File :-(, x, )
On the Subject of furries Evernight
Just curious as to what doesn't count as furry, and what the name would be for stuff that's more animalistic enhancement on a human than animal anthropomorphizing. I loves me my girls with fox tails and ears, but the tail is useless if it doesn't actually move.
...is that furry of me?
>> Anonymous
if it has a snout, its furry.
>> Anonymous
Well furry kinda means that they have fur. Ears and tails aren't don't make the person furry. They still have human skin.

Generally things start getting furry when they actually have full body fur and a face that is not human.
>> Evernight
so aside from "catgirl" what do you call that?
>> Anonymous
You don't call it anything. Maybe loli. Or fox girl. I don't see the point of labeling it.
>> Anonymous
what about liongirl, i believe she has full body fur but is accepted here
>> Verfor99 !dW6ztBRlKA
Ears and tails are NO WAY and NOT furry; they are animalgirls. In the case of the OP, he likes foxgirls. I myself am a staunch defender of catgirl's fuckability rights.
>> expert
     File :-(, x)
ears tails fangs = kemonomimi which is the animal parts fetish or catgirls

snouts or more animal then humanoid = kemono which is generally considered the furry/ anthropomorphism fetish.

the manga(hanafuda) you posted has a kemonomimi kitsune, which is perfectly fine but if it had say a foxs mouth it would be furry.

there are exceptions to rules as always and monstergirls are a completely different subject. See the monstergirl encyclopedia pages for a primer on monstergirls if you're unfamiliar.

also there is weird shit like this picture which is just better not to classify
>> Anonymous
See...this sucks. I don't want to be a furry, but I love me some tongue. And furry dogs and foxes have lots of tongue. Stupid spinoff fetishes.
>> expert
     File :-(, x)
>>940267
but they have dog tongues...
and there is nonfurry long tongue art out there and If I remember correctly its featured in a hentai movie or two.

also monstergirls are not furry and they usually have interesting tongues
>> Anonymous
If it's got a human face and at least some regular human skin, it's not furry.
>> Anonymous
>>940272
Oh, I agree. I've seen all sorts of awesome-tongued monster girls. I would post some now, but unfortunately I'm one of those guys who deletes all his porn as soon as he faps. Nothing like that ever stays on my computer. Makes it hard to start threads.
>> Czan
     File :-(, x)
saw this in another thread
>> Anonymous
WTF WHERES MY SHOTGUN!
>> Anonymous
>>940238
as a general rule, if it's the human parts that still are the main stimulation, it's not furry
>> Anonymous
>>940238
and no, that's just a cat girl/[insert domesticated animal here] girl fetish
>> Boros, Troll critic !9kbJjvwmwE
     File :-(, x)
Example;
for all intents and purposes this image is furry, since the male has a distinctly non human face and non human skin. However it could fall into the category of "monster fuck"/"interspecies" since the furry male character is most certainly going to rape the female, violently.
>> Boros, Troll critic !9kbJjvwmwE
     File :-(, x)
>>940380
and the aforementioned rape
>> Anonymous
>>940380
>>940381
these are kind of a gray area. if you can't decide if it's furry, then it can most likely be interpreted as nonfurry
>> Boros, Troll critic !9kbJjvwmwE
>>940384
yes

but it's still fucking hot holy shit.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Here. This is what you call furry. Ears, tail, whole body fur. Short of that, I wouldn't count it.
>> Anonymous
>>940422
I always draw the line at the face. Human face, not furry. Cat face, furry.
>> Anonymous
>>940422
uh. Why does her (its?) back seem to measure Ohms?
>> Anonymous
>>940425
all furfags are secretly electrical engineers.
>> Anonymous
>>940432
but then, wouldn't all electrical engineers secretly...be.....

oh my god
>> Anonymous
could it possibly be an omega?
>> Anonymous
>>940425
Greek alphabet, ever heard of it? Common symbol.
>> Boros, Troll critic !9kbJjvwmwE
     File :-(, x)
LESS TALKING, MORE GREY AREA
>> Boros, Troll critic !9kbJjvwmwE
     File :-(, x)
MMMM
>> Anonymous
>>940438
You sir have just won a award for funny
>> Boros, Troll critic !9kbJjvwmwE
     File :-(, x)
ALSO HYENA RAPE
>> Boros, Troll critic !9kbJjvwmwE
     File :-(, x)
ALSO BUG FUCK-OH MY GOD IS SHE MAKING OUT WITH IT?
>> Boros, Troll critic !9kbJjvwmwE
     File :-(, x)
WHATEVER, FAPFAPFAP
>> Anonymous
>>940450

I'm . . . not really sure how to react to that . . .
>> Anonymous
There is a point at which furry is not the worst thing in a thread.
>> Anonymous
>>940433
Logical fallacy. "All As are Bs" doe not also mean "all Bs are As"

Example: All dog are animals. Are you now going to say all animals are dogs?
>> Anonymous
I just have one question. Is there a reason why we flame furfags? I mean, everyone gets turned on by different stuff. How can you really say that bugs aren't weirder than animals? The way I understand is that I flame them cause everyone else does.
>> Anonymous
>>940479
We flame furfags because wherever they go, there is fail and aids.
>> Anonymous
Monstergirl is too risky imo. You're walking the thin line between 'cute girl with ears, tail and animal features' and 'yiff yiff yiff', and it's a line no Anon should play with.
>> Anonymous
>>940479

The standard reason is that the furfags that're actually known and visible are the dramabombs. The porn itself isn't the issue, as it covers every kink under the sun anwyay. The drama that furries tend to bring IS the issue.

Now, there are the kind that know better than to advertise their furfagness, and Anon has no problem with them.
>> Boros, Troll critic !9kbJjvwmwE
>>940475
are you going to say all animals are NOT dogs?

>>940479
frufags are inherent drama. They are annoying, generally pretentious, almost always have an inferiority or "if you disagree with me you are just prejudiced" and treat their FETISH like its a race or gender or something.

IT would be as if foot fetishists started dressing up as giant feet at foot conventions, drew incredibly shitty porn, and had blogs about how they are always oppressed
>> Anonymous
>>940475
If everyone who can't take a joke is an idiot, then that would mean...
>> Anonymous
>>940541
Another logical fallacy. Just because "all animals are dogs" is incorrect doesn't not mean "all animals are not dogs" is correct. The statement "all dogs are animals" already showed it anyway.

I guess purposely trying to spread confusion and retardation is fun for some.
>> Boros, Troll critic !9kbJjvwmwE
>>940552
Logical in fallacy;
you are a faggot.
>> Anonymous
>>940561
Point?
>> Anonymous
>>940561
well, can't argue with that
>> Anonymous
>>940238
An Anthropomorph, a.k.a. furry, is an animal/non-human with strong human characteristics. Therianthrope is the blanket term for a human with animal characteristics or in the process of becoming an animal. Greek- therion: wild animal or beast, anthropos: man
>> Anonymous
>>940566
But what does it mean?
>> Anonymous
monster on girl is only slightly furry if at all you're not getting of on the monster you're getting off on the girl be subjigated by the monster
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>940509
I chose to walk that line bravely good sir.
And on another note why haven't I seen this pic on /d/
>> Anonymous
>>940425

Her resistance only makes its penis harder.
>> Anonymous
>>940238
Sauce on flatchested kitsune.
>> Anonymous
>>940585
actually it's...hanafuda...hanafodo, something.
>> Anonymous
>>940591
it's hanadufa. A kitsune/demon doujin that uses an incredibly intricate and colorful traditional japanese art style.
>> Anonymous
>>940581
Sauce???
>> Anonymous
>>940600
i am seconding this....whoever draws manticore girls deserves a visit to their website.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>940602
>>940600
if it helps i think they drew this too.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>940620
Sauce on artist?
cause I'm liking this tauric thing they have going
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
No clue on the artist but I'll post what I have
>> Boros, Troll critic !9kbJjvwmwE
>>940625
>>940620
this is disgusting and arousing at the same time.
>> Anonymous
>>940629
does that make it right or us wrong?
>> Anonymous
Requesting a rapidshit/torrent of the translation of OP's doujin.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
found another by same artist does anyone know the artist name or site?
>> Anonymous
the definition of furry is much more than how much of an animal the girl in your porn is

a furry is an animal that assumes itself to be human, they are firstly an animal that walks and talks, not a girl with animal parts

so furry ratio is really judged mathmatically by:
(how much animal anatomy)/(how much they pretend it's no big deal and you should just accept that they are a homosexual dinosaur man)

if you end up dividing by zero, fap away
>> Nyarlathotep !VwZvCXxy0.
     File :-(, x)
While on the subject, I've always wanted to know... Is Cheshire furry? Her face is more human, but she's covered in fur. Care to clarify?
>> Nyarlathotep !VwZvCXxy0.
     File :-(, x)
This picture raises even more questions.
>> Anonymous
This isn't rocket science and has already been explained numerous times. Animal with human traits = furry. Human with animal traits = not furry.

If it's still hard to understand:
http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3Aanthropomorphic
>> Anonymous
>>940582
hah :D

I used to be a furfag but really more "animal ears are cute" than "I have the spirit of a fox." I was also 12. Neko/kemono/whatever-mimi is still cute and not furry.