File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Petrefication thread anyone

Animooted.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
I don't get it. What is sexual about this?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>405532

Honestly? I have no idea. But this is where I /d/iscovered it... seems there's quite a few people aroused by this sort fo thing.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
I'M GETTING SO HARD, OH SHI-
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Moar animooted?
>> Anonymous
>>405532
To each his own, I guess. It seems kind of... sad to me. Not sad as in pathetic, I mean sad as in I find the concept of cute girls being permanently turned into statues depressing.
>> Kastieris
>>405691
Well, at least that way they'll stay cute.
>> Anonymous
WTF? The girl isn't the one that's supposed to get hard!
>> Anonymous
>>405691
Well I see no reason why the petrification would have to be permanent. Permanent until reversed, but not permanent permanent.

Strangely though I find that they're more attractive with that color tone than with a flesh one, like the animooted one for instance.
>> Anonymous
>>405701
*last animooted one for instance.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Animooted again
>> Anonymous
Preserve your childhood girlfriend for loli goodness in your old age...
>> Anonymous
>>405701
Then why is there no pictures of them getting RESTORED from a petrified state?
>> Anonymous
>>405721

Because that's like making pics of cleaning up after sex, making the bed, etc. >.>
>> Anonymous
ISIDIONAI
>> Anon
>>405713
This would be epic win if she were turned into a Lamia or a Naga instead of stone.
>> Anonymous
>>405721
How about try looking at them in reverse.
>> Anonymous
WTF.

This isn't hentai. GTFO.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
There, nudity and tentacle molestation, happy?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
same artist as>>405713
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Aty-sensei gets stoned a lot.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>405680
"Because she's holding a thermal DETINATOR!"
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Moar animooted, again.

Glad there's some other Anon out there who likes this too. I was beginning to worry.
>> Anonymous
>>405951
Animated petrification. Ironic.
>> Anonymous
>>405951
Don't worry, this is the internet.

No matter what your fetish is, there'll be thousands of guys and girls who like this shit too. Its just that finding them among 6.5 billion people is a challenge.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>405952

Haha, I guess so. But it's also rediculously hot. I'm all about the petrifacation process, statuephilia doesn't really do it for me. XD

Animooted again.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
oh snap!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
fuck this. according to wikipedia's Transformation fetish entry, this falls under that catargory. what else falls under that, is animal transformation, or turning from animal to man as a fetish. i try to start a thread on that, and i get saged out of existence, and labeled a furry, meanwhile, this thread is thriving. fuck petrefications popularity and fuck this thread.
>> Anonymous
This'll sound like a troll, but it's not intended to be.

Do you get off to statues and busts?
>> Anonymous
>>406054
I get off to busty statues. That's close enough, right?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>406054

Some people do, but that's not my sort of thing (OP here, btw.) Like I mentioned before, I'm not into statuephilia, just the petrafication process.

>>406048

I'm sorry your thread got saged, but it's really NOT the same thing, at all. In petrafication they retain the look of a human girl, for one thing.


Also, animooted.
>> Anonymous
>>406031

Izzat Rydia? ._.

Hawt.
>> Anonymous
YOU KANT HAVE SEX WITH A ROCK
it hurts
>> Anonymous
>>406048
Because its furry under 4chan's rules, you dumb shit.
>> Anonymous
>>406048
Yeah, I guess you shouldn't have posted furry/transformed beast in 4chan, huh?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>406074

I don't know WHY it's hot.

All I know is that the OP gave me a massive erection.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>406091

It's like Apple Jacks. Nobody really knows WHY they like it.
>> Anonymous
>>406066
but they both fall under the same fetish.

>>406088
but it's NOT. FURRY.
>>406089transformed beast

i actually screwed up in my post.
i meant to say changing from man to animal.
either way, not furry. we don't try and fool ourselves that our fetish is a culture, or that it's anything but weird.
>> Anonymous
>>406117

Well, yes, they're both a type of transformation, but the problem that most people seem to have with the 'transformed beast' thing isn't the transforming itself, and therefore doesn't apply to petrafication. It isn't the changing that people have issues with.
>> Anonymous
>>406048

If Wikipedia says it, it must be true!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
heh heh, stoners

me so clever
>> Anonymous
the animations are just still images with a gradual color change...

if someone were changing into stone i think they would move a little bit in shock while it was happening
>> Anonymous
>>406296

If you've got better, please share.
>> Anonymous
Man, I KNOW animators would botch it up. If the muscles in your upper arm were stone, for instance, your lower arm would be frozen in place. You'd just be able to move your hand and fingers. They'd probably have parts moving until they themselves were stoned.
>> Anonymous
>>406303

Getting stoned is a magical state, the heart would normally stop and kill you unless the process was almost instantaneous. It's just a question of what looks better visually.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
NEED MOAR
>> Anonymous
>>406327

Clearly they'd be kept alive through magic of some kind, but how would the arm move if the muscles that moved it couldn't? I'm not talking nerves or anthing, but rock doesn't flex.

Though I suppose whichever was more visually pleasing would be better overall.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
It would be especially interesting if the girl retains her sense of touch despite the petrification. Like uber-bondage. And she can't come until she changes back.

Strap on some mystical vibrating panties and come back in a few hours... or days... or months... it's not like she's going anywhere.
>> Anonymous
>>406432

Manga artists, take note.
>> Anonymous
>>406432
Take it a step further! The mage petrifies the girl and sets up something to tease her, then goes out and gets killed by some adventurers.

Nobody pays any attention to the life-like statue.

A few hundred years later, some guy accidentally reverses the spell somehow. I guarantee you that girl's gonna have exactly one thing left on her mind...

*goes to eat cookies to quench the evil*
>> Anonymous
>>406450
few hundred years? Either she's going to orgasm so hard she passes out for a month, explodes from her orgasm, or it won't be satisfying enough.
>> ZippoBerry
     File :-(, x)
Scribblekid did three ASFR pics.
>> ZippoBerry
     File :-(, x)
>>406494
>> ZippoBerry
     File :-(, x)
>>406494
>>406497
>> Anonymous
>>406461
Reasonably sure if she just orgasmed and passed out, she'd definitely be ready for more once she woke up.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Sizustar
     File :-(, x)
>> Sizustar
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Win! Anonymous
Thread is win!
>> Anonymous
WHOA, THREAD MAXED.

OP here, did someone create a new one yet? >.>
>> Anonymous
yes please
>> Anonymous
Bumping for new thread.

In particular, the filename in>>406500implies there is at LEAST one more of these, amirite? - DO WANT -