File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
So are horsemen considered to be furry or not? And if they are, does the same standard apply to minotaurs and werewolves?
>> Anonymous
Furries are not allowed to ruin these things for me. :P
>> Anonymous
>>526170

But aren't monsters /d/ friendly?
>> Anonymous
>>526177
Hell yeah! And they shall remain free of furry taint in my mind.
>> Anonymous
Off course it's furry, it's human like with horse characteristics.
>> Anonymous
>>526180

So is a minotaur a furry instead of a monster because it has human characteristics? Or does it depend on the context?
>> Anonymous
>>526180
>off
>> Anonymous
If more than 30% of it's body is covered in fur, it's furry.
>> Anonymous
minotaurs, satyrs, and even centaurs were furries before furries were defined. haw.
>> Anonymous
Moar! plz and more penetration!
>> Anonymous
>>526224
also, when we say 'furries' we mean anthros. includes scalies, phins, etc.

so don't get technical with "no fur lolz!!"
>> Anonymous
>>526238

So no fantasy monsters are allowed in /d/ at all?

When did this fucking faggotry happen?
>> Anonymous
>>526265

I concur! How are satyrs at all furries? If we ban them we should ban catgirls and succubi too.
>> Anonymous
>>526274

Addendum: IMO the OP is a little too close to furry though.
>> Anonymous
if the girl is getting fucked by a half human half beast, its not furry.
if the girl IS the half human half beast, its furry.
how is this so hard to differentiate?
>> Anonymous
>>526274
Satyrs can barely make it. Catgirls mostly have no fur at all, and succubi never do.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
This is perfectly fine, right?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Any anti-minotaur argument is invalidated by the fact that minotaur's are FUCKING HOT
>> On the subject Faithless
Well, from what I've seen, people don't seem to mind furry as long as the lady isn't furry. You'll note that minotaur females being fucked are quite rare.