Does /c/ do Renamon?
No. Yiff in hell furfag.
OP herelulz
>>328331Oh yeah, its not human therefor it MUST be furry. Oh yeah, it has fur therefor it MUST be yiff related.See now, if he posted something more hentai like I could understand. But he didn't, that picture is pretty much normal.
Renamon is cute...And from an anime...So why cant she be here?
>>328345Closet Furfags. That's why.
>>328345Because she's not even humanoid?Although the thing that she evolves into isn't too bad looking.
>>328354Even if she's not human, she's still cute. Just because of the obvious connections to furfaggotry, it doesn't mean she can't be here.
>>328354That doesn't mean anything. I'm pretty sure I've seen some cute "pokemon" pics posted before and nobody said anything about them. As long as they have that cute and girly flare to them, why not? There's no place else to post them...
The way I see it, there's nothing dictating that Renamon can't be here.Moar, plz.
Sage for furry.Or /v/.Either works.
>>328386Go die, furfag. Get off my 4chan.
Surprisingly, this is the only one I have, but if you look up tailsrulez (I think that's how it's spelled) on DA, he has more.
Correction: It's tailsrulz
She's humanoid enough to be considered furry. And the first pic is obviously sexualized (the crack) so this counts as furry. Cute animals, allowed, anthro foxes, no.
Angewomon is probably the only "cute" digimon. She might even have a vagoo. But Renamon is for furfags, plain and simple.
Renamon is badass, not cute, GTFO.>>328395In the new one, the girl turns into this winged thing with a helmet that's pretty cute, and it's free of yiff.
>>328395Maybe where guys are concerned. And that's a strong maybe. :p
>>328386Her strong association with yiffing isn't enough reason for her not to be here? I've always understood /c/ to be for pictures of cute, HUMAN girls, though I'd hate to toe this potential shitstorm with catgirls and shit. Personally, I'd say she's way too anthropomorphic to be in /c/.>>328364There's always /v/. But you'd still get the furfag responses. "Cute" pokemon pictures? I've seen plenty... with humans in them. But only pokemon? I don't think so.
>>328395LadyDevimon is better.