>> |
Sam and OMG HAX!!
File :-(, x)
>>227380 But you don't understand! If we take away nude photos of unreal kids, pedophiles will stop lusting after real kids, right? Right?!
This logic is about as shaky as saying that if you keep a gay man away from other guys, he'll suddenly turn straight, or if you keep a Congressman away from Congress he'll grow a brain.
In fact, I'd like to point out that being a pedophile is NOT a crime, nor should it be. Being sexually attracted to children is not the same thing as raping them. In the same manner, lusting after adult women is perceived as A-OK by most of society (and the few that think lust in itself is evil can, ironically, go fuck themselves). But raping an adult women is bad, mm'kay? So don't be bad, and don't rape women, mm'kay? </Mr.Mackey>
We all have fetishes, and some are less legal than others, but desire is not, should not, and shall not be considered a crime in any decent society.
And as someone pointed out on the news site, even if this were passed, and lolicon and shota were made illegal, and the images were tracked... We ("we" refering to the people as a whole) could just send said images EVERYWHERE. They can't tell who had it for how long, who fapped to it, who saw it accidentally. So when the same shotacon image is found on 8 million PCs across the country, well, they're pretty screwed.
Chalk this one up to pre-election "moralizing." This is McCain trying to look "tough on child porn" to those of us who think that the only child molesters out there are on the Internet, and not in their own families or on their street.
Note: Sam does not support child molestation in any way. He's not into lolicon, just believes it is not a crime. The image attached is an example of a joke, so, don't get your adult diapers in a bunch, senator.
|