File :-(, x, )
/e/vil thread. Anonymous
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> RiderFan !!o7sFgCyZbre
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>498948
Wtf I was sure I posted that.
>> Anonymous
we need more evil in our /e/
Bump
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> gundrake !3stw1O/bgU
>>499931
:D
>> Anonymous
Hey, were some posts deleted here?
>> Anonymous
>>500309

Etna pics, yeah. She's regularly deleted for loli.
>> Anonymous
>>500319
Bah, that's a shame.
>> Anonymous
>>500319
If Etna is deleted for being a loli, then>>498932
should be deleted as well.
>> Anonymous
Hell, if Etna is deleted, a shitload of other pics on /e/ should be.
>> Anonymous
>>500363
you're a retard, how the fuck is>>498932loli with boobs and a waist like that?
loli refers to body-type and not age, fucking get it in your skulls already
>> Anonymous
>>500383
you really don't get the whole "loli" concept, do you?
>> Anonymous
>>500392

I get it; you don't. Hence you're surprised at the mod's actions, and I'm not.

It's body-type. If it looks pre-pubescent it's loli. And nothing else matters.
>> Anonymous
>>500396
I get it, but I'm not surprised by the mods actions either. It's more than just body type, and if you think it's that simple you're a total fuckwit. Research the term, understand the concept, ass.
>> Anonymous
>>500363

Mods operate, and have since they originally said it(as far as I know), on the rule of "tits or GTFO." as far as loli looking girls go.

Etna seldom has tits. The pic you're referring to has quite a decent set.

This rule, incidently, is also why no lucky star thread will go without losing 3/4th of its content to attrition.
>> Anonymous
>>500396

>>If it looks pre-pubescent it's loli.
>>And nothing else matters.

even if the character is documented to be >18? that's absurd.
>> Anonymous
>>500383
If you actually watched the anime from which that vampire is from, you'd know.
>> Anonymous
but etna is over 1000 years old...
>> Anonymous
>>500468

Not really. Assuming pictures should be judged on a "canonical" age is retarded.

Loli is as loli looks. A picture of a ten-thousand year old infant sucking her thumb and going "gaga googoo", may be of a ten-thousand year old infant, but it's still fucking toddlercon.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Read this thread in passing and moved on. The very next thread I browsed, this image was randomly selected for 4chan's header at the top of the page. I'm somewhat amused at the irony.
>> Anonymous
>>500477
While this is true in a sense, in practical terms we can (hopefully) agree that there is a balance point somewhere in the middle of all of this. Both extremes of the argument are idiotic.
>> Anonymous
>>500481

Not really. It's a pretty easy measure. If it looks loli, it's loli. "looking loli", by what standards 4chan's on-high has decreed, is an underage-seeming girl without tits. Since loli in art is not a function of arbitrary age, but of drawing style(DOA characters have been drawn as loli before), this is a very simple standard to use.

It gets complicated only when some assbiter gets butthurt because his favorite character is or is usually drawn loli, and frequently deleted.
>> Anonymous
I need to save this somewhere since I'm writing it every fucking time this comes up.

This is why going by canonial age is stupid: Take a loli-looking picture of Etna. You say it's ok to post here because she's 1000 years old? Fine. Now take the pic, and make her hair green or take away her wings or whatever. Now it's not Etna but otherwise looks exactly the same. But now it's just a generic loli-looking girl.

And now it'd be bad to post because you can't say "but she's 1000 years old". It makes no fucking sense. The only thing you can judge a picture on is what's in the picture. Not because someone says "I swear she said she was 1000 years old officer".

Besides, how do you know she's 1000 years old in that pic? It might be from when she was 10, you know. You can't tell the difference anyway.

And that's why looking loli = is loli. No excuses.
>> Anonymous
>>500498

>"I swear she said she was 1000 years old officer"

I intend to quote this at every oppurtunity, sir.
>> Anonymous
>>500480
well, loli is allowed in /b/, so...
>> RiderFan !!o7sFgCyZbre
You cannot always go by age. If you did then Dizzy would be well below the age of consent.
>> Anonymous
>>500503
You can never go by age. Only by looks.
>> Anonymous
>>500499

"I swear she said she was 1000 years old Your Honor"

and

"I swear she said she was 1000 years old Bubba"

should come in handy too...
>> Anonymous
>>498930

Incidentally, I don't know this character, but she looks damn loli to me. How come she hasn't been deleted yet?
>> Anonymous
>>500508

Funny you should mention it. My first use of the quote was intended to be my court date tommorow.
>> Anonymous
A LOLI IS VERY SHORT AND FLAT-CHESTED. THAT IS ALL.
>> Anonymous
>>500498
because with anime characters they age in reverse, so when they were ten, they were busty and not loli material.
>> Anonymous
etna is 14 guys
the extra 2 zeros are a joke
laharl is 1300
flonne is 1500
get it?