File :-(, x, )
Chubby Cuties Anonymous
BBW
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
WANT!!
>> Anonymous
OP source is by Kinoshita Junichi

rapidsearch has nothing but dead ends :(
>> Loves Lovely Love
     File :-(, x)
Oh my...
I approve!
Want more!
>> Loves Lovely Love
     File :-(, x)
>> Loves Lovely Love
     File :-(, x)
>> Loves Lovely Love
     File :-(, x)
>> Loves Lovely Love
     File :-(, x)
>> Loves Lovely Love
     File :-(, x)
>> Loves Lovely Love
     File :-(, x)
>> Loves Lovely Love
     File :-(, x)
>> Loves Lovely Love
     File :-(, x)
>> VZ
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
vore

do not want
>> Anonymous
Some nice ones there - especially the first
>> Anonymous
Nobody likes fat girls
>> Mr. X
     File :-(, x)
>>221878
Nobody likes people who don't belong in the thread. If you don't like it, then gb2/e/ or /h/
Besides, these aren't FATTIES per se... only Chubbies!
>> Mr. X
>>221878
oops! thought I was in /d
Sorry
>> Anonymous 20XX
*puts a "No Fat Chicks" sticker on this thread.*
>> Anonymous
Go back to /d, freaks.
>> Loves Lovely Love
     File :-(, x)
>> SonicTH
>>221886

This is /e/, homie...
>> disco ninja
     File :-(, x)
>> Sam and OMG HAX!!
     File :-(, x)
>>221994
And? Your point? Are you seriously saying girls with SLIGHT pudge is equivalent to dickgirls, tentacles, urine, and house-sized boobs?

A LOT of guys like girls who don't look like they're starving to death (but not so much as to be called) Don't like it? Fine, then shut up and GTFO of this thread and go to another one.

Now then... MORE.

Chubby XP-tan anyone?
>> SonicTH
Hey! Don't diss urine! That's actually somewhat sane (and pretty hot if done right).

Also, try clicking on the quote link. You'd notice the guy I was quoting said "gb2/e/" and I was just pointing out that we ARE on /e/.
>> Zahlman !GlqXwJT1NM
>>222023

You have a strange idea of "SLIGHT". I like girls who "don't look like they're starving to death" too. Guess what, there's *lots* of room in there before you get to wait-wtf-where-is-her-waist territory which is where we are now in this thread.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Moar!
>> Sam and OMG HAX!!
     File :-(, x)
>>222031
Whoops. Sowwy.

>>222032
Even if this thread is above average, I still highly disagree that this is /d/ material. And, other than the op, I'd pretty much call everything in the thread "slightly chubby." Debatable? Sure, but does it really matter?
>> Sam and OMG HAX!!
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>222038

This is a weird fetish (like feet fetish), no one save for a handful of people like this stuff, so this goes in /d.

There are lots of dickgirls and other stuff there, weird fetishes as this one is.
>> Loves Lovely Love
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
chubby > toothpick > fat
>> chapsy !GII5WKbDAI
     File :-(, x)
I swear chubby threads in either /h/, /e/, or /s/ are the evuivalent of FF VII threads in /v/
>> Loves Lovely Love
     File :-(, x)
>> Sam and OMG HAX!!
     File :-(, x)
>>222043
My point was that this is NOT a "weird fetish." Feet, dickgirls, etc. are for /d/

The fact is, chubby like this is a little too tame to be for /d/, and is a little bit more popular than you'd think.

Besides, for Christ's sake, isn't it possible for some potential topics to overlap different boards? Sometimes one picture will work on many different boards. Chubby has appeared in legitimate threads in /c/ /e/ /h/ and /d/. If you don't like it, well, hey, can't you just ignore it? It's one thing if it's furry/loli/guro/scat/etc. but this is far from those. So, let's just post here if we want to, go on to another thread if we don't, and stop this drama bomb? Mm'kay?
>> Anonymous
>>222134
Tip: Saying mm'kay makes you seem like an ass, even to others who might agree with you otherwise.
>> Sam and OMG HAX!!
     File :-(, x)
>>222135
Sorry. I wasn't meant to be condescending. It's actually a thing I picked up from Mr. Mackey on South Park. I just find it fun to say and add it to any sentence.

So, take this image as a peace offering?
>> Z3r02007
>>222135

I found the M'kay quite humorous.
But, on a different note, just as people who have this perticular fetish expect, peope who tend to stick to more cenventional hentai expect cetain respect. Just because you spend your lonly nights with hentai that is a little out of the norm does not automaticly make you somehow smarter or in touch with some form of psudointellectiual bullshit.

Case in point: furries. I don't mind the porn. I actually kinda like some of it. I just don't like furries who rub it in other's faces. You masterbate to lions raping antolopes, no one gives a flying fuck. Keep it to yourself, you attention whore!

Sorry. Bit of a relapse. But do you get what I mean?
>> Anonymous
>>222005

the source of this is http://ul53.rapidshare.com/files/9419352/Yawarakai_no.rar
>> Anonymous
Folks really need to learn what a fetish is. Having a fondness for a girl with dimensions slightly different than what the media presents as "normal" doesn't constitute a fetish by a longshot. If liking particular body dimensions is a fetish, then everyone who likes thin girls has a thin girl fetish; everyone who likes healthy girls has a healthy girl fetish; everyone who likes athletic girls has an athletic girl fetish; and so on.

A fetish, quite literally, is a fixation on something that - without which - the person with the fetish cannot achieve arousal or orgasm. So if a person could not get hard or get off with anything other than a chubby girl, thin girl, barefoot girl, pissing girl, whatever... then it's a fetish. There's a huge difference between finding something sexy, and fixating on something. But, since most Anons don't spend much time associating with real women, let alone having sex with them, I can see how they might get confused when someone voices an opinion on what is sexy that is not spoon-fed to them by the media. Just because E! didn't tell you you should think something is sexy doesn't mean it constitutes a fetish.

Drop the drama and expand your world view a little.
>> Anonymous
>>222158
fat is an alternative to the normal concept of beauty. if only there were a board for alternative prons.
>> Anonymous
>>222160
Actually, the definition of "beauty" presented by America is abnormal for what has been considered attractive through the ages. The women pictured in this thread have been considered normal and attractive for far longer and by far more cultures than the Madison Avenue definition of beauty.

Now, Gilbert Grape's mom might be abnormal, but with the women in this thread, "normal" is far too subjective a term for any one person or group to define it for everyone else.
>> Anonymous
By the /e/ notion of a fetish presented here, every single thread on this board represents a fetish. A Hinata fetish, an Elfen Lied fetish, a big boob fetish, elf fetish, Elite Beat Agent fetish, Winry fetish, teacher fetish, suit fetish, lingerie fetish... the list would be endless.
>> Anonymous
An Anonymous presented with an idea of sexy different from their own is almost worse than a furry presented with the idea that they're not a fox spirit trapped in a human body.
>> Anonymous
>>222162
"Normal" not good enough? How about "common?" How about "intuitive?" You can slice the definition of "normal" to ribbons with your subjectivity argument, but face it: all the different concepts of attractiveness where thinness is a priority numerically overwhelm those tilted towards fat. You're dodging the meaning of my argument and trying to hang us up on semantics. Fat is an alternative standard for attractiveness. Accept it and visit /d/ where no one will complain.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>221439
>>221441
>>221707
>>221708
>>221709
>>221714
>>221855
>>221874
>>221886
>>222005


>>222023
>>222035
>>222038
>>222039
>>222084
>>222112
>>222134
>>222158
>>222162
>>222164
>>222165
gb2/d and cry moar
>> Anonymous
Oh my god

All of you

Shut the hell up
>> Anonymous
>>222166
Common and intuitive are still subjective. It may be intuitive for someone like yourself to be attracted to thin girls while it's intuitive for the OP to be attracted to slightly heavier girls. You'll have to provide some documented statistics on your "overwhelming numerics," because simple observation of couples in the real world shows that what people consider attractive is highly diverse.. far too much so for anyone, let alone Anonymous, to say "this is normal/common/intuitive and that is not." Now, for the bulk of /e/-going Anons, it may be "abnormal," but it's certainly not abnormal enough to be /d/ material. If there was a board for ecchi that did not focus on a very narrow, vanilla view of beauty ingrained into kids by the media as opposed to thinking for themselves, I'm sure your more drama-shy Anons would be happy to post there, but this is far too tame for /d/. But, until then, you'll just have to accept the fact that your definition of beauty is not the only one, nor is it really in the majority, and this is not *your* Internets. Seriously, try cracking a National Geographic sometime and you'll see that the definition of beauty worldwide is far too varied to let your "numerically overwhelming" assumption hold any water. Accept it and you'll have no cause to complain, and maybe even have the willpower to just skip any thread that doesn't seem to fit on "your" Internet.
>> Anonymous
>>222169
Don't sweat it. As soon as one of the mods see anonymous furryfagging it up with the drama, they'll delete the thread.
>> Anonymous
>>222162

Yeah, it's America-exclusive and America's fault. That's why it's Europe's fashion industry who has to have rules and new laws about the skeletal-skinny models they're fostering.
>> SecondsAnyone? !gdvHW30iY2
     File :-(, x)
>>222094
>>222084
>>222038
>>221441

Not chubby, fat or even pudgy. But still hot.

Have a chubby bunny.