File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
>> Anonymous
Honestly, mods, fucking BAN anyone posting Macros. Its against the rules, and these people aren't reading the rules, so what's their purpose here?
>> Anonymous
if mods banned anyone for posting macros there would only be newfags here
>> Anonymous
>>128340
there are only 7 people posting in /an/.
there would be only two people left if mods banned everyone posting macros;
bitter anon and someone else.
>> Anonymous
>>128336
have YOU actually read the rules? Macros are not to be posted in reply. As long as the OP fits the board category the whole image could be filled with macros and it is still within the rules.
>> Anonymous
>>128404
post one and see?
>> Anonymous
>>128404
reply hazy, ask again later
>> 4tran
Btw, why is there a rule against macros anyway? Are the servers overburdened by people constantly posting macros?
>> Anonymous
>>128411
LOL that'd be hilarious if that were the case. I imagine it's in response to the lolz cat phenomenon, and keeping this place's standards up somewhat
>> Anonymous
>>128411
no just some people get all butthurt over it
>> Anonymous
>>128411
Go visit 7chan's /cat/ sometime. It was a nice place once, but now it's overrun by retarded macrofaggotry. I haven nothing against (good) macros in principle, but since we can't have a clear enough rule against failmacros or macro threads, we just have a rule against all macros.
>> Anonymous
Because for every macro that's actually funny, there are over nine thousand of them that are completely fucking stupid.