File :-(, x, )
Scientology explained Anonymous
see, it makes perfect sense,
>> Anonymous
RELEASE XENU
>> Anonymous
>>1025885
why he may freeze us all and then drop us in a volcano and our spirits will release and we will be a negative force haha fuck Scientology and more power to Anonymous
>> Anonymous
I am a freer being now!!

XE-NU! XE-NU!

I loved what you did in london, earlier this month. that was brilliance.
>> Anonymous
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! period.
>> scientology debunked Anonymous
If h-bombs were detonated on Earth 75 million years ago, they'd leave physical evidence.

Science has found no physical evidence of raised raiation levels before we humans pioneered nuclear fission.

tldr; there were no h-bombs on earth that long ago, scientology fails.
>> Anonymous
that's an over elaborate way to get fix overpopulation problems XD
>> Anonymous
>>1026544
THAT'S the thing to which you take exception?
>> Anonymous
>>1026544
Of all the ridiculous things to fault, you actually pick one that you're wrong about? H-bombs required only relatively small fission bombs to generate enough heat and pressure to start a fusion reaction (the H is for hydrogen). Be it Plutonium or U-235, the half life of the fissile material would be rather high and after all this time there would scarce be a trace. But, the primary fault in your argument lies in the fact that the Earth's core and mantle are relatively rich in radioactive elements. Why do you think it's still so hot and liquid? Radioactive decay is what keeps it that way, so a fusion bomb set off 75 million years ago in a mildly radioactive soup would be pretty damned difficult to detect, even if you were actually looking for it. But who's looking for that?
>> Anonymous
>>1026591
GTFO SciFAG!
>> Anonymous
>>1026552
I'LL put them all in a box
and I'll put that box into a smaller box and I'll send it to myself.
and when it gets here, hahaha, I'LL SMASH IT WITH A HAMMER!