File :-(, x, )
ITT, Roxanne. Anonymous
The only Pokemon girl that I give a shit about (it's the tights, it's my thing)
>> Anonymous
I don't actually see the ecchi in this pic.
I don't even think you could call this fanservice.

Heck, I don't even know why people can't figure out the difference. Ecchi has always been mainly for simple nudity where you can see the person's private parts either clothed or unclothed.

Fanservice is just underwear or censored nudity, normally including the said private parts being covers with hands, petals, whatever.

I mean really, most fanservice could be placed into /a/ considering it's suitable for kids aged 15, and on 4chan there wouldn't be many people under that age (and besides, worksafe boards on 4CHAN? don't make me laugh. If you want worksafe go elsewhere).

Seriously, the categorization here is horrible. For some reason, a picture of a girl with an incredibly small panty shot is on par with a fully naked woman.

How fucking stupid.
>> Truth
>>253481
Ecchi =/= nudity.
>> Anonymous
>>253481
Although I don't share the OP's interest in that particular character he DID point out specifically what he found ecchi about the picture, tights.

Hosiery, tights, long legs, and short skirts are definitely ecchi.

If it's not your thing find another thread. If you don't like the whole board don't visit it. If you don't like the way 4chan does things, don't come here.
>> Anonymous
>>253510

Why thank you, Anonymous. I figured the threade is better suited in /e/ than /c/ because a majority of Roxanne I have seen before is /e/ material.

Thank you andgoodnight.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I don't have any of the OP character, but here are some pantyhose of moral support... or something.
>> Anonymous
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecchi
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fan_service
>> Anonymous
>>253521
Note that they both have very different definitions. I don't claim they're incredibly accurate, however, it does suggest the term Ecchi is more... well, adult orientated than what fanservice is.
>> Anonymous
>>253516

It doesnt matter. You are the chosen one, because nobody can deny the topic is ecchi now.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
The only pic I have of her. Best of luck finding more.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
You know we might as well make this a thread for all the forgotten females of Pokemon, since between them all there's only enough pictures to fill one thread.

Somehow Flannery got lucky, I think it's because she was in three episodes. Whitney was in two, and there's a little more ecchi of her out there.

Of course, Sabrina was also in two episodes, but she was being a crazy bitch with a talking puppet in them.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>253571
Lorelei/Prima gets very little for some reason as well. Hard to imagine considering.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
There's more ecchi of ERIKA than there is of either Sabrina or Loreli.

It's a fucking crime. ONE OF THEM IS CLEARLY INTO BDSM AND THE OTHER HAS HUMONGOUS TITS.
>> Anonymous
OH GOD IT'S A GIRL WEARING CLOTHES IT MUST BE ECCHI.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
hard to imagine Lovrina hasn't either. she already looks like a porn star, it can't be that hard to make the jump.
>> disco ninja
>>253580
extra win for my fav pokemon
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Needs more FLANNERY