>> |
Ehhh.....
File :-(, x)
>>1023100 The upshot of all of this is that the visual signals that we receive upon looking at a drawing of a dickgirl are overwhelmingly pointing towards the subject being femalethe shape of the torso, the hips, and the face; the lack of traditionally male features such as leg or arm hair; and of course the biggest constantly visible indicator of femininity, the presence of breasts.
To return to my earlier claim, concerning how important a factor the penis actually is as a visual signal indicating masculinity: we have to remember that, in most societies, the genitalia have been widely censored for centuries, if not millenia. It is very unusual to see the genitalia of any given stranger, and thus other visual factors are our primary visual signals for our first perceptions of either masculinity or femininity. In other words, culturally and societally, most of the modern world depends first on visual signals other than the genitalia for gender determination, and only secondarily on the genitaliaand this is all the more true for those who have been browsing through pictures of dickgirls (or cuntboys, for that matter) for yearsthe more they look at these pictures, the more desensitized they become to seeing the wrong genitalia on the body they're seeing, and the less they rely on genitalia as a visual signal indicating either gender. This being the case, the majority of those looking at dickgirls do not see and kind of overpowering masculinity in these images, no matter the size of the penis.
Also, porn.
|