>> |
Anonymous
>>303469
No, the reason that I say that is because without a visible vagina (labia, etc) the person in question can be assumed to be MALE. Strictly speaking, the penis/testes are the genetals of a male and the uterus(and vagina)/ovaries are the genetals of a female. Between the two you get various stages of androgyny and such, but the point remains - a girl with a dick is not a female in the true sense of the word.
The balls kinda obscure any existing slit, making the gender of the dick"girl" to be nothing but an assumption. You -want- it to be a female, not a male, even though as far as we can determine by the visible genetals the opposite is true.
|