I was looking through my folders for something to contribute to the fetish thread, something to do with my particular fetishes which are pretty much non-con related, from mild forcing to full on rape, bondage, blood and so on... yeah, mostly not /cm/ but still - I was flabbergasted to find out that I don't have ANY /cm/ related non-con material. Even my Viral folder pulled a blank if you can possibly imagine.So, a challenge for you. Non-con pairings where the other party is clearly forced, but keep it WS.Pic best I could find.
this is all I have that might be what you are looking for.
Uh... this one kind of fits?
>>486798Kinda. It's such a challenge...
Maybe this?
This is tougher than I thought. When force is involved, it usually rapidly becomes /y/ material.
I share such fetishes, so give me a little while here to hunt through my folders.
I must have more around that has more than the hands of the aggressor...
Slightly OT, but I've got a serious thing for restraint or captivity in all its forms, so I thought you might appreciate this one.
OP greets and thanks a fellow fetishist... and I found some goodies from my Hellsing folder.
...I think rest is too guro for /cm/.
...Having a slightly better grasp on what your boundaries are for worksafe, allow me to expand my parameters.
More hands... -_-
Not just hands!
Finishing off with twincest picture until I can be arsed to go dig up the CDs from my old computers to hunt up more and start a new thread.
>>488213Ah, ws within limits of /cm/ - no cock, no frontal nudity... Not literally ws, nothing on /cm/ would be safe for my workplace...Anon, I'm in your debt.