>> |
Anonymous
>>757517 Yeah basically. Also no noses or lips please, I'm not a fucking fag. And fucking pubic hair? Eyelids? Shading? Cheek bones? Pig disgusting. Seriously, I'm not saying that the art didn't take time and effort and talent to produce, I am saying that it's sexually and aesthetically repulsive, and it's against the rules, and how anyone could get off on it escapes me. I realize sexuality is incredibly subjective, that's why people are so fiery about it, but the difference between stuff like this and cuter, fluffier, more aesthetic Japanese art is like night and day, black and white. I'll take my pink hair and Gundam parts and cat ears and magical happy heart scepters of love and giant eyes, please. I don't know about the weird dimensions though, I like a thicker, more delicate curve than a dramatic, angular one, usually. The point is that the reason animated or drawn pornography is often so much better than real stuff, is that it's cute, perfect, pretty, soft, smooth looking. To most straight males, cute and pretty soft should equal hot. This artistic style is more grotesque and manly and butch looking than real people even, which again has me completely confounded as to how anyone can find it sexually attractive. Again, to each his own, but I mean, Jesus...
TL;DR: It looks like shit.
|