>> |
Anonymous
>>304748 Not that I'm trying to defend the company or anything (I definitely do not condone the events outlined in OP's link), but what does the second one really have to do with Sony, other than association by proxy? That man could have been anyone's employee, and it's not like Sony has any reign over what he does in his free time (unlike in the first article) or requires their employees to all be animal abusers.
|