>> |
Ehhh.....
>>1183334 Because dictionary.com is the premier expert on human sexuality, mirite?
>>1183351 Yes it is, unless the effeminate male (or masculine male, for that matter) actually has gender identity disorder. Of course, that's nearly impossible to prove, but can be guessed at with some accuracy in the case of real people, with an amalgamation of opinions from trained, experienced professionals.
Of course, these are pixels, and pixels have no gender (or sex for that matter), so it's entirely up to the viewer how to interpret what he's seeing (ie, as male or female or neither), and therefore whether attraction to any image constitutes a homosexual attraction is entirely dependent on the viewer. But then, there is a point beyond which, absolutely speaking, the attraction could be said to be actually homosexual no matter what the viewer's perspective is, and that the viewer's perspective, if in conflict with this absolute measure, is incorrect. Determining where this absolute measure actually lies is difficult, though clearly a male attracted to a muscled, mustached, virile man who behaves in any manner generally attributed primarily to men is attracted to him homosexually, while any male attracted to a large chested, curvy/slender woman who behaves in any manner generally expected primarily of women is attracted to her in a heterosexual way.
|