File :-(, x, )
animal girls redo Anonymous
The last one vanished before I could save them all. I demand repost.
>> Anonymous
I demand repost as well.
>> Anonymous
SLORP
>> Anonymous
DO VERY MUCH WANT!
>> Anonymous
Why was it deleted...?
>> Anonymous
Give us repost!
>> Anonymous
Maybe this will make more sense with moar?
>> Anonymous
Both Vore and Furry are banned here. welcome to your ban.
>> Dude
found it

http://aryion.com/modules.php?name=2&g2_itemId=59023
>> Anonymous
>>379113
Vore isn't banned as long as there's no gore, but shitty artwork is.
>> Anonymous
>>379113
This isn't furry. It's a beegirl. Big difference between beegirl and furry. beegirl is more akin to neko.
>> Anonymous
>>379424
Beegirl is actually more like a monstergirl than a catgirl.
>> Anonymous
Let's not split hairs, okay? It's the same concept, isn't it?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>379455
This is not
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>379455
The same as this
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>379455
Monstergirls (but NOT cat girls) have been accepted on /d/ for a long time. Yeah, the 10% rule is stupid (it's still furry!), but as a furfag, I'm not complaining.
>> Anonymous
ITT, ambiguous rules on 4chan. lawl.
>> Anonymous
>>379462
Btw catgirls only get shit in /d/ because they don't have to be here, they go in /h/ and /e/ just fine.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>379469
Right, I know that. And really, to be fair, some of the faggiest furfags don't consider catgirls/monstergirls furry. But really, furry is so loosely defined that it arguably includes puppyplay to talking animals like the lion (JESUS CHRIST) from Narnia.
>> wate wut
     File :-(, x)
do want
>> Anonymous
>>379476
If you ask me, the real issue with furry on 4chan isn't the content, it's the artists and the drama they'd bring.

Most of us can live with some ass saging a thread because he doesn't like the fetish, but imagine if it were furry threads they saged? This place would be flooded with arguments. Not to mention having to get permission for every artist that was posted. 4chan doesn't moderate well enough for a furry content anyway.
>> Anonymous
>>379476

Source? I used to have the link to it but I dont anymore.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>379479
Xenotan there looks kinda loli.
>> wate wut
>>379485

Monstergirls are still girls.
>> Anonymous
>>379483
http://monster-girl.homelinux.net/

>>379482
I concur.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>379488
What?
>> wate wut
>>379490

Emphasis on GIRLS. Otherwise they'd be monsterWOMEN.
>> Anonymous
>>379492
-_-
>> Anonymous
>>379489

That site is made of win and God. dumping now.
>> Anonymous
>>379492
Did you somehow miss that loli is bannanated?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>379520
Not that poster, but perhaps the mods are forgiving so long as the loli is not naked/engaged in "suggestive" actions?

>>379482
Exactly. For some reason "furry" artists are often control freaks over their works.

>>379462
That rule is odd. It makes sense, but it's odd. I don't like much furry artwork (don't like the changes done to the face), but that which I do like gets saved to the same folder that all monster girl stuff, elves, nagas, etc. is saved in: the "Humanoid" folder.