File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
So just how buff/ripped/whatever can you get naturally? This board is already seeing a lot of mishapen roid beasts, I'm just wondering what the cut off point is where I can stop being impressed and start being disgusted.
>> Anonymous
>>7230
When their leg has small mountains on top of their muscles already, not like the OP but someone had an image here earlier of the 'guy who ran their gym' and he looked quite stupid.

It also looks disgusting when they tan themselves like that and rub body oil all over themselves. I understand it's to show shadows and definition, but it looks gross and unnecessary.

That picture is borderline too much muscle to me anyway. But honestly, the excessive tan makes him look absolutely horrible.
>> Anonymous
Depends upon the individual, but any of the big-name bodybuilders are in the "disgusted" category. Ronnie Coleman, for example, hit his natural peak years ago, and has been riding the 'roid beast even since.

Can't find it at the moment, but there's an old pic of him where he is a fraction of his current size.
>> Anonymous
Could someone toss up a pic of what is basicly the peak of natural?
>> Anonymous
>>8010

Any early pictures of Arnold though he took steroids later on.
>> Anonymous
>>8010
depends on your genetics and race
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>8010
Depends on the individual, but something around this:
Warren Clampit, winner 2007 Natural Olympia (Tested for Roids)
>> Anonymous
>>8037
there are many ways around testing.
my friends are in WNSO events (natural) and they are all taking shit.
>> Anonymous
>>8045
True, but Clampits physique is still probably attainable with hard work and proper diet.
>> Anonymous
>>8021
No. Arnold admitted to using steroids in his teens.