File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Is there any uncensor of fanatic fetish ?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
yes please! /r/ any out there cen. or otherwise
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Hello ? Anyone ?
>> Anonymous
for the love of /d/!!
bumb
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>275346
*bump*
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
ooops! wrong pic
>> Anonymous
>>275357
>>275360
rapidshare please ?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Crunch your pngs, people. Jesus... At least don't use photoshop for encoding them. No wonder most people bitch about pngs being xbox-hueg.
</rant>

Content-wise, this wins. You may claim your free internet at the front desk.
>> sage sage
Pngs are still gif posers.

Why go through all the trouble of saving a png externally, when a gif or jpg of high quality would suffice? Nothing SUPPORTS saving to png anyways. It's like having a mac or linux, why bother?

and, oh, it's just an image.. If you haven't noticed.
>> Anonymous
>>275578
Because gif > png, filesize-wise, and png > jpg, quality-wise. And pretty much any app supports png nowadays. It's not 1993 anymore.
>> DJ Exo
>>275640
while its true that a lot of apps now a days support PNG format, most apps that use image files, people convert the images to JPG format anyway, because they can be smaller in size without losing a lot of quality.
>> Anonymous
>>275523
if you use PNG use Super-PNG plugin to write 'em, and use the settings to use less spac
http://www.fnordware.com/superpng/
>> Anonymous
>>275578
even mspaint supports png
>> Anonymous
>>275652
mspaint even supports my ass.
png is just fine
>> Anonymous
>>275578
All the image apps I've seen in the past 12 months support saving to png. Get lost, troll.
>>275640
No. Png compresses better than gif. The reason the gif>png myth is still around is because idiots are comparing 8-bit gifs with 24-bit pngs. An 8-bit png will be smaller than an 8-bit gif, assuming they're both encoded well (as in, NOT using photoshop)
>>275651
I have doubts that Super-PNG will make those more than a few bytes smaller, if any at all as the ones I posted were crunched with pngout. Grab one of the OP pngs and post the results, please? I'm always looking for better crunching as it shaves off a nice chunk of download-time for people on the interbutts. (Note; the black and white png I converted to 8-bit. Apparently it had a pixel or two outside the 256-color grayscale palette so it didn't fit in 8 bits. So I suppose I cheated on that picture. No way am I gonna let a single pixel with a minute gradient-change nearly double my filesize).
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>275578
Scratch my last comment. It seems that mspaint included on the win98-disc doesn't support saving to png. So yeah, you're right, no point in using png. I'll stick to bmp from now on, as that one is supported. It's just an image after all. To please you, I did save the picture as a jpeg as well, so that you could save some storage space. You may thank me when you realize you can now save your progress one more time in dark messiah in the space you saved on using jpeg instead.
>> Anonymous
Now listen here, fuckers. Learn the difference between JPG and PNG ALREADY.

- JPEG (pronounced jay-peg) is a most commonly used standard method of lossy compression for photographic images.

- PNG (Portable Network Graphics) is a losslessly compressed bitmap image format.

PNG is supposed to substitute GIF format, not JPG format you motherfuckers. For GIF, read "DRAWINGS, PAINTINGS, ICONS, etc" with a tiny palette. PNG IS LIKE A GIF WITH 65K COLOR, DUH.

So stoping saving your shitty PHOTOGRAPHS in PNG. IT WILL NOT IMPROVE THE QUALITY AT ALL, NOR WILL MAKE YOU LOOK COOL OR INDIE.
>> Anonymous
>>275785
>PNG IS LIKE A GIF WITHOUT A PALETTE AND WITH FULL TRANSPARENCY OPTIONS, DUH.
Fix'd.

Also, PNG doesn't support animations. MNG does, but it doesn't have a lot of support yet.
>> Anonymous
so I've got the Elixir file from
http://rapidsearch.yi.org/?s=fanatic
can anyone tell me how to, or point me to instructions to, install this. All I get in the install boxes are ?????
>> Anonymous
>>275785
JPG = Lossy
PNG = Lossless

Lossless > Lossy

Therefore, PNG > JPG
>> Anonymous
I can't believe how misinformed some people are

- GIF is lossless compression. Can be up to 8-bit palettized color (256 colors)
- PNG is lossless compression. Can be 8-bit palettized color (just like GIF, only it compresses a bit better). Yes.. PNG-8 DOES have a palette.
- PNG can also be 24-bit RGB literal (PNG-24), but this results in much larger files
- PNG can have an alpha channel, GIF cannot
- GIF can animate, PNG cannot (as has been mentioned)
- JPEG is lossy compression, which as far as I know is not palettized (though I'm not 100% on this).
- A high quality JPEG will result in some loss, but the loss will hardly be noticable... or won't even be humanly noticable.
- High quality JPEGs compress to a MUCH SMALLER SIZE than PNG-24
- For web images with 256 colors or less, you're better with PNG-8.
- For web images with more than 256 colors, you're generally better off with a high quality JPEG.


Aside from animation, the PNG file format is 100% superior to GIF in every way (read the spec some time). The only thing that's held it back is Internet Explorer giving halfassed support and rendering .pngs improperly.
>> Anonymous
>>275976
>The only thing that's held it back is Internet Explorer giving halfassed support and rendering .pngs improperly.

Not with IE7.