File :-(, x, )
Hurr Anonymous
Is red XIII legal on this board?
>> Anonymous
>>186322

If whatever shit is above and below us at any given time isn't, I honestly can't see any reason why not...He's just a talking dog.
>> Anonymous
>>186325
Dogs don't talk, and Red XIII isn't a dog.
It's a furry. Furries are not welcome.

This picture is hot, though.
>> Ehhh.....
>>186492

You're right. He isn't a dog. He's closer to a lion, but he isn't that either.

But he isn't a human in an animal suit, nor is he in the least anthropomorphised, with the poor exception of his vocal cords. In other words, you're an idiot. Nanaki is an animal, not a furry.

Which would make porn with him in it bestiality. Still against the rules, but not for this moron's reasoning.
>> Anonymous
>>186535
Wrong. Anthros are anything that have human characteristics, which include a voice. They can have animal bodies, but speak like humans and its considered an anthro. Sorry to burst yer bubble folks.
>> Anonymous
>>186535
Furry and beastiality are basically the same thing.

It's just that in one of the two, the animal in question walks on two legs, rather than four.

And yes, furries are animals. Anyone who says otherwise is sympathising with furries, and is probably a furfag anyway.
>> Anonymous
>>186583
So by your logic Catgirls are a form of furry? or atleast they should be... its just a human with furry characterisitcs. i dont see the difference.
>> Anonymous
catgirls may as well be regular girls wearing a cat costume. it's cute, like a maid outfit or skimpy clothes. it goes too far when the fur starts to appear.... damn furfags
>> Hurtful Leper
This argument is retarded, and I have gotten stupiderer for reading it.
>> Anonymous
I've got a rather weird definition for furries that I'm sure nobody will agree with :p

I don't consider lycanthropes as furries because the former is always depicted as a bipedal animal - meaning their facial features and expressions are those of an animal's. A furry usually incorporates a human feature like human expressions or eyes which (in my opinion) distinguishes them from mythical beasts.

So (in my opinion) regardless of what their body structures are like, if they are animals with an expression or eyes that can only be found on humans, then they're furry.
>> Anonymous
Furry, like emo, is whatever the current person using it as an insult wants it to be, or not to be.

If the poster doesn't like Felicia? Felicia is furry.

If the poster likes Krystal from Starfox Adventures, somehow Krystal is not furry.

4chan logic. There y'go.
>> Anonymous
KRISTAL
FELICIA
RED XIII
r just antropomorphick game characters not furry
So iz TOM & Jerry furry iz Spunge bob furry iz Schobby doo(sucks btw) furry?
People hu dres up in shiti rugs they cool a costum and butsex echudher and think they have a stupid animal sool r furryes.
>> Ehhh.....
>>186579
Please don't argue when you don't know what you're talking about. 'kthx.

An anthopomorphised anything is when that thing is given physical characteristics that resembles those same characteristics in humans. Which is why it doesn't apply to your average cat or bunny girl, since these are humans that have been given minor characteristics that resemble those found in animals.

>>186583
Furries are not, in fact, animals. They are too disturbing and disgusting to be animals. To categorize them with animals is highly insulting to the entire animal kingdom.
>> Anonymous
>>186860

lol moral superiority from someone browsing /d/
>> Swann
>>186904
LOL Nice! Your my hero!
>> Anonymous
Furries and animals are two different things. For the most part, furries are bipedial animals with human characteristics. While talking is a characteristic, it alone doesn't change the fact that the rest is STILL a friggin dog. If he atleast walked on two legs then ya MIGHT have a point, but talking alone doesn't change the fact that its nothing more than a animal.
>> Anonymous
arguing, internet, special olympics, etc.
>> Anonymous
Wow, this is one retarded argument. I mean, seriously, why the fuck are you idiots arguing about what the fuck a furry is when there is an entire community of social rejects that specifically identify themselves as furries? It's like arguing what 'gay' is; if you want to know, ask a homosexual.

Go, ask a furry. It's usually the overweight or stick thin freak who believes they possess an animal spirit, do weird shit like 'yiffing', and/or dress up in furry suits and think they look sexy in it. If something drawn by one of those batshit insane people, it's probably furry art.

End of argument.
>> Anonymous
>>187250

wtf is up with all the anti-furry sentiment. they're none of that shit, man. what you just dolled out was a reg. internet dude, cept switched it around to furry lingo. and they're not batshit insane, as you say it, cause they draw anthropomorhpic characters. those've been around as long as fantasy art and comic books have been, much longer than hentai and anime. seriously, wtf amirite
>> Anonymous
>>187250Go, ask an otaku. It's usually the overweight or stick thin freak who believes they're in tune with nature or some shit, do weird shit like 'cybersex', and/or dress up in anime and think they look sexy in it. If something drawn by one of those batshit insane people, it's probably hentai.

fix'd
>> Anonymous
>>186583

wtf, no it's not. dude, i'm a furry, as i know plenty of people are here. i've never once thought of doing it with an animal and frankly bestiality is really fucked up shit. if you're going to judge an entire culture by it's most extremes, fuck, look at baseball fans. music fans. shit, anime fans/hentai fans. y'all are some fucked up people.
>> Anonymous
>>187250

Uh, seriously dude. You're in fucking /d/ right now. And you say they're batshit insane. You have fucking no right to talk.

PRIVILEGES REVOKED
>> Anonymous
Looks like the OP's reached his/her/its goal...
lol /d/
>> Anonymous
>>187264
>>187267
>>187271
Prejudices aside, what I said is still partially true: it's idiotic to argue about the definition of something (whether it be furry, hentai, or whatever) when there are people who define the genre ON HAND.

And to troll some more: I've never met an otaku who thinks he or she possesses the spirit of an anime character; yeah, they're still sad and pathetic, but at least they're still rooted in reality.

Of course, this isn't to say all furries believe in this, but you can't deny there are those who do.