Loveless is /good/.I mean, it's /actually/ good.How the hell did /that/ happen?
Why /are/ you using /forward slashes/ to /emphasize/ your words?
No /way/.
I've always liked Loveless. It's got gay and angst, what more could I ask for?
Have you ever seen pic from the dolls from this pic? If saw it , it would be a big help because I want a bigger one so much, thanx
>>981873God, that's a horrible top.
loveless /sucks/
>>981484Do you mean it recently got good or it has always been good and you've just never noticed?
>>981897Ha, which one?
>>983291... Ritsuka's.Also, bump.
anyone have links for manga~ to read/dl
i liked loveless. but it just recently got good, imo
Jeez. How come there's barely anything in this thread?
>>981873I want those cut outs... really badly..
Loveless is good, and always has been. Though it shouldn't be classified as Yaoi, it's shonen-ai since there is no sex (as of yet)
>>985702That's why this is /cm/. It it was Yaoi it would be in /Y/.
Me and my friend are cosplaying Soubi[me] and Ritsuka next month :)
>>985760You'll be posting pics in /cgl/?
just randomly posting som artwork of Loveless.
just randomly posting som artwork of Loveless, mostly Ritsuka...
:)
.
I /LOVE/ LOVELESS
>>982064Don't know about OP, but I just started reading it, and wow. I was expecting a silly shoujo manga about pretty boys with cat ears, but it's actually got a lot of depth.
Where be all the beloved Seimei?
What Loveless needs is more Kio.
Kio is always needed.
>>987260Where'd that come from?
>>985760... i hope you are a guy. I'm fed up with seeing girls playing Soubi. Have some zero repost