>> |
Anonymous
>>134627
Your use of the term "foot a phobe" is incorrect, as you're operating on the assumption that everyone who objects, is somehow at base afraid of feet.
While in reality, it is the opposing case in play - people who like feet to an ABNORMAL degree, playing in a pool of people who, for the most part, don't care.
You haven't seen an argument because you obviously don't care to read any contrary viewpoints(there have been tons upon tons upon tons of the same arguments, going over the same territory, over and over and over again. Both sides have had valid arguments made over time.)
But here it is, AGAIN, just for little old you.
A foot is not a primary or secondary sexual characteristic of a human being. It's not a sexual characteristic at all, unlike breasts, asses(by proxy.), the pubic region, etc. It's just a foot. Ergo, pics with barefooted girls are seldom complained about, unless someone's making a big deal out of it being all about the feet(and then it's not the pics, but the people being complained about, really.)
When a pic shoves the foot into the focus, and the girl is way off in the background as if she almost doesn't exist, then there is a sexual motive being assigned directly to the foot, to the EXCLUSION of all else the picture could have. This is where the problem is created, and where an ALTERNATIVE(Not shared by the majority of people) fetish comes into play.
It's a real simple standard. More girl than foot = /e/. As much or more foot than girl = /d/.
|