>> |
Anonymous
Bump! Also, mystical creatures are and should remain canon on /d/. I have no problem with the bestiality ban, despite being a monster fetishist, because xenophiles reserve their tastes for things with souls. Something animals arguably, do not have and thus breeding with them would only create genetically inferior children. Monsters hold a measure of our psyche as they evolve from our psychological archetypes (resembling humans spiritually, not physically, which would make them furries rather than monsters) and thus are capable of some meaningful connection. The more absentee tentacle variants also represent along with many monsters an aspect of supersentience inherent in 'otherworldly things' that we cannot understand. Furries are those psychological abominations that result from breeding with a lesser creature (measured as lacking a soul, not necessarily anything else) and are defined by those that conceive them (though they might not admit it) as need to destroy truly living things and pervert the sentient claim of existence. Thus the furries are individuals who seek oblivion and thus mate with animals mentally to create their soldiers that pose as living things to draw others into the trap of robotic instinct and inevitably, the dissipation of all free will. Such events lie solely within the fetishists mind, however and a 'catgirl' for instance can be either abomination or monstrous/alien in nature depending on the images summoner.
But that's just my opinion.
|