>> |
Stueh
!!m6C7FRdMp7g
>>181487
I'm not a christfag, but I've read the bible and work in an Anglican school.
As far as my knowledge goes, God said it was bad many many many generations AFTER Adam & Eve and all their several hundred year old children. I think it was sometime around Moses that he outlawed it.
>>181531
I believe that the chances can vary from highly likely to not likely at all. It all depends on the genetics. If your blood line is "pure", eg. no defects etc. then hey, not a problem.
The reason getting helmet heads comes into it is because almost all deformities etc. are caused by either two bad genes matching up, or the bad gene being passed on and activated in one way or another.
As an example. I have (a light case of) MD. Now, with a normal relationship, ie myself and someone totally unrelated, the chance of our child getting MD would be around 50/50, with around a %90 chance it carrying the gene if it doesn't have MD. If I were to have a relationship with my sister, who doesn't have MD, but has the gene, it would be more in the 75/25 ballpark (75 saying the child gets MD) with a %99 chance it gets the gene. If my sister had MD, it would be an almost certain thing that the child would have MD, and almost definite that, in the unlikely event of the child not having MD, it would carry the gene.
I'm using a "strong" genetic defect here as an example. Most defects, say colour blindness, are heavily complicated. Eg, A male has the gene, the gene will go to his daughter but his sons don't get the gene. If the daughter has a child, the gene will get passed onto the male children and will be activated in about 50% of them, with the females not getting the gene, but then for it to be activated, there has to be some sort of renants in the father.
Too long, will continue...
|