File :-(, x, )
Roo!
Genuine kangaroo paw back scratcher! 13" long, partially wrapped and sewn roo hide from paw down the bamboo stick about 6". Keep in mind the kangaroos are hunted by government permit only, if they did not keep the numbers down they would starve in the winter, which is worse. Then 100% of the roo is recycled (the meat is eaten, the hide is used, even the feet as you see here, much as deer here in the U.S.)
>> Roo!
     File :-(, x)
>> Roo!
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Goes great with my Kangaroo scrotum skin pouch!
>> Anonymous
In before some fucking furry wants to jack off with it.
>> Anonymous
>>191814
Hey, good idea.
>> Anonymous
>>191808
I'm not against fur or leather, but would you honestly want to scratch your back with this thing?
>> Anonymous
>>191817
If you're not against fur or leather, what's the problem?
>> Anonymous
>>191818
I'm somewhat disinclined to rub the dismembered body parts of dead animals on my body, especially if they still look like dismembered animal parts.
>> Anonymous
>>191820
Ahh. But the skin of dead animals which still looks like the skin and the animal is okay.

Either way, if you can't scratch your own back without one of these, there's a problem.
>> Anonymous
>>191822
Also, in b4 PETA; I'd buy one of these, especially since 100% of the roo is used, just for comedy value.
>> Anonymous
>>191822
Uhh... I own several leather jackets, leather gloves and leather shoes. None of those look like the skin of the animal the leather came from. Mainly because in most of the cases the animal wasn't originally hairless or black, or shaped like a jacket, glove or shoe.

Personally that's not what bothers me about that backscratcher, though. For some probably irrational reason that thing strikes me as unhygienic. It is the original paw, after all, just dried and stuffed with bamboo, right?