File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Dear /fit/ i'm freaking out here.
I've been talking to all of my lady friends showing them all pictures of different types of bodies and all of them are going for the biggest faggot of them all number 5, I was going to get big and bulky just under 1 but now i'm having second thoughts should I too become a faggot to get the ladies is it worth degrading myself for pussy?
Should I still push myself to get under 1 and find someone who loves the muscle or become a faggot?
What are the femanon's opinion on this, are they to finding the faggot better than the real men?

WHAT WOULD YOU DO?! AND WHO WOULD YOU CHOSE?

Not even King Leonidas gets some loving....
Pic related (I also nicked one of the pics from a previous thread)
>> Anonymous
I work my body in priority for myself, not for the bitches
>> Anonymous
Protip: Muscles arn't for attracting women.
>> Anonymous
>>142551
Bitches on the side is a great perk
>> Anonymous
as a woman anything bigger than 2 is a turn off and proof you have way too much free time and probably very little substance.
But why the fuck do it for pussy if youre going bigger you probably only want to jerk off in front of a mirror anyway.
>> Anonymous
I still LOL at Lesnar's penis sword tattoo (no.1)
>> Anonymous
>>142559
Women, dumb cunts, ect.
>> Anonymous
Get a pac, some arm muscles and you are set my friend.
>> Anonymous
Looking proportional is best. And don't do it for the women, do it because you want to. I find your behavior needy, and insulting to men all over the world.
>> Anonymous
they all went for the number 5 faggot... my god, women are retards
>> Anonymous
>>142581
I want to bulk up for myself to gain confidence and be a much healthier person but hearing all my friends telling me not to and saying its disgusting is kinda of discouraging, so i'm having second thoughts about how I should train myself
>> Anonymous
>>142560
its pretty damn awful.

i'm at 5 right now, aiming for 2/7. i'm not doing it for the bitches, i'm doing it to prove to myself that i'm not a scrawny geek, which will give me the confidence to make the bitches want me.

as for lack of substance because you're built, thats utter shit and only proves how idiotic bitches are. five minutes of conversation determines a person's substance.

i've got very little free time, i'm a carer for the mentally ill, i'm studying politics, i have an active social life, i read avidly and i keep myself in shape. fuck your preconceptions, i probably wouldn't stick my dick anywhere near you, because you're a vapid and worthless cunt.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
You would be a pretty fucking dumb motherfucker to think a girl would want a fucking BOX like in the first picture, WHY do all you /fit/fags want to look like a massive fucking box anyway? it's not the slightest bit sexy, you would just look like some insecure faggot who went WAY overboard with his training to make up for whatever it is he's lacking.

2 and 5 are by fucking FAR the best looking types in that picture, why? proportions!

I fucking hate you all.
>> Anonymous
>>142593

probably wouldn't and I really would not give a shit. As a rule girls don't like the bigger guys I just listed some of the reasons why that come up when my friends and I talk about it. If you're an exception whoop de fucking do.
>> Anonymous
I want a body like King Leonidas. That way I can destroy people much easier.
>> Anonymous
>>142601

A noble aim.
>> Anonymous
>>142598

i think expecting to pull purely because you're jacked is retarded, but the confidence you get from being sure of yourself is a big boost towards getting laid. chicks don't dig shy guys as much as they dig confident guys, body notwithstanding, right?
>> Anonymous
>>142601
He finally gets some loving
>> Anonymous
>>142601
Good logic
>> Anonymous
>>142606

To say that one formula works for all women is wrong but its been my experience that yes confidence is good. Humility is too. So if you're confident while not screaming I am gods gift to women the gods will shower much pussy upon you.
How to hit that balance is the question of the ages.
>> Anonymous
Are you the same faggots that 1 year ago bitched about girls wanting muscled "alpha males"?

You guys are fucking PATHETIC.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>142612

I was God's gift to women for Halloween.
>> Anonymous
Women lie. Never trust'em

(same for men, btw; but they are more prone to making up stories)
>> Anonymous
>>142616
thats brilliant
>> Anonymous
>>142618
>Women lie. Never trust'em

In this case they are telling the truth though, no girl would ever want a fucking xboxhueg squarebox, just like no guy would ever want a 2inch waist chick with 5kg tits, or wait you guys probably would.
>> Anonymous
NEWSGLASH: When it comes to long term relationships most women would prefer someone who was slightly overweight to someone who is incredibly ripped.

For one night stands they'll take the ripped dudes, but they generally shy away from them for committed relationships.
>> Anonymous
Problems with this thread:
1) You assume everyone trains for aesthetics.
2) You assume that we give any amount of shit about the opinions of your airheaded lady friends.
3) You assume your lady friends speak for all females, let alone all young women.

Keep this in mind before making another thread like this: teenagers will always go for the bicep-curling, Calvin Klein-wearing scrawny asswipe with the boyish face and obnoxious attitude.

It's worth noting that how people react to your body is entirely dependant on how you carry yourself. For example, when you see a muscular guy, especially like 1 or 4, you associate them with an aggressive image. That's not appealing. 2, 3, 6 and 7 aren't great photos, as they obscure the face. Which is an important factor in someones sex appeal. However, if you knew the girl in person and you had a body like that whilst being modest about it, that goes down much better. What you've done is detatched all humanity from the other bodies.
>> Anonymous
3 or 5 for me <3
>> Anonymous
>>142551

Do this. You want to look a certain way? Do it, and above all be healthy.

That being said, female here, and I wouldn't go for either. Somewhere in between would make you look like a tough guy with the ability to put your arms down, if you're still going to bulk up purely for looks.
>> Anonymous
>>142637

True words listen to this guy. any self improvement one for others is bullshit, and will never make you happy.
>> Anonymous
>>142616
I am fucking stealing that idea. ROCK ON.
>> Anonymous
You sir, are a fucking moron.
>> Anonymous
>>142616
>>142625
>>142651
Fucking hicks.
This idea has been rehashed for ages.
>> Anonymous
>>142595
because number 5 cant flip a car
>> Anonymous
>>142637
Pretty much sums it up.

I suspect why most women would decline the actually fit ones is because it makes them too insecure about their own lacking physique.
>> Anonymous
as a chick, i'd do 3
>> Anonymous
2 or 3 are best
>> Anonymous
>>142675
So you like them mongoloids.
Beady eyes and 50% downssyndrome. Enjoy.
>> Anonymous
>>142674
>I suspect why most women would decline the actually fit ones is because it makes them too insecure about their own lacking physique.

Actually it's because extreme physical fitness is seen as a sign of low intelligence.
While it may not be accurate, there's still a stereotype that anyone who can spend several hours a day bulking up has to be fairly unintelligent to enjoy countless hours of mindless repetitive actions.
>> Anonymous
>>142685
All that being said, this is only for first impressions. You CAN convince someone that you're not some sort of beefed up tough guy. If she still feels iffy about your physique even after you've proven to her that you're not that type of guy, then there are a lot of other fish in the sea.
>> Anonymous
Like there's that many fit Americans anyway.

It's not like there's enough muscle men to come by. Fit men are not easy to come by. Women adapted and accepted the stick men.

Possibly because it's less intimidating than having a muscle man who may beat them HARD.
>> Anonymous
>>142635
prove it
>> Anonymous
If a bitch doesn't want your muscley body, then that means the bitch isn't good enough for you, and she knows it. If you decide to make your body huge and ripped like 4, then welcome to your whole new social class, where the women are infinitely superior compared to the common filth you now associate with.
>> Anonymous
>>142706

Hahaha I don't believe you have a new social class enjoy your hand.
>> Anonymous
>>142706
a.k.a. welcome to the social class of meatheads, air headed bitches that only think of their looks and guidos, FUCK YEAH
>> Anonymous
>>142706
i cant tell if youre serious or not. you are the reason women don't like fucking thick neck bodybuilders.

>If a bitch doesn't want your muscley body, then that means the bitch isn't good enough for you, and she knows it

It sounds to me like you get turned down a lot and take it out on women to save your ego.
>> Anonymous
>>142713
I don't care if you believe me.

>>142714
Women shouldn't have intelligence anyways, the only thing they are good for are looking good on my arm, further increasing my social class, and for giving me healthy offspring.

>>142717
Sounds like you're not in my social class.
>> Anonymous
>>142721
>>Sounds like you're not in my social class.

Low prole?
>> Anonymous
>>142723

I don't understand your vernacular, peasant.
>> Anonymous
>>142717
Exactly.

A good woman is a good woman and a good man is a good man. Fuck that " I'm good looking now so I can get all the really hot high strung chicks" bullshit. It just sets you up for failure ( that is, if you're looking for a serious relationship).
>> Anonymous
>>142721
Obvious troll is obvious

and fat.
>> Anonymous
>>142724
Not surprising.
>> Anonymous
>>142714

I'm still wondering the quality of the women who actually go after the muscle types.

Sure, a great deal of them are airheads, but a part of me thinks it good to go out with someone who you're all-around attracted to (both personality and looks) than a slightly overweight fat guy who you aren't physically attracted to.

Isn't not being satisfied by both personality and looks setting women up for affairs? Anyway, I guess that's assuming that women naturally like their men to have muscle which I'm pretty sure a lot do, but there aren't enough men who are fit for women to admit that.

Just theorizing...
>> Anonymous
>>142726

Wrong. If you're an alpha male, you have your pick of the litter. The worst mistake in your life is to 'settle' for whatever.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>142721

I guess you're right. Boy am I jealous.
>> Anonymous
Typically I like really thin guys, I think scrumpet has a perfect body. On the other side of things I think muscle is really, really sexy, and it shows you have the drive to work towards things, have goals, and keep yourself up which is a HUGE turn on. 2 is who I'd pick.
>> Anonymous
4 FTW
>> Anonymous
>>142736
Yes. My friends and I have always agreed that Christian Bale in American Psycho has the best physique as far as looks are concerned.
>> Anonymous
i want to punch 3 and 5 in the faces
>> Anonymous
>>142732
I was referring to settling for a really pretty girl with a shit personality, but using " LOL SHES HOT" to make yourself feel better about your terrible personality. Being super hot doesn't automatically make you the best girl.
>> Anonymous
>>142735
duke nukem is that you?

also, 3 and 5 look like duchebags
>> Lil Dreamer !UYwMl8CsAs
>>142547
i'm somewhere between 3 and 5. 3 has bigger shoulders than i do and i have bigger arms than 5. god knows, i'm still not satisfied with my physique.
>> Anonymous
>>142730
I don't think you can be romantically involved with someone without being physically attracted to them. I think what you see in their personality rubs off on their looks. Same goes with dating a really good girl with a shit personality. People in love act somewhat foolish, or at least out of their personlaity.

This is why people always describe their ideal mates as something that isn't what they end up with.
>> Anonymous
Well no shit they liked number 5, all the others either had an unnaturally high amount of muscle, or unnaturally low amount of bodyfat.

Next time, use more realistically /fit/ people, and you might notice they won't gravitate towards the gigantic faggot as much.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Women like #3, but I dont give a shit, I want to be a proper man at #4. At that stage your body means shit all, it's your attitude. I am only 80% of these guys and I have no prob picking up.
Also in>>142547
Number 5 is the only one not flexing. Thus women might just want the guy who doesn't look like a tryhard.
>> Anonymous
femanon here. chill out bro, as long as you don't look like 1 or 6 you'll be fine.

although, I'm a dyke so maybe you shouldn't listen to me.
>> Anonymous
>>142637

I'd say 95% of people in the business of weight loss and lifting are in it for aesthetics.
>> Anonymous
i'm a girl. i would choose 3 or 5 ANY DAY OF THE WEEK.
the others just aren't as attractive body-wise.
to me, at least.
>> Anonymous
>>142783

Why?
>> Anonymous
>>142835
Im not the same girl but I am a girl that would have to agree. The bulker looks just arent attractive. Sure maybe they take more work and a stronger will but I would much rather have a slim toned man then a guy with pecks bulging out. Just because you worked harder for them doesnt mean you deserve more.
>> Anonymous
a big thing for me is the large ribcage or frame. i like big muscle and definition but i don't really like HUEG shoulders
>> Anonymous
>>142783

Because she wants a genetically superior male, duh
>> Anonymous
>>142846
>>142783
Listen to these two, that's the fucking truth.

Like i said 40 posts ago.
>> Anonymous
ITT: disappointment of insecure faggots training only to get chicks
>> Anonymous
Spoilers: Girls will only say they like number 5 because all of their friends will say they like number 5. It's the socially acceptable thing to pick.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>142846
>Just because you worked harder for them doesnt mean you deserve more.
>> Anonymous
>>142881
I think the first two replies summed up this thread pretty well.
>> Anonymous
>>142886

no girls will say no. 5 because no. 5 is hot what fucking reason would we have for lying here?
Way to fail.
>> Anonymous
Five looks like a gigantic faggot and douche bag. If you want to to attract trashy girls, look like that.
>> Anonymous
>>142898

He's implying you're influenced by what others would find attractive and that you'd go for the more familiar, safer 'boy' look.
>> Anonymous
i'd hit 2 and 5
i would've said 3 as well but he just looks like a gigantic asshat
>> Anonymous
>>142898

Okay, pick 10 girls, show them a bunch of guys with varying musculature, and it's very likely all 10 of them will pick a single guy. Is it that likely that all 10 share the same opinion on what musculature makes men attractive? No, they're just going with the group mentality.
>> Anonymous
>>142907
you fail at women.
>> Anonymous
i'm a guy, i'd like to be 1
3 and 5 look like faggots to me
but i totally understand why girls would like them the most, it's same with me
the girls i like the most aren't some totally plastic girls with huge tits, they are normal non ugly girls
>> Anonymous
These threads always make me come to the same conclusions: One, /fit/ is worryingly concerned with appearance over health. Two, females don't actually have a fucking clue what they want, especially the invariably deranged chicks on 4chan.
>> Anonymous
If girls are willing to go out with fat guys that have a great personality or a fat wallet, I think they'll still go out with a very muscular guy who has a great personality or a fat wallet.
>> Anonymous
>>142934
comparison of muscly guys to fat guys is borderline fail, but I see your point.
>> Anonymous
>>142933
But I'm a girl on 4chan and I know what I want... other girls.
>> Anonymous
>>142923
Sorry I don't want trash.
>> Anonymous
>>142835

because when you have too many muscles you look like a fucking alien or something. i prefer lean guys with some muscle on the arms and stomach/chest, and the rest can be slim. huge muscles just look gross to me.
>> Anonymous
>>142948
Man, ever been outside?
It's the massive muscly guys that are always with the trash, while realistic blokes get all the cute girls.
>> Anonymous
Wow fuck you OP. You're training your body for all the wrong reasons.

I train so I can live until it's possible to replace my body with something that won't die of natural causes.
>> Anonymous
>>142921

Beg to differ pretty much your responses will cover all of them except 1.
Girls taste differs fairly widely but 1 is generally for the men I find.
Personally i would go anything but 1 and 6.
But hey if theyre funny enough who knows.
And three does look like a douche but he's definately a prawn.
5's marks have improved in this thread because you left the head on just as 1 and 3's marks have decreased for the same reason.
2 is christian bale and any woman who says she wouldn't is a lying lesbian.
>> Anonymous
>>142736
ia with everything you said but i'm not too fond of ultra skinny
>> Anonymous
OP

The fact that you put a nice little collage together of shirtless dudes idicates that you sir, are a homosexual. You don't have to worry about becoming a faggot anymore because you infact already are one, and I suspect all the females you sent pictures to already know it.

Good day.
>> Anonymous
>>142637

Give this man his internets already
>> Anonymous
FEMANON HERE
GIRLS LIKE MUSCLE JUST NOT INSANE POPPING OUT OF THE SHIRT MUSCLE BUT BIG MUSCLES ARE LOVED AMONG US ALL OF THE PEOPLE SAYING OTHERWISE ARE FULL OF SHIT AND PROBABLY A NON /FIT/ MALE
>> Anonymous
>>142637
You sir, speak the truth
>> Anonymous
>>142947

Then go for 5.

>>142952
>i prefer lean guys with some muscle on the arms and stomach/chest

Sweet mother of God. You're the perfect match for the hordes of guys out there who, and I quote, "just want to tone". Please, any femanon out there, restore my faith in opposite gender and tell me you want a ripped-ass hairy bearded guy like 4 over the one who looks like he's been moulded out of tan coloured cookie dough.
>> Anonymous
>>142933
It's perfectly fucking clear from this thread that they DO know what they want, 95% of all the chicks in this thread have said 2 or 5. Now just because you were dumb enough to do the whole "more muscles = hotter chicks"-routine doesn't mean that girls don't know what they want.

Enjoy being a lonely box-looking guy while 2 and 5 get all the girls, dumbass
>> Anonymous
1 is alright if you're looking to impress some faggots
>> Anonymous
I'm at 3 and I love it. Look good in clothes and without.
>> Anonymous
>>142994

i'm sure when i get older i'll prefer the ripped hairy guy. when i'm in my 30s i'm not gonna want a 19 year-old looking guy like 3 and 5, but since i'm still young, i prefer that.
>> Anonymous
>>142695
>All that being said, this is only for first impressions. You CAN convince someone that you're not some sort of beefed up tough guy. If she still feels iffy about your physique even after you've proven to her that you're not that type of guy, then there are a lot of other fish in the sea.

Sure, but why invest time, money, and energy into HUGE BEEFY MUSCLES that are going to be a detriment to your sex life?
>> Anonymous
>>143100

Because according to /fit/, sex is for skinny emo camwhore pussies.
>> Anonymous
>>143062

Actually, right now, I most closely resemble 3. And if that dick stopped tensing and stretched his right arm backwards, odds are he'd pretty much look like 5.

Believe it or not, you're not making me jealous of a guy whose second name is .jpg, because it's not going to affect how many girls I sleep with. My face and ability to talk would probably rank more importantly in most situations.

But when it comes to what women actually want in a guy physically, I can guarantee it changes with age.

>It's perfectly fucking clear from this thread that they DO know what they want

Don't you think that the fact that the thread exists would suggest otherwise?
>> Anonymous
I'm about the size of 2 with the definition of 1, but with body hair and some skinfat. Girls love it. But then some of them get a little grossed out if I do a bodybuilder pose/flex.
>> Anonymous
>>143100
3 and 5 can't do this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Y0qmdUQQeE
>> Anonymous
I lol at everyone in this thread. You do NOT work out to get chicks. You either get chicks or you don't. If you have figured out how, you don't need any advice or abs or anything. And you certainly aren't here.

You remind me of my friend who started working out with me. I said i would help him because i've been working out for 5 years and i can show him a thing or 2. First day he comes to the gym, he tells me, i want bigger pecs and a nice butt, chicks dig that.

He stopped going to the gym 2 weeks later.

But he gets laid often, and he got laid before the gym, so i do not exactly see what i'm trying to say here.
>> Anonymous
>>143122
>i do not exactly see what i'm trying to say here.
How does "I'm a faggot hypocrite internet tough guy who states the obvious as though it were gospel" work for you?

Besides, working out can help people's self-image, as well as bring them out of a pratically unfuckable range of health. Sure it may not help *too* much being the ideal physique for a female, but being a fat fuck or skeletor will definitely hurt your options.
>> Anonymous
>>143150
2 more sets and i'm coming to kick your ass
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>143155
I'M ALL YOURS MUHFUGGAH
>> Anonymous
/fit/ needs to be divided into 2 boards:

1) Health & Wellness
2) GETTING HUGE
>> Anonymous
>>143258
As I was explained yesterday: no. If you want to be healthy and well you need to do the same thing as people who want to get huge. Just stop before.

He-men fan need to calm down though.

Oh and what's number 3's name ?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
LEONIDAS!
>> Anonymous
I want 2 or 3.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>142547
OP.. you should do want you want to achieve, you'll always find a girl would fin you attractive.

And for me, the body i try to achieve is pic related. Functionnal and strong.
>> Anonymous
>>142772
What's number 3 name here ?
>> Margaret
As a female, I think number 3 is the best looking one. You don't have to be a skinny faggot to get women. Trust me. I like three and four the best. They are REAL men.
>> Anonymous
I Think two and three have the sexiest bodies.
>> Anonymous
>>143308
REAL trolls don't use fake names
>> Anonymous
women also say they love sensitive guys who express their feelings,cry and are always willing to treat their lady like a queen, yet you only see them fucking manipulative douchebags
>> Anonymous
>>143325
That's simply because you don't ask what a woman wants, you tell her what she wants.
>> Anonymous
You shouldn't be surprised by everyone picking 5. It's widely known that women don't like xbaux hueg guys. They always go for the Brad-Pitt physique. I'd rather go with a Bruce-lee physique, have functional/explosive strength, and satisfy the ladies at the same time. It's win win. I'm not saying anything's wrong with being xbaux hueg, but I'd rather be like a spartan, both aesthetically and practically.
>> Anonymous
it's because 5 has the general look that women are told they find attractive, and his face is fare more appealing than the others.

stick a mask on them all, put them in tshirts and the big boys will win.
>> Anonymous
>>143341"you tell her what she wants"
>>143354"women are told they find attractive"

_This_. Shit varies from region to region and goes in waves. Deathly-skinny to skinny-muscular guys are simply the current fashion here in the West.
>> Anonymous
I don't think it has anything to do with whats culturally acceptable.

What we find attractive is pre-programmed in our genetics. Tone, and muscles show strength, when our ancestors were living off what they hunted, eating maybe once or twice a week... they would never have gotten enough protein to get xbaux hueg. The most healthy and strongest hunters usually looked like what top-condition or olympic athletes look like (number 5 and leonidas, they don't pick leonidas because of the mask hes wearing and the sneer) very low bodyfat, tone from muscles constantly being used daily, muscle mass but not hypertrophied muscles. Its ingrained.
>> Anonymous
>>143100
Look man, If you're not getting laid then it's NOT going to be because you have too much muscles. Seriously guys.

And that type of bullshit thinking leads to this:

>>143325
>>143341

Circlejerk bullshit. Lets just end this thread before more faggotry ensues.
>> Anonymous
>>143371
Although correct, it's not to the degree that you think it is. Throughout history the very pinnacle of beauty has changed over and over again, and claiming the vast social-cultural pressure towards one ideal doesn't massively affect our choices, is really seriously underestimating the overpowering force of the human mind to make people do stupid shit.
>> Anonymous
>143354

I think there's some truth to what you said, but I don't think its the muscles, its his face and the fact he's showing underwear.

If all the photos were cropped without the faces, and whatever underwear is showing, you might get different responces.
>> Anonymous
>>142987
CAPS LOCK LOLOLOLOL
>> Anonymous
>>143385

That's true, but I think the reason people liked fat people at that time was due to the fact everyone wasn't fit, they were all basically starving, sporting the heroine look literally. Fat people were exotic, only the very rich could pull it off. So it might have been a combination of that and being starved in the head from not enough carbohydrates. I'm pretty certain though that the base-line internalized attraction to beauty never changed though. The buff-lean blacksmith who got enough to eat but wasn't fat, sported good tone and bulging arms got all the ladies in the village, and the lean and slender but not emaciated who got just enough to eat peasant girl always was the target for the nobles.

I think the cultural attractiveness is just an overlying layer over what we find attractive at the base level, it augments it, but doesn't override it.
>> Anonymous
>>143371
Your logic is wrong because primitive people would prefer huge muscular and fat men, because those would be the strongest and eat more than the rest.
>> Anonymous
>>142547

1, obviously. Sans the shitty tattoo and blockhead.
>> Anonymous
>>143394

There's wasn't much "lean" back then, was there?

We are the ones who started getting into this lean thing when we started tweaking our diets to get fit.

Realistically, wouldn't the old time muscle people still have a decent layer of fat due to just eatting what they had? Regardless of it's calories, fat-content, and the like?
>> Anonymous
Isn't this a bit biased? I'm a guy and I'm gay for Bale and Leonidas. 1 looks retarded, 6&7 look gay and 3 (closest to my body-type zz) and 5 look like faggots.

I'd want to look like Bale or Leonidas, but that's mostly because they are actors and corrupted my vision of them. Will probably look like a fatter 3.
>> Miss/fit/ !CX5ZjxjyRA
Honestly, the first thing I thought was that number 5 was the hottest even before reading this thread. Sorry, anon.. chicks don't like big muscles that much.
>> Anonymous
>>143394
There has been more variations throughout the time than Fat-Thin. Just in the Euros it's been "tall, lean, and boyish", "stout, rough, and muscular", and of course "fat and jolly". Of course genetics is a constant companion in the search for a fuckbuddy, but the human mind can override that shit in a second with enough pestering.
>> Anonymous
>>143414

I still think the picture should be reposted without the face on 5, and his showing underwear. I think thats what's throwing it. female anons aren't going to go for leonidas because of the sneer... if it was just plain physique and no faces, you'd be getting diff. results.
>> Anonymous
>>143414
It's the face. Looks less retarded than the rest.
Put the 5 face on the 7 body and you have your winner every time.
>> Miss/fit/ !CX5ZjxjyRA
>>143424
>>143423

You guys might be right. Though his face isn't that great, it's better than the others.
>> Anonymous
>>143424

Don't forget the same gay pose and 'look at me' grin. Damn shit eating grin.

... I've developed an irrational hatred of a .jpeg image. Thanks /fit/.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Missfit, and other fem-anons.

Who would you pick now?
>> Anonymous
if they don't like 4 they aren't ladies and they aren't friends.

They are Persian spies.
>> Anonymous
>>143447
Wouldn't have looked twice in the direction of 5. Barely even once. 4 and 7 ftw.
>> Anonymous
>>143447

Mainly, 2 and 3. But 4 and 7 are attractive in very different ways. Basically, I usually draw the line with veins popping out everywhere, so 7 and 2 are kind of wavering on that line. But it's not a deal breaker.
>> Miss/fit/ !CX5ZjxjyRA
     File :-(, x)
>>143447

Alright, I'm gonna go with 3.

Also, pic related. I fucking love Ryan Reynolds. All men should strive to have his body.
>> Anonymous
#6 ftw fags.

powerful yet compact
>> Anonymous
>>143469
Sadly it's just some emo scene.
Use your amazing power of SIGHT to verify.
And if anyone, then 7 has the physique that closest resemble Hannibal from Blade Trinity.
>> Anonymous
>>143394

You are american and your view of medieval history comes from dungeons&dragons.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>143474

And all women should have this body and be able to put their feet behind their heads.
>> Anonymous
>>143474
But those are some lanky-ass arms, man.
>> Anonymous
Ugh. As a woman here I MIGHT go for 5 but his face is just too ugly, hurts me to look at it. I think out of all of them I'd probably prefer 2 or 3 the most, but need to see some actually good pictures of them and have them not flexing like faggots.
>> Anonymous
2 has the entire package. Pleasant face to look at , and a great body. Though maybe I'm biased because I love Christian Bale and American Psycho...

5 just has a typical "so-so" body, to me at least, and the face is just painful.
>> Anonymous
>>143447
Exactly what I was thinking, number 5 is a good-looking chap, so the girls you asked saw the whole package and based it on that. 2 or 7 are the ones most women would choose.
>> Anonymous
>>143467
>>143468
>>143542
>>143551

And the sane women arrive at last.
>> Anonymous
>>143447

lol 5 looks so terrible in comparison
>> Anonymous
>>143534

They should also look beautiful without makeup, have naturally thick and curly hair, be great cooks, wake me up every morning by nibbling on my ear, and shit nothing but cinnamon buns.

Yeah, so I trailed off the topic of fitness, I don't care. This hypothetical perfect woman kicks ass.
>> fashion diva !3wJfpCMhKc
anyone who is surprised by this is comically out of touch
>> Anonymous
5 looks "soft."
>> Anonymous
>>143576

I'm telling you, I called this like three times earlier. I said he was made of tan coloured cookie dough.
>> Anonymous
>>143562
>And the /fit/fags pretending to be women arrive at last.
>> Anonymous
>>143585

Haha. No, I'm definitely a woman. I'm just a woman who doesn't enjoy looking at scrawny 15 year-old boys flexing and pretending to have muscle.
>> Anonymous
I'm a guy and I made the "soft" comment.

5 just does look soft and not very dedicated. I'm training for 7's physique.
>> Anonymous
>>143574
Really? Because from my listening to a wide range of girls/women ramble on about what they like/don't like, burly (1), balanced athletic (2), and skinnybuff (3) beat out marginally better than unhealthy (5) 9 times out of ten.

Though I'm not particularly surprised that 4, 6, and 7 didn't do all that well, too much vascularity, too "muscly" or just too cutOP probably has very like-minded or similarly aged friends; ask a few in different generations and you'll get some very different answers.
>> Anonymous
6 is best, strong delts, but slim waist
>> Anonymous
>>143571

Wait, I forgot "fucks like a sex-starved mountain lion".
>> fashion diva !3wJfpCMhKc
>>143597
yes, really
>> Anonymous
>>143612
You must be the one who's out of touch then. Because from my experience, the main demographic for 5 is mall/club-dwelling immature, sexually inexperienced half-wits aged 14-23. Once they grow up a little, their tastes tend to draw towards something more masculine.
>> Anonymous
>>143662
I don't know how you think it follows that, because your experience is different, I'm out of touch. Indeed, the fact that your experience is different is something of a requirement for you being out of touch.

oh right, you're a meathead... ummmmmmm, no u?
>> Anonymous
even if you like skinnyfags, I don't see how anyone could find 5 better than 3
>> Anonymous
>>143662
>Once they grow up a little, their tastes tend to draw towards someone with a large bank account and steady job who can provide for them while they pump out babies.

Fixed your post, dude.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>143672
>because your experience is different
I prefer to call my experience more diverse. I can't imagine any girls from more rural areas (which comprises a large percent of the US population) thinking 5 isn't a total pussy. From my personal experience, I've been at 3 and 2 (2 from lifting, 3 from martial arts), have known guys at 1 and 5, and I've personally seen the attention each one gets based on bodytype alone, from a large variety of ages, places of origin, family values, and social backgrounds.

The name you're posting under forces me to assume you and many of your friends/collegues fall under my previously specified demographic, and I therefore dismiss your opinion as biased.
>> Anonymous
>>143699

where i live (big city) women want beanpole thin guys in skin tight black jeans
>> Anonymous
>>143704
You a eurofag by any chance?
>> Anonymous
>>143699
I'm a 27 year old (male) lawyer. I can't remember, was that the demo you described?

Although you maybe right - I've never been in a place flush with backwoods hicks ("rural" did you call them?)

so you may be right. Sorry, I was talking about people
>> Anonymous
>>143696
No hips, no tits, no ass, and man-jaw.

Wow.
>> Anonymous
>>143447

Femanon here, I'm going to have to go with 3. 5 is a bit too skinny (though I'd still do him if he took me out to a nice dinner or something). The rest look like they have nothing better to do than work out all the damn time, which tells me that either a) they're horribly insecure or b) they use working out to release massive amounts of RAGE, which will likely be released upon me should I get involved. So 3 is my top pick; he has a good amount of delicious muscle without going overboard (even if his chest is underdeveloped).
>> Anonymous
>>143720
Lol, preconceptions.

Whatever, not like I'm anything close to an angel, what with my belief that bodybuilder chicks are either mentally unstable or rape-victims.
>> Anonymous
>>143720

But I'm at three now. And I still love releasing rage.
>> Anonymous
>>143705
>eurofag

San Francisco, CA.
I'm not saying it's a good thing, but straight women here like really skinny (and in shape) men more than guys with muscles.
>> Anonymous
>>143696
I'm convinced she's a man
>> Anonymous
number 1. that is my goal. i even have the wide chest for it, just not the dive
>> Anonymous
>>143713
OH SHI- PASSIVE AGGRESSIVE RAGE!0!1!0!1!~
Besides, that was an example. I'm in Los Angeles now, and while 1 falls out of favor here, 2 and 3 still beat 5 outside of the valley girl/brentwood shopaholic demographic. Women like men that look like men, 5 looks like he'd try to touch my dick if he were drunk.

And on another note; you post under the name "Fashion Diva" and you're a 27 year old male? No wonder you think 5 is so hot you flaming faggot.
>> Anonymous
>>143751
>femanon
>number 1. that is my goal

The horror...the HORROR!
>> Anonymous
>>143756
i said WIDE chest you faggot, not huge tits theres a difference.
>> Anonymous
>>143720
>>143672
>>143542

amazing. even though it's well known throughout /fit/ that spending all day at the gym doesn't help you at all in building tons of muscles and when it's ridiculously hard to acquire as much muscle as 1,4,6,7, women are still stupid enough to make a statement like "The rest look like they have nothing better to do than work out all the damn time".

just stay in the kitchen ladies. just stay in the fucking kitchen.
>> Anonymous
>>143761

RAGE much?
>> Anonymous
>>143759
Recheck what the thread's about, hombre.
>> Anonymous
>>143756
what, its not okay for an F2M to want to be the epitome of manlyness?
>> Anonymous
>>143766
More like "simmering disappointment", I'd say.
>> Anonymous
>>143752
I think what I typed was just aggressive... it just wasn't retarded like "you flaming faggot." Or is that what makes it passive? I can never distinguish these things
>> Anonymous
>>143769
you
see
>>143770
>> Anonymous
No 3 ftw. Not for sexiness (I'm a guy, and not gay) but for build. His muscles show that they actually get worked on, his back in particular is a clear sign. He'll be strong as fuck because he's not been training just for size, you can tell those muscles are dense, and all the supporting muscles are in shape, too.

5 is not a strong or muscly guy, he's not in shape - he just has no body fat. Any of the others could snap him in half by accident.

Lol@people who think a six-pack and pecs are evidence of strength or fitness. They are what you get if you have no fat, full stop. Skinny guys ftl.
>> Anonymous
>>143770
If that's the case, why even respond to a question singularily out to females?

Kinda makes the whole procedure kinda stupid.
>> Anonymous
>>143780
good point....i retract my previous comments and leave your thread now
>> Anonymous
>>143752
doesn't it seem like the people who are most adamant about muscley guys are the guys?

seriously, you guys are all homosexuals
>> Anonymous
>>143766

yes i'm raginng. because even with all this information, these "femanons" are still idiots. i take it that you're a woman too.
>> Anonymous
>>143787
If it were that simple, /fa/ would consist solely of lesbians, what with their "thinspiration" bitchery.
>> Anonymous
>>142933
/thread.

>>142947
A fellow lesbitron!
>> Anonymous
>>143787
>seriously, you guys are all homosexuals

WHAT?
Men who spend all day staring at pictures of other men and hanging out in small, sweaty rooms and grunting with other half-naked men are closet faggots?

NO FUCKING WAY DUDE THAT IS CRAAAAAZY!!!
>> Anonymous
>>143787
I actually sent the cropped one (http://zip.4chan.org/fit/src/1212096775284.jpg) to a couple of my female friends I know IRL just now for confirmation - the results were pretty consistent with what I said in>>143752.
>> Anonymous
>>142933
>>142933
>>142933
>>142933
>>142933
>>142933
>>142933
>>142933
>>142933
>>142933
>>142933
>>142933
>>142933
>>142933

/thread

>>143062

girls are are crazy. they'll say one thing and mean another.
>> Anonymous
>>143806
nobody cares what your hick friends have to say
>> Anonymous
>>143805
"I can't play male characters in games, that's gay!"
"I can't watch porn with males doing chicks, that's gay!"
"I can't see or be seen by other males, that's gay!"
"I can't exist in the same space as anyone else of my own gender, that's gay!"
"I can't be informed of the doings-on of other males, that's gay!"

ad fucking nauseum
>> Anonymous
>>143808

Since when does a majority ruling count as them "not knowing what they want?" I think some people are just a little too insecure.
>> Anonymous
>>143812
I agree completely with you, bro (no homo)
>> Anonymous
>>143812
what do any of those things have in common with sitting around arguing about the attractiveness of men?

that shit is fucking gay
>> Anonymous
>>143816
And women who talk about the attractiveness of other women are all lesbians?
>> Anonymous
>>143810
I only asked the city ones to help prove my point.. The dipshits lurved #5, the ones with substance (lol impossible amirite?) had varying taste.
>> Anonymous
BIG MUSCLES ARE THE HOTTEST
NO AMOUNT OF GIRLS' OPINIONS CAN CONVINCE ME OTHERWISE
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>143821
SKIN AND BONES AM THE HOTTEST
NO AMOUNT OF GUYS' OPINIONS CAN CONVINCE ME OTHERWISE
>> Anonymous
>>143817
women barely have sexual preferences, anyway

besides, I'm not sure that it follows that if a guy does it and he's gay, then when women do it they're gay

any guy who has ever kissed a guy on the lips is gay. I'm not sure I can say the same about women
>> Anonymous
>>143824

actually most guys do prefer slightly anorexic women.
>> Anonymous
>>143828

no?
>> Anonymous
>>143824
it's a match made in dysmorphic heaven
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>143828
Right.
>> Anonymous
>>143828
Only gay men and other skinny chicks find the "gonna stab you with my sharp elbows"-look attractive.
>> Anonymous
>>143827

UGH i hate it when people generalize like that. "women barely have sexual preferences"
HEY BUDDY YOU DON'T KNOW EVERY SINGLE WOMAN IN THE WORLD SO YOU SAYING THAT JUST MAKES YOU LOOK LIKE A FOOL
>> Anonymous
>>143827
Lol at brainwashed retard bumpkin.
>> Anonymous
>>143847
lol wut?

why would I need to know every woman before I can generalize? Isn't that kind of the point of generalizing? I mean, it's not like I was saying "every woman barely has any sexual preference."
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Thin girls are the most beautiful. None of that curvy BBW shit.
>> Anonymous
>>143864
personal preference.

but i found as i gained muscle and got stronger and fetl like more of a man, i liked women who were bigger than that.

when i was 130lbs soaking wet, squeaky voice, no test, totally un alpha, and intimidated by everything.

i liked skinny chicks
>> Anonymous
>>143862

it should never be okay to generalize, period
because it makes you look like a fucking joke in any situation
so what i'm saying is, you're a fucking joke
>> Anonymous
>>143837

Look at the waist, dipshit, not the ass.
Note how her ass doesn't jiggle or pucker at all.
That ass is toned and hard, and her waist is extremely thin.


Sexy toned ass ? "curvy"
>> Anonymous
>>143867
>it should never be okay to generalize, period

You're a fucking moron.
Get off the internet, you're too stupid to be here.

>>143866
>when i was 130lbs soaking wet, squeaky voice, no test, totally un alpha, and intimidated by everything. i liked skinny chicks

You're also a fucking moron.
GTFO as well, you fucking Neanderthal.
>> Anonymous
>>143873


haha cant make me, im staying.

OOGAA BOOGAA BOO IM A CAVEMAN
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>143870
You do realize that girls in>>143864and much less>>143824bodyfat-level are waaaaaay less likely to have anything close to the "bootyliciousness" of slightly "thicker" girls?
>> Anonymous
>>143855
yeah, it's not like I based that on a study I read about in the new york times or anything

oh wait, yes it is
here's a quote:
"Although only a small number of women identify themselves as bisexual, Dr. Bailey said, bisexual arousal may for them in fact be the norm"
>> Anonymous
>>143873

lol. wow super hardcore
i laugh at people who attempt to sound superior by saying "gtfo you're just too stupid for me to even ARGUE WITH YOU" when really they just have nothing else to say. go die.
>> Anonymous
>>143866
you like fatties now?
dude where have your standards gone
>> Anonymous
>>143873

i love how being strong and muscular is associated with low intelligence..... ahahahah

do you have any idea how much you have to know about nutrition and training to develop a decently sized physique?

you have no idea what it feels like to be strong, i pity you
>> Anonymous
>>143867
isn't saying that generalizing makes you look like a joke in every situation sort of generalizing?

or have you experienced every sort of generalizing so that you would know this inductively?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>143882
Somewhere far away from this shit.

Like a boy with a wig.
>> Anonymous
i've just made a realization that every single thread on /fit/ ends up in a fight
>> Anonymous
You know the kid that threatened to call the cops on mommy if she spanked him?

>>143886

This is what it grew into.
>> Anonymous
>>143888
/r/ pics of your ideal woman shape wise
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>143882

more like this
>> Anonymous
>>143892
someone with a basic grasp of logic?
>> Anonymous
>>143886

no, i'm just saying that generalizing IN GENERAL (that's right, i said it) is stupid. there are very few things you can say that about, but when it comes to generalizing, there's just no right way to do it.
>> Anonymous
>>143883
>do you have any idea how much you have to know about nutrition and training to develop a decently sized physique?

facepalm.jpeg

Yeah, because you totally need a fucking PhD to read a 20-page pamphlet on bulking up.
>> Anonymous
>>143894

That chick is way too thin to be considered truly "curvy". That's a thin girl with big tits, not a "curvy" girl.
>> Anonymous
>>143901

Then i guess curvy is fat, because anything bigger than her is on the chubby side.
>> Anonymous
>>143896
why can't you understand that you are generalizing there (you even admit this)? Thus, by your own premise, whatever you said isn't correct
>> Anonymous
>>143896
>>143895
>>143892

samefag
>> Anonymous
>>143905
>Then i guess curvy is fat,

HOLY SHIT SOMEBODY GIVE THIS GUY A FUCKING MEDAL!!!!!
He just figured out something that any fucking retard who's been on the internet for more than a week could have figured out! BRAVO, SON!
>> Anonymous
>>143906

i'm only generalizing the action of generalizing, nothing else
>> Anonymous
>>143895
>>143906

There's a difference between grasping logic and desperately clinging to a technicality.

You're avoiding the real issue that was brought up; you being called on your dumbfaggotry.
>> Anonymous
>>143917

It's not like i just figured that out
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>143893
Not in the game of hording pics, sadly. Just gifs of jiggling butts and tits, apparantly.

"Tits and ass in luscious amounts" will simply have to suffice.
>> Anonymous
you guys obsessing over what kind of 6 pack you need to attract women sound like... well, you sound like women
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
purrfect bod
>> Anonymous
>>143917

Dumb fucking concepts usually are pretty hard to grasp.
>> Anonymous
>>143920

you just said this

"
it should never be okay to generalize, period
because it makes you look like a fucking joke in any situation
so what i'm saying is, you're a fucking joke"

so you just made yourself look like a joke by generalizing.
>> Anonymous
>>143927
Do you actually find shit attractive?
>> Anonymous
>>143923
I take it you don't know much about logic

and you calling me out on my dumbfaggotry consisted in making a logically untenable assertion. I don't know how to respond to those, except by saying "that makes no sense."
>> Anonymous
>>143936
Probably some weeks back, but at the moment I'm kinda neutral. Whatever the case, I'm not a picky man at heart, but chicks being like>>143888is just a heavy fucking "NO."
>> Anonymous
>>143935
I'm grateful that someone else isn't a complete retard
>> Anonymous
>>143924
>It's not like i just figured that out

Actually it's pretty clear that you just did since you posted a picture of a skinny girl with fat tits and called her "curvy."
>> Anonymous
>>and you calling me out on my dumbfaggotry consisted in making a logically untenable assertion.
>>consisted in making a logically untenable assertion.
>>consisted in
>>in
>> Anonymous
>>143956

I wasnt the one that posted the picture in the first place dumbfuck
>> Anonymous
>>143963
lol wut?

you people need to get out of the gym and go to class or something
seriously
>> Anonymous
you need to hang around better women.
>> Anonymous
femanon here: 2, 7, maybe 3
>> Anonymous
>>142933
appearance over health?
just how healthy is draining protein shakes and bulking urself up

could it be healthier than staying in normal, human-like size?