>> |
Yakov Smirnoff
!UyIEvIA9Mg
>>184768 No, you trolling piece of shit. Why you haven't been banned is a mystery considering everywhere I see you post, you complain about EVERYTHING being furry. Whining about furry this, furry that, you don't seem to understand what furry is. Apparently, I have to remind you:
Anthropomorphic is defined as adding human characteristics to an innanimate object OR ANIMAL. If it starts as an animal and has human attributes added to it, it's furry. If you look at the head/face/skeletal structure, if its base skeletal structure is that of an animal, then it's probably furry.
Example: If you look at most furry images, they have a muzzle, and, *gasp* fur! However, the absence of fur is no guarentee it's NOT furry. Example would be furry depictions of "dragons" and "lizards." These too can be anthropomorphed animals.
However, if the base skeletal/facial structure is that of a HUMAN, and has animal features added to it, it is probably a monster-girl. Example: Look at mermaids for a moment, human face/head, no fur, basically a human with a fish tail. That's what it means to NOT be furry. Human with particular animal parts.
To conclude:
Furry = Animal with human characteristics Not Furry = human with animal characteristics
There IS a difference!
|