File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I MUST SEE AND POST MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous !9wIj9WFvnc
>>331079
m0ar
>> Anonymous !9wIj9WFvnc
MMOAR
>> Anonymous
I thought loli was banned.
>> Anonymous
>>331773
17 years old
>> Anonymous
>>331783
Don't give a damn. Last time I checked, if it looks like loli, it's loli.
>> Anonymous !4X8vLLNDE2
oh hai
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Errr... How can we know their age? Do they have birth certificates or wtf?, How can an inanimate image..., ah fuck even how is possible to give human age to a bunch of curved lines with color fills, shadows, and other things generated by computer and human hands?

I just Don't get the scene. Giving human years to a fictitious character that barely resemble a real human being (anatomically talking).

Seriously wtf is wrong with the world? Can't difference reality from fiction?

Have a pic for all my rant.
>> Anonymous
>>331790

just like seeing a real girl with small tits and arguing if she's 14 or 19+ amiright?
>> Anonymous
>>331791

Not at all, a photograph of a real person includes the fact that:

A)It has a birth certificate, which means that the person does exist.(Legally talking)
B)Is possible to determine the age by just looking at their birth certificate date.
C)Is a real human being.

So if you have a pic with a girl flat as a table, and looks like she have 14, but she really has 19 just show the certificate that complies with this:

"All models were at least 18 years old when they were photographed.

18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement"

And whit that you can "shut the fuck out mouth" of whatever bitch complain about it.
>> Anonymous
>>331798

o_o

....-applauds-
>> Anonymous
Indeed... for example: how would one determine Mickey Mouse's age to ensure that Disney's business isn't based on exploitation of underage fictional mice?

One could say that Mickey Mouse is loli, due to proportionally large eyes and head, flat chest and lack of pubic hair and people would rightly regard you as some kind of retard.

Arguing over the age of a drawing is stupid.. almost as stupid as the Mickey Mouse example above. If lolicon sufferers choose to see a picture as being an underage chick, then that distinction is made more in their head than on the paper.

tl;dr POST MOAR!
>> Anonymous
This thread has collapsed beyond all repair.

Recommend aborting and restarting.
>> Anonymous
When it comes to drawn pictures there's a simple rule to determine if it's legal or not: If it looks underage, then it is.
>> ICAMETOO
They are seventeen because that is the age they say they are in the anime. They are all 3rd year high school students although the one with blue hair is just a late bloomer. Her knowledge of hentai exceeds that of all of us combined. If people would make an effort to watch the source before openong their useless mouth they would seem less STUPID and Loliphobic. If you don't like loli, shut the fuck up and sage the fucking thread or report it. Just stop your useless bitching about stuff that isnt loli in the first place. Let the mods decide if its loli or not. Its obvious you cant make the decision as you got this one wrong.
>> Anonymous
Why don't people like loli? O_o
>> mr.anon
if it looks like a young child (regardless of the age in the story) its loli.

if i wrote a story about a baby that was 102 years old that had sex, would that be ok? no, its loli you fucking idiot.

loli is for pedo twats.
>> Anonymous
>>331945

loli's look ugly.
/discusion
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>331970
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>331970