>> |
Anonymous
>>963744 You're not very bright, are you? By my standards, it's still allowed because my standards dictated that animals, no matter how intelligent or human, were banned whereas anthropomorphics, no matter how bestial, were permitted. That he is semi-intelligent and capable of speech as you point out is irrelevant -- HE'S ANTHROPOMORPHIC, YES? So nothing changes. Whether he can talk or not is irrelevant. Whether he thinks he's the Juggernaut and goes crashing into walls headfirst or sits down in the study to have tea and scones, he's still anthropomorphic.
This is independent of personal views on whether this policy makes any sense or not.
|