File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Iapetus flyover as seen by Cassini
>> Anonymous
needs more frames and a whole 360
>> Anonymous
Reminds me of that planet gif last night. Showing how the earth is really small compared to other celestial masses.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>746880

Yeah it's fucking amazing.
>> Anonymous
Wow...the universe is really fucking boring.
>> Anonymous
And to think, even though our planet is but a tiny speck in the cosmos, nobody gives a rat's ass about trying to get off it and explore all that other stuff.

They're more worried about what's on TV.
>> Anonymous
sadly true...
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>746900
Well, it's not like humanity is a happy stable lot. The longer we fester here on Earth the better off the rest of the universe is, I say.
>> Anonymous
>>746889
Someone needs to add XBox to the end of that
>> Anonymous
the thing with us leaving earth and exploring the rest of the galaxy is the fact that outside our ozone layer is a massive field of radiation created by the sun that with mutate/kill anyone who goes through it. thats why we never REALLY went to the moon. they just made it somewhere secret. and theres tons of proof. just watch the videos about the first landing.
>> Anonymous
>>746942

Does your tinfoil hat also protect you from the radiaton?
>> Anonymous
theres no way the aluminum siuts the astronauts were wearing would protect them. you want proof watch this: http://youtube.com/watch?v=wdMvQTNLaUE
>> Anonymous
>>746942
oh for the love of god, sure MAYBE the FIRST moon landing was faked, but we've been there many times after that anyways. And don't forget the GIANT FUCKING SPACE STATION. :D I'm pretty sure if you take a telescope and look in the right place you'll see it.
>> Anonymous
i highly dought we've been to the moon before they modified the space suits. the space station is in space but not out of our ozone layer. theres no way it would survive out there with the sun releasing massive amounts of heat and radiation. itd surely be destoryed and everyone on it dead
>> Anonymous
Apollo... 15 I think it was dropped a hammer and a feather on video and they hit the ground at the same time. We've been to the moon.
>> Anonymous
Oh so those satellites that give us TV and internet and cellphones and everything must be fake too huh? Because surely they'd be destroyed by the sun. You fail!
>> Anonymous
>>746970
>the space station is in space but not out of our ozone layer.

lulz
>> Anonymous
>>746970

Well.
What you have in mind is the "Van Halen Radiation Belt". While it is a pretty strong radiation, it's not able to penetrate the hull of a vessel (mind you, the Astronauts didn't walk to the moon in Spacesuits) And even while they can (in small amount) come into a vessel, the Vessel is not long enough in this Belt, so that the Crew actually is in mortal danger.
The ISS and MIR are not within the limits of the Radiation Belt, so they are NOT inside the radiation, but closer to the earth, where they are safe, and People can live there for longer time...
>> Anonymous
MEGA FAIL for the loser with the tin foil hat. He obviously hasn't heard of the Van Allen radiation belt.
>> Anonymous
>>746992
Win, game over.
>> Anonymous
you know how they got them to hit at the same time. a fuckin vacum sealed room. durr. anyone with a brain knows that. the satilites are real but out ozone layer doesnt end like right of the planet it extends quite a bit. so theres plenty of shit they can fit up there. theres proof all over the damn place. watch the videos you can see shimers off the wires that hold them up as they jump around acting like there no gravity. in the apollo 16 mission an astrounaut gets up using one foot and no help from the other guy. his other foot just kinda dangles there
>> Anonymous
>>746999

i get food in vacuum sealed jars. they do not defy the all powerful force called gravity while in this jar.
>> Anonymous
at the time of the space launch the sun had let a huge gas leak releasing a large ammount of radiation between earth and the moon. so howd they get through that in their little space suits. there wasnt enough sheilding to protect them from it on the space ship or thier suits
>> Anonymous
>>746999

Get your Shift button fixed.
>> Anonymous
vacum sealed jar is different then a vacum sealed room. taking out all the air decreses the gravity but eliminating it. so they both fall but at the same speed just like the video shwos
>> Anonymous
>>746992
>>"Van Halen Radiation Belt"

AHH HAH HAH HAH HAH Whooo "VAN HALEN" RADIATION BELT... AAAAH HA HA HA LOL LOLLOLOOL

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_Belt

...oh lawd.
>> Anonymous
>>747022

Has to be a troll. No one is actually this fucking stupid.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>747026
>> Anonymous
i may be fucking retarded but if you think about it. watch the videos about it. you will notice that there was no way of getting to the moon back then. they only made that video about going to the moon so they could ''beat'' russia to it. cause our government was scared that russia would build a weapons base on it
>> sage
Fag who makes a u-tube video > a collaboration of the greatest scientific minds?

Seriously why is every moon landing conspiratist under the age of 25? Cause they were NEVER THERE. "oh snap, light on the moon is coming from two places at once lolol" They brought their own light up there dumbass.
>> Anonymous
>>747043

Troll harder...
>> bocochoco
Just goes to show how we really ARE more interested on whats on T.V.
>> Anonymous
i never said they had a problem with lighting. i said theyd have a problem ith gettin there through al the radiation with being completly fucking mutated.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>747065
>> bocochoco
     File :-(, x)
Gun warrior after being mutated in belt
>> Anonymous
how about that. you posted pictures making fun of me. what couldnt think of anything else to say that isnt bullshit. theres so much proof they lied about it youd have to be retarded TO beleive it
>> Anonymous
>>747076
Bring proof, that it's all faked.
hilarity ensured!
>> bocochoco
     File :-(, x)
Oh shit our ozone layer is depleted....I FEEL IT!!!! Woh! I got TITS and More hands to play with myself
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>747068
lol hi bro
>> Anonymous
The real question is: who gives a shit?
Regardless of whether the first one was fake or not, we STILL beat the rest of the world there.
Seriously, get the fuck over it.
>> Anonymous
every single video from the missions are fake theres wires that are seen. same imagery for shots that were supposed to be 4kms apart. no blast crater.
>> Anonymous
but there was no point in beating the world there. no one else wanted to go except russia. and america is just afraid of them. the govenrment thought russia was gonna build nuclear base on the moon. so even if we did make it there first that wouldnt stop russia if they were going for a nuclear base
>> Anonymous
>>747084
No, nazi-flying saucers have been there long before.. just look up "Vril" or "Reichsflugscheibe" in google!
>> bocochoco
A camera panned upwards to catch Apollo 16's Lunar Landerlifting off the Moon. Who did the filming?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
i agree with bocochoco. and they footage of the lander as it leaves to return the the shuttle. but the footage is outside the lander. so theres a camera man just floating out into space? i think not
>> bocochoco
Nope WRONG you fail!
The mission left cameras behind after they left the moon. now if this was when the apollo 16 was landing, id question the idea, but it is not.
>> Anonymous
that means they wouldnt get the footage tilll someone returned to the moon. so then how did they get footage of it leaving and still get the film. the lander doesnt carry that mush fuel. but there is still th question of how they got footage of the lander out in space in front of the moon heading back to the shuttle. that would mean a camera man just floated out into space
>> bocochoco
So your trying to say that radio waves were non-existent then?
>> Anonymous
im not saying that. but i am saying that there still isnt a way for them to get a shot of the lander in front of the moon and send that footage to every single t.v. in america. and get the guy back. and the footage went to nasa. so nasa must have some damned good signals to get the footage to america live
>> bocochoco
I seriously cannot stand dumbasses! Nasa Invented that shit!
Go make a fucking T.V. Dinner you ass! Courtesy of NASA!

Every day, in a variety of ways, American lives are touched by space technology. Since 1976, about 1,400 documented NASA inventions have benefited U.S. industry, improved the quality of life and created jobs for Americans. The Apollo program has helped change the way of life in America, especially in health care. Here are some of the inventions contributed by the Apollo program.

Process for bonding dry lubricant to space metals led to the development of surface enhancement coatings, which are used in applications from pizza making to laser manufacture. Each coating is designed to protect specific metal group or group of metals to solve problems encountered under operating conditions.

Digital signal-processing techniques, originally developed to enhance pictures of the Moon for the Apollo Program, are an indispensable part of Computer-Aided Tomography (CAT) scan & Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) technologies used today worldwide.

Vacuum metallizing techniques led to an extensive line of commercial products, from insulated outer garments to packaging for foods & from reflective blankets to photographic reflectors.

Cordless power tools & appliances are one of the most successful commercial spin-offs of space-based technology.
>> Anonymous
And there weren't any cameras on the orbiter, which you keep calling a shuttle for some reason. Also, NASA didn't broadcast the footage, the TV stations had crews working with NASA to get the programming to the people.
>> bocochoco
Cool suits, which kept Apollo astronauts comfortable during moon walks, are today worn by race car drivers, hazardous area workers, & people with specific health problems.

A hollow retroreflector, a mirror-like instrument that reflects light & other radiation back to the source, is used as a sensor to detect the presence of hazardous gases in oil development, chemical plants, waste storage sites & locations where gases could be released into the environment.
>> bocochoco
Athletic shoe design and manufacture also benefited from Apollo. Space suit technology is incorporated into a shoe's external shell. A stress free "blow molding" process adapted from NASA space suit design is also used in the shoe's manufacture.
Freeze-dried food solved the problem of what to feed an astronaut on the long-duration Apollo missions.

Insulation barriers made of aluminum foil laid over a core of propylene or mylar, which protected astronauts and their spacecraft's delicate instruments from radiation, is used to protect cars and trucks and dampen engine and exhaust noise.

Water purification technology used on the Apollo spacecraft is now employed in several spinoff applications to kill bacteria, viruses and algae in community water supply systems and cooling towers. Filters mounted on faucets can reduce lead in water supplies.

Kidney dialysis machines were developed as a result of a NASA developed chemical process that could remove toxic waste from used dialysis fluid.

As a medical CAT scanner searches the human body for tumors or other abnormalities, the industrial version, or advanced computed tomography inspection system, finds imperfections in aerospace structures and components, such as castings, rocket motors and nozzles.

A cardiovascular conditioner developed for astronauts in space led to the development of a physical therapy and athletic development machine used by football teams, sports clinics and medical rehabilitation centers.

A hospital food service system employs a cook/chill concept for serving food. The system allows staff to prepare food well in advance, maintain heat, visual appeal and nutritional value while reducing operating costs.

Your a MORON!
You think it was the stone ages?
>> Anonymous
Sorry, made a typo.

There WERE cameras on the orbiter.
>> Anonymous
we can be benifited by nasa all we want. but the apollo missions half of them were failures. they came to how they are from the loses that happend back then. and with all the porblems they had they made a fake moon landing to keep the hopes up of americans. now im not saying nasa sucks but i am saying apollo missions half of them were fake
>> bocochoco
Thanx ANON the shuttle wasn't invented until 1981 22 years before this assholes mother forgot to shit the nut out of her asshole and concieved him as a stain in her granny panties
>> bocochoco
opinions are like you...highly uneducated.
>> Anonymous
so if there were cameras on the orbiter then why was the lander going the wrong way. half the shit you talked about wasnt that advanced back then. all they had was the basic outline of it. it doesnt matter what they had back then either. there were test with some of the same shit they had and it fucking failed against the test. the stuff they had to protect them from radiation failed when it was put up to the same type of radition on earth. and you still didnt explain why the fucking astronauts had hooked up to them. and what was above them that the wires hooked up to huh. answer me that
>> Anonymous
It's funny how the conspiracy videos were shown on FOX, but you had to have the Discovery Science Channel to watch the debunking (which involved experiments in similar conditions) of the conspiracies.
>> bocochoco
     File :-(, x)
Goddamnit man! WHAT WIRES!@!!!?
Here's what you think!
>> Anonymous
Not to mention the guy who came up with the theories is a fucking cat farmer.
>> Anonymous
still waiting for my answer about the wires
>> Anonymous
You're saying you need actual retrieval of film for a LIVE broadcast? Dude, the VIDEO SIGNAL, not FILM, was being sent live ON A DELAY, like pretty much every electronically sent long distance message, video or otherwise, where it was recorded upon receipt of the signal on Earth. Ever watch a news program where the person on the other end is using a satellite phone, and there's a delay, but they still say "Live from Iraq" or whatever? It's the same thing, and I don't hear you yelling fake about that. And you haven't needed a physical cameraman to automatically move or activate a camera since, oh, the invention of timers and servos.

And about the "wires"? Fuck, the moon landing videos look realler to me than friggin Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, and they used computer graphics to cover that stuff up.

And the stuff about pictures 4 kms apart looking the same? You obviously have not driven 4 kms in the Midwest or near the Rockies. 4 kms doesn't make a whole lot of difference when the scale is so huge.

The fact is, that unless John F. Kennedy himself fucking ATE the billions of dollars that went into the Space Program, there's plenty of physical,legal and economic evidence that the American Space Program legitimately went to the moon.
>> Anonymous
ive seen clip after clip after clip of lighting hitting the wires and the wires shimering. there isnt a need for wires if they were in space
>> Anonymous
>>746900
Canis Majoris

WTF is up with that star..
>> Anonymous
they went to the moon alright. but not in 69. so 4kms apart with the EXACT same imagery and the EXACT same rock rock formations in the EXACT same place. with footage of the 2 different spot with the 2 astronuats holding and moving in the EXACT same spot and place
>> Anonymous
>>747200

It's the Big Dawg.
>> Anonymous
The moon doesn't really have a very varied topography. It's perfectly realistic to assume that different regions of the moon looking remarkably similar, if not almost exactly the same.

I can and have disproved every single anti-moon-mission conspiracy theory there is. Do me a favor and play your own devil's advocate. The best way to find answers is not to try to disprove it, but prove it. Be pro-active.
>> Anonymous
the topography can be the same but how would that explain why 2 different fottages would have them moving the exact same. holding the exact same things.
>> Anonymous
Because many parameters of the missions were the same. That's how you accomplish science experiments, you repeat them to see if things produce the same results. I've seen alot of moon footage, and it's deceptive. Firstly, it's an alien environment. Things like this will distort your perception. Secondly, the suits are pretty much identical. And finally, many of the mission requirements, parameters, and objectives were fairly identical.
>> Anonymous
so an experiment requires an astronaut to move to a place that looks the exact same as before hold the same thing as before step at the time as before and move, jump, slide, stop at the same time as before.
>> Anonymous
>>747204


Yes, when a rock formation or crater can be twice that distance long, things look very similar in the scale of a human.

Ok? How can you guys say the first landing was fake and yet say the next ones not long after were real? Really, how much of an improvement to the suits and orbiters could rectify the van allen belt problem in your mind?

Complete flip-floppage on your parts. the suits and orbiter skins had sufficient protection aagainst radiation for the time spent in space.

And the shit about the cameras on the surface as they were leaving? How dense can one be? They had signal platforms and other various equipment on these missions that could send a signal back to earth... its not very hard in a vaccuum, sorry. Lawl@thinking someone had to be left there and picked back up..

Now on to the gravity. removing air causes less friction on an object so things with more surface area fall quicker than in a vaccuum. If an envirment without air was created on earth, it would not look anything different than on the moon, except faster... so theres no definite proof for you skeptics to use here. Just like with walking, of course if you speed it up it will look like earth gravity.
Also, the video of the dangling effect: you can walk fine on your tip-toes.. not hard, now divide your wieght by six. Not very hard to do push-ups with one pinky is it.. and also why it wasnt hard for the fallen astronaut to get back up; he had 3 forces helping his whole roughly 30 pound mass get up: his foot, his hand, and even the small tap from the helping astronaut. Very simple.
>> Anonymous
>>747245
Well, sorry, not mass, gravtational downforce...
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Moon movement
>> Anonymous
im not sayin the first was fake and the second real. im saying all up until they modiefied evetything was fake. if someone fell down in space and pushed themselves back up why would they come off the ground then be back on. he doesnt even push. the other guy says let me help you then the guy flys up and is back to normal. i highly dought they had equipment that was effiecent enough to withstand all the radiation while up there. plus the radiation was massively intensified by a gas outburst by the sun. so i dought they wouldve had equipment to withstand it. and with as thin as the suits were back then there no way they couldve withstood the intense heat of the sun. because the moon doesnt have an ozone so its able to be hit with direct sun rays and heat up intensly.
>> Anonymous
"Van Halen Radiation Belt"

HAHA! I love you guys.
>> Anonymous
4chan really loves astrology doesn't it?
>> Anonymous
i guess so. atrology and astronomy are good subjects
>> bocochoco
Astrology? You fucking CANCER!
>> Anonymous
>>747278

lern2spell
>> Anonymous
astrology is cool though. nothin wrong with it
>> Anonymous
>>747257
It's called libration.
>> Anonymous
>>747268

Not comprehending that radiation dose depends upon time of exposure, proponents of the Apollo Moon Landing Hoax tend to presume that the Van Allen radiation would kill or incapacitate an astronaut instantly, thus preventing the missions. James Van Allen himself dismissed these ideas. In practice, Apollo astronauts who traveled to the moon spent very little time in the belts and would have received a harmless dose [6]. Nevertheless NASA said that they deliberately timed Apollo launches, and used lunar transfer orbits that only skirted the edge of the belt over the equator to minimize the radiation. Astronauts who visited the moon would probably have a slightly higher risk of cancer during their lifetimes.

Wikipedia. I'm not saying that it is the all-be-all of research, but it is definitely better than opinions and conjectures on this fucking forum.

Maybe you should read this?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_hoax
>> Anonymous
>>747161
>Your a MORON!
>Your a MORON!
>Your a MORON!
>Your
>Your
>> Anonymous
but with the thinness of the space suits the astronuats wouldnt be able to survive on the moon because of the heat from the sun
>> Anonymous
>>747309

Alright buddy we get that he didn't spell it "You're". Nobody cares about grammar on 4chan, except wanna-be perfectionist morons.
>> Anonymous
>>747319
It's "all right," you fucking idiot.
>> Anonymous
>>747313
stoooooop troooooooling
>> Anonymous
So.. Conspiracy man... what about the huge fucking rocket called the Saturn V? What about the people who were launched in them? HMMMMM MAYBE THEY USED TELEpr0TERS
>> bocochoco
Insulation barriers made of aluminum foil laid over a core of propylene or mylar, which protected astronauts and their spacecraft's delicate instruments from radiation, is used to protect cars and trucks and dampen engine and exhaust noise.

AGAIN Your a MORON!
>> Anonymous
>>747313

Hmm.. this thread still exists?
And this trolling wannabe Fox Mulder is still trying to convince us, that there was no moonlanding?

Oh dear...
>> bocochoco
So Sorry "You're" a MORON!
>> bocochoco
It's rather entertaining listening to idiots at times.
Almost like watching retard gifs!
>> Anonymous
>>747366

I just wonder...

These Conspiracy-Guys allways come up with some shit about "OMG THESE TWO SCENERIES LOOK THE SAME!!!!111one LOLOL"
I mean... honestly: on one hand, they tell you it's the biggest hoax, there ever was AND THEN they tell you, the ones making the fake are too dump to make 2 different film-sets to protect the hoax...

(sorry for the spelling, btw... my english is ... very bad)
>> Anonymous
sage
>> Anonymous !sc1ntqMz5E
>>747022
It doesn't git rid of gravity, it just takes away wind resistance. No air = nothing preventing acceleration or hindering it so different weight objects fall at the same speed.
>> Anonymous
This generation is so fucking gullible and stupid it makes me want to shit blood.
>> Anonymous
This generation is so fucking gullible and stupid it makes me want to shit blood.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>747398
seconded. Just because you don't understand scientific fact, doesn't make it not real.

Kids these days..
>> Anonymous
Here's a whole bunch of "fake" pics and "information". retards

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/frame.html