File :-(, x, )
Kilgamayan !2BklmILFiE
Just out of curiosity, for the whole Western art deal, would linking to it and providing a disclaimer that it's Western art without actually posting the image itself (so those that don't want to see it know to avoid it) be bannable?
>> Anonymous
>>920080
And then there's that. Unless somebody /r/'s it here with good reason you should probably leave it alone altogether.
>> Anonymous
>>919975
You know, OP's picture is sort of my fetish. It's also japanese art. However, it's not really that good, and in fact there ARE western artists that draw in an eastern style that produce better stuff than it.

Which begs the question. Is this bannable material too? Or is this allowed even though it's of an inferior quality?
>> Anonymous
>>920144

It really is subjective, but I don't see why would shouldn't at least post Western art of exceptionally quality. Because really a lot of Japanese art is shit. Or can't we just ban anyone who posts shitty art?
>> Anonymous
>>920151
agreed. a general ban on shitty art, regardless of origin, would make more sense and would be more effective in keeping crap out.
>> Anonymous
>>920151

WE can't ban anyone. Mods ban anyone for any reason.
>> Anonymous
I guess the test is when we don't know it's western stuff unless we already know who the artist is.
>> Anonymous
>>920151
>>920168
out of the question, lurk more

>>920144
personally I would consider the OP bannable under the "SHITTY/western" ruling
>> Kilgamayan !2BklmILFiE
>>920080

That was my backup plan if nothing useful was gleaned from this thread.

I don't intend to go flounting Western art around anyway, it would just be nice to know if I can link to it occasionally if it's relevant to a discussion at hand.