>> |
Anonymous
If an animal is endangered, and the people trying to eat it are not starving or on a subsistance diet and have many other alternatives, then it should not be hunted.
And alternative sources of power must be researched and implimented. Fine, you want to mouth off about global warming being a conspiracy, or a natural process, go right ahead. The countries that are already affected by this are obviously more in touch with reality than you are. Global warming is a reality. The country I am in is strongly affected by it. It may be a natural process. I am studying environmental science because I want to be a practical environmentalist, someone with useful and practical ideas, and all of the data, papers, and books I have read suggest that the arguments saying that global warming *to the extent that it is reaching and the speed it is progressing* is entirely natural, are rather incorrect. You are welcome to disagree and continue burning fossil fuels.
However, if you use what little brain you have, you'd realise that just about everything in your room, your house, your street, your telephone cables, your city and your amerikka is made using some form of petrolium product in varying degrees of quantity. Shit, even the fucking paint on the walls, chances are. AND WE BURN THIS VITALLY IMPORTANT, LIMITED, UNBELIEVABLY USEFUL PRODUCT THAT SITS AT THE BASE OF ALL OUR MANUFACTURED GOODS? We stop burning oil, we massively reduce our carbon emissions output and can keep up our current manufacturing processes. We all get to keep our way of life. Everyone's a winner.
|