File :-(, x, )
hairy girls Anonymous
Need hairy girls this time lets get hairy arms and legs too
>> Anonymous
shave it with gillette
>> Anonymous
In before shitting dicknipples.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>547251
shave it with fucking fire
>> Anonymous
fucking ew
>> Anonymous
>>547283
Am I seeing things, or is that Ran from Detective Conan?
>> Anonymous
Here's an idea. Find a Jewish woman. Especially a Mediterranean Jew. "Swarthy" doesn't fit enough. Chicks got hair growing out of their hair. Chicks got mustaches better than you could grow. Now your fetish is solved.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Damn! Get a lawnmower for that shit!
>> Anonymous
Dude, if you guys dont like it, dont look at it. Some people like me and the OP are into this kind of stuff.
>> Anonymous
this is against god's will. burn in hell nao plzkthx
>> Anonymous
>>547538

As if there was a "God".

If there was, he probably committed suicide by now, exasperated by his best creation and realizing that the fact that he created humans makes him imperfect and unfit for the name "God".
>> Anonymous
>>547543
way to infect the thread with aethi-faggotry
>> Anonymous
MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Here you go.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>547543
Not that I believe in a god, but it's funny that you think we'd be His ultimate creation. And by "it's funny", I mean that you're a fucking idiot.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
last one. all i got from it
>> Anonymous
>>547250
my word... that young woman is being raped by a tribble
>> Anonymous
>>547906

OMG! Tribbles FTW!
>> Anonymous
moar hairy
>> Anonymous
I have a detective Conan doujin you might want. Pretty hairy.
>> Anonymous
>>548088
YES
>> Anonymous
>>548094
http://rapidshare.com/files/49599675/Detective_Conan_-_Ran-Chan_No_Shiri_-_Hentai_Manga.zip

...
big warning: contains one page of scat
>> Ehhh..... !N2Rn3IpqO2
>>547543
If you're referring to a God as conceived in a Judeo-Christian sense, which you probably are even if you don't realize it, then you should know that, in Genesis, God sees that everything he created was good immediately after creating it.

That is, except for humans. After he makes humans, it does say "and he saw that it was good." It doesn't say that again after the creation of man until it's referring to the world as a whole.

Also, there exists a pretty incontrovertible proof that God exists. It just doesn't prove what God, or what his characteristics are. The same guy also proves that God exists outside of time entirely, so that he can't directly influence anything.

This has been your lesson in religion today, as brought to you by somebody who thinks Anselm is cool, because he is.

>>547895
Rapidshare/name?
>> Nin
     File :-(, x)
>>548132
"there exists a pretty incontrovertible proof that God exists."

Source?

>>548132
"It just doesn't prove what God, or what his characteristics are. The same guy also proves that God exists outside of time entirely, so that he can't directly influence anything."

What guy? What god that exists outside of time? If this supposed god exists outside of time, how does this guy of your's know about it?

>>548132
"he can't directly influence anything."

If it can't directly influence anything, what makes it a god?
>> Anonymous
So hott

http://youtube.com/watch?v=P7ZfViiNYog
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Pretty ironic how horrible and repulsive female body hair is considered in a board dedicated to women with giant penises and saggy scrotums.
>> Anonymous
>>547250
Dangerously Furry...
>> Ehhh..... !N2Rn3IpqO2
>>548158
Source is Anselm.

What makes him God is that he is the prime mover--he moves other things without being moved, himself.

Brush up on some Plato, Aristotle, and Augustine, and then go on to Anselm. Some would point you to Thomas of Aquinas rather than Anselm, but Thomas's proofs are weaker, more dogmatically Christian, more worshipful of Aristotle, and, frankly, boring in comparison. Also, Thomas had a toilet built under him so that he wouldn't have to stop writing, and this simple fact calls into question his entire rationality.
>> Anonymous
I can understand people being into normal pubes. Natural and all that. Even if I personally find it disgusting.

But why would anyone find the OP picture erotic? It totally covers up the goods!
>> Anonymous
Anselm hardly can be said to have given incontrovertable proof of the existence of god... All it does is identify something with godlike powers as a prime mover; it NEVER proves that a prime mover must exist. It's not as if an infinite regress is impossible in regards to causality; it just can't be comprehended by us.

The ONLY person to have even come close to it was Berkeley, and almost noone is willing to accept it because it leads to idealistic metaphysics. Even berkeley didn't make it a proof, but merely an incredibly good inductive argument.
>> Anonymous
>>548132

You are not giving a lesson in religion. Please learn to give references. Making a vague motion about a shadowy figure of authority (lol a "guy") that you believe revealed the light on an eon-old blurred concept is not giving a lesson. Much lulz too since you probably did not simply give the name of the person nor the reference to his work because you DID NOT BOTHER TO REMEMBER THE NAME OF THE PERSON OR HOW TO REFERE TO HIS WORKS. What a great fucking figure of authority on the subject and what a great thinker you are, it certainly isn't glaringly obvious that you don't give a shit about the subject.

Do your brain even register what you are saying? "There is a proof that you are wrong and I am not naming it and I am writing much more words about said proof and its finality on the matter than it would need for just giving the words needed to google it".

You are not smart. You are not giving lessons. We don't need to hear your useless rambling on /b/, even less on /d/. Stop posting.
>> Anonymous
>>548183

First:

1. God is, by definition, a being greater than which nothing can be conceived (imagined).
2. Existence in reality is greater than existence in the mind.
3. God must exist in reality; if God did not, then God would not be that than which nothing greater can be conceived (imagined).

Is this what you consider this irefutable proof of God's existence? If yes, where is the link to christian mythology? Why do you say "God" and refer to the bible? If this argument could hold ANY WATER AT ALL, it would refer to a potential "something divine exists" and nothing about "God". WHERE is the LINK.

Second thing:

>>548132If you're referring to a God as conceived in a Judeo-Christian sense, which you probably are even if you don't realize it

You are a pretentious faggot. He clearly talked about a vague reference to a Creator. He even had quotation marks every time he mentionned "God", for christ's sake.

>then you should know that, in Genesis, God sees that everything he created was good immediately after creating it.

Bible is not a credible source.
>> Anonymous
>>548171

Actually, it's not ironic at all: it's just representative of what the /d/ posters want to see in their H.

Think of it this way: futa and super-scrots are fantastically infeasible, but body hair isn't.
>> Anonymous
Wow, this thread fucking sucks.
>> Anonymous
>>548233

NO U
>> Anonymous
>>548233
Because everyone wont stop bitching about the fact that they saw something they didn't find attractive on /d/.

newfags.
>> Anonymous
>>548295
I'm talking about the religion debate, moron.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>547895
>>547899
>>547900
sauce?

>>548171
not hairy. gtfo.
>> Ehhh..... !N2Rn3IpqO2
>>548193
God is that than which nothing greater can be conceived. This is a pretty safe definition of what all monotheistic religions seem to think their god is. This is a pretty safe definition of what many polytheistic religions seem to think their head god is.

Alright?

I never said that Anselm proved that God, in the Christian sense, exists. I said he proved that God exists. I think there aren't many people who, under the assumption that we aren't trying to give any connotations to the idea of God, other than something "great," would say that calling that thing than which nothing greater can be conceived God is right out. Most would probably, I think, after some discussion, say that it's fairly appropriate.

Anselm proved that something than which nothing greater can be conceived exists. Unless you have some objection to calling this God, there's not much that can be refuted.

Granted, it doesn't actually say much. It's just one of the coolest logical proofs ever, and should be brought up far more frequently than it is.
On to statement number two. I am pretentious, but there isn't a person on the internet who isn't, so that isn't saying much. I'm clearly not a faggot, as I'm interested in the female form. But these were not your main points.

He was almost certainly referring to God in the same way any average American would refer to God, since he referred to him in the same way that any average American might. The generic American concept of God is informed primarily by Judeo-Christian ideology. Yes? Even most American atheists primarily target Judeo-Christian ideology as the source of their ridicule.

Finally, the Bible is, actually, a credible source when you're using it in reference to its own mythos.

In short, you should really try to understand what a person is saying _before_ you go flying off on some handle or another.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>548431

Religion on the Internet: Serious Business.
>> Anonymous
>>548431
You really, really, REALLY are stupid, full of yourself and impossible to talk with. You confuse issues AND confuse together the people who bring them up. You REALLY need to STOP posting.
>> Anonymous
http://zeitgeistmovie.com
End religious debate. More hairy.
>> Ehhh..... !N2Rn3IpqO2
     File :-(, x)
>>548438
Not really. I just like talking.

Typing.
>> Moon Child
>>548171
I know, right...? o__O;;
And personally, I hate futa...but I don't complain about it in all the futa threads. D;
And BTW, the photoshopping in those first two pics is so obvious that it irks me... DX
>> Anonymous
>>548444
This is /d/. There are various place more appropriate where I am sure that you would LOVE to bring up your pseudo intellectuality.
>> Ehhh..... !N2Rn3IpqO2
>>548440
True, true, and true. I don't see anything in there that doesn't include the vast majority of humanity; I therefore see no reason why I should stop talking any more than you should, and as I see communication as an inherently good thing, despite the condition that those making it appear to be in, I see no reason to stop.
>> Ehhh..... !N2Rn3IpqO2
>>548447
Nah. See, I'm not trying to be intelligent here, in a false manner or otherwise. I'm bringing something cool up and making obvious corrections to things as necessary.
>> Anonymous
Why the flying fuck are you morons discussing religion here of all places?
You are all - every single one of you - fucking idiotic.
>> Anonymous
>>548448
No, not everybody is full of themselve and bringing up idiotic discussion in the most immature and ridiculous attempt at trying to sound smart. Yes, that is a good reason to STOP POSTING since it isn't the place, unlike people who actually know how to use the internet. And no, you are not sounding smart by making long-winded sentences. Please grow up, preferably elsewhere.
>> Anonymous
>>548449
Lol, no. Fueling a religion shitstorm is not bringing something cool. Your corrections have ALREADY been pointed out to be shitty. They were NOT necessary.

STOP.
POSTING.
>> Anonymous
just like the virgin mary
>> Anonymous
where did all the hair go...
>> Anonymous
>>548457
It's okay, it's okay. We'll probably manage a cool thread later.
>> Ehhh..... !N2Rn3IpqO2
     File :-(, x)
>>548452
Yes, virtually everybody is full of themselves. No, they aren't all bringing up discussion on 4chan. I am, in fact, one of the ones not bringing up discussion. I brought up something that should be referenced more frequently. Others are the ones who felt the need to expand on it.

I am, however unfortunately, not one to not respond to something of a certain level of coherence and above when it disagrees so vehemently with me.

Am I an asshole? Yes. I don't see what that has to do with this particular situation, though.
>> Anonymous
>>548461Yes, virtually everybody is full of themselves

No.

>I am, in fact, one of the ones not bringing up discussion. I brought up something that should be referenced more frequently.

Cute.

>Am I an asshole? Yes

We alrady knew. We welcome most assholes. Not your kind. Stop posting.
>> Anonymous
>>548461
You're the one who started the fucking discussion you moronic prick.
>> Anonymous
>>548458
tru tru
hair + religion = eh
hair - religion = cool
>> Anonymous
I hope the tripfag gets banned for this faggotry.
>> Ehhh..... !N2Rn3IpqO2
     File :-(, x)
>>548455
I see. You're blaming me for somebody else's (probably your) actions in starting a spiralling trend. Other than that, however, it looks like it simply comes down to a difference of opinion. And as I am so full of myself, I may as well say that my opinion is probably closer to right opinion than yours.
>> Anonymous
>>548470
You're not impressing anyone here tripfag. Just get the fuck out and stop ruining threads.
>> >>548452 Anonymous
>>548452

Source?
>> Anonymous
>>548470You're blaming me for somebody else's (probably your) actions in starting a spiralling trend
No and I though it was quite obvious that you were blamed for religion shitstorming.

>Other than that, however, it looks like it simply comes down to a difference of opinion
Except it isn't a matter of opinion. Nice trying the generic bullshit way out.

>I may as well say that my opinion is probably closer to right opinion than yours.
Except you don't even know who you're talking to. Yeah, that sounds like a good setup for an ad hominem. Fucking smart of you.
>> Ehhh..... !N2Rn3IpqO2
>>548463
You can tell me to stop posting as much as you want, but until you can post some kind of sensible reasoning for me to do so, I don't think I will.

It looks like you're winding down, however, so I probably won't have to respond too much more to this particular thread.


Tch. It looks like I'm out of pics that fall under this category that aren't futa.
>> Anonymous
>>548470
I'm with this guys just cause hes posting pics
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>548413
Look at the armpit... or maybe it's just a dodgy shadow.

BTW, This Anselm faggotry reeks of Intelligent Design V 0.99, GTHO.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>548478

MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Shaved version.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Moon Child
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Anonymous
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7ZfViiNYog
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>548503

Nobody Cares, GTFO
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Nin
>>548476
I don't think they hate the religious nonsense as much as they hate your laughable view of Anselm's "ontological argument."

He did not prove that any kind of god exists. At best, he demonstrated that a god can be imagined. Imagining gods does not make them real. Just ask the Greeks, or the Aztecs.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I'll now post some uglier/weirder ones until the image limit is reached.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Stupid USB modem.
Fucking ISP.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Anonymous
Words cannot describe this thread.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR NOW!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
MOAR
>> Anonymous
>>547301
Oh fuck it is.
>> Anonymous
>>548545
carpet matches the drapes, in color and length