File :-(, x, )
Pleasurable Tectacle Sex Anonymous
Masamune Shirows artwork owns, especially Hellhound. I'm a fan of tentacles and would like to see some more sexy stuff like this. Hardcore nasty rape just doesnt do it for me. Can anyone quench my thirst? If so, I shall post more of Masamunes godly artistry.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Save you the trouble of posting them.
http://mshirow.free.fr/pbcollection.html
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Are you interested in some of the good old Happy Tentacle stuff?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>661657

i dont really much like prego, internal shots are okay if they arent horribly nasty

i like this one too bad its censored
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Censorship: the bane of the Japanese smut connoisseur.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>661678

One could argue that the opposite is quite true, since the censorship is more inline with the traditional Japanese way of doing things.
>> Anonymous
hardcore nasty rape is fun, though. the victim is absolved of any improper conduct whilest she's driven to repeated screaming orgasm.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Of course none of this art is a patch on Masamune Shirow's work, but it's still fun.
>> Anonymous
Masamune Shirow is my favorite artist by far.

Upload more and I'll scour my collection to suit your fancy.
>> Anonymous
>>661691
source?
>> Anonymous
>>661311
OPTICAL CAMO TENTACLES
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Needs more consensual tentacle sex.
>> Anonymous
>>661938
But not so shitty or Western
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>661691
Source of that? Artist name?

<-- This image by Mogudan.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>661957
that ones new to me. what was it published in?
>> Ehhh.....
>>661311
What universe do you hail from where this picture doesn't qualify as hardcore rape?

>>661657
...I've actually managed to miss that. Source?

>>661678
This just in: Censorship found to not be all that big a deal for anybody with a working knowledge of the human anatomy.
>> Anonymous
>>662048
i love to see blocks instead of cunt
>> Anonymous
>>661957
Source?
>> Ehhh.....
>>662065
In other words, you need to be reminded of what cunt looks like every time you try to fap?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
Isn't the whole point of porn to see cunt? If it's censored, she might as well just be clothed from the waist down...
>> Anonymous
>>662304
clothed is one of my fetishes! oh yeah!
>> Anonymous
>>662304

The whole point of porn is to stimulate and excite. I have never in my life encountered a situation where not being able to see any one thing in a scene ruined it for me. Indeed, sometimes things can be MORE erotic and sensual in that which you DO NOT see than that which you go out of your way to shove down peoples throats.
Besides, there are no written rules that state any such thing like "obligitory cooch shot here"
>> Anonymous
>>661688
you can blame wwii for japanese censorship- obscenity laws were added to their constitution by the allies
>> Anonymous
>>662551

irrelevant. We don't care why they are there. All that will do is degrade this into a bitchfest about morals and "stupid amerikkanz"
>> JubJub the Impailer
     File :-(, x)
in one end and out the other I say!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>662048">>661657...I've actually managed to miss that. Source?"
Sorry, I found it here on 4chan.

>>662048">>661678This just in: Censorship found to not be all that big a deal for anybody with a working knowledge of the human anatomy.

Heh... well it really isn't the lack of snatch shots I mind, it's the interference with the artwork that I hate.
For me seeing the cooch is like seeing the gore in a scary film. There can be some pretty darn terrifying things without actually seeing the blood. I like it both ways.