Suggestive without showing anything.
>>129601>Horrifying without showing anything.Fixed.
If this place allowed it to go any further, the police would arrest people who downloaded from here.
I don't get it, and that's rarely a good sign.
>>129625seconded
God, this place must be a fuckin' haven for pedos.
It looks like a girl licking a thumb.
anti-pedos planning killing sprees again?
..I don't get it, what did>>129601post wrong? Doesn't look like loli or CP to me... o.o
Well, the girl in the pic clearly looks about 6 years old, and given the general theme of this imageboard, especially as this was posted in the "ecchi" board with the comment "Suggestive without showing anything", people's minds will wonder. But for the right reasons.
>>130081That face is actually clearly age neutral. It's as old as you want it to be (Within certain limits, of course)
>>130171Agreed. it looks early 20's to me.
>>1300816 years old? You aren't serious, are you?Or you are completely blind or you are a troll, pick the one which suits you better.
Something tells me this post was longer and a section of it is missing.
I agree that she can be just about any age you want. If you want to be nasty about it then you'll see an underaged girl.
Who gives a shit. It's a damn ugly pic, and I swear if this is a series, there is gonna be a tongue depressor involved.
I said 'horrifying' because, personally, I find the pic really creepy.It does have hints of underage, and she looks like she's unconscious or asleep, too.At least, on my take of it.
>>130173Well, that was my impression of it anyway. The girl in the pic looks like my 7 year old niece, and elements of the face, like how small it is and the cheeks, look young.
Not sure this thread can be saved. ;_;