File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Awesome series is Awesome!, But have anyone thing been translated into English yet ?
>> Anonymous
name and sauce.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>963357

Newfag is new.
>> Anonymous
>>963366
lol, cock nipples. XD
I'd probably understand how that happened if it was all subbed.
>> Anonymous
need the name of the series...plox!
>> sage sage
>>963350
>>963357
>>963395
>>963405
Nobody likes your behavior: whiny, selfish, impatient, and in violation of the rules.

This could have all been avoided if you'd posted this in /r/. A famous franchise, a modern hentai anime ... you'd have gotten an answer in 2 minutes.
>> Anonymous
>>963411
And people like you are the reason /d/ has gone to shit, constantly saging threads left and right. This place is worthless now.
>> Anonymous
>>963350
1 has been subbed.
>> Anonymous
Taimanin Asagi, ep 1 has been subbed
>> (? 3?) Onsokumaru !!ncYyB/oJlJM
>>963415
lol have you seen /a/? Don't complain about sage until you've been to /a/
>> Anonymous
>>963415
No, its threads like this that are worthless.
>> Anonymous
>>963425
No, it's really you.
>> Anonymous
>>963415
963411 here. This will probably get me banned, and it's probably tl;dr for you to consider reading, but for those who will lend an ear, here goes ...

>>963415
Actually I rarely sage. (Maybe once a week?) The problem is that people like this guy don't even try to contribute to the community and then spam their own shameless request with bumps. I don't mind requests for /d/ material in /d/, truth be told -- but I do mind /d/ being turned into /r/ Junior, where every fucking thread is one OP-request followed by 10 bumps, 50% of which are by the same guy.

As for "people like me," people like you, or people like [point a finger anywhere] killing 4chan, you've got it all wrong. The poison killing all of 4chan's hentai boards (not just /d/) is pretty straightforward:

1) people first come to /d/ either blindly or with a request already in mind (maybe they were referred here by /h/ let's say). Nobody EVER shows up on /d/ for the first time ready to contribute. It's either "WOW look at all the neat stuff! :O" or "Hey gaiz i has rekwest". It's a one-way relationship with the community.

2) After some burns (or even a ban), some requesters return to /d/ with something to contribute this time around. Except that for the rest of us it's a goddamn repost! Then they cutely squeeze in their request and say "I get to because I contribooted :P". Which is what we keep asking them to do ("If you must request, at least give something back in return.")

3) Meanwhile, /r/ is overloaded with requests for pornography (/s/), straight hentai (/h/), alternative hentai (/d/), image macros and other humor (/b/), wallpapers (/w/), and occasionally non-image requests. So people bitch that "/r/ failed me" because you have to sit behind the keyboard for the next hour of your life bumping your thread every 15-30 minutes both to keep it on top and to keep it from being bumped out of existence.

more in the next post
>> Anonymous
And here's the controversial part: advice.

I think the solution is pretty simple but that it hasn't been implemented yet either because it's not practical (bandwidth? page limits? coding?) or because someone high up just doesn't like it

1) you get rid of /r/ and allow people to make requests on their boards of interest. Pretty simpl.

2) In its place, you provide a requests channel for every board that says it needs one. /hr/ for /h/, /dr/ for /d/, etc. You then enforce a policy of "when you make a request, your thread needs to be in the appropriate request channel." First-time offenders will be disciplined but not too severely; repeat offenders, on the other hand, won't get off so easy and will be banned for several weeks. We won't pussyfoot about with this one: if you're "too busy" or too dumb to read the rules then we're too busy to put up with your shit.

3) You may say "This plan is full of fail. moot only has enough bandwidth and storage space to give /d/ 10 pages. Where's he gonna get the space for 10 more pages?" Well, I've taken that into consideration too. It's called sacrifice. Each board, when petitioning for its request sister channel, may set its own limit as to how many of its current pages it want reallocated to the request channel. So for example, say on /d/ it's decided that 40% of our current maximum-allowed topic count is going to be contributed to /dr/: that means that we'd be saying "we'll allot 6 pages' worth of space to non-requests and 4 pages to requests." You may say "fuck that! 10 pages is not enough never mind 6!" but It's the price we'd pay to get requests out of here while also getting them out of the (dysfunctional) "one size fits all" /r/. It's the price necessary to get requests to WORK, but to also get them to not kill the atmosphere of contributing rare images that takes place in the parent channels (on good days).
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>963456

I think that this would be to complicated and just clutter up the whole site.

No, one way would to get rid of requests entirely - to be honest, there is no need for them. Yep, you might want something specifically, but hell - there is Google. Or go ask someone else.
>> Anonymous
>>963463
In what sense would it "clutter up" the site? If you mean the navbar up on top, I don't think you could convince me that it would become "cluttered" it went from being one row long to two. I mean, to be honest it's already "cluttered" if you hold that mentality because over 50% of the boards linked to up there are ones you never ever go to. Nor do I. Nor do any of us. (Well, maybe those two guys over there with a little much too much free time on their hands.)

If you mean it'd clutter the site in terms of file clutter or traffic clutter, it wouldn't. Same old traffic, same exact (site-wide) maximum bandwidth and maximum file storage capacities 4chan presently has.
>> Anonymous
>>963415

OUCH
>> Anonymous
>>963435
No, its people like you who bump and defend pointless threads and requests.
>> Anonymous
You're all retards, now stfu and post naked macro dicked futas fapping to gay porn while riding on a tentacle horse's back and reciting the rules of the internet backwards with their armpit farts.

GO!
>> Anonymous
>>963564

rule 34ing this
>> Anonymous
>>963574
rule 34ing this
>> friendsofsandwiches
>>963456
I'd have to say it IS a bit complicated, but... it also has some potential. Dedicated request boards for specific channels would help I think. Fact of the matter is, no one goes to /r unless they need something. Occasionally I'll pop in there on a whim to see if there's something interesting, and sometimes there is.
MY problem with helping to contribute is my stuff is SO fucking scattered, it takes me usually about 10 min or more to find anything specific anyone is asking for.
Still, the idea has some merit, thought about submitting it to moot and the gang?
I dunno where you can submit it to though.
>> Anonymous
>>963647
963411 here just to say, "No, I hadn't thought to because I'm of the impression that advice is not welcome and is a possibly-bannable offense because of how fucking sick and tired the staff must be of hearing said 'advice'."

I don't presume that my idea is brilliant nor do I presume that it's something the staff hadn't already thought of. In fact, I'm sure they've thought of it before. Which is why I wrote:
>I think the solution is pretty simple but that it hasn't been implemented yet either because it's not practical (bandwidth? page limits? coding?) or because someone high up just doesn't like it

Because I was opening the floor to validation of why this idea (and ones similar to it) have not yet been implemented. I know it can't be that nobody else has thought of it; I'm not arrogant enough to presume that. Instead, I recognize that somebody thought of it already and so there's got to be a good reason why it didn't happen. There's some vital piece of information I'm missing. There's got to be. Unless, like with 963463's criticism, the reason is purely aesthetic.

I think that the idea of asking (minimum) four high-traffic boards (h, d, b, and s) to descend on one /r/ is a broken system and that we as a community have proven that. A solution ought to be sought. But (coming full circle) I'm hesitant to encourage people to discuss this matter given that I seem to recall someone saying several weeks back, or maybe a couple months back, that criticism of the current system and proposals for how to improve the system were banned. My behavior doesn't mean I'm looking for trouble, but rather that I'm facing it down because I think the risk is outweighed by the importance of the mission: of fixing the nightmare that is /r/.
>> Anonymous
Nah, the only real problem /d/ has is the shitty western art threads abound. It's like the mods just gave up on this place and I don't blame them. Even when the sticky was up, people still did that shit and just didn't care.

Sage for walls of text and baaaaaaawing(myself included).