File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Kirlia, Gardevoir, shower me in your love..
>> Anonymous
Gardevoir now counts as furry and is bannable, even though you could easily get away with your pic (being a Pokemon-girl rather than a girl-Pokemon).
>> Anonymous
Well where the hell am I supposed to get my Gardevoir fix then? ;_;
>> Anonymous
probably /b/ I see gardevoir threads on there all the time...
>> sage sage
>>611420
/fail/ works too.
>> Anonymous
>>611410
ha ha, no you neurotic faggot. this thread IS an /r/ outside of /r/, though.
>> sage FKA Anonymous !4UjY1di7KI
>>611410
So where does it say that Gardevoir is furry now? Or are you trying to make your personal opinion into a rule?

Because its currently not listed in either the rules or the FAQ.
>> Anonymous
IS pokemon furry?

Good question.
>> Anonymous
>>611551
1 - you mis-saged.
2 - gardevoir threads often get deleted, I've been banned twice before on the grounds of gardevoir being furry, so have a few other Anons.
>> Anonymous
>>611555
Furry = animal; animal = not human.
Pokemon =/= animal; however, Pokemon = not human.
Pokemon = furry.
>> Anonymous
Gardevoir has no fur, therefore cannot be furry.
/b/ has no threads of her, so post here NAO.
>> Anonymous
>>611557
You make a persuasive argument.
Not all furries, as I recall, are based on real animals.

But, then again, the op pic looks really close to human to me.
>> Anonymous
>>611561
As I said earlier, she's a Gardevoir-girl, not a girl-Gardevoir. More of the OP would be fine, but actual Gardevoir is apparently now a bannable offense.
>> Anonymous
>>611563
Fuck, she's not even Gardevoir, she's Kirlia. My mistake!

>>611560
...then make a thread there. Duh.
>> Anonymous
over the course of this argument, you all could have been posting porn.
>> Anonymous
What I've learned is that Pokemon-girl porn is very hard to come by. I've seen Blastoise and Mudkip-girls before, but all other Pokemon porn was either the characters or the Pokemon themselves (former makes for lulz, latter makes for fursecution).
>> Anonymous
oh common gardevoir is my favourite one porn
why not? when there is so many girls with dicks why not gardevoir?
>> Anonymous
>>611577
Because girls with dicks aren't furry?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
fuck ....
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
no, I don't have moar
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>611581
You didn't read through the thread, did you?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
okay I lied .. I have moar
>> Anonymous
furry is nice.
human = dirty mind.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>611588
I just don't care, gardevoir is NOT furry IMO so fuck it
>> Anonymous
>>611591
Fuck your opinion. Rules are rules.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
she's some kind of "monster-girl" and that should be allowed, just like jelly- spider- and harpyegirls or some shit
>> Anonymous
>>611595
Spidergirls nagas and shit are mostly human though. Just because Gardevoir LOOKS like a human doesn't mean she is.
Retard.
>> Anonymous
>>611596
just shut the fuck up
That they look human, but really aren't could be said about nagas and spidergirls too. And now tell me what exactly makes gardevoir furry
>> Anonymous
>>611602
See>>611557. Not my opinion, it's the moderators'.

And the same can't be said for spidergirls etc. because they're still human, 50% human at the very most/least. Nagas are 50% human, 50% snake.