File :-(, x, )
Topless-thread Anonymous
Remember, topless, not nude
>> Anonymous
that looks pretty terrible
>> Anonymous
>>677478
Thats incredible ugly..
>> Anonymous
looks like a piece of shit that someone took a shit on while eating shit.
>> Anonymous
>>677521
that doesn't seem to make sence
>> Testament
     File :-(, x)
stop bitching about the ugliness of the OP pic, and post something decent of ya own you worthless bums
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>677532

Agreed brother Anon.
Have a Karen to go with your Sakuya
>> Anonymous
>>677532
Of course what you provided was nude, not topless, which the OP specifically asked you not to give. Also, no one says 'worthless bums' anymore, fuck off faggot.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>677557
Of course /e/ disregards blatant /r/equests if the OP doesn't even bother posting anything but the mandatory thread starter pic. Hence nobody is under any obligation and thus whatever pic is fine.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
The artist forgot one thing. We won't want to look at it unless it looks good.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Just for fun, here's a comparison of the OP and the shop. Her left leg makes me wonder...
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> OP is a cocksucking faggot Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
durr am i doin it rite?
>> OP is a cocksucking faggot Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> OP is a cocksucking faggot Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> OP is a cocksucking faggot Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> OP is a cocksucking faggot Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>680274

I guess you're doing it right, but I always wondered.

Why say "cocksucking faggot"? Is a faggot, by sexual definition, not extremely likely to suck cocks? Does it require explicitly pointing it out? Or is it just redundancy for literary effect?
>> Anonymous
>>680290
OP is the bitch in the relationship. Thus, he sucks cocks rather than j-j-jamming it in.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Topless
>> Anonymous
>>680276
SOURCE PLEASE!!!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>680358
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>680276
seconded!
>> Mr.X !Pgpkn72wZo
     File :-(, x)
>>677478-fat.
>>678352-narrow face...
Combo! with the latter's face-much better.
>> Anonymous
>>682457
So I take it you prefer non-fat body with fat face?
>> Mr.X !Pgpkn72wZo
>>682462
She looks like a pacific islander with a wider face,also somewhat like certain asains.