File :-(, x, )
wot Anonymous
that collection/game/manga is this from
>> Anonymous
bump
>> Anonymous
http://reiq.deviantart.com/gallery/?
>> Anonymous
fugly
>> Anonymous
http://rapidsearch.yi.org/?s=jigglygirls
>> Filthy Phil
     File :-(, x)
<< anyone have the most recent siterip with this picture in it?
>> Anonymous
Shitty art.
>> Anonymous
>>318167
You do better, genius.
>> Anonymous
>>318169
Yeah, the argument complete idiots use.
>> Anonymous
>>318170
Because it's, oh, idunno. Valid. Idiots are the ones that generalize, like you sir.
>> Anonymous
sage for crappy frightening weeaboo art
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>318169
oh hi. this is one of my many paintings. i do believe that this qualifies me to say the OP art is mediocre.
>> Anonymous
>>318173

No, it's not a valid argument. One can believe something is bad and yet not be able to do better.
>> Anonymous
>>318226
That's not the validity in question. It's calling someone's work shit when you've never put forth an effort yourself. He can have his opinion all he likes, it doesn't change the fact that he doesn't understand very well what he's condemning in a very base tone. It's the difference between critiquing and impractical criticism.
>> Anonymous
dude artists draw, they are SUPPOSED to draw, people who don't draw DON'T draw therefore they won't be able to do better, but since art is for people to see they can damn well say whatever the fuck they want.
>> Anonymous
>>318173

No, it's not a valid argument at all, it's retarded.

It's like saying that you can't say that a videogame sucks because you aren't a programmer, you can't say a book is shit because you aren't a writer, etc.

It's a retarded fallacy. And I think this sucks, too.