File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Nyah!
>> Anonymous
in before NOM NOM NOM
>> Anonymous
this thread is making me wet
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>55764
OM NOM NOM NOM!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Nyah!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
nya!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Nyaaaaah!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Nyaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!
>> Anonymous
>>55815
OH SHI-
>> Anonymous
>>55815
That is quite the crap-quality image of an ugly critter.
>> Anonymous
>>55969
Probably because said critter is assumed to be extinct for quite some time now, images back then werent the best =p
>> Anonymous
>>55815
is that sum tazmanian tiger?
>> Wesker !JYbrm0g7fs
>>55969
70 years ago cameras weren't as advanced as they are today. :3
>> Anonymous
>>56000
Dunno. I'd wager a better photographer could have done an even better job given the same equipment. Not me though. I am the kinda person you can give a camera that doesn't blur or take pictures too dark or light and he'd still find a way to make them fail!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>56000
omg history lesson get!
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>55712
Poodle tongue pwnz j00.
>> Anonymous
its a friggen hedgehog.. i have one:)