File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Anyone have sauce??
>> Anonymous
Bags of Water #5
>> Anonymous
>>568219

Titties: Do you has it?
>> Anonymous
Boobies mutha fucka, do you see it!?
>> Anonymous
izzat sum lemon pepper chikin?

nomnomnomnomnom
>> Anonymous
breasts are for feeding babies
>> Anonymous
>>568416
Zoologists point out that no female mammal other than the human has breasts of comparable size when not lactating and that humans are the only primate that have permanently swollen breasts. This suggests that the external form of the breasts is connected to factors other than lactation alone.

One theory is based around the fact that, unlike nearly all other primates, human females do not display clear, physical signs of ovulation. This could have plausibly resulted in human males evolving to respond to more subtle signs of ovulation. During ovulation, the increased estrogen present in the female body results in a slight swelling of the breasts, which then males could have evolved to find attractive. In response, there would be evolutionary pressures that would favor females with more swollen breasts who would, in a manner of speaking, appear to males to be the most likely to be ovulating.

Some zoologists (notably Desmond Morris) believe that the shape of female breasts evolved as a frontal counterpart to that of the buttocks, the reason being that whilst other primates mate in the rear-entry position, humans are more likely to successfully copulate mating face on. A secondary sexual characteristic on a woman’s chest would have encouraged this in more primitive incarnations of the human race, and a face on encounter may have helped found a relationship between partners beyond merely a sexual one.[6]
>> Anonymous
sause
>> Anonymous
>>568417
That's a hypothesis with sound reasoning.
Breasts are still for feeding babies.
>> Anonymous
>>568426
Yes, but they do other things as well, was the point.

It's like saying "Dicks are for peeing."
>> Anonymous
>>568429
I never said they didn't. But their primary role is breastfeeding, and the rest is debatable.

From the same wiki page you sourced
>"Alternatively, one theory states that the human breast evolved in order to prevent infants from suffocating while feeding. Since human infants do not have a protruding jaw like human evolutionary ancestors and other primates, the infant’s nose might be blocked by a flat female chest while feeding. According to this theory, as the human jaw receded, the breasts became larger to compensate."

It's primarily western culture that has placed such high value on the female breast.

They likely are an indicator for fertility and high femininity though.
>> Anonymous
>>568433
Stfu, tits or gtfo!
>> Anonymous
>>568417
More likely it's because humans have such shitty eyesight that they needed a signifier of femininity at a distance so they wouldn't run a mile over snakes and lions and bears to get some fuck only to find a dude when they get to their destination.
>> Anonymous
>>568219
wtf, just shut up and give some sauce or rapidshare it damn!
>> Anonymous
>>568476
Humans actually have pretty good eyesight compared to most mammals. Primates have pretty high visual acuity, most mammals are more scent oriented. I know birds have better eyesight than people but off the top of my head I can not think of any other animals that do.
>> Anonymous
>>568861


well, wether animals, such as dogs or cats, have better sight or not than humans depends entirely on the view you are speaking from. for example a human has rods and cones, receptor cells for intesity and then each colour, the rods are the intensity, and take up less space, and near the edge of our vision we have more rods than cones giving us acuter vision in the corner of our vision, but with less colour. (which is why things moving at teh edge of yoru sight catches your attention.

now, dogs and cats, have rods and cones covering only green and blue, not red like we do (birds see 4, red, green, blue and ultra violet, which may be where you heard of them seeing better) but, dogs and cats due to having one less variety of light receptor in thier eyes, have a highe concentration of rods, and thus over all they have sharper vision. just in less colours.

as i said, depends on which you value more, colour channels, or sharpness.

(cue rod jokes and flaming)
>> Anonymous
tits or gtfo 30 yr old faggot