File :-(, x, )
John !DsP25/Ui/2
Was Source Found on these images?
>> John !DsP25/Ui/2
     File :-(, x)
second image

thanks for any info.

This isn't an /r/

I'm just asking if the previous threads ever delivered
>> Anonymous
source?!
>> Ehhh.....
>>661264
That's... pretty much the same thing. Not that I really care--as far as I'm concerned, any /r/ with a related image is allowed in /d/--but just so you know.
>> Anonymous
>>661261
>>661261
>>661261
been trying to locate the source of this picture forever...
>> Anonymous
>>661273
As far as you are concerned, you are wrong. /r/equests with a related image are not allowed, have never been allowed, weren't protected in the NO-REQUESTS mod sticky that lasted for weeks and have resulted in bans. The funny part is that I already said this clearly to you, namefag, in the past, when you said the same thing. Looks like it doesn't stop you from infecting others with your misinformation.
>> John !DsP25/Ui/2
>>661282
well, fair enough, but how else are we gonna come together on something like this?

/r/'s not exactly a bastion of win for d material.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>661273as far as I'm concerned

And your concerns don't mean anything when it comes to the rules.

in b4 shitstorm
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
while thread goes all to hell i post random stuff
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
... i'll just answer the man's question

i believe it comes from this as this was the source that was revealed when there was another post asking for the source of the op image. i don't know where you can get it or if there is more out there... you will just have to look.
>> John !DsP25/Ui/2
>>661289
false source

Someone told me, tracked it down through another anon. No good.
>> Anonymous
>>661293
oh... sorry, wish i had more info for you.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> John !DsP25/Ui/2
>>661294
don't have to be sorry, thanks for the info you had

>>661297
thanks for the random stuff