File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
What did I do right? What did I do wrong?

Does /hr/ approve?
>> Anonymous
looks nice. some artifacting near the botton, but overall, well done
>> Anonymous !cFAilUREq6
>>333416
fukken saved, good job.
>> Anonymous
Thanks :]
>> Anonymous
it makes me really horney in all honesty
>> Anonymous
you did a great job taking a picture of your eye. i have the same contacts
>> Anonymous
>>333416
What's that vein in the right part of your eye? did you add that there? if not you should get that checked out
>> Anonymous
>>333562

i had one like that before too. doctor told me it would go away and it eventually did
>> Anonymous
OP here... lol i actually ripped the eye off google. i just photoshopped the globe in.

hope you all still love me.
>> Anonymous
good shit. saved.
>> Anonymous
I see Africa, fail
>> Anonymous
tightest shit evar
>> Anonymous
Neat;saved.
>> Anonymous
Did you poop a virgin? Cause that shit is tight!
desktop'd
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
If you're looking for tips:
- There are sattelite photos of earth without clouds out there. You might want to use one
- Maybe a bit more blur along the outer edges?
- Eye photos almost always have a clear reflection of a light source, your photo has a dim sort of reflection. makes it more plasticy in my view
- The black circle in the middle (dunno anatomical name) starts suddenly, there shouldn't be a smooth transition between that, and the coloured part of the eye. Although i admit it will look strange if you just make it sharp also. Hm..
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
eye see what you did there.
Do you get it eye / I
>> Anonymous
>>333910
>sattelite photos of earth without clouds
Those are actually all computer-generated.
>> Anonymous
in hall honesty, did you just put the earth over the iris and put a blending mode on? maybe then shape mask the top and bottom?
>> Anonymous
Do any Anon's have any tutorials on this photoshpo technique?

Cheers in adv.
>> Anonymous
>>333935

Composite imagery: do you know it?

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/BlueMarble/

"The original Blue Marble was a composite of four months of MODIS observations with a spatial resolution (level of detail) of 1 square kilometer per pixel. Blue Marble: Next Generation offers a year’s worth of monthly composites at a spatial resolution of 500 meters."

"From a computer processing standpoint, the major improvement is the development of a new technique for allowing the computer to automatically recognize and remove cloud-contaminated or otherwise bad data—a process that was previously done manually."

"In tropical lowlands, cloud cover during the rainy season can be so extensive that obtaining a cloud-free view of every pixel of the area for a given month may not be possible."
>> Anonymous
It's a fantastic idea and looks good but you asked what was wrong so I'll give you a hint.

You've made a common mistake in which you've got more grain and compression artifacts in the parts of the image containing the eye's edge than the much clearer part containing the earth so they don't completely match. I suppose you could get rid of this by adding grain to the earth and compressing that image slightly before applying it or what I'd personally suggest, taking a picture of the eye yourself and therefore being able to have a clearer overall picture.

Good luck Anon, it still looks great!
>> Anonymous
Thanks guise!

All your help is very appreciated. I had lost this thread til i tried to upload the picture again and got an error which linked me back to here :]
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>333974

That's what I'm guessing he did.
>> Ash !!CVD5ZsOp1ZV
     File :-(, x)
try again
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
winrar