File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
>> Anonymous
deep shit man...
>> Anonymous
MORE PHILD CORN
>> Anonymous
>>1293822
/Thread

1 internet for roy batty reference
>> Anonymous
Spoiler: see the ending of Blade Runner
>> Anonymous
Not yet, but soon...
>> It's too bad she won't live. Anonymous
But then again who does?
>> Anonymous
SPOILER: Deckard is obviously an anti-replicant replicant with extended longevity, signified by the sharing of the artificial unicorn memory.
The asian cop ("Too bad she won't live..."), is thought to be the same, but self-aware.
>> Anonymous
>>1295339
Not really a spoiler. Ridley Scott said he isn't meant to be a replicant. Harrison Ford said Deckard is a replicant. Philip K Dick's version pretty much said no fucking way is deckard a replicant.

Regardless, it makes for some interesting viewpoints on the movie and adds many layers depending on the point of view you subscribe to. Not going to debate it either way.
>> Anonymous
i think replicant is a pretty cool guy. eh makes a face and doesn't afraid of anything.
>> Anonymous
>>1295341
Other way around. The 5 disk directors cut has Ridley saying he is a replicant, and Ford saying he isn't.
Francher (the writer) says he doesn't like the idea that he is a rep.
>> Anonymous
the unicorn dream and origami at the end of the director's cut are a pretty blatant sign that Scott liked the movie better with dekkard as replicant.

however, ford acted the part with the understanding that dekkard was NOT a replicant. the unicorn scenes were added in later.

the above is well known and extensively documented.

the point everyone seems to miss is that in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, Dekkard finds that the act of killing the replicants makes him inhuman, whereas their struggle to survive make them MORE human.

the story was never a mystery "find the robot" detective novel; it's about how your actions define you as a person more than anything else.

read a fucking book 4chan
>> Anonymous
>>1295359
>read a fucking book 4chan

No