File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
As awesome as the 2497823 futa threads in /d/ right now are...

let's have a piss thread, please.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
I don't think you're doing a good job of fighting the futa menace by posting just one pic
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>1067613
Working on it, man. I don't want to post my whole folder and then have nothing to bump with later.
>> Socrates
That's why the futa threads do well, we don't hold back.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>1067626
Wish you would a little. I love it, but you can have too much of a good thing.
>> one giant " Anonymous
>>1067626
"Futa threadS" plural being the key observation there. People complain because they feel that there are way too many futa threads with 20-30 pictures at any given time while other fetishes either a) fizzle out with fewer than 10 pictures or b) reach the image limit before the next thread is posted. The GTS folks are best about observing this unspoken gentlemen's rule but every once in a while you'll get a lactation fan or a monstergirl fan who posts a new thread and he gets screamed at and linked to the existing thread on Page 6. It's time like these that engender the confusion and hatred towards all of the futa threads.
>> Socrates
>>1067630
I doubt it. Think of it this way; if we post every futa pic on the internet as quickly as possible, it'll die off faster and be out of your way, right?

Sageing because I don't feel right not posting content, and I'm not personally into pee, although with the clearness of some of this pee I would almost think it was tremendously excessive wetness, which is something I like, but mainly mixed with copious amounts of cum, so not really that accurate. For me, anyway.
>> Anonymous
>>1067631
& futa threads with different topics (big balls, facefucking guys, etc) are still futa threads, which people seem to think exempts them from being duplicate threads.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>1067634
But it won't die. I'll bet that if I went through all the futa threads, I'd find a hell of a lot of duplicates. Internet does not work that way.
>> Socrates
>>1067631
Ah, I see. thank you for clarifying, I hadn't noticed this before. It is true that this does happen, but a 'general futa thread' will usually be a lonely general futa thread. The problem is when people try to do a more specific fetish, such as the 'mouthfucking men futa' thread, which should have simply existed within the general futa thread. I understand now, thank you for clarifying, although my other reply remains mostly valid.

>>1067635
Well, you beat me to the punch, lol. You posted that just before I clicked 'reply'!

Sage because what I said earlier, just want to remind everyone so they don't rage at me.
>> Socrates
>>1067636
Actually, you won't. At least, not in any of the older ones I dumped, and not in most that are on 4chan right now, because 4chan prevents repeat images with the same name. I wouldn't doubt that you'd find maybe 3 or 4 repeats in all 10(?) pages of /d/, however you would have to be careful about images with slight variations.

Now get to it, prove my 3-4 wrong.
>> Socrates
sorry to cut this off, but I just noticed that this thread itself is going to get hated on just like the newest general Futa thread for /d/iscussion, which I personally like, but I don't want to disturb anyone too much. You can have one point, though, that of the multiple threads. If it weren't for that, though, OP, I would not go this peacefully. I've got other things to do as well, so, yeah, two birds with one stone, although I hate to leave .d. in the middle of such a great argument!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>1067638
...because people never rename images that they pull off of 4chan.

>>1067639
You just posted three times. :|
>> Anonymous
>>1067638
>4chan prevents repeat images with the same name

Wrong.
>> Anonymous
Also, OP, if I were you I'd delete this thread and then start it again, seeing as it's now been ruined by futa discussion (and no offence, but you kinda brought it on yourself.)