File :-(, x, )
Hypothetical incest question Anonymous
Dear /d/,

I was having a disscussion with a friend of mine at work today, and was wondering if you could solve our problem. Our hypothetical incest question is if we surgicely removed his balls, and replaced my balls with his, then I slept with his sister, would it be considered, in any way, incest?

Thank you for your time.

Oh and if any of you can give me the sauce on this manga, it would be nice. I've been looking for it for a few weeks.
>> Jumpluff @ Delicious Pink Ribbon !a34R3NA1a.
That's a good question.

If the operation was a success.
Incest is defined as "sexual intercourse between closely related persons" so, technically, I don't think it is.
>> Anonymous
genetically, yes (unless you used a condom), but it would be your penis.
but... his balls would be touching you. so it would be gay.
>> Anonymous
>>895889
Lol'd
>> Fag
technically if you used a condom its not incest at all, I say keep it in the familly
>> Anonymous
The entire reason incest is taboo is because genetic procreation between people with highly similar genes carries a risk factor of genetic drift ~4% higher than normal (compounds with multiple generations). So if you were injecting the gametes of relative into her it would have the same consequences.
so yes.
>> Anonymous
op here. suppose I didn't use a condom, nor was she on birth control of any kind.
>> Anonymous
*Hears dueling banjos playing somewhere in the distance*
>> Anonymous
it would never be incest, which is a legal/moral term about screwing your sister.

it would, however, produce retard babies.
>> Fag
is that any less hot?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
incest on /d/, serious business
>> Jumpluff @ Delicious Pink Ribbon !a34R3NA1a.
>>895893
See
>>895895
>> Anonymous
>>895895
it only carries a 4% higher chance of genetic difference.
unless your family has a history of incestual pregnancies, then it either increases logarithmically or exponentially, I can't remember which.
>> Anonymous
thanks /d/ this'll clear things up, but do you have the sauce on that manga?
>> Anonymous
>>895904
glad we got to the most important part of the thread cuz I too want the source
>> ass fan
counts as incest to me. you're still fucking your sister. does that mean you can finger your sis and its not incest. if she got a sex change and fucked you, is that not incest?
personally, i don't care. fuck your sis.i don't think its so bad. don't have kids though(with your sis or not, children are the worst STD you can get).

but i think its also a threesome
>> Anonymous
>>895889
This guy is right.
>> yes4me
Fucked up discussion imo
>> Anonymous
that question could only be ask in /d/ ^^
>> Anonymous
Where do you work that you can
A. Have time to discuss this sort of thing?
B. Don't get fired for discussing this?
>> Anonymous
>>895970
damn near any where
>> Anonymous
I don't think it'd be incest since you're the one sleeping with her, not the balls. Balls only make the babies, and having retard babies can't prove any kind of incest relationship is involved.
>> Anonymous
>>895894
i ssooooo loled here. thanks anon! =))
>> Anonymous
>>895975
The only flaw in that is the fact that 'incest' is only taboo because of retard babies to begin with. So you're still running the risk of exactly why it's generally outlawed.
>> Anonymous
>>895979
That's true, but I believe that the general public would think the person has to be related to call it incest.
>> Anonymous
also the balls wouldnt produce his sperm but your own, only if you had sex with her like right away
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>895887
That's the most retarded thing I've ever heard. You and your faggot friend need to kill yourselves.

And of course it's incest, you jackass. By your retard standards using a condom when fucking your mother, sister, father, whatever would not be incest.
>> Karlo
Source on OP? please? TwT
>> Anonymous
It could never be incest because you'd be so happy to have your friends testicles you wouldn't bang your sis.
>> Anonymous
>>895887
you might want to get you head checked, and what is the source of the pic
>> Anonymous
>>895887
I'd say while it would not be genetically advisable, I doubt it would legally be considered incest, organ transplants don't carry with them any sort of legal identity exchange.
Brain/memory transplant, that's science fiction but would be a better model for a hypothetical incest scenario.
>> Anonymous
All this talk, but nobody mentions that incest is a /h/ fetish, not /d/.
>> Anonymous
If I were a betting man I'd say that it wasn't legally incest. If anything, It's more like 'incest by proxy', which I'd guess has few if any statutes specifically outlawing it -- it's not like your average congress critter and his lawyer pals are thinking up of scenarios along OP's lines to legislate against. I have no doubt that upon finding out about it that such operations would probably be outlawed.

On a related note, I remember a case where a married couple couldn't have children because their genes were so similar that the fertilised embryo wasn't recognised or some-such. (It was in Woman's Day or the like, details are hazy after all this time, and I can't remember exactly what caused the constant miscarriages, but their genes being far closer than brother or sister was pinpointed as the cause.) Didn't seem to concern doctors to help them conceive despite the fact that the couple might as well have been the same person they were that genetically similar, with the exception of the whole XX/XY thing of course.

Considering that Australian grandfather and his daughter the doctor's attitudes in this case really shouldn't surprise anyone. (inb4 someone corrects me about it being Austria, someone mentions Tazmania, gb2/b/, etc.)

tl;dr: legally, no, but that legal distinction wouldn't last long.
>> Anonymous
>>895889
I didn't think of that. Sorta how if a guy was invited to form a threesome by a pair of copulating lesbians his acceptance would make him gay, as he would be participating in a "homosexual act."
>>896127
good point

But srsly...
I would say that if your friend gave you a ball(s) for the express purpose of slathering his sis with your baby batter (condom,anal, hand-job w/e) he is committing an act that is incestuous by proxy but you are not. Though if you knew the origin of the ball(s) and you knew that he knew what you were going to use it for then you would be complicit in his scheme (follow that?).
>> Anonymous
sauce of the manga you fag
>> Anonymous
>>895887
sauce
>> Anonymous
>>896303
>>896388

http://www.megarotic.com/?d=u1jpuv6p
>> Dr. Evil
>>895887
ok, first off, lay off the shrooms, second, where i come from (US, Midwest) that's not called incest, that's called just plain FUCKED UP, why would you think of being castrated, then getting your buddie's balls stuck on.
>> Anonymous
He's fucking his friend's sister with his friend's balls. Not his sister with his friend's balls.
>> Anonymous
>>895887
Of course not. Don't be stupid. If successfully transplanted, his balls would start producing sperm with YOUR genetic code in it anyway and, as the years passed by, cell death and reproduction would eventually cause the assimilated organ to lose all traces of foreign DNA.
>> Anonymous
>>897351
Ok, first off, if you think that's gross, wtf are you doing on /d/?

Second, the midwest sucks balls.

Third, Mushrooms are awsome!

Forth, No, it wouldn't be incest. Just cause you have someone else balls doesn't mean you came out of the same person as the girl your fucking did. You wouldn't be siblings, hence, no incest.
>> Blank
oh, my, fucking, god. that has to be the most fucked up hypothetical question ever.
>> Anonymous
see, this is why i come here. well, that and the extremely fucked up fetishes that NEED to be fed. funny stuff like this are what keeps me coming back.
>> Anonymous
Man, where's the silly fuck that said there's no such thing as a /d/iscussion?

It's the little chats about things like this that make life horrifying and fascinating at the same time
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>898794
That pic is great, and she probably has a wang too. XD
>> Anonymous
>>898808
Too bad the caption is full of shit and engrish.
>> Anonymous
>>898794
now i want the original
>> Anonymous
Since it seems like it has gone from "no sex before marriage" to "sex sex sex" I'm personally wondering how many more years it will take before incest is a common sibling activity just for pleasure.

I bet if they manage to to combine those male pills, the normal female pills and a condom you can lower the chances for pregnancy a lot.
>> Anonymous
>>899142
I'm not so sure it isn't common already. I mean, probably more people have done it than will ever admit to doing it.
>> Anonymous
>>895889
It's only gay if their balls touch each other. Fag.
>> Thisguy2021
>>898794
I lol'd.

Hard.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
just for the record, genetic codes don't deteriorate with one incestuous pairing, its when you do it over generations that they deteriorate. scientifically speaking incest is fine, so long as it dosent happen too often over a period of time. Enjoy.
>> Anonymous
>>900019
>>895887

eddit: if you willingly do this , you probably shouldent be breeding anyways.