>> |
Ehhh.....
!N2Rn3IpqO2
>>792189 It's a shame you didn't do it harder, then.
>>792510 Hurrah for Greek philosophy! Also, sex is better with your socks on.
>>792576 Actually, no. That's a good explanation for a particular angle of attraction to futa, and has no relation to whether the attracted person is straight, bi, or even gay (in the event of a woman finding such to be attractive). Fantasizing about futa x guy is no more gay than fantasies of pegging are--which is to say, not at all. There are some who enjoy the fetish due to the presence of an extra sexual organ added into the mix, some who enjoy it due to the possible embarrassment on the part of the futa, some who enjoy it due to the possibility for directly pleasuring a meter of femdom, some who enjoy it simply because they experience pleasure from anal stimulation, some who enjoy it due to its heightened level of "forbidden"-ness... the list goes on and on. And that's just a few of the ways that _I_ experience attraction to futa. God only knows what kinds of reasons other people might have towards it. Sure, the idea of romantic lesbian sex with a dick is a particularly nice one, but attraction to a dickgirl in any regard is proof only of heterosexuality (as regards men, homosexuality, of course, as regards women). Of course, bisexuals could easily entertain such an attraction to futa--in fact, may be more likely to--but an attraction to futa in itself is not indicative of any attraction at all to men.
|