File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
/r/ ubercute japan

pic unrelated
>> Anonymous
omfg hypercube
>> Anonymous
It isn't a hypercube you idiot. Hypercubes never leave the the perimeter of the cube it's in.

STFU and GTFO
>> WiiTard
>>643998
please, explain this further.
>> Anonymous
>>643726
>>644001
same newfag
>> Anonymous
That would be a tesseract.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesseract
>> Anonymous
that .gif thing is possible. entirely. but motorizing it would need to be in the little orbs and the lines would have to be bungee cords that wouldnt shink less than they have to be.
>> WiiTard
>>644004
INCORRECT
>>644005
>The tesseract is the four-dimensional hypercube or 4-cube
(quoted from wiki)
But I understand what you mean though, a cube's projection onto a 2-dimentional plane isn't a cube. However, if such a projection is seen, especially if it is rotating, people will agree that there is a cube creating the projection.
For all purposes, when someone says that a tesseract is a hypercube, it doesn't mean that the projection is in fact the hypercube, it means that the projection is representing a hypercube.
>> Anonymous
>>644001
The OP is, in some shape or form, the depiction of a tesseract, which is a type of hypercube.

A hypercube can be ANY sort of shape with n-dimensions. n=1 gives us a point. n=2 is a line. n=3 is a standard cube. n=4 is where is starts to get interesting ...
>> Anonymous
WHY IS THIS THREAD HAPPENING?
>> WiiTard
>>644021
are you saying that a hypercube can be more than just 4 dimentions?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>644030
Yes, that's what I'm getting at. It's actually a label for classifying a group of objects. Presumedly, there's no such thing as a n=0 and lower Hypercube but that may only be a product of our math not being efficient enough to represent such a hypothetical shape.

There was a time a long time ago when I thought that you couldn't count lower than zero ...
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>643403
Heh, I remember when I first posted this here AGES ago..
Here's moar
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
and moar
>> WiiTard
>>644077
gotcha.
Don't worry, I already knew that there could exist hypercubes above 4 dimensions, but I didn't think any "cubelike" above 3 dimensions is called a hypercube--thought that only 4 dimensions was called that.
either way, thanks. I'll be using the word tesseract from now on instead of just hypercube.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
moar!