File :-(, x, )
ITT ABSORBTION OR SOFT VORE The Dude
If not, does ayone have the rest of this set? I already have the other like it, but I'm hopig that this oe is just as good.
>> The Dude
     File :-(, x)
>> ?? !rape.hoh.I
good job bitch, your chances of escaping on your own suddenly became nonexistent.
>> Ande
What CG set is this from?
>> Anonymous
>>602929
this is pretty much guro
>> Anonymous
>>603558
Assimilation is freakshow, not guro. Lurk moar.
>> SiggyPoo !GQUOsC9mgk
aw fuck no.. her limbs dissolved...
>> Anonymous
>>603561
i've been here for quite a while, and i don't see how dissolving body parts is anything but guro, but i really don't feel like arguing about it.
>> Ande
>>602928

It's one of those fuzzy lines things. It can go either way upon interpertation. Then again I've seen some other stuff that's been posted around here that would make this look tame in comparison, so why start complaining now?
>> Anonymous
Emos Complain about anything here, you can have a chick with a huge dick and not call the a confused Gay male trying to be straight but for some reason soft Vore is Taboo
>> Anonymous
someone call the waaaaaambulance.... I don't care if you think the rules are fair or not, if you don't like it LEAVE. Like there aren't enough chans out there for you emo kids to take your "OMG its SO unfair I can't post my pics here, why should Moot and the staff get to decide what is and isn't allowed!?"
This isn't a democracy, fools... there IS a gurochan, you know...
>> Anonymous
>>603578
Who's bitching about the rules? The pic is tentacle absorption, not guro. Besides, I'd be worried more about what the first pic is doing to her internals than her limbs.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
lol wut?
>> Anonymous
>Besides, I'd be worried more about what the first pic is doing to her internals than her limbs.
Also, if someone'd bitch about that then we'd need to forbid anything that shows things that aren't anatomically correct, translated to anime-shape. No uterus-fucking, no abnormally distorted stomachs of any kind, whether it's alien egg-insertion or just plain getting fucked hard by some guy with a hueg penis.

Dissolving body parts that act as if they're made of flesh and blood is guro. Dissolving body parts that act as if they're made out of plastic and as if they're from a plastic mannequin/doll is not. That's pretty how I see these images in spite of that they're very much not something I'd ever like to have on my harddrive. They're too far divorced from reality (and too inorganic) to be guro, which is why they're not as bad as guro.
>> Mel !iKGMr61IHM!!VJX
>>603807
>>603807
>>603807

THIS
>> Anonymous
Call it what you want, I don't like the limb dissolving bit either. But I'll just edit in the limb bits from the first pic and have a new pair of alien impreg pics.
>> theinternetisforporn !!AIwF3yHC4F6
sage for guro, the OP was kinda hot with the girl looking like she was enjoying it, but the dissolving arms and legs--not tentacles--in the second pic ruins the thread.
>> Ande
>>603723

*hits him in the dead with his piko hammer of doom*


No one is complaining about anything. I just stated that this thing is border line; it can go either way. Ipso facto the mods/admins haven't said anything involving this kind of material, so who can say that it's banable?

>>603816

What you said; just because it's out of the ordinary (for /d), that doesn't mean that it shouldn't be posted. Is it guro (blood, disembowlment, violent decapitation, that sort of thing)? Probably not. Is it unsettling? Yes, much in the same way as vore is, but it still keeps getting posted here because it doesn't show anything overly graphic.

In other words, while unsettling, that doesn't necessairly mean that it can be baned on that principle alone. Come back to me when the person looks like they just went through a meat grinder.
>> Anonymous
>>In other words, while unsettling, that doesn't necessairly mean that it can be baned on that principle alone.
As many faggots need to realise. I still see the occasional muscle-chick and BBW thread saged on the grounds that the sager doesn't like what he's seeing.
The standards of /d/ constantly change, new fetishes will arise. The only time you need to worry is if the fetish ACTUALLY DEPICTS rule-breaking material - some more obvious than others. If you don't like what you're looking at, then just fucking move on - unless of course, the art is absolutely shit, in which case you may sage freely.