File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Would you, /an/?
>> Anonymous
Yes.
>> Anonymous
Not for all the Klondike Bars in the world.
>> Anonymous
Would I what?
>> Anonymous
>>292813
possibly.
>> Anonymous
I'd hit it
if thats what you mean
>> Anonymous
well , meth is a hell of a drug
>> Anonymous
FUCK YEAH RED HUSKIES

ALWAYS
>> Anonymous
She's cute.
>> Anonymous
>>292836
You'd WHAT?
>> Anonymous
Yes I would, but only if she was willing of course
>> Anonymous
Ok , why? your really phisically attracted to dogs??
>> Anonymous
>>292909
Yes I am and I'd never force a dog into it.
>> Anonymous
But I mean what is it about a dog ? I just dont understand, how could look at a dog and think , hey I think Id fuck that?
>> Anonymous
>>292933
Their personality, loyalty, honesty, appearance... list goes on.

And no, when I see a dog my first thought isn't fucking it.
>> Anonymous
You like to give it some wine and spoon for a little first, what are you smoking that is wrong on so many levels LuLz
>> Anonymous
>>292944
I don't smoke neither tobacco or any other drugs.

No alcohol for dogs.

And what would she do with that spoon?
>> Anonymous
I would totally eat that dog. GNOM GNOM GNOM GNOM GNOM GNOM GNOM GNOM GNOM
>> Anonymous
what would you do with that spoon LuLz Lulz NOM NOm
>> Anonymous
Perhaps
>> Anonymous
twice
>> Anonymous
Wow, red huskies are awesome. She looks so feminine~
>> Anonymous
>>292988
Yeah, mine dream dogs too :)
>> Anonymous
>>292988
Is it the tongue hanging out or the blank lifeless stare?
>> Anonymous
Is /an/ discussing what I think they're discussing?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
yay huskies!!11
>> Anonymous
>>292988

lol
>> Anonymous
No, since I'm not a lesbian.
>> Anonymous
>>293060
Does it even count?
>> Anonymous
>>292813
What, cuddle with her? Sure. More than that? I'd have to think real hard about it.
>> Anonymous
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tl5ifbaa3JI
>> Anonymous
I came
>> Anonymous
>>293069
I don't even know... never understood how lesibian zoophiles worked out anyway.
>> Anonymous
I used to have a red husky growing up as a kid. It was a bit lighter than this one in the picture though.

Beautiful, calm, loyal dogs. I fucking loved her. She had one brown eye and one blue eye. She never played fetch, was too lazy, but I didnt care cause she would sit and chill with me all day no matter where I went :).

I miss my Stoli :(....
>> Anonymous
>>293175
Same as regular lesbians I imagine
>> Anonymous
>>293175
I don't even understand how straight ones work.
>> Anonymous
>>292813
Probably yes.
>> Anonymous
>>292813
Well is she clean?
>> Anonymous
>>293175
>>293225
Many zoophiles are often attracted to both genders of the species.

I'm a straight male myself and strictly interested in female dogs. But sure, I'd still kiss and cuddle a male dog anyway :)
>> Anonymous
This thread is disturbing.
>> Anonymous
>>292813
Would I WHAT?
>> Anonymous
Maybe!
She is awfully pretty, hyuk hyuk.
>> Anonymous
>>292896
sage for a delusional fucking idiot.
>> Anonymous
>>293740
lolwut
>> Anonymous
Yes i do believe i totally would!
>> Anonymous
>>293110

lol
>> Anonymous
>>292813
Those eyes... that look...
>> Anonymous
>>292911

Well, holy shit. Came here thinking I'd find this, AND HERE IT IS.

>>293518

FOR THE LOVE OF CHRIST NO
>> Anonymous
I don't see the repulsion in it.

A dog gets into moods just as we do, no harm if they are willing to go with it.

They breath just like a person would when stimulated, they grip just like a woman does, and they climax just as a satisfied woman does.
>> Anonymous
>>294060

That has gotta be the stupidest argument I've read in a long time.
>> Anonymous
Not an argument, just a personal observation
>> Anonymous
>>294060
>they climax just as a satisfied woman does.
Really?
>> Infidel !!qiClNei5oRk
>>294065
What, never satisfied a woman?
>> Anonymous
>>294066

Not a dog, no.
>> Anonymous
Its really not that hard actually. I found it easier than my ex gf.

Most of the stuff was fingering, you don't rush it like you probably see in videos. Dogs love slow and steady just like people do. The trick for me was when she started to grip I'd go faster. You'd hear her hold her breath as I go fast and when she relaxed you'd hear a big exhale and I'd slow down.

A few mins of that, (she'd grip tighter each time) you go slighter faster each time, within about 2mins or so, she hold her breath pretty strongly, and you'll feel a rush of warmth run along your fingers.

Sometimes she'd want to sit up and start licking her self, but after I while I found if I layed her back down, and kept going (slow and steady, and fast when she gripped) she'd orgasm again a little while later, this time stronger and with a much more prominent wash of warm liquid.

I think on one night I got her to climax probably 4 times, the 4th being the biggest. She really wanted to lick herself then and didn't want to stay laying down, she I let her go for it. At the same time I shit you not, there was a huge wet patch on my bed, and it was not from me, all 100% her.

I'm talking like a wet patch the size of your hand, properly soggy.


The trick is, you really got to stimulate your dog the way a woman would want, its not simply getting it in her right away and hammering away like a jack hammer, slow and steady to start with, be receptive of her feedback (breathing, tightness, arching, etc) and you'll probably satisfy her even more....
>> Anonymous
Once in the middle of the night she must have been in the mood, as she licked me to wake me up (on the face) and then rolled onto her back and spread her legs. Being half awake, I thought I'd have a quick play thinking she just wants a massage. No she was wet, very wet, so we had a bit of fun :)

(for the non believers out that, I'm not going to try and prove it, I'm not going to embellish it, we had fun together, and there were times when there was some frustration, its all not roses, but yeah. If you have a dog that havn't been desexed, help release some pressure, they'll appreciate it if you give it to them as a reward. Just don't ever give into it when they want it, otherwise they will do inappropriate things at inappropriate times.)
>> Infidel !!qiClNei5oRk
>>294070
>>294071
*Vomits*

Seriously, get help.
>> Anonymous
>>294079

Help he does not need.

Fire, yes. Help, no.
>> Infidel !!qiClNei5oRk
>>294087
Help being set ON fire.
>> Anonymous
>>294070
>>294071

gtfo beastfag
>> Anonymous
lol

I wouldn't, but lol at the rage
>> Anonymous
>>294070
>you don't rush it like you probably see in videos

/b/ is that way
<------------------

Btw, this thread sucks pretty hard.
>> Anonymous
This is why /an/ needs more beast threads. Fun for everyone.
>> Anonymous
>>294070Fap Fap Fap
>> Anonymous
>>294070
Dammit now i have a raging hardon, and no dog to stick it in :(
>> Anonymous
Jesus sages.
>> Anonymous
>>294070
>>294071
I wish I didn't find this arousing ;_;
>> Anonymous
When I was paging down quickly I thought it was Ronald McDonald

Try yourself
>> Anonymous
I don't get why people get so angry about this.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Dis thread is funnay.
>> sage sage
SAGE
>> Anonymous
WAT
>> Anonymous
Depending how time goes, I might type up my first experience. Its something I was hoping to put on beastforum, or beastchan, but having "beast" in the url kind of stands out if we ever have our web usage audited.
>> Anonymous
This thread is the greatest troll on /an/. Kudos to OP for posting and to the crazies on both sides of the argument for continuing to bump it. Seriously, the arguing is hilarious and disturbing at the same time.
>> Anonymous
>>294473
Trolling?
Well you just keep telling that to yourself.
>> Anonymous
These threads always make me wonder what percentage of the population is dogfuckers, we seem to be fairly numerous but the social taboo makes it really hard to be sure about anything... Didn't kinsey end up estimating it at like 5% of men or something
>> Anonymous
Its probably not as much as we'd like to think. I've met a lot of dog owners, and I they seem pretty repulsed by the idea of interspecies sex.

Eg, when their dog gets in the mood they either find it cute/funny and laugh at it, or are embarrassed by it.
>> Anonymous
>>294532
>These threads always make me wonder what percentage of the population is dogfuckers

>>294546
>Its probably not as much as WE'D LIKE TO THINK

We'd like to think there are MORE people who have sex with dogs than there really are? Is this for real?

This is the worst thread I have ever seen outside of /b/.
>> Dry Bones
     File :-(, x)
>>294070
>>294071
>> Anonymous
I wonder if anyone can actually tell me a reason other than "its wrong" or "immoral" as to why they don't help relieve your dog's pressure if the dog is willing?

I genuinely would like to hear some of the reasons why people find this so repulsive?
>> Anonymous
>>294572

Well, don't you think it would be awkward if you got walked in on while doing it?
>> Anonymous
So don't get walked in on...

While more taboo being caught with an animal, its still awkward to be walked in on if you're fapping away, but you take precautions so that you aren't. (eg, live in a home that isn't your parents?) :P
>> Anonymous
>>294574

I get it, I get it, but seriously, I'm no christfag but, I think someplace in the bible it says somewhere "he who lies with a beast will surely be put to death", so that's worth looking into for anyone who knows about it.

tldr; It's probably some culture thing, or who knows :/
>> Anonymous
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Leviticus%2020;&version=31;

'If a man has sexual relations with an animal, he must be put to death, and you must kill the animal.'

Leviticus 20:15 of the OLD Testament. Basically where it outlines a whole lot of rules, that all christfags seem to selectively live by, but will happily tout when it suits them.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leviticus
>> Anonymous
>>294457

There's... a... beast... chan?

WHAT THE FUCK.

>>294572

If you'd like to relieve your dog's 'pressure', go let it get fucked by another dog.

I think that's what they made other dogs for.

Other than that, I think it's wrong because it feels wrong. You can say it's immoral because the dog cannot consent, in that it's not intelligent enough to consent to interspecies sex.

If it was Scooby Doo, we'd have a problem on our hands. It, however, is not.

tl;dr: Scooby Doo can get married, Marmaduke cannot.
>> Anonymous
I'm like 90% sure dogs don't enjoy sex, so thats basically sums up why it's wrong
>> Anonymous
>>294591
>I'm like 90% sure dogs don't enjoy sex
What the fuck?
>> Anonymous
>>294572
Because you're fucking a dog. It's incredibly abnormal to be sexually attracted to animals outside of your species.

It's fucking weird, you're fucking weird. The end.
>> Anonymous
>>294591
How are you so sure dogs can't say no so its not rape.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
lol
>> Anonymous
>>294591

What makes you so sure?
>> Anonymous
Of course I'd fuck her, she looks wonderful

>>294590
So what? Me helping people feels extremely wrong because I'm giving away my resources to other people.

I don't let my emotions cloud my ability to reason though.

>>294593
>It's incredibly abnormal to be sexually attracted to animals outside of your species.
Say's who?
>> Anonymous
>>294599
>Say's who?
Everyone who doesn't have the urge to fuck animals.
>> Anonymous
>>294600
And what percentage of the population is that? Besides, since when is abnormality wrong?
>> Anonymous
>>294601
I have no idea what percentage that is and I hope to never find out, but I'm sure it's a hell of a lot less than normal people. Regardless of the attraction itself, fucking animals is creepy because it's like you went to a store and bought a girlfriend with the intelligence of a 2-year-old.
>> Anonymous
I'm sure a lot of people that have been on 4chan for a while have seen the common pictures of a Giraffe fucking a Donkey, or a Deer about to fuck a dog.

>>294591

You could be 100% sure if you like, doesn't mean you're accurate in you're assumption.

The scientific community is still in debate as to how cognitive an animal's mind is, and in recent years there's been some interesting studies done that show some interesting tests whereby animals are actually fairly close to humans when it comes to base emotions and though processes.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/08/20/scidogs120.xml
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2007/11/28/scidogs128.xml
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2007/04/27/scidogs27.xml
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/01/16/scidog116.xml

If you're an observer of wildlife you'd probably be more inclined to believe that animals aren't that much different from us.
>> Anonymous
There's a long way to go in proving that animals experience the world like us in many ways, and there will always be the non believers, but thats science for you. Believe what you want to believe, but if you become close minded you tend to miss out on some interesting stuff.

In regards to a dog being like scooby doo. Yes that would make things a bit more interesting as they'd be able to tell us how they feel about it all, but dogs don't communicate on that level yet. But if you watch closely you can pick up on certain ways they interact and give you signs in regards to liking something or disliking it. Its really very obvious once you know what to look for.

Then again on the flip side, take a wife that has been beaten by their husband, they don't always tell others about it. So even if we did get to a scooby doo level of communication with our dogs, there'd probably still be dogs out there that just wouldn't tell others they weren't liking what was happening to them, they'd accept their situation as how life is. (But thats a whole 'nother debate right there) So it really comes down to the human, they can either treat their partner as a sex object, or have some empathy and form a relationship. Either way, that person is going to be like that to human or animal.
>> Anonymous
>went to a store and bought a girlfriend with the intelligence of a 2-year-old.

But then again, they have the hormones and body development of an adult, which means they still have the pressures of an adult when it comes to breeding, etc.

By that logic, does that mean adult mentally handicapped people should never be allowed to have sex?
>> Anonymous
>>294612
Yes, because their mental retardedness would pass on to future generations. They should not be allowed to breed.
>> Anonymous
>>294612
Not with intelligent people, no. If you're going around seducing retards then you're seriously fucked up in the head.
>> Anonymous
>>294612

HA HA! You have fallen into my trap.

No, it simply means it's wrong for a normal human adult to have sex with a mentally-handicapped human.

Which translates into why it's not a good idea to have sex with animals, huzzah.
>> Anonymous
>>294611

ITT: Scooby Doo is mai waifu
>> Anonymous
>>294616
You said it's creepy, not wrong.

And why exactly is it wrong? Have you ever met any mentally handicapped people?

Try watching The Ringer sometime for a pretty close understanding of what they're like.

Your trap would be an actual trap, IF you proved that having sex with mentally handicapped people is wrong. But you haven't...
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Why is anyone bumping this?
>> Anonymous
>>294623
The OP pic is hot.
>> Anonymous
>>294620
Well it's certainly not RIGHT to walk your girlfriend around on a leash and make her crap in your yard. Besides, debating morality is pointless. I couldn't even prove to you that killing people is truly "wrong"; there's a hell of a lot of good reasons to kill people sometimes.
>> Anonymous
>>294620
This is what's wrong with the world today. Deluded idiots like this. It's wrong because it is not your fucking species. Whether you believe on God or not, We were designed to have sex with our OWN species. Every fucking animal on the planet is. THAT is why it i abnormal. It is against nature.
>> Anonymous
>>294626
I don't see what's wrong with having your girlfriend walk around on a leash, take craps on your lawn, etc.

That's like saying that a diaper fetish is wrong.

If there is no harm and both parties agree (as well as they can), what's the problem?
>> Anonymous
>>294620

It's wrong because of the possibility of harming them. They're not mental equals. I'm sorry.

I really liked the Ringer. The mentally handicapped can be very sweet people, and the movie was very good for showing the general populace just what they are capable of. Still, it is genuinely not a good idea to try to have sex with a mentally handicapped person simply because the two of you may very well understand sex in different ways, and it could cause psychological distress to the mentally handicapped person. Most likely, it would, as human beings don't really have a good track record with treating the disadvantaged well. The mental barrier between the two types of people is significant enough to erect laws that would make it illegal for the two types to have sex, as to protect the disadvantaged people. (in before race argument)

Yes, I have met mentally handicapped people. At times it is like talking to a child. They don't understand some things, and even though that's sad, that's not exactly the point. The point is, at that mental level, they're not going to exceed a parent-child type of relationship when it comes to interacting with a normal human being. Sex is to be between two consenting equals who understand just what they're doing. A dog and a human are not equals in any way, as the dog can be overpowered through various means by a human (drugged, tied), and, as was even depicted in one of the zoophile's posts here, the dog tried to get up and stop what the man was doing to her several times, only to be laid back down.

When two human beings do the same thing, it could be construed as being borderline rape.
>> Anonymous
All I can say is that so many of you are missing out on a good opportunity to bond well with your pet. (assuming you'd do it right)

There is communication there more primal than words, yet more civil than instinct. Its not magic, its just time you both can enjoy with one another on a level that naturally stimulates the mind and body to its heights
>> Anonymous
>>294627
So is medicine wrong? What about life extension or contraceptives? They all go against nature.

Explain to me why fucking something other than your own species is wrong. And how can you say it's against nature when animals themselves do it?

Designed my ass. By the way, haven't you ever heard of hybrids?

Once again, what is wrong with abnormal? Einstein was abnormal. Feynman was abnormal. Madam Curie was abnormal.
>> Anonymous
>>294631
ITT we compare people who fuck dogs to famous scientists.

Jesus Christ.
>> Anonymous
>>294629
Harm them? In what way? Physically? Mentally? Emotionally?

The only way that is going to happen is if you're abusive.

If the dog doesn't want to do it, don't do it. The same applies to a human. But if the dog is willing and helps you out (by thrusting against you in rhythm or several other ways), then it's pretty obvious that they understand what is going on on at least some level.
>> Anonymous
>>294632
Where did I compare any scientists to dogs?
>> Anonymous
>>294629

It could also be the dog tried to get up because IT thought it was wrong. and according to some of those articles posted it could be a possibility
>> Anonymous
>>294631

Hybrids. Aren't those the offspring of closely-related species?

Also, uh, are you really going for the animal fucker South Park episode way of understanding zoophilia?


>>294630

I JUST WANT TO PET THE CAT NOT FUCK IT
>> Anonymous
>>294636
In most instances, yes. But they are completely different species regardless.

I've never watched South Park (I just looked it up on Google).
>> Anonymous
>>294625
>The OP pic is hot.

Ohhhh, ok. Sorry, somehow I thought it was a picture of a dog. What a relief; I thought you guys might be sickos.
>> Anonymous
>>294633

> could cause psychological distress to the mentally
> handicapped person.

Also, in any possible way.

> The only way that is going to happen is if you're
> abusive.

Well, we could argue this in the same vein as having sex with a slave. Due to the difference in power, the slave has no choice, thereby making it rape. An animal, who is more easily confused and trained, can indeed be tricked into having sex with humans.

It sounds funny, I know, but if you'd do a little research into the zoophilia community (which I would assume you're a part of), you'd know that dogs have to be -trained- to -not bite- when humans want to have sex with them.

If you'd also read the accounts of zoophiles (this word I use only because "animal fucker" is a little too coarse for a board where cute animals are normally displayed), you'd realize that very rarely, if at all, do animals have sustained sexual contact with humans of their own free will. Every first-hand account I've ever read involved the animal licking a human briefly, and then the human being pursued the animal for a long period of time until the human got what he or she wanted.

Or they used peanut butter. Really, most of what I've read (outside of pure fiction) involves tricking the animal to lick the human using some manner of tasty foodstuff. Anytime you have to trick anyone, animal or human, to have sex with you, something is deeply wrong.

The animals that actually -want- to have sex with humans, if they even exist, are doing so in the same way your dog humps your leg. It's lookin' for -anything-, man, and it doesn't matter what. It's not some beautiful expression of love, it just wants a hole, and it's desperate enough to try and use yours.
>> Anonymous
>>294640
A slave has no choice, yeah. But animals do.

Some people trick them into having sex with them, but people do the same exact thing. Have you ever heard of "game"? Look up Neil Strauss sometime.

Yeah, I read Beast Forum and a couple of private sites and blogs. The only time I see people having to stop an animal from biting them is when they're sub and that's an animals natural instinct.

Otherwise I've never even heard of that or have any experience with it myself. I have experience with four bitches (female dogs).

Sure, you have to use something like peanut butter to make them lick you most of the time, but that's the only time you have to trick them. Like I said, look up Neil Strauss
>> Anonymous
>>294644

In what way does an animal have a choice? Think about it: if animals really are as cognizant of their situation as you feel they are, you're keeping a slave. You feed them, take care of them, shelter them, and, if they do not comply with your demands, all this may end.

"Natural instinct"? No, no, no, wait. Wait a minute. Are they capable of controlling themselves, or are they simple beasts?

Also, the whole thing with you is... apparently, tricking women is... acceptable.

... okay, you're fucked in the head. Not like I didn't already know that, but I didn't expect it went that deep.
>> Anonymous
>>294640
>Well, we could argue this in the same vein as having sex with a slave.
Well excuse me, King of Spain, but if it was good enough for Thomas Jefferson!
>> Anonymous
>>294646
They can choose what to do. They can solve minor puzzles. They can choose to go back to whatever they were doing instead of having sex. They have all kinds of choices.

Slave: a person who is owned by someone

I'm not keeping a slave. And if my dog suddenly became a lot less playful I wouldn't be happy, but I wouldn't stop loving her.

Yes, I do think tricking women is acceptable. Are you 100% honest when you're talking to a woman? What about someone giving you an interview?

I'm not, so I'm tricking them.

Do I use an algorithm and psychology to get women? Yes, I play the game according to them.

So I'm tricking them.

I wish I could give you numbers for this, but I can assure you that the vast majority of people are never 100% honest when flirting

Besides, I have monthly mental health checks because of my job. I've so far gotten nothing but a perfectly clean bill of health so far
>> Anonymous
>>294646
Oh quit trying. He is obviously a troll.
>> Anonymous
>>294646
As for the natural instinct thing, they can control themselves when it comes to certain things. In my experience they can control themselves 99% of the time
>> Anonymous
>>294652
I guess all of BeastForum is trolling too then, huh?
>> Anonymous
>Slave: a person who is owned by someone

If you don't consider the dog a person, what do you consider it? Is this just a semantic argument?

> Are you 100% honest when you're talking to a
> woman? What about someone giving you an
> interview?

Yes to both. No, seriously!

>Do I use an algorithm and psychology to get women?

That's sad. Not gonna quote the other thing, but I don't think Zoophilia is the kinda thing you find unless you tell the clinician about it yourself.
>> Anonymous
This thread is sad, hilarious, surprising and even slightly arousing. I love you 4chan community.
>> Anonymous
>>294655
I still consider a dog... a dog. Unless you can find a definition of the word "person" you can use to put dogs in that category, I don't see how you can consider a dog a person.

Do you think most people are 100% truthful when picking up women or going to job interviews?

What's sad about using an algorithm and psychology to pick up women?

Also, get a real job where every aspect of your life is checked out. I mean EVER aspect. Sexual, dietary, hobbies, library books, etc.
>> Anonymous
>>294654
No they are busy DOING the trolls.
>> Anonymous
>>294657
>Also, get a real job where every aspect of your life is checked out. I mean EVER aspect. Sexual, dietary, hobbies, library books, etc.
What the hell are you talking about?
>> Anonymous
>>294659
My job requires me to answer questions about my entire life once a month while hooked up to various biofeedback devices. It's part of maintaining my security clearance (I'm an engineer working on a DARPA project at the moment).

They know about my bestiality. You know what? They don't care, it's not a big deal and they still consider me mentally stable enough to keep my job.
>> Anonymous
>>294660
Anyway, I'm going back to sleep. I'm going on vacation and my airplane leaves in a few hours :D
>> Anonymous
>>294660

I'm sure they do. If you're working on something important, they could give less a shit.

> (I'm an engineer working on a DARPA project at the
> moment).

Not anymore you're not!
>> Anonymous
>>294659
It's called grasping at straws.
>> Anonymous
> as was even depicted in one of the zoophile's posts here, the dog tried to get up and stop what the man was doing to her several times, only to be laid back down.

This is what frustrates me most, is that one has to be so specific in everything you write as people like you will assume a context and take it out of proportion.

The dog was more than capable of moving away if she didn't like the experience, which she had done in the past and I respect it. In these particular moments, it was nothing more than a lean in, on par with scratching and itch, repositioning herself on the bed, etc. I gently prompted her to lay back down and there was no resistance, no second try to get up again, she was happy to go with it and lay back down.

I can't speak for all zoos out there, but the ones that actually respect their animal's feeling tend to be able to read them fairly well. Yes there are those who will always exploit animals every which way, and there's no way to prove I'm not one of them as everyone will see my experiences differently.

All I can say is, before you start to flame maybe try and understand the context first, as your ill informed presumptions don't win you any points in a balanced debate.
>> Anonymous
>>294666
WHY DID YOU BUMP THIS FUCKING THREAD. LET IT DIE. GODDAMN.
>> Anonymous
> It sounds funny, I know, but if you'd do a little research into the zoophilia community (which I would assume you're a part of), you'd know that dogs have to be -trained- to -not bite- when humans want to have sex with them.

I don't know where you got your information from but that's far from the case in all circumstances. There may be instances where dog is trained, but not in any of the expericnes I've had.

The first girl I helped get her rocks off by fingering was actually a desexed female. She had been desexed as a puppy, so she never went through any sort of puberty. BUT, shed happily come close to me, and I'd give her a rubs and shed hump away at it. There'd be deep pants, and after a few seconds, you'd feel her suddenly relax and sit down to chill for a few moments before wanting to do it again. I never trained her for this, and I doubt she'd been trained in the past. We simply found a comfortable position with one another, and I touched the right spot at the right time and we went with it. From that time on, we'd spend some moments with one another doing this.

One of my other females got into right away, I even felt she was rushing me. Similar position to that I used on the girl described above, but instead of humping and relaxing afterwards, she would hump and positioned herself so my finger slid right into her. No trying to jump off, not trying to escape, she wanted me in her. I had a play and pulled it out. Seeing if she wanted to go for a second hump, she did the same thing again, humped until my finger slid in.

Yes she was in heat which contributed to the situation, but we had built a trust with one another and continued from that day on. She'd invite me at times to give her a fingering, she'd roll on her back, splay her legs and there'd be no resistance. Once again, I never trained her for this.

She even continued to do this behaviour even after being desexed. I think I can positively say she enjoyed it.
>> Anonymous
>>292813
Have sex with it? Probably not because I don't know it. It'd be like having sex with a total stranger
>> Anonymous
>>294666

It got up, ending the sexual contact, several times.

>ill informed presumptions

Oh, a thousand pardons. Obviously I do not understand the intricacies of fingering my dog.
>> Anonymous
> Oh, a thousand pardons. Obviously I do not understand the intricacies of fingering my dog.

You've done it again, you missed the context that was in. Your ill informed presumptions are your accusations stating that the dog got up to discontinue sexual contact as if it was a fact.

I mean if you can't even understand the context of what is being said to you, you're obviously not one to understand the basics of general body language, thus you probably hold no educated ground stating what a dog does or does not want to do.
>> Anonymous
So I was browsing 4chan just now and I thought to myself "Hey, I'll check out animals and nature, I haven't visited that board for like a year." And this thread is at the very top.

Now I remember WHY I stopped coming here.
>> Anonymous
>>294676

Why is one of the symptoms of illnesses like these "only I, the bearer of this fetish, can understand it"?

And please, quit trying to use that there high-fallutin' talk. We're talking about humans fucking dogs, I don't think there is any 'educated ground' to speak of there.
>> Anonymous
>>294679
lrn2read srsly
>> Anonymous
> Why is one of the symptoms of illnesses like these "only I, the bearer of this fetish, can understand it"?

Far from it, its well within the reach of understanding of lots of people for and against it. What annoys me is that instead of learning about animal behaviour, many people will read a simple article posted on the next and quote it as gospel here.

I've been out there with many animals learning the nuances of behaviour and been reading a stupid amount of books with research spanned across the years. Its all there for everyone to see. I've still got more to learn, and there are those who I would consider on par and better with understanding animals behaviour as I do; and some of them would probably hold a better debate for or against bestiality here than half the bullshitters here can do.

I'm not saying people with lack of knowledge should refrain from posting here, I'm saying ask questions first and learn the appropriate contexts before making accusations. Otherwise you're just another person on par with a university student protesting some government decision where you don't actually understand the full situation.

FYI, I'm not some shun in either that only hangs out with dogs, I have a great social life, full time job that I love (doing techy things), and I actually get out into the sun.
>> Anonymous
>>294681

Agh... where do I even start...

>I'm saying ask questions first and learn the appropriate contexts before making accusations.

Why exactly is it a good idea to ask someone who's biased a question? And why exactly do you think you have information that is to be believed? Even in research there are crackpots who occasionally get published. (Riet et al comes to mind)

Since when did the idea of "if the majority of people believe it, it's true" come to mind? It's like you're saying you have some sort of secret knowledge. You're also saying, "the majority is wrong", while claiming to have a majority yourself. The hell?
>> Anonymous
I'd never do it but I don't see anything wrong with pleasuring a dog. Personally the idea disgusts me, but if it appeals to you then go ahead, why not.
>> Anonymous
> Why exactly is it a good idea to ask someone who's biased a question?

You learn their point of view so you can compare it against others before making accusations.

> And why exactly do you think you have information that is to be believed?

Agree, its one person's point of view, but once again compare it to others to see if there are similarities, as there may be some sort of mind opening stuff there.

> Even in research there are crackpots who occasionally get published. (Riet et al comes to mind)

Agree

> Since when did the idea of "if the majority of people believe it, it's true" come to mind?

Not that it holds true, but that there may be truth in it, and helps guide you where you can research next.

> It's like you're saying you have some sort of secret knowledge. You're also saying, "the majority is wrong", while claiming to have a majority yourself. The hell?

I probably should have put that in better context. I view myself as someone that has spent a lot of time looking into the subject of animal and human behaviour, thus I feel I hold more weight over people who would simply base their accusations of what has been written here by taking it out of context. I could start citing everything I've looked into, and where I've been but then I may as well start writing a scientific paper about my sex life.
>> Anonymous
>>294694
proceed
>> Anonymous
>>>/r9k/1337093
>> Anonymous
> proceed

Nah, I dont think so

But what I should have said was... "write a scientific paper on my sex life and my justifications for it"
>> Anonymous
>145 posts and 5 image replies omitted.
Oh god.
>> Anonymous
>>294721
I lol'd
>> Anonymous
>>294721
And no hot bitches except the OP. Post some already!
>> Anonymous
WOULD THIS THING JUST FUCKING DIE
>> Anonymous
My second visit to /an/ and I'm welcomed by this. What the fuck. Don't you guys have a furry board or something?
>> Anonymous
I would do the dog, yes
>> Anonymous
>>294814

Bestiality and furries are different.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>294798

Hey there cutie.
>> Anonymous
>>294884

but the same when it comes to making me fucking puke.
>> Anonymous
Yes i would that dog is hardcore
>> Anonymous
NO ONE WILL EVER KNOW!
>> Anonymous
>>294884
i'm beginning to doubt this
>> Anonymous
I don't get why people think sex is this sacred holy thing between a man and a woman.

Sticking your dick in a dog isn't any different from giving it a really good back scratch, they both feel great and the dog will love you for it and start begging you for more :3

But i guess that's what you get from a world full of christfags and allahssholes
>> Anonymous
>Sticking your dick in a dog isn't any different from giving it a really good back scratch, they both feel great and the dog will love you for it and start begging you for more :3

/thread
>> Anonymous
>>294937
This man speaks the truth
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I HAVE SEX WITH DOGS! WHAT'S UP WITH THAT!?
>> Anonymous
If people want to fuck dogs that's fine with me, but I don't want to hear about it. Same with faggots, and to a certain extent people who get off on child pornography. As long as it doesn't hurt anybody and they do it in private I don't give a shit.

I do believe that people with these fetishes have disorders and that they should talk to a psychologist about it if it's causing any sort of problems in their lives. Otherwise, they're victimless social crimes, really, I don't think that the animals are harmed emotionally.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
doggy fuck doggy fuck it's awwwright
>> Anonymous
> If people want to fuck dogs that's fine with me, but I don't want to hear about it. Same with faggots, and to a certain extent people who get off on child pornography.

Why the hell are you on 4chan then? Go back to the nice innocent part of the internet then where flash banners rule and web pages are made in MS Frontpage and include pictures of dancing cartoon hamsters
>> Anonymous
>>294975
Lion paws are superior
>> Anonymous
>>292933
I don't get it either. A horse I can understand, I mean just look at their shapely asses. But a dog?
>> Anonymous
>>295015
Horse pussy looks a lot like black pussy. The only way I was able to date my black girlfriend for a while was to pretend I was pounding a horse
>> Anonymous
it smells.
there i said it.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>294975
post the rest?
>> Anonymous
>it smells.
>there i said it.

Try washing your dog? My dog didn't smell at all, if anything I find it easier to eat out my dog's vagoo than some of my ex gf's. Dogs like to keep a clean vagoo ;)
>> Anonymous
>I find it easier to eat out my dog's vagoo than some of my ex gf's.

wut
>> Anonymous
>>294999

You're a moron...I didn't say that I was offended by it, I just don't want to hear stories about these half retarded perverts fucking their animals, is that ok with you?

What I SAID, to clarify for those of you who can't read, is that Zoophelia should never be socially acceptable, nor should homosexuality, but I'm not one to judge so if they do it in the confines of their own home then I won't bother them.
>> Anonymous
> You're a moron...I didn't say that I was offended by it, I just don't want to hear stories about these half retarded perverts fucking their animals, is that ok with you?

Unless you've been around 4chan since its inception, I'd say you're the moron for coming here and expecting this place to not have this sort of stuff. If you want to live in your little bubble and hold onto your beliefs from the 1950s, go ahead, but you'll find this place is not going to cater to your intolerances as its been a pretty seedy place to begin with.

So saying you don't want to hear or read about it, then I'd strongly recommend you stop visiting 4chan, cause even if I don't contribute anything to future beast, homo, child sex, mutilations, scat, etc topics on this site, a lot of other people will.

Go whine about it on a Christian forum, as winging here makes you look like a redneck christfag and you won't hold any moral high ground if you frequent 4chan anyway then try to tout your values like some sort of preacher.

I'm glad that you're content with this happening behind closed doors, as I'm not saying you're closed minded in that regard, but I am saying, that you are fooling yourself that a place like 4chan would be a squeeky clean website where you can expect morally correct stories that you approve of.
>> Anonymous
>>295031
I always thought it looked more like a cow's pussy
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>295100
Did you just relate Zoophelia and Homosexuality?
Did you seriously just do that?
>> Anonymous
>>295100
Why shouldn't homosexuality be socially accepted?

I don't expect a response since that post was made a while ago :/
>> Anonymous
>>295100

There's a difference between being born with a hormone imbalance, and falling in love with your own gender...

... and then fucking your pet poodle foo foo.
>> Anonymous
> There's a difference between being born with a hormone imbalance, and falling in love with your own gender...

Oh you'd like it to be that simple; to pass the buck on your makeup, hey wouldn't you mr butt fairy?

Simple fact is, humans pride themselves on rationality and our ability to make consiose decisions. So yes, there may be a 'hormone' imbalance, but through the years of growing up and thinking about the world, it still took you to activly decide to go for the butt sexing.

While instinct is there in our mind nudging us from the background, conscious thought can easily override it. Its no excuse for humans any more to blame our decisions in life on minor imbalances of hormones. (excluding serious cases of brain damage) If you're gay, its because you chose to be solely gay. Hormone imbalance or not your body is out there for sex, you just happen to add layer upon layers of conscious thought to solely like it up the butt. Otherwise you'd be happily bisexual.

Enjoy your life choice fudge packer.
>> Anonymous
>>295203
The brain of a homosexual male is strikingly similar to that of a straight female. It's not a conscious decision, it's a product of their brain structure and chemistry just like your sexual preference is

Can you make yourself attracted to members of the same sex?

There is a reason that "conversion" camps don't work
>> Anonymous
>>295120

Still you don't get what I'm saying. I don't mind if people talk about it on a message board, I can ignore that. Most dog fuckers believe that there is nothing wrong with it whatsoever and that everyone should accept it. I don't ever want to have it shoved in my face like gay pride parades etc.. I don't see how I'm preaching, I'm not telling anyone what is wrong or right on a moral level, I'm just saying that there's no reason for these abnormal behaviours to be pushed in everyone's faces as being normal, because they are not. Anyone who is fucking animals has to realize that what they are doing is NOT normal.

Also, since someone asked why I believe homosexuality shouldn't be socially acceptable.. First of all, homosexuality is not normal, I don't understand why anyone would dispute that. I don't believe that they are sub-human or that they are less intelligent than the rest of us, but there is something wrong with them that causes them to act that way. Personally I would rather not have homosexuality pushed in my face as normal when it is clearly not.

I'm not a Christian btw.
>> Anonymous
>>295216
We know of over 1,000 species of animals who have shown homosexuality.

A fairly large percentage of humanity is homosexual or bisexual.

Does normal to you mean practiced by at least half of the population?

By the way, bestiality was not considered abnormal in the past. Some cultures considered bestiality as a rite of passage
>> Anonymous
>Also, since someone asked why I believe homosexuality shouldn't be socially acceptable.. First of all, homosexuality is not normal, I don't understand why anyone would dispute that.
I do dispute it. Explain why it is unnatural. Don't say anything about its self evidence; give me actual reasons.

Unless you think all sex for pleasure is unnatural I don't see how buttfucking is any more unnatural than other forms of sex for pleasure. There isn't going to be a child anyway (if all goes well) so what does it matter how it happens? Is oral sex more unnatural than vaginal sex?
>> Anonymous
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonobo

Nuff said in regards to sex between gender
>> Anonymous
>>295229

ITT: Someone who forgot he's an animal.
>> Anonymous
>>295216
You dont have to be Christian to be ignorant, but it helps.
>> Anonymous
All in all, all said and resolved, .... don't fuck foo foo.....
>> Anonymous
>>295229

Who said anything about anal sex being unnatural? It's because they are instinctively attracted to the same sex that they have a disorder. Are you saying that homosexuals choose to be that way because it feels good?

Oh, and to the guy who said that 1000 species have reports of homosexuality. Woop dee doo, other species have defects. Big surprise.
>> Anonymous
inb4 200 post bestiality shitstorm
>> Anonymous
>>295537
You said it's not normal, yet it's pretty obvious that it is by looking at nature. Also, what about homosexuality is a disorder?
>> That Gomez
>>295563
I think he means it's a disorder in the same way that being born non-Aryan is a disorder.

SEIG HIEL!
>> Anonymous
Would I do her? At full fucking force
>> Anonymous
>>295229
Considering that the purpose of life is propagate one's genetic material, anal (nor oral) sex does not serve this purpose. I do not believe that homosexuality is inherently bad. It is an aberrant behavior, but no less acceptable than any other disorder. If homosexuals wish to have social parity they must neither treat themselves as outcasts nor celebrities.
>> Anonymous
>>295691
Kirkpatrick wrote a paper in the year 2000 talking about the evolutionary benefits of homosexuality in primates. It helps cement social bonds. It makes people friendlier to each other.

That is actually one of the things that Spartans did, they fucked each other to make their social bonds stronger.

If that's true (Which it is, you can look up the study if you like) then it gives homosexual behavior a damn good reason for existing
>> Anonymous
>>295692
second born sons are also more likely to be faggots, like 33% actually
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
DO THESE TURN YOU ON GUISE?
>> Anonymous
>>295692
Unfortunately the only social bond that is important is that of male and female. Two males or females cannot produce offspring.
>> Anonymous
>>295706
No, but they are impressive. Where are they from?
>> Anonymous
>>295711
So you don't think male/male friendship is important?
>> Anonymous
>>295716
As far as continuing the human species, no.
>> Anonymous
>>295712
i think its a cow
>> Anonymous
I guess ill make this really easy for you guys.

If its not possible to produce offspring through the sex, then its wrong.

Its the whole reason why the gays are wrong.

If you want to be gay, be a lesbian, have sex with animals, whatever its your choice, just dont even allow yourself to believe its right, or normal, or anything foolish like that as unless they somehow create life its not and never will be.

Whatever though I guess... Animals are smarter then most people think, but that's irrelevant.
>> Anonymous
>>295717
Male/male bonds help shape minds. It increases competition and teaches you new techniques to getting a female. It has obvious reproduction advantages.

Think about this in evolutionary terms. Strong male bonds would help a tribe by increasing their chances of survival. The stronger the bond the better.

Homosexuality makes perfect sense from an evolutionary sense.

Look at the appendix.
>> Anonymous
>>295720
>If its not possible to produce offspring through the sex, then its wrong.

Why? Both humans and non-human animals use sex to bond with each other. It helps them socially among other ways.

Why is sex for pleasure wrong, explain this.

>
If you want to be gay, be a lesbian, have sex with animals, whatever its your choice, just dont even allow yourself to believe its right, or normal, or anything foolish like that as unless they somehow create life its not and never will be.

Homosexuality IS normal, we observe it in nature and it is quite prevalent. Look at pre-abrahamic religion times, it was extremely normal. The social stigmas fairly new.

Even bestiality used to be practiced in decent numbers
>> Anonymous
>If you want to be gay, be a lesbian, have sex with animals, whatever its your choice, just dont even allow yourself to believe its right, or normal, or anything foolish like that as unless they somehow create life its not and never will be.

It almost sounds like you're saying sex for pleasure is not normal
>> Anonymous
>>295721

male/male sex does NOT create life

>>295722

Sex for pleasure is not wrong, but beyond that it has no purpose.
>> Anonymous
>>295725
It doesn't have to. It makes perfect evolutionary sense It's about making social bonds stronger to help ensure survival so that people can reproduce

Reread my post

I'm getting a flood error, maybe this extra text will help. One two three four six five ten eleven
>> Anonymous
>>295725
Sex for pleasure has no purpose beyond fun? What about bringing people closer together? What about helping you stay fit, live longer, keeping you stable, and so on?

It also helps you find a suitable mate which may eventually have kids with you
>> Anonymous
>>295726
>>295727
You 2 don't understand evolution. Life is NOT about relationships. Whatever species can replicate itself the most will survive. It may be cruel, but that is life.
>> Anonymous
>>295729
I understand evolution.

>Whatever species can replicate itself the most will survive

Wrong. If a species has a higher death to birth ratio then it doesn't matter how much they reproduce. Being able to reproduce a lot doesn't mean anything if you get picked off too fast.

Have you ever heard of natural selection? Relationships play a huge role in evolution. Bug colonies, animal packs, bacteria colonies, primate society, and so on.

Those all rely on relationships to get things done.

Admit it, homosexuality makes perfect sense in evolutionary terms and homosexuality is very normal
>> Anonymous
>>295733
So failing is normal and should be encouraged?
>> Anonymous
>>295737
Failing? I don't see what about homosexuality is fail.

But yes, failing should be encouraged because at least you try.
>> Anonymous
>>295737
Failing to succeed at life's primary goal is the ultimate fail. Pretending that being homosexual is anything but fail is foolish. I am not one to speak as I do not plan on prcreating, but you, sir, FAIL.
>> Anonymous
>>295741
Uh... what? Many homosexuals still have children. Being gay doesn't stop you from having kids.

Why are you limiting yourself to what nature wants? Why not set your own life goal/purpose instead?

As has already been explained, homosexuality helps procreation. It is not fail
>> Anonymous
>>295744
>>295744
>>295744
>>295744
I'm confused, how exactly do 2 males/females procreate?
>> Anonymous
>>295744
Homosexuals aren't exclusive to their own gender... what would make you think that?
>> Anonymous
>>295750

Stupidity?
>> Anonymous
>>295748
Two females can procreate using sperm from a donor
>> Anonymous
>>295760
So, what you're saying is no.
>> Anonymous
>>295762
What I'm saying is that many homosexuals do have straight relationships and that you don't need to have sex to become pregnant
>> Anonymous
>>295764
So, what you're saying is that homosexuality never leads to procreation and that a male and female are necessary for life.

Somehow I feel you are being butthurt (LOL) by my opinion. Let me say that I understand, at the very least, the homosexual position, but on a purely animal/instinctual level I cannot help but feel aroused by female genitalia.
>> Anonymous
>>295769
>So, what you're saying is that homosexuality never leads to procreation and that a male and female are necessary for life.

Yes, something which I've never denied.

But like was said before, homosexuality makes perfect sense from an evolutionary point of view.

I'm not butthurt by your opinion, but I notice that you've failed to respond to several things like

>Uh... what? Many homosexuals still have children. Being gay doesn't stop you from having kids.

>Why are you limiting yourself to what nature wants? Why not set your own life goal/purpose instead?

Or, >Admit it, homosexuality makes perfect sense in evolutionary terms and homosexuality is very normal

Why aren't you responding to those comments?
>> Anonymous
>>295772
Yeah, homosexuals may 'have' children through other people, but how is that natural?

Also,
>Why are you limiting yourself to what nature wants? Why not set your own life goal/purpose instead?

Few people's goals are to be homosexual. Other than that description, what limits a person from their goals?

Homosexuality is not some magical key that unlocks the human potential. It is not something to be celebrated, but to be accepted as it is.
>> Anonymous
>>295774
I don't understand what's unnatural about it. Two homosexuals love each other. They want a kid. They have sex with someone else.

What's not natural about that?


>Uh... what? Many homosexuals still have children. Being gay doesn't stop you from having kids.

>Admit it, homosexuality makes perfect sense in evolutionary terms and homosexuality is very normal
>> Anonymous
>>295776
Your cognitive dissonance amazes me. By introducing someone else for procreation it is no longer a homosexual relationship. Love is a uniquely human emotion, regardless of gender, but to pretend that homosexuality is natural is a farce.
>> Anonymous
>>295777
It's still a homosexual relationship because once they get pregnant that's it. No more straight sex.

I don't see how you're not getting this. Over 1000 species of animals have homosexual members. Homosexuality was widely practiced in many different cultures, and in some cultures it's still practiced.

Doesn't the fact that so many animals practice it and that humans have always practiced it mean it's natural?


>Uh... what? Many homosexuals still have children. Being gay doesn't stop you from having kids.

>Admit it, homosexuality makes perfect sense in evolutionary terms and homosexuality is very normal

Why don't you respond to those two messages?
>> Anonymous
>>295780
I have responded to your 'messages'. Unfortunately nature is not a majority rules, or even a loud minority rules. Those who proper survive. To take example from other animals into human life is a folly. Many animals eat their young, most animal procreation is rape by human standards, many animals have sex with those who are not yet able to bear young. Are we to take these examples along with the homosexuality? Clearly these practices would not be acceptable.

I'm not sure if I can say this clearly, but homosexuality is by no means natural, but is far from being morally wrong.
>> Anonymous
>>295787

Okay, do me a favor and define natural for me.
>> Anonymous
>>295790
How do i got trolled? Seriously, what are you trying to prove here? I've already said that homosexuality is okay. Are you trying to get me to say that homosexuality is the best/only way?
>> Anonymous
>>295791
That homosexuality is natural.

Please, define natural for me.
>> Anonymous
>>295792
If you are trying to prove something then prove it don't dance around definitions.
>> Anonymous
>>295796
Something needs to be defined before it can be proven.

So how do you define natural?
>> Anonymous
>>295798
lol

Not homosexual. Now what? Your troll-fu is weak.
>> Anonymous
>>295801
So your definition of natural is anything that is not homosexual?

So you're using a non-standard definition of natural. By your definition it's impossible for homosexuality to be natural, but according to any dictionary I've come across homosexuality is 100% natural
>> Anonymous
>>295804
Wow, I did NOT see that coming. Your arguments are weak. Methinks your previous statement of un-butthurtness was a lie.

http://www.answers.com/homosexual&r=67
I find no normal here.

I don't know what time zone you're in, but I am le tired. Have fun tilting at windmills.
>> Anonymous
>>295811
Normal, Biology: Functioning or occurring in a natural way; lacking observable abnormalities or deficiencies.

Homosexuality meets that definition.

Normal: Conforming with, adhering to, or constituting a norm, standard, pattern, level, or type

Homosexuality also meets that definition.

Doesn't that mean that homosexuality is normal?

>I find no normal here.

Hetereosexuality: Sexual orientation to persons of the opposite sex.

Where do you see normal there?

Also, good night
>> Anonymous
>>295815
lalx, so normal is not abnormal, HOLY SHIT! Tautologies (I hope you can handle such a big word) are really fun. Not only is your logic flawed, it is completely absent. Have fun with your poopdick. Sweet dreams, Quixote.
>> Anonymous
>>295822
Homosexuality fits both those definitions. That makes it normal. Am I wrong?
>> Anonymous
>>295823
Homosexuality fits neither of those definitions. That makes it abnormal. Am I wrong?
>> Anonymous
>>295830
Your impeccable logic seems to point that way.
>> Anonymous
>>295830
Homosexuality occurs through naturally through genetics. It fits the definition of normal in a biological sense.

Homosexuality conforms with the standard/patterns of natural selection. It fits the definition of normal.

Therefore, homosexuality is normal. Am I wrong? If I am, show me where
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>295834
I, AM NORMAL
>> Anonymous
This is a stupid thread.

The OP bitch looks lovely.
>> sage sage
sage for stupidity
>> Anonymous
>242 posts and 11 image replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> Anonymous
Wow. This got way out of hand.
Fucking awesome dog in the OP.
>> Anonymous
That's a pretty sexy dog.
>> Anonymous
Do you have any more pictures of the sexy dog?
>> Anonymous
>>292813
Would you?
>> Anonymous
>>292813
lol dog fuckers.
>> Anonymous
Oh no this thread almost fell off page 10 :(

Also dogfuckers are nice people, it's a shame society does its best to ruin the life of anyone that gets outed.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
Fuck it's not bumping anymore