File :-(, x, )
Magic the Gathering based cards Kranchan
Post your Magic the Gathering based cards here!
>> Anonymous
The correct term for a creature destroyed in a way it cannot be regenerated from is "bury"
>> Anonymous
>>338870
maybe a million years ago.
>> Anonymous
>>338882
QFT.

Bury is the old school version for modern Magic's destroy + can't be regenerated.
>> Anonymous
>>338870
>>338924
"Bury" is no longer the "correct" term as it is now obsolete. It's now referred to "Destroy the creature. It can't be regenerated."

Bury has been obsolete for quite a long while now. Where have you been?
>> Speedycat !pitV0nGrEw
     File :-(, x)
>>338862
Wait...they use letters instead of symbols in the casting cost now? OMGWTF!?
>> Anonymous
dont worry No.338870 its like "he's not moving any more" they called it "dead" along time ago...lol
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Here's one, I have to look for more
>> Anonymous
>>339113

Even now, that card has outdated terminology. It would now be type "Enchantment -- Aura" and have the ability "Enchant creature" above the effect.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
is dis dah magics
>> Anonymous
Original content from http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/40282061/
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Original content from http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/40282061/
>> the1
someone needs to make one of waha.
>> Anonymous
>>339127

Enchantment-Aura and Enchant Creature are 2 different things, nucake.
>> GenocideHeart !hh2xn6PX/U
>>339352

When was the last time you played Magic, kid? Get some Ravnica cards. They decided that ALL "Enchant *something*" cards are now Enchantment-Aura's. The text in the card now specifies what they enchant, be it creature, artifact, land or players.

It's part of Wizards's plan to replace all abilities and mechanics with keywords, apparently. Can't say I approve, but that's how things are, and errata's in Oracle reflect this now.

In conclusion, try doing a little research before typing such nonsense.
>> Anonymous
>>339361

Still, it would utterly disrupt the rules to say they are the same; as some things only affect Auras, yet not Enchant Creatures/Lands/etc, and vice versa.

They are not the same, just Enchant Creature/Land/etc. has been knocked off and replaced. They are still seperate things and subject to seperate rules.
>> Anonymous
Forgot to add: In conclusion, don't be a nubcake.
>> GenocideHeart !hh2xn6PX/U
>>339365

Actually, Oracle errata's have been issued to address that point. That's the whole reason why Auras have a little line saying 'Enchant Creature' or 'Enchant Land' or whatever in their textboxes - because they STILL count as the old types so as not to render stuff like Crown of the Ages unusable.

So they pretty much DO count as the same. I should know, I routinely enter DCI sanctioned tournaments. All old Enchant *something* type spells have been errata'd to count as Aura's.

Nice seeing that you actually are up to date instead of running your mouth pointlessly like so many n00bs around here do, anyway. Even if your point was not entirely accurate.
>> Anonymous
>>339367

Well then I never recieved the memo >_>

Sorry for the pointless debate.