>> |
Anonymous File :-(, x)
>>316536 egh... i ought to just let it go, but your stupid motivational pic got to me...
first off, 316126 is moe, completely worksafe, no naughty bits showing. so it doesn't even qualify to be in /e/. second, the girl in the pic has got tits, and her legs are thick and meaty, both of which indicate she's not loli. And finally, on your motivational poster it says Got CP? Maybe you don't understand that CP stands for child pornography, which requires real live children. In no way, shape or form can lolicon be CP because none of it involves actual humans. It might not be your cup of tea, but there is a distinction between illustrations of fictional characters and actual minors.
and really this isn't the place to argue about the legality or legitimacy of lolicon. we don't need any more drama than i'm stirring up right now. pic is unlreated to thread but offered as apology for this rant.
|