>> |
Anonymous
>>1026544 Of all the ridiculous things to fault, you actually pick one that you're wrong about? H-bombs required only relatively small fission bombs to generate enough heat and pressure to start a fusion reaction (the H is for hydrogen). Be it Plutonium or U-235, the half life of the fissile material would be rather high and after all this time there would scarce be a trace. But, the primary fault in your argument lies in the fact that the Earth's core and mantle are relatively rich in radioactive elements. Why do you think it's still so hot and liquid? Radioactive decay is what keeps it that way, so a fusion bomb set off 75 million years ago in a mildly radioactive soup would be pretty damned difficult to detect, even if you were actually looking for it. But who's looking for that?
|