>> |
Anonymous
>>863101
by technicality, they ARE "Pocket Monsters" but its not the technicalities ppl bitch about, but the fact they resemble furry art.
and in case ur wondering if ppl will bitch or not... its not so much "furry" that ppl hate, but the 2 main things that separate furry from monster girls, or monster on girls.
(1) most furry is drawn by shitty westerners. and the few good westerners most ppl like, usually dont draw furry.
the reason these artists even draw furry in the 1st place (more so back then, then now adays) is the fact they couldnt draw ppl decent looking enough, and went with the furry style, since it requires ALOT less skill to draw that shit.
(2) most ppl, but not all, like seeing either a human, or something MORE human looking, being the focus of the porn. (tho in most cases with girls who like furry, to them, looking at ugly hairy guys, isnt any better, so if it looks human or not, doesnt matter to them.)
so since there are more guys here, than girls, they want to see something feminine enough, yet human enough, their "natural" urges kick in.
so in the end, despite being "monsters" they fall under the category of "furry" even tho they rly arnt.
|