File :-(, x, )
A rant, with pictures! Fallen Horror
There is a big difference between Stockings and Pantyhose/Tights.
Yet many websites continue to list them as the same. When trying to browse for pictures or movies
of hose you'll be getting nothing but stockings. This is very, very irritating. Not only that, but it borders on false
advertising.
People who put movies and pictures on file sharing programs do the same thing.
Hose and tights media are hard to come by! But for Stocking fetishists, you don't have to look far to find your fix.

It grates my nerves when people knowglingly mislabel their media and put Stockings as Pantyhose. It makes me want to beat the hell out of them!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
lighten up, dude. at least your fetish is both relatively common and physically possible. and what is the difference anyway? I sure as hell don't know.
>> RiderFan
     File :-(, x)
>>385449

Yes it does get frustrating trying to find the right pictures, but don't think of resorting to violence because of it.
There are always people who are willing to help a fellow comrade like you in there searches (like myself). So, here is a little help from me to you. http://blue.ribbon.to/~powderskin/
>>385463
The difference is that one covers the genital area, while one does not. Nice picture though, I didn't have that one.
>> Fallen Horror
     File :-(, x)
>>385463
One is common, one is not. Stockings keep being put in the same categories as pantyhose and tights. I've actually been to a megasite that listed the category of "pantyhose" thinking they might have a few but had none in there, only boring stockings. That was a waste of time and money.
>>385470
Thanks man (or woman)!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> reply Anonymous
hot!!!
>> RiderFan
     File :-(, x)
>>385594
You must be new to /e/. There have been at least 5 threads devoted to these tastes. And yes, it is hot.
>> VGK
I agree with everything you said.


The diffceres are obvious, yet they get so confused...
>> Anonymous
>>385449
Getting upset about porn is pretty powerful.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>385449

Piss off you whiny bastard.
>> Anonymous
>>385463

Physically possible, lol. At least it's not shitting dick-nipples or something /d like that.
>> RiderFan
     File :-(, x)
>> RiderFan
     File :-(, x)
>> RiderFan
     File :-(, x)
All of my pics that aren't real women.

http://www.sendspace.com/file/nau1zx
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>385449
Could you at least post the non-altered version of the pic you marked up to make your point? You just committed one of *my* pet peeves.

Besides, /e/ is pretty good about supplying some good p-hose pics (a number of great threads recently), I'm not sure what good ranting here will do, other than to annoy people like>>385626
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> RiderFan
     File :-(, x)
>>385739
>>385740
Nice ones!
I try to post new images if I am able to.
>> RiderFan
     File :-(, x)
>> RiderFan
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>385882
>> RiderFan
     File :-(, x)
>>385932
>> Anonymous
I sometimes have troubles with this myself when sorting.

If I don't see everything, how do I know if it is stockings or pantyhose? This is usually a problem combined with skirts.

Also when it is a full lingerie set and these long leg things are on... are they lingerie or are they stockings?
>> RiderFan
>>385967
A valid issue with not being able to see everything in order to differentiate.
I usually download and hope for the best.


As for lingerie, I am guessing that overly decorated stockings with more accessories qualify in that category. But, with lingerie you still get stockings galore.

Where is Fallen Horror anyway? He should at least contribute to this thread. Who knows, he's probably just too busy fapping to the link I posted.>>385687
>> Anonymous
stockings > pantyhose
>> RiderFan
>>385996
I think we've had this discussion already... At least I think that you are the same Anonymous as before.

The thing we have in common: We love legs!
So far no foot fanatics have started spamming threads.
>> VGK
>>385967


It's usually Pantyhose.
>> Anonymous
>>385449
I hope you die by accidentially strangling yourself with the stockings you pull over your head when you masturbate.

Seriously, shut up, GTFO, nobody gives a shit about your stupid little fetish. You're as bad as a furfag.
>> VGK
>>386111


Hey, I give a shit. Dumbassanon.
>> Anonymous
>>385463
not to mention.. legal D:
>> Anonymous
>>385996
then go to a thread about stockings? not hard.
>> RiderFan
     File :-(, x)
Thread Hijacked!

Now it's a continuation of our previous threads! Come brothers in taste!

>>386137
Or do stockings search. You're bound to find a few hundred thousand that are listed correctly.
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
last one for now,enjoy
>> RiderFan
     File :-(, x)
>>386204
>>386194
>>386184

I know for a fact that I was the one who originally posted those.
>> Anonymous
>>385995
If they're transparent, it's hose.
If they're opaque, stockings.
>> Anonymous
>>386231
Pics or it didn't happen
>> Anonymous
>boring stockings

You have insulted the Absolute Territory, faggot.
>> Anonymous
ever seen cuban heeled one? the black is just slightly transparent on me, the red is not. i've seen it both ways on the same pair (its not that i have fat legs, they're muscular. i'm a dancer. and not a trap)
>> Anonymous
To OP:

It's really not that much of a problem since stockings are better anyways.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Stockings get OOOOLD after awhile, especially since they are practically everywhere now.
>> RiderFan
     File :-(, x)
>>386488
Very, very true statement.

A buddy of mine just sent me this link:
http://www.tights.jp/

I don't have time to check it out though.
>> sage
PANTYHOSE SUCKS WHY THE FUCK WOULD U WANA JERK OFF TO THAT/ ITS LIKE A GIRL WITH CLOTHES ON USELESS AND U COULDNT FUCK A GIRL WITH PANYHOSE ON U STUPID FAGS CUZ IT GOES ALL THE WAY UP TO THE WAIST. U CAN FUCK A GIRL WITH STOCKINGS SO FUCK U FAGS
>> VGK
>>386701


I've known about that site. Should've just asked me.


You already know about kimarin, right?


He draws a majority of his girls in black tights. Google if you dont.
>> Anonymous
>>386715
And yet you respond with such immaturity. You are truely pathetic.
>> RiderFan
     File :-(, x)
Now that I've browsed the website, I remember it from about a year ago (I had forgotten the link!).

>>386715
Hahaha! *Whew* I laughed after reading that! Here's an uncharacteristic move from me:

Hey sage, do the world a favor and fuck off. Your whole statement is asinine. Yes, you can fuck a girl while she is wearing hose. She just needs to pull them down enough.
>> Anonymous
>>386715

you see friend, jerking off is done *because* you cannot fuck a girl; thus it is entirely logical to masturbate to the image of a girl who is wearing (relatively) sex-proof clothing

alternately you can just rip her pantyhose open / down and have at her the 4chan way
>> Anonymous
>>386779
"Yes, you can fuck a girl while she is wearing hose. She just needs to pull them down enough."

This sounds really hot. You see, I prefer pantyhose over stockings for a variety of reasons. I'd totally love to fuck a girl in pantyhose.
>> Anonymous
ITT namefags thinking that we give a shit about their fetish.
>> Anonymous
>>386785
>ITT namefags posting relevant /e/ content, praise them.

fixd
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
i guess i can contribute while im at it, its a repost though :(
>> Anonymous
oh god yes
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>386779
Having complained about the tightness of pantyhose and how stockings are more comfortable in a previous thread, I must insert another comment here.

Pantyhose are MADE to be tight. They are body-control garments. A girl that had to pull down her pantyhose so you could stick it in would be very uncomfortable, her legs would have to be tensed the entire time to keep them open... unless she pulled them down to her knees or something. Of course, you could stick it in her pooper or rip them up like so without a problem.

Stockings are way easier to handle in many ways. Pantyhose are equally hot, but irritating to wear and deal with.
>> Anonymous
And once again, I have ranted into an almost dead thread. The lolz!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>386831
you can always make a new one
>> Anonymous
>>386828
Exactly how does pulling pantyhose down make the girl uncomfortable?
>> Anonymous
>>386836
It depends on how far you pull them. If you pull them to just below her genitals, they'll be really tight and be pulling her legs shut the entire time. Which is sadly the hottest way to do it! But if you pull them down to her knees she'll be fine... it just removes a lot of the "look".
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>386838
I agree with you, but I still find pulling the pantyhose right beneath her pussy really hot.
>> Anonymous
I'm not denying that it is. I think there's less material of pantyhose just because they're impractical/uncomfortable as compared to stockings.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
lol image limit.
>> Anonymous
Two words: Fucking Epic Thread
>> Anonymous
>>386852
That's three, but it's ok. Your blood is probably all in your pen0r
>> Anonymous
>>386852
Would be, without the epic trolls.