File :-(, x, )
Gardevoir Anonymous
As requested in /a/
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
A little lactation for you guys who think this isn't /d/ material.

And I'm out. There's very little good shit, or so I am led to believe.
>> Anonymous
>>599373
The lactation? Yes, very.
>> Anonymous
Wtf? Is dat sum furriez?
>> Anonymous
Too tired to post all my pics, try here

http://rule34.paheal.net/post/list/Gardevoir/1
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>599397
Go home, Steve.
>> Anonymous
http://wandering.un-clic-por-el-bosque.com/
http://wandering.un-clic-por-el-bosque.com/
http://wandering.un-clic-por-el-bosque.com/
http://wandering.un-clic-por-el-bosque.com/
http://wandering.un-clic-por-el-bosque.com/
>> Anonymous
Furry? In my vagina?
>> Anonymous
>>599459
I was gonna say, I thought Gardevoir was banned?
>> Anonymous
>>599397
Not furry, leafy!

/me gets the fuck out.
>> Anonymous
>>599719
Leafy? What the hell? She's Psychic, not Grass.

Oh, and last time I posted Gardevoir I was banned (literally for about ten minutes though), so it looks like this thread will disappear as soon as a mod wakes up.
>> Anonymous
gardevoir is not furry. it is just like any harpie or naga. dont discriminate
>> Anonymous
>>599727
Harpy/naga = human with tail instead of legs/ wings instead of arms
Gardevoir = the fact that it stands up straight and has arms is the only thing that makes it human-like
>> Anonymous
>>599736
gardevoir= everything human except shes a phychick pokemon easily mistaken to be a grass pokemon.

also human like features with no fur. so you cannot label her as furry. if you must call her something... call her a monster.

gardevoir != furry
>> Anonymous
Gardevoir with stick legs and no breasts, nipples, and vagina is a pokemon.

With feet, some sort of breasts, and/or nipples, she's a monstergirl. Think of the transformation threads. Gardevoir is in the second part from last change, so she's not fully the pokemon anymore.
>> Anonymous
>>599743
an excellent description sir
>> Anonymous
>>599743
Even though I disagree, allow me to state that I'm happy with the way you presented your opinion, at the very least trying to insert logic into why this particular fetish is not banhammer-worthy. Arguments are better when everyone remains civil. =3

>>599742
Just because she has no fur doesn't mean she's not "furry". Furry has now become a term for anything non-human really, Pokemon fall under the furry category despite many of them not having fur because they're still remarkably close to animals. Animals behaving like humans is indeed what we have come to know as "furry".
>> Anonymous
>>599743

In that case /r/ing a link to the comic with forced transformation & impregnation of Ash as a Gardevoir.

Mist is a such a bitch :P