File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
http://rapidshare.com/files/154458629/Jukan_CG_Collection_2.zip
>> Anonymous
Reported for Bestiality
>> Anonymous
>>1107611
downloaded
>> Anonymous
>>1107611
You know, you can be banned for making false reports.
>> Anonymous
>>1107620
who doesn't?
>> Anonymous
>>1107622
Quite a few people it would seem. So then you're trying to get banned?
>> Anonymous
>>1107625
you seem to be op right?
what if?
>> Anonymous
>>1107615
>>1107620
>>1107625
anyway we shall see if the file gets deleted or not.
good bye
>> Anonymous
>>1107627
I am not, in fact, OP. However:

There is no bestiality in the picture that he posted. There is no rule prohibiting posting links to material that is banned from being posted (in pictorial or textual form). So you made a report regarding material that hasn't been posted in any form that is bannable.

His post is perfectly permissible. It would be nice of him to note, for the sake of the weak of heart that probably really shouldn't be on /d/ in the first place, that there is bestiality in the set he's linking to, but this is the internet, and all links are "follow at your own risk."
>> skeets
>>1107611
Downloaded for Bestiality
>> Anonymous
OP
my bad :P
>> Anonymous
>>1107641
We're surrounded by stupid everywhere...the reason for reporting is not focused on the pic, but for the content.
Also if you take a nice look at the pic you can easily notice that there's beastiality.
Enough of your shitty lectures, you are wrong and GTFO!
>> sage
>>1107611

Downloaded for beast
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
i just downloaded it
there are some pictures of just bondage, and some milking
she has sex with a bear, a puppy, a pig, a dolphin, an old man, a donkey, a horse, a bug, and some humanoid pig-man thing
also a rat crawls in her vaginal looking for cheese
and a deformed bee sucks on her ass
there's also an octopus

the bonus folder includes a really nice picture of aeris standing in bondage, posted here
>> Anonymous
>>1107656
There are animals in the picture. Animals do not equal bestiality. Sexual intercourse with animals equals bestiality. Is sexual intercourse implied? Yes. Is it displayed? No. Hence, for much the same reason nude women can be displayed on the cover of things for public sale, so long as the nipples, anus, and labia are covered, so too is this picture permitted on /d/. Just as things containing sexually explicit material can be sold in stores open to the general public, so too can bannable content be linked to here.

How much more would you like to fail today, sir?
>> Anonymous
>>1107718
I have this set for a long time, and don't tell me that is not implied in the pic (intercourse) top right.
bannable content allowed? don't make me laugh...
talking about fail? suit youself before your possible "i'm correct" msg.
>> Anonymous
>>1107750
You didn't even read what I wrote, did you?
>> Anonymous
I don't frequent /d/ so much, but beastiality is ban-material? Why?
>> Anonymous
>>1107754
Moot removed bestiality from the site (and he also removed the /l/ board) back when 4chan was actually sponsored and the companies that sponsored the site apparently did not like anything illegal, even if "implied" (i.e. cartoons)

He has since been emailed regarding whether or not bestiality can be allowed back to /d/. He has since not responded.
>> Anonymous
>>1107752
first, let's keep using sage in this thread.
second, i think i should question you that...
and also state that the intercouse is implied yet no explicit in the pic. but the main reason for the file to be deleted is due content (inside) the file and so it makes the post suitable to be removed.
>> Anonymous
DL'd! Thnx!
>> Anonymous
>>1107756
I guess we should go ahead and start deleting references to /d/ in /e/ and /h/, huh? And references to /rs/ in every board.

It's a link, that you have to copy and paste, to a page that displays no illegal or bannable content, from which you can subsequently download a set containing /d/ material, that also happens to contain content that, if posted directly on /d/, would constitute a bannable offence.

God, you're not even good at being a rulefag. Also, 2da bar|? Learn English before you start trying to argue in it.
>> Anonymous
>>1107764
Truth in your words. But mods are still gonna delete this because it's got bestiality in it.

Well, when they come online. Eventually.

Time on /d/ has taught me that life is never fair. And trolls never die.
>> Anonymous
>>1107770
Except not. By that explanation, every time an up of any of the Nippon Onna Heroine doujinshi got posted, it would be deleted for scat. Or every time half of the HCG sets relevant to /d/'s interests got posted, they would be deleted for (loli/bestiality/scat/etc.) Or that virtually any major compilation from the Amanoja 9 got posted, it would be deleted for scat. I'd say a good quarter to a third of the popular stuff of any significant size on /d/ contains bannable content. As long as that content isn't directly posted on /d/, it's fine.
>> Anonymous
>>1107777
Once again, truth. But the OP link is viable for bans as the major theme of the download is bestiality. As explained in the thread, there is *some* /d/ content but *mostly* it's sex with bears bees and dolphins. Your logic is profound but has a few holes in it: Arguably I could post a whole furry folder for downloading here provided a) there was ONE non-furry pic in there and b) I didn't post any furry content on /d/.

I still don't get why we argue over bestiality. It's banned, pure and simple. It's not like we can have an actual discussion over it like western art or what constitutes furry. But those arguments bother the fuck out of me too.
>> Anonymous
>>1107764
>>Also, 2da bar|? Learn English before you start trying to argue in it.
just what the the hell? talking about someone nuts (and trying to speak flawlessly to impress ppl)
about the first line: http://gurochan.net/

>>1107788
I couldn't say better
>> Anonymous
>>1107788
Actually, it wouldn't even need to contain any non-furry pics. There would still be nothing wrong with your posting it here.

There would be something wrong with you, for being a furry, of course, but that's something else entirely.

It's pretty simple: if you don't post bannable content, you aren't going to get banned for posting bannable content. Somebody posting nothing but a rapidshare link is not posting bannable content. Therefore, etc.
>> Anonymous
>>1107807
We know you couldn't. You can't speak.
>> Anonymous
>>1107817
lol don't speak for others loser.
see ya in another thread whoever you are, kiddo
>> Anonymous
>>1107817
I will take time out of our petty meaningless Internet argument to say "Touche".
>> Anonymous
>>I will take time out of our petty meaningless Internet argument to say "Douche".
fixed
>> Anonymous
Bump.
>> Anonymous
huh? is it good or what?