File :-(, x, )
Cuntboys Anonymous
Cuntboys go!
>> Anonymous
...you mean women without tits?
Where's the fun in that?!
>> Anonymous
Or maybe the poster meant boys with a cunt. I don't know.
>> Anonymous
>>742255
Kinda like dickgirls are men with breasts, right?

You're an idiot.
>> Anonymous
>>742271

Exactly.
>> Anonymous
How come all cuntboy threads are requests with this exact same shitty picture?
>> Anonymous
dunno, although I really wish there was more of it, futa on cuntboy that is
>> Anonymous
>>742309

Because there's barely anything in the niche in the first place. Rare fetish is rare. Which is sad, because it's hot.
>> Anonymous
>>742396
indeed it is. and dickgirls are...kinda boring lately.
>> Dickgirl
     File :-(, x)
>>742432
I WILL RAM YOU IN THE ASS UNTIL YOU LOVE ME AGAIN
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I personally would like to see more like the OP's pic, but then again probably not gonna happen.
>> Anonymous
I always wondered about this OP, why I never see any reverse futa, guys with vags.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Could be a cuntboy, could be a loli. Quite frankly I don't care.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
dear christ, ive never even pondered such a concept before
>> Anonymous
Have we actually found something even gayer than dickgirls?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>742964
ORLY?


Does anyone have anything else of THE*MAD*RED's
>> Anonymous
Moar? Please? For the love of god?
>> edo_hure !CY6ac/sjcI
>>743176
hmmmm...could be accompished.ftm transexual, but without any change to the genital area...
and what a mindfuck!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>743176

I stand corrected.

And truly we must find and identify this 'THE*MAD*RED' character and his delicious artwork.
>> Anonymous
>>742249
>>742271
What do cuntboys have that women don't?

Nothing.

What do women have that cuntboys don't?

Nothing. (in b4 breasts, even though men technically do)
>> Anonymous
>>743144
if i remember correctly, this was posted ages ago, and was made by a frequent (back then) poster
>> Anonymous
Oh god, please god, don't let anyone post that ftm tarp Buck something. Not in /d/. Not in /d/.
>> Anonymous
Question: If shemales are men with female builds and cuntboys are women with male builds, then wouldn't shemalexcuntboy be a hotter fetish than futaxcuntboy? For the balance.
>> Anonymous
I'm not THAT turned on by those pics or anything... but something tells me i must see MORE of this.

Moar please.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>743416
>>743425
>>743435

Awesome! I didn't think pics like these existed. What fetish is this exactly? it's not futa...
>> Anonymous
>>743460

reverse futa
>> Anonymous
>>743460
It belongs in /y/

As in, /y/aoi.

As in, gay men.
>> Anonymous
Ok, I have to ask now because now, it's bothering me:

I do not understand this fetish at all. Men already come equipped with a hole. A hole that is equipped with a prostate gland which is extremely sensitive. So why the need to imagine up men with vaginas? Are people deluded enough to think, "BUT IF IT GOES IN THAT HOLE IT'S AUTOMATICALLY GAY! EVEN IF A WOMAN IS HAVING SEX WITH A MAN IN HIS POOPER THAT MEANS THEY ARE BOTH AUTOMATICALLY GAY!"

In what world does this make sense?
>> Anonymous
>>743498
Come now, surely you know better than to try making sense of hentai, and on /d/ no less.
>> Anonymous
>>743514
I'm not trying to make sense of the porn.

I'm trying to make sense of the people who draw it and masturbate to it.
>> Anonymous
>>743515
Whether it's the subject, the creator, or the consumer, hentai rarely makes complete sense.
If I had to guess though, I'd say that this is some strange hybrid between futa and yaoi.
Aside from the dickgirl+cuntboy combo, it's only feasible purpose is to avoid anal sex.
I think your original point (though on cruise control) hit closer than you think.
>> Anonymous
>>743524
I can't help but think that fans of this fetish are either women or yaoi fangirls.

(Note: yaoi fangirls are not women. They're barely people.)
>> Anonymous
>>743515
GL & HF
>> Anonymous
>>743529
It's basically futanari with a male body type.
It was bound to pop up sooner or later.
People tend to forget that the definition of the word is hermaphrodite.
That means both sets of genitalia, not necessarily just dickgirls.
Dickgirls were basically a transition from yuri.
I see cuntboys as the same thing concerning yaoit.
>> Anonymous
>>743537
The OP's image is just a man without a dick or balls with a vagina... (read: woman)
>> Anonymous
The op pic is sort of a female to male transsexual. Same way shemales are sort of male to female transsexuals.

I have some pictures.. but they are furry. Tis forboden.
>> Anonymous
>>743556
Yes, I'm fully aware, another reason this particular fetish peeves me is that it seems to have come out of the furry community. And when it first came out of the furry community it was strictly men with no dicks or balls with vaginas. (Read: WOMEN.)
>> Anonymous
>>743545
My statements were made concerning more than just the OP.
Read the first line of my post again.
Body types are important.
Shape and proportion of features defines gender just as much as the space between their legs.

Gender association goes much further than just the genitals.
At first glance, most people would see a man and a woman in that picture.
While the stuff in between their legs might not match up, that is how we are supposed to think of them.
Otherwise the artist wouldn't have bothered drawing them as they are.
>> Anonymous
>>743529
You have no right to judge fetishes when you are browsing /d/. This isn't a place for judging fetishes.
>> Anonymous
>>743558
Are you so certain it came from the furry community?

I doubt it.

The reverse of this is quite popular and has been around for a while. It is only natural this would exist as well.

Furries probably made more of this kind of thing and brought some attention to it, but I doubt they came up with it.
>> Anonymous
>>743561
Fair enough.

I've fapped to my fair share of shemales who are basically just men with tig ol' bitties.
>> Anonymous
>>743562
I'm not judging fetishes.

I'm judging people. Which Yaoi fangirls barely qualify as.
>> Anonymous
>>743561
What this person said.

Gender is a whole hell of a lot more than what is between the legs. So much so that it should probable be the last thing on your mind when trying to decide how to classify someone(doesn't mean you shouldn't consider it when figuring out who to fuck though).

Example.. a woman with a penis. A gay guy wouldn't hit that just because there is a penis. They like MEN. Even with a penis that is NOT a man.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>743570
I think I see your point.

I'm not attracted to men or the OP in anyway, despite the fact that I am attracted to this image as well as regular women.

I do believe that the discussion here should include more images though. This is still an imageboard, not a forum.
>> Anonymous
>>743575
Well, if furry was aloud I would help out. Otherwise.. this is very rare. Indeed a niche fetish.

I like it myself. I enjoy all topics having to do with transgender. I also benefit from being genuine bisexual. Girl with a penis.. man with a pussy.. whatever.

Nothing wrong with a discussion on the side though. We've all learned something!
>> Anonymous
>>743468
Men belong in /y/

Men don't have a vagina anywhere on them.
>> Anonymous
It's less gay to be attracted to a dickgirl fucking a woman, more gay if just DG x DG, much more gay if Cuntboy x Man. Futa x Cuntboy may very well balance the equation out.
>> Boys with cunt, not girl with dicks! Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>742255
I say CUNTBOYS. NOT DICKGIRLS! Hard too understand or what?
>> Anonymous
"In this new-wing world anything is possible"
>> Anonymous
>>743575
I know it may be off-topic but...more/sauce?
>> Anonymous
>>743613Men don't have a vagina anywhere on them.

Oh, I think I know a few who got themselves one.
It isn't even that rare these days. Although most of them try to shape their appearance towards the female, but they're still genetically and usually also built like men.
>> Anonymous
Looks like the opposite sex finally hit back with a dose of our own medicine.
>> Anonymous
>>743575

Where is that from?
>> Anonymous
>>743176
Relevant to my interests.

Please stop complaining guys, we're all perverts
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>743870
>>743872
These really look like women to me.
>> Anonymous
Technically, there is nothing preventing males being posted on this board. It's still a fetish and it's still hentai.

There is no possible way this could be a way to avoid gayness except for the most homophobic transphobic assholes out there.
>> Anonymous
>>743876

He's an FTM trans. Still cuntboy.
>> Anonymous
This is for fags.
>> Anonymous
>>743909
Your face is for fags.
We get dickgirls, so why not the exact opposite?
Anyone got more?
>> Anonymous
/d/ is for fags.

>>743914
No, but I might attempt to draw some.
>> edo_hure !CY6ac/sjcI
>>743922
please do.i think this may be my new fetish...i've always been partial to androgynous/hermaphroditic.
>> Anonymous
bump for tragically obscure fetish
>> Anonymous
BUMP

AND FUCK OFF WITH THE COMPLAINING, ITS REALLY NOT RELEVANT IN /D/
>> Anonymous
awesome drawing ~~ if only ...
>> Anonymous
This is quite disturbing.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>743524
i bet the next one to show up, will be the cuntboy being rammed in the ass.
>> Anonymous
Once again, from now on, there are called atuf.
>> Synonymous !BHUJfTXHtM
>>744346

I believe this fetish is linked with femdom and humiliation. For me it is attractive because I want to be dominated, degraded and humiliated (by women), so being without a penis while being pleasured by a dominant woman is quite a turn on. Although I don't actually want to lose my penis, its fun to imagine I have.

I don't think it has anything to do with an aversion to anal sex, if someone finds this attractive they probably have some kind of fetish related reason to do so.
>> Anonymous
>>744415
Interesting position.

I'm attracted to it because I'm bisexual, and it, like futa, is a combination of two genders I enjoy.
>> Anonymous
There HAS to be more of this...

HAWT!
>> Anonymous
sort of want
>> Anonymous
>>743498
Why? Why not?

There's plenty of reasons. The anal region is somewhat delicate and messy. Anal sex is supposed to be slow and careful, vaginal is much better suited for being fast and rough. And I think anal stimulation on its own doesn't do all that much for guys. And who says you have to use only one hole at a time?

I'm guessing that getting your head around this fetish might require separating it from futa, by looking at this as "sympathy based" porn, rather than atraction based. Or not, both could be either way.
>> Anonymous
>>744547
Oh, and another thing... multple orgasms. I only jerked off twice today and... ow, OW, OWWWW, my balls! OWWW!
>> Anonymous
>>744421
I like it because I like transgender stuff.. or anything that messes with the typical idea of what is appropriate for men and women.. so on so on.

I'm also bi. I enjoy this and the more traditional futa.
>> Anonymous
>>744547
I am a man and I can cum just from anal.