File :-(, x, )
Squirters Anonymous
(in before "it's piss"... "no it's real")
>> Anonymous
it's piss
>> Anonymous
no it's real
>> Anonymous
thread over.
>> Anonymous
top tip of the day: pee hole is at top, penis hole is at botom
>> Anonymous
>>384223
>>384220
>>384219

same person
>> Anonymous
>>384218
No shit Sherlock.
>> Anonymous
>>384230
>>384231
same person!
>> Anonymous
what kind of piss is there besides real piss? you people are strange
>> Anonymous
OMG LOLZ FEMALE ORGAMZEZM EXIST CUZ LOLZ I GIBEV MAH GIRLFREND WHO HAS 33DD TITZ ORAGAMRASMES ALL TEH TIEM IN BED lOLZ SO STFU FAGGTOZZZZZ CUZ IRS REEL LOZL BUT N ALSO DIZ GIF IS NOT PIZZ CUZ I KNO TEH DIFRENCE BETWEN PIS N CUM SO STFU LOLZ
>> Anonymous
I don't care what it is, someone rapidshit.

>>384261
this is quite possibly the least funny thing I have ever read. Please, stop trying and go back to Gaia.
>> Anonymous
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_ejaculation
>> Anonymous
You'd have to be pretty stupid to ignore the existence of female ejaculation. It's seriously not that hard to consider.
>> Anonymous
Female ejaculation is true... and cleanup sucks
>> Anonymous
it's piss
>> Anonymous
>>384312
This one flunked out of troll school.
>> Anonymous
http://pornotube.com/media.php?m=57610
>> Anonymous
The woman is Cytherea for the record. And it's ejaculate, not piss. And yes, she cums like a firehouse, but it is a real orgasm.
>> Anonymous
In some pornographic movies, women are shown ejaculating a clear or milky fluid. The validity of pornography as a source of evidence is, however, suspect, as there is a strong incentive to generate dramatic visual effects, with no implication or assurance of accurate recording of real events. Allegedly, some of this is done through trick editing or by filling the vagina with fluids from external sources; with the camera on, the woman can then expel the fluid. In other cases, the fluid is clearly seen as coming from her urethra, at high velocity. Urination is typically used in this context to provide the illusion of a female ejaculation.
>> Anonymous
>>384333

Incorrect, it's actually urine.
>> Anonymous
>>384362

Thread over
>> Anonymous
Actually, it isn't urine. Rarely, if ever, do they find urine in samples that have been taken of female ejaculations. The liquid itself comes from a different gland.
>> Anonymous
>>384387
In real female ejaculate, yes. But in porn it's usually just someone pissing as far as they can.
>> Anonymous
>>384387
sir you are full of shit. If its coming out of the urethra there bound to be urine residue, its after all where pee comes from. And also you act as if there was a scientific study done on this. Admit it your talking out of your ass
>> Anonymous
I DON'T SEE ANY GIF'S, ASSHOLES
>> Anonymous
Yes female ejaculation is real. No squirting out 3+ feet is not real female ejaculation, that's porn special effects. But don't let that keep you from getting your fap on.
>> Anonymous
Oh for the love...this will be the cause of WWIII...whether female ejaculation is real or not...but I wonder...Who the hell gives a damn to begin with?
>> Anonymous
>>384408

No, it is urine, there is no "female ejaculation" like this in real life.
>> Anonymous
The female ejaculation is just about as real as a female orgasm. They just pretend like they can do it to get stuff from us...And it works...
>> Anonymous
You'd have to be some kind of fucking idiot to deny female orgasm. All the people denying it have clearly never been with a real female. Female ejaculation is, for whatever reason, still a very touchy subject, plus only some women are said to be able to do it. But honestly, who gives a fuck? It's fucking hot, and whether it's real or not is no concern of mine. I'd like to see more gifs, less virgins trying to sound knowledgeable about sex.
>> Zin
......felt pretty real with my gf.......Stinks too....
>> Anonymous
Pick up a human anatomy book sometimes you fucking idiots, there is NOTHING in the female body to produce any "ejaculate" and nothing that can squirt it out. There is lubrication glands but hey fon't squirt nothing. The only thing that can squirt from there is PISS. Now drink it up you fucking idiots. :)
>> Anonymous
>>384395
Strike one for extreme technicality ("LOL it came out of her urethra so it -has- to have at least some piss in it!"), and strike two for being a hypocrite and talking out of your ass. Doctors are still studying the validity of female ejaculation even now, so of course, there has been plenty of extensive study, and several books on the subject.

Do you want to try for strike three?
>> Anonymous
>>384440
Sir your response to my obviously sarcastic statement leads me to believe you might be a bit insecure....Do we have issues that we are suppressing? Can't get it up?
>> anonymous
I speak as a female. That's fake as all fuck. Even if she did ejeculate, there's no way in hell it'd have the force to go that far.
>> Anonymous
Okay, you guys who are nay sayers are pretty ignorant. as stated there are books, and it can be controlled and manipulated and forced to shoot. So, miss so called female who apparently knows everything about the female anatomy is somewhat wrong. But hey, if you don't believe try looking at "Swallow my Squirt" series, and explain to me how precisely it is either edited/fake/piss. If you watch it, you'll notice that pissing can't be possibly done that much in one time, no special effect is grand enough to be that detailed, and no editing can possibly work that well.

But you know, I'll just let you see for yourself.
>> anonymous
Oh noes! Someone's seen porn! Quick, take their word for it! They're totally right! D:

Moron.
>> Anonymous
>>384458
XD I have seen movies make cars fly and animals talk, yet you tell me that it is impossible to make a girl ejaculate with special effects? You sir fail at life.
Porn =/= fact
>> Anonymous
virgins
>> Anonymous
I'd like to know how a gland and duct system connected to the urethra big enough to hold *gallons* of fluid expelled rapidly and forcefully has escaped the eyes of 100's of years of medical science.

Does female ejaculation exist? Possibly. Is the "female ejaculation" you see in porn real? Fuck no. It's either special efects or piss.
>> Anonymous
>>384448
I think you should get someone that actually knows how to read to cite this "Anatomy book", because I doubt you read a thing.

It never occurred to you that maybe a gland wasn't responsible for the "squirt", but that the glands instead secreted the ejaculate into the urethra and pooling there until a convulsion triggered by orgasm ejected it out? It would both explain why the ejaculate did contain very small trace amounts of urine in tested samples, and how so much fluid could be expelled in one squirt, as the glands themselves are not large enough to hold all of that fluid -at once-, nor have openings large enough to squirt so much fluid.
>> Anonymous
so does anyone have the video
>> Anonymous
No, it didn't occur to me that there was "maybe" a gland that secretes into the bladder at a pace unknown to medical science to fill the bladder with liquid only at the time of ejaculation. Where is this fluid at times other then "ejaculation" and furthermore WHY THE FUCK WOULD IT EXIST? What conceivable purpose could this magical ejaculation gland serve?

Do you know what type of physiology is required to secrete that much fluid? It take two fucking kidneys hours to produce that much urine, and you morons think an *effectively invisible* gland can do it in seconds or minutes?

Just give up, you guys are watching piss porn and loving it.
>> Anonymous
>>384470
4chan needs its own fucking scientists so we can finally put this shit to bed.
>> Anonymous
>>384479
>>384467
>>384466
Thank the gods, I thought I was the only person that knew it was piss.
>>384471
But seriously, does anyone have the movie?
>> Anonymous
>>384333
>>384362
>>384365
>>384387
>>384391
>>384395
>>384404
>>384408
>>384410
>>384411
>>384440
>>384448
>>384449
>>384456
>>384457
>> Anonymous
>>384479
Given you're inability to even consider the possibility, it's obvious to me that even if the gland was capable of creating ejaculate in that much quantities, you'd still not believe it unless I threw it in your face.

I was never trying to say that porn stars like Cynthia where real squirters, or that the ejaculate came in that much quantity (but I didn't really say I wasn't, so I guess that, at least, is my fault). This isn't an argument of what's unknown to medical science, but what stubborn society doesn't know, or just refuses to consider. Humans as a species still have very useless parts of their anatomy, maybe you should go and discover those as well.
>> Anonymous
We (stubborn society) refuse to consider this as science because there is NO empirical evidence of any kind that suggests the possiblity that the typ of "squirting" seen in porn is anything but urine.

Why should we blindly believe anything because it's possible? The burden of proof is on you.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>384496
Again... I am not arguing that female ejaculation as portrayed in porn is in fact true ejaculation. You should, however, not staple yourself to every "known fact", because if you knew anything about science, you'd realize that there is always a probability of error. If you never consider that maybe it may exist, then you'll simply cease to learn and grow.

If you want "proof" (or at least, sources), then you should try looking up Carol Queen and Susan Block, a sexologist and sexual instructor respectively. They each made instructional videos in order to educate females on how to achieve female ejaculation.

You could also read a few articles from here: http://www.sexscience.org/publications/index.php?category_id=439

You shouldn't blindly believe anything, but you should never blindly deny anything either. If people are making such a commotion about it, chances are there's at least a bit of truth to it.
>> Anonymous
>>384494
Yes you did, when you posted here. By calling us ignorant, you took to this .gif's (>>384218
) defense.
>> Anonymous
>>384514
No, I really didn't. You're being presumptuous again. You where attacking female ejaculation in general.

By continuing to pursue your claim that I'm arguing in favor of this gif, it shows further that you don't know how to leave an assumption at the door. So I'll say it again; I never argued that female ejaculation as depicted in porn was real.
>> Anonymous
SOMEONE CALL MYTHBUSTERS NAO!!!!!!
>> Anonymous
>>384524

MORE LIKE MIKE ROWE FROM DIRTY JOBS
>> Anonymous
*&*(A IT CALL NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC!
>> Anonymous
>>384524
>>384524

lol
>> Anonymous
guy in the hat=pwned
>> anonymous
0o if I was any of you lot I'd seriously check whatever "Girls" you've been going out with/having sex with for signs of a dick.
>> Anonymous
>>384508
>>384517
And as long as we're talking about leaving assumptions at the door,
I never suggested *anywhere* that every known fact is absolute truth. Neither did I say that no kind of female ejucation exists. I said the burden of proof is on the claimant to show whether something is true or not.

As far as citing a "sexologist and sexual instructor" as professional sources, I can show you a handful of other made-up "experts" who can heal your cancer with crystals, cleanse the harmful "toxins" from your body with seaweed and moonbeams and can beyond-the-shadow-of-a-doubt prove that elvis is alive, man has never been to the moon and aliens crash landed at roswell.
>> Anonymous
>>384218to>>384594

same person
>> Anonymous
>>384594
Yeah, like I said. You wouldn't believe anything unless I threw it right in your face and rubbed your nose in it. It wouldn't have mattered who's names I would have posted.

In order to prove something, you have to be willing to believe first.
>> Anonymous
There have been a number of studies done on the fluid expelled during female ejaculation to determine the chemical makeup. Through chemical analysis the expelled fluid has been found to contain the following:
--glucose (a natural sugar) and fructose (another natural sugar, also found in the prostatic fluid of semen)
--prostate-specific antigen (PSA), the fluid produced by males which forms the base of male ejaculate, produced by the prostate gland, and in females, believed to be generated by Skene's glands
--very low levels of creatinine and urea (the two primary chemical markers of urine, found in high levels in pre- and post-ejaculatory urinalysis).

The Skene's glands are glands located on the upper wall of the vagina, around the lower end of the urethra. They drain into the urethra and near the urethral opening. Some believe that the Skene's glands are the source of female ejaculation. In 2002, Emanuele Jannini of L'Aquila University in Italy showed that there may be an explanation both for the phenomenon and for the frequent denials of its existence. Skene's glands have highly variable anatomy, and in some extreme cases they appear to be missing entirely. If Skene's glands are the cause of female ejaculation and g-spot orgasms, this may explain the observed absence of these phenomena in many women.
>> THE BOTTOM LINE. Also-->Read and encyclopedic entry on the Skene's glands Anonymous
(NOTE: nowhere do I or am denying female orgasm)

The bottom line:
When a woman "ejaculates" (bastardization of the word) it means a liquid comming out (not necessarily shooting/squirting) upon orgasm.

Whatever the content of this liquid THERE ARE ONLY 2 PLACES IT CAN COME FROM (if you say 3, you are gross, shitting does not count, gtfo)

The "ejaculate" will be from either or both of these:
1. urethra
2. vagina
that is all

Option 1 possibilities:
If it comes from the urethra then it is urine (many women do indeed empty their bladders upon orgasm)
AND/OR
>> Anonymous
lol internet
>> Shooter McCray
I wonder when the people in charge are going to wake up and realize it's actually a pretty good idea to limit some discussions here.

Like this one, which proves you're all stupid bastards.
>> ANONYMOUS
more like "lol 4chan"

Seriously guys, video or fuck off. If you like it, you do. No one else should give a fuck whether or not it's piss.
>> Anonymous
piss is fine too
>> Anonymous
are you guys stupid!? fuck cum is cum man. a guy's cum comes from his balls and a girl from wherever the fuck it comes from. a girl's pussy gets wet when excited but you don't question that. you just keep going on about oh a girl can't possibly ejaculate fluid. there's nothing there to produce the cum that flies out and shit. are you guys stupid? there's fluids coming out from left right centre. people sweat, people piss, people got a layer of liquid on their eyes, they cum. lots of watery shit comes from human bodies.
do any of you'se have some advanced degree in medical science? who gives a fuck! female ejaculation exists. you haven't seen it. go hook up with some girl and give 'er a wank till cum starts flying out. wwooooooo weeeee yeah cum flying everywhere man...
and if she doesn't cum oh well.

seriously. this isn't dateline or the discovery channel. just some outlet for porn.
for fuck sake. have a wank and see how far you can cum MUHAHAHA

"my dick goes sha la la la la! *clap clap clap*
sha la la in the mor-ning....
sha la la la la! *clap clap clap* sha la la in the eve-ning..."
>> Anonymous
>>384467
First off, a hundred years ago, they thought that a lobotomy would cure severe depression and schizophrenia. That was obviously untrue. Don't release your ignorance, keep it deep within you.
>> Anonymous
SHUT. THE FUCK. UP!!!!
>> Anonymous
>>384736
You need to work on that suppression. I'm telling you, your life would be so much easier. Just bottle it up and keep it deep down inside.
>> Anonymous
>>384218

Cytheria is the biggest fucking fake out there. just like all the other "squirting" pornstars.

female ejaculation ISNT fake but it certantly doesnt look like that at all. if a woman had that much fluid come out of her, she could get dehydrated.
>> Anonymous
I speak as a woman, female ejaculation as portrayed in these gifs IS PISS. With real ejaculation such a large quantity of fluid couldn't possibly come out of a vagina, and it wouldn't squirt out like that. In my opinion perhaps women who can't hold up their piss during sex confuse this with female ejaculation, and in porn this is just done on purpose.

"Just give up, you guys are watching piss porn and loving it."
>> Anonymous
That's what I've been telling them!
>> Anonymous
don't care if it's fake, the look on her face is fucking priceless
>> Anonymous
>>384660
Actually, you're wrong. If you get "ejaculate" coming from the vaginal cavity, then chances are that it's vaginal infection or any number of STDs. If you notice secretions coming from the vaginal cavity, you should talk to your doctor.

Anyways, this whole debate is whether or not there are "squirters". The end verdict (which is what this thread comes to each and every time) is that they do exist, but porn is enhanced for dramatic value. Female "ejaculate" is largely glucose sugars secreted from the body, which may or may not come in generous quantities due to "retrograde ejaculation", where the fluid mixture travels up the urethra first (but not necessarily filling the bladder) before being discharged in a squirt triggered by convulsions during orgasm .

And, like always, the entire argument source is largely misunderstanding and unfounded assumption of the arguers, by the arguers.
>> Anonymous
jesus christ, basic human fucking biology
>> Anonymous
>>384879
Sorry, but it's dumbasses like you that stick to everything they've been "taught", rather than stepping outside of the safe box on occasion, that makes everyone around you just as stupid as you.
>> Anonymous
There have been a number of studies done on the fluid expelled during female ejaculation to determine the chemical makeup. Through chemical analysis the expelled fluid has been found to contain the following:

* glucose (a natural sugar) and fructose (another natural sugar, also found in the prostatic fluid of semen)
* prostate-specific antigen (PSA), the fluid produced by males which forms the base of male ejaculate, produced by the prostate gland, and in females, believed to be generated by Skene's glands
* very low levels of creatinine and urea (the two primary chemical markers of urine, found in high levels in pre- and post-ejaculatory urinalysis).


In 1988, Milan Zaviacic, M.D., Ph.D., head of the Institute of Pathology, Comenius University Bratislava, published a study of five women who were patients at a fertility department of a hospital of gynecology and obstetrics. Total samples from one of the participants and one of four samples from a second participant were collected in the laboratory. The rest were collected at the homes of the women and transported to the laboratory in ice. In four of the five cases, the samples were analyzed within three hours of collection, with the fifth subject’s specimens analyzed three months after collection. The results in all five cases showed a higher concentration of fructose in the ejaculate sample than in the urine sample.
>> Anonymous
In 1997 Dr. F Cabello Santamaria analyzed urine for PSA using Microparticle Enzyme Immunoassay and found that 75 percent of the samples showed a concentration of PSA in post-orgasmic urine samples which was not present in pre-orgasmic urine samples. The fluid collected at the point of orgasm (distinct from the urine samples) showed the presence of PSA in 100 percent of samples.

In 2002, Emanuele Jannini of L'Aquila University in Italy offered one explanation for this phenomenon, as well as for the frequent denials of its existence:

Skene's gland openings are usually the size of pinholes, and vary in size from one woman to another, to the point where they appear to be missing entirely in some women. If Skene's glands are the cause of female ejaculation, this may explain the observed absence of this phenomenon in many women.
>> Anonymous
Edwin G. Belzer, Jr., Beverly Whipple and William Moger, co-researchers with Addiego, et al (1981)
Gary Schubach, Ed.D 2001, Urethral Expulsions During Sensual Arousal and Bladder Catheterization in Seven Human Females
Cabello, F. (1997). Female ejaculation: Myth and reality. In J.J. Baras-Vass & M.Perez-Conchillo (Eds) Sexuality and Human Rights: Proceedings of the XIII World Congress of Sexology (pp.325-333) Valencia, Spain: E.C.V.S.A.
>> Anonymous
Yeah, everyone else has access to wikipedia too
>> Anonymous
>>384894
wikipedia collected the data, but the sources are all there.
>> Anonymous
It does exist.. I've seen it first hand.

It's not as crazy as in those movies or the .GIF's, look up "G-spot Orgasm"

Lol that old creepy woman from the sunday night sex shoe talked about it a couple years ago.
>> Anonymous
In never fails that once someone posts squirting gifs, a huge argument ensues.

There are books on how to squirt. It has been proven by many people that squirting exists.

Now shut the fuck up.
>> Anonymous
>>384901

No, squirting does NOT exist. Try posting some proof next time, oh wait, there is no proof so you automatically fail.