File :-(, x, )
GTS 2: Electric Boogaloo Anonymous
whats the deal with GTS threads anyway? i see nothing but futa, futa, and rarely GTS. then suddenly a huge GTS thread appears! whats the deal?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Simple to say, there is almost no new GTS material. So in most cases when a wild GTS thread appears its filled with something even my grandmas retarded monkey has, and everything new is awful devianTARTs cheap drawings that are very bad in quality. Also, there are enforcer GTStards that make sure that everything from I raf you and good artists does not get pirated out ... thus making it almost imposible for anything good to leak out. But when it does, (once in a month maybe) a thread hits full capacity, with a few new things, and a 80 % just art reposts. My advice, every follow every link from a gts thread that you can find. Much more material relevant to the interests is bound to be there. Especially rapidshit.
>> Anonymous
>>697064

this is common for most things on /d/, with the exception of common shit like dickgirls. 4chan's a good way to start getting pics and finding links to other websites, but it's pretty much all reposts.
>> Anonymous
Why are dickgirls so commmon anyhow?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Still no progress on this.
>> Anonymous
>>697622
http://www.digiket.com/work/show.php?ID=ITM0013959

jp credit cards only.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
BUMP and also MOAR!!!!!!
>> Anonymous
>>697592
You should ask Dr. Freud that question.
>> Anonymous
Gentlemen the only thing that needs to be said is MOAR VOAR
>> Anonymous
>>697592
>>698347
Because of the male aversion to castration that in childhood leads to the "universal theory of the penis", which states that everything has a penis. Ask little kids, you'll notice that this is still valid (a classic example is how they explain away girls as that they "lost" theirs or "it's too small, it'll grow up).
Anyway, infantile tendencies mantain through every person's life. Although the possibility of castration is accepted to mature, there still remains a desire to find "completeness" into things.
Now, on top of that, THE first object of love for a person is the mother. And of course, the kids think she has a penis too. Discovering the contrary is what enables the kid to believe in the possibility of castration, actually. So it's the most traumatic experience.
Now, that would put the image of the phallic mother as an unattainable thing. And thus, at some point desired.
SO. Guys with mommy issues and stern fathers are likely to develop a taste for futanari imagery as it resonates with the fantasies that fuel them.
>> Anonymous
>>698371

Freud and his theories are about as valid as the world being flat.
>> Anonymous
>>698371
Well, fuck, I knew that. When genitalia was a non-issue for me, I just assumed the female anatomy I could not see was merely constructed with corresponding parts. That may have been due to general apathy, knowing me, but it makes sense.
>> Anonymous
Yeah, that's some pretty rediculous theory if you ask me. Freud was just sexist as hell and crazy about penis.
>> Anonymous
>>698371
That theory is bad and you should feel bad for posting it.
>> Anonymous
>>698396

Freud was actually accurate, well, for his time.

Women in the Victorian era were treated like shit. They didn't get inheritances, they didn't have well paying jobs, they had no power. men had all these things. And what do men have that women don't have? Yup, thats right; the cock. So Freud took this and ran with it. But times have changed and all so his theory is no longer valid.
>> Anonymous
At Freud's time EVERYBODY was working with sexual theories. Sex had recently been increasingly forbidden and seen as taboo, so when several unexplained pathologies started showing up, working with the sex issues was seen as quite innovative.
What distinguishes Freud from all the other people that worked with sex as a relevant factor in men is that he went BEYOND the actual genitalia and the physical body.
You all already heard the stupid shit about Oedipus, loving the mother and hating the father. But that's not what he talked about if you actually read the fucking texts. The sex part got spammed IN AMERICA (and England first, of course) pretty much with a "LOL SEX" bias. He was ridiculed by the behaviorists that already got their shop well set and didn't want anybody tripping on their psychology biz.
The english Freud translation thus had several mistranslations which earned it superficial readings and thus the criticism that's still going on today.
But Freud gave privilege to fantasies and how the mind processes this shit. So the actual sexual organs, the actual mother and all? Only markers that were common to his times. Everybody lies, and specially to themselves. So he only used those stories because people tended to accept them.
Now, what mattered was the positions those people and objects occupied in people's minds. The PENIS was actually the phallus, which isn't the same thing. It's a symbol, a symbol that represents a positive difference. Namely, men have penises and have a certain "shape". Women lack them and thus as people tend to perceive things, they can seem as they "lack" something. So the penis-object turns into a phallus as it's a signal of that plus over the other minus.
>> Anonymous
Not to mention that whatever Freud said is only valid during analysis. And he said this. Literally. Any interpretation only has value if a person can assign it meaning. Most of his written works are about commonplaces that he heard while working with patients, and thus reflect his era, yes.
But in his works you can find the groundwork, the patterns to improve and evolve. To adapt to newer times.
The french school did this. But you won't hear about them much because the main representative, Jacques Lacan, is a dipshit that said "Freud's works are written to be accesible. That's bad. That way anybody can read them, and because of their topics, stupid people tend to read it more often. So I'm going to write a return to his theory that reveals the real usefulness of it. But I'm going to write it in such a cryptic and difficult way only a handful of people will be able to understand it. That way only people who really want to study psychoanalisis will be able to grasp it".
>> Anonymous
So, in summary, theories like that are amusing to write and should be amusing to read. But don't read too much into it if the question of why you like futas isn't an issue to you.
If it is, then something to that extent could have ringed a bell in your internal alarm system.
So yes, do ignore the theory. But just remember that according to it, this is just a possible and somewhat common fantasy (phallused women have been around for millenia, plaguing the dreams and phanteons of men).
But according to any other theory, you're fapping to a thing with a penis. And that makes you gay. Or at the very least dismorphic disorder'd.
>> Anonymous
>>697054
Does this artist have a site, or do all his images come from a set?

I've seen a few, but I'm no fan of GTS. I like his style.
>> Anonymous
>>698453
They all come from I-raf-you's games.
>> karbine
simple. futa's have cocks women have brests(flat or round) and vagina's and of corse the human ass. men have cocks, they know how cocks feel. now add that cock to a woman and presume that she now has a female personality and a cock. now without testosterone she must deal with the cock and female genitalia. theres a cock but she has it so it must be ok to appreciate her body and what SHE might do or respond to with it. /\vaginia/\ cock both together, how much can she feel more then a normal female and you can appreciate it. but she NEVER was a guy to begin with. she didn't get a sex change. now her first time with a woman is interperated as normal because cock goes in vaginia but it is more stimulating that buth are female in nature. even, EVEN if both females fall under female/futanari. case and point. makes sence to anayone? good.
>> Anonymous
>>698474
learn to punctuation
>> Anonymous
>>698474
Learn to many things.
>> karbine
ok, i suck at grammer, i'm good at science, math, and figureing things out. your points?
>> Anonymous
>>698516

Look, it's hard to read text that is not appropriately spaced, has to many spelling errors and generally looks like a mess.

I'm not a native english speaker, and usually you can tell. But if you want people to read your shit, you should write it in a way that is pleasing to the eye.

Just my 2 cent
>> karbine
ok fair enough
>> Anonymous
>>697054

Fantastic title! It is good to see someone with taste.
>> Anonymous
How the hell did we get from ranting about /d/ to psychology and Dr. Freud's theories and the validity of same?

In short ... Dr.Freud in my /d/? more likely than you think!
>> Anonymous
no new GTS material?
the sauce for the old ones were never even posted yet!
Junny has lots of GTS but sadly there's no free sauce as of yet!
>> Anonymous
>>698553
exploration of sexual psychology is practically what /d/ is for.
I got started on face sitting and femdom when I stumbled onto namio and went on to gts insertion had a brief liason with toilet slave art and from there fell into futa on guy shit.
For some reason I love the idea of being a completely and utterly helpless toy in the hands of an overwhelmingly powerful woman.
>> Anonymous
>>698629
Same here. Just that i started with GTS and never changed. Not that i don't have other fetishes, but in the end they have to be GTS related. I'm starting to think its either a genetic defect/mental illness. Seriously, i had the fetish since i was 5 or so. And i still don't know why...
>> Anonymous
>>698633
I was never able to find any satisfactory gts insertion material. had to keep moving.
>> Anonymous
Oh come on guys, /d/ is not for discussion.
Post moar giantesses.