>> |
Anonymous
>>595127 actually, being able to criticize something/someone only has value if people give that critic value... or if that critic is better, to measure, than said thing being criticized. Artists' only true critics are those who understand artwork, and what goes into it, such as fellow artits. Everyone knows that art critics, if not artists, usually suck at criticizing art, I mean, look at 80%+ of the stuff in art museums. Movie critics usually don't know how to make a movie, but people listen to what they have to say, giving it value. You're a bunch of 4channers, why the hell should I listen to your opinions on Nicolas Cage as an actor? Nobody has given you the right to criticize him professionally, meaning you aren't getting paid, you can't act better than him, I'm pretty sure of that, and you come from an unreliable source, fucking 4chan. I rather like him as an actor btw, and just for future reference, Anon was right in what he said, and you saying that's the worst excuse... makes you're excuse unreliable. Hoo-ray for scientific methods and facts!
|