File :-(, x, )
Anonymous
>> Anonymous
animals were injured in the making of this movie. b& >:{
>> Anonymous
>>163425
Oh, don't be a peta fag.
>> Anonymous
>>163425
I would like to know moar.
>> Anonymous
but the kitteh wasn't injured so it's ok
>> Anonymous
So what if they got through a few pugs? They're not real dogs anyway.
>> Anonymous
>>163477
thats right, they knew who the real star was
>> Anonymous
>>163480
Do pugs even count as animals? I thought they were a kind of sausage.
>> ­­ ­­
The credits of this movie is nothing but japanese people.
>> Anonymous
rough n tumble like a dog
>> Anonymous
In germany they are named "Miez und Mops"

...which is much cuter
>> Anonymous
among the best.
>> Anonymous
GONNA TAKE A WALK OUTSIIIDE TODAY

GONNA SEE WHAT WE CAN FIIIND TODAY

GONNA TAKE A WALK OUTSIIIIDE TODAY

GONNA SEE WHAT WE CAN FIIIIIND TOODAAAYYY
>> Anonymous
My last day of kindergarten we watched this movie.
>> Anonymous
It was gross when they showed them having babies.
>> G??????????????
om,g i lurved this movie! :O
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
I see your Milo & Otis, and raise you this:
>> Peorth !!zKfADcnG1JS
>>163624
Infinitely more awesome.
>> Anonymous
/thread
>> Anonymous
     File :-(, x)
>>163624
The original was much better.
>> Anonymous
>>163624
fail for michael j fox
>> Anonymous
>>163671

Damn, now I need to find a copy of that book
>> Anonymous
Link to info on animals harmed during Milo and Otis?
>> Anonymous
>>163878
From what I can gather no one can really make up there mind as far as the abuse goes. There are a few forums regarding the discussion of this, but they are split between indecisive, and foaming at the mouth PETA-fags. Not really worth bothering.
>> Anonymous
http://www.abc.net.au/news/arts/articulate/200707/s1977214.htm

This seems to be of interest.