File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
has anyone ever found the foxyville threesome vid?
>> Anonymous
is this it?

http://rapidlibrary.com/index.php?q=foxyville+threesome&filetype=&ord=s_plus&page=1
>> Anonymous
>>211676
Nah, that looks like the photo set again.
No vid has ever shown up, and I haven't been able to get a divinity18 pass out of #3x yet.
It's odd, because you can see what looks a lot like a video camera in the mirrors through the photo set.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
See guy sat in corner with video camera, guy taking the hi-res photos you see also reflect ont he right with a big-lens SLR.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
He gets some pretty close up shots.
Can only imagine it was being made for distribution.
>> Anonymous
you do know that's a trap getting dicked, don't you?
>> Anonymous
>>211790
lies!
>> Anonymous
>>211810
Don't feed him.
>> Anonymous
These guys http://peachyforum.com/forums/p/139757/570583.aspx were after a video too - one of them even had access to her old site. Says no video of the HC was on there. I've requested a pass for divinity18 on #3x, but I'm neither hopeful of getting it, nor of the video actually being on the site. The stuff on /rs/ claiming to be a vid is actually just a slideshow of the photo set.
>> Anonymous
she looks like someone I work with...
>> Anonymous
does a video even exist or is it just speculation from the video camera in the pics?
>> Anonymous
If you look closely you'll notice the camera man forgot to remove that black thing infront of the lense. That's why there is no vid, sadly.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>211832

nooooooooooooo

how can this be
>> Anonymous
>>211832

can't they just fuck again? make a new video?
>> Anonymous
>>211832
Too blury to tell. Yes it looks black, but you'd expect that as the lenses are always recessed. He appears to be looking hrough the viewfinder and at the screen at various points, so it would be odd for him not to have noticed (unlike compact stills cameras, the viewfinder just reproduces the image recorded by the lens in camcorders).

>>211825
Barring the kind of incompetence referred to above by the guy with the camera, it is likley the video exists (or existed). What I've been able to dig up suggests that it has never been released however. If this kind of thing never makes it as far as the internet, it is hard for even anon to get his filthy paws on. (See the so-called "holy grail" that anon never actually got. What we eventually got was actually a reshoot).