File :-(, x, )
Drug test Anonymous
excuse me in advance for posting here if it's the wrong place--nothing else I felt would fit the definition, and this has to do with health, so I'm giving it a shot.

I recently got hired to a job and go in on Wednesday to get my schedule. My manager also mentioned that I have to, at some point, go and get a drug test done at "corporate." The last time I did it was on Friday, so around 48 hours ago. On Wednesday, it'll be 5 days. I can almost guarantee that it won't be until at least a week after my last time, but I want to be safe.

I've been drinking a lot of water, but other than that, I'm not sure what I can do. I have no problem spending money on something that will help me out, so I'm not restricted to only household items. What can I do?

Thanks
>> Anonymous
1) Build time machine
2) Steal pot from past self
3) stash until after test
4) ?????
5) PROFIT!
>> Anonymous
just exercise and drink a ton of water, piss a lot.
>> Anonymous
OP here...would it be worthwhile to invest in a personal @ home drug test?
>> Anonymous
The best way I've found to pass a drug test is....DON'T DO DRUGS DIPSHIT.


That being said, yes, drink, drink, drink. Pissing, sweating, and pissing some more will do it. My friend got a job at home depot, passing the drug test just 3 days after burning. He just drank gallons and gallons every day...
>> Anonymous
bump
>> Anonymous
>>59466
>>DON'T DO DRUGS

The fact that irrational people call the shots over our society's drug phobia and relevant political policies, doesn't mean this advice is of any value.
>> Anonymous
>>59576
>drug phobia
It's not a phobia, we just think all of you fucking potheads and junkies are morons who need a better, more fulfilling and challenging hobby than sitting in a circle smoking shit because it makes your head feel funny. As it stands, you are worthless. FOAD.
>> Anonymous
>>59638

Thank you for demonstrating what I meant by irrational.
>> Anonymous
Drugs aren't really worth it, but yeah, run alot, drin of water and TEA. Tea is the ultimate piss drink. Whenever I drink it, i have to go about 5 minutes later.
>> Anonymous
>>59644
What I said was totally rational. Only in your demented fucking detached from the world mentality is what I said irrational. You just wish that what I said didn't make sense, even though it did.

Denial.
>> Guil
>>59638
>FOAD
Quit using this, it's stupid. You kids and your new abbreviations. In my day we had GTFO and we liked it.

>>59644
You're right, all drugs should be legal. I'd like to see more overdosed people dead, from the drugs themselves or from the stupid shit they do while on them. World is overpopulated as it is
>> Anonymous
>>59661

Nope.

Your petty, insignificant grudge against any group of people does not justify the War on Drugs. Nothing, in fact, justifies this egregious assault on the civil liberties of millions of Americans. Don't care for mind-altering substances? Fine -- nobody is forcing you to do them.
>> Anonymous
>>59665
Actually Guil, it's only me, your personal hate machine that uses FOAD. It's how you can tell me apart from other anonymous. I'm just full of rage man. Roid rage.

Also, you still don't know shit, but I agree with your drug stance. Fucking junkies.
>> Anonymous
>>59665
>>overdosed

Assuming this thread is specifically about pot, then you're a fucking idiot for even bringing up this word.
>> Guil
>>59679
Can't handle 14 posts? What's the matter too DEEP for you?

By the way the door was opened when talk of society's stance on drugs was brought up rather than arguments for marijuana.
>> Anonymous
>>59673
>petty
lol, you're right, I am being petty, but at least I don't say the following phrase and hope it makes sense...
>insignificant grudge against any group of people does not justify the War on Drugs
lol wut? First of all, strawman. Second of all, in what way is my 'grudge' 'insignificant?' You lost me on that one.

>Don't care for mind-altering substances? Fine -- nobody is forcing you to do them.
And what about forcing me to live with you knucklehead mouth-breathers around me? Do I get a choice in that? How about whenever one of you dipshits get so delusional you put other people in harms way? That is irresponsible - I don't care if you think you have great self-control while on anything, you are being irresponsible by imbibing WHILE knowing that you may make shit decisions. Same goes for alcohol.

Don't give me this "Oh but ____ is safer than alcohol." I don't drink either. I prefer being sober and enjoying reality rather than confusing my senses to distract me from the possibility that I am too intellectually lazy to create entertainment.

I don't think the solution is as simple as prohibition. I think drug use should carry the death penalty.
>> Anonymous
>>59705
Super. I think being a holier than thou douchebag should carry the death penalty.
>> Anonymous
>>59705
>>lol wut? First of all, strawman. Second of all, in what way is my 'grudge' 'insignificant?' You lost me on that one.

All your argument boils down to is, "I hate drug users. Jail them." There is no actual reasoning behind any of it -- that's what makes it insignificant in the arena of reasonable debate.

This is the political equivalent of superstition, and the fact that this is pretty much the driving force of our national drug policy opens all kinds of ugly cans of worms, not least of which being that the government has been able to get away with blatantly disregarding the Constitution.

>>Don't give me this "Oh but ____ is safer than alcohol."

I don't get suckered into that area anyway, because it's irrelevant to the real issue at stake, that being a government that is clearly overstepping its bounds without just cause.
>> Anonymous
>>59719
Jeez man, you think drugs should carry the death penalty because someone under the influence might make a bad decision and harm others? What about stupid people? they make bad decisions all the time! Should we kill them too? Politicians? What about people who are simply ill-informed?
>> Anonymous
>>59724
Stupid people don't choose to be stupid. Drug users choose to make themselves prone to the bad decisions willingly.

>>>59719All your argument boils down to is, "I hate drug users. Jail them."
Is that all you can do? Paraphrasing so you can 'knock down' yet another argument I never made?

Here is something you can quote me on: Drug users don't want a relaxation on drug laws for liberalization, they want justification for their irresponsible and base habit.
>> Moonmauler
>>59705
Drug use should carry the death penalty? There goes 90% of the North American population.
>> Anonymous
>>59744
You say that almost like that's a bad thing...
>> Moonmauler
>>59732
>Stupid people don't choose to be stupid. Drug users choose to make themselves prone to the bad decisions willingly.

You logic makes no sense.
Are drug users stupid?
>> Moonmauler
>>59745
I didn't intend to.
>> Anonymous
>>59732
>>Stupid people don't choose to be stupid. Drug users choose to make themselves prone to the bad decisions willingly.

One can also be a drug user and keep it in moderation, and live a successful and crime-free life. In fact, I would argue that is the norm -- whilst you only hear about the exceptional cases in the news and in the media. Those are, after all, the ones sensational enough to make it in the news.

>>Here is something you can quote me on: Drug users don't want a relaxation on drug laws for liberalization, they want justification for their irresponsible and base habit.

I wasn't aware that "drug users" appointed you to be their spokesman. As for your generalization -- does this mean you believe that all drug users are irresponsible, unemployed junkies who live in the gutters and alleys? And that you believe all drug users do it out of habit?

I am not denying the existence of irresponsible drug use or addiction, however it would be equally foolish and fallacious to paint every single last drug user as if they fit one single homogeneous profile. You're only going to notice the visible, blatantly addicted drug users out of any given sample pool.

And if you don't want me "paraphrasing" you (and you pretending to act offended when I do), perhaps you should be clearer in your statements, all of which have been constructed on generalizations.
>> Anonymous
you'll be lucky if you pass. thc is fat soluble and can linger in your fatty tissue. if you smoked a lot of pot then traces of it will be detectable after 5 days, even if you drink a lot of liquids.
>> Anonymous
>>59751
A lot of tests have reasonable cut-offs though. They'll be able to detect it, but it wont be enough to prove anything.
>> Anonymous
>>59756
>>I use cannabis because I enjoy it.

That's the problem.

You enjoy it.

The Bible tells us not to indulge in things we enjoy.

This makes you a sinful person worthy of death.
>> Anonymous
>>59748
I never really wanted to make an argument against drug use legalization. Legalize it all you want, that won't change my opinion of the weak-minded, weak-willed and boring bourgeois who divert their attention from reality because they are incapable of procuring in their lives anything but stagnation and droll repetition.
>> Anonymous
>>59748
And I will ALWAYS look down my nose at anyone who uses or has used drugs, regardless of their position or accomplishments.
>> Moonmauler
>>59763
And I will continue to look at you as ignorant and extremely short-sighted. I guess we're even.
>> Anonymous
>>59763
>>regardless of their position or accomplishments.

Then anything that comes out of your mouth has no relevance to anything else.
>> Anonymous
>>59766
You only view me that way because, as I've said before, you can't come to grips with having no self-control or gifts. Sure, it's all because I am ignorant and has nothing at all to do with your decision to impair your abilities.

Seriously, I hope you not only flunk your test but you get a kidney stone from drinking too much water.
>> Anonymous
>>59778
>>a kidney stone from drinking too much water.

Ho ho ho, this troll is OT-4
>> Anonymous
Seconded.
Drug-takers are weak, have no self-discipline and are plain scum.
>> Anonymous
>>59782

Close your mouth, you're letting the flies in
>> Moonmauler
>>59778
I'm not the OP.

And after careful consideration on my part I came to the conclusion that impairing my abilities was of no major importance when I'm sitting by myself at home playing video games. I very rarely get high when I'm not at home, and on those rare occasions I'm at a friends place just relaxing anyway.

It also amuses me how I've kept a neutral, calm approach in my argument while you've relied on biased, arbitrary opinions and skewed gross generalizations/stereotypes. Not to mention wishing me personal harm.
>> Anonymous
>>59790
>>biased, arbitrary opinions and skewed gross generalizations/stereotypes

WELCOME TO AMERICAN POLITICS
>> ?suomynonA?
I don't even know what FOAD means.
>> Anonymous
Yeah so cool

How about some advice?