>> |
Anonymous
>>165324
Agreed.
Also, I would just like to point out that this is just one big circle jerk of responsibility.
The animal's owner has already paid for it: with a dead cat. I don't know about anyone else here, but I would rather have a live, friendly companion than a "quick buck," thank you. So, no, I do not feel that the cat's owner was out of line by joining in a class action lawsuit against the manufacturer.
However, no, the pet food manufacturer isn't entirely at fault... but, hey, they actually have access to quality control equipment procedures and obviously failed. Therefor, a greater portion of the culpability belongs to them, for having the methods available to them to prevent this, but failing to act.
However, the greatest and ultimate blame lies on the manufacturer of the products used in the pet food. Therefor, there should be nothing stopping the pet food manufacturer from suing THEM in turn.
It's not "unfair" to anyone or a double-standard to hold other, more culpable people accountable for their actions at each step of the process.
|