>> |
Anonymous
If you're gonna cite the rules, atleast do it right.
# Do not post the following outside of /b/: Trolls, flames, racism, off-topic replies, uncalled for catchphrases, macro image replies, indecipherable text (example: "lol u tk him 2da bar|?"), anthropomorphic ("furry"), grotesque ("guro"), or loli/shota pornography.
Furries do not qualify as beastiality, and why that is I won't get into. But they ARE furries, which IS against the rule in question. As for if this qualifies... Well, its up to the mods. She looks kinda furry, but not overly so. Being that she doesn't have a head which is 100% animal like the one in the fox picture. But I'll just assume she is since she has full body hair and a animal type nose. Best bet would be to cover your bases and delete the pictures.
|