>> |
Anonymous
>>1062617
I will not dispute the logistics of what you said; better to euthanize a diseased, potentially dangerous animal that may go on to injure an innocent than let it roam wild.
But, it's the manner in which it was carried out that's dispicable. An overdose of morphine--a relatively small amount for such a puppy, surely on hand at military sites--would be fine, working quickly and painlessly. Even a gunshot from behind would be instantaneous. But, the result here is a matter of taking pleasure in another animal's suffering, not simply damage control and pragmaticism.
To the man responsible, may such things not only occur to him, but more importantly, to the people he loves most. Now, that'd be something worth spectating. Do you have a preference for your mother/wife, soldier? I can offer either gentle passage to eternal sleep through medicine, or tortuous pain through Mancuerda.
Why so quick to answer?
|