>> |
RSI guy
!HjbWRiSTJ.
>>47603 the thing is, it's technically correct. and that's the best kind of correct for them. firstly, no product will elaborate in detail it's "potentially" harmful sugars. secondly, they are however required by law to have a nutrition facts label on pretty much every food item.
that will technically provide energy, but it's the crappy kind. also kJ is unusual for me to see on these labels.
|