File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
ITT: Any Harry Potter Pairings or Single Pictures of Cuteness. There is a mirror thread for the smutty bits in /y/.

We can avoid snapesnogger's art kthx? We really can I think.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Very want.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
We can ALWAYS avoid Snogger's art, dearie.

Apologies, nothing to contribute at the moment.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
Oh my god, oh my god, the last Harry Potter book is amazing. Go read it.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>469012
GTFO
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Ignore Hermione and Pansy.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>469012
I hope by "amazing" you mean "amazingly bad."
>> Anonymous
you know why.
>> Anonymous
>>469162
Who is that?
>> Anonymous
who the fuck is snapesnogger anyway? Some random BNF?

yeah, yeah, I know, lurk moar. slowpoke.jpg going back into hiding now.
>> Anonymous
>>469354

http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Snapesnogger
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>469355

Edjumacation.

the TL;DR version: Snapesnogger is a teenage overemotional bitch. And sometimes she doesn't draw noses on her art.

It's pretty shitty.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>469162
Characters?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
am I doin it rite?
>> Anonymous
>>469169
I think she meant amazing as in amazingly good. I agree with that assessment!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Ignore Ravenclaw and Hufflepuff
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>469012
Deathly Hallows was not Harry Potter. JKR basically threw away what set those books apart from most generic fantasy novel series, which was Hogwarts itself.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>470245

Agreed.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>470245
Yeah, book 7 was seriously lacking some Hogwarts. But in return, she gave us RANDOM CAMPING. That totally makes up for it, doesn't it?!

... *sob*
>> Anonymous
>>469974
Then you have little to no taste in literature. That book was insipid dreck.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
DH was horrible. All she did was kill off a bunch of characters and threw in a bunch of shipper moments so the rabid fantards wouldn't complain.

1) Pair off everybody
2) Kill people
3) ????
4) PROFIT!!
>> Anonymous
>>470399
Ah, but not everything has to be literature, asshat. DH was entertaining and satisfying. If you want more than that from a book featuring poo-flavoured jellybeans and inflatable aunts, you want too much.
>> Anonymous
I agree with>>470399. True, everything doesn't HAVE to be literature, but it'd be damn nice if everyone stopped going mad with joy over a series of children's books, and focused on decent writing.

Besides, truly great literature is rarely appreciated in its own time. The Scarlet Letter, The Great Gatsby, you get my point.

Sage because I have nothing to contribute, save a point to make.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>470436If you want more than that from a book featuring poo-flavoured jellybeans and inflatable aunts, you want too much.
In regards to Deathly Hallows, "alas, earwax!"

To me, book seven read like fanfiction - it didn't seem like it was an actual Harry Potter novel. I enjoyed it, of course, but still . . .

Oh, and here, have a pic. It's a repost, though.
>> Anonymous
>>470444
Most people don't read at all.
>> Anonymous
>>470444
I've read the Scarlet Letter and the Great Gatsby, and didn't enjoy them.
>> Anonymous
What thehell is a BNF?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
BNF - Big Name Fan
>> Anonymous
>>470494

I appreciate Gatsby for the elegance of the language. The Scarlet Letter was a bit heavy-handed. Both are inferior to anything by Flannery O'Connor.

DH was entertaining. That is all.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>470444I don't really think anyone's pretending that Harry Potter is the epitome of literary brilliance. Like I tell people, for me it's more 10% books + 90% fandom. J.K. creates characters and places you can really grow to like but her plots are horrible.

The Scarlet Letter is literary toilet paper, I'm not being flippant, I can't stand the Scarlet Letter. The Great Gatsby is ok. I'm more of a Scarlet Pimpernel/Three Musketeers person myself.

<< Sage 4 Pic not related to op.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>470522
I don't fully agree with you, but internets for mentioning The Scarlet Pimpernel. It's probably my favorite book.
>> Anonymous
Arguing literature? On my 4chan?
>> Anonymous
>>470444

The Scarlett Letter was one of the worst books I've ever read. Repeated vomiting was induced.
But besides that, I agree with your comment.
>> Anonymous
ITT: BOOKS ARE SERIOUS BUSINESS.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>470522

Three Musketeers for life. I has no Musketeers fanarts too contribute, unfortunately.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
FRED DIES!

FRED DIES

FRED DIEEEESSSSS!
>> Anonymous
>>470451
I don't know how many people have said DH was the combination of the last three fanfics they've read.

And they were right.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)