File :-(, x, )
Hime Hajime - Sex Education Machette
Some Dickgirl action
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Machette
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>702785
As always, that last panel ruined it for me.
>> Anonymous
>>702788
the last panel at least is a total rewrite. the others have some resemblance to the original text, but the last panel is enough to cast the accuracy of the entire translation into doubt.
>> Anonymous
and the poor kid who was supposed to ask about it didn't bother to ask and didn't even get his cards! what a ripoff! i think that knowledge of every girl in your class growing a dick is worth three Gairanger Blacks and two other cards, rare or not.
>> Anonymous
>>702788
>>702792
Dayum, that ending sucked.
>> Anonymous
Very good and quite funny comic, Thanks for uploading!
>> Anonymous
>>702785
i'm so glad i came before this. also, walls of text, wtf!!!!!!!!!

walls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of textwalls of text
>> Anonymous
http://rapidshare.com/files/74422447/_Hime_Hajime__Sex_Education.rar
>> Anonymous
some femnazi shit WRONG translation.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
fap to the last page in ease
>> Anonymous
I concur. Crap-ass ending.
>> Anonymous
fake ending is faaake.
actual text says something like "i have to hang in there..." i think
>> Anonymous
>>702869
I think the fake translation is less boring. What is "i have to hang in there" supposed to mean?
>> Anonymous
>>702869
I think she really is a lesbian now, and that's sort of supposed to imply that she doesn't care about him anymore?
>> Anonymous
Wait, I don't get it, how are they futanized? Is it because of the aphrodisiac?
>> Anonymous
>>702889
Dude, that's still pretty harsh. I can't read Japanese, but what does it really say?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Rewrites are always shitty, what did you expect?
This is just on a whole different level since it's basically an erotic fanfiction with the dumbfuck rewriter as the main character.
>> Anonymous
>>702895
It almost sounds like there's some realworld biology behind there, though I'm not knowledgeable enough to know for sure.
>> Anonymous
>>702901
Rewriter sounds like one of those bitches that deserve a slapping.
>> Anonymous
>>702900

Best I can make of it:

????????? = Can you wait a little bit?
???????????? = Because I'm trying me best, since ...

As to what she's saying between the lines, I have no idea.
>> Anonymous
>>702934
Scotland much? You have a typo there.
>> Anonymous
>>702934
??? = infact ...
>> Anonymous
>>702938
Thought it's supposed to be "even ..."
>> Anonymous
>>702934
She's trying her best to continue her sort-of relationship with him? By pretending?

That's not a lot better than the fake translation.
>> Anonymous
>>702943
I had hoped I could fap in peace, but that "correct" trans makes me feel bad too ...
>> Anonymous
I've always suspected that women only tolerate men for their penises.

This killed my hardon.
>> Anonymous
>>702903
The realworld biology is that a hermaphrodite clit resembles a penis, but doesn't approach regular length. It's conceivable that the clit can be altered with hormone use, but the piping shift between a normal female urethra and the center of the clit is drastic enough that you would just end up with maybe a 3 inch clit.

On the other hand, maybe the hormone used is something we don't know about ...

>>702998
I took it to mean that she "puts up with him" but needs to take care of her libido first, so her "faithfulness" to him as a psuedo-girlfriend is actually pretend.
>> Anonymous
>>703033
Desire first, morality later? Maybe the fake trans isn't too much of an exaggeration.
>> Anonymous
>>703035
I really don't get the issue. What's wrong with feminazis? I felt the whole thing was hot.

And besides, whats better thn dickgirls everywhere?
>> Anonymous
>>703107
Biting_Beaver probably started the whole thing off
I would literally die loling if it turned out that she did this rewrite
>> Anonymous
>>703110
Who is Biting_Beaver?
>> Anonymous
>>703114
Just some lady who wanted to go back in time and abort her 13-year-old son because he looked at softcore porn
Your average feminist really
>> Anonymous
>>703035

Sensetivity in my /d/?

who the fuck cares? You do realise the context here makes you all look like idiots. All dick girl porn is feminist. Where, apart from dg on guy specific, does the dickgirl choose to be with a guy in stead of other dickgirls? This one just happens to spell it out and you get all butthurt. Take a nap, some midol and come back when your pussy stops bleeding this whiney shit all over my /d/.
>> Anonymous
>>703154
>All dick girl porn is feminist.
Your argument lost its convincability right then and there
>> Anonymous
Not the entire "men are what's wrong with the world" dogma again. Seriously...if you've ever studied history, or have actually seen what's going on around you, women are just as bad, if not worse, than most men. That said we're all fucked up and are bound to start killing each other soon because we're to dumb to realize that has more to do with human nature rather than it does if you got a pener or a vagoo.
>> Anonymous
>>703154
I like dickgirl porn where she has sex with a boy, rolls over and goes "ooh, I love you, I love youuuu~"

I do not like dickgirl porn where she rapes a boy and says "you're fucking retarded, men ruin the world, I hope you die because you are a filthy man"
>> Anonymous
>>703161
Oh, and may I add that when the dickgirl is a little girl still in school, it makes it even more fucking disturbing.
>> Anonymous
What kind of faggot translated this?
>> Anonymous
>>703160
Totally true.
>> Anonymous
its...

AAAWWWEEEEEEEESOOOOOOOMEEEEEE
>> No Man
ah, men-ruin-everything dogmatic feminism. Yech.
>> Anonymous
its ture that girls mature a bit faster than the boys (both physically and mentally) but in the long shot the girls get "screwed" over by the evolution, as in men have greater potential when observing the big masses
>> Anonymous
>>703262
uh... what?
>> Anonymous
>>703161
Love is dead. Feminists killed it along with chivalry and that guy who developed an efficient water powered car.
>> Anonymous
>>702822
At least it didn't have any B^U
>> Anonymous
>>703154
You might actually be on to something, a man who watches porn with two girls because he can't stand looking at men is bound to have some problem with his sexual identity, like a gender-inferiority complex. This could be a result from social conditioning though, from a very, very early age, boys are convinced by their classmates that attraction to males is wrong, which is like saying that males are supposed to be unattractive, while parents teach them that females should be treated with as equals and with more respect than males (pime taradox), in a way, this can easily make any male feel inferior, simply because our messed-up society.

Anyway, posting this translation should be a bannable offense, because it causes more of a shitstorm every single time than it gives pleasure.
>> Kebinu !GhiZeo/aQQ
I see my motivator is gaining traction.

Also, I think what she meant by "I'm trying my best" was that she couldn't tell him what happened because they had been told to keep it a secret so she was "trying her best" to go along with it.

This still pisses me off but not as much as it used to. Let's be real, this would NEVER happen in real life. There ain't a hormone in the world that could turn a regular girl's clitoris into a full-sized, fully-functional ejaculating penis. Even if it did, say hello to body and facial hair, shrunken breasts, sterility, and everything else that comes with introducing male hormones into a female body. No government would ever fund a program like this. Can you imagine the litigation if parents found out what had been done to their daughters? They might even stop immunizing their children against diseases due to lack of trust, and the health results would be disastrous. And there's no way it would stay secret. Preteen girls are notorious blabbermouths and everyone knows it. Sooner or later someone would be found out or get caught, the cat would be out of the bag and everything would blow up in their faces. Even the feminazis on /u/ know this would never happen, and they wouldn't even want it to, since they all insist they hate penis and penetration so much, even on girls.
>> Anonymous
>>703389
ITT, we critique dickgirl lolicon manga on the criteria of their biological and sociological accuracy.

(By the way, feminists, lesbians and dildos have had an interesting relationship over the years; I thought that most had stopped shunning penetrative sex toys as symbolic of male oppression decades ago, but I suppose we could have some holdouts from the old guard on /u/.)
>> Ted
>>703389
In case you didn't pick up the subtext, the "hormones" they gave to the girls also altered their personalities substantially, like some sort of bizarre sex-changing everlasting roofie.

I think it's pretty clear that this is fictional.
>> Anonymous
>>703380
The only reason I don't watch straight porn is because all the guys are fucking ugly.

And real femenists don't think that chicks are better, they think they're equal.
>> Anonymous
>>703443
'feminist' means so many things that it doesn't mean anything, unless you qualify it somehow.
>> iopq !laipgs5uOE
>>703443
no, because then they'd just be egalitarian
but to be feminist you have to fight for rights of women even after the point where women have more rights...

feminism = sexism
>> Anonymous
>>703481
Again, true for SOME people that call themselves feminists. There isn't only one feminist movement; unfortunately, they all insist on using the same term to describe themselves, which causes no end of confusion.
>> Anonymous
>>702785
Lol, feminism in a porno comic.
>> Anonymous
Good thing they didn't name themselves then.
>> Servant of Suiseiseki !XXRGyU7XMs
>>703500

Unfortunately - in their eyes, the only way for us to counter our "male bias" is to generate a polar opposite and highly exaggerated situation in which us guys get kicked to the curb and are treated like worthless pigs.

This is why I am kinda happy feminazism has it's own built in counter argument. The whiny little bitches piss and moan, and then they die without giving birth. Darwin couldn't have invented a better proof for his theory.
>> Anonymous
>>703532
And once again, feminazi != feminist.
>> Anonymous
>>703324
Chivalry deserved to die, it's just undercover misogyny anyway. Love is getting up there on list too IMO.
>> Anonymous
Physicality of a dickgirl: 1-hermaphrodite, 2-Z chromosome instead of X or Y, 3-fake penis or vagina made however without real sperm or eggs, 4-real penis made with chemicals that override commands from DNA so XX cells can form working a penis or XY a working vagina, 5-magic
This is a case of #3 or #4
>> Anonymous
>>703599
Wait a minute, are you saying love is made to undercover misogyny?
>> Anonymous
>>703635
by caring for a woman, you attempt to sheild her from the harsh truths of reality. which means you think she can't take it, and is weak and inferior.
>> Anonymous
>>703522
That is probably the point since advertising feminism to men ticks them off like now

Also, the original end was probably something like her trying to overcome her desire to have sex with the other girls so she can be his girlfriend or she can't put away her dick during sex yet
>> Anonymous
>>703432

An "everlasting roofie"? Would that be something like one of Willy Wonka's Everlasting Gobstoppers?
>> Anonymous
>Let's be real, this would NEVER happen in real life.
I just cried because you felt that needed to be said.

On another note, shouldn't the guys get breasts and vaginas to be fair in this scenario (ignoring the impossibility and speaking objectively to anyone who almost textually raped me for the question)
>> Anonymous
>>703324
Chivalry deserves to die. It's an out dated belief that existed when women were given little rights. Now that they have similar rights, there's no need for them.

>that guy who developed an efficient water powered car.

That's a scam, btw. The laws of thermodynamics ensure no one will ever make an efficient water powered car.
>> C h a n
>>703706

you don't believe in the power of SCIENCE!! ???
>> backhand
even if the penises they would have gotten were fully funtional, any children they would've had would have birth defects due to the bodys high temperature malforming any and all sperm cells they would have produced. the balls are outside the body for a reson
>> Anonymous
last panel was total lulz. i came.
op is winrar.
>> Anonymous
>>703638
Man, those are fucked up beliefs. There is one thing that many people seem to ignore, men and women are absolutely not equal. One has a penis and one has a vagina. One is known for its strong frame, while the other is know for its slender frame. One has most is responsible for the majority of achievements in science and civilization, while the other is more known for being able to take care of a family. One is known for its leader capabilities, while the other is known for being submissive. Women are weaker, regardless of what feminists will tell you.

Also, misogyny literally means to hate women. There's quite a difference between acknowledging the weakness of something and hating it. I personally only hate what is stronger than me. Women in general, on the other hand, I tend to love.
>> Anonymous
>>703751
Only on the internet can someone be as hypocritical as this.
>> Anonymous
>>703752
I don't detect any hypocriticism.
>> Anonymous
>>One has most is responsible for the majority of achievements in science and civilization, while the other is more known for being able to take care of a family. One is known for its leader capabilities, while the other is known for being submissive.
That one I'd like to debate you on, as it was only recently that women have had any head-way into society and their position in it. Education? Check; women were put to sewing needles and pots and pans before they were to swords, mortars, and test tubes. Ruling? Check; how many more kings have there been across history than queens (who act like kings rather than decoration), just because of a succession rite that is arbitrarily masculine because of traditions that go deeper in roots than conservative people were willing to surrender?

And, of course, that doesn't completely negate female achievements in "science and civilization." Joan d`Arc and the Ada Lovelace, Elizabeth I and Sappho; it's not that women have had no contributions in the past, for the exceptions prove the rule wrong. The contributions you do not know about are scattered between those that have had masculine pseudonym and those that have been swept into the background. Sappho's poetry is just as beautiful as Plato's The Republic, but they hold beauty for different reasons.
>> Anonymous
>>703751
First, speaking in absolutes about people is a bad idea. Second, never get divorced is my advice to you. Third, being small and underestimated makes it a heck of a lot easier to kick someone in the groin. Finally, everyone has his or her own conscious and subconscious views of other groups and individuals making anything you say on this topic a personal, subjective opinion. So, just read the hentai and mastrubate people.
>> Anonymous
>>703754

That's "hypocrisy" dipshit.
>> Kebinu !GhiZeo/aQQ
>>703695

If you'd seen previous shitstorms about this manga you'd know that there have been anons claiming there's a conspiracy to render males obsolete, and regrettably it DID in fact need to be said.
>> Anonymous
>>703758

There is nothing beautiful about Plato's Republic.
>> Anonymous
>>703776
Point

But seriously people who try to reach a middle ground become the enemy to the side they're responding to and an idiot to the side they use examples from and people from either side are idiots to the middle and enemies to the opposite. Because of this we just spin our wheels when we could be mastrubating, posting, reading, or some combination of the three.
>> Anonymous
>>703758
Everyone brings up the fact that woman have been suppressed, but what caused this suppression in the first place? It's not just something that happens by coincidence. We all started out as primitive ape-like creatures, with true equality, because we weren't civilized enough to treat each other differently, until whoever proved to be capable decided to lead us into greater glory, and through all of our great civilizations, the male has always been the one capable.

And of course there will always be exceptions to such patterns, but these are rare enough to be possible to disregard as luck.
>> Anonymous
I can't believe no one's mentioned Freud and his theory of women having penis envy. This obviously proves his theory true! Women wish they were men, because men (and their penises) are superior.
>> backhand
well even if this were scientificly posible, no government would allow it because, as she said "makeing biological males obsolet" and would thus lead to our extinction, thats genocide which is a crime aginst humanity
>> Anonymous
>>703799
First of all, the earliest human societies worshipped the mother figure and revered women according to AP World History. second of all leadership is not given by any necesarity to whomever is the most capable else all those greatest civilizations would still be around according to logic. third apes have social and family hierarchies according to every zoo info poster. third specialization, the precurser to the suppression you mentioned, occurred with the advent of HUSBANDry and things got out of hand from there. fourth, >civilized enough to treat each other differently
is either a poor word choice or offensive to just about everyone since most peoples have been treated differently to death at some time. fifth, differences in body structure making men more suited to handle animals, fight hand-to-hand, and lift weights are not the standards by which we should judge the overall usefullness of a human being anymore, unless you have internet in that feudal society your living in. Also, for anyone that feels the need to respond to this, I'd like you to notice I never said how we should judge people, I just used a high school education to rend to pieces a stupid argument so don't call me either way.
>> Anonymous
>>703822
>First of all, the earliest human societies worshipped the mother figure and revered women according to AP World History.
The Egyptians, for example, like many others, worshiped deities represented by animals, but I haven't heard anything in Egyptian history of animals being treated as if they have the same abilities as humans. The mother figure is important in most mythology, and it also describes the nature of females. The mother figure is always seen as pure, nurturing, merciful, basically the kind of person you'd want to watch your kids instead of ruling your country, which by coincidence is exactly the role of women throughout history.

>second of all leadership is not given by any necesarity to whomever is the most capable else all those greatest civilizations would still be around according to logic.
You're right, it's not given, it's taken, and by "capable" I merely mean capability to take leadership.

>third apes have social and family hierarchies according to every zoo info poster
I was talking about the stage before anyone even had the chance to develop a social hierarchy.

>third specialization, the precurser to the suppression you mentioned, occurred with the advent of HUSBANDry and things got out of hand from there.
Makes no difference, at some point women accepted not having much power over society, that's what matters.

>fourth,[...]
Poorly phrased, meant a bit humoristic, doesn't make any difference to me if anyone finds it offensive.

>fifth,[...]
It was just another factor. Sure, there's not much use for it today, but men are naturally suited for a protective role, and it's retarded to claim that it's sexism to accept the role nature has given to you by physical means and instincts.
>> backhand
well when she say im done with your immature behaviour or whaterver, i can live with that cause men more offten then not are less mature thatn women, but fucken loser i think thats what is pissen most people off
>> Anonymous
why are you all still talking
>> Anonymous
Wait... this is doomed because teenaged girls are blabbermouths? I had kind of figured it was doomed because one of those little herm-girls was bound to get a boyfriend and then spring some hot surprise buttsex on him.

Also, lol /d/iscussion.
>> Anonymous
EPIC THREAD.
>> Anonymous
>Makes no difference, at some point women accepted not having much power over society, that's what matters.

LOL, I love the way you say this, like they handed out a survey and the women all checked the "yes, I'd like to have no power, please exploit me!" box.
>> Anonymous
>>703815
The way it's described, it seems pretty clear that the women who gave the injections had some kind of insider in the government. Some female Diet member they converted?
>> Anonymous
From the way they describe it, it's obvious that the organization has an insider in the government.
>> Anonymous
>>703751
>>703799

You guys don't know what you are talking about, especially the first dude. Go read up on some biological pyschology.

So obbviously there are physical differences between guys and girkls, I wont go there, I'll just talk mental attributes.

Yes, there are differences between the intelligences of the different genders. Us guys, we have a better spacial awareness, and we're better at problems that involve space (on average of course). In nearly every other type of intelligence women have the edge. So no, the fact that most recognised scients are male has nothing to do with gender related intelligence. If it was purely intelligence based, us guys would be at a disadvantage.

So what do we have in our favour? Testosterone. We have more testosterone. This will mean (on average) that we are more aggressive. Perhaps it also means we are more likely to be driven too. not sure on that one.

Thats it. When we are cunts we are more likely to be in your face about it. We have the muscles to back it up. More intelligent? not at all.
>> Anonymous
Welcome to /d/, dickgirl discussion centre.
>> Anonymous
>>702758
You notice how her friend became stronger? What's up with that?
>> Anonymous
Yes, they are differences in men and women, however at the same time, they are also simialarities as well. It is ridicoulous to try to fit anybody into anything based on a circumstance they had no controll over. The argument that men are stronger, and women are more nurturing, strikes me as wrong because I can think of guy's who are more brainy than anything else, and women who are self-obsesed little bitches that desperatly needs a slap in the face in order to get their act together. In other words, yes, they are extremes, but most people fit more into a gray-like area that tends to focus on aspects of both sides. Either way you look at it, if you're a woman who weighs 112 lbs, and you slap a guy who weighs 220 lbs (more from muscel than from flab) and expects him not to retalliate on you, then you just proved that not all men are agressive/mean as sterotyped. If they really were then you, my dear, would be laying in the back alley with a lot more than a broken nose and a stinging jaw.

In other words it's like this; if a woman is on her way home in the middle of the night, and she was attacked, most people would say that her attacker was male. However, if someone was to come to resue her, then again people would say that her rescuer was male. Why is it that the guy is being sterotyped as violent/dangerous, and then at the same time suppose to be self-sacrificing so as to be as much benefit as he can be to the woman? Double standards anyone?
>> No Man
tl;dr: modern feminism promotes double standards.
>> Anonymous
Ever wonder where hermaphrodites stand on these issues? /d/ needs a hermaphrodite debater.