File :-(, x, )
Shota Boys Anonymous
Need moar shotas. ;_;

Post any you have, if you have em. I need to fill up my shota folder. It's lonely and only has a couple pics. v.v
>> duoikari
     File :-(, x)
i shall aid you fellow shota lover
>> duoikari
     File :-(, x)
>> duoikari
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
Bump
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
R-Remus shota and Nawoko-sensei shota? God does exist!
>> Anonymous
Fucking hell, shota is animated porn of little boys, not just images of kids -_- A worksafe pic of a young boy is no more shota than a worksafe pic of a grown man is yaoi.

And the boys involved in the sex aren't "shotas", it's the porn that is shota. You wouldn't call the men involved in yaoi "yaois" either, so stop being stupid and learn the correct meaning of terms if you're going to be using them.
>> Mari the Faithless
     File :-(, x)
What can I say, terms change and evolve. A lot of people call them Shota now. :|
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
As we all know, shota is short for "shoutarou-complex", which describes attraction towards young boys. That's not the same meaning as pr0n.
>> Anonymous
>>171125
>>171193
¬_¬ So you also call men "yaois" and women "yuris"? It would be exactly the same as calling little boys "shotas".
>> Anonymous
>>171204
And people call little girls "loli"s all the time
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
bitch bitch moan moan
the vaginas are restless reeeooooorgh

just post pictures ploz
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> booger
     File :-(, x)
Ritsuka <3
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
cuilan!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
i am still waiting for restaurants like this to exist ;3;
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Kayra de Sirell
     File :-(, x)
weeeeelll, I think all of us already know what the creator of the thread really want, ne?? so we can post more and talk less ^^U
>> Kayra de Sirell
     File :-(, x)
>> Kayra de Sirell
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>171214
Wow! What an amazing comeback. A person bitches and moans, and they are automatically a female? Bravo anonymous! Bravo!
>> Mari the Faithless
I had forgotten to point out that shota and loli only involve one person. Yaoi and yuri involve two. While you can't have one person standing there in a picture and lable it yaoi, you CAN have two guys being near each other and some will label it yaoi. Doing that is the same as labeling a little boy pic shota.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
No.171204> what i was saying is that shota is not another word for "porn". i'm aware it is also not another word for "random picture of a ten year old".
>> Anonymous
>>171299
>> you CAN have two guys being near each other and some will label it yaoi

No, you can´t. Yaoi is the explitic thing, where they are doing it and you most likely see dicks, whereas Shounen/Shonen-ai is the worksafe thing.

Also, the Japanses term for Boys is Shonen/Shounen (both Version are fine) and Shoujo/Shojo is Girl.
A Bishounen and a Bishoujo are literaly Beautiful boy/girl.
Shota and Loli mean here in Western, explitic Manga or Artwork with younger Kids, whereas in Japan the meaning is that an older guy/woman is sexually attracted to a child.

Dear /cm/, get you fucking terms straight or just look them up on Wiki.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
everyone just drop it, and fuck the person who pointed it out in the first place.
we're here to post, not to argue.
>> Anonymous
>>171340
You DO realise that shounen-ai is an outdated term right?
It's only used when referring to REAL LIFE PEDOPHILIA nowadays. :|
People are supposed to use BL instead.
GL and shoujo-ai never really existed.
All they use is Yuri, except for lolicon, which does not fit into the yuri genre because it's made for men.
>> Anonymous
>>171390
>>All they use is Yuri, except for lolicon, which does not fit into the yuri genre because it's made for men.

Breaking news: Yuri made for men too. Belive or not, the target audience is not the lesbians :P
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>171394
Nope.
Yuri is targeted towards women, not men. :/
I think the hardcore hentai is targeted towards men though.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>171401

You are naive or just ignorant.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>171401
Wait, Men don´t like Lesbians? :O When did I miss THAT?
>> Anonymous
>>171401

Hahaha, no. Have you ever watched yuri? For even a minute? It's QUITE OBVIOUS it is not made for gay women, much in the same way looking at yaoi made by fangirls makes it quite obvious the intended audience was not gay males.
>> duoikari
     File :-(, x)
>>171043
STFU, god quit moaning, you complain when we post safe image and you complain when we post nor safe ones, GET OVER IT.
>>171299
and thank you for pointing things out to the people who are like 'this isn't shota' crap.

DO YOU STUPID PEOPLE REALISE YOUR STUPID KINGDOM HEARTS IS SHOTA

and now on with more pics
>> duoikari
     File :-(, x)
>> duoikari
     File :-(, x)
>> duoikari
     File :-(, x)
>> duoikari
     File :-(, x)
>> duoikari
     File :-(, x)
>> duoikari
     File :-(, x)
>> duoikari
     File :-(, x)
>> duoikari
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>171425
>>DO YOU STUPID PEOPLE REALISE YOUR STUPID KINGDOM HEARTS IS SHOTA

No, they´re too old. Sora is 14 in the first one and 15 in the second one. Typical Shota age would be aound 4 - 10. (If I´m wrong, corect me, please)
BUT, it´s all about the Style they are drawn in. While Sora is neither in the typical Shota nor is he (normally) drawn like that, I would consider Laharl Shota, because of the Design and not the age, where he is obviously much older than you typical Shota Character.
>> duoikari
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>171434
>While Sora is neither in the typical Shota age...

>_> Stupid mistake.
>> duoikari
     File :-(, x)
>>171434
he's properly about 4 foot tall, his voice hasn't broke and he looks about 12, therefore i'd dubb him shota.

and shota is 18 darling, but it's normally between the ages of 6-16. I personally prefer it around 12-16.

anyway, more pics :D
>> duoikari
     File :-(, x)
>> duoikari
     File :-(, x)
>> duoikari
     File :-(, x)
>> duoikari
     File :-(, x)
>> duoikari
     File :-(, x)
>> duoikari
     File :-(, x)
i'll post more pics, later i have to find some more that are 'clean'.
>> Anonymous
I have been to Japan. Yes I am a weeaboo, and the term shota IS USED WHEN REFERRING TO SEXUALLY EXPLICIT ART OF YOUNG BOYS. Yes the term did originate from Shotaro complex, but Shotaro complex is only really used when talking about real men who like real boys. Shotacon is not just images of kids, and if you use it that way, you are retarded. For something to be shota, it must have at least one boy who is doing something sexual in it. It can be one little boy masturbating, two little boys screwing, one little boy being screwed by a man, or one little boy screwing a woman. The most basic requirement for shota is a sexualized little boy, so no, by definition these pics are NOT shota, and nowhere in Japan will you EVER see anyone referring to either normal images of boys or the boys in shota as "shotas". That is just retarded.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>171441
Even further proof you have no idea what you are talking about. 18 is only the legal age of consent for real people in the US, genius, not in Japan, and not for shota. 18 is WELL into the yaoi category -_-
>> duoikari
     File :-(, x)
ok, so two little boys who are kissing is not consider gay?, to little boys rubbing each other's pants is not consider gay? a little boy rubbing another little boys nipple through his shirt is not consider to be gay?

cos you know, maybe it's just me, but i think that might be consided as gay behavior and yet, it's still clean? isn't it?
>> Anonymous
>>171474
What the fuck are you talking about?
>> duoikari
>>171455
you basically said here, shota is anything that is sexually things involve boys are shota, so is a kissing scene not shota?, because it's a gay sexual act and yet it doesn't break the rules of /cm/

and take a look at this while your at it
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_rights_in_Japan
>> Anonymous
>>171390GL and shoujo-ai never really existed.
>>All they use is Yuri, except for lolicon, which does not fit into the yuri genre because it's made for men.

GL never really existed? Well, I do wonder why the Japanese search engine that specializes in yuri sites is called "Girls' Love Search", then!
And both you and the poster who replied to you are incorrect about the target audience of yuri. The majority of commercial and popular yuri series are, of course, made for men, but the ones that are less disqusting are surely read by women too. Then there's the niche manga by lesbians for lesbians. There also are occasional shoujo-ai one-shots appearing in girls' manga magazines.
For example, who do you think the female Zero couple in Loveless was targeted at? The men who watch yuri for porn wouldn't touch Loveless with a ten-foot pole!

Maximum image limit has been reached, so I'm not replying with a picture, but to make up for pictureless verbosity I'll post in a new thread.
>> Anonymous
>>171484
Since when has kissing been sexual? Sticking a penis in another man's butt is sexual. Getting a blowjob is sexual.

Getting a simple kiss = not sexual. Thus safe for /cm/.

And what does gay rights in Japan have to do with little boys fucking each other?
>> Anonymous
>>171497

Even if you screams madly, the fact is majority of yuri and especially yuri porn is made by men for men. Just think about the vulgar style. OFC there are girls love' novels, art, doujins made by women, but the market is growning from the money of hentai otakus. And don't come up with the marginal episode of the lesbians in Loveless. There are straight men who can enjoy the show too (like there are lesbians who visit /y/). Things are pretty complex, boys like to read shoujo manga, and there are notorious female mecha fans.
>> Anonymous
>>171474
OMG -_- Gay and Sexual are not synonymous with one another. It is illegal to perform sexual acts in public, and yet it is not at all illegal to kiss someone in public, because guess what, kissing ? sexual. And yes, I said "sexual act", so obviously two boys rubbing their penises together through clothes would be shota, because that is most definitely a sexual act. Two boys kissing/cuddling/holding hands is not sexual and thus is not shota, but shounen-ai. Their being gay does not mean their kisses are somehow more sexual than straight kisses. You need to shut up, you are only making yourself look even more dumb with every post.
>> Anonymous
laff
>> Anonymous
>>171441
>"and shota is 18 darling"

Rofl, you couldn't sound more patronising, which makes it so much more laughable because you're such an idiot.
Consentual age in Japan is 13. It is 18 in some cases for 'immoral acts' like prostitution. Get back under your rock.

>>171390
I'd barely call shounen-ai "outdated". It's pretty arbitrary, especially if you know what BL is. Oh, secondly... LOL INTERNET.
>> Anonymous
>>171601the age for gay consent is different all over the world, in japan it's 18 but was almost moved up to 21, this is the same for england but i believed they moved the age down rather then up.
>>171500
and it's strange how you go out of your way to pick the least gay act that i mentioned just to prove that you right, get over it, you said it yourself, shota is sexually, so a man pitching a little boys nipples is not sexually?, stop going to the easy answer you closet pedo.

If you have such a problem with this thread then why did you not just go past it?, that's why you pc has a scroll bar. Just leave us to our shota, if you think it's 'safework' then you think that, but to me and so other people the majority of this stuff would go in the shota folder. end of go home
>> Anonymous
>>171516
I wonder if you even read my post. You're saying:
>> the fact is majority of yuri and especially yuri porn is made by men for men
, which is supposed to contradict me saying:
>> The majority of commercial and popular yuri series is, of course, made for men.

What I was disagreeing with were statements like "Yuri is made for men, not for lesbians" - which is true often enough, but not in all cases.
When you say,
>> Just think about the vulgar style,
I can't help but want to contradict you. The vulgar style you mentioned is what I hate most of all in manga, yet I have about a gigabyte of tastefully drawn female-friendly yuri scanslations on my hard drive right now.

Basically I want to say the same thing you're saying:
>> Things are pretty complex, boys like to read shoujo manga, and there are notorious female mecha fans
- and there is also yuri by women for women, and there's enough of it to feed my addiction.
>> Anonymous
>>171635
So we basicly saying the same thing. I was point on the fact, that even if yuri is about lesbians, the target audience, who buy and pay (keep the yuri artist motivated) for this kind of porn/stories are (mostly) males. Its hard to admit that your addiction is paid (mostly) by male otakus? I cheers for the yaoi "fangirls" who put effort, time and money in yaoi scene, withouth them this genre would be not as popular as is now.
>> Anonymous
>>171651
Yes, mostly. ^^
Well, actually, my addiction isn't paid for by men, that's the point ^^;; The kind of yuri I like is (probably) bought by lots of women, too.

Hmm, I wonder if there would have been any kind of yaoi at all without us fangirls. Probably it wouldn't have been yaoi as we know it, but rather, well, gay porn.
>> Anonymous
>>171680
>>Well, actually, my addiction isn't paid for by men, that's the point ^^;;

Well, yeah 'cuz you're a lil freeloader like almost all of us ;P This whole thing went far away from the main theme of /cutemales/ anyway :O
>> Anonymous
>>171632
People aren't bitching at you because they don't like shota. I'm one of them and I absolutely LOVE shota, but you're using the word wrong and are generally being a moron, and that is my beef. And sorry to burst your bubble, but YOU are in the MINORITY by using the word shota in a way it isn't meant to be used. You are wrong. Humans, at least most of us, have the ability to process new information and correct our mistakes accordingly. You seem to lack this basic ability.

And yes, of course someone pinching/nipping/licking someone's nipples is a sexual act because its sole intent is to sexually arouse the person. DUH. Like I said : the most basic requirement for shota is a sexualized little boy, so no, by definition these pics are NOT shota, and nowhere in Japan will you EVER see anyone referring to either normal images of boys or the boys in shota as "shotas". That is just retarded. For something to be shota, it must have at least one boy who is doing something sexual in it. Stop being retarded, for the love of god.

Again, I personally love shota, so I'm not attacking it, I'm defending it. You are using the term incorrectly and refuse to admit you are wrong, and that pisses me off.
>> Anonymous
Jesus Fucking Christ people! Bunch of drama queens lololololololololololololo


oh and by the way, thread hijacked with....


DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU Jesus Fucking Christ people! Bunch of drama queens lololololololololololololo


oh and by the way, thread hijacked with....


DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU
>> Anonymous
>>171632
What the fuck are you talking about? Is it possible for you to write at least one coherent sentence in your sad excuse for a post? Is it even possible for you to read? The person I was referring to (which is probably your dumbass) said that kissing is sexual. I stated that kissing is not sexual (or does that mean I just had sex with my mom when I kicked her cheek? Or what about when little kids kiss their parents, does that mean the parents should go to jail for sexual abuse?)

And I'm a closet pedo because I said two boys kissing isn't sexual? And no, if a man was "pitching" a little boy's nipples, I doubt it would be sexually. The word you were looking for is "pinching"; and yes, that is sexual, but where the hell is any of that going on in the pictures in this thread?

Stop being an asshat because you're only making yourself look stupid. A little boy standing by himself is not shota. Two little boys kissing is not shota. A boy getting fucked by someone is shota, which would not belong here on the /cm/ board.

Congratulations on being a prime example why people hate weaboos who misuse the language. I guess next you'll be declaring that a man just standing there fully-clothed is yaoi.
>> Anonymous
Will everyone shut the fuck up please?
>> Anonymous
>>171916
Why? You don't have to read any of it, so it shouldn't matter. It's a valid gripe. If people are going to use these terms, they need to learn to use them correctly. Same with any word in any language.
>> Anonymous
Trainwreck of thirdhand information and armchair anthropology.

Good job!
>> Anonymous
Saging again. This board is filled with the most retarded drama queens on 4chan.
>> Anonymous
.
>> Anonymous
>>171925
You need to go to /y/. This is nothing. This at least is a good point, people misusing terms is hella annoying and they need to learn how to use them correctly. But in /y/, well, anything at all will get something going. This is the first bit of drama in /cm/ in a long while.
>> Anonymous
O.P. here

Wow. What a flame war this turned into.

The internet is serious fucking business, it seems.
>> Anonymous
>>172034
I don't like yaoi, so I don't go there. Half the time I don't come here because of that. Of course there is NOTHING wrong with yaoi, it's just not my cup o' tea, yo. But seriously, everyone here whines and bitches over the most retarded shit ever. XD I feel bad for everyone who just wants some nice pics, be it /cm/ or /y/...
>> Anonymous
>>172137
Well, /cm/ is quite tranquil 98% of the time. But correcting someone when they use a word incorrectly isn't "retarded shit". If I was using a word wrong, I'd want someone to correct me so I wouldn't continue to look like an idiot. Unfortunately some people just won't learn.
>> Anonymous
STFU, god, this is 4chan and not DA or LJ you cunts.
>> Anonymous
>>172213
Actually, it is retarded.

>>172331
You forgot to sage.
>> Anonymous
Shit, another sage then.
>> Anonymous
Okay, let's end this drama.

Shota=SEXUAL acts with a minor 12 years of age and under. No exceptions.

So if the partner is between 14-17 (13 is a bit iffy). IT IS NOT SHOTA. Or pedophilia for that matter.

Fact: There are states in the US where the legal consent is 16 or 17. I live in one of them.

And any chara that looks loli/shota but is of legal consent, it's against the wall really. I like to call it psuedo-shota than the actual stuff.

Kissing in a certain way can be a sexual act if it meant to arouse someone. All types of kissing =/= sexual acts.
>> duoikari
>>172434
thank you
i was going to say something but i think i'll keep it to my self since it will only just start this whole arguement up again

THE END???
>> Anonymous
>>172434
i dont want to start an argument up again, but i have to comment on your post

>>And any chara that looks loli/shota but is of legal consent, it's against the wall really.

the real definition of shota is LOOKS not AGE. thats just the simplest way to put it. if it looks loli/shota, then it IS. no despute.

as for kingdom hearts, sora is a little iffy in the first one, but ultimately it is not shota, unless a particular picture is depicted as such.

>>So if the partner is between 14-17 (13 is a bit iffy). IT IS NOT SHOTA.

thats not necessarily true, for the same reasons as above. take honey from ouran as an example.
>> Anonymous
>>172434
Thread over!
>> Anonymous
>>172488
Not true. I read some psuedo-shota BL stuff and not once that they were categorized as shota, hence pseudo-shota (and it's more of a run-on joke or something). The only time that they categorized shota is when one of the partner is male and 12 and under (and the male partner's age is revealed as such). Like's there pseudo-BL and pseudo-yuri, there's pseudo-shota as well.

Hunny-senpai ONLY looks loli-shota, it doesn't mean he is (he's 17). When they categorized each of the hosts in Ouran Host Club is purely on their looks. I mean Mori-senpai is the "wild" type but that can't be any more further than the truth on how he really is.

BUT this discussion is OVER. The OP wants pics of young boys, let's give to her/him and stop this drama already.
>> Anonymous
>>172680
O Rly?

Try posting some pics of shota-fied characters in /y/ and see if you don't get banned.
>> Anonymous
>>172977
Clothed small boys go in /cm/. Naked small boys go in www.not4chan.us.
:]