>> |
Anonymous
>>319007 Please try to pick apart my post, as that would be completely unrelated as to why I made refrence to the dictionary. And this loophole you imagined is false. Yes, you can eat weed; but that dosnt make it a food. I could sit and eat grass all day (actual grass), but that wouldnt make it a food. Chocolate, on the other hand, is made and produced to be eaten as a food(a snack or treat specifically), and therefore not a drug; although it's side-effects where discovered, leading chocolate to be one of the greater valentine gifts given. All things granted, every food has a mind or bodily altering effect on an individual. Drugs, however, have a much more drastic effect; which is why they're drugs.
>>319043 Typical stoner response. 'You cant say shit about it if you've never toked out!', which may or may not be followed as well by 'You're a fucking stoner too, you hypocrite'. These are the poeple you'll never be able to convince, because either way, they'll dissagree with you whether you've smoked pot or not. I dont smoke pot myself, but I know many people that do, and I see the effects second-hand. It's garbage.
>>319092 I'm assuming you just like to throw out words you dont know in an attempt to look intelligent, otherwise I have no clue why you're calling us all 'prudish cunts'. Our opinions are too 'proper' for you? Also, television isnt a drug in the literal sense, as you dont intake any outside substance. Furthermore, I hardly watch any TV lately.
Also, I laughed at 'harmless weed'. Roll more joints please, while I go and try to petition television for being an addictive substance. Oh wait.
|