>> |
Anonymous File :-(, x)
>>232169 That's formal logic, not English! Any normal statement in English carries the implication that all of its components are of interest. Hence 'X when Y' does not just mean that 'Y' is some sort of condition for 'X', it means that 'Y' is an interesting conditionn for 'X'. And it is impossible for 'Y' to be an interesting condition for 'X' if 'not Y' is a sufficient condition for 'X'. Thus in English rather than formal logic, 'X when Y' implies that it is possible to simultaneously have 'not X' and 'not Y'. So anyone who believes that 'X', in this case the cuteness of Ilya is always true is perfectly entitled to object to such a statement.
But since this is one of the sillier arguments on the internet, and that's saying something, here's some more Ilya.
|