File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
Lets discuss the legality of bestiality. I recently found out that, despite some of the truly twisted shit that gets posted on 4chan, bestiality is an insta 404 due to such images being illegal.

Now I understand how many cases of bestiality can be considered non-consensual and animal abuse, but I don't like that stuff anyway, so I agree completely. What I don't see a problem with is when a woman lays across her bed and lets her perfectly willing pet make love to her, without any coercion or rape involved.
>> Anonymous
0/10
>> Anonymous
>>346132

Not a troll. I'm being super serial you guys.
>> Anonymous
When the world all accepted same sex marriage, I believe bestiality is next on line.
>> Anonymous
>>346134
i guess you'd be wrong then. idiot
>> Anonymous
>>346134
lol the "world" will never accept it

they still kill homos in Iran and other assorted crazy religious nations
>> Anonymous
marrying the same sex and a different species are.... obviousl nothing a like. But i think a girl should be able to get screwed by a dog (r horse or w/e) and it be just fine.
>> Anonymous
Pitiful trolling attempt. I'll be glad when you kids go back to school.
>> Anonymous
I was genuinely surprised when I went to /r/ to request bestiality, and it was deleted before I could even get back to it to check for a response.

It hadn't even occured to me at first that such a thing could be DNP amidst the mess of things being /r/'d.

>>346147

Obviously. Animals know nothing of marriage, thus they don't care about it. They are far more instinctual than us, and don't have the same type of emotional attachment to sex as we do. Which is why letting an animal give you sexual relief seems ok to me.

Though I apply this to mostly to animals which are around a similar size to humans. Too small and neither party gets proper enjoyment. Too large and you stop worrying about 'animal abuse' and start worrying about 'attempted suicide'.
>> Anonymous
Sex is something that is supposed to keep the species going. By having sex with an animal and not another human being, you wasted some perfectly good sex, and it was an effort that would have been best spent making offspring. Therefore, by having sex with animals and not producing any offspring you are driving mankind into the ground and should be killed, like homosexuals. The only difference between bestiality and homosexuality is that the latter is protected by governments in a bootless effort to seem progressive and humane.
>> Anonymous
>>346131
Not a troll.

>>346158
Troll.
>> Anonymous
>>346160
Well yeah. Can't I have some fun, too?
>> Anonymous
You requested zoo on /r/, couldn't get laid, now you bitch about it here. Epic fail.
>> Anonymous
>>346154
too bad finals are the week after next, I'll enjoy my winter break trolling
>> Anonymous
>>346131
Bestiality != Zoophilia
Zoophilia != Animal abuse
damn,stupid newfags...
>> Anonymous
>>346131
What you are talking about is Zoophilia ,not Bestiality!
>> Anonymous
The loads of beastiality porn out there suggest that alot of people like seeing girls and animals getting it on.

But what irrates me is that man and animals aren't just as easily available. Its hard to get pics yet alone video of a dog giving a good licking
>> Anonymous
>>99539932

the beast gods smile upon me
>> Anonymous
>>346186
there was a video on anonib (pre getting raped by exploits) of a jaybee getting licked by a chihuahua

she kinda forced it to if it tried to walk away, but still
>> Anonymous
>>346181
>>346182

>Zoophilia refers specifically to sexual interest in animals, not sexual behavior involving animals

The act is bestiality, and I'm not sexually interested in the animals, so no.
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
You fucking furries seriously need to go die in a fire
>> Anonymous
>>346237

Furry and Bestiality are two completely different things.
>> Anonymous
I read alot about it because of this vet on a blog I used to read about, and she said there were so many ill effects it'd cause. Just having a dog "intact" could cause health problems, let alone STDs, tearing of the skin, etc.
Male dogs apparently would go nuts and attack female dogs in heat because they'd become confused about what to fuck.

Lastly OP, screwing animals is seen by people as bad as screwing children. Neither can consent in the way people can, and it's the person who needs to do what's best for the animal, not their ill little thoughts of "Well, they obviously MUST enjoy it so I can't be doing something wrong! It'slove! I'm not hurting them!"
>> Anonymous
>>346260
>Male dogs apparently would go nuts and attack female dogs in heat because they'd become confused about what to fuck.

Seems to me like domesticated dogs are sexually confused regardless. They fuck people, pillows, stuffed animals, couches. A large percent of the dogs I've seen (including one female dog) seem pretty intent on mounting just about anything.

>Lastly OP, screwing animals is seen by people as bad as screwing children. Neither can consent in the way people can, and it's the person who needs to do what's best for the animal, not their ill little thoughts of "Well, they obviously MUST enjoy it so I can't be doing something wrong! It'slove! I'm not hurting them!"

The big difference there is that the dogs are fully sexually mature. If we've determined that the animal isn't capable of deciding that it wants to have sex, then sex between it and other animals should be just as wrong, and clearly that isn't the case.
>> Anonymous
I've seen a cat trained to use a fork to eat dinner. That has to be at least as bad as this.
>> Anonymous
>>346158
Wouldn't that make it more a case of thinning the herd?
>> Anonymous
>>346267
Screwing inanimate objects and screwing living t hings are two different things, especially as the owner. A dog rarely goes into heat and then rips the shit out of another dog after they've humped a pillow.

Sexually mature, but they have the mind dumber than a retarded 3 year old child. They don't have the ability to say no either. The problem lies where they cannot tell you what they want or do not want, and some people do not care/notice the warning signs.

The easiest thing to do is take care of your dog, and love it, but buy yourself a goddamn vibrator so you don't impact the dog negatively (Yes sometimes the dog is fine, but more often than not it will lead to fucked up behaviour).
>> Anonymous
>>346344
a dog can say no

teeth, etc
>> Anonymous
>Screwing inanimate objects and screwing living t hings are two different things

Where do legs, clothed backsides (after a surpise mounting when you're just trying to get something off the floor), or completely different species of animal that they've found in the back yard or on the street fall into this equation? Because that's all pretty normal behavior for domesticated dogs I've seen too. The line somehow jumps instantly from "aw, that's funny" to "sanity destroyed" when they penetrate a human?

>Sexually mature, but they have the mind dumber than a retarded 3 year old child. They don't have the ability to say no either. The problem lies where they cannot tell you what they want or do not want, and some people do not care/notice the warning signs.

That doesn't really answer the question. If it's immoral to let them have sex with you because they don't have the proper background to make that decision, how is it not immoral to let them decide to have sex with each other? How are animal breeders allowed to carry on with their business? They're committing an act akin to someone breeding children together.
>> Anonymous
bestiality is legal in sweden
and so is fucking 15-year-olds


GO SWEDISH
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>> Anonymous
I'm 100% against bestiality, it's abusing an animal.
>> Anonymous
>>346610
0/10
>> Anonymous
>>346554

How is that possible?
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I have exotic tastes and only have access to dogs and horses [most barnyard animals disgust me as far as sex goes, though]. I'd like to get a dog or burmese python someday-- but believe it or not-- I have a moral conflict with wanting to own an animal for sex. Though I'd take good care of said animals, I feel like I need to justify my ownership of them beyond sex-pets. Example, my cat and ball python. Pets I can't fuck. But I love having them around. But the fact that a dog can accomidate a penis makes me wonder if that property will overshadow all the other perks that come from owning a dog. I'm in no position to buy a dog right now.

I'm NOT the kind of zoophile that thinks my dog would have sex with me because it loves me. Animals don't love. No matter how much I love my pet, she won't love back. Why do dogs not want to stop when you're making out with them? They like the taste of your breath. Why does a dog let you fuck her in the first place? You're the Alpha Male, you stand tall and grant access to food. The most consentual sex can ever get is when the bitch is rolling around on the floor moaning from estrus. But even then, it's rape. It's ~A L W A Y S~ rape. I hate it when zoophiles try to justify why they have sex with animals. Me? I do it because it feels fucking awesome. And the afterglow is nice. Animals are just nice to have around. So why ruin that by having sex? I feel the same way about relationships with women. In fact, I think we have more real fun together because I'm essentially harmless, like a gay guyfriend [I'm mostly gay for dolphins, btw].
>> Anonymous
>>346623
Rubbery sex torpedo
>> Anonymous
>>346623
Dolphin is the only animal id love to fuck.