>> |
Ande
>>303329
There is a reason why most people don't like those who are a fan of furries. You're giving a good example right now of one of them.
>>303326
You are correct.
>>303323
To be more direct it all depends on how animal like they are. Take a centaur for example; they are closer to 1/4 human as far as body dimensions, but have been allowed, possibly because from the waist above they are completely human. What this means is, even if it does go beyond 25%, it's how animal-like they appear. Because the top half is completly human most will regard them as non-furry. However, if the person stood on two legs, and 75% of their body was covered in fur, then they would count as a furry.
Quite trying to pussy-foot around the rules; most of you know what qualifies and disqualifies something as a furry. It is not that hard to tell the difference between the two, and most of the one's who are raising this fuss by people who anti-furs, really need to take the hint and get back to fchan if that's the sort of stuff they want to see. There is a time and place for everything; /d is not one those places where furries are accepted, or at least, not until one of the mods/admins decides to modify the rules.
|