>> |
Sam and OMG HAX!!
>>241695 Population growth statistics are always skewed. Okay, if they were to continue to populate at the same rate until 2200, they'd die out. However, THAT WOULD NEVER HAPPEN.
I'm in college studying calculus, and accurate functions describing population growth and reduction have roofs and floors. The more or less there is of a population, the faster or slower the birth rate would change. If the Japanese population got DANGEROUSLY low, people would start having more kids. Inversely, if there were too many people, the Japanese would have LESS children. (And since that's what they're doing... might that say something?) In fact, MOST places in the world seriously need to lose as many people as they can. The human race is overpopulated. We need less kids, not more. The problem is that a population surge is good for the economy, and a good economy is good for politicians, so who's going to suggest we have more kids?
|