sauce on pic? anybody?
bump for moar
Fucking Bizarre.
I'm not gonna lie, I might fap to this.
if you look past the tackiness this is actually artistically valid.
>>966491What do you mean by 'artistically valid'?
Holy shit that's awesome.
>>966496don't try to draw too much meaning to it. I wasn't trying to be deep. All I mean is it's aesthetically pleasing and there is more going on then what's at face value. She is a contortionist right? She looks like she is being attacked/eaten, but she is really doing it herself? Or am I wrong? I know not the source of said gif.
>>966508Oh, ahh. I didn't think that she might be a contortionist - figured it might just be mediocre CGI, but I wasn't sure.Somehow, I do find this a little hot. I don't know why. X.X
>>966512I don't think it's CGI, it looks too raw and too real. That's not my forte though, so I definitely could be wrong.
This is CGI. Look closely. She's being folded up like that because the snake's jaw is crushing her. Stop trying to sound intelligent; this is 4chan.
Of course it's CGI you fools.http://www.voreville.com/samples/index.php?action=showgal&cat=1
Any of you dipshits stop to consider that it's playing in reverse? The girl is a contortionist, and they recorded her wriggling her way out of a fake snake and then reversed it. Stupid cocks.
>>966600See>>966550
All it takes is a good pair of eyes to see that it's CGI.Just look at the colors on the woman.
This wouldn't be possible to imitate IRL. Obviously CGI.
Or maybe the fact that it's from voreville, and voreville calls it CGIretards
Strangely arousing
wow you guys are like, so smart, for spotting cgi and stuff. You are clearly better than anyone that thought otherwiseeeeeeeSARCASM
To all of you saying that it's not CGI and that it's a contortionist, look up positional asphyxia.Dumbasses.