File :-(, x, )
?????????????
>> Anonymous
already been done
>> Anonymous
>>536934
gtfo!
>> Anonymous
face to face with a proton?

You are missing quarks
>> Anonymous
>>536979

whaa? we have not even been able to detect quarks yet.
>> Anonymous
>>536999
we will never be able to detect quarks due to the nature of the strong interaction. Quarks come in the forms of various pairs to form mesons and hadrons but they still exist inside.
>> Anonymous
How does this start from 10 million light years away? It's not like we have a satellite out there, how would we know?
>> Anonymous
>>537191

yes we do, lurk moar
>> Anonymous
this is from powers of ten?
>> Anonymous
>>537145
I enjoy when religion pretends to be science.
>> Anonymous
>>537195
We have a satellite 10 million light years away from Earth? Yeah, sure thing, dumbass.
>> Anonymous
BRACE FOR IMPACT
HUH
WHUT
>> ??????????Anonymous??
>>537208
how does i hubble space telescope

doesn't quite explain OP's pic though
>> Anonymous
needs to be shoop'd
>> Anonymous
eat any good books lately?
>> Anonymous
>>537195
so....how do we have a satellites 10 million light years away when it would take a few million years to travel 1 lightyear with existing technology? And even if we did have one out there, it would take another few million years for the pictures to be received on earth. You realize what a lightyear is right? It's how far light travels in a year, incase you didn't know, light travels pretty fucking fast. The sun is 92,955,820.5 miles from earth, it takes 8 minutes for the light from the sun to travel to earth. There is roughly 525600 minutes in a year. Divided by 8min = 65700 8minute blocks x 92,955,820.5 = 6,107,197,406,850 miles is equal to 1 lightyear. Now, 10 million light years would equal 61,071,974,068,500,000,000 miles. Now, do you think a sattelite could have traveled that far by present technological means? No.
>> Anonymous
>>537213
Doubt any telescope in existence can see 61 quintillion miles away. Also, how does hubblescope shot self? I mean, is there some kind of huge mirror floating around the universe so the galaxies can take pictures of themselves for their myspace?
>> Anonymous
>>537224
Thank you for that Wiki copy and paste.
>> Anonymous
>>537235
I actually spent a good 20 minutes calculating all that shit out, didn't even think about wiki, FUCK.
>> Anonymous
>>537233
we can see most of our galaxy bcoz we r on the outer rim (western spiral arm)
>> Anonymous
>>537233
Have my babies.
>> Anonymous
>>537242
you're a retard
>>537243
If you are actually capable of carrying a child, lets do it.
>> Anonymous
>>537247
ditto
>> Anonymous
>>537242
The set of pictures was accurate, just not real pictures, so you should know how fucking BIG the galaxy is, we wouldnt be able to see it like a whole like that. We wouldnt even be able to see the outline of our own galaxy.
>> Anonymous
ITT a legitimate smart person pwns anon
>> Anonymous
>>537250
never said you could see it all (the core , yes, the all, not a chance) , you certainly couldnt get photos like these from where we are (obviously) but it could all easily be calculated and simulated. you tards are way too literal
>> ??????????Anonymous??
>>537233
>how does hubblescope shot self?

I lol'd. Let's just say NASA has some pretty damn good shoopers.
>> ??????????Anonymous??
>>537256
>way too literal

Right, because being literal isn't important to science. Let's just assume the world is run by tiny pink transvestite leprechauns.
>> Anonymous
>>537258
haha right, lets ignore all the little details, like they matter. ammirite?
>> Anonymous
>>537247
hell teach em a lesson in life, who cares weather they can carry them as long they get reemed
>> Anonymous
>>537224
>>537233
Thank you.

And to the idiot who suggested Hubble Space Telescope. It's in Earth's orbit, dumbass.
>> Anonymous
I enjoyed schooling the retards in this thread. Also, why don't we have a /sc/ience board? I could discuss spacey shit all day.
>> Anonymous
>>537277
OHSHI- I guess we do on text board, but I demand image.
>> Anonymous
>>537145

>hadrons

I read that as "hardons"
>> Anonymous
>>537145
Lolz that nigga said hardon