File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
I know requesting loli or shota is a bannable offense but does anyone here know what the legal status of it is in the US? The reason I'm asking is because that wikipedia entry on lolicon only managed to confuse me more if anything. In return I give you this picture of sexy forest nymphs.
>> Anonymous
Realistic depictions of pedophilia is illegal, but what 'realistic' is can be abused; a christfag is going to bitch and scream that loli and shota looks realistic to him/her, but then again they think the shit in the bible is real too.

Still, doesn't stop the christfag from shitting in the pool by calling up politicians and child safety groups to complain.
>> Anonymous
>>537285
So then the Protect Act that Bush signed in 03 is defunct? If so what about the bit regarding drawings and sculptures and such?
>> Anonymous
Yeah but apparently stautes are 'Art' another blurry idea. Fuckin Christfags
>> Anonymous
goddamn those christfag motherfuckers, not letting me jack off to fucking CHILDREN. cartoon or not it's still fucked up and fucking disgusting
>> Anonymous
>>537412

Yes, but it's the American dream to be as fucked up and disgusting as you want to be as long as you aren't hurting anybody.
>> Anonymous
Hear Hear
>> Anonymous
It's illegal under laws that have NOT been checked by the supreme court(I believe they're from the bush jr. administration), but the supreme court protects you, as long as it wasn't based off of real child modeling (I.E. it wasn't a painting of a real naked girl [Apparently people do this]), or you have actual CP.

Do not have CP and lolicon on the same computer, you might as well just shoot the lolicon community in the temple with a fucking RPG. You are just another person that they can use in a made up statistic saying that lolicon promotes CP.
>> Anonymous
I've never really cared enough to find out. If she doesn't have boobs and isn't at least a teenager, then I don't care. In fact, I prefer women who are obviously in their twenties.

Love the opening pic by the way.
>> Anonymous
>>537640

This person speaks the truth. A recent ruling made "virtual CP" legal, as long as no real children are used. As far as I know, this means a child's head shooped on an adult naked body is illegal. A realistic painting of hardcore porn involving a horse and a baby is not.
>> Anonymous
>>537666
I thought that only applied to that particular state's Supreme Court...umm...Ohio wasn't it?
>> Anonymous
>>537677

Haha, I think you're right.

Disregard my last post, unless you live in Ohio. I fail.
>> Anonymous
>>537283
This is slightly off topic, but it might be a usefull note to make that under a proposed British law, the Criminal Justice Bill, viewing pretty much anything in /d/ will be the equivalent of posessing CP. (IE illegal)
>> Anonymous
For British people that is.
>> Anonymous
>>537715

WHAT WHAT WHAT
>> Anonymous
>>537711

Pfft, that's nothing. I live in a state where it's illegal to have cybersex with an adult pretending to be a minor...otherwise, police "cyber-stings" would be illegal.
>> Ao
eh...I think Ill just say thanks for the pic.
>> Martin Seargent !7chTDwPQh2
My most reliable source (wikipedia lol) surprised me when it mentioned a 2003 bill (the PROTECT Act of 2003)which "criminalizes all forms of pornography that shows people under the age of 18 regardless of production. The Act introduced 18 U.S.C. 1466A "Obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children", which criminalizes material that has "a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture or painting"

And FYI, in February, John McCain tacked a mandatory 10 year sentence to people who violate the act with the Internet.

Though, again, this is Wikipedia. So either you'll go to jail for ten years posting or downloading loli, or nothing happens.
>> Anonymous
>>538025
I'm not sure if this part is still on there, but when I read that it said that the supreme court ruled against that law (I want to say under first ammendment, but I'm not sure). Their reason was because it does not hurt anyone to have lolicon. Who is mentally and physically abused when a lolicon picture is made? No one.
>> Kebinu !GhiZeo/aQQ
>>538032

Correct, the PROTECT Act was ruled unconstitutional. There's another anti-CP law under which a man in Virginia WAS prosecuted for owning lolicon in 2005, but that was because he was violating the conditions of his parole by possessing it, was also in possession of real CP *AND* was using library (government-owned) computers to download it.

Loli is not illegal in the U.S., but it's against the rules on 4chan because the site sponsors don't want to be associated with a site that features loli because it would be bad publicity (never mind the main sponsors of 4chan are sex shops, hentai sites, online dating/sex services etc.). Losing that ad revenue = 4chan go bye-bye, again. It's a matter of survival to ban it from being posted.

Occasionally loli is let be on some NSFW boards at the mod's discretion; the rules seem to have been loosened a bit after not4chan.us died. It's worth noting not4chan has been relaunched at notfourchan.net; however, even they are somewhat forced to control their content--they had to get rid of their toddlercon board because advertisers complained, among other reasons.
>> Anonymous
>>538037
Better question, Canadians likely interact with lolicon on a daily basis, but if it's considered cp over there, why isn't half the population in jail?
>> Anonymous
>>538132
That is sort of weird I guess. Supposedly it's not very well enforced. Though one d00d imported lolicon manga and ended up in the jailhouse for a year. I'll concede this one to Amerikkka.
>> Anonymous
>>538143
Wasn't that guy a known offender though?
>> Anonymous
>>538154
Not that I know of. The guy who went to prison in Amerikkka was a known offender though and violated probation. The import case was pretty unique.
>> Anonymous
>>538037

What was his name? Something very similar happened to a guy I knew.
>> Anonymous
This only applies if you live in Washington state, but as far as I know, there is a law that prohibits you from even looking at images over the internet that show under-aged characters nude or having sex.

Somebody correct me if I'm wrong.
>> Anonymous
>>538178
In KKKanada or Amerikkka?
I feel like a stroke victim.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
why are any of you even entertaining the notion of lolicon? child porn is WRONG! how long is it before you llolis become pedos? then how long before you abduct a kid? i say nip the shit in the bud.
>> Anonymous
>>538200
Welcome to 4chan.
We don't like your kind here.
>> Anonymous
>>538200
Fuck Yeah! Now here's a man who sees the light.
>> Anonymous
I fap to furries, dickgirls, and inflatable people too. And sex with dinosaurs. Oh, god, look out inflatable big-dicked dinovixens!

Cartoons too, but I blame that on being raised by a television. Sort of explains why I want to have sex with a T.A.R.D.I.S.

Seriously, reality sucks. Why would anyone want to have sex with a monkey?
>> Anonymous
>>538200
i don't think you can nip something like this in the bud; you can only make real life enactments seem much less attractive. one way is by letting them have their fake cp. that's right, i'm advocating lolicon, for pedos. for the record, i find the shit utterly disgusting on such a basic level that i can't even call it moral; it just disgusts me and i can't understand how people honestly like this shit -and i fucking like nipplefucking dickgirls shitting out their dicks into other girls throats and being fucked and eaten by tigers in chains with another girl's head stuck up the futa's ass who's been given an enema and no chance yet to evacuate it. fuck, writing that just gave me a boner.

the theory is, you sate pedo's appetites with the fake shit so they DON"T go after real children; it seems like this is the weird sort of thing you're born liking and based upon what we know, these urges will be with these people for the rest of their lives (unfortunately, chemical and physical castration don't seem to work -and that's just for the pedos we prosecute) they will need a release of some kind or innocents will be hurt. seeing as how there's no reliable way to detect a pedo, this just seems like the only credible 'solution.'

by 'letting them have their fake cp' i just mean not prosecuting against drawn artwork.
>> Anonymous
>>538214
We don't like your kind either.
>> Anonymous
I live in Ohio. Yay me!
>> Anonymous
Lolicon was not the target of that bill. The only person ever convicted on it also had tons of CP.
>> Anonymous
I like loli. Does that make me a pedofag?
>> Anonymous
>>538334

Yes. You find children's bodies attractive. You are a pedophile. However, you are aware that it's socially unacceptable, and wouldn't ever want to engage in the real thing, so it's repressed to the point that actual CP is still disgusting to you.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
CP is wrong, Loli is... confusing but thats besides the point. I refuse to believe this board stands for /d/ebates.

Post some anal fsking /d/ickgirls or GTFO.
>> Anonymous
>>538337
Thx Dr. Phil. It all makes sense now.
>> Anonymous
>>538341

Fuck yeah, that's what I'm talking about! Got any more of those beauties?
>> Anonymous
>>538200
child porn is wrong because it exploits children, but i have yet to see evidence that loli leads people to becoming pedo; in my experience, people are either already pedo and look for loli, or aren't and like loli for some other bizarre reason. if loli does not actually involve children, it is thereby a far superior alternative to cp.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>538337
the internet is serious business.


Where exactly is the 'loli line' at? Is this a loli? She looks kinda young. Am I a pedofag just for owning it?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Where exactly is the 'loli line' at? Is this a loli? She looks kinda young. Am I a pedofag just for owning it?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Where exactly is the 'loli line' at? Is this a loli? She looks kinda young. Am I a pedofag just for owning it?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Where exactly is the 'loli line' at? Is this a loli? She looks kinda young. Am I a pedofag just for owning it?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Where exactly is the 'loli line' at? Is this a loli? She looks kinda young. Am I a pedofag just for owning it?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Where exactly is the 'loli line' at? Is this a loli? She looks kinda young. Am I a pedofag just for owning it?
>> Anonymous
Is it just me, or does nobody care about shota?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>538371
well, if you like shota, you are a faggot by default.

Where exactly is the 'loli line' at? Is this a loli? She looks kinda young. Am I a pedofag just for owning it?
>> Anonymous
>>538350
>>538351
>>538357
>>538384
Not /d/
>> Anonymous
>>538357
O LAWD IS DAT SUM NANATSUIRO DROPS?
>> Anonymous
>>538409

so, in your country not /d/ = not loli?