File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Anyone have the source site these came from?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
A scanner.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>655496
arent you productive
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
pr0n on fucking notebook paper = SAGE
>> Mr. Cell
>>655504
My, aren't we the picky one?
>> Anonymous
>>655494

lol, that would suck
>> Anonymous
shit sucks, don't ever post this again
>> Anonymous
They're cute, especially>>655497and>>655498, but they are too scribbly and poorly drawn. Being scribbled onto lined paper doesn't help either.
Note that Global Rule No6 says that "high quality images" should be posted.
>> Anonymous
Art quality is good enough for the majority of bottom feeders that lurk in /d/

As for the artist site. http://metamorgirl.blog83.fc2.com/
>> Anonymous
>>655760

yeah...says you and...uh, you? sage this shit sucks
>> Anonymous
>>655763
Fail detected
>> heres an Idea... Anonymous
>>655635
>>655613
>>655504
if you think it sucks, then perhaps you can do better? if no, GTFO. these are rather well drawn, better then some licenced artists that get payed to draw prOn. grow up, it sucks that it is on lined paper, but id like to think he/she didnt have anything else to draw on at the time.
>> Anonymous
>>655808
>>WAAAH YOU HAVE TO DRAW TO BE AN ART CRITIC
So when's Roger Ebert releasing his first ever motion picture? When is my father gonna build his own car instead of bitching about the fact that his current one doesn't work as good as it used to?
>> Anonymous
i think they are really good. whomever drew them is a great artist and will only get better later on. bravo!
>> Anonymous
>>655808
>>655812
Same person.
Also, refer to my previous post: They are good drawings but are not up to the standard /d/ is used to, or supposed to get. Also, it's in violation of the rules. The only reason why this thread is still here is because nobody's reported it.
>> Anonymous
If people actually bothered to look at the artists site, most pictures on it are more of a scribbles for stories.
>> Anonymous
>>655819
every image on the artist's site gives me a 403 error when i click on their link

FAIL
>> Anonymous
>>655808

Your failure defies definition...this is NOT an oekaki board.. we are not here for you to make your debut as a "professional hentai arteest" (or anyone for that matter)
If you need to be part of the stupid sycophant fanboy legions then I suggest you take your attitude to devart, or sheezy... you aren't wanted or particularly liked here.
Waah waah I thought it was good waah
Whatever you evidently have no taste in art then, or have extremely low standards
>> Anonymous
>>656529
Cry more fucktard, a lot of stuff that gets posted in /d/ fall below the "art requirement" rule