>> |
Anonymous
>>288542 Here is what you said, OP:
>>288056Post girls we dont see enough of on /e/ preferably decent images that look like the character.
Clearly, by grouping Motoko with some of the other subjects in the thread, you communicated that you didn't have many pics of her. When I flooded the thread yesterday, I did it under the assumption that someone didn't have a large collection of her. I think you'll find that a broad majority of my posts meet your criteria for being "decent images." Even still, the comment you specifically made of Motoko--
>>288088There's a HUGE lack of pics of her on /e/
--doesn't even ask for anything new. You stressed a general lack of Motoko on /e/, not a lack of new content. I delivered what you requested. You asked for the wrong things if you're not happy with a Motoko flood.
|