>> |
Anonymous
Well, nazis did have some good ideas, but they had so many bad ideas that it's hard to take a neutral attitude. I think survival of the fittest should somehow apply to people too. But not like the nazis did; by killing the others. I think the concept I'm trying to find is negative eugenism. Or something like that. It means that it's regulated that who can reproduce and nobody gets killed. The Earth is already overflooded, so some birth regulation would be good anyway. If only the ones with no genetic diseases and such could have babies. Sounds cruel, of course, but at least the human race wouldn't be weakening. Evolution has stopped what comes to human. Also, race obviously doesn't matter, what comes to finding the fittest. Still, I am aware of the fact that the controlling would be impossible to execute in real life. The one's doing the control would twist the whole thing to their own advantage. Only richest would be having babies or some shit like that. Oh yeah, my point was; it's good to keep that "survival of the fittest"-thing in mind. Maybe not all of us should reproduce. No one in 4chan should at least. And how long will human be the "fittest" of this planet? Not too long is my guess. Not that I really care, or anyone else for that matter...
|