File :-(, x, )
Children Rhythm
I'm doing a final project in art and I need children for referancing. Girls age 12 (or at least look that;ie Sasami) or younger.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
i r watching you.
>> Anonymouse
     File :-(, x)
Satsuki is 9, apparently, tho...
>> Anonymouse
     File :-(, x)
maybe Chiaki-sama?
>> Anonymouse
     File :-(, x)
and of course...any of this group aside from the 21, I mean 16-year-old.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
>>452486
You do realize that anime/manga drawing have distorted dimensions.
>> Anonymous
>>452751
less distorted than american cartoons
the only disproportional thing is that their heads are too big
>> Viaggiatore !lDZfmmdTWM
     File :-(, x)
So, what's this project about? Give us some details, friend.
>> Anonymous
right, their heads. And eyes. And mouths. And pretty much every other body part ever. please don't tell me you're using this as a ref for actual children.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I think I know what Anonymous is looking for...
>> Anonymous
little girls are so awesome
>> Anonymous
>>452778
ok, heads as whole, including eyes etc. And this isnt even applicable to all animes, there are some that have proportionate features.
other than making women's breasts unimaginably large, everything else is proportional. especially this being children, whom have no breasts.
>> Rhythm
     File :-(, x)
>>452751
Yes.
>>452767
My thoughts exactly.
>>452778
Not exact referance in all aspects of course.
>>452776
I wasn't sure anyone on 4chan would care about the details so I didn't mention them! This is for my final project in Drawing II. I must do a large scale drawing of a social issue. It's in condordance w/ this new 21st century movement called thinkism-> http://www.thinkism.org/

I'm considering doing a couple of issues on the websites called "Child Labor" and "Children's Rights"(see-> http://www.thinkism.org/asp/socialissues.asp). I don't generally like doing social drawings so I figured drawing cute children would make the project more enjoyable for me. I haven't gotten inspired compositionally w/ real children so I decided to try getting some images of anime childlren since I can usually draw alot of good ideas from that.

Oh, and the other part involves me doing a paper on David Kam's work; which I think is boring because it puts concept over everything to the extend that if I hate the concept he has nothing else to fall back on-> http://www.thinkism.org/asp/studiothumb.asp?type=Painting&style=Thinkism&theme=Love&nw=n
o&prod=&fa=1
>>452804
They are the sign of innocense!^^
>>452805
Exactly! So it's not that weird of a conversion...
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Stick limbs are real proportional, folks. Cartoons are not realistic, even Japanese ones. Sorry, weeaboos.
>> Anonymous
>>452486

...Art project, right.

>>452821

...You have disappointed pedo bear.
>> Anonymous
what the fuck is this shit? your thinkism site may be the biggest load of bullshit and failure ive seen all year. ive seen wahts on /b/ and this is worse than any of it
>> Anonymous
>>453246
My grammatically bankrupt friend here has a point. His definition of 'the thinkism style of fine art' is something of a paraphrasing of the definition of art itself, and his implication is that all other art is not as meaningful as his own because his own is constructed to have meaning. The artist responsible for the site seems to have been told his art blows goats one too many times and taken it upon himself to liberate us all from thinking that old art movements had any real meaning or significance next to his painting of animals WITHOUT THE ANIMALS! I AM MAKING A SOCIAL STATEMENT, SOMETHING WHICH NO ARTIST HAS EVER DONE BEFORE ME.

Fuck you, David Kam. You're going on my list of people to send a shit in a box to.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
David Kam, 'art' in hell.
Note the filename begins with ART- in case you were confused, you poor inferior pleb.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>453255

o lawd, is dat sum windfish?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
Hans Haacke. grass grows. according to your site, this is thinkism. how about we go a little older girl with pearl earing is now thinkism according to your sites guidelines. chris burden is obviously thinkism of course. oh and lets not forget giger. he was reeeeeealy into his thinkism im sure
>> Anonymous
Now... you said "Note the filename begins with ART" well that is a very good way to promote a your thinkism. Very thoughtful. cutting out the whale? "We get recycled art following along historical lines." RT_extinction_bluewhale_med.jpg ... well. thats obviously new and creative. its not like greenpeace has ever put out an anti whaling campaign.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>452486
...