File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Dear /gif/,

I now present to you my first Party Hard gif! :]
Hope you like it. D:
>> Anonymous
fail

party hard is two frames only.
>> Anonymous
I've seen many good Party Hard gifs with more than two frames... go die.
>> Anonymous
fails for being too slow.
>> Anonymous
>>224764
wrong
party hard is 2 frames
lrn2partyhard
kthxbai
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Tried making it two frames... Can't find it any funnier.
I better stick to my obi-wan / random gifs... >:[
>> Anonymous
GUESS HOW MANY FRAMES PARTY HARD IS THATS RIGHT ONLY TWO OMFG
>> Anonymous
what, is that guy gay or something?
>> sempai's pleasurous nutrients !UXYkIpCvwg!!a9z
     File :-(, x)
>>224780
wrong. the only rule behind party hard is that it says party hard.
YOU FAILED.
>> Dude 00
>>224793
I take it you haven't watched The Simpsons. Yes, Wayland Smithers is gay.
>> Anonymous
>>224796
Party hard is 2 FRAMES.

YOU FAIL IT.
>> Anonymous
>>224760
YOU WIN!!!!!!
>> Anonymous
>>224760
win
>> Anonymous
>>224760
rofl, great stuff
>> Anonymous
>>224760
FOUR FREE INTERNETS SIR
>> Anonymous
>>224899
>>224901
>>224902
>>224904
Same Person
>> Anonymous
>>224905


>>224899
>>224901
>>224902
>>224904
Same Person
>> Anonymous
>>224899
>>224901
>>224902
>>224904
>>224905
Same person.
>> Anonymous
hahahha
>> Anonymous
awesome

5 thumbs up
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Awesomest thread ever mate, A++++++!

Here's my 1st party hard too!
>> OvRiDe
its a trap........^
>> sempai's pleasurous nutrients !UXYkIpCvwg!!a9z
     File :-(, x)
>>224898
sorry, you're wrong. i can do whatever i want to a gif, so long as it says 'party hard'.
YOU FLUNKS.
>> Anonymous
>>224760
/r/ original
>> Anonymous
>>224918
Sayin' it don't make it so.
>> Anonymous
you fucking fail, party hard = auto fail
>> Anonymous
>>224918
Yeah, you can make a party hard (that fails rather hard mind you) with as many frames as you like, but it just spawns "omg fail. 2 framez onry" comments out the ass, because it fails.

Of course party hard inherently fails so I'm guessing you're just posting these hardcore fail worthy party hards and defending them because you're bored and want to have a little flame war.
>> sempai's pleasurous nutrients !UXYkIpCvwg!!a9z
     File :-(, x)
>>225071
that may be it. or it may be that i don't subscribe to 'INTERNET MEME WEEKLY' so I don't know the official rules.
>> Anonymous
>>225074
Well my only problem with your argument is you seem to follow party hard, the meme which only has one rule; Two frames or fail. It's not that fucking hard to understand. This rule is bitched about constantly when someone breaks it, of course followed by party hard fails comments.

In conclusion, your name makes me giggle, fairly hard at that <3
>> Anonymous
im in /gif/?

rofl. i seriously thought i was browsing /b/.
>> sempai's pleasurous nutrients !UXYkIpCvwg!!a9z
     File :-(, x)
>>225082
i'm making a point that it's 4chan, not some business. sure, party hards of old were two frames only, but that doesn't mean they always have to be.
>> Anonymous
>>225191

This is not a difficult concept. You seem unable to grasp it, so I will break it down clearly.

Take either one picture (typically someone who appears to be partying hard) or two pictures (again, looking to be partying hard is important). If one picture, mirror it. The frame rate should be rapid, but not ridiculously so as>>225191and>>225074are.

It is not, however, a Party Hard without Party Hard. There are many schools of thought on it, but what is generally accepted is PARTY HARD in either the top or bottom. In one frame, it is red, and in the next it is yellow. The location need not be entirely consistent. The colors are generally guidelines, but the darker/brighter color pair should be adhered to.

>>224782is the closest to a proper Party Hard in this thread, though is somewhat flawed - mostly in the location of the Party Hard, and could use just a bit more speed.
>> Anonymous
As an aside, your handle is fucking vile, and makes my fleshy Cheetos-stained arms quiver with fury.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>225222

is this not party hard?
>> Anonymous
IN BEFORE PARTY SOFT !!!!11111
>> Anonymous
there is no such thing as a meme done incorrectly.

things are legitimised on 4chan by being popularly considered a) cool, b) funny or c) both. a new party hard, a new close.jpg, are not fucking 'illegitimate' if they exceed two frames or exceed the original delayclose dimensions; they are only illegitimate if they suck fuck.

if 4channers never deviated from the status quo we'd still be posting cockmongler and santino.

get a bloody life, you stick-in-the-muds.
>> Anonymous
and ftr, the coolesy ph i've ever seen comprised of about THIRTY frames: a newsradio grab of phil hartman's character bobbing his head up and down, replete with maniacal grin.
>> Anonymous
>>224764

yes...by people who dont' know how to fucking make them

it's 2 frames dipshit
>> Anonymous
>>225288

'YOUR CREATIONS ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE 4CHAN ORIGINAL CONTENT PROLIFERATION CHARTER 2006, CHAPTER NINE CLAUSE J6. PLEASE PRESENT YOUR FUTABA VIRTUAL-ID AT THE INFRACTION PROCESSING STATION NEAREST YOU. YOU HAVE 0.3 GETS TO COMPLY.'

amirite? amirite?

fuckwit.
>> Anonymous
Who the fuck cares if there are 2 or more frames? All I know that it is worthless with only one frame.
>> Anonymous
>>225086
so fucking wrong man...

seriously, all stfu , the OP post is not party hard. taking the normal gif and just throwing in party hard doesnt make it party hard.
and the same person bumping this shit with you win and free internets is clearly shizophren~
>> sage sage
sage