File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
wow
>> Juggy !tr.t4dJfuU
Wow... but shooped.
>> assassnigger !ryHsTY4Wro
waoh
>> Anonymous
>>28611
moar. i'm alone at my office at work and am now strongly considering fapping.
>> Anonymous
>>28631
how will you handle cleanup?
>> Anonymous
Not shooped, that's Timea Majarova

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/p_ECqH1-ReU"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/p_ECqH1-ReU" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
>> Juggy !tr.t4dJfuU
Definitely shooped. Muscle definition is enhanced via lighting, making it look more pronounced. Just look at her skin. Mind you, I'm not saying she doesn't have muscle and a nice frame to begin with.
>> Anonymous
>>28611


http://www.myspace.com/timeamajorova
>> Anonymous
>>28666
Lighting doesn't equal shooping.

ALL photos in magazines, publicity shots, etc, are shooped. I know, I get paid great money to do it.

On this photo, all that was probably done was skin clean up to get rid of any imperfections. They always do too much on the face, which they did here. Also, you can't shoop this one as much because the light is so harsh. Harsh light = tough edges to conceal when shooping.

There might be some minor burning done to make her back cuts look deeper, but judging by other photos of her available, this is not shooped significantly in regards to making her appear more fit.