>> |
Anonymous File :-(, x)
>>755327 So then if it's a count of "items" a person has that belongs to either sex that determines the gender, a man with tits can't really be considered a man when they have chemicals and parts that are exclusively female, so calling them a man is incorrect as well as calling them a female.
Note: I don't actually care, but after seeing many "MAN WITH TITS VS THEYRE STILL CHICKS" arguments, I realized a flaw in that argument.
MOAR POISON
|