>> |
who knew one little reply could grow so large
Anonymous
>>969940 In the sense that it was cliché, yes, I want more originality. But nobody complains when something well-loved is done to death (e.g. "zomg she turned into a demon haven't seen that before :p"), so my main point was that this has to be one of the DUMBEST ideas in the history of sex.
One man. One penis. Two women. Two vaginas. This problem is "remedied" (like using super glue to restore a tornado-wrecked home's foundation) by one of two means:
1) the women put their vaginas close together and make a "hot dog sandwich" with their vaginas as the bread bun and the guy's penis as the hotdog. But this keeps the guy from penetrating either girl and only allows for clitoral stimulation, something he could have done better with his tongue or fingers. Next.
2) The guy sticks his dick into one of the women's vaginas, leaving the other girl to either wait her turn or be fondled by one of his spare hands. Better than #1, but still a failure of a "solution" because if the woman wants your cock hey guess what -- your right hand is not your penis! (Though the two may share an intimate relationship.)
Even though I know we as manly men are supposed to love the idea of a three-way with 2 girls and 1 guy, I've always found it to be impractical. The girls can't position themselves right, one girl is left out, and (though doujins don't always deal with this) there's the whole psychological can of worms that comes with "How come you didn't pick me first?" or "How come you came inside of her and not me?"
Women, on the other hand, ... they were MADE for the menage à trois. Or fuck that, if the girl likes to use all three holes then she can. One more reason women get to have more fun than us during sex. Fuckin' a.
|