File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
As requested by /a/
>> Anonymous
So now the mods delete offensive content, edit out what was offensive, and repost it?
I'm not complaining.
>> Anonymous
>>262851
Actually I've seen that edit before. Props to the mods for replacing the original!
>> Anonymous
LOL the actual ones that might be consider under age are still there heheheh. The one that looked loli are a few hunderd years old.
>> Anonymous
>>262939
Blah, blah, Etna argument, blah blah.
>> Anonymous
given that the last two were in no way sexual to begin with, i dont know what the fuss was about.
>> Anonymous
13 looks like Haruka from Noein.
>> Anonymous
>>262944

Indeed, it was cute but not hot, and I'm saying this as a pedo.
>> Anonymous
Frankly I think removing loli based on looks is the best way. You can say that a character is hundreds of years old, but bottom line is that that pic you have looks like a kid.

Lets be honest, how many under 18 characters do we all collect pics of that look of age? Plenty! I think its fine because if some lay person looked at my porn it all "looks" fine.
>> Anonymous
ISO last 2 lol
>> Anonymous
>>262944
That does not keep people from fapping.

>>263118
Agreed.
>> Anonymous
>>262944
By that logic why not post nude non-sexual pics in worksafe boards? Because it still breaks the rules.