File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Huge, milk swollen breasts.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> GeneralGuy
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> GeneralGuy
     File :-(, x)
>> GeneralGuy
     File :-(, x)
>> GeneralGuy
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>628787
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> GeneralGuy
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>628788
>> GeneralGuy
     File :-(, x)
>> GeneralGuy
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
Imagine if women's breasts kept producing milk and they had to be milked like cows on a regular basis.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>628797
I'd still like to know the source of that one.
>> Anonymous
>>628826

Bra's would cost a fortune!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>628826

I wonder if their back muscles and such would adapt to the added weight.
>> Anonymous
>>628826
The world would be a better place
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>628850

I actually remember reading a BE story where a scientist goes back in time to alter how females develop. He repeats the process until all women have huge boobs and have to do chest exercises to strengthen themselves.

I can't remember the title, though. Can anon help out?
>> Anonymous
>>628887

Time Machine by Noble Sword
>> Anonymous
>>628913
Source? I don't see it on rapidshare
>> Anon
It's on overflowingbra. http://overflowingbra.com/download.php?StoryID=776
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
This thread is hot.
>> Anonymous
>>628832

Dry cleaners would make a fortune.
>> Anonymous
>>628826

We can dream.
>> Anonymous
>>628850

They probaby would adapt. I wonder if breasts would still be regarded as sex symbols if they were basically just two giant udders.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
this is my fetish....

starting slow clap now
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>628956

Indeed. It's funny how the primary founction of breasts is shunned in most societies.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
What's this? Discussing evolutionary theory and how society influences human sexual attraction? In MY /d/?
>> Anonymous
>>628956

Indeed. It's funny how the primary function of breasts is shunned in most societies.
>> Anonymous
Protip: No female mammal other than the human has breasts of comparable size, relative to the rest of the body, when not lactating and human females are the only primate that have permanently swollen breasts.
>> Anonymous
>>629021
Which is just all kinds of bizarre.
>> Anonymous
>>628981

Can I get a translation, please?
>> Anonymous
>>629024

Isn't it, though? Speaking of which, someone should start a breastfeeding thread.
>> Anonymous
Cant someone photoshop some cocks pounding these things? That would look better.
>> Anonymous
>>628969

>starting slow fap now

Fixed.
>> Anonymous
>>629021

Yeah, even the idea of lactation is icky to many.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
This thread wins on so many levels.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>629029

How about A cock?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>629039

SAUCE?!
>> Anonymous
>>628785

Props for the pregnant chick.
>> Anonymous
>>629039

SELF TIT FUCK!
>> GeneralGuy
>>628826
That would be so awesome. I'd love to see their breasts get loaded with tons of milk. Their breasts would be so damn huge and heavy, they'd need to wear new bras constantly.
>> Anonymous
Having breasts that continually swelled with milk, engorging your breasts to massive proportions, would be a real bitch.
>> Anonymous
giood
>> Anonymous
>>628826

Yeah, if the hormones that cause breasts to produce milk after pregnancy instead were kicked into excessive production all the time.
>> Anonymous
>>629050

Not to mention that they'd have no balance and need help walking and doing the simplest tasks.
>> Anonymous
Fun fact: New mothers can have their breasts grow two cup sizes overnight.
>> Anonymous
>>629064

Nah, they'd need wheelchairs. Or some kind of cart to hold them.
>> Anonymous
I came. A few times.
>> Anonymous
>>628826

Hopefully it wouldn't make the boobs feel rock hard, hot and tight.
>> Anonymous
>>629064

Like showering. :)
>> Anonymous
win thread is win
>> Anonymous
How large would you prefer if every woman was stuck on massive mode?
>> Anonymous
Bump for awesomeness.
>> Anonymous
>>629133

No larger than>>628843. Even that's stretching it a lot. Bigger than her head, anyways.

>>628820is too much. Some mobility is good.
>> Anonymous
>>629225

At the most.
>> Anonymous
>>628826(also, just for general knowledge)
Actually, cows don't just naturally produce milk all the time. Like humans, they only produce milk for a certain period of time after giving birth. Dairy cows are just reimpregnated constantly to give a constant supply of milk.
>> Anonymous
>>629229

Ah, so it'd happen if those milk producing hormones were always on in hyper mode.
>> Anonymous
>>629133

No bigger than>>628847.
>> Anonymous
You guys know how back breakingly painful it would be to have 50 pounds of fat hanging on your chest all the time? Much less if they constantly felt overfilled and heavy with liquid to the point of bursting.
>> Anonymous
>>628815
>>629034
>>629012
>>628923
I've been looking for a site or set or even just a name for this artist for the longest time. Hottest stuff ever basically. Anyone have any idea?
>> Anonymous
>>629241
Easier to sleep on, suck on, and fuck if they're stationary.
>> Anonymous
>>629241
BAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
>> Anonymous
>>629245
http://ga015.blog50.fc2.com/
>> Anonymous
>>629248

EASIER to sleep on? Hell no. Any large breasted women will tell you that.
>> Anonymous
>>629241

No.
>> Anonymous
>>629248

I'd just like to mention that boobs are most definitely not stationary.
>> Anonymous
>>629252
I didn't say for HER to sleep on.
>> Anonymous
>>629255
They are if they're four feet in diameter.
>> Anonymous
>>629250
Kickass. Thanks.
>> Anonymous
>>629241

But that's just the thing, see. We figured that women would evolve and adapt somewhat to the extra weight with stronger muscles and perhaps small changes in skeletal structure if it had been like that for a long time.

Boobs larger than your head would be more of a mobility problem than a physical strain, I think.
>> Anonymous
>>629257

I see your point.
>> Anonymous
>>629266

That still leaves the feeling of fullness and tightness you'd get with too much milk but I guess they'd get used to that swelling feeling as well.
>> Anonymous
>>629266

I'm sure the biggest problem would be always knocking into things.
>> Anonymous
I'm loving the biological speculation in this thread.

How can you be sure that the mammoth boobs wouldn't be a major hinderance to early women in evading threats?
>> Anonymous
>>629298

Don't you know anything about evolution? Gradual change through a long period of time. The hormones responsible for milk production would gradually increase output. They'd start out normal.

But this raises another question: What's the advantage in having gigantic, milk engorged jugs? Why would females develop in this way?
>> Anonymous
>>628981

I need a basic translation on this.
>> Anonymous
An intelligent, civil argument in /d/?

How come no one's told anyone to fuck off yet?
>> Anonymous
>>629306
My best guess would be that as human started walking more upright and were switching from majoring in scent to sight, females needed a different way to advertise their health, fertility, and good genes to potential mates rather than than now (largely) ineffective hormones. Breasts swell during pregnancy, menstruation periods, and a little during heightened states of arousal, plus large breasts would mean a good deal of extra fat, meaning she ate well and had few diseases. Larger breasts would also mean more milk for hungry babies, and this alone would lead to it becoming a desirable trait.
>> also gigantomastia Anonymous
Breast hypertrophy.
Basically ultra hormone mode active.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginal_breast_hypertrophy
>> SMAP
>Larger breasts would also mean more milk for hungry babies
Actually, the mammary glands' size is mostly independant of the size of the breast. The majority of the noticable bits are fat deposits.

Breasts are, of course, incredibly inconvenient from a survival standpoint (ask any woman who jogs, for example) but, like many such adaptations, may occur anyways if the increased chance of mating outweighs the detriments to activity, such as with the peacock. However, since dimorphism between the sexes is fairly minor in humans you'd never see XBOX hueg breasts occur in a natural environment.

It's worth noting that breast size correlates strongly to nutrition intake during childhood, which is why many countries are seeing fairly large leaps in average breast size lately (especially Asia, etc).

>>629021
Sexuality as a private, generally taboo, subject is pretty standard and a normal development as a result of sexual jealousy, etc. Which is not to say it's "good" in the sense of modern society et al, but from an evolutionary standpoint...

>But that's just the thing, see. We figured that women would evolve and adapt somewhat to the extra weight with stronger muscles and perhaps small changes in skeletal structure if it had been like that for a long time.
Sad to say it wouldn't work that way. Frankly, the human spine is a kludge solution at best and adding a HUGE additional strain from even just 5 lbs of addional mass is pretty destructive to its integrity. (Remember, all that mass is positioned well off-center so the moment of inertia is much larger than, say, 5 lbs worn on the back.)
>> Anonymous
Thread over.
>> Anonymous
ITT We bring up the fact fantasies are not realistic.
>> Anonymous
>>629241

that's why it's so hot, fag
>> Anonymous
I love this thread.
>> Anonymous
>>It's worth noting that breast size correlates strongly to nutrition intake during childhood, which is why many countries are seeing fairly large leaps in average breast size lately (especially Asia, etc).


Perhaps if humans began to need a large amount of more nutrition for some reason.
>> Anonymous
>>Breasts are, of course, incredibly inconvenient from a survival standpoint (ask any woman who jogs, for example) but, like many such adaptations, may occur anyways if the increased chance of mating outweighs the detriments to activity


Indeed, when would the benefits of massive funbags outweigh the detriments?
>> Anonymous
>>629750

I think that might've been a girl.
>> Anonymous
>>It's worth noting that breast size correlates strongly to nutrition intake during childhood, which is why many countries are seeing fairly large leaps in average breast size lately (especially Asia, etc).


I thought it was because of extremely fatty American diets.
>> Anonymous
>>629039

Source?
>> GeneralGuy
I think breasts should naturally produce excessive amounts of milk(100 lbs.) every day.
>> Anonymous
Tell me one animal with a bigger breast size than the human's in relation to the body
>> Anonymous
>>629924
That's why men to the protecting of offspring.
>> Anonymous
>>630378

Wait...what?
>> Anonymous
>>630290


>>629022
>> Anonymous
>>630290

There isn't. One theory is based on the fact that, unlike nearly all other primates, human females do not display clear signs of ovulation. This could have resulted in males evolving to respond to more subtle signs of ovulation. During ovulation, the increased estrogen present in the female body results in a slight swelling of the breasts, which then males could have evolved to find attractive. Females with more swollen breasts would appear to males to be the ones most likely to be ovulating.
>> Anonymous
>>630290

Cows? Well...those are udders so they don't neccssairly relate I guess.
>> Anonymous
Why are we still arguing? We should be FAPPING.
>> Anonymous
>>630512

This isn't an arguement, it's an actual debate! On /d/!
>> Anonymous
>>628826

You guys know this would probably mean being woken up at all hours of the night to milk your wives/girlfriend's juggs? And how often do you think they'd want sex with two overfilled milk balloons on their chest?
>> Anonymous
Well...a woman's got two other holes doesn't she? Also, as for the milking thing, what if that was you're fetish, and you had no problems with it (not to mention the possibility of receiving one heck of a breast fuck)? Besides...I seriously doubt that cows have to be milked constantly (meaning including the middle of the night), and even if they did, they are machines that can take care of that.
>> Anonymous
There are accctually self milking machines for cows, and they are trained to use them. And to there surprise instead of once a day, they cows if they have it there way will want to be milked 3-5 times a day.
>> Delita !x8ngkAZjXE
Age'd for doing what is usually my job. Excellent work!