File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
/d/ Is for dragons
>> Anonymous
In before gout of flame fired inside and female enjoying internal BBQ.
>> Anonymous
In during potential guro
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
i had better see more than what i saw last time >=(
>> fetish sponge !8.L5bN30V.
something tells me I'm going to love this thread so much.
>> Anonymous
>>590431
tinypic is tiny
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
FUCK YES THIS IS MY ULTIMATE FETISH

GO /d/ GO!!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I could be out.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
ok maybe one more
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
moar , anyways, some shit i found
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
that's all i've got...
by the way , i'm looking for source for this one, something i found here a while ago
>> Anonymous
>>590911

you can't just post hentai with a small picture of a dragon on the last page and say it's related?!
>> Anonymous
>>590920
Grammar, my friend, is the key to victory.
>> Anonymous
>>590920
One does'nt simply post last page dragon on Mordor!
>> Kirby
     File :-(, x)
>> Kirby
     File :-(, x)
>> Kirby
     File :-(, x)
>> Kirby
     File :-(, x)
>> Kirby
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>590920
i'm quite sure if i could only get the source of this, there would be more dragons to come.
>> Anonymous
>>590993

oic
carry on then
>> Anonymous
by the way, even though it wasn't VERY related, i hope it was enjoyable
>> Anonymous
I only enjoy Dragon on woman porn if lunch is enjoyed afterwards.
>> Anonymous
>>591022
makes sense
>> Anonymous
>>590931
I, for one, would like to see more of this.
>> Anonymous
Don't have any pics to contribute...but anyone who likes dragons and doesn't mind awesomely bad movies should see Dragon Wars....Painful but fun
>> Anonymous
>>591071

OMG FAIL
>> Anonymous
>>591071
but does it have any dragon on woman sex?
>> Anonymous
Isn't this considered... Oh, I don't know... FURRY?
>> Anonymous
>>591164
Mmm... nope, I do believe is scaley
>> Anonymous
>>590479

This pic IS furry.
>> fetish sponge !8.L5bN30V.
>>590993
i could be wrong, but i think ive seen that style in futanarikko love, you can at least look up the author that way.
>> Anonymous
>>591236
Probably... it's T.K-1
>> Anonymous
i LOVE the one with the yellow dragon and the elf moar plz!
>> Anonymous
>>590619

Oh god sauce of this please?

Or, if you have 'em, other pics in the series? I seem to remember there being a couple others but I could be wrong.
>> Anonymous
>>591282
"May Lish 2" by Isago Sou
>> Anonymous
>>591282
that mini and most of his other mini stuf here:

http://s6.artemisweb.jp/49kda/007/index.html
>> Anonymous
>>590479
Concurred.

Anthro art detected.
>> Anonymous
>>590946
believe it or not I never got the sauce of that,
could somebody fix this?
>> Anonymous
>>590636

Moar!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>591633
>> Anonymous
bump
>> Anonymous
did you know that Suddam Hussain had dragon porn, like softcore fantasy art, in one of his mansions.
>> Anonymous
OMG SADDAM WENT ON /D/
>> Anonymous
yeah it was on a documentry, the Artist (some woman in England i believe) found out when a televised raid of one of Saddam's mansions, the pictures of dragons about to lunge on naked babes, so this was you could say Western erotic D&D fanart from what the documentry showed, i would imagine Saddam destroyed his /d/ collection before the Coalition came round
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
here we go, straight from Suddam's collection
>> Anonymous
oh yeah, i just found out the Mansion was Saddams 'love nest', the other painting went to a 'Japenesse collector'
>> Anonymous
>>591815

What?

And destroy a national treasure?
>> Anonymous
>>590946
Anyone have a source? Or more?