Yummy getbackers!!!!!
a friend requests an official art that's very blatant on yaoi implication... so far it's not any of those she says o_O
Is it this? Sorry I only have shit quality.
>>206787i think it's something elsemy friend said there's another one or something more extreme..? o.o
>>207118Does she lack descriptive capabilities? Virtually every official GB illustration has serious slash implications.
>>207120Good point.
moar :P
>>206758LOL, talk about a needle in a haystack. If it's not>>206787, my next guess would be this one.
is this anime actually worth watching? Or are these pics all horribly misleading?What about the manga?
lol!! thanks all! i asked her to be more specific and her descriptions closely resemble this>>207142i'll show the others tho XDthanks again! you guys are great! :3
>>207440It is misleading, I watched a few episodes because of these pics and they both were acting straight as a wall.
>>207589Pssh, you must be watching the wrong series. It's certainly not blatant yaoi but give it a chance until the end, at LEAST for the fucking adorable Juubei x Kazuki. ;^;
They're so not gay, Ban hits on girls, Ginji's liked that girl that works in the cafe before she went for Shido...the only ones i think are gay are juubei, akabane and kazuki is bi i think? Def worth watching all the way thru tho. ^_^
>>207709not even hints/subtext?
>>207805GB literally oozes BL hints and subtext. Even the girls seem to be gay for each other.
>>207805I agree with>>207863, GB is full of slashy goodness. The only way you can't see the subtext is by being blind. Srsly. Even the mangaka himself (yes, _him_) has said he wants to draw some Ban/Ginji doujinshi...