the internet.
>> Anonymous
>>84371
I'm going to report this to our MOE Kamisama, be sure to watch your ass desu!
>> Anonymous
>>84346

OMG R U SMRT OR SUMTHIN? I NEVAR SEE DIS BE4, DOOD.
>> Anonymous
Both types are stupid, but people who
believe GOD exists are usually more desperate and do even violent things just to protect their
fantasies...
>> Anonymous
>>84463
That's my only real beef with foundational religion, abstracting "association with fellow worshippers" from the list: they've only changed to reflect social systems and, where need be, humility. I haven't seen a single reputable religion out there that has actually tried to prove things, and without that proof the only thing they are required to say are things that are in-line with their past record of things said. One of the things I find sadly befuddled about these sorts of religions are their acute classifications of enlightenment.

Hindu reincarnation and, to an extent, core intentions behind Scientology beyond the "let's make money" parts I can at least have some respect for trying to spurn an ethereal ubermensch. The problem with this is that no one will ever know if it works. Bodhisattva(s) are hard to come by and can't be self-divined, the transcendency is transparent, and its actualization (where they may be: there have never been any claimed-as-successful patrons of Scientology, including Hubbard himself) is beyond human perspective.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)