moar
This is strangely intriguing
This is new... but at the same time... old...
FAKE, they wouldn't have been shaved back then >:|
Wat? Err.. Hmm. Did not know of this. Actually, in some regards it seems slightly better than newer stuff. I feel dirty.
>>316620Says you.
>>316620oh, were you around then?
they had to hold their pose for minutes, otherwise the image would be too blurry
I find this unique and arousingplease proceed
>>316588The one at the bottom looks a little bit too much like Margaret Dumont.OUT OF MY HEAD CHARLES
The pornstache is indeed an ancient and venerable tradition.
bump for awesomeness
>>316620Prostitutes shaved because otherwise they would get lice. That's the way you would recognize a prostitute back then.You fail hard.
ahh... you gotta love old grainy black-and-white film. Makes prostitutes look like classy victorian ladies...
>>316680By 1841 exposure would only last one minute, i don't have data for after that but that time gradually decreased, all these photos probably have exposure time under 1 second.
>>316567Vintage scenegirl.
hows about some antique DVDA?
more vintage butts pleaseI love those chubby butts