File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Moar.
>> Anonymous
how...
does someone get hit by a train
>> Anonymous
>>233871
S/He was playing chicken and lost...
>> Captionless Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Deaf girl
>> Anonymous
this that train had hit a kitten, this thread would have 50+ replies by now
>> Better Than You
Kids are stupid. I'm glad she got hit.
>> Anonymous
so she died?
that would kill anyone

i blame the guy with him/her.......
>> Anonymous
SPOILERS: It's fake
>> Burny
Oy. Not this again. It's NOT FAKE, and it's NOT A KID. It's a fully grown woman, and the tape is from a camera that was set up to get footage of trains for a railroad crossing safety video. And yes, of course she fucking died.

Does Anonymous ever get tired of being retarded?
>> Anonymous
SPOILERS: /r/ MOAR STUPID DEATHS
>> Anonymous
Fake. The girl would have been pulled under the train.

As for "the tape is from a camera that was set up to get footage for of trains for a railroad crossing safety video"... Set up? The camera MOVES. It's in someone's HANDS.
>> Anonymous
>>233950

Its not fake, you twit. The camera was setup, by a guy, shooting a train safety video. Ofcourse it pans, the guy was going to follow the train as it passed, the woman getting hit was just coincidence, just like a thousand other things people happen to catch on video.

Shit happens.
>> Anonymous
watch the first Banned from Television. The noise was bad. Sounded like someone dropped a full icechest.
>> Anonymous
>>233964
thats not a pan, asshole, it shakes too much.
>> Anonymous
>>233989
actually, it's going fairly smooth until the girl gets hit, when it probably shakes because the guy saw a fucking girl get creamed by a train and had her body fly right at him

>>233950
The girl would have been pulled under the train? Are you retarded? What possible evidence do you have for that? I would expect that a massive object colliding with ANYTHING at those speeds would send it flying, exp. since it was a glancing hit. The only way it could possibly drag her under was if she got caught under a wheel, and ever then it would probably just tear her leg off and send the rest of her body flying forward.
>> Anonymous
The front of those trains are designed to knock shit out of the way. The last thing you want is for something to go under a train and make the wheels jump the track, derailments are no fun.

Ever seen a picture of a dog or a sheep or something hanging from a telphone wire or power lines? Thats how they got up there, they were knocked flying through the air.
>> anonymous
What actually happened was the guy with the camera was there (i don't know what for) And the train crossing lights and noises were going but people thought it was because of the train parked at the station so a group of people crossed earlier and the girl and the guy ran up to the track a little while after the group. The reason she got hit outside of being a dumbass was because the noise of a moving object like a train is largly carried behind it so she didn't hear it until it was to late.
>> Anonymous
>>234004

Um, no. Last I heard, trains don't break the sound barrier. Plus there were all these nice fancy flashing lights, and anyone who spent half a second to check and see IF THERE REALLY WAS A TRAIN COMING would have seen it. She was just a fucking dumbass.
>> Anonymous
am I the only person to notice that the train isnt even running on its tracks on this gif?

FAKE
>> Anonymous
wow, blind AND retarded. Look again
>> Anonymous
>>234031
Retard.
>> Anonymous
she also failed to notice the rails vibrating like crazy as they do whenever a high speed train is coming?
>> Anonymous
>>234047
People do stupid shit. Stop trying to have faith in humanity.
>> Anonymous
>>234024
well there's the doppler effect...
>> Anonymous
Look again. Most likely fake. I've seen the real thing happen at a young age, it happened to an old lady. She didn't go like that, she was basically splattered.
>> Anonymous
>>234071
It's real. I saw this video on a worlds scariest videos type show. However, they did cut it off on the show just as the train hits her... so if any part is fake it's the part after the train hits her. But all leading up to that is real, and they even said on the show she died.
>> Anonymous
>>234031

fucking retard
>> Anonymous
i recall seeing the video school or something, honestly i think its fake too. more of that random faces of death shit.
>> Anonymous
>>234071
How can you not realize the difference between something fake and a real one? Oh, that's because you're a retard.
>> Anonymous
ahh me being retarded, that it. it all falls into place now, thanks for enlightening me. Pasta shitz...
>> Anti-Anonymous
It's fake... holy fuck, it's been disputed on 4chan every month for the past 2 years you fucking nubs.
>> Fried Fish
Is not. It was on this train wrecks thing I was watching. Only they didn't show the part where she got hit, just up to before the train actually struck her.
>> Anonymous
I saw this many years ago. It's real, stfu bitches and go suck a horse cock.
>> Anonymous
THE WORLD MAY NEVER KNOW
>> /b/ !4Chan8IW0E
real
>> Fiend-kun
Then world may indeed never know, or it's just that some stuck up ignorant people may never accept it when something they see goes against a bunch of 'definate' theories of something they've never actually seen happen in real life before.

You've got to be some sort of idiots who just have to question everything. Whta, do you take philosophy in uni or something?

There are no rules for getting hit by a train. If there were, there it is, right there. That is what it is like. Are there no such aspects as variables in your theories? When you see a person getting hit by a car, do you ever tell them that they did it wrong?

Real footage. Don't be a stubborn shite.
>> Anti-Anonymous
>>234139
>>234140
>>234163
EVERYTHING YOU SEE ON TV IS REAL
>> Anonymous
Burlington Northern (now Burlington Northern Santa Fe) logo on the train. (white B shape with a green N in the middle)

That means two things: It's a freight train (as BN is only freight), and it's in the US.

While trains can reach 70mph (or more) in the countryside, US law requires them (or at least frieght trains) to go painfully slow while within city limits. I forget the exact number, but you could probably sprint faster.

This is in a city, as you can see the huge ass building in the background, and there are pedestrians walking on both sides of the tracks (and the one guy is in a business suit and carrying a briefcase).

So this happened in a highly populated business center.

So, the train was going far too fucking fast for where it was. Not enough evidence to definetly say 'fake', but strongly supports it.
>> Anonymous
#2: The guy in the business suit does not react to the lady being hit. He just calmly walks away.

While trains are frickin loud and cause lots of ground vibration, it would be highly unlikely he could miss the 'splat' not 3 feet from him.

As well, the pedestrians waiting didn't react to the people trying to beat the train, or even the impact. One lady took one calm step back, and didn't react at all even though she was looking right at the impact.

If the cameraman reacts, the others should have as well. A hand going up to a mouth, a dropped bag or briefcase, a fast turn of the head, SOMETHING!
>> Anonymous
#3: A train going at that speed would have splattered her like a water balloon. Even assuming somehow her body held together AND stayed in one piece, there would have been wounds. Yet no blood on the body as it is rolling on the ground (her wrists are still perfectly white).

Add in the body rolls in a perfectly straight line. Being thrown to the ground with that force should have bounced her into the air at least a few feet.

4: Story is bogus. 'filming safety film when this happened'.

Picture quality is of a camcorder bought a Wal-mart. While that could be explained by a high-school teacher doing something on his own time, that is another 'unlikely coincidence' to add to the pile.

And then the camera is shaking WHILE PANNING and BEFORE SHE GOT HIT. So, no tripod. Again, anything done in an 'official' capacity would have had someone with the basic tools to actually do the job.

This was a home camcorder held by hand.


Now for counter arguement for 'OMG I saw it on this Reality TV Show, it must be true!'

The 'fact checking' departments for these shows (if they even have one) are not the frickin FBI. Basically, as long as it's convincing enough to give the audience goosebumps on first view, then it's good enough.

They have been fooled before, but it doesn't hurt their bottom line so it's no big deal to them.
>> Anonymous
If it was fake or not, ill like to point out the body did not go any faster then the train prior to contact which supports the "real" argument. The body would not explode in this case because it wasnt a face on impact, IE standing right infront of the thing. In this case the person got hit on the side of the train. Not sure about how it works in the US, but urban trains in UK go over 30Mph which is well enough to be fatal. A 30Mph flat on hit will cause a body to splat. This is very common on the London Underground trains which is litterally a flat front.
>> Fiend-kun
The carriages look a hell of a lot like the double-decker passenger type. Maybe the engine was called out for a different purpose than usual; passenger work. Maybe that's just what they do in that part of the country.

You don't know unless you made the film.

You can never understand 100% of any given situation.

Getting hit by a train has no rules. You can't predict an individual's reactions to something that happens in a fraction of a second.

If you were going to fake something of this type, wouldn't you have made it a bit more spectacular and splattery anyway?

Also this footage has been around since the 90's. How would a person with a camera bought 'from Wal-Mart' make such a film, and why? What technology? Why endanger actors by getting them that close? How would you get permission? Wouldn't you have used a better camera? Surely if you can afford to pull off such a stunt wouldn't you have used a more decent camera?
>> Anonymous
the guy looks painfully shopped on frame 59. i call for fake.