>>1001366Could be a ridiculously big womanI dunno, what's so /d/ about this anyway
>>1001373if it was a big ridiculously woman we could turn it into a giantess thread or something, but i don't thinks that's the case...not really /d/ material at all
>>1001383>>giantesses threadNO.Those are just ridiculously big tits.Which is /d/ by its very nature.
>>1001384They're not ridiculously big at all, AnonBut then, I have been on /d/ for two yearsEverything has lost meaning
you could be on /d/ for two weeks and everything would loose meaning