File :-(, x, )
Guns vs. Swords 2 Mr. Worksafe
>>393846

Continue the war here.

Any girl with a weapon can be posted, but the dicussion is between whether guns or swords make the girl more attractive.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous !cj95/MNHvA
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Guns or swords?
Or both?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Personally, I say swords.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Though it IS a tough call.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
And Black Lagoon sure doesn't make the call any easier to make...
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Not to mention KOS-MOS....
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I really like both, actually...
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
... but in the end, I have to say...
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
... swords rule the day.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I likes guns.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
What about mallets?
>> Anonymous
>>395197
Giant squeaky mallet > all
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
It's really not the weapon that matter's but rather the person who holds it. Still, there's nothing like the smell of burning gunpowder.
>> Seeker_Annonymous
>>395451

I agree, and Sion is smoking hot too, which helps a great deal.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
maybe it's because I'm a former soldier but.guns FTW
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>> noko
Guns are mindless point and click affairs... Now swords, they take actual skill to be of any use, and downright own the fantasy genre.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>396102
"point and click"
you've never actually used a firearm have you?
>> Anonymous
>>396176

point and click.....JAM...you've never actually used a firearm have you?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>396191
USAF
52nd. security forces squadron
Bravo flight
Spangdahlem A.B.,Germany

never once had a jam,how 'bout you
>> Anonymous
>>396191

I've never jammed a weapon.
>> Anonymous
>>396198

Canadian Armed Forces
4th Air Defense Reg, 128 Bty

Aside from manning the 35mm gun, I've fired everything the infantry has to offer. Every automatic jams, no exceptions. Get back in your plane, pigeon.
>> Anonymous
>>396198
>>396202

Looks like you haven't fired enough, you both need to back to the range and fire a little more.... EVERYTHING jams....
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>396204
I was a cop dumbass,I drove a patrol vehicle
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>396207

Good for you, we're talking about weapons, not cars... go drive some more....
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>396205
Maybe if you'd ever used a gun made during this century, you'd feel otherwise. This thing called technology makes technological things like guns much less tedious. You might as well be arguing that guns hardly ever fire straight. (which was true, until the invention of rifled barrels in the mid-late 1800's)

Either way, aesthetically, swords. For practical purposes, guns.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>396209

You're actually right, I've never fired a weapon made this century.... and probably, neither have you. I'm just saying guns and rifles are overated. Jams are only one thing, they can overheat, run out of ammunition, one can forget the safety on at a crucial moment. Dirt can get in the barrel very easily while crawling through mud. On the other hand I'm not saying a sword can deflect bullets or anything. I'm just saying in terms of reliability, a sword wins.
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>>396207
"I was a glorified metermaid good sir,I drove a go-kart"
fixed

get serious junior every firearm can jam,you might have known this if you had fired one more than once a year just to qualify,I spent over a decade in the Army and have seen some seriously shit-tastic jams and mechanical failures.
ever see the feed tray cover or backplate of an MA-2 50 cal. machine gun blow off,it ain't pretty.
>> Anonymous
>>396207
who the fuck cares, this is /e/.
post some fucking porn
fap
or get the fuck out
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>396212

I haven't heard the word "shit-tastic" used in soooo long....its kinda nostalgic.
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>>396213
point taken,no more drama just pics
guess we got a little carried away
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>396221

Whats that from? I thought it was Grenadier till I opened the pic....
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
just so there' no hard feelings,have some sword pics
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
does this count?
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Now THIS is a weapon...
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>> Semper paratus
>>396224
honestly friend I have no idea
the irony is I dl'd it from a thread like this one
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Semper paratus
     File :-(, x)
>>396218
that's the term the unit armorer used when we brought that 50 cal. back from the range,he looked it over and then looked up at us and said
"you guys have made one seriously shit-tastic mess out of one of the hardest to damage weapons I have,congratulations now please leave"
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>396209
Well, actually, rifling was discovered in 16th/17th Century France by a gunsmith who accidently made some scratches in the barrel of a dueling pistol, because of that dueling with pistols was out lawed and he was no longer allowed to manufacture fire arms. Go figure.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Hey there's still people in this thread.....