>> |
Anonymous
RISI: Exactly. However, you would have the inability to interact -- as opposed to time travel -- which is to send yourself, as one being, to a different point in time. I feel dilation is more plausible. It would be like a mirror image of you. You would simply be stretching yourself along a time period. You would be mobile, but you would only be mobile throughout the time period you were moving through. It's just a hypothesis, of course. And there are inevitable paradoxes involved. For instance, the argument that if it's possible to stretch yourself through time, why wouldn't you be able to interact? If somebody slugged your mirror image in the face, would you react now or in the future? Because at certain points in time, it hasn't happened yet. So how would you be reacting to something that hasn't happened yet? >>1110913
|