File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
found these the other day, what does/an/ think they are?
photographer says they're of a previously unidentified primate species responsible for bigfoot myth, Pennsylania Game Commission say they're of a magey bear
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
moar
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
what a bear with mange looks like
>> Anonymous
Ask /x/, they are really smart and will know exactly what it is.
>> Anonymous
>>240373
really more of an animal question though
>> Anonymous
>>240375
I think he was joking.

/x/ thinks everything is bigfoot, ghost, or alien.
>> Anonymous
Photographer obviously did not want people to know that the face looks like an animal's, as they only took ass shots.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Okay guys, people are gonna bash me for this but, could it be a descendant of the Chalicotheres?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
take it to /x/, kids
>> Anonymous
And I realize it's a long shot that I'm saying this because of how small it is, but in that first picture the "primates" forelimbs definitely look longer than it's hindlimbs and it looks like it has a long neck.

If it WAS a descendant of Chalicotheres, maybe no one has discovered it because its incredibly small (like the difference between elephants and hyraxes).
>> Anonymous
Oh and if you look, it has no tail. Maybe it lost it's tail, since it was so short. A few million years could that I think.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
We've had this discussion before.
Its a bear with mange.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I believe this is the same bear, just taken on a different day.
>> Anonymous
>>240397

Well, I wanted to believe, but even I was skeptical of my "related to Chalicotheres" thing.
>> E Noni Mos !/PraVV22sc
Fairly sure that is a bear.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>240398
shut up and accept the fact that its a bear.
>> Anonymous
>>240412

You're an idiot.
>> Anonymous
Who the fuck are we gonig to believe? the photographer that was there and has visual evidence, or some bear-loving cockfag on /an/?
>> Anonymous
>>240433
Least I didn't think it was some sort Chalicothere.
>> Anonymous
>>240435
The bear-loving cockfag on /an/.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>240435
oh no he wasn't there, it was automated through a motion sensor
>> Anonymous
>>240449
I was skeptical that it was a bear til I saw this one. Definitely BARES
>> Anonymous
>>240476
yeah those are bear cubs he provided as comparison
here's the place, decide for selves: http://www.bfro.net/avevid/jacobs/jacobs_photos.asp
>> Anonymous
/an/ - Paranormal
>> Anonymous
Jesus christ, it's a diseased bear. Cryptozoology fags are fucking idiots. It's a fucking bear. Not Big Foot.
>> Anonymous
>>240491
Actually, I've seen this picure before on a cryptozoology website where they explained why, based on the anatomy, it has to be a mangey bear. Some cryptozoologists are nuts, most are relatively down to earth. Why would a bigfoot be on all fours anyhow?
>> Guodzilla
I thought that maybe it could be the real deal, since it even made it to the news. . .However, Dr. Jeff Meldrum (Dr. Sasquatch since the passing of Grover Krantz in '02) says that it is DEFINITELY a mangy bear. SO, with a sasquatch believer debunking this tempting image, I'm thinking perhaps he's right, and it IS a bear. I stress however, it MAY BE a bear. Skeptics could still be wrong, you know.