File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
I'm confused right now /fit/
This food label just seems fucked up-- Beef Sausage
2 oz serving
Calories 110
Cal from fat 100
Total Fat 7g
Sat Fat 3g
Sodium 430mg
Carb 0g
Protein 9g

At the bottom it says:
Not a significant source of trans fat, dietary fiber, sugars, vitamin A, vitamin C or Calcium

What I don't get... What happened to the other grams of fat if 100 are from fat? Thats about 11g of fat, but theres only 7g.
Comment too long. Clickhereto view the full text.
>> Anonymous
thats 100 calories from fat, and 7g of total fat, I t mentions that it isnt a significant source of transfat because it isnt and they have to tell you that you fuckin chud.
>> Anonymous
>>286351

You're an idiot.

Carbohydrates = 4 calories per gram
Fat = 9 calories per gram
Protein = 4 calories per gram

These are rough estimates, and are mostly accurate.

If this was true, the servings would be 7g fat = 7x9 or 63 fat cals.

9 grams of protein SHOULD be 9x4 = 36 calories.

63+36 = 99 calories.

The label reads "110 calories, 100 from fat."

Even if the sat. fat bumped up the calories to 100, that means 100/110 calories per serving are from fat.. with 9 grams of protein per serving, that simply doesn't make sense. My only guess is that a solid line divides the protein from the rest and the protein isn't per serving, but, rather, in the entire can or whatever it is. Sausage has more fat than protein, especially when it's processed garbage... so this would make perfect sense.

Also, BECAUSE IT HAS AN INSIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TRANS FAT, because the fat is 3 grams saturated and 4 grams poly or mono unsaturated.
>> Anonymous
>>286351
they don't have to explicitly say that though

they only started that since the war on transfat started.
>> Anonymous
>>286362
I did the math too. I think someone failed math class.

But the transfat thing would seem to imply that you need transfat in your diet or do I just have an odd sense of things?