>> |
Anonymous File :-(, x)
>>225858
*recalls that one pic of a man with a vagina*
*shudders* That is just too scary.
Although, getting back to the topic of futa, it's a heck of a lot like this; it is what you want it too be. For me futanari is simply nothing more than just another odd-ball fetish (which will go nicely with my other fetishes such as distention, tentacles, nipple fucking, the list goes on). It is a fetish that includes intercourse between two women by removing the guy. When I look at porn, I want to look at women, easy as that. So a picture of a woman with a dick screwing a woman (futa or not) is no biggie in my mind, since I'm getting what I want; tits with little involvment of having to look at a naked guy. Maybe looking at a naked men does it for some people (mostly the women and homo/bi group), but not for me, therefore futanari is a way to produce the tits I'm interested in, and a dick is a bit of "extra" that I can easily over look, mostly because I already have designated in my mind that this person is a woman. As stated by>>225971if this was real life, it would be another story, hence one of the reasons I never look at any *real* dickgirl pics. If futanari still strikes you as gay, fine, it's gay then, but only to you and others who think like you. Therefore, if you don't like this stuff, well guess what, we do, so since you're obviously outnumbered you might as well go else where if you got a problem with it. We have already made up out minds, we like what we like, we all have reached ther conclusion that it's just a woman with a bit of extra, so, by majority vote, you loose.
|