File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
The way we are doing this is as follows. Beating an animal gets you 1 point, while losing to an animal gets you -1 point. Having a decent chance of winning but probably losing gets you -.5 point. Draws (completely unable to hurt the other, ant vs. blue whale) result in no points for either side. Running away with no hopes of being caught constitutes a draw as well.

You don't actually have to go down the list a thousand times and make a score for each one, this is just for reference. I'd like to know which animal you think is the baddest, most versatile killing machine, and why. In my opinion, it is the crocodile, due to their badness and versatility (can drag most land animals underwater and has a decent chance against anything fishy).

All animals can have any terrain they want. If both water and land/shallows is requested, land/shallows slopes off into water at a 45 degree angle.

These animals are considered to have human intelligence. However, they may not use tools unless it is common for a member of that species to carry that tool most of the time. That means no guns for humans.

Example: Polar Bear vs. Shark. Bear has a realistic chance of winning in water, but shark will likely win. Shark could jump onto ice and crush bear or ice (making it fall) before suffocating if necessary. +1 point to shark, -.5 points to bear.

These are your choices:

Human
Polar Bear
Grizzly Bear
Comment too long. Clickhereto view the full text.
>> Anonymous
>>194168
human vs my cock
fuck yeah
>> Anonymous
What the fuck is this shit? I don't want to play your stupid tl;dr game for faggots.