>> |
Ehhh.....
>>835124 What you seem to be leaning toward, however, is homosexuality in perception, ie, a psychologically based idea of homosexuality. In other words, we should focus on how futanari fits into homosexuality if we define such as attraction to one's own gender.
In that case, we have to rely on an individual's perception of another's gender in order to determine whether that individual is attracted to the other as in a homosexual manner or a heterosexual manner. I'd say that, in the case of a "typical" futanari, the overwhelming alerts toward gender are female--after all, they are designed, in every respect but in one part of their genitalia, to appear female, and frequently to appear attractively female--face, torso shape, breasts, leg shape, etc. They have vaginas, wombs--in fact, all of the sexual organs of a woman.
In light of all these signals, as compared to the single signal that would suggest maleness--the penis, and, if present, testicles--, it would be logical to conclude that most people that are attracted to futanari are attracted to them in a heterosexual way--ie, are perceiving their gender to be female. In other words, finding yourself attracted to futanari more frequently than not should indicate heterosexuality rather than homosexuality, given a gender-based definition of sexual preference (unless, of course, the viewer happens to be female). Once again, given a sex-based definition of the same, attraction to futanari has no weight on one's sexual preference at all.
|