>>322385what law would that be?
Vacuous Truth of Universal Statements
>>322387and yes, it is a huge generalization that says if you can't disprove it, even if the original statement is false, it is trueBUT it still says God exists
There are gay men in an alternate universe using a machine to watch you touch yourself at night.You can't disprove it, therefore it must be true.
>>322389wrong, because the negation of that would be>There are gay men in an alternate universe using a machine to watch you touch yourself at night.Prove: There are straight women in this universe using a machine to watch you touch yourself in the morningSo: FBIThe negation is true, thus the original statement is false //
>>322392>>322392>The negation is true...lol, no
what does any of this have to do with /an/?
>>322394people from old /n/ don't know the existence of 4chan text boards, so they take all their philosophical and political shit to other boards.Also, flying spaghetti monster, invisible pink unicorn, etc...
>>322394sarah pallin murders wolves
>>322379The burden of proof fails on the claimant. If you say there's a God, then the onus is on you to prove it.ps. faith can't prove shit.
>>322470Though, you'll have to admit, on 4chan there's more "God doesn't exist, prove me wrong christfag" than the alternative. I frankly don't care either way, but atheists sure don't come out looking too good on this image board.