File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
>> Anonymous
>>325203
works for me
>> Anonymous
wait what?
>> Anonymous
I know I've seen another picture of this girl in a different pose but I don't have a copy...
>> Anonymous
http://www.dj.il24.net/~youhachi/

She's on the site somewhere, its pretty much ecchi only.
>> Anonymous
woa is she growing another let of legs or something?
>> Anonymous
>>325706

I'm pretty sure someone is up her ass
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Humantaur, it seems.
>> ChannelMaster
>>325203
I think this is the only good 'taur' picture I've ever seen.

(BTW, it's centaur, silly ones; stop renaming everything and generally infecting it)
>> Anonymous
>>325998

That doesn't look anything like a centaur.
>> Anonymous
It would seem that the connection between conjoined twins is not always equitable.
>> ChannelMaster
>>326004
Calling it "taur," the short, dumb-ified form of "Centaur" doesn't make it look more like one.

Also, the author calls it "KENTAUROSU" inside his pages.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>326038
If the artist uses it that way, ok. Still, centaur typically refers to a human torso on a horse body, which this is clearly not. I suppose this is another case where the naming is ambigious, like Lamia/Naga.
>> Anonymous
Anonymous, allow me to introduce you to the source of all true truths:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centauroid_creature
It seems that you humans have been unable to provide a proper set terminology for this sort of creature that doesn't even exist. Therefore, going by precedent, it would seem that any one of a number of terms would work best, although "taur" seems to be popular among those you call "furries", and "___taur" or "___centaur" seem to be standard among people who document these things.

...IGNORE ME.