File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
One of my brit friends mentioned something about possession of 'Extreme porn' and 'Lolicon in all explicit forms including Mangas, models and personal artwork becoming outlawed in the UK because it 'promotes the abuse of children'.
George Orwell must be flipping his tombstone.

So I looked it up, UK's Criminal Justice Act 2008 Made it ilegal to VIEW 'Extreme porn' which they defined as

"An “extreme image” is an image which—
(a) falls within subsection (7), and
(b) is grossly offensive, disgusting or otherwise of an obscene character."

Sub section 7 V
"(a) an act which threatens a person’s life,
(b) an act which results, or is likely to result, in serious injury to a person’s anus, breasts or genitals,
(c) an act which involves sexual interference with a human corpse, or
(d) a person performing an act of intercourse or oral sex with an animal (whether dead or alive),"

Comment too long. Clickhereto view the full text.
>> Anonymous
>>938081
PROTIP: Images can't
A. threaten a person's life
B. inflict serious injury to a person’s anus, breasts or genitals
C. sexually interfere with a human corpse
D. perform an act of intercourse or oral sex with an animal (whether dead or alive)
>> Anonymous
Any psychiatrist worth his/her salt will tell you that it's healthier for people to have aforementioned pictures than to stifle thier urges. A pedo is less likely to rape kids if he can get his fix via loli.

Of course, outlawing loli = +votes. Who cares if it will result in increased child molestation? No politician would be caught dead supporting "extreme porn" even if it would keep potential rapists from snapping.
>> Anonymous
>>938100Any psychiatrist worth his/her salt

You are not a pyschiatrist, and if you were you would not be worth any amount of salt.
>> Anonymous
Shit sucks doesn't it?

>>938091
Tell that to the buckets of faggotry we've got in charge.

Especially the (b) definition of extreme porn, as who the fuck judges it? Some people consider Tubgirl fap material, others think that anyone showing their shoulder should be illegal. I think that's the most bullshit part because it basically says "We can ban whatever the fuck we feel like, fuck you human rights!"

RAGE
>> Anonymous
>>938105
Wow, were you anally raped by someone in the psychiatric profession or something?

Fantasy has long been accepted as an outlet for urges one wouldn't want to really give in to. Are you new to life or something?
>> Anonymous
My buddy just got his BS in psych, I'm just repeating what he said. Of course, I doubt any psychiatrist would actually tell a client to fap to loli even if they thought it would help him control sadistic urges. They could lose thier job over that shit.
>> Anonymous
Sometimes, I might just get the urge to draw a loli being raped by a whale. For lulz - it surely wouldn't have enough artistic merit for anything else knowing my lack of talent. But it should be my business, what I decide to draw in my own home for me. Not the government. It can go stuff itself.
>> Anonymous
And I'm proud to be an American where at least I know I'm free......
>> Anonymous
>>938124

And for how long does one expect
America to be free.

Family values! Only in America!
>> Anonymous
As far as I'm concerned the Extreme Porn Bill does NOT include written or drawn works

The Lolicon one, however, does
>> Anonymous
From Wikipedia
>Material is considered extreme pornography only if the main purpose of creating it was to produce sexual arousal. This rules out most mainstream films, documentaries, war footage or instructional videos, regardless of content, though these would be included if images were extracted from them for the purpose of sexual arousal. Textual material or cartoon depictions are also excluded regardless of theme or detail.

So OP, please delete this thread and start it again, because this is only going to devolve into people on purposely posting bannable content and /b/tards loling at Britfags
>> Anonymous
Egh...this reminds me of my argument for guro. I can barely even stand the stuff, and yes I do think the people who look at it are messed up, but as long as they aren't going out and doing what they see in real life why should I care?

Yes, a few go nuts and do this kind of stuff, but then again two idiots dressed up a Sephiroth and actually killed two people in their own home. Does this mean that FFVII should know be considered a violent and demoralizing game? If anyone has already played it at least once then I really do not have to say anything beyond this. Things are what they are; even if a few people do these things aren't they really just the lunatic fringe? It's like banning hammers because someone used it to as a murder weapon; WTF?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
For me pr0n that involves any of those mentioned is a real buzz-killer. Example, Bible Black NT when that bank robber ass-rapes a teller with the barrel of a shotgun and pulls the trigger when he climaxes. Blegh! Gross.
>> Anonymous
I'm British, and my government can fuck off. I'm not sexually abusing any underage girls. Just because they can't tell the difference between fantasy and reality, doesn't mean I can't.
>> Anonymous
>>938311

Exactly what I wa saying in>>938294

The fact that people who look/watch whatever and then equate that to doing the same thing in real life is insane. How do I know that? Because I've played just about Resident Evil game there is, I've played God of War 1 & 2, a few 007 games, GTA, the list goes on. If it is true that looking/watching/playing said material means your doing it in real life then why am I not somewhere down mainstreet with a sawed off shotgun in one hand, and a chainsaw in the other? Seriously I should be going Kratos right about now if I'm this hell bent about killing everything that so much as moves, and even a few that don't.

Ie. there is a difference between fantasty and reality. If anyone is so gullible that they will enact what they see that got more to worry about than a couple of dirty images and a few violent videogames. It's like if I tell you to rob a bank or shoot someone; odds are you're not going to do it just because I put the suggestion into your head, and even if you did, then wouldn't that speak more of your lack of higher thinking?