File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
So, are monster girls /d/ material, /h/ material, or is it Goddamn Furry?

I've always wondered.
>> Anonymous
monster girls are always welcome
>> Anonymous
Is there a good site to find monster girl hentai on? I've only ever found http://monster-girl.homelinux.net
>> Anonymous
Well this thread died pitifully.
>> Anonymous
>>882413
monster girls are /d/
furry is a completely different fetish.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Who's the guy that draws these, anyway?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Man, is nobody else gonna contribute to this thread?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Right, so Monster girls are considered to be /d/. Furries are anthropomorphic animals, Monster Chicks are humans with animal parts. Big difference.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
goddamnit im getting sick of those comics. they were pretty good at first but im sick of all the reaproasts. apparently its the only thing people can find that doesnt suck ass. now i dont know how this pic ive got even exists, because its actually a fucking high quality monster pic, and its a friggin harpy girl, both of which are exceedingly rare. fucking sauce anyone?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>882623
If that was the case monster-girls like this wouldn't be allowed but they are so that's not the case. I never understood why furry is banned from /d/ I consider them monster girls too
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>882595
everything so far is repost everyones seen its not that we don't want to contribute its just its all the same shit when we do.
>> moss
     File :-(, x)
i cant see what this is from the thumbnail. it looks like it could be a monstergirl
>> Anonymous
>>882462
lol, fail
>> Anonymous
Generally speaking, as long as it has a recognisable human face (ie, no animal snout) it's not considered furry.

Furry is banned from /d/, and 4chan in general, because they don't want furries on 4chan, because furries are believed to be notorious for starting 'drama.'

Conveniently enough, "shitty western art" is also disallowed on /d/, and furry fetish seems to be almost exclusively a western occurance, which helps to further distinguish what isn't acceptable here.
>> Anonymous
>>882886
So basiclly it's the furfags fault huh? No surprise there. I've seen loads of awesome anime furry art and it made no sense why it was hated so much. But if it's the fans fault I guess I can understand.
>> Anonymous
>>882920
Though with the way people act on the matter on this board you'd think they'd have a problem with the art ITSELF. Hating furries is pretty much a fad and an out of control one at that to the point people are fucking calling catgirls furry
>> Anonymous
>>882920
Not only that but the things furries do are just play weired even by /d/ standerds and that's saying something. Which is calling someone a furry is an insult. As someone who likes vore I have no right to judge what you do behind closed doors. But when you involve animal suits and going out in public and announcing it to the world, and conventions, that's when I gotta say something
>> Anonymous
>>882938

I'm going to venture that because there's a large number of gays in the furry population their drama results from them not being able to separate their fetish from their sexuality (and that their sexuality has somehow become their "lifestyle", as if who you liked to fuck had something to do with how you lived your life outside your bedroom).
>> Anonymous
Man, I like some of this stuff, but once it veers into the vore territory... Ugh.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
furfags are anthropomorphic... monster girls are fuckin hot

Lamia are my favourite.
>> Anonymous
Monstergirls make my penis happy
Furries make me RAAAAAAAAGE!!!
>> Anonymous
>>882991

Is she preggers and choking him with her tail?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
for the most part, monster girls go in the same folder as furry for me, but there's a fine line between the two. Generally a human face (no snout/etc) is what defines the two. For example, you could argue>>882700is furry, but most probably wouldn't think it furry. A lot of people go by artist, too. If an artist is a "furry" artist, then its most likely to be accepted as a furry picture. but its all subjective.

As supreme court justice Stewart said about obscenity, i know it when i see it.
>> Anonymous
>>883351

Really I consider furry to be mammals and the occasional bird, anthropomorphized. But if you'll notice, furries are mostly just wolves, foxes and sometimes bears. The way I see it, if it has a human face, it's not furry. Also, catgirls and rabbit girls are exempt for obvious reasons.
>> friendsofsandwiches
     File :-(, x)
a few things one needs to understand about the furry stuff, while there is a fair amount of good art, there's a godawful amount of shit art. Start checking the various furry forums and boards and you'll see. There's some posted here in the furry threads.
This is one of the reasons moot and gang don't want furry art in general and western art. Because allowing it seems to open the door to drama fucking asshats.
Now you may consider what goes on in /b, and occasionally around here and on /h to be drama, in seeing it directly, the drama here is kept far below what it could be.
There is however, some difficulty on the definition of furry for some types to others.
>> friendsofsandwiches
     File :-(, x)
okay, we all have a pretty good idea what is furry and what isn't for the most part.
It's the borderlines that confuse us so.

Lizardgirls are part of the furry community, but aren't allways considered furry here.
Renamon is considered furry, but is tolerated. Same with Krystal from starfox.
Mithra are low content furry, and are abided.
Gardivor is pokemon, but is more then tolerated by the fact it's considered monstergirl.
Blazicon or whatever the firey chicken is, seems to be regarded more as furry, but I've seen it posted here, and tolerated, so I would guess most if not all pokemon are under the monster title.
However, some eevee art and alternates fall heavilly into the furry community, especially because so manhy dramafurs use them as avatars or what have you.
Adding to the confusion is at times oddball janitor service, where some near furry threads are deleted, and posteres put on short bans, while others are left alone.
It's hard to tell sometimes, and this is why I keep going back to /b when I would otherwise stay out of there, simply because that seems to be the only 'safe' place to post and get posts of this nature.
You just have to deal with delayclose and F40PH posts trying to hit the image limit for the thread.
oh, and while furry is banned, beastiality in this area isn't. go fig...
>> friendsofsandwiches
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>883397
They're exempt because they're not anthropomorphic. A catgirl is just a girl with cat ears (hence nekomimi), a cat furry is an actual cat that walks/acts like a human. Unfortunately it turns grey area where the two meet (a catgirl with a cat nose and some light fur, or an anthromorph with bare skin sans snout).

I think that's also why the transformation fetish is quite different from the furry fetish - (animal) transformation deals with humans forcibly getting animal characteristics bestowed on them, so it still has nothing to do with anthropomorphism (even if the eventual art could easily be mistaken for it).

Ofcourse, the biggest difference is that when a monstergirl is posted, there's little chance of the "copyright owner" and his legion of fans swarming in to throw legal threats about illegal spreading of IP (no matter how shitty the actual artwork is). No drama, no problem.
>> friendsofsandwiches
     File :-(, x)
furry artist, (but is japanese, and well accepted)
depecting non fur(human)
with scaly (dragon)
with large insertion.
Beastiality.

Safe or not. you be the judge.
>> friendsofsandwiches
     File :-(, x)
okay, here's one that pushes the limit.
American artist, and not a terribly good one at that,
scaly,
definite anthro,
possible avatar for someone.

Safe or not.
>> Anonymous
>>883421
fucking furry get rid of it D:

/cry
>> Anonymous
>>883421
Anon would hit it, my good man!
>> Anonymous
I'm thinking furry are ANIMAL>humanoid. Monsters are creatures that don't exist like Naga, Centuars... etc...
>> Anonymous
>>883421

By previously given definition, this would be a furry. Please cut yourself for posting it
>> Anonymous
>>883415
I have some interesting "grey area" pictures made by KissaG that I'll post one of these days. Obviously human body and facial structure, but with a surprising amount of "cat" showing through anyway.
>> Cosine
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
moar
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
no wai
>> Vendetta1000
From what I understand, the main difference between monster girl and furry depends on how much their face is muzzle...if the face is closer to human, then its a monstergirl, if the face has more muzzle, its furry
>> Anonymous
If anyone is Curious as to who draws OP's picture. Search Karbo on Deviant art. I am a big fan of his work. He draws mainly works that focus on Vore. If you don't know what Vore is, look it up. But his work is wonderful
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> MR. Anon
     File :-(, x)
>>882413
Silly, if you posted it in /d/, it's a "monster", not a "furry". Unless, of course, it's poorly drawn.
>> Anonymous
I've probably read a hundred + MonsterGirl topics that evolved into furry discussions but I've never expressed my opinions.

I have absolutely no problems with furries, art or those that call themselves that. The fact that I can jerk off to Renamon is proof of this. I can tolerate the dog stuff that most people probably envision when the word furry is brought up.

Now if I did have a problem with that, I would be a hypocrite for being on /d/ because it just isn't just normal sex or hentai. It's an alternative to real life. Now, I may not be into furry as much as others here, but I can also say that I am not all that interested in GTS or BBW. But it doesn't mean that I can't respect the fact that people like what they like and as a fellow /d/eviant myself, I am in no position to judge what other's sexual fantasies or fetishes are deemed t o wiered or creepy.

I'm also sageing this thread out of respect and because I have no picutre to post.
>> Anonymous
>>883722
Truer words were never spoken
>> Anonymous
>>883421
ITS HAS NO HUMAN FEATURES OTHER THEN BEING BIPEDEL ITS FUCKING FURRY
>> Anonymous
furry = anthropomorphic depiction of a living creature.

monster = mythological animal.

there is a small difference in the artwork, notable difference in the people. namely furries are dicks who think it's impossible for someone to not like their porn.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>883722
I have as well.
And every arguement ever can be solved by the simple rule of
HUMAN/MOSTLY HUMAN FACE = MONSTERGIRL
MUZZLE OR ANIMAL SNOUT = FURRY

THERE IS ALMOST NO EXCEPTIONS TO THIS RULE AND ITS EASY TO REMEMBER.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>883896
thinking about it for a second there are a few cases were the rule is ignored

the catgirls from ff11(final fantasy eleven has enough amazing /d/ porn and they're still more human then cat)

Saya from Saya no Uta(she's actually a blobous tenticle monster but appears as a little girl. Though she's not been popular in quite some time)

and I'm sure there are others but nothing blatant enough to be considered furry.
>> Anonymous
I'm going with /h/ if it's very human looking, and /d/ if it's more animal/human. /h/ and /d/ would both be accpeting of it, though, imo.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>883895
>>883471
I think whether or not the animal is "real" has nothing to do with a pic being furry (nor some limited set of animal types). Dragons are not real, but>>883421is CLEARLY a furry pic.
Nor do i necessarily think its because the art is shit. Some furry art can be quite well done yet is still clearly furry and not allowed. (and western art is fine, yo)

I think the best way to tell if something is furry or not is to assess how human the face is. If there is a snout or muzzle on the face, then it is probably furry. Horns/ears/hair/etc don't change things quite as much. This isn't a bright-line rule though and there are definately exceptions (for example, goo girls often have very non-human faces, but aren't considered furry, because they aren't animals). But its still all real subjective. For example, the pic i've posted is toeing the line pretty close; known furry artist, large possibly snout-like nose. But is it as clearly furry as>>883421? Probably not, but it's right on the damn line.

I think the approach that the community should take is to be more lenient of monstergirls/furry when it slips the line, rather than less. I'm absolutely in support of the no-furry rule, but *drama* is what we don't want here, folks. (civil discussions like this i think are fine, though) An occassional slip into the wrong territory is inevitable.

I agree with>>883722in terms of the respect that is due towards other's fetishes. This is /d/, after all, and there is no real moral difference between furry and monstergirl. Furry culture just happens to bring drama, which is why it is banned on 4chan. (Claiming that furry and monster girls are somehow fundamentally different is just fooling yourself, anon.)
>> Anonymous
>>883941
>(Claiming that furry and monster girls are somehow fundamentally different is just fooling yourself, anon.)

monstergirls its not about being animalistic its about danger most of the time. As most monstergirls are based on human eating mythological creatures. Also I don't care how good your fucking arguement is DONT POST FURRY SHIT YOU FUCKING RETARD
>> Anonymous
Monstergirls are /d/ material.
Furry used to be /d/ material, then they fagged it up.
If there were some way to get well-drawn antho porn without cocks all over it or things out of proportion, and without people BAWWWWWing, then I'd support it.
At the moment, that's not possible.
>> Anonymous
>>884000
If we let furries back in we might as well let gurofags back in. /d/ is better the way it is now any fucking furries or fucking gurofags can go too FURRYCHAN OR GUROCHAN
WAIT YOU HAVE YOUR OWN BOARDS YOU DON'T NEED TO FAG UP OURS
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
So /d/ approves of monstergirls, and hates furries.

Where do moogles fall?
>> Anonymous
>>884007
moogles are furry. And your picture has nothing to do with /d/.
>> Anonymous
>>884010

I know, but I couldn't be arsed to look for an appropriate picture.
>> Anonymous
>>883896

You cannot tell me>>882700face is mostly human
>> Anonymous
>>884007

Moogles fall in the relam of ugly, stupid shits that kill boners, much like your picture.
>> Anonymous
>>884007
ehh? Akon '06?
>> Anonymous
>>884147

Actually, yes. Not my picture.
>> Anonymous
>>882413

"Got a snout? get the fuck out."

Monster girls do NOT have snouts, so they're not furry.

Monster girls are safe.
>> Anonymous
Most monster girls are 50% furry at BEST, so you are still safe...keep on Anon!
>> Anonymous
if you want lamia things, go to SnapeSnoggers deviant.
lol
>> Anonymous
>>884048
its got the same build as a humans skull a human nose and besides fangs a humanlike jaw. ITS CLOSE A FUCKING NUPH
>> Anonymous
>>884241
You are one sadistic asshole.
>> Anonymous
>>884231
50% how? By species? Cause furries seem to be in th same boat. 50% cat, dog, rabbit, 50% human.
>> Anonymous
>>884352
I don't think furries are 50% human at all. They all look to me like animals with some human bones.
>> Anonymous
Furry: animals with strong human characteristics.

Monster: humans with strong animal or non-human characteristics.

The difference lies in whether they are, at their very core, human or animal, hence checking the face for human or animal features. Job done. Now can we get back to the monster girls please?
>> Ralzel
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
what is it with hentai and censorship?
>> Anonymous
>>884370
Japan has laws against depiction of genitalia. Even in porn (or hentai). I'm tired of explaining in detail (or seeing it explained in detail for that matter). Get used to it.
>> Anonymous
>>884241
I KNOW NAGAS
>> Anonymous
>>883941
lol apparantly it was over the line.

touche, mo/d/s. touche.
>> Anonymous
any d?jinshis of guys turning into monster girls?
>> Anonymous
The difference between a furry and a monster girl is the same one between a child and a loli.
>> Anonymous
Weeabo = monstergirl
Amerikkan = furry

Very simple. No exceptions.
>> Anonymous
>>884777
We are the ultimate prey, which drives us to change our world and the werewolf is representative of that extreme need to create a safe environment. Even if it means killing everyone you love and flattening your home town. A werewolf is not a furry because the whole point is that it is more human than a human. Wolves represent this well, as intelligent, but vicious creatures we've been spending our lives with (dogs are wolves, not just descended from them).

Yes, wolf anthros are furfaggotry, but werewolves are not as long as they stay true to what I stated above. This also implies that they are humans who transform. So, fuck you.
>> Anonymous
>>884369
i like how slime is incredibly well-defined
>> Anonymous
Sauce for "living with" comics?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>884841
got mine off /b/...
>> Anonymous
>>884225

mithras are safe forever
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
It comes down to the face really.
Girl with fangs? Sure.
Animal ears? Sure.
Fangs? Sure.
Wings? Sure.
Claws/Paws? Sure.
Furry legs? Sure.
Snout/Nose. ZOMFG FURRY BURN IT.

As stupid as it sounds, /d/ is fine with just about anything, as long as there isn't an overabundance of fur, and there is no animal snout/nose.

Most monster girls have human faces, which means they aren't even in the gray area like werewolves can be. Nagas, centaurs, driders, succubi, goo girls, etc.
>> Kaen !sfgTbkSy0o
>>885499
I wonder how /d/ would react to Minotaur wimminz.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>885503

It's all good as long as the lady part is on bottom and the bull part is on the top
>> Anonymous
>>885503
>>885513
Actually, mods have deleted that set with the minotaur fucking the elf for violation of teh furrah rulez.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
It's those who talk the most who post the less.
STFU and POST MORE or GTFO!!!
>> Anonymous
>>884369
i have a lot of these description pics. does /d/ want?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>885522
WHAT HE SAID except post something GOOD and not fucked up and disturbning. Also, anyone know the moonspeek 4 dis pic?
>> Friendsofsandwiches
>>885507
dude, is that nodoka?
>> Anonymous
>>885561
no its a cadbury cream egg (also its common character design)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Heres an idea. JUST POST WHATEVER THE HELL YOU WANT AND IF IT GETS YOU BANNED THEN DON'T POST IT ANYMORE AND MAYBE READ THE RULES FIRST.
>> Anonymous
>>885559
She calls herself "boku" which suggests she's tomboyish. Or a trap.

"Is something like me nice?"
"Eheheh... Eccentric aren't you."
>> Idealist
>>884841
The "living with" comics are on /rs/ if you search "monster girls" the rar is simply called monstergirls.rar

There is another monster girl thread still going atm in /d/ where all the monster girl description pages have been posted recently. I recommend seeking that thread out.
>> Anonymous
>>883351
who is she and what is she from?
>> Anonymous
>>885650
>starship troopers

If Heinlien was alive today, I would send this to him.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Succubus FTW!
>> KiTA !zx3TGNvBPw
     File :-(, x)
>>884777
Really? How about I post some Den, or Dr. Trump, or any of a billion other Japanese furry artists?

Fuck, I've even been banned for posting Naritaya's stuff before.

The whole "Zomg, Furry" meme is fucking old, so old that SA doesn't even bother with it anymore. Get over it. The "living with Werewolf-chan" comic is going to cause you guys seizures otherwise.
>> KiTA !zx3TGNvBPw
     File :-(, x)
>> KiTA !zx3TGNvBPw
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>886827
That there is probably one of many reason SA mocks us
>> Anonymous
>>886848
SA dosn't ban furrys any more, and one of their front page writers in a furry, sooooooooooo
>> Anonymous
>>886702
astaroth from a japanese tcg shes a 2ch meme. this is really remidial /d/ stuff here.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
what about this /d/? monster-girl? or furry?

(im pretty sure its incomplete, dont know who drew it)
>> Thornstromb
>>886755
Agreed!

ok, to all ppl out there, im just throwing in my 2 bits here...

ok, monstergirl or furry, so what, if u fap to it, thats alll that matters. as long as u do it in private. the "furries" ppl hate are the ones who go and get together and have orgies IN REAL LIFE. i don't *hate* that, but i dont wanna KNOW about ur preferences in person... over internet, like here on 4chan, where what you are is just another person on the planet, no knowing where u are, fine. as to the art being shit, yeah. thats cuz most furry art is fanart for shit. ie, there is an unbelievable amount of Sonic porn out there. to 90%, BURN IT!!!!! 10% is actually either good or hella f'ing funny (ie, to laugh at after). i know this cuz ive *looked* at pretty much everything. real-life pictures are horrible unless they are normal guy-on-girl (that part depends on ur sexual preference). i have a small amount of furry porn.... bcuz either its part of the 10% (rarely), or bcuz its tenta.

continued in 2nd post... which will have pic.
>> Thornstromb
     File :-(, x)
>>886976
continued...

yes, u heard me, tenta. thats MY focus. whether its guro, furry, beast, futa, or ANYTHING, if its tenta, and its not horrible art, ill probably fap to/save it. i have a *VERYVERYVERY* small amount of non-tenta, usually for very specific reasons. for instance, i have this f'ing beastial hentai thats 4 pages long, from a comic (ie tenma), that is very beast, but is very good japanese art, and the girl is incredible. you heard me, the girl. not the f'ing beasts, i dont give a shit about them, but the girl alone is enough to make me fap. and yet, i want it translated...... so little there..... and it will get instantly deleted. which is total bullshit.

Just because something is furry or guro or beast, its not inherently unfappable. some ppl think TENTA is "inherently unfappable", and some ppl think ANYTHING is fappable. for them, maybe, but not for us. or you. or me. depending on what we are talking about. the point is, there are always those things which involve the unfappable.... that make u fap. bcuz a PART of it is so good it makes u fap, good enough to counteract the bad parts. also.... "furfag" isn't an insult. its an inverstupidity. ie, saying it doesnt make them stupid, it just proves that YOU are stupid. if someone was REALLY a furfag, u've just complimented them. if they ARE'NT furfags, you're an idiot for making such a mistake. and if u think im trying to defend my furfaggotry, ur right. i am defending my preferences. and u just proved ur an idiot. "yiff in hell" is a good phrase.... bcuz yiffing only applies to real life, and it implies publicity. as i said, i DONT want to know your preferences, IN PERSON.

note, i got this in a tenta pack, no clue where it originated, artist is Xiin, but the original is horrendously censored, so enjoy.
>> Anonymous
>>886980
>>886976
tl;dr

what was the point?
>> Anonymous
>>886976
>>886980
You make good points...too bad you can't be bothered to type out "you" which kind of detracts from it
>> Anonymous
>>886988and u just proved ur an idiot
I love posts like that.

Also, while I'm sure there are plenty of people that *disapprove* of other people's kinks around here, that's not why furry is banned. It's shit like DNP lists, artist/fanboy drama and a tendency for cartoony or low quality art that did that.
>> Thornstromb
>>886988
i said i was just throwing in my 2 bits. thats my point, there is no point, this is my say in the matter.

>>887001
im sorry i have dysgraphia and to type it all out in correct grammar would be just my kind of thing but its late and i have to sleep soon so sue me i tried to type it faster. spelling out all the "u"'s correctly would double the time it takes me to write it.

>>887004
2nd part : i didn't say anything about that. i AGREED that theres shitty fanart and bad western art in furry, read next time.
1st part : Huh?? u took it outa context, numbskull.
here is what i meant, with added emphasis so u understand
"also.... "furfag" isn't an insult. its an inverstupidity. ie, saying it doesnt make them stupid, ***it just ****proves**** that YOU are stupid.*** if someone was REALLY a furfag, u've just complimented them. if they ***ARE'NT furfags, you're an idiot for making such a mistake.***"
"and if u think **im** trying to defend **my** furfaggotry, ur right. i am defending my *preferences*. and u just ****proved**** ur an idiot. "...
NOW do u get it? if not, go read some more, or do some logic puzzles.
>> Anonymous
>>887004
I noticed that bit about the quality.
90% of it makes me feel like i'm looking at disney porn....really bad disney porn....

I don't like furries because.....If I see a girl with a hot body and big tits... I don't want her face to look like my dog that wakes me up by barking his head off in the morning.
human face or 90% human face>fappable
my dogs head on a hot chicks body=vomiting in my mouth.
>> Anonymous
>>884225

wow. that's a remarkably good litmus test, and witty and easy to remember too.

i'm gonna keep that one.
>> Anonymous
>>884225
what about pig-girls, asshat.
>> Anonymous
>>886973
Any moar?
>> KiTA !zx3TGNvBPw
>>887199
And Mithras?
>> Anonymous
>>887065
It's not called "having dysgraphia", it's called "being retarded".
>> Nightmare Otaku !!GTROp2Z31oC
Furries: Anthropomorphic animals.
Monster girls: Humanoid monsters.

Do ye ken?
>> Anonymous
>>887235
So ken tha monster girl hav fur a'whatnot?
>> Evil Lord Proteus !Pf61BYvMqU
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>887244
a monstergirl can have fur just not a fucking snout or animal face. THE FACE HAS TOO LOOK LIKE IT WAS DESIGNED AROUND A HUMANOID SKULL TO COUNT.
>> Anonymous
>>887245

sauce?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>887065
WARNING, TROLL AT WORK, PLEASE IGNORE LINKED COMMENT
>> Anonymous
>>887199
Little curly tail? Fine.
Cloven hooves instead of feet? Possibly fine.
Snouted face? FUKKEN FURRY.
>> Anonymous
>>887245
Is she from a hgame/manga?
>> Anonymous
lamia's turn me on
>> Anonymous
>>886791

Westerns and peliculary Americans are just littles dicks at drawing porn.
Why does they think their porn are so good?
They have shit in front of eyes or what?
Yes. Western arts worth less than shit, they must know it at once.
Japanese rulez.
>> Another /d/ Girl
Eh...
Not all furries are drama starters...
But I have other sites for looking at Yiffy things myself.

You /d/ are for my monster girl and tentacle or both fetishes.
>> Anonymous
>>888047
pics or GTFO furfag
>> Anonymous
If you can't tell the difference between monsters and furry, you fail at socialization.

Nobody should ever have to tell you the difference between the two. You're not fucking five.

Retard.