File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
This is a delicious Midna--she must take the knot. GO MIDNA THREAD! YOOSH!
>> Anonymous
bump
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
bump
>> Anonymous
Oh, good, I've been looking for this.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Ande
Wouldn't this count as furry (ie. be against the rules)?
>> Arc51
>>302034

Technically, she's not an anthropomorphic anything - she's just a screwed-up fuzzy elf.
>> Anonymous
>>302037

Technically, shut up. It's furry, you know it, we know it, and it's banned.
>> Anonymous
Covered in fur = furry.
>> Anonymous
Only posted here, because posting on /b/ wont work for some reason.
>> Arc51
>>302039

"Banned"? We've had Midna threads here before and the Powers That Be haven't done a blessed thing about them, and I *know* they've been reported by whiners like you.
>> Anonymous
>>302043

Furry was always banned, this is furry and it will be banned when the mods move their lazy asses.
>> Arc51
>>302056

Tell me, do you get a charge out of parading about invoking the authority of folks who evidently don't give a damn? ;)
>> KiTA !zx3TGNvBPw
Jesus fucking christ people.

There's bestiality in the opening picture.

The opening posting dumbfuck even comments on the dog-cock.

Midna being or not being a furry (she's not, she's a fucking elf-pixie-... thing) has NOTHING to do with the banhammer that is about to smack down on the resident dogfucking trolls in this thread.

Bestiality is banned (read: DO NOT WANT) in /d/, we have this same stupid fucking conversation every 1-2 weeks when the dogfuckers bans expire.

And, since the point needs to be made -- there's a huge fucking difference between furry (a vocal sub-genre of monster-girl fetish) and bestiality.
>> Anonymous
>>302080
This isn't beasty. It's normal porn. Link is a person. He just happens to be a wolf when in twilight. With that in mind, it's not beasty-porn.
>> KiTA !zx3TGNvBPw
Get real.
>> Anonymous
>>302119
Play the game. Midna is fucking hot... when not an imp. When she's an imp, she looks cute but not like... not fuckably cute. I wouldn't mind that spare hand though.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Ande
>>302117
>>302080

In other words posting a pic of Sasami from Tenchi Muyo won't violate the rules because she's 100+ years old. Sorry, but that don't work. If it looks it then it is. In other words, because Link looks like a wolf, then it's counted as bestality. Same thing for Midna (more than 25% of her body is covered in fur so she would count as a furry).

On a final note if the rules says do not post such-and-such, then guess what, you're not supposed to post it. If you don't like it then you need to take it up with a mod/admin since they are the ones who made the rules in the first place.

In other words, screaming at someone who is only pointing out the obvious (ie. a rule has been violated), will not bring anyone to you're side, and worse yet, will often turn them against you.

It is against the rules to post furry and bestality; period. Therefore if it is a blantant "do not want" then why post it? It's not wanted, we don't want to see it, and if we did, then we'd go else where to view it (fchan most likely).

In short, it's not about hating furries, it's about following the rules. If you follow them, then there will be no problems, if you break them, then you end up with this scenario.