File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Monster girls are always relevant
>> Anonymous
In b4 'furry/shitty western art' rants.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
more centaur girls!!!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
This one is my favorite :3
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Centaur Porn: Even Christopher Walken would be sexually aroused.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>1097662
Bonus points for OP being Dawn from the Buffy comix. It's like the Joss is specifically fanservicing /d/ or something.
>> Anonymous
Hmm... while it looks hot, everytime I see a horsegirl I wonder how her hygiene is, seeing as she can't really reach back there.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>1097662

YOU have made this furry thread :D
>> Anonymous
Centuars aren't furry.
>> Anonymous
>>1098165
...pokes the troll.
>> Anonymous
http://www.ihatemisty.com?id=9juji0gqyp7qrsvy4cg2va9ogiat81
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>1098165
fail. welcome to /d/
>> Anonymous
not furry? they dont have fur?

right.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
recent discovery! enjoy
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>1098204
im not going to post furry here, but if you actually want to see real furry, google fchan and go there. Otherwise quit fagging up the place
>> Anonymous
>>1098204
On the off chance this anon is new...

Furry as in having fur is different from "Furry" as in "having to do with yiffing". Anthropomorphic animals with animal faces is the main dividing line.
>> Anonymous
There was a post a month or so ago with the history of the 4chan vs Furry situation. By some miracle, did anyone save it?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>1098194
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>1098002

Do want moar.
>> Anonymous
Does this mean Catgirls are /d/ material?
>> Anonymous
>>1098398
If they have the top half of a catgirl and the bottom half of a horse then yes.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
lamias > centaurs
>> Anonymous
>>1098398
Yup, catgirls are one of the things specifically allowed on /d/.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Oh lawdy is dat sum chikinz?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
What is your tolerance level on the human ---> MonsterGirl ---> Furry scale?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>1099758
10% sounds about right, and the breasts have to be fur-free
>> Anonymous
>>1099758

The chickengirl serves as a good example for me. If their breasts and vagoos are human, thats good. I'd want the face to be human as well, but fur/feathers could be used as the girls "hair."
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>1099760
Fur really has nothing to do with furry. (This is why, for example, "furry" also includes anthropomorphic reptiles, etc.) What matters is the head and face, more than anything else. Once the head and face have more animal features than human, it's undeniably a furry. There is a gray area in-between, where context, art style, and other bodily features must be relied upon to judge accurately, but, typically speaking, if it hasn't got a primarily animal-like face, it's not furry. That said, it isn't like everything female that isn't clearly human and doesn't fall under the category outlined here is a monstergirl, as understood by fans of the fetish.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>1100045
what is she writing?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>1100063
The number of times she's making him cum. I think it's 7 times.
>> Anonymous
>>1098364
Delicious nezumi. I wish he would draw more centaurs/horse porn.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>1099766
I know this is /d/ and all, but...

*YARP*
>> Anonymous
>>1099724
Chikken McFuckits?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>1097954
Found the artist: http://yuni.deviantart.com
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>1099766

sauce/moar plz?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>1100080
Holy shit for a second I thought that was a bullsquid girl...

+1,000,000 points to first one to post an HL monster girl.
>> frost
>>1100121
well i remeber seeing one pic.
a headcrab girl i think it was.
>> Anonymous
>>1100121

it is actually a Shriekmaw. From Magic the Gathering card game. Artist is really talented to have turned that into a female from the original pic (google it)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>1100137
>> Anonymous
Not that I particularly mind, but why exactly is a horse/snake with a woman's head fine, and yet a girl with skin coloured to make it look like she has fur isn't?

Personally I like both, I just don't get why everyone BAAAAAWWWWWWs whenever they see a slightly animal-like face
>> Anonymous
>>1100137
do want DO WANT DDDDDDDDDDOOOOO WAAAAAAAAAANT
>> Anonymous
>>1100175
I heard that years back there was a lot of drama from full-blown furries when people picked on their "lifestyle," and 4chan got tired of the whining. There is some overlap between furry and monstergirl, but in general anything with a non-human face is banned. Now odd as it may sound, there are also things that repulse even most /d/ anons, and beastiality is one of them. Some folks equate furry to bestiality, and that contributes to the situation too.
>> Anonymous
But every time I've seen bestiality on /d/ it's usually either been ignored or celebrated...
>> Anonymous
>>1100175
I've only been here a few years, but it seems like newer folks often like to yell about things, or equally likely, pick on something. So, lots of stuff that is not furry gets an almost requisite post or two of "Burn it with Fire" or "Furfags yiff in Hell."
>> Anonymous
>>1100195
Mods aren't gods.
(Please don't ban me, oh mighty ones!)
>> Anonymous
Stop talking about fucking furries and post porn.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I hope that helped you a bit, CuriousAnon.
>> friendsofsandwiches
Jesus with this shit again.
Can we get some definitions between furry and monstergirl at some point?
And seriously, these so called anti furry people... does this shit REALLY bother them THAT fucking much?
Or are they just doing it to be pricks like everyone else?

God fucking fuck fuck damnit, they post CP whenever they get the chance, but furry stuff? oh it's GTFO, and trains and dalaks and delayclose.
...belive this happy horseshit here..
>> Anonymous
>>1100252

You can't really have a clear demarcating line between "furry" and "non-furry" due to the way a lot of artists break the rules and the way different people see things. Best example I can think of would be a Japanese artist called Pisipisi, who draws in a sort of pseudo-furry style (catgirls that have fur but humanoid everything else). Some people think his stuff is furry, others don't.

General Rule: If it's Western, and it could possibly be considered furry, it probably is.
>> Anonymous
the problem isn't so much the furry art... it's that when furry art isn't bad the fucking insane furries come and take over. They aren't like casually nuts like we all are. There's something seriously fucking wrong with them. You gotta treat them like goddamn Aliens.

Nuke them from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
>> Anonymous
I'm just wondering what Dawn's going to be next. She's done giantess and now centaur... I'm kind of hoping for goo girl.>>1098068is right though, Whedon is definitely going down the /d/ checklist.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>1100352
Afraid that this is an example of "furry".
>> Anonymous
>>1100080

only niggers and terminators would live long enough to fuck her
>> friendsofsandwiches
well fuck. I collect the furry art, the GOOD stuff, and I collect the good monster girl stuff.
But I don't subscribe to the whole furry mentality. When there's a fur thread on /b, it's often how I get the new stuff,
but if I don't like it, I won't save it.
I don't understand the need to sage and picturebomb the stuff if it's just a picture thread.
And now monster girls are being lumped in that. I figgured lizardgirls would be, and some dragonmorphs, but...
I dunno. fuck it.
People do whatever.
>> friendsofsandwiches
uh, guys... no. not here.
Please don't do that. Unless the pic is edited to show or make a point, don't fucking start that shit here. okay?
>> friendsofsandwiches
god FUCKING damnit, I try and defend the art to some extent, and the people who post it, and what the fuck happens, but some shittard has to come in here and start posting the stuff.
GodDAMN.

FUck it. I give up, Call the mods, ban the mother fucker.
>> friendsofsandwiches
>>1100420
Don't do me no favors. If you wanna post the stuff, go to /b, do it there.
This is /d. Monster girls. Different stuff.
Thank you. good night.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>1100431
my bad here this is my apology
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Eelgirls will always be a personal favorite of mine.

I just need to find some more...
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>1100309

/tg/ concurs. Orbital weapons strikes and virus bombs. Although responsible mods are a welcome substitute. It's nice to know someone out there with the power to do something cares every now and then.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>1100497
the people who scream the most are ranting with one hand and fapping with the other.

/d/ is fine with some 12 year old girl with a cock getting orally raped by some tentacles while in the arms of her mother with a vibrator up her ass, but there better damned well never be some whiskers on a catgirl.

BECAUSE THAT'S OVER THE LINE
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>1097662
>> Anonymous
>>1101063
no wiskers in that one lol
>> Anonymous
>>1101035

Yeah, pretty much. Although if the nose is actually human and the whiskers are more symbolic, then it would probably be acceptable.

Also, missionary-style, heterosexual, *shudder* consensual sex with *urk* no toys or tentacles, between two completely normal humans. That shit is too extreme for us simple, good-natured /d/ folk.

Also, /r/ a pic much like you described!
>> Anonymous
>>1101074
>>1101035

Nothing's going on with the girl's vagina. Her mother should be a futa who is also raping her.

My god I've got a hard-on. Any artists out there with nothing to do interested in making it?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
So, is this (and most of the other pics in this set) furry or not?
>> Anonymous
>>1101149
Does not really appear to be furry but I'd avoid posting it whenever there is a /d/ nazi around.

Also, sage for yet ANOTHER fucking furry discussion thread. /r/ing we make another monstergirl thread that isn't as homosexual as this one.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>1100192
Bestiality is fine with me but I find furries repulsive. My main concern is that 95% of furry art is western or gay or both. Seeing a girl getting raped by a horse is fine, seeing a guy raping a horse is not.

Also, I found this pic on some jp site.
>> Anonymous
>>1101251
You say that as if 90% of /d/ art isn't western/gay. And yes, it is
>> Anonymous
>>1101264
Thats only if you consider futa gay.

Looking pretty butthurt there, furfag.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I don't particularly care, you're only missing out my being a retard and assuming that all art of monster girls with hair on their faces is shitty/western/gay. I'll just enjoy being a 'furfag' without you

Hope this isn't too furry for you
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
is this furry or monster?
>> Anonymous
>>1101284
It's furry because it has a cat's face, it's covered in fur and it's quite clearly a giant walking talking teddy bear.

Thread reported for being shit.
>> Anonymous
>>1101289
wtf r u lookin at
>> Anonymous
Anonymous, your stupidity never ceases to amaze me.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>1101295
>> Anonymous
>>1101284
Not furry because it lacks a snout or some other form of proboscis, but still western so it sucks.
>> Anonymous
>>1101298
>>1101302
what makes this western?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>1101308
>> Anonymous
>>1101298
Gtfo, furfag.
>> Anonymous
>>1101313
>>1101315
its not furry a zora is a monster girl
>> Anonymous
>>1101298
>>1101063
>>1101284
Too much furfaggotry in this thread.
>> Anonymous
>>1101316
Wrong link, dumbass. Click it and look.
>> Anonymous
>>1101289
What the FUCK kind of cat has a face like that?

>>1101298
>>1101313
fukken save'd
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
oh ok
>> sage ????? !3GqYIJ3Obs!!kg1
     File :-(, x)
>>1101298
That is what gets you permabanned, that is furry porn. We don't like your kind here. Go back to fur affinity or whatever fur pride site you fags strut around currently.
>> Anonymous
>>1101308
Its not eastern?
>> Anonymous
>>1101322
how to report furfaggotry?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> ????? !3GqYIJ3Obs!!kg1
     File :-(, x)
>>1101326
Look at image, click exclamation point next to post you want to report.
>> Anonymous
>>1101322
Posting unrelated shit, image macros and being a massive flamewar-inciting douchebag is also against the rules. So why don't you BOTH go back to fucking /b/
>> ????? !3GqYIJ3Obs!!kg1
>>1101337
I'm from /v/, sorry bro, I'm assuming you're from deviant art or some furry pride community.
How am i being a douche? Last i checked all boards didn't tolerate furries.
>> Anonymous
>>1101284
sauce on that?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>1101149here
Seeing as the furry porn got deleted (was it good stuff? I've only seen one pic) while my pic is still up, it is not furry and proper archiving will be enacted.

And have some monstergirls for keeping this thread up.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
bump
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>1100080
Had to add this.

And as for my 2 cents, I honestly don't care about this furry/not furry dichotomy. As long as its cute with tits and a vagina, it's fine by me.
>> Anonymous
>>1097662
bump
>> Anonymous
>>1097665
Apologies, Anon, we did not listen
>> Anonymous
>>1101610
bump
>> Anonymous
>>1097662
there has to be more
>> sage ????? !3GqYIJ3Obs!!kg1
     File :-(, x)
Furfags again, stop posting fur shit, stick to moster, not "hurr hurr shes covered in fur and is cute so i call it a monster, all of deviantart agrees hurr hurr" No fur,
fur = CUT IT OUT
>> Anonymous
>>1101789
you sir are an idiot
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>1101789
>> Anonymous
>>1101284
what idiot thought this satyr-girl was furry. The only hair she has is on the top of her head, short hair at that. She's got a bald snatch fer crissakes.

If she was less furry she would have no skin. Then you would be crying about guro.

Also, furries only push back because of proud intolerance. If you didn't BAWWWW then probably fewer furries would post.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>1101752
Oh theres plenty more, but the last time I created a thread on my particular fetish (which was within the bounds of all the rules) it got sage bombed to hell. I've got a hoard of this stuff I'm keeping from /d/ just for that.
>> Anonymous
i copy pasta!
Bump!
Also, mystical creatures are and should remain canon on /d/. I have no problem with the bestiality ban, despite being a monster fetishist, because xenophiles reserve their tastes for things with souls.
Something animals arguably, do not have and thus breeding with them would only create genetically inferior children. Monsters hold a measure of our psyche as they evolve from our psychological archetypes (resembling humans spiritually, not physically, which would make them furries rather than monsters) and thus are capable of some meaningful connection.
The more absentee tentacle variants also represent along with many monsters an aspect of supersentience inherent in 'otherworldly things' that we cannot understand. Furries are those psychological abominations that result from breeding with a lesser creature (measured as lacking a soul,
not necessarily anything else) and are defined by those that conceive them (though they might not admit it) as need to destroy truly living things and pervert the sentient claim of existence.
Thus the furries are individuals who seek oblivion and thus mate with animals mentally to create their soldiers that pose as living things to draw others into the trap of robotic instinct and inevitably, the dissipation of all free will.
Such events lie solely within the fetishists mind, however and a 'catgirl' for instance can be either abomination or monstrous/alien in nature depending on the images summoner.

But that's just my opinion.
>> Anonymous
>>1101906
You put waay too much thought into that. It has nothing to do with sentience or souls, furries just tend to have shitty art. We also like to see at least one human female in our /d/ and furries happen to cross that line of human female. People whole like bestiality like girls getting raped by horses/dogs/etc, but don't like seeing 2 animals fucking.
>> Anonymous
>>1101906
My opinion is you thought about it too much.
Personally, I want to see the ban on furry to be lifted on /d/, as long it is of GOOD QUALITY, no western art (we really need a board for this) and no drama.
>> Anonymous
>>1101906
man i didn't write this but i love how deep it trys to preer into this issue so every time i see a argument brake out about this i post this. I'm developing a counter post to this too so any one thing of a good argument post it
>> Anonymous
think*
>> Anonymous
>>1101918
That's impossible. Western art and drama are integral parts of the furry experience.
While you might be able to find quality jap-styled pics, the drama that posting them causes is inevitable.
/d/ simply wouldn't tolerate an influx of furry, whether the rules were changed or not.
>> Anonymous
>>1101308
It's a tiefling.

not furry.
>> Anonymous
do want
do fucking want moar mare pussy
>> Anonymous
>>1101512
That thing would be worse than a medusa to fuck...

I'm a non-black creature! She would destroy me when she came... into play
>> Anonymous
>>1099758

"If it has a snout, then get the fuck out."
>> Anonymous
>>1101789

If you didn't want alternative, you should have stayed out of /d/. Get over it.
>> Anonymous
>>1100211
>>1100212
Oh gawd, we need the source for these!
>> Anonymous
>>1100080
>>1101512

Damn, I'd think twice about evoking that--I'd want it to stay around for a while...

I guess I'd just Makeshift Mannequin it if I had to, but is intercourse a targeted effect?