File :-(, x, )
Tony Taka futa Anonymous
hi. i don't normally enter /d/, but the other boards would have my head if i posted this here. i am aware that most tony taka fans wouldn't be here but i still hope you guys have something more to add. i'll post what i do have but it's not much.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
same one in b/w
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
sorry about the balls, no idea why he includes them
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
preview which contains the last pic, hopefully there's more where it came from
>> Anonymous
that's hayate, so that's not futa. cross dressing more like.
>> sage sage
>>742104
What he said.
>> Anonymous
>>742089

Well, I loled.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
What's wrong with CD stuff?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>743821

Nothing as far as I'm concerned. Except that usually to get away with it, the CDer needs to be shota, which /d/ isn't allowed to have, unless they're worksafe.
>> Anonymous
>>743823
yeah, that's always irritated me. I don't want to fap to little boys
>> Anonymous
>>743823
Bridget makes everyone gay tho'.
>> Anonymous
>>743821nothing at all
>>743823more bridget
>> Anonymous
>>743823

The hell? Bridget isn't allowed on /d/ anymore?
>> Anonymous
>>743819
>>you're
>> Anonymous
>>743906
Bridget, as far as we know, is underage and therefore shota.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>743920

So what? So are the vast majority of the girls we fap to. The cast of Sailor Moon, Bleach, Naruto, and Haruhi are all under 18, but that doesn't stop them from getting posted.
>> Anonymous
>>743925

Not to mention Hinagiku and Hayate, both of whom are still in school and one who is definitely all man.
>> Anonymous
>>743925

if it's not your house, you go by their rules, whether you like them or not. If you don't like it, make your own anime imageboard where you call all the shots, or go to somewhere they don't care. As far as I knew there are at least two that have boards dedicated to, if not Bridget, then crossdressing in which Bridget is a mainstay.
>> Anonymous
>>744058
I think that you missed his point, which is that "nobody underage" is clearly NOT an actual rule, since it is not normally enforced.