File :-(, x, )
HFCS Anonymous
http://tinyurl.com/hfcs-com

How does this make you feel, /fit/?

Pic possibly related.
>> Anonymous
Nice try, not clicking on a fucking tinyurl you fagget.
>> well fuck your shit !SvVHiVQG4I
We've been over this multiple times.

HFCS is no worse for you than sugar.
>> Anonymous
>>319387
Here you go, Paranoid Pete.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVsgXPt564Q
>> Anonymous
HFCS = 55% FRUCTOSE, 45% GLUCOSE

TABLE SUGAR = 50% FRUCTOSE, 50% GLUCOSE

THAT'S IT. ASIDE FROM THAT SINGLE 5% DIFFERENCE, THEY'RE CHEMICALLY IDENTICAL. HFCS IS BAD FOR YOU IN THE EXACT SAME WAY SUGAR IS BAD FOR YOU, BECAUSE THEY'RE THE EXACT SAME THING. ENOUGH OF THIS BULLSHIT ABOUT IT BEING SATAN
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>HFCS = 55% FRUCTOSE, 45% GLUCOSE

>TABLE SUGAR = 50% FRUCTOSE, 50% GLUCOSE

>EXACT SAME
>> Anonymous
>>319407
i can't view youtube on this computer, but is this one of those pro-HFCS commercials? if it is...

those bug me a bit, because they seem to imply that it's actually HEALTHY since it's made from corn. but i do think that the amount of shit thrown at HFCS is unjustified. it's not satan's tool to make you fat... just eat things made with it in moderation. like any sugars.
>> well fuck your shit !SvVHiVQG4I
     File :-(, x)
>>319435
>ASIDE FROM THAT SINGLE 5% DIFFERENCE
>> Anonymous
>>319459
That is it. The implication that HFCS is good for you in any capacity is one that a lot of television viewers will take to heart with no more consideration. The ads are one-sided. The silence of the protester when prompted for the concerns presented with HFCS means to say, hey, HFCS is not such a bad guy after all.

/fit/fags saying HFCS is no worse than sugar are missing the point.
>> Anonymous
HFCS are Satan lol. Not to mention the fact that HFCS are processed in totally unnatural chemical slurry. So technically HFCS are pre-digested in the refining process.