File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Wouldn't it be great if the thing that caused women to lactate during pregnancy was always on in overdrive, resulting in massive breasts that constantly needed to be milked?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>700148

That would be pretty interesting.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Bras would cost a fortune.
>> Anonymous
Would they even still be thought of as sex objects if they were basically giant udders?
>> Anonymous
>>700166

lol welcome to /d/
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>700166
I would still think of them as sex objects
>> Anonymous
>>700168
Is that Bulleta in the background?
>> Res.urrect.ion
>>700148
That would be fuckin awesome!!! lol
I think that could quite possibly prevent war!!!
>> Anonymous
>>700148
Yes, except for the depression caused by the inevitable vitamin B deficiency.
>> Anonymous
That would be so awesome! Every woman trying to get around with giant, milk engorged boobs. Bras would need to always be replaced as they grew bigger.
>> Anonymous
Pharmecuetical Engineer here... I'm working on it.
>> Anonymous
>>700176

Why would they lack vitamin B?

One thing is they'd probably be always too tired for sex.
>> Anonymous
>>700177
Not all women, just the ones with the best flavor.
>> Anonymous
>>700183
Vitamin B gets donated into breast milk, among other things. They would need to supplement their diets to make up for the constant loss.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>700187

That'd be doable. Bigger problem would be how they'd adapt to the extra weight.
>> Anonymous
Yeah, it wouldn't be practical for all women to be like that.
>> Anonymous
>>700189
Specialized corsets could be developed that supported both the breasts and the back, as well as back strengthening steroids.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>700181
Work on making them produce chocolate milk.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
Heh, what would the normal women think?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>700205
It would be just like any trend, they would get jealous and competitive with the milk maids.
>> Anonymous
>>700205
They'd secretly enjoy it.
>> Anonymous
>>700205

They would feel jealous for not being picked and inadequate, of course.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>700205

Depending on just how big they got, I'm sure there'd be some drawbacks. They'd probably be secretly happy to not deal with the extra hassle.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>700148
>>Wouldn't it be great if the thing that caused women to lactate during pregnancy was always on in overdrive, resulting in massive breasts that constantly needed to be milked?

It's possible to induce lactation, and the result is- like normal lactation- enlarged breasts that need to constantly be milked. In fact, pretty much any time a woman is lactating, she needs to be "emptied" pretty much daily or it starts getting painful. Usually this is accomplished by suckling of the baby, but when artificially induced, you need to milk her.

Now all we need is something to make them even more massive.
>> Anonymous
What would pregnancy do to these women?! Would they not be allowed for it being too unsafe?
>> Anonymous
>>700235

Can't lactation continue for as long as they're "emptied".
>> Anonymous
>>700236

That's what the normal women would be for.
>> Anonymous
Some university did a study that found that pheromones related to breastfeeding boost sexual drive by almost 50% in other women. True story.
>> Anonymous
This thread is hot.
>> Anonymous
>>700181
Make it air-borne so all women are effected.
>> Anonymous
How would they even move around?
>> Anonymous
>>700269

You can't have all women be affected. It's not practical and we'd still need sexing.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>700272

Wheelchairs.
>> Anonymous
>>700269
There's really no way to separate men and women with that sort of thing. Also, what about the poor loli?
>> Anonymous
>>700287
Loli's with huge tits? ... oh ... god .... *fap*fap*fap*fap*fap*
>> Anonymous
>>700287

Men. There's a scary thought. Also, grannies.

No, this would have to be something where only a few are selected.
>> Anonymous
>>700292
Administered stealthily from long distances using a dart gun?
>> Anonymous
>>700294

Voluntary.
>> Anonymous
>>700292
Trouble is how do you convince women to do this willingly? How do you make it a trend when it would be so difficult to live with?
>> Anonymous
>>700296

How do we convince them to do all the other crap they do? :/
>> Anonymous
>>700302
Tell them that other women are doing it.
>> Anonymous
>>700302

It's a little different than boob jobs and high heels.
>> Anonymous
>>700305
Not really.
>> Anonymous
Why would this need to be done at all? Sudden deficiency in breast milk?
>> Anonymous
Make a company that sells the milk. Then tell ppl its better than cows because its voluntary. That will atleast get peta ppl doin it.
>> Anonymous
We convince a bunch of celebrities to do it. It'll be the "new thing", then we infiltrate all those women's magazines and have uber-lactation women placed on all the covers. Have a bunch of hired journalists write about it who will make it seem stylish, rebelious or whatever shit it is people fall for.

It'll be a trend by 2013.
>> Anonymous
>>700307

Or it could be a purely sexual thing. Mankind could develop a huge boobs fetish and this would be the new type of implant.
>> Anonymous
>52 posts and 14 pics hidden
Less talking about science, more boobs.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>700310

Ewww, hippie bitch milk
>> Anonymous
People with lower than the average IQ will be altered to be able to provide services for the rest of humanity?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>700325

"But your highness, she is a commoner! Her Slurm will taste foul!"
>> Anonymous
>>700236

You probably wouldn't be allowed to get pregnant if your breasts were already overstimulated to produce a ton of milk. Not being able to have kids would be a huge trade off.

Of course, some would do it anyways. And then they'd be screwed.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Sex would still be possible. You might just have to make some adjustments.
>> Anonymous
>>700238
Yes.
I looked into extending lactation [so my hubby can enjoy it ;) ] and as long as the breasts are pumped on a regular basis (ever 4-6 hours) they will continue to lactate. The nipple can not tell the difference between a baby suckling and a pump. It only knows that it needs to replace the milk being used.

>>700235
There IS a way to artificially induce lactation? Do share.
>> Anonymous
>>700462

Anonymous provides.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erotic_lactation#Lactation.2C_re-lactation_and_induced_lactation
>> Anonymous
>>700462
Modern medicine speeds things up with medication, but in the old days women who adopted infants would induce lactation simply by allowing the infant to suckle them even though they were dry. They still had to feed the infant mush for a while, because it took a month or two to get any flow.

You should be able to pump for half an hour a day to eventually induce lactation. Machine will probably work, but a human would probably be better.
>> Anonymous
>>700272

Anti-grav things built into their bras. Problem solved.

Biggest problem would be getting used to them. Always bumping into things and stuff.
>> Anonymous
>>700489
>>700491
<3
>> Anonymous
As long as it's optional, so I don't have to do it and I can laugh my butt off watching the stupid people walk around doubled over in pain, waisting an hour a day with breastpumps.
>> Anonymous
>>700515

And the extreme pain if you miss a milking.
>> Anonymous
Moar pics with discussion nao.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
How about multiple milk-filled breasts? Can we make that happen as well?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>700521

Maybe if you missed a couple. Breastfeeding women can hold it a bit, can't they?
>> Anonymous
MOAR
>> Anonymous
>>700532
I'd volunteer for that. I've always wanted more than just two and I also liked the idea of easily giving milk.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>700535

It gets really uncomfortable.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Or you could just do it like this.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>700545

Does it? How does it feel?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>700557

I'd think it would be something like having two full bladders. On your chest.
>> Anonymous
>>700541
That's pretty hot.
>> Anonymous
basically, from what I have heard, you don't need ANY kind of medicine, hormones or whatever.

Given enough stimulation every woman will eventually lactate and maintain that state...
I heard it's even possible for men to produce milk.. not that we would want that, but it is still possible...

about the size.. that's probably another thing. Though as most people know, breast size has nothing to do with the ability to produce more or less milk. It's mostly just fat anyways that makes them big. Though it is believes that the average cup size will go up in the next hundret years since, and there is no doubt about that, it helps to attract possible partners and nature emphasises features that successfully attract partners as evolution continues.

blah blah.. now back to pictures
>> Anonymous
>>700557

I don't really know how to describe it. They just feel full. And they get rock hard. That should put a damper on the thread.
>> Anonymous
MOAR PICS YOU FOOLS
>> Anonymous
How'd this thread get so huge?
>> Anonymous
Because we all want to suck out woman milk. MOAR
>> Anonymous
>>700569

Scientific speculation and the influence of the media on cultural standards. No, really.
>> 7eAL !PFSxapZ0Cc
>>700216
>>700282
>>700542
these I don't recognize - sauce?
>> Anonymous
>>700314

It'd be a lot safer than the implants we have now, that's for sure.
>> Anonymous
BBWchan is down. AGAIN!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
A woman who can cook is a winner. A woman who can cook, and produces her own ingredients, is pure win.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>700427
>> Anonymous
This thread is win.
>> Anonymous
>>700567
Well, I'm not a woman, but can't they just lactate and that's it?

I mean, I have to eat and go to the toilet every day, too...
>> Anonymous
>>700588

Yeah, but you can't just whip out the breast pump anywhere. People are uptight like that.
>> Anonymous
Maybe I've just had this fetish since birth, but even when I was a kid it seemed weird to me that people normally drink cow milk instead of human milk, which is what I thought we were always meant to drink.

Do you think being a dairy cow would be a decently-paying job for a woman?
>> Anonymous
>>700593

For all the troubles you'd have to go through, it better be.
>> Anonymous
>>700593
I'd buy it.
>> Anonymous
ITT: Anonymous plots immense societal overhaul in how we eat and how we mate with the only motivation being that it's his fetish, and posts appropriate porn while doing it.

I am torn between saying "Good GOD" and "DO IT, FAGGOT". I think I'll go with both.
>> Anonymous
>>700590

Also, you can't just breastfeed a kid wherever in many places.
>> Anonymous
>>700607

You can't?
>> Anonymous
>>700607

The fact that this is true enrages and infuriates me.
>> Anonymous
>>700607

What the hell?! That's what they're FOR.
>> Anonymous
Why is it that women would be milked by machines? Why not do it the old-fashioned, natural way: by hand?
>> Anonymous
yeah, its a dumb "social taboo" that I'm glad isn't that much of a deal where I live. I've seen moms throw a blanket over their shoulder and start nursing in the store where I work XD
>> Anonymous
>>700622

Machine would probably be easier if they were really huge.
>> Anonymous
This whole thread reminds me of that Sealab episode with the "would you put your human brain in a robot body?" thing.
>> GeneralGuy
     File :-(, x)
Females should have huge breasts, filled with gallons of milk.
>> Anonymous
>>700206
source?!
>> Anoniminous
I saw a woman breastfeeding her baby in public a few years ago. I really didn't find it abnormal, more like she actually loved the kid instead of shoving a bottle with some powdered crap mixed with tapwater in his/her face for convenience/apathy. That's not to say that all mothers who give their kids bottles are apathetic or care more for their own convenience than the kid, but I think breastfeeding is just the best option.

Didn't hurt that she was decently attractive, either.
>> Anonymous
>>700894

*sough* not to mention some mothers lactate, milk themselves, and put it into bottles because the kid's a sodding biter. thankfully but an indirect personal experience of watching someone else coping with being religious about wanting to breastfeed, and then eventually getting to that point after the kid clamped down hard enough for serious bruising.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
omg, it won't bump!!
>> Anonymous
bump for milk is good
>> Anonymous
Once a baby is attached to a mother's breast it's not sexual anymore to me. I've seen women breastfeeding in public. I see no problem with it and I don't think twice about it.
>> Anonymous
I think we should make men able to produce litres of semen at a time !
>> Anonymous
Bump.