File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
lightsaber bondage
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
This didn't result in gruesome dismemberment how?
>> Anonymous
sauce
>> Anonymous
gay
>> Anonymous
I don't think this is canon.
>> Anonymous
>>782715
Stunner setting just like the younglings use. Fuck yeah!
>> Anonymous
fuck the stunner setting use the shocker setting
>> Anonymous
Now there's something you don't see every day.
>> Anonymous
>>782721
Lightsabers have a stun setting now? Tenel Ka is displeased.
>> Anonymous
Touché, /d/.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
you want to give me sauce.
>> Anonymous
>>782875
Well c'mon, Jedi are peaceful by nature. If they can just knock someone out instead of killing them, I'm sure that's just better for their minds.
>> - <> Irritation <> -
I have altered the lightsaber pray I do not alter it any further.
>> - <> Irritation <> -
I have altered the lightsaber pray I do not alter it any further
>> Anonymous
Lightsabers only have a "kill you" setting. The training sabers used by younglings are not actual lightsabers. Conversely, they cannot be set to inflict lethal damage either.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>783097
This sounds more acceptable.

>>782911
I lol'd. Source is Deus Ex Machina.
>> Anonymous
In before Nerd off!
>> Anonymous
Star Trek pwns Star Wars
>> Anonymous
>>782720
>I don't think this is canon.

LOL.
>> Anonymous
>>783097
Dear sir, the "setting" in the lightsaber is force controlled by the user. I know this shit because I grew up on star wars, and still believe in the force.
>> Anonymous
>>783669

Provide an at least semi-canonical instance or stop spreading nonsense.
>> Anonymous
>>783698
In one of the star wars books, Obi-Wan is captured by enemies who are controlled by sith. They put a bomb collar on his neck, and to remove it Qui-Gon tries to set the setting on his lightsaber lower to cut through it without killing obi-wan, but doesn't work. So then they use the force to disable it until it can be removed.
>> Anonymous
>>783701

NOVELS ARE NOT CANON.
>> Anonymous
>>783706

Who gives a flying fuck? This = hot, moar!
>> Anonymous
>>783706
NO U
>> Anonymous
should the lightsaber be destroying her right now?

or do I leave my physics at the door with my shoes when I enter /d/?
>> Anonymous
>>783097

"Conversely" in this sense means "the opposite is also true." You want "ergo," or "consequently."
>> Anonymous
>>783770
It's obviously a glowy-hentai-tentacle-on-a-stick, and not a lightsaber.

>>783781
It kind of works, since he means the reversal between "proper lightsabers can only kill and not stun" and "youngling lightsabers can only stun and not kill."
>> fetish sponge !8.L5bN30V.
>>783795
>glowy-hentai-tentacle-on-a-stick
I want one.
>> Anonymous
can we have less discusion of light sabres and moar porn, or is 3 images all we get?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>783872
Well, you can have this one but it looks kind silly
>> Anonymous
>>783781
Fuck you, fool. Conversely works fine.

Also, this is bullshit. /r/ glowstick bondage
>> Anonymous
>>783701

Then how the fuck was Han able to use one to cut open that Ton Ton?
>> Anonymous
>>So then they use the force to disable it until it can be removed.

Sounds like a stupid story. Why didn't they just do that from the start?
>> SMAP
News flash: Star Wars is full of made-up pseudoscientific bullshit and moralistic rambling. We now return you to your regularly scheduled programming.
>> Anonymous
>>784110
News flash: Sci-Fi is full of made-up pseudoscientific bullshit

HOLY NEWS FLASH BATMAN!
>> Anonymous
Clearly guys, we are all wrong. It is merely the unknown power of /d/ asserting its laws upon our posts. If it did cut her up this would belong in /b/ or 7chan, but as /d/ needs its nutritious hotness it has altered the pictures so it may keep them.
>> Anonymous
>>784140
Clearly /d/ is mighty beyond our understanding