>> |
Anonymous
>>1160378
No. More like, to become a good critic one has to actually know what's bad and what's good. Like in the case of Cowell, he can obviously tell talent from shitty singers. In the case of 4Chan "critics", anything, no matter how good it is, can be called shit. Yeah, I'd say the major difference is that actual critics are supposed to be critical and give praise where it is due, while 4Chan "critics" are trolls/whiners who'd whine about anything often while doing the same thing themselves, all the while they are entirely unable to do any better.
Note that when I say "4Chan critics", I don't actually mean just "critics" on 4Chan, but all kinds of trolls and whiners all across the internets (especially in places where people congregate to spread shit to each other). It's how this place (the Internets) works.
This thing's getting stoopids and I'm sure we all have better things to do, maybe we should quit it even if it keeps bumping this thread!
|