>> |
Anonymous File :-(, x)
>>967801 I doubt he was referring to the artistic quality so much as the subject matter or perceived eroticness. Though to be honest I'm not sure what to make of his troll since many of these images quit being considered hi-res back when Windows 98 SE hit store shelves (example: 799 x 600 for>>967769).
The content belongs on /d/. The art is better than most of /d/. And as for eroticness, meh, doesn't do it much for me either but then again no HCG does, not for me anyway. So why not let him be? I'll tell you why: because>>967798is obviously bored and obviously trolling.
I was expecting Tommot3000 to post this but it looks like he's done for now, so I'll throw it up myself. It's a repost from June 25 (last Wednesday) but may as well put it here with its brothers and sisters. Plus it's somewhat larger than 800 x 600.
|