So are horsemen considered to be furry or not? And if they are, does the same standard apply to minotaurs and werewolves?
Furries are not allowed to ruin these things for me. :P
>>526170But aren't monsters /d/ friendly?
>>526177Hell yeah! And they shall remain free of furry taint in my mind.
Off course it's furry, it's human like with horse characteristics.
>>526180So is a minotaur a furry instead of a monster because it has human characteristics? Or does it depend on the context?
>>526180>off
If more than 30% of it's body is covered in fur, it's furry.
minotaurs, satyrs, and even centaurs were furries before furries were defined. haw.
Moar! plz and more penetration!
>>526224also, when we say 'furries' we mean anthros. includes scalies, phins, etc.so don't get technical with "no fur lolz!!"
>>526238So no fantasy monsters are allowed in /d/ at all?When did this fucking faggotry happen?
>>526265I concur! How are satyrs at all furries? If we ban them we should ban catgirls and succubi too.
>>526274Addendum: IMO the OP is a little too close to furry though.
if the girl is getting fucked by a half human half beast, its not furry.if the girl IS the half human half beast, its furry.how is this so hard to differentiate?
>>526274Satyrs can barely make it. Catgirls mostly have no fur at all, and succubi never do.
This is perfectly fine, right?
Any anti-minotaur argument is invalidated by the fact that minotaur's are FUCKING HOT
Well, from what I've seen, people don't seem to mind furry as long as the lady isn't furry. You'll note that minotaur females being fucked are quite rare.