>> |
Anonymous
I'm>>17488 >>17487 >>17467 >>17451 As well as a ton of other posts in this thread that I'm too lazy to link.
I don't want to give you the wrong impression. I'm totally in favor of the Wikipedia. I'm one of the most prolific contributors in the biochemistry and molecular biology areas. I've written large parts of many many GAs, and had a front page article. That aside, it will still never be an academic source. Sure, it reeks of elitism, but the fact that people who have no expertise in a subject are able to edit with impunity means that so long as the experts are outnumbered, there will always be inaccuracies. And believe me, we are outnumbered. Badly.
|