>> |
Ehhh.....
File :-(, x)
>>947614 Then MURK LOAR, etc. Femdom threads pop up every other day.
>>947617 >>947654 >>947652 >>947653 Not femdom at all. Christ, people, nothing wrong with wanting cd pr0nz, but identify it properly. Also put it in the right place.
>>947835 Faggotry is not what is against /d/ rules in that pic, so your report for faggotry is technically a false report. If anything, that pic should be reported for lack of /d/ material, but then, I have no idea whether the mods consider cd /d/ or not.
An argument could be made for that pic violating the "no shota" rules, but then, that guy can't be any younger than>>947617's girl, and I've never, over the hundreds of times I've seen that pic reposted in both this and the original, unshopped incarnation, ever seen that pic get deleted by the mods. In other words, if that girl ain't loli, then that guy ain't a shota.
|