File :-(, x, )
Bondage thread Anonymous
LOL
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>Bondage thread
>>LOL

What's wrong with this one?>>652273
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>653278
Too full. I've done several bondage threads in the past, after pumping them to the image limits they quickly vanish at the end of the day because all the bumps have been used. Thus now I resort to making smaller threads with a better lifespan.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>653317
Source?
>> Anonymous
>>653281
How many times do I have to say bumping doesn't make a thread last longer? Am I the only loser that hangs on 4chan enough to have figured it out?
>> No one is going to read this tl;dr
I'll admit I don't know exactly how 4chan works but this is how I believe it goes:

Each board has a limit to the number of threads, what that number is depends on the board, to keep the example simple I'll use 10.
When 10 threads are posted, an new thread will cause one of the old threads to be deleted to make room.
The thread that gets deleted will be the oldest one created, ie. the one the oldest first post. This is why bumping a thread won't make it last longer, because time it was created is still the same.
That post gets tagged with "Marked for deleton (old)" to let people know it will be deleted when a new post is made.
Now, should one of the other threads be deleted for a reason other than a new thread being made (such as mod deletion) then there will be only 9 threads on the board, which means a new thread could be posted without needing to delete the oldest thread.
When that happens then oldest thread should no longer be tagged with "Marked for deletion (old)".
This means that the only thing that make threads "expire" are the creation of new threads when the thread limit is reached, which is pretty much all the time unless something like a mod wipe happens. This also means that stupid threads like requests and failed replies both bump off good threads and waste space.

Because I'm a loser that spends too much time on 4chan, I've noticed this happen.
>> Anonymous
>>653873
>>653903

Why hasn't someone proposed yet that the threads that wind up on the last page get bumped off first? It only makes sense to toss the threads that are least popular/are getting the least action. Is it because they don't want to maintain the images in the database?

(Most of the other img boards that look like 4ch I've seen actually *keep* all their threads... if it weren't for 4ch getting so much traffic and /b/, I think it would just suck a lot.)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>654314
>>(Most of the other img boards that look like 4ch I've seen actually *keep* all their threads... if it weren't for 4ch getting so much traffic and /b/, I think it would just suck a lot.)
As you said, 4chan gets way too much traffic for us to keep all of our threads. Look at Wakachan, each board sees four new posts a day on average. /d/ alone gets up to ten new threads a day, even though four of them are probably requests.
>> Anonymous
>>654320

By the system described, I'm sure /d/ gets much more than 10 new threads a day, because when I start threads I don't think they ever last for even 2 days. I still don't see why they don't keep the front-runners up and bump by least activity. I mean, with the image limit in the threads, even older threads that *have* gotten a lot of action will eventually get bumpbed off, so it's not like we'll forever be stuck with massive, unnavigable threads.
>> Anonymous
>>654326

By "bump" I meant "bump off". >.>
>> Anonymous
It's the main reason why requests are met with such disdain; it's the fact that a perfectly good thread with 50 pictures of classic watersports, futa, BBW or whatever will easily get bumped off by a request for some shitty artwork that could easily be found on Rapidshare.
Either way, we're kinda derailing this thread from its original topic...
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>654331

But either way, it argues that threads should be deleted by popularity/action rather than age. If ppl don't respond to requests, then as long as some asshole doesn't attempt to prolong the damn thing unproductively it'll just go away. And well, we may be diluting the thread, but at least we're bringing it up where ppl can see it and go in to look if they want. It's not like text posts affect the thread's lifetime, anyway.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
needs more slavery, whips and chains
>> Zero G
>>654340

Ho yeah!