File :-(, x, )
/d's discussion thread Anonymous
revived!
>> Anonymous
I love how /e/ is just the random guy jacking off to the sex
>> Anonymous
Somehow, I can't imagine it will rival the original levels of awesome...
>> Anonymous
>>523216
so true, so true.
>> Front Desk
All the more reason I'm glad I screen-capped the begeezus out of the original.
>> Anonymous
What is this from?
>> /e/ spy
>>523252
I heard that. ¬¬
>> Anonymous
I'm a guy. I like penis. There, I said it.
>> Anonymous
/d/ is not a discussion forum, stfu and post more pronz
>> Anonymous
>>523216
wow i need the rest of that, i have a thing for uninterested girls getting banged by alot of guys
>> Anonymous
>>523216
fuck that.

no one needs a revival of some whore talking about her sexual taste in nerds.
>> Anonymous
So... topic anyone?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>523273
This man is correct. If you want anyone to listen to your worthless opinion, post some forking porns!
>> Anonymous
>>523297
What a fucking lucky fetish.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>523431
tentacle rape + egg laying + dickgirl + milking + bondage = I agree with whatever statements this poster made.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>523416
I agree. What this thread needs is a man talking about his sexual taste in nerds. I nominate this man.
>>523272
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
As the original thread's friendly misanthrope, I'm sorry to inform you that this one is already a miserable failure and I'll be playing SMAC instead of participating.

I'm leaving flower tentacles, though; enjoy.
>> Anonymous
>>523441
holyfuck SHINING FORCE MOAR!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>523479
Unfortunately I only have three pics total.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>523416

It's sort of strange how there's no middle ground in regards to society's views on women's sexuality; that is, they're either virgins or whores. This brings up interesting questions, like how a society that adhered to these expectations (wherein all men are promiscuous and all women are chaste) would function.

My guess is that it would involve a lot of bald-faced lies.
>> Anonymous
>>523610
On the matter of society, this whore/virgin thing only really applies to unmarried women. See where this goes?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>523610

The only aspect of that that's really interesting is the example it provides of humanity's unending service to self-fulfilling prophecy. I've met a hilarious number of girls who want to wander around having sex with lots of different people, but are crippled by the fear that someone might think of them as less than chaste.
>> Rape is FUN
>>523610
it's called rape.
>> Anonymous
>>523433
the op does look good though. Does anyone know it?
>> Anonymous
most likely done by kisaragi gunma, but I haven't seen this pic before
>> Anonymous
>>like how a society that adhered to these expectations (wherein all men are promiscuous and all women are chaste) would function.

Multiple men compete for a smaller group of females. The few slutty females are very popular, and as such, viewed with contempt and jealousy by the more chaste females who see them as potential competition.

Which is BS. Women heat too, but unlike guys, they tend to come up with some BS rationalization and go to more ridiculous lengths with it. Just as many guys aren't happy courting just one woman, many women aren't satisfied with being courted by just one man. The guy wants to be the only guy the chick speels with and the chick wants to be the only chick the guy sleeps with, but the guy wants to bang other chicks and the chick wants other guys to want to bang her.
>> Anonymous
>>523846

I second the search for the sauce.

I beg to differ on the likely source of the 'slutty' thing. If you look at it in scientific terms, in most human societies people mate for life. Therefore sleeping with a great deal of people is seen as abnormal.

I'm really against sleeping around, be it on the male or female side. I'm not sure why other than the fact that it seems wrong to me. If that's what everyone wants, fine, I'll leave it alone, but there's a problem when people trick others into having sex with them by telling them they love them and are seeking a long-term relationship then just leave them when they've finished with the sexing.
>> Anonymous
>>523610
>>523766
>>524098

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this essentially how things are now?
>> BARON VON CUNT
     File :-(, x)
/d/ needs more inflation
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>523216

lol /b/ is sleeping
>> Anonymous
>>524182
that right there is actually preg, and /d/ needs moar of it, btw incidently that's a horse thats...
>> BARON VON CUNT
     File :-(, x)
>>524264
it's inflation look at how the clothes tore from expansion

<-also some preg
>> Anonymous
>>524272
look don't argue with me it's from Ryoubu "maternity insult" look it up and you'll find that character it's PREG there's no tubes
>> Anonymous
>>524272

Ya does anyone have the full gallery for that game?
>> Anonymous
Nothing is the same without some nice, violent gangrape that all the family can enjoy
>> BARON VON CUNT
     File :-(, x)
>>524287
I'll argue all day

<-more preg
>> Anonymous
>>523523
>>523482
IT AIN'T EASY BEIN' CHEESY.
>> Anonymous
You know, honestly? I just come to /d/ for the tentacles. I have no interests in futa, shota, vore, feet fetishes, giantesses, non-tentacular bondage, women in misery (except for tentacles) or even tentacles with futas or guys.

Basically, I'm just here for the tentacles, and I skip all of the others.

Otherwise I like non /d/ stuff.

Meh, never mind.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>524328
Well, it'd be kinda hypocritical for you to say, "EWWWW, (insert kink here) GTFO!" I mean, it's not like you're much different, masturbating to tentacles and all. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

So do you like your tentacles in your women...

OR ON THEM?
>> Anonymous
>>524336
don't know if want?
>> Anonymous
>>524303
YES! MOAR~!
>> Anonymous
Oh no, I've never actually said "eww", since I understand your point entirely. I just... don't look at those pictures, and move on until I find pictures I do like.

I'm aware of the status of my interest. Though I'm not nearly as into it as my ex girlfriend...

Oh, and I like the tentacles in them, yes, not on them.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>524344
That's a pity.

Because they want the tentacles on them, in you.
>> Anonymous
I'm sure they do. I'm sure they do.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>524098
Thus, prudeness gets shot in the foot. XD Frankly, I say be happy, do what you want, and fuck what other people say. There are some guys and girls who turn up their noses and squeal about 'filthy' people and how they have 'no respect for themselves' whereas the 'filthy' people know more about sex and how to stay safe and STD-free (and how to make relationships work without getting obsessive, clingy, or jealous) than the prudes who never bothered with sex-ed, and have a ton more fun and are, statistically, much happier and confident than prudes who are too shy or holier-than-thou to go get laid within reason.
>> Anonymous
>>523216
I'd like the original of this one, if you have it please. (un-shooping it would just pixilate it more if I tried it)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Here is original of OP's pic. But still, dunno the source.
>> Anonymous
it'll be a kisaragi gunma doujin based on ichigo 100%
>> Anonymous
>>524336
Both, in fact, I would like to see the ones with tentacles ON them putting them IN to those that do not have them.
>> Anonymous
The virgin/whore concept is stupid, since it assumes that a woman is being defined by their sexuality.
>> Anonymous
>>524421
http://rapidshare.com/files/41854638/_Gumma__G_s_Studio__Kozue_Panic__Ichigo_100___C68_.zip

enjoy.
>> Anonymous
thx, was waiting for someone kind enough to share :)
>> Texas Raider
     File :-(, x)
>>523610
The contrast between the chaste virgin and dirty whore is, historically, a fairly recent phenomenon. Before about the 1600's or so, women were widely regarded as being more sexually driven than men.