File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
How 'bout some uncut cocks? Moar plz!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Ace Hero
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Just for you.
>> Anonymous
Moar?
>> Anonymous
Why the fuck do you want to stare at penises?
>> Anonymous
BUMP
>> Anonymous
Yo nigga, nails long enough?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
This is /hc/, let's have some action, please
>> Anonymous
So are most dudes cut?
>> Anonymous
depends on where you live
>> Anonymous
Dirty, infectious penises in this thread.
>> Anonymous
only jews and american whites are cut
>> Anonymous
>>84648

Americans circumsise their children because their jew overlords tell them to.

There is no good medical reason for it.

Stupid Amerifags.
>> Anonymous
>>84659

makes your penis look bigger
>> Anonymous
no it doesnt. Another jew lie.
>> Anonymous
>>84646
Pfft you let other people touch your penis (a guy and you're a faggot) and let him cut a part of your penis and still be proud? GTFO jew
>> Anonymous
Here's some science for you: uncircumcised penises have a higher rate of AIDs and other STDs. They also have a higher chance of developing PPP.

While it is said that the smegma under the foreskin keeps the penis cleaner due to its link to the lymphatic system, the truth is that the foreskin actually traps bacteria giving them a better place to grow and duplicate.

Stop with this "circumcision is just a jew cover-up" crap. Science is NOT on your side. The fact is that you aren't as clean. Deal with it, fags.
>> Anonymous
ITT: A bunch of guys caring whether other guys are circumsised or not for some strange reason.
>> Anonymous
>>84670

>>84666

Nobody cares about your science faggot. Bacteria? Germs? Oh please unless you don't wash your penis for 1 month nothing is going to happen so gtfo
>> Anonymous
>>84672

*Circumcised - My bad.
>> Anonymous
>>84678

You can wash your penis all you like. Tha doesn't change that multiple scientific studies saying uncut people have a higher chance of getting HIV, other STDs, and PPP. None of which (especially not PPP) can be just washed away.

Enjoy your ugly, disease-ridden, sea-urchin-looking cock.

You know, if you'd just refrain from putting down cut people, it wouldn't be necessary to bring up the science saying you're unclean and covered in wart-like skin growths...
>> Anonymous
>>84646
fucken idiot jew detected
>> Anonymous
>>84681
statistics are plain wrong and stupid. also PPP is not an std and any penis can get it. it´s genetical fucken prick.
also enjoy your mutilated cock.

there is no, and I repeat no medical reason at all in cutting stuff off of your body parts. period.
If you are really convinced otherwise you deserve teh aids, dirty jew.
>> Anonymous
>>84681
you should cut off your eyelids, they can harvest Germs!
>> Anonymous
>>84681
faggot defending his parents for mutilating his weewee.
oh lawd the denial
>> Anonymous
If girls want my DICK CUTE then they better NOT have extra SKIN ON THEIR VAG! THAT SHOULD BE CUT OFF TOO!! ROFL
>> Anonymous
>>84682

Dude, getting cut is the same as getting a tattoo or a boy piercing. Its to man the body more aesthetically pleasing.

I don't know, uncut cocks just look nasty. If I was a chick(or a gay dude), I wouldn't go anywhere near those things. And I do know plenty of girls that have told me the same thing. Some of them say they have no problem fucking an uncut cock, but they'd never give it head.
>> Anonymous
>>84702
I say the exact same thing about women with extra flaps down there. I don't mind fucking it but I won't eat it.
>> Anonymous
>>84686
What, really? This is what you give me to respond to? I made a point of listing the items of STD and PPP seperately. As a response to your comment about PPP being genetic and not related to circumcision... Kapow: http://www.emedicine.com/derm/topic313.htm

I like your whole "statistics are bullshit" by the way. We should use that on everything!
"You know, statistics say that walking into a nuclear reactor is harmful to your health."
"Fuck that! Statistics are bullshit!"

"You know, it's been statistically proven that men have penises at some point in their life."
"Whatever, man, my vagina is totally manly. Statistics are bullshit."

I could go on. It really is fun. In before "Whatever, they just did a shitload of tests and then the jews picked the ones that proved them right. Jews are evil bastards that are trying to force everyone to mutilate their penises." conspiracy theory. I bet you think that unicorns really exist too. The government has just covered them up because it turns out that unicorns shit crack cocaine.
>> Anonymous
>>84702
so do I know a lot of chicks that say the opposite. because the scar turns them off.
well the hell will freeze before I give a shit about what chicks want.

the problem is that an uncircumcised man can choose to cut that shit off as long as he wants. an Cut guy doesn´t.
and it´s totally unethical from amerifail parents to decide it over their babys heads.
>> Anonymous
>>84127
she doesn't mind....mind over matter guys
>> Anonymous
>>84702

First line is suppose to read as follows:

>>Dude, getting cut is the same as getting a tattoo or a body piercing. Its to make the body more aesthetically pleasing.

I can't fucking type today.
>> Anonymous
>>84706
I will stop arguing with you after this post because you´re obviously retarded.

I meant YOUR statistics. and obviously the stupid examples you came up with. I just need common sense for that.

the statistics that Cut penises reduce HIV infection is plain false and stupid.
how do you test this?
you compare people of an area in africa for example that are infected and mostly known for being cut, to people from an other region that are uncut. the problem is they don´t tell you that the region with the uncut guys are also the most retarded and conservative ones that never would use a condom. while the cut people they compared are mostly more educated.
OR DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE THEY INFECTED GUYS AND LOOKED `HOW MANY CHICKS THEY COULD INFECT?

HIV is not transfered over the skin of your penis kiddo...
retard.
>> Anonymous
>>84714
aesthetics are relative

I for myself don´t think a scar on my peenor is "pretty"

If you got an 5 inch ant eater hangin of your cock i would say why not reducing the skin a little. but I would never in the hell cut it all off. I mean for fucking what?
because jews do it?
>> Anonymous
This thread brings me back to the time I'd convinced a girl to at least try the sandworm out for fun. She was kind of reluctant, but once we got going, she said "Oh... This is how it's SUPPOSED to feel? ...Why would anyone want to ruin this?"

That is all.
>> Anonymous
>>84706
>http://www.emedicine.com/derm/topic313.htm

"Lesions are observed more frequently in uncircumcised males; however, the mechanisms underlying their development remain unknown."

you just killed your own argument.
read: it´s a believe. not a medical fact.
>> Anonymous
>>84716
Yeah, just because they don't know WHY people with uncut skin are more prone to disease (not just HIV), doesn't mean it's not true. Just like with PPP. They have no idea why it's true, but it is. Uncut penises are sea urchins. Such is life.

I understand your arguement: the cut people are more socialized and intelligent and, therefore, more likely to use a condom preventing infection. If that's so, please explain this study:
http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20051029/fob1.asp
And whilst this study provides evidence against un-cuts being more prone to other diseases, it still bolsters my arguement in the case of transmission of HIV:
http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20040403/fob4.asp

Come the fuck on. This isn't just looking at statistics of people in a country and deciding. These are bona fide studies of educated people and of people of a similar social class with similar interests. Just stop with the bullshit already.
>> Anonymous
>>84729
Oh, wait, no, you're still an idiot. It's also not exactly known why gravity seems to be a weaker force than strong force, weak force, and electromagnetism. Yet... GRAVITY STILL SEEMS TO BE A WEAKER FORCE. Just because we don't know why doesn't mean it isn't true. Medieval people didn't know why there were lightning storms. That doesn't mean lightning storms didn't exist.

You guys are just making me sad...
>> Anonymous
>>84730
hearsay hearsay hearsay.

I don´t give a shit about the statistics you pull out your ass. or the links that won´t load. I don´t care.
I just need common sense to see that statistics are just a believe.
why? because I for sure know I´m not in that statistic cause no one asked me out.
it´s an amerifail myth. in most other countries
it´s totally uncommon thing to cut skin of your babys penises. and the std rates are not higher (if you believe in statistics).
Even If it would reduce the chance of transfering stds, a condom is still necessary. so what benefit do you got? mediacally?
zero.
also again HIV is not transfered over your penis´s skin.
Get it in your head litle nigger you´re retarded.
>> Anonymous
>>84735

2/10
try harder faget
>> Anonymous
>>84735
so in every other country circumcition is not practiced.... THEY ALL ARE STD RIDDEN FAGGOTS
ALL HAIL AMERIFAGLAND!

so adorable
>> Anonymous
>>84735
have you ever heard of the word "coincidence"?
>> Anonymous
>>84743
>>84749
What is this? Amateur night at the Apollo?
First you say that statistics are bullshit because of the wrong cross-section of people. Since it "won't load" I'll copypasta the gist of them for you for you:
>Auvert and an international team of researchers recruited 3,274 uncircumcised heterosexual men, ages 18 to 24, from an area near Johannesburg.

>All wanted to be circumcised and agreed to get the operation either at the start or at the end of the planned 21-month study. After the volunteers were randomly divided, physicians circumcised half the men and instructed them to abstain from sex for 6 weeks to allow full healing. Men in both groups were counseled on safe sex practices and checked for HIV infection three times during the study.

>After 18 months, an oversight panel of scientists halted the project because the data were clear—49 of the uncircumcised men but only 20 of those who were circumcised had acquired HIV. The researchers report the findings in the November PLoS Medicine.

>"There can no longer be a shadow of doubt that male circumcision gives a man major protection against HIV infection," says physiologist Roger V. Short of the University of Melbourne in Carlton, Australia, who wasn't involved in the South African study.
>> Anonymous
Damned long articles... Here's the first part of the second link:
>Better-Off Circumcised? Foreskin may permit HIV entry, infection

>Nathan Seppa

>Circumcision seems to arm men with a degree of protection against HIV, the AIDS virus, but the mechanism underlying this defense has been unclear. A new study bolsters earlier reports implicating the foreskin of the penis as one of HIV's portals to the body. The study also finds that while circumcision confers some protection against HIV, it doesn't guard against other sexually transmitted diseases.

>Robert C. Bollinger of the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions in Baltimore and his colleagues identified 2,107 uncircumcised and 191 circumcised men attending health clinics in Pune, India, during the 1990s. Most were unmarried men in their 20s, and all were free of HIV at the outset of the study. Over 18 months, 165 of the uncircumcised men (8 percent) but only 2 of the circumcised men (1 percent) acquired HIV, even though both groups reported similar frequencies of unprotected sex and sex with prostitutes. The uncircumcised men were about twice as likely to develop genital ulcers but had no more gonorrhea, syphilis, or herpes infections than the circumcised men did, the scientists report in the March 27 Lancet.

>Earlier research indicated that HIV could enter a man's body via the soft foreskin. In 2002, Robert C. Bailey of the University of Illinois at Chicago and his colleagues found that foreskin samples from uncircumcised, healthy men harbor less of the protective protein called keratin than other types of skin do.
>> Anonymous
Second part:
>Moreover, the foreskin has high concentrations of CD4 T and Langerhans' cells, the immune cells typically targeted by HIV, Bailey reported. The concentrations were even greater than those in tissue from women's cervices, which are highly susceptible to HIV infection. When exposed to the virus in a lab dish, the foreskin cells took up six to nine times as much HIV as cervical cells did, Bailey says.

>"The hypothesis is that the foreskin contains a lot of cells . . . that are magnets for HIV," says Bollinger.

>The scientific community remains divided on medical and ethical grounds over the issue of circumcision. However, the case for circumcision as a means to avert HIV transmission appears to be gaining strength, Bailey says.

>A 1999 study of 746 Kenyan truck drivers found that uncircumcised men were four times as likely to acquire HIV as circumcised men were, even though the groups reported similar frequencies of unprotected sex and sex with prostitutes. In 2000, a study of healthy Ugandan men in stable relationships with HIV-positive women found that 40 of 137 uncircumcised men acquired HIV from their partners over a 30-month span, whereas none of 50 circumcised men did. Few men in either group used condoms.

>Moreover, African countries where the vast majority of men are circumcised—such as Nigeria and Gabon—have HIV-infection rates of less than 5 percent among men. In contrast, Zimbabwe and Botswana, with low circumcision rates, have male HIV-infection rates of 25 percent or higher.

>Three rigorous studies currently under way in Africa may further clarify how circumcision affects HIV risk, says Bailey.

>Meanwhile, Bollinger emphasizes that any defense afforded by circumcision is incomplete and that men should use condoms for sex outside a monogamous relationship.
>> Anonymous
>>84760

>Auvert and an international team of researchers recruited 3,274 uncircumcised heterosexual men, ages 18 to 24, from an area near Johannesburg.

>All wanted to be circumcised and agreed to get the operation either at the start or at the end of the planned 21-month study. After the volunteers were randomly divided, physicians circumcised half the men and instructed them to abstain from sex for 6 weeks to allow full healing. Men in both groups were counseled on safe sex practices and checked for HIV infection three times during the study.

>After 18 months, an oversight panel of scientists halted the project because the data were clear—49 of the uncircumcised men but only 20 of those who were circumcised had acquired HIV. The researchers report the findings in the November PLoS Medicine.

>"There can no longer be a shadow of doubt that male circumcision gives a man major protection against HIV infection," says physiologist Roger V. Short of the University of Melbourne in Carlton, Australia, who wasn't involved in the South African study.

That's utter bullshit, I live in Johannesburg. Our AIDS stats are a joke... I put it to you that you could not possibly find 3274 men without aids and if you did find 3274 without aids there would not only be 69 infected with the virus after 20 months. Every 1 in 3 students at major universities here have the disease. Think about your infection rate...
>> Anonymous
>>84765

also, the general view on circumcision here is very bad. Maybe the circumsized ones just got laid less.
>> Anonymous
>>84759
Indeed... it's a coincidence that study after study after study comes out with the same result? Intelligent thinking, Ace.

I don't need to try any harder. You provide an utterly bogus arguement: "They don't know why they keep getting this as an answer. Therefore, it must not be true."

Just because you don't know why something happens or what causes it to happen, doesn't mean it doesn't happen. If it were one study saying that this was true, it could be coincidence, but it's not. It's multiple studies FROM NON-AMERICAN SOURCES.

It's not a jew cover-up. It's not some stupid American propaganda. It's just facts being presented to you. Deal with it for fuck's sake.
>> Anonymous
>>84764
>>84763
>>84760
>Meanwhile, Bollinger emphasizes that any defense afforded by circumcision is incomplete and that men should use condoms for sex outside a monogamous relationship.

that´s the only intelligent sentence in there.

there is nothing in that whole text that proves anything. you would be surprised how the whole world would have jumped out of their seats and enforced circumcition everywhere if that would be a fact.
there are countries that give more about the health of their people than america. your health care system is unmatched! :)
>> Anonymous
>>84767
I'm going to have to post the whole thing, aren't I? Son of a bitch...
First part:
>Defense Mechanism: Circumcision averts some HIV infections

>Nathan Seppa

>Men who get circumcised reduce their risk of acquiring HIV, the AIDS virus, by more than half, a clinical trial in South Africa shows.

>Many previous studies have suggested such a benefit from male circumcision (SN: 4/3/04, p. 212: Available to subscribers at http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20040403/fob4.asp). But this trial and two ongoing trials in Uganda and Kenya are the first ones to investigate the procedure's effect on HIV risk to men. It did so by randomly assigning some men and not others to be circumcised, says physician Bertran Auvert of INSERM, the French national research agency, in Saint-Maurice.

>Auvert and an international team of researchers recruited 3,274 uncircumcised heterosexual men, ages 18 to 24, from an area near Johannesburg.

>All wanted to be circumcised and agreed to get the operation either at the start or at the end of the planned 21-month study. After the volunteers were randomly divided, physicians circumcised half the men and instructed them to abstain from sex for 6 weeks to allow full healing. Men in both groups were counseled on safe sex practices and checked for HIV infection three times during the study.

>After 18 months, an oversight panel of scientists halted the project because the data were clear—49 of the uncircumcised men but only 20 of those who were circumcised had acquired HIV. The researchers report the findings in the November PLoS Medicine.

>"There can no longer be a shadow of doubt that male circumcision gives a man major protection against HIV infection," says physiologist Roger V. Short of the University of Melbourne in Carlton, Australia, who wasn't involved in the South African study.
>> Anonymous
And second part:
>Auvert says that although circumcision reduced HIV risk by 60 percent, some men might mistakenly interpret this benefit as full protection. The circumcised men in the trial reported having sex 18 percent more often than the uncircumcised men did. The reason for the difference is unclear, he says.

>Shortly after circumcision, men are at high risk of contracting the disease from sex partners because of the surgical wounds. But Auvert notes there was no jump in HIV infections among recently circumcised men in this study.

>Uncircumcised men have soft foreskin around the head of the penis containing many cells that are easily infected by HIV, according to epidemiologist Robert C. Bailey of the University of Illinois at Chicago. These cells, called Langerhans' cells, "tend to be close to the surface," he says. Once infected, he adds, "they carry the virus deeper," to the immune system T cells that HIV most commonly infects.

>Circumcision removes the foreskin. During healing after the procedure, the protein keratin toughens the skin of the penis, which reduces HIV penetration there, Bailey says.

>If circumcision offers protection for young-adult men, then it would be at least as valuable—or even more so—if done earlier in life, says Bailey, who is leading the study in Kenya.

>The new data support a policy of early circumcision, Short concurs. "The later in life a man is circumcised, the more likely he is to be already infected with HIV."
>> Anonymous
>>84769
you fucking idiot, and what do you tell the guys that ARE circumcized and that ARE HIV+ ?
what do you tell them? Oh I´m sorry normally that shouldn´t happen since your penis is mutilated!
>> Anonymous
>>84767

continuing on. I just phoned a friend who works as a medical professor at one of the universities and according to him the study took place in the Orange Farm township... There is no fucking way in hell you'll find so many uninfected people in that township. NO FUCKING WAY.

I call shenanigans.
>> Anonymous
>>84778
ahahaha
>> Anonymous
statistics have proven that 90% of all statistics are made up shit.
>> Anonymous
>>84781
Blame the French. It's their study.

>>84778
You tell them >Meanwhile, Bollinger emphasizes that any defense afforded by circumcision is incomplete and that men should use condoms for sex outside a monogamous relationship.

>>84774
A study proving that people with the same social class, same educational level, same rate of sexual activity, and same amount of visits to hookers have a lower chance of getting HIV proves nothing. All righty then...

You guys are like bible freaks arguing against Evolution. Science proves you wrong, yet you just keep holding on to some sort of ignortant belief passed down to you.

I don't hate uncut people. I don't give a fuck. It's not my penis and I'm not going to fuck it. I don't really mind them in porn except that it hinders the fantasy of me being the guy slightly. However, when you run around talking about how my penis is mutilated and my parents are evil for it, I take an understandable offense.

Don't call my cock mutilated and I won't give you studies showing your's is dirty. Just how it goes.

By the way, why hasn't anyone responded to the fact that uncuts show a higher tendency for PPP?
>> Anonymous
>I'm going to have to post the whole thing, aren't I?

no, actually you can stop. also not everything that is written is true.
I could post you a text of a medical site that tells the almost exact opposite of what you posted.
>> Anonymous
>>84787
Did you just half-quote a cable commercial? Ugh...
>> Anonymous
>>84791
Go ahead.
>> Anonymous
>By the way, why hasn't anyone responded to the fact that uncuts show a higher tendency for PPP?

tell that the guys that are cut and got it...
>> Anonymous
>>84793
different country , different TV shows ect
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
this conversation is retarded. there is no medical proven fact that it´s need to cut off skin of your penis.
If you don´t know the chick use a condom. period.

<------ she doesn´t care
>> Anonymous
>>84794
This directory contains official policy statements of various medical organizations regarding non-therapeutic male circumcision, along with discussions of these positions. All known statements by national medical organizations are accessible from this page. No statement recommends the practice of non-therapeutic child circumcision.
Introduction

Medical organizations in the various English speaking nations have found it appropriate to issue policy statements for the information of the medical community and the public. The Circumcision Reference Library has collected these official policy statements, both old and new, from the various English speaking nations. The medical societies of non-English speaking nations do not issue circumcision policy statements because neonatal male circumcision is not a practice of those countries. The older statements may not reflect current policy but are presented for reference purposes.

Conflict of interest. Medical organizations are political associations of doctors that have a duty to represent the interests of their doctor members, of whom some may profit by performing circumcision. The protection of the income and estates of the members may be given high priority. This duty to the members may in some instances prevent complete candor about the effects of non-therapeutic circumcision. The content of circumcision policy statements may also be influenced by political considerations.
>> Anonymous
>>84806
In September 2002, under the lead of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP), Paediatrics and Child Health Division, six major medical societies of Australasia developed a unified position statement on male circumcision. All six medical societies (the RACP, Australian Association of Paediatric Surgeons, New Zealand Society of Paediatric Surgeons, Urological Society of Australasia, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, and Paediatric Society of New Zealand) have now corroborated the Canadian Paediatric Society, declaring that circumcision of newborn males should not be routinely performed. The new statement firmly declares: "There are no medical indications for routine male circumcision." This statement was slightly revised in 2004.

* Beasley S, Darlow B, Craig J, et al. Position statement on circumcision. Sydney: Royal Australasian College of Physicians, 2004.
>> Anonymous
>>84793
this quote is older than the internets and still true.
>> Anonymous
BAWWWWWWWW DEY CHOPPED OFF MY COCK WHEN I WAS A KID AND NOW I NEED TO FIND RETARDED EXCUSES TO MAKE MYSELF FEEL BETTER ABOUT HAVING A BUTCHERED PENIS BAAAWWWWW ITS BETTER SHUT UP BAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWW
>> foreskin master
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
statistics show that if you have a nice car, you get laid- i've been laid
>> Anonymous
if you are uncut, and your lovers don't care, be proud

if you are cut and your lovers don't care, be proud

don't hate on others cock, never know who will show your lover up...
>> Anonymous
>>84806
>>84811
The fuck kind of lame response is that? That wasn't the opposite. The opposite would be saying that male circumcision causes an increased risk for contracting HIV. All you did was give me a lame part of an article stating that Canada and Australia don't, AT THIS TIME, believe there is enough evidence to support neo-natal circumcision as a preventative measure and should not be performed routinely. Wow... Australia and Canda took the same political stance on circumcision. Whoopty doo.

There have been over 35 studies in the past years stating a significant increase in uncircumcised males in both contracting and transfering HIV. Other studies indicate increased occurances of penile cancer, UTIs, prostate cancer, and epididymitis.

>>84819
Why? What was the point of that? I feel no shame or remorse whatsoever over the fact that I am circumcised. I fail to see how presenting a multitude of scientific studies count as me "making excuses."
>> Anonymous
>>84864
>enablecolor

go back to /b/, jew.
>> Anonymous
>>84798
Is this seriously what you consider an argument?
Because someone took a preventative measure and still got the disease, the measure doesn't work? Well, people get the flu vaccine and still get the flu. I guess we should just stop vaccinating everyone? People don't smoke or drink while pregnant and still get abnormal babies. I guess we should just tell everyone they might as well smoke and drink while pregnant?
Conversely, I've never gotten the flu and never been vaccinated. There are people who smoke and drink while pregnant and their babies are fine. These example don't stand as proof that we should stop vaccinations and start drinking while pregnant either.
>> Anonymous
>>84872
Actually, I'm an EX-Catholic Atheist and have no (known) Jewish blood in me. That's with geneological history going back a couple hundred years, too.
>> Anonymous
.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I enjoy being uncut as it means my tip is more sensitive when I fuck my wife therefore I can cum 4 or 5 times in an extended session.

Also my foreskin is loose enough that I have no problems pulling it back and cleaning underneath it daily. This means my wife is more than happy to give me blowjobs on demand
>> Anonymous
>>84864
Enjoy your denial, and citing irrelevant and meaningless statistics to live with your mutilated penis.
>> Anonymous
>>84890
amen?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>84891
Enjoy your's and denying an insurmountable and ever-growing number of statistics for which you have no counter statistics. Plus, you know, living with your disease-ridden penis.

>>84890
I don't give a fuck. As long as you don't go around saying mine is mutilated, it has no bearing on my life whatsoever.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>84898
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
my question is, Circumcised or not, why are you fucking a chick with an STD anyways?
>> Anonymous
>>84899
lol mutilated
>> Anonymous
>>84899
You seem to know a bit too much about penises, rather than prove a point you've just come off as a raving faggot who is trying to justify something very few people outside of this website acutally care about. Well done, prick.
>> Anonymous
>don't go around saying mine is mutilated

IT IS YOU MORONIC PILE OF SHIT

THERE IS A HUGE SCAR ON YOUR DICK

the hell stop making an idiot out of yourself, besides no one is hating on your jew cock. all we say is that it´s moronic to do and ethical plain wrong to give parents the right to rule over their babys body. which is a violation of human rights.
get that in your troll head little shitbrat.
>> Anonymous
>>84918
you must know that a guy which penis is mutilated can fuck everything without a condom and is totally safe! cause the magic is in the scar! it´s got an invisible Mana shield!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>84681

FYI in England (outside Jews and Slims) no one is circumcised, yet here the Rate of AIDS among the population is MUCH lower than the US. seeing as the studies you are referring to where conducted in third world countries we have to consider the possibility that Circumcision is actually helping the spread of AIDS in the developed world

you fail.
>> Anonymous
hey guyz i heard you can get ear or eye infections so i liek cut my eears and eyelids off, k?
>> Anonymous
well there goes 20,000 nerve endings, bye bye foreskin. LUL circumcision for barbarians.

accept it, circumcision, a cure in need of a disease to cure you from.
>> Anonymous
His disciples asked him, "Is circumcision useful or not?"

Jesus said to them, "If it were useful, their father would produce children already circumcised from their mother. Rather, the true circumcision in spirit has become profitable in every respect."

FUCK YOU JEWS. Mankind went for hundreds of thousands of years without mutilating their dicks, and somehow, they survived. STFU you sick bastards, you're no better than the African clit-mutilators.
>> Anonymous
I just have this to say: That Abraham must have been one charismatic motherfucker! He convinced his people god spoke to him (with no witnesses) and that they have to remove their foreskins as part of a covenant... way before anesthetic or anything as sharp as a scalpel.
>> Anonymous
Forgetting all the bullshit about STDs, AIDS, etc, don't you think its wrong for a child to have a part of their body removed? I'm uncut, and unless I'm the only one who can pull my foreskin back, when I do, theres hardly a difference visual between a cut cock and an uncut cock. Is pulling back a big problem for uncut guys?
>> Anonymous
>>85045

What do you care if others are circumcised or not? Really, I appreciate the concern for the well-being of my penis, but it's a little creepy.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
FUCK YOU, WORSHIPERS OF BAAL! Just because your God requires you to plug up your penis rather than ejaculate, it doesn't mean you have to do it this way!
>> Anonymous
anteater
>> Manyfist !!PTENINBEFgd
>>84976
US has a bigger population than the UK. So of course the US is going to have more Aids. Also theres no brits outside the jews and slims. Enjoy your Muslimland.
>> Anonymous
>>84902

MOAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
uncut is for niggers
>> Anonymous
I'm uncut, but when I get erect all the foreskin naturally pulls back and I "look" cut, so the girls I've been with don't seem to mind.
>> Anonymous
>>85355
Welcome to puberty.
>> Anonymous
IGNORANCE LEVELS REACHING CRITICAL, no one cares if you're cut or uncut because chances are you had little to no choice what you were dealt, and by the way, neither is better than the other.

Rofl at people claming that one is "a more intelligent choice".

You forget that statistics are often written by guilt ridden white men, which has proven inaccurate results. Same goes for uncut fags, don't think one side is more righteous, and I love how /hc/ just turned into /b/. Sage for mods not doing their godamn jobs.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
lets get this thread going.

ignore the cutfag trolls.

just post some girls sucking on some uncut cocks plz.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>85386

plz tell me theres more!


holy shit.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>85386

mmm sasha grey.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>85388

of course there is.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>85391

can you please PLEASE post all of them? at least the good ones!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>85393
i'll try,
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>85397

sweet
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>85399
In the thumbnail it looked like her right arm was the rest of the dick and I was like holy jesus that's a huge dick
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>85405

lol.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>85407
thats pretty much it from this.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
well if you've got more hot babes sucking off uncut dudes... POSTT!!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I wish I knew who this girl was.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
love this one.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
animooted
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>84670
lol this is so fucking stupid. who cares about aids??? MOST of 4chan are virgins, and of course you wont be banging bitches with aids or any other kind of that crap. about the bacterias... just wash it everyday, cut or uncut is the same thing, if you fuck someone with aids or and std you will get it, if you know how to take a shower bacterias are not a problem. the important thing is both kind of cocks and fuck the same way, just fags care about it.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>85449

true. now post pics or GTFO.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
LULZ! That picture is just priceless...It's like "DUUHHHHH!!"
>> Anonymous
>>85390
speaking of this picture/video. are there any other vids of her or other girls mentioning the enjoyment of an uncut cock? or at least... playing of the foreskin
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
animooted
>> Anonymous
>>85492
i need a damn source on this! or a video
>> Anonymous
>>85487

yes. in one video she says "oh, its uncut" when the guy pulls it out. with excitement in her voice.

the guy says "you like that?"

and she says "ya, when its clean like this!"

and then she goes to work on it.. very hot.
>> Anonymous
my dick is circumcised. : [
i wish it wasnt. : [[
>> Anonymous
>>85496

whats the easiest place for me to upload it off my computer to?

send me a link of where to upload it.
>> Anonymous
>>85502
I love my foreskin. You'd have so much fun if you had a foreskin.
>> Anonymous
>>85502
All it is is extra maintenance. There's no real reason for remaining circumcised. Don't listen to the uncivilized apecocks.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>85507
You forgot the part where you don't need any help masturbating and the part where the foreskin rubs over the head of your dick, and it's like two seconds to clean, wtf.
>> Anonymous
>>85501
dude, i know, thats the pic of the video where she says that.
>> Anonymous
>>85513
need help masturbating? I'm cut and I've never needed "help" masturbating.
>> Anonymous
>>85514

true. your guess is as good as mine though.
>> Anonymous
>>85517

listen, you clearly don't GET the way the foreskin helps jacking off.

not only that, but you're most likely really closed-minded about the whole thing, so why should we bother trying to explain.

just go off, and enjoy your penis how it is. but trust me.. the foreskin is VERY useful for the guy that owns it.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
she seems to like the one on the left best.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>85528
I WOULD
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
DUDE... I can't believe this thread is still here. I just wanted to say... there is at least one girl on the internets... cuz I'm one... but yeah... I'm bi... :/
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
http://forumbb.hotmail.ru
list forums
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
love this one.
>> Hah! Anonymous
Guess what people, uncut guys are generally better at sex!!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>85564
too bad the rest of the set is made of whale and fail.
>> Anonymous
>>85571

prove it.

thats the only one i've seen.
>> Anonymous
>>85573
i'm sorry i cant supply you, can someone help?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>85595
I would love to know who this lady is :)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>85612

unfortunately, i can't help you.. but i can post another.


very similar though.