File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
It is can be stereoscopic tiem nao plz?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Come on guise, I know you have it.
I shouldnt have to keep my own thread alive.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
stereoscopic images give me a headache after looking for 5 seconds, cant look at it.
>> Anonymous
the point is to cross your eyes and see the image in 3D right?

Then why is it that instead of 3D boobies, I get a headache and sore eyes?
>> Anonymous
>>673923
becuz ur doin it rong
>> Blind Anonymous
I can only manage to do it with the thumbnails... lol...
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
shit makes me RAGE
>> Anonymous
>>673923
because a real stereoscopic image uses two, slightly, different images to produce the effect. Duplicating the same image does absolutely nothing.
>> Anonymous
does this board support .mng?
i figure i could crop the image and display each one at a specific frequency. then all you would need to do is blank each eye in sync and you should get 3d.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
i can't believe shit actually works.
how i've longed for 3d ishikei.
>> Anonymous
>>673858
this one was really cool
>> Anonymous
How does one make these?
>> Anonymous
>>673971
you make this be duplicating the image, then shifting the zones you want to add relief on by a few pixels on one of the copies.
The difficulty is that you must shop for the disapearing pixels, but it's not very difficult.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>673971
to make it more understandable, I made a quick example with paint:
the first line is the original image
for the second, I only duplicated it, no 3D effect if you cross your eyes on this one
for the third and fourth, I moved the inner square in the right part. notice how it changes your perception according to the direstion it is moved to.
>> Anonymous
I can never view these properly. By using the finger trick, I can see the two images merge into a third image, but when I try to transfer my view from my finger back to the monitor, my eyes refocus and there are only two pictures again.
>> Anonymous
>>674026
when you have your eyes crossed and see the third image, I find that blinking help me focus on it.
>> Anonymous
The way I do it is to make the third image that you see when you cross your eyes overlap onto the right image exactly. You have to be at a certain distance as well to make it work depending on the image.
>> Anonymous
problem with the images above is that some are designed for cross-eyed viewing while the rest was made for parallel viewing (ie swapped left and right images).

looking at a pic the wrong way --> spatial cues your brain receives from the difference between the pics mismatches what it derives from the shading (and what you'd expect) --> head go boom
>> Anonymous
how the fuck do i do this?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
not that great, but I was bored, so I had a little fun...
>> Anonymous
I think the issue I have is the fact that I have to get up pretty close to my monitor to do it right. Then again. I've been needing glasses for a while
>> Anonymous
how do you produce these? With an application? What is its name?
>> Anonymous
My visual ports lack the proper configuration for this.
>> Anonymous
MOAR! Faping was never so fun before...
>> Anonymous
>>674266
i'd make a shitload of these if I only knew how
>> Anonymous
>>673854

Who's the artist on this?
>> Anonymous
>>674289
if you need to ask that, you haven't lurked enough
>> Anonymous
Fapping with my eyes crossed. Oh the places you'll go.
>> Anonymous
they're too big dammit
>> Anonymous
bump
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
saw this in another thread, thought it'd be more enjoyable like that. enjoy.
>> Anonymous
Oh, the breakthroughs we'll have when they finally invent a polarised monitor (for 3D-movie style 3D instead of the shitty old red&blue 3D or eye straining like this)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
gifed the op one, dunno if it works
>> Anonymous
>>674545
are red/cyan glasses that bad? I don't really remember, it has been years since I last used them...
>> Anonymous
>>674557
not really, apart from, you know, making everything purple
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
that, and i wish current-generation 3D goggles (as in the kind with two screens, one for each eye) weren't a combination of expensive and shit quality. Seriously, 640x480? and it doesnt cover your eyes enough to block out light from behind the screens? and you cant even charge the batteries and use it at the SAME TIME?! goddamnit
>> Anonymous
>>674548
working but a bit too fast.
>> Anonymous
>>673855
>>673858
These pics are the only ones which can be counted as 3d.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>674579
well, to be fair, the only one that can really be called 3d is>>673914
For the others, it's only pseudo-3d shops, you only pointed the best two.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
made this a while ago for those who aren't there yet
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
the above exemplifies an original.

this one here is an exaggeration of what you see when you cross your eyes. i know a couple people who just plain can't see double on command, so if you can't, forget it. no big deal.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
after you get it to go double, play with it until the inside two overlap. you'll see something like this.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
the hardest part for me was focusing. get the center image in focus and - viola - you'll see it in 3D. i spent like an hour banging my face against the screen before i got it.
>> alfonzo-chan
>>674591
FUCK YES, THANK YOU LOL i got it finally
>> Anonymous
...I don't see 3D...

I just see five of the same girl.
>> Anonymous
>>674622
Five? You really should go see a doctor, get that third eye looked at
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
i think the weirdest part of all this stereoscopic stuff is how, once you get it focused, it gets a lot easier to stay cross-eyes and focused.

i suck at photoshoop, anyone care to take a shot at 3Ding this one?
>> Anonymous
>>674591
i tried doing what you said, but i used a pen to stare at. i just moved it closer and farther away from the screen (wile in the center of the 2 pics and my eyes) in till the 4 girls turned into 3 then those 3 turned into the normal 2 and moved back and forth till i got the 3 girls. my problem now is that it seems all 3 of these girls are so blurry i cant do shit, halp? please?
>> Anonymous
>>674717
granted i did this with a big picture, is it easier to use thumbnails and alike small pics?
>> Anonymous
>>674718
i held the pen there (with 3 blurry girls) for about 10-15 minutes and then my entire vision went blank and i could only see the center girl REALLY clearly, but she only stayed there for a few seconds. and then my nose actually started to bleed, i think i need to take a break.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>674625
>> Anonymous
>>674810
you, sir, are a god amongst men
>> Anonymous
>>674813
please, I simply am an anonymous with too much free time
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>674814
>an anonymous with the power to fux with dimensions with too much free time

fixed
>> Anonymous
>>674814
so, are you going to tell us how you do it?
>> Anonymous
finally i got this!
awesome
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
wow...
this is the best way to fap
can someone shoop this one?
>> Anonymous
>>674838
I did, here:>>674011>>674015

I admit it's not very explicit but I can't explain it better...
and sorry but right now I have to go work, I'll probably shop more later
>> Anonymous
>>674579

you missed
>>674540
which has a very nice 3d effect of arms and hanging boobies in the foreground :) then there's hair and legs in the back, and the background even further back.

i completely agree with the two you mentioned.
>> Mii
>>674548
OP isnt even supposed to work. I just shooped the picture a bit and decided to post the shoop and the original in same picture. So its not one of these stereoscopic pictures
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
work was boring... did my best on this one, but I'm not really satisfied...
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>675021
not my best, but better than nothing
>> Anonymous
if you put these on a PSP and use the Metal Gear Acid 2 thingy it works quite well
>> Anonymous
Tody I figured out how to do it! Up until now I just couldn't focus my view, but now I can do it! Just relax your eyes while still crossing them!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>674728
I GOT IT TO WORK FUCK YES!

....i haxed, pic related
>> Anonymous
MOAR!!!!
>> Anonymous
>>675182
moar? then please submit picture you want 3D-fied
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
This please
>> stereoscopic ftw! Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
please 3D this one, thx!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
This is awesome.

I'm scared I'm gonna fuck my eyes up, though...
>> Anonymous
>>674015
>>674588
>>674589
>>674591

YES! I finally saw them in 3D! Thanks for the tips, Anon!!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>675186
here
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
more seriously, here
>> Anonymous
WHAT THE FUCK, IT WORKS

Won't this fuck my eyes up though?
>> Anonymous
>>675295
The most I think it would do is just make you feel like your still cross-eyed for a few minutes

but that means you can easily pay attetion to you girlfriend and watch TV at the same time
>> Anonymous
More accurately, you perceive depth of an image.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
First attempt.

Any suggestions on improving?
>> Anonymous
>>675340

On second glance, the effect looks a bit too subtle.
>> Anonymous
>>675170

Got bored and printed this out/ taped it together, and the shit actually works. Never had a problem with viewing these, however, so sage.
>> Anonymous
>>675340
it's difficult to know when you're too subtle. And it wasn't an easy pic, so I say it's good
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>675340
various tips from experience:
-it's easier to work locally than on the whole picture, but it has less effect.
the best method is to divide the picture in layers, move the layers according to their depth, then redraw the missing parts. But it's really time-consuming and implies to have some decent drawing and shooping abilities (with this method, you often have holes of 20 pixels wide to fill). It's the "whole picture" method.
The "local" method just say "hey, here this should be behind", and work on a small part to put it behind. It's easier 'cause you can break down the work on various independant parts, and the result is still good. Also, with this method, keep in mind that you can work on both pictures, therefore choosing if you want to move the behind layer left or right (you just have to be careful which copy you are on and which side you move to)
>> Anonymous
>>674728

Nosebleeds from thinking too hard are often caused by brain tumors, have that looked at.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
? for 3d
>> Anonymous
Any tutorial for making such pics?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
just dropping some stuff
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
still dropping
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
dropping
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
and I'm done
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
thank U ~~~
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>675620
it's nothing
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Anyone care to take a shot at 3Ding this one?
>> Anonymous
I can't find any tutorial to teach me how to make suck pics. Any links?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
If someones bored, this one could make a good 3D too. thx guys! You are great. Stereoscopic is fun to look at :D
>> Anonymous
>>675632
I'll take a shoot at it, but this one looks quite difficult

>>675633
I'll write a tutorial, please wait a few hours until I find the time to do it.
>> Anonymous
>>675633
ZOMG!!! I MEAN SUCH! SUCH!

>>675635
Where are you going to upload it? Here?
>> Anonymous
>>675638
Yeah, I'll upload it here. In this thread, or at least in this board if something where to happen to the thread
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
OR this one?
>> Anonymous
bump
>> Anonymous
>>675639
OK, many thanks! Don't rush it, I have plenty of time.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
great works
>> Anonymous
Great work! Thank you!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
annnd here is the promised tutorial

part 1/3
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
2/3
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
3/3
>> Anonymous
CAN do this work WITH Photoshop ?
>> Anonymous
>>675719
well, indeed, it works with photoshop. And opencanvas. Even paint, if you want (as a matter of fact, I did>>674181,>>674540,>>674810,>>675072,>>675101,>>675215,>>675217,>>675429,>>675589and>>675631with paint)
>> Stereoscopic Anonymous
How I do the crosseye thing.
First of all: if nothing else works for you, sorry... it's really hard to explain how to look at stereoscopic things properly.

The two things that matter are Focus (what you are looking at with your eyes) and Distance (how far away you are from your screen) note that I wear glasses, so you may have to adjust nearer or further, it varies from anon to anon.

1. Practice crossing your eyes and not focusing on anything. Cross your eyes and glance around the room, looking in general directions and noting that your eyes aren't focusing on anything in particular.
2. Find a small stereoscopic image to practice on. The second image in this topic is a good example, something under 900px wide.
3. Fullscreen the image (or view it at its full size. If possible, try not to have too much interference on either side of the image (ads or other windows or stuff).
4. Measure a foot and a half away from your screen. Move your head there, and cross your eyes, don't focus. Now slowly move your head forward, let them focus on the picture if you feel your eyes trying to move a little (don't let them uncross).
5. Now that your eyes are cross-eyed and focused on the image, move your head forward or backward until you can see it without straining yourself.

The rest is up to you. For wide images (1400+) I usually have to back up 2.5 to 3 feet. When you get the hang of it, it becomes as simple as crossing your eyes and letting them focus on the image, with little effort on your part.

Scaled images (or ones that are particularly pixely) are not very good to practice on.

Some people focus on the image (and see it crosseyed) but they lose it too easily. Once you have focus, wait and don't look at any part of the image for a few seconds. Slowly shift your focus across the image, skipping around can destroy your concentration and uncross your yes.

Good luck
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
i found a trick to getting it to work:

cross your eyes until you get the 3 images
partially cover each eye with a hand so you can only see the middle image
your brain should do the rest
>> Stereoscopic Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
messing around in corel photopaint, to see if I could find a cheapass way to make some sense of stereoscopic depth via lighting and bump maps
>> Anonymous
>>675802
hey, that actually kinda works, still a bit flat though

i just made a stereoscopic nude pic using second life (so you wont want to see it, pig disgusting etc etc) and god thats really weird seeing stuff in actual 3D
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
my version
>> Stereoscopic Anonymous
>>675808
I can't stand seeing the lines where the layers were split, heh...
>> Anonymous
>>675814
yeah, I can still improve on that matter...
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>675818
the only way to fix it would be re-drawing the lines, i think :/

and hell, seeing as no-one objected to>>673914
i'm gonna post the SL ones I made
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
those 3d 'design a girl and the have her pose/fuck' games should have stereoscopic mode :(
>> Anonymous
Has anybody tried this technique by simply stretching shapes? I see a lot of cut/paste/fill going on, but it seems like stretching might work better.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I'd be real interested to see what you guys could whip up with a good high-def figure picture like this one. The 3D would probably look incredible.
>> Anonymous
Actually, you can play those 3d games in 3d. You just have to download a driver. I've played those games in 3d. You can pick side by side, or if you have glasses, you can go with anaglyph.
>> Anonymous
The guy who was making these needs to go make some over in /u/
>> Notoys !N5H/SLw3R2
>>675832
You might want to know this figure is currently on a special sale for 23$USD on HLJ.com

Its not very big (1/8) but from the pictures of it I would say its really worth it, which is why I ordered one :D

> http://heiseidemocracy.com/2007/12/01/ero-figure-review-megahouses-excellent-model-core-tsukasa-bull
et-02-holstein-hanako-san-pvc/
>> poser porn Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Poser Porn Poser Porn
     File :-(, x)
>> Poser Porn Poser Porn
     File :-(, x)
img 2
>> Poser Porn Poser Porn
     File :-(, x)
img 3
>> Anonymous
(>>675721here, aka the guy who made the tuto)

>>675929
to /u/, /h/ and so many other places... but I have so much things to do, and I'm sure other peoples have so much things to do too...
(free advertisement ( I think I deserve the right to, since I contributed a lot in this thread) : am currently looking for serious H-artists who work for free in order to make a doujin game)(yeah I know, it doesn't exist....)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>674548
uhh, ok, what should i do with this?
>> Anonymous
>>676201
converting to a animated gif is a good wey to tell if it's done right. OP's image isn't the gif looks like her body is pusling or jiggling.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
not for cross-eyed viewing
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Notoys !N5H/SLw3R2
>>676120
I know some good japanese illustrators looking for jobs, but they require money : )

(maybe I should stop parasiting /e/ :D ...)
>> Anonymous
>>675609
>>675589

These two are exceptional. Not in terms of the original image, but after viewing in stereo, they are still both crisp images with nice viewing depth.
>> Anonymous
>>674810
Ok, this is just freaky and probably the coolest thing I've done with my eyes next to reading!
>> Anonymous
>>676386
Agreed, the depth is insane. The boobs and nipples pop out as well as the depth of hair.
>> Rounder... Anonymous
>>676181
>>676182

I was wondering when mine were going to be posted, I use a trick with Photoshop's "warp" edit function that makes s smoothly curving 3D effect useful for tits and ass... and faces, hair, etc.
>> tuto guy
>>676361
they always do. can't expect them to work for free, I guess :p unfortunatly I want to make something free, so I can't pay them. Thanks anyway.

>>676806
they are indeed very nice
>> tuto guy
>>676361
out of curiosity... how much do they charge?
>> Anonymous
>>676181
>>676182
these are my favourite!

>>675672

someone really skilled with photoshop should try to redo this, since to make the spoon really stand out, i think you need draw a lot of extra
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
My contribution, still trying to figure this crap out...
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
ramping up the difficulty some here, but...
>> Anonymous
>>676974

You didn't do anything other than put the same image next to each other.

Everyone who's making theirs setup for parallel viewing is dumb. Eye's crossing is way easier.
>> Anonymous
>>677005
>Eye's crossing is way easier.
agreed, especially if you cover up the outer images with your hands like hat other guy suggested
>> Anonymous
Finally some delicious original content.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>676974
That's pretty badass. I made an animated gif of it, in case anyone can't do the crosseye trick.
>> tuto guy
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Here's a few from awhile back. I've always wished they'd make movies with this stuff. It's so easy to do, just film with two cameras about an inch apart...
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
and here's one I made but never came out as good as I'd hoped. (Not real Ecchi but who cares..)
>> ccurious
No.677047 - Does anybody know what that figure is from?
>> Anonymous
REQUEST TO ARCHIVE THIS EPIC THREAD ON 4CHANARCHIVE.ORG
>> Anonymous
>>677044
LEVEL UP!
You got:
+1 internet
>> Anonymous
>>677055
what am I gonna do with a second internet? can I eat it?
>> Anonymous
>>677048Another one I did.
>>676912Shouldn't be any more difficult than>>676182was... of course I _still_ hate that stupid, stupid cake (a LOT of fiddly little 2-5 pixel seams to fill).
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
would have to be resized smaller for sure, but with the white bg and the rest you might be able to do some fun stuff with it.