File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
You know what would be awsome?

If you coult take a big syringe full of water, push it into your nipple(NO NEEDLES), and just pump the water into the boob like a water balloon. Then go back, fill the syringe up again and just keep going until hey are like big skin tight basketballs.

Too bad boobs dont work that way. :"(
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
/d/ cares not for the bounds of reality
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
If I could Id do this to myself everyday. >_>

Itd be so hot.
>> shmifty5
>>1162718
youd have some fucke dup water balloon boobs
>> Anonymous
>>1162721

>youd have some fucking awesome water balloon boobs

fixed
>> Anonymous
>>1162686
ahh but good sir, that is what /d/ is for. To defy such physical imposibilities and deliver what you want
>> Anonymous
>>1162745
and stretchmarks.
>> Anonymous
>>1162686
You would need to cut open the skin, but why don't plastic surgeons do basically this for breast implants?
>> shmifty5
>>1162809
that would prolly just create a pocket of water under the skin
>> Anonymous
>>1162809

As much as I fucking love a nice big pair of tits to squeeze, I hate breast implants. They gross me right the fuck out. You could present me with two women that were exactly the same, except one has huge DDD-whatever sized tits with implants, and the other is DFC. Id grab that DFC girl anyday.

...anyway they do some boob jobs like this. they put the empty implants in, but leave a little valve on the side they can access later. They let the girl heal up, and then she comes back and they stick a syringe full of saline into the little side valve and fill up the implant right there in the office. LOL BREAST EXPANSION. Then they go home.

Implants are pig disgusting.
>> Anonymous
>>1162838

Oh forgot. The valve isnt hangin outside the body. Its part of the implant, and they have to reach it with a needle. :3

Also watch this. LOL REAL LIFE EXPANSION. You can do it at home if you dont pussy out.
http://expansionmansion.com/video/view_video.php?viewkey=c92e6d7493423d729448
>> Anonymous
>>1162686
>>1162813
>>1162809
>>1162792
>>1162781
>>1162745
>>1162721

All good arguments, gentlemen, we must remember to beat this into the heads of every physician, genetic scientist, and biologist we know at the time of the construction of the Human Body 2.0:

I'd say we could start with the construction of a highly-compressible, elastic membrane-walled sac embedded a few centimeters beneath the areola in a ring-like shape with a deflated back-end (as to fill the entire breast shape) which is also optimized for the adsorption of fluids, such as water, milk, and semen, such that it can expand greatly with the influx of said fluids, and then let them leak slowly with some sort of loosely-fitting "valve rows" on the ring.
It could be composed of the same fibrous tissue as other fluid-holding organs but customized for strength and impermeability, while also leaving the central structure of the nipple intact, for other modifications (a la nipple-fucking) etc. Milk-producing glands would have to be re-arranged for space constraints, or the size of the breast in general could be increased to accommodate them.

Obviously this idea would make a perfect candidate for an "enhanced human feature" that fulfills the guidelines of the human body 2.0, which also include a high degree of customization and easily-alterable appearance based on personal preference without the need to produce direct-molecule-editing nanomachines quite yet, which also lowers the timeframe on the project. I might draw a diagram for the lulz later.

Amirite?
>> ­­
>>1162809
Scars, mostly. Once upon a time, plastic surgeons were known as reconstructive surgeons, and very well respected in the medical field. They had one of the hardest of all surgical vocations, surpassed only by organ transplants in the level of difficulty. Their job was to rebuild the body to what it should have been before illness or injury damaged it, to try and make the person look as if they had never set foot in a hospital. Scars, therefor, would be rather counter productive. Then, when they figured out that vanity pays better than philanthropy and they became plastic surgeons, scars would destroy the illusion that their work was natural. Also, breast anatomy doesn't make it as simple as cutting them open and sticking a sack of saline or silicone inside.

By the way, most implants are put in either through an incision in the armpit or on the border of the areola.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
:D
>> shmifty5
>>1162854
hmm, this eems like it could be accomplished if we had suffecient technology and information present on said feild of interest, tho it would most likely be a very very expensive task, that said if billl gates and all the other uber rich where to take an interest in this it could be accomplished within this century
>> Anonymous
>>1162718
source please!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
LESS TALKING MOAR PICS OF BIG BLOATED INFLATED TITS.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Sage Sage
>>1162714

Here! Here! ...which is why I am here.
>> shmifty5
>>1163001
wut? its a cow-girl
>> Anonymous
>>1162987
>>1162988
>>1162989
>>1162992
>>1162996
>>1162999
sauce ?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>1162838
>> shmifty5
>>1163013
that would be very painful not to mention if they made the slush and squoosh sounds they'd be really notice able
>> Anonymous
Are you guys frigin' kidding me? Do you know how much more water weighs then body fat. Breasts like that would weigh a ton, hurt, and basically not be good for anything. You need something less dense than pure water. If you don't quite get it try strapping two gallon milk jugs to your chest some time.
>> shmifty5
>>1163016
or they could just become really fat and fill their man boobs with water
>> Anonymous
>>1163016

Water weighs more than fat?

Just like a tonne of bricks weighs more than a tonne of feathers?
>> shmifty5
>>1163020
i always thought it was spelled ton
>> Anonymous
>>1163020
No, like a gallonne of water weighs more than a gallonne of fat.
>> Anonymous
>>1163016

That would be so fucking hot to heave around big heavy breasts like that. Having to cup them up in your arms or else they hang down and hurt.

Then just deflate them later when your all finished up. :3
>> Anonymous
>>1163022
Depends on what side of the pond you're on. Tonne is a metric unit while ton is imperial.
>> Anonymous
>>1163020
Those two things weigh the same, dumbass.
>> shmifty5
>>1163241
i believe he was using whats called sarcasm, have you heard of it?
>> Volothamp Geddarm !vk3kkm6Azw
     File :-(, x)
>>1163243

Who cares about sarcasm?

INFLATING TITS NAO!!!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>1163246
furry
>> Anonymous
>>1162987
>>1162988
>>1162989
>>1162992
>>1162996
>>1162999
Gonna need a source. I know the artist is InoIno.
>> Anonymous
>>1163016

I believe you're thinking of density, not weight.
>> Anonymous
>>1163246
yiff yiff
>> Anonymous
>>1163296
Yes and no, water has incredibly dense molecular form, so the same volume or water as to ice would weigh more. This is because it's so compact that you can compress it so unlike other liquids it weighs more than it's solid form. Basically put waters density equals added weight, because more water molecules fit in the same space to other bonds. It's why they use a saline solution in breast implants and formerly silicon gel.
>> Anonymous
>>1163296
Yes and no, water has incredibly dense molecular form, so the same volume or water as to ice would weigh more. This is because it's so compact that you can't compress it so unlike other liquids it weighs more than it's solid form. Basically put waters density equals added weight, because more water molecules fit in the same space to other bonds. It's why they use a saline solution in breast implants and formerly silicon gel.
>> shmifty5
>>1163327
wait, so a block of ice would weigh more than a block (theoretical, since water has no solid form when liquid) of water? this is a fascinating topic
>> Anonymous
ITT: physics majors. LOL.
>> Anonymous
>>1163330
no you retard, a block of ice is BIGGER than a block of water
>> shmifty5
>>1163334
i said weight not size
>> shmifty5
>>1163330
i misspelled, replave ice with water and water with ice
>> Ryu Himora
>>1163330

No, idiot, water expands as it freezes, so the density becomes less and therefore weighs less.
>> shmifty5
>>1163338
oh, no need to call me an idiot
>> Ryu Himora
>>1163339

Yeah. Sorry.
>> shmifty5
>>1163341
wait, so then a block of water would weigh more than a block of ice
>> Ryu Himora
You know, this is a perfect example of how 4Chan can change anything into anything else in the universe. It's a breast expansion thread, and now we're talking about science.
>> Anonymous
enjoy your stretch marks
>> Ryu Himora
>>1163343

That's exactly right.
>> Ryu Himora
>>1163343

That's right.
>> shmifty5
ah, the joys of a /d/iscussion, they are many and bountiful
>> Anonymous
No you've got that backwards water expands while freezing it the only common substances to do so, as such less Ice can fit into the same space. The same volume of ice would weigh less than the same volume of water. Now take mercury as a counter example it compresses when it freezes, which is why a thermometer goes down in the cold. As a result a give volume of solid mercury would weight more than a given volume of liquid mercury. Although mercury is a non-bonded element,.in this instance, so its not total comparable to water which is one hydrogen atom bonded with two oxygen atoms, hence H2O. Not that mercury can't form bonds argon + mercury is what makes florescent lights work. But I'm totally going off point so...
>> shmifty5
>>1163351
i believe that was already established, although i didn't know that about mercury, the things you learn on 4chan
>> Anonymous
Hum must be rambling to much 13 other post while I typed that.
>> Tyfuslijer !!FctERDsszQL
>>1163347
If you turned a block of water in to a block of ice the mass wouldn't change, it's volume would increase. (Which is counter to what most substances do, most shrink when cooled.)

That said, if you compare 1 cm3 of water to a seperate 1 cm3 of ice the block of water would have more mass due to it's greater density.
>> shmifty5
>>1163362
alot of math was in that...i bet your a mathfag or a scifag
>> Tyfuslijer !!FctERDsszQL
>>1163367
I suck at maths, pure chemistry and physics my dear.
>> Anonymous
Hentai stick man :D ggrrrr -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jshe65EE0So
>> shmifty5
>>1163370
ah, i see, but isn't science and chemistry like depent on math
>> Tyfuslijer !!FctERDsszQL
>>1163372
To a point.

physics and chemistry are more tangible and don't contain as many pointless excercises in pointlessness.
>> Anonymous
wait. instead of water, couldn't you just use saline?

Yes, I read too much Warren Ellis
>> Anonymous
As someone who has basic knowledge of science,

What the fuck?
>> Anonymous
>>1163380

Well, that still has the problem of weight and that awkward unnatural stiffness. Also, your body will absorb the saline in about an hour or so, so there wouldn't be much effect aside from you having to pee like a racehorse. True story, in the 50's, during the allied occupation of japan, japanese women would shoot their breasts full of paraffin wax to make them larger and more appealing to the American GI's, who were used to larger fare in their women (Marilyn Monroe and other rather rubenesque women were the norm). The wax would be harmlessly reabsorbed within a month. The whole point of implant bags is to give some semblance of permanence. You might as well just go with actual fat as with saline. Remember, texture and density matters, permanence isn't, and toxicity is bad.
>> :) Anonymous
totally possible ;)
>> Anonymous
>>1164481

They've actually begun using fat for implants. They liposuction some out of the woman's ass or thighs and then injected it in the breast (multiple locations, obviously). Assuming the woman doesn't lose any weight, they will remain enlarged for quite a while before the fat gets "redistributed" by the body. On the upside, the breasts look all natural, but on the downside, the procedure has to be repeated every few months (~6 months).
>> Anonymous
The reason we don't have nipples with a valve is because to make a valve that traverses the skin is almost impossible. The infection and reject just makes it infeasible at this time.

The closest thing we have is semi permanent IV lines that have to be cleaned and replaced every few days.
>> Anonymous
>>1162686

Interesting scientific fact. If a woman keeps breast feeding after her baby doesn't need her milk anymore, her breasts can keep on producing milk indefinitely (until menopausic age).

So if any of you sick fucks get married someday, suck the milk out of your wife's breasts after your baby doesn't need it anymore for milk sex...
>> Anonymous
>>1165536

You can induce lactation with manual stimulation without pregnancy, though obviously the hormones produced by pregnancy make it much easier. Oxytocin supplements can be used to stimulate milk production instead of pregnancy.
>> Anonymous
>>1163377
and engineering is even more tangible and less pointless.
>> Anonymous
>>1165501
Wrong. They tried that for a bit, but found that the body simply absorbed the transplanted fat, and left behind painful calcifications.
>> shmifty5
anyone else notice that after the whole water vs fat topic came up the image posts stopped? whenever a /d/iscussion pops up a thread loses its point, as a side note i thought that this thread was dead, lol
>> BlueCurtains42
>>1165588
That's the nature of the beast, I suppose.

Still, I find the discussion far more engaging and exciting than the pictures :)