File :-(, x, )
Decensoring / Uncovering Anonymous
This was a semi-request by a couple anons in /v/.

In a thread where the original of this pic was posted, I typed out my thoughts, saying I should shop her out of her panties. One anon said if I could do that without messing it up, he'd suck my cock.

Though I had no interest in that, I did it anyway to see how well I could do it without deviating from the original artist's style.

I embellished a tiny bit with the lowlight/midlight/highlight transition on her mons but the result gives me a boner and I particularly dislike elves and anything with ears like them, so I believe I did ok.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
'riginal
>> Anonymous
I am a man of my word. If given the proper information (privately of course) then I would be more then happy to seek you out and fulfil our agreement.
>> Anonymous
>>376921
Haha, was it really you? I was just about to make a thread in /v/ and link to this.

And no, no thanks.
>> Anonymous
>>376919

Oh wow, that's terrible. I'm not saying that to make you feel bad, but damn. I take it you've never seen a vagina, before?
>> Anonymous
>>376939
This is how you should direct your ire, creature that claims to have a vagina.

Even so, I will defend the OP (somewhat) by saying that parts in /e/ or /h/ images are usually not exactly anatomically correct, they're abstractions.
>> Anonymous
>>376919
I'm a fanatic about correct anatomy. I saw this and facepalmed for a good minute.
If you don't know what you're doing, just don't do it.
>> Anonymous
>>376941

When did I claim to be female? Anyway, OP would've been a lot better off just copy/pasting a vagoo from another pic than instead of making whatever the hell that thing is. This is the internets, I don't have to be nice and honesty is the best policy.
>> Anonymous
>>376945
Amen to that.
>> Anonymous
>>376939
Like I mentioned, I did it as close to his drawing as possible. If you look at the original, you'll see his/her grasp, or lack thereor, of the human female anatomy. I am and have been working on alternates. I'll be updating the thread with them.
>> Anonymous
>>376945
Sorry sir, you just sounded a lot like the woman in the Angel/Demon thread that never takes sage out of the email field for some reason
>> Anonymous
>>376947
Do so.
I'd like to see if you could actually figure out that her cunt shouldn't be glued closed.
>> Anonymous
>>376949

Maybe it's the lack of sleep, but I fukkin' lol'ed!
>> Anonymous
>>376949
So apparantly simply spreading your legs to a mild degree (judging by the 'tween the legs camera shot I'd say its mild) is supposed to make your labia gape open and flap wildly in the wind, then?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>376949
Why be an ass?

Hopefully something that'll give you a bit of faith in my ability.
>> Anonymous
>>376949
lmao
>> Anonymous
>>376952
Don't assume things. I never said that.
But as a proud owner of one of these puppies, I know how a vagina works.
The way her legs are spread, the slit would come open just slightly, not shut up like a clam. Maybe if her legs were closer together, it'd look somewhat like that. (but we have to consider that you fucked up the angle, as her body is pointed SE like that, and the slit is off in some other fricking direction.)
>> Anonymous
>>376956
Now I have even less faith.
>> Anonymous
>>376960
well keep in mind the overall style of the image perspective an such. i get sic of seeing the same copypasta-ed pussies in all 'uncensored' hentai
>> Anonymous
>>376962
Yes, exactly.
And the perspective is one way, and your vagina is the other way.
Fucking failure.
>> Anonymous
>>376959
I'm a girl too, as a matter of fact.
However, if you watch any degree of pornography, which by being here I assume (apologies) you must, or maybe have at some point, you may realize that some chicks are just like that. Not everyone has those nearly nonexistant labia that are spread all the time.

As a more realistic examples, there's a whole fetish based around chicks who can have an attractive camel toe, and their vaginas usually HAVE to be spread and even when bent over very little of the inner labial surace will be visible.

I do agree that some pink should be visible, but I think that in general there should be a bit more of a pink hue to the skin there because even in a mild state of arousal (or none at all, though not sure it'd be visibly pink then) there is more bloodflow in that area.
>> Anonymous
>>376965
Finally, another who can make some sense!
You're a beautiful soul.
>> Anonymous
>>376965
Haha, win.
>> Anonymous
>>376965
By watching any degree of pornography, you will realise that most cunts are the most widestretched, completely unvirginial things ever. Most of them could catch wind like sails. The girl or guy who's crit-ing your work is right. The anatomy is completely off.
You've basically taken the fat folds, inbetween the legs, and made them into a cunt. Not only that, but by the angle of which she's sitting, the left flap should not overlap the right. It looks as if you've basically gone and appeared on "Plastic surgeons do the funniest things".
>> Anonymous
>>376970
YES.
>> Anonymous
>>376970
I didn't make the drawing. Nor did I alter the angle at which the artist placed vague visual implications of a vagina through the panties.
>> Anonymous
>>376972
If it WAS a vagina, you might have gotten it right.
>> Anonymous
>>376970

Well, most yes. This is fucking fantasy art though. What do you want, an artist saying "I want to make this fantasy princess look like an innocent virgin, but for realisms sake I had better give her a nasty ass hallway vagina."
>> Anonymous
>>376975
No, I'm just saying
"Give her a vagina that doesn't look like a fat fold in completely the wrong direction."
>> Anonymous
>>376972
You are avoiding the point I'm making.
The drawing was ALREADY in one angle, and you drew the vagina turning off in some random OTHER direction.
Even in the original you could still see that the inner pink of that area was showing.
There are so many terrible, TERRIBLE things wrong with your edits. I think you should stop, get a young, virgin girlfriend, and use her as good reference.
Or you could just never touch this again, and let those who know what they're doing create some real work. That would be really super.

Also, why is there a TAN LINE where the panties were?
>> Anonymous
lol girl power
>> Anonymous
>>376977
I understand what you're saying. It's just that I simply took off the panties. But I'll correct his initial placement. It's really not worth all the work but this thread poking at me.
>> Anonymous
>>376990here.
I meant to quote>>376978
>> Anonymous
I love this thread.
>> Moo !XBOXgikTFw
CORRECT ANATOMY ON ANIMU PIKTAR LOL
>> Anonymous
wtf since when do any 4chanians know what female anatomy is?
>> Anonymous
>>376956
Not that it wasn't a bad pic to begin with, but now her equipment looks like a ballsack.

And since when is this /ic/?

>>377000
What was that saying we used to have involving real physics, animu, god, murder and kittens?
>> Anonymous
>>377007
so ronery~!
>> Anonymous
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE???
OP WAS JUST TRYING TO GET YOUR HONEST OPINION ABOUT HIS UNCOVERING. now please, this is not /b/, nor is it /h/. /e/ is much more sophisticated than that. JUST because he hasnt shown her labia open like if i just said open sesame doesnt mean it sucks. sure it could use a little opening, but not flapping about, like in the jessie pic. that is disgusting. although i must say the artist forgot the clitoris.
now then, can we all just get along and finally get it through you alls thick skulls that this is NOT OPs work. now how about a decent uncovering thread, huh?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
This went from removing some panties to almost completely restructuring some hastily-drawn woman's pelvic area.

Altered how much of the pelvis the skirt was showing in order to make things flow better.
>> Anonymous
>>377024
thank you
>> Anonymous
>>377062
Which one of the above posters were you?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I did this a while ago. Anyone have the original because I saved over it.
>> Anonymous
I don't think the original was good enough to deserve this much attention.
The skin tone was a little off in OP, but only 4chan could make so much drama out of so little substance.
And another thing, can't you just be happy with the original? Unless you're editing something offensive, the edit does more harm than good.
>> Anonymous
>>377114
What harm? Possibly offending the original artist?
>> Anonymous
>>377114
>I don't think the original was good enough to deserve this much attention.

I know but /v/ really wanted it. I love mah /v/atos. Plus I could use the practice, AND I had nothing better to do but sleep.
>> Anonymous
bizzump
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Fixed.
>> Anonymous
>>377895
Kakashi needs to fucking control where he points his eyes.
>> Anonymous
>>377895
fukken win !
>> Anonymous
>>377895
hahahaha. this thread was getting too serious.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
why do you freaks have to add anuses to everything
>> Anonymous
>>378107
Because its the alternative entry
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>378107
I wonder why.
>> Anonymous
>>378107
Sort of agreed, they're not terribly necessary in pictures
>> Anonymous
>>378115
Matter of opinion.