File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Would it have been too much trouble, considering the size of their bankroll, to put a few CGI whizzes together to come up with a better Galactus for the Fantastic Four sequel?

Instead we get a cloud of fucking smoke.
>> Anonymous
Can't have a giant alien man in a comic book movie. That would be unrealistic.
>> Anonymous
What a total fucking copout that was. I waited to see the movie until I heard if they did a good Galactus...needless to say I did not go.
>> Anonymous
The way Galactus looked in MAU was perfect, shame they didn't go with that or a similar design.
>> Anonymous
I fail to see what's wrong with the design in the gif, it doesn't look ridiculous at all.
>> Anonymous
Yeah it was bullshit... I was pissed.
>> Anonymous
look more closely, there were hints of Galactus within the cloud.
>> Anonymous
>>783662
Nothign is wrong with the gif at all, they are referring to the Fantastic Four sequel. They didn't show him at all, it was literally just a big cloud of smoke and nothing more.

Oh yeah, and a shadow lulz.
>> Anonymous
They could have done a lot of interesting things with Galactus, considering he is not really just a giant humanoid but rather an incomprehensible godlike being that appears to be a titan of similar proportions to the race of the individual perceiving it. They could have made him some powerful, vaguely human shaped phantasmal being and I would still have been somewhat satisfied. But a completely nondescript black cloud was some major bullshit.
>> Anonymous
>>783689
We could make him a bunch of bugs. How 'bout that?
>> Anonymous
>>783695
They should have just replaced the Silver Surfer with Deadpool. Replacing Phoenix with Deadpool would have also saved X-men 3. Replace Rico with Deadpool in Judge Dredd and the movie would have been a thousand times better too (Although I think back then, Deadpools serial had just started). If instead of gimped un-monstery blackheart, Ghostrider could have had Deadpool instead and been way more awesome. The new Iron Man movie? It too could use Deadpool.
>> Anonymous
He'll be in the Surfer spin-off movie.
>> Anonymous
>>783701
As a giant cloud?
>> Anonymous
How about if hes a big gaseous mass next time?
>> Anonymous
Surfer blowing himself up with Glactus at the end was such bullshit
>> Anonymous
>>783698
I'd just suggest a Deadpool movie...but I'm afraid because I know it'd get completely botched.
>> Anonymous
>>783718
Even Deadpool comics didn't go over well. Deadpool doesn't do so well as a main character, he seems to be better off as a cameo in other settings that appears solely to fuck everything up unimaginably so. I personally really liked his original serial, although his appearances in other comics are the ones that are typically awesome.
>> Anonymous
>>783718

Ninja SpiderMan movie would be AWESOME!!!
>> Anonymous
>>783698

how 'bout they just not have made any Fantastic Four movies, and stopped making X-Men after 2
>> Anonymous
You know, his arrogant arsehattery aside, Ryan Reynolds might be a good choice to play Deadpool.
>> Anonymous
Marvel Zombies the Movie
>> Anonymous
>>783741
I think Reynolds' arrogant arsehattery is perfect for Deadpool.
>> Anonymous
>>783739

God the third one sucked...can't believe it got such great reviews.

X2 was the best of the trilogy.

X1 almost destroyed the comics what with Marvel trying to make the comics more like the movie as to appeal to slew of fucking noobs.
>> Anonymous
>>783746
The reason is David Hayter, voice actor of MGS series' Solid Snake, wrote the first two movies. For unexplained reasons, they kicked him out the door when they wanted to do number three then they got the guy who directed the Rush Hour movies for extra suck. I remember Hayter saying he had already started to write a script for three when they gave him the boot.

Who gives Solid Snake the boot? Faggots, that's who.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
you kno who I think needs to be in a movie?
>> Anonymous
>>783756
Thanos, Galactus, and apocalypse all in one movie. Whoever wins, we get om nom nom nomed.
>> Anonymous
>>783756

Yup!
>> Anonymous
>>783746
Most comic movies stray from their source material, I can only think of a couple at the moment that stayed really close, that being Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.

>>783756
Agreed.
>> Anonymous
>>783762

Wolverine comes in and pwns em all.
>> Anonymous
>>783768
But Deadpool's beaten Wolverine before. OH GOD PIME TARADOX.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
or how about?
>> Anonymous
>>783767

Oh yeah, absolutely. Sometimes it's good, most of the time it's bad.

It's when those changes are carried on over to the original source is when I find it unacceptable.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Iron Man looks to be pretty awesome btw.
>> Anonymous
>>783769
And Wolvie has beaten Deadpool before, too.
>> Anonymous
>>783768
>>783769
>>783784

Wolverine is not nearly as broken as Cable. They should just get it over with and rename him Jesus.
>> Anonymous
>>783783
That it does.
>> Anonymous
>>783767
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles was so awesome.
>> Anonymous
>>783577
Do you have any idea how ridiculously silly a CGI attempt at Galactus would look? Unless they lost the giant thing on his head and made him look nothing like the Comic Book version it'd never work or else the entire theather would be erupting with laughter.
>> Anonymous
>>783789
It's not like they wouldn't take liberties with the design, it's just that I don't think anybody wants Galactus to have his personality stripped from him.
>> Anonymous
>>783789

Ultimate Alliance made him look pretty badass. Also, comic book movies are fucking silly to begin with. Its something you just accept.
>> Anonymous
>>783789
What's the point of making comic book movies if you aren't making them with COMIC BOOK FANS in mind?
>> SpazZuchan
Actualy they're going with the Ultimate Continuity for Galactus. He's not a cloud, or gas, or smoke, but helooks like it from far away. What Galactus is in the Ultimate series, is trillions of smaller robotic workers that systematicaly dissaemble a plant, stripe it of it's resourses, then use them to build even more of thier tiny robot-kinds. So Galactus essentialy 'eats' the planet
>> Anonymous
>>783789
I would think that most people in the theatre would be fans, and rather than laughing they would be busting in their pants.
>> Anonymous
>>783797
Did you see the movie? He was a fucking cloud, he wasn't a plethora of smaller, but still huge robots... He was an alien cloud.
>> Anonymous
>>783762
One of these things is not like the other
One of these things just doesn't belongggg
>> Anonymous
>>783762
Thanos and Galactus are aliens, Apocalypse is just a really old mutant.
>> Anonymous
>>783804
MICROSCOPIC
>> Anonymous
>>783831
Wrong. If you had real the Ultimate Galactus books you would know that he wasn't made of microscopic robots. He was made up of a bunch of massive robots.
>> Anonymous
>>783831
>>783833
Yeah, dipshit
>> Anonymous
Wasn't Thanos born an Eternal on Titan or something? Making him technically human?
>> Anonymous
The reason why they made Galactus into a giant mass of clouds was that they were told by 20th Century Fox to not make him humanoid. The CGI people had no choice.

Anything as to why the studio execs would do that, I don't know. Maybe they didn't get the rights to his true image or some dumb shit.
>> Anonymous
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galactus#Movies
>> Anonymous
Yes, they could have done something much better. However I didn't bother going to see it because I felt the first movie was terrible enough on its own that I need not subject myself to an equally lack luster sequel.
>> Anonymous
>>783840
No way, Thanos is certainly not homosapien.
>> Anonymous
>>783840
Also, Thanos is from one of Saturn's moons, which by definition, makes him extraterrestrial alien.
>> Anonymous
ok i must put my two cents..in...refer to INfinity Wars/gauntlet...Galactus is one of the Eternal beings...not machine...he is a immortal...(a god)...well as immortal as the others i suppose...such as the watcher...and others who exist and have a purpose on different planes of demensions...dunno what his purpose is tho...however he has takin some already bad ass people and gave them even more potent powers.
>> Anonymous
>>783840
Titan, i think. Still an alien, so not human. either way, he pwnd everyone when he had the Infinity Gauntlet.
>> Anonymous
but thanos almost put an end to all of that shit with the infinity gauntlet...all of the (gods)...such as the guy with 3 eyes...forgot his name but he's supposed to be the baddest one...and the one who is actually the whol universe
>> Anonymous
>>783884
He is the only one to survive the universe before this one. He was born with Eternity and Death, he considers them his siblings. His purpose, he brings balance to the universe. They killed him once and all hell broke lose, Abraxas was let loose. Then they were all like, "Nah we like Galactus better, lets revive him." And so they did.
>> Anonymous
>>783885
Yup, it's Titan. I couldn't remember it's friggin' name. Today is new comic day! Right on.
>> Anonymous
>>783882

Yeah, and my pet Rex is a canine dog you FUCKING MORON
>> Anonymous
Physical appearance

Although Galactus is usually illustrated as a giant, armoured humanoid, each species perceives Galactus in a form resembling its own. [24] As a being who is both an abstract entity (e.g. Death, Eternity, et al) and a physical creature, Galactus' true form and nature are beyond the capability of mortal beings to comprehend. He has, however, adopted the appearance of a roughly humanoid energy being on at least three occasions. [47]
>> Anonymous
>>783793
yeah, but that's a game quality engine, I think it would take more to make him a bit more real and as much 3D
>> Anonymous
>>783892

According to the alternate reality of Earth X (out of continuity) Galactus' main purpose, or cause, is to extinguish the Celestial Seeds (baby Celestials) that grow within Celestially enhanced worlds (the reason Earth has super-heroes and mutants etc) thus serving the greater good.
>> Anonymous
>>783903
Huh?
>> Anonymous
>>783903
I guess you don't realize that canine, like extraterrestrial, is a vague and non specific term... Idiot.
>> Anonymous
the reason galactus was a cloud in the movie is the director of fantastic four 3 is a bitch and he said he would never direct a movie with a "giant robot" in it and galactus be that or somewhat that or whatever he be, he was close enough for the director to bitch and get him changed, so yea that is why
>> Anonymous
They could have at least had his massive orb ship seen within the cloud.

Yeah, I know his silhouette was seen, but that's not enough.
>> Anonymous
[CO] is leaking into [GIF]

I'm completely fine with that.
>> AnonyMouse
>>783577
Personaly i liked the whole cloud like entity thing, it made more sence than a giant pink guy that sucks off planets... The cloud is a living thinking entity that surrounds and devours a planet before moving on, i think it was good (How ever the ending was shit! >_< Silver Serfer copout, no way could he take down Galactus on his own)
>>783756
and Agree'd
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
i was also pissed off about this the guy fails big time for taking him out. I mean look how cute he is
>> Rooster
>>783993

Yeah that would be all as well, except the fact the director asshole tampered with the source material by not making Galactus's appearance as he should be. His hatred for giant robots be damned. Stick with the comics, the movie is more likely to be better.

An example of a comic book movie gone wrong = X-Men 2 and the 3rd film Last Stand...when you start taking too much liberties and begin to alter stuff not even in the original source material it makes for a bad association for those that are fans among the comic book base...And considering it's a movie based ON a Comic book, there is a hell of alot of people IN this fan base in particular.